|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 45, 37974-37987, November 11, 2005
Epidermal Growth Factor Induces Tyrosine Phosphorylation, Membrane Insertion, and Activation of Transient Receptor Potential Channel 4*From the School of Biomedical Sciences, Level 5 MSB, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia
Received for publication, April 4, 2005 , and in revised form, August 29, 2005.
Various members of the canonical family of transient receptor potential channels (TRPCs) exhibit increased cation influx following receptor stimulation or Ca2+ store depletion. Tyrosine phosphorylation of TRP family members also results in increased channel activity; however, the link between the two events is unclear. We report that two tyrosine residues in the C terminus of human TRPC4 (hTRPC4), Tyr-959 and Tyr-972, are phosphorylated following epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor stimulation of COS-7 cells. This phosphorylation was mediated by Src family tyrosine kinases (STKs), with Fyn appearing to be the dominant kinase. In addition, EGF receptor stimulation induced the exocytotic insertion of hTRPC4 into the plasma membrane dependent on the activity of STKs and was accompanied by a phosphorylation-dependent increase in the association of hTRPC4 with Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor. Furthermore, this translocation and association was defective upon mutation of Tyr-959 and Tyr-972 to phenylalanine. Significantly, inhibition of STKs was concomitant with a reduction in Ca2+ influx in both native COS-7 cells and hTRPC4-expressing HEK293 cells, with cells expressing the Y959F/Y972F mutant exhibiting a reduced EGF response. These findings represent the first demonstration of a mechanism for phosphorylation to modulate TRPC channel function.
The precise regulation of Ca2+ signaling is crucial to the function and survival of all cell types, with disrupted Ca2+ handling contributing to the pathogenesis of many diseases, including heart failure, ischemia, and neuronal degeneration (1-3). Control is maintained through complex interplays between plasma membrane proteins, the mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, Ca2+-binding proteins, and second messenger systems (4, 5). A ubiquitous mechanism of Ca2+ entry is through the activation of non-voltage-gated Ca2+ channels located in the plasma membrane. These channels respond to either receptor activation or intracellular Ca2+ store depletion to control events such as gene expression, secretion, and migration (6). Various members of the transient receptor potential (TRP)2 family of cation channels are implicated as important components of this ubiquitous Ca2+ signaling pathway and represent an important area for potential drug therapy (7).
The canonical or classic transient receptor potential ion channel sub-family (TRPC) is one of three TRP subfamilies known to mediate receptor-operated and store-operated Ca2+ entry (7). The most compelling experimental evidence for a role of a TRPC protein in store-operated Ca2+ entry came from studies on the TRPC4 null mouse where TRPC4 was identified as an essential component of store-operated Ca2+ channels in aortic endothelial cells (8). Evidence for a role of TRPC channels in receptor-operated Ca2+ entry include the finding that isolated endothelial cells from the TRPC4 knock-out mouse exhibited reduced Ca2+ entry in response to acetylcholine, ATP, and thrombin application, and antisense oligonucleotide down-regulation of TRPC4 reduced Ca2+ oscillations in response to carbachol application in HEK293 cells (8-10). Clearly, both store-operated and receptor-operated mechanisms can contribute to the activation of TRPC channels, in particular, TRPC4; however, the precise signaling components remain largely unknown. Recent findings suggest phosphorylation may be important in the control of TRP channel activation. Stimulation of the EGF receptor (EGFR) has also been shown to activate various members of the TRP family, including TRPC4, -5, and -6 (11, 12), with the latter shown to undergo tyrosine phosphorylation and enhanced channel activity following EGFR activation. Indeed, a recent report demonstrated the involvement of TRPC4 in the activation of a store-operated current in corneal epithelial cells by EGF through an unknown mechanism (13). Furthermore, an increase in diacylglycerol-stimulated single channel activity of TRPC6 was seen upon addition of the Src family tyrosine kinase (STK), Fyn (11). STKs also appear important in the activation of TRPC3, TRPV4, and TRPM7 (14-17). The modulation of TRP channels by receptor tyrosine kinase activation suggests an important role for TRP members in regulating Ca2+ influx initiated by growth factor application. To date there have been no reports of phosphorylation occurring in the TRPC1/4/5 family, and the mechanisms of phosphorylation-induced modulation of TRP channel activity remain unknown.
Another important mechanism in the regulation of TRP channels is modulation of membrane expression through the reversible translocation of subunits to the plasma membrane (18, 19). For example, TRPL was shown to undergo rapid membrane insertion following exposure of photoreceptors to light (20), and TRPC6 was demonstrated to traffic to the cell surface upon G-protein-coupled receptor activation (21). The C-terminal PDZ (PSD-95, Dlg, ZO-1) motif of TRPC4 has been implicated in the control of channel surface expression and localization (22). This motif is also responsible for mediating the interaction with the multi-PDZ domain-containing scaffolding protein Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor, NHERF (23). Deletion of the PDZ motif (T-R-L) of hTRPC4 dramatically reduced the plasma membrane levels of the channel, which led the authors to suggest that the interaction between hTRPC4 and NHERF is required for the retention and stabilization of hTRPC4 channels at the cell membrane (22). NHERF is also involved in regulating the cell surface expression levels of numerous other plasma membrane proteins, including the The present study investigates the basis for EGFR-mediated Ca2+ entry through hTRPC4 channels. Evidence is presented that this key physiological activity results through Src family tyrosine kinase-mediated phosphorylation of hTRPC4 causing an increase in channel association with NHERF and a resultant increase in the plasma membrane expression of hTRPC4.
AntibodiesAnti-M2 FLAG antibody was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, anti-PY20 antibody from BD Transduction Laboratories, and anti-TRPC4 and -TRPC5 antibodies from Alomone Laboratories. Anti-TRPC6 antibody was from Chemicon Laboratories. Rabbit polyclonal and mouse monoclonal anti-NHERF antibodies were from Calbiochem and Abcam Ltd., respectively. Anti-FYN (FYN3), anti-Lyn, anti-EGFR, anti-Src, anti- 4 integrin, and anti-TRPC4 (sc-20) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Streptavidin horseradish peroxidase and alkaline phosphatase conjugates were from Silenus Laboratories. Horse anti-mouse biotin was from Vector; Rabbit anti-GFP antibody and Streptavidin Alexa-594 were from Molecular Probes. All other reagents were from Amersham Biosciences. Immunoprecipitation and BiotinylationCell lines were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Cell culture reagents were obtained from Invitrogen. HEK293 cells stably expressing FLAG-hTRPC4 were maintained in the above media containing 400 µg/ml Zeocin (Invitrogen). COS-7 and HEK293 cells were transfected with expression plasmids with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions and routinely achieved between 35 and 60% transfection efficiency. For immunoprecipitation studies, cells were washed in ice-cold PBS and lysed in 1.2 ml of RIPA buffer (1% Triton X-100, 0.5% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, 0.05% (w/v) SDS, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) supplemented with Complete Protease Inhibitors (Roche Applied Science). Protein content was determined by BCA analysis (Pierce Biotechnology) and equal amounts of protein subjected to immunoprecipitation with protein G-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) and 4 µg of antibody for 2 h at 4°C. For immunoprecipitation from rat brain membranes, lysates were pre-cleared with protein G-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) followed by centrifugation. Immune complexes were washed four times with lysis buffer and resolved, along with lysates, by 8% SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting onto Hybond ECL nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Biosciences). Membranes were blocked and probed with indicated antibodies, visualized with ECL Plus reagent on Typhoon Imaging System (Amersham Biosciences), and quantified with ImageQuaNT software. For biotinylation studies A431 or COS-7 cells treated with human EGF (Sigma-Aldrich) either in the presence or absence of PP2, PP3, or AG1478 (Calbiochem, Merck Biosciences) were washed in PBS and either lysed in RIPA buffer or biotinylated with 0.2 mg/ml EZ-Link Sulfyl-NHS-Biotin (Pierce Biotechnology) in PBS for 30 min at 4 °C. Cells were then washed three times with 10 mM glycine in PBS prior to lysis in RIPA buffer. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis with streptavidin-HRP or streptavidin-AP. Total biotinylated membrane proteins were isolated by incubating lysates with 50 µl of NeutrAvidin-agarose (Pierce Biotechnology) for 2 h at 4°C. DNA Constructs and MutagenesisN-terminal FLAG-tagged hTRPC4 was generated by PCR from pCMVSport-hTRPC4 (gift of Dr. J. Putney, NIEHS, National Institutes of Health) (27) using Expand High Fidelity Taq (Roche Diagnostics) and cloned into BamH1-NotI sites of pcDNA3.1/Zeo(+) with an inserted internal ribosome entry site-GFP sequence (Invitrogen). All clones were verified by DNA sequencing (Biomolecular Research Facility, Newcastle, Australia). The Y959F, Y972F, and Y959F/Y972F hTRPC4 mutants were generated using QuikChange II (Stratagene). Primer pairs for all PCR steps were supplied upon request. YFP-hTRPC4 was generated by BamH1-NotI digestion of FLAG-hTRPC4 from pcDNA3.1/Zeo(+) and insertion after the C terminus of YFP in pYFP-NT-3.1/Zeo(+) (Dr. F. Ross, University of Newcastle). peGFP-hTRPC1 was amplified by PCR from pTRPC1-N-FLAG (gift of Dr. G. Barritt, Flinders University and Dr. C. Montell, John Hopkins University) with Expand High Fidelity Taq and inserted into BamH1-XbaI sites of peGFP-C3 (Clontech). Truncated C-terminal GFP-hTRPC4 was generated by PCR amplification of pCMVSport-hTRPC4 and ligated in-frame with the C terminus of GFP in peGFP-C2 (Clontech). GST fusions were generated by PCR amplification from pCMVSport-hTRPC4 and insertion into the BamH1-NotI sites of pGEX-4T-1 (Amersham Biosciences). GST-NT-T was generated by EcoR1-SalI digestion of GST-NT and sub-cloning liberated DNA into pGEX-4T-1. The hTRPC5 construct was obtained from Dr. D. Beech (University of Leeds). Fyn constructs were provided by Dr. T. Yamamoto (University of Tokyo, Japan) (28), Lyn constructs by Dr. M. Hibbs (29), and the wild-type-EGFR construct by Dr. F. Walker (Ludwig Institute, Melbourne) (30). In Vitro Kinase AssayHEK293 cells were transfected with pMET-Fyn-YF expression vector and lysed with RIPA buffer. Fyn-YF was precipitated with FYN3 antibody, washed two times with kinase buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 3 mM MnCl2, 10 µM ATP, with 0.25% Triton X-100), and immune complexes were incubated with equal quantities of purified GST fusion proteins in kinase buffer for 30 min at 37 °C. Complexes were cleared by centrifugation and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Immunofluorescence and Confocal MicroscopyCOS-7 cells transfected with YFP-hTRPC4 and HA-NHERF, were grown on glass coverslips, washed twice with PBS, then fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde/PBS/5% sucrose and permeabilized with 50 µg/ml digitonin. Cells were blocked in 5% normal goat serum/5% normal horse serum for 45 min, then stained with anti-NHERF antibodies followed by anti-mouse biotin prior to development with streptavidin-conjugated Alexa 594. Cells were mounted with Anti-Fade (Dako Cytomation) and observed under 63x oil-immersion objective on a Zeiss Axiovert 100M confocal microscope and analyzed with Zeiss LSM510. Intracellular Ca2+ ImagingCells were cultured on glass coverslips and loaded with 2-4 µM fura-2-acetoxymethyl ester in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium at 37 °C for 30 min and incubated in HEPES-buffered saline (HBS, 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 5.5 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, 2 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4) for 30 min prior to stimulation. In experiments performed in Ca2+-free medium, cells were placed in HEPES-buffered saline without CaCl2 containing 200 µM EGTA. Fluorescence was recorded from coverslips mounted in 4.5-ml chambers, alternatively excited at 340 and 380 nm wavelengths and emission measured at 510 nm. Measurements were made using a PerkinElmer Life Sciences LS50B luminescence spectrophotometer sampled every 1.4 s at 30 °C and analyzed with an FL Data Manager (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Changes in [Ca2+]i were monitored as 340/380 fluorescence ratio and converted to relative Ca2+ concentration using the formula of Grynkiewicz et al. (31), after establishment of daily Rmin and Rmax. Peak Ca2+ change was measured as the integral under the rise in [Ca2+]i above basal for the period of stimulation or Ca2+ re-addition. Single cell imaging was performed on transfected HEK293 cells illuminated with Lambda DG-4 lamp, captured with an Orca ER camera, and analyzed with the MetaFluor program (Universal Imaging Devices) using an objective with 40x magnification. All statistics were performed using Prism, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's post test.
EGF Receptor Stimulation Induces Tyrosine Phosphorylation of hTRPC4Activation of EGFR is known to induce both Ca2+ entry and store release with a number of TRPC channels, including TRPC4, -5, and -6 activated following EGF application. We sought to examine whether tyrosine phosphorylation of the TRPC member, hTRPC4, is involved in its activation. A recent report has questioned the specificity of commercially available TRPC4 antibodies (32); therefore, we first sought confirmation of the ability of the Alomone antibody to detect hTRPC4. An immunoblot was performed on whole cell lysates from control, FLAG-hTRPC4, and YFP-tagged FLAG-hTRPC4 transfected COS-7 cells to demonstrate the ability of the anti-TRPC4 antibody to recognize transfected hTRPC4 and endogenous TRPC4. As shown in Fig. 1A, the anti-TRPC4 antibody recognizes both endogenous TRPC4 and transfected hTRPC4. The endogenous product has a lower apparent molecular weight, possibly due to a species difference between the proteins or differential processing of the products in COS-7 cells. Interestingly, a variation in size between the endogenous and transfected proteins has also been reported for TRPC1 (33). Significantly, neither the endogenous nor transfected protein were recognized by the antibody in the presence of immunizing peptide (data not shown) suggesting that the antibody is specific for the TRPC4 epitope. To address the role of phosphorylation in the activation of TRPC4 by EGF, serum-starved COS-7 cells transfected with FLAG-hTRPC4 were stimulated with EGF and assessed for tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 by immunoblotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (PY20). At 20 min post stimulation, a 5-fold increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 was observed (Fig. 1B); an effect also shown to occur with heterologously expressed hTRPC4 tagged with YFP (Fig. 1C). This shift in apparent molecular weight of the band recognized by the PY20 antibody to match the corresponding TRPC4 band upon addition of YFP suggests the species recognized by the PY20 antibody is the exogenously expressed immunoprecipitated TRPC4 protein in both FLAG and GFP precipitates and not a TRPC4-associated protein. Further, anti-FLAG immunoprecipitates failed to isolate any significant PY20 or TRPC4 reactive bands in the absence of expressed FLAG-TRPC4. To determine if endogenous hTRPC4 is phosphorylated, lysates from EGF stimulated A431 cells, which express both TRPC4 and large amounts of EGFR, were reacted with PY20 and precipitated proteins probed for the presence of TRPC4. In agreement with the results obtained with transfected hTRPC4, endogenous TRPC4 was phosphorylated upon EGFR stimulation (Fig. 1D), an effect that was prevented upon application of the specific EGFR inhibitor, AG1478 (10 nM) (Fig. 1D). Tyrosine phosphorylation in response to EGF stimulation was not common to all TRPC members, because GFP-hTRPC1, a closely related TRPC member, was not phosphorylated under similar conditions (Fig. 1E). Taken together, these data show that hTRPC4 is tyrosine phosphorylated following EGFR stimulation. Numerous proteins are regulated by tyrosine phosphorylation following activation of both G-protein-coupled receptors and receptor tyrosine kinases, including members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and STK-signaling cascades. Therefore, we sought to determine whether tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 was unique to EGFR activation. Transiently transfected COS-7 cells were treated with a range of stimuli known to activate TRPC channels and initiate Ca2+ entry. G-protein receptor pathways were activated with the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor agonist, carbachol, the PKC agonist oleoylacyl-sn-glycerol, and histamine. The effect of store depletion on hTRPC4 tyrosine phosphorylation was investigated using the sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor, thapsigargin. Cells were examined for activation of the classic G-protein and tyrosine kinase receptor signaling pathway, Ras/Raf/MAPK by immunoblotting lysates for phosphorylated ERK1/2. The effect on global tyrosine phosphorylation was also studied by probing lysates with PY20. All stimuli used were shown to induce ERK activation and global tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 1F), however only EGF induced significant tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 (Fig. 1F). These data indicate that tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 is unique to receptor tyrosine kinase activation. Tyrosine Phosphorylation of hTRPC4 Is Mediated by Src Family Non-receptor Tyrosine KinasesSrc family tyrosine kinases, including Fyn and Lyn, are important downstream signaling intermediates of the EGF receptor and are implicated in the regulation of ion channels (34, 35). Therefore, their role in EGFR-induced hTRPC4 phosphorylation was investigated. COS-7 cells transfected with FLAG-hTRPC4 were stimulated with EGF in the presence of the specific STK-inhibitor, PP2 (5 µM), or an equivalent concentration of inactive analogue, PP3, and cell lysates examined for hTRPC4 tyrosine phosphorylation. When STK activity was inhibited, EGF failed to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 (Fig. 2A), an effect not observed upon treatment with PP3 (Fig. 2A). Because the application of PP2 did not directly affect EGFR activation, as determined by phosphotyrosine levels of immunoprecipitated receptor (Fig. 2A), it was concluded that tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 following EGF receptor stimulation is mediated by Src family tyrosine kinases.
Recent findings have implicated the STKs, Fyn and Lyn, in the regulation of TRPC channels. Therefore, their role in EGF-stimulated TRPC4 tyrosine phosphorylation was investigated. Either kinase-inactive Fyn (K299M, Fyn-KM), wild-type Fyn (Fyn-WT), or constitutively active Fyn (Y531F, Fyn-YF) was co-expressed with FLAG-hTRPC4 in COS-7 cells, and lysates were examined for hTRPC4 tyrosine phosphorylation. Co-expression of Fyn-WT or Fyn-YF with hTRPC4 enhanced the phosphorylation of the channel by The ability of Lyn co-expression to induce the phosphorylation of hTRPC4 was also assessed. Co-expression of constitutively active p53 and p56 Lyn (Lyn-YF) isoforms with FLAG-hTRPC4 in COS-7 cells elevated the tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 in the absence of EGF (Fig. 2D). However, in contrast to the results obtained with Fyn, wild-type isoforms of Lyn did not significantly increase basal hTRPC4 tyrosine phosphorylation, possibly due to lower transfection levels of Lyn (data not shown). Significantly, Lyn was found to co-precipitate with hTRPC4 from transfected cells, providing further evidence that Lyn also closely associates with hTRPC4 and is involved in the phosphorylation event (Fig. 2D). Co-expression of a kinase inactive form of Lyn (Lyn-ki, Y397F) did not significantly alter the EGF-induced phosphorylation of TRPC4 (Fig. 2E). This may indicate a preference for Fyn in the EGFR signaling pathway to hTRPC4.
To further assess the interaction of STKs with TRPC4, a series of co-immunoprecipitations were performed from transfected COS-7 cells. Lysates from cells co-transfected with Fyn-WT and hTRPC4 were immunoprecipitated with anti-Fyn antibody or control rabbit immunoglobulin. Bound proteins were probed for the presence of phosphotyrosine (PY20), TRPC4 (FLAG), and Fyn. Only Fyn precipitates contained TRPC4 and a corresponding PY20 band (Fig. 3A). To assess the potential involvement of Src in hTRPC4 phosphorylation, EGF-stimulated FLAG-hTRPC4-transfected COS-7 cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-Src antibody and lysates analyzed by immunoblotting for phosphotyrosine and hTRPC4 (Fig. 3B). Similar to Fyn and Lyn, Src was found to associate with hTRPC4 and may be involved in mediating the EGF response, however, its role was not explored further due to the strong functional evidence for Fyn and Lyn. Associations between endogenous TRPC4 and Fyn and Lyn were also investigated. Fyn, Lyn, or EGFR were immunoprecipitated from COS-7 cell lysates, and bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting. Both Fyn and Lyn immunoprecipitates contained a strong TRPC4-immunoreactive band at the molecular weight predicted for TRPC4 protein (Fig. 3C), indicating a close association between endogenous TRPC4 and the respective STKs. This band was not present in immunoprecipitates performed with control rabbit immunoglobulin. Fyn immunoprecipitates were also shown to contain low levels of EGFR immunoreactivity, suggesting these two molecules complex in COS-7 cells. In contrast, TRPC4 was not present in EGFR immunoprecipitations indicating that the proteins do not interact directly in COS-7 cells under the conditions examined. Reverse precipitations with anti-TRPC4 antibody were not performed due to the inability of the commercially available antibodies to precipitate significant amounts of endogenous TRPC4 (data not shown). Taken together, these results demonstrate a physical association between TRPC4 and STKs. This association appears responsible for the tyrosine phosphorylation of TRPC4 in activated cells. Specific Tyrosine Residues in the C Terminus of hTRPC4 Are Phosphorylated in Response to EGF StimulationTo define the region of hTRPC4 that undergoes Fyn-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation, truncated GST-hTRPC4 fusion proteins were generated; GST-NT (amino acids 0-350), GST-NT-T (amino acids 236-350), and GST-CT (amino acids 686-977) of hTRPC4. The truncated fusion proteins were purified from BL21 Escherichia coli and used as substrates for in vitro kinase assays in the presence of immunopurified constitutively active Fyn (Fyn-YF). Under these conditions, only the C terminus of hTRPC4 was phosphorylated (Fig. 4A). A series of hTRPC4 C-terminal truncations were generated, expressed as GFP fusion proteins in COS-7 cells, and assessed for Fyn and EGF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation. Phosphorylation was shown to occur in the most distal 131 amino acids (G846-L977) of hTRPC4 (Fig. 4B). Site-directed mutagenesis of C-terminal amino acids in FLAG-hTRPC4 was used to analyze potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites in this region. Mutated constructs were expressed in COS-7 cells and assessed for their ability to undergo tyrosine phosphorylation in response to EGFR stimulation. Mutation of either tyrosine 959 or tyrosine 972 to phenylalanine (Y959F and Y972F) resulted in reduced EGFR-mediated hTRPC4 tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 4C). Mutation of both residues ablated hTRPC4 phosphorylation following EGF stimulation, indicating that these residues may be phosphorylated additively in response to EGF (Fig. 4C). Interestingly, these residues are absent from all other TRPC members, including TRPC5, and may represent a mechanism for selectively controlling TRPC4 activation.
