JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M407351200 on August 19, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 45, 46969-46980, November 5, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/45/46969    most recent
M407351200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nickols, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Limbird, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nickols, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Limbird, L. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Calmodulin Interacts with the V2 Vasopressin Receptor

ELIMINATION OF BINDING TO THE C TERMINUS ALSO ELIMINATES ARGININE VASOPRESSIN-STIMULATED ELEVATION OF INTRACELLULAR CALCIUM*

Hilary Highfield Nickols{ddagger}, Vikas N. Shah§, Walter J. Chazin§||, and Lee E. Limbird{ddagger}**

From the Departments of {ddagger}Pharmacology, §Biochemistry, ||Physics, and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6600

Received for publication, July 1, 2004 , and in revised form, August 10, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
To identify molecules that might contribute to V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) trafficking or signaling, we searched for novel interacting proteins with this receptor. Preliminary data, using the V2R C terminus as bait in a yeast two-hybrid screen, revealed calmodulin as a binding partner. Because calmodulin interacts with other G protein-coupled receptors, we explored this interaction and its possible functional relevance in greater detail. A Ca2+-dependent interaction occurs between calmodulin-linked agarose and the holo-V2R as well as the V2R C terminus. Truncation and site-directed mutagenesis of the V2R C terminus revealed an involvement of an RGR sequence in this interaction. NMR studies showed that a peptide fragment of the V2R C terminus containing the RGR sequence binds to calmodulin in a Ca2+-dependent manner with a Kd ≤1.5 µM; concentration-dependent binding of the V2R C terminus to calmodulin-agarose was used to estimate a Kd value of ~200 nM for this entire C-terminal sequence as expressed in mammalian cells. Madin-Darby canine kidney II cells stably expressing either wild type or a mutant V2R, in which the RGR C-terminal sequence was mutated to alanines (AAA V2R), revealed that the steady-state localization and agonist-induced internalization of the AAA V2R resembled that of the wild type V2R in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney II cells. V2R binding of agonist similarly was unchanged in the AAA V2R, as was the concentration response for arginine vasopressin (AVP)-stimulated cAMP accumulation. Most interestingly, AVP-induced increases in intracellular Ca2+ observed for the wild type V2R were virtually eliminated for the AAA V2R. Taken together, the data suggest that a C-terminal region of the V2R important for calmodulin interaction is also important in modulation of V2R elevation of intracellular Ca2+, a prerequisite for AVP-induced fusion of aquaporin-containing vesicles with the apical surface of renal epithelial cells.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R)1 is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family and belongs to a subset of the neurohypophyseal peptide hormone receptors that includes the V1a, V1b, V2, and oxytocin receptors (1). The V2R binds the agonist arginine vasopressin (AVP) and signals through the heterotrimeric protein Gs to promote water reabsorption and concentration of the urine in the collecting duct of the kidney (2). AVP is a cyclic nonapeptide hormone, 8-arginine vasopressin, that is secreted by the posterior pituitary in response to low urine osmolality or to decreased blood pressure (2). AVP binds to the V2R on the basolateral surface of the principal cells of the renal collecting duct, couples to Gs, and stimulates adenylyl cyclase. The subsequent increase in intracellular cAMP leads to activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase, phosphorylation of aquaporin-2, and the translocation of pre-formed aquaporin-2-containing vesicles to the apical membrane of the principal cells (3). This translocation appears to involve calcium in some (4, 5) but not other (6) experimental conditions. Because the calmodulin inhibitor W7 blocks the AVP-induced stimulation of water flow in the toad urinary bladder (7) and the rat inner medullary collecting duct (4), calmodulin may play a role in AVP-induced insertion of aquaporin 2 channels in these systems. The ultimate insertion of aquaporin 2 water channels into the apical membrane allows the renal epithelial cells to absorb water, which accounts for the antidiuretic effect of AVP.

The C-terminal region of the V2R has been shown to be important for agonist-mediated phosphorylation (8), receptor escape from the endoplasmic reticulum and transport to the plasma membrane (9), sequestration and endocytosis of the receptor (8), and prevention of recycling (10) of the endocytosed V2R. Consequently, we decided to explore proteins that might interact with the V2R C terminus with the intent of understanding their possible role in V2R trafficking or signaling.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials—Human wild type (WT) V2R cDNA was graciously provided by Dr. Jürgen Wess. The pEBG-SrfI mammalian GST expression vector was generously supplied by Dr. Yusen Liu (NIA, National Institutes of Health). [2,8-3H]Adenine (30.4 Ci/mmol), 8-arginine [phenylalanyl-3,4,5-3H]vasopressin (60.0 Ci/mmol), [8-14C]cAMP ammonium salt (51.2 mCi/mmol), [methoxy-3H]inulin-methoxy (430 mCi/g) were purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. Additional [2,8-3H]adenine (24.2 Ci/mmol) was purchased from MP Biomedicals. Paraformaldehyde (16% solution, EM grade) was from Electron Microscopy Sciences (Washington, PA). PVDF nylon membranes were from Millipore (Bedford, MA). Dowex AG50 W-X4 resin, 40% acrylamide, TEMED, ammonium persulfate were from Bio-Rad. cAMP (sodium salt), alumina, [Arg8]vasopressin (acetate salt), bacitracin, bovine serum albumin, calmodulin-agarose (phosphodiesterase 3':5'-cyclic nucleotide activator from bovine brain), fetal calf serum, leupeptin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), probenecid, soybean trypsin inhibitor, and Triton X-100 were from Sigma. The mouse HA.11 monoclonal antibody (5 µg/µl) directed against the hemagglutinin (HA) epitope tag engineered into the N terminus of the various V2R structures was obtained from Berkeley Antibody Co. (Richmond, CA). Rat anti-HA monoclonal antibody (100 µg/ml, clone 3F10) against the HA epitope tag was obtained from Roche Applied Science, and the Alexafluor-488-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (2 µg/µl) was from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Protein A beads were from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA). EZ-linkTM sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)-biotin and ImmunopureTM immobilized streptavidin were from Pierce. The 12- and 24.5-mm polycarbonate membrane filters (Transwell chambers, 0.4 µm pore size) were obtained from Costar (Cambridge, MA). Aqua-Poly/Mount was from PolySciences Inc. (Warrington, PA). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and trypsin/EDTA were prepared by the Cell Culture Core facility sponsored by the Diabetes Research and Training Center at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. All other chemicals were reagent grade.

