|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 35, 30924-30934, September 2, 2005
The Synthetic Peptide Derived from the NH2-terminal Extracellular Region of an Orphan G Protein-coupled Receptor, GPR1, Preferentially Inhibits Infection of X4 HIV-1*![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ||
From the
Received for publication, January 6, 2005 , and in revised form, May 19, 2005.
Several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) serve as co-receptors for entry of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) into target cells. Here we report that a synthetic peptide derived from the NH2-terminal extracellular region of an orphan GPCR, GPR1 (GPR1ntP-(1-27); MEDLEETLFEEFENYSYDLDYYSLESC), inhibited infection of not only an HIV-1 variant that uses GPR1 as a co-receptor, but also X4, R5, and R5X4 viruses. Among these HIV-1 strains tested, viruses that can utilize CXCR4 as their co-receptors were preferentially inhibited. Inhibition of early steps in X4 virus replication was also detected in the primary human peripheral blood lymphocytes. GPR1ntP-(1-27) directly interacted with recombinant X4 envelope glycoprotein (rgp120). This interaction was neither inhibited nor enhanced by the soluble CD4 (sCD4) but inhibited by the anti-third variable (V3) loop-specific monoclonal antibody and heparin known to bind to the V3 loop. Although the conformational changes in gp120, including the V3 loop, have been reported to be required for its interaction with a co-receptor after binding of gp120 to CD4, it has also been reported that the V3 loop is already exposed on the surface of virions before interaction with CD4. We found that GPR1ntP-(1-27) blocked binding of virus to the cells, and this peptide equally bound to rgp120 in the presence or absence of sCD4. Because we detected the binding of GPR1ntP-(1-27) to the highly purified virions even in the absence of sCD4, GPR1ntP-(1-27) probably recognized the V3 loop exposed on the virions, and this interaction was responsible for the anti-HIV-1 activity of GPR1ntP-(1-27).
HIV-11 is the causative agent of AIDS (1, 2). CD4 glycoprotein as a receptor and GPCRs as co-receptors are required for the entry of HIV-1, and the cell tropism of HIV-1 is mainly determined by its ability to use co-receptors expressed on the target cells (3). The major co-receptor for R5 viruses is CCR5, of which ligands are CC chemokines RANTES (regulated on activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted), MIP1 , and MIP1 . On the other hand, the major co-receptor for X4 viruses is CXCR4, of which ligand is the CXC chemokine SDF-1. Dualtropic viruses (R5X4 viruses) can efficiently utilize both of these co-receptors (4-9).
In addition, primary human brain-derived fibroblast-like cells (BT-cells) are isolated from microvessel segments derived from autopsy of human brain tissue, are positive for CD4 and highly susceptible to HIV-1 variants, but are resistant to R5, X4, and R5X4 HIV-1 strains (10, 11). BT-cells are thought to be originated from smooth muscle cells or pericytes. We have previously shown that the substitution of Pro to Ser at the Gly-Pro-Gly-Arg sequence in the V3 loop of envelope glycoprotein (gp120) is responsible for the BT-cell tropism of the HIV-1 variants (10, 12). We have recently identified orphan GPCRs, GPR1 and RDC1, as co-receptors for the HIV-1 variants in vitro (13, 14). Not only HIV-1 variants, but also several strains of HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus have been shown to utilize GPR1 and RDC1 as their co-receptors (13-15).
During the course of our previous experiments to generate anti-GPR1 antibody ( In the present study, we tested anti-HIV-1 activity of GPR1ntP-(1-27) by several assays, including focal infectivity assay, HIV-1 p24 Gag detection assay, PCR assay, and syncytium formation assay. These assays all demonstrated an inhibitory activity of GPR1ntP-(1-27) against HIV-1 infection. Surprisingly, anti-HIV-1 activity of GPR1ntP-(1-27) was detected not only in HIV-1 variants that utilize GPR1 as a co-receptor, but also in genetically diverse isolates, including X4, R5, and R5X4 viruses. Our findings suggest that synthetic peptides derived from the NH2-ECR of GPR1 are novel candidates for the development of GPCR-based and peptide-based agents to inhibit HIV-1 infection.
CellsNP-2 cells were derived from a human glioma and kindly provided by Dr. T. Kumanishi (Niigata University, Niigata, Japan). NP-2/CD4 and NP-2/CD4 cells stably expressing human GPCRs (NP-2/CD4/GPCRs, such as NP-2/CD4/CCR3, NP-2/CD4/CCR5, NP-2/CD4/CXCR4, and NP-2/CD4/GPR1) as indicator cells for HIV-1 infection were described previously (13-15, 22, 23). NP-2/CD4 and NP-2/CD4/GPCRs cells were maintained in Eagle's minimum essential medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). The human T-cell lines C8166 (24), MOLT-4 clone 8 (25), and MOLT4/IIIB (26) were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS (RPMI/FCS). Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were isolated from the blood of healthy subjects by Ficoll-Paque gradient centrifugation. PBLs were stimulated with phytohemagglutinin prior to HIV-1 infection and cultured in RPMI/FCS and 100 units/ml of recombinant interleukin-2 (Roche Applied Science). All cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified, 5% CO2 atmosphere. HIV-1 StrainsThe GUN-1WT strain is a clinical isolate and can infect both T-cell lines and macrophages, but not BT-cells (10, 12, 27). In contrast, the variant of GUN-1WT strain can infect the BT-cells and T-cell lines (10, 12). Similar to the variant of GUN-1WT strain, GUN-1Ser strain, which had been prepared by the ligation and transfection of cloned HIV-1 (GUN-1WT) DNA fragments containing a mutation of proline to serine made by the site-directed mutagenesis at the GPGR sequence in the V3 loop, can infect BT-cells as well as T-cell lines (10, 12). The GUN-1WT, GUN-1Ser, and IIIB (28) strains of HIV-1 were produced by persistently infected MOLT-4 cells. The BaL (29) and SF162 (30) strains of HIV-1 were produced by infected PBLs. The primary HIV-1 strains, GUN-4 and GUN-14, were isolated from Japanese hemophilia patients as described previously (12). To prepare virus samples, culture supernatants containing HIV-1 were harvested, centrifuged at a low speed, and passed through 0.45-µm pore size cellulose acetate syringe filters (Gellman Science, Ann Arbor, MI). The virus samples were stored at -80 °C until use. Synthetic PeptidesAll synthetic peptides used in this study were purchased from Sawady Technology (Tokyo, Japan). The purity of the peptides was more than 95%. The amino acid sequences of the synthetic peptides used in this study are shown in Table I.
AntibodiesSera from patients infected with HIV-1 were heat-inactivated (56 °C, 30 min) before use. The polyclonal rabbit antibodies to GPR1ntP-(1-27) ( -GPR1), and X4ntP-(1-28) ( -CXCR4) were generated and purified through peptide-coupled affinity columns. Mouse ascites containing the monoclonal antibody (mAb) 0.5 , which recognizes an epitope in the V3 domain and specifically neutralizes infection of HIV-1 IIIB strain (31), was kindly provided by Dr. S. Matsushita (Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan). The mouse ascites containing mAb against the HIV-1 p24 Gag (p24Gag) protein were obtained from Immunoprobe Co. (Saitama, Japan). The sheep antibody against soluble CD4 (sCD4) was obtained from the AIDS Reagent Project of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (Potters Bar, United Kingdom). The mAb to human CD4 (NU-TH/I), which inhibits HIV-1 gp120 binding to human CD4 and recognizes a discontinuous conformational epitope corresponding to the complementary-determining region 2 and 3 (CDR2 and CDR3) of CD4 (32), was purchased from Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan. HIV-1 Infectivity AssayTo determine HIV-1 infectivity, a focal infectivity assay was performed as described previously (33-37). Namely, NP-2/CD4 cells expressing one of GPCRs were seeded at 2 x 104 per well into 24-well tissue culture plates (Corning, Acton, MA), infected with 200 µl of the virus (1,000-2,500 focus-forming units per ml) in the presence or absence of one of the synthetic peptides. After 2 h at 37 °C, the cells were washed, fresh culture medium was added, and the cultures were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. The cells were fixed with methanol for 10 min at room temperature, rinsed with PBS, and then incubated with anti-HIV-1 sera from AIDS patients diluted 1:300 with 3% bovine serum albumin (w/v) in PBS (blocking buffer A) for 2 h at room temperature. After being washed with PBS, cells were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled antibody to human IgG (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) diluted 1:200 with blocking buffer A for 1 h at room temperature, washed with PBS, and rinsed with Tris-buffered saline. To develop the color, cells were reacted in the dark with a solution of aminoethyl carbazol (Sigma) and H2O2 in acetate buffer (pH 5.0) for 20 min at room temperature, rinsed with water, air dried, and examined under a microscope. To determine the inhibitory activity of peptide to HIV-1 infection (inhibition (%)), the following formula was used: [(the number of foci with no peptide - the number of foci with peptide)/the number of foci with no peptide] x 100%. To examine the effect of GPR1ntP-(1-27) on the infectivity of HIV-1 primary isolates, the level of p24Gag protein in culture supernatants was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described elsewhere (38). Azido-3'-deoxythymidine was purchased from Sigma.
PCR Assay to Detect Reverse-transcribed HIV-1 DNAThe virus preparation (IIIB strain) was treated with RNase-free DNase I (10 units/ml, Roche Applied Science) for 30 min at 37 °C to remove contaminating viral DNA or cellular DNA. DNase I-treated IIIB virus was incubated with one of the synthetic peptides for 1 h at 37 °C, and inoculated onto MOLT-4 cells (5 x 105) or PBLs (5 x 105) for 2 h at 37 °C. The cells were washed, and fresh medium was added. After incubation for 20 h, the cells were washed and lysed with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3) containing 1 mM EDTA, 0.45% Nonidet P-40 (Sigma), 0.45% Tween 20 (Sigma), and 0.2 mg/ml proteinase K (Sigma). The cell lysates were incubated for 2 h at 52 °C, heated for 10 min at 96 °C to inactivate proteinase K, and used as templates for the subsequent PCR analysis to detect the formation of reverse-transcribed HIV-1 DNA within the cells. PCR was performed with HIV-1 gag-specific primers, SK38 and SK39 (39) (nucleotide sequence: SK38, 5'-AAGGGGAAGTGACATAGCAG-3'; SK39, 3'-GGACCAACAAGGTTTCTGTC-5') in a PerkinElmer Life Sciences Cycler under the following conditions: 1 cycle at 95 °C for 9 min, 30 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and one cycle at 72 °C for 5 min. The human
HIV-1 Cell Binding AssayHIV-1-cell binding assay was essentially done according to the protocol described by Valenzuela et al. (41). MOLT-4 cells (6 x 106) were incubated with HIV-1 (IIIB strain) (200 ng of p24Gag) for 1 h at 37 °C in RPMI/FCS (final volume, 0.5 ml). When indicated, viral preparation was incubated with GPR1ntP-(1-27), GPR1ntP-(Y/A), 0.5 Syncytium Formation AssayMOLT-4/IIIB cells and C8166 cells were suspended in RPMI medium at 1 x 105 cells per ml and 5 x 105 cells per ml, respectively. Before addition of 50 µl of C8166 cell suspension to each well of a U-bottom 96-well plate (Corning), MOLT-4/IIIB cells (50 µl per well) were incubated with 100 µl of RPMI medium containing one of the synthetic peptides or the medium alone for 1 h at 37 °C. After incubation at 37 °C for 17 h, the number of syncytia per well was counted by light microscope observation (42). The inhibitory activity of peptide to syncytium formation (inhibition (%)) was calculated using the following formula: [(the number of syncytia with no peptide - the number of syncytia with peptide)/the number of syncytia with no peptide] x 100%. Association of GPR1ntP-(1-27) with HIV-1 VirionsTo concentrate virus particles (IIIB strain), the culture supernatant (10 ml) of MOLT-4/IIIB cells was layered onto a 20% (w/v) sucrose cushion (2.5 ml) and centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 2 h at 4 °C using a Hitachi SRP28 rotor (Hitachi Koki Co., Tokyo, Japan). The viral pellet was resuspended in 100 µl of TNE buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA), layered onto the top of a continuous sucrose gradient (20-60% (w/v) sucrose in TNE) (43, 44), and centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 16 h at 4 °C. Fractions (700 µl) were collected from the top of the gradient, and the density of each fraction was determined. An aliquot from each fraction (50 µl) was mixed with 50 µl of TNE buffer containing 2% (v/v) Nonidet P-40 and 0.2% (w/v) bovine serum albumin, the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 56 °C, and the HIV-1 p24Gag protein was detected by dot blotting as described below. The fractions that contained HIV-1 virions were pooled, concentrated again by centrifugation at 100,000 x g for 2 h at 4 °C using an RP55S rotor (Hitachi Koki Co.), suspended in TNE buffer, and used for detection of the association of synthetic peptides (GPR1ntP-(1-27) or X4ntP-(1-28)) with the HIV-1 virions. The viral suspension (100 µl) was incubated with one of peptides (5 µg) for 1 h at 37 °C, subjected to sucrose density gradient sedimentation, and then fractionated. The dot blotting was carried out to detect the presence of the HIV-1 p24Gag protein and peptides in each fraction using anti-p24Gag mAb and anti-peptide antibodies, respectively.
Dot BlottingThe HIV-1 lysates prepared after sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation were blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany) using a Minifol-Microsample Filtration Manifold (Schleicher & Schuell). They were then blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk (w/v) in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (v/v) (PBST) (blocking buffer B) for 2 h at 37 °C. The membranes were then probed with Detection of Binding of rgp120 to GPR1 Peptides by ELISAThe recombinant envelope glycoprotein (rgp120) of HIV-1 (IIIB strain) produced in a baculovirus expression system, >90% pure, was obtained from the AIDS Reagent Project of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (Potters Bar, United Kingdom). ELISA to detect peptide-rgp120 or sCD4-rgp120 interaction was based on the protocol as described (45), with a few modifications. Wells of a 96-well microtiter plate (Corning) were coated with GPR1ntP-(1-27) or its fragment or mutant peptides (0.015-5 µM in PBS) for overnight at 4 °C, washed twice with PBS, and blocked with blocking buffer A for 2 h at room temperature. After being washed with PBS, rgp120 (0.016 µM) in PBS containing 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 was added, and the mixture was incubated for 2 h at room temperature and washed with PBST. To detect bound rgp120, anti-HIV-1 sera from AIDS patients diluted 1:2000 with 3% bovine serum albumin (w/v) in PBST (blocking buffer C) was added, and the mixture was incubated for 2 h at room temperature and washed with PBST. Then horseradish peroxidase-labeled antibody to human IgG diluted 1:5000 with blocking buffer C was added, and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at room temperature, washed with PBST, and rinsed with PBS. To develop color, 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine solution (Bio-Rad) as a substrate was added for 20 min at room temperature, and 1 N H2SO4 was added to stop the reaction. Then the optical densities (A) at 450 nm were determined. For detection of interaction of sCD4 with GPR1ntP-(1-27), microtiter wells were coated with GPR1ntP-(1-27) as described above. Then, sCD4 (0.016 µM), which was obtained from the AIDS Reagent Project of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council, was added for 2 h at room temperature. Bound sCD4 was detected by ELISA as described above using antibody against sCD4 and horseradish peroxidase-labeled antibody to sheep IgG (Dako).
To examine the effect of
To examine the effect of GPR1ntP-(1-27) on binding of V3-specific neutralizing mouse mAb (0.5
Effects of Synthetic Peptides Derived from the NH2-ECR of GPCRs on Cell-free HIV-1 InfectionWe have previously established human glioma-derived, new HIV-1 infection indicator cell lines, which are transduced with both CD4 and co-receptors (NP-2/CD4/GPCRs), and showed that infectivity assay using these cell lines were highly reproducible and sensitive (13-15, 22, 23). As shown in Fig. 1, detection of HIV-1 antigen-positive cells by immunostaining after infection with several HIV-1 strains is dependent on both CD4 and the types of co-receptors expressed on NP-2 cells. We, therefore, examined the effects of synthetic peptides derived from NH2-ECR of GPCRs (GPR1, CXCR4, CCR3, and CCR5) on the infectivity of several HIV-1 strains by focal infectivity assays with NP-2/CD4/GPCRs as indicator cells (Fig. 2). Because our initial experiments indicated that the treatment of cells with the peptides at 37 °C for 1 h and their removal by washing before virus inoculation did not affect the infectivity by HIV-1, virus was incubated with one of the peptides (37 °C for 1 h), and this virus-peptide mixture was added to target cells. Among the peptides, only GPR1ntP-(1-27) markedly inhibited the infection of NP-2/CD4/GPR1 cells with GUN-1Ser strain, which utilizes GPR1 as a co-receptor, in a dose-dependent manner. Surprisingly, infections of the IIIB (X4), GUN-1WT (R5X4), and BaL (R5) strains were also inhibited by GPR1ntP-(1-27). As for IIIB, GUN-1Ser, and GUN-1WT strains, 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were 0.4-0.8 µM and 90% inhibitory concentrations (IC90) were 3-12 µM (Table II), whereas GPR1ntP-(1-27) had weaker effects on infection of R5 virus (BaL strain) as compared with other HIV-1 strains; its IC50 and IC90 were 10 µM and 50 µM, respectively. No inhibitory activities of X4ntP-(1-28), R3ntP-(1-24), and R5ntP-(1-20) against any HIV-1 strains tested were detected. As for R5ntP-(1-20), our results are consistent with previous reports showing that no inhibitory effects on HIV-1 infection are detected in unmodified synthetic peptides derived from the NH2-ECR of CCR5 (46, 47).
Effect of GPR1ntP-(1-27) on the Infection of HIV-1 Primary IsolatesWe next examined the effect of GPR1ntP-(1-27) on the infection of primary R5X4-tropic HIV-1 strains, GUN-4 and GUN-14, which had been isolated from Japanese hemophilia patients. For this, the viruses were mixed with or without GPR1ntP-(1-27) and inoculated onto NP-2/CD4/CCR5 cells. The concentration of p24Gag protein in culture supernatants at 3 days after inoculation was measured (Fig. 3). GPR1ntP-(1-27) inhibited infection of both primary GUN-4 and GUN-14 strains in a dose-dependent manner. In addition to primary isolates, we also examined the effect of GPR1ntP-(1-27) on the infection of R5-tropic SF162 strain. Infection of SF162 strain was inhibited by GPR1ntP-(1-27) in a dose-dependent manner at higher concentrations, but this strain, like BaL strain, was relatively resistant to GPR1ntP-(1-27). Thus, as summarized in Table II, the inhibitory activities of GPR1ntP-(1-27) against HIV-1 strains (IIIB, GUN-1WT, GUN-1Ser, GUN-4, and GUN-14) that can utilize CXCR4 as their co-receptors were 10-20 times as strong as R5 viruses (BaL and SF162). No inhibitory activity of a synthetic peptide derived from the NH2-ECR of CCR5, R5ntP-(1-20), to infection of all HIV-1 strains, including primary strains, was repeatedly detected. Inhibition of HIV-1 Infectivity to a T-cell Line and Primary PBLs by GPR1ntP-(1-27) at Early Infection Step before Reverse TranscriptionWe next examined which step of virus infection was inhibited by GPR1ntP-(1-27). For this, a human T-cell line, MOLT-4, was infected with cell-free HIV-1 (IIIB strain), DNA was harvested 20 h after infection, and then the synthesis of HIV-1 DNA in target cells was detected by PCR using primers specific for the gag region. The relative intensities of amplified DNA bands were correlated with dilutions of the inoculated virus, indicating that PCR was performed within a linear range (Fig. 4, A and B). When HIV-1 was inoculated into the target cells in the presence of GPR1ntP-(1-27), the formation of HIV-1 DNA was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4, C, lanes 1-5, and D). The inhibitory activity was not again detected when X4ntP-(1-28), R3ntP-(1-24), or R5ntP-(1-20) was used (Fig. 4, C, lanes 6-8 and D). When GPR1ntP-(1-27) was added to MOLT-4 cells only after inoculation of the virus, the formation of HIV-1 DNA was not inhibited (data not shown), suggesting that the reverse transcription of HIV-1 RNA in the host cells was not inhibited by GPR1ntP-(1-27). We next examined whether GPR1ntP-(1-27) could inhibit HIV-1 infection to primary human PBLs, which are natural targets for HIV-1. The formation of reverse-transcribed HIV-1 DNA in PBLs, prepared from two independent donors, was also clearly inhibited by GPR1ntP-(1-27) in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4, E and F). Thus, these findings indicate that GPR1ntP-(1-27) blocks the early step of HIV-1 infection before reverse transcription, such as virus attachment or its entry into target cells. Effect of GPR1ntP-(1-27) on Syncytium FormationTo examine the effect of GPR1ntP-(1-27) on the formation of multinucleated giant cells (syncytia), which are considered to represent cell-to-cell infection, we performed syncytia assays using HIV-1-positive MOLT-4/IIIB cells and HIV-1-negative C8166 cells in the presence of one of the synthetic peptides (Fig. 5). Syncytium formation was clearly inhibited by GPR1ntP-(1-27) but not by the other peptides. IC50 of GPR1ntP-(1-27) determined by the syncytia assay was 1.1 µM. Because little effect of 50 µM GPR1ntP-(1-27) on the growth and viability of MOLT-4 cells was observed for up to 4 days (data not shown), the anti-HIV-1 activity of GPR1ntP-(1-27) appears not to be due to its cell toxicity. Identification of a Functional Domain and Amino Acids in GPR1ntP-(1-27) Responsible for Its Anti-HIV-1 ActivityTo determine a functional domain in the GPR1ntP-(1-27) peptide more precisely, fragment peptides, overlapped by six amino acids (GPR1ntP-(1-13), GPR1ntP-(8-20), and GPR1ntP-(15-27)) were synthesized (Table I). We examined the effect of these fragment peptides on the infection of NP-2/CD4/GPCR cells with HIV-1 (IIIB, GUN-1Ser, and BaL strains) (Table III). Among a series of the fragment peptides, GPR1ntP-(15-27) inhibited the infection of the IIIB and GUN-1Ser strains but not that of the BaL strain. Although relatively high concentrations of GPR1ntP-(15-27) were required for the inhibition of HIV-1 infection as compared with GPR1ntP-(1-27), the inhibitory effect of GPR1ntP-(15-27) against HIV-1 was repeatedly detected. This result indicates that the amino acid sequence from 15 to 27 (YSYDLDYYSLESC) is pivotal to inhibit HIV-1 infection by GPR1ntP-(1-27). Because it has been implicated that the tyrosine residues in the NH2-ECR of CXCR4 and CCR5 play an important role in the co-receptor activity for HIV-1 infection (16-21), we examined a mutant peptide, in which all tyrosine residues had been substituted with alanine residues (GPR1ntP-(Y/A); Y15A, Y17A, Y22A, and Y23A), on HIV-1 infection. The inhibitory activity of GPR1ntP-(Y/A) peptide against HIV-1 infection was completely abrogated, indicating that tyrosine residues play a crucial role for GPR1ntP-(1-27) to inhibit HIV-1 infection.
Binding of GPR1ntP-(1-27) to Highly Purified HIV-1 VirionsBecause no inhibitory effect of GPR1ntP-(1-27) was detected when cells had been treated with GPR1ntP-(1-27) and washed before HIV-1 inoculation, it is most likely that targets for GPR1ntP-(1-27) are virus particles rather than the host cell molecules. To test this, we performed a GPR1ntP-(1-27)-binding assay using HIV-1 virions highly purified through sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation. The purified virus (IIIB strain) was incubated with GPR1ntP-(1-27) for 1 h at 37 °C, subjected to sucrose density gradient sedimentation, and then the HIV-1 protein and GPR1ntP-(1-27) in each fraction were detected by dot spotting (Fig. 6). The sedimentation of virions with or without GPR1ntP-(1-27) was mainly detected in fractions #8 and #9 (Fig. 6A, the first and second blots), consistent with an expected density for retroviruses ( 1.15 g/ml) (43, 44) (Fig. 6B), indicating that the presence of GPR1ntP-(1-27) did not affect the sedimentation of the virions. Sucrose density gradient sedimentation of GPR1ntP-(1-27) without virions revealed that this peptide remained at the top of the gradient (#1 and #2), and it was hardly detectable in the fractions at densities around 1.15 g/ml (#8 and #9) (the third dot blot). In contrast, when GPR1ntP-(1-27) had been mixed with HIV-1 before sedimentation, this peptide was detected not only in the top fractions (#1 and #2) but also in the middle fractions (mainly in #8 and #9) containing viral particles (the fourth dot blot), indicating co-sedimentation of HIV-1 virions and GPR1ntP-(1-27). This was confirmed by measuring the intensity of signal in each dot spot (fractions #5-#11) (Fig. 6B). The interaction of GPR1ntP-(1-27) with the virions is specific for GPR1ntP-(1-27) sequence, because the co-sedimentation of X4ntP-(1-28) with the virions was hardly detectable in the middle fractions (#8 and #9, the fifth blot). Thus, these results indicated that GPR1ntP-(1-27) specifically associates with HIV-1 virions (IIIB strain) under physiological conditions.
Specific Interaction of GPR1ntP-(1-27) with rgp120 through Its V3 LoopWe next examined whether GPR1ntP-(1-27) binds directly to envelope glycoprotein gp120. Because GPR1ntP-(1-27) efficiently inhibited infection of X4 HIV-1 (IIIB strain), we performed a binding assay using a baculovirus-derived recombinant gp120 (rgp120) (IIIB strain) and GPR1ntP-(1-27). Microtiter plate wells were coated with different concentrations of GPR1ntP-(1-27) (0.015-5 µM) and incubated with rgp120 (0.016 µM), and bound rgp120 was detected by ELISA (Fig. 7A). The binding of rgp120 to GPR1ntP-(1-27) was detected in a concentration-dependent manner, indicating an association of rgp120 with GPR1ntP-(1-27). This binding appears to be specific, because pretreatment of GPR1ntP-(1-27) with
It is known that the CD4-binding domain (CD4-bd) and the V3 loop within gp120 play an important role for its interaction with target cells at the entry step of virus infection. To determine which region in rgp120 is involved in its binding to GPR1ntP-(1-27), we firstly examined the effect of sCD4 on the binding of rgp120 to GPR1ntP-(1-27) (Fig. 7C). When rgp120 had been incubated with sCD4 before addition to GPR1ntP-(1-27), sCD4 did not affect the binding of rgp120 to GPR1ntP-(1-27), suggesting that the CD4-bd in rgp120 might not be involved in the primary binding site for GPR1ntP-(1-27). Because it has been reported that the soluble polyanion such as heparin binds to rgp120 at the V3 loop region (48-50), we next examined the effect of heparin on binding of rgp120 to GPR1ntP-(1-27) (Fig. 7D). The rgp120 was incubated with different concentrations of heparin (37 °C for 1 h) before addition to microtiter wells, which had been coated with either GPR1ntP-(1-27) or sCD4, and bound rgp120 was detected by ELISA. We found that heparin could inhibit association of rgp120 with GPR1ntP-(1-27) in a concentration-dependent manner. In contrast, heparin had little effect on the binding of sCD4 to rgp120, which is in consistent with a previous report (49).
To examine whether the V3 loop in rgp120 is involved in binding to GPR1ntP-(1-27), we carried out binding assays using the mAb, 0.5 , which has been reported to recognize the V3 loop of the IIIB strain (31). Microplate wells were coated with rgp120, incubated with 0.5 , and bound 0.5 was detected by ELISA (Fig. 7E). Incubation of rgp120 with GPR1ntP-(1-27) before addition of 0.5 resulted in inhibition of 0.5 binding to rgp120 in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas X4ntP-(1-28) did not have much of an effect at any concentrations tested. Taken together, these results strongly suggested that the V3 loop plays an important role for binding of GPR1ntP-(1-27) to rgp120. To determine which region of GPR1ntP-(1-27) was necessary for rgp120 binding, we next examined the binding activities of the fragment peptides to rgp120 (Fig. 7F). Among the fragment peptides, a small peptide, GPR1ntP-(15-27) significantly bound to rgp120, with a lower affinity compared with GPR1ntP-(1-27), which is consistent with our finding that GPR1ntP-(15-27) inhibited HIV-1 infection at higher concentrations (Table III). In contrast, any apparent interaction of neither GPR1ntP-(1-13) nor GPR1ntP-(8-20) with rgp120 was detected. The tyrosine mutant GPR1ntP-(Y/A) completely lost its ability to bind to rgp120, indicating that tyrosine residues in GPR1ntP-(1-27) play an important role in its binding to rgp120 as well as in its inhibition of HIV-1 infection (Table III).
Inhibition of HIV-1 Binding to MOLT-4 Cells by GPR1ntP-(1-27)It has been reported that the V3 loop is exposed on the surface of intact virions (52, 53). In addition, it has also been reported that anti-V3 loop mAbs inhibit the binding of HIV-1 to cells (41), suggesting that the V3 loop exposed on the surface of virion plays an important role for its binding to the target cells. Since our sucrose density gradient sedimentation assay indicated that GPR1ntP-(1-27) bound to intact virions (Fig. 6), and the ELISA assay revealed that there was a specific interaction between the V3 loop and GPR1ntP-(1-27) (Fig. 7), we examined whether GPR1ntP-(1-27) affected the binding of HIV-1 (IIIB strain) to MOLT-4 cells. For this, the cells were incubated with HIV-1 at 37 °C for 1 h, washed three times, and lysed, and the total amount of viral p24 core protein associated with the cells was determined by ELISA. The effects of anti-human CD4 mAb (NU-TH/I), anti-V3 loop mAb (0.5
In contrast to anti-CD4 mAb (NU-TH/I), incubation of viruses with 0.5
In this study, we found that the 27-amino acid-long synthetic peptide derived from the NH2-ECR of GPR1 inhibits HIV-1 infection of human glioma-derived indicator cells (NP-2/CD4/GPCRs), a T-cell line, and more importantly, primary PBLs, which are natural targets for HIV-1 infection. The inhibitory effect of GPR1ntP-(1-27) was observed not only in GUN-1Ser strain, which utilizes GPR1 as a co-receptor, but also in diverse HIV-1 strains, including X4 (IIIB), R5X4 (GUN-1WT, GUN-4, and GUN-14), and R5 (BaL and SF162) (Figs. 2 and 3 and Table II). Among these HIV-1 strains tested, R5 viruses were relatively resistant to GPR1ntP-(1-27) as compared with the other strains.
We found that GPR1ntP-(1-27) binds to rgp120 (Fig. 7, A and B), and this interaction is inhibited by heparin (Fig. 7D), which has been reported to bind to the V3 loop of gp120 (48-50). Moreover, interaction between anti-V3 loop mAb (0.5
GPR1ntP-(1-27) inhibited binding of 0.5 to rgp120 by 50% at 25 µM, although the peptide at higher concentrations up to 100 µM showed only a limited decrease in rgp120 binding (Fig. 7E). As for the affinity of 0.5 for rgp120, an A450 value of binding of GPR1ntP-(1-27) at 0.6 µM to rgp120 was 0.32 (Fig. 7A), whereas almost a similar A450 value was obtained when 0.027 µM of 0.5 was used (data not shown), suggesting that the affinity of 0.5 for rgp120 is 22 times as high as that of GPR1ntP-(1-27). Thus, the incubation of 0.5 with rgp120 may displace GPR1ntP-(1-27) from rgp120 through a competitive action of 0.5 for rgp120, and this may explain a slight and limited decrease in 0.5 binding to rgp120 even in the presence of high concentrations of GPR1ntP-(1-27).
The conformational changes in gp120, including the V3 loop, have been reported to be required for its interaction with a co-receptor after binding of gp120 to CD4 (21). The result of ELISA showed that GPR1ntP-(1-27) binds equally to rgp120 in the presence or absence of sCD4 (Fig. 7C), suggesting that GPR1ntP-(1-27) does not probably recognize the conformational changes in rgp120, especially in the V3 loop, induced by sCD4. This finding also suggested that the HIV-1 entry step at which gp120 interacts with a co-receptor after binding of envelope glycoprotein to CD4 is not a primary target for the anti-HIV-1 action of GPR1ntP-(1-27). Rather, we speculated that this peptide blocks an HIV-1 infection step before binding of gp120 to CD4 as described below. It has also been reported that anti-V3 loop mAbs strongly bind to the intact virus particles, indicating that the V3 loop is already exposed on the surface of virions before interaction with CD4 receptor (52, 53). Indeed, we found that GPR1ntP-(1-27) binds to the highly purified virions (IIIB strain) even in the absence of sCD4 (Fig. 6), suggesting that GPR1ntP-(1-27) directly binds to the V3 loop exposed on the surface of intact HIV-1 virions under the physiological conditions. In contrast to the mAbs against the V3 loop, it has also been reported that none of four mAbs against the CD4-binding domain (CD4-bd) bind to intact virions, including IIIB strain, indicating that the CD4-bd is not exposed on the surface of intact virions (52). It has been reported that there are CD4-dependent and CD4-independent sites for HIV-1 binding on the surface of CD4+ cells (41). The presence of cell surface molecule(s) other than CD4 on MOLT-4 cells responsible for HIV-1 binding was also suggested by our data, i.e. detection of viral p24Gag bound to MOLT-4 cells even when the cells had been treated with anti-CD4 mAb before inoculation of virus (Fig. 8). In contrast to anti-CD4 mAb, anti-V3 loop mAb, heparin, and GPR1ntP-(1-27), expected to bind to the V3 loop exposed on the virions, almost completely inhibited the binding of HIV-1 to MOLT-4 cells (Fig. 8). Because CD4-bd on the surface of HIV-1 virions has not been reported to be exposed as described above, our results suggested that the binding of virus to the cells before interaction with CD4 is mediated by the V3 loop exposed on the surface of virions and that this initial CD4-independent virus binding step is an important target for GPR1ntP-(1-27) to inhibit HIV-1 infection. Although GPR1 serves as a specific co-receptor for the HIV-1 variants, GPR1ntP-(1-27) blocked infection of diverse HIV-1 strains with different co-receptor usage. It may be explained in two ways. Firstly, the V3 loop is known to have the highest density of positively charged amino acids among all regions of gp120: it contains five to nine basic residues, and their distribution pattern within the V3 loop is well conserved among different strains (51, 55). Because GPR1ntP-(1-27) shows the highest ratio of acidic amino acids (net negative charge is -10) among the peptides used in this study (Table I), electrostatic interaction might be responsible for GPR1ntP-(1-27) to bind to basic residues within V3 loop, and to inhibit HIV-1 infection. Because the charge of amino acids in the V3 loop of R5 viruses is known to be more acidic than that of X4 or R5X4 viruses (51, 55), the relative resistance of R5 viruses (BaL and SF162) to GPR1ntP-(1-27) might be explained by the electrostatic repulsion between GPR1ntP-(1-27) and the V3 loop of the R5 viruses. Secondly, as the presence of a similarity in the conformation or antigenicity of the V3 loop has been suggested (52, 56), GPR1ntP-(1-27) would bind to this conserved conformation. Namely, an mAb, 447-52D, has been reported to bind to the V3 loop exposed on the surface of different HIV-1 strains even in the absence of the linear epitope (52, 56). Thus, recognition of the conserved conformation in the V3 loop by GPR1ntP-(1-27) might be important for its inhibitory activity to diverse HIV-1 strains. The exact stoichiometry of GPR1ntP-(1-27) binding to target gp120 molecules in HIV-1 virions remains to be determined. It has been reported that gp120 is shed from infected cells and/or from virions soon after budding (57, 58). Schneider et al. (59) reported that virus-free culture fluid contains at least 100-fold more gp120 than virions pelleted from the same volume of culture supernatant. Thus, not only virion-associated gp120 but also free gp120 might also bind to GPR1ntP-(1-27) and affect its anti-HIV-1 activity. Although GPR1ntP-(15-27) (YSYDLDYYSLESC) binds to rgp120 less efficiently than GPR1ntP-(1-27) (Fig. 7F), an inhibitory effect of GPR1ntP-(15-27) is much lower than GPR1ntP-(1-27) (Table III). Thus, there is a discrepancy between the binding ability to rgp120 and the anti-HIV-1 activity of GPR1ntP-(15-27). This is probably due to the inefficient binding of GPR1ntP-(15-27) to intact virions, because the conformation of monomer rgp120 is different from that of gp120 on the surface of HIV-1 virions. Namely, three gp120 molecules are associated noncovalently with the ectodomain of the gp41 envelope glycoprotein trimer to form oligomers (60).
In this study, we showed that the mutant peptide (GPR1ntP-(Y/A)) substituting tyrosine to alanine does not inhibit HIV-1 infection (Table III) and has no activity for binding to rgp120 (Fig. 7F). Thus, tyrosine residues in GPR1ntP-(1-27) could contribute for interaction with rgp120 and play a crucial role in inhibition of HIV-1 infection. Farzan et al. (61) have shown that tyrosine residues from NH2-ECR of CCR5 contribute to the co-receptor activity through their sulfation, a post-translational modification resulting in the addition of a negatively charged sulfate. Although the sulfation of tyrosine residues in NH2-ECR of GPR1 remains to be elucidated, it is possible that the introduction of sulfated tyrosine residue to GPR1ntP-(1-27) will enhance its anti-HIV-1 activity as a result of an addition of negative charge to GPR1ntP-(1-27). With regard to GPR1ntP-(1-27) analogs, we previously reported that a hexapeptide derived from GPR1ntP-(1-27) (amino acid residues from 17 to 22: YDLDYY) has a weak anti-HIV-1 activity at concentrations around 500 µM (62). The introduction of sulfation to tyrosine residues of this hexapeptide, however, did not significantly improve its inhibitory activity as compared with a nonsulfated hexapeptide (62). Because GPR1ntP-(15-27) binds to rgp120 less efficiently than GPR1ntP-(1-27), the amino acid residues of GPR1ntP-(1-27) from 1 to 14 (MEDLEETLFEEFEN), which contain no tyrosine but several acidic amino acids, will also be necessary for the strong inhibitory activity of GPR1ntP-(1-27) against HIV-1 infection. Thus, the addition of acidic amino acid residues to sulfated tyrosine may be important to develop GPR1ntP-(1-27) analogs with enhanced anti-HIV-1 activities. This possibility is currently under investigation. The entry stages, including initial attachment in HIV-1 replication cycle, are effective targets for the development of new antiretroviral therapies, because de novo infection of HIV-1 to humans can be prevented. This has already been shown by the clinical application of several antiretroviral agents. For instance, PRO 542 is a fusion protein of the gp120-binding domain of CD4 with immunoglobulin constant domains, and is expected to block the interaction between gp120 and the CD4 receptor (63); or T20 is a peptide (36 amino acids) that inhibits the HIV-1 fusion step through binding to the viral envelope protein gp41 (64, 65). With a view to the antiviral potency of GPR1ntP-(1-27), the direct use of this peptide as a therapeutic agent will remain uncertain until studies of toxicity and pharmacokinetics are carried out. A critical concern with peptide-based antiviral therapy is its potential to elicit an antibody response to a peptide and make it ineffective (66). Because the amino acid sequence of GPR1ntP-(1-27) is derived from human, the antigenicity of GPR1ntP-(1-27) may be little or not at all in treated patients. The elucidation of the in vitro antiviral mechanism of GPR1ntP-(1-27) shown in this study will disclose valuable insights in the development of a new class of GPCR-based and peptide-based HIV-1 inhibitors.
* This work was supported in part by grants-in-aid for Scientific Research and the 21st Century Centers of Excellence (COE) Program from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and by Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Corp. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel.: 81-27-220-8000; Fax: 81-27-220-8006; E-mail: hoshino{at}med.gunma-u.ac.jp.
1 The abbreviations used are: HIV-1, human immunodeficiency virus, type 1; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; BT-cell, primary human brain-derived fibroblast-like cell; NH2-ECR, NH2-terminal extracellular region; FCS, fetal calf serum; PBL, peripheral blood lymphocyte; mAb, monoclonal antibody; sCD4, soluble CD4; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; bd, binding domain.
We thank T. Nakamura for excellent technical assistance. We are grateful to Drs. T. Kumanishi (Niigata University, Niigata, Japan) and S. Matsushita (Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan) for kindly providing us with NP-2 glioma cells and an anti-V3 loop MAb, 0.5 , respectively. We also thank Dr. H. Holmes (AIDS Reagent Project of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council) for supplying rgp120, sCD4, and anti-sCD4 antibody.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||