JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 43, 99918, October 22, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow Papers Of The Week
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Probes Shed Light on DNA Handoff{diamondsuit}

Because DNA is constantly exposed to an onslaught of mutagens, cells must have a method for excising and repairing DNA lesions. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major DNA repair pathway involving the UvrABC proteins. In bacteria, UvrA dimerizes to become UvrA2, which then interacts with UvrB to form the UvrA2B complex. The complex then binds to DNA and searches for lesions via the {beta}-hairpin of UvrB. When a lesion is encountered, conformational changes occur, and the DNA, which is initially in contact with UvrA, is passed to UvrB via an unknown mechanism. Once this happens, UvrC binds to the UvrB·DNA complex and excises the lesion.Go


Putative UvrB DNA binding model showing potential points of contact for cross-linking reagents.

To capture UvrA in the act of DNA handoff to UvrB, Matthew J. DellaVecchia and colleagues designed two types of arylazido-modified photoaffinity cross-linking reagents. One type of reagent probed Uvr residues closest to the damaged DNA strand, and one probed residues closest to the non-damaged strand. The damaged strand probes, which functioned as both lesions and cross-linkers, consisted of dNTP analogues linked to terminal arylazido groups. The non-damaged strand probe consisted of an arylazido compound coupled to a phosphorothioate-modified backbone of an oligonucleotide opposite the damaged strand, which contained an internal fluorescein adduct. Using their probes, DellaVecchia et al. determined that DNA handoff occurs in three steps: 1) UvrA and UvrB bind to DNA via contact sites on UvrA; 2) a transfer reaction occurs with UvrB mostly contacting the non-damaged strand; 3) the lesion is engaged by the damage recognition pocket of UvrB, and UvrA is released. The methods developed here should be applicable to other DNA enzymes as well and are likely to be very useful to all DNA enzymologists.

FOOTNOTES

{diamondsuit} See referenced article, J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 45245–45256 Back



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow Papers Of The Week
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.