Cell Lines—Permanent clonal MDCKII cell lines expressing HA epitope-tagged WT and mutant V2Rs were developed using the CaPO4 method as described previously (7). Briefly, 10 µg of V2pcD-N-HA and pCMV4N-V2R-AAA (individual cDNAs encoding HA epitope-tagged human WT or mutant (AAA) V2Rs, respectively) were each co-transfected with 2 µg of pRSVneo (cDNA encoding neomycin resistance) into MDCKII cells. Colonies were selected based on resistance to G418, a neomycin analog, and isolated as described previously (7). G418-resistant colonies were screened for WT or AAA V2R expression by assaying binding of the radioligand [3H]AVP. Parental and stably expressing V2R MDCKII cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Simian kidney fibroblast (COS M6) cells were maintained in supplemented DMEM + 20 mM HEPES. The studies presented were obtained in the WT V2R, clone 61, which expresses the HA epitope-tagged WT V2R at a density of 4.3 ± 1.0 pmol/mg specific [3H]AVP binding per mg of protein, estimated in homologous competition binding studies. Studies with AAA V2R exploited two independent clonal cell lines, clone 5 (6.7 ± 1.5 pmol/mg protein) and clone 11 (3.2 ± 2.0 pmol/mg protein).

Generation of cDNAs Encoding GST-V2R-C Terminus—The cDNAs encoding the GST-FLAG-V2R-C terminus constructs in the pEBG-SrfI vector were generated via overlapping PCR extension using Pfu Turbo DNA polymerase (Stratagene). The FLAG tag was inserted immediately 5' to the V2R C-terminal sequence and downstream of the GST start site and coding sequence. The AAA V2R construct, containing the holo-V2R receptor in pCMV4, was generated using the QuickChange II site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The cDNAs were sequenced in their entirety to confirm that the sequences were correct.

Transient Expression Studies—COS M6 cells were seeded the day prior to transfection at a density of 7.5 x 105 (60-mm dish) or 1 x 106 (100-mm dish). On the day of transfection, FuGENE 6 (Roche Applied Science) was placed dropwise into a polypropylene tube containing Opti-MEM (Invitrogen) at 37 °C and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. According to the manufacturer's instructions, 1 µg of plasmid DNA was placed into an additional tube, and the FuGENE mixture was placed dropwise on top of the DNA in a ratio of 3 µl of FuGENE to 1 µg of DNA, incubated at room temperature for 20 min, and placed onto the cells in their existing culture medium. We used 1 µg of DNA per 60-mm dish and 3 µg of DNA per 100-mm dish, respectively. The cells were maintained at 37 °C, 5% CO2 prior to assessment 48 h post-transfection.

Calmodulin-linked Agarose Pull-down Experiments—Cells were placed on ice and washed once with DPBS-CM (Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline: 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4,1mM MgSO4, 0.5 mM CaCl2, pH 7.3). Cells were extracted into ice-cold dodecyl-{beta}-D-maltoside:cholesteryl hemisuccinate buffer (D{beta}M: CHS: 4 and 0.8 mg/ml, respectively, containing 20% glycerol, 25 mM glycylglycine, 20 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EGTA, 100 µM PMSF, 1 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, pH 7.4), sequentially triturated with 22- and 25-gauge needles, and centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 60 min. The detergent-solubilized supernatant was precleared with BSA linked to agarose beads and incubated overnight with calmodulin-linked agarose (Sigma) that had been precleared with parental cellular lysate that did not express the V2R or V2R-C terminus. The resin was washed three times with D{beta}M:CHS wash buffer (D{beta}M:CHS-wash: 0.5 and 0.1 mg/ml, respectively, containing 25 mM glycylglycine, 20 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) and eluted into 1x Laemmli buffer for 15 min at 37 °C. Samples were run on 12% SDS-PAGE gels, transferred to PVDF, and blotted for receptor using either the mouse anti-GST (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:2000) or the mouse anti-HA.11 (Babco; 1:1000) monoclonal antibodies. When binding to calmodulin, agarose was assessed as a function of calcium concentration, and the amount of free calcium present in solution was calculated using the MaxChelator program, version 2.10 (www.stanford.edu/~cpatton/maxc.html).

Estimation of V2R-C Terminus Affinity for Calmodulin—Supernatants from COS M6 cells transiently expressing either the WT or AAA GST-FLAG-V2R-C terminus were prepared as described above. The WT V2R or AAA V2R-expressing cells were solubilized by scraping 100-mm dishes (25) into 1.5 ml of D{beta}M-CHS extraction buffer. For some experiments, the extract of AAA V2R was concentrated further using Amicon ultracentrifugal filter devices. Serial dilutions of the WT lysate were performed to obtain a saturation binding curve for binding of the C terminus to a constant quantity of calmodulin-linked agarose, and binding to calmodulin-agarose was performed as described above. The amount of GST-C-terminal protein in the eluate and total fractions was determined quantitatively by comparison to known amounts of bacterially expressed GST. The Western blot bands were quantitated using Scion Image software.

NMR Sample Preparation and Spectroscopy—A peptide fragment of the V2R C terminus (339LLSSARGRTPPSLGPQDES357 with the cysteines normally acylated in V2R (Cys-341 and Cys-342) mutated to serine) was ordered from Genemed Synthesis and subsequently purified by reversed-phase high pressure liquid chromatography. Purity of the eluted peptide was confirmed by electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry. The final peptide was lyophilized and resuspended at 10 mg/ml in 500 mM Tris, pH 7.0. A bacterial expression vector for human calmodulin was kindly provided by Eva Thulin (University of Lund, Lund, Sweden) (11). The construct was transformed into BL21(DE3)pLysS Escherichia coli, and the bacteria were grown in M9 minimal media supplemented with 15NH4Cl. The bacteria were grown and induced with isopropyl-{beta}-D-thiogalactopyranoside as described previously (11). Briefly, the growth protocol calls for serial dilution of bacteria growing at 30 °C, allowing the bacteria to double prior to each dilution. Following induction at 1 mM isopropyl-{beta}-D-thiogalactopyranoside, the bacteria are incubated at 37 °C until growth stops. The protein was purified as described previously by Ca2+-dependent binding of calmodulin to phenyl-Sepharose. Samples were loaded in 1 mM CaCl2 and eluted at 1 mM EDTA. NMR samples were prepared by three steps of concentration and resuspension (100-fold dilution at each step) to thoroughly exchange purified calmodulin into 20 mM Tris, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, pH 7.0, supplemented with either 2 mM EDTA or 20 mM CaCl2. Final samples were adjusted to contain 10% D2O. The calmodulin concentration was determined by A276. Experiments were conducted on a Bruker Avance500 spectrometer equipped with a cryoprobe. Two-dimensional 15N-1H heteronuclear single quantum correlation experiments were performed at 25 °C, acquiring four scans per increment and 512 points in the indirect (t1) dimension. NMR data were processed and analyzed in XWinNMR (Bruker). For the preliminary titration mentioned in the text (data not shown), the peptide was resuspended at 18.3 mg/ml in 100 mM bis-Tris, pH 6.5, and Ca2+-calmodulin was prepared by thoroughly exchanging 15N-calmodulin into 20 mM bis-Tris, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 20 mM CaCl2, pH 6.5.

Assessment of Transcellular Leaks of Polarized MDCKII Cells—Integrity of the cell monolayer via [3H]methoxy-inulin leak was accomplished exactly as described previously (12).

Polarized Localization of V2R at Steady State—For these studies, the appropriate number of 24.5-mm Transwells of polarized (7 days growth) WT or mutant V2R were biotinylated with NHS-Biotin (1 mg/ml) on the apical or basolateral surface as described previously (12). The cells were scraped into RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, pH 7.4) with protease inhibitors (100 µM PMSF, 1 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 1 µg/ml leupeptin) present, and the extracts were centrifuged at 100,000 x g. The supernatant (detergent-solubilized preparation) was incubated overnight at 4 °C with streptavidin-agarose. The streptavidin-agarose resin was washed 2x with RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors and eluted with SDS sample buffer (1.6% SDS, 8.3% glycerol, 167 mM Tris, pH 6.8) for 10 min at 95 °C, and the eluate was resolved by SDS-PAGE on 12% gels. The resolved proteins, representing the fate of the V2R at the cell surface at the time of biotinylation, were transferred to PVDF, and the biotinylated, epitope-tagged V2R was identified by Western blot analysis using mouse HA.11 antibody against the HA epitope.

Cell Surface Receptor Quantitation via Intact Cell ELISA—MDCKII cells stably expressing WT V2R or AAA V2R were seeded at 1 x 104 cells per well of a 96-well plate 1–2 days prior to the experiment. The medium was replaced with serum-free DMEM 20 min before the assay. Cells were treated with either vehicle alone or with 1 µM AVP and placed in the incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2 throughout the drug treatment. The vehicle was 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 0.1% BSA, 1 mg/ml bacitracin. After treatment, the medium was removed, and the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde containing 0.12 M sucrose in DPBS-CM for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were washed twice with DPBS-CM for 5 min each and treated with 3% BSA in DPBS-CM to block nonspecific antibody binding for 30 min at 37 °C. Cells were incubated with 1:500 of anti-rat HA (Roche Applied Science) in 3% BSA in DPBS-CM for 1 h at 37 °C and washed three times with DPBS-CM. Cells were incubated with 1:100 horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rat (Amersham Biosciences) in 3% BSA in DPBS-CM for 1 h at 37 °C. The colorimetric substrate, o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (Pierce, 1 mg/ml), was added and incubated for 30 min to 1 h at room temperature. The reaction was stopped with the addition of an equal volume of 1 M sulfuric acid. The absorbance at 490 nm was determined for each well using a SpectraMAX 190 microtiter plate reader (Molecular Devices). Four replicates of each treatment condition were performed per experiment.

Immunolocalization of the Wild Type and Mutant V2R—Stably expressing WT V2R MDCKII cells were grown in clear 12-mm Transwell chambers and maintained for 6–9 days prior to fixing with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. Paraformaldehyde-fixed cells were washed in DPBS-CM, rinsed with 50 mM NH4Cl in DPBS-CM for 15 min, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in DPBS-CM for 15 min at room temperature. Permeabilized cells were washed once with DPBS-CM and incubated with DPBS-CM containing 2% BSA for 30 min. The Transwells were carefully cut away from their plastic support and placed into a 12-well plate for antibody labeling. The cells were incubated with a 1:500 dilution of rat anti-HA monoclonal primary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. After rinsing cells three times in DPBS-CM (10 min/wash), a 1:1000 dilution of Alexa488-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG in DPBS-CM with 2% BSA was added, and the cells were incubated in the dark for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were then washed prior to mounting on glass slides with Aqua-Poly/Mount and covered with a glass coverslip. Slides were stored in the dark until examination with a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal laser scanning inverted microscope in the Vanderbilt Cell Imaging Core Facility.

For the AVP-mediated internalization studies, polarized cells were treated either with vehicle alone or with 1 µM AVP, which was added to both the apical and basolateral chambers of the Transwells, and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 throughout the drug treatment. After treatment, the medium was removed, and the cells were fixed and labeled for immunofluorescence examination as described.

Competition Binding—To assess the potency of AVP in competing for the WT V2R and AAA V2R, [3H]AVP binding assays were performed. Confluent 100-mm dishes of MDCKII cells stably expressing the WT V2R or AAA V2R were placed on ice and washed once with DPBS-CM. The cells were scraped into 15:5:5 buffer (15 mM HEPES, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.6) containing 100 µM PMSF and centrifuged at 18,000 rpm in an SS-34 rotor for 15 min. The pellet was resuspended in 15:5:5 buffer by sequential trituration with 22- and 25-gauge needles. Centrifugation and resuspension was repeated one time. Finally, the pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 0.1% BSA, and 1 mg/ml bacitracin, which was included to protect the radioligand from proteolysis. Membranes were incubated, with shaking, for 1 h at room temperature in the presence of 1.4 nM [3H]AVP. The incubation was terminated by harvesting on a Brandel cell harvester. Nonspecific binding was defined as that binding detected in the presence of 10 µM AVP. The samples were counted using a Packard 1600 TR Tri-Carb scintillation counter. Kd and Bmax values were calculated from these homologous competition binding experiments as described by Limbird and Motulsky (13).

cAMP Accumulation—Basal or AVP-mediated cAMP accumulation in intact cells was measured by assessing the conversion of [3H]ATP into [3H]cAMP in cells prelabeled with [3H]adenine to permit synthesis of [3H]ATP intracellularly. MDCKII cells were seeded into 24-well plates at 1 x 105 cells per well. Twenty four hours later, the cells were labeled overnight (12–16 h at 37 °C) in supplemented DMEM containing 6 µCi/ml of [3H]adenine (PerkinElmer Life Sciences or MP Biomedicals). On the day of the assay, cells were placed on a 37 °C plate and rinsed with DPBS-CM, and serum-free DMEM supplemented with 20 mM HEPES was added. Cells were treated with AVP for 15 min, with vehicle alone to obtain basal cAMP levels, or with 10 µM forskolin to assess direct activation of adenylyl cyclase. Reactions were terminated by adding 750 µl of an ice-cold solution containing 12% trichloroacetic acid, 2 mM cAMP, 2 mM ATP, and [14C]cAMP (~1400 cpm/ml) to permit an assessment of recovery of [3H]cAMP in subsequent purification steps. Cells were then placed on ice for 10 min, after which the reactions were transferred to glass test tubes using disposable transfer pipettes. Each well was washed with 120 µl of DMEM supplemented with 20 mM HEPES and combined with its respective harvested sample for a final volume of 2 ml. After neutralization with 120 µl of 5 N NaOH, cellular debris was pelleted by centrifugation (3000 rpm, 10 min at 4 °C). The supernatants were subjected to sequential Dowex and alumina column chromatography to isolate [3H]cAMP (14). Recovery of [3H]cAMP from other triturated nucleotides during this procedure was corrected based on the recovery of [14C]cAMP tracer in the stop solution.

Measurement of Intracellular Ca2+We used a FlexStation II (Molecular Devices) fluorometric imaging plate reader to measure changes in intracellular Ca2+. MDCKII cells stably expressing the WT V2R or AAA V2R were plated in 96-well clear bottom black microplates (Corning Glass) at ~1 x 105 cells per well and incubated overnight at 37 °C and 5% CO2. On the day of the assay, cells were loaded with Calcium 3 dye (FLIPR Calcium 3 assay kit, Molecular Devices) for 1 h at 37 °C in Hanks' buffered saline solution (HBSS), pH 7.4, containing 0.1% BSA and 2.5 mM probenecid, in the presence (Invitrogen catalog number 14065-056) of 1.26 mM calcium. After loading, cells were washed three times with 1x HBSS, pH 7.4, containing 0.1% BSA and 2.5 mM probenecid lacking calcium (Invitrogen catalog number 14185-052, supplemented with 0.9 mM magnesium). Cells were placed in 1x HBSS with or without calcium as indicated and placed in the FlexStation II for the assay. The machine was used in Flex mode, and the fluorescent intensity was measured from the bottom with the excitation at 485 nm and emission at 525 nm for 90 s at 25 °C. Trituration upon addition of compound during the FlexStation assay had no effect on the position of the AVP concentration-response curve for the WT V2R.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The V2R C Terminus Interacts with Calmodulin in Vitro in a Calcium-dependent Manner—To investigate mechanisms involved in the processing and signaling of the V2R, we searched for proteins that could associate with the C terminus of the receptor, as this region had been implicated both in trafficking (9) and signaling (15). In preliminary studies using yeast two-hybrid technology, we identified calmodulin as a potential interacting molecule with the V2R C terminus. Given recent reports that other GPCRs also interact with calmodulin (1621), we chose to pursue this interaction further.

As shown in Fig. 1, the full-length V2R also interacts with calmodulin in vitro in a calcium-dependent fashion. Detergent extracts from MDCKII cells expressing WT V2R were incubated with calmodulin-linked agarose. Calcium-dependent binding of the V2R occurred at pH 7.6, and even greater binding was observed at pH 6.8, which more closely resembles intracellular pH. Binding could be detected at 1 µM free [Ca2+], based on calculations using the MaxChelator program as detailed under "Experimental Procedures." Evaluation of lower concentrations of calcium could not be achieved with confidence, based on predictions of the MaxChelator program. In some experiments, as in Fig. 1A, binding of precursor forms (22) of the V2R to calmodulin also was detected.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
The V2R interacts with calmodulin-agarose in vitro in the presence of calcium. MDCKII cells stably expressing the WT V2R were extracted with 1 ml of D{beta}M-CHS buffer plus protease inhibitors. The resultant detergent-solubilized preparation containing the V2R was rocked with calmodulin-agarose for 4 h at 4 °C. The resin was washed with D{beta}M-CHS wash buffer and eluted into SDS sample buffer. The receptor bound to calmodulin-agarose preferentially in the presence of 1 mM calcium as compared with 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.6 (A, n = 3) and pH 6.8 (B, n = 3). In some studies, the terminally glycosylated (mature) and high mannose (immature) forms of the receptor bound, as defined previously by endo-{beta}-N-acetylglucosaminidase H and peptide N-glycosidase F sensitivity of the WT V2R (22).

 
The V2R C Terminus Interacts with Calmodulin in Vitro via an RGR Motif—To determine the region(s) of the V2R C terminus important for interacting with calmodulin, we expressed this sequence as a GST fusion protein and made truncations and mutations of the V2R C terminus to assess their impact on interaction with calmodulin. Fig. 2A shows the region of the V2R C terminus fused to GST in relation to the holo-V2R structure, and Fig. 2B provides the amino acid sequence for the C-terminal region investigated. GST-V2R-C-terminal fusion proteins were synthesized in COS M6 cells, harvested, and incubated with calmodulin-linked agarose in the presence of 1 mM calcium, as described under "Experimental Procedures." As shown in Fig. 2C, the V2R C-terminal fusion protein bound to calmodulin-linked agarose, whereas GST did not (Fig. 2C, lane 10 versus lane 5). The uppermost band in Fig. 2C represents the full-length fusion protein, whereas the extra bands in Fig. 2, C or D, could indicate incompletely translated proteins or degraded fusion proteins. The A336X and Q354X truncations also bound to calmodulin-linked agarose and eluted with Laemmli buffer, whereas the R344X, R337X, and E335X truncations did not (Fig. 2C, lanes 15 and 20 versus lanes 25, 30, and 35). Taken together, these findings revealed that the region containing the residues RGRTPPSLGP is essential for the interaction of the V2R C terminus with calmodulin (Fig. 2B, thick black bar).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
The V2R C terminus interacts with calmodulin in vitro in the presence of calcium and depends on a critical RGR motif. The WT V2R sequence and its predicted seven transmembrane-spanning topography is shown with the C terminus expanded at the right (A). The GST-FLAG-tagged V2R C-terminal fusion protein sequence and mutant structures are aligned in B. COS M6 cells transiently expressing GST-FLAG-tagged fusion proteins of the V2R C terminus were extracted into 1 ml of D{beta}M-CHS buffer plus protease inhibitors, and the resultantdetergent-solubilized preparation (100,000 x g supernatant) was adsorbed to calmodulin-agarose overnight at 4 °C in the presence of 1 mM calcium, washed with buffer containing 1 mM calcium, and eluted with Laemmli buffer, as detailed under "Experimental Procedures." The total (solubilized preparation prior to interaction with calmodulin-agarose) and unbound (pass-through of the resin) washes (first two of four washes), and eluate fractions are shown (C). Experiments testing binding of GST proteins to calmodulin-agarose were performed for GST control versus V2R C terminus, n = 18, comparing both with the E335X, n = 10, with the R337X and R344X, n = 9, with the Q354X, n = 7, with A366X, n = 8, and with AAA, n = 3. The calcium dependence of the interaction was demonstrated by the elution of the V2R C terminus from calmodulin-agarose with 10 mM EDTA for the WT sequence (WT) and Q354X and A366X truncation sequences (n = 5) (D).

 
To confirm that the RGR region of the V2R C terminus contained the calmodulin-binding site, mutations were designed in the sequence to reduce the affinity of the interaction. The target binding surface of calmodulin contains significant acidic patches that are typically complemented by basic residues in the calmodulin-binding motifs of its binding partners (23, 24). Consequently, we mutated the RGR sequence to AAA. In accord with this line of reasoning, this AAA mutant of the C terminus failed to bind to calmodulin-agarose under the experimental conditions tested (Fig. 2C, lane 40). The effects of these mutations were significant because only at concentrations of AAA V2R that were 2.5-fold greater than the Kd value of the WT V2R were we able to detect any binding of the AAA to calmodulin-agarose at all, and this binding was ≤5% of that for WT V2R C terminus at equivalent protein concentrations (see below for affinity estimated for the WT V2R C terminus).

The in vitro interaction with GST-V2R, like for the holo-V2R (Fig. 1), was indeed found to be calcium-dependent, because elution of the V2R C terminus from calmodulin-agarose could be affected by the addition of 10 mM EDTA (Fig. 2D). Together, these data demonstrate that the interaction of the V2R C terminus with calmodulin-linked agarose depends on the presence of calcium and an essential RGR motif in the V2R C terminus.

To confirm further the observed interaction between the V2R C-terminal RGR motif and calmodulin, we performed a series of NMR experiments using uniformly 15N-enriched calmodulin and a peptide fragment of the V2R C terminus containing the RGR motif (RGRm). For these experiments, RGRm was titrated into solutions of calmodulin, in both the absence (190 µM calmodulin) and presence (150 µM calmodulin) of calcium. The peaks in these two-dimensional spectra arise from backbone and side chain amide N-H groups, providing a minimum of one probe for each residue in the protein. The position of each peak is highly sensitive to both the structure and influences from the surrounding environment.

Fig. 3A shows a selected region of the two-dimensional 15N-1H heteronuclear single quantum correlation NMR spectra obtained for Ca2+-loaded calmodulin in the absence (black) and presence (red) of 1.5 molar eq of the RGRm peptide, whereas Fig. 3B shows the corresponding spectra for the apoprotein. The observation that many peaks shift position when the peptide is present in Fig. 3A but not Fig. 3B reveals that RGRm binds to calmodulin in a Ca2+-dependent manner, corroborating the findings in Fig. 2D.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
A peptide fragment of V2R C terminusbindstocalmodulininaCa2+-dependent manner. The V2R peptide (Leu-337 to Ser-357, RGRm) was titrated into a solution of 15N-enriched calmodulin in the presence (A, 150 µM calmodulin) and absence (B, 190 µM calmodulin) of calcium. In each panel, regions from two-dimensional 15N-1H NMR spectra were overlaid for the free protein (black) and the complex with 1.5 molar eq of RGRm (red). Arrows are drawn to highlight the shift in calmodulin peaks caused by binding of the RGRm.

 
The changes in the NMR signals over the course of the titration of RGRm into calmodulin can be used to estimate the in vitro binding affinity of the peptide for Ca2+-calmodulin. However, a linear change in peak position as a function of peptide concentration that saturated at a peptide:protein ratio of ~1:1 indicated that the dissociation constant (Kd) must be at least 100-fold lower than the protein concentration of 150 µM. Thus, the Kd of RGRm for calmodulin is ≤1.5 µM. An estimate of the affinity of the entire V2R C terminus was obtained by examining the concentration-dependent binding of the GST-V2R-C terminus to calmodulin-agarose by using the methods described in Fig. 2C. The estimated Kd of calmodulin for the WT V2R C terminus was ~200 nM (evaluated in three independent experiments). We were not able to rigorously estimate a Kd value for the AAA V2R C terminus due to limitations in the amount of mutant protein available to achieve concentrations where we could detect binding.

The AAA V2R, Like the WT V2R, Localizes to the Basolateral Surface of Polarized MDCKII Cells—To address the functional consequence of mutating the V2R C-terminal region on receptor localization, we stably expressed the AAA V2R in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCKII) cells. This model system allows the study of trafficking of surface proteins to polarized cellular surfaces, and we have examined the trafficking of WT and mutant V2R X-linked nephrogenic diabetes insipidus alleles in these cells previously (22). As shown in Fig. 4A, both the WT and AAA V2R are localized at the cell surface (Fig. 4A, upper panels, XY scan) of polarized stably expressing MDCKII cells, based on recognition of the HA epitope introduced into the N terminus of each of these receptors; a Z scan of these cells reveals that both the WT and AAA V2R are enriched at the lateral subdomain (Fig. 4A, lower panel, Z scan) of polarized cells.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
The AAA V2R, like the WT V2R, localizes to the basolateral surface of polarized MDCK cells. A, the localization of the V2R containing the RGR -> AAA (344–346) stably expressed in MDCKII cells was compared with the WT V2R by confocal microscopy. Cells were grown for 7 days on clear 12-mm Transwells at 37 °C, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and immunoisolated as described under "Experimental Procedures." The rat anti-HA monoclonal antibody was detected by Alexafluor-488-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG secondary antibody. Localization of the HA epitope tag on the N terminus of the WT V2R and AAA V2R was analyzed on a Zeiss LSM 510 laser confocal microscope, where the XY is presented in the upper panel of each image. Z scans shown in the lower panel display a laser-sectional side view of the V2R-expressing MDCKII cells. The yellow line across each XY scan represents the laser sectioning that resulted in the Z scan (A). MDCKII cells stably expressing the WT V2R or AAA V2R were grown for seven to 8 days on 24.5-mm Transwells. The data shown are from a representative experiment performed at least three times. B, polarized MDCKII cells were surface-biotinylated and subjected to streptavidin-agarose chromatography, SDS-PAGE, and Western blot analysis for epitope-tagged WT V2R and AAA V2R, n = 3, as described under "Experimental Procedures." The data shown are from a representative experiment, with the average receptor distribution as 19% apical, 81% basolateral for the WT V2R, and 22% apical and 78% basolateral for the AAA V2R.

 
To complement these morphological studies, we used cell surface biotinylation to provide quantitative data about the relative distribution of the WT V2R on the basolateral versus apical surfaces, and the impact of the AAA mutation on distribution of the V2R. As demonstrated in Fig. 4B, the majority of both WT V2R and AAA V2R is detected in streptavidin eluates from basolaterally biotinylated MDCKII cells. The findings indicate that the AAA V2R, like the WT, localizes predominantly to the basolateral surface at steady state in polarized MDCKII cells.

AVP-induced AAA V2R Internalization Parallels That of the WT V2R—We examined the AVP-induced internalization of the AAA V2R versus WT V2R by using a cell surface ELISA. Calmodulin has been shown to play a role in the endocytosis of the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor, which is important for receptor-mediated extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation (27). The V2R is known to undergo agonist-induced internalization, without recycling to the cell surface (10). In Fig. 5A, both the WT and AAA V2R remained localized at the cell surface during the 90-min incubation of these studies, whereas treatment with 1 µM AVP led to an accelerated rate of V2R loss from the surface that was indistinguishable for the WT and AAA V2R. Parallel immunofluorescence studies (Fig. 5B) revealed that WT and AAA V2R have similar internalization profiles at 30 and 90 min, with the appearance of intracellular puncta. Because the AAA V2R appeared more diffuse upon internalization in these studies, we exploited a complementary approach, i.e. antibody feeding, to assess any possible differential fates of WT versus AAA V2R following internalization. In these studies, surface receptor was bound to anti-HA antibody by pretreating the cells for 60 min at 4 °C, and cells subsequently were treated with agonist. By using this approach, the cell surface pool of WT V2R and AAA V2R internalized to intracellular puncta that were visually indistinguishable (data not shown), arguing against a different fate of WT versus AAA V2R post-internalization. A second AAA V2R clone stably expressed in MDCKII cells was tested and displayed similar profiles (data not shown). These data indicate that the AAA V2R internalizes in response to AVP with kinetics and a morphological profile comparable with that of the WT V2R.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
AVP-induced internalization of WT V2R and AAA V2R. A, cell surface ELISA. MDCKII cells stably expressing WT V2R or AAA V2R were seeded into 96-well plates and evaluated for cell surface expression of the HA epitope at the N terminus of these receptor structures as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data shown are the mean ± the S.E. from experiments with WT V2R (n = 7) and AAA (clone 5) V2R (n = 4). The WT V2R was treated with vehicle ({Delta})or with AVP ({blacksquare}), and the AAA V2R was treated with vehicle ({Delta}) or with AVP ({blacktriangleup}). B, AVP-mediated V2R internalization viewed with immunofluorescence. The localization of the WT V2R and AAA V2R in polarized MDCKII cells was observed at time 0 and following stimulation with 1 µM AVP. Cells were grown on 12-mm clear Transwells (Costar) for 6 days to achieve polarization of these stably expressing clonal cell lines. The medium was replaced with serum-free medium 20 min before the experiment. Cells were incubated for 0, 30, or 90 min at 37 °C in the absence (time 0) or presence (30 and 60 min) of AVP. The medium was aspirated, and cells were immediately fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and processed for examination of immunofluorescence as described under "Experimental Procedures." The data shown are from one experiment, where three fields of view were imaged, performed twice. Similar findings also were observed when the same question was addressed by feeding anti-HA antibody at the cell surface and watching the entry of the HA-tagged V2R over time as described under "Experimental Procedures."

 
AAA V2R Binds AVP with an Affinity Similar to the WT V2R—To determine the ability of the WT V2R and AAA V2R to bind agonist, we performed homologous competition binding assays, in which unlabeled AVP competes with [3H]AVP for binding to V2R. [3H]AVP, as an agonist at these receptors, reflects binding to the high affinity G protein-coupled state of the V2R. Analysis of these data permitted an estimate of the Kd and Bmax values for the V2R in these cell lines (13). The AAA V2R had a similar affinity as WT V2R (Fig. 6, inset), and the affinity of [3H]AVP for these receptors is in agreement with previous findings for the V2R (8).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
V2R affinity for AVP is indistinguishable at WT V2R and AAA V2R. Competition of AVP for [3H]AVP binding was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Homologous competition allows for the calculation of the Kd and the Bmax for the receptor population (13). Data were fit to a one-site competitive binding curve (GraphPad Prism). Protein concentration of the lysates was determined by using the Bradford analysis. Shown is the mean ± the S.E. from experiments with n = 4 for the WT V2R ({blacksquare}), for clone 5 of the AAA V2R ({circ}; n = 5), and for clone 11 of the AAA V2R ({Delta}; n = 3).

 
Impact of the AAA V2R Mutation on AVP-stimulated cAMP Accumulation—To assess the ability of the AAA V2R to function upon ligand binding, we examined AVP-mediated cAMP accumulation in MDCKII cells stably expressing the WT or AAA V2R.

As shown in Fig. 7, the WT and AAA V2R displayed similar concentration dependence in eliciting cAMP accumulation in response to increasing concentrations of AVP, with EC50 values of 6.0 and 1.5 nM respectively. We performed a nonparametric, two-tailed t test which yielded a p value of 0.49, indicating that these EC50 values are not significantly different. These data indicate that mutation of the V2R C terminus to create the AAA V2R does not perturb receptor coupling to Gs, which is the transducer of V2R activation by AVP to elevations in cAMP production.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.
AVP-stimulated [3H]cAMP accumulation in cells expressing the WT V2R or AAA V2R. MDCKII cells stably expressing the WT V2R ({blacksquare}, n = 9) or AAA V2R ({circ}; clone 5, n = 7) were seeded into 24-well culture plates and labeled with [3H]adenine prior to assessment of cAMP accumulation for 15 min at 37 °C, as described under "Experimental Procedures." Basal cAMP accumulation is defined as that cAMP content detected in cells treated with vehicle alone. Parental MDCKII cells lacking heterologous V2R expression demonstrated no AVP-stimulated cAMP accumulation. The values are shown as % of forskolin-stimulated [3H]cAMP, corrected for recovery using the [14C]cAMP tracer in the stop solution as described under "Experimental Procedures." For MDCKII cells expressing the WT V2R, the maximal cAMP stimulation was 13% of forskolin-stimulated cAMP, as determined by linear regression (one-site sigmoidal fit), and for AAA V2R was 9.6%. The forskolin-stimulated (10 µM) sample was corrected for recovery using the average correction value of the AVP-stimulated sample for the WT V2R and AAA V2R, because the high value of [3H]cAMP counts/min measured resulted in a large spillover of counts/min into the 14C channel. Forskolin-stimulated cyclase activity in the parental MDCKII cell line and AAA V2R-expressing cell line were ~7 and 21% of that observed in cells expressing WT V2R, respectively.

 
Although the WT V2R and AAA V2R had a similar concentration-response relationship in activating adenylyl cyclase, the forskolin-stimulated cyclase in each of the cell lines varied, so that the amount of cAMP produced in response to both forskolin and maximal (10 µM) AVP stimulation was greater in MDCKII cells expressing the WT V2R (4.3 pmol of receptor/mg of protein) than in cells expressing AAA V2R (6.7 pmol of receptor/mg of protein). However, the amount of AVP-evoked cAMP accumulation was a comparable percent of forskolin stimulation for the V2R-expressing cell lines (11.8% for WT V2R and 8.7% for AAA V2R). No AVP-stimulated cyclase activity was detected in parental cells lacking heterologous V2R expression, indicating that all effects of AVP on cAMP accumulation detected in our studies resulted from the heterologously expressed V2R. We cannot account for the difference in forskolin-stimulated cAMP production among the cell lines, but the similar concentration-response relationship and fraction of forskolin-stimulated cyclase for both the WT V2R and AAA V2R suggest that the mutation to substitute AAA for RGR in the V2R C terminus does not have a dramatic impact on V2R communication with the adenylyl cyclase system.

WT V2R Stimulation of Increases in Intracellular Calcium Cannot Be Mimicked by the AAA V2R—In the isolated rat inner medullary collecting duct (4), the V2R has been demonstrated to stimulate an increase in intracellular calcium in response to AVP, which is necessary for the enhanced water permeability at the apical surface of renal cells (28). To test the ability of the AAA V2R to increase intracellular calcium, we utilized the FlexStation II (Molecular Devices) to measure real time changes in intracellular calcium, as described under "Experimental Procedures." The WT V2R demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in intracellular calcium in response to AVP stimulation. This rise in calcium was not observed for WT V2R-expressing cells pretreated with 10 µM of the V2R antagonist SR121463B or for MDCKII parental cells not expressing heterologous V2R (Fig. 8A).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.
AVP-mediated changes in intracellular calcium concentration in cells expressing WT V2R versus AAA V2R. MDCKII cells stably expressing the WT V2R or AAA V2R were seeded into 96-well plates and assayed for an increase in intracellular calcium concentration using the FlexStation II, as described under "Experimental Procedures." A, treatment with AVP results in a dose-dependent increase in intracellular calcium in cells expressing the WT V2R ({blacksquare}) that is blocked by pretreatment for 10 min with 10 µM SR121463B ({blacktriangledown}), a V2R antagonist. Parental MDCKII cells (224) not heterologously expressing the V2R did not increase intracellular calcium in response to any concentration of AVP tested. Data are from multiple independent experiments performed in duplicate: WT V2R (n = 8); AAA V2R (clone 5, n = 6); AAA V2R (clone 11, n = 4); parental cell line (n = 3). B, the AAA V2R is unable to increase intracellular calcium at any concentration of AVP. Both clone 5 ({circ}) and clone 11 ({Delta}) of MDCKII cells stably expressing the AAA V2R were tested. The data were normalized by setting stimulation with the maximal AVP concentration of the WT V2R as 100%. The range of relative fluorescence units (RFU) for the WT was 19,000–82,000 relative fluorescence units for stimulation with 50 µM AVP (n = 6) or 10 µM AVP (n = 2) in A and B. In each experiment, background fluorescence was defined as that obtained using vehicle treatment. The ability to detect elevations in [Ca2+]i was confirmed in each experiment by treatment with the ionophore ionomycin (0.1 µM) or with ATP (1 mM), which acts through P2Y purinergic receptors to increase intracellular calcium in MDCK cells (30). Data are from multiple independent experiments performed in duplicate: WT V2R (n = 8); AAA V2R (clone 5, n = 6); AAA V2R (clone 11, n = 4); parental cell line (n = 3). C, WT V2R and AAA V2R expressing cells were assayed in the absence of extracellular calcium or were pretreated with BAPTA-AM (10 µM) for 20 min prior to treatment with agonist. Comparable findings were obtained whether BAPTA-AM was present during AVP stimulation or whether it was removed, and the cells were washed, and calcium-containing medium was replaced prior to AVP stimulation. Data are from multiple independent experiments performed in duplicate: WT V2R (n = 8); AAA V2R (clone 5, n = 6); AAA V2R (clone 11, n = 4); parental cell line (n = 3). For A–C, the data are given as the mean ± S.E. D, treatment of cells with 50 µM AVP (n = 6), 250 µM dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate (dbcAMP) (n = 4), 500 µM 8-bromo-cyclic AMP (BrcAMP) (n = 4), or 10 µM forskolin (Fsk) (n = 2) is shown as fluorescence due to increased intracellular calcium concentration ± S.D.

 
It was of considerable interest that this readily detectable increase in intracellular calcium was not observed for the AAA V2R in response to any concentration of AVP (Fig. 8B). Both AAA V2R clone 5 and clone 11 were tested, demonstrating that the lack of AVP-stimulated increase in intracellular calcium was not particular to a single clonal cell line.

We next tested the source of the increase in intracellular calcium. Fig. 8C illustrates that the removal of extracellular calcium blocked the AVP-induced increase in intracellular calcium for the WT V2R. Also, chelation of intracellular calcium by BAPTA-AM inhibited the AVP-induced rise in intracellular calcium by the WT V2R. These data are consistent with the interpretation that both extra- and intracellular stores of calcium contribute to AVP-stimulated increases in [Ca2+]i. Our preliminary studies of the effects of antagonists of calcium mobilization (e.g. TMB-8) on AVP-induced calcium elevations were confounded by profound changes in basal [Ca2+]i, as observed previously in tests of calmidazolium (29), the calmodulin antagonist, on modulation of [Ca2+]i; consequently, we did not pursue this avenue of investigation further.

We tested whether the addition of membrane-permeant cAMP analogs could stimulate an increase in intracellular calcium in WT V2R-expressing MDCKII cells. Fig. 8D illustrates that neither dibutyryl-cAMP nor 8-bromo-cAMP stimulated an increase in intracellular calcium. Similarly, the addition of 10 µM forskolin also did not elicit a calcium response, even though forskolin caused a readily measured increase in cAMP accumulation in all cell lines evaluated (Fig. 7). As a positive control, we observed that ATP stimulated calcium rises in the same experiment (data not shown), presumably via purinergic receptors (30), indicating that the target cells evaluated were capable of mobilizing intracellular calcium. Taken together, these data illustrate that the accumulation of cAMP and increase in intracellular calcium appear to be occurring independently of one another in response to AVP stimulation of the V2R in MDCKII cells.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The present studies reveal that the V2R interacts with calmodulin involving a domain of the receptor that includes the C terminus of this seven transmembrane-spanning receptor protein. The affinity of this interaction was determined to be ~200 nM, consistent with data obtained for other GPCR peptides and calmodulin (Table I). For the V2R, mutation of the calmodulin-interacting region blocks elevations in intracellular calcium in response to AVP. Other calmodulin-interacting domains also may exist in the V2R, as the first intracellular loop contains a second putative binding site predicted by sequence homology (31) and association of the holo-AAA V2R with calmodulin-agarose has been detected in preliminary studies (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
Calcium-dependent binding of calmodulin to GPCR The abbreviations used are: AVP, arginine vasopressin; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; Erk, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; Grk, G protein-coupled receptor kinase; ND, not determined; PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase; PKC, protein kinase C; PKG, cGMP-dependent protein kinase; SPR, surface plasmon resonance.

 
Calmodulin also has been shown to interact with other GPCRs including the dopamine D2 (21), metabotropic glutamate mGluR5 (18) and mGluR7 (17, 3234) receptors, opioid MOR (19), serotonin 5-HT1A (16), and angiotensin II AT1A (20) receptors. As summarized in Table I, calmodulin, in the presence of calcium, either interacts with the 3i loop or the C terminus of these receptors, regions that play important roles in G protein-coupling for the particular receptors studied. The role that the calmodulin interaction domain plays in receptor function is varied, depending on the GPCR. For example, calmodulin serves as an antagonist for protein kinase C phosphorylation of the mGluR by competing for protein kinase C binding to the receptor phosphorylation site (17, 18, 32). Calmodulin serves as a functional antagonist of G protein-coupling to the D2R (21) and suppresses G protein activation by MOR (19). For mGluR7, binding of calmodulin enhances G{beta}{gamma} signaling. For the 5-HT1A receptor, calmodulin modulates receptor endocytosis required for subsequent extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation in that system (27).

In our studies, we learned that the interacting domain for calmodulin includes the RGR sequence in the C terminus. However, as for other GPCRs that interact with calmodulin, this motif does not correspond exactly to classical calmodulin-interacting motifs, such as the IQ or the 1-8-14 motifs (24).

The V2R increases cAMP in virtually all target cells evaluated. The V1R is classically responsible for elevations in [Ca2+]i, but the V2R also has been implicated in elevating intracellular calcium concentrations in response to AVP in some target cells (28). We similarly observed that the WT V2R causes rapid elevations in [Ca2+]i, and this AVP-evoked enhancement of [Ca2+]i is not observed for the AAA V2R. Despite the complete loss of AVP-stimulated elevation of [Ca2+]i by the AAA V2R, we observed virtually no change in coupling to Gs and activation of adenylyl cyclase, or to mitogen-activated protein kinase (data not shown) for the AAA V2R when compared with the WT V2R. These findings reveal that AVP stimulation of [Ca2+]i in MDCKII cells occurs independently of these other second messenger systems. This interpretation is corroborated by our findings that neither cell-permeant cAMP analogs nor forskolin, which causes dramatic increases in cAMP (Fig. 7), elevate [Ca2+]i in any of our MDCKII clonal cell lines. This dissociation of the cAMP and calcium pathways is in agreement with data from others (35, 36) evaluating AVP responses in isolated rat inner medullary collecting ducts but is in contrast to the findings of Chou et al. (4) who also using isolated rat inner medullary collecting ducts as a model system.

Another interesting aspect of our findings is the different concentration-response relationship between AVP stimulation of cAMP accumulation versus elevation of [Ca2+]i. The AVP concentration-response curve for increased intracellular calcium of the WT V2R appears to be almost threshold in nature and is not amplified like the cAMP response (compare occupancy, Fig. 6, with cAMP response, Fig. 7.) The blockade of AVP-stimulated calcium elevation by both removal of extracellular calcium and chelation of intracellular calcium would be consistent with a mechanism for calcium mobilization involving both extra- and intracellular stores. Future studies will hopefully reveal the in vivo physiological significance of this novel calcium elevation in response to high V2R occupancy.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK43879 (to L. E. L.) and GM40120 (to W. J. C.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Robinson Research Bldg., Rm. 464, Nashville, TN 37232-6600. Tel.: 615-322-6379; Fax: 615-322-6378; E-mail: lee.limbird{at}vanderbilt.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: V2R, V2 vasopressin receptor; AVP, arginine vasopressin; BAPTA-AM, 1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid tetra(acetoxymethyl) ester; CaM, calmodulin; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; HA, hemagglutinin; MDCKII, Madin-Darby canine kidney II; NHS, sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide; DPBS, Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline; RGRm, V2R C-terminal RGR motif; WT, wild type; BSA, bovine serum albumin; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; GST, glutathione S-transferase; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; TEMED, N,N,',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine; 2-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol; HBSS, Hanks' buffered saline solution; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Carol Ann Bonner and Susan Meyn for superb technical support; Dr. Christopher M. Tan for guidance in early phases of these studies; and the members of the Limbird laboratory for their critical input and shared enthusiasm. We also appreciate the cDNA encoding HA-WT V2R provided by Jürgen Wess, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, and the pICBWR human calmodulin bacterial expression vector provided by Eva Thulin (University of Lund, Sweden). The membrane-permeant V2R antagonist SR121463B (Batch 98-01407) was a generous gift from Claudine Serradeil-Le Gal (Sanofi-Synthelabo, Toulouse Cedex, France). We also thank the Vanderbilt Medical Scientist Training Program for fostering a wonderfully collaborative atmosphere. Laser scanning confocal microscopy studies were obtained in part through the use of the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Cell Imaging Shared Resource, supported by National Institutes of Health Grants CA68485 and DK20593. NMR studies were obtained through the use of the Vanderbilt Biomolecular NMR Center, supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant ES0000267.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Schulein, R., Zuhlke, K., Krause, G., and Rosenthal, W. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 8384-8392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Morello, J. P., Salahpour, A., Laperriere, A., Bernier, V., Arthus, M. F., Lonergan, M., Petaja-Repo, U., Angers, S., Morin, D., Bichet, D. G., and Bouvier, M. (2000) J. Clin. Investig. 105, 887-895[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. van Balkom, B. W., Savelkoul, P. J., Markovich, D., Hofman, E., Nielsen, S., van der, S. P., and Deen, P. M. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 41473-41479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Chou, C. L., Yip, K. P., Michea, L., Kador, K., Ferraris, J. D., Wade, J. B., and Knepper, M. A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 36839-36846[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Yip, K. P. (2002) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 538, 891-899[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lorenz, D., Krylov, A., Hahm, D., Hagen, V., Rosenthal, W., Pohl, P., and Maric, K. (2003) EMBO Rep. 4, 88-93[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Levine, S. D., Kachadorian, W. A., Levin, D. N., and Schlondorff, D. (1981) J. Clin. Investig. 67, 662-672[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Innamorati, G., Sadeghi, H., Eberle, A. N., and Birnbaumer, M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 2486-2492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Schulein, R., Hermosilla, R., Oksche, A., Dehe, M., Wiesner, B., Krause, G., and Rosenthal, W. (1998) Mol. Pharmacol. 54, 525-535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Innamorati, G., Sadeghi, H. M., Tran, N. T., and Birnbaumer, M. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 2222-2226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Vogel, H. J., Lindahl, L., and Thulin, E. (1983) FEBS Lett. 157, 241-246[CrossRef]
  12. Keefer, J. R., and Limbird, L. E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11340-11347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Limbird, L. E., and Motulsky, H. (1998) in Handbook of Physiology: The Endocrine System Cellular Endocrinology (Conn, P. M., and Goodman, H. M., eds) pp. 49-67, Oxford University Press, Inc., Oxford
  14. Salomon, Y., Londos, C., and Rodbell, M. (1974) Anal. Biochem. 58, 541-548[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Wess, J. (1998) Pharmacol. Ther. 80, 231-264[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Turner, J. H., Gelasco, A. K., and Raymond, J. R. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 17027-17037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Nakajima, Y., Yamamoto, T., Nakayama, T., and Nakanishi, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 27573-27577[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Minakami, R., Jinnai, N., and Sugiyama, H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20291-20298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Wang, D., Sadee, W., and Quillan, J. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22081-22088[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Thomas, W. G., Pipolo, L., and Qian, H. (1999) FEBS Lett. 455, 367-371[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Bofill-Cardona, E., Kudlacek, O., Yang, Q., Ahorn, H., Freissmuth, M., and Nanoff, C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 32672-32680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Tan, C. M., Nickols, H. H., and Limbird, L. E. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 35678-35686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. O'Neil, K. T., and DeGrado, W. F. (1990) Trends Biochem. Sci. 15, 59-64[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Rhoads, A. R., and Friedberg, F. (1997) FASEB J. 11, 331-340[Abstract]
  25. Deleted in proof
  26. Deleted in proof
  27. Della Rocca, G. J., Mukhin, Y. V., Garnovskaya, M. N., Daaka, Y., Clark, G. J., Luttrell, L. M., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Raymond, J. R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4749-4753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Ecelbarger, C. A., Chou, C. L., Lolait, S. J., Knepper, M. A., and DiGiovanni, S. R. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, F623-F633[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Jan, C. R., and Tseng, C. J. (2000) Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 162, 142-150[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Insel, P. A., Ostrom, R. S., Zambon, A. C., Hughes, R. J., Balboa, M. A., Shehnaz, D., Gregorian, C., Torres, B., Firestein, B. L., Xing, M., and Post, S. R. (2001) Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 28, 351-354[CrossRef][Medline]