Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.C400498200 on November 17, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 4, 2409-2412, January 28, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/4/2409    most recent
C400498200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bussière, F. I.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, K. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bussière, F. I.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, K. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Spermine Causes Loss of Innate Immune Response to Helicobacter pylori by Inhibition of Inducible Nitric-oxide Synthase Translation*

Françoise I. Bussière{ddagger}, Rupesh Chaturvedi{ddagger}§, Yulan Cheng{ddagger}§, Alain P. Gobert{ddagger}§, Mohammad Asim{ddagger}§, Darren R. Blumberg{ddagger}§, Hangxiu Xu{ddagger}, Preston Y. Kim{ddagger}§, Amy Hacker||, Robert A. Casero, Jr.||, and Keith T. Wilson{ddagger}§**{ddagger}{ddagger}

From the {ddagger}Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, and **Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, the §Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 and the ||Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231

Received for publication, October 22, 2004 , and in revised form, November 9, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Helicobacter pylori infection of the stomach elicits a vigorous but ineffective host immune and inflammatory response, resulting in persistence of the bacterium for the life of the host. We have reported that in macrophages, H. pylori up-regulates inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and antimicrobial NO production, but in parallel there is induction of arginase II, generating ornithine, and of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), generating polyamines. Spermine, in particular, has been shown to restrain immune response in activated macrophages by inhibiting proinflammatory gene expression. We hypothesized that spermine could prevent the antimicrobial effects of NO by inhibiting iNOS in macrophages activated by H. pylori. Spermine did not affect the up-regulation of iNOS mRNA levels but in a concentration-dependent manner significantly attenuated iNOS protein levels and NO production. Reduction in iNOS protein was due to inhibition of iNOS translation and not due to iNOS degradation. ODC knockdown with small interfering (si) RNA resulted in increased H. pylori-stimulated iNOS protein expression and NO production without altering iNOS mRNA levels. When macrophages were cocultured with H. pylori, killing of bacteria was enhanced by transfection of ODC siRNA and prevented by addition of spermine. These results identify a mechanism of immune dysregulation induced by H. pylori in which stimulated spermine synthesis by the arginase-ODC pathway inhibits iNOS translation and NO production, leading to persistence of the bacterium and risk for peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Helicobacter pylori is a Gram-negative, microaerophilic bacterium that selectively colonizes the human stomach. Current prevalence of H. pylori is ~30–40% of the population in the United States (1) and substantially higher in underdeveloped regions. H. pylori infection induces a vigorous mucosal immune response that fails to eradicate the organism and results in chronic gastritis that can lead to peptic ulcers and gastric cancer. In addition to a chronic lymphocytic response, H. pylori infection induces activation of an innate immune response in neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages (28). Inducible NO synthase (iNOS)1-derived NO is a central effector molecule in the innate immune response to pathogens, with essential antimicrobial functions in host defense. We have reported that H. pylori induces iNOS expression and activity in macrophages (47). H. pylori is considered a noninvasive pathogen, but it can disrupt epithelial integrity, and its antigens are present in the lamina propria (3). H. pylori can induce iNOS and other innate immune response genes in macrophages even when separated by filter supports or when water extracts are used (6). Although H. pylori-induced NO production can kill the bacterium in vitro (7, 9), it survives in the stomach, despite detection of iNOS in infected gastric mucosa (10).

Production of NO by macrophages can be limited by H. pylori arginase that competes with iNOS for the same substrate, L-arginine (7) under conditions of low arginine availability. However, this effect is overwhelmed by increased substrate (7) indicating that other mechanisms of iNOS inhibition are likely important. H. pylori induces both arginase II and ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) in macrophages (5). Arginase converts L-arginine to L-ornithine, which is metabolized by ODC to produce the polyamine putrescine that is converted to the polyamines spermidine and spermine. Spermine has been shown to inhibit the immune effector function of monocytes and macrophages in response to LPS (11, 12). We now report that spermine inhibits H. pylori-stimulated NO production in macrophages by a post-transcriptional effect on iNOS translation. Our studies are the first to show a bacterial survival strategy in which the effectiveness of the host innate immune response is attenuated by inhibition of iNOS due to spermine synthesis.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Reagents—Reagents for cell culture, RNA extraction, and RT-PCR were obtained from Invitrogen. All other chemicals were from Sigma.

Bacteria, Cells, and Culture Conditions—H. pylori SS1 was grown and used as described (4). For bactericidal studies, H. pylori were separated from macrophages by filter supports (0.4-µm pore size; Transwell; Corning Inc.), and colony-forming units determined by serial dilution and culture (7). The murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 was maintained in complete DMEM (13). For coculture experiments, RAW 264.7 cells were plated in medium without antibiotics for 1 h prior to addition of H. pylori. Experiments were also conducted with peritoneal macrophages isolated from male C57BL/6 mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). Cells were harvested 5 days after intraperitoneal injection of 0.5 ml Bio-Gel P-100 polyacrylamide beads (14).

Measurement of NO—Concentration of the oxidized metabolite of NO, nitrite (), was assessed by the Griess reaction (47).

RT-PCR—RAW 264.7 macrophages were seeded at 1 x 106/well in 6-well plates. After 6-h stimulation, total RNA was isolated and RT-PCR for iNOS performed exactly as described (5, 6).

Immunoblotting Analysis for iNOS, ODC—After coculture with H. pylori, RAW 264.7 macrophages were lysed and 100 µg of protein/lane separated by SDS-PAGE using 12% gels and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA) by electroblotting. Membranes were blocked overnight at room temperature with 5% nonfat dry milk. iNOS (130 kDa), ODC (53 kDa), and {beta}-actin (42 kDa) proteins were detected with a rabbit polyclonal iNOS Ab (1/1000; Pharmingen), a goat polyclonal ODC Ab (1/1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and a mouse polyclonal {beta}-actin Ab (1/5000; Sigma), respectively. Chemiluminescent detection was performed as described (5, 6).

Immunoprecipitation Analysis for iNOS—After 18-h coculture of RAW 264.7 macrophages with or without H. pylori, and in the presence or absence of spermine, cells were washed and placed in methionine-depleted medium for 2 h in the presence or absence of spermine. Then, [35S]methionine (0.2 mCi/ml, Amersham Biosciences) was added for 4 h and cells lysed in radioimmune precipitation assay buffer with protease inhibitors. For pulse-chase analysis, RAW 264.7 macrophages were stimulated and proteins labeled with [35S]methionine. Spermine (12.5 µM) was added and cells harvested and lysed as above.

For immunoprecipitation, equivalent counts of trichloroacetic acid-precipitable [35S]methionine-labeled proteins (2 x 108 cpm) were incubated overnight with monoclonal iNOS Ab (Pharmingen) and protein G-Sepharose (Calbiochem). After the immunoprecipitated complexes were washed, pellets were dissolved in gel-loading buffer and separated by SDS-PAGE. Gels were dried and imaged using a PhosphorImager (Storm 840 Phosphor Screen, Amersham Biosciences).

Transient Transfection of ODC siRNA in Macrophages—Four siRNA duplexes targeting ODC were designed and synthesized by Qiagen (Valencia, CA). These were tested for knockdown of ODC. The most effective siRNA duplex targeted nucleotides 1980–1998 (sense, 5'-CUCAUGAAACAGAUCCAGA-3'; antisense, 5'-UCUGGAUCUGUUUCAUGAG-3'). Scrambled control siRNA that had no sequence homology to any known genes was used as a control. Conditions for transfection and activation were exactly as described (13).

Measurement of ODC Activity and Polyamines—Cells were lysed and ODC activity was determined by a radiometric analysis of 14CO2 liberated from L -[14C]ornithine as described (5, 13). Polyamine levels were determined by precolumn dansylation reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography as reported previously (15).

Statistical Analysis—Quantitative data are shown as the mean ± S.E. Comparisons between groups were made by using analysis of variance with the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons test.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Spermine Inhibits NO Production from H. pylori-stimulated Macrophages by Inhibiting iNOS Protein Translation—Since we have reported that NO production, measured as , peaks at 24 h after H. pylori stimulation (4, 5), we determined the effect of spermine on levels at that time point. As shown in Fig. 1A, addition of spermine resulted in a concentration-dependent inhibition of production in RAW 264.7 cells (left panel) and Bio-Gel-elicited mouse peritoneal macrophages (right panel). These data show an IC50 for spermine of 9.2 µM in RAW 264.7 cells and 9.0 µM in peritoneal macrophages.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Effect of spermine on iNOS expression and production in H. pylori-stimulated macrophages. A, inhibition of production by spermine in RAW 264.7 cells (left) and mouse peritoneal macrophages (right). Cells were cocultured with H. pylori at a multiplicity of infection of 10 in RAW 264.7 cells and 100 in peritoneal macrophages. Spermine was added at the same time as H. pylori and measured after 24 h. The level of in unstimulated control macrophages was 2.19 ± 0.25 µM in RAW 264.7 cells and 1.59 ± 0.30 µM in peritoneal macrophages. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 versus no spermine, n = 5–8 experiments in duplicate for RAW 264.7 cells and n = 3–6 mice at each concentration for peritoneal macrophages. Results shown are for stimulation with intact bacteria; similar results were obtained using lysates of H. pylori. B, iNOS mRNA expression in RAW 264.7 cells was assessed by RT-PCR at 6 h in the presence of the concentrations of spermine (Spm) as marked. iNOS (130 kDa) (C) and {beta}-actin (42 kDa) (D) protein levels were assessed in RAW 264.7 cells by Western blotting with cell lysates harvested at 24 h. E, iNOS translation analysis. After treatment with the conditions noted, RAW 264.7 cells were labeled with [35S]methionine, and iNOS protein was immunoprecipitated, resolved on SDS-PAGE and phosphorimaged. F, pulse-chase experiment. RAW 264.7 macrophages were cocultured with or without H. pylori for 20 h, [35S]methionine was added for 4 h, and then the effect of spermine (12.5 µM) addition for 30 min or 90 min on de novo synthesized iNOS protein was determined. In B–F, representative experiments are shown, similar results were observed in at least three experiments.

 
We then determined the effect of spermine on iNOS in RAW 264.7 cells. Because H. pylori-stimulated iNOS mRNA expression peaks at 6 h (5), we assessed the effect of spermine at that time point. Addition of spermine (5–100 µM) did not inhibit H. pylori-stimulated iNOS mRNA expression (Fig. 1B). By Western blot analysis, spermine inhibited iNOS protein expression in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1C) that paralleled the decrease in NO levels. This effect was not attributable to toxicity of spermine or its serum-mediated oxidation, since we measured cell viability by XTT assay and found that at a spermine concentration of 25 µM where cells had maximal inhibition of iNOS protein, there was still 90% viability in the presence of H. pylori. Additionally, incorporation of [35S]methionine into total protein was unaffected by spermine, indicating that the effect on iNOS translation was specific.

Because we identified that spermine was inhibiting iNOS via an effect on iNOS protein, we directly tested the effect of spermine on de novo iNOS protein synthesis. H. pylori stimulated translation of iNOS that was significantly attenuated by spermine (Fig. 1E). We then conducted pulse-chase experiments (Fig. 1F) to determine whether spermine affected iNOS protein stability; addition of spermine to cells after 24-h stimulation with H. pylori did not inhibit levels of immunoprecipitated iNOS protein. Taken together, these results indicate that the inhibition of iNOS protein expression by spermine occurs at the level of protein translation and not by an effect on stability. To confirm this conclusion, we stimulated cells with H. pylori for 24 h, washed the cells to remove bacteria, and incubated them for an additional 24 h in the presence of spermine. Both and iNOS protein levels were identical in the presence and absence of spermine, indicating that spermine had no effect on preformed iNOS (data not shown).

We also assessed the effect of the two other biogenic polyamines on H. pylori-stimulated NO production and iNOS protein levels. Putrescine had no inhibitory effect, while spermidine had a modest effect that was less marked than spermine. At 12.5 µM, spermidine inhibited levels by 36.0 ± 2.6% versus 74.1 ± 7.6% for spermine (p < 0.01). A similar difference was detected by Western blotting (data not shown).

Specific Knockdown of ODC by siRNA Increases H. pylori-stimulated iNOS Protein Expression and NO Production—We have reported that H. pylori induces ODC expression and activity (13). We therefore transfected cells with an siRNA duplex specific for ODC or scrambled control siRNA. Transfection of ODC siRNA caused a significant reduction in H. pylori-stimulated ODC activity (Fig. 2A) and spermine levels (Fig. 2B) that resulted in a significant potentiation of NO production (Fig. 2C). Western blot analysis (Fig. 2D) demonstrated that in H. pylori-stimulated macrophages, transfection of ODC siRNA resulted in a significant knockdown of ODC protein expression and a concomitant marked increase in iNOS protein levels. Consistent with the data in Fig. 1, ODC siRNA had no effect on H. pylori-stimulated iNOS mRNA expression (Fig. 2E).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Transfection of ODC siRNA increases iNOS protein expression and production in H. pylori-stimulated macrophages. RAW 264.7 macrophages were transiently transfected with duplex ODC siRNA or scrambled siRNA. Cells were stimulated with H. pylori at multiplicity of infection of 10, and the following were measured: ODC activity (A), spermine levels (B), production (C), protein expression of ODC and iNOS by Western blotting (D), and iNOS mRNA expression (E). A, C, and D were at 24 h after stimulation; B was at 12 h; and E was at 6 h. A—C: **, p < 0.01 versus unstimulated scrambled siRNA control; §§, p < 0.01 versus H. pylori + scrambled siRNA. In A–D and E, n = 4 and 2 separate experiments, respectively.

 
Spermine Prevents Killing of H. pylori by Macrophages— Since we have reported that H. pylori are killed by macrophages by an NO-dependent mechanism (7), we determined whether inhibition of H. pylori-stimulated macrophage iNOS expression and NO production by spermine impairs host defense against H. pylori. When H. pylori were cocultured in complete DMEM with macrophages for 24 h, there was a 3-log order killing of H. pylori compared with bacteria cultured in medium alone (Fig. 3A). Addition of spermine to cocultures prevented this killing. Spermine added to H. pylori alone in the absence of macrophages had no effect on H. pylori levels. There was an inverse correlation between bacterial concentration and NO production, such that killing was associated with increased levels and spermine rescue with loss of NO generation (Fig. 3B). When macrophages were transfected with ODC siRNA and cocultured with H. pylori, there was a significant enhancement of bacterial killing compared with scrambled siRNA control (Fig. 3C). There was again a clear correlation between killing and NO levels generated in these cells (Fig. 3D).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Spermine inhibits NO-mediated killing of H. pylori by macrophages. H. pylori placed above transwell filter supports were incubated with or without 1 x 106 macrophages/ml in complete DMEM for 24 h at multiplicity of infection of 100. Colony-forming units were determined after 24-h coculture. A, effect of exogenous spermine addition on H. pylori survival. B, levels for the conditions in A. A and B: **, p < 0.01 versus H. pylori alone, H. pylori + spermine, or H. pylori + macrophages + spermine, n = 4. C, effect of transient transfection of ODC siRNA on H. pylori survival. D, levels for the conditions in C. C and D: **, p < 0.01 versus H. pylori alone; §§, p < 0.01 versus H. pylori + macrophages transfected with scrambled siRNA, n = 4.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We demonstrated that spermine inhibits H. pylori-stimulated NO production by inhibition of iNOS protein translation. Production of polyamines by ODC in H. pylori-stimulated macrophages acts to down-regulate iNOS, since knockdown of ODC by RNA interference resulted in increased iNOS protein expression and NO production. We have shown in macrophages that putrescine synthesis is not induced by H. pylori, while spermidine and spermine are increased (13). Since addition of spermine had a greater inhibitory effect on iNOS than spermidine, it is most likely that the main effect of the ODC siRNA on iNOS is due to inhibition of spermine generation. Consistent with this, addition of spermine (25 µM) to macrophages transfected with ODC siRNA (data not shown), or prevention of spermine catabolism, discussed below, potently inhibited NO generation.

Spermine has been reported to inhibit NO production in LPS-stimulated J774 macrophages (12, 16). However, in these studies, the effect on iNOS itself was not studied. Also in this model NO production and inhibition with spermine depended on the presence of serum. In our model, H. pylori stimulates iNOS by an LPS-independent mechanism (4). When we replaced serum with bovine serum albumin, there was no loss of H. pylori stimulated NO production, and the inhibitory effect of spermine was maintained (data not shown).

Polyamine oxidation can occur by acetylation of spermine or spermidine by spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase prior to back-conversion by acetyl polyamine oxidase (17, 18) or by direct conversion of spermine to spermidine by polyamine oxidase 1 (PAO1), also called spermine oxidase (19, 20). We have recently demonstrated that H. pylori up-regulates expression and activity of PAO1 in macrophages, which acts to regulate intracellular spermine levels in activated cells (13). Inhibition of polyamine oxidation with MDL 72527 resulted in a significant inhibition of H. pylori stimulated NO production and enhanced the inhibitory effect of spermine (data not shown). Similarly, we have found that in macrophages stimulated with H. pylori, cells transfected with PAO1 siRNA that prevents spermine metabolism have a marked inhibition of NO production, and conversely, transfection with PAO1 cDNA that causes spermine oxidation to spermidine results in potentiation of NO levels.2 These findings indicate that it is spermine itself and not an oxidized product or spermidine that inhibits iNOS.

Knockdown of ODC could lead to increased iNOS and NO levels by shunting of L-arginine substrate away from the arginase-ODC pathway and back toward iNOS, since increased L-arginine availability has been reported to increase iNOS translation (21, 22). However, since spermine has a negative feedback effect on ODC (23), if this were true, addition of spermine or prevention of spermine degradation would be expected to increase iNOS, whereas we have observed the opposite effect. We used RNA interference to inhibit ODC, because {alpha}-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), the pharmacologic inhibitor of ODC can increase spermine levels, which has been attributed to increasing S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (24). We have observed that in H. pylori-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells, DFMO inhibited putrescine and spermidine generation and increased spermine levels; in parallel there was inhibition of iNOS protein expression and NO production (data not shown). While there is a report of DFMO increasing iNOS protein and NO levels in LPS-stimulated J774.2 macrophages (25), but the effect only occurred when cells were pretreated for at least 24 h with DFMO, and the same group also reported inhibition of iNOS when DFMO was used concurrently with LPS stimulation (26).

The increase in iNOS and NO levels with ODC siRNA could be due to rescue of macrophages from apoptosis. We reported that inhibition of ODC (5) or of spermine oxidation (13) blocks H. pylori-induced apoptosis and restores cell viability; ODC siRNA has a similar effect (data not shown). However, we have strong evidence that changes in iNOS and NO levels occur independently of effects on apoptosis in H. pylori-stimulated cells: 1) inhibition of PAO1 by siRNA or MDL 72527 reduces apoptosis (13) but actually decreases iNOS/NO levels2; 2) overexpression of PAO1 increases H. pylori-stimulated iNOS/NO2, despite causing macrophage apoptosis (13); and 3) prevention of apoptosis by inhibition of arginase does not further increase H. pylori-stimulated NO levels (5). Moreover, our Western blot analysis in Fig. 2 utilized equal amounts of protein loaded per lane that was verified by blotting for {beta}-actin, indicating that the increase in iNOS protein levels cannot be explained simply by more cells contributing to the amount of iNOS.

Similar to our results, spermine has been shown to inhibit TNF-{alpha} and MIP-1{alpha} generation in monocytes by a post-transcriptional effect that was independent of the presence of serum or an oxidized product (11). While spermine is known to inhibit the translation of its own biosynthetic enzymes (23), we are the first to report that spermine regulates protein translation of an important immune response gene, namely iNOS. Although iNOS is a transcriptionally regulated gene (27), evidence of translational control has emerged, such that reduction of L-arginine availability by arginase (21, 22) reduces iNOS protein translation. We have found that spermine inhibits H. pylori-induced L-arginine uptake,2 but spermine may have direct effects on iNOS translation because arginase inhibitors did not result in increased NO production in H. pylori stimulated macrophages in DMEM with serum (5).

We show that H. pylori are killed by macrophages separated from the bacteria by a filter, mimicking the situation in vivo, and that NO levels (measured as ) are inversely correlated with bacterial levels, consistent with our previous report that iNOS–/– macrophages failed to kill H. pylori (7), and our findings that iNOS–/– mice infected with H. pylori have increased bacterial colonization and gastritis severity.3 Our killing studies indicate that the induction of ODC by H. pylori contributes to the persistence of the bacterium. When combined with our studies implicating spermine and its oxidation product, H2O2, in apoptosis (5, 13) and DNA damage (28), we contend that the induction of ODC by H. pylori is a key cause of the dysregulation of the innate immune response to this pervasive pathogen.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants DK53620 and DK63626 (to K. T. W.) and CA51085 and CA98454 (to R. A. C.) and grants from the Office of Medical Research, Department of Veterans of Affairs (to K. T. W.) and the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America (to K. T. W.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

Present address: Unité de Microbiologie, Inst. National de la Recherche Agronomique de Clermont-Ferrand-Theix, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France. Back

{ddagger}{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene St., Rm. N3W62, Baltimore, MD 21201. Tel.: 410-706-1471; E-mail: kwilson{at}umaryland.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: iNOS, inducible NO synthase; ODC, ornithine decarboxylase; PAO, polyamine oxidase, DFMO, {alpha}-difluoromethylornithine; si, small interfering; RT, reverse transcription; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; Ab, antibody. Back

2 R. Chaturvedi, F. I. Bussière, M. Asim, Y. Cheng, H. Xu, R. A. Casero, Jr., and K. T. Wilson, manuscript in preparation. Back

3 A. P. Gobert, Y. Cheng, and K. T. Wilson, unpublished data. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Varanasi, R. V., Fantry, G. T., and Wilson, K. T. (1998) Helicobacter 3, 188–194[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Mai, U. E., Perez-Perez, G. I., Wahl, L. M., Wahl, S. M., Blaser, M. J., and Smith, P. D. (1991) J. Clin. Invest. 87, 894–900[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Mai, U. E., Perez-Perez, G. I., Allen, J. B., Wahl, S. M., Blaser, M. J., and Smith, P. D. (1992) J. Exp. Med. 175, 517–525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wilson, K. T., Ramanujam, K. S., Mobley, H. L. T., Musselman, R. F., James, S. P., and Meltzer, S. J. (1996) Gastroenterology 111, 1524–1533[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Gobert, A. P., Cheng, Y., Wang, J. Y., Boucher, J. L., Iyer, R. K., Cederbaum, S. D., Casero, R. A., Jr., Newton, J. C., and Wilson, K. T. (2002) J. Immunol. 168, 4692–4700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Gobert, A. P., Mersey, B. D., Cheng, Y., Blumberg, D. R., Newton, J. C., and Wilson, K. T. (2002) J. Immunol. 168, 6002–6006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Gobert, A. P., McGee, D. J., Akhtar, M., Mendz, G. L., Newton, J. C., Cheng, Y., Mobley, H. L., and Wilson, K. T. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 13844–13849[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Meyer, F., Ramanujam, K. S., Gobert, A. P., James, S. P., and Wilson, K. T. (2003) J. Immunol. 171, 3913–3917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kuwahara, H., Miyamoto, Y., Akaike, T., Kubota, T., Sawa, T., Okamoto, S., and Maeda, H. (2000) Infect. Immun. 68, 4378–4383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Fu, S., Ramanujam, K. S., Wong, A., Fantry, G. T., Drachenberg, C. B., James, S. P., Meltzer, S. J., and Wilson, K. T. (1999) Gastroenterology 116, 1319–1329[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Zhang, M., Caragine, T., Wang, H., Cohen, P. S., Botchkina, G., Soda, K., Bianchi, M., Ulrich, P., Cerami, A., Sherry, B., and Tracey, K. J. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 185, 1759–1768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Szabo, C., Southan, G. J., Thiemermann, C., and Vane, J. R. (1994) Br. J. Pharmacol. 113, 757–766[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Chaturvedi, R., Cheng, Y., Asim, M., Bussiere, F. I., Xu, H., Gobert, A. P., Hacker, A., Casero, R. A., Jr., and Wilson, K. T. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 40161–40173[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fauve, R. M., Jusforgues, H., and Hevin, B. (1983) J. Immunol. Methods 64, 345–351[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Casero, R. A., Jr., Ervin, S. J., Celano, P., Baylin, S. B., and Bergeron, R. J. (1989) Cancer Res. 49, 639–643[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Szabo, C., Southan, G. J., Wood, E., Thiemermann, C., and Vane, J. R. (1994) Br. J. Pharmacol. 112, 355–356[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Casero, R. A., Jr., Celano, P., Ervin, S. J., Applegren, N. B., Wiest, L., and Pegg, A. E. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 810–814[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Casero, R. A., Jr., Wang, Y., Stewart, T. M., Devereux, W., Hacker, A., Smith, R., and Woster, P. M. (2003) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31, 361–365[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Wang, Y., Devereux, W., Woster, P. M., Stewart, T. M., Hacker, A., and Casero, R. A., Jr. (2001) Cancer Res. 61, 5370–5373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Vujcic, S., Diegelman, P., Bacchi, C. J., Kramer, D. L., and Porter, C. W. (2002) Biochem. J. 367, 665–675[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Lee, J., Ryu, H., Ferrante, R. J., Morris, S. M., Jr., and Ratan, R. R. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 4843–4848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. El-Gayar, S., Thuring-Nahler, H., Pfeilschifter, J., Rollinghoff, M., and Bogdan, C. (2003) J. Immunol. 171, 4561–4568[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Shantz, L. M., and Pegg, A. E. (1999) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31, 107–122[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Shirahata, A., and Pegg, A. E. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 9583–9588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Baydoun, A. R., and Morgan, D. M. (1998) Br. J. Pharmacol. 125, 1511–1516[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Morgan, D. M. (1994) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 22, 389S[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. MacMicking, J., Xie, Q. W., and Nathan, C. (1997) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15, 323–350[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Xu, H., Chaturvedi, R., Cheng, Y., Bussiere, F. I., Asim, M., Yao, M. D., Potosky, D., Meltzer, S. J., Rhee, J. G., Kim, S. S., Moss, S. F., Hacker, A., Wang, Y., Casero, R. A., Jr., and Wilson, K. T. (2004) Cancer Res. 64, 8521–8525[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C.-P. Liao, M. E. Lasbury, S.-H. Wang, C. Zhang, P. J. Durant, Y. Murakami, S. Matsufuji, and C.-H. Lee
Pneumocystis Mediates Overexpression of Antizyme Inhibitor Resulting in Increased Polyamine Levels and Apoptosis in Alveolar Macrophages
J. Biol. Chem., March 20, 2009; 284(12): 8174 - 8184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Singh, R. Chaturvedi, M. Asim, D. P. Barry, N. D. Lewis, M. P. Vitek, and K. T. Wilson
The Apolipoprotein E-mimetic Peptide COG112 Inhibits the Inflammatory Response to Citrobacter rodentium in Colonic Epithelial Cells by Preventing NF-{kappa}B Activation
J. Biol. Chem., June 13, 2008; 283(24): 16752 - 16761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. L. Madsen, S. Puttamreddy, E. L. Thacker, M. D. Carruthers, and F. C. Minion
Transcriptome Changes in Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae during Infection
Infect. Immun., February 1, 2008; 76(2): 658 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
R. Chaturvedi, M. Asim, N. D. Lewis, H. M. S. Algood, T. L. Cover, P. Y. Kim, and K. T. Wilson
L-Arginine Availability Regulates Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase-Dependent Host Defense against Helicobacter pylori
Infect. Immun., September 1, 2007; 75(9): 4305 - 4315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
N. Wanasen, C. L. MacLeod, L. G. Ellies, and L. Soong
L-Arginine and Cationic Amino Acid Transporter 2B Regulate Growth and Survival of Leishmania amazonensis Amastigotes in Macrophages
Infect. Immun., June 1, 2007; 75(6): 2802 - 2810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
K. Ckless, A. van der Vliet, and Y. Janssen-Heininger
Arginase Modulates NF-{kappa}B Activity via a Nitric Oxide-Dependent Mechanism
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., June 1, 2007; 36(6): 645 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
M. T. Talaue, V. Venketaraman, M. H. Hazbon, M. Peteroy-Kelly, A. Seth, R. Colangeli, D. Alland, and N. D. Connell
Arginine Homeostasis in J774.1 Macrophages in the Context of Mycobacterium bovis BCG Infection
J. Bacteriol., July 1, 2006; 188(13): 4830 - 4840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
N. N. Tun, C. Santa-Catarina, T. Begum, V. Silveira, W. Handro, E. I. S. Floh, and G. F. E. Scherer
Polyamines Induce Rapid Biosynthesis of Nitric Oxide (NO) in Arabidopsis thaliana Seedlings
Plant Cell Physiol., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 346 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
H. Grasemann, R. Schwiertz, S. Matthiesen, K. Racke, and F. Ratjen
Increased Arginase Activity in Cystic Fibrosis Airways
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2005; 172(12): 1523 - 1528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Cheng, R. Chaturvedi, M. Asim, F. I. Bussiere, H. Xu, R. A. Casero Jr., and K. T. Wilson
Helicobacter pylori-induced Macrophage Apoptosis Requires Activation of Ornithine Decarboxylase by c-Myc
J. Biol. Chem., June 10, 2005; 280(23): 22492 - 22496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/4/2409    most recent
C400498200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bussière, F. I.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, K. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bussière, F. I.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, K. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement