Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M500405200 on April 6, 2005
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 23, 21726-21730, June 10, 2005
Insights into Hydrophobicity and the Chaperone-like Function of 
A- and B-crystallins
AN ISOTHERMAL TITRATION CALORIMETRIC STUDY*
M. Satish Kumar
,
Mili Kapoor¶,
Sharmistha Sinha¶, and
G. Bhanuprakash Reddy||
From the
Biochemistry Division, National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad 500 007, India and the ¶Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
Received for publication, January 12, 2005
, and in revised form, February 28, 2005.
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
-Crystallin, composed of two subunits, A and B, has been shown to function as a molecular chaperone that prevents aggregation of other proteins under stress conditions. The exposed hydrophobic surfaces of -crystallins have been implicated in this process, but their exact role has not been elucidated. In this study, we quantify the hydrophobic surfaces of A- and B-crystallins by isothermal titration calorimetry using 8-anilino-1-napthalenesulfonic acid (ANS) as a hydrophobic probe and analyze its correlation to the chaperone potential of A- and B-crystallins under various conditions. Two ANS binding sites, one with low and another with high affinity, were clearly detected, with B showing a higher number of sites than A at 30 °C. In agreement with the higher number of hydrophobic sites, B-crystallin demonstrated higher chaperone activity than A at this temperature. Thermodynamic analysis of ANS binding to A- and B-crystallins indicates that high affinity binding is driven by both enthalpy and entropy changes, with entropy dominating the low affinity binding. Interestingly, although the number of ANS binding sites was similar for A and B at 15 °C, A was more potent than B in preventing aggregation of the insulin B-chain. Although there was no change in the number of high affinity binding sites of A and B for ANS upon preheating, there was an increase in the number of low affinity sites of A and B. Preheated A, in contrast to B, exhibited remarkably enhanced chaperone activity. Our results indicate that although hydrophobicity appears to be a factor in determining the chaperone-like activity of -crystallins, it does not quantitatively correlate with the chaperone function of -crystallins.
|
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Small heat shock proteins (sHSPs)1 form a large family of proteins of 12–43 kDa found ubiquitously in cells as large (200–800 kDa) oligomeric complexes (1, 2). -Crystallin, a member of the sHSP group, constitutes a major portion of the eye lens cytoplasm. Its concentration in the lens fiber cells can make up to 50% of the total protein that exists as a polydisperse aggregate (2–4). Although the average size of -crystallin is 
700 kDa, its size can range from 360 to >1000 kDa depending on the source, the purification protocols employed, and the presence of posttranslational modifications (2–4). Lenticular -crystallin is a hetero-oligomer with two subunits, A and B, mostly present in a stoichiometry of 3:1. A and B are 20 kDa each and share 60% sequence identity (3–5). Apart from their presence in the lens, -crystallins are also found in many non-lenticular tissues. For example, B-crystallin is expressed in the heart, skeletal muscle, kidney, and brain (5). Increased levels of B-crystallin have been observed in many neurodegenerative disorders and tumors (5, 6). Unlike B-crystallin, A-crystallin appears to be largely lens-specific. Both homopolymers and heteropolymers of -crystallin exhibit chaper-one-like activity similar to that of other sHSPs (4–7). Several studies have demonstrated that -crystallin suppresses protein aggregation, protecting them from heat, chemicals, and UV light irradiation (4–7). Hence, in addition to providing refractive properties to the eye lens, -crystallin is instrumental in maintaining transparency of the eye lens with its chaperone-like activity (4–8).
Despite high sequence homology, the relative importance of A- and B-crystallins is not completely understood (4, 5). Whereas A-crystallin knock-out mice develop cataracts, B knock-out mice show degeneration of specific skeletal muscles with no symptoms of cataracts (8, 9). Likewise, A-crystallin is more effective than B-crystallin in conferring protection against UVA light stress-induced apoptosis in lens epithelial cells (10). Primary cultures of B–/– lens epithelial cells showed genome instability and hyperproliferation, suggesting that B-crystallin regulates cell division through the stabilization of cytoskeleton filaments (10–13). Regarding the ability of A- and B-crystallins to act as chaperones, different studies have reported conflicting results (14–18). At this point, it is not clear whether the apparent differences in tissue specificity and distinct physiological demands/necessities of A- and B-crystallins have differentially influenced their chaperone ability and other structural properties.
Although the mechanism of chaperone function is not completely understood, the ability of -crystallin to specifically recognize aggregation-prone non-native proteins and prevent their subsequent insolubilization is well established (3, 4, 7). Numerous studies implicate surface-exposed hydrophobic sites on -crystallin and other sHSPs in binding to partially unfolded proteins (14–23). The finding that increased exposure of hydrophobic surfaces on structurally perturbed -crystallin is associated with increased chaperone-like function substantiates the role of hydrophobicity in the chaperone function of sHSP (14–16, 21). However, enhanced chaperone-like activity with an increase in temperature was not similarly associated with increased hydrophobicity with recombinant A- and B-crystallins (14, 16). A- and B-crystallins differ not only in their hydrophobic character with temperature but also in their secondary and tertiary structure, molecular size, and other physicochemical properties (14–16). This makes an exact correlation between hydrophobicity and chaperone activity difficult to establish.
Historically, hydrophobicity has been measured qualitatively and quantitatively by spectroscopic methods like fluorescence and equilibrium dialysis, mostly by using two common fluorescent dyes, 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid (ANS) and bis-ANS (19, 20, 22, 24). In such cases, indirect methods such as van't Hoff analysis for obtaining thermodynamic parameters to elucidate ANS binding are often limited. For instance, one study reported a stoichiometry of one ANS binding site per 24 subunits (22), whereas others have reported one ANS or bis-ANS binding site per subunit of -crystallin (14, 19, 24). More sensitive and accurate methods are needed to resolve such ambiguities. High sensitivity isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) is one such method for quantifying the hydrophobic sites and measuring the thermodynamic parameters directly and accurately. In the present study, we have employed ITC to determine the number of binding sites and the thermodynamics of ANS binding to A- and B-crystallins. We correlate hydrophobicity and chaperone activity of A- and B-crystallins at different temperatures to get greater insight into the role of hydrophobicity in the chaperone-like function of -crystallin.
|
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
|
|---|
Materials—ANS, 
-mercaptoethanol, acrylamide, bis-acrylamide, bovine serum albumin, isopropyl 1-thio--D-galactopyranoside, DTT, and insulin were obtained from Sigma. Sephacryl 300 HR and MonoQ were from Amersham Biosciences. All other chemicals were procured from local companies.
Purification of Recombinant A- and B-crystallins—Bacterial (BL21) cells containing expression vectors (pET23d) of human A- and B-crystallins were a generous gift from Dr. J. Mark Petrash (Washington University, St. Louis, MO). Proteins from 1-liter cultures were extracted and purified according to the procedures described previously (14). Briefly, A- and B-crystallins were overexpressed in Escherichia coli BL21 cells containing the respective vectors by isopropyl 1-thio--D-galactopyranoside induction and purified using MonoQ anion exchange and Sephacryl S-300 gel filtration columns. The purity/homogeneity of A and B was found to be 99% as analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Concentrations of A and B were calculated using molar extinction coefficients, (
280) of 16,500 and 19,000 M–1 cm–1, respectively.
Chaperone Activity Assay—The chaperone activities of A-crystallin and B-crystallin were assessed by measuring each one's ability to prevent the aggregation of insulin denatured by the reduction of disulfide bonds. The aggregation assay was performed essentially as described previously (14). Apparent absorption at 400 nm due to DTT-induced aggregation of insulin was monitored as a function of time in the absence and presence of A- and B-crystallins using a Cary100 UV-visible spectrophotometer. For a chaperone assay performed in the presence of ANS, A- and B-crystallins were preincubated with saturating amounts of ANS under specific conditions as showned in Table III, and excess ANS was removed by dialysis.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE III
Percentage loss of chaperone activity of A- and B-crystallin (native and preheated) in the presence of ANS at 15 and 30 °C
Data are average of three chaperone assays. The chaperone activity in the absence of ANS was considered as 100%.
|
|
Isothermal Titration Calorimetric Studies—Titration calorimetric measurements were performed using a VP-ITC calorimeter (Microcal Inc., Northampton, MA) as described previously (25). In brief, 4–8-µl aliquots of ANS solution (10 mM) were added via a 300-µl syringe with constant stirring at 310 rpm to the sample cell containing 1.4 ml of A- or B-crystallin (50 µM), and heat changes accompanying these additions were recorded. An interval of 3 min between injections was chosen for the baseline to stabilize. The protein samples were extensively dialyzed against 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5 (containing 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.01% NaN3), before titration. ANS was solubilized in the final dialysate buffer. The titration of ANS solution with buffer alone gave negligible values for the heat of dilution, which were subtracted from the actual titration data. The data so obtained were fitted using a non-linear least squares minimization method for determining the binding stoichiometry (N), binding constant (Kb), and change in enthalpy (
Hb) using Origin software (Microcal Inc.), and the two-site model provided the best fit for the data. The change in entropy (S) was calculated from G = H – TS.
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
|
|---|
Despite the presence of a wealth of literature on the dependence of the chaperone function of -crystallin on its surface hydrophobicity, a deterministic role of hydrophobicity in quantitative terms remains unresolved. There are numerous instances where hydrophobicity could not be directly correlated to the chaperone-like activity of A- and B-crystallins. For instance, replacement of Phe-71 with Gly in A-crystallin results in loss of chaperone activity despite an increase in surface hydrophobicity with no significant alterations in structure (26). In another study, calf lens A-crystallin was found to be more hydrophobic but showed lower chaperone activity than B-crystallin at room temperature (18). In vitro modification of bovine -crystallin with methylglyoxal enhanced the chaperone-like activity, particularly in aggregation assays, although hydrophobicity showed a decrease (27). Moreover, apparent differences in the temperature-dependent behavior of A- and B-crystallins with respect to chaperone activity, hydrophobicity, and oligomeric size necessitate a critical evaluation of the role of hydrophobicity in A-crystallin and B-crystallin function.
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry Studies—The polydisperse nature of -crystallin may complicate the quantification of hydrophobicity by spectroscopic methods. ITC is sensitive and appropriate because it measures the heat change directly, independent of the state of the protein. ANS binding to A- and B-crystallins was characterized by using ITC at 15 and 30 °C. Figs. 1 and 2 show the typical titration calorimetry profiles that resulted from the addition of 8-µl aliquots of 10 mM ANS to A- and B-crystallins along with the normalized integrated titration data. The results exhibit a monotonic decrease in the exothermic heat of binding with successive injections until saturation is achieved. The data best fitted to nonlinear least squares were provided by means of the two-site binding model. Stoichiometry (N) and thermodynamic parameters (changes in enthalpy (H), free energy (G), and entropy (S)) for the binding of ANS to A- and B-crystallins at 15 and 30 °C are listed in Table I. Both A-crystallin and B-crystallin showed two sets of binding sites for ANS, low affinity and high affinity, based on the binding constants. Thermodynamic parameters for the binding of ANS to A- and B-crystallins indicate that high affinity binding is driven by both enthalpy and entropy changes, whereas the entropy change is dominant for low affinity binding. These data suggest that hydrophobic forces are dominant in the ANS binding to -crystallin. The fact that A- and B-crystallin have two sets of binding sites is in agreement with the studies of Stevens and Augusteyn, who suggested two kinds of interactions for the binding of ANS to -crystallin (22). Moreover, binding of destabilized mutants of T4 lysozyme to -crystallin was demonstrated to be biphasic (28).
A-Crystallin, at 30 °C, showed one high affinity binding site per subunit for ANS and large number of low affinity binding sites. Stoichiometries of higher and lower affinity sites were greater in B as compared with those in A at 30 °C (Table I). This supports the view that B is more hydrophobic than A. At a low temperature (15 °C), A crystallin showed an increase in the number of high affinity ANS binding sites but a decrease in the number of low affinity binding sites. Although, both A and B displayed similar binding stoichiometry for ANS at 15 °C, their binding constants differed particularly for low affinity sites (K2), which probably hints that low affinity sites may influence the chaperone-like activity of -crystallins under different conditions.
Chaperone-like Activity Studies—We assessed the chaperone activity of A-crystallin and B-crystallin by analyzing the ability of the two to suppress the aggregation of the insulin B-chain at 15 and 30 °C and compared it to their hydrophobic nature as deduced by ITC. Fig. 3, A and B show the suppression of insulin B-chain aggregation by A-crystallin and B-crystallin, respectively, at 15 and 30 °C. At 30 °C, B-crystallin showed higher chaperone activity than A crystallin (Fig. 3B) and was associated with a greater number of ANS binding sites (both high and low affinity) as compared with A (Table I). In contrast, at 15 °C A showed greater protection than B crystallin (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, ANS binding sites were found to be similar in number for both A and B, though K2 was higher for A at 15 °C. At higher temperatures (above 40 °C), A has been reported to be more protective than B (14–16). Thus, it appears that at extreme temperatures (both low and high) A acts as a better chaperone than B in preventing the aggregation of insulin. The results of the present study indicate that the relative chaperone activities of A and B are not correlated with the number of hydrophobic sites at low temperature, as A and B have similar number of binding sites (both high and low affinity) (Table I). Also, the diminished ability of A-crystallin and B-crystallin to prevent the insulin aggregation at 15 °C as compared with that at 30 °C is not directly related to the number of hydrophobic sites, as A showed one high affinity binding site per subunit at 30 °C but 3–4 sites at 15 °C.
Temperature-dependent Changes in Hydrophobicity and Chaperone Activity—Although, the increase in chaperone function with temperature was thought to be associated with the exposure of additional hydrophobic sites (21, 29), it was later shown that only the A polymer displayed an increased hydrophobic surface due to structural reorganization upon heating followed by cooling, but B did not (14). Here, we studied the binding of ANS to A- and B-crystallins by ITC at 15 °C after preheating the samples at 58 °C. The data indicated that whereas there was no change in the number of high affinity sites for ANS in both A and B, there was an increase in the number of low affinity sites in both A and B (Fig. 4 and Table II). To assess how the above changes in hydrophobicity are quantitatively associated with the chaperone activity, we estimated the chaperone activity of preheated A-crystallin and B-crystallin at 15 °C. As shown in Fig. 5A, preheated A displayed remarkably enhanced (5x) chaperone activity than the unheated one. In contrast to A, B did not show such an enhanced chaperone activity with preheating (Fig. 5A). Thus, the increased chaperone activity of preheated A cannot be explained by changes in its hydrophobic character. Interestingly, preheated A showed significantly higher chaperone ability than B at 30 °C (Fig. 5B), whereas unheated A displayed lower chaperone activity compared with unheated B (Fig. 3B). Apart from the increased and/or reorganized hydrophobic surfaces, the increased chaperone-like activity of preheated -crystallin over unheated protein has been mainly attributed to its increased aggregate size (30), Furthermore, the increase in size was observed with preheated A-crystallin but not with B-crystallin (31). Thus, the aggregate size of -crystallin may play an important role in the chaperone activity of A- and B-crystallins.
Effect of ANS Binding on the Chaperone Activity of A- and B-crystallins—Some studies demonstrated that the blocking of hydrophobic sites with the incorporation of ANS or bis-ANS into -crystallin results in a partial but not complete loss of chaperone activity (19, 32). In the present study, we have used this approach to ascertain the enhanced chaperone function to that of increased hydrophobicity. It is believed that the enhanced chaperone activity may be due to the increased and reorganized hydrophobic sites. If this notion were true, we would expect a greater loss in chaperone activity with prior ANS binding under the conditions, which enhance chaperone activity. However, the results of the present study are not in agreement with the above assumption. For instance, the percent decrease in chaperone activity due to ANS binding was more for B than for A at 15 °C (Table III), but B displayed lower chaperone activity than A at this temperature (Fig. 3A). However, at 30 °C the loss in activity due to ANS binding appeared to go hand in hand with chaperone activity of A and B (Table III and Fig. 3B). The hydrophobicity and chaperone activity paradox appears to be more striking with the preheated crystallins. The percentage loss of chaperone activity due to ANS binding was similar with preheated A and B irrespective of the assay temperatures, 15 and 30 °C (Table III). However, the enhanced chaperone potential was remarkable with preheated A as compared with B (Fig. 5).
These findings, taken together, indicate that the correlation between hydrophobicity as assessed by the binding of hydrophobic dyes (both quantitatively and qualitatively) and chaperone activity may often be coincidental rather than a true indication of their function. Furthermore, these results suggest that factors other than hydrophobicity could play a role in the chaperone-like activity of -crystallin. Liao et al. reported that in addition to surface hydrophobicity, structural stability plays a major role in the chaperone-like activity of -crystallins (33). Nonetheless, the oligomeric size of sHSP (30, 31, 34) and electrostatic forces between sHSP and their denaturing substrates (18, 35) have also been proposed to play an important role. Further studies would be required to delineate the contribution of these factors in -crystallin chaperone activity.
In summary, the data presented in this study provide the stoichiometry and the affinity of ANS binding sites of native and preheated recombinant A-crystallin and B-crystallin in quantitative terms vis-à-vis their contribution to chaperone activity. Together, the ITC data and the data on chaperone activity (both in the absence and presence of ANS) suggest that there is no direct quantitative correlation between hydrophobicity and chaperone-like activity. Furthermore, this approach may be employed to establish the role of hydrophobicity in the chaperone activity of other sHSPs.
|
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
* This work was supported in part by Department of Science and Technology Grant SR/FT/L-05/2004 (to G. B. R.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 
Recipient of a research fellowship from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research.
|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 91-40-27008921; Fax: 91-40-27019074; E-mail: geereddy{at}yahoo.com.
1 The abbreviations used are: sHSP, small heat shock protein; ANS, 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid; DTT, dithiothreitol; ITC, isothermal titration calorimetry.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
We thank Profs. A. Surolia and R. Varadarajan, Indian Institute of Science, for the use of the VP-ITC facility.
|
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Buchner, J. (1996) FASEB J. 10, 10–19[Abstract]
- de Jong, W. W., Caspers, G. J., and Leunissen, J. A. (1998) Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 22, 151–162[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bloemendal, H., de Jong, W. W., Jaenicke, R., Lubsen, N. H., Slingsby, C., and Tardieu, A. (2004) Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 86, 407–485[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Horwitz, J. (2003) Exp. Eye. Res. 76, 145–153[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bhat, S. P. (2003) Prog. Drug Res. 60, 205–262[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Klemenz, R., Frohli, E., Aoyama, A., Hoffman, S., Simpson, R. J., Mortiz, R. L., and Shafer, R. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 803–812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ganea, E. (2001) Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2, 205–225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Brady, J. P., Garland, D., Duglas-Tabor, Y., Robison, W. G., Groome, A., and Wawrousek, E. F. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 884–889[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Brady, J. P., Garland, D. L., Green, D. E., Tamm, E. R., Giblin, F. J., and Wawrousek, E. F. (2001) Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 42, 2924–2934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Andley, U. P., Song, Z., Wawrousek, E. F., Fleming, T. P., and Bassnett, S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 36823–36831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bai, F., Xi, J. H., Wawrousek, E. F., Fleming, T. P., and Andley, U. P. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 36876–36886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Andley, U. P., Song, Z., Wawrousek, E. F., Brady, J. P., Bassnett, S., and Fleming, T. P. (2001) FASEB J. 15, 221–229[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Fujita, Y., Ohto, E., Katayama, E., and Atomi, Y. (2004) J. Cell Sci. 117, 1719–1726[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Reddy, G. B., Das, K. P., Petrash, J. M., and Surewicz, W. K. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 4565–4570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Datta, S.A., and Rao, C. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34773–34778[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- van Boekel, M. A., de Lange, F., de Grip, W. J., and de Jong, W. W. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1434, 114–123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sun, T. X., Das, B. K., and Liang, J. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 6220–6225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bhattacharyya, J., Srinivas, V., and Sharma, K. K. (2002) J. Protein Chem. 21, 65–71[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sharma, K. K., Kaur, H., Kumar, G. S., and Kester, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8965–8970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sharma, K. K., Kumar, G. S., Murphy, A. S., and Kester, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15474–15478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Das, K. P., and Surewicz, W. K. (1995) FEBS Lett. 369, 321–325[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Stevens, A., and Augusteyn, R. C. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 243, 792–797[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gomez-Puertas, P., Martin-Benito, J., Carrascosa, J. L., Willison, K. R., and Valpuesta, J. M. (2004) J. Mol. Recognit. 17, 85–94[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Liang, J. N., and Li, X. Y. (1991) Exp. Eye. Res. 53, 61–66[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wiseman, T., Williston, S., Brandts, J. F., and Lin, L. N. (1989) Anal. Biochem. 179, 131–137[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Santhoshkumar, P., and Sharma, K. K. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 47094–47099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kumar, M. S., Reddy, P. Y., Kumar, P. A., Surolia, I., and Reddy, G. B. (2004) Biochem. J. 379, 273–282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mchaourab, H. S., Dodson, E. K., and Koteiche, H. A. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 40557–40566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Raman, B., and Rao, C. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 23559–23564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Burgio, M. R., Kim, C. J., Dow, C. C., and Koretz, J. F. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 268, 426–432[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Burgio, M. R., Bennett, P. M., and Koretz, J. F. (2001) Mol. Vis. 7, 228–233[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Smulders, R. H., and de Jong, W. W. (1997) FEBS Lett. 409, 101–104[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Liao, J. H., Lee, J. S., and Chiou, S. H. (2002) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 295, 854–861[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kumar, L. V., and Rao, C. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 22009–22013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Mao, Q., Ke, D., and Chang, Z. (2001) Biochemistry (Mosc.) 66, 904–908[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
P. Santhoshkumar and K. K. Sharma
Conserved F84 and P86 residues in {alpha}B-crystallin are essential to effectively prevent the aggregation of substrate proteins.
Protein Sci.,
November 1, 2006;
15(11):
2488 - 2498.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Wang, G. Xu, H. Li, V. Gonzales, D. Fromholt, C. Karch, N. G. Copeland, N. A. Jenkins, and D. R. Borchelt
Somatodendritic accumulation of misfolded SOD1-L126Z in motor neurons mediates degeneration: {alpha}B-crystallin modulates aggregation
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
August 15, 2005;
14(16):
2335 - 2347.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
) and 
).