![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 30, 27654-27661, July 29, 2005
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



¶
From the
Departments of
Pharmacology and Cancer Biology and of
Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
Received for publication, May 9, 2005 , and in revised form, June 7, 2005.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
I(1,3,4,5)P4
I(1,2,3,4,5)P5
PP-IP4
PP2-IP3 and required Kcs1 (or possibly Ipk2), Ipk1, a novel inositol pyrophosphate synthase, and then Kcs1 again, respectively. Mutation of kcs1 ablated this pathway in ipk2 null cells and overexpression of Kcs1 in ipk2 mutant cells phenocopied IP3K expression, confirming it harbors a novel 3-kinase activity. Our work provides a revised genetic map of IP metabolism in yeast and evidence for dosage compensation between IPs and PP-IPs downstream of I(1,4,5)P3 in the regulation of nucleocytoplasmic processes. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cloning and characterization of several evolutionarily conserved inositol polyphosphate kinases (IPKs) has reinvigorated interest in "orphan" IP messengers (1517). In yeast, activation of phospholipase C results in production of I(1,4,5)P3, and its sequential phosphorylation to IP6 via the activities of two kinases, Ipk2 and Ipk1 (5, 8, 18). Ipk2 has been found to sequentially phosphorylate I(1,4,5)P3 on its D-6 and D-3 positions to generate I(1,3,4,5,6)P5. Ipk1 functions as a 2-kinase to convert I(1,3,4,5,6)P5 to IP6. Additionally, both Ipk2 and Ipk1 have been shown to have promiscuous activities suggesting that each may facilitate generation of complex branches of IP metabolites. Subsequent metabolism of IP5 and IP6 by inositol pyrophosphate synthases, such as Kcs1 and a novel activity designated Ids1, generate PP-IP4 and PP-IP5 (10, 13, 19). It appears that the metabolic functions of IPKs have been conserved across eukaryotes as they are required for IP6 synthesis (18, 2027).
The enzymatic promiscuity Ipk2 and its action early in complex IP metabolic pathways may account for the pleiotropic biological defects observed in ipk2 mutant yeast. To further dissect the roles of the kinase activity of Ipk2 we have utilized heterologous complementation analysis in ipk2 mutant yeast cells (20, 21, 23). Here, in order to specifically assess the role of 3-kinase activity, we studied the effects of expression of a Drosophila I(1,4,5)P3 3-kinase
isoform (dmIP3K), whose only reported enzymatic function was to generate inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate (I(1,3,4,5)P4) (21, 28). This work has led to an unexpected finding that expression of dmIP3K initiates a novel IP pathway, whose molecular basis we describe. Additionally, we provide evidence for dosage compensation among IP species in the regulation of Ipk2-mediated nuclear and cytoplasmic processes.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
High Performance Liquid Chromatography Columns and GradientsTwo different Partisphere SAX columns and elution gradients were used in this study. Method 1 utilized a custom-made narrow-bore column and was obtained from Capital HPLC Ltd. (12.5 cm x 2.1 mm). IPs were eluted with a linear gradient of ammonium phosphate (pH 3.5) (AP) from 10 mM to 1.7 M over the course of 12 min and isocratic elution at 1.7 M AP for 23 min (flow rate of 0.4 ml/min). Method 2 achieved higher resolution IPs by using a wider-bore Whatman column (12.5 cm x 4.6 mm) and a longer elution gradient as follows: a linear gradient from 10 to 85 mM AP over 5 min, then 85 mM to 1.7 M AP over 65 min, and then isocratic elution at 1.7 M AP for 30 min all at a flow rate of 1 ml/min.
|
(which we will refer to as "dmIP3K" throughout the remainder of this report) and Kcs1 expression constructs (pRS-Kcs1 and pRS-kcs1kin-) was described previously (10, 21). The plasmids were then transformed into different yeast strains using standard yeast transformation techniques. The pCR®2.1 vector (Invitrogen) containing the entire scIpk1 coding region with a PCR-generated SalI site at the 5' end was provided by Dr. Makoto Fujii (York laboratory, Duke University). The scIpk1 coding region was subcloned from pCR®2.1 using SalI and EcoRI and ligated into the pGEX-2T vector. The vector was transformed into Escherichia coli (DH5
) for expression of recombinant protein. In Vivo Labeling of Yeast CulturesYeast cultures were incubated at 30 °C in minimal medium lacking the appropriate amino acids and 150 µM CuSO4 to late logarithmic phase. [3H]Inositol (American Radiolabeled Chemicals) was added to a final concentration of 80 µCi/ml. For pulse-chase analysis: yeast strains were grown to late logarithmic phase in 50 ml of unlabeled CM medium. The cells were washed and resuspended in 500 µl of inositol-free CM medium supplemented with 1 mCi/ml [3H]inositol. After labeling for 10 min the cells were washed, resuspended in 50 ml of inositol-replete CM medium without label, and incubated at 30 °C. Aliquots were taken at various time points, and the cells were frozen on dry ice until they could be harvested and analyzed by Partisphere strong-anion exchange HPLC. Soluble IPs were harvested and analyzed by HPLC using a strong-anion exchange column as described previously (8). Alternatively, the IPs were harvested for enzyme treatment as described below.
Enzyme Analysis of [3H]Inositol-labeled Yeast ExtractsLabeled yeast strains were resuspended in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and lysed for 30 s with a bead beater (Biospec Products) using glass beads (B. Braun Biotech International). The lysate was immediately boiled for 5 min, and then the entire procedure was repeated a second time. Extracts containing soluble IPs were recovered by centrifugation. Reactions were carried out by incubating the extracts for 1 h at 37 °C in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 10 mM NaCl with 500 ng of human Type I 5-phosphatase and/or human diphosphoryl inositol polyphosphate phosphohydrolase (DIPP). The reactions were stopped by addition of 200 µl of 10 mM ammonium phosphate, pH 3.5, and analyzed by Partisphere strong-anion exchange HPLC.
Bacterial Expression of dmIP3 and scIpk1Transformed E. coli (DH5
) were grown at 37 °C to an A600 of 0.6 and induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-
-D -galactopyranoside for 4 h at 30 °C.Thecells were recovered by centrifugation at 4 °C, resuspended in ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM dithiothreitol, Complete Mini protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Applied Science) and lysed with four passes through a cell cracker (a high shear fluid processing system for cell rupture, Microfluidics Corp.). The lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 14,000 x g. The glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins were purified over glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and 20 mM glutathione was used to elute the proteins from the glutathione Sepharose. Proteins were quantified by modified Bradford method and SDS-PAGE analysis.
Inositol Phosphate Kinase AssayAll unlabeled IPs were purchased from Cell Signals, Inc., and [3H]I(1,3,4,5)P4 was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. [32P]I(1,3,4,5)P4 was synthesized in buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 µM I(1,4,5)P3, trace amounts of [32P]ATP, and 7.5 µg of dmIP3K. [3H]I(1,3,4,5,6)P5 standard was synthesized by incubating [3H]I(1,3,4,5)P4 with recombinant dmIpk2 and ATP as described (21). Kinase assay conditions were carried out essentially as described by Stevenson-Paulik et al. (20).
Kinetic AssaysThe Km and Vmax values of the enzymatic interaction between scIpk1 and I(1,3,4,5)P4 and various substrates were determined. The following reaction mixture was prepared: 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10 mM NaCl, 4 mM ATP, 20 mM MgCl2, 10,000 cpm/µl [32P]I(1,3,4,5)P4, 500 ng of scIpk1, and various concentrations of unlabeled I(1,3,4,5)P4 in a 20-µl reaction volume. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 4 µl of 1 M KH2PO4. The amount of product formed was quantified by thin layer chromatography. The Km and Vmax values were obtained from a nonlinear curve fit to the Michaelis-Menten equation using GraphPad Prism version 4.01.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
I(1,4,5,6)P4
I(1,3,4,5,6)P5 via 6- and 3-kinase activities. Recombinant yeast Ipk2 has been shown biochemically, but not in vivo, to possess a less efficient I(1,4,5)P3 3-kinase activity. Of interest, both kinase-dependent and independent roles have been described for Ipk2 in regulating biological functions (58, 18, 20, 30, 31). To further probe the kinase-dependent roles for Ipk2, we compared I(1,4,5)P3 6- versus 3-kinase activities for functional complementation. To accomplish this, we genetically added back I(1,4,5,6)P4 or I(1,3,4,5)P4 production by heterologously expressing Drosophila IPKs, either dmIpk2 or dmIP3K, in ipk2-deficient yeast. Both kinases have been shown to be members of a family of IP kinases bearing a signature PXXXDXKXG motif that includes the following: Ipk2 6-/3-/5-kinases; IP6 kinases, which function as inositol pyrophosphate synthases and utilize IP5 and IP6 substrates; and IP3Ks, which were not found in budding yeast or plants, but were present in fly, mouse, and human genomes (4, 17). We recently reported the cloning and biochemical characterization of dmIP3K and dmIpk2 and showed they possess I(1,4,5)P3 3-kinase and I(1,4,5)P3 6-kinase activities, respectively (21). Functional analysis of ipk2-deficient cells that expressed either dmIpk2 or dmIP3K revealed that 6-kinase, but not 3-kinase activity could rescue growth on ornithine as a sole nitrogen source (Fig. 1A). This data, coupled with our previous analysis of the ipk23 mutant (5), indicated that production of I(1,4,5,6)P4, but not I(1,3,4,5)P4, was necessary for activation of the ArgR-Mcm1 transcriptional complex. When we analyzed the transgenic strains for growth at high temperatures, we found that either 6- or 3-kinase activity was able to complement the temperature-sensitive phenotype of ipk2 null yeast (Fig. 1B). To rule out that complementation analysis may be related to downstream metabolites, such as those required for mRNA export pathways as described for Ipk1 (8), we tested the expression in ipk2 ipk1 double mutant cells. Rescue of growth on ornithine as the sole nitrogen source or temperature sensitivity by dmIpk2 did not require the presence of Ipk1; however, the rescue of temperature sensitivity by dmIP3K did require Ipk1 (Fig. 1, A and B). Additionally, to determine if 6- or 3-kinase complementation of temperature sensitivity required pyrophosphate synthesis, we analyzed ipk2 kcs1 double mutants. We report that dmIpk2 and IP3K were able to partially (not fully) rescue under these conditions (Fig. 1B). Our data indicate that I(1,2,3,4,5)P5 production and a downstream PP-IP were required for sustaining temperature-sensitive complementation. Of interest, the ipk1-dependent temperature-sensitive phenotype may be of use for forward genetic strategies aimed at identification of regulators and receptors of Ipk1 pathways. Of note, we have previously published that ipk1 mutation is not temperature-sensitive by plating assays (only after 20 generations; see York et al. (8)).
Discovery of a Novel IP Metabolic Pathway Initiated by I(1,4,5)P3 3-Kinase ActivityWe next analyzed the effect of heterologous expression of dmIpk2 and dmIP3K on IP metabolism in ipk2 null yeast. We previously reported that dmIpk2 expression was able to fully complement Ipk2 enzyme function in cells by converting I(1,4,5)P3 to I(1,3,4,5,6)P5 (21). Remarkably, analysis of ipk2-deficient cells expressing dmIP3K revealed the synthesis of several new IP metabolites, including novel IP3, IP4, IP5, and PP-IP species (Fig. 2).
To determine the genes required for synthesis of the new species downstream of I(1,3,4,5)P4, we examined the role of inositol pyrophosphate synthase and 2-kinase activities. Kcs1 has been shown to synthesize PP-IP4
and PP-IP5
from I(1,3,4,5,6)P5 and IP6 precursors (14, 19). Of note, we have implemented a symbol-based nomenclature (
,
, and
) to enable the distinction of the growing list of PP-IP isomers and species. As we describe below, the basis for assigning distinct isomers was that they had unique HPLC elution profiles and unique genetic routes of synthesis. At this time we do not have chemical structures that enable definition of the ring positions harboring pyrophosphates. Loss of Kcs1 in ipk2
cells expressing dmIP3K resulted in the obvious elimination of the most polar PP-IP species detected, PP2-IP3
(Fig. 2). We used the "
" designation due to its distinct elution profile from PP2-IP3
(which is synthesized downstream of I(1,3,4,5,6)P5
PP-IP4
) and the fact that it is synthesized through I(1,3,4,5)P4
I(1,2,3,4,5)P5
PP-IP4
(also see below). These data indicate the existence of a second pyrophosphate synthase gene product, designated here as Ips1, required for the synthesis of PP-IP4
. It is unclear at this point whether or not Ips1 is similar or identical to the activity identified previously as Ids1, which is required for the synthesis of PP-IP5
(10). We next tested whether yeast Ipk1 was required for the pathway. When dmIP3K was expressed in ipk2
ipk1
cells, there was a loss of IP5 and all PP-IPs, along with the accumulation of unique IP3 and IP4 species (Fig. 2). We therefore conclude that phosphorylation of I(1,4,5)P3 on the D-3 position initiates a novel IP synthesis pathway that requires Ipk1, a novel inositol pyrophosphate synthase, and Kcs1.
Does this novel pathway exist in wild-type or ipk2 mutant cells? Earlier work by our laboratory and the Shears laboratory indicated that IPs with similar HPLC elution profiles to those we observed in Fig. 2 exist at low levels in ipk2-deficient and wild-type cells (8, 18). We therefore re-examined several combinations of kinase mutants using a high resolution and high sensitivity radiolabeling system (Fig. 3). Using this method, examination of ipk2 null cells revealed a similar pattern of IPs to those observed in the dmIP3K-expressing cells (compare Fig. 3, top and second traces). Of note, this method also exposed that the number of unique IP and PP-IP species in ipk2-deficient cells expressing dmIP3K was substantially greater than we previously thought (compare Fig. 3, top trace to Fig. 2, second trace). The presence of these IPs in ipk2-deficient cells led us to speculate that another yeast gene product harbors I(1,4,5)P3 3-kinase activity. We therefore analyzed ipk2 ipk1 and ipk2 kcs1 double mutant cells (Fig. 3, bottom two traces). Similar to results shown above, loss of Ipk1 in ipk2 null cells resulted in the disappearance of IP5 and PP-IP species, and a corresponding accumulation of IP3 and IP4. Loss of Kcs1 in ipk2 null cells ablated the synthesis of nearly all IP and PP-IPs detectable using this high sensitivity method. This indicates that Kcs1 may regulate or act as a I(1,4,5)P3 3-kinase and that Ipk1 functions in the conversion of IP4 to the higher IPs of this pathway. High sensitivity labeling of wild-type cells indicated similar species were present (data not shown) consistent with results of others (18).
|
|
ipk1
cells did not restore I(1,2,3,4,5)P5, PP-IP4
, or PP2-IP3
synthesis (data not shown). Conversely, Arabidopsis thaliana Ipk1 was able to phosphorylate I(1,3,4,5)P4.2 This suggests that the ability of the 2-kinase to use I(1,3,4,5)P4 as a substrate was species-specific in eukaryotes.
|
|
cells expressing dmIP3K. DIPP specifically removes the
-phosphate from PP-IPs and has no reported activity against the IP monophosphates (34). Recombinant human DIPP completely dephosphorylated the two major species that eluted at 20 and 30 min with a concomitant increase in the levels of I(1,2,3,4,5)P5 (Fig. 5, third trace). The observed increase in IP4 levels in DIPP-treated extracts confirmed that PP-IP3
and PP2-IP2
were present as shown in Fig. 3 (top trace) (note that under low resolution HPLC this species co-eluted with IP5). We did not observe evidence of IP6 after treatment. Additionally, we simultaneously treated extracts with both DIPP and 5-phosphatase. We observed a disappearance of PP-IP4
and PP2-IP3
, the reduction of a major peak of I(1,2,3,4,5)P5, and the formation of I(1,3,4)P3 and I(1,2,3,4)P4 (Fig. 5, bottom trace). We conclude that the major IP5 released by DIPP treatment was I(1,2,3,4,5)P5 based on: 1) this IP5 species co-eluted exactly with authentic I(1,2,3,4,5)P5; 2) it was fully susceptible to 5-phosphatase treatment generating a product that coeluted with the I(1,2,3,4)P4 standard; and 3) that its synthesis in cells required Ipk1. Furthermore, recombinant type I 5-phosphatase was unable to hydrolyze any additional IP5 species tested, and we are not aware of any literature demonstrating that 5-phosphatases have ring-position promiscuity (i.e. 4- or 3-phosphatase activities). Collectively, these data corroborated our genetic evidence that PP-IP4
and PP2-IP3
arose through sequential phosphorylation of I(1,2,3,4,5)P5, via the action of two pyrophosphate synthase steps, likely through Ips1 or Ids1 and then Kcs1. Additionally they suggested that I(1,3,4,5)P4 was the likely precursor for PP-IP3
and PP2-IP2
. A second IP5 (IP5x) species was identified through this experiment, based on the observation of an IP5 species that was not susceptible to 5-phosphatase treatment (compare Fig. 5, second and bottom traces).
Pulse-chase Analysis of the IP3K-dependent Synthesis PathwayTo further examine the order of cellular IP synthesis we used pulse-chase analysis of ipk2 null cells expressing dmIP3K. Overnight cultures were grown to late logarithmic phase, pulse labeled with medium labeled with [3H]inositol for 10 min, washed, and then chased with medium supplemented with excess cold inositol. Examination of IP profiles revealed that IP3 and IP4 pools accumulated first, and were followed by the synthesis of IP5, PP-IP4
, and PP2-IP3
(Fig. 6A). These data were consistent with the kinetics we observed for scIpk1 phosphorylation of I(1,3,4,5)P4. The relatively high Km that scIpk1 exhibits for I(1,3,4,5)P4 may help explain our observation that the substrate of the 2-kinase (I(1,3,4,5)P4) accumulated before a significant amount of I(1,2,3,4,5)P5 was synthesized.
Treatment of the pulse-labeled extracts with 5-phosphatase revealed that at early time points, I(1,4,5)P3 and I(1,3,4,5)P4 were the predominant species (Table I). At progressively later time points I(3,4,5)P3 (90 min or more) and I(2,3,4,5)P5 (after 240 min) became the predominant species, because the majority of IP3 and IP4 were no longer 5-phosphatase-susceptible. Presumably, I(3,4,5)P3 accumulates early from the high levels of I(1,3,4,5)P4, whereas I(2,3,4,5)P4 was not synthesized until later, because it was generated from I(1,2,3,4,5)P5. I(1,2,3,4,5)P5 was the only IP5 species detected at any of the tested time points, further supporting its role as the substrate for PP-IP4 and PP2-IP3 synthesis (Table I).
|
ipk1
cells expressing dmIP3K I(1,3,4,5)P4 was the only IP4 species detected at any of the tested time points. At later time points the IP3 species was not susceptible to 5-phosphatase hydrolysis, indicating it was I(3,4,5)P3. Based on these findings, together with the genetic and pulse labeling data presented above, we propose the primary synthesis pathway to be I(1,4,5)P3
I(1,3,4,5)P4
I(1,2,3,4,5)P5
PP-IP4
PP2-IP3
. Given the complexity of additional species, it also appears that there were several branches to the pathway, which may arise from phosphatase and promiscuity of IPK kinase activities.
Kcs1 Functions as an I(1,4,5)P3 3-Kinase in ipk2
Cells Two lines of evidence support that Kcs1 may function as an I(1,4,5,)P3 3-kinase: the work of Dubois and colleagues that reported that Kcs1 had an undetermined I(1,4,5)P3 kinase activity in vitro (13); and our observation that deletion of KCS1 ablated synthesis of higher IPs in an ipk2 null. Dubois and co-workers also reported that Kcs1 overexpression in ipk2
cells resulted in the production of several higher phosphorylated IPs, which resembled profiles we reported here for ipk2 null cells expressing dmIP3K. We directly compared the IP profiles generated by either expression of dmIP3K or Kcs1 in ipk2
cells. This analysis revealed that I(1,3,4,5)P4, I(2,3,4,5)P4, I(1,2,3,4,5)P5, and PP-IP4
were synthesized in both extracts; however, there were significant differences in the relative levels of the different PP-IP4 species (Fig. 7A, top and middle traces). When Kcs1 was expressed in ipk2
ipk1
cells, the synthesis of I(1,2,3,4,5)P5, PP-IP4
, and PP2-IP3
was abolished; however we observed the production of PP-IP3
and PP2-IP2
species (Fig. 7A, bottom trace). Treatment of extracts from ipk2
ipk1
cells overexpressing Kcs1 with 5-phosphatase and/or DIPP confirmed that I(1,3,4,5)P4 was a precursor to PP-IP synthesis demonstrating that Kcs1 functioned in cells as an I(1,4,5)P3 3-kinase (Fig. 7B). Of note, treatment with 5-phosphatase caused almost complete hydrolysis of IP3 to I(1,4)P2 indicating that it was I(1,4,5)P3 and not I(3,4,5)P3 (Fig. 7B).
|
cells, we did not observe the Kcs1-dependent synthesis pathway, indicating that the 3-kinase activity uses the same catalytic domain as the pyrophosphate synthase activity (data not shown).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our initial hypothesis for the heterologous expression of Drosophila IPKs in ipk2 mutant yeast was that such experiments would allow us to distinguish between 6- and 3-kinase activities. These experiments also provide a means to "add-back" I(1,4,5,6)P4 and I(1,3,4,5)P4 production in cells without complications due to protein components, because the Drosophila enzymes have less than 50 residues, out of over 350, in common with yeast Ipk2 (note: the concept of "add-back" was first proposed in the York laboratory by Drs. Audrey Odom and Jill Stevenson-Paulik while studying the A. thaliana Ipk2). Although dmIpk2, and inferred 6-kinase activity, was able to complement growth on ornithine as a sole nitrogen source and growth at high temperatures, dmIP3K I(1,4,5)P3 3-kinase activity was only able to complement temperature growth. Thus, this provided the first evidence that synthesis of I(1,3,4,5)P4 was unable to restore regulation of gene expression as judged by growth on ornithine. These data further support our initial evidence that I(1,4,5,6)P4 production plays a role in gene expression through studies of the ipk23 mutant, which appears to be a 6-kinase-selective enzyme in cells (5). This work also demonstrates that production of I(1,4,5,6)P4, but not I(1,3,4,5)P4, was able to bypass a kinase-independent function of Ipk2 in transcriptional control as proposed by Messenguy and colleagues (30). Subsequent work of this group (31), and work of the O'Shea and Wu laboratories (6, 7), further support our initial claim that the kinase activity of Ipk2 was and still is required for its role in gene expression and biological processes (for example, ArgR-Mcm1 transcription, chromatin remodeling, growth on arginine or ornithine as a sole nitrogen source, and growth at high temperatures).
Perhaps the most surprising aspect of this work arose from the metabolic analysis of ipk2-deficient cells expressing dmIP3K. In these cells, we expected to observe conversion of I(1,4,5)P3 and stoichiometric accumulation of I(1,3,4,5)P4. However as Figs. 2 and 3 illustrate, we instead found over 11 new species of IPs and PP-IPs that were downstream metabolites of I(1,3,4,5)P4 production. Of interest, when we expressed dmIP3K in wild-type yeast, we did not observe stimulation of this pathway, and the metabolic profiles of these cells were identical to wild-type, having a signature major peak of IP6 (not shown). These data indicate that when Ipk2 was present the 6-kinase pathway was the major route of metabolism for I(1,4,5)P3. Having said this, the 3-kinase pathway was present in wild-type and ipk2-deficient cells, albeit at low levels as compared with IP6 synthesis.
Our data help interpret the observations that we and others made previously that several other low abundance IPs are present in ipk2 null and wild-type cells (5, 8, 18). In contrast to the report of Saiardi et al. (18), we found that ipk2
cells do not generate I(1,3,4,5,6)P5, IP6, PP-IP5
, and PP2-IP4
. Rather, they synthesize I(1,2,3,4,5)P5, PP-IP3
, PP-IP4
, PP2IP2
, and PP2IP3
(see Fig. 3). Of note, when using a Partisphere SAX HPLC column, the PP2-IP2
species that is generated co-elutes with IP6, which may have led to its misidentification. We, therefore, confirmed our results through treatment of the ipk2 null IP extracts with DIPP and found that the PP2-IP2
peak was completely hydrolyzed (not shown). Additionally, DIPP treatment of the extracts did not result in the formation of IP6, providing evidence that the PP-IPs were only synthesized from IP4 and/or I(1,2,3,4,5)P5. We note that the data presented in this study do not reveal the chemical structures of the PP-IP species produced in the pathway, specifically which ring positions harbor the pyrophosphate. However, their unique elution profiles and their synthesis via different precursors provided evidence that they appear structurally distinct (Fig. 8).
|
Through our studies we have assigned novel activities and specificities to Kcs1 and Ipk1. We assign an I(1,4,5,)P3 3-kinase activity to Kcs1 that was functional in cells. This extends previous work of Dubois and co-workers (13) that ascribed an undetermined I(1,4,5)P3 kinase activity to Kcs1. The metabolic phenocopy of dmIP3K and Kcs1 expression in ipk2 null cells, and the loss of I(1,3,4,5)P4 production observed in an ipk2 kcs1 double mutant demonstrate this new activity is present in cells. It is not entirely surprising that Kcs1 can function as an I(1,4,5)P3 kinase given that it is evolutionarily related to two I(1,4,5)P3 kinases, Ipk2/IPMKs and IP3Ks (17, 35), thus it may have retained I(1,4,5)P3 kinase activity, in addition to acquiring pyrophosphate synthase activities. Also, we note in the context of wild-type cells, our data do not exclude a role for Ipk2 in initiating the 3-kinase pathway. We show for the first time that Ipk1 from yeast acts as a 2-kinase on I(1,3,4,5)P4. Analysis of the kinetic properties of this reaction indicated that this is not as efficient as those described for other Ipk1 substrates, but clearly under conditions of I(1,3,4,5)P4 accumulations in cells this activity is relevant. Thus, it is possible that cellular alterations in Ipk2, Ipk1, and/or Kcs1 activity or specificity would regulate flux to either the 6- or 3-kinase pathways.
The discovery of the 3-kinase pathway has also enabled the identification of new IP phosphatase and inositol pyrophosphate synthase activities. Recently, we reported the existence of Ids1, an inositol pyrophosphate synthase present in cells lacking Kcs1 and DIPP whose activity appeared to convert IP6 to PP-IP5
(10). Here we provide evidence of a inositol pyrophosphate synthase, designated Ips1, capable of phosphorylating I(1,2,3,4,5)P5 to generate PP-IP4
. At this point we have not determined if these are two distinct enzymes or a single gene product, nor have we determined which phosphate position serves as an acceptor for the synthesis of the pyrophosphate. Lastly, we find evidence for an IP 1-phosphatase activity, designated Inp1, that does not appear to be related to lithium-inhibited inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase INPP1 (36, 37). Our previous studies of ipk2 mutant cells showed evidence for this activity toward I(1,4,5)P3 substrates (5, 8), and here we find evidence that such an activity also utilizes I(1,3,4,5)P4 to generate I(3,4,5)P3. The molecular identity of Inp1 has yet to be established. However, we have ruled out that this activity was encoded by Inp5s and SAC1-like inositol phosphatases (5, 8, 32, 33, 38) based on genetic and biochemical analysis.4
The discovery of the 3-kinase pathway may have important ramifications for interpreting genetic evidence. The 6-kinase and IP6 synthesis pathway has been implicated in the regulation of cellular functions, including transcription, chromatin remodeling, RNA export, vacuole function, DNA metabolism, and telomere maintenance (10, 15, 17). Clearly, the 3-kinase pathway that remains in ipk2-deficient cells does not appear to compensate for loss of 6-kinase, thereby supporting the parsimonious explanation that the 6-kinase pathway is most relevant to these functions. However, up-regulation of the 3-kinase activity by expression of dmIP3K or Kcs1 indicated that some of the IP/PP-IPs generated by this pathway were able to dosage compensate for at least some, but not all, of the functions attributed to 6-kinase metabolites. It is intriguing to speculate that the alterations in Ipk2 specificity (i.e. 6- versus 3-kinase) and/or Kcs1/Ipk1/Ids1/Ips1 activity may provide the yeast cell with a complex repertoire of signaling molecules to enable adaptation to changes in cellular environment.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Duke University Medical Center, DUMC BOX 3813, Durham, NC 27710. Tel.: 919-681-6414; Fax: 919-668-0991; E-mail: yorkj{at}duke.edu.
1 The abbreviations used are: I(1,4,5)P3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate; I(1,3,4,5)P4, inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate; I(1,2,3,4,5)P5, inositol 1,2,3,4,5-pentakisphosphate; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; Vmax, maximal velocity attained with excess substrate; Km, substrate concentration permitting a half-maximal velocity; IP, inositol polyphosphate; PP-IP, diphosphoinositol polyphosphate; IP3, inositol trisphosphate; IP4, inositol tetrakisphosphate; IP5, inositol pentakisphosphate; IP6, inositol hexakisphosphate; Ipk2, inositol polyphosphate kinase 2; dmIP3K, Drosophila I(1,4,5)P3 3-kinase
isoform; DIPP, diphosphoryl inositol polyphosphate phosphohydrolase; IPK, inositol polyphosphate kinase; CM, complete minimal medium. ![]()
2 A. M. Seeds, J. Stevenson-Paulik, and J. D. York, unpublished results. ![]()
3 J. D. York and B. D. Spiegelberg, unpublished results. ![]()
4 B. Spiegelberg and J. York, unpublished results. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|