EGF Stimulation Promotes the Insertion of hTRPC4 into the Plasma MembraneRecent data suggest that TRPC channels may be reversibly trafficked between the cell surface and an intracellular compartment in numerous cell types (36-38). Therefore, it was of interest to investigate whether, in addition to inducing tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4, EGF stimulation also promotes the translocation of hTRPC4 to the plasma membrane. To assess this, COS-7 cells transfected with FLAG-hTRPC4 were treated with EGF and the surface expression of FLAG-hTRPC4 assessed by biotinylation. Under these conditions, a 2-fold increase in surface expression of hTRPC4 was observed (Fig. 5A). The translocation of hTRPC4 was time-dependent, becoming significant after 5-min stimulation and peaking at 20 min (Fig. 5B). Elevated plasma membrane levels persisted for at least 60 min in the continual presence of EGF. The time course of the membrane insertion of hTRPC4 closely mimicked that of EGF-induced hTRPC4 tyrosine phosphorylation in COS-7 cells with both events peaking at 20-min post stimulation (Fig. 5B), indicating that the two events may be closely linked. The surface expression of endogenous hTRPC4 in response to EGF stimulation was also examined in A431 cells, which overexpress human EGFR. Surface biotinylated proteins isolated by NeutrAvidin agarose binding were assessed for the presence of hTRPC4 by immunoblotting with anti-TRPC4 antibody. Similar to the results obtained with transfected hTRPC4, EGF stimulation produced a significant increase in surface expression of endogenous TRPC4 (Fig. 5C). Surface expression of 4-integrin, a control integral membrane protein, was not altered under these conditions (Fig. 5C). Actin polymerization and store depletion have been shown to influence the plasma membrane expression of TRPC channels, with membrane levels of TRPC6 increased by store depletion and carbachol treatment in HEK293 cells and TRPC1, -3, and -4 proteins internalized after cytoskeletal reorganization in neutrophils (21, 37). Therefore, the effect of store depletion and actin polymerization on the insertion of hTRPC4 into the plasma membrane was investigated. COS-7 cells transfected with FLAG-hTRPC4 were pretreated with either cytochalasin D to disrupt actin polymerization, or the store-depleting agent, thapsigargin, prior to EGF stimulation and immunoprecipitation of surface biotinylated hTRPC4. Neither agent had any effect on the translocation of FLAG-hTRPC4 to the surface of non-treated nor EGF-stimulated cells (Fig. 5D). The effect of these agents on tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 was also investigated. Similar to the findings on membrane insertion, neither agent alone altered the tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 (Fig. 5D). Further, treatment with cytochalasin D or thapsigargin also had no effect on the level of EGF-induced phosphorylation of transfected hTRPC4. Taken together, these results demonstrate that a proportion of hTRPC4 resides in an intracellular compartment and undergoes plasma membrane insertion following EGF stimulation. Furthermore, the time course of membrane insertion closely mimics that of hTRPC4 tyrosine phosphorylation indicating that the two events may be related. The role of STK-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 in promoting membrane insertion of the channel was investigated further by stimulating COS-7 cells transiently expressing hTRPC4 with EGF in the presence of the STK inhibitor, PP2, and assessing for surface biotinylation of transfected hTRPC4. In the presence of PP2, the EGF-induced increase in hTRPC4 surface expression was reduced to non-stimulated control levels (Fig. 6A), indicating that STKs and tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 regulate the membrane insertion of hTRPC4 channel protein. To confirm a role for Fyn in this process, hTRPC4 together with either Fyn-YF or Fyn-KM were expressed in COS-7 cells and surface expression of hTRPC4 assessed by biotinylation. Overexpression of active Fyn-YF was shown to enhance the cell surface localization of hTRPC4 2-fold, whereas expression of dominant-negative Fyn-KM had no effect on the level of hTRPC4 at the plasma membrane (Fig. 6B). The enhanced level of hTRPC4 surface expression observed in the presence of Fyn-YF was similar to that shown in transfected cells following EGF stimulation. These results demonstrate an important role for STK-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation in regulating the level of TRPC4 at the cell surface.
The role of Fyn and tyrosine phosphorylation in hTRPC4 insertion was explored further using dominant negative Fyn-KM to suppress the EGF response. Co-expression of Fyn-KM with FLAG-hTRPC4 prevented the membrane insertion of hTRPC4 consistent with the block-ade of hTRPC4 tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 6C).
EGF-stimulated Tyrosine Phosphorylation of hTRPC4 Enhances the Association between hTRPC4 and NHERFPrevious studies have shown that the interaction between hTRPC4 and the Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor, NHERF, is critical in controlling the cell surface expression and localization of hTRPC4 channels (22). Recently, the interaction between NHERF and platelet-derived growth factor To assess the levels of NHERF bound to hTRPC4 in the presence of EGF, COS-7 cells transfected with FLAG-hTRPC4 and hemagglutinin-tagged NHERF (HA-NHERF) were serum-starved and incubated with EGF. FLAG-hTRPC4 was isolated from cells and immunoprecipitates analyzed for the presence of NHERF and phosphorylated tyrosine residues. Under non-stimulating conditions there is a constitutive association between NHERF and hTRPC4; however, upon stimulation with EGF there is a 50% increase in the amount of NHERF present in hTRPC4 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 7, A and B). Significantly, this increase is prevented by preincubation with the STK inhibitor PP2 (5 µM), implicating the phosphorylation of hTRPC4 as the critical event in strengthening the association between NHERF and hTRPC4 (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, examination of FLAG-hTRPC4 and NHERF immunoprecipitates for the presence of tyrosine phosphorylated hTRPC4 after EGF stimulation demonstrated that NHERF immunoprecipitates contained a greater proportion of phosphorylated hTRPC4 relative to total bound hTRPC4 when compared with FLAG immunoprecipitates (Fig. 7C). As shown in the lower panel of Fig. 7C, NHERF immunoprecipitates contained 2-fold more phospho-hTRPC4 relative to total hTRPC4 than corresponding FLAG precipitates. This suggests NHERF preferentially associates with tyrosine-phosphorylated hTRPC4, providing further evidence of modulation of NHERF-hTRPC4 interaction by tyrosine phosphorylation. Indirect confocal immunofluorescence analysis of HA-tagged-NHERF (Fig. 7D, left panel) and YFP-hTRPC4 (Fig. 7D, middle panel) transfected COS-7 cells also confirmed the enhanced association between the molecules and membrane translocation of hTRPC4 evident upon EGF stimulation. YFP-hTRPC4 adopted a more classic membrane staining pattern and exhibited greater co-localization with NHERF at the cell membranes in the presence of EGF (Fig. 7D). Taken together, these results implicate STK-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 in the enhanced association of NHERF with hTRPC4.
This was investigated further using mutated hTRPC4 constructs devoid of the C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation sites (Y959F, Y972F, and Y959F/Y972F) expressed in COS-7 cells and assessed for their ability to bind NHERF. Mutation of either or both tyrosine residues of hTRPC4 decreased the amount of NHERF bound to hTRPC4 by 40% in untreated cells and in the presence of EGF (Fig. 7E). The previously observed increase in NHERF binding to hTRPC4 upon EGF stimulation was also ablated (Fig. 7E). Mutation of both C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation sites reduced NHERF interaction by over 55% in comparison to wild-type hTRPC4 (Fig. 7E). These results confirm a role for Tyr-959 and Tyr-972 in regulating the interaction of hTRPC4 with NHERF. Phosphorylation of these residues appears responsible for the enhanced NHERF-hTRPC4 interaction evident upon EGF stimulation and potentially for promoting the insertion or stabilization of hTRPC4 channels in the plasma membrane. Indeed, mutation of both C-terminal residues completely prevented the increase in membrane expression normally induced by EGF (Fig. 7F). The failure of the dual mutant (Y959F/Y972F) to translocate in response to EGF highlights the importance of the phosphorylation event in regulating the membrane insertion of hTRPC4. STKs Are Required for the Activation of hTRPC4-mediated Ca2+ Entry Induced by EGF StimulationBoth mouse TRPC4 and TRPC5 are known to form cation channels activated by carbachol and EGF receptor stimulation (12), however the mechanisms of activation are unknown. Stimulation of serum-starved COS-7 cells with EGF (50 ng/ml) was shown to induce a transient rise in intracellular Ca2+ followed by a sustained influx of extracellular Ca2+ (Fig. 8A). A peak increase in [Ca2+]i of 600 nM was a typical response following EGF stimulation and was largely dependent on the presence of extracellular Ca2+. Ca2+ entry was abolished upon transfer to Ca2+ free buffer (Fig. 8B). To address whether or not a tyrosine phosphorylation event was responsible for mediating the sustained influx of extracellular Ca2+ following EGF receptor stimulation, COS-7 cells were preincubated with the STK inhibitor, PP2 (5 µM), for 10 min prior to EGF application. The addition of PP2 reduced both peak Ca2+ influx and the sustained phase of Ca2+ entry by over 50% (Fig. 8, A and B). Cells were also incubated with PP2 prior to stimulation with thapsigargin. In contrast to reports in other cell lines (39), the thapsigargin response was largely unaffected by STK inhibition (Fig. 8C). Neither Ca2+ release from the passively depleted stores or Ca2+ entry upon re-addition of Ca2+ were affected by the presence of PP2 (Fig. 8C). Fig. 8D represents collated peak Ca2+ levels in the presence of extracellular Ca2+. This suggests that STKs are involved in mediating the Ca2+ changes initiated by EGF application, but are not involved in classic store-operated Ca2+ entry in COS-7 cells.
Previously, TRPC4, -5, and -6 have been reported to be activated by receptor tyrosine kinase stimulation (11, 12). All three subtypes, along with NHERF, are expressed in COS-7 and A431 cells, with only TRPC5 apparent in HEK293 cells (Fig. 8E). Of those three TRPC members only mTRPC6 and now hTRPC4, are known to be phosphorylated by STKs. All three TRPC proteins are candidates for mediating the sustained Ca2+ entry phase of EGF stimulation. However, the large endogenous EGF response in COS-7 cells impeded analysis of the contribution of overexpressed hTRPC4 to EGF-induced Ca2+ entry in these cells. To investigate the possible involvement of hTRPC4 in the EGF response we generated stable HEK293 cell lines expressing FLAG-tagged hTRPC4. As a consequence of the lower EGFR background we were able to demonstrate a 2-fold increase in [Ca2+]i in response to EGF application in Fura-2-AM-loaded cells (Fig. 9A, unbroken trace). Although the response was small, in part because of the low EGFR levels in these cells, it was still significantly greater than the control cell response (Fig. 9A, broken middle trace). When cells were pre-treated with PP2 (5 µM for 10 min) the hTRPC4-mediated EGFR response was reduced to near control levels (Fig. 9A, dashed lower trace), demonstrating a requirement for STKs in the activation of Ca2+ entry by EGF. Also shown as Fig. 9B is the collated data of peak Ca2+ levels evident upon EGF application, and the inset is a representative immunoblot of FLAG-hTRPC4 immunopurified from EGF-stimulated HEK293 cells stably expressing hTRPC4. Taken together with previous data, this observation indicates that EGF-stimulated Ca2+ entry may in part be mediated by tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4. To confirm the role of hTRPC4 tyrosine phosphorylation in the activation of the channel, single cell Fura-2 Ca2+ imaging was performed on HEK293 cells transiently expressing both the wild-type human EGFR and either control GFP vector (GFP, n = 37), wild-type hTRPC4 (WT-hTRPC4, n = 34), or dual mutant hTRPC4 (Y959F/Y972F, n = 35) (Fig. 9C). Cells expressing WT-hTRPC4 showed a greater response to EGF than control cells, consistent with results in Fig. 9A. Importantly, mutant hTRPC4 exhibited a reduced EGF response compared with the wild-type hTRPC4 control; however, it failed to reach control levels (Fig. 9C). This may indicate that other factors are involved in regulating hTRPC4 channel activation in addition to tyrosine phosphorylation. Similarly, when transfected cells were stimulated with EGF (50 ng/ml) in nominally Ca2+ free buffer (0 Ca2+) followed by the re-addition of 2 mM barium (Ba2+), WT-hTRPC4 transfectants (n = 31) exhibited greater cation entry than both control (n = 20) and mutant Y959F/Y972F-expressing (n = 22) HEK293 cells (Fig. 9D). Taken together, these results demonstrate a role for the tyrosine phosphorylation of C-terminal residues in the activation of hTRPC4 by EGF.
To further define the hTRPC4-mediated Ca2+ responses elicited by EGF, additional experiments were performed on EGFR- and either GFP-, hTRPC4-, or hTRPC5-expressing HEK293 cells. When cells were stimulated with EGF (50 ng/ml) in the presence of Ba2+, both hTRPC4- and hTRPC5-expressing HEK293 cells demonstrated enhanced cation influx compared with control cells (GFP, lower trace). However, upon switching to buffer containing 2 mM Ca2+, the hTRPC4 cation influx was reduced and further impaired by the addition of 50 µM La3+ (Fig. 9E). In contrast the presence of hTRPC5 resulted in a cation influx that appeared unaffected by the Ca2+ switch and was stimulated by La3+ application (Fig. 9E). This is consistent with previous findings regarding activation of hTRPC5 channels by lanthanides (40, 41). To verify that transfected hTRPC4 participates in the formation of a cation permeable channel, the effect of EGF (50 ng/ml) stimulation on transfected cells in the absence of Ca2+ (supplemented with 250 µM EGTA), followed by the sequential addition of 2 mM Ba2+ and 2 mM Ca2+ was also examined (Fig. 9F). Cells expressing hTRPC4 (broken, middle trace) demonstrated a sustained Ba2+ influx compared with control cells (unbroken, lower trace), which was reduced upon transfer to Ca2+-containing buffer. This result is consistent with the Ca2+ influx data in Fig. 9E and indicates that hTRPC4 forms cation channels responsive to EGF stimulation. In contrast, the expression of hTRPC5 resulted in the formation of cation channels similarly selective for Ba2+ and Ca2+ (Fig. 9F), demonstrating that the channels formed by hTRPC5 possess different properties to hTRPC4, despite both being activated by EGF stimulation.
The findings presented here provide evidence that hTRPC4 undergoes rapid tyrosine phosphorylation mediated by Src family tyrosine kinases (STKs) following activation of the EGF receptor. Although several reports have previously implicated tyrosine phosphorylation by STKs in TRP channel regulation (13, 38), our finding that phosphorylation of hTRPC4 by STKs enhances the interaction of hTRPC4 with the scaffold protein NHERF is the first report of TRPC protein interactions undergoing modulation by phosphorylation. Indeed, it represents the first report of PDZ-mediated interactions undergoing modulation by tyrosine phosphorylation. The interaction of hTRPC4 with NHERF was modulated by the phosphorylation of two C-terminal tyrosine residues of hTRPC4. The proximity of these tyrosyl residues to the C-terminal PDZ (PSD-95, Dlg A, ZO-1) motif of hTRPC4 allows their phosphorylation to regulate interactions with PDZ domain containing proteins and potentially influence channel activity. Consistent with this, mutation of Tyr-959 and Tyr-972 to phenylalanine reduced the interaction of hTRPC4 with NHERF in the absence of stimulation, implying that phosphorylation of these tyrosine residues induces a conformational change in the C terminus of hTRPC4 to facilitate NHERF binding. Mutation of these residues also prevented the membrane insertion of hTRPC4 consistent with reduced NHERF binding, strengthening the argument of enhanced NHERF binding as responsible for the membrane trafficking upon EGF stimulation. The candidate tyrosine residues are confined to TRPC4, being absent from both TRPC5 and TRPC6. Thus, by manipulating NHERF binding through phosphorylation of hTRPC4, channel surface expression and resultant activity of hTRPC4 may be closely and dynamically regulated independent of other TRPC members. Furthermore, together with the recent findings by Gordon Gill and coworkers (42) regarding the NHERF-dependent stabilization of EGFRs on the plasma membrane, our data hint at a role for NHERF in the assembly and maintenance of signal transduction events linking EGFR stimulation to hTRPC4 channel activation and Ca2+ entry. For members of the TRP family of non-selective cation channels, reversible membrane trafficking is becoming a widely reported occurrence. For example, the activation of TRPC6 by store depletion and carbachol application has been shown to involve the exocytotic insertion of channels into the plasma membrane (21). This insertion was not mediated by the classic secretory pathway involving an elevation of intracellular Ca2+ and was prevented by condensation of the actin cytoskeleton. In contrast, the insertion of hTRPC4 by EGF application is not affected by inhibition of actin polymerization nor store depletion or carbachol application, but is instead reliant on the activity of STKs. This demonstrates a clear difference in the regulation of hTRPC4 externalization from that proposed for TRPC6. EGF has been found to induce the activation of TRPC5 in HEK293 and PC12 cells, a process mimicked by NGF application to hippocampal neurons (38). This activation was accompanied by increased plasma membrane expression of TRPC5. We have found that hTRPC4 is similarly regulated by EGF receptor stimulation in COS-7 and A431 cells and undergoes rapid membrane insertion following agonist application. However, the membrane translocation of hTRPC4 is accompanied by tyrosine phosphorylation of the channel, with both exhibiting similar kinetic properties. A role for phosphorylation in regulating plasma membrane expression of hTRPC4 is consistent with previous reports where the surface levels of both K+ and Na+ channels are altered by channel phosphorylation (43, 44). Phosphorylation may therefore represent a common mechanism for controlling ion channel localization.
TRPV2 and TRPC5 translocation in response to receptor tyrosine kinase activation is dependent on phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, with TRPC5 incorporation enhanced by constitutively active Rac1 through a phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (5) K
A previous report by Schaeffer and colleagues (12) described the activation of TRPC4 channels by EGF application. Here we provide evidence that the tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 by STKs is involved in this activation. The time course of hTRPC4 tyrosine phosphorylation corresponds with the sustained phase of Ca2+ entry in COS-7 cells and hTRPC4-expressing HEK293 cells following EGF application. The reduction in Ca2+ entry by STK inhibition suggests an important role for tyrosine phosphorylation in the maintenance of receptor-operated Ca2+ influx. This was confirmed by the reduced Ca+ entry profile of HEK293 cells expressing the dual C-terminal tyrosine-deficient hTRPC4 mutant and was consistent with the defective phosphorylation and membrane insertion displayed by this mutant upon EGF stimulation (Figs. 7 and 9). The failure of the Y959F/Y972F mutant to exhibit a Ca2+ entry profile consistent with control GFP-expressing cells indicates that other regulatory factors are involved in controlling channel activation apart from phosphorylation. This may involve activation by other signaling intermediates, possibly phospholipid derivatives, generated by EGFR stimulation. Indeed, it may involve interactions with phospholipase C Characterization of the EGF-induced cation entry profile in HEK293 cells expressing both hTRPC4 and hTRPC5 demonstrated that both channels are capable of mediating cation entry, with hTRPC4 channels exhibiting an enhanced permeability to Ba2+ over Ca2+ (Fig. 9, E and F). The ability of hTRPC5 to increase EGF-stimulated cation influx in the absence of corresponding C-terminal phosphorylatable tyrosine residues indicates the involvement of alternative mechanisms for regulating Ca2+ influx through these channels. This provides a mechanism to differentially modulate the activity of these two closely related channels. Contrary to a previous report (41), the addition of micromolar La3+ did not stimulate further cation entry through hTRPC4 channels (Fig. 9E). Our results are, however, consistent with another report investigating the effects of lanthanides on currents mediated by both native and transfected TRPC4 (49). In contrast, and as others have reported, hTRPC5 channels are stimulated by micromolar La3+ application (Fig. 9E) (40, 41). These data further highlight the functional differences between channels formed by hTRPC4 and hTRPC5. In summary, we have shown that tyrosine phosphorylation of C-terminal residues in hTRPC4 induces channel translocation from inside the cell to the plasma membrane in response to EGF application. Channel phosphorylation is dependent on STKs, is directly mediated by Fyn, and promotes the association of hTRPC4 with the scaffolding protein NHERF. This association appears responsible for the enhanced membrane insertion of hTRPC4 through the recruitment and stabilization of channels at the plasma membrane. This cascade contributes to the resultant Ca2+ influx initiated by EGFR activation and is unique to growth factor-induced activation of hTRPC4 with other stimuli failing to alter channel tyrosine phosphorylation and membrane expression levels. Tyrosine phosphorylation of hTRPC4 represents a novel mechanism for regulating plasma membrane channel levels and activation through modulation of PDZ-mediated interactions. This activation may be important in providing Ca2+ entry to drive the growth factor-stimulated events of cell proliferation, differentiation, and motility.
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 61-2-4921-7827; Fax: 61-2-4921-7406: E-mail: adam.odell{at}newcastle.edu.au.
2 The abbreviations used are: TRP, transient receptor potential; TRPC, TRP channel; hTRPC4, human transient receptor potential channel 4; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, EGF receptor; STK, Src family protein-tyrosine kinase; NHERF, Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor 1; GST, glutathione S-transferase; YFP, yellow fluorescence protein; GFP, green fluorescent protein; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; CMV, cytomegalovirus; HA, hemagglutinin; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; PP2, 4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine; PP3, 4-amino-7phenylpyrazol[3,4-d]pyrimidine.
We thank J. W. Putney and R. R. McKay for providing hTRPC4 cDNA, C. Montell and G. Barritt for providing hTRPC1 cDNA, D. Beech for providing hTRPC5, T. Yamamoto for providing Fyn constructs, and M. Hibbs for kindly providing the Lyn constructs.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||