Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M500601200 on March 13, 2005

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 20, 19488-19495, May 20, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/20/19488    most recent
M500601200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buhrke, T.
Right arrow Articles by Haumann, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buhrke, T.
Right arrow Articles by Haumann, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Reduction of Unusual Iron-Sulfur Clusters in the H2-sensing Regulatory Ni-Fe Hydrogenase from Ralstonia eutropha H16*

Thorsten Buhrke{ddagger}§, Simone Löscher§, Oliver Lenz{ddagger}, Eberhard Schlodder||, Ingo Zebger||, Lars K. Andersen||, Peter Hildebrandt||, Wolfram Meyer-Klaucke**, Holger Dau¶, Bärbel Friedrich{ddagger}, and Michael Haumann¶{ddagger}{ddagger}

From the {ddagger}Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Biologie/Mikrobiologie, Chausseestrasse 117, D-10115 Berlin, Germany, Freie Universität Berlin, FB Physik, Arnimallee 14, D-14195 Berlin, Germany, ||Technische Universität Berlin, Institut für Chemie, Max-Volmer-Laboratorium für Biophysikalische Chemie, Sekretariat. PC14, Strasse des 17, Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany, and **DESY, EMBL Outstation, Notkestrasse 85, D-22603 Hamburg, Germany

Received for publication, January 18, 2005 , and in revised form, February 23, 2005.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The regulatory Ni-Fe hydrogenase (RH) from Ralstonia eutropha functions as a hydrogen sensor. The RH consists of the large subunit HoxC housing the Ni-Fe active site and the small subunit HoxB containing Fe-S clusters. The heterolytic cleavage of H2 at the Ni-Fe active site leads to the EPR-detectable Ni-C state of the protein. For the first time, the simultaneous but EPR-invisible reduction of Fe-S clusters during Ni-C state formation was demonstrated by changes in the UV-visible absorption spectrum as well as by shifts of the iron K-edge from x-ray absorption spectroscopy in the wild-type double dimeric RHWT [HoxBC]2 and in a monodimeric derivative designated RHstop lacking the C-terminal 55 amino acids of HoxB. According to the analysis of iron EXAFS spectra, the Fe-S clusters of HoxB pronouncedly differ from the three Fe-S clusters in the small subunits of crystallized standard Ni-Fe hydrogenases. Each HoxBC unit of RHWT seems to harbor two [2Fe-2S] clusters in addition to a 4Fe species, which may be a [4Fe-3S-3O] cluster. The additional 4Fe-cluster was absent in RHstop. Reduction of Fe-S clusters in the hydrogen sensor RH may be a first step in the signal transduction chain, which involves complex formation between [HoxBC]2 and tetrameric HoxJ protein, leading to the expression of the energy converting Ni-Fe hydrogenases in R. eutropha.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ni-Fe hydrogenases represent an important class of metalloenzymes that catalyze the reversible cleavage of molecular hydrogen into electrons and protons (reaction H2 {Leftrightarrow} 2H+ + 2e-) (1). The chemolithoautotrophic {beta}-proteobacterium bacterium Ralstonia eutropha H16 houses three different Ni-Fe hydrogenases that are physiologically active in the presence of O2 (2, 3). The membrane-bound and soluble NAD-reducing enzymes are involved in energy conversion (4, 5).

The regulatory Ni-Fe hydrogenase (RH)1 belongs to a particularly interesting type of Ni-Fe hydrogenase functioning as hydrogen sensors (6). Hydrogen sensors have also been described in Bradyrhizobium japonicum (7) and Rhodobacter capsulatus (8). Upon the interaction of the RH with molecular hydrogen, a complex signal transduction cascade is initiated that leads to the expression of the energy-converting hydrogenases (9).

The RH consists of the large subunit HoxC that harbors the hydrogen-activating Ni-Fe site and the small subunit HoxB that contains iron-sulfur clusters (6). Several unusual properties of the RH (3, 10, 11) are remarkably different from those of the so-called standard Ni-Fe hydrogenases from inter alia, Desulfovibrio gigas and Allochromatium vinosum (1, 12, 13). In contrast to the dimeric standard Ni-Fe hydrogenases, the RH forms a double dimer [HoxBC]2 (Fig. 1A) that is connected to a tetramer of the HoxJ protein (14). The N-terminal input module of HoxJ containing a PAS domain is required for the formation of the RH-HoxJ complex, whereas the C-terminal domain of HoxJ has histidine protein kinase activity (14). The RH cleaves H2 only at extremely low rates (3, 10). In contrast to standard hydrogenases, which can exist in up to nine different redox states (1, 13), in the RH only two states of functional relevance have been detected (10). After aerobic isolation the enzyme is in its oxidized state containing Ni(II). This state does not need to be activated but is always ready to bind hydrogen, a prerequisite for the sensor function (10, 11). In the presence of H2 it is rapidly converted to a state revealing a typical EPR-signal, termed Ni-C, due to a Ni(III)-H- species formed during heterolytic H2 cleavage (15). In standard Ni-Fe hydrogenases the nickel is coordinated by four conserved cysteine residues. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) investigations on the RH, however, revealed that nickel may be coordinated by less than four cysteines (11). The iron atom of the RH active site, on the other hand, carries two cyanides and one CO molecule, similar to standard Ni-Fe hydrogenases (3, 10).

Although information has become available about the sequence of events that occur at the Ni-Fe active site upon interaction of the RH with H2 (10, 11, 15), it is unclear whether electron transfer out of the Ni-Fe site takes place during H2 cleavage and to where these electrons are transferred. Information on these points is expected to contribute to the understanding of the H2-sensing mechanism of the RH-HoxJ complex (14).

In standard Ni-Fe hydrogenases of the D. gigas type, the small subunit contains three Fe-S clusters, two [4Fe-4S] and one [3Fe-4S] (16), which are bound via conserved cysteines and one histidine residue found in all Ni-Fe hydrogenase sequences. During hydrogen turnover these clusters become reduced as detected by EPR spectroscopy (1, 17). The RH small subunit HoxB also contains these conserved cysteines. Therefore, it was postulated that it might also harbor three Fe-S clusters (6). EPR investigation of the RH, however, did not show reduced Fe-S clusters when the Ni-C EPR signal was formed under H2 (3, 10, 15). It has been proposed that a non-Fe-S cofactor may be involved in electron transfer instead (10).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of the subunit compositions of (A) RHWT and (B) RHstop.

 
In this work the double dimeric wild-type RH (RHWT, Fig. 1A) and a derivative denoted as RHstop (Fig. 1B), which forms a monodimer due to mutational truncation of the C terminus of HoxB (14), were compared. It has been suggested that the RHstop may lack the putative non-Fe-S cofactor (14). In both preparations, for the first time reduction of Fe-S clusters in the presence of H2 was clearly detected in UV-visible spectra and by XAS at the iron K-edge. Support for reduction of a non-Fe-S cofactor was not obtained. Seemingly, the Fe-S clusters of the RH differ from those of standard hydrogenases.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacteria Growth and Enzyme Purification—Strains with the initials HF were derived from R. eutropha H16 (DSM428, ATCC 17699). Large scale cultivation of R. eutropha strains, cell harvesting, cell disruption, and preparation of soluble protein extracts were published before (10, 14). RHWT (Fig. 1A) was purified from the RH-overproducing strain R. eutropha HF371(pGE378) as described in Bernhard et al. (10). Starting with 50 g of cells (wet weight) yielded 3.7 mg of RH with a specific activity of 1.6 units/mg of protein. The RHstop protein (Fig. 1B) was purified from R. eutropha HF574(pGE567) as a Strep-tag II fusion protein.2 Starting with 18 g of cells yielded 1.5 mg of RHstop with a specific activity of 1.6 units/mg of protein.

The homogeneity of the respective protein preparations was investigated by SDS-PAGE analysis and subsequent Coomassie staining. The amount of impurities was quantified by using the Gelscan Professional V5.1 software (BioSciTec, Frankfurt, Germany). After background subtraction, the sum of the percent differential integrated density of the HoxC- and HoxB-specific bands was correlated to the sum of the percent differential integrated density from the contaminating proteins.

Assays of Hydrogenase Activity—H2-oxidizing activity was quantified by an amperometric H2 uptake assay as in Pierik et al. (3) using a H2 electrode with methylene blue as an electron acceptor. One unit of H2 methylene blue oxidoreductase activity was the amount of enzyme that catalyzed the consumption of 1 µmol of H2/min. Protein concentrations were determined according to the protocol of Bradford (18).

Analysis of Metal Contents—Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) and total reflection x-ray fluorescence analysis (TRXFA) (19) were used for quantification of nickel and iron. For AAS, three aliquots of each RH preparation were solubilized overnight in concentrated HNO3 (65%, Suprapur, Merck), then diluted with ultrapure water (Millipore) to 1–5% HNO3 and further diluted for measurements using the transversely heated graphite furnace technique with longitudinal Zeeman-effect background correction on a PerkinElmer Life Sciences Aanalyst 800 spectrometer equipped with an autosampler and WinLab32 software in the laboratory of Dr. Klaus Irrgang (TU-Berlin). TRXFA for simultaneous nickel and iron quantification was performed on a Picotax spectrometer at Röntec (Berlin, Germany) using 1 µl of concentrated and dried protein solutions. Nickel and iron contents were determined against commercial nickel and iron standards (Fluka) in AAS and relative to a gallium standard in TRXFA.

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)—FTIR measurements were carried out with a Bruker IFS66V/S spectrometer equipped with a photovoltaic MCT detector using a resolution of 2 cm-1. The sample compartment was purged with nitrogen. Samples were held in a temperature-controlled (23 °C) gas-tight liquid cell (volume ~7 µl) with CaF2 windows. FTIR spectra were baseline-corrected using the software available with the spectrometer.

EPR Spectroscopy—EPR measurements were performed in the laboratory of Prof. Robert Bittl (FU-Berlin) on an X-band Bruker Elexsys E580 spectrometer equipped with a SHQE resonator and a helium cryostat (Oxford) (microwave frequency of 9.6 GHz). For additional conditions see the figure legends. From each enzyme spectrum in Fig. 2 the background from sample holder and cavity was subtracted. EPR signals in enzyme samples were quantified by comparison with the integrated intensities of signals from CuSO4 solutions used as spin standards (20).

UV-Visible Spectroscopy—Purified samples of wild-type RH and RHstop were diluted with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) to a protein concentration of 0.64 mg/ml. UV-visible spectra were recorded on a Cary 1E spectrophotometer (Varian) with a spectral resolution of 0.3 nm. To reduce the RH samples, protein solutions were flushed with hydrogen gas for 1 min. Subsequently, the sample was centrifuged (1 min, 12,000 x g) to remove small amounts of precipitated protein. The clear supernatant was immediately re-transferred to the cuvette, and the UV-visible spectrum of the reduced sample was recorded.

XAS—X-ray absorption spectra at the iron K-edge were collected at beamline D2 of the EMBL at HASYLAB (DESY, Hamburg, Germany). XAS samples contained 10–20 µl of RH solution (protein concentration 0.4–1 mM). Fluorescence-detected XAS spectra were measured with a 13-element solid-state germanium detector (Canberra) at 20 K as described elsewhere (11). An absolute energy calibration (accuracy, ±0.1 eV) was performed by monitoring the Bragg reflections of a crystal positioned at the end of the beamline (21). 3 scans of ~60-min duration were taken on the same spot (4.5 x 1 mm) of the sample. Comparison of the first and third scan revealed that radiation damage to the samples was absent because the iron K-edge energy remained unchanged. Six scans, obtained on two separate spots of the samples, were averaged for each EXAFS spectrum. Spectra were normalized, and EXAFS oscillations were extracted as in Dau et al. (22). The energy scale of iron EXAFS spectra was converted to a k-scale using an E0 of 7112 eV; E0 refined to 7120 eV during the EXAFS simulations. Unfiltered k3-weighted spectra were used for least-squares curve-fitting (22) and for calculation of Fourier transforms representing k-values ranging from 1.85 to 13 Å-1. The data were multiplied by a fractional cosine window (10% at low and high k-side). For EXAFS simulation, complex backscattering amplitudes were calculated using FEFF 7 (23); the amplitude reduction factor S02 was 0.9. For XAS sample preparation, RH solutions were degassed 3 times under vacuum and subsequently flushed for 10 min with H2 gas. H2-reduced samples were filled under argon or H2 atmosphere into Kapton-covered acrylic glass sample holders using syringes previously filled with Ar or H2. The same samples were used for EPR (before and after XAS) and XAS measurements.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Comparison of the Ni-Fe Active Site in RHWT and RHstop—To test whether truncation of the C-terminal 55 amino acids of HoxB affected the Ni-Fe site, preparations of RHWT and RHstop were examined by FTIR and EPR measurements. The FTIR spectrum of oxidized RHstop was identical to that of RHWT (Fig. 2A) in showing an intense peak at 1942 cm-1 originating from the Fe-CO and two peaks at 2072 cm-1 and 2081 cm-1 from the two Fe-CN stretching vibrations as previously reported (3, 10). Upon reduction of the samples by H2, the {nu}(CO) vibration in both spectra shifted to higher frequencies by 18.5 cm-1 (not shown), whereas the {nu}(CN) vibrations remained unaffected as previously observed for RHWT (10).

The redox properties of the Ni-Fe active site of RHstop also turned out to be similar to those of RHWT as detected by EPR (Fig. 2B). Flushing of the RH with H2 generates the Ni-C state (Ni(III)-H-) of the Ni-Fe active site with the hydride in a bridging position between nickel and iron (15). The Ni-C EPR signals (Fig. 2B) were similar in RHWT and RHstop. Signal quantification revealed that greater than 90% of the nickel was converted to Ni(III) in both preparations after incubation with H2 for 10 min, implying similarly effective heterolytic hydrogen cleavage. However, EPR signals from singly reduced Fe-S clusters were completely absent in the Ni-C state. Reduced Fe-S clusters were also not detected when temperatures between 6 and 50 K and microwave power variations between 0.01 and 10 milliwatt were applied (data not shown).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.
A, FTIR spectra of oxidized RHWT and RHstop (normalized on the CO bands). B, normalized Ni-C EPR spectra due to Ni(III)-H- (15) in the H2-reduced samples later used for XAS. EPR conditions: temperature 30 K, microwave power 250 microwatts, modulation amplitude/frequency 2 millitesla/100 KHz. Quantification of measured Ni-C spectra in combination with nickel determination by AAS revealed that >90% of the nickel was present as Ni(III) in RHWT and RHstop. a.u., arbitrary units.

 
In summary, RHWT and RHstop appeared to be similar with respect to the coordination of the iron of the Ni-Fe site both in the oxidized state and in the Ni-C state, which was nearly quantitatively formed in both cases in the presence of hydrogen. Moreover, both preparations showed identical hydrogenase activities (see "Materials and Methods"). The catalytic properties of RHstop were, thus, not affected by the truncation of the C terminus of HoxB.

Determination of Metal Contents—Analysis of the nickel contents by AAS in combination with protein determination yielded on the average about 0.6 mol of nickel in the RHWT and close to 1 mol of nickel in the RHstop (Table I). The relatively low nickel content in RHWT can be explained with impurities in the preparations. SDS-PAGE analysis indicated that preparations of RHWT contained sizable amounts of copurified proteins, whereas preparations of RHstop were homogenous (Fig. 3). The amount of impurities in the RHWT sample was quantified by calculating the intensities of HoxC- and HoxB-specific protein bands and the sum of the band intensities derived from the contaminating proteins. According to this analysis the RHWT sample contained about 16% of impurities, whereas the RHstop sample was pure. Therefore, assuming that each HoxBC unit of RHWT also contained one nickel similar to RHstop, it was estimated from the Fe/Ni ratios (Table I), determined by two independent techniques (AAS and TRXFA), that each HoxBC unit of RHWT contained about 8–9 iron atoms, in accordance with previous estimates (10). The iron content of RHstop was about 4–6 and, thus, distinctly lower than that of RHWT.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE I
Metal contents of RH preparations Ni,Fe/(HoxBC) values represent the average over values from AAS and protein determinations from five independent preparations of both RHWT and RHstop. Mean iron/nickel ratios were derived from the AAS values and from concentrations determined by TRXFA on two preparations of both RHWT and RHstop. The respective error ranges represent S.D.

 



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.
SDS-PAGE analysis of purified RH samples. Purified samples of RHWT (left lane) and RHstop (right lane) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12% gels; 5 µg of protein per lane) and subsequently stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (Serva). The RH subunits HoxC and HoxB are indicated by arrows. Due to the truncation of its C-terminal 55 amino acids, the HoxBstop band from the RHstop sample is found at a lower molecular weight than the native HoxB from the RHWT sample.

 
Based on sequence homologies (see "Discussion") one would expect HoxB to contain three [4Fe-4S] clusters (6). Taking also the iron atom of the Ni-Fe site into account, one HoxBC monodimer might contain 13 Fe/Ni. Thus, the experimentally determined iron content of RHWT was significantly lower than expected. Furthermore, HoxBWT seemed to contain more iron than HoxBstop. The double dimeric RHWT may, thus, comprise iron species that are absent in monodimeric RHstop.

Detection of Fe-S Cluster Reduction by UV-Visible Spectroscopy—The optical absorption spectra of the oxidized RHWT and RHstop showed, in addition to a peak at 280 nm due to the absorption of the aromatic amino acid residues of the protein, a broad shoulder around 410 nm, presumably due to the presence of Fe-S clusters (Fig. 4, solid lines). That both preparations were fully oxidized was apparent from the absence of any Ni-C EPR signal (data not shown). The extinction coefficients were calculated at 390 and at 420 nm and compared with data from the literature (Table II). The {epsilon}(420 nm) value determined for RHstop is in good agreement with the value that would be expected in the presence of two cysteinyl-coordinated [2Fe-2S] clusters (49). The {epsilon}(420 nm) of RHWT, on the other hand, is significantly higher, confirming the data from the metal analysis which indicate that RHWT contain additional iron species (see "Determination of Metal Contents"). The {epsilon}(390 nm) values estimated for RHWT as well as for RHstop were significantly larger than the value of {epsilon}(390 nm) that was expected if only one [4Fe-4S] cluster was present (Table II).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE II
Extinction coefficients of preparations of RHWT and RHstop at 390 and at 420 nm as obtained from the UV-visible spectra (Fig. 4)

 
When the RH was reduced by flushing of samples with H2, increased absorption was observed in the whole spectral range (not shown); the curvature of the background (proportional to {lambda}-4) suggested its origin from a scattering contribution. Because this background could be removed by centrifugation of H2-flushed samples, apparently a small portion of the RH protein precipitated, thereby light-scattering aggregates were formed. Aggregation was also observed after flushing with argon, which indicated that it was not specifically caused by H2.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4.
UV-visible spectra of RHWT (A) and RHstop (B) (solid lines, oxidized; dotted lines, H2-reduced). The insets show the difference of spectra (H2-reduced minus oxidized).

 
Reduction of RHWT by flushing with H2 and subsequent removal of aggregates by centrifugation yielded a spectrum with clearly decreased absorption between 350 and 600 nm compared with the oxidized state (Fig. 4A, dotted line); the absorption at ~280 nm was almost unchanged. Reduction of RHstop with H2 yielded similar results (Fig. 4B, dotted line). The difference spectra (reduced – oxidized RH, insets in Fig. 4, A and B) showed two main minima (bleachings) around 410 and 550 nm, respectively. Whereas bleaching solely around 410 nm has been observed upon reduction of [4Fe-4S] clusters (24, 25), two minima as found in the RH spectrum may be attributed to the reduction of [2Fe-2S] clusters (26, 27).

Characterization of Fe-S Clusters by XAS—By XAS (22, 28) at the iron K-edge, the iron sites in the RH preparations were selectively studied. Because the coordination of the iron of the Ni-Fe site was similar in RHWT and RHstop both in the oxidized and H2-reduced states and this iron remained in its divalent oxidation state, any changes in the iron XAS spectra were expected to be attributable to the putative Fe-S clusters.

The XANES spectra from both RH preparations (Fig. 5) were similar to typical spectra of Fe-S clusters (29–31). A pronounced shift of the iron K-edge to lower energies by 1.0–1.2 eV after reduction by H2 was observed (dotted lines). The shift was by 0.2 eV larger in the RHWT (Table III). A shift by ~0.2 eV was also evident in the pre-edge peak of the XANES spectra (Fig. 5, insets). Such spectral shifts are typical for Fe-S cluster reduction (29, 31), implying that such clusters became reduced in RHWT and RHstop upon formation of the Ni-C state.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE III
Iron XANES features of RHWT and RHstop Eedge, K-edge energy at 50% of normalized X-ray fluorescence; {Delta}Eedge, edge shift in the H2-reduced state.

 



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5.
Normalized iron XANES spectra of oxidized (solid lines) and H2-reduced (dotted lines) RH preparations. The insets show the pre-edge peaks in magnification. Dashed lines emphasize the spectral differences between RHWT and RHstop.

 
The maxima of the XANES spectra of the RHWT were larger, and the pre-edge peak magnitudes and areas were smaller than in the RHstop, pointing to an average coordination of iron in the RHWT by less sulfur and more O/N ligands (32). For one-electron reduction of single-Fe(III) compounds with mixed O/N/S ligation of iron, a shift of the K-edge by about –2.5 eV may be expected (29, 31, 33). Hence, it was estimated that 3–4 and ~2 iron atoms (on basis of 8 and 5 iron atoms in total) became reduced in the RHWT+H2 and RHstop+H2, respectively (Table III). In both preparations obviously more than one electron was transferred to iron in the Ni-C state. Moreover, the overall iron coordination was different, and additional iron atoms seemed to become reduced in the RHWT.

The Fourier transforms (FTs) of iron EXAFS oscillations (Fig. 6) of oxidized RHWT and RHstop showed two prominent peaks immediately revealing the presence of at least two backscatterer shells, likely due to Fe-O/N/S and Fe-Fe/Ni interactions around 2–2.2 and 2.7 Å (the true iron-backscatterer distances are by about 0.4 Å larger than the reduced distances indicated in Fig. 6). The FTs of RHWTox and RHstopox were not identical; FT peak I was larger in RHstopox, and an additional shoulder was present on FT peak II in RHWTox (Fig. 6, arrow).

Precise structural information was obtained from simulations of the EXAFS oscillations (Fig. 6, inset). In both preparations the EXAFS was expected to be dominated by contributions from Fe-C/N/O/S and Fe-Fe/Ni vectors in the first and second ligand spheres. The broad shoulder at lower distances on FT peak I in RHWT (Fig. 6) suggested the presence of C/O/N atoms with significantly shorter distance from iron than the S-atoms at about 2.3 Å. A first simulation where one Fe-C/O/N, one Fe-S, and one Fe-Fe/Ni vector were included yielded an error factor RF of about 10% for both RHWT and RHstop (Table IV, A, fit I). The coordination number of the Fe-Fe vector NFe-Fe was close to one in both cases. For the presence of two [4Fe-4S] clusters plus one [4Fe-4S] or [3Fe-4S] cluster as in standard hydrogenases, a value of 2.5 < NFe-Fe < 3 was expected because each iron in such clusters has three (in [4Fe-4S]) or two (in [3Fe-4S]) iron neighbors at about 2.7-Å distance (34–36). Thus, fit I immediately suggested that the iron EXAFS of the RH was not dominated by cubane clusters. Instead, a value of NFe-Fe close to one was compatible with the predominant presence of iron clusters where each iron ion has only one iron neighbor in both RH preparations. Such a situation is realized in [2Fe-2S] clusters. That NS was much lower than four suggested the mixed coordination of several iron ions by O/N and S ligands and not predominantly by terminal Cys-S and bridging µ-S ligands as observed for [4/3Fe-4S] clusters. If [2Fe-2S] clusters were present, they could, therefore, be of the Rieske type ([2Fe-2S](Cys-S)2(His-N)2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE IV
Simulation results of EXAFS spectra from RHWT and RHstop (oxidized state (ox); +H2, Ni-C state) Ni, coordination number; Ri, absorber-backscatterer distance; 2{sigma} 2i, Debye-Waller parameter; RF, error value calculated as defined in Meinke et al. (48) over a reduced distance range of 1–3 Å. A, three fit approaches to spectra from oxidized enzymes. B, fit of the spectra from H2-reduced enzymes. C, fit of the spectrum of the tentatively isolated contribution from the extra iron ions in RHWT (see Fig. 8). The following fit restraints were applied: #, the sum of N1–3 was restricted to a value of 5.0; §, 2{sigma} 2 was coupled to yield equal values for the respective backscatterer shells; *, parameters were not varied in the simulations.

 



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 6.
FTs of k3-weighted iron EXAFS oscillations (in the inset) of RHWT (solid lines) and RHstop (dotted lines) (thick lines in the inset; simulations are according to Table IV, A, fit III). Arrow, contribution to the RHWT EXAFS from ~3 Å Fe-Fe interactions. a.u., arbitrary units.

 
The EXAFS of RHWTox showed a shoulder on FT peak II that was absent in RHstopox. Inclusion of a second Fe-Fe vector in the simulations to account for this feature almost halved the RF value for RHWTox (Table IV, A, fit II), whereas it did not significantly improve the fit for RHstopox. Furthermore, the Debye-Waller parameters (2s2) were unrealistically large for both Fe-Fe vectors, meaning that a distinct long Fe-Fe distance was likely not present in RHstop. The estimated longer Fe-Fe distance of >3 Å in RHWTox is not observed in normal [4Fe-4S], [3Fe-4S], or [2Fe-2S] clusters where typical Fe-Fe distances are ~2.7 Å (29, 31, 34–36). These results seemed to imply the presence of an additional more unusual iron cofactor in the RHWT.

In a third simulation a C-shell was included to account for the three CN/CO ligands of the iron of the Ni-Fe site. The fit for RHWTox was not improved, supporting its lower (CN,CO)/Fe ratio. A significantly improved fit was obtained for RHstopox (Table IV, A, fit III) where the coordination number of the Fe-(CN,CO) vector was in agreement with its larger (CN,CO)/Fe ratio of ~0.6 according to the lower iron content.

To gain more support for the unexpected result that the Fe-Fe coordination number (NFe-Fe) was close to one, a particularly stringent analysis (37) of the Fe-Fe vector in RHstop was performed. The values of NFe-Fe and 2{sigma}2Fe-Fe were varied, an EXAFS simulation was carried out for each parameter couple, and the resulting fit errors (RF) were depicted in Fig. 7. Clearly, the absolute minimum (RF = 12%) in the fit function was obtained at a value of NFe-Fe close to 1. The presence of only one [4Fe-4S] cluster was strongly disfavored because at the then expected NFe-Fe of 2.6 (taking into account the iron from the Ni-Fe active site) RF was 3-fold increased. The presence of only 1 [3Fe-4S] or of 1 [2Fe-4S] plus 1 [3Fe-4S] in RHstop was also disfavored because at the then predicted NFe-Fe values of 1.75 and 1.5 (including the single Fe-Ni vector) RF was already about doubled (Fig. 7). Thus, the presence of 2 [2Fe-2S] clusters appeared to be the most likely option in RHstop.

The Fe-Fe distances in [4/3Fe-4S] clusters in crystallized Ni-Fe hydrogenases range between 2.62 and 2.77 Å (Refs. 34–36; unusually long (38) and short (39) Fe-Fe distances were neglected); the range is similar in [2Fe-2S] clusters (29, 31). The Debye-Waller parameters of the ~2.7-Å Fe-Fe vectors corresponded to a smaller distance spread of only ~0.07 Å (Table IV, A). Superimposition of EXAFS oscillations from Fe-Fe vectors differing by less than 0.1 Å does not cause significant destructive interference (22, 37), rendering underestimation of NFe-Fe unlikely.



View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 7.
Contour plot of RF values (numbers in the figure given in %) derived from two shell simulations (1x Fe-S and 1x Fe-Fe; NFe-S was allowed to vary in the simulations; 2{sigma}2s was restricted to positive values) of the RHstopox EXAFS under variations of the coordination number (NFe-Fe) and Debye-Waller parameter (2{sigma}2Fe-Fe) of the ~2.7-Å Fe-Fe vector. Contour lines are spaced by {Delta}RF = 3%. A white color denotes the lowest RF-values (best fit).

 



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 8.
FT of a k3-weighted EXAFS spectrum (solid line) tentatively attributed to the extra iron present in RHWT but not in RHstop. The FT was calculated from normalized EXAFS oscillations {chi}(k) representing [(9{chi}RHWT – 5{chi}RHstop)/4]. Here, the presence of four extra iron ions in HoxB of RHWT was assumed (taking into account the error range of the iron content, Table I) to allow for comparison with the theoretical EXAFS spectrum (triangles) of the [4Fe-3S-3O] cluster (inset) in the D. desulfuricans crystal structure (39) calculated by using parameters given in Table IV, C (in parenthesis). a.u., arbitrary units.

 
In RHWT the fit minimum for the ~2.7-Å Fe-Fe vector was also observed for NFe-Fe ~1 irrespective of the specific fit approach, e.g. inclusion of 1–3 O/N/C ligand shells and/or of an additional ~3 Å Fe-Fe vector (not documented). Presumably, RHWT contained the same [2Fe-2S] clusters as RHstop and, furthermore, an additional Fe-S cluster.

In the H2-reduced state, the EXAFS spectra of both RH preparations were overall similar to the ones in Fig. 6; in particular, the shoulder on FT peak II due to long Fe-Fe distances was still present in RHWT+H2 (data not shown). Simulations revealed significantly elongated Fe-O/N and Fe-S distances; the Fe-Fe/Ni vectors of ~2.7-Å length were slightly shortened (Table IV, B). Very similar effects have been observed upon reduction of the [2Fe-2S]Rieske cluster in Pseudomonas cepacia phthalate dioxygenase (29). Fe-S cluster reduction was clearly detectable both in the XANES and EXAFS of the RH in the Ni-C state.

Tentative Identification of the Additional Iron Cofactor in RHWT —The EXAFS of RHWT revealed Fe-Fe distances of ~3Å that were absent in RHstop. Similar Fe-Fe distances were found in the [4Fe-3S-3O] cluster in the proximal position of the small subunit of the Ni-Fe hydrogenase from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (36). To test the hypothesis of whether the RHWT may contain a [4Fe-3S-3O] cluster, a tentative isolation of the contribution of the extra iron to the RHWT EXAFS was performed (Fig. 8, see legend). The resulting EXAFS difference spectrum (from oxidized enzymes) revealed pronounced splitting of both FT peaks (the difference from the H2-reduced enzymes was similar (not shown)). The best fit was achieved using a (O/N)1.25–1.75S2.25–2.75 iron coordination and two Fe-Fe vectors with NFe-Fe = 1 and ~2.7- and ~3-Å length (Table IV, C). The [4Fe-3S-3O] cluster in D. desulfuricans reveals similar structural motifs (Fig. 8, inset) and also 4-coordinated iron ions (Table IV, C, in parentheses). The FT (Fig. 8, triangles) of an EXAFS spectrum calculated on basis of the crystal structure (36) was similar to the one tentatively attributed to the extra Fe-S species in RHWT. The binding of one extra [4Fe-3S-3O] to each HoxB subunit was, thus, a conceivable option in RHWT.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
The RH of R. eutropha belongs to a subclass of Ni-Fe hydrogenases acting as hydrogen sensors (3). H2-sensing proteins have also been examined in B. japonicum (7) and R. capsulatus (8). Moreover, genome sequencing projects of a number of microorganisms have uncovered sequences of additional potentially H2-sensing Ni-Fe hydrogenases (Fig. 9). These proteins may all be similarly organized, the large subunit carrying a Ni-Fe site and the small subunit harboring Fe-S clusters. However, due to the lack of crystal structures, only little information about the chemical nature of the putative Fe-S clusters in the H2-sensing hydrogenases was available. In this study, for the first time the structure and function of Fe-S clusters in the oxygen-insensitive hydrogen sensor of R. eutropha was investigated.

Alignment of the HoxB amino acid sequence with those of the small subunits of crystallized Ni-Fe hydrogenases and of potential H2 sensors (Fig. 9) shows that the conserved residues coordinating the iron ions of Fe-S clusters in standard hydrogenases are always present. Thus, on the level of amino acid primary sequences one might argue that the small subunits of H2-sensing hydrogenases possibly contain Fe-S clusters such as found in the standard hydrogenases. Crystal structure analyses (34–36) revealed that the standard hydrogenases harbor a proximal [4Fe-4S] cluster coordinated by four cysteine residues (P1 to P4 in Fig. 9). The medial cluster usually is a [3Fe-4S] cluster coordinated by three cysteines except for the Ni-Fe-Se enzyme from Desulfomicrobium baculatum (38), where a [4Fe-4S] cluster is found due to the replacement of one proline residue by another cysteine (39). All four cysteines are present in the sequences of the small subunits of the H2 sensors (M1 to M4 in Fig. 9). The distal [4Fe-4S] cluster is coordinated by three cysteines and one histidine, which are conserved in all Ni-Fe hydrogenases including the H2 sensors (D1 to D4 in Fig. 9). One cysteine is shifted by one amino acid in the binding motif for the distal Fe-S cluster (D3 in Fig. 9).

Despite these striking sequence similarities, our experimental data provided no evidence for [4Fe-4S] or [3Fe-4S] clusters in the RH but instead favored the presence of [2Fe-2S] clusters possibly of the Rieske type. These may be coordinated by two cysteines and possibly two histidines. Conserved histidine residues present only in the sequences of the H2 sensors that could be involved in Fe-S cluster binding are highlighted in Fig. 9 (H1 to H4). The coordination of iron ions by non-sulfur ligands could also be explained by the oxidative conversion of cysteine thiols to sulfenates (Cys-SOH) or sulfinates (Cys-SO2H) observed in a variety of proteins (40, 41), which would impair direct coordination of iron ions by Cys-S. The presence of [2Fe-2S] clusters instead of [4Fe-4S] clusters in the RH may, thus, be related to thiol group oxidation under aerobic conditions. Preliminary resonance Raman data suggested the presence of Fe-O bonds in RHstop.3 Thus, in RHstop perhaps iron binding oxygens from oxidized thiol groups may be present. Future studies will employ Mössbauer and resonance Raman spectroscopy to elucidate further details of the Fe-S clusters of the RH. Interestingly, in the Ni-Fe hydrogenase of the aerobic Thiobacillus ferrooxidans only 8 irons per nickel were found instead of the 12–13 irons per nickel in standard Ni-Fe hydrogenases (42). Possibly, [2Fe-2S] clusters may be present in Ni-Fe hydrogenases from a variety of aerobic organisms.



View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 9.
Alignment of the amino acid sequences of Ni-Fe hydrogenase small subunits from known and potential H2-sensing hydrogenases from R. eutropha H16 (R.eut; accession number AAB49364 [GenBank] , Alcaligenes hydrogenophilus (A.hyd; AAB49360 [GenBank] , Burkholderia cepacia R1808 (B.cep; ZP00224364), Rubrivivax gelatinosus PM1 (R.gel; ZP00243688), Azorhizobium caulinodans (A.cau; AAS91023 [GenBank] , Dechloromonas aromatica RCB (D.aro; ZP00203774), Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum MS-1 (M.mag; ZP00054235) R. capsulatus (R.cap; AAC32032 [GenBank] , Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 (R.sph; CAA74584 [GenBank] , Magnotococcus species MC-1 (M.spc; ZP00288962), B. japonicum USDA110 (B.jap; AAA62627 [GenBank] , Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009 (R.pal; CAE26403 [GenBank] , and from the five crystallized standard Ni-Fe hydrogenases from D. gigas (D.gig; P12943 [GenBank] ), Desulfovibrio fructosovorans (D.fru; P18187 [GenBank] ), Desulfovibrio vulgaris Miyazaki F (D.vul; P21853 [GenBank] ), D. desulfuricans G20 (D.des; ZP00129917) and from the Ni-Fe-Se hydrogenase from D. baculatum (D.bac; AAA23376 [GenBank] . Amino acids highlighted by a gray background coordinate the iron ions of the proximal (P1 to P4), the medial (M1 to M4) and the distal (D1 to D4) Fe-S cluster in the standard hydrogenases. Amino acids highlighted by a black background (H1 to H4; E) are discussed as potential ligands to Fe-S clusters in the RH from R. eutropha. stop indicates the proline residue the codon of which has been replaced by a stop codon to generate the RHstop protein.

 
Metal quantification and XAS analysis seemed to reveal an additional Fe-S cluster in RHWT that is absent in RHstop. In D. desulfuricans, a [4Fe-3S-3O] cluster is found in the proximal position (36) with Fe-Fe distances of ~3 Å as also observed in RHWT. The authors postulated its formation in a reaction of a normal [4Fe-4S] cluster with O2 and H2O (39), causing release of H2S and an iron coordination change from Cys-30 to Glu-87, a strictly conserved residue in the sequences of all Ni-Fe hydrogenases (E in Fig. 9). Because the RH operates under aerobic conditions, similar [4Fe-3S-3O] cluster formation may readily occur. A [4Fe-3S-3O] cluster has also been found in the so-called "prismane" protein (43). The aerobic conversion of a [4Fe-4S] into a [4Fe-3S-3O] cluster may be a more general feature of Fe-S proteins.

The range of the iron content in RHWT was also compatible with the binding of only one extra Fe-S cluster per [HoxBC]2 by residues from the two HoxB proteins. Such a binding mode was observed in Rhodospirillum rubrum dimeric carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (CODH) where a [4Fe-4S] cluster is ligated by two cysteines from each of the two CODH molecules (44). The binding of a [4Fe-3S-3O] in between two HoxB units may be less likely for symmetry reasons since this cluster should be coordinated by three cysteines and by one glutamate residue.

In RHstop where the C-terminal extension of HoxB was truncated, XAS-detectable ~3-Å Fe-Fe distances were absent. The RHstop protein does not form the RH double dimer [HoxBC]2 and is also unable to bind the PAS domain of the HoxJ protein (14). The HoxB C terminus may, thus, mediate these protein interactions and stabilize the Fe-S species appearing to be lost in RHstop. Loss of a Fe-S cluster in this position in RHstop could affect the Ni-Fe site in HoxC of the RH and the efficiency of electron transfer. Indeed, the nickel coordination may differ between RHWT and RHstop.4 However, the hydrogen cleavage activity at the Ni-Fe site was unchanged. Assuming a maximal distance between the Fe-S clusters of about 25 Å as in standard hydrogenases, electron transfer between these clusters may in any event proceed at least within seconds (45).

Compared with energy-generating hydrogenases, the RH displays a very low but clearly defined hydrogen cleavage turnover rate (3, 10). Consequently, electrons have to be released from the Ni-Fe active site. In standard Ni-Fe hydrogenases these electrons are transferred to the Fe-S clusters, which when reduced show typical EPR signals (1, 13). In the RH, the splitting of H2 at the Ni-Fe site yields the EPR-detectable Ni-C state (10, 11), but no EPR signals from reduced Fe-S clusters in the HoxB subunit were observed. Previous UV-visible data were interpreted to suggest reduction of a two-electron accepting organic cofactor in the RH (10). The more detailed UV-visible analysis performed in the present study clearly indicated the reduction of Fe-S clusters upon incubation of the RH with H2. No evidence for an additional organic redox cofactor was obtained.

In the presence of hydrogen the reduction of iron ions both in RHWT and RHstop was unambiguously detected by iron XAS spectroscopy. In case of the RHstop protein, two iron ions possibly from two [2Fe-2S]+ clusters in the medial and distal positions of HoxB seemed to become reduced. Their presumably small distance of about 12 Å may cause strong magnetic coupling between the Fe(II) ions, rendering them EPR-invisible by relaxation enhancement. In RHWT there was evidence for the reduction of up to four iron atoms. Thus, besides of formation of two [2Fe-2S]+ clusters, the putative [4Fe-3S-3O] cluster may become doubly reduced. The [4Fe-3S-3O] cluster in prismane proteins was shown to exist in four oxidation states (43); the doubly reduced state was EPR silent. This cluster, however, showed a bleaching around 400 nm in the UV-visible spectrum (46) upon reduction similar to that of RHWT. Thus, a doubly reduced [4Fe-3S-3O] cluster may also escape detection by EPR in the RH.

The sensing of H2 involves complex formation between double dimeric RH and a tetramer of the histidine protein kinase HoxJ (14). A similar arrangement has been described in the R. capsulatus regulatory hydrogenase (47). In the RH, reduction of Fe-S clusters of the HoxB subunit may cause a structural change of the RH-HoxJ complex, thereby modifying its phosphorylation activity. These events may represent the first step in the signal transduction chain leading to the expression of the energy converting Ni-Fe hydrogenases in R. eutropha.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant SFB 498 (Projects C1, C6, C8, and A8) and by the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

§ These authors contributed equally to this work. Back

{ddagger}{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49-30-8385-6101; Fax: 49-30-8385-6299; E-mail: haumann{at}physik.fu-berlin.de.

1 The abbreviations used are: RH, regulatory Ni-Fe hydrogenase; AAS, atomic absorption spectroscopy; EPR, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy; EXAFS, extended X-ray absorption fine structure; FTIR, Fourier transform (FT) infrared spectroscopy; RH+H2,H2-flushed RH; RHox, air-oxidized RH; TRXFA, total reflection X-ray fluorescence analysis; XANES, X-ray absorption near-edge structure; XAS, X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Back

2 T. Buhrke, O. Lenz, and B. Friedrich, manuscript in preparation. Back

3 I. Zebger and P. Hildebrandt, unpublished results. Back

4 M. Haumann, S. Löscher, and H. Dau, unpublished results. Back


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank the staff at the EMBL Outstation Hamburg for excellent support, Prof. R. Bittl and Dr. C. Kay (FU Berlin) for generous help with the EPR experiments, Prof. S. Albracht (Amsterdam) for helpful advice in the FTIR experiments, Dr. K. Irrgang (Technische Universität Berlin) for kind support in AAS, and J. Stöhr for excellent technical assistance. We are indebted to Dr. H. Stosnach from Röntec (Berlin) for generous support in the TRXFA measurements.



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Cammack, R., Robson, R., and Frey, M., eds. (1997) Hydrogen as a Fuel: Learning from Nature, Taylor & Francis Ltd., London
  2. Schink, B., and Schlegel, H. G. (1978) Biochimie (Paris) 60, 297-305
  3. Pierik, A. J., Schmelz, M., Lenz, O., Friedrich, B., and Albracht, S. P. (1998) FEBS Lett. 438, 231-235[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Schneider, K., Schlegel, H. G. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 452, 66-80[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Schink, B., and Schlegel, H. G. (1979) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 567, 315-324[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Kleihues, L., Lenz, O., Bernhard, M., Buhrke, T., and Friedrich, B. (2000) J. Bacteriol. 182, 2716-2724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Black, L. K., Fu, C., and Maier, R. J. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 7102-7106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Elsen, S., Colbeau, A., Chabert, J., and Vignais, P. M. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 5174-5181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lenz, O., and Friedrich, B. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 12474-12479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Bernhard, M., Buhrke, T., Bleijlevens, B., De Lacey, A. L., Fernandez, V. M., Albracht, S. P., and Friedrich, B. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 15592-15597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Haumann, M., Porthun, A., Buhrke, T., Liebisch, P., Meyer-Klaucke, W., Friedrich, B., and Dau, H. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 11004-11015[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Frey, M. (2002) J. Chem. Biochem. 3, 153-160
  13. Albracht, S. P. J. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1188, 167-204[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Buhrke, T., Lenz, O., Porthun, A., and Friedrich, B. (2004) Mol. Microbiol. 51, 1677-1689[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Brecht, M., Van Gastel, M., Buhrke, T., Friedrich, B., and Lubitz, W. (2003) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 13075-13083[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Volbeda, A., Charon, M. H., Piras, C., Hatchikian, E. C., Frey, M., and Fontecilla-Camps, J. C. (1995) Nature 373, 556-557[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Armstrong, F. A. (2004) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8, 133-140[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Bradford, M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Klockenkämper, R. (1996) Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, London, UK
  20. Albracht, S. P. J., van der Linden, E., and Faber, B. W. (2003) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1557, 41-49[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Pettifer, R. F., and Hermes, C. (1985) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 18, 404-412[CrossRef]
  22. Dau, H., Liebisch, P., and Haumann, M. (2003) Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 376, 562-583[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Zabinsky, S. I., Rehr, J. J., Aukudinov, A., Albers, R. C., and Eller, M. J. (1995) Phys. Rev. B. Condens. Matter 52, 2995-3009[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Nakamaru-Ogiso, E., Yano, T., Ohnishi, T., and Yagi, T. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 1680-1688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Agarwalla, S., Stroud, R. M., and Gaffney, B. J. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 34123-34129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Pikus, J. D., Studts, J. M., Achim, C., Kauffmann, K. E., Münck, E., Steffan, R. J., McClay, K., and Fox, B. G. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 9106-9119[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Kounosu, A., Li, Z., Cosper, N. J., Shokes, J. E., Scott, R. A., Imai, T., Urushiyama, A., and Iwasaki, T. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 12519-12528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Yachandra, V. K. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 246, 638-678[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Tsang, H.-T., Batie, C. J., Ballow, D. P., and Penner-Hahn, J. E. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 7233-7240[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. McDermott, A. E., Yachandra, V. K., Guiles, R. D., Sauer, K., and Klein, M. P. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 8056-8059[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Cosper, N. J., Eby, D. M., Kounosu, A., Kurosawa, N., Neidle, E. L., Kurtz, D. M., Iwasaki, T., and Scott, R. A. (2002) Protein Sci. 11, 2969-2973[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Colpas, G. J., Maroney, M. J., Bagyinka, C., Kumar, M., Willis, W. S., Suib, S. L., Mascharak, P. K., and Baidya, N. (1991) Inorg. Chem. 30, 920-928[CrossRef]
  33. Penner-Hahn, J. E., McMurry, T. J., Renner, M., Latos-Grazynsky, L., Eble, K. S., Davis, I. M., Balch, A. L., Groves, J. T., Dawson, J. H., and Hodgson, K. O. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 12761-12764[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Volbeda, A., Garcia, E., Piras, C., deLacey, A. L., Fernandez, V. M., Hatchikian, E. C., Frey, M., and Fontecilla-Camps, J. C. (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 12989-12996[CrossRef]
  35. Higuchi, Y., Ogata, H., Miki, K., Yasuoka, N., and Yagi, T. (1999) Structure Fold. Des. 7, 549-556[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Matias, P. M., Soares, C. M., Saraiva, L. M., Coelho, R., Morais, J., Legall, J., and Carrondo, M. A. (2001) J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 6, 63-81[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Dau, H., Liebisch, P., and Haumann, M. (2004) Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6, 4781-4792[CrossRef]
  38. Garcin, E., Vernede, X., Hatchikian, E. C., Volbeda, A., Frey, M., and Fontecilla-Camps, J. C. (1999) Structure Fold. Des. 7, 557-566[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Rousset, M., Montet, Y., Guigliarelli, B., Forget, N., Asso, M., Bertrand, P., Fontecilla-Camps, J. C., and Hatchikian, E. C. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 11625-11630[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Claiborne, A, Yeh, J. I., Mallett, T. C., Luba, J., Crane, E. J., Charrier, V., and Parsonage, D. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 15407-15416[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Nagashima, S., Nakasako, M., Dohmae, N., Tsujimura, M., Takio, K., Odaka, M., Yohda, M., Kamiya, N., and Endo, I. (1998) Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 347-351[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Fischer, J., Quentmeier, A., Kostka, S., Kraft, R., and Friedrich, C. G. (1996) Arch. Microbiol. 165, 289-296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Arendsen, A. F., Hadden, J., Card, G., McAlpine, A. S., Bailey, S., Zaitsev, V., Duke, E. H. M., Lindley, P. F., Kröckel, M., Trautwein, A. X., Feiters, M. C., Charnock, J. M., Graner, C. D., Marritt, S. J., Thomson, A. J., Kooter, I. M., Johnson, M. K., van der Berg, W. A. M., van Dongen, W. M. A. M., and Hagen, W. R. (1998) J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 3, 81-95
  44. Drennan, C. L., Heo, J., Sintchak, M. D., Schreiter, E., and Ludden, P. W. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 11973-11978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Moser, C. C., Keske, J. M., Warncke, K., Farid, R. S., and Dutton, P. L. (1992) Nature 355, 796-802[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Wolfe, M. T., Heo, J., Garavelli, J. S., and Ludden, P. W. (2002) J. Bacteriol. 184, 5898-5902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Elsen, S., Duche, O., and Colbeau A. (2003) J. Bacteriol. 185, 7111-7119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Meinke, C., Sole, V. A., Pospisil, P., and Dau, H. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 7033-7040[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Lippard, S. J., and Berg, J. M. (1994) Principles of Bioinorganic Chemistry, University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Saggu, I. Zebger, M. Ludwig, O. Lenz, B. Friedrich, P. Hildebrandt, and F. Lendzian
Spectroscopic Insights into the Oxygen-tolerant Membrane-associated [NiFe] Hydrogenase of Ralstonia eutropha H16
J. Biol. Chem., June 12, 2009; 284(24): 16264 - 16276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Voevodskaya, F. Lendzian, O. Sanganas, A. Grundmeier, A. Graslund, and M. Haumann
Redox Intermediates of the Mn-Fe Site in Subunit R2 of Chlamydia trachomatis Ribonucleotide Reductase: AN X-RAY ABSORPTION AND EPR STUDY
J. Biol. Chem., February 13, 2009; 284(7): 4555 - 4566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Ludwig, T. Schubert, I. Zebger, N. Wisitruangsakul, M. Saggu, A. Strack, O. Lenz, P. Hildebrandt, and B. Friedrich
Concerted Action of Two Novel Auxiliary Proteins in Assembly of the Active Site in a Membrane-bound [NiFe] Hydrogenase
J. Biol. Chem., January 23, 2009; 284(4): 2159 - 2168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Buhrke, O. Lenz, N. Krauss, and B. Friedrich
Oxygen Tolerance of the H2-sensing [NiFe] Hydrogenase from Ralstonia eutropha H16 Is Based on Limited Access of Oxygen to the Active Site
J. Biol. Chem., June 24, 2005; 280(25): 23791 - 23796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/20/19488    most recent
M500601200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buhrke, T.
Right arrow Articles by Haumann, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buhrke, T.
Right arrow Articles by Haumann, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement