JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M503120200 on July 11, 2005

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 36, 31530-31536, September 9, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/36/31530    most recent
M503120200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pfeffer, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pfeffer, L. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Interferon Induces NF-{kappa}B-inducing Kinase/Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-associated Factor-dependent NF-{kappa}B Activation to Promote Cell Survival*{boxs}

Chuan He Yang, Aruna Murti, and Lawrence M. Pfeffer{ddagger}

From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center and the University of Tennessee Cancer Institute, Memphis, Tennessee 38163

Received for publication, March 21, 2005 , and in revised form, July 5, 2005.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Type I interferons (IFNs) play critical roles in the host defense by modulating the expression of various genes via the IFN-dependent activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription and NF-{kappa}B (nuclear factor kappa B) transcription factors. Previous studies established that IFN{alpha}/{beta} activates NF-{kappa}B to promote cell survival through a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway, which involves serine phosphorylation and degradation of I{kappa}B{alpha}. We now describe a second pathway by which IFNs activate NF-{kappa}B that is independent of I{kappa}B degradation. This pathway involves NF-{kappa}B-inducing kinase (NIK) and the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor-2 (TRAF2) and results in IFN{alpha}/{beta}-induced processing of the p100/NF-{kappa}B2 precursor into p52. IFN{alpha}/{beta} stimulates NF-{kappa}B DNA binding and NF-{kappa}B-dependent transcription. Whereas expression of NIK and TRAF2 constructs causes NF-{kappa}B activation, expression of dominant negative NIK and TRAF2 constructs blocks IFN-promoted NF-{kappa}B activation and IFN-stimulated {kappa}B-dependent transcription and IFN{alpha}/{beta}-induced processing of the p100/NF-{kappa}B2 precursor into p52. In contrast, PI3K does not mediate IFN{alpha}/{beta}-induced p100 processing, although PI3K is involved in the pathway resulting in I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation. Moreover, whereas IFN promotes cell survival in lymphoblastoid cells, expression of dominant negative NIK and TRAF2 constructs enhances IFN-induced apoptosis. Our results for the first time place NIK and TRAF2, previously shown to function in TNF signaling, within the IFN signal transduction pathway. Thus, IFN induces NF-{kappa}B activation to mediate IFN-dependent cell survival signals through a "canonical" pathway of I{kappa}B{alpha} proteolysis mediated by PI3K/Akt and a "noncanonical" pathway of p100 processing mediated by NIK/TRAF.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Interferons (IFNs)1 are multifunctional cytokines that block viral infection, inhibit cell proliferation, and modulate cell differentiation. In a well characterized signal transduction pathway, type-1 IFNs (IFN {alpha}, {beta}, and {omega}) bind to their cognate receptors and transduce signals from the cell surface, resulting in selective gene induction. This pathway is mediated by the receptor-associated JAK tyrosine kinases and the latent cytosolic signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) transcription factors (1–4). Upon their tyrosine phosphorylation, IFN{alpha}/{beta}-activated STATs (STAT1, STAT2, and STAT3) form transcriptionally active dimers and translocate into the nucleus to induce gene transcription. However, other signaling pathways are activated by type I IFNs that are required for IFN action. In a series of recent studies, we defined an important IFN signaling pathway involving NF-{kappa}B transcription factors that also leads to altered gene expression (5–7).

NF-{kappa}B is a transcription factor that regulates the expression of genes involved in cell survival, as well as immune and inflammatory responses, by binding to cis-acting {kappa}B sites in the promoters and enhancers of these genes. NF-{kappa}B represents a family of related proteins that in mammals includes NF-{kappa}B1 (p105 processed to p50), NF-{kappa}B2 (p100 processed to p52), RelA, RelB, and c-Rel. Although p50/RelA and p52/RelB heterodimers are the NF-{kappa}B complexes most often observed in cells, other combinations of Rel homodimers and heterodimers also form. The NF-{kappa}B1 and NF-{kappa}B2 precursor proteins undergo proteolytic processing into the p50 and p52 proteins, respectively. The processing of p105 is constitutive and largely cotranslational, whereas the processing of p100 is tightly controlled through ligand-inducible phosphorylation and subsequent ubiquitinylation.

Under most circumstances, NF-{kappa}B homodimers or heterodimers are bound to I{kappa}B inhibitory proteins in the cytoplasm of unstimulated cells. In common with a variety of stimuli, IFN{alpha}/{beta} promotes the dissociation of the cytosolic inactive NF-{kappa}B-I{kappa}B complexes via the serine phosphorylation and degradation of I{kappa}B, leading to NF-{kappa}B translocation to the nucleus and DNA binding (5). IFN-dependent NF-{kappa}B activation involves the sequential activation of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) and Akt, which mediate IFN-dependent cell survival (6). The pathway leading to proteolysis of I{kappa}B is denoted as the canonical NF-{kappa}B activation pathway. However, recent studies have identified that the LMP1 protein of Epstein-Barr virus, B-cell-activating factor, lymphotoxin-{beta}, and lipopolysaccharide induce NF-{kappa}B activation through an alternative signaling pathway that does not involve I{kappa}B degradation (8–16). This so-called "noncanonical" pathway involves the linkage of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors (TRAFs) to the activation of the mitogen-activated protein 3 kinase-related kinase, NF-{kappa}B-inducing kinase (NIK), which results in the ubiquitinylation and proteolytic processing of p100/NF-{kappa}B2 protein and nuclear translocation of p52-Rel heterodimers to activate transcription.

In the present report, we examined whether IFN induced NF-{kappa}B activation through a signaling pathway independent of I{kappa}B degradation. We demonstrate that IFN{alpha}/{beta} induced NF-{kappa}B activation by a pathway mediated by NIK and TRAF proteins that does not results in I{kappa}B degradation. This pathway of NF-{kappa}B activation results from the processing of the p100/NF-{kappa}B2 precursor into p52 and is independent of the previously described IFN-induced PI3K/Akt-dependent NF-{kappa}B signaling pathway that results in I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation. Through this signaling pathway IFN promotes cell survival. Therefore, IFN induces NF-{kappa}B through two parallel signaling pathways, the canonical pathway dependent on PI3K and Akt that results in I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation and the noncanonical pathway dependent on NIK and TRAF that results in NF-{kappa}B2 processing into p52.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Biological Reagents and Cell Culture—Recombinant human IFN{alpha} (IFNCon1) was provided by InterMune (Brisbane, CA) and its biological activity expressed in terms of international reference units/ml as described previously (17). Anti-Rel and I{kappa}B{alpha} antibodies were generously provided by Dr. N. Rice (NCI, National Institutes of Health). Human Daudi cells were maintained in static suspension cultures at 2–15 x 105 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% defined calf serum (HyClone Labs, Logan, UT). For experiments, cells were suspended at 0.5–1 x 108 cells/ml in medium prior to the addition of IFN or other agents.

Transfection Conditions and Constructs—Transient transfection of cells (107) was accomplished by electroporation (capacitance 300 µF, 250 V) with 500 µg of salmon sperm DNA and 20 µg of plasmid DNA for each sample. Dominant negative (DN)-p85 is a p85 mutant in which 35 amino acids from residues 479–513 are deleted and 2 amino acids (Ser-Arg) are inserted (18). p110* is a constitutively active mutant of the p110 subunit of PI3K (19). DN-NIK is a NIK mutant in which Lys-Lys in the ATP binding domain has been replaced by Ala-Ala (20). DN-TRAF2 lacks the NH2-terminal 86 amino acids that comprise the RING finger domain of TRAF2 (21). All constructs were overexpressed in transiently transfected cells (Supplemental Fig. 1). The pUX-CAT 3XHLA{kappa}B CAT reporter construct contains three tandemly repeated copies of the NF-{kappa}B site from the HLA-B7 gene (22).

NF-{kappa}B Activity Measurements—Nuclei were extracted with buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.85, 250 mM sucrose, 0.4 M KCl, 1.1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM {beta}-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1.75 µg/ml benzamidine), and extracts were frozen and stored at –80 °C (23). For EMSA, the nuclear extracts were incubated with a 32P-labeled {kappa}B probe (5'-AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGG-3') derived from an NF-{kappa}B binding sequence in the immunoglobulin gene promoter (24). To define the presence of specific Rel proteins, nuclear extracts were preincubated with anti-Rel antibodies at 25 °C for 20 min and then subjected to EMSA. Gels were quantitated by phosphorimage autoradiography. For reporter gene assays, Jurkat cells were transiently cotransfected by electroporation with the pUX-CAT 3XHLA{kappa}B CAT reporter construct (22) and the appropriate expression vector. After 48 h the cells were treated with IFNCon1 (1,000 units/ml) for 15 min and assayed for CAT activity. Following thin layer chromatography, radioactivity was measured by phosphorimage autoradiography.

I{kappa}B{alpha} Degradation—At various times after IFN{alpha} treatment, 2 x 107 cells were lysed directly in Laemmli buffer, and equivalent amounts of protein were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes, immunoblotted with specific affinity-purified rabbit anti-I{kappa}B{alpha}, and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Pierce).

GST Fusion Construct—p65 (RelA) cDNA was subcloned into the HindIII and EcoRI sites of pGEX-KG (25). The construct was confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion. The p65-glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein was obtained from Escherichia coli transformed with the plasmid construct and affinity-purified on glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) as previously described (26).

Immunoprecipitations and Immunoblot Analysis—For immunoprecipitation studies, transiently transfected cells were treated with IFN{alpha} (1,000 IU/ml) at 37 °C for the indicated periods of time and then washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed for 20 min in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40; 15% glycerol) containing 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1.75 µg/ml benzamidine. Samples were centrifuged (12,000 x g, 15 min) at 4 °C, and supernates were immunoprecipitated with anti-p65 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) overnight at 4 °C. Immune complexes were collected using Protein A-Sepharose beads (Amersham Biosciences) and eluted in sample buffer. Samples were run on SDS-7.5% PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore), and probed with anti-p52 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) followed by anti-mouse IgG coupled with horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz) or with mouse IgG TrueBlot (eBioscience). Blots were developed using ECL (Pierce).

For GST pulldown assays, lysates from control or IFN-treated Daudi cells were incubated with p65-GST or GST bound to glutathione-agarose beads. The bound proteins were eluted with Laemmli buffer, resolved by SDS-PAGE (7.5%), blotted onto PVDF membranes, and probed with anti-p52.

Apoptosis Assays—For determining apoptosis, cells were cytospun onto glass slides, fixed with 4% formaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100, and processed for terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Roche Applied Science). Alternatively, lysates of control and IFN-treated (1000 IU/ml, 24 h) cells were analyzed for apoptotic DNA by modification of a chemiluminescence-based assay (27). In brief, cells (5 x 106) were lysed in hypotonic buffer and sequentially digested with RNase and proteinase K. Low molecular weight DNA was extracted and subjected to non-isotopic labeling of 3'-ends with digoxigenin-11-dUTP and Taq DNA polymerase. Labeled DNA was separated by electrophoresis on 1.6% agarose and transferred to nitrocellulose. Fragmented DNA was visualized by chemiluminescent detection with alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG and CDP-Star substrate (Roche Applied Science).


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The Role of NIK in IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B Activity and Degradation of I{kappa}B—The protein kinase NIK, a member of the mitogen-activated protein 3 kinase family, is central to signaling pathways by which TNF and interleukin-1 activate NF-{kappa}B. Previous studies have shown that a kinase-inactive NIK mutant suppresses NF-{kappa}B activation mediated by TNF and interleukin-1 (20). The role of NIK in IFN-promoted NF-{kappa}B activation was assessed by expressing NIK or a dominant negative kinase-inactive NIK mutant (DN-NIK) in Daudi cells and examining the effect on IFN-promoted NF-{kappa}B activation. As shown in Fig. 1A, NIK expression promoted NF-{kappa}B DNA binding activity similar to the level induced by IFN treatment. In contrast, expression of DN-NIK in Daudi cells blocked IFN-promoted NF-{kappa}B DNA binding activity (Fig. 1B).

Inhibitory I{kappa}B proteins bind to NF-{kappa}B in the cytoplasm of cells, maintaining it in an inactive state. Through a PI3K-dependent pathway, IFN{alpha}/{beta} promotes the serine phosphorylation and proteasome-mediated degradation of I{kappa}B, thereby inducing NF-{kappa}B translocation to the nucleus. Expression of a dominant negative PI3K mutant blocks IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B DNA binding activity and gene reporter activities, as well as the IFN-induced degradation of I{kappa}B{alpha} (6). The role of NIK and PI3K in IFN-promoted I{kappa}B degradation was assessed by expressing dominant negative NIK or PI3K in Daudi cells and examining the effect on IFN-promoted I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation by immunoblotting. As shown in Fig. 2, whereas IFN induced a progressive decrease in cellular levels of I{kappa}B{alpha} (empty vector), expression of dominant negative PI3K blocked I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation as shown previously (6). In contrast, expression of DN-NIK had no effect on IFN-promoted I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation. This result demonstrates the distinct roles that both NIK and PI3K play in IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B activation, and they apparently do so through distinct signaling pathways.

To assess the functional consequences of NIK on {kappa}B-dependent gene transcription, human Jurkat cells were cotransfected with DN-NIK and a CAT reporter construct (pUX-CAT 3XHLA{kappa}B CAT) containing three tandemly repeated copies of the NF-{kappa}B site from the HLA-B7 gene. Previous studies have shown that this reporter construct is induced by IFN and that HLA-B7 is an IFN-induced gene (6). Jurkat cells were used in these assays because they are IFN-responsive in reporter assays, whereas Daudi cells are relatively nonresponsive (28). As shown in Fig. 3, IFN treatment stimulated {kappa}B-dependent transcription ~6–8-fold. In contrast, expression of DN-NIK blocked the stimulation by IFN of {kappa}B-dependent transcription by ~85% (Fig. 3). DN-NIK expression had no effect on stimulation by IFN of STAT-dependent transcription (data not shown), demonstrating that the role of NIK is distinct from the well established IFN stimulus response element-dependent mechanism in regulating gene expression.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.
The roles of NIK, TRAF2, and p52 in NF-{kappa}B DNA binding activity induced by IFN. A, nuclear extracts were prepared from Daudi cells treated in the absence or presence of IFNCon1 (1,000 IU/ml, 15 min) and were subjected to EMSA. In addition, EMSA was performed on nuclear extracts from cells transiently transfected (transfection efficiency of ~85%) for 48 h with a NIK construct in the pCMV expression vector. B, EMSA on nuclear extracts from control and IFN-treated Daudi cells transiently transfected for 48 h with DN-NIK or DN-TRAF2 expression vectors or with empty vector (EV) in the absence or presence of a 50-fold excess of unlabeled {kappa}B oligonucleotide probe ({kappa}B). C, to define the presence of specific Rel proteins in nuclear extracts of IFN-treated Daudi cells (1,000 IU/ml, 15 min), extracts were preincubated with anti-Rel antibodies or isotype-matched control antisera (IgG) prior to EMSA.

 



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.
IFN induces I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation via a NIK-dependent but a PI3K-independent signaling pathway. Cell lysates prepared from Daudi cells transiently transfected for 48 h with DN-NIK, DN-PI3K, or empty-vector (EV) treated with IFNCon1 (1,000 IU/ml) were resolved by SDS-PAGE, blotted onto PVDF membranes, probed with anti-I{kappa}B{alpha}, and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence.

 
The Role of TRAF2 in IFN-promoted NF-{kappa}B Activation—The results described so far demonstrate that NIK plays a role in IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B activation and cell survival. TRAF2 is a member of the family of TNF receptor-associated factors (TRAFs 1–7) and functions as an adaptor molecule for various members of the TNF superfamily to activate NIK and subsequently mediate NF-{kappa}B activation. To assess the role of TRAF2 in IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B signal transduction pathway and IFN-mediated cell survival, cells were transfected with an expression plasmid for DN-TRAF2, which lacks the NH2-terminal 86 amino acids of the RING finger domain of TRAF2 and functions as a dominant negative for TRAF2-dependent signaling events (21). The transfected cells were assessed for IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B activation and NF-{kappa}B-dependent gene transcription. As shown in Fig. 1B, expression of DN-TRAF2 in Daudi cells blocked IFN-promoted NF-{kappa}B DNA binding activity. Moreover, expression of DN-TRAF2 in Jurkat cells blocked the stimulation by IFN of {kappa}B-dependent transcription by ~85%, which is similar to the inhibitory effect of DN-NIK expression (Fig. 3). These results indicate that both TRAF2 and its downstream effector NIK are involved in the IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B signal transduction pathway.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.
The roles of PI3K, NIK, and TRAF in IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B-dependent gene transcription induced by IFN. NF-{kappa}B-dependent reporter gene activity in control and IFN-treated Jurkat cells transiently cotransfected for 48 h with DN-PI3K, DN-NIK, or DN-TRAF2, and the pUX-CAT 3XHLA{kappa}B construct (22). Data shown are from one of three experiments with quantitatively similar results and expressed relative to CAT activity in cells transfected with empty vector.

 
IFN Induces p100 Processing to p52—Our results demonstrate that IFN induces NF-{kappa}B through a NIK/TRAF-dependent signaling pathway that is independent of I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation. Recent studies suggest an alternative pathway for NF-{kappa}B activation in which NIK/TRAF signaling pathway mediates the processing of the p100 NF-{kappa}B2 precursor protein into p52. In the noncanonical pathway of NF-{kappa}B activation, p52/Rel heterodimers are formed, which translocate into the nucleus to regulate gene transcription. In a previous study, we determined that IFN treatment of Daudi cells activates NF-{kappa}B DNA binding complexes containing c-Rel, but not RelB (5). Preliminary studies of p65 immunoprecipitates indicated that in Daudi cells IFN induced the appearance of a 50–55-kDa protein that was poorly resolved from heavy chain of IgG in Western blots (data not shown), which we hypothesized might be p52.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4.
IFN induces p100 processing to p52 in Daudi cells and human fibrosarcoma cells. A, lysates prepared from control or IFN-treated (1,000 IU/ml, 15 min) Daudi cells were incubated with either GST or p65-GST fusion protein bound to glutathione-agarose beads (pulldown assays). The proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, blotted onto PVDF membranes, and probed with anti-p52. Blots were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence. B, p65-GST pulldown assays on nuclear extracts from human 2fTGH fibrosarcoma cells or mouse 3T3 cells treated for 15 min with human IFNCon1 or murine IFN{beta} (1,000 units/ml), respectively. C, p65-GST pulldown assays on cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts from Daudi cells treated with IFNCon1 (1,000 units/ml) for varying times. Alternatively (bottom panel), whole cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-p65 antibody and probed with anti-p52 antibody. D, p65-GST pulldown assays on nuclear extracts from Daudi cells treated with IFN (0, 10, 100, or 1,000 units/ml for 15 min).

 
To assess whether IFN induces p100 processing to p52, p65 was expressed as a GST fusion protein (p65-GST), and GST pulldown assays were performed. Daudi cells were treated with IFN, and at various times after IFN addition nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts were prepared, incubated with p65-GST or GST alone, and GST-bound material was subjected to immunoblotting with anti-p52. As shown in Fig. 4, in control Daudi cells no detectable p52 was bound to p65-GST. However, within 5 min of addition IFN induced the appearance of p52 in both nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts prepared from Daudi cells, which was bound to p65-GST (Fig. 4C). The maximal binding of p52 in nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts occurred between 15 and 30 min after addition, and p52 was detectable in nuclear extracts as long as 2 h after IFN addition. To further validate the interaction of p65 with p52 in vitro, anti-p65 immunoprecipitates were prepared from Daudi cell lysates at various times after IFN addition and Western blotted with anti-p52. As shown in Fig. 4C, IFN induced the interaction of p65 with p52 after IFN addition as determined by their coimmunoprecipitation from whole cell extracts. Moreover, the presence of p52, as well as p50 and c-Rel, in IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B complexes was demonstrated by supershift assays with Rel-specific antisera (Fig. 1C).

The specificity of the interaction between p52 and p65-GST is further demonstrated by the finding that pulldown assays with GST alone did not bring down p52 from IFN-treated Daudi cells (Fig. 4A). Moreover, as shown in Fig. 4B IFN induced p100 processing to p52 in human fibrosarcoma cells and mouse embryo fibroblasts, which are cells previously found to be sensitive to IFN induction of NF-{kappa}B activation (5).

IFNs are extremely bioactive substances with effects induced at low concentrations. To further assess the biological significance of IFN-induced processing of p100 into p52 we determined whether dose response between IFN and p52 appearance exists. Daudi cells were treated with IFN for 15 min at concentrations varying from 10 to 1000 units/ml, and nuclear extracts were prepared and assayed for p52 binding to p65-GST. As illustrated in Fig. 4D, p52 appearance in nuclear extracts of Daudi cells was detectable at an IFN concentration of 10 units/ml, and its appearance increased with increasing IFN concentrations. Moreover, the dose-response relationship for p52 appearance is similar to our previous findings of IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B activation in Daudi cells as well as the induction of STAT-dependent DNA binding activity (5).

IFN-induced p100 Processing Is Dependent on NIK and TRAF, but Is Independent of PI3K—The role of NIK and TRAF in IFN-induced p100 processing was evaluated by expressing a dominant negative NIK or TRAF construct and examining the effect on IFN-induced processing of p100 to p52 by GST pull-down assays. As shown in Fig. 5A, a dominant negative NIK construct completely blocked IFN-induced p52 appearance in nuclear extracts. NIK expression alone induced low levels of p52 processing and enhanced IFN-induced p52 processing. Moreover, expression of TRAF2 or TRAF6 had no effect on IFN-induced appearance of p52 in nuclear extracts (Fig. 5B). In contrast, expression of a dominant negative TRAF2 construct completely blocked the IFN-induced appearance of p52 in nuclear extracts. These results demonstrate the roles of NIK and TRAF in IFN-induced p100 processing.

We previously demonstrated the role of PI3K in IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B activation (6). To assess the role of PI3K in IFN-induced p100 processing, PI3K activity in Daudi cells was inhibited either by expression of a dominant negative PI3K construct or with the pharmacological PI3K inhibitor LY294002 and examining the effect on IFN-induced processing of p100 to p52 by GST pulldown assays. As shown in Fig. 6A expression of a constitutively active form of PI3K, p110*, alone had no effect on either basal or IFN-promoted appearance of p52 in nuclear extracts. Cells transfected with empty vector served as an internal control. Moreover, expression of DN-PI3K had no effect on IFN-induced p52 nuclear appearance, although its expression inhibited IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B activation and NF-{kappa}B-dependent gene transcription (Figs. 1 and 3). Further evidence that PI3K does not play a role in IFN-induced p100 processing is provided by the finding that the PI3K inhibitor LY294002, which inhibits IFN-induced PI3K-dependent signaling events in Daudi cells (6), has no effect on IFN-induced p100 processing (Fig. 6B). Thus, these results demonstrate that IFN-induced p100 processing to p52 is dependent on NIK/TRAF signaling but is independent of PI3K.

The Role of NIK and TRAF2 in IFN-mediated Cell Survival—NF-{kappa}B plays a critical role in regulating cell survival. Although IFN has demonstrated pro-apoptotic activity on some tumor cells (29, 30), IFN also protects cells from pro-apoptotic stimuli (5, 31, 32). The strategy of expressing in Daudi cells dominant negative constructs to block IFN-promoted NF-{kappa}B activation and to sensitize cells to pro-apoptotic signals generated by IFN itself has been used previously to define the role of I{kappa}B{alpha}, PI3K, and Akt in the IFN-promoted cell survival signals (5, 6). To assess the role of NIK in IFN-mediated cell survival, Daudi cells were transfected with expression plasmids for DN-NIK and assessed for apoptosis by TUNEL assays. In empty vector and mock-transfected Daudi cells, IFN induced a negligible increase in apoptosis, as determined by TUNEL assays. However, expression of DN-NIK resulted in a marked sensitization to IFN-induced cell death (Fig. 7A), demonstrating that NIK plays a role in the pathway that protects cells against IFN's own pro-apoptotic action. A prominent feature of apoptosis is the formation of DNA ladders, which reflects DNA cleavage into discrete multimers of ~200 bp. When cell lysates of IFN-treated Daudi cells expressing DN-NIK were examined by a highly sensitive chemiluminescent-based DNA fragmentation assay, the formation of the telltale DNA ladder was clearly evident when compared with lysates of IFN-treated Daudi cells transfected with an empty vector (Fig. 7B). In addition, expression of DN-TRAF2 sensitized Daudi cells to IFN-induced cell death as determined by TUNEL or DNA fragmentation assays, whereas expression of the plasmid alone had no effect. These results indicate that the NIK/TRAF-dependent pathway leading to NF-{kappa}B activation protects cells against pro-apoptotic action of IFN. Thus, IFN also generates a strong cell survival signal through the noncanonical NF-{kappa}B pathway dependent on NIK/TRAF, in addition to the canonical NF-{kappa}B pathway dependent on Akt/PI3K (6).



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5.
IFN-induced p100 processing is dependent on NIK and TRAF. Lysates prepared from control or IFN-treated (1000 units/ml, 15 min) Daudi cells transiently transfected for 48 h with NIK, DN-NIK, or empty vector (A) or TRAF2, TRAF6, or DN-TRAF2 (B) were incubated with p65-GST fusion protein bound to glutathione-agarose beads. The proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, blotted onto PVDF membranes, and probed with anti-p52. Blots were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence.

 



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 6.
IFN-induced p100 processing is independent of PI3K. Lysates prepared from control or IFN-treated (1000 units/ml; 15 min) Daudi cells transiently transfected for 48 h with constitutively active PI3K (p110*), DN-PI3K, or empty vector (A) or control or IFN-treated (1000 units/ml, 15 min) Daudi cells pretreated with 5 µM LY294002 (B) were incubated with p65-GST fusion protein bound to glutathioneagarose beads. The proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, blotted onto PVDF membranes, and probed with anti-p52. Blots were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
IFNs by definition are antiviral cytokines, but they also regulate cell survival and the immune/inflammatory system. IFN{alpha} elicits biological activity by inducing gene expression through the JAK tyrosine-kinase-dependent activation of STAT transcription factors (1–3, 17, 23, 24, 33–35). Upon IFN binding the JAKs, TYK2 and JAK1, become activated and phosphorylate specific tyrosine residues in STAT proteins (23, 36). Phosphorylated STAT1 and STAT2 complex with the IRF-9 DNA-binding protein, translocate into the nucleus, and bind to a highly conserved IFN stimulus response element in ISG promoters to directly activate these genes (1, 37). The activation of STAT1 and STAT2 proteins has been assumed to account for nearly all the manifold biologic actions of IFN. However, IFN has been shown to regulate gene expression in both STAT1 and STAT2 knock-out mouse cells (38, 39). Thus, in addition to the classic JAK-STAT pathway IFN must activate other signaling pathways to regulate gene expression and induce its biological effects. We have previously established that IFN{alpha} activates the NF-{kappa}B pathway that promotes cell survival in a diverse variety of human cells (5–7).

The family of NF-{kappa}B transcription factors regulates the expression of a wide spectrum of genes involved in immunity, inflammation, and cell growth by binding to cis-acting {kappa}B sites (7, 40–43). However, analysis of NF-{kappa}B-deficient mice and cells has led to the identification of a novel function for this versatile transcription factor, the inhibition of apoptosis. In most cells, NF-{kappa}B lies dormant in the cytoplasm through the binding of I{kappa}B inhibitory proteins. Stimulating agents such as IFN promote the serine phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of I{kappa}B, thereby unmasking the nuclear localization sequence of NF-{kappa}B. The liberated Rel dimers translocate into the nucleus, bind DNA, and regulate {kappa}B-dependent gene transcription. This NF-{kappa}B signaling pathway is described as the canonical pathway and is activated by viruses, cytokines, and lipopolysaccharides. IFN induces the canonical NF-{kappa}B pathway involving PI3K-dependent I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation and liberation of p50-Rel protein complexes (6). We describe in the present study an additional IFN signaling pathway, which leads to NF-{kappa}B activation that is independent of I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation.

In this pathway upon IFN addition the p100 NF-{kappa}B2 precursor protein is processed into p52, which dimerizes with p65 (RelA) and translocates to the nucleus to regulate {kappa}B-dependent gene transcription. We show that IFN induces the rapid appearance of p52-p65 complexes in the cytoplasm, which rapidly translocate into the nucleus, in lymphoblastoid and fibrosarcoma cells. IFN{alpha}/{beta}-induced processing of the p100/NF-{kappa}B2 precursor into p52 is dependent on NIK, the NF-{kappa}B-inducing kinase, but is independent of PI3K. We show that DN-PI3K expression or LY294002 (a pharmacological inhibitor of PI3K) treatment has no affect on the IFN-induced processing of p100 precursor. In contrast, DN-NIK expression blocks IFN-induced p100 processing and IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B-dependent gene transcription. Thus, whereas the canonical NF-{kappa}B pathway is PI3K-dependent, this alternate NF-{kappa}B pathway is independent of PI3K. A number of cytokines activate NF-{kappa}B through a PI3K/Akt pathway (6, 44, 45), which our data would indicate is through the canonical NF-{kappa}B pathway of I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation and liberation of p50-Rel protein complexes.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 7.
The roles of PI3K, NIK, and TRAF in the promotion of cell survival by IFN. Daudi cells transiently transfected for 48 h with DN-PI3K, DN-NIK, or DN-TRAF2 were pretreated overnight with IFN (1,000 units/ml) and analyzed for apoptosis by TUNEL assays (A) or for apoptotic DNA by a chemiluminescent assay with a DNA ladder provided for reference (B). The data shown in panel A are the average of two experiments performed in duplicate.

 
Recent studies have identified that members of the TNF superfamily such as CD40, lymphotoxin-{beta}, and B-cell-activating factor, activate an alternate NF-{kappa}B pathway. This noncanonical pathway is mediated by activation of NIK, which binds to the carboxyl-terminal portion of p100 precursor protein resulting in its proteolytic processing to p52 and the preferential release of p52/RelB dimers (13, 46). Mutant mice with defects in this pathway such as mice deficient in NIK, lymphotoxin or its receptor, B-cell activating factor or its receptor, and NF-{kappa}B2 exhibit similar immune defects, suggesting that proper activation of this pathway plays a critical role in the development, organization, and function of the immune system (47–53). Moreover, uncontrolled processing of p100 may contribute to the development of human malignancies (54, 55). In contrast to the formation of p52/RelB dimers, we find that IFN induces the translocation of p52/p65 (RelA) into the nucleus through the noncanonical pathway. The involvement of RelA dimers, not RelB dimers, in the noncanonical NF-{kappa}B pathway is not without precedent. For example, CD28 stimulation leads to preferential nuclear translocation of RelA and p52 (56). Moreover, p52 and RelA are recruited to the promoters of CD28 target genes, whereas RelB and p50 are not recruited. Transcriptionally active p52-RelA heterodimers have been observed after CD40 and lipopolysaccharide stimulation of B cells (13, 14).

In addition, we show that the IFN-induced noncanonical NF-{kappa}B signaling pathway also involves the TRAF protein TRAF2. Whereas TRAF2 constructs induce NF-{kappa}B activation, expression of DN-TRAF2 blocks IFN-promoted NF-{kappa}B activation, IFN-induced processing of p100 into p52, and IFN-stimulated {kappa}B-dependent transcription. The TRAF proteins are critical mediators of NF-{kappa}B pathways activated by members of the TNF superfamily that have TRAF binding domains (57). TRAF proteins (six members of the TRAF family have been found to date) form heterodimers with one another and activate NIK, leading to the ubiquitinylation and proteasomal processing of p100 into p52. We focused on the potential role of TRAF2 in IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B activation because a conserved TRAF binding site (58), a (P/S/A/T)X(Q/E)E motif, is present within the cytoplasmic tail of the IFNAR1 subunit of the IFN{alpha}/{beta} receptor. Moreover, in preliminary studies TRAF2 was found in anti-IFNAR1 precipitates and a DN-TRAF2 construct blocked IFN-induced NF-{kappa}B activity. TRAF2 plays a direct role in p100 processing by TNF receptor family members CD40 and CD120 (59). Because TRAF2 forms heterodimers with other TRAF proteins, we anticipate the involvement of other TRAF proteins in the activation of the NF-{kappa}B pathway by IFN.

NF-{kappa}B plays a critical role in cell survival through regulation of anti- and pro-apoptotic signaling pathways. IFN{alpha}/{beta} promotes the survival of activated T cells (32), protects CD4+ cells from human immunodeficiency virus-induced cell death (31), and protects lymphoblastoid cells against several pro-apoptotic stimuli (5). However, IFN can also efficiently induce the apoptosis of certain tumor cells (29, 30). Thus, the clinical efficacy of IFN{alpha} in the treatment of human cancer may be limited by its inability to induce marked cell death because of activation of the NF-{kappa}B cell survival pathway. Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the NF-{kappa}B pathway activated by IFN that regulate apoptosis is an important goal. We have previously shown that expression of super-repressor I{kappa}B{alpha}, DN-PI3K, and DN-Akt constructs or the use of pharmacological inhibitors of PI3K (LY294002 and wortmannin) to inhibit the canonical NF-{kappa}B pathway potentiates the ability of IFN to induce cell death (5, 6). In the present study we have shown that inhibition of the IFN-induced noncanonical NF-{kappa}B pathway by expression of DN-NIK or DN-TRAF2 also potentiates IFN-induced cell death. These results suggest that the canonical and noncanonical NF-{kappa}B pathways are functionally redundant for IFN-induced cell death.

The results reported here demonstrate that IFN activates two distinct NF-{kappa}B signaling pathways to promote cell survival. One unanswered question is why does IFN specifically, and other cytokines in general, activate multiple NF-{kappa}B pathways. These different NF-{kappa}B pathways result in the activation of different combination of Rel dimers. For example, in Daudi cells IFN induces the canonical NF-{kappa}B pathway resulting in the activation of c-Rel-p50 heterodimers, whereas the noncanonical pathway results in RelA-p52 dimers. The generation of knock-out mice has defined the overlapping role of Rel proteins to processes such as proliferation and cell survival; nonetheless, they have identified the distinct roles of individual Rel proteins (52, 60–63). Therefore, the differential activation of canonical and noncanonical NF-{kappa}B pathways has potential important ramifications for receptor-mediated gene induction. A number of IFN-regulated genes have {kappa}B elements (64), but the role of NF-{kappa}B in IFN-regulated gene expression has been largely unexplored (7). Recent studies with fibroblasts in which the p65 and p50 NF-{kappa}B proteins have been knocked out demonstrate that NF-{kappa}B plays a complex role in IFN-regulated gene expression (7). Specifically, NF-{kappa}B enhances the expression of some IFN-regulated genes while diminishing the expression of other IFN-regulated genes. In future studies it will be important to define the roles of the canonical p50-Rel dimers and the noncanonical p52-Rel dimers in IFN-regulated gene expression.

Thus, in summary, our studies reveal that the antiapoptotic activity of IFN requires the dual activation of the canonical and noncanonical pathways. Although the canonical pathway requires the activation of PI3K, the noncanonical pathway is PI3K-independent. In contrast, the noncanonical pathway induced by IFN is NIK-dependent, and the canonical pathway is NIK-independent. Thus, these parallel pathways require distinct signaling components. It is of particular interest that blockage (using either dominant negative constructs or pharmacological inhibitors) of either the canonical PI3K pathway or the non-canonical NIK/TRAF pathway results in nearly complete inhibition of both NF-{kappa}B DNA binding and NF-{kappa}B-dependent gene activities. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that these IFN-induced signaling pathways function synergistically to regulate NF-{kappa}B activity. Moreover, our results place for the first time NIK and TRAF2, previously shown to function in signaling by members of the TNF cytokine superfamily, within the IFN signal transduction pathway. Continued investigation is required to understand how these signaling circuits cooperate in IFN signal transduction and the diversity of IFN biological actions. Our results are a reminder that the mechanisms by which cells execute diverse functions are dependent on different combinations of distinct, as well as shared, signals to elicit diverse biological responses.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant CA73753 (to L. M. P.) and by funds from the Muirhead Chair Endowment at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{boxs} The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains a supplemental figure. Back

{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 930 Madison Ave. (Rm. 530), Memphis, TN 38163. Tel.: 901-448-7855; Fax: 901-448-6979: E-mail: lpfeffer{at}utmem.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: IFN, interferon; STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TRAF, TNF receptor-associated factor; NIK, NF-{kappa}B-inducing kinase; DN, dominant negative; EMSA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; GST, glutathione S-transferase; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. Back


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank D. Donner (Walther Oncology Center), M. Kasuga (Kobe University), J. Vilcek (New York University), R. Roth (Stanford University), and L. T. Williams (University of California, San Diego) for providing expression vectors.



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Friedman, R. L., and Stark, G. R. (1985) Nature 314, 637–639[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Larner, A. C., Chaudhuri, A., and Darnell, J. E. J. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 453–459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Darnell, J. E. J., Kerr, I. M., and Stark, G. R. (1994) Science 264, 1415–1421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Schindler, C., Fu, X.-Y., Improta, T., Aebersold, R., and Darnell, J. E. J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 7836–7839[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Yang, C. H., Murti, A., Basu, L., Kim, J. G., and Pfeffer, L. M. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 13631–13636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Yang, C. H., Murti, A., Pfeffer, S. R., Kim, J. G., Donner, D. B., and Pfeffer, L. M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 13756–13761[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Pfeffer, L. M., Kim, J. G., Pfeffer, S. R., Carrigan, D. J., Baker, D. P., Wei, L., and Homayouni, R. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 31304–31311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Pomerantz, J. L., and Baltimore, D. (2002) Mol. Cell 10, 693–695[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Luftig, M., Yasui, T., Soni, V., Kang, M. S., Jacobson, N., Cahir-McFarland, E., Seed, B., and Kieff, E. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 141–146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Xiao, G., Harhaj, E. W., and Sun, S. C. (2001) Mol. Cell 7, 401–409[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Xiao, G., Fong, A., and Sun, S. C. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 30099–30105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Muller, J. R., and Siebenlist, U. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 12006–12012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Dejardin, E., Droin, N. M., Delhase, M., Haas, E., Cao, Y., Makris, C., Li, Z. W., Karin, M., Ware, C. F., and Green, D. R. (2002) Immunity 17, 525–535[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Coope, H. J., Atkinson, P. G., Huhse, B., Belich, M., Janzen, J., Holman, M. J., Klaus, G. G., Johnston, L. H., and Ley, S. C. (2002) EMBO J. 21, 5375–5385[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Claudio, E., Brown, K., Park, S., Wang, H., and Siebenlist, U. (2002) Nat. Immunol. 3, 958–965[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Senftleben, U., Cao, Y., Xiao, G., Greten, F. R., Krahn, G., Bonizzi, G., Chen, Y., Hu, Y., Fong, A., Sun, S. C., and Karin, M. (2001) Science 293, 1495–1499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Pfeffer, L. M., Mullersman, J. E., Pfeffer, S. R., Murti, A., Shi, W., and Yang, C. H. (1997) Science 276, 1418–1420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hara, K., Yonezawa, K., Sakaue, H., Ano, A., Kotani, K., Kitamura, T., Kitamura, Y., Ueda, H., Stephens, L., Jackson, T. R., Hawkins, P. T., Dhand, R., Clark, A. E., Holman, G. D., Waterfield, M. D., and Kasuga, M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 7415–7419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hu, Q., Klippel, A., Muslin, A. J., Fantl, W., and Williams, L. T. (1995) Science 268, 100–102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Malinin, N. L., Boldin, M. P., Kovalenko, A. V., and Wallach, D. (1997) Nature 385, 540–544[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Rothe, M., Sarma, V., Dixit, V. M., and Goeddel, D. V. (1995) Science 269, 1424–1427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Oliviera, I. C., Mukaida, N., Matsushiam, K., and Vilcek, J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5300–5308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Yang, C. H., Shi, W., Basu, L., Murti, A., Constantinescu, S. N., Blatt, L., Croze, E., Mullersman, J. E., and Pfeffer, L. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 8057–8061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Yang, C. H., Murti, A., and Pfeffer, L. M. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 5568–5572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Guan, K., and Dixon, J. E. (1991) Anal. Biochem. 192, 262–267[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Smith, D. B., and Johnson, K. S. (1988) Gene 67, 31–40[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Blanco, F. L., Gonzalez-Reyes, J., Fanjul, L. F., Ruiz de Galarreta, C. M., and Aguiar, J. Q. (1998) BioTechniques 24, 354–358[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Yang, C. H., Murti, A., Baker, S. J., Frangou-Lazaridis, M., Vartapetian, A. B., Murti, K. G., and Pfeffer, L. M. (2004) Exp. Cell Res. 298, 197–206[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Einhorn, S., and Grander, D. (1996) J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 16, 275–281[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Chawla-Sarkar, M., Leaman, D. W., Jacobs, B. S., and Borden, E. C. (2002) J. Immunol. 169, 847–855[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Cremer, I., Viellard, V., and De Maeyer, E. (1999) Virology 253, 241–249[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Marrack, P., Kappler, J., and Mitchell, T. (1999) J. Exp. Med. 189, 521–530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Muller, M., Briscoe, J., Laxton, C., Guschin, D., Ziemiecki, A., Silvennoinen, O., Harpur, A. G., Barbieri, G., Witthuhn, B. A., Schindler, C., Pellegrini, S., Wilks, A. F., Ihle, J. N., Stark, G. R., and Kerr, I. M. (1993) Nature 366, 129–135[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Velazquez, L., Fellous, M., Stark, G. R., and Pellegrini, S. (1992) Cell 70, 313–322[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Schindler, C., Shuai, K., Prezioso, V. R., and Darnell, J. E. J. (1992) Science 257, 809–813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Greenlund, A. C., Farrar, M. A., Viviano, B. L., and Schreiber, R. D. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1591–1600[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Reich, N. C., Evans, B., Levy, D. E., Fahey, D., Knight, E., and Darnell, J. E. J. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 6394–6398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Gil, M. P., Bohn, E., O'Guin, A. K., Ramana, C. V., Levine, B., Stark, G. R., Virgin, H. W., and Schreiber, R. D. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 6680–6685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Park, C., Li, S., Cha, E., and Schindler, C. (2000) Immunity 13, 795–804[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Beg, A. A., Sha, W. C., Bronson, R. T., Ghosh, S., and Baltimore, D. (1995) Nature 376, 167–170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Beg, A. A., and Baltimore, D. (1996) Science 274, 782–784[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Van Antwerp, D. J., Martin, S. J., Kafri, T., Green, D. R., and Verma, I. M. (1996) Science 274, 787–789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Wang, C.-Y., Mayo, M. W., and Baldwin, A. S., Jr. (1996) Science 274, 784–787[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Ozes, O. N., Mayo, L. D., Gustin, J. A., Pfeffer, S. R., Pfeffer, L. M., and Donner, D. B. (1999) Nature 401, 82–85[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Romashkova, J. A., and Makarov, S. S. (1999) Nature 401, 86–90[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Matsushima, A., Kaisho, T., Rennert, P. D., Nakano, H., Kurosawa, K., Uchida, D., Takeda, K., Akira, S., and Matsumoto, M. (2001) J. Exp. Med. 193, 631–636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Miyawaki, S., Nakamura, Y., Suzuka, H., Koba, M., Yasumizu, R., Ikehara, S., and Shibata, Y. (1994) Eur. J. Immunol. 24, 429–434[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. De Togni, P., Goellner, J., Ruddle, N. H., Streeter, P. R., Fick, A., Mariathasan, S., Smith, S. C., Carlson, R., Shornick, L. P., Strauss-Schoenberger, J., Russel, J. H., Karr, R., and Chaplin, D. D. (1994) Science 264, 703–707[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Futterer, A., Mink, K., Luz, A., Kosco-Vilbois, M. H., and Pfeffer, K. (1998) Immunity 9, 59–70[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Thompson, J. S., Bixler, S. A., Qian, F., Vora, K., Scott, M. L., Cachero, T. G., Hession, C., Schneider, P., Sizing, I. D., Mullen, C., Strauch, K., Zafari, M., Benjamin, C. D., Tschopp, J., Browning, J. L., and Ambrose, C. (2001) Science 293, 2108–2111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Schiemann, B., Gommerman, J. L., Vora, K., Cachero, T. G., Shulga-Morskaya, S., Dobles, M., Frew, E., and Scott, M. L. (2001) Science 293, 2111–2114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Caamano, J. H., Rizzo, C. A., Durham, S. K., Barton, D. S., Raventos-Suarez, C., Snapper, C. M., and Bravo, R. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 187, 185–196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Franzoso, G., Carlson, L., Poljak, L., Shores, E. W., Epstein, S., Leonardi, A., Grinberg, A., Tran, T., Scharton-Kersten, T., Anver, M., Love, P., Brown, K., and Siebenlist, U. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 187, 147–159[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Rayet, B., and Gelinas, C. (1999) Oncogene 18, 6938–6947[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Karin, M., Cao, Y., Greten, F. R., and Li, Z. W. (2002) Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 301–310[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Marinari, B., Costanzo, A., Marzano, V., Piccolella, E., and Tuosto, L. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 6098–6103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Takeda, K., and Akira, S. (2004) Semin. Immunol. 16, 3–9[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Ye, H., and Wu, H. (2000) Proc.