Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M410859200 on October 26, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 1, 494-505, January 7, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/1/494    most recent
M410859200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berrou, L.
Right arrow Articles by Parent, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berrou, L.
Right arrow Articles by Parent, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The C-terminal Residues in the Alpha-interacting Domain (AID) Helix Anchor CaV{beta} Subunit Interaction and Modulation of CaV2.3 Channels*

Laurent Berrou{ddagger}§, Yolaine Dodier{ddagger}§, Alexandra Raybaud§, Audrey Tousignant||, Omar Dafi{ddagger}§, Joelle N. Pelletier||, and Lucie Parent{ddagger}§**

From the {ddagger}Département de Physiologie, §Groupe d'étude des Protéines Membranaires, the Département de Physique, and the ||Département de Chimie, Université de Montréal, P. O. Box 6128, Downtown Station, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada

Received for publication, September 21, 2004 , and in revised form, October 25, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
The alpha-interacting domain (AID) in the I-II linker of high voltage-activated (HVA) Ca2+ channel {alpha}1 subunits binds with high affinity to CaV{beta} auxiliary subunits. The recently solved crystal structures of the AID-CaV{beta} complex in CaV1.1/1.2 have revealed that this interaction occurs through a set of six mostly invariant residues Glu/Asp6, Leu7, Gly9, Tyr10, Trp13, and Ile14 (where the superscript refers to the position of the residue starting with the QQ signature doublet) distributed among three {alpha}-helical turns in the proximal section of the I-II linker. We show herein that alanine mutations of N-terminal AID residues Gln1, Gln2, Ile3, Glu4, Glu6, Leu7, and Gly9 in CaV2.3 did not abolish [35S]CaV{beta}1b or [35S]CaV{beta}3 subunit overlay binding to fusion proteins nor did they prevent the typical modulation of whole cell currents by CaV{beta}3. Mutations of the invariant Tyr10 with either hydrophobic (Ala), aromatic (Phe), or positively charged (Arg, Lys) residues yielded CaV{beta}3-responsive whole cell currents, whereas mutations with negatively charged residues (Asp, Glu) disrupted CaV{beta}3 binding and modulation. In contrast, modulation and binding by CaV{beta}3 was significantly weakened in I14A (neutral and hydrophobic) and I14S (neutral and polar) mutants and eradicated in negatively charged I14D and I14E or positively charged I14R and I14K mutants. CaV{beta}3-induced modulation was only preserved with the conserved I14L mutation. Molecular replacement analyses carried out using a three-dimensional homology model of the AID helix from CaV2.3 suggests that a high degree of hydrophobicity and a restrained binding pocket could account for the strict structural specificity of the interaction site found at position Ile14. Altogether these results indicate that the C-terminal residues Trp13 (1) and Ile14 anchor CaV{beta} subunit functional modulation of HVA Ca2+ channels.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
The passage of Ca2+ in a selective manner across the lipid bilayer of the cellular plasma membrane occurs by way of several transport proteins. The voltage-dependent calcium channel (VDCC)1 represents one key pathway that regulates the entry of extracellular calcium into electrically excitable cells. VDCC are multimeric proteins composed of the transmembrane pore-forming CaV{alpha}1, the disulfide-linked dimer CaV{alpha}2{delta}, the intracellular CaV{beta} subunits ({beta}1-{beta}4), and in some cases the CaV{gamma} subunit (2). To this date, the primary structures for 10 distinct VDCC {alpha}1 subunits have been identified by molecular cloning and shown to belong to three main families: the classical L-type high voltage-activated (HVA) VDCC form the CaV1 class; CaV2 are non-L-type HVA VDCC; and CaV3 are the T-type VDCC that are activated at low voltage (LVA). Although a minimum VDCC can be formed by a single CaV{alpha}1 subunit, co-expression with auxiliary CaV{beta} subunits is required for HVA CaV channels such as the cardiac L-type CaV1.2 (3, 4), brain N-type CaV2.1 (5), brain L-type CaV1.3 (6-8), and R-type CaV2.3 (4) to generate Ca2+ currents with time course and voltage dependence similar to native currents (9). CaV{beta} subunit modulation of LVA T-type (CaV3.1-3.3) channels has yet to be reported (10).

CaV{beta} subunits increase peak current density, in part by recruiting the CaV{alpha}1 subunit to the plasma membrane (11-14), by hyperpolarizing the voltage dependence of activation and inactivation, and by increasing the channel opening probability at the single channel level (4, 15). CaV{beta} subunits increase inactivation kinetics in an isoform-specific manner with CaV{beta}3 > CaV{beta}1b > CaV{beta}1a > CaV{beta}4 >> CaV{beta}2a (4). The four known auxiliary CaV{beta} subunits can potentially associate with any of the six CaV{alpha}1 pore-forming subunits of HVA VDCC (CaV1.1-1.4, CaV2.1-2.3) via the alpha interaction domain (AID) located on the I-II linker of the CaV{alpha}1 subunit. The AID motif is absent from LVA T-type (CaV3.1-3.3) VDCC for which CaV{beta} subunit modulation has never been reported. About half of the residues of the AID helix (Gln1-Gln2-X3-Glu4-X5-X6-Leu7-X8-Gly9-Tyr10-X11-X12-Trp13-Ile14-X15-X16-X17-Glu18) are strictly conserved (in bold) among the six CaV{alpha}1 subunits but homology was found to be higher within members of the CaV1 and CaV2 families. Nonetheless, positions 8, 11, and 15 are occupied by residues that could vary even within the same CaV family (Table I). The AID motif Gln1-Gln2-X3-Glu4-X5-X6-Leu7-X8-Gly9-Tyr10-X11-X12-Trp13-Ile14-X15-X16-X17-Glu18 (where X can be any residue) might not be the unique determinant of the CaV{alpha}1-{beta} interaction. In vitro binding experiments have revealed the presence of additional interaction sites of lower affinity on the cytoplasmic loops of CaV2.1 (16, 17) and on the C-terminal of CaV2.3 (18) but the AID appears to be the primary high affinity site of interaction (14, 15).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
AID domain in HVA CaV{alpha}1 subunits

Primary sequences of the AID domain are shown at each of the 18 positions of the AID region for six HVA CaV{alpha}1-subunits corresponding to the CaV1.1 to the CaV2.3 families. Sequences were obtained from the rabbit CaV1.1 (GenBankTM M23919 [GenBank] ), rabbit CaV1.2 (GenBankTM X15539 [GenBank] ), rat CaV1.3 (GenBankTM D38101 [GenBank] ), rabbit CaV2.1 (GenBankTM X57477 [GenBank] ), rabbit CaV2.2 (GenBankTM D14157 [GenBank] ), and human CaV2.3 (GenBankTM L27745 [GenBank] ).

 
The recent publication of three crystal structures of the CaV{beta}-AID peptide complex provides a unique insight in the intricate set of interactions between the two subunits (19-21). The three-dimensional structures of the conserved core region of CaV{beta}2a and CaV{beta}3, alone and in complex with the AID peptide from CaV1.1 or CaV1.2 channels, show that the CaV{beta} subunit core contains two interacting domains: a Src homology 3 (SH3) domain and a guanylate kinase (GK) domain connected by a HOOK region similar to the one found in PSD95 (19-21). The BID (CaV{beta} interaction domain) is essential both for the structural integrity of the CaV{beta} subunit and for bridging the SH3 and GK domains, but does not participate directly in binding the CaV{alpha}1 subunit.

The AID peptide from the CaV{alpha}1 subunit adopts an {alpha}-helical structure upon binding to the CaV{beta} subunit, and the six AID residues from the three main {alpha}-helical turns nestle into the hydrophobic groove found in the GK domain opposite to the SH3 domain in the CaV{beta} subunit. The hydrophobic face of the AID helix aptly named the "alpha-binding pocket" (ABP) contains 7 residues X3, X6, Leu7, Gly9, Tyr10, Trp13, and Ile14 (or Ile376, Glu379, Leu380, Gly382, Tyr383, Trp386, and Ile387 in CaV2.3) that interact with the CaV{beta} subunit. The interaction between the AID helix and the CaV{beta} protein appears to be primarily secured by the projection of the AID C-terminal pairs Gly9/Tyr10 and Trp13/Ile14 onto the CaV{beta} fold (21). Both Tyr10 and Trp13 are buried completely within the CaV{beta} protein. Tyr10 makes multiple van der Waals interactions with CaV{beta} through its main chains while its side-chain hydroxyl group forms hydrogen bonds with two water molecules, the side-chain of Asp6, and the main chain of Ile14 (19). Trp13 plays a central role by forming six van der Waals interactions with residues of CaV{beta} subunits and one hydrogen bond with the main-chain carbonyl of a methionine residue in CaV{beta} subunit. Ile14 forms three van der Waals interactions with residues of CaV{beta} subunits (19, 20). Gly9 appears to be entrenched within the CaV{beta} fold like Tyr10 and almost to be as inaccessible as Trp13 and Ile14 (19), but the extent of its interaction with CaV{beta} remains debatable (20, 21). The extensive network of interactions between the two subunits, mostly hydrophobic in nature, probably account for the nanomolar affinity between the CaV{alpha}1 and the CaV{beta} subunits (22, 23).

