Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M311218200 on December 18, 2003 Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M311218200 on December 12, 2003 Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M311218200 on December 9, 2003 Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M311218200 on November 27, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 7, 5648-5654, February 13, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/7/5648    most recent
M311218200v4
M311218200v3
M311218200v2
M311218200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gagnon, E.
Right arrow Articles by Isenring, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gagnon, E.
Right arrow Articles by Isenring, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Molecular Mechanisms of Cl- Transport by the Renal Na+-K+-Cl- Cotransporter

IDENTIFICATION OF AN INTRACELLULAR LOCUS THAT MAY FORM PART OF A HIGH AFFINITY Cl--BINDING SITE*

Édith Gagnon{ddagger}, Marc J. Bergeron, Geneviève M. Brunet, Nikolas D. Daigle, Charles F. Simard, and Paul Isenring, A Canadian Institute of Health and Research Clinician Scientist II§

From the Nephrology Research Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec G1R 2J6, Canada

Received for publication, October 13, 2003 , and in revised form, November 12, 2003.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The 2nd transmembrane domain (tm) of the secretory Na+-K+-Cl- cotransporter (NKCC1) and of the kidney-specific isoform (NKCC2) has been shown to play an important role in cation transport. For NKCC2, by way of illustration, alternative splicing of exon 4, a 96-bp sequence from which tm2 is derived, leads to the formation of the NKCC2A and F variants that both exhibit unique affinities for cations. Of interest, the NKCC2 variants also exhibit substantial differences in Cl- affinity as well as in the residue composition of the first intracellular connecting segment (cs1a), which immediately follows tm2 and which too is derived from exon 4. In this study, we have prepared chimeras of the shark NKCC2A and F (saA and saF) to determine whether cs1a could play a role in Cl- transport; here, tm2 or cs1a in saF was replaced by the corresponding domain from saA (generating saA/F or saF/A, respectively). Functional analyses of these chimeras have shown that cs1a-specific residues account for most of the A-F difference in Cl- affinity. For example, Km(Cl-)s were ~8 mM for saF/A and saA, and ~70 mM for saA/F and saF. Intriguingly, variant residues in cs1a also affected cation transport; here, Km(Na+)s for the chimeras and for saA were all ~20 mM, and Km(Rb+) all ~2 mM. Regarding tm2, our studies have confirmed its importance in cation transport and have also identified novel properties for this domain. Taken together, our results demonstrate for the first time that an intracellular loop in NKCC contributes to the transport process perhaps by forming a flexible structure that positions itself between membrane spanning domains.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The bumetanide-sensitive Na+-K+-Cl- cotransporter (NKCC)1 belongs to the cation-Cl- cotransporter (CCC) family, which includes 3 other groups: the K+-Cl- cotransporters, the Na+-Cl- cotransporter, and the orphan CCCs (1–10). With the possible exception of the latter group for which no ionic substrates have been identified (10), the main function of a CCC is to couple the movement of Cl- to that of Na+ and/or K+ across cellular membranes (11–14).

Within the NKCC group, 2 isoforms have been described: NKCC1, a widely distributed carrier that is expressed basolaterally in polarized cell types (13–15) and NKCC2, a kidney-specific carrier that is expressed apically in the thick ascending limb (3, 16–18). Alternative splicing of NKCC2 yields different gene products that are differentially distributed along this nephron segment (3, 16). These products include the NKCC2B, A, and F variants.

Except in squid axon, the stoichiometry of ion transport by NKCCs has generally been found to be 1Na+-1K+-2Cl-. Various kinetic models for this system predict that occupancy of each site occurs sequentially in the order Na+-Cl--K+-Cl-, and that ion binding at one site induces the formation of other ion-binding sites (19–23). In some of the studies from which these models are derived, the kinetic properties of the 2 Cl--binding sites have been shown to differ, e.g. Km(Cl-) for the 1st site appears > 5-fold higher than that for the 2nd site (21, 23).

Detailed analyses of the NKCC2 variants have demonstrated that 86Rb+ influx by these carriers, especially the "A" form, could be partially sodium-independent (24, 25). Based on the kinetic models discussed above (19–22), we have hypothesized that this behavior was due to Rb+/K(Rb+) exchange resulting from aborted reactions during the transport cycle, that is, from incomplete unloading of ions on either the intra or extracellular (o) sides. Incomplete reactions have also been shown to result in Na+/Na+ exchange under certain conditions.

All members of the CCC family share a common structure, illustrated by the model of shark (sa) NKCC2A in Fig. 1. Hydropathy plot analyses predict 12 transmembrane domains (tms) with intracellular N- and C-termini (1, 26, 27). Additional topological insight has come from the identification of epitope and phosphorylation sites in NKCC1 (28, 29) as well as from the membrane insertion properties of fusion proteins containing NKCC1 domains (30).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.
Hydropathy plot models of saNKCC2. Each form symbolizes amino acid residues. The model in the left panel includes the entire coding sequence of saNKCC2 (blue, saNKCC2A; lighter blue, exon 4 of saNKCC2A). The 8 models in the right panel correspond to residues from the alternatively spliced exon 4 that encodes tm2 and cs1a (yellow, saNKCC2F; red, residues that are identical between the variants). These models were drawn using the program Plot by Biff Forbush.

 
In previous studies (12, 22, 27, 31), structure-function analyses of shark and human (hu) NKCC1 chimeras have led to the identification of 3 domains, namely, tm2, 4, and, 7, that mediate kinetic differences between species. The importance of tm2 in ion transport by the NKCCs was also confirmed through functional characterizations of NKCC2 variants (24, 32, 33). Indeed, these variants exhibit marked differences in their affinities for cotransported ions, yet they are identical to one another with the exception of a single exon from which tm2 is derived. It is noteworthy that this exon also encodes part of the following connecting segment (cs1a), which as tm2, is only conserved to a degree among variants.

Domains that play important roles in the various operations of homologous proteins can be identified readily through structure-function analyses. With such an approach, however, key residues can be missed if they are conserved. For example, the importance of tm2 or cs1a in Cl- transport was revealed through structure-function analyses involving the 3 NKCC2 variants but not the saNKCC1-huNKCC1 chimeras (12, 22, 27, 31). To this effect, the tm2-cs1a region among the B, A, and F variants is less conserved (~65%) than the corresponding region between saNKCC1 and huNKCC1 (> 80%).

In this work, we have prepared chimeras of A and F variants to determine whether cs1a is also involved in ion movement by NKCC2. We have found that cation transport kinetics are mediated at least in part by variant residues in tm2, confirming previous observations. Here, in addition, we have found that differences in Cl- affinity and in the magnitude of Na+-independent 86Rb+ influx are specified by variant residues in cs1a mainly.


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Vectors and cDNA Construction—For our experiments, the following vectors were used: (1) pBluescript SK (pBS); (2) Pol1, a Xenopus laevis oocyte expression vector derived from pGEM and comprised of the T7 promoter, the X. laevis {beta}-globin untranslated regions, and a poly(A) tract (10, 25, 26, 34); and (3) pTZ19U, a phagemid designed to produce single stranded-DNA from cDNA templates (Bio-Rad).

Wild type constructs analyzed in this study (saNKCC2A/Pol1 and saNKCC2F/Pol1) are the same as those analyzed in previous studies (25, 26). Briefly, saNKCC2A/Pol1 and saNKCC2F/Pol1 were generated from 3 library-derived saNKCC2/pBS constructs, each consisting of: (1) a full-length saNKCC2AF, which contains the A and F exons in tandem, (2) a partial-length saNKCC2A, or (3) a partial-length saNKCC2F. For saNKCC2A/Pol1, the ~712-bp SphI-PflmI fragment of saNKCCAF/pBS was replaced with that of saNKCCA/pBS, and the resulting insert was transferred to Pol1 as an EcoRI fragment. For saNKCC2F/Pol1, the fragment of saNKCC2F was used as replacement. For simplicity, saNKCC2A/Pol1 and saNKCC2F/Pol1 are called saA and saF hereafter.

Chimeric structures between shark A and F variants were produced by transferring the 2428-bp SphI-Bst1107I fragment of saA or saF into pTZ19U digested with SphI-SmaI. The mutagenic synthetic oligonucleotide cc acc tcc acg aac aac tcc att ggt aca tat agc gga cat aga gat gca agt aat tg, which corresponds to a sequence of saNKCC2F comprised between bps 854 and 911 of the open reading frame and which encodes the tm2-cs1a junction point region, was hybridized to saNKCC2A/pTZ19U and extended with T7 polymerase to generate uracil-containing single-stranded DNA. Another oligonucleotide, c tcg aac aca tcc gtt ggt cga aat ggc tga ggt aga caa ccc tgt taa gac, which corresponds to a sequence of saNKCC2A comprised between bps 853 and 904 of the open reading frame and which also encodes the tm2-cs1a junction point region, was hybridized to saNKCC2F/pTZ19U and extended as above. Mutants were screened with AccI (the restriction site was removed from saNKCC2F/pTZ19U and it was introduced in saNKCC2A/pTZ19U), and positive clones were verified by sequencing. After these steps, the 1433-bp DraIII-MunI fragment of each mutant was reinserted in saA or saF to generate saA/F or saF/A. The former contains the tm2-coding sequence of saNKCCA and the cs1a-coding sequence of saNKCC2F and the latter, the tm2-coding sequence of saNKCCF and the cs1a-coding sequence of saNKCC2A.

Expression in the X. laevis Oocyte—The 4 cDNA/Pol1 constructs were linearized and in vitro transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 kit (Ambion). Defolliculated stage V-VI oocytes were injected with 25 nl H2O or with ~5 to 25 ng cRNA diluted in 25 nl H2O, and tested 3 to 4 days after injection. Before the kinetic studies, eggs were maintained at 18 °C in Barth's medium supplemented with 125 µM furosemide.

Kinetic Studies—Ion transport rates were determined by 86Rb+ influx measurements at ~22 °C. As shown in Table I, various flux media were used for these studies. Each medium is derived from a basic solution that is isoosmolar relative to the X. laevis extracellular fluid.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE I
HEP, Hepes; NMG, N-methyl glucamine; GLU, gluconate; SUC, sucrose; OSM, osmolality

 
The following multi-step protocol was used: 1) Removal of furosemide with several washes in a tracer-free basic solution. 2) Preincubation of oocytes for 1 h in a tracer-free hyperosmolar solution (obtained by supplementing the basic solution with 84 mosM sucrose) to activate cotransporter-mediated transport (25, 26); for some experiments, bumetanide was added at various concentrations (0 to 2 µM) during the last 15 min of this preincubation. 3) Reincubation of oocytes for 45 min in one of several isoosmolar solutions containing 1 to 2 µCi/ml86RbCl, 10 µM ouabain, and 0 to 250 µM bumetanide. Here, the various isoosmolar solutions consisted of basic solutions in which [Na+] was varied from 0 to 87 mM, [Rb+] from 0.1 to 20 mM or [Cl-] from 0 to 86 mM. In these solutions, Na+ or Rb+ was replaced with N-methyl glucamine and Cl- with gluconate ± SO4 (see Table I and figure legends). 4) Repeated washes in a tracer-free basic solution containing 250 µM bumetanide and 10 µM ouabain. 5) After the final washes, oocytes were transferred in 96-well plates (1 oocyte/well) and solubilized in 2% SDS. 86Rb+ was detected by liquid {beta}-scintillation counting using the TopCountNXT microplate counter (Packard).

In each experiment, fluxes among 1 to 9 oocytes (usually from 4 to 6 oocytes) were averaged and normalized to other flux values or to [85Rb+]/[86Rb+] used in the flux medium. Normalized flux rates from 2 to 7 experiments (usually from 3 to 4 experiments) were then reaveraged and expressed as means ± S.E. For none of the data presented in this study were the bumetanide-sensitive 86Rb+ influxes of H20-injected oocytes subtracted from the bumetanide-sensitive 86Rb+ influxes of NKCC2-expressing oocytes. These background levels, which have been determined repeatedly in the past (25, 26), are very low under the experimental conditions used for the assays, and they do not alter the dependence of NKCC2 activity on [Na+], [Rb+], or [Cl-].

Km values were determined by non-linear least square analysis using the Michaelis-Menten equation (for a one-binding site model) or the Hill equation with a coefficient of 2 (for a 2-binding site model). These Km values were obtained by fitting averaged "activity versus [ion]" data points from all experiments as well as from individual experiments (see figure legends). Closeness of fits (expressed as S.E. in this work) were determined with the program SigmaPlot 4.00 for Windows. When appropriate, differences between Km values obtained for different chimeras were analyzed by Student two tail t-tests and the null hypothesis was rejected for p values < 0.05.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Functional Expression of NKCC2s—As seen in Fig. 2, X. laevis oocytes injected with either wild type or mutant NKCC2s (saA, saF, saA/F, saF/A) exhibit bumetanide-sensitive 86Rb+ influxes that vary between 1.9 to 4.5 nmol/oocyte/h. For saA and saF, these rates are more than ~8-fold above the usual background level (~0.4 nmol/oocyte/h), and they are also similar to those reported previously (25). For saF/A, on the other hand, cotransporter-specific activity is shown to be slightly lower (~4-fold above background). In these studies, flux measurements were obtained after a 1-h preincubation in hyperosmotic medium.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.
86Rb+ bumetanide-sensitive influx by X. laevis oocytes injected with saA, saF, saA/F, or saF/A. After a 1 h-incubation in hyperosmotic medium, oocytes were assayed for 86Rb+ influx in a basic medium + 10 µM ouabain. The data are shown as averages ± S.E. of 7 to 12 oocytes. Composition of media used for these studies are shown in Table I. Bu, bumetanide.

 
Kinetics of Na+ Transport—To determine whether variant residues in tm2 and/or cs1a account for differences in Na+ affinity between saA and saF, we measured the dependence of 86Rb+ influx on [Na+] for the saA/F and saF/A chimeras, and compared results to those obtained in simultaneous experiments for wild type transporters. Data are illustrated in Fig. 3, A–D, fit by a model of Na+ binding at a single site, and Km values derived from these activity versus [ion] relationships are depicted in Fig. 3E.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.
Dependence of 86Rb+ influx on [Na+] for saA, saF, saA/F, or saF/A. Within each experiment, averaged fluxes among 3 to 9 oocytes were normalized to the value measured at the highest [ion]. The data in each panel are shown as an average of these normalized fluxes among 2 to 7 experiments. In panels A–D, [Na+] was varied from 0 to 87 mM whereas [Rb+] and [Cl-] were maintained at 5 and 86 mM, respectively, and data points were fit by the Michaelis-Menten equation. In panel E, Km(Na+)s shown were obtained by a fit of the averaged data. *, significantly different statistically (p < 0.05) compared with high affinity carriers (black bars) based on Km values obtained by averaging Kms from individual experiments.

