JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M411006200 on November 2, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 1, 326-333, January 7, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/1/326    most recent
M411006200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raymond, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pavelka, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raymond, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pavelka, M. S., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Identification of the namH Gene, Encoding the Hydroxylase Responsible for the N-Glycolylation of the Mycobacterial Peptidoglycan*

Jon B. Raymond{ddagger}§, Sebabrata Mahapatra¶, Dean C. Crick¶, and Martin S. Pavelka, Jr.{ddagger}||

From the {ddagger}Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642 and the Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523

Received for publication, September 24, 2004 , and in revised form, October 27, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The peptidoglycan of most bacteria consists of a repeating disaccharide unit of {beta}-1,4-linked N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine. However, the muramic acid moieties of the mycobacterial peptidoglycan are N-glycolylated, not N-acetylated. This is a rare modification seen only in the peptidoglycan of mycobacteria and five other closely related genera of bacteria. The N-glycolylation of sialic acids is a unique carbohydrate modification that has been studied extensively in eukaryotes. However, the significance of the N-glycolylation of bacterial peptidoglycan is unknown. The goal of this project was to identify the gene encoding the hydroxylase responsible for the N-glycolylation of the mycobacterial peptidoglycan. We developed a novel assay for the mycobacterial UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid hydroxylation reaction and demonstrated that Mycobacterium smegmatis has an enzyme activity that can convert UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid to UDP-N-glycolylmuramic acid. We identified the gene namH encoding the mycobacterial UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid hydroxylase by computer data base searching and motif comparisons with the eukaryotic enzymes responsible for the N-glycolyation of sialic acids. The namH gene is not essential for in vitro growth as we were successful in deleting the gene in M. smegmatis. The M. smegmatis mutant is devoid of UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid hydroxylase activity and synthesizes only N-acetylated muropeptide precursors. Furthermore, the mutant exhibits increased susceptibility to {beta}-lactam antibiotics and lysozyme. Our studies suggest that the N-glycolylation of mycobacterial peptidoglycan may play a role in lysozyme resistance or may contribute to the structural stability of the cell wall architecture.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In a manner similar to the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, the outer portion of the cell envelope of mycobacteria is believed to be arranged as an asymmetric bilayer, with an outer layer composed of various lipids with short to medium length fatty acids, and an inner layer composed of long chain mycolic acids covalently attached to the arabinogalactan polysaccharide (1, 2). The arabinogalactan is in turn covalently attached to the peptidoglycan via an essential rhamnose-N-acetylglucosamine linker, forming the mycolylarabinogalactan-peptidoglycan complex (mAGP) (3, 4). The peptidoglycan ultimately serves to anchor the principle mass of the mycobacterial cell envelope.

Peptidoglycan is an essential component of the cell envelope of virtually all bacteria, providing both shape and structural integrity to the cell. Peptidoglycan fragments are also biologically active molecules with toxigenic and immunomodulatory properties (58). In general, peptidoglycan is comprised of a {beta}-1,4-linked polymer of N-acylated muramic acid and glucosamine carbohydrates with cross-linked peptides of varying composition attached to the muramyl moieties. In virtually all bacteria, both carbohydrates in the glycan chain are N-acetylated, however, in the mycobacteria the muramic acid moieties are N-glycolylated instead (9). Only five other genera of bacteria, Rhodococcus, Tsukamurella, Gordonia, Nocardia, and Micromonospora have N-glycolylmuramic acid in their peptidoglycan (10). These five genera are closely related to mycobacteria, and all six belong to the class Actinomycetales. Why N-glycolylated muramic acid is only produced by a small number of bacteria is unknown. N-glycolylation is a rare carbohydrate modification seen only for muramic acid in these actinobacteria and for neuraminic acids (sialic acids) in eukaryotes (11). The N-glycolylation of sialic acids in eukaryotes is known to confer differential biological activities upon the carbohydrates. However, it is not known what role N-glycolylated muramic acid plays in peptidoglycan biology, although it has been hypothesized to stabilize the cell wall through hydrogen bonding (2).

The initial discovery of N-glycolylated muramic acid (MurNGlyc)1 in mycobacteria prompted the hypothesis that it was synthesized from an N-acetylated muramic acid (MurNAc) precursor by the action of a monooxygenase enzyme, known generically as a hydroxylase (12). These enzymes typically require a proton donor, usually NADH or NADPH, for the reduction of molecular oxygen to water prior to the insertion of an oxygen atom into the substrate and forming a hydroxyl group (13). Previous work with Mycobacterium phlei established that the production of N-glycolylmuramic acid in mycobacteria likely occurs by the action of an atmospheric oxygen-dependent hydroxylase that converts UDP-MurNAc to UDP-MurNGlyc (14). In addition, a soluble activity present in Nocardia asteroides capable of converting UDP-MurNAc to UDP-MurNGlyc in an NADPH-dependent fashion was demonstrated almost 30 years ago (15), but since then no UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase has been purified and no gene identified from any bacterial species.

Our laboratory studies the biosynthesis of the mycobacterial peptidoglycan and we are particularly interested in determining the significance of N-glycolylmuramic acid in the cell wall of these organisms. In this study, we report the development of a new assay to detect the conversion of UDP-MurNAc to UDP-MurNGlyc and the identification of the namH gene (N-acetylmuramic acid hydroxylase) encoding the mycobacterial UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase. We also show that while the namH gene is not essential for the survival of Mycobacterium smegmatis, a namH deletion mutant is hypersusceptible to {beta}-lactam antibiotics and lysozyme.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial Strains, Culture Techniques, Electroporation of M. smegmatis, and Reagents—M. smegmatis strains mc2155 (ept-1) (16), mc21255 (ept-1, rpsL4) (17), PM965 (ept-1 rpsL4 {Delta}blaS1), and PM979 (ept-1 rpsL4 {Delta}blaS1 {Delta}namH1) were grown in LBT (Luria-Bertani broth supplemented with 0.05% (w/v) Tween-80), or on LBT agar, or in Middlebrook 7H9 medium containing ADS (0.5% bovine serum albumin fraction V (Roche Applied Science), 0.2% glucose, 0.85% NaCl), 0.05% (w/v) Tween-80, 0.2% (v/v) glycerol), or on Middlebrook 7H10 agar supplemented with ADS, Tween-80, and glycerol. The blaS1 deletion in PM965 and PM979 removes the major {beta}-lactamase enzyme of M. smegmatis and allows us to test the {beta}-lactam susceptibilities of the strains in this study (18). Escherichia coli K-12 DH10B (F- mcrA {Delta}[mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC] {varphi}80lacZ{Delta}M15 {Delta}lacX74 deoR recA1 endA1 ara{Delta}139 {Delta}[ara, leu] 7697 galU galK {lambda}-rpsL [Strr]) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used for plasmid DNA cloning, and E. coli strains were grown on LB agar or in LB medium. All strains were incubated at 37 °C. When necessary hygromycin (Roche Applied Science) or kanamycin was used at a final concentration of 50 µg/ml. M. smegmatis strains were electroporated using a standard protocol (19). All reagents used in this study were purchased from Sigma unless otherwise specified. Sephadex G-25 and Superdex Peptide column were from Amersham Biosciences. Hypersil ODS (C18) column and EZ:faast amino acid analysis kit were from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA). High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade water and acetonitrile were purchased from Burdick and Jackson (Muskegon, MI).

Plasmid Construction—Plasmid DNA was purified using Qiagen columns (Qiagen Inc., Chatsworth, CA), and DNA fragments were isolated using GeneClean (Bio101, Vista, CA). Suicide plasmids pMP252 ({Delta}blaS1) and pMP354 ({Delta}namH1), were constructed in E. coli K-12 DH10B, whereas the M. smegmatis namH+ complementing plasmid pMP336 was constructed in the M. smegmatis {Delta}namH1 mutant PM979. All plasmids were confirmed by restriction mapping and then sequencing by ACGT (Northbrook, IL). Detailed descriptions of the construction of the plasmids used in this study can be obtained from the corresponding author.

Construction of the M. smegmatis {Delta}blaS1{Delta}namH1 Mutant PM979 — The M. smegmatis {Delta}blaS1{Delta}namH1 mutant was constructed by allelic exchange using sacB as a counterselectable marker (20). This was accomplished in a two-step process beginning with the deletion of the M. smegmatis major {beta}-lactamase blaS (18), resulting in strain PM965. Subsequent allelic exchange of the wild-type namH gene in PM965 was accomplished using pMP354, resulting in the double mutant PM979.

Synthesis of Radiolabeled UDP-N-acetylmuramic Acid—Radiolabeled UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid was synthesized from UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (2 x 109 Bq/mmol) (American Radiolabeled Chemicals Inc., St. Louis, MO) labeled with carbon-14 in the acetyl group. The synthesis of UDP-MurNAc was described previously (21), but the reaction volumes were reduced to 100 µl and contained UDP-GlcN[14C]Ac (2 x 109 Bq/mmol) (180 nmol), {beta}-NADPH (400 nmol), phosphoenolpyruvate, (PEP, 400 nmol), in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0 buffer with 1 mM dithiothreitol, and purified, polyhistidine-tagged MurZ (120 µg) and MurB (55 µg).

Preparation of M. smegmatis Whole Cell Extracts—M. smegmatis strains harboring plasmids pMV261.hyg or pMP336 (pMV261.hyg bearing namH+)were inoculated into 100 ml 7H9 medium containing hygromycin and grown overnight at 37 °C with shaking. The following morning, cells were harvested at 3,000 x g at an OD600 of ~0.6–0.8, and cell pellets were washed once in ice-cold 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0. The washed cells were centrifuged, and pellets were resuspended in 3 ml of the same buffer containing DNase and RNase at a final concentration of 100 µg/ml and protease inhibitor (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). Cell suspensions were lysed in a French pressure cell (Aminco, Urbana, IL) three times at 15,000 psi, and cellular debris was pelleted at 10,000 x g. The membrane fraction was obtained after centrifugation of the lysate at 100,000 x g for 1 h at 4 °C. The supernatant consisting of the soluble cytoplasmic fraction was saved on ice and the membrane pellet resuspended in 400 µl of ice-cold 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0.

UDP-MurNAc Hydroxylase Assay—UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase reactions contained UDP-MurN[14C]Ac (2 x 109 Bq/mmol) (1 nmol), {beta}-NADPH (250 nmol) in 50 mM Tris pH 8.0 buffer with 1 mM dithiothreitol. Mixtures were prewarmed to 37 °C, and reactions were initiated by the addition of a freshly prepared M. smegmatis whole cell extract, soluble extract, or membrane fraction (2 mg of total protein/reaction) for a final reaction volume of 300 µl. Reactions were incubated at 37 °C for 15 min at which time protein was removed from the reactions using an Amicon Centriplus YM-10 filter device (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) by centrifugation at 7,500 x g for 1 h at 4 °C. Following protein removal, 150 µl of each sample was added to 150 µl of 8 N HCl and hydrolyzed at 100 °C for 4 h to liberate nucleotide sugar acyl groups (acetic or glycolic acid), then the mixture was neutralized by the addition of 150 µl of 8 N NaOH. Components of the acid-hydrolyzed reaction mixtures were separated by anion exchange HPLC using a Waters 2695 separation module (Waters Corp., Milford, MA) and a Shodex KC-811 column (Waters Corp) equilibrated with 0.1% phosphoric acid. 50-µl samples were injected into the column using an isocratic flow of 0.1% phosphoric acid at 1 ml/min. Separations were performed at 60 °C for 15 min. Fractions were collected at 10-s intervals from 8 to 12.5 min post-injection based upon control separations of glycolic and acetic acid, which possessed retention times of 9.5 and 10.8 min, respectively. We routinely added unlabeled acetic acid and glycolic acid standards to the reaction mixtures prior to acid hydrolysis as internal controls. The unlabeled acids are detected by the absorbance at 210 nm. 100 µl of each fraction was added to 5 ml of Ecolite+ scintillation fluid (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA) for detection of the labeled acids in a Beckman LS-1801 liquid scintillation counter. Radioactive counts were tallied under the organic acid peaks and activity expressed as pmol of UDP-MurNGlyc produced/min/mg protein.

Purification and Analysis of UDP-acylmuramyl Pentapeptides— Cells for muropeptide preparation were harvested from mid-exponential phase cultures (OD600 of 0.4–0.8) that were quickly chilled, the cells washed in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7, pelleted, and frozen at -20 °C. Ten grams of cell pellet were suspended in ice-cold 50 mM MOPS buffer, pH 8, and subjected to probe sonication on ice. The cell lysate was centrifuged at 27,000 x g and the supernatant transferred to a new tube to which trichloroacetic acid was added at a concentration of 10%. The mixture was stirred on ice and centrifuged at 15,000 x g and 4 °C. The clear supernatant was transferred to a new tube, and the trichloroacetic acid removed by three extractions with diethyl ether. The resulting solution was dried on a rotary evaporator and reconstituted in water and loaded on a Sephadex G-25 (116 x 2.5 cm) column equilibrated with 75 mM ammonium acetate (pH 5). The column was calibrated with authentic UDP-acylmuramyl pentapeptide prepared using recombinant E. coli enzymes (4). Fractions containing UDP-acylmuramyl pentapeptide were pooled and lyophilized to remove ammonium acetate. These partially purified nucleotide-linked precursors were resuspended in 2 M trifluoroacetic acid and incubated at 60 °C for 1 h to remove the UDP moiety. The resulting muropeptides were further purified by size exclusion chromatography on a Superdex peptide 10/300 GL column, equilibrated and eluted with 30% acetonitrile containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. An aliquot of the muropeptide-containing fraction was applied to a Hypersil ODS C18 column connected to an 1100 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies. Palo Alto, CA). The eluent was directly introduced into a LCQ Duo electrospray mass spectrometer (Finnigan-Theromquest, San Jose, CA), and the muropeptides were analyzed by mass spectrometry (MS).

Acylated muramic acid was analyzed by GC-MS after treatment of purified muropeptides with mutanolysin to remove the peptides from the muramic acid. The reactions were deproteinated by ethanol precipitation and the supernatant dried under vacuum. The samples were resuspended in 3 N methanolic-HCl, heated to 80 °C for 1 h, cooled to room temperature, dried under a stream of N2, and Tri-Sil reagent was added. The mixtures were heated at 70 °C for 20 min., cooled to room temperature and the reagent evaporated under a stream of N2. The derivatized products were dissolved in a small volume of hexane and analyzed in a ThermoQuest Trace GC 2000 gas chromatograph linked to a Finnigan Polaris mass detector.

M. smegmatis Antibiotic and Lysozyme Susceptibility Assays—Determination of antibiotic susceptibility was done by disk diffusion assays, while lysozyme susceptibilities were assayed by minimal inhibitory concentration tests using the macrodilution method as previously described (18). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of lysozyme were noted as the lowest concentration at which no microbial growth could be observed or a noticeable growth defect (granular clumping) had occurred.

M. smegmatis Lysozyme Growth Curves—M. smegmatis strains were grown to saturation in 7H9 broth and then diluted 10-fold into fresh 7H9 medium and incubated at 37 °C. Optical density readings were recorded at 30-min intervals. Upon reaching an OD600 of ~0.4, the cultures were split into two, and freshly prepared lysozyme was added to a final concentration of 20 µg/ml to one of each of the split cultures of each strain. Readings were continued at 30-min intervals until each culture reached an OD600 of ~1.0.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Development of the UDP-MurNAc Hydroxylase Assay—UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase activity was first described in the actinobacterial species N. asteroides nearly 30 years ago using an assay that monitored the NADPH-dependent conversion of radiolabeled UDP-MurNAc to UDP-MurNGlyc (15). The substrate and product were detected using paper chromatography with comparison to chemically synthesized standards. Unfortunately, this assay was difficult for us to reproduce without UDP-MurNAc and UDP-MurNGlyc for comparison, as neither of these compounds is commercially available. Therefore, we decided to develop a new, HPLC-based assay, for the detection of the mycobacterial UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase activity, using UDP-MurNAc synthesized in our laboratory from commercially available UDP-GlcNAc.

Our initial attempts to assay the hydroxylase using UDP-MurNAc or radiolabeled UDP-MurNAc synthesized from UDP-GlcNAc in which the hexosamine backbone was 14C-labeled, were unsuccessful (data not shown). In each case, we were not able to unambiguously determine if UDP-MurNGlyc was produced in our assays, as we had no authentic UDP-MurNGlyc available for comparison. To overcome this problem, we used UDP-MurNAc in which the acetyl group of the nucleotide sugar was 14C-labeled in order to facilitate the identification of UDP-MurNGlyc ("Experimental Procedures"). The detection method is based upon the observation that acid hydrolysis of N-acylated hexosamine sugars liberates the acyl group as a free acid. Therefore, acid hydrolysis of the hydroxylase assay reaction mixtures would release the labeled acyl groups of UDP-MurNAc and UDP-MurNGlyc as [14C]acetic acid and [14C]glycolic acid, respectively. These acids are easily distinguished from each other by their separation profiles in anion exchange HPLC.

A schematic representation of our mycobacterial UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase assay is shown in Fig. 1. Completed reaction mixtures were clarified using an Amicon filtration device, and then subjected to acid hydrolysis. The components of the hydrolysate were separated by anion exchange HPLC for 15 min, and the fractions containing the 14C organic acids were detected by scintillation counting. The radioactive peaks were compared with our established retention times for unlabeled glycolic acid (9.5 min) and unlabeled acetic acid (10.8 min) standards. Because the acid hydrolysis is essentially 100% efficient in the removal of acyl groups from nucleotide sugars (data not shown) the amount of [14C]glycolic acid detected after acid hydrolysis of the reaction components corresponds to the amount of UDP-MurNGlyc produced.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of the UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase assay. The radiolabeled acyl group (acetyl or glycolyl) can be removed from the nucleotide sugars by mild acid hydrolysis (A) and the two functional groups separated in their acid forms by anion-exchange HPLC and detected by scintillation counting (B).

 
The UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase activity in reactions containing 2 mg of protein of a whole cell extract of wild-type M. smegmatis strain PM965 was 23 pmol of UDP-MurNGlyc/min/mg protein (Table I). The activity was present in a soluble fraction prepared from the cell extract but was not present in the membrane fraction (Table I). The addition of a 10-fold excess of unlabeled UDP-MurNAc to reactions with whole cell extracts decreased the amount of labeled product by a factor of ten, However, the same result was not seen when a 10-fold excess of unlabeled UDP-GlcNAc was added to the reactions (Table I).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
Measurement of M. smegmatis UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase activity Enzymatic activity was determined from various fractions of a M. smegmatis cell lysate and is expressed as the pmol of UDP-MurNGlyc produced/min/mg of protein. Data represent the average of triplicate assays (variance < 2 units of activity per assay).

 
Identification of the Bacterial UDP-MurNAc Hydroxylase Genes—Only two carbohydrate N-glycolylation reactions have been demonstrated in biology: the N-glycolylation of CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid in many eukaryotic organisms and the N-glycolylation of UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid in a limited number of bacteria. We used the protein sequence of the mouse CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase in a BLAST (23) search (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) for a homolog in the sequenced and annotated Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv genome (24). The best match that we obtained was open reading frame Rv3818. Additional BLAST searches revealed the presence of Rv3818 homologs within the genomes of all the available mycobacterial species (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sutils/genom_table.cgi) including M. smegmatis, Mycobacterium avium, and Mycobacterium leprae, in which the gene is designated an pseudogene in the annotated genome, (25) as well as homologs in the actinobacteria Nocardia farcinica and Rhodococcus sp. RHA1, both of which possess peptidoglycan containing N-glycolylmuramic acid. A comparison of these proteins is shown in Table II. Furthermore, Rv3818 homologs were not present within the genomes of the related actinobacteria Corynebacterium glutamicum and Streptomyces albus that do not produce N-glycolylmuramic acid (9).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE II
Comparison of actinobacterial UDP-MurNAc hydroxylases The percent identity of several actinobacterial UDP-MurNAc hydroxylases is shown above. Species include M. smegmatis, M. tuberculosis, M. avium, N. farcinica, and Rhodococcus sp. RHA1.

 
We analyzed the Rv3818 homolog in M. smegmatis in greater detail for consideration as the mycobacterial UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase. Shown in Fig. 2, panel A is a ClustalW (26) alignment of the M. smegmatis UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase protein sequence with several eukaryotic CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylases and the homologs present in the genomes of N. farcinica and Rhodococcus sp. RHA1. To aid in sequence alignment only residues present within the protein cores were used in the ClustalW analysis. We omitted the N and C termini of the eukaryotic hydroxylases and C termini of the bacterial enzymes for the sake of clarity (see below). We found that the prokaryotic proteins are only 12% identical to the eukaryotic hydroxylases, although when strongly conserved residues are considered the similarity increases to 28%.



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Comparison of the M. smegmatis UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase with eukaryotic CMP-NeuNAc hydroxylases. In panel A the sequences of several eukaryotic CMP-NeuNAc hydroxylases and actinobacterial UDP-MurNAc hydroxylases were used in a ClustalW alignment with the M. smegmatis UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase. The N and C termini of the eukaryotic sequences are not shown as well as the C termini of the bacterial sequences to facilitate alignment of the core hydroxylase sequences. Identical and strongly conserved residues are in bold (asterisks represent identical amino acids). Underlined sequences indicate the mononuclear iron binding site. Panel B, the C terminus of the M. smegmatis UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase is shown as an example representing the C termini of the prokaryotic proteins containing the Rieske iron-sulfur center. Underlined residues are required for coordinating the Fe-S cluster. Abbreviations and references: N. farcinica, nocardia.nih.go.jp/blast; R. sp. RHA1, Rhodococcus sp. RHA1 (www.bcgsc.ca/gc/rhodococcus); M. smegmatis, contig 3269, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.c-gi?id=246196); starfish, Asterias rubens (GenBankTM accession no. AJ308602 [GenBank] ); mouse, Mus musculus (GenBankTM accession no. AB061276 [GenBank] ); chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes (GenBankTM accession no. AF074481 [GenBank] ). Sequences were analyzed by BLAST (23) and CDART (35), at NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

 
A conserved iron binding domain, presumably required for the metal-dependent acquisition of oxygen (13, 27), is present in both the eukaryotic enzymes and the bacterial protein sequences (Fig. 2A). Also, a Rieske iron-sulfur domain found in the N termini of the eukaryotic enzymes and involved with electron transfer (13, 27), is located within the C termini of the bacterial proteins. The differential location of these [Fe-S] domains among the various proteins prompted us to remove the N and C termini of the proteins in the alignment in Fig. 2A (see Fig. 2B, for the Rieske [Fe-S] domain of the M. smegmatis protein, as an example). Based upon these sequence analyses we believe the prokaryotic proteins described here, represented by M. tuberculosis open reading frame Rv3818 and the homologous open reading frame present within M. smegmatis are the bacterial UDP-MurNAc hydroxylases. We propose to name the corresponding gene namH.

The namH Gene Is Not Essential to M. smegmatis—We tested the essentiality of the namH gene in M. smegmatis by allelic exchange. We constructed a sacB-based suicide plasmid, pMP354, bearing an unmarked, 500-bp deletion allele ({Delta}namH1). The deletion of the gene in wild-type M. smegmatis strain PM965 was done by a previously described counterselection protocol ("Experimental Procedures"). Southern blot analysis confirmed the exchange of the {Delta}namH1 allele with that of wild type in the M. smegmatis genome of strain PM979 (data not shown).

The M. smegmatis {Delta}namH1 Mutant Is Devoid of UDP-MurNAc Hydroxylase Activity—No UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase activity was observed in reactions containing 2 mg of protein of whole cell extracts prepared from the {Delta}namH1 mutant (Table I). Complementation of the mutant with a plasmid bearing the wild-type gene restored UDP-MurNAc hydroxylase activity to levels greater than that seen within the parental strain (Table I). The increased hydroxylase activity of the complemented mutant compared with the parental strain can be attributed to the use of a multicopy plasmid containing a promoter that may be stronger than the native namH promoter.

The M. smegmatis {Delta}namH1 Mutant Lacks N-Glycolylated Peptidoglycan Precursors—We isolated and analyzed the peptidoglycan precursor muropentapeptides from the wild-type parental strain PM965 and the {Delta}namH1 mutant PM979 by LC-MS to determine the aclylation state of the muramyl moieties. The positive ion mass spectra of the muropeptides from PM965 (namH+) were dominated by ions having m/z values of 824.2 and 808.2 in an apparent ratio of 7:3 (Fig. 3). These ions have been previously identified as MurNGlyc-L-Ala-D-Glu-DAP-D-Ala-D-Ala and MurNAc-L-Ala-D-Glu-DAP-D-Ala-D-Ala, respectively (22). In contrast, the positive ion mass spectra of the muropeptides from PM979 ({Delta}namH1) were dominated by an ion having an m/z value of 808.2 and the corresponding sodium adduct (m/z 830.3), consistent with the muropeptide MurNAc-L-Ala-D-Glu-DAP-D-Ala-D-Ala. No signal consistent with MurNGlyc-L-Ala-D-Glu-DAP-D-Ala-D-Ala was observed from muropeptides purified from the {Delta}namH1 mutant. The identities of muramyl residues in the purified muropeptides from both strains were confirmed by GC-MS analysis after removal of the peptides from the muramic acid with mutanolysin treatment and analysis of the muramic acid as described under "Experimental Procedures" (data not shown).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Mass spectral analysis of muropeptides derived from nucleotide-linked muropeptides isolated from PM965 namH+ (panel A) and PM979 {Delta}namH1 (panel B). The molecular ions of MurNAc-L-Ala-D-Glu-DAP-D-Ala-D-Ala, MurNGlyc-L-Ala-D-Glu-DAP-D-Ala-D-Ala, and the monosodium adducts have m/z values of 808.2, 824.2, 830.3, and 846.3. Ions formed by the loss of water from MurNAc-L-Ala-D-Glu-DAP-D-Ala-D-Ala and MurNGlyc-L-Ala-D-Glu-DAP-D-Ala-D-Ala have m/z values of 790.2 and 806.2, respectively.

 
The M. smegmatis {Delta}namH1 Mutant Is Hypersusceptible to {beta}-Lactam Antibiotics and Lysozyme—Although namH was determined to be a non-essential gene for M. smegmatis, we hypothesized that the lack of N-glycolylated muramic acid in the peptidoglycan would have a detrimental effect on cell wall biosynthesis or stability. This hypothesis was evaluated by testing susceptibility of the {Delta}namH1 mutant to various antibiotics that interfere with cell envelope biosynthesis and to lysozyme.

We tested the sensitivity of the {Delta}namH1 mutant to the {beta}-lactam antibiotics amoxicillin and ampicillin, drugs that interfere with peptidoglycan assembly and cross-linking, by a disk diffusion assay. As shown in Table III, the mutant was hypersusceptible to {beta}-lactams compared with the parental and namH+ complemented strains regardless of the media (rich or minimal) used for culture. However, the susceptibility of the mutant to amoxicillin (and to a lesser extent, ampicillin) was exacerbated when grown on rich medium (LB) as compared with minimal medium (7H9) (Table III). We observed no difference in susceptibility between the {Delta}namH1 mutant and the parental and complemented strains to the antimycobacterial drugs ethambutol and isoniazid that target the biosynthesis of mycolic acids and arabinan, two other components of the mycobacterial cell envelope (Table III).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE III
The M. smegmatis {Delta}namH1 mutant is hypersusceptible to penicillins Shown are the average zones of inhibition (mm) for three experimental trials (variation <2 mm).

 
In this work, we demonstrated hypersusceptibility of the {Delta}namH1 mutant to penicillin type {beta}-lactam antibiotics. In addition, a namH mutant of M. smegmatis is also hypersusceptible to the cephalosporin type {beta}-lactam ceftriaxone. In a separate project, our laboratory isolated a namH::mariner transposon insertion mutant of M. smegmatis from a transposon mutagenesis search for mutants hypersusceptible to cephalosporins (28). The phenotype of this mutant is due to the transposon insertion in namH as a plasmid bearing a copy of the wild-type namH gene confers parental ceftriaxone susceptibility to the mutant (data not shown).

A characteristic of organisms belonging to the genus Mycobacterium is an inherent resistance to lysozyme, a muramidase that cleaves the glycosidic bond between the sugar residues of the peptidoglycan chain. To see if the glycolylation state of the peptidoglycan affects lysozyme susceptibility, we determined the lysozyme MIC of the {Delta}namH1 mutant grown in both minimal and rich media. As shown in Table IV, both the wild-type and complemented strains were able to tolerate lysozyme challenge to a greater extent than the mutant strain, although all strains were more susceptible growing in minimal medium compared with rich. The fold difference in lysozyme MIC between the various strains tested was never greater than 2-fold when grown in minimal medium. However, the difference in lysozyme MIC between the M. smegmatis {Delta}namH1 mutant and controls strains was at least 8-fold when grown in rich medium (Table IV).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE IV
Susceptibility of the M. smegmatis {Delta}namH1 mutant to lysozyme Values represent the minimum concentration (µg/ml) of lysozyme that inhibits bacterial growth.

 
To further characterize the lysozyme sensitivity of the {Delta}namH1 mutant, we studied the effect of lysozyme added to mid-exponential phase cultures growing in minimal medium. The optical density of the cultures was recorded over an 8-h period following challenge with 20 µg/ml lysozyme (Fig. 4). Consistent with the lysozyme MIC results, growth of the mutant was hindered following the addition of lysozyme to the media. The optical density of the wild type and the complemented cultures plateaued at 0.5 h after addition of lysozyme. This plateau lasted for 2 h, after which the density of the cultures increased. In contrast, the density of the {Delta}namH1 culture decreased 1 h after the addition of lysozyme and the cells appeared to begin to aggregate. The culture eventually recovered 3.5 h later, but the density of the {Delta}namH1 cultures never matched that of the controls. The viable counts of the {Delta}namH1 cultures did not decrease throughout the growth curve following lysozyme addition (data not shown). The recovery and continuation of culture density during later time points of the growth curve can be attributed to the lability of the enzyme, as addition of fresh lysozyme at these later time points affected the growth of the mutant (data not shown).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Lysozyme growth curves. The parental, {Delta}namH1 mutant, and the complemented strains were grown in 7H9 medium in the absence (A) and presence (B) of lysozyme at a concentration of 20 µg/ml. Lysozyme was added to cultures at an OD600 of ~0.4, and OD readings were recorded at 30-min intervals.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The occurrence of N-glycolylated muramic acid in peptidoglycan is very rare and the purpose of this modification is unclear. The presence of this sugar in only closely related members of the class Actinomycetales suggests a correlation between the presence of N-glycolylmuramic acid and the type of cell envelope in the organism. All of the N-glycolylmuramic acid-containing bacteria also have a mycolylarabinogalactan-peptidoglycan type of cell envelope. In this study we have identified the namH gene encoding the enzyme responsible for the production N-glycolylated muramic acid in the mycobacterial peptodoglycan. This gene is found in all mycobacterial genomes sequenced to date, but it is a pseudogene in M. leprae. This was initially surprising, as the peptidoglycan of M. leprae has been reported to contain N-glycolylmuramic acid (29). A more recent study demonstrated that the peptidoglycan of M. leprae is not N-glycolyated (30), consistent with the identity of NamH as the enzyme responsible for this modification of the mycobacterial peptidoglycan. Given that the eukaryotic sialic acid hydroxylases require a cytochrome and cytochrome reductase for activity (11, 47, 48), there is the slight possibility that the namH gene encodes a protein that indirectly interacts with the peptidoglycan hydroxylase system in mycobacteria. To address this issue, we have made several attempts to express and purify NamH fusion proteins bearing N- or C-terminal polyhistidine or thioredoxin tags and then assay the purified protein with or without reconstitution using cell extracts. Unfortunately, the NamH protein does not appear to tolerate fusions, as all our fusion constructs failed to complement the namH deletion mutant. Likewise, attempts to overexpress the native protein in E. coli were unfruitful, since the protein is rather toxic to E. coli resulting in low protein expression or the generation of mutant namH genes (data not shown).

We show that namH is not essential for the growth of M. smegmatis, however, a namH deletion mutant is hypersusceptible to {beta}-lactam antibiotics that interfere with peptidoglycan cross-linking and lysozyme. These two phenotypes could suggest that the N-glycolyl group does indeed serve to stabilize the cell wall via hydrogen bonds as previously suggested, and the loss of this group decreases the integrity of the wall such that {beta}-lactam antibiotics and lysozyme have a greater ability to affect the peptidoglycan. However, there is very little information about the three-dimensional organization of this part of the mycobacterial cell wall. The rhamnose-N-acetylglucosamine linker that connects the arabinan polysaccharide to the peptidoglycan is attached to the C6 of muramic acid via a phosphoryl group (3). It may be that the phosphoryl groups are involved in hydrogen bonding to the N-glycolylmuramic acid on adjacent strands, but not all of the muramic acid groups are substituted with the linker. If there were a broad defect in cell envelope stability in the PG of the {Delta}namH1 mutant, it would be expected to have a generalized effect upon other aspects of the cell envelope, presumably resulting in hypersusceptibility to other antibiotics (i.e. isoniazid, ethambutol) that target the biosynthesis of other cell envelope components. However, the mutant has wild-type susceptibility to these antibiotics.

We favor an alternative hypothesis that the two phenotypes of the {Delta}namH1 mutant are the result of separate mechanisms. The increased susceptibility to {beta}-lactams is due to problems with either the translocation of the peptidoglycan precursors across the cytoplasmic membrane, the polymerization of the glycan backbone, or the recognition of the precursors by the peptidases responsible for cross-linking of the peptidoglycan peptides. We propose that the recognition of the abnormal sugar by the transglycosylases is affected. This could influence peptide cross-linking, as transpeptidation reactions are generally linked to the polymerization of the glycan chain. The net result of this would be a decrease in the amount of peptidoglycan cross-linking and thus, hypersusceptibility to {beta}-lactam antibiotics. The second part of this hypothesis posits that the increased susceptibility of the {Delta}namH1 mutant to lysozyme is because the specific function of the N-glycolyl group is to block the enzyme from the {beta}-1,4 bond between the muramyl and the N-acetylglucosaminyl residues in the glycan chain. It is known that O-acetylation at C6 of the muramic acid ring confers lysozyme resistance (31), as does the de-acetylation of N-acetylglucosamine (32). In this model, the replacement of the N-glycolyl group with N-acetyl on muramic acid in the {Delta}namH1 mutant would result in a peptidoglycan with increased sensitivity to lysozyme.

The large differences in lysozyme sensitivity observed between the {Delta}namH1 mutant and the parental strain during growth in rich versus minimal medium are interesting and ought to be explored in greater detail. All the strains were consistently more sensitive to lysozyme when grown in minimal medium. However, the fold difference in sensitivity between the parental strain and {Delta}namH1 mutant were significantly more pronounced when grown in rich medium. Likewise, the mutant was more susceptible to the {beta}-lactam antibiotic amoxicillin when grown in rich medium versus minimal medium. Whether or not these results are the consequence of metabolic changes under different growth conditions that affect the structure and permeability of the cell envelope remains to be determined.

Another question is whether this unique modification has a role in mycobacterial pathogenesis. Mammals possess a series of antibacterial enzymes (lysozymes, amidases) capable of cleaving bacterial peptidoglycan. Any modification of the peptidoglycan that confers resistance to these types of enzyme could have a role in pathogenesis. For Streptococcus pneumoniae, resistance to lysozyme is a virulence trait. This organism possesses a peptidoglycan de-acetylase that removes the N-acetyl group from N-acetylglucosamine, rendering the peptidoglycan lysozyme resistant (32). A S. pneumoniae mutant unable to de-acetylate its peptidoglycan is sensitive to lysozyme and is attenuated in a mouse model (33). The N-glycolylation of the mycobacterial PG could play a similar role in M. tuberculosis virulence.

Peptidoglycan fragments are pathogen-associated molecular patterns recognized by the innate immune system (8). It is possible that N-glycolylated muramic acid could function to modulate the innate immune response to mycobacterial peptidoglycan fragments released during a mycobacterial infection. Recent studies demonstrated that the peptidoglycan of M. tuberculosis is 40 times more effective than E. coli peptidoglycan at inhibiting the interferon-{gamma} induction of MHC Class II expression on macrophages (34). Given that the structures of the peptidoglycan of these two bacteria differ primarily on the basis of the acylation of the muramic acid residues, we hypothesize that the presence of the N-glycolyl group on muramic acid in the mycobacterial peptidoglycan could explain the potency of M. tuberculosis peptidoglycan in effecting macrophage function.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by NIAID, National Institutes of Health Grants AI47311 (to M. S. P.), AI049151 (to D. C. C.), and a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award in the Biomedical Sciences (to M. S. P.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

§ Supported by the Molecular Pathogenesis of Bacteria and Viruses National Institutes of Health Training Grant T32 AI07362. Back

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of Rochester Medical Center, Dept. of Microbiology and Immunology, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 672. Rochester, NY 14642. Tel.: 585-275-4670; Fax: 585-473-9573; E-mail: martin_pavelka{at}urmc.rochester.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: MurNGlyc, N-glycolylated muramic acid; MurNAc, N-acetylated muramic acid; MOPS, (3-(N-morpholino)-propanesulfonic acid); HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; namH, N-acetylmuramic acid hydroxylase; LB, Luria-Bertani medium; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MS, mass spectrometry. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Brennan, P. J. (2003) Tuberculosis (Edinb) 83, 91-97
  2. Brennan, P. J., and Nikaido, H. (1995) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 29-63[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Crick, D. C., Mahapatra, S., and Brennan, P. J. (2001) Glycobiology 11, 107R-118R[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Yagi, T., Mahapatra, S., Mikusova, K., Crick, D. C., and Brennan, P. J. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 26497-26504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Burroughs, M., Rozdzinski, E., Geelen, S., and Tuomanen, E. (1993) J. Clin. Investig. 92, 297-302
  6. Luker, K. E., Tyler, A. N., Marshall, G. R., and Goldman, W. E. (1995) Mol. Microbiol. 16, 733-743[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Melly, M. A., McGee, Z. A., and Rosenthal, R. S. (1984) J. Infect. Dis. 149, 378-386[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Royet, J., and Reichhart, J. M. (2003) Trends Cell Biol. 13, 610-614[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Azuma, I., Thomas, D. W., Adam, A., Ghuysen, J. M., Bonaly, R., Petit, J. F., and Lederer, E. (1970) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 208, 444-451[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Holt, J. G., Krieg, N. R., Sneath, P. H. A., Staley, J. T., and Williams, S. T. (eds) (1994) Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 9th Ed., pp. 597-649, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
  11. Angata, T., and Varki, A. (2002) Chem. Rev. 102, 439-469[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Petit, J. F., Adam, A., and Wietzerbin-Falszpan, J. (1970) FEBS Lett. 6, 55-57[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Mason, J. R., and Cammack, R. (1992) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 46, 277-305[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Essers, L., and Schoop, H. J. (1978) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 544, 180-184[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Gateau, O., Bordet, C., and Michel, G. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 421, 395-405[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Snapper, S. B., Melton, R. E., Mustafa, S., Kieser, T., and Jacobs, W. R., Jr. (1990) Mol. Microbiol. 4, 1911-1919[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Miesel, L., Weisbrod, T. R., Marcinkeviciene, J. A., Bittman, R., and Jacobs, W. R., Jr. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 2459-2467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Flores, A. R., Parsons, L. M., and Pavelka, M. S., Jr. (2004) Microbiology, in press
  19. Pavelka, M. S., Jr., and Jacobs, W. R., Jr. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 6496-6507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Pavelka, M. S., Jr., and Jacobs, W. R., Jr. (1999) J. Bacteriol. 181, 4780-4789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Raymond, J. B., Price, N. P., and Pavelka, M. S., Jr. (2003) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 229, 83-89[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Mahapatra, S., Scherman, H., Brennan, P. J., and Crick, D. C. (2004)
  23. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Cole, S. T., Brosch, R., Parkhill, J., Garnier, T., Churcher, C., Harris, D., Gordon, S. V., Eiglmeier, K., Gas, S., Barry, C. E., 3rd, Tekaia, F., Badcock, K., Basham, D., Brown, D., Chillingworth, T., Connor, R., Davies, R., Devlin, K., Feltwell, T., Gentles, S., Hamlin, N., Holroyd, S., Hornsby, T., Jagels, K., Kroghs, A., Mclean, J., Moule, S., Murphy, L., Oliver, K., Osborne, J., Quail, M. A., Rajandream, M.-A., Rogers, J., Rutter, S., Seeger, K., Skelton, J., Squares, R., Squares, S., Sulston, J. E., Taylor, K., Whitehead, S., and Barrell, B. G. (1998) Nature 393, 537-544[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Cole, S. T., Eiglmeier, K., Parkhill, J., James, K. D., Thomson, N. R., Wheeler, P. R., Honore, N., Garnier, T., Churcher, C., Harris, D., Mungall, K., Basham, D., Brown, D., Chillingworth, T., Connor, R., Davies, R. M., Devlin, K., Duthoy, S., Feltwell, T., Fraser, A., Hamlin, N., Holroyd, S., Hornsby, T., Jagels, K., Lacroix, C., Maclean, J., Moule, S., Murphy, L., Oliver, K., Quail, M. A., Rajandream, M. A., Rutherford, K. M., Rutter, S., Seeger, K., Simon, S., Simmonds, M., Skelton, J., Squares, R., Squares, S., Stevens, K., Taylor, K., Whitehead, S., Woodward, J. R., and Barrell, B. G. (2001) Nature 409, 1007-1011[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., and Gibson, T. J. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Schlenzka, W., Shaw, L., Kelm, S., Schmidt, C. L., Bill, E., Trautwein, A. X., Lottspeich, F., and Schauer, R. (1996) FEBS Lett. 385, 197-200[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Volcy, K., Flores, A. R., Spence, J. M., and Pavelka, M. S., Jr. (2004)
  29. Draper, P., Kandler, O., and Darbre, A. (1987) 133, 1187-1194
  30. Mahapatra, S., and Crick, D. C. (2004)
  31. Heckels, J. E., and Virji, M. (1988.) in Bacterial Cell Surface Techniques (Hancock, I., and Poxton, I., eds) pp. 82-83, Wiley-Interscience, Bath, Avon
  32. Vollmer, W., and Tomasz, A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 20496-20501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Vollmer, W., and Tomasz, A. (2002) Infect. Immun. 70, 7176-7178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Fortune, S. M., Solache, A., Jaeger, A., Hill, P. J., Belisle, J. T., Bloom, B. R., Rubin, E. J., and Ernst, J. D. (2004) J. Immunol. 172, 6272-6280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Geer, L. Y., Domrachev, M., Lipman, D. J., and Bryant, S. H. (2002) Genome Res. 12, 1619-1623[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
E. C. Hett and E. J. Rubin
Bacterial Growth and Cell Division: a Mycobacterial Perspective
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2008; 72(1): 126 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
S. Mahapatra, D. C. Crick, M. R. McNeil, and P. J. Brennan
Unique Structural Features of the Peptidoglycan of Mycobacterium leprae
J. Bacteriol., January 15, 2008; 190(2): 655 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. Z. Kincaid, A. J. Wolf, L. Desvignes, S. Mahapatra, D. C. Crick, P. J. Brennan, M. S. Pavelka Jr., and J. D. Ernst
Codominance of TLR2-Dependent and TLR2-Independent Modulation of MHC Class II in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection In Vivo
J. Immunol., September 1, 2007; 179(5): 3187 - 3195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. L. Bishop, E. C. Boyle, and B. B. Finlay
Deception point: Peptidoglycan modification as a means of immune evasion
PNAS, January 16, 2007; 104(3): 691 - 692.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. G. Boneca, O. Dussurget, D. Cabanes, M.-A. Nahori, S. Sousa, M. Lecuit, E. Psylinakis, V. Bouriotis, J.-P. Hugot, M. Giovannini, et al.
From the Cover: A critical role for peptidoglycan N-deacetylation in Listeria evasion from the host innate immune system
PNAS, January 16, 2007; 104(3): 997 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
N. P. Price and F. A. Momany
Modeling bacterial UDP-HexNAc: polyprenol-P HexNAc-1-P transferases
Glycobiology, September 1, 2005; 15(9): 29R - 42R.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/1/326    most recent
M411006200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map