Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M414360200 on June 27, 2005

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 34, 30083-30090, August 26, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/34/30083    most recent
M414360200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yusa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Harada, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yusa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Harada, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Isolation of TAK-779-resistant HIV-1 from an R5 HIV-1 GP120 V3 Loop Library*

Keisuke Yusa{ddagger}, Yosuke Maeda, Aki Fujioka, Kazuaki Monde, and Shinji Harada

From the Department of Medical Virology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 2-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan

Received for publication, December 21, 2004 , and in revised form, June 27, 2005.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein (GP) 120 interacts with CD4 and the CCR5 coreceptor for viral entry. The V3 loop in GP120 is a crucial region for determining coreceptor usage during viral entry, and a variety of amino acid substitutions has been observed in clinical isolates. To construct an HIV-1 V3 loop library, we chose 10 amino acid positions in the V3 loop and incorporated random combinations (27,648 possibilities) of the amino acid substitutions derived from 31 R5 viruses into the V3 loop of HIV-1JR-FL proviral DNA. The constructed HIV-1 library contained 6.6 x 106 independent clones containing a set of 0–10 amino acid substitutions in the V3 loop. To address whether restricted steric alteration in the V3 loop could confer resistance to an entry inhibitor, TAK-779, we selected entry inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 by increasing the concentration of TAK-779 from 0.10 to 0.30 µM in PM1-CCR5 cells with high expression of CCR5. The selected viruses at passage 8 contained five amino acid substitutions in the V3 loop without any other mutations in GP120 and showed 15-fold resistance compared with the parental virus. These results indicated that a certain structure of the V3 loop containing amino acid substitutions derived from 31 R5 viruses can contribute to the acquisition of resistance to entry inhibitors binding to CCR5. Taken together, this type of HIV-1 V3 loop library is useful for isolating and analyzing the specific biological features of HIV-1 with respect to alterations of the V3 loop structure.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Entry of R5 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)1 into target cells requires sequential interaction of the envelope glycoprotein GP120 with CD4 and the coreceptor CCR5 (1). The binding of GP120 to CD4 leads to exposure of the coreceptor-binding site, designated the third hypervariable loop (V3 loop), which is composed of ~35 amino acid residues (2, 3). Subsequently, the interaction of GP120 with the coreceptor induces the exposure of a fusion peptide of transmembrane glycoprotein GP41, and allows membrane fusion and entry of the viral core into the target cell (36). In the series of viral entry events, the GP120 V3 loop has been regarded as the major determinant of coreceptor usage (715). Single amino acid changes in the V3 loop can switch viral coreceptor usage (1619), although changes in this region alone are not always necessary or sufficient to confer a particular phenotype on the viruses (2024). In fact, an increase in the positive charge of the V3 loop is often associated with CXCR4 usage (7, 25). The presence of at least one basic substitution at V3 position 11 or 25 can change coreceptor usage (26, 27), and sequence changes in the GPG motif in the V3 loop can modulate coreceptor usage (17, 18). Variation in the residues flanking the GPG motif can alter the stability of the {beta}-sheet and/or alter the surface accessibility of this element, thereby influencing coreceptor usage (2830). If we can manipulate a mixed population of HIV-1 with diversity in the V3 loop in vitro, it would be a useful system for screening and analyzing the biological features of HIV-1 with regard to V3 variation. There has been a report regarding the construction of a heterogeneous retrovirus population in vitro (31), and we recently constructed an in vitro system that created an HIV-1 library containing mutations associated with protease inhibitor resistance (32). In the current report, we constructed an R5 HIV-1 V3 loop library containing diverse structures of the V3 loop. We chose 10 amino acid positions in the V3 loop (residues 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 312, 314, 317, 318, and 321; V3 loop starting from Cys293 to Cys327 within V3 of HIV-1JR-FL Env) (Fig. 1A), and we incorporated the amino acid substitutions in 31 R5 HIV-1 strains obtained from the Los Alamos HIV data base (//hiv-web.lanl.gov). Theoretically, the number of substitution combinations in a library carrying a set of random combinations of 0–10 substitutions is 27,648 possibilities.

A new class of antiretroviral drugs that prevent virus entry are being developed. TAK-779 inhibits HIV-1 replication by blocking the interaction of GP120 with CCR5 (34). This compound has been shown previously to inhibit cell-to-cell fusion and cell-free virus infectivity in vitro (34). The binding site for TAK-779 is located near the CCR5 extracellular surface, within a cavity between transmembrane helices (35). Recently, the viruses resistant to an entry inhibitor enfuvirtide (T20) were sensitive to TAK-779 (36). However, development of TAK-779 resistance remains to be elucidated. To address the contribution of the V3 loop to susceptibility to an entry inhibitor, we selected TAK-779-resistant variants from the HIV-1 library, and we isolated R5 entry inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 with mutations restricted to the V3 loop.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Culture and Molecular Clones—PM1 (37) and HeLa-CD4-LTR-{beta}-gal (MAGI) cells (38) were provided by the National Institutes of Health AIDS Research and Preference Reagent Program. PM1-CCR5 cells were generated by standard retrovirus-mediated transduction of PM1 cells with pBABE-CCR5 provided by the National Institutes of Health AIDS Research and Preference Reagent Program. PM1 and PM1-CCR5 cells were grown in RPMI 1640-based complete medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Vitromex, Bayern, Germany), 200 units/ml penicillin, and 200 units/ml streptomycin. The transduced cells were selected with complete medium plus 1 µg/ml of puromycin (Sigma), and a single clone was selected based upon the expression level of CCR5 assessed by flow cytometry analysis. Similarly, MAGI-CCR5 was isolated by standard retrovirus-mediated transduction of MAGI cells with pBABE-CCR5 (39). MAGI and MAGI-CCR5 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 200 units/ml penicillin, and 200 units/ml streptomycin.



View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
GP120 V3 loop sequences from 31 R5 HIV-1 described in the HIV data base. The top line shows the V3 loop amino acid residues in HIV-1JR-FL. The numbers shown beside the residues indicate the frequency of the substitutions in 31 R5 viruses. The 10 residues in boldface are the positions incorporated with amino acid substitutions.

 
The HIV-1 proviral expression vector pJR-FL was kindly provided by Dr. Y. Koyanagi (Kyoto University). pJR-FLan was created from pJR-FL by incorporation of AflII and NheI sites into env at nucleotides 6395 and 6564, respectively. There were no amino acid substitutions caused by incorporation of the AflII site (CTG AAA (Leu Lys) -> CTTAAG (Leu Lys)). Incorporation of the NheI site led to two amino acid substitutions (GTT ATA (Val Ile) -> GCT AGC (Ala Ser)). HIV-1JR-FLan was used as the parental virus.

Construction of an R5 HIV-1 V3 Loop Library—The strategy used to construct the HIV-1 library carrying a set of random amino acid substitutions is shown in Fig. 2A. The 2077-bp StuI-XhoI fragment from pJR-FLan was subcloned into pCR{Delta}Z digested with StuI and XhoI, resulting in pCR-SANX. pCR{Delta}Z was created from pCR-blunt (Invitrogen) by deleting a PmlI fragment containing a Zeocin cassette. Six oligonucleotides, V31, V32, V33, V34, V35, and V36, were commercially synthesized to generate three short DNA fragments with sticky ends. The respective pairs of complementary oligonucleotides at 0.35 µg/µl were denatured for 2 min at 90 °C in a heat block and then left in the switched-off heat block for 30 min in 10 mM MgCl2 and 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) at room temperature for annealing. The resultant short DNA fragments were designated V312 (48 bp), V334 (65 bp), and V356 (64 bp), respectively. V334 contained 10 degenerated codons (ARA for Lys or Arg; RGT for Ser or Gly; RTA for Ile or Val; HMY for His, Pro, Asn, Ser, Thr, or Tyr; MTR for Ile, Met, or Leu; TKK for Phe, Leu, Trp, or Cys; RCW for Thr or Ala; SMM for Glu, Asp, Gln, Ala, His, or Pro; RTA for Ile or Val; and RAT for Asp or Asn) (Fig. 2A). The single letter code used here is as follows: R represents A or G; H represents A, C, or T; M represents A or C; Y represents C or T; K represents G or T; W represents A or T; and S represents C or G. The three DNA fragments (0.25 µg each) were ligated by T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), and the resultant 185-bp DNA fragment was purified by 1.5% agarose electrophoresis. One hundred nanograms of the purified DNA fragment was used for PCR as the DNA template with Pfx DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). The upstream primer was VV-Af (5'-ACAGCTTAAGGAATCTGTAGAAATTAATTG-3'), and the downstream primer was VV-Nh (5'-ATTTGCTAGCTATCTGTTTTAAAGTGTCAT-3'). The amplification conditions for the first-round PCR were 94 °C for 1 min, 16 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 68 °C for 60 s and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR was performed using a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA). The PCR product (5.0 µg) was purified using the Concert Rapid PCR Clean-up System (Invitrogen), digested with AflII and NheI and then ligated into the AflII and NheI sites of pCR-SX{Delta}AN (10.0 µg). pCR-SX{Delta}AN was created from pCR-SANX by replacing the AflII-NheI fragment with a linker. The ligation mixture was purified by Microcon-30 (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) and used to transform Escherichia coli strain DH5{alpha} by electroporation with an ECM 600 (BTX, San Diego) at 2.5 kV, generating pCR-SX-V3Lib containing 7.1 x 106 independent clones with an AflII-NheI fragment. After purification of the pCR-SX-V3Lib DNA, the StuI-XhoI fragment from 15 µg of the plasmid was cloned into the StuI and XhoI sites of pJR-FL{Delta}SX. pJR-FL{Delta}SX was created from pJR-FL by replacing the StuI-XhoI fragment of pJR-FL with a linker. The ligation products (0.2 µg) were transformed into E. coli strain JM109 by electroporation as described above. Finally, the HIV-1 library, designated pJR-FL-V3Lib, contained 6.6 x 106 independent clones containing a 2077-bp (StuI-XhoI) env DNA fragment (ligation efficiency, 77%) (Table I).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
HIV-1 library (pJR-FL-V3Lib) containing combinations of 0-10 amino acid substitutions in the V3 loop

 
Analysis of Replication—All viral stocks, including the virus library, were prepared by transfecting 293T cells as described previously (32). Viral stocks for analysis of the replication of the virus library HIV-1V3Lib were generated by transient transfection of 293T cells with pJR-FL-V3Lib. Then 5 x 105 of PM1-CCR5 or MT-2 cells were infected with HIV-1JR-FLan or HIV-1V3Lib stocks containing 600 ng of p24 Gag antigen/ml. Viral replication was monitored by measuring the p24 Gag antigen concentration in the supernatants of the challenged cells. p24 Gag antigen was determined by p24 Gag antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system using RETRO-TEK (ZeptoMetrix, Co., Buffalo, NY).

Selection of TAK-779-resistant HIV-1V3LibPM1-CCR5 cells (1 x 106) were infected with HIV-1V3Lib (600 ng of p24 Gag antigen) at passage 1 and incubated for 3 days in the presence of 0.1 µM TAK-779. Virus passages were then performed at 3–4-day intervals using PM1-CCR5 cells (2 x 105) in the absence or presence of 0.10 µM TAK-779. The concentration of TAK-779 was increased from 0.10 to 0.30 µM at passage 3. The infectivity of the supernatant at each passage was evaluated using MAGI-CCR5 cells in the presence or absence of 0.1 µM TAK-779.

Determination of Susceptibilities—The susceptibilities of the viruses to entry inhibitors were determined by the MAGI assay using previously titrated virus preparations (80 blue foci/well). MAGI-CCR5 cells (1 x 104 cells/well) were plated into 48-well tissue culture plates 1 day prior to infection. After absorption of the virus for 2 h at 37 °C in the presence or absence of 0.001–1.0 µM TAK-779 or AMD3100, the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and then further incubated for 48 h in the presence or absence of 0.0010 nM to 3.0 µM TAK-779 or AMD3100 in fresh medium. The cells were stained, and the number of blue foci in each well was counted (37). All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Sequencing—The nucleotide sequences of the V3 loops in the virus library were determined as follows. The virus mixture was precipitated and subjected to reverse transcription-PCR using the ImProm-II transcription system (Promega, Madison, WT). A 380-bp fragment containing a V3 loop sequence was amplified by PCR in a 50-µl reaction volume comprising 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 2 mM MgCl2, 0.01% gelatin, and 2 units of AmpliTaq (Applied Biosystems Inc.) with primers VV1 (5'-AATGGCAGTCTAGCAGAAGAAG-3') and VV2 (5'-TTTCTGGGTCCCCTCCTGAGGA-3'). The PCR products were purified by 1% agarose electrophoresis and cloned into the pCR-TOPO vector (Invitrogen). The cloned sequences were sequenced using an ABI Prism 310 (Applied Biosystems Inc.).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Construction of the Proviral DNA for the HIV-1 V3 Loop Library—A variety of amino acid substitutions was observed in the V3 loop of 31 R5 HIV-1 derived from the Los Alamos HIV data base (Fig. 1). To construct a proviral DNA mixture containing a set of random substitution combinations derived from the envelope V3 loops of the R5 isolates, we chose 10 amino acid positions for substitutions (residues 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 312, 314, 317, 318 and 321; V3 loop starting from Cys293 to Cys327 in HIV-1JR-FL) (Fig. 2A). AflII-NheI DNA fragments containing a set of random combinations of these mutations were prepared with overlapping oligodeoxynucleotides comprising both DNA strands and were subsequently annealed and ligated to form the complete gene. In the AflII-NheI DNA fragments, the residues at positions 302, 303, 304, 314, 318, and 321 contained two possible amino acid residues, whereas the residues at positions 305, 306, 312, and 317 contained 6, 3, 4, and 6 possibilities, respectively (Fig. 2A). Amino acid substitutions (Phe to Cys at 312, Gln to His or Pro at 3317; Fig. 2A, underlined) that were not detected in the R5 isolates (Fig. 1) were inevitably incorporated into the library because of unintended combinations of nucleotide substitutions. Theoretically, the number of possible combinations of 0–10 amino acid substitutions was calculated to be 27,648 (Table I), and the lowest frequency combination of the substitutions was 0.00204%. We finally obtained a proviral DNA, designated pJR-FL-V3Lib, for the HIV-1 library that contained 6.6 x 106 independent clones. This size of the library contained all possible combinations of the recombinants. Incorporation of random combinations of the amino acid substitutions into the V3 loops was confirmed by the sequencing of randomly selected clones from the library DNA (Fig. 3A). There was no marked difference in the composition of the amino acid residues at the 10 positions in V3 between the library DNA and the virus library prepared for the following experiments (Fig. 3B).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Construction of the HIV-1 V3 loop library. A, oligonucleotides used to construct the library. The nucleotides in boldface indicate the positions incorporated with substitutions. The single letters in boldface indicate the degenerated nucleotides as follows: R represents A or G; H represents A, C, or T; M represents A or C; Y represents C or T; K represents G or T; W represents A or T; and S represents C or G. The underlined nucleotides indicate the V3 loop-encoding sequence. The residues in boldface indicate the substitutions that are randomly incorporated in the V3 loop of pJR-FL-V3Lib. The underlined residues indicate the substitutions that are not detected in the 31 R5 viruses but are inevitably incorporated into the library because of combinations of nucleotide substitutions. B, schematic procedures for the construction of pJR-FL-V3Lib.

 
Coreceptor Usage of the Virus Library—We tested the coreceptor usage of the virus library using a single-round assay (Fig. 4A). HIV-1JR-FLan, which was used as a background for the construction of the V3 loop library, showed similar infectivity to HIV-1JR-FL. The infectivity of the virus library HIV-1V3Lib into MAGI-CCR5 cells was 26% lower than that of parental HIV-1JR-FLan. This result suggested that most of the viral clones in the library were replication-competent. In fact, 16 of 21 (76%) viral clones randomly selected from the library were competent in PM1-CCR5 cells (data not shown). No blue-stained foci were detected in MAGI cells infected with HIV-1JR-FLan and HIV-1JR-FL, whereas the X4 virus HIV-1NL4–3 did generate blue foci. To examine whether the library contained viral clones that acquired the ability to use CXCR4 as a coreceptor by a combination of mutations restricted to the V3 loop, a large amount of p24 was used for infection of MAGI cells. No blue-stained cells were obtained with HIV-1V3Lib (Fig. 4A). To further confirm this result, MT-2 cells were infected with HIV-1V3Lib (Fig. 4B). p24 production from PM1-CCR5 cells infected with HIV-1JR-FLan was saturated on day 3 because of the intense cytopathic effect caused by the high efficiency of infection at time 0. p24 generation from HIV-1V3Lib-infected PM1-CCR5 cells reached a higher level than that of HIV-1JR-FLan-infected cells because of a slower cell death rate, although no increase in p24 was observed in the supernatant of MT-2 cells infected with the same amount of p24 of HIV-1V3Lib, even at day 7 post-infection. Similarly, there was no increase in the amount of p24 released from MT-2 cells infected with HIV-1JR-FLan. We repeated the same experiments, but we did not obtain any viral clones from the library that could use CXCR4 for entry. These results indicated that none of the combinations of the 0–10 substitutions (27,648 possibilities) in the V3 loop derived from R5 viruses could use CXCR4 as a coreceptor in an HIV-1JR-FLan background. The V3 loop of clinical isolates has a global positive charge that can vary from +2 to +10, and an increase in the positive charge of the V3 loop enabled the use of CXCR4 (7, 25). The virus library had V3 loops with a positive charge from +3to +7 and did not contain the X4 type.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
A, amino acid sequences of the V3 loops of viral clones in the virus library HIV-1V3Lib used for the selection of escape viruses. B, compositions of the amino acid residues at positions 305, 306, 308, 309, 315, 320, 321, and 324 in the V3 loop in the library DNA and the generated virus library used for selection.

 



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Coreceptor usage of the virus library HIV-1V3Lib. A, infectivities of HIV-1V3Lib and HIV-1JR-FL to MAGI and MAGI-CCR5 cells. The cells (1 x 106) were infected with HIV-1V3Lib or HIV-1JR-FLan (0.6 µg of p24 Gag) and stained at 48 h post-infection. B, PM1-CCR5 and MT-2 cells (1 x 105) were infected with HIV-1V3Lib or HIV-1JR-FLan (0.6 µg of p24 Gag), and virus replication was monitored by measuring the p24 antigen production. PM1 cells (1 x 105) were also infected with HIV-1V3Lib, HIV-1JR-FLan, or HIV-1NL4-3 (0.6 µg of p24 Gag), and virus replication was monitored.

 



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Selection of TAK-779 escape viruses from the HIV-1 V3 loop library. The virus library (Fig. 3) was infected into PM1-CCR5 cells. At 3–4 days post-infection in the presence or absence of TAK-779, the released viruses at passages 0, 3, 6, 8, and 10 were used for single-round assays with MAGI-CCR5 cells in the presence of 0.1 µM TAK-779. The number of blue foci obtained in the presence of TAK-779 was divided by that in the absence of TAK-779.

 
Selection of TAK-779-resistant HIV-1 from the Library—In the presence of 0.1 µM TAK-779, infectivity of HIV-1JR-FLan or unselected HIV-1V3Lib was suppressed by 86–92%, as evaluated by a single-round assay using MAGI-CCR5 cells (Fig. 5, passage 0). After three passages of HIV-1V3Lib in the presence of 0.1 µM TAK-779, we increased the concentration of TAK-779 to 0.30 µM at passage 3. HIV-1JR-FLan could not be passaged in PM1-CCR5 cells in the presence of 0.1 µM TAK-779 because of poor replication, whereas HIV-1V3Lib started to replicate after a delay of 3 or 4 days compared with HIV-1V3Lib in the absence of 0.30 µM TAK-779 at passage 3 (data not shown). The inhibitor-sensitive population of the virus library seemed to be replaced with the inhibitor-resistant variants from passages 3 to 8 (Fig. 5). The infectivities of the variants at passages 8 and 10 were not even inhibited by the presence of 0.10 µM TAK-779. In contrast, HIV-1V3Lib at passage 8 in the same passage schedule without the inhibitor did not acquire resistance to TAK-779. We determined the IC50 of the selected HIV-1V3Lib using a single-round assay (Table II). The selected variants showed 15-fold resistance to TAK-779 compared with HIV-1JR-FLan, whereas unselected HIV-1V3Lib at passage 8 did not. To elucidate the alteration of the V3 loop responsible for the resistance in the selected HIV-1V3Lib, we subcloned and sequenced the V3 loops of the variants. The V3 loops contained five incorporated substitutions, namely I304V, H305N, I306M, F312L, and E317D (Fig. 6A). In addition to these substitutions, 25% of the clones (3/12) contained A332D in the GP120 C3 region. No other mutations were detected in other regions of GP120 in the selected viruses by direct sequencing (data not shown). In the absence of the entry inhibitor, the viruses at passage 8 only contained three types of V3 loop in 13 clones (Fig. 6A), although the virus at passage 0 contained complexity in all 10 amino acid positions (Fig. 3A). These V3 loops, especially V3 loop number 01, containing I304V, H305Y, I306L, E317H, I318V, and D324N (85%; 11/13), may confer a substantial replicative advantage among the 27,648 possible substitution combinations in PM1-CCR5 cells without selective pressure.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE II
Susceptibilities of selected HIV-1Lib-P8 to entry inhibitors

 



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
A, sequences of the V3 loop in TAK-779 escape viruses (passage 8) in the absence (HIV-1V3Lib-P8-) or presence (HIV-1V3Lib-P8+) of TAK-779. The numbers above the sequences indicate the positions of amino acid residues in JR-FLan GP120. HIV-1JR-FLan has been also passaged for same the duration without drug pressure; however, no mutations were detected in the V3 loop (data not shown). B, susceptibilities of recombinant viruses containing TAK-779 resistance associated mutation(s). IC50 indicates the concentration required to inhibit 50% of the blue foci formation in MAGI-CCR5 cells at 2 days post-infection. Degree of resistance (x-fold) is compared with HIV-1JR-FLan.

 
To confirm that resistance was conferred by changes in the V3 loop, we cloned the AflII-NheI DNA fragment into env genes containing the V3 loop of numbers 31 and 32. These were then used to replace the V3 loop of the parental virus HIV-1 JR-FLan, and their drug sensitivities were determined (Fig. 6A). The recombinants showed 16-fold resistance to TAK-779 compared with the parental virus and recombinants carrying the numbers 01, 02, and 03 V3 loops, indicating that the set of five substitutions in V3 loop 31 was sufficient for resistance, and A332D in the C3 region was not required (Table III). To confirm a key amino acid substitution to resistance, we constructed HIV-1JR-FLan with one amino acid substitution detected in HIV-1V3Lib-P8+. However, one amino acid substitution could not confer TAK-779 resistance to the parental virus (Fig. 6B). Gly307–Pro308–Gly309–Arg310–Ala311 forms the tip of the V3 loop. The recombinant virus containing two substitutions at the both sides of proximal residues of the tip could confer low resistance (3.1-fold), compared with HIV-1V3Lib-P8+31.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE III
Susceptibilities of recombinant HIV-1V3Lib to entry inhibitors

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We developed an alternative in vitro system for screening and analyzing an R5 HIV-1 library containing diverse structures of the V3 loop using HIV-1JR-FLan as the background. By using the R5 HIV-1 library, we could isolate the virus resistance to TAK-779 containing five amino acid substitutions in the V3 loop by eight passages in PM1-CCR5 cells. For construction of the virus library, we reduced the number of substitution combinations by considering the following observations for the limited size of the library (<107) (32). The residues in the GPG motif (Gly320–Pro321–Gly322 in HIV-1 JR-FLan Env) (Fig. 1) are important for the soluble GP120-CD4 complex binding to cell surface CCR5 (39). Loss of an N-linked glycosylation site in the V3 loop (Asn298–Asn299–Thr300) has an influence on switching from R5 to the X4 phenotype (41). We did not alter these amino acid residues. Instead, we randomly substituted the amino acids Lys302, Ser303, Ile304, His305, Ile306, Phe312, Thr314, Gln317, Ile318, and Asp321 with amino acid residues derived from 31 R5 isolates. An increase in the positive charge of the V3 loop is often associated with CXCR4 usage (7, 25). In particular, previous studies have determined that the presence of at least one basic substitution at V3 position 11 or 25 (at position 303 or 317 in HIV-1JR-FLan GP120) is associated with the X4 and R5X4 phenotypes (26, 27). There were no basic substitutions at positions 303 or 317 in the library (Fig. 1). For incorporation of the mutations Leu or Trp at 325 and Glu, Gln, or Ala at 330, the library inevitably contained the unintended mutations of Cys at 325 and His or Pro at 330. In addition to these mutations, 6.5% of the viral clones in the library contained at least one random mutation, which was considered to be incorporated through the PCR procedure because of low fidelity (Fig. 2A). As demonstrated, replacement of the HIV-1JR-FL V3 region containing amino acid substitutions (27,648 combinations) derived from 31 R5 HIV isolates did not generate the R5X4 or X4 phenotype (Fig. 4), although replacement of the HIV-1JR-FL V3 region with that of HIV-1NL4–3 was sufficient to use CXCR4 as a coreceptor (data not shown). Various combinations of 0–10 amino acid substitutions derived from R5 viruses and random mutations incorporated by PCR were not enough to generate X4 virus. Alternative mutations were required for acquisition of the ability to use CXCR4 from the parental virus.

To manipulate the library for the selection of escape viruses, recipient cells with a high susceptibility to infection were required to retain the diversity of the virus library. The diversity of the virus library could not be maintained in activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy donors because of their low susceptibility (data not shown). PM1 cells (42) endogenously express CCR5, suggesting that an increase in CCR5 expression may be possible. We used PM1-CCR5 cells generated from PM1 cells that were highly susceptible to the virus library and formed large frequent syncytia when infected with R5 HIV-1. After eight passages, the virus population contained a restricted number of V3 loop types, even in the absence of the compound (Fig. 6A), suggesting that there was a V3 loop structure that conferred distinctive superior fitness to HIV-1.

It is considered that there are two possible ways to acquire resistance to CCR5 entry inhibitors as follows: one is coreceptor switching from CCR5 to CXCR4/CCR5 or CXCR4 usage, and the other is to develop resistance by altering the molecular environment of CCR5 to avoid steric hindrance by the inhibitor (43). Several escape HIV-1 variants have been isolated by CCR5 entry inhibitors (43), a CC chemokine (44) or an anti-CCR5 monoclonal antibody (45). The escape mutants isolated with the CCR5-specific small molecule inhibitor AD101 (SCH 350581) in vitro did not switch to CXCR4 use and continued to use CCR5 in an inhibitor-insensitive manner (33, 43). The escape mutants with significant (>100-fold) resistance to the anti-CCR5 monoclonal antibody 2D7 did not lead to coreceptor switching to CXCR4 (45). A MIP-1{alpha}-resistant virus was selected from HIV-1JR-FL molecular clones cultured in a cell line expressing both CCR5 and CXCR4 but did not acquire CXCR4 usage (44). Similarly, in this report, the escape mutant selected from the V3 loop library continued to use CCR5 for entry but was at least 15-fold more resistant to TAK-779 than the parental virus. We cloned the partial env genes containing the V3 loop from the escape mutant isolates and made recombinant infectious molecular clones that fully recapitulated the phenotypes of the corresponding escape viruses without the mutation in C3 detected in clone 03. Introduction of amino acid change(s) in V3 loop of NL4–3/CC85env chimeric virus could alter susceptibility to AD101 (33). One amino acid change in V3 loop (H305P in HIV-1JR-FL V3 loop) conferred 500-fold resistance to AD101, and the chimeric virus with four amino acid changes (K302R, H305P, A311V, and G316E in HIV-1JR-FL V3 loop) showed extremely high resistance (>5 x 106-fold). In the present study, TAK-779 selected variants did not contain K302R or H305P, although the library contained these two amino acid changes. Furthermore, eight passages were required to reach >10-fold resistance, suggesting that the amino acid substitutions derived from polymorphisms in the V3 loop of R5 viruses may not confer high resistance to TAK-779 with the HIV-1JR-FLan background. We continued the selection of the virus library with TAK-779 up to 22 passages, but we could not obtain variants replicating in the presence of >0.30 µM TAK-779 (data not shown). According to the mutagenesis and modeling data, the TAK-779-binding site is located near the CCR5 extracellular surface, within a cavity surrounded by transmembrane helices of 1–3 and 7 (35). This binding site may be less influenced by interaction of V3 loop in GP120 than that of AD101. To acquire relatively higher resistance to TAK-779, other mutations that are not classified as polymorphisms may be needed for authentic interaction with CCR5 without the inhibition caused by entry inhibitors. This type of HIV-1 library based on molecular clones containing combinations of mutations localized in a certain domain of the genes in HIV-1 may be a useful tool for analyzing the acquisition of resistance to entry inhibitors.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Medical Virology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University 2-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan. Tel.: 81-96-373-5129; Fax: 81-96-373-5132; E-mail: yusak{at}kaiju.medic.kumamoto-u.ac.jp.

1 The abbreviations used are: HIV-1, human immunodeficiency virus, type 1; env, envelope; GP, glycoprotein. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
TAK-779 was kindly provided by Takeda Chemical Industries Ltd. (Osaka, Japan).



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Berger, E., Murphy, P., and Farber, J. (1999) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17, 657–700[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Platt, E. J., Kuhmann, S. E., Rose, P. P., and Kabat, D. (2001) J. Virol. 75, 12266–12278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kwong, P. D., Wyatt, R., Sattentau, Q. J., Sodroski, J., and Hendrickson, W. A. (2000) J. Virol. 74, 1961–1972[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Chan, D., and Kim, P. (1998) Cell 93, 681–684[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Kwong, P., Wyatt, R., Robinson, J., Sweet, R., Sodroski, J., and Hendrickson, W. (1998) Nature 393, 648–659[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Weissenhorn, W., Dessen, A., Harrison, S., Skehel, J., and Wiley, D. (1997) Nature 387, 426–430[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Hoffman, T. L., and Doms, R. W. (1999) Mol. Membr. Biol. 16, 57–65[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Derdeyn, C. A., Decker, J. M., Sfakianos, J. N., Zhang, Z., O'Brien, W. A., Ratner, L., Shaw, G. M., and Hunter, E. (2001) J. Virol. 75, 8605–8614[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Cocchi, F., DeVico, A. L., Garzino-Demo, A., Cara, A., Gallo, R. C., and Lusso, P. (1996) Nat. Med. 2, 1244–1247[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Hung, C. S., Vander Heyden, N., and Ratner, L. (1999) J. Virol. 73, 8216–8226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hwang, S. S., Boyle, T. J., Lyerly, H. K., and Cullen, B. R. (1991) Science 253, 71–74[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. O'Brien, W. A., Koyanagi, Y., Namazie, A., Zhao, J. Q., Diagne, A., Idler, K., Zack, J. A., and Chen, I. S. (1990) Nature 348, 69–73[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Shioda, T., Levy, J. A., and Cheng-Mayer, C. (1991) Nature 349, 167–169[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Trujillo, J. R., Wang, W. K., Lee, T. H., and Essex, M. (1996) Virology 217, 613–617[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Wu, L., Gerard, N. P., Wyatt, R., Choe, H., Parolin, C., Ruffing, N., Borsetti, A., Cardoso, A. A., Desjardin, E., Newman, W., Gerard, C., and Sodroski, J. (1996) Nature 384, 179–183[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Briggs, D., Tuttle, D., Sleasman, J., and Goodenow, M. (2000) AIDS 14, 2937–2939[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Hu, Q., Trent, J., Tomaras, G., Wang, Z., Murray, J., Conolly, S., Navenot, J., Barry, A., Greenberg, M., and Peiper, S. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 302, 359–375[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Shimizu, N., Haraguchi, Y., Takeuchi, Y., Soda, Y., Kanbe, K., and Hoshino, H. (1999) Virology 259, 324–333[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Verrier, F., Borman, A. M., Brand, D., and Girard, M. (1999) AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 15, 731–743[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Boyd, M. T., Simpson, G. R., Cann, A. J., Johnson, M. A., and Weiss, R. A. (1993) J. Virol. 67, 3649–3652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Cho, M. W., Lee, M. K., Carney, M. C., Berson, J. F., Doms, R. W., and Martin, M. A. (1998) J. Virol. 72, 2509–2515[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Koito, A., Harrowe, G., Levy, J. A., and Cheng-Mayer, C. (1994) J. Virol. 68, 2253–2259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ross, T. M., and Cullen, B. R. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 7682–7686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Carrillo, A., and Ratner, L. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 1301–1309[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Moulard, M., Lortat-Jacob, H., Mondor, I., Roca, G., Wyatt, R., Sodroski, J., Zhao, L., Olson, W., Kwong, P. D., and Sattentau, Q. J. (2000) J. Virol. 74, 1948–1960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. De Jong, J. J., De Ronde, A., Keulen, W., Tersmette, M., and Goudsmit, J. (1992) J. Virol. 66, 6777–6780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Fouchier, R. A., Brouwer, M., Broersen, S. M., and Schuitemaker, H. (1995) J. Clin. Microbiol. 33, 906–911[Abstract]
  28. Catasti, P., Fontenot, J. D., Bradbury, E. M., and Gupta, G. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2224–2232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Chesebro, B., Wehrly, K., Nishio, J., and Perryman, S. (1992) J. Virol. 66, 6547–6554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Tugarinov, V., Zvi, A., Levy, R., Hayek, Y., Matsushita, S., and Anglister, J. (2000) Structure Fold. Des. 8, 385–395[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Berkhout, B., and Klaver, B. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 5020–5024[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Yusa, K., Song, W., Bartelmann, M., and Harada, S. (2002) J. Virol. 76, 3031–3037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kuhmann, S. E., Pugach, P., Kunstman, K. J., Taylor, J., Stanfield, R. L., Snyder, A., Strizki, J. M., Riley, J., Baroudy, B. M., Wilson, I. A., Korber, B. T., Wolinsky, S. M., and Moore, J. P. (2004) J. Virol. 78, 2790–2807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Baba, M., Nishimura, O., Kanzaki, N., Okamoto, M., Sawada, H., Iizawa, Y., Shiraishi, M., Aramaki, Y., Okonogi, K., Ogawa, Y., Meguro, K., and Fujino, M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 5698–5703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Dragic, T., Trkola, A., Thompson, D. A., Cormier, E. G., Kajumo, F. A., Maxwell, E., Lin, S. W., Ying, W., Smith, S. O., Sakmar, T. P., and Moore, J. P. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 5639–5644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Reeves, J. D., Lee, F. H., Miamidian, J. L., Jabara, C. B., Juntilla, M. M., and Doms, R. W. (2005) J. Virol. 79, 4991–4999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Schwenk, H. U., and Schneider, U. (1975) Blut 31, 299–306[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Kimpton, J., and Emerman, M. (1992) J. Virol. 66, 2232–2239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Chen, Z., Zhou, P., Ho, D. D., Landau, N. R., and Marx, P. A. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 2705–2714[Abstract]
  40. Deleted in proof
  41. Pollakis, G., Kang, S., Kliphuis, A., Chalaby, M. I., Goudsmit, J., and Paxton, W. A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 13433–13441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Lusso, F., Cocchi, C., Balotta, P. D., Markham, A., Louie, P., Farci, R., Pal, R. C., Gallo, M. S., and Reitz, J. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 3712–3720[Abstract]
  43. Trkola, A., Kuhmann, S. E., Strizki, J. M., Maxwell, E., Ketas, T., Morgan, T., Pugach, P., Xu, S., Wojcik, L., Tagat, J., Palani, A., Shapiro, S., Clader, J. W., McCombie, S., Reyes, G. R., Baroudy, B. M., and J. P., M. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 395–400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Maeda, Y., Foda, M., Matsushita, S., and Harada, S. (2000) J. Virol. 74, 1787–1793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Aarons, E. J., Beddows, S., Willingham, T., Wu, L., and Koup, R. A. (2001) Virology 287, 382–390[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. B. Patel, N. G. Hoffman, and R. Swanstrom
Subtype-Specific Conformational Differences within the V3 Region of Subtype B and Subtype C Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Env Proteins
J. Virol., January 15, 2008; 82(2): 903 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Monde, Y. Maeda, Y. Tanaka, S. Harada, and K. Yusa
Gp120 V3-dependent Impairment of R5 HIV-1 Infectivity Due to Virion-incorporated CCR5
J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2007; 282(51): 36923 - 36932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. Shibata, K. Yoshimura, A. Honda, A. Koito, T. Murakami, and S. Matsushita
Impact of V2 Mutations on Escape from a Potent Neutralizing Anti-V3 Monoclonal Antibody during In Vitro Selection of a Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolate
J. Virol., April 15, 2007; 81(8): 3757 - 3768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/34/30083    most recent
M414360200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yusa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Harada, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yusa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Harada, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement