Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M408286200 on April 26, 2005

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 31, 28424-28429, August 5, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/31/28424    most recent
M408286200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nomura, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, V. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nomura, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, V. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Prostaglandin Signaling in the Renal Collecting Duct

RELEASE, REUPTAKE, AND OXIDATION IN THE SAME CELL*{boxs}

Teruhisa Nomura{ddagger}, Hee Yoon Chang{ddagger}, Run Lu{ddagger}, Joseph Hankin§, Robert C. Murphy§, and Victor L. Schuster{ddagger}||

From the Departments of {ddagger}Medicine and Physiology & Biophysics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461 and the §National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Division of Cell Biology, Denver, Colorado 80206

Received for publication, July 22, 2004 , and in revised form, April 25, 2005.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Prostaglandins mediate autacrine and paracrine signaling over short distances. We used the renal collecting duct as a model system to test the hypothesis that local control of prostaglandin signaling is achieved by expressing inactivation in the same cell as synthesis. Immunocytochemical studies demonstrated that renal collecting ducts in situ express the prostaglandin (PG) synthesis enzyme, cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), as well as both components of prostaglandin metabolic inactivation, i.e. the prostaglandin uptake carrier prostaglandin transporter (PGT) and the enzyme 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase. We characterized this system further using the collecting duct cell line Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK), which retains COX-2 and prostaglandin dehydrogenase expression but which has lost PGT expression. When we reintroduced PGT, it was correctly sorted to the apical membrane where it altered the sidedness of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) release, a process we call "vectorial release via sided reuptake." Importantly, although COX-2 and prostaglandin dehydrogenase are expressed in the same MDCK cell, they must be compartmentalized because even in the presence of excess dehydrogenase newly synthesized PGE2 is released largely un-oxidized. However, when PGE2 undergoes first release and then PGT-mediated reuptake, significant oxidation takes place, suggesting that PGT imports PGE2 into the prostaglandin dehydrogenase compartment. Our data are consistent with a new model that offers significant new mechanisms for the fine control of eicosanoid signaling.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Prostaglandins (PGs)1 represent an extreme example of context-dependent autacrine or paracrine signaling. A single type of prostaglandin, PGE2, can activate any of four receptor subtypes (EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4) so as to mediate changes in physiological function as diverse as gastric acid secretion, body temperature, intraocular pressure, blood pressure, and airway reactivity (1–3).

Even within a single organ, such as the kidney, PGE2 has diverse effects including afferent arteriolar vasodilatation, reduction of NaCl resorption by the thick ascending limb of Henle, vasodilatation of medullary vasa rectae, and inhibition of osmotic water flow in the cortical collecting duct (2). On a smaller scale, the renal collecting expresses luminal EP4 receptors, activation of which increases Na+ reabsorption and increases water reabsorption, and basolateral EP1 receptors, activation of which signals the opposite effects (4, 5). Clearly, to achieve the requisite fidelity in PGE2 signaling, rapid inactivation must occur.

PG inactivation involves active uptake into the cell followed by cytoplasmic oxidation (6). Our laboratory identified the prostaglandin transporter PGT (Slc21a2; oatp2A1) (7), which is the lead candidate for the uptake step. Targeted deletion of mouse PGT results in death at post-natal day 1, most likely the result of an inability to inactivate circulating PGE2.2 The enzyme 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (PGDH) has been extensively characterized by others (8). Indeed, we recently reconstituted the two-step model of PG metabolism by co-expressing PGT and PGDH in cells otherwise lacking these elements; in this system, exogenously added PGE2 was efficiently taken up and oxidized to the inactive metabolite (9).

The need for prostanoid inactivation over very short distances raises the possibility that PG synthesis and the PG inactivation coexist in close proximity. In accord with this hypothesis, in the present study we identified the components of both PGE2 synthesis and PGE2 inactivation in the collecting duct and went on to examine whether PG synthesis and inactivation can occur within the same collecting duct cell.


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Immunocytochemistry of Endogenous PGDH and PGT in Rat Kidney—Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighting 180–250 g were anesthetized with Nembutal. Immediately after exteriorization kidney tissue was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h and then washed with 1x phosphate-buffered saline. Sections 5 µm thick were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated through graded ethanols to water, and equilibrated in phosphate-buffered saline. Sections were pretreated for 20 min by steaming in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 0.3% H2O2 for 30 min; 5% bovine serum albumin and 2% normal goat serum were used to block nonspecific antibody binding.

For PGT, sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with mouse monoclonal antibody #20 as straight hybridoma supernatatant (10). For PGDH and cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with a rabbit antiserum to PGDH (catalog number 160615, 1:100) or with rabbit anti-mouse COX-1 (catalog number 160109, 1:500), respectively (Cayman Chemical). In all cases, negative controls consisted of omission of the primary antibody. Sections were then incubated with either biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG or goat anti-rabbit IgG, respectively (Vector Laboratories, 1:500), for 1 h at room temperature, and antibody sites were visualized by incubating in avidin-biotin peroxidase complex solution (ABC complex, Vectastain, Vector Laboratories) and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Dako Corp., Caepinteria, CA). Counter-staining was done with hematoxylin (Harris Hematoxylin, Poly Scientific, Bay Shore, NY). Survey and photomicroscopy were performed using a Zeiss Axiophot microscope at a magnification of x630.

Release of PGE2 and PGE2 Metabolite from MDCK Monolayers—For immunoassays, the levels of PGE2 and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 in collected solutions were determined using the prostaglandin E2 and Bicyclo prostaglandin E2 enzyme immunoassay kits according to the manufacturer's protocol (Cayman Chemical). All release values were calculated as fmol per mg of protein per 10 min from duplicate monolayers.

Agonist-induced PGE2 release experiments were performed by rapid washing with Waymouth solution followed by addition of 1 µM bradykinin or 1 unit/ml thrombin in 1 ml of Waymouth solution added to the apical side and 2 ml added to the basolateral side. After 10 min at 37 °C, the release was terminated by collecting the incubation solutions, after which the monolayers were lysed with 0.5% SDS, 0.1 N NaOH for protein assay.

Cloning and Characterization of Human PGDH cDNA and Transient Overexpression in MDCK Cells—The sequence of human NAD+-dependent PGDH (8) was used to search the NCBI data base. A human pancreas adenocarcinoma expressed sequence tag clone in the vector pOTB7 was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) (ATCC no. 5793242). The cDNA insert was sequenced in both directions and subjected to restriction mapping, followed by sequence analysis using MacVector and Geneworks software programs. The cDNA contained the entire coding region (798 bp) of the human PGDH. The total size of the cDNA was 2.6 kb. The sequence of the 266-amino acid open reading frame was the same as that reported by Ensor except for one nucleotide change at codon 52, CAG, which did not result in an alteration of the deduced amino acid sequence (11). The full-length human PGDH cDNA in the vector pOTB7 was subcloned into the vector pCR3.1 (Invitrogen) at BamHI and XhoI sites and was used for the transient transfection of MDCK Tet-Off cells.

Transient Expression of PGDH in MDCK Tet-Off Cell Monolayers Grown on Filters—MDCK Tet-Off cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% tetracycline-free fetal bovine serum, 50 units/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, 1 µg/ml puromycin, and 1 µg/ml doxycycline. The cells were seeded on Nunc tissue culture inserts at 4.0 x 105 cells/insert without doxycycline (Clontech). The day after splitting, when the cells were ~40% confluent, they were transiently transfected with rPGT cloned in pcDNA3, pcDNA3 vector alone, full-length human PG15DH cloned in pCR3.1, or both plasmid DNA as described previously (9). Three days after transfection, intact monolayers had formed and were assayed for the agonist-induced PGE2 release from the co-transfected cells.

Northern Blot and Reverse Transcription-PCR Analysis of Endogenous PGDH Expression in MDCK Cells—The 3'-untranslated region of the human PGDH cDNA was removed at the EcoRI site close to the 3'-end within the open reading frame, and the remaining cDNA was subcloned into pCR3.1 at EcoRI sites of both ends. The direction of the cDNA was deteremined by DNA sequencing. This construct, in turn, was linearized with XhoI to form a template, and antisense digoxigenin-labeled cRNA probe was generated with T7 RNA polymerase (Genius 4 kit, Roche Applied Science).

Tet-Off PGT-green fluorescent protein MDCK clone 5, or control MDCK Tet-Off cells (Clontech), were seeded on Nunc tissue culture inserts at 4.0 x 105 cells/insert with or without doxycycline. Five days later, total RNA was prepared by guanidinium acid phenol extraction (12). RNA was separated by glyoxal agarose gel electrophoresis, transferred to a Nytran N membrane (Schleicher & Schuell), and hybridized overnight at 62 °C in 5 x SSC, 50% formamide, 2% blocking reagent, 0.1% N-lauroyl sarcosine, 0.02% SDS, 0.01 M EDTA with 100 ng/ml of the digoxigenin labeled RNA probe. Membranes were washed twice in 1 x SSC, 0.1% SDS; twice in 0.5 x SSC, 0.1% SDS; and twice in 0.1 x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 62 °C. Detection was performed using horseradish peroxidase-coupled anti-digoxigenin antibody (Fab fragments, Roche Applied Science). Signals were visualized by chemiluminescence autoradiography (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). The extent of loading of lanes was established by methylene blue staining.

RNA extracted from MDCK cells was reverse-transcribed and subjected to reverse transcription-PCR using primers based on the cDNA sequence of human PGDH (forward primer, 5'-TGACCAGCAACAACTGAGAGACAC-3'; reverse primer, 5'-AATGATGCCGCCTTCACCTC-3'). The initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min was followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s, annealing at 60 °C for 45 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min. A final extension at 72 °C was performed for 10 min. The PCR product, which migrated at ~200 bp, was subcloned into the TA cloning vector pCR 2.1 (Invitrogen) and was sequenced from the both end.



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.
Co-localization of COX-1, PGT, and PGDH in rat collecting duct epithelia. A, immunolocalization of COX-1 in rat kidney cortical collecting ducts using a mouse monoclonal antibody. Arrows indicate localization at the nuclear envelope (21). B, immunolocalization of endogenous PGT in rat kidney cortical collecting ducts using a mouse monoclonal antibody. Arrows indicate localization at or near the apical plasma membrane (10). C, immunolocalization of endogenous PGDH in rat kidney cortex. Arrows indicate localization in collecting ducts.

 
Statistical Analysis—Comparisons were analyzed by paired t test, Wilcoxon ranked test, or one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison test.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cyclooxygenase, the prostaglandin transporter PGT, and the enzyme PGDH are co-expressed in renal collecting ducts

To test the hypothesis that PG synthesis and PG metabolic clearance may occur in the same cell, we examined renal cortical collecting ducts, a site of COX expression and PGE2 synthesis (13–20). Fig. 1 shows the immunocytochemical localization of COX-1 (Fig. 1A), PGT (Fig. 1B) and PGDH (Fig. 1C), all in the rat cortical collecting duct. COX-1 was expressed in a perinuclear pattern consistent with its known localization to the nuclear envelope (21). PGT was expressed at the apical membrane as reported previously by our laboratory (10). PGDH was expressed throughout the cytoplasm of cortical collecting duct cells. There was also weaker, punctate labeling for PGDH in proximal tubules.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.
Effect of PGT expression on release of PGE2 by filter-grown MDCK monolayers in response to bradykinin stimulation for 10 min (n = 10 monolayers for each group). A, total release of PGE2 (apical + basal compartments). Cell lines and doxycycline (dox) exposure are the same as described in the legend to Fig. 3. Doxycycline produced no significant change in total PGE2 release from the monolayers. Not significant (NS) by paired t test. B, PGE2 released into the apical compartment as a fraction of the total PGE2 release. Expression of apical wild type PGT ("rPGT minus dox") significantly reduces the fraction of total PGE2 that is released apically. Significance was determined by paired t test.

 
MDCK Cells Are an in Vitro Model System for the Collecting Duct—To study the functional ramifications of the above findings, we used MDCK cells grown on permeable supports. Although of collecting duct origin (22, 23), MDCK cells have lost expression of PGT.3 To reconstitute the endogenous system, we established stable MDCK cell lines in which green fluorescent protein-tagged rat PGT, or a non-functional mutant (R560N) (24), is expressed under the control of a tetracycline-responsive promoter. As with transient PGT expression (25), these cell Tet-controllable cell lines express PGT at the apical membrane, where it mediates the active uptake of PGE2 from the apical medium. In addition, they synthesize PGE2 from COX-2 (see supplemental data).

Net PGE2 Release in Filter-grown MDCK Cells Is Modulated by PGT-mediated Reuptake—To examine whether apical PGT carries out reuptake of endogenous prostaglandins released into the medium, we stimulated the cells with bradykinin (1 µM, 10 min) or thrombin (1 unit/ml, 10 min) (26) and determined net PGE2 release.

Fig. 2A shows that, although the various MDCK clones expressing wild type rat PGT, inactive R560N PGT, or empty Tet-Off vector were each associated with different overall levels of PGE2 release upon bradykinin stimulation, there was no effect of PGT expression (i.e. ±doxycycline) on the total amount of PGE2 released. Similar results were obtained with 1 unit/ml thrombin (data not shown).

Despite the fact that overall PGE2 release was not affected by PGT expression, the sidedness of PGE2 release was altered. Net release of PGE2 into the apical compartment of the filter apparatus, as a fraction of the total PGE2 release, was significantly reduced when PGT expression was induced at the apical plasma membrane by doxycycline withdrawal. This resulted in a significant reduction in the apical-to-basal release ratio (Fig. 2B). Induction of PGT reduced the average apical PGE2 release from 1714 to 573 fmol/mg of protein/10 min and increased the average basolateral PGE2 release from 691 to 1307 fmol/mg of protein/10 min. The most likely explanation for these results is that PGT scavenges PGE2 from the apical solution and brings it back into the cell, whereupon it has another chance to exit by diffusion across the basolateral membrane. PGT expression did not change COX expression, a possible alternative explanation (data not shown).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.
Evidence for PGDH expression in MDCK cells. n = 10 monolayers for each group. A, release of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 by MDCK clones after stimulation with bradykinin. Expression of PGT ("minus dox") significantly induced the release of the metabolite. *, p < 0.05 with/without doxycycline. B, Northern blot analysis of endogenous PGDH mRNA expression in MDCK stable cell lines. Loading of the lanes is shown by total RNA (lower panel). The MDCK clone stably expressing rPGT expresses more PGDH mRNA than the control MDCK clone. Dox (or dox), doxycycline.

 
PGE2 Taken Back Up by PGT Is at Least Partially Oxidized to the 15-Keto Metabolite by Endogenous PGDH—Given that renal collecting ducts in vivo express PGDH (Fig. 1C), we considered the possibility that PGE2 taken back up by MDCK cells might undergo partial intracellular oxidation. Fig. 3A shows the appearance in the medium of the PGE2 metabolite 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 as assayed by enzyme immunoassay. Induction of PGT expression by doxycycline removal resulted in a roughly 4-fold increase in the appearance of this PGE2 metabolite. The average PGT-induced fall in apical PGE2 was 1140 fmol/mg of protein/10 min, and the average total rise in 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 (apical + basolateral) after PGT induction was 296 fmol/mg of protein/10 min, indicating that about 23% of PGE2 taken up by PGT was oxidized.

Further quantitative considerations raised the possibility that metabolites other than 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 might be formed: induction of PGT expression reduced the apical [PGE2 + PGE2 metabolite] from 1756 ± 774 to 649 ± 185 fmol/mg of protein/10 min (mean decrease = 1107) but only increased the basolateral [PGE2 + PGE2 metabolite] from 760 ± 513 to 1638 ± 837 fmol/mg of protein/10 min (mean increase = 878). However, when we incubated the cells in a mixture of PGE2, d4-PGE2, and [3H]PGE2 and analyzed the products formed in response to PGT expression using high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, the results showed that only 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 is formed following PGE2 reuptake (see supplemental data).

PG Synthesis and PG Reuptake and Metabolism Are Compartmentalized in MDCK Cells—The presence of enzymatically active PGDH in a cell that is also engaged in PGE2 synthesis raises the question of whether newly synthesized PGE2 is subject to oxidation before it is released.

To address this question further, we forced the system toward even more oxidation by overexpressing exogenous PGDH. In the presence of excess PGDH, PGT continued to significantly shift the direction of PGE2 release away from the apical and toward the basal side, as was the case without exogenous PGDH, and the combination of PGT and PGDH resulted in an ~4-fold increase in the appearance of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 into the medium (see supplemental data).

A critical element of these experiments is shown in Fig. 4. Bradykinin did not generate significant PGE2 metabolite above base line unless PGT was also present, even in the presence of excess PGDH. These data argue against significant access of newly synthesized PGE2 to PGDH. Rather, they suggest that access of PGE2 to PGDH requires first the release of PGE2 into the medium, followed by PGT-mediated reuptake into the cell.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
This study addresses the question of whether PG synthesis and PG inactivation co-exist within the same cell. Rat kidney collecting ducts were shown to strongly express COX plus the two components of PG inactivation, namely the PG uptake carrier PGT and the enzyme PGDH. Using the collecting duct cell line MDCK as an in vitro model system, we found that agonist-stimulated PG synthesis and release were followed by PGT-mediated PG reuptake and PGDH-mediated oxidation. The reuptake of released PGE2 by apical PGT shifted the polarity of net PGE2 release by the epithelium, an apparently novel mechanism of directing signaling molecules that we have called "vectorial release via sided reuptake." Data derived from overexpression of PGDH also lead to the new hypothesis that the COX synthetic pathway must be compartmentalized relative to the PG reuptake/oxidation pathway.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4.
Release of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 into the (combined) apical and basal compartments. Expression of PGDH alone did not cause bradykinin to induce release of significant PGE2 metabolite. However, the combination of PGT and PGDH resulted in the significant release of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 into the medium. p < 0.05 compared with all others by analysis of variance and by Bonferroni's multiple comparison test.

 



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5.
Model comparing neurotransmission with proposed eicosanoid signaling. In neurotransmission, an action potential triggers the release of neurotransmitter that has been compartmentalized in vesicles. Neurotransmitter undergoes reuptake by a carrier, followed by cytoplasmic oxidation or reuptake into vesicles. In prostaglandin signaling, an agonist induces triggered release via activation of cytoplasmic phopholipase A2 (cPLA2), causing delivery of archidonate to cyclooxygenase (Cox). We propose that prostaglandin signaling also involves PG reuptake via PGT which, as in neurotransmission, is followed by cytoplasmic oxidation. The dotted vertical line implies compartmentation between the PG synthesis/release pathway on the one hand and the PG reuptake/oxidation pathway on the other. The nature of the compartmentalization remains to be determined.

 
MDCK cells are a good model system for the collecting duct in that they share many common features (22, 23, 27–31). However, whereas collecting ducts express PGT in subapical vesicles or at the apical plasma membrane (10, 32), MDCK cells have lost this expression. Similarly, PGT expression is lost from endothelial cells when cultured, but expression is regained when shear stress is applied (32–35). In MDCK cells, when PGT was reintroduced it was correctly sorted to the apical plasma membrane (see supplemental data) (25).

Different PGE2 receptors that mediate opposite physiological effects are often expressed on a single cell type. For example, cultured osteoblasts express both EP1 and EP4 receptors, which signal opposite effects on DNA synthesis and alkaline phosphatase activity (36). Similarly, the renal collecting duct expresses apical EP4 receptors and basolateral EP1 receptors that signal opposite effects on Na+ and water transport (4, 5). Since PGE2 likely exits collecting duct cells non-directionally by simple diffusion (37, 38), one method for directing PGE2 toward basolateral (EP1) receptors would be to use an apical reuptake carrier like PGT. The reclaimed PGE2 could either be oxidized or could rediffuse intact out of the cell across the basolateral membrane. In our studies, about 75% of the PGE2 taken back up apically by PGT in MDCK cells appeared as native PGE2 in the basolateral solution. Since PGT is also expressed at the luminal membrane of endothelial cells (32, 33), and endothelial cells preferentially release prostanoids toward the basolateral (abluminal) side (39), sided PG reuptake may be a general system of directing eicosanoids toward one or another receptor population.

A major finding of the present studies is that, even when PGDH is overexpressed, newly synthesized PGE2 does not appear to have significant access to the enzyme unless the PGE2 is first released and then taken up again by PGT. Taken with the other data presented here, the most likely explanation for these results is that the process of PGE2 synthesis/release is compartmentalized away from the process of PGE2 reuptake and oxidation. A release-reuptake model for PG signaling bears a resemblance to synaptic signaling (Fig. 5) in which secreted neurotransmitter is taken up by the cell that released it and then oxidized (e.g. serotonin (40, 41), {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (42), and glutamate (43)).

The concept of PG compartmentalization within the cell is interesting in light of recent data on PG synthases. Although originally thought to occur exclusively in the cytoplasm (44, 45), recent evidence suggests that PGE2 synthase consists of at least two distinct isoenzymes that are expressed in distinct locations within the cell and are coupled to different pools of arachidonic acid (46–48). The mechanisms of this coupling, as well as of the compartmentation described in the present study, are unknown.

The control of net PG release now appears to be more complex than previously appreciated. In addition to control steps at the level of phospholipase, COX, and the PG synthases, PG reuptake is also controlled. Unpublished work from our laboratory indicates that PGT and COX-2 expression in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts is coordinately regulated by serum.4 Similarly, a recent report showed that PGT and COX-2 are coordinately regulated during the estrus cycle in the bovine corpus luteum (49). We propose that carrier-mediated PG reuptake represents a level of control that is complementary to the regulation of COX-2.

In summary, we have presented data in support of a new model of eicosanoid signaling in which PG synthesis and PG inactivation occur in the same cell and are segregated from each other.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01DK049688 and P50DK064236 (to V. L. S.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{boxs} The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental "Methods," Tables 1 and 2, and supplemental Figs. 1–3. Back

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Belfer Bldg., Rm. 1008, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461. Tel.: 718-430-8560; Fax: 718-430-8649; E-mail: schuster{at}aecom.yu.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: PG, prostaglandin; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; PGT, prostaglandin transporter; PGDH, prostaglandin dehydrogenase; MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney; COX, cyclooxygenase. Back

2 H. Y. Chang, M. L. Pucci, J. Locker, R. Lu, and V. L. Schuster, unpublished data. Back

3 T. Nomura, H. Y. Chang, R. Lu, and V. L. Schuster, unpublished observations. Back

4 R. Lu, M. L. Pucci, T. Nomura, and V. L. Schuster, unpublished data. Back


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank the AECOM Analytical Imaging Facility.



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Narumiya, S., Sugimoto, Y., and Ushikubi, F. (1999) Physiol. Rev. 79, 1193-1226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Breyer, M. D., and Breyer, R. M. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279, F12-F23
  3. Serhan, C. N., and Levy, B. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 8609-8611[Free Full Text]
  4. Sakairi, Y., Jacobson, H. R., Noland, T. D., and Breyer, M. D. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, F257-F265
  5. Ando, Y., and Asano, Y. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 268, F1093-F1101[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Schuster, V. L. (1998) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 60, 221-242[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Kanai, N., Lu, R., Satriano, J. A., Bao, Y., Wolkoff, A. W., and Schuster, V. L. (1995) Science 268, 866-869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ensor, C. M., and Tai, H. H. (1995) J. Lipid Mediat. 12, 313-319[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Nomura, T., Lu, R., Pucci, M. L., and Schuster, V. L. (2004) Mol. Pharmacol. 65, 973-978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Bao, Y., Pucci, M. L., Chan, B. S., Lu, R., Ito, S., and Schuster, V. L. (2002) Am. J. Physiol. 282, F1103-F1110
  11. Ensor, C. M., Yang, J. Y., Okita, R. T., and Tai, H. H. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 14888-14891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Smith, W. L., and Wilkin, G. P. (1977) Prostaglandins 13, 873-892[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Smith, W. L., and Bell, T. G. (1978) Am. J. Physiol. 235, F451-F457
  15. Khan, K. N., Venturini, C. M., Bunch, R. T., Brassard, J. A., Koki, A. T., Morris, D. L., Maziasz, T. J., and Alden, C. L. (1998) Toxicol. Pathol. 26, 612-620[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Schlondorff, D., Satriano, J. A., and Schwartz, G. J. (1985) Am. J. Physiol. 248, F134-F144[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Farman, N., Pradelles, P., and Bonvalet, J. P. (1987) Am. J. Physiol. 252, F53-F59
  18. Campean, V., Theilig, F., Paliege, A., Breyer, M., and Bachmann, S. (2003) Am. J. Physiol. 285, F19-F32
  19. Mikkelsen, H. B., Rumessen, I. T., and Thuneberg, L. (1990) Histochemistry 93, 363-367[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Komhoff, M., Grone, H. J., Klein, T., Seyberth, H. W., and Nusing, R. M. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, F460-F468
  21. Spencer, A. G., Woods, J. W., Arakawa, T., Singer, I. I., and Smith, W. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9886-9893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Valentich, J. D. (1981) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 372, 384-404[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Devuyst, O., Beauwens, R., Denef, J. F., Crabbe, J., and Abramow, M. (1994) Cell Tissue Res. 277, 231-237[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Chan, B. S., Bao, Y., Itoh, S., Lu, R., and Schuster, V. L. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 9215-9221[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Endo, S., Nomura, T., Chan, B. S., Lu, R., Pucci, M. L., Bao, Y., and Schuster, V. L. (2002) Am. J. Physiol. 282, F618-F622
  26. Cortizo, A. M., Besterman, J. M., Leitner, P. P., and Chandrabose, K. A. (1992) Prostaglandins 44, 357-371[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Pfaller, W., Gstraunthaler, G., Kersting, U., and Oberleithner, H. (1989) Renal Physiol. Biochem. 12, 328-337[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Oberleithner, H., Vogel, U., and Kersting, U. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 416, 526-532
  29. Rosenberg, S. O., Berkowitz, P. A., Li, L., and Schuster, V. L. (1991) Am. J. Physiol. 260, C868-C876
  30. Lynch, R. M., and Balaban, R. S. (1987) Am. J. Physiol. 253 22, C269-C276
  31. Gstraunthaler, G., Pfaller, W., and Kotanko, P. (1985) Am. J. Physiol. 248, F536-F544[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Adachi, H., Suzuki, T., Abe, M., Asano, N., Mizutamari, H., Tanemoto, M., Nishio, T., Onogawa, T., Toyohara, T., Kasai, S., Satoh, F., Suzuki, M., Tokui, T., Unno, M., Shimosegawa, T., Matsuno, S., Ito, S., and Abe, T. (2003) Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 285, F1188-F1197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Topper, J. N., Cai, J., Stavrakis, G., Anderson, K. R., Woolf, E. A., Sampson, B. A., Schoen, F. J., Falb, D., and Gimbrone, M. A., Jr. (1998) Circulation 98, 2396-2403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Topper, J. N., Cai, J., Qiu, Y., Anderson, K. R., Xu, Y. Y., Deeds, J. D., Feeley, R., Gimeno, C. J., Woolf, E. A., Tayber, O., Mays, G. G., Sampson, B. A., Schoen, F. J., Gimbrone, M. A., Jr., and Falb, D. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 9314-9319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. McCormick, S. M., Eskin, S. G., McIntire, L. V., Teng, C. L., Lu, C. M., Russell, C. G., and Chittur, K. K. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 8955-8960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Suda, M., Tanaka, K., Natsui, K., Usui, T., Tanaka, I., Fukushima, M., Shigeno, C., Konishi, J., Narumiya, S., Ichikawa, A., and Nakao, N. (1996) Endocrinology 137, 1698-1705[Abstract]
  37. Schuster, V. L. (2002) Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 68–69, 633-647
  38. Chan, B. S., Satriano, J. A., Pucci, M. L., and Schuster, V. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6689-6697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Moore, S. A., Spector, A. A., and Hart, M. N. (1988) Am. J. Physiol. 254, C37—C44
  40. Blakely, R. D., Berson, H. E., Fremeau, R. T., Jr., Caron, M. G., Peek, M. M., Prince, H. K., and Bradley, C. C. (1991) Nature 354, 66-70[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Hoffman, B. J., Mezey, E., and Brownstein, M. J. (1991) Science 254, 579-580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Borden, L. A. (1996) Neurochem. Int. 29, 335-356[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Wu, S. M. (1994) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 56, 141-168[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Morita, I., Schindler, M., Regier, M. K., Otto, J. C., Hori, T., DeWitt, D. L., and Smith, W. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10902-10908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Morita, I., Smith, W. L., DeWitt, D. L., and Schindler, M. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 7194-7199[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Ueno, N., Murakami, M., Tanioka, T., Fujimori, K., Tanabe, T., Urade, Y., and Kudo, I. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34918-34927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Murakami, M., Nakatani, Y., Tanioka, T., and Kudo, I. (2002) Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 68–69, 383-399
  48. Han, R., and Smith, T. J. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 36897-36903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Arosh, J. A., Banu, S. K., Chapdelaine, P., Madore, E., Sirois, J., and Fortier, M. A. (2004) Endocrinology 145, 2551-2560[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
Y. Chi, M. L. Pucci, and V. L. Schuster
Dietary salt induces transcription of the prostaglandin transporter gene in renal collecting ducts
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): F765 - F771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
B. Yao, J. Xu, R. C. Harris, and M.-Z. Zhang
Renal localization and regulation of 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): F433 - F439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
Y. Jin, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, B. Yang, and W.-H. Wang
PGE2 inhibits apical K channels in the CCD through activation of the MAPK pathway
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): F1299 - F1307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ReproductionHome page
K. Sayasith, N. Bouchard, M. Dore, and J. Sirois
Cloning of equine prostaglandin dehydrogenase and its gonadotropin-dependent regulation in theca and mural granulosa cells of equine preovulatory follicles during the ovulatory process
Reproduction, February 1, 2007; 133(2): 455 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ReproductionHome page
M. Parent, E. Madore, L. A MacLaren, and M. A Fortier
15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase in the bovine endometrium during the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy.
Reproduction, March 1, 2006; 131(3): 573 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
J. Kang, P. Chapdelaine, P.Y. Laberge, and M.A. Fortier
Functional characterization of prostaglandin transporter and terminal prostaglandin synthases during decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 592 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/31/28424    most recent
M408286200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nomura, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, V. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nomura, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, V. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement