JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M309929200 on November 20, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 7, 6056-6064, February 13, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/7/6056    most recent
M309929200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyurina, Y. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kagan, V. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tyurina, Y. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kagan, V. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Lipid Antioxidant, Etoposide, Inhibits Phosphatidylserine Externalization and Macrophage Clearance of Apoptotic Cells by Preventing Phosphatidylserine Oxidation*

Yulia Y. Tyurina{ddagger}, F. Behice Serinkan{ddagger}, Vladimir A. Tyurin{ddagger}, Vidisha Kini{ddagger}, Jack C. Yalowich§, Alan J. Schroit¶, Bengt Fadeel||, and Valerian E. Kagan{ddagger}§**{ddagger}{ddagger}

From the Departments of {ddagger}Environmental and Occupational Health and §Pharmacology, **Cancer Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, Department of Cancer Biology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, and ||Division of Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden

Received for publication, September 8, 2003 , and in revised form, November 13, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Apoptosis is associated with the externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS) in the plasma membrane and subsequent recognition of PS by specific macrophage receptors. Selective oxidation of PS precedes its externalization/recognition and is essential for the PS-dependent engulfment of apoptotic cells. Because etoposide is a potent and selective lipid antioxidant that does not block thiol oxidation, we hypothesized that it may affect PS externalization/recognition without affecting other features of the apoptotic program. We demonstrate herein that etoposide induced apoptosis in HL-60 cells without the concomitant peroxidation of PS and other phospholipids. HL-60 cells also failed to externalize PS in response to etoposide treatment. In contrast, oxidant (H2O2)-induced apoptosis was accompanied by PS externalization and oxidation of different phospholipids, including PS. Etoposide potentiated H2O2-induced apoptosis but completely blocked H2O2-induced PS oxidation. Etoposide also inhibited PS externalization as well as phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by J774A.1 macrophages. Integration of exogenous PS or a mixture of PS with oxidized PS in etoposide-treated HL-60 cells reconstituted the recognition of these cells by macrophages. The current data demonstrate that lipid antioxidants, capable of preventing PS peroxidation, can block PS externalization and phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by macrophages and hence dissociate PS-dependent signaling from the final common pathway for apoptosis.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A common feature of the apoptotic program is phospholipid signaling aimed at the generation of "eat me" signals on the surface of the apoptotic cell that make it recognizable by phagocytes (1). This apoptotic signaling is mediated through the loss of plasma membrane phospholipid asymmetry and the concomitant externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS)1 (2). PS-dependent signaling is coupled to the final common pathway of apoptosis, i.e. the caspase-driven dismantling of the cell, thus allowing for effective phagocytosis and clearance of cell corpses. The importance of phagocytosis of apoptotic cells for prevention of spillage of cellular contents and resultant tissue disruption and inflammation has been emphasized in numerous studies in recent years (3, 4); however, the specific mechanisms that govern PS externalization and recognition during apoptosis remain to be elucidated.

We have recently shown that PS externalization during apoptosis is preceded by its selective oxidation, likely catalyzed by cytochrome c released from mitochondria (5, 6). We have also demonstrated that oxidized PS (PS-OX) may serve as an "eat me" signal for macrophage receptor(s), thus facilitating recognition and PS-dependent engulfment of apoptotic cells. (7, 8) Based on these observations, we hypothesized that PS oxidation acts as an essential component of the signaling pathway that is required for PS externalization and the safe clearance of apoptotic cells by macrophages (5, 8, 9, 10). Our hypothesis predicts that lipid antioxidants capable of blocking PS oxidation will inhibit PS externalization and/or recognition of apoptotic cells by phagocytes. An important feature of such a lipid antioxidant, however, is that it should block phospholipid oxidation without affecting other redox-sensitive mechanisms.

Our previous work has established that a phenolic antitumor drug, etoposide (a topoisomerase II inhibitor), acts as a powerful lipid antioxidant but does not protect thiols against oxidation because of a relatively high reactivity of etoposide phenoxyl radicals toward SH-groups (11). Etoposide has been reported to cause DNA damage and induce apoptosis accompanied by ROS generation (12, 13). It is conceivable that the fastidious lipid antioxidant traits of etoposide may dissociate PS-dependent signaling pathways of apoptosis from the final common pathway for apoptosis by inhibiting PS oxidation. However, etoposide effects on phospholipid peroxidation, as they relate to PS-dependent signaling pathways of apoptosis, have not been documented to date.

In the present study, we used etoposide as a tool to dissect the mechanism of PS signaling during apoptosis. We found that etoposide fails to trigger PS oxidation and externalization in HL-60 cells. Moreover, etoposide was able to block oxidation of all major phospholipids, including PS, during oxidant (H2O2)-induced apoptosis in these cells. The blockade of phospholipid oxidation correlated with the etoposide-dependent inhibition of PS externalization and phagocytosis of apoptotic HL-60 cells by J774A.1 macrophages. The etoposide-mediated dissociation of PS signaling during apoptosis could be overcome by the integration into HL-60 cells of exogenous PS, and even more so upon integration of PS-OX, thus emphasizing the essential role of PS oxidation in the clearance of apoptotic cells. These results demonstrate that etoposide can modulate PS-dependent externalization and recognition of apoptotic cells by macrophages by means of regulation of PS oxidation.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chemicals—cis-Parinaric acid (cis-PnA) and 2-methyl-6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3,7-dihydroimidazol[1,2-a]pyrazin-3-one hydrochloride (MCLA) were obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). HPLC grade solvents, fluorescamine, N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), fetal bovine serum, glutathione, Hoechst 33342, human serum albumin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and superoxide dismutase were purchased from Sigma. RPMI 1640 medium, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), penicillin, streptomycin, and gentamycin were purchased from Invitrogen. ThioGloTM 1 was obtained from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). NBD-phosphatidylserine (NBD-PS), 1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-[phospho-L-serine], NBD-phosphatidylcholine (NBD-PC), 1-palmitoyl-2 arachidonoyl-sn-glysero-3-phosphocholine were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc. (Alabaster, AL).

Cell Culture—HL-60 human promyelocytic leukemia cells (American Type Culture Collection) were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 12.5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere (5% CO2 plus 95% air) at 37 °C. Cells from passages 25-40 were used for the experiments. The density of cells at collection time was 0.5 x 106 cells/ml. HL-60 cells were incubated in the presence of etoposide (10 µM or 50 µM) and/or H2O2 in fetal bovine serum-free RPMI 1640 medium without phenol red for 2 h at 37 °C. H2O2 (25 µM) was added four times (every 30 min of incubation). In the case of combination of etoposide with H2O2, etoposide was added 15 min before the addition of H2O2. Macrophages J774A.1 (from the American Type Culture Collection) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 50 µg/ml gentamycin sulfate in a humidified atmosphere (5% CO2 plus 95% air) at 37 °C.

Apoptotic Nuclear Morphology—HL-60 cells were incubated in the presence of etoposide and/or H2O2 for 2 h at 37 °C. At the end of the incubation, cells were washed and re-suspended in PBS. Hoechst 33342 (2 µg/ml) was added, and cells were examined under fluorescent microscopy. Results are expressed as the percentage of the cells showing characteristic nuclear morphological features of apoptosis (nuclear condensation and fragmentation) relative to the total number of counted cells (>200 cells).

Caspase-3 Activity—The activity of caspase-3 was determined by using a commercially available kit (Molecular Probes). At specified time intervals, aliquots of etoposide- and/or H2O2-stimulated HL-60 cell suspensions were taken, cells were washed twice with PBS and lysed for 30 min in lysis buffer (Molecular Probes). The suspensions were centrifuged at 4 °C, and supernatants were collected as lysates. For measurement of caspase activity, 50 µl of lysates were combined with 50 µl of reaction buffer, containing 20 mM PIPES, 4 mM EDTA, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2% CHAPS, 0.2 mM Asp-Glu-Val-Asp 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (DEVD-AMC, a fluorogenic peptide substrate), pH 7.4, and incubated for 30 min at 25 °C. After incubation, fluorescence was measured in a Packard FusionTM Multifunctional plate reader (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) using excitation at 365 ± 50 nm and emission at 465 ± 35 nm. The protein concentration in cell lysates was measured using the Bio-Rad assay.

MCLA-enhanced Chemiluminescence—HL-60 cells (2 x 106 cells/ml) were pre-warmed in PBS containing 0.5 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 30 mM glucose for 5 min at 37 °C. After that, etoposide (50 µM) was added, and cells were monitored for 30 min at 37 °C using Luminescence Analyzer 633 (Coral Biomedical Inc., San Diego, CA) set at continuous mixing in the presence of 4 µM MCLA. Assays were performed in the absence and in the presence of superoxide dismutase (50 units/ml) added 5 min prior to the addition of etoposide. The total amount of O2 produced was estimated as the area under the curve (mV x s) upon etoposide stimulation and after subtracting values obtained in the presence of superoxide dismutase. Data were collected and analyzed with the Multiuse PC software version 2.0.2 for Luminoskan 1251 Carousel (Labsystems).

Assay of GSH—GSH content in the cells was determined fluorometrically using ThioGloTM 1 as previously described (14). Briefly, cells treated with etoposide and/or H2O2 for 2 h at 37 °C were collected by centrifugation, washed, and re-suspended in PBS. GSH was measured in cell lysates prepared by freezing and thawing cells. Immediately after the addition of ThioGloTM 1 to the cell lysates, fluorescence was measured in a Packard FusionTM Multifunctional plate reader (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) using excitation of 390 ± 15 nm and emission of 515 ± 30 nm.

Annexin V Staining of Externalized PS—PS exposure was determined by flow cytometric detection of annexin V staining using a protocol outlined in the annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit (BioVision Research Products, Mountain View, CA). Briefly, HL-60 cells (0.5 x 106) exposed to etoposide and/or H2O2, washed once with PBS and re-suspended in binding buffer were stained with annexin V (0.5 µg/ml) and propidium iodide (0.6 µg/ml) for 5 min at room temperature. After staining, cells were immediately analyzed using a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) with simultaneous monitoring of green fluorescence (530 nm, 30 nm band-pass filter) for annexin V-FITC and red fluorescence (long-pass emission filter that transmits light >650 nm) associated with propidium iodide. 10,000 events were collected and analyzed using the LYSISTM II software (BD Biosciences).

Derivatization of Externalized PS with Fluorescamine—Labeling of externalized PS with fluorescamine (a probe that reacts with lipids containing primary amino groups) was performed as described previously (8). Briefly, HL-60 cells (3 x 107) exposed to etoposide and/or H2O2 were suspended in labeling buffer (150 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, 5 mM NaHCO3, 5 mM glucose, and 20 mM HEPES, pH 8.0). Cells were gently agitated in the presence of fluorescamine (200 µM) for 30 s. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4. Cells were collected by centrifugation and lipids were extracted by the Folch procedure (15). Lipids were analyzed by two-dimensional HPTLC using a solvent system of chloroform:methanol:28% ammonium hydroxide (65:25:5, v/v/v) in the first direction and chloroform:acetone:methanol:glacial acetic acid:water (50:20:10:10:5, v/v/v/v/v) in the second. Fluorescamine-modified PS was localized by exposure of HPTLC plates to UV light by using a Fluor-STM MultiImager (Bio-Rad). Unmodified phospholipids were visualized under visible light in a Fluor-STM MultiImager (Bio-Rad) after exposure of HPTLC plates to iodine vapor. The phosphorus content of phospholipids was determined according to Bottcher et al. (16) after scraping representative spots from the plate. The amount of modified PS is expressed as percentages of total PS (unmodified plus modified) recovered from the plate on the basis of phosphorus content assay.

Assay of Phospholipid Peroxidation—cis-PnA was incorporated into HL-60 cells as described previously (17). Briefly, HL-60 cells were incubated in serum-free RPMI medium 1640 without phenol red in the presence of cis-PnA (1 µg cis-PnA/106 cells) for 2 h at 37 °C. At the end of incubation, cells were washed with PBS containing human serum albumin (fatty acid-free, 0.5 mg/ml) to remove an excess of unbound cis-PnA. cis-PnA-labeled cells were treated with etoposide (10 or 50 µM) in the presence or in the absence of H2O2 for 2-6 h at 37 °C in 25 mM HEPES buffer containing 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, 8 mM Na2HPO4, 10 mM glucose, pH 7.4. H2O2 (25 µM) was added every 30 min during the initial 2 h of incubation. At the end of the incubation, lipids were extracted by the Folch procedure (15). The lipid extracts were separated by normal-phase HPLC using a 5-µm microsorb MV column (4.6 x 250 mm; Rainin Instrument Co. Inc.) as described previously (17). The separations were performed by using a Shimadzu LC-600 high-performance liquid chromatography system with an in-line configuration of RF 10 AXL fluorescence detector. Fluorescence of cis-PnA was measured at 420 nm emission after excitation at 324 nm. Data were processed and stored in digital form with Shimadzu EZChrom software. Lipid phosphorus was determined by a micro-method (18).

Assay of Aminophospholipid Translocase Activity—Aminophospholipid translocase (APT) activity was measured using modifications of the methods of McIntyre and Sleight (19) and Williamson and et al. (20). HL-60 cells (4 x 106) treated with etoposide (50 µM, 2 h at 37 °C) in the presence or absence of H2O2 were centrifuged (400 x g, 10 min) and washed once in incubation buffer (136 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5). Cell pellets were re-suspended in incubation buffer (5 x 106 cells/ml) containing 500 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, transferred to a microfuge tube, and placed in ice-water for 10 min. NBD-labeled PS (ethanol solution) was added to cells (final concentration, 10 µM) and incubated for 10 min at 4 °C. Labeled cells were centrifuged and re-suspended at the same density in incubation buffer with phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Cell suspensions were placed in a 28 °C water bath to initiate internalization, and 75-µl aliquots of cell suspension were removed at various time intervals (1-20 min) and placed into 2.5 ml of incubation buffer including the reducing agent and 10 mM sodium dithionite. Fluorescence (excitation = 470 nm, emission = 540 nM) was then recorded (within 30-60 s). Samples from the last time point were also placed in incubation buffer without dithionite to obtain total fluorescence intensity (FLtotal). Internalized fluorescence at various times (FLt) was normalized as a percent of the total fluorescence by the following equation: % internalized = (FLt - FL0)/(FLtotal - FL0) x 100. To inhibit APT activity, HL-60 cells were incubated in the presence of NEM (10 µM) for 10 min at 37 °C. At the end of incubation, cells were washed twice with PBS, and APT activity was determined as described above.

Phagocytosis of HL-60 Cells by J774A.1 Macrophages—J774A.1 macrophages were seeded into an eight-well chamber slide (5 x 104 cells/well) and cultured overnight in DMEM medium. Before adding target (control or etoposide and/or H2O2-treated HL-60) cells, stimulated cells were washed with serum-free RPMI medium 1640 without phenol red and fluorescently labeled with Cell TrackerTM Orange (5 µg/ml, 10 min at 37 °C) and subsequently washed again (three times) with PBS. Fluorescently labeled cells (5 x 105 cells/well) were co-cultured with macrophages for 1 h at 37 °C. After incubation, unbound target cells were washed three times with RPMI medium 1640 and three times with PBS; well contents were fixed with a solution of 2% formaldehyde in PBS containing Hoechst 33342 (1 µg/ml) for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were examined under a Nikon ECLIPSE TE 200 fluorescence microscope (Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a digital Hamamatsu charge-coupled device camera (C4742-95-12NBR) and analyzed using the MetaImaging SeriesTM software version 4.6 (Universal Imaging Corp., Downingtown, PA). Macrophages that had a side-by-side connection with target cells (binding) and/or internalized target cells (engulfment) were considered phagocytosis-positive. A minimum of 300 macrophages were analyzed per experimental condition. Results are expressed as the percentage of the phagocytosis-positive macrophages.

Preparation of PS- and PS-OX-containing Liposomes—PS was oxidized by incubation with a water-soluble azo-initiator of peroxy radicals, 2,2'-azo-bis-(2-amidinopropane) hydrochloride. PS in chloroform was dried under nitrogen and PBS was added to achieve the final concentration of 5 mM. The lipid was incubated with 2,2'-azo-bis-(2-amidinopropane) hydrochloride (50 mM) at 37 °C for 4 h and then extracted with chloroform:methanol (2:1, v/v). Oxidation was assessed by measuring the absorbance of PS hydroperoxides with conjugated dienes at 234 nm. Approximately 30% of PS molecules were estimated to be oxidized after a 4-h incubation, whereas 70% remained non-oxidized; this mixture of PS species is hereafter referred to as oxidized PS (PS-OX). Small unilamellar liposomes containing 50% phosphatidylcholine (PC) and 50% PS (nonoxidized PS or PS-OX) were produced as described by Fadok et al. (21). Individual phospholipids, stored in chloroform, were dried under nitrogen. PBS was added to obtain a phospholipid concentration of 1 mM, and the lipid mixture was vortexed and sonicated for 3 min on ice. All liposomes were used immediately after preparation.

Treatment of HL-60 Cells with Liposomes—Naïve or etoposide-treated (50 µM for 2 h at 37 °C) apoptotic HL-60 cells were incubated with NEM (10 µM, 10 min at 37 °C) to inhibit APT. At the end of the incubation, cells were centrifuged and NEM was washed out. NEM-treated cells were incubated in the presence of PC+PS or PC+PS+PS-OX liposomes (2.5-150 µM) for 30 min at 37 °C. After that, cells were washed with PBS labeled with Cell TrackerTM Orange, and phagocytosis assays were performed as described above.

Statistics—The results are presented as mean ± S.E. values from at least three experiments, and statistical analyses were performed by either paired or unpaired Student's t test or one-way ANOVA. The statistical significance of differences was set at p < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Oxidant- and Non-oxidant-induced Apoptosis in HL-60 Cells—To determine the conditions resulting in triggering of apoptosis in HL-60 cells by etoposide, H2O2, or a combination of etoposide plus H2O2, we studied the appearance of typical nuclear fragmentation as well as caspase-3 activation. Microscopic examination of nuclear morphology showed that, at 50 µM (2 h at 37 °C), etoposide triggered apoptosis in 25.8 ± 6.3% of cells (Fig. 1A). No significant increase in the number of apoptotic cells at this time point was observed when 10 µM of etoposide were employed (data not shown). Under the conditions used, H2O2 (25 µM added every 30 min during incubation for 2 h at 37 °C) effectively induced apoptosis in 30.6 ± 3.5% cells. Notably, a combination of etoposide and H2O2 yielded further enhancement of apoptosis (46.2 ± 9.9% of apoptotic cells after exposure to 50 µM etoposide plus H2O2 (25 µM, four additions over 2 h).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Etoposide and/or H2O2 induce apoptosis in HL-60 cells. Cells were incubated in the presence of etoposide (50 µM) and/or H2O2 (25 µM x 4) for 2 h. Etoposide was added 15 min prior to H2O2 administration. H2O2 was added every 30 min of incubation. At the end of incubation, cells were examined for nuclear morphology (A) and caspase activity (B), as described under "Materials and Methods." Caspase-3 activity is presented as nmol AMC/mg protein/min. {square}, control; {blacksquare}, H2O2 (25 µM x 4); {circ}, etoposide (50 µM); •, etoposide (50 µM) plus H2O2 (25 µM x 4). Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 3-6); *, p < 0.05 versus control.

 
As can be seen from the time course of caspase-3 activation, both etoposide and H2O2 induced pronounced responses (Fig. 1B). Even at a low concentration of 10 µM, etoposide caused a significant activation of caspase-3 at 2 h after the exposure (data not shown). At 50 µM, the effect was detectable as early as 1.5 h after exposure and further increased by 2 h. Similarly, H2O2 caused a marked activation of caspase-3 at both 1.5 and 2 h. The effects of the combination of etoposide plus H2O2 were additive at 1.5 h and saturated at 2 h. Caspase-3 was completely inhibited when a pan-caspase inhibitor, z-VAD-fmk (50 µM), was present in the incubation system during the exposure to etoposide, H2O2, or a combination of etoposide plus H2O2 (data not shown).

Etoposide Treatment of HL-60 Cells Prevents H2O2-induced Oxidation of PS—Execution of the apoptotic program triggered by both oxidant and non-oxidant stimuli may be associated with the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ensuing oxidative stress (22). Therefore, we determined ROS production and oxidative stress in our model. To determine whether apoptosis was accompanied by the production of superoxide, we used a superoxide-specific enhancer of chemiluminescence, MCLA. The results in Fig. 2A show that superoxide production was significantly increased in HL-60 cells exposed to etoposide (50 µM for 2 h at 37 °C) as compared with untreated cells. To assess the degree of oxidative stress, we measured the level of intracellular GSH in HL-60 cells. We found that after etoposide (50 µM) stimulation for 2 h at 37 °C, the GSH content significantly decreased to 63.6 ± 2.0% of its initial level (Fig. 2B). Similarly, H2O2 (25 µM x 4, 2 h) caused a pronounced depletion of GSH. Finally, when HL-60 cells were exposed to a combination of etoposide and H2O2, an even stronger depletion of GSH was evident. This suggests that etoposide is not likely to interfere with thiol-dependent redox signaling pathways of apoptosis.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Production of superoxide and oxidation of glutathione during apoptosis in HL-60 cells. A, superoxide production induced by etoposide in HL-60 cells. MCLA-enhanced chemiluminescence was monitored in the presence of etoposide (50 µM) for 30 min at 37 °C. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 3); *, p < 0.05 versus control. B, effect of etoposide and/or H2O2 on glutathione content in HL-60 cells. Cells were stimulated in the presence of etoposide (50 µM) and/or H2O2 (25 µM x 4) and glutathione was measured 2 h after stimulation using ThioGloTM 1, as described under "Materials and Methods." Data are shown as mean ± S.E. (n = 9); *, p < 0.05 versus control.

 
To establish the extent to which oxidation of phospholipids was associated with the execution of the apoptotic program induced by etoposide, H2O2, and a combination of etoposide plus H2O2, we used a cis-PnA-based technique for quantitative assessment of oxidation of different classes of phospholipids in live cells (17, 23). To this end, cellular phospholipids were metabolically labeled with cis-PnA, an oxidation-sensitive fluorescent fatty acid containing four conjugated double bonds (17). After incubation of cis-PnA-loaded cells with etoposide and/or H2O2, total lipid extracts were prepared and separated by fluorescence HPLC. Typical chromatograms are presented in Fig. 3A. Four peaks corresponding to the major classes of cis-PnA-labeled phospholipids were identified in control HL-60 cells as phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), PS, and PC, respectively (Fig. 3A, a). Treatment of cells with H2O2 (25 µM x 4, 2 h) resulted in a marked oxidation of all major phospholipid classes, including PS, as evidenced by decreased intensities of fluorescence responses (Fig. 3A, b). Etoposide alone at both 10 µM (data not shown) and 50 µM did not cause any significant oxidation of phospholipids. In fact, etoposide exerted an antioxidant effect against H2O2-induced phospholipid peroxidation. Protective effects of etoposide were already apparent at 10 µM (data not shown) and were complete at 50 µM (Fig. 3B). As expected for live cells, phospholipid oxidation involved only a relatively small fraction of total membrane phospholipids such that HPTLC analysis of "gross" phospholipid composition did not reveal any significant alterations after stimulation of apoptosis in HL-60 cells with either H2O2 or etoposide (data not shown).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Effect of etoposide on H2O2-induced peroxidation of cis-PnA-labeled phospholipids in HL-60 cells. cis-PnA-loaded HL-60 cells (1 µg of cis-PnA/106 cells, 2 h at 37 °C) were stimulated with 50 µM etoposide in the presence or absence of H2O2 (25 µM x 4). Phospholipids were then extracted and separated by HPLC, as described under "Materials and Methods." A, typical normal phase HPLC chromatograms obtained from control and H2O2-treated HL-60 cells. PI, phosphatidylinositol; DPG, diphosphatidylglycerol; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine, PS, phosphatidylserine. Upper trace (a), control; lower trace (b), after H2O2-induced oxidation. B, content of cis-PnA-labeled phospholipids in HL-60 cells treated with etoposide and/or H2O2. Control group represents cells without any stimulation. Data are presented as mean ± S.E. (n = 9); *, p < 0.001 versus control; **, p < 0.05 versus H2O2.

 
Etoposide Inhibits H2O2-induced PS Externalization in HL-60 Cells—We were further interested in determining the extent to which inhibition of PS oxidation was associated with changes in its externalization during apoptosis in HL-60 cells. To quantify PS exposure, we used two different assays: (i) flow cytometric analysis of fluorescently labeled annexin V to evaluate the number of cells with externalized PS, and (ii) derivatization of externalized aminophospholipids by a non-permeable reagent for primary amines, fluorescamine, to determine the amounts of PS on the cell surface. Using annexin V-FITC labeling, we found no significant increase in the number of annexin V-positive cells after treatment with etoposide alone at both 10 µM (data not shown) or 50 µM (2 h), as compared with non-treated controls (<2.5% cells with exposed PS on their surface; Fig. 4). Treatment of HL-60 cells with H2O2 (2 h at 37 °C) resulted in a significant increase in the number of cells with externalized PS (up to 14.5%). Most importantly, HL-60 cells treated with H2O2 in the presence of etoposide (50 µM) responded with a significant (although incomplete) decrease of annexin V binding such that only ~7% cells remained annexin V-positive. At 10 µM, etoposide did not significantly reduce the number of H2O2-induced annexin V-positive cells (data not shown). Increasing the treatment time of HL-60 cells with etoposide (50 µM) to 4 and 6 h, however, resulted in a significantly increased number of cells with externalized PS (up to 8.1 ± 1.3 and 11.3 ± 0.4%, respectively) (Fig. 5A). After 4 and 6 h of exposure of HL-60 cells to H2O2, 22.4 ± 2.5 and 30.8 ± 2.4% cells were annexin V-positive. At these later time points, etoposide did not decrease H2O2-induced externalization of PS, although it remained lower than the expected additive sum (30.5 and 42.5% at 4 and 6 h, respectively). Most importantly, the dependence of PS externalization on its oxidation held true for these later time-points as well. In particular, elevated levels of PS externalization were associated with PS oxidation revealed by decreased contents of cis-PnA-PS in HL-60 cells treated with etoposide alone, H2O2 alone, or a combination of H2O2 plus etoposide at both 4 and 6 h. Although etoposide did not protect PS against H2O2-induced oxidation at either 4 or 6h, in both cases the oxidation levels were lower than the expected additive effects of etoposide alone and H2O2 alone. Our incubation conditions (50 µM etoposide and/or H2O2 25 µM x 4) were not associated with any significant accumulation of necrotic (PI-positive/annexin V-positive) cells during 2, 4, or 6 h exposures as compared with their content in control samples (1.5-2.0%).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Flow cytometric detection of PS expression in HL-60 cells treated with etoposide and/or H2O2. HL-60 cells were incubated with etoposide in the absence or presence of H2O2 for 2 h at 37 °C. Control group represents cells without any stimulation. The percentage of propidium iodide-negative, annexin V-positive cells is shown. Data are presented as mean ± S.E. (n = 6); *, p < 0.01 versus control; **, p < 0.05 versus H2O2.

 



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Time course of PS externalization (A) and oxidation of cis-PnA-labeled PS (B) induced by etoposide and/or H2O2 in HL-60 cells. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 6); *, p < 0.05 versus control. {square}, control; {blacksquare}, H2O2 (25 µM x 4); {circ}, etoposide (50 µM); •, etoposide (50 µM) plus H2O2 (25 µM x 4).

 
To quantitate the amounts of externalized PS on cell surfaces, we treated the cells with fluorescamine, a cell-impermeable fluorescent reagent, extracted phospholipids, and resolved these by HPTLC (Fig. 6A). Exposure to iodine vapors revealed all major phospholipid classes (PC, PE, sphingomyelin, PI, diphosphatidylglycerol, PS) as well as neutral lipids and free fatty acids (Fig. 6A, FFA, panels 2, 4, 6). Importantly, four spots, two for each of the aminophospholipids, PE and PS, respectively, could be detected on HPTLC plates. Comparison of the iodine-revealed spots (Fig. 6A, panels 2, 4, 6) with those revealed by fluorescence of fluorescamine-labeled aminophospholipids on the plates (Fig. 6A, panels 1, 3, 5) demonstrated that only one of the two spots in each of the PE- and PS-couples was fluorescent, i.e. labeled with fluorescamine. These spots corresponded to PE and PS available to fluorescamine modification on the cell surface and were designated as phosphatidylethanolamine modified by fluorescamine and phosphatidylserine modified by fluorescamine, respectively. Using measurements of Pi in the spots, we further quantitated the amounts of externalized PS (Fig. 6B). In control HL-60 cells, the content of PS exposed on the cell surface did not exceed 5% of its total amount (8.1 ± 2.8 pmol/106 cells). After 2 h of exposure to H2O2, HL-60 cells harbored significantly higher levels of externalized PS, which reached 10% of its total amount. Etoposide alone (at 50 µM) caused a slight enhancement of PS externalization that did not, however, significantly differ from the control. In the presence of etoposide, the effect of H2O2 was inhibited. Hence, at a 2-h exposure to 50 µM etoposide, the amounts of externalized PS were not significantly different from the control but were different from those detected after exposure to H2O2 alone. The amounts of PE on cell surfaces accessible for fluorescamine derivatization were not significantly different in control cells as compared with the cells treated with etoposide, H2O2, and the combination of both stimuli (data not shown).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Externalization of PS in HL-60 cells revealed by fluorescamine. HL-60 cells were treated with etoposide (50 µM) and/or H2O2 (25 µM x 4) for 2 h at 37 °C. At the end of incubation, phospholipid externalization was analyzed by fluorescamine-associated fluorescence and HPTLC of externalized PS. A, typical two-dimensional HPTLC of total lipid extracts from control (1 and 2), etoposide-treated (3 and 4), and H2O2-exposed (5 and 6) cells. HPTLC chromatograms were visualized by using a Fluor-S MultiImager (Bio-Rad) with a UV light source after treatment with fluorescamine (1, 3, and 5) or a VIS light source after staining by exposure to iodine vapors (2, 4, and 6). NL, neutral lipids; FFA, free fatty acids; SPH, sphingomyelin; PI, phosphatidylinositol; DPG, diphosphatidylglycerol; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine, PS, phosphatidylserine, mPE, PE modified by fluorescamine; mPS, PS modified by fluorescamine. B, amounts of externalized PS (fluorescamine-modified) on the surface of HL-60 cells after stimulation with etoposide and/or H2O2. The percentage of total PS modified by fluorescamine was determined by phosphorous analysis of each modified phospholipid spot after two-dimensional HPTLC, as described under "Materials and Methods." Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. (n = 3); *, p < 0.05 versus control; **, p < 0.05 versus H2O2.

 
APT, an ATP-dependent enzyme, is responsible for the maintenance of the asymmetric distribution of PS in viable cells through its efficient internalization of PS molecules appearing on the surface of the plasma membrane (2). Because inhibition of PS oxidation by etoposide was accompanied by blockade of PS externalization, we next determined whether etoposide and/or H2O2 affected APT activity as it relates to PS externalization in HL-60 cells. To this end, we utilized a fluorescent phospholipid substrate for APT, NBD-PS. NBD-PS was incorporated into the outer leaflet of plasma membrane of HL-60 cells, and its internalization by APT was monitored over time and presented as a percentage of internalized NBD-PS (Fig. 7A). Control (non-treated) HL-60 cells displayed a high level of APT activity (43.4 ± 4.4 pmol NBD-PS/min/106 cells) resulting in complete internalization of exogenously added NBD-PS within ~15 min of incubation. In contrast, almost all NBD-PC remained on the external surface over the 20-min incubation period, indicating that internalization was specific for aminophospholipids (data not shown). Pretreatment of cells with NEM (10 µM, 10 min at 37 °C) resulted in an essentially complete inhibition of APT (Fig. 7A). H2O2 (25 µM x 4, 2 h) reduced the ability of cells to internalize NBD-PS by ~2-fold (Fig. 7A), and etoposide did not affect H2O2-induced APT inhibition (Fig. 7B). Accordingly, the rate of NBD-PS internalization was 1.6-fold higher in control cells than in H2O2-exposed cells (both in the absence and in the presence of etoposide; Fig. 7B). No significant changes in the ability of HL-60 cells to internalize NBD-PS were observed after exposure to etoposide alone (2 h at 37 °C). Thus, etoposide did not protect APT against H2O2-induced inactivation.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.
Effect of etoposide and H2O2 on APT activity in HL-60 cells. NBD-PS was incorporated into the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane of control HL-60 cells and HL-60 cells treated with etoposide (50 µM) and/or H2O2 (25 µM x 4), and the rate of NBD-PS internalization was calculated. A, internalization of NBD-PS in HL-60 cells. NBD-PS was incorporated into the outer leaflet of plasma membrane of control HL-60 cells, HL-60 cells treated with H2O2 (25 µM x 4), or treated with N-ethylmaleimide (10 µM, 10 min), and APT-mediated internalization of NBD-PS was monitored over time and presented as a percentage of internalized NBD-PS. {circ}, control; •, H2O2 (25 µM x 4); {square}, NEM (10 µM). B, effect of etoposide and/or H2O2 on the rate of NBD-PS internalization in HL-60 cells. Data are depicted as pmol of NBD-PS/106 cells/min (mean ± S.E. (n = 5)); *, p < 0.001 versus control; **, p < 0.01 versus H2O2 or etoposide + H2O2.

 
Etoposide Inhibits Macrophage Engulfment of H2O2-treated HL-60 Cells—Because phagocytosis relies on the recognition of externalized PS on the surface of apoptotic cells (1, 21), which in turn may depend upon PS oxidation (7, 8), we further studied the effects of etoposide and/or H2O2 on phagocytosis of HL-60 cells by J774A.1 macrophages (Fig. 8A). Relatively low levels of phagocytosis-positive macrophages (<=2.0-2.5%) were detected when control (non-treated) HL-60 cells were incubated (for 1 h) with J774A.1 macrophages. Etoposide-treated HL-60 cells were phagocytosed at a slightly (albeit significantly, ~1.3-fold) higher level than control cells. In contrast, H2O2-treated HL-60 cells were readily ingested by J774A.1 macrophages, yielding a 2.1-fold increase in the number of phagocytosis-positive cells. Remarkably, etoposide (at 50 µM) caused inhibition of phagocytosis of HL-60 cells treated with H2O2 (Fig. 8A) insofar as the level of phagocytosis-positive macrophages was not different from that detected in the presence of etoposide alone.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.
Phagocytosis of apoptotic HL-60 cells by J77A.1 macrophages. A, effect of etoposide on J77A.1 macrophage engulfment of H2O2-treated HL-60 cells. HL-60 cells were treated with etoposide (50 µM) and/or H2O2 for 2 h and subsequently analyzed for phagocytic engulfment as described under "Materials and Methods." Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. (n = 8); *, p < 0.05 versus control (non-treated HL-60 cells); **, p < 0.01 versus H2O2-treated HL-60 cells. B, phagocytosis of HL-60 cells enriched with PS- or PS-OX-containing liposomes. Control (non-apoptotic) or etoposide-treated (50 µM) (apoptotic) HL-60 cells were pre-incubated with NEM (10 µM for 10 min at 37 °C), incubated with liposomes containing different mixtures of phospholipids at 50 µM (PC and PS (50:50%), PC and PS plus PS-OX (50:50%)), and subsequently analyzed for phagocytic engulfment by J774A.1. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 6); *, p < 0.05 versus control.

 
If inhibition of PS oxidation and externalization by etoposide is responsible for the inability of macrophages to recognize apoptotic cells, then enrichment of the surface of etoposide-triggered apoptotic HL-60 cells with PS and/or PS-OX should reinstate their phagocytosis by macrophages. To test this, we integrated PS or a mixture of PS+PS-OX into the plasma membrane of both control and etoposide-treated HL-60 cells by incubating them with liposomes containing PS or PS+PS-OX (50 µM) and subsequently co-cultured these cells with J774A.1 macrophages. It should be noted that target HL-60 cells were pretreated with NEM (10 µM, 10 min) to inhibit APT to prevent internalization of exogenously added PS or PS+PS-OX (see Fig. 8A). Expectedly, this pretreatment resulted in some externalization of endogenous PS (data not shown) and consequently in an increased background level of phagocytosis-positive macrophages (Fig. 8B). Nevertheless, we found that phagocytosis of HL-60 cells was significantly stimulated by both PS and PS+PS-OX (Fig. 8B). Notably, PS-OX turned out to be markedly more effective in stimulating engulfment of both etoposide-pretreated as well as non-pretreated HL-60 cells by J774A.1 macrophages (Fig. 8B). When control (non-pretreated with etoposide) HL-60 cells were enriched with different amounts of PS or PS+PS-OX (from 6 to 105 pmol/106 cells integrated into the outer leaflet of plasma membrane), a higher effectiveness of PS-OX compared with PS (2.0- to 5.0-fold) as a phagocytosis signal for J774A.1 macrophages was observed at each of the concentration used.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Etoposide-mediated Inhibition of PS Oxidation Dissociates PS-dependent Signaling from Other Features of the Apoptotic Program—The exposition of PS on the surface of apoptotic cells has been identified as a common "eat-me" signal that interacts with the so-called PS-receptor or other PS-binding molecules on the phagocytic cell membrane (24-26). However, the specific mechanisms involved in the egress of PS, normally sequestered in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, remain poorly characterized. We have reported previously that oxidation of PS precedes its externalization during both oxidant- and non-oxidant-induced apoptosis (10). These findings are suggestive of a causative link between oxidative modification of PS and its subsequent translocation. One of the experimental approaches to proving such a link is to use antioxidants capable of blocking phospholipid oxidation and associated PS externalization. It is important to note, however, that disruption of mitochondrial electron transport and subsequent ROS production are essential components of apoptosis that may be critically involved in redox-sensitive apoptosis signaling pathways (22, 27). Indeed, the ability of antioxidants to interrupt the execution of the apoptotic program has been reported by several laboratories (28-30). Therefore, the antioxidant of choice should have specific redox properties that make it effective in protecting phospholipids, but not other targets, against oxidative modifications during apoptosis. As a phenolic compound, etoposide can act as an effective donor of reducing equivalents for reactive radicals participating in the initiation and propagation of lipid oxidation, i.e. etoposide can act as a radical scavenger to yield its own phenoxyl radical (31). The redox potential of an etoposide/etoposide phenoxyl radical couple (E° = +0.56 V; Ref. 32) is low enough to prevent reactions of its phenoxyl radicals with lipids but high enough to allow for the oxidation of thiols (e.g. GSH and protein SH-groups). Therefore, we decided to explore these unique lipid antioxidant properties of etoposide to test whether selective inhibition of oxidation of phospholipids (including PS) and subsequent PS-dependent apoptotic signaling can occur without disturbing other redox-sensitive mechanisms of the final common pathway of apoptosis.

Our data clearly demonstrate that etoposide can trigger oxidative stress and induce apoptosis in HL-60 cells. Despite these effects, etoposide effectively prevented phospholipid oxidation during the execution of the apoptotic program. Moreover, in line with previous work (33), etoposide-induced apoptosis in HL-60 cells was not accompanied by PS externalization at early stages of apoptosis. In H2O2-treated cells, etoposide conferred complete protection of phospholipids against oxidation and inhibited PS externalization. Importantly, etoposide did not block the execution of other features of the H2O2-induced apoptotic program (i.e. caspase activation and nuclear fragmentation) and did not prevent H2O2-induced inhibition of APT. Etoposide is thus able to dissociate PS signaling from the common pathway of apoptosis by inhibiting oxidation of phospholipids, particularly PS. It is worth noting that PS externalization does, in fact, occur during late stages of the etoposide-induced apoptotic program (4 and 6 h) (34-36). These findings would seem to contradict our conclusion concerning antioxidant blockade of PS externalization during etoposide-triggered apoptosis. However, one needs to keep in mind that scavenging of reactive radicals by phenolic antioxidants is associated with their oxidation, i.e. depletion of antioxidant capacity (37, 38). In fact, we observed that low doses of etoposide (10 µM) were much less effective in protecting against phospholipid peroxidation as well as in inhibiting PS-dependent signaling compared with etoposide used at 50 µM. It is likely that oxidative metabolism of the phenolic moiety of etoposide (known to form quinone derivatives; Ref. 39) is responsible for its ineffectiveness as an inhibitor of PS externalization during late stages of apoptosis. In line with this, we found that exposure of HL-60 cells to etoposide and a combination of H2O2 plus etoposide for 4 and 6 h resulted in a significant PS oxidation. Notably, even at these later time points, PS externalization correlated with PS oxidation, suggesting the existence of a causative link between the two processes.

APT, a P-type ATPase, maintains the asymmetrical distribution of PS in cells (2). Inhibition of APT has been suggested as playing an important role in PS externalization during apoptosis (40, 41). However, the link between APT inactivation and the execution of the apoptotic program remains unclear. It has been suggested that APT is not a substrate for caspases (42), indicating that alternative mechanisms may be involved in the inhibition or inactivation of this enzyme. In particular, depletion of ATP may contribute to APT inhibition during apoptosis (34, 43). The current data indicate that etoposide inhibits PS externalization through its effect on PS oxidation, rather than by means of a direct inhibition of APT. This is supported by our results demonstrating that etoposide did not prevent H2O2-induced inhibition of APT. Moreover, because etoposide alone did not affect APT activity in HL-60 cells but triggered production of ROS and caspase activation, one may assume that its prevention of phospholipid peroxidation is likely responsible, at least in part, for the lack of APT inhibition. It is tempting to speculate that oxidized PS may contribute to APT inactivation and this effect is minimized in the presence of etoposide. It is possible that oxidized PS acts as an essential regulator of APT activity and PS externalization in intrinsic apoptotic pathways, but it is relatively less important in extrinsic mitochondria-independent (type I) apoptosis.

Etoposide-mediated Inhibition of PS Oxidation Blocks Macrophage Engulfment of HL-60 Cells—Because the externalization of PS on the surface of apoptotic cells acts as an important "eat me" signal for phagocytes, we assumed that etoposide-treated apoptotic HL-60 cells that fail to externalize PS would be less readily engulfed by macrophages. Indeed, we found that etoposide-triggered, early apoptotic cells were poorly engulfed by J774A.1 macrophages. In contrast, apoptosis induced by H2O2 was accompanied by PS externalization, and these cells were successfully eliminated by macrophages. Moreover, the combination of etoposide and H2O2 resulted in a significant inhibition of both H2O2-induced PS externalization and phagocytosis of these cells. Thus, etoposide not only dissociates the common final pathway of apoptosis from the PS signaling pathway essential for phagocytosis, but also blocks this signaling during H2O2-induced apoptosis. Similarly, overexpression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 prevents PS exposure and macrophage engulfment but does not affect DNA fragmentation or the activation of downstream caspases in Fas-triggered SKW6.4 cells (44). Taken together, these data suggest that the execution of cell death and the clearance of cell corpses are governed, in part, by distinct mechanisms or subprograms.

Our data suggest that etoposide-dependent inhibition of PS oxidation contributes to the failure of macrophages to recognize apoptotic HL-60 cells. In line with these findings, we found that enforced PS externalization in apoptotic HL-60 cells could overcome the etoposide-induced concealment from macrophage recognition. PS-OX integrated into the plasma membrane of etoposide-treated HL-60 cells was an even more potent recognition signal and yielded more effective engulfment by macrophages. These findings concur with our previous studies in which viable Jurkat, Raji, and HL-60 cells were ingested after enrichment with PS and/or PS-OX (8), and further underscore the importance of PS oxidation in PS-dependent signaling pathways of phagocytic clearance of apoptotic cells. Of note, etoposide alone, or in combination with other drugs, was recently shown to induce apoptosis and subsequent phagocytosis of Burkitt lymphoma cell lines; this effect was inhibited upon the addition of H2O2 (45, 46). The apparent contradiction between our findings and those of Shacter et al. (45, 46) is likely explained by the relatively high concentration of H2O2 (200 µM) utilized by these investigators resulting in potent inhibition of apoptosis and accumulation of relatively large amounts of necrotic and "late" apoptotic cells recognizable by macrophages. Indeed, Hampton and Orrenius (47) have shown that H2O2 exerts a dual regulation of caspases, such that low doses (50 µM) are able to trigger apoptosis, whereas high doses (above 200 µM) yield oxidative inactivation of these enzymes and subsequent switching of the mode of cell death to necrosis. Notably, our experimental conditions (50 µM etoposide and/or H2O2 25 µM x 4) did not yield any significant increase in the number of necrotic cells over an incubation of 2-6 h with etoposide and/or H2O2. When high concentrations of H2O2 were used (250 µM), a significant accumulation of necrotic HL-60 cells (up to 30%) was observed already after a 2-h exposure, in agreement with the data by Shacter et al. (45, 46)

Since its introduction in 1971, etoposide has become one of the most widely used and effective antitumor drugs in the treatment of different malignancies in both adults and children (48). As an anticancer drug, etoposide is commonly used in combination therapy in both conventional and high-dose regimens (49-55). Although most common conventional regimens result in etoposide plasma concentrations around 2-10 µM (49-52), it is not unusual in clinical practice to utilize high dose etoposide (~500 mg/m2) that may yield peak plasma concentrations of 100 µM or higher (53). Utilization of higher doses of etoposide (1500-2400 mg/m2; Refs. 54, 55) can be expected to achieve even higher plasma concentrations. Therefore, the concentration of etoposide used in the current study is well within the range of therapeutic levels achievable during etoposide treatment. One of the unfortunate side effects of etoposide, particularly in children, is therapy-related acute myelogenous leukemias (AML; Refs. 56, 57). Although specific mechanisms responsible for the induction of AML are not fully understood, they include inhibition of topoisomerase II, likely enhanced by myeloperoxidase-catalyzed one-electron metabolism of etoposide in bone marrow progenitor cells (58). The latter is associated with the production of different reactive free radical intermediates potentially leading to direct genotoxic effects as well as non-genotoxic carcinogenesis (31, 39, 59, 60). Apoptosis and safe elimination of transformed cells by phagocytes are of obvious importance for the prevention of pro-carcinogenic effects of etoposide. Our results suggest that impaired PS signaling and elimination of etoposide-triggered apoptotic cells may contribute to the deleterious side effects of this drug, particularly those leading to AML.

To conclude, we have shown that etoposide, an antitumor agent with unique antioxidant properties, can suppress phospholipid oxidation and PS externalization in HL-60 cells. Moreover, we have shown that PS signaling can be dissociated from other features of the apoptotic program insofar as H2O2-induced apoptosis was potentiated, whereas H2O2-induced PS oxidation and externalization as well as phagocytosis by J774A.1 macrophages were blocked upon incubation of cells with etoposide. Both externalization of PS and oxidation of phospholipids (including PS and PC) have been identified as important determinants of macrophage clearance of apoptotic cells (1, 8, 61, 62). We speculate that oxidation of PS may combine these features of the apoptotic process and facilitate externalization of PS as well as PS-OX, with subsequent recognition of these phospholipid species by neighboring macrophages. Future studies should aim to quantify amounts of PS and its oxidized counterpart on the surface of apoptotic cells as well as to identify the macrophage receptor(s) that are involved in the recognition of PS/PS-OX. A more detailed understanding of the mechanisms that govern the safe removal of apoptotic cells will aid in the design of novel therapeutic strategies in conditions of unscheduled cell death and/or impairment of cell clearance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL70755, CA90787, and GM64610 and the Swedish Society for Medical Research (to B. F.). J. C. Y. has a significant equity interest, as defined by the U. S. Public Health Service, in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., a manufacturer of etoposide, used in this research. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger}{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. Tel.: 412-383-2136; Fax: 412-383-2123; E-mail: kagan{at}pitt.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: PS, phosphatidylserine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; cis-PnA, cis-parinaric acid; MCLA, 2-methyl-6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3,7-dihydroimidazol(1,2-a)pyrazin-3-one hydrochloride; NBD-PS, 1-palmitoyl-2-(6-((7-nitro-2-1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)amino)hexanoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphoserine; NBD-PC, 1-palmitoyl-2-(6-((7-nitro-2-1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)amino)hexanoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphochilone; PS-OX, oxidized phosphatidylserine; APT, aminophospholipid translocase; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; NEM, N-ethylmaleimide; ROS, reactive oxygen species; z-VAD-fmk, benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethyl ketone; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; HPTLC, high performance thin layer chromatography; PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid; CHAPS, 3-((3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonic acid; ANOVA, analysis of variance; AML, acute myelogenous leukemia. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Fadok, V. A., Bratton, D. L., and Henson, P. M. (2001) J. Clin. Invest. 108, 957-962[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Balasubramanian, K., and Schroit, A. J., (2003) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 65, 701-734[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Savill, J. (1997) Br. Med. Bull. 53, 491-508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Fadeel, B., and Kagan, V. E. (2003) Redox Rep. 8, 143-150[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Kagan, V. E., Fabisiak, J. P., Shvedova, A. A., Tyurina, Y. Y., Tyurin, V. A., Schor, N. F., and Kawai, K. (2000) FEBS Lett. 477, 1-7[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Shvedova, A. A., Tyurina, Y. Y., Kawai, K., Tyurin, V. A., Kommineni, C., Castranova, V., Fabisiak, J. P., and Kagan, V. E. (2002) J. Invest. Dermatol. 118, 1008-1018[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Arroyo, A., Modriansky, M., Serinkan, F. B., Bello, R. I., Matsura, T., Jiang, J., Tyurin, V. A., Tyurina, Y. Y., Fadeel, B., and Kagan, V. E. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 49965-49975[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kagan, V. E., Gleiss, B., Tyurina, Y. Y., Tyurin, V. A., Elenstrom-Magnusson, C., Liu, S. X., Serinkan, F. B., Arroyo, A., Chandra, J., Orrenius, S., and Fadeel, B. (2002) J. Immunol. 169, 487-499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Tyurina, Y. Y., Shvedova, A. A., Kawai, K., Tyurin, V. A., Kommineni, C., Quinn, P. J., Schor, N. F., Fabisiak, J. P., and Kagan, V. E. (2000) Toxicology 148, 93-101[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Kagan, V. E., Borisenko, G. G., Serinkan, B. F., Tyurina, Y. Y., Tyurin, V. A., Jiang, J., Liu, S. X., Shvedova, A. A., Fabisiak, J. P., Uthaisang, W., and Fadeel, B. (2003) Am. J. Phys. 285, L1-L17
  11. Kagan, V. E., Kuzmenko, A. I., Tyurina, Y. Y., Shvedova, A. A., Matsura, T., and Yalowich, J. C. (2001) Cancer Res. 61, 7777-7784[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Gorman, A., McGowan, A., and Cotter, T. G. (1997) FEBS Lett. 404, 27-33[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Pham, N. A., and Hedley, D. W. (2001) Exp. Cell Res. 264, 345-352[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Shvedova, A., A., Kommineni, C., Jeffries, B. A., Castranova, V, Tyurina, Y. Y., Tyurin, V. A., Serbinova, E. A., Fabisiak, J. P., and Kagan, V. E. (2000) J. Invest. Dermatol. 114, 354-364[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Folch, J., Lees, M., and Sloan-Stanley, G. H. (1957) J. Biol. Chem. 226, 497-509[Free Full Text]
  16. Bottcher, C. J. F., van Gent, C. M., and Pries, C. (1961) Anal. Chim. Acta 24, 203-204[CrossRef]
  17. Kagan, V. E., Ritov, V. B., Tyurina, Y. Y., and Tyurin, V. A. (1998) Meth. Mol. Biol. 108, 71-87[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Chalvardjian, A., and Rudnicki, E. (1970) Anal. Biochem. 36, 225-226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. McIntyre, J. C., and Sleight, R. G. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 11819-11827[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Williamson, P., Bevers, E. M., Smeets, E. F., Comfurius, P., Schlegel, R. A., and Zwaal, R. F. A. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 10448-10455[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Fadok, V. A., Voelker, D. R., Campbell, P. A., Cohen, J. J., Bratton, D. L., and Henson, P. M. (1992) J. Immunol. 148, 2207-2216[Abstract]
  22. Raha, S., and Robinson, B. H. (2001) Am. J. Med. Gen. 106, 62-70[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Tyurina, Y. Y., Tyurin, V. A., Shvedova, A. A., Fabisiak, J. P., and Kagan, V. E. (2002) Methods Enzymol. 352, 159-174[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Savill, J., and Fadok, V. (2000) Nature 407, 784-788[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Savill, J., Dransfield, I., Gregory, C., and Haslett, C. (2002) Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2, 965-975[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Fadok, V. A., Bratton, D. L., Rose, D. M., Pearson, A., Ezekewitz, R. A., and Henson, P. M. (2000) Nature 405, 85-90[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Cai, J., and Jones, D. P. (1999) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 31, 327-334[CrossRef][Medline]