 
Unexpectedly, the results show that the saA/F and saF/A chimeras both exhibit an affinity for Na+ that is very similar to that exhibited by saA, the wild type high affinity carrier in this study; the Km values are 18, 23, and 15 mM, respectively, contrasting with a Km value of 93 mM for saF (Fig. 3D). These results suggest that variant residues in both tm2 and cs1a mediate differences in Na+ affinities between the 2 NKCC2 variants. When compared with the wild type carriers, on the other hand, saA/F and saF/A exhibit changes in Km(Na+)s that are not additive, contrasting with the expected behavior of reciprocal chimeras. Hence, it is possible that a change in affinity for one ion following residue substitutions at one site (e.g. in cs1a) is at least partly due to a change in affinity for a co-ion (see "Discussion").

Looking more closely at the activity versus [ion] relationships, it is seen that even if the chimeras exhibit a similar Km for Na+, their kinetic behavior is not identical. Indeed, Fig. 3, C and D, show that saF/A-mediated activity at 0 mM Nao is ~50% of that at 87 mM (see panel D), whereas saA/F-mediated activity at 0 mM Nao is ~20% of that at 87 mM (see panel C). In this regard, saF/A is similar to the A variant (see panels A versus D), whereas saA/F is similar to the F variant (see panels B versus C); for the wild type saA and saF carriers, such behaviors are similar to those reported previously (24, 25). These results indicate that differences in the magnitude of Nao-independent activity are probably conveyed to a large extent by variant residues in cs1a.

Kinetics of Rb+ Transport—To determine whether tm2 and cs1a also convey differences in affinity for the other cotransported cation, the dependence of 86Rb+ influx on [Rb+] was measured as above for saA/F and saF/A as well as for the wild type transporters (see Fig. 4, A–E). For these experiments, the data is again fit by a model of ion binding at a single site and Km values derived from the activity versus [ion] relationships are provided in panel E. As for Na+, the 2 chimeras display an affinity for Rb+ that is very similar to that displayed by the wild type high affinity NKCC2 carrier; as shown in panel E, for instance, Km(Rb+)s are 2.2, 1.8, and 2.2 mM for saA/F, saF/A, and saA, respectively, whereas Km(Rb+) is 4.6 mM for saF. It thus appears obvious from these results that differences in cation transport kinetics among the NKCC2 splice variants are specified by variant residues in both tm2 and cs1a.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4.
Dependence of 86Rb+ influx on [Rb+] for saA, saF, saA/F, or saF/A. Within each experiment, averaged fluxes among 2 to 8 oocytes were also normalized to the value measured at the highest [ion]. The data in each panel are shown as an average of these normalized fluxes among of 2 to 5 experiments. In panels A–D, [Rb+] was varied from 0.1 to 20 mM, whereas [Na+] and [Cl-] were maintained at 87 and 86 mM, and data points were fit by the Michaelis-Menten equation. In panel E, Km(Rb+)s shown were obtained by a fit of the averaged data. *, significantly different statistically (p < 0.05) compared with high affinity carriers (black bars) based on Km values obtained by averaging Kms from individual experiments.

 
Kinetics of Cl- Transport—Fig. 5 presents results for the Cl- dependence of 86Rb+ influx and Km values derived from the activity versus [ion] relationships. Similar to the observed differences in cation affinities, the wild type carriers exhibit marked differences in Cl- affinity. As shown in panels A and B, by way of illustration, Km(Cl-) is 6.9 mM for saA and 69.1 mM for saF.2 Here, on the other hand, the affinity for cotransported anions also differs substantially between the chimeras. Indeed, Km(Cl-) for saF/A is 8.6 mM (panel C), comparable to that for saA, and Km(Cl-) for saA/F is 70.0 mM (panel D), comparable to that for saF. These results suggest that cs1a plays a key role in Cl- transport but that tm2, on the other hand, does not mediate appreciable differences in Cl- affinity. Results presented in Fig. 5 also point to the possibility that cs1a contains residues that constitute part of a high affinity Cl--binding site.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5.
Dependence of 86Rb+ influx on [Cl-] for saA, saF, saA/F, or saF/A. Within each experiment, averaged fluxes among 1–9 oocytes were normalized to the value measured at the highest [ion] as for Na+ and Rb+. The data in each panel are shown as an average of these normalized fluxes among of 2 to 5 experiments. In panel A–D, [Cl-] was varied from 0 to 86 mM, whereas [Na+] and [Rb+] were maintained at 87 and 5 mM, and data points were fit by the Michaelis-Menten equation (panels A, C, and D) or the Hill equation with n = 2(panel B). In panel E, Km(Cl-)s shown were obtained by a fit of the averaged data. *, significantly different statistically (p < 0.05) compared with high affinity carriers (black bars) based on Km values obtained by averaging Kms from individual experiments.

 

In a recent publication (25), we have observed a non sigmoidal relationship between the activity of certain variants and [Cl-]. For saA, e.g. this relationship was better fit with a model of Cl- binding at a single site, whereas for saF, it was better fit with a model of Cl- binding at 2 sites. In Fig. 5 (panels A and B), Hill coefficients for the wild type carriers are also seen to be different, consistent with previously reported behaviors. Quite interestingly, in addition, Fig. 5 shows that the 2 chimeras are not reciprocal in regard to this behavior. In fact, Hill coefficients for both saA/F and saF/A are exactly the same, that is, they are closer to 1. These results suggest that tm2 is also involved in Cl- transport to some extent, e.g. it could constitute part of a low affinity Cl--binding site.

Kinetics of Bumetanide Inhibition—Earlier studies have shown that bumetanide inhibits the Na+-K+-Cl- cotransporter by interacting with the protein at a site that is presumably extracellular (35, 36). More recent studies have also revealed that residues near tm2 or within tm2 are partly involved in inhibitor binding (31, 33). To determine whether cs1a plays a role in this regard as well, we measured bumetanide inhibition of 86Rb+ influx in oocytes expressing the wild type or mutant saNKCC2s prepared in this study.

Looking first at the results for the wild type saNKCC2s (Fig. 6, panels A, B, and E), we observe a small albeit significant 3-fold difference in bumetanide affinity between the variants. Here, Ki(bumetanide) is 0.26 µM for saA and 0.83 µM for saF. This difference is relatively similar to that reported by another group (33) and confirms the presumed importance of the tm2-cs1a region in bumetanide binding.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 6.
Inhibition of 86Rb+ influx by bumetanide for saA, saF, saA/F, or saF/A. Within each experiment, averaged fluxes among 1–8 oocytes were normalized to the value measured at lowest [bumetanide]. The data in each panel are shown as an average of these normalized fluxes among of 3 to 5 experiments. In these studies, [bumetanide] was varied from 0 to 2 µM whereas [Na+], [Rb+], and [Cl-] were maintained at 87, 5, and 86 mM; here bumetanide was also added during the last 15 min of the preincubation period at the same concentration as during incubation with 86Rb+. In panels A–D, the data points were all fit by the Michaelis-Menten equation, and in panel E, Ki(Bu)s shown were obtained by a fit of the averaged data. *, significantly different statistically (p < 0.05) compared with high affinity carriers (black bars) based on Km values obtained by averaging Kis from individual experiments. Bu, bumetanide.

 
Looking next at the chimeras, it is seen that Ki(bumetanide) are also different. As illustrated in Fig. 6, the affinity constant is 0.39 µM for saA/F (panel C), thus closer to that for saA (panel A), whereas it is 1.46 µM for saF/A (panel D), thus closer to that for saF (panel B). Taken together, the findings reported in Fig. 6 indicate that variant residues specific to tm2 are responsible for the differences in bumetanide affinity observed between the wild type NKCC2 carriers, whereas variant residues specific to cs1a play little if any role.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
In this study, we have examined the role of tm2 and cs1a in ion transport and bumetanide binding by NKCC2 splice variants. Functional analyses of chimeric saNKCC2s in which tm2 or cs1a were interchanged between the A and the F variants have demonstrated that differences in cation and anion affinities are mediated by variant residues present in both domains, whereas the difference in bumetanide affinity is mediated by variants residues present in tm2 only. Intriguingly, the way in which these domains affect cation transport differs from that in which they affect anion transport (see below).

Because the affinity for one ion during the transport of 1Na+-1K+-2Cl- is, as mentioned earlier, affected by the affinity for other ions (11, 12, 19–23), it may be difficult in this work to interpret functional changes resulting from residue substitutions. However, previous analyses (12, 19, 22) have demonstrated that the interdependence of kinetic constants could be predicted within the scheme of ordered substrate-carrier interactions characteristic of the NKCCs (11, 12, 19–23). For the secretory isoform, in particular, it was shown that at high [Na+] or [Rb+], changes in either Na+ or Rb+ affinity have small effects on Km(Cl-), whereas at high [Cl-], a change in Cl- affinity has a larger effect on Km(Na+) and Km(Rb+) (22). Considering that the mode of operation of NKCC2 is analogous to that of NKCC1, the pattern of interdependence among kinetic parameters is probably similar for both isoforms.

Looking at changes in Cl- affinity in the context of the codependence profiles described in this work, it is noteworthy that substitutions in either of tm2 or cs1a led to reciprocal changes in Kms. In these studies, for example, Km(Cl-) for saA/F was identical to that for saF, whereas Km(Cl-) for saF/A was identical to that for saA. These results indicate that most of the difference in Cl- affinity between the A and F forms are conveyed by variant residues in cs1a and, therefore, that this domain is probably very important in determining the true affinity for Cl-.

Although saF and saA/F were shown to exhibit similar Km(Cl-)s, they still differed in some interesting aspects of Cl- transport. For example, the dependence of saF on [Cl-] was better fit with the Hill equation using a coefficient >1, whereas that of saA/F was better fit with the Michaelis-Menten equation (similar to saA and saF/A). These results suggest that tm2-specific residues also are also important in determining true Cl- affinity but to a lesser extent than cs1a residues. Assuming a simple model in which tm2 and cs1a are each part of a distinct ion-binding site, an increase in Hill coefficient would signify that the exchange of one domain led to an increase in the affinity difference between the 2 sites (n ~1) or a decrease in this difference (n ~2). Based on the differential importance of tm2 and cs1 in determination of Cl- affinity, one might then postulate that tm2 residues constitute part of a low affinity Cl--binding site and cs1a residues, part of a high affinity Cl--binding site (23).

It is important to recognize that the Hill coefficient is a lower limit for the number of specific ions that are included in the transport process (25). Accordingly, it is possible that the transport cycle for saA, saA/F, and saF/A does not involve 2 Cl- ions and 2 binding sites of fairly dissimilar affinities but that it involves only one Cl- ion and 1 binding site. Additional experiments examining the electrogenecity of transport will be necessary to determine whether the stoichiometry for certain NKCC2 is actually 1Na+-1K+-1Cl-.

In regard to the kinetics of cation transport, the pattern of changes due to residue substitutions was unlike that observed for Cl-. Indeed, exchanging either of tm2 or cs1a between the carriers led to Kms that were identical to those displayed by saA. These results suggest that differences in Km(Na+) and Km(Rb+) are mediated by variant residues present not only in tm2 but present in cs1a as well. Based once more on the expected changes in Kms stemming from the ion-dependence of ion binding by NKCC1, and based on the importance of cs1a in determining Cl- affinity, it is possible that residue substitutions in cs1a led to changes in the affinity for cations largely through changes in Cl- affinity.

In the current work, a large fraction of 86Rb+ influx through saA and saF/A was seen to be Nao-independent. This behavior for the A variant has already been reported in the past (24, 26) and is not due to contamination of the flux medium by Na+ (based on various measurements and on the experimental design used for the assays). Hence, we consider 2 explanations for this Nao-independent component (1). Could Rb+/K+ occupy the Na+ site under some conditions, e.g. when [Rb+/K+] is very high? At present, there is no direct evidence for or against this hypothesis. However, a sigmoidal dependence of 86Rb+ influx on [Rb+/K+] has not been described for this system to date (2). Could some of the NKCC2s exhibit substantial Rb+/K+(Rb+)? Here, interestingly, differences in the Nao-independent component were conveyed by variant residues in cs1a, a domain that also encodes strongly polarized behaviors in regard to Cl- transport kinetic. Hence, it is possible that the properties of the Cl--binding sites, perhaps of the one that is occupied last in the series Na+-Cl--K+-Cl-, determine to a large extent the degree at which NKCC2s behave as K+/K+ exchangers.

It has generally been assumed that bumetanide and Cl- bind to the same site on NKCC (33, 35–37). However, recent kinetic analyses using saNKCC1-huNKCC1 chimeras have provided evidence against this hypothesis by showing that regions involved in inhibitor binding are different from those determining Cl- affinity (12, 22, 31). In this work, we have also demonstrated a similar distinction between such regions; by way of illustration, the chimera with a higher bumetanide affinity (saA/F) had lower Cl- affinity, and the chimera with a lower bumetanide affinity (saF/A), a higher Cl- affinity. These results suggest further that the bumetanide-binding site is not the same as the Cl--binding site. They indicate, nonetheless, that tm2 does contribute to bumetanide binding in a, as yet unidentified manner.

The characterization of mutant NKCC2s allows us to extend structure-function studies of the tm2-cs1a region begun previously (12, 22, 31). As illustrated in Fig. 7, the chimeras induce 9 substitutions in tm2 (Pn 1–5, 7, 9, 12, and 13, relative to the beginning of this domain) and 5 substitutions in cs1a (Pn 15, 16, 18, 22, and 26). Based on the behavior of saNKCC1-huNKCC1 chimeras reported earlier, one might predict that tm2- or cs1a-specific residues differing between saNKCC1 and huNKCC1 as well as between high affinity and low affinity NKCCs would be those that are important in determining cation affinities, whereas tm2- or cs1a-specific residues differing only between high affinity and low affinity NKCC2s would be those that are important in determining anion affinity.



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 7.
Alignments of the tm2-cs1a regions of 9 NKCCs. On the left side, each number in a black circle symbolizes an amino acid. Here, number 1 is attributed to the first residue of the tm2 {alpha}-helix according to the proposed model of NKCC1 and 2 (1, 3, 25, 26). The positions of residues relative to the hydrophobic face of the helix (represented by the gray area) are based on a helical wheel model of tm2 drawn with 100° angles. Gray letters, residues that are predicted to be in contact with the lipid bilayer; black letters, residues that are predicted to be on the hydrophilic face of the wheel or in the cytosol; boxed letters, residues that are different between saA and saF; and arrows, residues that might constitute part of a high affinity Cl--binding site.

 
In regard to cations, the only residue fitting the evoked criteria is at Pn 22; for instance, it is a T in saNKCC1 and an A in huNKCC1, and it is an A, S, or E in high affinity carriers andaCorTinlow affinity NKCCs. Hence, the current analysis does not allow the identification of individual residues that might be important in determining affinity. In regard to anions on the other hand, several residues (9, 13, 16, 18, and 26) fit the criteria; here, residue at Pn 15 is excluded because it is conserved between high and low affinity carriers and residue at Pn 22 is also excluded because it differs between saNKCC1 and huNKCC1. Based on kinetic measurements reported in this study and on the site of the chimeric junction point (between residues 14 and 15), we propose that residue(s) 9 and/or 13 modulate Cl- affinity at one site and that residue(s) 16 and/or 18 and/or 26 modulate Cl- affinity at another site.

Groups of residues within the Na+-K+-Cl- cotransporter probably operate in concert to bring about ion binding. In such a case, given combinations of residues rather than individual residues could be a more important determinants of affinity. In the outer region of tm2, by way of illustration, residues at Pn 1, 4, 7, and 8 are predicted to be in close proximity to one another on the most hydrophilic face of a helical wheel model (Fig. 7) and these are combined differently among carriers. Hence, the chimera approach exploited here was probably informative in permitting to assess the role of intact residue groups. For the same reasons, pursuing with this approach in the future, e.g. by exchanging domains at different junction points, may be a more advantageous avenue than single point substitutions to infer the role of individual residues.

In conclusion, we have shown for the first time that an intracellular loop within the Na+-K+-Cl- cotransporter is involved in ion transport and more specifically, that it probably modulates the true affinity for Cl-. We propose that this domain forms part of a high affinity Cl--binding site within the Na+-K+-Cl--binding pocket. On a structural level, such a role for cs1 may indicate that NKCCs possess a pore region that is analogous to that of voltage-sensitive cation channels (38–40).


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institute of Health and Research (MT-15405) and the Kidney Foundation of Canada. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger} A Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ) scholar. Back

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec Research Center, 10 Rue McMahon (Rm. 3852), Québec G1R 2J6, Canada. Tel.: 418-691-5151 (ext. 15477); Fax: 418-691-5787; E-mail: paul.isenring{at}crhdq.ulaval.ca.

1 The abbreviations used are: NKCC, Na+-K+-Cl- cotransporter; CCC, cation-Cl- cotransporter; cs, connecting segment; hu, human; pBS, vector pBluescript; Pn, position; sa, Squalus acanthias; saA, S. acanthias NKCC2A; saA/F, chimera of the saNKCC2A (tm2) and saNKCC2F (cs1a); saF, S. acanthias NKCC2F; saF/A, chimera of the saNKCC2F (tm2) and saNKCC2A (cs1a); tm, transmembrane domain. Back

2 It should be noted that we have reported a Km(Cl-) for saA in Ref. 25 that is higher than that measured in the current work (38 versus 7mM). Hence, the difference between the A and F variants in regard to Cl- affinity may be more important than initially assumed. Although we do not have a firm explanation for this discrepancy, it is reasonable to assume that Km(Cl-) for saA is in fact probably closer to 10 mM based on the behavior of the rabbit NKCC2A and rat NKCC2A (32, 33). In addition, it should be noted that Km(Cl-)s reported in Ref. 25 were obtained by averaging Km values of individual experiments; when the Km(Cl-) for saA in this previous study was obtained by fitting the averaged activity versus [ion] data points from all experiments, Km(Cl-) was actually ~2-fold lower (16 instead of 38 mM). Back


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Valérie Montminy, Luc Caron, and Michael G. Baril.



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Xu, J. C., Lytle, C., Zhu, T. T., Payne, J. A., Benz, E., and Forbush, B. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2201-2205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Delpire, E., Rauchman, M. I., Beier, D. R., Hebert, S. C., and Gullans, S. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25677-25683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Payne, J. A., and Forbush, B. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 4544-4548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Gamba, G., Miyanoshita, A., Lombardi, M., Lytton, J., Lee, W. S., Hediger, M. A., and Hebert, S. C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 17713-17722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gillen, C. M., Brill, S., Payne, J. A., and Forbush, B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16237-16244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hiki, K., D'Andrea, R. J., Furze, J., Crawford, J., Woollatt, E., Sutherland, G. R., Vadas, M A., and Gamble, J. R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 10661-10667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Race, J. E., Makhlouf, F. N., Logue, P. J., Wilson, F. H., Dunham, P. B., and Holtzman, E. J. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 277, C1210-1219
  8. Mount, D. B., Mercado, A., Song, L., Xu, J., George, A. L., Delpire, E., and Gamba, G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 16355-16362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Gamba, G., Saltzberg, S. N., Lombardi, M., Miyanoshita, A., Lytton, J., Hediger, M. A., Brenner, B. M., and Hebert, S. C. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 2749-2753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Caron, L., Rousseau, F., Gagnon, E., and Isenring, P. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 32027-32036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Russell, J. M. (2000) Physiol. Rev. 80, 211-276[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Isenring, P., and Forbush, B. (2001) Comp Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 130, 487-497[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Mount, D. B., Delpire, E., Gamba, G., Hall, A. E., Poch, E., Hoover, R. S., and Hebert, S. C. (1998) J. Exp. Biol. 201, 2091-2102[Abstract]
  14. Haas, M., and Forbush, B. (2000) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 62, 515-534[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Lytle, C., Xu, J. C., Biemesderfer, D., and Forbush, B. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, C1496-1505
  16. Igarashi, P., Vanden Heuvel, G. B., Payne, J. A., and Forbush, B. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, F405-418
  17. Yang, T., Huang, Y. G., Singh, I., Schnermann, J., and Briggs, J. P. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 271, F931-939
  18. Kaplan, M. R., Plotkin, M. D., Lee, W. S., Xu, Z. C., Lytton, J., and Hebert, S. C. (1996) Kidney Int. 49, 40-47[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Lytle, C., McManus, T. J., and Haas, M. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, C299-309
  20. Benjamin, B. A., and Johnson, E. A. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, F473-482
  21. Miyamoto, H., Ikehara, T., Yamaguchi, H., Hosokawa, K., Yonezu, T., and Masuya, T. (1986) J. Membr. Biol. 92, 135-150[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Isenring, P., Jacoby, S. C., Chang, J., and Forbush, B. (1998) J. Gen. Physiol. 112, 549-558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Brown, C. D. A., and Murer, H. (1985) J. Membr. Biol. 87, 131-139[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Isenring, P., Jacoby, S. C., Payne, J. A., and Forbush, B. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 11295-11301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Gagnon, E., Forbush, B., Caron, L., and Isenring, P. (2003) Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol 284, C365-370[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Gagnon, E., Forbush, B., Flemmer, A. W., Gimenez, I., Caron, L., and Isenring, P. (2002) Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 283, F1046-1055[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Isenring, P., and Forbush, B. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24556-24562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Forbush, B., Payne, J. A., Xu, J. C., Biemesderfer, D., and Isenring, P. (1995) Abstr. Int. Soc. Nephrol., American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD
  29. Darman, R. B., and Forbush, B. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 37542-37550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Gerelsaikhan, T., and Turner, R. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 40471-40477[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Isenring, P., Jacoby, S. C., and Forbush, B. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 7179-7184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Gimenez, I., Isenring, P., and Forbush, B. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 8767-8770[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Plata, C., Meade, P., Vazquez, N., Hebert, S. C., and Gamba, G. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 11004-11012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Bergeron, M. J., Gagnon, E., Wallendorff, B., Lapointe, J. Y., and Isenring, P. (2003) Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 285, F68-78[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Forbush, B., and Palfrey, H. C. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 11787-11792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Moore, M. L., George, J. N., and Turner, R. J. (1995) Biochem. J. 309 (Pt 2), 637-642
  37. Haas, M., and Forbush, B. (1987) Kidney Int. Suppl. 23, S134-S143[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Labro, A. J., Raes, A. L., Bellens, I., Ottschytsch, N., and Snyders, D. J. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 50724-50731[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Doyle, D. A., Morais Cabral, J., Pfuetzner, R. A., Kuo, A., Gulbis, J. M., Cohen, S. L., Chait, B. T., and MacKinnon, R. (1998) Science 280, 69-77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Jiang, Y., Ruta, V., Chen, J., Lee, A., and MacKinnon, R. (2003) Nature 423, 42-48[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
H. Castrop and J. Schnermann
Isoforms of renal Na-K-2Cl cotransporter NKCC2: expression and functional significance
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): F859 - F866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. F. Simard, M. J. Bergeron, R. Frenette-Cotton, G. A. Carpentier, M.-E. Pelchat, L. Caron, and P. Isenring
Homooligomeric and Heterooligomeric Associations between K+-Cl- Cotransporter Isoforms and between K+-Cl- and Na+-K+-Cl- Cotransporters
J. Biol. Chem., June 22, 2007; 282(25): 18083 - 18093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Gimenez and B. Forbush
The Residues Determining Differences in Ion Affinities among the Alternative Splice Variants F, A, and B of the Mammalian Renal Na-K-Cl Cotransporter (NKCC2)
J. Biol. Chem., March 2, 2007; 282(9): 6540 - 6547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. Oppermann, D. Mizel, S. M. Kim, L. Chen, R. Faulhaber-Walter, Y. Huang, C. Li, C. Deng, J. Briggs, J. Schnermann, et al.
Renal Function in Mice with Targeted Disruption of the A Isoform of the Na-K-2Cl Co-Transporter
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 440 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. Oppermann, D. Mizel, G. Huang, C. Li, C. Deng, F. Theilig, S. Bachmann, J. Briggs, J. Schnermann, and H. Castrop
Macula Densa Control of Renin Secretion and Preglomerular Resistance in Mice with Selective Deletion of the B Isoform of the Na,K,2Cl Co-Transporter
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2006; 17(8): 2143 - 2152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. J. Bergeron, E. Gagnon, L. Caron, and P. Isenring
Identification of Key Functional Domains in the C Terminus of the K+-Cl- Cotransporters
J. Biol. Chem., June 9, 2006; 281(23): 15959 - 15969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Gagnon, M. J. Bergeron, N. D. Daigle, M.-H. Lefoll, and P. Isenring
Molecular Mechanisms of Cation Transport by the Renal Na+-K+-Cl- Cotransporter: STRUCTURAL INSIGHT INTO THE OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ION TRANSPORT SITES
J. Biol. Chem., September 16, 2005; 280(37): 32555 - 32563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/7/5648    most recent
M311218200v4
M311218200v3
M311218200v2
M311218200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gagnon, E.
Right arrow Articles by Isenring, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gagnon, E.
Right arrow Articles by Isenring, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement