JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M500464200 on March 23, 2005

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 24, 22962-22967, June 17, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/24/22962    most recent
M500464200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Crystal Structure of Human Vacuolar Protein Sorting Protein 29 Reveals a Phosphodiesterase/Nuclease-like Fold and Two Protein-Protein Interaction Sites*

Deqiang Wang{ddagger}§, Min Guo{ddagger}§, Zhi Liang{ddagger}§, Jun Fan{ddagger}§, Zhiqiang Zhu{ddagger}§, Jianye Zang{ddagger}§, Zhongliang Zhu{ddagger}§, Xiaowu Li{ddagger}§, Maikun Teng{ddagger}§||, Liwen Niu{ddagger}§**, Yuhui Dong{ddagger}{ddagger}, and Peng Liu{ddagger}{ddagger}

From the {ddagger}Hefei National Laboratory of Physical Sciences at Microscale, §Key Laboratory of Structural Biology of Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, and the {ddagger}{ddagger}Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19B Yuquan Road, Beijing 100039, China

Received for publication, January 13, 2005 , and in revised form, March 14, 2005.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Vacuolar protein sorting protein 29 (Vps29p), which is involved in retrograde trafficking from prevacuolar endosomes to the trans-Golgi network, performs its biological functions by participating in the formation of a "retromer complex." In human cells, this complex comprises four conserved proteins: hVps35p, hVps29p, hVps26p, and sorting nexin 1 protein (SNX1). Here, we report the crystal structure of hVps29p at 2.1 Å resolution, the first three-dimensional structure of the retromer subunits. This novel structure adopts a four-layered {alpha}-{beta}-{beta}-{alpha} sandwich fold. hVps29p contains a metal-binding site that is very similar to the active sites of some proteins of the phosphodiesterase/nuclease protein family, indicating that hVps29p may carry out chemically similar functions. Structure and sequence conservation analysis suggests that hVps29p contains two protein-protein interaction sites. One site, which potentially serves as the interface between hVps29p and hVps35p, comprises 5 conserved hydrophobic and 8 hydrophilic residues. The other site is relatively more hydrophilic and may serve as a binding interface with hVps26p, SNX1, or other target proteins.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
To function properly for the organelles in eukaryotic cells, it is necessary that specific sets of proteins and lipids are sorted and delivered to various intracellular compartments efficiently. The trafficking of proteins and lipids between intracellular organelles requires a series of proteins that are involved in the membrane transport pathways (1–3). Genetic screens in yeast have uncovered more than 50 Vps1 genes. The products of these Vps genes are involved directly or indirectly in protein sorting or trafficking between the late Golgi and the vacuoles (4–6). Disruption of Vps genes can cause disturbance and mis-sorting of many proteins, such as CPY. As a vacuolar hydrolase, CPY is recognized by Vps10p in the late Golgi. Vps10p binds to CPY and conveys it via vesicle to the prevacuolar compartment where Vps10p releases it. After that, Vps10p returns to the Golgi for further rounds of transportation. Some yeast Vps gene products, Vps26p, Vps29p, Vps35p, Vps5p, and Vps17p, are necessary for the retrograde retrieval process of Vps10p from endosomes back to the trans-Golgi network (7–10). By forming a complex named "retromer complex," the five proteins are also involved in the proper sorting and transportation of dipetidyl aminopeptidase A, Kex2 protease (Kex2p), polymeric immunoglobulin receptor, and mannose 6-phosphate receptor (9–12). This complex consists of two subcomplexes. One subcomplex, consisting of Vps35p, Vps29p, and Vps26p, is responsible for selecting cargoes retrieved from the prevacuolar compartment (10, 13). The other subcomplex of Vps5p and Vps17p provides structural components to complete the retromer complex and mechanical force for vesicle budding (10, 14, 15). The retromer complex is conserved and has homologs in mammalian cells. In human cells, the retromer complex comprises hVps26p, hVps29p, hVps35p, and SNX1 (the mammalian homolog of Vps5p) (16, 17). hVps35p serves as the core of this multimeric complex and binds directly to the other retromer subunits. In addition, there are some potential interactions that may stabilize the complex between hVps26p and hVps29p, hVps29p and SNX1, as well as hVps26p and SNX1 (17).

Vps35p, a receptor for cargo proteins, is directly associated with sorting signaling in the cytosolic domains of many cargo proteins, including Vps10p and A-ALP, a model trans-Golgi network resident protein (8, 13, 18). As a necessary component of the retromer complex, Vps29p directly binds to Vps35p but not to cargo proteins. Vps29p possibly assists Vps35p to bind to cargo proteins by enhancing its association with membranes and/or with other retromer proteins (10). In the absence of Vps29p, Vps35p cannot bind to Vps26p in solution (17). Furthermore, when both Vps29 and Vps26 are mutated or knocked out, Vps35p will be very unstable (10, 19). Vps35p and Vps29p assemble into a stable subcomplex that is fit together with Vps5p/Vps17p through the interactions in which Vps26p is required to participate (7, 8, 10, 20). SNX1 contains a Phox homology domain that can bind to phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate, phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate, or phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-bisphosphate. These phosphoinositides may serve as direct, local regulators and recruiters of protein machinery that control membrane trafficking in some pathways, whereas the exact roles of the three small molecules in the retromer complex remain to be investigated (20–23).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.
Sequence alignment of seven hVps29p homologs of eukaryotic species, including hVps29p of H. sapiens (accession number NM_016226 [GenBank] ), DrVps29 of Danio rerio (accession number NP_956331 [GenBank] ), DmVps29 of Drosophila melanogaster (accession number NP_608575 [GenBank] ), CeVps29 of C. elegans (accession number CAA87426 [GenBank] , Ncvps29 of Neurospora crassa (accession number XP_328261 [GenBank] ), EgVps29 of Eremothecium gossypii (accession number NP_985958 [GenBank] ), ScVps29 of S. cerevisiae (accession number P38759 [GenBank] ). Identical and similar residues are shown in red and yellow, respectively. Secondary structure elements of hVps29p are shown above the sequences.

 
Vps29p homologs are found to be present in several prokaryotic species of Archaea, some thermophilic bacterium, yeast, Caenorhabditis elegans, insects, and mammal (17, 24). Sequence alignments of seven hVps29p homologs of eukaryotic species are shown in Fig. 1. Northern blot analyses show that mRNA of hVps29 is expressed highly in the colon, thymus, spleen, and peripheral leukocytes, whereas mRNAs of hVps35 and hVps26 are expressed much lower in these tissues (17). These data suggest that hVps29p not only serves as a subunit of the retromer complex but also carries out other biological roles (17).

As the first step to understand the functions of hVps29p at the atomic level, we determined the crystal structure of hVps29p at 2.1 Å resolution, the first three-dimensional structure of the retromer subunits. hVps29p contains a potential metal-binding site formed by 9 hydrophilic residues. Based on the structural and sequence analysis, two conserved surface regions are proposed to serve as binding sites for hVps35p and other target proteins, respectively.


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cloning, Expression, and Purification—The complete cDNA encoding hVps29p (accession number NM_016226 [GenBank] ) was subcloned from a human brain cDNA library (BD Biosciences) into pET-22b vector (Novagen) with the NdeI and XhoI restriction sites. hVps29p was expressed highly as a soluble protein in Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3) cells, induced by isopropyl-1-thio-{beta}-D-galactopyranoside at 37 °C. The harvested cells were resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) at 4 °C, supplemented with DNase I and lysozyme, and lysed by sonication, and the soluble lysate was applied to DEAE-SepharoseTM Fast Flow (Amersham Biosciences). The protein was eluted with a linear gradient of NaCl from 0 to 120 mM. Fractions containing hVps29p were pooled and then further purified by gel filtration (Superdex 75, Amersham Biosciences) in a buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 80 mM NaCl. The peak fractions were concentrated to 15 mg/ml and stored at –70 °C.

To prepare the SeMet-derivative protein, hVps29p was expressed in E. coli strain B834 (Novagen) using M9 medium supplemented with SeMet and 6 amino acids, including leucine, isoleucine, valine, phenylalanine, lysine, and threonine. The SeMet-derivative protein was purified by similar procedure to the wild-type protein.

Crystallization and Data Collection—Crystals of both the wild-type and the SeMet-derivative proteins of hVps29p were grown using the hanging drop vapor diffusion method at room temperature. The initial crystallization conditions were screened by the sparse matrix sampling method using Crystal Screen I and II (Hampton Research). The crystals suitable for x-ray diffraction were grown in 25% polyethylene glycol 4000, 10% ethylene glycol, and 100 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, with a protein concentration of 3 mg/ml in 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5.

A MAD data set was collected from a single crystal of SeMet-derivative protein at 100 K without additional cryoprotectant on beamline 3W1A of the Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility at the Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The data were collected at two wavelengths ({lambda}peak = 0.9814 Å and {lambda}edge = 0.9817 Å). The MAD data were processed using MOSFILM (25) and Scala in CCP4 suite (26). In addition, by using imaging plates (Mar Research) and x-rays (copper K{alpha}) from a rotating anode source (Rigaku), a native data set with 2.1 Å resolution was obtained from a wild-type protein crystal at 100 K. The native data set was processed by Automar (marresearch GmbH). Both the wild-type and the SeMet-derivative crystals are in space group p43212 with similar cell parameters. Data collection statistics are presented in Table I.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE I
Data collection and refinement statistics

Cell dimensions are as follows: a = b = 53.87Å, c = 124.20Å, space group P43212.

 
Structure Determination and Refinement—Two of the three expected selenium positions were determined by SHELXD (27) using Bijvoet differences of the MAD data prepared by XPREP (Bruker Analytical X-ray Systems). The initial phases were calculated by SHARP with the resolution ranging from 25 to 2.7 Å (28). The resulting phases were extended to 2.3 Å and improved through solvent flattening and histogram matching using DM and SOLOMON (29). An initial model (112 out of the 182 amino acids) was autobuilt by ARP/wARP (30), and the model was further built and refined at 2.3 Å resolution using Refmac 5.0 (31) and O (32) by manual model correction. After the model reached a reasonable quality, refinement was continued with the 2.1 Å data collected from native protein crystal. Further cycles of refinement and model building were carried out until the crystallography R-factor and free R-factor converged to 21.8 and 24.4%, respectively (33). The stereochemistry of the structure was checked by PROCHECK (34). Figures were prepared using PyMOL and GRASP (35). MAD phasing and model refinement statistics are shown in Table I.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Structure Solution and Model Quality—The hVps29p crystal structure was phased by MAD with SeMet-substituted protein and refined against the diffraction data of native protein crystal. The current model consists of 180 amino acids (residues 1–92 and 95–182) and 48 water molecules. Due to conformational disorder, Trp-93 and Gly-94 are invisible in the electron density and therefore not included in the final model. Moreover, side chains of 5 residues, i.e. Lys-21, Asp-47, Ile-91, Lys-118, and Lys-180, show weak electron density. The final model was refined to 2.1 Å with free R-factor of 24.4% and crystallographic R-factor of 21.8%. The r.m.s.d. from ideal values of bond lengths and bond angles were 0.009 Å and 1.774°, respectively. Of all the residues in the final refined model, 87.3% have main chain torsion angles in the most favored regions and only one residue, His-115, which can be well defined in the experimental electron density, is in a disallowed region. Data collection and refinement statistics are summarized in Table I.

Structure Overview—hVps29p, an approximately spherical molecule with dimensions of 36 x 42 x 44 Å comprises two {beta} sheets (five-stranded and six-stranded) and three {alpha} helices ({alpha}1, {alpha}2, and {alpha}3), adopting a four-layered {alpha}-{beta}-{beta}-{alpha} sandwich fold (Fig. 2A). The five-stranded {beta} sheet that is flanked by one helix ({alpha}3) consists of strands {beta}4-{beta}8, and {beta}4 and {beta}7 are antiparallel to the other three strands. In a similar manner, the six-stranded {beta} sheet, flanked by two {alpha} helices ({alpha}1 and {alpha}2), consists of strands {beta}1-{beta}3 and {beta}9-{beta}11, with {beta}9 and {beta}11 antiparallel to the other four strands. The interfaces between layers in the {alpha}-{beta}-{beta}-{alpha} sandwich are mainly formed by tightly packed hydrophobic side chains.

There is only one hVps29p molecule in the asymmetric unit, and the crystallographic contact between molecules involves very limited interactions, which seem unlikely to be physiological. Size exclusion chromatography and dynamic light scattering experiments confirmed the presence of hVps29p as a monomer in solution (data not shown). These data imply that the monomer of hVps29p may be a stable and functional unit in solution.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.
Overall structure of hVps29p. A, a stereo view of hVps29p. The secondary structure elements are numbered correspondingly. The purple arrow represents the negatively charged groove. Sticks represent the hydrophilic amino acids (Asp-8, His-10, Arg-14, Asn-39, Asp-62, His-86, His-115, His-117, and Asn-140) that are possibly involved in binding metal ions. B, the electrostatic potential surface of hVps29p. Saturating red indicates {phi} < – 10 kiloteslas/e, and saturating blue indicates {phi} > 10 kiloteslas/e, T = 293 K (38). The purple arrow represents the negatively charged groove.

 
The electrostatic potential surface of hVps29p displays prominent asymmetry. As shown in Fig. 2B, a negatively charged groove stretches along one side of the molecule. The 11 amino acids at the groove, including Asp-8, Glu-44, Asp-62, Asp-64, Glu-65, Glu-71, Asp-95, Glu-120, Glu-143, Asp-170, and Asp-171, contribute the negative charge of the surface. Most of these amino acids are highly conserved (Fig. 1), suggesting that the negative groove may be a feature of Vps29p homologs.

Comparison of Sequence and Structural Homologs—A Pfam (36) annotation suggests that hVps29p belongs to a family of Calcineurin-like related phosphoesterase. This family contains many kinds of phosphoesterases, such as phosphoserine phosphatases, nucleotidases, sphingomyelin phosphodiesterases, 2'-3'-cyclic AMP phosphodiesterases, and nucleases. A BLAST search reveals a large number of homologs of hVps29p. Besides the proteins from C. elegans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, plants, insects, and mammalians (Fig. 1), the homologs of Vps29p are also found in one thermophilic bacterium (Thermatoga maritime) and several species of Archaea (Methanococcus jannaschii, Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum, Pyrococcus abyssi, and Pyrococcus horikoshii), suggesting that they are ancient proteins and perform essential biological functions (17).

Despite the low sequence identity, hVps29p shows structural similarity to many previously determined structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The most similar proteins found by the Dali server (37) in the PDB are phosphodiesterase MJ0936 of M. jannaschii (PDB code 1S3N, r.m.s.d. = 2.5 over 150 C{alpha} atoms) (38), hypothetical protein of Pyrococcus furiosus (PDB code 1NNW [PDB] , r.m.s.d. = 3.1 over 159 C{alpha} atoms), purple acid phosphatase of Sus scrofa and Phaseolus vulgaris (PDB code 1UTE [PDB] , r.m.s.d. = 3.7 over 168 C{alpha} atoms; PDB code 4KBP [PDB] , r.m.s.d. = 3.5 over 167 C{alpha} atoms) (39, 40), mre11 nuclease of Pyrococcus furiosus (PDB code 1II7 [PDB] , r.m.s.d. = 3.2 over 149 C{alpha} atoms) (41), hypothetical protein of Thermus thermophilus (PDB code 1UF3 [PDB] , r.m.s.d. = 3.2 over 140 C{alpha} atoms), serine/threonine phosphatase 2B of Homo sapiens and Bacteriophage lambda, respectively (PDB code 1AUI [PDB] , r.m.s.d. = 3.1 over 151 C{alpha} atoms; PDB code 1G5B [PDB] , r.m.s.d. = 3.2 over 131 C{alpha} atoms) (42, 43), and 5'-nucleotidase of E. coli (PDB code 1USH [PDB] , r.m.s.d. = 3.3 over 150 C{alpha} atoms) (44). Except for the two hypothetical proteins, 1NNW [PDB] and 1UF3, the other proteins perform molecular functions that are chemically similar (phosphodiesterase, phosphatase, nuclease, or nucleotidase). These enzymes adopt the common sandwich fold, and the metal-chelating residues involved in enzymatic activity are also conserved.

The Metal-binding Site of hVps29p—Based on the structural comparison with these enzymes, we determined that the presumed metal ion-binding site of hVps29p is located at the highly negatively charged groove and formed by a cluster of turn/loop regions among {beta}1/{alpha}1, {beta}2/{alpha}2, {beta}3/{beta}4, {beta}5/{alpha}3, {beta}6/{beta}7, and {beta}8/{beta}9 (Fig. 2, A and B). The residues, which are proposed to be involved in metal binding, include Asp-8, His-10, Arg-14, Asn-39, Asp-62, His-86, His-115, His-117, and Asn-140.

hVps29p shares similar fold and overall structure with MJ0936 (Fig. 3A), a kind of phosphodiesterase of M. jannaschii (41). Some ions, such as Mn2+, are necessary for the enzyme activity of MJ0936. The di-Mn2+-binding sites of MJ0936 show great resemblance to the presumed metal-binding site of hVps29p. The corresponding residues at the metal-binding site (hVps29p:MJ0936) are: Asp-8:Asp-8, His-10: His-10, Asn-39: Asp-36, Asp-62:Asn-59, Phe-63:Gln-60, His-86:His-97, His-115: His-120 and His-117:His-122, respectively (Fig. 3B). In addition, Arg-14 and Asn-140 of hVps29p are highly hydrophilic and may also be involved in metal binding. Although Phe-63 of hVps29p locates at a similar position to Gln-60 of MJ0936, the phenylalanine apparently cannot bind to metal ions. Residues of the presumed metal-binding site of hVps29p also show similar architecture to those of purple acid phosphatase (PDB code 1UTE [PDB] ) and mre11 nuclease (PDB code 1II7 [PDB] ) (42, 44). To carry out the enzymatic function, one Fe3+ and one Fe2+ are necessary for purple acid phosphatase, and two Mn2+ are necessary for mre11 nuclease. Thus, it is proposed that the nine hydrophilic residues of hVps29p may harbor suitable metal ion(s) at this site. In fact, we found that hVps29p can bind to some metal ions (such as Fe3+ and Ni2+) in solution (data not shown). However, the experimental electron density map does not indicate the presence of any metal ion in the crystal structure of hVps29p, although many kinds of metal ions were soaked and co-crystallized. The crystallization environment may interfere with the incorporation of metal ions.

Two Possible Protein-Protein Interaction Sites of hVps29p— As a key subunit of the retromer complex, hVps29p strongly binds to hVps35p, which is crucial to the assembly of this molecular machine (18). In addition, some weak interactions between hVps29p and other proteins, such as hVps26p, SNX1, etc., may exist (10, 11, 18). Similar to many other membrane trafficking machineries, the sequences and functions of the retromer proteins, including Vps35p, Vps29p, Vps26p, and SNX1/Vps5p, were conserved during evolution (17, 18). Although only the Vps29 proteins of human and yeast have been characterized, their homologs of other eukaryotes may play a similar role in the retromer complex (10, 11, 18). Accordingly, it is deduced that the amino acids at the protein-protein interaction sites of hVps29p are possibly conserved.



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.
Presumed metal-binding site of hVps29p. A, the superposition of hVps29p (cyan) and MJ0936 (gray, PDB code 1S3N). N and C represent the N terminus and C terminus of hVps29p (colored in black) and MJ0936 (colored in red), respectively. Sticks represent the di-Mn2+-binding residues (Asp-8, His-10, Asp-36, Asn-59, Asn-60, His-97, His-120, and His-122) of MJ0936. B, the superposition of the metal ion-binding site. The residues of hVps29p and MJ0936 are colored in cyan and gray, respectively. The two red balls represent the two Mn2+ in MJ0936.

 
Seven homologs of eukaryotes, with identity from 96 to 40%, were selected to delineate the conservative sites of Vps29 proteins. As shown in Fig. 1, there are about 80 identical or similar residues colored in red and purple, respectively. The conserved amino acids can be classified as exterior and interior residues. The interior conserved residues may mainly serve as structural components sustaining the stability of structure, whereas the exterior ones are probably involved in protein functions, such as protein-protein interaction, enzymatic activity, etc. The exterior conserved residues mainly cluster together at two regions (regions I and II), which are candidates for protein-protein interaction interfaces (Fig. 4, A and C). Other conserved exterior residues (such as Pro-12, Arg-14, Asp-55, Arg-60, Phe-63, Pro-70, Asp-95, Tyr-139, Pro-148, etc.) are located separately in space or near the metal-binding site that possibly correlates with the biochemical activity (Fig. 4B).

As shown in Fig. 4A, at region I, which is formed by the residues in {beta}11, {beta}10, {beta}9, {beta}1 and {alpha}1, there are 13 conserved residues, including 5 charged, 2 hydrophilic, and 6 hydrophobic residues. Similar to many protein-protein interfaces (45), this region has a hydrophobic center formed by 6 conserved hydrophobic residues, i.e. Leu-2, Leu-4, Leu-25, Leu-152, Val-172, and Val-174, and surrounded by 7 charged or hydrophilic residues, i.e. Lys-21, Lys-23, Lys-24, Lys-30, Asp-154, Tyr-163, and Tyr-165 (Fig. 4A). At region II, which is on the opposite side of region I, there are 7 conserved exterior residues, including 4 charged residues, i.e. Arg-104, Asp-107, Asp-109, and Lys-127, 2 hydrophilic residues, i.e. Gln-79 and Gln-105, and one hydrophobic residue, Val-74 (Fig. 4C). These exterior residues, located at {beta}4, {beta}6, {beta}8, and {alpha}3, encompass a smaller but more hydrophilic surface area as compared with region I.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4.
Possible protein-protein interaction sites of hVps29p. The conserved residues on the surface are indicated, and the presumed sites are circled for clearance. A, the conserved exterior residues at region I. B, some of the conserved exterior residues at the negatively charged groove. The blue arrow represents the charged groove of hVps29p. C, the conserved exterior residues at region II.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Interaction of hVps29p with hVps35p and Other Target Proteins—Previous research suggests that hydrophobic interactions serve as not only the major sources of protein folding and protein stabilization (46–48) but also the predominant driving force in the formation of biologically relevant complexes (45, 49). Hydrophilic interactions participate in stabilizing protein complexes by providing strong interactions and shielding the hydrophobic core from hydrophilic environments (50, 51). Both the hydrophobic and the hydrophilic components are essential to molecular recognition (52), and they often work cooperatively to stabilize favorable protein-protein interaction (50).

As a subunit of the retromer complex, hVps29p can bind to hVps35p directly and may also interact with other retromer proteins, hVps26p and SNX1 (17). The C-terminal (residues 307–796) of full-length hVps35p can strongly bind to hVps29p. However, some fragments of hVps35p show little interaction with hVps29p, for instance, residues 1–603, 307–403, 307–500, 307–603, 307–754, and 603–796 (17). These data imply that the C-terminal of hVps35p (residues 307–796) may fold into either one large domain or multiple domains that interact with hVps29p solely or cooperatively. Additionally, it is observed that large protein-protein complexes have large interfaces consisting of many hydrophobic residues, whereas polar amino acids are common in small interfaces (45, 49). Thus, it is possible that hVps29p binds to hVps35p by a large hydrophobic surface area. As compared with region II, region I contains more conserved hydrophobic amino acids, encompasses a larger hydrophobic surface area, and thus potentially provides stronger interaction with target proteins. Taken together, these results imply that region I serves as the interface between hVps29p and hVps35p. With hydrophobic residues surrounded by several charged and hydrophilic ones, the interaction between hVps29p and hVps35p would be cooperatively stabilized by both kinds of interactions.

Vps29p binds to Vps35p directly and possibly assists the interaction of Vps35p with cargo proteins (10). Without Vps29p, Vps35p cannot bind to Vps26p in vitro (17) and becomes very unstable when both Vps29 and Vps26 are knocked out or mutated (10, 19). Vps35p and Vps29p assemble into a stable subcomplex that is complexed with Vps5p/Vps17p through the interaction with Vps26p (17). Thus, Vps29p, together with Vps35p, may act as a fundamental scaffold for trafficking protein machines and interact with various protein partners. The sequence conservation analysis reveals that besides the large surface region I that potentially interacts with Vps35p, a relative small and hydrophilic region II is also conserved among the eukaryote homologs. On the spherical molecule of hVps29p, this region resides at a flank of region I (Fig. 4). Along with the association with hVps35p, region II of hVps29p possibly provides the interface for the interaction with other target proteins, such as, SNX1 and hVps26p. Alternatively, by binding to hVps35p through region I, the nearby region II of hVps29p may get close to hVps35p and form a complete interaction site with regions in hVps35p for other partners. However, unraveling the detailed binding map of hVps29p to target proteins requires further studies.

Putative Active Site for Phosphate Group-containing ligand—As an ancient protein, Vps29p possibly plays some other biological roles in addition to serving as a subunit of the retromer complex (17). As shown in Fig. 2, A and B, the most prominent feature of hVps29p structure is the distinctive groove that is negatively charged and about 18 Å long and 8 Å wide. The presumed metal-binding site of hVps29p is located at the center of this groove. This cleft is free from crystal packing and entirely exposed to the solvent tunnel in the crystal structure. The architecture of the metal-chelating residues is similar to those of many enzymes with {alpha}/{beta} four-layered sandwich structures and binding di-metal ions, such as MJ0936, purple acid phosphatase, and mre11 nuclease (38, 39, 41). This similarity suggests that hVps29p not only acts as a subunit of the retromer complex but may also function as an enzyme with substrates containing phosphate groups or bases, chemically similar to MJ0936, purple acid phosphatase, and mre11 nuclease. The higher expression of hVps29 relative to its partners of the retromer complex in some tissues indicates the multiple functions of hVps29p beyond a subunit of the retromer complex (17). We speculate the possible enzymatic activity, as well as the interactions with other target proteins, to be a candidate for the additional functions of hVps29p. Interestingly, the location of this possible active site in hVps29p is flanked by the conserved surface regions I and II (Fig. 4). The spatial separation of these three sites implies that they can function individually or cooperatively. However, there is no evidence that hVps29p can catalyze any phosphodiesterase-like reactions. Consequently, there is still another possibility that this negatively charged groove is utilized to bind the phosphate groups or bases containing ligand, instead of catalyzing it. Similarly, SNX1 contains Phox homology domain that binds phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate, phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate, or phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-bisphosphate and may serve as directly local regulators or recruiters of protein machines that control the membrane trafficking in some pathway (20–23). Further investigations are needed to determine the exact role of the negatively charged groove of hVps29p.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by research grants from the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (Grants 30121001, 30025012, and 30130080) (to L. N. and M. T.), the "973" and "863" Plans of the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (Grants G1999075603 and 2002BA711A13) (to L. N. and M. T.), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant KSCX1-SW-17) (to L. N. and M. T.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The atomic coordinates and structure factors (code 1W24) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/). Back

|| To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 00-86-551-3606334; Fax: 00-86-551-3603046; E-mail: mkteng{at}ustc.edu.cn. ** To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 00-86-551-3606334; Fax: 00-86-551-3603046; E-mail: lwniu{at}ustc.edu.cn.

1 The abbreviations used are: Vps, vacuolar protein sorting; Vps29p, vacuolar protein sorting protein 29; hVps29p, human Vps29p; SNX1, sorting nexin 1 protein; DPAP A, dipetidyl amino peptidase; pIgR, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor; SeMet, Seleno-L-methionine; MAD, multiple wavelength anomalous dispersion; r.m.s.d., root mean square deviations; PDB, Protein Data Bank. Back


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Scott Venners, Dr. Condict Moore, and Dr. Hong Ye for carefully editing the manuscript.



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Novick, P., and Zerial, M. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 496–504[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Bryant, N. J., and Stevens, T. H. (1998) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 230–247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. van Vliet, C., Thomas, E. C., Merino-Trigo, A., Teasdale, R. D., and Gleeson, P. A. (2003) Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 83, 1–45[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Bankaitis, V. A., Johnson, L. M., and Emr, S. D. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 9075–9079[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rothman, J. H., and Stevens, T. H. (1986) Cell 47, 1041–1051[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Raymond, C. K., Howald-Stevenson, I., Vater, C. A., and Stevens, T. H. (1992) Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 1389–1402[Abstract]
  7. Horazdovsky, B. F., Davies, B. A., Seaman, M. N. J., McLaughin, S. A., Yoon, S.-H., and Emr, S. D. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 1529–1541[Abstract]
  8. Nothwehr, S. F., and Hindes, A. E. (1997) J. Cell Sci. 110, 1063–1072[Abstract]
  9. Seaman, M. N. J., Marcusson, E. G., Cereghino, J. L., and Emr, S. D. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 137, 79–92[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Seaman, M. N. J., McCaffery, J. M., and Emr, S. D. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 665–681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Vergés, M., Luton, F., Gruber, C., Tiemann, F., Reinders, L. G., Huang, L., Burlingame, A. L., Haft, C. R., and Mostov, K. E. (2004) Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 763–769[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Seaman, M. N. J. (2004) J. Cell Biol. 165, 111–122[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Nothwehr, S. F., Ha, S.-A., and Bruinsma, P. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 151, 297–310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Seaman, M. N. J., and Williams, H. P. (2002) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 2826–2840
  15. Burda, P., Padilla, S. M., Sarkar, S., and Emr, S. D. (2002) J. Cell Sci. 115, 3889–3900[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Pfeffer, S. R. (2001) Curr. Biol. 11, R109–R111[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Haft, C. R., Sierra, M., Bafford, R., Lesniak, M. A., Barr, V. A., and Taylor, S. I. (2000) Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 4105–4116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Bryant, N. J., and Stevens, T. H. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 287–297[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Reddy, J. V., and Seaman, M. N. J. (2001) Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 3242–3256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Gullapalli, A., Garrett, T. A., Paing, M. M., Griffin, C. T., Yang, Y., and Trejo, J. (2004) Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 2143–2155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Cozier, G. E., Carlton, J., McGregor, A. H., Glesson, P. A., Teasdale, R. D., Mellor, H., and Cullen, P. J. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 48730–48736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Zhong, Q., Lazar, C. S., Tronchère, H., Sato, T., Meerloo, T., Yeo, M., Songyang, Z., Emr, S. D., and Gill, G. N. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 6767–6772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Corvera, S., D'Arrigo, A., and Stenmark, H. (1999) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 460–465[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Edgar, A. J., and Polak, J. M. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 277, 622–630[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Rossmann, M. G., and van Beek, C. G. (1999) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 55, 1631–1640[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Bailey, S. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 760–763[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Schneider, T. R., and Sheldrick, G. M. (2002) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58, 1772–1779[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. De la Fortelle, E., and Bricogne, G. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276, 472–494
  29. Cowtan, K., and Main, P. (1998) Acta Crystallogr. D Biol Crystallog. 54, 487–493
  30. Perrakis, A., Morris, R., and Lamzin, V. S. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 458–463[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A., and Dodson, E. J. (1997) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 53, 240–255[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Jones, T. A., Zou, J. Y., Cowan, S. W., and Kjeldgaard (1991) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 47, 110–119
  33. Bruner, A. T. (1992) Nature 355, 472–474[CrossRef]
  34. Laskowski, R. A., McArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., and Thornton, J. M. (1993) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 282–291[CrossRef]
  35. Nicholls, A., Sharp, K. A., and Honing, B. (1991) Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 11, 281–296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Bateman, A., Birney, E., Cerruti, L., Durbin, R., Eddy, S. R., Griffiths-Jones, S., Howe, K. L., Marshall, M., and Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2002) Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 276–280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Holm, L. S., C. (1996) Science 273, 595–603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Chen, S., Yakunin, A. F., Kuznetsova, E., Busso, D., Pufan, R., Proudfoot, M., Kim, R., and Kim, S-H. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 31854–31862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Guddat, L. W., McAlpine, A. S., Hume, A., Hamilton, S., Jersey, J.de, and Martin, J. L. (1999) Structure Fold. Des. 7, 757–767[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Klabunde, T., Sträter, N., Fröhlich, R., Witzel, H., and Krebs, B. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 259, 737–748[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Hopfner, K. P., Karcher, A., Craig, L., Woo, T. T., Carney, J. P., and Tainer, J. A. (2001) Cell 105, 473–485[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Kissinger, C. R., Parge, H. E., Knighton, D. R., Lewis, C. T., Pelletier, L. A., Tempczyk, A., Kalish, V. J., Tucker, K. D., Showalter, R. E., and Moomaw, E. W. (1995) Nature 378, 641–644[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Voegtli, W. C., White, D. J., Reiter, N. J., Rusnak, F., and Rosenzweig, A. C. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 15365–15374[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Knöfel, T., and Sträter, N. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 448–453[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Jones, S., and Thornton, J. M. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 13–20[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Goto, K. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 206, 497–501[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Honig, B., and Nicholls, A. (1995) Science 258, 1144–1149
  48. Sheinerman, F. B., Norel, R., and Honig, B. (2000) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10, 153–159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Glaser, F., Steinberg, D. M., Vakser, I. A., and Ben-Tal, N. (2001) Proteins 43, 89–102[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Xu, D., Lin, S. L., and Nussinov, R. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 265, 68–84[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Horton, N., and Lewis, M. (1992) Protein Sci. 1, 169–181[Abstract]
  52. Lo Conte, L., Conthia, C., and Janin, J. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 285, 2177–2198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Cell Sci.Home page
J. B. Dacks and M. C. Field
Evolution of the eukaryotic membrane-trafficking system: origin, tempo and mode
J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2007; 120(17): 2977 - 2985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cell Biol.Home page
T. I. Strochlic, T. G. Setty, A. Sitaram, and C. G. Burd
Grd19/Snx3p functions as a cargo-specific adapter for retromer-dependent endocytic recycling
J. Cell Biol., April 9, 2007; 177(1): 115 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
R. Rojas, S. Kametaka, C. R. Haft, and J. S. Bonifacino
Interchangeable but Essential Functions of SNX1 and SNX2 in the Association of Retromer with Endosomes and the Trafficking of Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptors
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2007; 27(3): 1112 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
T. Shimada, Y. Koumoto, L. Li, M. Yamazaki, M. Kondo, M. Nishimura, and I. Hara-Nishimura
AtVPS29, a Putative Component of a Retromer Complex, is Required for the Efficient Sorting of Seed Storage Proteins
Plant Cell Physiol., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1187 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Plant CellHome page
P. Oliviusson, O. Heinzerling, S. Hillmer, G. Hinz, Y. C. Tse, L. Jiang, and D. G. Robinson
Plant Retromer, Localized to the Prevacuolar Compartment and Microvesicles in Arabidopsis, May Interact with Vacuolar Sorting Receptors
PLANT CELL, May 1, 2006; 18(5): 1239 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/24/22962    most recent
M500464200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar