JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M409706200 on January 6, 2005

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 10, 9023-9029, March 11, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/10/9023    most recent
M409706200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pappan, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Semenkovich, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pappan, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Semenkovich, C. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Pancreatic {beta}-Cell Lipoprotein Lipase Independently Regulates Islet Glucose Metabolism and Normal Insulin Secretion*

Kirk L. Pappan{ddagger}§, Zhijun Pan§, Guim Kwon{ddagger}, Connie A. Marshall{ddagger}, Trey Coleman¶, Ira J. Goldberg||, Michael L. McDaniel{ddagger}, and Clay F. Semenkovich¶**

From the {ddagger}Department of Pathology and Immunology, Departments of Medicine and Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, and ||Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032

Received for publication, August 24, 2004 , and in revised form, December 15, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Lipid and glucose metabolism are adversely affected by diabetes, a disease characterized by pancreatic {beta}-cell dysfunction. To clarify the role of lipids in insulin secretion, we generated mice with {beta}-cell-specific overexpression ({beta}LPL-TG) or inactivation ({beta}LPL-KO) of lipoprotein lipase (LPL), a physiologic provider of fatty acids. LPL enzyme activity and triglyceride content were increased in {beta}LPL-TG islets; decreased LPL enzyme activity in {beta}LPL-KO islets did not affect islet triglyceride content. Surprisingly, both {beta}LPL-TG and {beta}LPL-KO mice were strikingly hyperglycemic during glucose tolerance testing. Impaired glucose tolerance in {beta}LPL-KO mice was present at one month of age, whereas {beta}LPL-TG mice did not develop defective glucose homeostasis until approximately five months of age. Glucose-simulated insulin secretion was impaired in islets isolated from both mouse models. Glucose oxidation, critical for ATP production and triggering of insulin secretion mediated by the ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channel, was decreased in {beta}LPL-TG islets but increased in {beta}LPL-KO islets. Islet ATP content was not decreased in either model. Insulin secretion was defective in both {beta}LPL-TG and {beta}LPL-KO islets under conditions causing calcium-dependent insulin secretion independent of the KATP channel. These results show that {beta}-cell-derived LPL has two physiologically relevant effects in islets, the inverse regulation of glucose metabolism and the independent mediation of insulin secretion through effects distal to membrane depolarization.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Normal secretion of insulin, the anabolic hormone central to glucose metabolism, is necessary for normal lipid metabolism. The converse may also be true; normal lipid metabolism may be necessary for normal insulin secretion. Acute exposure to fatty acids potentiates glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, whereas chronic exposure causes a muted insulin secretory response to glucose (1, 2). Pharmacological depletion of plasma fatty acids after a prolonged fast inhibits glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (35). The excessive delivery of lipids to the {beta}-cell is thought to contribute to insulin secretory failure and the development of type 2 diabetes, part of a general process commonly called lipotoxicity (6).

How lipids affect insulin secretion is unknown. In most tissues, glucose and fatty acids compete for respiration. Increased provision of lipids might be expected to decrease insulin secretion by decreasing pyruvate dehydrogenase activity and glucose oxidation, known as the Randle effect (7). Reports addressing this issue are conflicting (8, 9), but it is likely that any effects on pyruvate dehydrogenase are blunted because of the high activity of pyruvate carboxylase in islets, which ultimately prevents effects on glucose oxidation by preserving cytoplasmic pyruvate (10). Fatty acids have been postulated to interfere with insulin secretion by disrupting normal mitochondrial pyruvate metabolism (11), inducing apoptosis (12), and by depleting ATP levels through the induction of uncoupling protein-2 (13, 14). Fatty acids have been postulated to promote insulin secretion through the effects of long chain acyl-CoA molecules on a variety of potential targets (15), and more recently, through direct effects on the G-protein-coupled receptor GPR40 (16).

The source of lipids that modulate insulin secretion is also unknown. Fatty acids delivered to {beta}-cell regulatory pools could be derived from circulating non-esterified fatty acids (mostly bound to albumin), intracellular triglycerides (the substrate for the intracellular enzyme hormone-sensitive lipase) (14), or circulating triglycerides traveling in lipoproteins. The relative contribution of each of these pools in {beta}-cells to insulin secretion is unknown. In other tissues, hydrolysis of circulating lipoprotein-associated triglycerides is the principal source of fatty acids destined for metabolism (17). This process is accomplished by the extracellular enzyme lipoprotein lipase (LPL).1

LPL is regulated by hormones and nutrients in a tissue-specific manner (18). In adipose tissue, where fatty acids are stored, LPL activity is induced by feeding and suppressed by fasting. In muscle, which relies on fatty acids for energy production in the postabsorptive state, LPL activity is induced by fasting and suppressed by feeding. Insulin stimulates LPL in adipocytes and adipose tissue (19) but may inhibit LPL in heart (20). We have shown that LPL is expressed in human and rodent islets (21) where its regulation resembles that of adipocytes, because {beta}-cell LPL expression is induced by glucose and insulin (22).

Here we describe two novel mouse models generated to define how LPL, a physiologic provider of fatty acids, affects insulin secretion. Both overexpression and inactivation of {beta}-cell LPL activity cause diabetes phenotypes despite opposite effects on islet glucose metabolism. Both also cause defects in the amplifying pathway of insulin secretion, suggesting that optimal {beta}-cell function requires maintenance of a discrete range of triglyceride-derived fatty acids by LPL.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals—The Washington University Animal Studies Committee approved these studies. Mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free barrier facility with unrestricted access to water and standard mouse chow containing 6% fat.

For mice with {beta}-cell overexpression of LPL ({beta}LPL-TG), a human LPL cDNA engineered to encode a hemagglutinin (HA) tag at the carboxyl terminus of the protein was inserted at the EcoRI site of the vector pRIP I (a gift from Dr. Bess Marshall), which contains an intron and polyadenylation signal and is known to direct expression of transgenes in mouse {beta}-cells (23). The recombinant plasmid was sequentially treated with SacI and XhoI to liberate the LPL transgene and then the fragment was separated from vector DNA, and C57BL/6 x CBA hybrid embryos were injected at the Washington University Mouse Genetics Core. Transgenic animals, identified by PCR genotyping using human LPL/HA-specific primers, were born in expected Mendelian frequencies, and all experiments were performed with littermates.

For mice with {beta}-cell-specific inactivation of LPL ({beta}LPL-KO), Ins2Cre mice (The Jackson Laboratory, number 003573) were crossed with mice carrying LPL alleles flanked by loxP recombination sites (LPLlox/lox) (24). First generation animals hemizygous for the RIP-Cre gene and bearing one "floxed" LPL allele (LPLlox/wt Cre+) were crossed with LPLlox/lox animals to generate {beta}-cell LPL-deficient (LPLlox/lox Cre+) and {beta}-cell LPL wild-type (LPLlox/lox Cre) littermates that were used for experiments. The following primers (schematically represented in Fig. 2) were used to document LPL gene rearrangement: Primer A, 5'-GTA GGT TTG GAA TGG TCA TTT GGC ATG TCC-3'; Primer B, 5'-TTT CCA CTG CAC AGC TGT TTA AGT GAC TGG-3'; and Primer C, 5'-CCT AGT CTT CTC TAG GCA GAG AGC AGC AGA-3'. Amplification of non-rearranged DNA by primers A and B yields a product of ~700 bp, whereas the amplification of appropriately rearranged DNA with primers A and C yields a product of ~400 bp.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
LPL gene rearrangement and decreased LPL enzyme activity in islets of {beta}LPL-KO animals. A, schematic representation of the LPL gene in the absence (–) or presence (+) of Cre recombinase. B, three primer PCR screening of DNA from {beta}LPL-KO (ko) and wild-type (wt) islets. C, LPL enzyme activity of wild-type (open bars) and {beta}LPL-KO (filled bars) islet extracts. *, p < 0.05 versus wild-type littermates under the same condition; FFA, free fatty acid. D, triglyceride content of islets isolated from wild-type (open bar) and littermate {beta}LPL-KO (filled bar) animals. Islets were isolated from 2–3-month-old {beta}LPL-KO mice and wild-type siblings.

 
Islet Isolation—Islets were isolated by collagenase digestion and Ficoll step density gradient separation and then selected with a microscope to exclude any contaminating tissues (25). Mouse islets were counted and aliquoted for insulin secretion studies (10–25 islets/aliquot), analysis of triglyceride content (50–100 islets/aliquot), insulin content (5 islets/aliquot), measurement of glucose oxidation (30 islets/aliquot), or measurement of LPL activity (200 islets/aliquot).

Analytical Procedures—Islet LPL enzyme activity was measured as described previously (22). Islets were solubilized in a buffer composed of 200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), 10 mg/ml BSA, 80 mg/ml sucrose, 50 µg/ml heparin, and 2 mg/ml deoxycholate. Activity was assayed as the release of radiolabeled oleate from an emulsion containing glyceroltri[1-14C]oleate (Amersham Biosciences).

Serum glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, and non-esterified fatty acids were measured using reagents from Sigma. Islet triglycerides were determined after extraction of lipids with 2:1 (v/v) chloroform and methanol followed by sonication of the extract in reagent buffer using a Branson 250-probe-tip Sonifier. Serum insulin was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Crystal Chem Inc., Downer's Grove, IL). Islets in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% BSA were sonicated, and the total insulin content was determined by radioimmunoassay in the Washington University Diabetes Research and Training Center.

For Western blotting, tissues were Dounce-homogenized, solubilized in sample buffer under reducing conditions, boiled for 10 min, and then proteins were separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by transfer to nitrocellulose. Detection of human LPL protein produced by transgenic mice was performed using an anti-hemagglutinin antibody (MMS-101P; Covance).

ATP levels were determined within the linear response of a luciferin-based assay. Freshly isolated islets were homogenized in a nucleotide-releasing mixture and then frozen. Standard curves were generated with serial dilutions of ATP, and bioluminescence was detected using a luminometer.

Static Insulin Secretion—Islets were rinsed with CMRL 1066 medium containing 3 mM glucose and 0.1% BSA, placed in microcentrifuge tubes in the same buffer, and incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2/95% air incubator for 30 min. The buffer was then replaced with CMRL 1066 medium containing 3 or 20 mM glucose and 0.1% BSA, and the samples were incubated for 30 ({beta}LPL-TG) or 20 min ({beta}LPL-KO). Insulin secreted into the medium was measured by radioimmunoassay.

Glucose and Insulin Tolerance Tests—Mice in clean cages with free access to water were fasted for 4 h and then weighed, and baseline blood glucose was determined using a glucose oxidase analyzer (HemoCue Inc., Lake Forest, CA). The animals were injected intraperitoneally with 50% (w/v) dextrose at a dose of 2 mg/g body weight, and blood glucose was measured at 30, 60, and 120 min. Insulin tolerance tests were conducted in an analogous manner, except that mice received an intraperitoneal injection of human regular insulin (Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana) at a dose of 0.5 units/kg body weight.

Glucose Oxidation—Islets were washed and then incubated in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (25 mM Hepes, 115 mM NaCl, 24 mM NaHCO3, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4) without glucose or BSA, gassed with 5% CO2/95% air, and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer containing 3 or 16.5 mM glucose in the presence of D-[U-14C]glucose was added, and the tubes were transferred to scintillation vials containing filter paper and sealed with septum caps (26, 27). The vials were incubated for 2 h in a shaking water bath at 37 °C, and then 200 µl of 2 N NaOH was added to the filter paper through the stopper cap using a needle and syringe. Two hundred µl of 6 N HCl was added to the tubes containing islets, and the vials were incubated without shaking at room temperature overnight. The tubes were then removed, scintillation fluid was added to the vials containing filter paper, and radioactivity representing 14CO2 production determined in a scintillation counter.

Statistical Methods—Results are presented as mean ± S.E. Data were evaluated by unpaired, two-tailed Student's t test or by analysis of variance with appropriate post-hoc tests. Significance levels are described in the individual figure legends.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Generation of {beta}LPL-TG and {beta}LPL-KO Mice—For {beta}LPL-TG mice, two independent founders carrying the transgene encoding an HA-tagged LPL molecule, shown schematically in Fig. 1A, were characterized and found to share the same phenotype. An HA-tagged protein of the predicted size was detected in islets from {beta}LPL-TG animals but not in control islets (Fig. 1B). Certain regions of the brain, such as the hypothalamus, transiently activate the insulin promoter during embryogenesis (28). No HA-tagged LPL was detectable in brain extracts from {beta}LPL-TG or control mice (Fig. 1B), and there was no difference in brain LPL enzyme activity between genotypes (data not shown). Compared with non-transgenic islets, {beta}LPL-TG islets had three-fold more LPL activity (Fig. 1C) in the presence of 3 mM glucose (p = 0.0019) and nearly five-fold more LPL activity in the presence of 20 mM glucose (p = 0.0004). Islet triglyceride content was modestly but significantly increased in the transgenic animals (Fig. 1D). Isolated islets in culture respond to elevated glucose concentrations by increasing LPL activity (22). The increased intracellular triglyceride accumulation (Fig. 1D) suggests that the increased LPL activity measured in our in vitro assay (Fig. 1C) leads to increased fatty acid flux and subsequent metabolic adaptations in vivo.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Increased LPL enzyme activity and triglyceride content in islets of {beta}LPL-TG animals. A, schematic representation of the human LPL transgene. B, Western blot of islet (50 islets/lane) and brain (200 µg/lane) proteins from wild-type (wt) and littermate {beta}LPL-TG (tg) animals using an anti-HA antibody. C, LPL activity assay of wild-type (open bars) or littermate {beta}LPL-TG (filled bars) islet extracts. D, triglyceride content of islets isolated from wild-type (open bar) and littermate {beta}LPL-TG (filled bar) animals. Islets and brain tissue were obtained from 5–6-month-old {beta}LPL-TG animals and littermates. *, p < 0.005; **, p < 0.05 versus wild-type littermates under the same condition; FFA, free fatty acid.

 
For {beta}LPL-KO mice, the presence of the Cre recombinase in {beta}-cells was predicted to remove exon 1 of the LPL gene (Fig. 2A). PCR reactions, including Primers A, B, and C as shown in Fig. 2A, showed the expected rearrangement of the LPL gene (as indicated by the presence of a 400 bp band) in islet DNA from Cre+ mice (Fig. 2B). Detection of the 700-bp wild-type band in the KO lane is expected, as Cre is driven by a {beta}-cell-specific promoter, and DNA from non-{beta}-cells in islets should not be rearranged. That the conditional rearrangement of the LPL gene occurred only in the {beta}-cell was shown by the presence of the wild-type product and the absence of the rearranged product in DNA from the following tissues of RIP-Cre+ mice: brain, heart, adipose tissue, spleen, and liver (data not shown). LPL enzyme activity (Fig. 2C) was ~40% lower in {beta}LPL-KO as compared with control islets in the presence of 20 mM glucose (p = 0.0307). Residual LPL activity detected in islets from {beta}LPL-KO mice is likely because of the presence of non-{beta}-cells. Although we observed a reduction in glucose-stimulated LPL activity in {beta}LPL-KO islets (Fig. 2C), this change in LPL activity did not alter the islet content of triglycerides in vivo (Fig. 2D).

Glucose Intolerance and Defective Insulin Secretion with Perturbations of {beta}-cell LPL—Neither genetic manipulation of LPL expression affected fasting serum levels of cholesterol, triglycerides, free fatty acids, or insulin (data not shown). There was also no effect of increased or decreased islet LPL activity on body mass. Weights for {beta}LPL-TG mice at the age of 12 weeks were: TG males, 32.8 ± 1.8 g; WT males, 31.2 ± 0.9 g; TG females, 24.5 ± 4.9 g; and WT females, 25.5 ± 5.0 g. Weights for {beta}LPL-KO mice at the age of 12 weeks were: KO males, 27.2 ± 1.6 g; WT males, 28.3 ± 1.3 g; KO females, 22.0 ± 0.5 g; WT females, 21.3 ± 1.3 g.

Insulin sensitivity as assessed by insulin tolerance testing was unaffected in both {beta}LPL-TG and {beta}LPL-KO mice (Fig. 3, B and D). However, {beta}LPL-TG and {beta}LPL-KO animals became hyperglycemic compared with their respective wild-type littermates during glucose tolerance testing (Fig. 3, A and C). The data of Fig. 3 represent males, but the same results were seen with females. To characterize in vivo insulin secretory responses, insulin was measured during glucose tolerance tests in separate cohorts. Compared with the basal state, plasma insulin nearly doubled 30 min after glucose administration in both the {beta}LPL-TG and {beta}LPL-KO animal models (Table I). Although {beta}LPL-TG and {beta}LPL-KO mice displayed significantly higher blood glucose levels 30 min after challenge, there were no significant differences in circulating insulin concentrations between these animals and their respective wild-type littermates. The failure to detect higher insulin levels in the setting of hyperglycemia suggests the presence of defective insulin secretion, which was confirmed using isolated islets (Fig. 4). {beta}LPL-TG (Fig. 4A) and {beta}LPL-KO (Fig. 4C) islets secreted less insulin than controls when stimulated with 20 mM glucose. Islet insulin content was unaffected in both models (Fig. 4, B and D).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
{beta}LPL-TG and {beta}LPL-KO mice have impaired glucose tolerance but normal insulin sensitivity. A, glucose tolerance testing in {beta}LPL-TG (filled circles) and wild-type littermate (open circles) mice. Data are reported for six males at the age of 5–6 months for each genotype. The same results were seen in two other male cohorts and with females. Glucose intolerance was also seen in males from a separate founder line. B, insulin tolerance testing in {beta}LPL-TG (filled circles) and wild-type littermate (open circles) mice. C, glucose tolerance testing in {beta}LPL-KO (filled squares) and wild-type littermate (open squares) mice. Data are reported for eight males at the age of 2–3 months for each genotype. D, insulin tolerance testing in {beta}LPL-KO (filled squares) and wild-type littermate (open squares) mice. The time zero blood glucose values (mg/dl) in B were 126 ± 9 and 149 ± 8 for wild-type and {beta}LPL-TG animals, respectively, and in D, were 130 ± 5 and 116 ± 5 for wild-type and {beta}LPL-KO mice, respectively. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005 versus wild-type littermates at the same time point.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
Plasma insulin and glucose concentrations before and after glucose challenge

Blood samples were obtained from mice after fasting 4 h (time 0) or after subsequently being challenged with 50% dextrose at a dose of 2 mg/g body weight (time 30). Plasma insulin was determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using mouse insulin for the standard curve. {beta}LPL-TG mice and their respective littermates were 5-6 months old when tested, whereas {beta}LPL-KO mice and wild-type siblings were 2-3 months of age when examined.

 



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
{beta}LPL-TG and {beta}LPL-KO mice have impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion but normal insulin content. A, static insulin secretion at basal (3 mM) and stimulatory (20 mM) glucose levels using islets isolated from wild-type (open bars) and {beta}LPL-TG littermate (filled bars) animals. B, insulin content of islets isolated from wild-type (open bar) and {beta}LPL-TG littermate (filled bar) mice. C, static insulin secretion at basal (3 mM) and stimulatory (20 mM) glucose levels using islets isolated from wild-type (open bars) and {beta}LPL-KO littermate (filled bars) animals. D, insulin content of islets isolated from wild-type (open bar) or {beta}LPL-KO littermate (filled bar) mice. In {beta}LPL-TG studies, islets were obtained from 5–6-month-old {beta}LPL-TG animals and littermates. For the {beta}LPL-KO model, islets were isolated from 2–3-month-old {beta}LPL-KO mice and wild-type siblings. The results in A and C were each replicated in four or more experiments. The same results shown in B and D were seen in two independent experiments. *, p < 0.05 and **, p < 0.005 versus wild type under the same condition.

 
Although both {beta}LPL-TG and {beta}LPL-KO mice display impaired glucose tolerance relative to their relevant wild-type littermates, the age at which this occurs differs between the two models. {beta}LPL-TG mice and their wild-type siblings have normal glucose tolerance up to four months of age, then manifest glucose intolerance by the age of five months (data not shown). This delayed onset of glucose intolerance suggests that these animals successfully compensate for the increased delivery of fatty acids for a period of time. In contrast, {beta}LPL-KO mice as young as one month of age, the earliest age examined, exhibit impaired glucose tolerance (data not shown), suggesting that these animals have insufficient levels of a fatty acid-derived signal required for normal insulin secretion. Because these two animal models developed impaired glucose tolerance at different ages, {beta}LPL-TG animals were studied at 5–6 months of age, whereas {beta}LPL-KO mice were studied at 2–3 months of age.

Opposite Effects on Islet Glucose Oxidation and Defects in the Amplifying Pathway of Insulin Secretion—These genetic models of altered islet LPL expression had opposite effects on islet glucose oxidation. Glucose oxidation was decreased at 16.5 mM glucose in {beta}LPL-TG islets relative to islets from wild-type siblings (Fig. 5A), but this decrease was unlikely to be due to lipotoxicity-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, because islet ATP content was increased (Fig. 5B). Previous studies have suggested that increased availability of fatty acids in islets can increase expression of uncoupling protein-2 (14), known to decrease insulin secretion presumably through effects on ATP generation (29). Consistent with the ATP data of Fig. 5B, there was no effect of LPL expression on islet uncoupling protein-2 mRNA levels (not shown). There was also no effect of LPL modulation on islet mRNA levels for glucokinase (not shown), a key mediator of {beta}-cell glucose metabolism.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Glucose oxidation is diminished in {beta}LPL-TG islets but enhanced in {beta}LPL-KO islets. A, glucose oxidation at basal (3 mM) and stimulatory (16.5 mM) glucose levels using islets isolated from wild-type (open bars) and {beta}LPL-TG littermate (filled bars) animals. B, ATP content of islets isolated from wild-type (open bar) or {beta}LPL-TG littermate (filled bar) mice. C, glucose oxidation at basal (3 mM) and stimulatory (16.5 mM) glucose levels using islets isolated from wild-type (open bars) and {beta}LPL-KO littermate (filled bars) animals. D, ATP content of islets isolated from wild-type (open bar) or {beta}LPL-KO littermate (filled bar) mice. The same results for these panels were seen in 2–5 independent experiments. For the {beta}LPL-TG experiments, islets were obtained from 5–6-month-old {beta}LPL-TG animals and littermates. For the {beta}LPL-KO model, islets were isolated from 2–3-month-old {beta}LPL-KO mice and wild-type siblings. *, p < 0.005 and **, p < 0.01 versus wild-type littermates under the same condition.

 
Glucose oxidation was increased at both 3 and 16.5 mM glucose in {beta}LPL-KO islets as compared with islets from wild-type littermates (Fig. 5C). Qualitatively, the increased glucose oxidation as a consequence of lowered {beta}-cell LPL expression is the opposite to that of {beta}LPL-TG islets, which have reduced glucose oxidation. However, differences in the ages of animals studied and in their genetic backgrounds limit the validity of direct quantitative comparisons of glucose oxidation between these two models of altered LPL expression. There was no effect of {beta}-cell LPL knockdown on islet ATP content (Fig. 5D).

Despite differing effects on glucose oxidation, {beta}LPL-TG and {beta}LPL-KO islets had similar defects in the amplifying pathway of insulin secretion (Fig. 6). Treatment with 250 µM diazoxide and 30 mM KCl, conditions inducing insulin secretion independent of the KATP channel, revealed defects in insulin secretion at 3 and 20 mM glucose in {beta}LPL-TG islets (Fig. 6A) and at 20 mM glucose in {beta}LPL-KO islets (Fig. 6B).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
The amplifying pathway of insulin secretion is impaired in {beta}LPL-TG and {beta}LPL-KO islets. Static insulin secretion assays were performed in the absence (–) or presence (+) of 30 mM KCl and 250 µM diazoxide to assess insulin secretion independent of the KATP channel and used islets isolated from wild-type (open bars) and {beta}LPL-TG littermate (filled bars) animals (A), or islets isolated from wild-type (open bars) and {beta}LPL-KO littermate (filled bars) animals (B). The same results for both panels were seen in 2–3 experiments. For the {beta}LPL-TG studies, islets were obtained from 5–6-month-old {beta}LPL-TG animals and littermates. For the {beta}LPL-KO model, islets were isolated from 2–3-month-old {beta}LPL-KO mice and wild-type siblings. *, p < 0.01 and **, p < 0.025 versus wild-type littermates under the same condition.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Diabetes, a disease projected to affect 366 million people worldwide by the year 2030 (30), is characterized by two salient pathophysiologies: insulin resistance and the inability of the {beta}-cell to secrete sufficient insulin to maintain normal levels of blood glucose. Both may be affected by abnormal lipid metabolism. By modulating {beta}-cell expression of LPL, which is known to be altered in diabetes and critical for the physiologic delivery of fatty acids to tissues, we have identified three important roles for this enzyme in {beta}-cell function. First, normal levels of {beta}-cell LPL are required to maintain glucose homeostasis in an intact physiologic system, because an increase in islet LPL activity ({beta}LPL-TG mice, Fig. 3A) and a decrease in islet LPL activity ({beta}LPL-KO mice, Fig. 3C) resulted in systemic glucose intolerance. Second, LPL activity inversely regulates islet glucose metabolism. Glucose oxidation was decreased in islets with increased LPL activity (Fig. 5A) and increased in islets with deficient LPL activity (Fig. 5C). Third, LPL appears to independently regulate insulin secretion at a level distal to events associated with membrane depolarization. Islets from {beta}LPL-TG and {beta}LPL-KO mice secreted less insulin under conditions causing calcium-dependent insulin release independent of the KATP channel (Fig. 6).

The current work emphasizes the importance of LPL, and hence free fatty acid availability, for glucose metabolism and insulin secretion, because too much or too little LPL has negative effects on {beta}-cell function. The intracellular accumulation of fatty acids in triglycerides is just one possible fate for non-esterified fatty acids liberated by LPL, and in the case of the {beta}LPL-TG model, it served as a relevant indicator of the increased provision of lipids to the {beta}-cell (Fig. 1D). However, in the case of the {beta}LPL-KO model, the triglyceride content was unaffected. This result is not surprising given the young age of these animals and the very low levels of triglycerides, near the threshold of detection, in both wild-type and knock-out islets (Fig. 2D). Too much LPL impairing insulin secretion is consistent with the concept of lipotoxicity (31). Increased triglycerides in {beta}LPL-TG islets (Fig. 1D) may represent storage of potentially toxic fatty acids as inert neutral lipid (32, 33). Increased LPL activity would be expected to accelerate loss of this potentially protective mechanism as the capacity for lipid storage is exceeded, and we interpret the delayed onset of glucose intolerance in the transgenic model as representing the eventual negative consequences of exceeding this capacity in the {beta}-cell. Too little LPL, also impairing insulin secretion, is consistent with the concept that a lipid-derived coupling factor is required for insulin secretion (34, 35). Circulating free fatty acids are required for glucose-stimulated insulin secretion following prolonged fasting (18–24 h in rodents, 24–48 h in humans) and treatment with nicotinic acid (3, 4). {beta}LPL-KO mice were fasted for 4 h, and there was no effect on serum free fatty acid levels. The fact that circulating free fatty acids were available to islets in the current work and yet did not prevent a hyperglycemic phenotype in {beta}LPL-KO mice (animals with a reduction in lipid delivery limited to those fatty acids derived from the activity of {beta}-cell LPL) strongly suggests that {beta}-cell LPL controls a discrete pool of fatty acids required for normal insulin secretion. These results suggest that the {beta}-cell detects triglycerides in the blood, via the action of LPL, and that the {beta}-cell is capable of distinguishing between free fatty acids supplied by LPL versus those present as fatty acid-albumin complexes.

Effects on glucose oxidation in our mouse models contribute to a growing body of evidence that LPL participates in the regulation of glucose metabolism. Haplotype analysis in humans indicates that variations in the LPL gene impact glucose metabolism (36). Two independent groups have shown that glucose metabolism is impaired in mice with skeletal muscle overexpression of LPL (37, 38). Cardiac-specific knockdown of LPL activity increases myocardial glucose metabolism (24). Now we show that {beta}-cell-specific overexpression of LPL decreases and {beta}-cell-specific knockdown of LPL increases islet glucose metabolism (Fig. 5).

Surprisingly, these effects on glucose metabolism did not appear to account for defective insulin secretion in our models. Glucose oxidation was decreased in {beta}LPL-TG islets, but ATP levels were increased (Fig. 5), and insulin secretion was decreased in the presence of KCl and diazoxide (Fig. 6), implicating an effect on events distal to membrane depolarization. Glucose oxidation was increased in {beta}LPL-KO islets (Fig. 5), which might be expected to increase insulin secretion by increasing ATP production and decreasing KATP activity, but instead, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was decreased in the presence and absence of KCl/diazoxide (Fig. 6). Studies using insulinoma cells have shown that the inhibition of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion caused by the chronic exposure of free fatty acids occurs independently from the effects of those fatty acids on glucose metabolism (39, 40). Our animal models of altered {beta}-cell LPL expression suggest that the dissociation of the effects of fatty acids on glucose oxidation and insulin secretion also occurs in vivo. Other groups have provided evidence that a lipid-coupling factor mediates a KATP channel-independent pathway of insulin secretion (34, 35). Our data demonstrate that {beta}-cell LPL activity is a key physiologic generator of the lipids involved in this effect.

We did not address the in vivo effects of individual fatty acids on {beta}-cell function in this study. However, the in vitro effects of different free fatty acid species on islet function have been studied extensively. No difference between saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, in terms of acute potentiating effects on insulin secretion, was observed by Warnotte et al. (41). Chronic stimulation by saturated fatty acids, such as palmitate, provokes {beta}-cell apoptosis, whereas monounsaturated fatty acids do not cause apoptosis and appear to protect against palmitate-induced apoptosis by redirecting this saturated fatty acid into the triglyceride esterification pathway (32, 33). A slight preference of rat LPL for saturated fatty acid species over unsaturated ones was detected using an in vitro assay (42), but whether this difference affects LPL substrate selection in vivo is unclear.

A downstream event likely to be affected by LPL expression is the exocytosis of vesicles containing insulin (43). Docking and fusion of vesicles with the plasma membrane requires the assembly of a complex between tSNAREs, located on the plasma membrane, and vSNAREs, located on secretory vesicles. The tSNARE protein SNAP-25, important for insulin release (44), is palmitoylated (45), a modification that allows proteins to be associated with membranes. Palmitoylation is poorly understood (46). If the process is enzymatic, it is likely to be dependent on an optimal concentration of fatty acids. There is precedence for this notion; serine palmitoyltransferase, a key enzyme in the ceramide synthesis pathway, is functional within a narrow range of fatty acid concentrations (47). It is thus plausible that lipid modification of vesicles would be impaired both with LPL deficiency and LPL excess when LPL activity controls a pool of fatty acids available to modify tSNAREs. If palmitoylation is non-enzymatic (substrate-driven), the low level of lipids could be insufficient for vesicle anchoring, and high levels could lead to excessive palmitoylation and self-association of vesicles that would interfere with docking. Other components of the exocytotic machinery may also be involved. Munc-18 is a tSNARE binding protein expressed in {beta}-cells that is released to allow assembly of the active SNARE complex (48). Skeletal muscle overexpression of LPL is associated with increased Munc-18 expression (49).

In summary, overexpression or inactivation of LPL in the {beta}-cell disrupts glucose metabolism in mice. LPL appears to deliver triglyceride-derived fatty acids to the {beta}-cell within a discrete concentration range required for optimal glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. {beta}-cell LPL thus represents an important translator of the cross-talk between glucose and lipid metabolism involved in the development of diabetes.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK06181, HL58427, and HL45095, an American Diabetes Association mentor-based postdoctoral fellowship (to M. L. M.), and the Washington University Diabetes Research and Training Center (DK20579) and Clinical Nutrition Research Unit (DK56341). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

§ These authors contributed equally to this work. Back

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Washington University, Campus Box 8127, 660 South Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel.: 314-362-7617; Fax: 314-362-7641; E-mail: csemenko{at}im.wustl.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: LPL, lipoprotein lipase; {beta}LPL-KO, {beta}-cell lipoprotein lipase knockout; {beta}LPL-TG, {beta}-cell lipoprotein lipase transgenic; HA, hemagglutinin; BSA, bovine serum albumin; KO, knock-out; SNARE, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors; tSNARE, target membrane-associated SNARE; vSNARE, vesicle-associated SNARE; TG, transgenic; WT, wild-type. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Crespin, S. R., Greenough, W. B., and Steinberg, D. (1969) J. Clin. Investig. 48, 1934–1943
  2. Sako, Y., and Grill, V. E. (1990) Endocrinology 127, 1580–1589[Abstract]
  3. Stein, D. T., Esser, V., Stevenson, B. E., Lane, K. E., Whiteside, J. H., Daniels, M. B., Chen, S., and McGarry, J. D. (1996) J. Clin. Investig. 97, 2728–2735[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Dobbins, R. L., Chester, M. W., Daniels, M. B., McGarry, J. D., and Stein, D. T. (1998) Diabetes 47, 1613–1618[Abstract]
  5. Koyama, K., Chen, G., Wang, M. Y., Lee, Y., Shimabukuro, M., Newgard, C. B., and Unger, R. H. (1997) Diabetes 46, 1276–1280[Abstract]
  6. Lee, Y., Hirose, H., Ohneda, M., Johnson, J. H., McGarry, J. D., and Unger, R. H. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10878–10882[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Randle, P. J. (1998) Diabetes Metab. Rev. 14, 263–283[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Zhou, Y. P., and Grill, V. E. (1994) J. Clin. Investig. 93, 870–876
  9. Liu, Y. Q., Tornheim, K., and Leahy, J. L. (1999) Diabetes 48, 1747–1753[Abstract]
  10. Liu, Y. Q., Jetton, T. L., and Leahy, J. L. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 39163–39168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Boucher, A., Lu, D., Burgess, S. C., Telemaque-Potts, S., Jensen, M. V., Mulder, H., Wang, M. Y., Unger, R. H., Sherry, A. D., and Newgard, C. B. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 27263–27271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Unger, R. H., and Zhou, Y. T. (2001) Diabetes 50, Suppl. 1, S118–S121[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Tordjman, K., Standley, K. N., Bernal-Mizrachi, C., Leone, T. C., Coleman, T., Kelly, D. P., and Semenkovich, C. F. (2002) J. Lipid Res. 43, 936–943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Winzell, M. S., Svensson, H., Enerback, S., Ravnskjaer, K., Mandrup, S., Esser, V., Arner, P., Alves-Guerra, M. C., Miroux, B., Sundler, F., Ahren, B., and Holm, C. (2003) Diabetes 52, 2057–2065[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Yaney, G. C., and Corkey, B. E. (2003) Diabetologia 46, 1297–1312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Itoh, Y., Kawamata, Y., Harada, M., Kobayashi, M., Fujii, R., Fukusumi, S., Ogi, K., Hosoya, M., Tanaka, Y., Uejima, H., Tanaka, H., Maruyama, M., Satoh, R., Okubo, S., Kizawa, H., Komatsu, H., Matsumura, F., Noguchi, Y., Shinohara, T., Hinuma, S., Fujisawa, Y., and Fujino, M. (2003) Nature 422, 173–176[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Augustus, A. S., Kako, Y., Yagyu, H., and Goldberg, I. J. (2003) Am. J. Physiol. 284, E331–E339
  18. Merkel, M., Eckel, R. H., and Goldberg, I. J. (2002) J. Lipid Res. 43, 1997–2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Semenkovich, C. F., Wims, M., Noe, L., Etienne, J., and Chan, L. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 9030–9038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Sambandam, N., Abrahani, M. A., St. Pierre, E., Al-Atar, O., Cam, M. C., and Rodrigues, B. (1999) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 19, 1526–1534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Marshall, B. A., Tordjman, K., Host, H. H., Ensor, N. J., Kwon, G., Marshall, C. A., Coleman, T., McDaniel, M. L., and Semenkovich, C. F. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 27426–27432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Cruz, W. S., Kwon, G., Marshall, C. A., McDaniel, M. L., and Semenkovich, C. F. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 12162–12168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Koster, J. C., Marshall, B. A., Ensor, N., Corbett, J. A., and Nichols, C. G. (2000) Cell 100, 645–654[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Augustus, A., Yagyu, H., Haemmerle, G., Bensadoun, A., Vikramadithyan, R. K., Park, S. Y., Kim, J. K., Zechner, R., and Goldberg, I. J. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 25050–25057[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. McDaniel, M. L., Colca, J. R., Kotagal, N., and Lacy, P. E. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 98, 182–200[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. McDaniel, M. L., King, S., Anderson, S., Fink, J., and Lacy, P. E. (1974) Diabetologia 10, 303–308[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Corbett, J. A., Wang, J. L., Hughes, J. H., Wolf, B. A., Sweetland, M. A., Lancaster, J. R., and McDaniel, M. L. (1992) Biochem. J. 287, 229–235
  28. Gannon, M., Shiota, C., Postic, C., Wright, C. V., and Magnuson, M. (2000) Genesis 26, 139–142[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Zhang, C-Y., Baffy, G., Perret, P., Krauss, S., Peroni, O., Grujic, D., Hagen, T., Vidal-Puig, A. J., Boss, O., Kim, Y.-B., Zheng, X. X., Wheeler, M. B., Shulman, G. I., Chan, C. B., and Lowell, B. B. (2001) Cell 105, 745–755[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R., and King, H. (2004) Diabetes Care 27, 1047–1053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Unger, R. H., and Orci, L. (2001) FASEB J. 15, 312–321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Cnop, M., Hannaert, J. C., Hoorens, A., Eizirik, D. L., and Pipeleers, D. G. (2001) Diabetes 50, 1771–1777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Listenberger, L. L., Han, X., Lewis, S. E., Cases, S., Farese, R. V., Jr., Ory, D. S., and Schaffer, J. E. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 3077–3082[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Mulder, H., Yang, S., Winzell, M. S., Holm, C., and Ahren, B. (2004) Diabetes 53, 122–128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Roduit, R., Nolan, C., Alarcon, C., Moore, P., Barbeau, A., Delghingaro-Augusto, V., Przybykowski, E., Morin, J., Masse, F., Massie, B., Ruderman, N., Rhodes, C., Poitout, V., and Prentki, M. (2004) Diabetes 53, 1007–1019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Goodarzi, M. O., Guo, X., Taylor, K. D., Quinones, M. J., Saad, M. F., Yang, H., Hsueh, W. A., and Rotter, J. I. (2004) Diabetes 53, 214–220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Ferreira, L. D., Pulawa, L. K., Jensen, D. R., and Eckel, R. H. (2001) Diabetes 50, 1064–1068[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Kim, J. K., Fillmore, J. J., Chen, Y., Yu, C., Moore, I. K., Pypaert, M., Lutz, E. P., Kako, Y., Velez-Carrasco, W., Goldberg, I. J., Breslow, J. L., and Shulman, G. I. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 7522–7527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Liang, Y., Buettger, C., Berner, D. K., and Matschinsky, F. M. (1997) Diabetologia 40, 1018–1027[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Segall, L., Lameloise, N., Assimacopoulos-Jeannet, F., Roche, E., Corkey, P., Thumelin, S., Corkey, B. E., and Prentki, M. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 277, E521–E528
  41. Warnotte, C., Nenquin, M., and Henquin, J-C. (1999) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 153, 147–153[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Sato, K., Suzuki, K., and Akiba, Y. (1998) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 119A, 569–573
  43. Ma, L., Bindokas, V. P., Kuznetsov, A., Rhodes, C., Hays, L., Edwardson, J. M., Ueda, K., Steiner, D. F., and Philipson, L. H. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 9266–9271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Sadoul, K., Lang, J., Montecucco, C., Weller, U., Regazzi, R., Catsicas, S., Wollheim, C. B., and Halban, P. A. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 1019–1028[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Hess, D. T., Slater, T. M., Wilson, M. C., and Skene, J. H. (1992) J. Neurosci. 12, 4634–4641[Abstract]
  46. Bijlmakers, M. J., and Marsh, M. (2003) Trends Cell Biol. 13, 32–42[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Hanada, K., Hara, T., and Nishijima, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8409–8415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Coppola, T., Frantz, C., Perret-Menoud, V., Gattesco, S., Hirling, H., and Regazzi, R. (2002) Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 1906–1915[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Schlaepfer, I. R., Pulawa, L. K., Ferreira, L. D., James, D. E., Capell, W. H., and Eckel, R. H. (2003) J. Lipid Res. 44, 1174–1181[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Bao, D. A. Jacobson, M. Wohltmann, A. Bohrer, W. Jin, L. H. Philipson, and J. Turk
Glucose homeostasis, insulin secretion, and islet phospholipids in mice that overexpress iPLA2{beta} in pancreatic {beta}-cells and in iPLA2{beta}-null mice
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2008; 294(2): E217 - E229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
C. J. Nolan, M. S.R. Madiraju, V. Delghingaro-Augusto, M.-L. Peyot, and M. Prentki
Fatty Acid Signaling in the {beta}-Cell and Insulin Secretion
Diabetes, December 1, 2006; 55(Supplement_2): S16 - S23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H.-L. Noh, K. Okajima, J. D. Molkentin, S. Homma, and I. J. Goldberg
Acute lipoprotein lipase deletion in adult mice leads to dyslipidemia and cardiac dysfunction
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2006; 291(4): E755 - E760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
I. J. Goldberg and H. M. Dansky
Diabetic Vascular Disease: An Experimental Objective
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2006; 26(8): 1693 - 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Bao, H. Song, M. Wohltmann, S. Ramanadham, W. Jin, A. Bohrer, and J. Turk
Insulin Secretory Responses and Phospholipid Composition of Pancreatic Islets from Mice That Do Not Express Group VIA Phospholipase A2 and Effects of Metabolic Stress on Glucose Homeostasis
J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2006; 281(30): 20958 - 20973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. Tiffin, E. Adie, F. Turner, H. G. Brunner, M. A. van Driel, M. Oti, N. Lopez-Bigas, C. Ouzounis, C. Perez-Iratxeta, M. A. Andrade-Navarro, et al.
Computational disease gene identification: a concert of methods prioritizes type 2 diabetes and obesity candidate genes
Nucleic Acids Res., June 6, 2006; 34(10): 3067 - 3081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]