The three-dimensional structures vividly account for a wealth of structure-function data gathered over the last decade. Functional studies have long shown the YWI residues to be critical for CaV{beta}1b and/or CaV{beta}3 binding in CaV2.1 (24). We have recently shown that point mutations of the conserved Trp13 (Trp386) eliminated the functional modulation of CaV2.3 currents by CaV{beta}3 as well as disrupted the CaV{beta}3 subunit binding to the AID peptide (1). The stereochemical requirements at this position were strict since substitutions with either hydrophobic (Ala, Gly), hydrophilic (Gln, Arg, Glu), and aromatic (Phe, Tyr) residues led to the same results suggesting that Trp13 (Trp386) played a unique role in CaV{beta} subunit binding and modulation of CaV2.3 channels. Y10F preserved in part CaV{beta}3 and CaV{beta}2 binding but preserving the hydroxyl side-chain in Y10S and conserving the aromatic group in the Y10W mutant led nonetheless to a significant decrease in CaV{beta}2, CaV{beta}3, and CaV{beta}1b binding to AIDA (CaV2.1) (24, 25). This observation was also confirmed in CaV1.2 and CaV1.1 channels where the Y10S mutant disrupted the plasma membrane localization of the CaV{alpha}1 subunit while preserving in part the CaV{beta} subunit-induced modulation of whole cell currents (26-28). In contrast, point mutations of Gln1, Gln2, Glu4, Leu7, Gly9, and Glu16 failed to abolish the binding of CaV{beta}3 to the denatured AID peptide from CaV2.1 (13) suggesting that the stereochemical requirements might not be as strict in these positions to achieve a strong interaction with CaV{beta} subunits. In contrast, there is very little information regarding the role of the N-terminal pair of residues Glu6/Leu7 in establishing the functional interaction with CaV{beta} subunits although the crystal structures have demonstrated a strong interaction between the two subunits at this site. It thus remains to be seen whether all of these CaVAID-CaV{beta} interaction sites are required to confer the typical CaV{beta} subunit-induced functional modulation of CaV1 and CaV2 currents.

Herein we show that the alanine mutation of each of the AID residues Gln1, Gln2, Glu3, Glu4, Glu6, Leu7, Gly9, and Glu18 did not eliminate [35S]CaV{beta}1b or [35S]CaV{beta}3 subunit overlay binding to fusion proteins nor did it prevent the typical modulation of CaV2.3 whole cell currents by CaV{beta}3. Mutations of Tyr10 with either aromatic (Phe) or positively charged (Arg, Lys) residues yielded whole cell currents that responded to CaV{beta}3 essentially like the wild-type channel whereas mutations with negatively charged residues (Asp, Glu) disrupted CaV{beta}3 binding and modulation. The structural requirements were more stringent for Ile14 since the modulation and binding by CaV{beta}3 were only preserved with the conserved Iso to Leu mutation. Altogether these results suggest that the C-terminal residues Trp13 (1) and Ile14 play a more critical role than Gly9 and Tyr10 in CaV{beta} subunit functional modulation of HVA Ca2+ channels.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Recombinant DNA Materials—Standard methods of plasmid DNA preparation were used (29). cDNAs coding for the auxiliary rat CaV{beta}3 (GenBankTM M88751 [GenBank] ) and rat brain CaV{beta}1b (GenBankTM X61394 [GenBank] ) were kindly donated by Dr. E. Perez-Reyes (30-32). The wild-type human {alpha}1E or CaV2.3 (GenBankTM L27745 [GenBank] ) was a gift from Dr Toni Schneider (33). The rat brain CaV{alpha}2b{delta} subunit was provided by Dr. T. P. Snutch.

Point Mutations and RNA Transcription—Point mutations were performed with 40-mer synthetic oligonucleotides using the QuikChangeTM XL-mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Briefly, mutations were achieved by cassette cloning using the NotI/XhoI CaV2.3 fragment (positions 111 and 1275 nt) subcloned into pBluescript (Stratagene). Constructs were verified by restriction mapping after religation of the mutated fragment into the naturally occurring NotI/XhoI sites of the wild-type CaV2.3. The nucleotide sequence of the mutant channels was confirmed through automated fluorescent DNA sequencing (BioST, Lachine, Qué). cDNA constructs for wild-type and mutated CaV{alpha}1 subunits were linearized at the 3'-end by HindIII digestion whereas the CaV{beta}3 subunit was digested by NotI. Run-off transcripts were prepared using the methylated cap analog m7G(5')ppp(5')G and T7 RNA polymerase with the mMessage mMachine® transcription kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). The final cRNA products were resuspended in DEPC-treated H2O and stored at -80 °C. The integrity of the final product and the absence of degraded RNA were determined by denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide.

CaV{beta}3 and CaV{beta}1b Overlay Assays onto pGFP-uv Fusion Proteins—A fragment of 105 bp including the whole AID region of CaV2.3 (25-residue AIDE peptide) was generated by polymerase chain reaction and cloned in-frame into the HindIII-KpnI sites of pGFPuv vector (GenBankTM U62636 [GenBank] ) (Clontech, BD Biosciences, Mississauga, Ontario) to give a fusion protein with an estimated molecular mass of 32 kDa. The AID-fusion protein was expressed in the chemically competent Escherichia coli strain DH5{alpha}. The synthesis of the fusion proteins was induced at 37 °C using 0.5 mM isopropyl {beta}-D-thiogalactoside in an overnight liquid culture, and bacteria were collected by centrifugation. As the GFP protein cloned in-frame with the AIDE peptide has been modified to fluoresce under UV light, the fusion protein confers a green color to the DH5{alpha} bacterial extracts when monitored under UV light. For overlay assays, crude DH5{alpha} bacterial extracts (200 µl) were boiled for 2 min in Laemmli's loading buffer and separated on a denaturing 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Total proteins were either visualized with Red Ponceau or were loaded in duplicate to be visualized by Coomassie staining in addition to the autoradiogram. This half of the gel was transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Fisher, Whitby, Ontario) using Towbin buffer (in mM: 25 Tris, 192 glycine, 20% methanol, and 0.05% SDS). The membrane was blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin in HBS-Tween (in mM: 137 NaCl, 3 KCl, 10 HEPES, and 0.05% Tween-20 pH 7.4), washed once with HBS-Tween and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in 5 ml of HBS-Tween with 20 µl of [35S]methionine labeled CaV{beta}3- or CaV{beta}1b subunit prepared as described below. The blots were washed twice for 10 min with 1 mM CaCl2 in HBS-Tween, air-dried, and radioactive signals were detected by autoradiography.

[35S]Methionine-labeled CaV{beta}3 or CaV{beta}1b in pBluescript (0.5 µg) was synthesized by coupled in vitro transcription and translation (TNT; Promega, Madison, WI) in a 50-µl reaction volume for 1 h, and the reaction mixture was applied without further treatment to the overlay membrane.

Functional Expression of Wild-type and Mutants Channels—Oocytes were obtained from female Xenopus laevis clawed frog (Nasco, Fort Atkinson, WI) as described previously (1, 34, 35). Briefly, stage VI oocytes free of follicular cells were injected with 46 nl of a solution containing 28 ng of cRNA coding for the wild-type or mutated CaV{alpha}1 subunit. The CaV{alpha}1 subunit was always co-injected with cRNA coding for the rat brain CaV{alpha}2b{delta} (6) and with or without the rat brain CaV{beta}3 (36) in a 6:2:3 or 6:2 weight ratio. The final amount of exogenous CaV{beta}3 injected corresponds to 14 ng, which represents a 23-fold enrichment over the estimated concentration of 0.56 ± 0.02 ng of endogenous CaV{beta}3xo per oocyte (22). Oocytes were incubated at 19 °C for 1-5 days after injection in Barth's solution (in mM): 100 NaCl; 2 KCl; 1.8 CaCl2; 1 MgCl2; 5 HEPES; 2.5 pyruvic acid; 100 units/ml of penicillin; 50 µg/ml gentamicin; pH 7.6.

Electrophysiological Recordings in Oocytes—Wild-type and mutant channels were screened at room temperature for macroscopic Ba2+ currents using a two-electrode voltage clamp amplifier (OC-725C, Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT) as described earlier (1, 4, 34). In order to minimize series resistance problems associated with voltage clamping large currents in Xenopus oocytes, experiments were performed on cells with peak currents smaller than -5 µA in most cases. Hence, the wild-type channel was recorded 3-4 days after cRNA injection whereas whole cell Ba2+ currents were generally measured 1-2 days after injection for AID mutant channels in the absence of CaV{beta}3 and 2-3 days in the presence of CaV{beta}3. Oocytes were first impaled in a modified Ringer solution (in mM): 96 NaOH; 2 KOH; 1.8 CaCl2; 1 MgCl2; 10 HEPES titrated to pH 7.4 with methanesulfonic acid CH3SO3H (MeS), then the bath was perfused with the 10 Ba2+ solution (in mM; 10 Ba(OH)2; 110 NaOH; 1 KOH; 20 Hepes titrated to pH 7.3 with MES). To minimize kinetic contamination by the endogenous Ca2+-activated Cl- current, oocytes were injected with 18.4 nl of a 50 mM EGTA (Sigma) 0.5-1 h before the experiments. Oocytes were superfused by gravity flow at a rate of 2 ml/min that was fast enough to allow complete chamber fluid exchange within 30 s. Experiments were performed at room temperature (20-22 °C).

Electrophysiological Data Acquisition and Analysis—PClamp software, Clampex 6.02 and Clampfit 6.02 (Axon instruments, Foster City, CA) was used for on-line data acquisition and analysis as previously described (1, 34, 35). Unless stated otherwise, data were sampled at 10 kHz and low pass-filtered at 5 kHz using the amplifier built-in filter. For all recordings, a series of voltage pulses were applied from a holding potential of -80 mV at a frequency of 0.2 Hz from -40 to +60 mV. Isochronal inactivation data (h{infty} or hinf) were obtained from tail currents generated at the end of a 5-s prepulse (4, 37). Tail current amplitudes were estimated using the function Analyze in Clampfit 6.0 from the peak current arising during the first 10 ms after the capacitive transient (20 data points). Each of these currents was then normalized to the maximum current obtained before the prepulse voltage (I/Imax) and was plotted against the prepulse voltage. For the isochronal inactivation figures,

(Eq. 1)

pooled data points (mean ± S.E.) were fitted to Equation 1 using user-defined functions and the fitting algorithms provided by Origin 6.1 and 7.0 (Microcal Software, Northampton, MA) analysis software. Equation 1 accounts for the fraction of non-inactivating current with E0.5,inact mid-point potential; z, slope parameter; Y0, fraction of non-inactivating current; Vm, the prepulse potential, and RT/F with their usual meanings. The fitting process generated values estimating errors on the given fit values.

Activation potentials were estimated from the normalized I-V curves obtained for each channel combination (22). Although this calculation was not exempt from gating contamination, it provided a qualitative approximation of the CaV{beta}3 modulation on I-V parameters. The I-V relationships were normalized to the maximum amplitude and were fitted to Equation 2, a Boltzmann equation coupled to a linear function.

(Eq. 2)

E0.5,act is the potential for 50% activation; Grel is the normalized conductance; z, slope parameter; Vm, the test potential, Vrev, the apparent reversal potential and RT/F with their usual meanings.

Inactivation kinetics were quantified using R300 values, that is the ratio of the whole cell current remaining at the end of a 300-ms pulse (34, 35, 38). As inactivation kinetics can vary with current density, comparisons between constructs and mutants were generally restricted to whole cell currents lower than -5 µA as much as possible. Furthermore, this range of current densities made it easier to voltage clamp the oocyte uniformly thus decreasing the possibility of series resistance artifacts contaminating the current kinetics data. Capacitive transients were erased for clarity in the final figures. Statistical analyses and Student's t test were performed using the fitting routines provided by Origin 6.1 and 7.0 (Microcal Software, Northampton, MA).

Homology Modeling of Wild-type and Mutant CaV2.3—Computations were performed using the InsightII package (version 2000, Accelrys) as described elsewhere (39, 40). Briefly, the BIOPOLYMER and BUILDER modules were used in particular to build or modify molecular structures, and all energy minimizations were performed with the DISCOVER module using the consistent valence force field (CVFF). For all minimizations, one thousand steps of Steepest Descent minimization were performed, followed by a Conjugate gradient minimization until a convergence of 0.001 kcal/mol/Å was reached.

The starting coordinates were taken from the PDB file 1T0J [PDB] .pdb (CaV{beta}2a + AID from CaV1.2) (19). Molecular replacement of the following eight residues (L430I, E432R, D433E, K435N, L438R, D439A, T442D, and Q443D) to their reciprocal residues in the human CaV2.3 was undertaken using BIOPOLYMER to obtain the complex CaV{beta}2a + AID wt from CaV2.3. The crystallographic water molecules were not retained. Hydrogen atoms were added using the BIOPOLYMER module at the normal ionization state of the amino acids at pH 7.0. Potentials as well as partial and formal charges were fixed with CVFF. A first series of energy minimizations was then performed with the DISCOVER module using the CVFF with a distance-dependent dielectric constant of 80 (implicit H2O). Minimizations were carried out while keeping the heavy atoms of the protein fixed. The structure obtained was then submitted to a second series of energy minimizations performed as explained above, after removing all constraints on the atoms and with a 20 Å radius sphere of explicit water molecules centered around AID residue Asn435. These two series of minimizations yielded the energy-minimized configuration of CaV{beta}2a + AID wt from CaV2.3. This wild-type configuration was then used to produce six individual mutants: Y437F, Y437R, Y437D, I441L, I441R, and I441D that were also minimized as explained above with a 20 Å radius sphere of explicit water molecules.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
A Three-dimensional Model of the AID Peptide from CaV2.3—By homology with the three crystal structures obtained by x-ray diffraction of the AID region in CaV1.1 and CaV1.2 channels, the AID region of the CaV2.3 channel (AIDE) should form an {alpha}-helix upon binding to CaV{beta} subunits (19-21). The primary sequence of AIDE, Gln1-Gln2-Ile3-Glu4-Arg5-Glu6-Leu7-Asn8-Gly9-Tyr10-Arg11-Ala12-Trp13-Ile14-Asp15-Lys16-Ala17-Glu18 conserves 9 out of 18 residues when compared with the AID helix from CaV1.1 and CaV1.2 {alpha}1 subunits (Table I). The three-dimensional representations of AIDE obtained by homology modeling with either CaV1.1/CaV{beta}2a (21) (not shown), CaV1.2/CaV{beta}3 (20) (not shown), or CaV1.2/CaV{beta}2a (19) (Fig. 1) all show that AIDE assumes an {alpha}-helical structure in the presence of CaV{beta}. The orientation of the residues facing the hydrophilic side of the AID helix (Gln2, Glu4, Arg5, Asn8, Arg11, Ala12, Asp15, and Lys16) was seen to vary slightly but the residues mostly located on the hydrophobic face of the AIDE helix that includes the invariant LGWYI residues (Glu6, Leu7, Gly9, Tyr10, Trp13, and Ile14) are well buried in the CaV{beta} subunit fold. As seen in Fig. 1, the front (A), the back (B), and the bottom (C) perspectives of the AIDE model obtained using the crystal coordinates of CaV1.2/CaV{beta}2a (19) clearly show that the side-chains of Tyr10, Trp13, and Ile14 are entrenched within the CaV{beta} subunit. Hence, the C-terminal residues appear to interact extensively with the CaV{beta} subunit. The Gly9 residue is significantly enclosed by the CaV{beta} subunit and could be needed to provide some degree of flexibility to the AID helix. The crystal structures further show that the aromatic side-chain of Tyr10 is significantly surrounded by residues of the CaV{beta} subunit suggesting that the interaction might require an aromatic residue at this position. Located on the adjacent turn, the extreme concealment of Trp13 is compatible with our previous observations that mutations considered to be even conservative (W13F, W13Y), eliminated CaV{beta}3 binding and modulation of CaV2.3 (1). In contrast, Ile14 situated next to Tyr13 and the N-terminal residues Glu6 and Leu7 appear to form fewer interactions with CaV{beta} suggesting these three positions might be more compliant to structural substitutions than Tyr10 and Trp13. We thus undertook a systematic analysis of the physicochemical requirements of key AID positions to achieve functional modulation of CaV2.3 by CaV{beta} subunits.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Three-dimensional model of the AID helix of the human CaV2.3 (AIDE). Model was obtained with INSIGHT II using the atomic coordinates for the human CaV1.2 AIDC crystal structure co-crystallized with CaV{beta}2a at a 2.0 Å resolution (1T0J. pdb) as a template (19). The AIDC peptide (Gln1-Gln2-Leu3-Glu4-Glu5-Asp6-Leu7-Lys8-Gly9-Tyr10-Leu11-Asp12-Trp13-Ile14-Thr15-Lys16-Ala17-Glu18) underwent 8 substitutions to obtain the primary sequence of AIDE (Gln1-Gln2-Ile3-Glu4-Arg5-Glu6-Leu7-Asn8-Gly9-Tyr10-Arg11-Ala12-Trp13-Ile14-Asp15-Lys16-Ala17-Glu18) as described under "Experimental Procedures" (see also Table I). The core of the AIDE helix is colored in white. The following side-chains on the hydrophobic face of the helix are color-coded: E379 (yellow), L380 (orange), G382 (turquoise), Y383 (green), W386 (red), I387 (magenta). The CaV{beta}2a subunit is shown in blue. A, front view with the N-terminal end projecting toward the top of the figure. B, back view with the N-terminal end projecting toward the top of the figure. C, bottom view. The BIOPOLYMER module was used to build the molecular structure, and all energy minimizations were performed with the DISCOVER module as described under "Experimental Procedures."

 
Alanine Scan of the N-terminal AID residues (Gln1-Leu7) in CaV2.3—CaV{beta} subunit binding and modulation of N-terminal AID residues (Gln1, Gln2, Ile3, Glu4, Glu6, Leu7) in CaV2.3 (Fig. 2A) were investigated with alanine mutations of these residues. Mutations of the nonconserved Arg5 were extensively studied and reported before (1, 34). Fig. 2, B and C shows the overlay binding assays for point mutations Q1A, Q2A, I3A, E4A, E6A, L7A performed in the 18-residue AID peptide from CaV2.3 (AIDE) inserted in the pGFPuv vector that corresponds respectively to mutants Q374A, Q375A, I376A, E377A, E379A, and L380A in CaV2.3. CaV{beta} subunit binding was evaluated with both [35S]methionine-labeled CaV{beta}3 (Fig. 2B) and CaV{beta}1b (Fig. 2C) subunits. As seen, strong signals were obtained in both cases at the expected molecular mass of 32 kDa for the wild-type AID peptide {approx} Q374A {approx} Q375A {approx} I376A {approx} E377A {approx} E379A > L380A mutants indicating that both CaV{beta}3 and CaV{beta}1b interacted strongly with the alanine mutants under denaturing conditions. In contrast, the empty pGPFuv vector (29 kDa) and the well documented W386A (WA) mutant failed to interact with either [35S]CaV{beta}1b or [35S]CaV{beta}3. W386A mutant was not either modulated by CaV{beta}3 (1) or CaV{beta}1b (not shown).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Alanine mutations in the N-terminal end of the AID helix do not impede CaV{beta} binding and modulation. A, primary sequence of the AID region (Q1 Q2 I3 E4 R5 E6 L7 N8 G9 Y10 R11 A12 W13 I14 D15 K16 A17 E18) is shown for CaV2.3 (AIDE). The N-terminal residues mutated in this figure are underlined. B, autoradiogram of in vitro translated [35S]CaV{beta}3 overlays on GFPuv-AIDE mutants immobilized on nitrocellulose. Strong signals were detected (from left to right) for the wild-type AID peptide, Q374A (Q1A), Q375A (Q2A), I376A (I3A), E377A (E4A), E379A (E6A), and L380A (L7A). [35S]CaV{beta}3 binding could not be detected for the empty vector pGFPuv and the AID mutant W386A (WA). C, autoradiogram of in vitro translated [35S]CaV{beta}1b overlays on GFPuv-AIDE mutants immobilized on nitrocellulose. Strong signals were detected (from left to right) for the wild-type AIDE peptide, Q374A (Q1A), Q375A (Q2A), I376A (I3A), E377A (E4A), E379A (E6A), and L380A (L7A). [35S]CaV{beta}1b binding could not be detected for the empty vector pGFPuv and the AIDE mutant W386A. D, typical whole cell current traces obtained after the expression of the E379A (E6A) mutant in Xenopus oocytes with CaV{alpha}2b{delta} without exogenous CaV{beta}3 (-{beta}3) and after co-injection with CaV{beta}3 (+{beta}3). Time and current scales are identical for D and E. E, typical whole cell current traces obtained after the expression of the L380A (L7A) mutant in Xenopus oocytes with CaV{alpha}2b{delta} without exogenous CaV{beta}3 (-{beta}3) and after co-injection with CaV{beta}3 (+{beta}3). F, mean R300 ratios (the fraction of the whole cell current remaining at the end of a 300-ms pulse) are shown ± S.E. from 0 to +20 mV for the wild-type and the mutant CaV2.3 channels (Q374A, Q375A, I376A, E377A, E379A, L380A, and W386A) in the absence of CaV{beta}3. G, R300 graph for the wild-type and the mutant CaV2.3 channels (Q374A, Q375A, I376A, E377A, E379A, L380A, and W386A) after co-injection with CaV{beta}3. As seen, the VDI kinetics of the N-terminal mutants are significantly accelerated in a manner comparable to the wild-type channel. In contrast, the kinetics of W386A were not increased by CaV{beta}3 suggesting that the first turn of the AID helix is more tolerant to alanine mutations. Whole cell currents were recorded using the two-electrode voltage clamp technique in the presence of 10 mM Ba2+ after injection of EGTA. Holding potential was -80 mV. Xenopus oocytes were pulsed from -40 mV to +60 mV using 10 mV steps for 450 ms. All mutants expressed significant inward currents with typical current-voltage properties. Capacitive transients were erased for the first ms after the voltage step. The mutant properties (mid-potentials of activation and inactivation as well as peak currents) are provided in Table II.

 
As seen in Fig. 2, D-G, the binding data correlated well with the functional data. The six alanine mutants were expressed in Xenopus oocytes in the presence and in the absence of CaV{beta}3. Under both conditions, the N-terminal mutants yielded robust inward Ba2+ currents with current-voltage relationships typical of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Typical current traces are shown for E6A (E379A) and L7A (L380A) in the absence (left panels) and in the presence (right panels) of CaV{beta}3. To ensure that the current density was not unduly influencing the VDI (voltage-dependent inactivation) gating, the RNA concentrations were adjusted to yield peak currents in the -3 to -5 µA range when possible. Co-expression with CaV{beta}3 slightly hyperpolarized the activation potential for I377A, E379A, and L380A at p < 0.01 but had little or insignificant effect on Q374A and Q375A (see Table II for detailed values). The VDI gating was estimated from the whole cell currents remaining after 300 ms (R300). In the absence of CaV{beta}3, the R300 values were similar for most channels (wild-type and mutants) although they were significantly larger at p < 0.001 for the N-terminal mutants Gln1, Gln2, Ile3, and Glu4 (Fig. 2F) suggesting that the N-terminal end of the AIDE helix could be an intrinsic determinant of VDI gating in this channel (44). Co-injection with CaV{beta}3 significantly decreased the R300 values for the wild-type channel, Q374A, Q375A, I376A, E377A, and E379A with less than 10% of the whole cell currents remaining at 300 ms (Fig. 2G). Hence, the VDI gating of N-terminal mutants was not significantly different than the wild-type channel (p > 0.05). L380A turned out to be the only mutant with kinetics slightly significantly faster than the wild-type channel at p < 0.05. By comparison, the R300 values obtained for W386A under the same conditions were 3-times larger, with roughly 30% of the whole cell currents remaining at the end of a 300-ms pulse and significantly different from the wild-type channel at p < 10-10. Altogether, these data indicate that the VDI gating of the alanine mutants was intrinsically similar to the wild-type channel in the absence of CaV{beta}3 and further show that they were modulated by CaV{beta}3 in a wild-type fashion.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE II
Biophysical properties of Cav2.3 mutants

Biophysical parameters of Cav2.3 wild-type and mutant channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes in the presence of Cav{alpha}2b{delta} and ± Cav{beta}3 subunits. Whole cell currents were measured in 10 mM Ba2+ throughout. The voltage dependence of inactivation was determined from the peak currents measured at 0 mV after 5-s pulses from –100 to +50 mV. Relative currents were fitted to Boltzmann equation 1. The fractional currents represent the fraction of whole cell currents remaining at the end of a 5-s conditioning pulse to + 10 mV. Activation data were estimated from the mean I-V relationships and fitted to Boltzmann equation 2. Peak IBa was determined from I-V relationships for the corresponding experiments. The data are shown with the mean ± S.E.

 
The N-terminal alanine mutants displayed the additional hallmarks of CaV{beta}-modulation. Co-expression with CaV{beta}3 significantly hyperpolarized by {approx} -30 mV the mid-potential of inactivation of the N-terminal mutants replicating the behavior of the wild-type channel from a E0.5,inact = -36 ± 3 mV (10) in the absence of CaV{beta} to E0.5,inact = -64 ± 1 mV (10) with CaV{beta}3 as previously published (1, 4, 34) (Table II). Considering that the fifth position (Arg378) was previously studied and reported (1, 34), these data indicate that alanine substitutions at any of the first seven positions of the AIDE helix failed to alter significantly CaV{beta} subunit binding and modulation of CaV2.3 channels. Hence, the N-terminal Glu6 and Leu7 residues located in the first {alpha}-helical turn of the AIDE helix are tolerant to alanine substitutions.

Alanine Scan of the GYI Residues in the {alpha}-Helix C-terminal Turns in CaV2.3—The role of the two remaining pairs of critical residues Gly9/Tyr10 and Trp13/Ile14 located on the C-terminal {alpha}-helical turns was also investigated after mutation with alanine. As explained earlier, CaV{beta} subunit binding was investigated in overlay assays whereas modulation by CaV{beta} subunits was studied after functional expression in Xenopus oocytes. Fig. 3A shows the overlay binding assays for Y383A, G382A, and I387A performed in the 25-residue AIDE peptide inserted in the pGFPuv vector. CaV{beta} subunit binding is shown for [35S]methionine-labeled CaV{beta}1b (Fig. 3A). The empty pGPFuv vector and wild-type AIDE peptide were tested along as additional controls. Strong bands were obtained at the expected molecular weight of 32 kDa for the wild-type AIDE peptide as well as for G382A indicating that the alanine mutation at position Gly9 did not impede the interaction with [35S]CaV{beta}1b under denaturing conditions. In contrast, [35S]CaV{beta}1b binding onto Y383A and I387A peptides was similar to the background level as compared with the lane loaded with the empty vector pGPFuv suggesting that substitution with alanine disrupted the interaction between Tyr383 or Ile387 and CaV{beta}1b. Similar results were obtained with [35S]CaV{beta}3 (not shown). The binding data were compared with the electrophysiological data obtained for the same mutants in the presence and in the absence of CaV{beta}3. As expected from the binding studies, CaV{beta}3 modulated the whole cell currents of G382A in a fashion reminiscent of the wild-type channel (Fig. 3B) with a {approx}5-fold decrease in the R300 values in the presence of CaV{beta}3 (p < 10-5) (Fig. 3D). Table II reports the estimated mid-potentials of activation and inactivation under the same conditions.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
CaV{beta} subunit binding and modulation of G382A, Y383A, and I387A channels. A, Coomassie Blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel showing the wild-type AIDE and the alanine mutants Y383A, G382A, and I387A (in that order) from CaV2.3 is juxtaposed with the autoradiogram of the same mutants with the in vitro translated [35S]methionine CaV{beta}1b. As seen, gel loading was equivalent in each lane. The fusion proteins have a molecular mass of 29 kDa (no insert) or 32 kDa (the 25-residue AID peptide). The lanes were loaded equally except for I387A that shows a larger concentration of proteins. Autoradiogram of in vitro translated [35S]methionine CaV{beta}1b overlays on GFPuv-AIDE mutants immobilized on nitrocellulose. The empty vector pGFPuv (no insert) is shown as a control (lane 1). Whereas a strong signal was obtained for the wild-type AIDE peptide (lane 2) and the G382A mutant (lane 4), [35S]CaV{beta}1b binding could not be detected for Y383A (lane 3) and for I387A (lane 5). Similar results were obtained with [35S]CaV{beta}3 (not shown). B, typical whole cell current traces obtained after the expression of the G382A mutant in Xenopus oocytes with CaV{alpha}2b{delta} without exogenous CaV{beta}3 (-{beta}3) and after co-injection with CaV{beta}3 (+{beta}3). Time and current scales are identical for panels B and C. C, typical whole cell current traces obtained after the expression of the I387A (I14A) mutant in Xenopus oocytes with CaV{alpha}2b{delta} without exogenous CaV{beta}3 (-{beta}3) and after co-injection with CaV{beta}3 (+{beta}3). D, mean R300 ± S.E. values of G382A were significantly decreased by the co-injection of CaV{beta}3 (p < 10-8 at 0 < Vm < 20 mV). R300 values for the wild-type channel have been added for comparison. E, mean R300 ± S.E. values of Y383A were decreased by the co-injection of CaV{beta}3 (p < 10-3 at 0 < Vm < 20 mV). R300 values for the wild-type channel have been added for comparison. F, mean R300 ± S.E. values of I387A were decreased by the co-injection of CaV{beta}3 (p < 0.05 at 0 < Vm < 20 mV). R300 values for the wild-type channel have been added for comparison. The numbers to the right of the mutants refer to the numbers of experiments used for statistical analysis. The voltage dependence of activation and inactivation are detailed in Table II.

 
Although alanine mutations to Tyr10 or Ile14 positions were sufficient to upset the binding of [35S]CaV{beta}1b and [35S]CaV{beta}3 to the AIDE peptide, CaV{beta}3-induced modulation of the Y383A and I387A channels was mostly preserved in Y383A and partially preserved with I387A (Fig. 3C). Co-expression with CaV{beta}3 significantly decreased the R300 values of Y383A at p < 10-4 at all membrane potentials in a wild-type fashion (Fig. 3, E and F). The functional modulation of CaV2.3 Y383A by CaV{beta}3 has already been reported before by us (1). The mid-potential of inactivation was also hyperpolarized by CaV{beta}3 although the -20 mV shift was significantly smaller at p < 10-4 than the -30 mV routinely observed for the wild-type channel (Table II). The data for I387A appeared to be more easily reconciled with the binding studies. The modulation of VDI gating kinetics as measured at 300 ms was milder for I387A although the R300 values measured with CaV{beta}3 remained significantly smaller (p < 0.05 at 0 mV) (Fig. 3F). The milder modulation of the I387A mutant by CaV{beta}3 was also apparent in the smaller shift in the voltage dependence of inactivation with E0.5 inact experiencing a -13 mV shift in average as compared with the -30 mV displacement reported for the wild-type channel (Table II). Hence, measuring CaV{beta} binding to the AID peptide under denaturing conditions does not appear to entirely account for the interaction between the I-II linker and CaV{beta} subunits.

Aromatic and Positively Charged Residues at Tyr10 Preserve CaV{beta} Binding and Modulation—Because the substitution of the aromatic tyrosine residue Tyr10 at position 383 by the small and hydrophobic alanine (Ala) residue was shown to disrupt CaV{beta}3 subunit binding as well as decreasing the CaV{beta}-induced modulation of CaV2.3, the structural requirements for CaV{beta} subunit binding and modulation were further investigated after substitutions with aromatic (Phe, Trp) as well as positive (Arg, Lys) and negative (Asp, Glu) residues. CaV{beta} subunit-induced modulation of inactivation was also preserved with the Y10S mutant in L-type CaV1.1 and CaV1.2 channels (26) whereas in vitro binding of CaV{beta}4 to AIDA was demonstrated in the presence of the Y10S and Y10F mutants (25). We had previously reported that the substitution with the neutral but polar serine (Ser) residue at the same position yielded a channel with VDI gating slower than the wild-type channel in the presence of CaV{beta}3 (1). Nonetheless, the voltage dependence of inactivation of Y383S was clearly shifted in the hyperpolarized direction by -20 mV in the presence of CaV{beta}3 (1). These data were replicated over a 2-year period, and Table II provides the complete set of numerical values for this and the other Tyr383 mutants.

[35S]CaV{beta}1b binding to pGFPuv-AIDE fusion proteins mutated to Y383F, Y383E, Y383K, and Y383R is shown in Fig. 4A whereas [35S]CaV{beta}3 binding to pGFPuv-AIDE mutants Y383F, Y383S, Y383E, Y383R, and Y383W in Fig. 4B. For the CaV{beta}1b data, the wild-type AIDE fusion protein was used as a positive control whereas W386A was loaded to assess the background signal. E391A (E18A) was used as a positive control in the presence of CaV{beta}3 since it remained functionally modulated by CaV{beta}3 in a wild-type fashion (Table II). Altogether, the signal intensity for the AIDE fusion peptides ranked from AIDE wt {approx} E391A >> Y383F {approx} Y383W {approx} Y383K {approx} Y383R >Y383S >> W386A. The binding signal for Y383E was somewhat stronger in the presence of CaV{beta}3. As seen, the signal was similar for the two aromatic mutations Y383F and Y383W confirming that the aromatic side-chain is a key structural requirement. Furthermore, positively charged residues were more tolerated than the negatively charged ones suggesting that electrostatic-based interactions are important for [35S]CaV{beta}1b and [35S]CaV{beta}3 binding at least under our experimental conditions where the AID helix has been denatured.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
CaV{beta} subunit binding and modulation of Tyr383 mutants. A, autoradiogram of in vitro translated [35S]methionine-labeled CaV{beta}1b overlays on GFPuv-Y383 mutants immobilized on nitrocellulose. The W386A (WA) mutant is shown to assess the background signal (lane 2). Whereas a strong signal was obtained for the wild-type AIDE peptide (lane 3), [35S]CaV{beta}1b binding ranked from AID >> Y383F (lane 1) > Y383K (lane 5) {approx} Y383R (lane 6) > Y383E (lane 4). B, autoradiogram of in vitro translated [35S]methionine CaV{beta}3 overlays on GFPuv-Tyr383 mutants immobilized on nitrocellulose. The W386A mutant is shown as a negative control to assess the background signal (lane 2). Whereas a strong signal was obtained for the E391A (E18A) (lane 1), the intensity of the signal went from Y383F (lane 3) > Y383W (lane 7) {approx} Y383R (lane 6) > Y383E (lane 5) > Y383S (lane 4) >> W386A (lane 2). C, typical whole cell current traces obtained after the expression of the Y383R (Y10R) mutant in Xenopus oocytes with CaV{alpha}2b{delta} without exogenous CaV{beta}3 (-{beta}3) and after co-injection with CaV{beta}3 (+{beta}3). Time and current scales are identical for C and D. D, typical whole-cell current traces obtained after the expression of the Y383D (Y10D) mutant in Xenopus oocytes with CaV{alpha}2b{delta} without exogenous CaV{beta}3 (-{beta}3) and after co-injection with CaV{beta}3 (+{beta}3). E, bar graph showing the mean R300 ± S.E. values for the wild-type, Y383F, Y383A, Y383K, Y383R channels (from left to right) with the R300 value obtained with CaV{beta}3 plotted before the value obtained in the absence of the subunit. VDI gating were significantly decreased by the co-injection of CaV{beta}3 for these mutants at p < 10-4 for 0 < Vm < 20 mV. The Y383W did not yield detectable inward Ba2+ currents in response to membrane depolarization (see Table II). F, bar graph showing the mean R300 ± S.E. values for the wild-type, Y383S, Y383D, Y383E channels (from left to right) with the R300 value obtained with CaV{beta}3 plotted before the value obtained in the absence of the subunit. The VDI gating of Y383D and Y383E were not significantly altered by the co-injection of CaV{beta}3 (p > 0.05) for 0 < Vm < 20 mV. For Y383S, the R300 values were decreased in the presence of CaV{beta}3 (p < 0.01) for 0 < Vm < 20 mV but remained significantly higher than for the wild-type channel (p < 0.001) for 0 < Vm < 20 mV. The numbers to the right of the mutants refer to the numbers of experiments used for statistical analysis. The voltage dependence of inactivation for these mutants were computed using the Boltzmann Equation 1 after 5-s prepulses. The estimated values for the mid-potentials of activation and inactivation are provided in Table II.

 
To establish a functional correlation with the binding studies, Tyr383 mutants (Phe, Trp, Ala, Lys, Arg, Ser, Asp, Glu) were expressed ± CaV{beta}3 and characterized by the double electrode voltage clamp approach in Xenopus oocytes. All Tyr383 mutants, with the exception of Y383W, expressed robust inward currents in the presence of 10 mM Ba2+ (Fig. 4, C and D). The activation potentials of the mutant channels were comparable to the wild-type channel although their mean current-voltage relationships were not significantly shifted by CaV{beta}3 in the hyperpolarized direction (Table II). The VDI kinetics (Fig. 4, E and F) and voltage dependence of inactivation (Table II) of Tyr383 mutants were modulated by CaV{beta}3 in a manner that mimics the binding data. The R300 values plotted as a function of voltage indeed revealed that substitutions with aromatic (Phe), neutral (Ala), and positively charged (Arg, Lys) residues reproduced the phenotype of the wild-type channel shown as a control (Fig. 4E). CaV{beta}3 compellingly increased the VDI gating kinetics of these mutants with a 4-fold acceleration that is similar to the wild-type channel (p < 10-4). Furthermore, the voltage dependence of inactivation of these mutants was indistinguishable from the wild-type channel whether measured in the presence or in the absence of CaV{beta}3 with the exception of Y383A that inactivated at E0.5 inact = -54 ± 1 mV (10) in the presence of CaV{beta}3 (Table II). In contrast, mutations with the negatively charged aspartate and glutamate residues eliminated the functional modulation of VDI gating (Fig. 4F) and blunted the CaV{beta}3-induced hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of inactivation (Table II). Mutation with the neutral but polar serine residue significantly restrained the extent of CaV{beta}3-induced modulation. Altogether, it can be concluded that the Tyr10 position in the second turn of the AID helix is relatively tolerant to substitutions with aromatic, small hydrophobic, or positively charged residues.

The Iso to Leu Substitution Is Tolerated at Position Ile14—The stereochemical requirements for CaV{beta} binding and modulation at position Ile14 were investigated after substitutions with the conserved leucine residue (Leu), the neutral but polar serine (Ser) as well as positive (Lys, Arg) and negative (Asp, Glu) residues. As seen earlier, the substitution of the hydrophobic isoleucine residue at this position by the likewise hydrophobic but smaller alanine residue was shown to disrupt CaV{beta}3 subunit binding as well as decreasing the CaV{beta}-induced modulation of CaV2.3 suggesting that the volume of the residue plays a critical role in establishing essential interactions with CaV{beta} subunits.

[35S]CaV{beta}1b binding to pGFPuv-AIDE fusion proteins mutated to I387D, I387R, and I387K is shown in Fig. 5A. As shown before, the wild-type AIDE fusion protein and W386A were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The signal was unambiguous for AIDE wt but was indistinguishable from the background noise for I387D {approx} I387R {approx} I387K {approx} W386A. Similar data were obtained with [35S]CaV{beta}3 with I387S {approx} I387D {approx} I387E {approx} I387R {approx} I387K (not shown). As seen, none of the polar mutations at this position, including the mutation by the neutral serine, preserved binding to [35S]CaV{beta} under denaturing conditions.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
CaV{beta} subunit binding and modulation of Ile387 mutants. A, autoradiogram of in vitro translated [35S]methionine CaV{beta}1b overlays on GFPuv Ile- mutants immobilized on nitrocellulose. The W386A mutant is shown to assess the background signal (lane 2). Whereas a strong signal was obtained for the wild-type AID peptide (lane 1), the [35S]CaV{beta}1b binding to I387R (lane 4) was modest whereas binding to I387D (lane 3), and I387K (lane 5) was comparable to the W386A (lane 2) peptide. Similar data were obtained with [35S]CaV{beta}3 (not shown). B, typical whole cell current traces obtained after the expression of the I387L (I14L) mutant in Xenopus oocytes with CaV{alpha}2b{delta} without exogenous CaV{beta}3 (-{beta}3) and after co-injection with CaV{beta}3 (+{beta}3). Time and current scales are identical for panels B and C. C, typical whole cell current traces obtained after the expression of the I387K (I14K) mutant in Xenopus oocytes with CaV{alpha}2b{delta} without exogenous CaV{beta}3 (-{beta}3) and after co-injection with CaV{beta}3 (+{beta}3). D, mean R300 ± S.E. values of I387L were significantly decreased by the co-injection of CaV{beta}3 (p < 10-10 at 0 < Vm < 20 mV) but the modulation was milder for I387A and I387S mutants (p < 0.05 at 0 < Vm < 20 mV). E, mean R300 ± S.E. values of negatively and positively charged I387 mutants were unaffected by the co-injection of CaV{beta}3 at most voltages. However, the R300 for I387E and I387K were significantly decreased by CaV{beta}3 at 0 mV (p < 10-3). The numbers to the right of the mutants refer to the numbers of experiments used for statistical analysis. The voltage dependence of inactivation for these mutants estimated from 5-s prepulses are provided in Table II.

 
The functional characterization was carried out as discussed before in the presence of CaV{beta}3. All the Ile14 mutants activated within the same voltage range as the wild-type channel (Table II). In agreement with the binding data, the CaV{beta}-induced modulation of VDI kinetics (Fig. 5, B-E) and voltage dependence of inactivation (Table II) was preserved to a certain extent after substitution with neutral residues but was lost with the charged substitutions. Typical current traces are shown for I387L ± CaV{beta}3 (Fig. 5B) and I387K ± CaV{beta}3 (Fig. 5C). As shown in the R300 graph, the inactivation kinetics of I387L, I387A, I387S, and the wild-type channel were not significantly different in the absence of CaV{beta} (p > 0.05) (Fig. 5D). Although co-injection with CaV{beta}3 sped up to a certain extent the inactivation kinetics of the three neutral mutants (Leu, Ser, Ala), I387A + CaV{beta}3 and I387S + CaV{beta}3 remained significantly slower at p < 10-5 than the wild-type and the I387L channel measured under the same conditions (p < 10-5) suggesting that the functional interaction with CaV{beta}3 was fully preserved with the conserved I387L mutation but not optimal with the I387A and the I387S mutants.

Substitutions with positively charged (Arg, Lys) or negatively charged (Asp, Glu) residues yielded functional channels with typical I-V properties that were ineffectually modulated by CaV{beta}3 (Fig. 5E). Although CaV{beta}3 appeared to significantly speed up the VDI kinetics of I387E at 0 mV (p < 10-5), this effect vanished at +20 mV. Furthermore the R300 values for I387E + CaV{beta}3 were systematically larger than the wild-type channel under the same conditions. Finally, the voltage dependence of inactivation of the charged mutants was not significantly hyperpolarized by the co-injection with CaV{beta}3 (Table II). Altogether these data suggest that the position Ile14 specifically requires a bulky, neutral, and hydrophobic residue to achieve CaV{beta}-induced modulation of CaV channels.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
The C-terminal Turn of the AID Helix Anchors the Interaction with CaV{beta}—The four known auxiliary CaV{beta} (CaV{beta}1-4) subunits can potentially associate with any of the six CaV{alpha}1 pore-forming subunits of HVA VDCC (CaV1.1-1.3; CaV2.1-2.3) via AID located on the I-II linker of the CaV{alpha}1 subunit. About half of the residues of the AID helix Gln1-Gln2-X3-Glu4-X5-X6-Leu7-X8-Gly9-Tyr10-X11-X12-Trp13-Ile14-X15-X16-X17-Glu18) are strictly conserved among the six CaV{alpha}1 subunits but homology was found to be higher within members of the CaV1 and CaV2 families (Table I). The crystal structures of the CaV{beta}/AID peptide complex from L-type CaV{alpha}1.1 and CaV{alpha}1.2 channels have recently revealed that the AID region forms an {alpha}-helix upon binding CaV{beta} subunits (19-21). The interaction between the AID helix and the CaV{beta} protein appears to be primarily secured by the projection of three pairs of hydrophobic residues onto the CaV{beta} fold with Tyr10 and Trp13 being almost completely buried within the CaV{beta} protein (19-21). The three-dimensional model of AIDE obtained by homology modeling with CaV1.2/CaV{beta}2a (19) suggests similarly that the {alpha}-helical structure of the AID peptide is preserved in CaV2.3 with the three pairs of residues Glu6/Leu7, Gly9/Tyr10, and Tyr13/Ile14 projecting into CaV{beta} residues with Leu7, Gly9, Tyr10, Trp13, and Ile14 being invariant in all HVA CaV{alpha}1 channels. The sixth position is always occupied by a negatively charged residue with the aspartate residue in CaV1 being replaced by a glutamate residue in CaV2 channels. The three-dimensional model of AIDE shows that Tyr10 and Trp13 are deeply enmeshed within residues of the CaV{beta} subunit suggesting that these residues could play a more critical role in CaV{beta} modulation of CaV2.3 currents than Gln1, Gln2, Ile3, Glu4, Glu6, Leu7, Gly9, and Ile14.

Our mutational analysis herein demonstrated that alanine mutants of Gln1, Gln2, Ile3, Glu4, and Glu18 did not abolish [35S]CaV{beta}1b or [35S] CaV{beta}3 subunit overlay binding to fusion proteins nor did they prevent the typical modulation of CaV2.3 whole cell currents by CaV{beta}3. These results suggest that the N-terminal residues of the AID helix located on the hydrophilic face of the AID helix do not play a determinant role in the interaction between CaV{alpha}1 and CaV{beta} subunits in agreement with the predictions of the crystal structure. In general, the signal intensity to the AIDE peptide was found to be more robust for [35S]CaV{beta}1b than for [35S]CaV{beta}3 binding in agreement with previous reports showing that CaV{beta}1b displayed a significantly higher affinity for the AIDA peptide than CaV{beta}3 in CaV2.1 channels (17, 41).

Furthermore, alanine mutations of Glu6 and Leu7 located in the first hydrophobic {alpha}-helical turn of the AIDE helix did not affect significantly CaV{beta} binding and modulation of CaV2.3 currents. These results suggest that the binding pocket at these positions can accommodate alanine residues. The central {alpha}-helical turn of the AID helix was slightly less tolerant to mutations than the N-terminal residues. In fact, mutation of Gly9 by alanine enhanced CaV{beta}-induced modulation indicating that the helical propensity conferred by the alanine residue fastened the interaction with CaV{beta} whereas increased flexibility at this position could loosen the interaction. Mutations of Tyr10 with either aromatic (Phe) or positively charged (Arg, Lys) residues yielded whole cell currents that responded to CaV{beta}3 essentially like the wild-type channel whereas mutations with negatively charged residues (Asp, Glu) disrupted CaV{beta}3 binding and modulation.

In contrast, mutations of the C-terminal residues Trp13 and Ile14 disrupted significantly CaV{beta} binding and modulation. We had previously provided evidence that position Trp13 could not be successfully substituted with hydrophobic (Ala, Gly), hydrophilic (Gln, Arg, Glu), or aromatic (Phe, Tyr) residues (1). Herein, we further demonstrate that modulation and binding by CaV{beta}3 was significantly weakened in I14A (neutral and hydrophobic) and I14S (neutral and polar) mutants and completely eradicated in negatively charged I14D and I14E or positively charged I14R and I14K mutants. The conservative mutation I14L was found to be the only substitution that preserved the CaV{beta}3-induced modulation of CaV2.3 currents. Hence, in contrast to the N-terminal residues, we have compellingly established that CaV{beta} binding as well as CaV{beta}-induced modulation of HVA CaV currents are determined by the C-terminal pair of residues of the AID helix.

Computer Modeling and Molecular Replacements of Tyr10 (Tyr383) and Ile14 (Ile387) Positions—The analysis of the accessible surface area in the CaV1.2 AID-CaV{beta}2a complex showed Tyr10 to be slightly more buried within the CaV{beta} fold than Ile14 suggesting that the binding pocket formed at the Tyr10 position could impose harsher structural requirements than the binding pocket at Ile14 (19). On the contrary, our data revealed that mutations at position Ile14 impacted more significantly on CaV{beta}3 binding and functional modulation of CaV2.3 channel function than mutations at Tyr10. To visualize the changes in the environment caused by the AIDE mutations, molecular replacements were produced in the three-dimensional model of the wild-type AIDE helix obtained for CaV2.3 (see "Experimental Procedures"). The resulting energy-minimized configuration was then compared with the three-dimensional model for the wild-type AIDE helix.

The three-dimensional model of the AIDE helix implies that Ile14 could make van der Waals interactions with CaV{beta}2a hydrophobic residues Leu352, Val241, Met244, and Met245. From the wild-type model, Ile14 appears to be confined to a smaller hydrophobic pocket than Tyr10 suggesting that steric hindrance could become a key parameter at this position. As a result, mutations with hydrophobic residues of comparable size are predicted to be better tolerated than mutations with bulkier residues. Indeed, there is an excellent superposition of the C{alpha}, C{beta}, and C{gamma} between the isoleucine and the similar leucine residues at position 14 of the AIDE helix. The van der Waals interactions are also highly conserved and the I14L mutation does not appear to alter the helix conformation of the AID peptide (not shown).

The I14R mutation that introduces a bulkier and hydrophilic residue in the highly hydrophobic binding pocket produced stronger effects with a distinct deviation of the side-chain at the C{gamma} that pushes residues from CaV{beta}2a away from the AIDE helix and results into a significantly increased r.m.s.d. value (1.53Å as compared with 0.55Å for I14L) especially for the four hydrophobic CaV{beta}2a residues (Fig. 6). Hence, the introduction of an arginine residue could result in a significantly loosening of the interaction with CaV{beta}2a residues. The I14L and I14R models thus appear to correlate well with our experimental data both in terms of in vitro binding and CaV{beta}-induced functional modulation.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Three-dimensional models of the AID helix of the human CaV2.3 obtained with INSIGHT II using the atomic coordinates for the human CaV1.2 AID crystal structure co-crystallized with CaV{beta}2a at a 2.0 Å resolution (1T0J.pdb) as a template (19). The backbone of the AID helix is colored in white. Key residues are shown in CPK representation. A, front view of the AID helix with the native isoleucine residue at position 14. B, front view of the AID helix with the bulkier arginine residue at position 14. The atoms of the residue at position 14 are color-coded with carbon atoms (green), oxygen (red), and nitrogen (blue). The hydrogen atoms are not shown. The residue at position 14 makes van der Waals interactions with four hydrophobic residues from CaV{beta}2a shown in CPK representation with a single color with the residue: Leu352 (cyan), Val241 (magenta), Met244 (gray), and Met245 (violet). The I14R mutation pushes CaV{beta}2a residues away from the AIDE helix and results in a significantly increased r.m.s.d. value (1.53 Å as compared with 0.55 Å for I14L) for the four hydrophobic CaV{beta}2a residues. The BUILDER module was used to construct the molecular replacements onto the CaV2.3 model and all energy minimizations were carried out with the DISCOVER module as described under "Experimental Procedures."

 
In contrast with the I14R mutation, our molecular replacement experiments suggest that the introduction of an aspartate residue is not likely to impact significantly on the position of the CaV{beta}2a residues as a result of steric constraints. Indeed, the r.m.s.d. values for the AIDE helix (0.12 Å) as well as for the CaV{beta}2a residues remained small throughout (0.23 Å). However, the absence of CaV{beta}-binding and modulation with the I14D mutant is likely to stem from the relatively higher electrostatic energy produced by the net negative charge and the lower hydrophobicity of the aspartate residue as compared with the arginine residue. The three-dimensional model also infers that the aspartate residue could not form additional hydrogen bonds unlike the arginine residue. Although these bonds are non-existent with the native isoleucine, they could have minimized the energy of the CaV{beta}-CaVAID complex. The negative charge of I14D would then be associated with a high energetic cost of burial in the hydrophobic environment of the binding pocket (42, 43). These properties could become noteworthy considering the hydrophobic character of the protein-protein interface between the CaV{alpha}1 and the CaV{beta} subunits.

Since the binding pocket formed by Tyr10 appears to be deeper than the Ile14 site, bulky residues are expected to be better tolerated at Tyr10 than at Ile14. The substitution of the tyrosine by a phenylalanine at position 10 results in the loss of two hydrogen bonds with the CaV{beta}2a residues Ser344 and Glu389. Nonetheless, the aromatic rings of the tyrosine and the phenylalanine residues remain in the same orientation and the carbon atoms of the side-chains for both residues are in the same plane. The r.m.s.d. value for the AIDE helix (0.18 Å) remained small suggesting that the Y10F mutation should not affect the CaV{beta}-CaVAID interaction as we have observed experimentally. Given that the binding pocket at this position is relatively deeper than the one at position 14, the arginine residue could eventually adopt an energetically favorable elongated configuration where its carbon atoms ({alpha}, {beta}, and {gamma}) could espouse the same conformation as the equivalent carbon atoms from the native tyrosine residue. Indeed, the arginine residue appears to be as comfortably buried within CaV{beta}2a as the phenylalanine or the native tyrosine residues, which is substantiated by the small r.m.s.d. value observed with this mutant (0.23 Å). Finally, the arginine residue forms also a hydrogen bond with CaV{beta}2a like the native wild-type tyrosine residue does, albeit with a different residue (Asp388). All these factors could account for the observation that the Y383R mutation did not affect significantly CaV{beta} binding or CaV{beta}-induced modulation. In contrast, the aspartate residue at this position (Y10D) was too short to fully interact with CaV{beta}2a or to form any hydrogen bond with CaV{beta}2a residues. The shorter side-chain of the aspartate residue does not however appear to significantly affect the conformation of the AIDE peptide since the r.m.s.d. value (0.24 Å) remained comparable to the values obtained for the arginine and the phenylalanine at this position. Hence the overall lower hydrophobicity as well as the absence of the hydrogen bond could explain in part the lack of CaV{beta}-induced modulation of the Y383D mutant in CaV2.3.


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our data proved that mutations of residues located on the N-terminal {alpha}-helical turn of the AID helix (Glu6, Leu7) impact less significantly on CaV channel modulation by CaV{beta} than mutations on the C-terminal end of the AID helix (Trp13, Ile14). These data agree with the three-dimensional model of CaV2.3/CaV{beta}2a built using the crystal coordinates from CaV1.2/CaV{beta}2a. However, CaV{beta} binding to the denatured AID peptide did not appear to completely account for the interaction between the CaV{alpha}1 and the CaV{beta} subunits. In particular, CaV{beta} binding to the AID peptide was ablated after conserved and nonconserved mutations of the Tyr10 whereas CaV{beta}-induced modulation of whole cell currents was mostly preserved with Y10F, Y10A, Y10K, and Y10R mutations. It can be speculated that the interaction is conserved when both the AID helix and CaV{beta} are in their native conformation. It remains also possible that functional modulation of HVA CaV currents by CaV{beta} involves more partners than just the AID helix. Nonetheless, binding and functional modulation data were quite well correlated for the C-terminal Ile14 residue. We have thus proposed that fewer structural constraints such as the deeper interaction site and the lower degree of hydrophobicity at Tyr10 could account in part for these differences. Altogether, the CaV{beta}-induced modulation data are compatible with a region-specific specialization of the AID helix: the N-terminal residues playing a critical role in a hinged-lid type inactivation mechanism (44) while the C-terminal residues anchoring CaV{beta} subunit interaction.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by the Canadian Heart and Stroke Foundation and by Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant MOP 13390 (to L. P.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 514-343-6673; Fax: 514-343-7146; E-mail: lucie.parent{at}umontreal.ca.

1 The abbreviations used are: VDCC, voltage-dependent calcium channel; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; r.m.s.d., root mean-squared deviation; GFP, green fluorescent protein; AID, alpha-interacting domain; HVA, high voltage-activated; LVA, low voltage-activated; VDI, voltage-dependent inactivation; SH3, Src homology 3 domain; GK, guanylate kinase. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Toni Schneider for the human CaV2.3 channel, Dr. Ed Perez-Reyes for CaV{beta}3 and CaV{beta}1b subunits, Dr. Rémy Sauvé for critical reading, Drs. Pierre Bissonnette, and Hélène Klein for discussions, Claude Gauthier for artwork, and Julie Verner for dedicated oocyte culture.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Berrou, L., Klein, H., Bernatchez, G., and Parent, L. (2002) Biophys. J. 83, 1429-1442[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Catterall, W. A. (2000) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 521-555[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Singer, D., Biel, M., Lotan, I., Flockerzi, V., Hofmann, F., and Dascal, N. (1991) Science. 253, 1553-1557[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Parent, L., Schneider, T., Moore, C. P., and Talwar, D. (1997) J. Membr. Biol. 160, 127-140[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Williams, M. E., Brust, P. F., Feldman, D. H., Patthi, S., Simerson, S., Maroufi, A., McCue, A. F., Velicelebi, G., Ellis, S. B., and Harpold, M. M. (1992) Science. 257, 389-395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Williams, M. E., Feldman, D. H., McCue, A. F., Brenner, R., Velicelebi, G., Ellis, S. B., and Harpold, M. M. (1992) Neuron 8, 71-84[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Bell, D. C., Butcher, A. J., Berrow, N. S., Page, K. M., Brust, P. F., Nesterova, A., Stauderman, K. A., Seabrook, G. R., Nurnberg, B., and Dolphin, A. C. (2001) J. Neurophysiol. 85, 816-827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Beguin, P., Nagashima, K., Gonoi, T., Shibasaki, T., Takahashi, K., Kashima, Y., Ozaki, N., Geering, K., Iwanaga, T., and Seino, S. (2001) Nature. 411, 701-706[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Catterall, W. A. (1991) Science. 250, 1499-1500
  10. Perez-Reyes, E. (2003) Physiol. Rev. 83, 117-161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Brice, N. L., Berrow, N. S., Campbell, V., Page, K. M., Brickley, K., Tedder, I., and Dolphin, A. C. (1997) Eur. J. Neurosci. 9, 749-759[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Tareilus, E., Roux, M., Qin, N., Olcese, R., Zhou, J., Stefani, E., and Birnbaumer, L. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 1703-1708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Bichet, D., Cornet, V., Geib, S., Carlier, E., Volsen, S., Hoshi, T., Mori, Y., and DeWaard M. (2000) Neuron 25, 177-190[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Dolphin, A. C. (2003) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 35, 599-620[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Birnbaumer, L., Qin, N., Olcese, R., Tareilus, E., Platano, D., Costantin, J., and Stefani, E. (1998) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 30, 357-375[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Cens, T., Restituito, S., Vallentin, A., and Charnet, P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18308-18315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Walker, D., Bichet, D., Campbell, K. P., and De Waard M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2361-2367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Qin, N., Platano, D., Olcese, R., Costantin, J. L., Stefani, E., and Birnbaumer, L. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 4690-4695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Van Petegem, F., Clark, K. A., Chatelain, F. C., and Minor, D. L., Jr. (2004) Nature. 429, 671-675[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Chen, Y. H., Li, M. H., Zhang, Y., He, L. L., Yamada, Y., Fitzmaurice, A., Shen, Y., Zhang, H., Tong, L., and Yang, J. (2004) Nature. 429, 675-680[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Opatowsky, Y., Chen, C. C., Campbell, K. P., and Hirsch, J. A. (2004) Neuron 42, 387-399[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Canti, C., Davies, A., Berrow, N. S., Butcher, A. J., Page, K. M., and Dolphin, A. C. (2001) Biophys. J. 81, 1439-1451[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Opatowsky, Y., Chomsky-Hecht, O., Kang, M. G., Campbell, K. P., and Hirsch, J. A. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 52323-52332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. DeWaard M., Scott, V. E., Pragnell, M., and Campbell, K. P. (1996) FEBS Let. 380, 272-276[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Witcher, D. R., De, W. M., Liu, H., Pragnell, M., and Campbell, K. P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18088-18093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Neuhuber, B., Gerster, U., Doring, F., Glossmann, H., Tanabe, T., and Flucher, B. E. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 5015-5020[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Neuhuber, B., Gerster, U., Mitterdorfer, J., Glossmann, H., and Flucher, B. E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9110-9118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Gerster, U., Neuhuber, B., Groschner, K., Striessnig, J., and Flucher, B. E. (1999) J. Physiol. (Lond) 517, 353-368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2nd Ed.) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  30. Castellano, A., Wei, X., Birnbaumer, L., and Perez-Reyes, E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 3450-3455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Pragnell, M., Sakamoto, J., Jay, S. D., and Campbell, K. P. (1991) FEBS Lett. 291, 253-258[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Perez-Reyes, E., Castellano, A., Kim, H. S., Bertrand, P., Baggstrom, E., Lacerda, A. E., Wei, X. Y., and Birnbaumer, L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1792-1797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Schneider, T., Wei, X., Olcese, R., Costantin, J. L., Neely, A., Palade, P., Perez-Reyes, E., Qin, N., Zhou, J., Crawford, G. D., Smith, R. G., Appel, S. H., Stefani, E., and Birnbaumer, L. (1994) Recept. Channels 2, 255-270[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Berrou, L., Bernatchez, G., and Parent, L. (2001) Biophys. J. 80, 215-228[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Bernatchez, G., Berrou, L., Benakezouh, Z., Ducay, J., and Parent, L. (2001) Bioch. Biophys. Acta 1514, 217-229[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Castellano, A., Wei, X., Birnbaumer, L., and Perez-Reyes, E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 12359-12366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Parent, L., Gopalakrishnan, M., Lacerda, A. E., Wei, X., and Perez-Reyes, E. (1995) FEBS Lett. 360, 144-150[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Bernatchez, G., Sauvé, R., and Parent, L. (2001) J. Memb. Biol. 184, 143-159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Chica, R. A., Gagnon, P., Keillor, J. W., and Pelletier, J. N. (2004) Protein Sci. 13, 979-991[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Doucet, N., De Wals, P. Y., and Pelletier, J. N. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 46295-46303[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Walker, D., Bichet, D., Geib, S., Mori, E., Cornet, V., Snutch, T. P., Mori, Y., and De Waard M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12383-12390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Kangas, E., and Tidor, B. (1998) J. Chem. Phys. 109, 7522-7545[CrossRef]
  43. Sheinerman, F. B., and Honig, B. (2002) J. Mol. Biol. 318, 161-177[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Dafi, O., Dodier, Y., Berrou, L., Raybaud, A., Sauve, R., and Parent, L. (2004) Biophys. J. 87, 3181-3192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JGPHome page
G. Gonzalez-Gutierrez, E. Miranda-Laferte, D. Naranjo, P. Hidalgo, and A. Neely
Mutations of Nonconserved Residues within the Calcium Channel {alpha}1-interaction Domain Inhibit {beta}-Subunit Potentiation
J. Gen. Physiol., September 1, 2008; 132(3): 383 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Raybaud, E.-E. Baspinar, F. Dionne, Y. Dodier, R. Sauve, and L. Parent
The Role of Distal S6 Hydrophobic Residues in the Voltage-dependent Gating of CaV2.3 Channels
J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 27944 - 27952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Beguin, Y. J. A. Ng, C. Krause, R. N. Mahalakshmi, M. Y. Ng, and W. Hunziker
RGK Small GTP-binding Proteins Interact with the Nucleotide Kinase Domain of Ca2+-channel beta-Subunits via an Uncommon Effector Binding Domain
J. Biol. Chem., April 13, 2007; 282(15): 11509 - 11520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Raybaud, Y. Dodier, P. Bissonnette, M. Simoes, D. G. Bichet, R. Sauve, and L. Parent
The Role of the GX9GX3G Motif in the Gating of High Voltage-activated Ca2+ Channels
J. Biol. Chem., December 22, 2006; 281(51): 39424 - 39436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Hidalgo, G. Gonzalez-Gutierrez, J. Garcia-Olivares, and A. Neely
The {alpha}1-beta-Subunit Interaction That Modulates Calcium Channel Activity Is Reversible and Requires a Competent {alpha}-Interaction Domain
J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2006; 281(34): 24104 - 24110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. J. Butcher, J. Leroy, M. W. Richards, W. S. Pratt, and A. C. Dolphin
The importance of occupancy rather than affinity of CaV{beta} subunits for the calcium channel I-II linker in relation to calcium channel function
J. Physiol., July 15, 2006; 574(2): 387 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Leroy, M. S. Richards, A. J. Butcher, M. Nieto-Rostro, W. S. Pratt, A. Davies, and A. C. Dolphin
Interaction via a Key Tryptophan in the I-II Linker of N-Type Calcium Channels Is Required for {beta}1 But Not for Palmitoylated {beta}2, Implicating an Additional Binding Site in the Regulation of Channel Voltage-Dependent Properties
J. Neurosci., July 27, 2005; 25(30): 6984 - 6996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/1/494    most recent
M410859200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berrou, L.
Right arrow Articles by Parent, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berrou, L.
Right arrow Articles by Parent, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement