![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 4, 2998-3011, January 28, 2005
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


¶
From the
Department of Microbiology and Immunity, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan and the
Laboratory of Bacterial Infection, Kitasato Institute for Life Science, Kitasato University, 5-9-1, Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8642, Japan
Received for publication, October 12, 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
espF) decreased mitochondrial membrane potential (
m), leading to cell death. The 
m decrease and cell death were restored in cells infected with
espF/pEspF but not
espF/pEspF(L16E), suggesting that the 16th leucine in the MTS is a critical amino acid for EspF function. To demonstrate the impact of EspF in vivo, we exploited Citrobacter rodentium by infecting C3H/HeJ mice with
espFCR,
espFCR/pEspFCR, or
espFCR/pEspF(L16E)CR. These results indicate that EspF activity contributes to bacterial pathogenesis, as judged by murine lethality and intestinal histopathology, and promotion of bacterial colonization of the intestinal mucosa. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
EPEC attachment to the intestinal epithelium is accompanied by a number of cellular responses, including reorganization of host cell F-actin (2, 10), disruption of the intestinal cell barrier (11), inflammatory reactions (11), and cell death (12-15). Importantly, these cellular responses may be a consequence of effector translocation into host cells. For example, Tir, which is translocated into the host cytoplasmic membrane, acts as the intimin receptor required for the intimate attachment involved in inducing actin pedestal structures by recruiting host proteins required for actin polymerization (16, 17). EspG and Orf3 both share significant amino acid homology with Shigella VirA (18, 19) and stimulate microtubule destruction, eventually leading to the stimulation of RhoA and Rac1 (20). EspF may be involved in the disruption of tight junctions and induction of cell death (see below). Map is reportedly targeted to the host mitochondria and interferes with membrane potential (21), as well as being involved in cytoskeletal rearrangements in the formation of filopodia (22). EspH has been indicated to promote pedestal formation (5). NleA/EspI has recently been identified as a novel effector targeted to the host cell Golgi body using EHEC and C. rodentium, defects in which affect colonization of the mouse intestine and are involved in the development of intestinal hyperplasia (7, 8).
One of the prominent pathogenic features of EPEC during the colonization of intestinal epithelial cells is the ability to injure the epithelial barrier and eventually kill host cells, although the meaning of this biological paradoxical activity in bacterial colonization remains largely speculative. EspF seems to play an important role in this form of cell damage (13). Indeed, studies indicate that though EspF is not involved in bacterial adherence to host cells, F-actin condensation, or tyrosine phosphorylation (23), this protein plays some role in the induction of host cell death (13) and decreasing transepithelial electrical resistance via the destruction of tight junctions in the intestinal epithelium (24). Recently, Viswanathan et al. (25) indicated that EspF can interact with cytokeratin 18, and Nougayrede and Donnenberg (26) have shown that EspF can migrate into host mitochondria and induce host cell death. Importantly, recent studies with C. rodentium (strain DBS100) revealed that C57BL/6, NIH Swiss, or C3H/HeJ mice, infected with the espF mutant, was partly attenuated as compared with that of wild-type C. rodentium (6, 8). Although these studies have clearly demonstrated that EspF acts as a bacterial effector, the biological relevance of each EspF activity in bacterial infection of the intestinal mucosa remains unclear.
In this context, by creating a series of single amino acid substitutions in the mitochondrial targeting signal (MTS) of EspF, we investigated the biological relevance of EspF activities to migration into host mitochondria, as it pertains to bacterially induced cell death, injury of the intestinal barrier, or bacterial colonization of the intestinal mucosa. One of the single amino acid substitutions at the 16th leucine in EspF abolished the ability to migrate into mitochondria, and this was also relevant to the EspF activity of initiating the mitochondrial death pathway. The single amino acid-substituted EspF mutant was created using C. rodentium, and the cloned plasmid was introduced into the espF mutant of C. rodentium in order to evaluate the impact on the pathogenesis of bacterial infection of the murine intestine. Our data provide for the first time convincing evidence that EspF activity contributes to injury of the intestinal mucosa including cell death and enhances of bacterial colonization of the intestinal mucosa.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
espF) was determined by PCR and immunoblotting. The espF and map double mutant (
espF-
map) were created using
map by the same method as that used for the construction of
espF. The espF internal deletion mutant of C. rodentium (strain EX-33) was constructed using pCACTUS, as described above, without aphA3.
|
Anti-mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 (mtHsp70) mAb (ALEXIS Biochemicals), anti-cytochrome oxidase subunit II mAb (Molecular Probes), anti-cytochrome c mAb (BD Biosciences), anti-Tom20 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-aldolase polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rhodamine 123 (Molecular Probes), Mitotracker (Molecular Probes), ethidium homodimer (EH, Molecular Probes), and rhodaminephalloidin (Molecular Probes) were obtained commercially. Anti-rabbit IgG-horseradish peroxidase, anti-mouse IgG-horseradish peroxidase, anti-rabbit IgG-FITC, and anti-mouse IgG-TRITC were purchased from Sigma. Anti-intimin polyclonal antibody was used as described previously (30).
Plasmid ConstructionspEspF was constructed by ligating the BamHI and XhoI fragment of the espF complementary gene (from +300 bp to -116 bp of EPEC espF) into the BamHI and SalI sites of pBR322 (ampicillin-resistant). pBREspFCR and pEspFCR were constructed by ligating the BamHI and XhoI fragment of the espFCR complementary gene (from +150 bp to -174 bp of C. rodentium espF) into the BamHI and SalI sites of pBR322 and pSU18 (chloramphenicol (CP)-resistant) (31), respectively. The full-length or truncated pEGFP-EspFs and pEspF-EGFPs were constructed as follows. The various espF gene fragments amplified by PCR were digested with EcoRI and BamHI and then ligated into the corresponding sites of pEGFP-N3 or pEGFP-C2. The point mutants on pEspF-EGFP, pEspF, and pEspFCR were created with a QuikChangeTM site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). pMnSOD-EGFP and pTom20-EGFP were constructed, respectively, by ligation of MnSOD and tom20 fragments amplified by RT-PCR using total cDNA of HeLa cells with pEGFP-N3.
Conditions of Eukaryotic Cell Culture and Bacterial CultureHeLa and COS-7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Sigma) with 10% fetal calf serum (Sigma) at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2. In the EPEC infection experiment, bacteria were grown overnight in LB broth containing 1% mannose at 37 °C with or without appropriate antibiotics (ABPC; 50 µg/ml or CP; 25 µg/ml). The bacteria were diluted 1:10 into modified EPEC adherence medium (13) consisting of DMEM supplemented with 40 mM HEPES (at pH 7.4), 2% fetal calf serum, and 1% mannose with or without antibiotics and grown with shaking at 37 °C for 2 h. Cultured bacteria were added at a multiplicity of infection (moi) of 100 in the modified EPEC adherence medium.
Infection of Cultured Cells with EPECsThe state of infection was followed by the method of Crane et al. (13). HeLa cells (2 x 105 per well) were grown (on coverslips in the experiment with immunofluorescent staining) on 12-well cell culture plates in DMEM with 10% fetal calf serum for 16 h at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2. Then, the culture medium was changed to modified EPEC adherence medium prior to bacterial infection. The precultured bacteria as described above were added to HeLa cells and incubated at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2. After 1 h of infection, the plate was washed with PBS three times and replaced with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 40 mM HEPES (at pH 7.4), 1% mannose, and 0.1% bovine serum albumin with or without antibiotics.
Immunofluorescent Staining and ImmunoblottingThe cells on a coverslip were washed with PBS three times and immunostained with the appropriate antibodies as described previously (32). The coverslips were mounted on VectorShield (Vector Laboratory) for observing by a confocal laser-scanning microscopy (MicroRadiance Plus, Bio-Rad). Immunoblotting analysis was carried out as described previously (33).
Intracellular Expression of EspF-EGFP Fusion ProteinsCOS-7 cells (
50% confluent on 12-well plate) on coverslips were transfected with 1 µg/ml EGFP fusion protein expression vectors (pEspF-EGFP etc.) using FuGENE 6 (Roche Applied Science) according to the manufacturer's protocol in the absence or presence of 10 µM valinomycin (uncoupler of mitochondrial inner membrane potential). After 16 h of incubation, the cells were treated with 100 nM MitoTracker (Molecular Probes) in DMEM (fetal calf serum-free) for 30 min in the absence or presence of 10 µM valinomycin and then washed three times with PBS. After fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, coverslips were washed with PBS and then immunostained. They were observed by confocal laser-scanning microscopy. To determine the ratio of EspF-EGFPs localized in mitochondria, 100 cells expressing EspF-EGFPs were counted (a cell whose mitochondrial EGFP fluorescent signal was stronger than the cytosolic signal was counted as being localized in mitochondria). The counts were performed three times, independently.
Fractionation of Mitochondria from HeLa Cells Infected with EPECThe mitochondrial fractionation was based on a method described previously (34, 35). HeLa cells (2 x 107) were infected with
espF/pEspF or
espF/pEspF(L16E) for 3 h and washed with PBS four times. The following procedures were performed at 4 °C. Cells collected with a scraper were gently homogenized using a Microtube homogenizer (I.S.O) in buffer A (250 mM sucrose, 25 mM HEPES-KOH (at pH7.4), 25 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EGTA, and 5 mM 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzene sulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride (AEBSF). The homogenate was centrifuged at 600 x g for 10 min, and the pellet was used as the nuclei and unbroken cell fraction, while the supernatant was centrifuged at 7000 x g for 10 min. The resulting pellet was the crude mitochondrial fraction including bacteria, while the supernatant was centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 1 h, yielding a pellet (microsome fraction) and another supernatant (cytosolic fraction). To obtain highly purified mitochondria, the crude mitochondrial fraction was layered on a discontinuous sucrose gradient consisting of 4.5 ml of 1.6-1.0 M sucrose from the bottom and centrifuged at 82,000 x g. After 200 min, the middle band was collected and was used as a mitochondrial fraction.
Measurement of Mitochondrial Inner Membrane Potential (
m) HeLa cells preincubated with the 
m-sensitive dye rhodamine123 (Rho123) at 2 µg/ml (36) in DMEM (fetal calf serum-free) were washed with PBS three times and then infected with EPECs at an moi of 100 as described above. After 6 h of infection, both detached (supernatant) and adherent (trypsinized) cells were collected and the non-adherent bacteria were removed by centrifugation (200 x g, for 10 min, at room temperature). The pellets were washed three times with PBS and then resuspended in 500 µl of PBS. The intensity of 
m for at least 10,000 cells was analyzed by FACSCaliburTM (BD Biosciences).
Time Course ImagingHeLa cells preteated with 2 µg/ml of Rho123 for 30 min were infected with wild-type EPEC (WT) at an moi of 100. After 1 h of infection, cells were washed and replaced with RPMI 1640 supplemented with 40 mM HEPES (at pH7.4), 1% mannose, and 0.1% BSA, and 1 µg/ml of EH. Then, phase contrast and fluorescent images (Rho123 for 0.5 s, and EH for 0.2 s) were taken every 10 min for up to 6.5 h at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2 by fluorescent microscopy (Axiovert 135-SENSYS, Zeiss).
LDH AssayCytotoxicity induced by EPEC infection was analyzed using a CytoTox 96 cytotoxicity assay kit (Promega). The extent of cytotoxicity was assayed by measuring the amount of cytosolic LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) released by cells, which represents loss of membrane integrity. The cytotoxicity was calculated as follows: experimental LDH activity/total LDH activity x 100%.
Detection of Cytochrome c ReleaseThe cytosolic fractions of HeLa cells (4 x 106) infected with EPECs at an moi of 100 at various time points were obtained by a digitonin-based subcellular fractionation technique as described previously (37). For the detection of released cytochrome c, the equal amounts of cytosolic proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-cytochrome c, and anti-actin antibody as an internal standard control.
Detection of EspF Secreted by EPEC into the Culture Medium The secretion of EspF was analyzed by immunoblot as described previously (29).
Infection of Mice with C. rodentium6-week old, female C3H/HeJ mice (JC1, CLEA Japan) highly susceptible to C. rodentium (38), were housed for a week in the animal facility of the Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo in accordance with guidelines drafted by the University of Tokyo. Wild-type C. rodentium (WTCR),
espFCR, complementary strain
espFCR/pEspFCR and
espFCR/pEspFCR (L16E) were cultured overnight in LB broth with or without 25 µg/ml of CP at 37 °C. The respective cultures (2 ml) were centrifuged (1000 x g, 5 min) at room temperature, and after the supernatant had been discarded, bacteria were resuspended with 2 ml of LB broth. In order to examine the survival assay, 200 µl of bacterial suspension (
2 x 108 cfu/head) were inoculated into ten mice by oral gavages. Survival was assessed daily over the course of the infection for up to 20-days postinfection. For determination of the numbers of adherent bacteria on the colon and colonic weight, five mice were inoculated in the same manner. At 9-days postinfection, these mice were sacrificed, and 5.5 cm of distal colon from the rectum were cut vertically along the colon. These samples were washed with PBS to remove fecal pellets. Weights were then determined, and the specimens were homogenized in 5 ml of ice-cold PBS with a Potter Elvehjem homogenizer (digital homogenizer, AS ONE). The homogenates were serially diluted with ice-cold PBS and plated on MacConkey agar plates with or without 25 µg/ml of CP. Colonies of C. rodentium, which were checked with PCR by amplifying the espFCR, were counted and the number of cfu per mouse was calculated. For histological analysis, colons infected with C. rodentium at 9-days postinfection, were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4 °C overnight and then frozen in tissue-freezing medium (Leica Jung). Frozen sections were cut with a cryostato (CM1900, Leica) and immunostained with anti-C. rodentium antiserum and rodamine-phalloidin by a method described previously (8). Immunostained samples were examined by fluorescent microscopy (Axioplan 2, Zeiss). TUNEL (TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling) assay revealed dead cells to be stained by the DEAD-EndTM Fluorometric TUNEL System (Promega) and counterstained with rhodamine-phalloidin, DAPI (staining of nuclei), and anti-C. rodentium antiserum. TUNEL-positive cells were counted at least in five fields of view that included the proprial muscular layer through the luminal side at x50 magnification and then converted to numbers per 1 mm2.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
espF), the subcellular localization of EspF was examined using immunofluorescence microscopy with anti-EspF, anti-mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 (mtHsp70) antibody and TO-PRO3. As shown in Fig. 1A, the EspF signal (green) in HeLa cells merged with the mitochondrial signal (red) (Fig. 1A, panel j or o), in which the intensity profiles of EspF and mtHsp70 signals as scanned along the X-X' axis in panels l and m, were similar (Fig. 1B). Since the EspF signal mostly overlapped with the bacterial signal, we subsequently scanned the signals toward the Z-axis moving along to the X-X' to ensure the special relationship among the three signals for bacteria, EspF, and mitochondria. As shown in Fig. 1C, the major EspF signal was merged with that of the mitochondria. A similar subcellular localization was observed in other mammalian cell lines such as HEp-2, Caco-2, T84, and COS-7 infected with EPEC,2 supporting the notion that EspF secreted by EPEC is imported into host mitochondria.
|
EspF MTS Functions in Mitochondrial ImportTo investigate whether or not the MTS exists in EspF, we constructed various truncated versions of EspF, and each was cloned into either pEGFP-N3 (for pEspF-EGPF derivatives) or pEGFP-C2 (for pEGFP-EspF derivatives) (Fig. 2A). The resulting plasmids introduced into COS-7 cells were analyzed for cellular distributions of the signals for EspF-EGFP (EGFP, green) and MitoTracker, a mitochondrial specific marker (red), using immunofluorescence microscopy. As shown in Fig. 2, A and B, the full-length EspF-EGFP, EspF-(1-72)-EGFP, EspF-(1-43)-EGFP, and EspF-(1-24)-EGFP were colocalized with mitochondria, whereas EspF-(24-206)-EGPF, EspF-(134-206)-EGPF, EGPF-EspF-(134-206), and EGPF-EspF were dispersed in the cytoplasm, indicating that the N-terminal EspF sequence functions as the MTS.
|

m) has been shown to be required for mitochondrial proteins (other than mitochondrial outer membrane proteins) to be imported into mitochondria (39), we examined whether or not EspF migration into mitochondria would depend on 
m. COS-7 cell transfectants carrying pEspF-EGFP, pMn-SOD-EGFP, or pTom20-EGFP were investigated in the presence or absence of valinomycin (10 µM) for subcellular localization using immunofluorescence microscopy. As can be seen in Fig. 3 (panels e, m, and u), because MitoTracker is incorporated into mitochondria in a manner dependent on 
m, in valinomycin-treated cells the MitoTracker signal was not confined to the mitochondria instead being distributed within the cytoplasm, confirming that the 
m had disappeared. Tom20 could be imported into mitochondria regardless of valinomycin treatment (Fig. 3, panel v). Under these conditions, EspF, as well as Mn-SOD, which localizes in the matrix, was unable to migrate into mitochondria of cells treated with valinomycin (Fig. 3, panels f and n), strongly indicating that migration of EspF into mitochondria requires 
m.
|

m (43), we substituted the 14th and 22nd Arg residues with Gln. The localization in mitochondria was investigated by the same methods as those used for the point EspF mutants. Interestingly, the import capacity of the resulting EspF(R14Q-R22Q)-EGFP was almost completely abolished, while EspF(R14Q) and EspF(R22Q) retained this ability. Thus, the 16th Leu in the MTS of EspF appears to be critical for interaction with some putative mitochondrial receptor, whereas the 14th or 22nd Arg may participate in EspF uptake by mitochondria.
|
espF/pEspF or
espF/pEspF(L16E)), and the subcellular localization of EspF was analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy with anti-EspF and anti-mtHsp70 antibodies. As expected, the EspF signal (green) in HeLa cells infected with
espF/pEspF was confined to the mitochondria (red), but the EspF(L16E) signal in HeLa cells was dispersed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 5A). To further confirm this, subcellular fractions of HeLa cells infected with
espF/pEspF or
espF/pEspF(L16E) were investigated for the localization of EspF or EspF(L16E). Using fractional centrifugation and sucrose density-gradient centrifugation (see "Experimental Procedures"), the locations of EspF (and EspF(L16E)) in each of the subcellular fractions, the nuclei-unbroken cell, mitochondria, microsomes, and cytosol, were analyzed by immunoblottings with anti-COX II (cytochrome oxidase subunit II) (mitochondrial marker), anti-Intimin (bacterial marker), anti-aldolase (cytosolic marker), and anti-EspF antibodies, respectively. As shown in Fig. 5B, though EspF was mostly localized in the mitochondria, EspF(L16E) was barely detectable in the mitochondrial fraction, instead being detected mostly in the cytosol.
|

m is necessary for producing ATP, a major source of bioenergy, via oxidative phosphorylation, and plays a regulatory role in cell fate, "survival versus death" (44). Previous studies found that EPEC infection of cultured epithelial cells elicited both apoptosis and necrosis, in which the role of EspF is important (13). Therefore, we investigated HeLa cell responses to EPEC infection by focusing on the relationship between cell death and 
m. HeLa cells pretreated with rhodamine123 (Rho123), a fluorescent dye sequestered by active mitochondria, were infected with EPEC for 30 min in the presence of EH (1 µg/ml), a cell-impermeable fluorescent dye, allowing it to flow into the host cytosol and nucleus upon disruption of the cytoplasmic membrane (13). The time course imaging of cell responses was analyzed using phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy up to 5.5-h postinfection. As seen in the series of photographs, the Rho123 signal (green: active mitochondria) within the cells gradually decreased up to 3.5-h postinfection, after which the infected cell lapsed into a rapid cell burst without cell shrinkage (Fig. 6A, white arrowheads at 2.5-3.5 h and yellow arrowheads at 3.5-5 h). Following the cell burst, an influx of EH into the nucleus resulted from the loss of cytoplasmic membrane integrity (Fig. 6A, white arrowhead at 3.5 h and yellow arrowhead at 4.5 h). These results thus suggested that the collapse of 
m directed by EPEC infection leads to cell burst. (The videos of these phase (S1), fluorescent (S2), and merged (S3) images are published on the Journal of Biological Chemistry website as Supplemental Data.) These cellular responses were not detectable when HeLa cells were infected with the
espF.2
|

m reduction would occur upon the import of EspF into mitochondria. To test this, HeLa cells pretreated with Rho123 were infected with WT,
espF, or the espF complement strains. (The amount of EspF secreted by these strains were almost the same (Fig. 6B).) HeLa cells at 6-h postinfection were collected and subjected to FACS flow cytometry in order to analyze the Rho123 intensity profile (see "Experimental Procedures"). In this assay, a low intensity Rho123 peak appeared in 99% of HeLa cells upon treatment with 0.05% Triton X-100 representing loss of 
m, whereas a high intensity Rho123 peak appeared in 99% of untreated HeLa cells, representing a high 
m level (Fig. 6C, top panel). As shown in Fig. 6C, upon infection with WT or
espF, a low intensity Rho123 peak was detected in 78.7 or 18.5% of the cell population, respectively. Furthermore, when HeLa cells were infected with
espF/pEspF or
espF/pEspF(L16E), low intensity Rho123 peaks were seen in 81.8 or 23.3% of the cell population, respectively, indicating that the dissipation of 
m induced by EPEC depends upon the import of EspF into mitochondria. Kenny and Jepson (21) previously indicated that Map, one of the EPEC TTSS-mediated effectors secreted, targets mitochondria and disrupts 
m. Therefore, we investigated
map and
espF-
map for their effects on 
m. As shown in Fig. 6C (bottom panels), infection of HeLa cells with
map and
espF-
map resulted in low intensity Rho123 peaks in 58.5 and 8.9% of cells, respectively, suggesting that, though the presence of Map affects 
m to some extent, the major factor leading to dissipation of 
m in this assay is EspF.
To further characterize the cell death induced by EspF during EPEC infection, we carried out an LDH assay to quantify the amount of LDH released from the damaged cell cytoplasm into the medium. The amounts of LDH released from HeLa cells into the medium at 2-, 4-, and 6-h postinfection were measured as described under "Experimental Procedures." As shown in Fig. 6D, upon WT infection of HeLa cells, cytotoxicity increased markedly in a time course manner as compared with that shown by untreated cells. However, the cytotoxicity was significantly reduced in HeLa cells infected with
espF. Similarly, upon infection of HeLa cells with
espF/pEspF, cytotoxicity was high as compared with that of
espF/pEspF(L16E) infection, suggesting that EspF import into the mitochondria is involved in cell death. Since
espF and
espF/pEspF(L16E) infection of HeLa cells still elicited cell death to some extent, it is likely that some additional factor(s) associated with EspF participate in the induction of cell death. A similar cytotoxic effect on HeLa cells by C. rodentium-borne EspF (EspFCR) was observed when we introduced pBREspFCR but not pBREspFCR(L16E) into the EPEC
espF (Fig. 6D). Furthermore, we examined the
map and
espF-
map for their capacities to induce cell death under the same conditions. As shown in Fig. 6D, the absence of Map from EPEC but not EspF had no appreciable effect on the EPEC-induced cytotoxicity in HeLa cells. When the LDH assay was conducted using another cell line such as a colonic T84 cell monolayer, no significant differences in the cytotoxity induced by WT and
espF infection were observed. However, when cytotoxicity on the T84 cell monolayer was measured by counting the cells taking up EH, the cytotoxic pattern was similar to that of the LDH assay using HeLa cells and was dependent on the ability of EspF to migrate into mitochondria.2
Recent studies indicate that the pathway stimulating apoptotic cell death via the decrease in 
m is mediated by release of cytochrome c from the mitochondrial intermembrane space into the cytoplasm; then a complex composed of caspase-9, Apaf-1 and dATP is formed, and activates caspase-3, -6, and -7 which are required for apoptosis induction (45). Hence, we investigated whether or not cytochrome c is released from mitochondria in response to EPEC infection of epithelial cells. As shown in Fig. 6E, release of cytochrome c into the cytoplasm was detected at 4 and 6 h after infecting HeLa cells with WT and
espF/pEspF but not
espF or
espF/pEspF(L16E) (Fig. 6E). The results of this series of experiments indicate that migration of EspF into mitochondria during bacterial infection leads to disappearance of 
m, which leads to the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria into the cytoplasm and ultimately necrotic cell death.
The Status of EspF as a Virulence FactorTo establish the in vivo role of EspF in bacterial infection of the intestinal mucosa, we constructed a C. rodentium-borne espF non-polar mutant (
espFCR), and pEspFCR or pEspF(L16E)CR was introduced into
espFCR (called
espFCR/pEspFCR and
espFCR/pEspF(L16E)CR). As shown in Fig. 7A, the amounts of EspF secreted by
espFCR/pEspFCR and
espFCR/pEspF(L16E)CR were similar. EspFCR and EspF(L16E)CR were subsequently assessed for their ability to migrate into mitochondria by creating pEspFCR-EGFP and pEspF(L16E)CR-EGFP. As expected, EspFCR-but not EspF(L16E)CR-EGFP could migrate into mitochondria.2 To investigate whether or not the import of EspFCR into mitochondria affects bacterial pathogenesis,
2 x 108 of wild-type C. rodentium (WTCR),
espFCR,
espFCR/pEspFCR, and
espFCR/pEspF(L16E)CR were orally administered via the stomach to 10 C3H/HeJ mice, and survival of the mice was monitored up to 20 days after inoculation (Fig. 7B). Mice infected with WTCR showed 100% mortality up to day 12, whereas mice infected by
espFCR survived through day 12 with 10% mortality after day 14. Similarly, mice infected with
espFCR/pEspFCR showed 80% mortality up to day 14, whereas those infected with
espFCR/pEspF(L16E)CR exhibited 20% mortality by day 16 (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, C3H/HeJ mice (n = 5) infected with C. rodentium strains were sacrificed on day 9 and typical pathological features of the large intestine were macroscopically observed (Fig. 7C). Although intestines from the mice inoculated with LB were healthy with solidified feces, those from mice infected with WTCR were edematous without solidified feces and were typical findings of bacterially induced intestinal colitis. The intestines from mice inoculated with
espFCR remained healthy with solidified feces, albeit some portions of the intestine were slightly swollen. The intestines from mice inoculated with
espFCR/pEspFCR showed findings similar to those of specimens with WTCR. However, the intestines from mice infected with
espFCR/pEspF(L16E)CR barely showed such findings, though the content of solidified feces was slightly less than with
espFCR. The mice infected with these strains were sacrificed on day 9 and were also investigated for colonic weight, numbers of bacteria colonizing the colon, and intestinal mucosal layer thickness as described under "Experimental Procedures." These indices were significantly reduced by infection with
espFCR as compared with WTCR. The same was true for infection with
espFCR/pEspF(L16E)CR or
espFCR/pEspFCR (Fig. 7, D-F). Bacteria present in the frozen distal colon sections on day 9 postinfection were also stained using anti-C. rodentium antiserum and then visualized using immunofluorescence microscopy. Phalloidin (actin) staining was used to counterstain the tissue. High numbers of bacteria were visible over the epithelial surfaces including intestinal crypts with WTCR or
espFCR/pEspFCR infection but not
espFCR or
espFCR/pEspF(L16E)CR infection (Fig. 7G). The bacteria were frequently visible in proximity to the lamina muscularis mucosae in colonic sections (Fig. 7G, blue arrowheads), whereas large amounts of exfoliative epithelial tissue inside the lumen were stained with anti-C. rodentium antiserum (Fig. 7G, white arrowheads). The intestinal tissue infected with WTCR or
espFCR/pEspFCR showed marked hyperplasia, whereas hyperplasia was significantly milder with
espFCR or
espFCR/pEspF(L16E)CR infection. Thus, these results from this series of experiments further support the notion that the ability of EspF to migrate into host mitochondria is critical for bacterial colonization of the intestinal epithelium and the initiation off disease processes.
|
espFCR,
espFCR/pEspFCR, or
espFCR/pEspF(L16E)CR (Fig. 8). Frozen distal colonic sections on day-9 postinfection were stained for dead cells by the TUNEL method and counterstained with rhodamine-phalloidin, anti-C. rodentium serum, and DAPI- and the TUNEL-positive cells were counted. The numbers of TUNEL-positive cells per mm2 of a section showed cell death caused by infection with WTCR or
espFCR/pEspFCR to be decreased to one-fifth of that with
espFCR or
espFCR/pEspF(L16E)CR (Fig. 8A). Fig. 8B shows the representative data from the TUNEL-positive cells in the infected intestinal section. Based on the results of this series of experiments, we concluded that the ability of EspF to migrate into mitochondria is biologically relevant to intestinal injury including the cell death that results from bacterial infection.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mitochondria are an important host target for many pathogens determining the fate of infected host cells (47). For example, human T-lymphotrophic virus type I protein p13II has an amphiphilic MTS and decreases mitochondrial membrane potential (48). PorB is the porin protein of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis. Though N. gonorrhoeae PorB has no typical MTS, it interacts with the mitochondrial outer membrane via binding to VDAC (voltage-dependent anion channel) protein, leading to apoptotic cell death (49). In contrast, the PorB of N. meningitidis protects cells from apoptosis (50). The N-terminal cleavage product of VacA (p34) secreted from Helicobacter pylori has no MTS, but can be imported into mitochondria and trigger apoptotic cell death (51). SipB secreted from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium via TTSS can also be imported into mitochondria and lead to cell death via induction of mitochondrial autophagy (52). Interestingly, although no genetic evidence has yet been obtained, Map secreted from EPEC via the TTSS has a typical MTS in the N-terminal 42 amino acids involved in import into mitochondria (22). Furthermore, Tir, the intimin receptor, has also been indicated to migrate into mitochondria and thereby lead to cell death (53). Together with those of a recent study indicating that EspF has the capacity to migrate into mitochondria (26), these findings indicate that the delivery of various effectors into host mitochondria from EPEC is likely to play some important roles in bacterial infection.
We demonstrated here that EspF can be imported into mitochondria, and that this protein import is crucial for EPEC infection. MTS involved in mitochondrial import of proteins reportedly takes part in recognition by several mitochondrial outer membrane proteins such as Tom20, Tom22, and Tom70, followed by translocation into the matrix through a general import pore (40). Since the MTS of EspF is located at the N terminus, EspF might initially be recognized by the Tom20-Tom22 complex instead of Tom70. A genetic and functional study of Tom20 indicated that the MTS recognized by Tom20 frequently possesses a motif composed of
XX
(
represents a hydrophobic amino acid, whereas X represents an arbitrary amino acid with a hydrophilic plus long side chain) (54). Thus, we looked for a putative consensus motif in the MTS of EspF, and found 5-ISNAA-9 and 13-GRQLV-17 to fit the motif. The fact that EspF(L16E) (13-GRQEV-17) was poorly transported into mitochondria raised the possibility that the EspF MTS might also be imported into mitochondria via an interaction with Tom20.
As mentioned above, many pathogenic bacteria can kill host cells by inducing cell death, although the type of cell death varies among target host cells, depending on cellular physiological or experimental conditions (55). Crane et al. (13) reported that EPEC infection of epithelial cells caused necrosis-like cell death, whereas ectopic expression of EspF in epithelial cells triggered apoptotic cell death (13). In this study, we demonstrated that import of EspF into mitochondria resulted in a decrease in 
m, accompanied by necrotic cell (see Fig. 6). Recent studies have shown Salmonella-induced macrophage necrotic cell death to be caspase-1-dependent (56), while Bordetella bronchiseptica-induced necrotic cell death in epithelial cells is caspase-1-independent (57). Nevertheless, various forms of necrotic cell death were prevented by adding glycine (inhibitor of necrosis caused by nonspecific ion fluxes through the cytoplasmic membrane). Furthermore, EspF-induced cell death was not inhibited by glycine but was inhibited by z-VAD-fmk (pancaspase inhibitor), although no cleavage of polyADPribose polymerase (PARP), a substrate for caspases, was observed.2 It has recently been shown that two different types of cell death occur in Jurkat cells, with the type being determined by the intracellular ATP concentration (58). The authors observed the concentration of intracellular ATP to act as a molecular switch controlling the type of cell death. Indeed, they reported that with a low concentration of intracellular ATP, necrotic cell death could be blocked by adding z-VADfmk without Lamin B, a substrate for caspases, being cleaved. These features of necrotic cell death are similar to those of cell death induced by EPEC infection. Intriguingly, Crane et al. (13) reported that EspF has some capacity to reduce the intracellular ATP concentration (13). If true, this raises the possibility that necrotic death of epithelial cells in response to EPEC infection may be triggered by reducing the ATP concentration via the release of cytochrome c, which functions in respiration as a key molecule, from mitochondria resulting from the import of EspF into mitochondria.
Recent studies have indicated another biological activity of EspF i.e. involvement in alteration of intestinal epithelial barrier function (24, 59). Dickman et al. (60) suggested that Rota virus infection decreased metabolism and cellular ATP concentrations, resulting in the destruction of cell-cell junctions. Thus, we are currently attempting to address whether EspF import into the mitochondria causes destruction of cell-cell junctions via a decreased cellular ATP concentration.
Infection of the murine intestine with C. rodentium has recently been established as the most reliable model of EPEC pathogenesis. The espFCR mutant created in C. rodentium (strain EX-33) in our study confirmed lower virulence, with oral administration to C3H/HeJ mice, than with WTCR. Importantly, the ability of EspFCR to migrated into mitochondria as determined by EspF(L16E)CR was shown to be highly relevant to bacterial pathogenicity, as judged by the mouse mortality rate, colon weight, and intestinal mucosal layer thickness. Furthermore, EspF activity was also required for promotion of bacterial colonization. Though we have no other evidence as yet, we speculate that EspF activity might be needed for the pathogen to stimulate intestinal cell metabolism, thereby increasing the opportunity for bacteria to attach to the freshly renewed cell surface, possibly conferring some advantage over epithelial cells in a normal metabolic state. In fact, as shown in the histopathological study of murine intestine infected with WTCR, it seems likely that the hyperplasia caused by the pathogen increases opportunities for the bacteria to colonize the intestinal cryptae, as compared with the condition associated with the espF mutant. Since infection of mice with
espFCR or
espFCR/pEspF(L16E)CR still caused some intestinal hyperplasia as compared with the untreated intestine, bacterial effectors other than EspF, as described in the Introduction, must also be required for full bacterial virulence.
In summary, EspF secreted via the TTSS of EPEC targets host mitochondria. The N-terminal 24 amino acids serve as a mitochondrial targeting signal. In migration of EspF into host mitochondria, Leu16 and Arg14,22 in the MTS are critical. Assessment of mitochondrial membrane potential (
m) in infected epithelial cells indicated that EspF is required for loss of 
m to be triggered by EPEC infection. Furthermore, EspF is associated with the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria into the cytoplasm, which leads to host cell death. Finally, the significance of the ability of EspF to migrate into mitochondria during bacterial infection was established for the first time by creating the C. rodentium mutants,
espFCR,
espFCR/pEspFCR, and
espFCR/pEspF(L16E)CR, in the murine infection model. Our findings thus provide clues to elucidating the role of EspF in initiation of the mitochondrial death pathway, which appears to be an important mechanism by which EPEC promote colonization of the intestinal mucosa.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains Supplemental Materials. ![]()
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-3-5449-5252; Fax: 81-3-5449-5405; E-mail: sasakawa{at}ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
1 The abbreviations used are: EPEC, enteropathogenic E. coli; LEE, locus of enterocyte effacement; 
m, mitochondrial membrane potential; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; EH, ethidium homodimer; EspF, EPEC-secreted protein F; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; mtHsp70, mitochondrial heat shock protein 70; MTS, mitochondrial targeting signal; Rho123, rhodamine 123; TTSS, type III secretion system; WT, wild type; MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; TUNEL, TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling; Map, mitochondrial-associated protein; moi, multiplicity of infection; mAb, monoclonal antibody; Km, kanamycin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; cfu, colony-forming unit; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; TRITC, tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate. ![]()
2 T. Nagai and C. Sasakawa, unpublished data. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|