Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M509066200 on October 18, 2005

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 51, 41967-41975, December 23, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/51/41967    most recent
M509066200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, N.
Right arrow Articles by Iwatsubo, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, N.
Right arrow Articles by Iwatsubo, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Pen-2 Is Incorporated into the {gamma}-Secretase Complex through Binding to Transmembrane Domain 4 of Presenilin 1*{boxs}

Naoto Watanabe{ddagger}, Taisuke Tomita{ddagger}1, Chihiro Sato{ddagger}, Toshio Kitamura§, Yuichi Morohashi{ddagger}, and Takeshi Iwatsubo{ddagger}2

From the {ddagger}Department of Neuropathology and Neuroscience, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and §Division of Cellular Therapy, Advanced Clinical Research Center, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

Received for publication, August 17, 2005 , and in revised form, October 17, 2005.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
{gamma}-Secretase is a multimeric membrane protein complex comprised of presenilin (PS), nicastrin (Nct), Aph-1, and Pen-2. It is a member of an atypical class of aspartic proteases that hydrolyzes peptide bonds within the membrane. During the biosynthetic process of the {gamma}-secretase complex, Nct and Aph-1 form a heterodimeric intermediate complex and bind to the C-terminal region of PS, serving as a stabilizing scaffold for the complex. Pen-2 is then recruited into this trimeric complex and triggers endoproteolysis of PS, conferring {gamma}-secretase activity. Although the Pen-2 accumulation depends on PS, the binding partner of Pen-2 within the {gamma}-secretase complex remains unknown. We reconstituted PS1 in Psen1/Psen2 deficient cells by expressing a series of PS1 mutants in which one of the N-terminal six transmembrane domains (TMDs) was swapped with those of CD4 (a type I transmembrane protein) or CLAC-P (a type II transmembrane protein). We report that the proximal two-thirds of TMD4 of PS1, including the conserved Trp-Asn-Phe sequence, are required for its interaction with Pen-2. Using a chimeric CD4 molecule harboring PS1 TMD4, we further demonstrate that the PS1 TMD4 bears a direct binding motif to Pen-2. Pen-2 may contribute to the activation of the {gamma}-secretase complex by directly binding to the TMD4 of PS1.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
{gamma}-Secretase is a cryptic aspartic protease that catalyzes the intramembrane proteolysis of scissile bonds within a transmembrane domain (TMD)3 of type I proteins (for review, see Ref. 1). Missense mutations in PSEN (Presenilin, PS) 1 and 2 genes are linked to the early onset familial Alzheimer disease (FAD). FAD mutations lead to altered cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) and overproduction of amyloid {beta} peptides (A{beta}) ending at position 42 (A{beta}42). A{beta}42 peptides are more prone to formation of amyloid deposits (2). In contrast, ablation of Psen genes causes a complete loss of {gamma}-secretase activity and thus cleavage of a set of type I transmembrane proteins (e.g. APP, Notch, ErbB4, and CD44). In addition to the beneficial loss of A{beta}, failure to release Notch intracellular domain (NICD) causes lethality (3), perhaps masking the biological activities of other released intracellular domain. Thus, PS-dependent {gamma}-secretase mediates a novel mode of proteolysis-dependent signal transduction (4).

Genetic and biochemical analysis revealed that in addition to PS, {gamma}-secretase is comprised of nicastrin (Nct), Aph-1, and Pen-2. All four proteins define the minimal set of components required to reconstitute activity (5–8). PS, which contain the catalytic aspartate residues in adjacent TMDs, undergoes endoproteolysis to generate N- and C-terminal fragments (NTF and CTF, respectively) each containing one aspartyl residue (9, 10). The fragment forms a stable heterodimer and are incorporated into a highly stabilized, high molecular weight (HMW) protein complex together with the other components (11–14). However, the stoichiometric composition and the mechanism of assembly of the {gamma}-secretase complex have remained elusive. We have shown by a systematic mutational analysis that stabilization and HMW complex formation of PS is essential to the {gamma}-secretase activity and requires preservation of the C terminus of PS (15–17). Recent studies suggest that the C terminus of PS directly interacts with the Nct-Aph-1 subcomplex, the latter being initially formed in the biosynthetic pathway of the {gamma}-secretase complex (18). Nct, a single pass transmembrane protein harboring a large extracellular region, and Aph-1, a putative multipass transmembrane protein (19–21), form a subcomplex that is stable in the absence of PS, suggesting a direct interaction of these two components (22–26). Furthermore, overexpression of Aph-1 and Nct forms a relatively stable trimeric intermediate complex leading to accumulation of PS holoprotein, whereas genetic ablation of either Ncstn or Aph-1 caused a significant loss of PS stability (5, 8, 27–29). Thus, the Nct-Aph-1 subcomplex contributes to the stability of the {gamma}-secretase complex.

Pen-2 was originally identified by genetic screening in Caenorhabditis elegans as an enhancer of PS activity (21). Human PSENEN (PEN-2) gene encodes a 101-amino acid polypeptide that has a hairpin-like topology with N and C termini being exposed to the lumen (30, 31). Subsequent studies indicated that, during the process of {gamma}-secretase complex assembly, Pen-2 is incorporated into the PS-Nct-Aph-1 trimeric intermediate and provokes the endoproteolysis of PS and confers the proteolytic activity (5, 7, 8). It has also been shown that the length and the amino acid sequences of the C terminus of Pen-2 are crucial for the stability of PS fragments, suggesting a role of Pen-2 in the metabolism of the {gamma}-secretase complex after its assembly (32–35). Recently, it was demonstrated that the generation of PS1 fragments as well as {gamma}-secretase activity requires the proximal two-thirds of the first TMD of Pen-2, which mediate interactions with PS (33). Further report on the partial dissociation of the {gamma}-secretase complex using a mild detergent (i.e. dodecyl {beta}-D-maltoside) suggested the formation of a PS1 NTF-Pen-2 subcomplex (36). However, the identity of the functional and physiological binding partner of Pen-2 within the {gamma}-secretase complex remains elusive. To address this issue, we reconstituted PS1 activity in Psen1/Psen2-deficient cells (37, 38) with chimera that harbor deletion or replacement TMD. We report that TMD4 of PS1 is the docking site for Pen-2 and is required to mediate its incorporation into the {gamma}-secretase complex.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Plasmid Construction, Cell Culture, Transfection, and Retroviral Infection—cDNAs encoding PSEN1, PSENEN, APP carrying Swedish mutation (APPNL), Notch{Delta}E(N{Delta}E), and CD4 were inserted into pMXs-puro or pLPCX (Clontech) (16, 18, 39–42). cDNAs encoding mutant PSEN1 or CD4 were generated by long PCR-based QuikChange® (Stratagene) or SLIM protocols (43). Each TMD of PS1 was replaced with those of CD4 (type I) or CLAC-P (type II) according to its predicted topology (Fig. 1). All constructs were sequenced using Thermosequenase (Amersham Biosciences) on an automated sequencer (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE). Maintenance of Psen1/Psen2-deficient fibroblasts (DKO cells) was done as previously described (16). Packaging cell line Plat-E was kept in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 1 µg/ml puromycin (Sigma) and 10 µg/ml blasticidin (44). A highly efficient retroviral infection system using pMXs-puro was applied as reported previously (45). Briefly, retroviral transfer plasmids were transfected by FuGENE 6 (Roche Biochemicals) into Plat-E cells. After 48 h, conditioned media were filtered through 0.45-µm size pore and used as a virus stock. For infection, DKO cells were cultured with a virus stock containing 5 µg/ml Polybrene. After 24 h, the virus stock was replaced with new media that did not contain virus and was further analyzed. Stable infectants of APPNL or N{Delta}E in DKO cells were generated by infection of recombinant retrovirus and selection in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing puromycin. The infection efficacy was ~100% as estimated in a control experiment using pMXs-IG, a retroviral plasmid carrying green fluorescent protein.

Antibodies and Immunochemical Analyses—Anti-G1Nr2 and PNT3 antibodies against glutathione S-transferase-fused human PS1 N terminus or a synthetic peptide corresponding to the N-terminal 26 amino acids of human/mouse Pen-2, respectively, have been previously described (46, 47). Anti-SCAP monoclonal antibodies (numbers 7601, 7606, and 7623) were described previously (48). Other antibodies were purchased from BD Transduction Laboratories (anti-Flotillin-1, anti-GM130, anti-golgin-84), Chemicon (anti-PS1Loop (MAB5232)), Cell Signaling Technology (anti-cleaved Notch1 (V1744)), Covance (anti-Aph-1aL (O2C2)), Diatec (anti-CD4 (EDU-2)), or Santa Cruz Biotechnology (anti-CD4 (H-370) and anti-Nct (N-19)). Immunoblot analysis, immunoprecipitation of CHAPSO-solubilized lysates, or quantitations of A{beta} by two-site enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using BNT77 as a capture antibody were performed as previously described (5, 15–17, 26, 39, 42, 46, 47, 49, 50).


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chimeric Mutant PS1 Swapped at Transmembrane Domain 4 Lacks the {gamma}-Secretase Activity because of Loss of Interaction with Pen-2—Several lines of evidence suggest that intramembranous helix-helix interactions play important roles in the assembly as well as activity of the {gamma}-secretase complex (18, 24, 26, 33, 51–54). To identify functionally important TMDs of PS1 without causing topological changes, we constructed PS1 mutants in which one of the six N-terminal TMDs was swapped with that of functionally irrelevant proteins (TMD-swap), i.e. CD4 (type I transmembrane protein; Ref. 18) or CLAC-P (type II transmembrane protein; Ref. 55). Especially, we focused on the N-terminal fragment (NTF) of PS1 for the following reasons. (i) The topological analyses of PS1 NTF have reached a genuine consensus, whereas the topology of the C-terminal fragment is still controversial (56–61); (ii) PS1 NTF is believed to harbor functionally important domains: TMD1 and -2 are required for the proteolytic activity and implicated in substrate binding (62–64), and TMD6 bears a catalytic aspartate (8). (iii) Importantly, PS1 NTF-Pen-2 subcomplex has been detected by partial dissociation of the {gamma}-secretase complex using dodecyl {beta}-D-maltoside as a detergent (36). We systematically replaced TMDs of PS1 NTF according to their predicted topology (Fig. 1): TMDs exhibiting a type I orientation (i.e. TMD2 and TMD4) were replaced with that of CD4 (TM2mt and TM4mt, respectively), and those with a type II orientation (i.e. TMD1, -3, and -5) with that of CLAC-P (TM1mt, TM3mt, and TM5mt, respectively). As aspartate residue at position 257 in TMD6 is predicted to be one of the catalytic residues for {gamma}-secretase activity, we replaced amino acid sequences proximal to this aspartate (i.e. residues 244–255) with those in the corresponding position of CD4 TMD (TM6mt). We examined the effects of these PS1 mutants on the expression of and the assembly with other {gamma}-secretase components in Psen1/Psen2 double knock-out fibroblasts (DKO cells) by the recombinant retrovirus-mediated overexpression system. As reported, DKO cells lacked the expression of complex-type N-glycosylated (mature) Nct, as well as of Pen-2 (Fig. 2A) (65–67). Upon infection of a retrovirus encoding WT PS1, the levels of endoproteolyzed forms of PS1, as well as of the mature Nct recovered, and the expression of Pen-2 were also restored. To assess if a highly stable heterotetrameric complex (PS fragments-Nct-Aph-1-Pen-2) formed, we blocked translation by adding cycloheximide to the cells. Pen-2 polypeptides and PS1 fragments were highly stable (see Fig. 4), consistent with the formation of the HMW complex.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1.
Schematic depiction of TMD-swap PS1 mutants. The names of the PS1 mutants are indicated at the left of each sequence. Original TMDs and TMDs replaced with those of CLAC-P or CD4 are indicated as white, shaded, and black boxes, respectively. Alignments of amino acid sequences of the TMDs of PS1 and CD4 or CLAC-P are shown at the right. Amino acid sequences remained as those of PS1 in TM6mt are underlined.

 
Among the TMD-swap chimera, only TM3mt expression restored the maturation of Nct, Pen-2 level, and endoproteolysis (Fig. 2A). Coimmunoprecipitation analysis revealed that like WT PS1, TM3mt forms the HMW complex containing all four proteins, suggesting that replacement of TMD3 with that of CLAC-P did not interfere with the assembly of the {gamma}-secretase complex (Fig. 2B).

All six PS1 TMD chimera were co-immunoprecipitated with Nct and Aph-1aL (Fig. 2B), in agreement with the recent reports that the Nct-Aph-1 subcomplex interacts with the C terminus of PS1 (18, 68). These TMD-swap PS1 mutants were not co-immunoprecipitated with membrane proteins irrelevant to the {gamma}-secretase complex (supplementary Fig. S1). With the exception of TM4mt, the remaining TMD chimera restored accumulation of mature Nct and Pen-2 even though they failed to undergo endoproteolysis (Fig. 2A). However, the levels of mature Nct in DKO cells expressing TM1mt or TM5mt PS1 were noticeably lower than those in other mutants. In sharp contrast, TM4mt PS1 failed to support the maturation of Nct or the accumulation of Pen-2. Because Pen-2 accumulation was restored in the absence of TM1, -2, -3, -5, and -6 of PS1 TMDs, we hypothesized that TMD4 was essential for the assembly of the {gamma}-secretase complex, perhaps via recruitment of Pen-2. To examine if TM4mt interacted with Pen-2, we coinfected recombinant retrovirus encoding Pen-2 together with those encoding WT or TMD chimera PS1 (Fig. 3). Overexpression of Pen-2 did not affect the generation of PS fragments nor Nct maturation (data not shown). Only the TM4mt chimera failed to interact with either endogenous or overexpressed Pen-2 polypeptides, suggesting that the TMD4 of PS1 directly contributes to the interaction of Pen-2 with PS1.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2.
Complementation of maturation of Nct and accumulation of Pen-2 by expression of TMD-swap PS1 mutants in DKO cells. A, immunoblot analysis of DKO cells transiently infected with WT or mutant PS1 (as indicated above the panel). Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with each antibody (as indicated below the panel). B, co-immunoprecipitation analysis of 1% CHAPSO-solubilized fractions from DKO cells. Soluble fractions were precipitated by G1Nr2 or MAB5232 antibody and then analyzed by immunoblotting with each antibody (as indicated below the panel). mNct, mature nicastrin; imNct, immature nicastrin. FL, holoprotein. Note that all TMD-swap PS1 mutants formed a heterotetrameric complex, except for TM4mt that lacked binding to Pen-2.

 



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3.
Interactions of TMD-swap PS1 mutants with overexpressed Pen-2 in DKO cells. Co-immunoprecipitation analysis of 1% CHAPSO-solubilized fractions from DKO cells transiently and doubly infected with WT or mutant PS1 (as indicated above the panel) and Pen-2. Fractions containing equal amounts of Pen-2 ("input" at the upper panel shows the steady-state level of overexpressed Pen-2 in DKO cells) were precipitated by G1Nr2 antibody as described in the legend to Fig. 2 and then analyzed by immunoblotting with each antibody (as indicated below the panel).

 
To rule out the possibility that replacement of PS1 TMD4 with that of CD4 caused significant structural changes on PS1, we assessed its stability by cycloheximide treatment (Fig. 4A). As reported (11, 16), NTF of WT PS1 was stable at 12 h of treatment, whereas PS1 holoprotein was mostly degraded during the chase of 4 h. Consistent with the previous results that endoproteolysis-deficient functional PS (e.g. PS1/M292D (69)) as well as catalytic site mutants (e.g. PS1/D385A (10)) are able to incorporate into a HMW complex, we confirmed that a subfraction of these uncleaved mutants persisted as stable holoprotein (16). These results are in agreement with the notion that the heterotetramer interactions produce a highly stable complex (5). Our previous analysis suggested that the Nct-Aph-1 subcomplex stabilized PS (5, 26). TM4mt was also stabilized in the presence of Nct and Aph-1 proteins, indicating that the TMD4 chimera folded properly and retained the proper PS1 conformation. However, only WT PS1 promoted the stability of Pen-2 (Fig. 4B). Taken together, these data confirm that TMD4 of PS1 plays an important role in the incorporation of Pen-2 into the {gamma}-secretase complex and in the stabilization of Pen-2.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4.
Stability of TMD-swap PS1 mutants and Pen-2 overexpressed in DKO cells. A, analysis of half-lives of WT or mutant PS1 (indicated at the left of the panel) in DKO cells incubated in culture media containing CHX (30 µg/ml). Lysates prepared after various incubation periods (0–12 h) were analyzed by immunoblotting with G1Nr2 antibody. Note that TM4mt showed higher stability compared with WT PS1 holoprotein during the cycloheximide (CHX) chase period in a similar manner to M292D or D385A mutants. B, stability of overexpressed Pen-2 in DKO cells. Total lysates from CHX-treated DKO cells transiently coexpressing WT or TM4mt PS1 (indicated at the left of the panel) and Pen-2 were analyzed using PNT3 antibody. Numbers shown above each lane denote the incubation period.

 
We next analyzed the {gamma}-secretase activities of the TMD chimera in DKO cells coexpressing APPNL or N{Delta}E. As reported, expression of WT PS1 restored proteolysis of these substrates to generate A{beta} as well as NICD (Fig. 5). Consistent with the restoration of endoproteolysis, TM3mt exhibited a low, but obvious {gamma}-secretase activity as revealed by the generation of A{beta}42 and NICD. In contrast, despite their ability to participate in heterotetrameric complex formation, TM1mt, TM2mt, TM5mt, and TM6mt did not display any {gamma}-secretase activity to generate A{beta} nor NICD. This may suggest that these TMDs play specific roles in the acquisition of proteolytic activity of the fully assembled {gamma}-secretase complex. In agreement with the result that TMD4 was required for the incorporation of Pen-2 into the {gamma}-secretase complex, TM4mt showed no complementation of the proteolytic activity even when Pen-2 was coexpressed (data not shown). Thus, our results strongly suggest that TMD4 of PS1 plays a significant role in its interaction with Pen-2, as well as in the stabilization of Pen-2, the latter being a crucial molecule required for the {gamma}-secretase activity.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5.
{gamma}-Secretase activities in DKO cells transiently expressing TMD-swap PS1 mutants. Sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis of secreted A{beta} from APPNL-stable DKO cells (A) and immunoblot analysis of the generation of NICD from N{Delta}E-stable DKO cells (B) transiently expressing TMD-swap PS1 mutants. The levels of A{beta}40 and A{beta}42 are shown by white and black bars, respectively. Only TM3mt exhibited a significant {gamma}-secretase activity in the complementation analyses (asterisk, p < 0.001; double asterisk, statistically significant (p = 0.053) by Dunnet test).

 
The Proximal Two-thirds of PS1 TMD4 Including the Conserved WNF Motif Is Crucial for the Direct Interaction with and the Stabilization of Pen-2—To narrow down the critical region within the TMD4 of PS1 required for the incorporation of Pen-2, we systematically replaced each third of PS1 TMD4 with the corresponding subregions of CD4 TMD (Fig. 6A). A chimeric protein in which the C-terminal one-third of the PS1 TMD4 is replaced with the corresponding TMD sequences of CD4 (PPC) was endoproteolyzed to generate PS1 fragments and was able to rescue the expression of mature Nct as well as Pen-2 in a similar fashion to WT PS1 (Fig. 6B). In contrast, mutants swapping either the N-terminal or central regions of TMD4 (CPP and PCP, respectively) were not cleaved and did not rescue the expression of mature Nct and Pen-2 (Fig. 6B). To determine which of the subregions (i.e. proximal or central) in TMD4 is involved in the interaction with Pen-2, we further analyzed chimeric mutants in which two-thirds of TMD4 were replaced with those of CD4 (i.e. PCC, CPC, and CCP), and found that none of these mutants complemented the PS1/2-null phenotypes (Fig. 6B). This suggests that both the N-terminal (proximal) and central regions of TMD4 are required for Pen-2-dependent PS functions.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 6.
Functional analysis of chimeric mutant PS1 substituted at one- or two-thirds of the TMD4. A, amino acid sequences of TMDs of PS1, CD4, and various chimeras in which one-third (CPP, PCP, and PPC) or two-thirds (PCC, CPC, and CCP) of PS1 TMD4 was replaced with the corresponding sequences of CD4 TMD. Unchanged amino acid sequences of PS1 in each chimeric mutant are underlined. Asterisks indicate the locations of amino acid substitutions linked to FAD. B, immunoblot analysis of DKO cells transiently expressing the chimeric PS1. Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with each antibody (as indicated below the panel). C, co-immunoprecipitation analysis of 1% CHAPSO-solubilized fractions from DKO cells transiently coexpressing WT or mutant PS1 (as indicated above the panel) and Pen-2.

 
We next analyzed the interaction of the PPC, PCC, CPC, or CCP chimeric proteins with overexpressed Pen-2 in DKO cells (Fig. 6C). Consistent with the results of the rescue experiments, only PPC mutant PS1 bound to Pen-2 to a similar level as WT PS1. CCP mutant failed to interact with Pen-2, although a small amount of Pen-2 was coprecipitated with the PCC and CPC mutants. Combined with the ability of these mutants to impact Pen-2 levels (Fig. 6B), these results suggest that both the proximal and central regions of TMD4 are cooperatively involved in the stable interaction of PS1 with Pen-2.

Alignment of amino acid sequences of PS family proteins reveals that the TMD4 sequences contain an "NXXXDYXTXXXXXWNFGXVG-XXXI" consensus motif (X denotes unconserved residues; see Fig. 10, upper panel). Within the N-terminal two-thirds of TMD4, we focused on the sequence "WNF" (Fig. 7A), because the PCC mutant completely lacked the accumulation of and interaction with Pen-2, whereas the PPC mutant behaved normally as WT PS1 (see Fig. 6). Replacement of the WNF sequence with alanine residues (WNF_AAA) completely abolished the accumulation of Pen-2, maturation of Nct (Fig. 7B), and its interaction with Pen-2, whereas WNF_AAA bound to Nct and Aph-1aL (Fig. 7C, and data not shown). Because CPP mutant PS1 did not rescue Pen-2, we surmised that among the N-terminal two-thirds of PS1 TMD4, the WNF sequence located within the central region, along with the more N-terminal region, are cooperatively involved in the PS1-Pen-2 interaction, and thus contributing to the stabilization of Pen-2 and its incorporation into the {gamma}-secretase complex.

The Amino Acid Sequences within the TMD4 of PS1 Harbor an Intrinsic and Direct Binding Motif to Pen-2—These chimeric studies identified TMD4 of PS1 as the intrinsic binding domain of Pen-2. Genetic and functional studies indicate that the binding of the Nct-Aph-1 subcomplex to PS is the primary step in the maturation of the {gamma}-secretase complex, which is followed by the incorporation of Pen-2 (5). To examine whether preassembly of the Nct-Aph-1-PS1 subcomplex is required for the recruitment of Pen-2, we analyzed DKO cells expressing two types of endoproteolysis-deficient PS1 mutants: PS1/M292D, which forms a functionally active complex, and PS1/455stop, which is unable to bind to Nct and fails to support its maturation (similar to TM4mt (18, 68–71) (Fig. 8A)). Interestingly, PS1/455stop bound to and rescued the level of Pen-2 similarly to WT PS1 or PS1/M292D, suggesting that the acquisition of stability of Pen-2 takes place independently of the interaction with the Nct-Aph-1 subcomplex. Because a PS1 NTF-Pen-2 subcomplex has been detected in partially disrupted {gamma}-secretase complex fractions solubilized by dodecyl {beta}-D-maltoside (36), we overexpressed NTF of WT or TM4mt PS1 (NTF/TM4mt) in DKO cells and analyzed their interactions with Pen-2 (Fig. 8B). Importantly, PS1 NTF overexpressed in DKO cells bound Pen-2, indicating this interaction did not require preassembly of PS1-Nct-Aph-1 subcomplexes. As expected, NTF/TM4mt failed to interact with Pen-2 even in the presence of MG132 (an inhibitor of proteasome-mediated degradation of NTF/TM4mt and Pen-2). Furthermore, the PS1 C-terminal fragment did bind to the Nct-Aph-1 subcomplex, but did not associate with Pen-2 (Ref. 67, and data not shown). These results supported our view that an intrinsic binding site for Pen-2, located within the PS1 NTF, can mediate the PS1-Pen-2 interaction independent of the interaction with the Nct-Aph-1 subcomplex.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 7.
WNF sequence is essential for the interaction of PS1 with Pen-2. A, amino acid sequences of TMD4 of WT PS1, TM4mt, and WNF_AAA. Unchanged amino acid sequences of PS1 in each chimeric mutant are underlined. Asterisks indicate the locations of amino acid substitutions linked to FAD. B, immunoblot analysis of DKO cells transiently expressing PS1 mutants. Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with each antibody (as indicated below the panel). C, co-immunoprecipitation analysis of 1% CHAPSO-solubilized fractions from DKO cells transiently coexpressing WT or mutant PS1 (as indicated above the panel) and Pen-2. Soluble fractions were precipitated by MAB5232 antibody and then analyzed by immunoblotting with each antibody (as indicated below the panel).

 



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 8.
Pen-2 interacts with PS1 independently of the incorporation of Nct into the complex. A, 1% CHAPSO-solubilized cell lysates (input, left) or immunoprecipitated fractions by G1Nr2 were analyzed by immunoblotting with each antibody (as indicated below the panel). Note that PS1/455stop was able to bind to and increase Pen-2, whereas it failed to support Nct maturation. B, coimmunoprecipitation analysis of MG132-treated DKO cells stably expressing WT or TM4mt PS1 NTF (as indicated above the panel).

 
To unequivocally demonstrate that the Pen-2 binding region resides within the TMD4 of PS1, we constructed chimeric CD4 proteins in which the single TMD was swapped with the TMD4 of PS1 (CD4_TM4) or with that of PS1 replaced at the WNF sequence with three alanine residues (CD4_AAA). Strikingly, overexpression of CD4_TM4, but not of WT CD4 or CD4_AAA, in DKO cells increased the level of Pen-2 (Fig. 9A). CD4_TM4 formed a complex with endogenous as well as exogenous Pen-2 in PS null background, whereas neither WT CD4, CD4_AAA, nor irrelevant membrane proteins pulled down exogenously overexpressed Pen-2 (Fig. 9B, and supplementary Fig. S2). Cycloheximide treatment showed that the expression of CD4_TM4 increased the stability of Pen-2 in a similar fashion to WT PS1 (Fig. 9C, compare with Fig. 4C). As all CD4 chimeras were relatively stable polypeptides, the ability to stabilize Pen-2 reflects its interaction with the CD4_TM4 chimera. Collectively, these results indicate that TMD4 of PS1 is required and sufficient to mediate a direct interaction with Pen-2.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
A series of genetic and biochemical studies have revealed the mechanisms underlying the sequential assembly of the {gamma}-secretase complex components (1). To obtain further information about the relationships between PS1 (especially its TMDs) and other {gamma}-secretase components, we constructed and expressed a series of "TMD-swap" chimeric PS1 proteins in which one of the N-terminal six TMDs were replaced with those of irrelevant transmembrane proteins (i.e. CD4 and CLAC-P), and examined their binding to other components, as well as their ability to complement the levels of individual subunits and the {gamma}-secretase activity in PS null background. Swap of most of the TMDs, besides that of TMD3, abolished the {gamma}-secretase activity. However, most of the TMD mutants formed the tetrameric {gamma}-secretase complex, except for the TM4mt that lacked the interaction with Pen-2. Further chimeric analysis suggested that the N-terminal two-thirds of the TMD4 of PS1 is the direct binding site of Pen-2. This binding stabilizes Pen-2, and converts the "proenzymatic" PS1-Aph-1-Nct ternary complex into a fully activable {gamma}-secretase. Importantly, the TMD4 sequence of PS1 introduced into an irrelevant transmembrane protein, CD4, retained the capacity to bind to Pen-2, underscoring the specificity of the sequence in this interaction. Recently, Kim and Sisodia (81) have also found that TMD4 of PS1 is the binding site of Pen-2 by swapping the TMDs of PS1 with those of SREBP cleavage-activating protein, which strongly corroborates our findings.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 9.
Direct binding of Pen-2 to PS1 TMD4 chimerically expressed as TMD of CD4. A, immunoblot analysis of DKO cells expressing CD4 or its chimeric mutant. Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with each antibody (as indicated below the panel). B, co-immunoprecipitation analysis of 2% CHAPSO-solubilized fractions from DKO cells expressing CD4 chimera (as indicated above the panel) coinfected with or without Pen-2 (right and left, respectively). Soluble fractions were precipitated by EDU-2 antibody and then analyzed by immunoblotting with each antibody (as indicated below the panel). C, analysis of half-lives of overexpressed CD4 and Pen-2 (indicated at the right of the panel) in DKO cells incubated in culture media containing cycloheximide (CHX) (30 µg/ml). Lysates prepared after various incubation periods (0–12 h) were analyzed by immunoblotting with each antibody. Numbers shown above each lane denote the incubation period.

 
Previous studies have suggested that the intramembrane interactions through TMDs may serve as the major mechanism underlying the assembly of the {gamma}-secretase complex components (18, 24, 26, 33, 51–54). However, introduction of a deletion or point mutation into PS1 occasionally caused significant topological changes of the TMD, rendering PS1 polypeptide unstable and making the functional and interaction studies difficult (11, 15, 16). Therefore, we employed the TMD-swap method for the analysis of the individual roles of TMDs. The finding that all TMD mutants within the PS1 NTF were able to form the PS1-Nct-Aph-1 trimeric complex, whereas PS1 harboring a small deletion at the C terminus (i.e. PS1/455stop) failed to form this complex, was consistent with previous reports that the C terminus of PS1 is the interaction domain with the Nct-Aph-1 subcomplex (18, 68). Swap of TMD1, -2, or -6 caused a complete loss of the {gamma}-secretase activity, despite the formation of the heterotetrameric complex. This may suggest that these TMDs are directly involved in the enzymatic machinery, or serve as the interaction sites with as yet unknown factor(s) required for the proteolytic activity. Of note, PS1 lacking TMDs 1 and -2 ({Delta}TM12) has been shown to exhibit a dominant negative phenotype in the presence of endogenous PS, implicating these N-terminal TMDs in the binding with substrates as well as in the endoproteolysis of PS (62–65, 71). Another interesting finding was that TMD3mt showed the least defects in the complex formation as well as the proteolytic activity. Moreover, TM3mt-containing {gamma}-secretase predominantly produced A{beta}42. It is intriguing that a number of FAD-linked mutations, some of which result in overproduction of A{beta}42 in culture and a very early onset clinical manifestation of Alzheimer disease, map to TMD3 (e.g. L166P) (72). Notably, amino acid residues linked to FAD mutations in TMD3 align along the helical face (73). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that the helical face of TMD3 of PS1 harbors an allosteric domain that modulates the activity and the cleavage site specificity of {gamma}-secretase. In contrast, loss of TMD5 abolished the maturation of Nct as well as the {gamma}-secretase activity, but the formation of a heterotetrameric complex was not affected. After assembly, which takes place in the early secretory compartment (i.e. endoplasmic reticulum and ER-Golgi intermediate compartment) (74, 75), the assembled {gamma}-secretase complex is transported to the post-Golgi compartments including the plasma membrane where mature Nct can be found in lipid rafts (76, 77). It should further be examined whether the loss of Nct maturation in the {gamma}-secretase complex harboring TM5mt PS1 is because of an abnormal trafficking of the {gamma}-secretase complex, which may indicate involvement of TMD5 in this process.

The primary amino acid sequences of Pen-2 are highly conserved in metazoans (21). Substitutions of evolutionarily conserved residues of Pen-2 cause a loss-of-function phenotype (33–35). It stands to reason that the molecular interactions of Pen-2 within the {gamma}-secretase complex would also be highly conserved. In fact, we have shown that overexpression of human Pen-2 can rescue the knockdown phenotype of Drosophila pen-2 in S2 cells (5). Genes encoding PS-like proteins are present not only in Bilateria (e.g. mammals, fish, and insects) and Magnoliophyta (e.g. Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa), but also in Entamoebidae (e.g. Entamoeba histolytica), Mycetozoa (e.g. Dictyostelium discoideum), Parabasalidea (e.g. Trichomonas vaginalis), or Euglenozoa (e.g. Trypanosoma brucei and Trypanosoma cruzi). All these PS-like proteins contain the "GXGD" (X denotes unconserved residues) and "PALP" motifs, suggesting that they belong to the PS-type intramembrane aspartic protease family (16, 78, 79). Alignment of amino acid sequences of these PS family proteins reveals that the TMD4 sequences are also highly conserved and contain an "NXXXDYXTXXXXXWNFGXVGXXXI" consensus motif (Fig. 10A). Our results indicate that the WNF sequence that locates at the center of TMD4 is necessary for the interaction of PS1 with Pen-2. Helical alignment of the TMD4 sequences further suggests that a conserved motif comprised of amino acid residues NDTXNmay form an interface located on one side of the TMD4, which might be involved in its interaction with Pen-2 (Fig. 10B, underlined residues in consensus). It is noteworthy that the asparagine (N) residue of the WNF motif locates on this interface, and is the most highly conserved residue within PS TMD4 beyond species, supporting the view that this residue might play a critical role. Kim and Sisodia (33) reported that amino acid sequences at the N-terminal two-thirds of TMD1 of Pen-2 comprise a functionally important domain mediating its interaction with PS1. Considering that both the TMD4 of PS1 and TMD1 of Pen-2 show a type I orientation, it is possible that these two hydrophobic domains interact with each other at their N-terminal two-third regions by a helix-helix interaction through specific amino acids, leading to the formation of a functional {gamma}-secretase complex. Notably, TMD4 of PS1 has an unusual characteristic in that FAD-linked amino acid substitutions are rare and their location is highly biased: all three mutation sites are located within the C-terminal one-third of the TMD4 sequence (69, 70) (Fig. 9, asterisks).4 These findings are also consistent with the proposed molecular mechanism that the N-terminal region of TMD4 is critical for the {gamma}-secretase activity.

In contrast to the exchangeable relationships between Drosophila and mammalian {gamma}-secretase components (5, 17), it is noteworthy that human Pen-2 was unable to rescue the phenotype of pen-2 mutant in C. elegans, whereas overexpression of all four human {gamma}-secretase components rescued the Egl phenotype (21). However, the overexpression of human PS1 can rescue the Egl phenotype in sel-12 mutant C. elegans (80), suggesting that human PS1 has a capacity to interact with C. elegans PEN-2 but SEL-12 protein is unable to bind to human Pen-2. In fact, the amino acid sequences of the N-terminal two-thirds of C. elegans PS (i.e. SEL-12 and HOP-1) TMD4 are largely divergent from those of mammalian as well as Drosophila PS, including those comprising the NDTXN consensus motif (Fig. 10A). In contrast, the amino acid sequences of the N-terminal region of Pen-2 TMD1 are less divergent between mammals and C. elegans (21). It is possible that the mechanism of interaction between PS and Pen-2 is somewhat different between C. elegans and mammals or insects.

The mechanistic impact of the binding of Pen-2 to PS1 TMD4, in relation to the functional and structural changes in the {gamma}-secretase complex, remains unknown. Pen-2 is the smallest subunit of the {gamma}-secretase and incorporated into the complex at the final stage of maturation. It is required for the endoproteolysis of PS and N-glycosyl maturation of Nct (5, 7, 8, 22, 34, 66). It is possible that the binding of Pen-2 causes a structural change in PS in a way to directly elicit its proteolytic activity, or alternatively, to convert the holoprotein in a manner that makes it susceptible to endoproteolysis, which in turn exposes or masks a specific trafficking signal required for the activation of the {gamma}-secretase complex. It has been shown that the requirement of the sequence specificity of Pen-2 TMD2 for the formation of the {gamma}-secretase complex and its proteolytic activity is not so stringent compared with that of TMD1 (33). Moreover, insertion of green fluorescent protein into the cytoplasmic loop of Pen-2 did not affect the activation of {gamma}-secretase in C. elegans (21). However, recent studies indicate that the C terminus of Pen-2 plays a significant role in the stability of endoproteolyzed PS1 (32–35), although the mechanism of the degradation of the {gamma}-secretase complex remains unclear. Thus, it is plausible that the two-dimensional topological mapping of the TMD4 of PS and the TMD1 and C terminus of Pen-2 determines the metabolic fate (i.e. activation, stabilization, and degradation) of the {gamma}-secretase complex.

In summary, we have demonstrated that the TMD4 of PS1, especially its N-terminal two-thirds, was required (loss of Pen-2 binding in TM4mt PS1) and sufficient (positive interaction of CD4_TM4 with Pen-2) for PS1-Pen-2 interactions and therefore it constitutes the intrinsic docking site for Pen-2. Further biochemical and cell biological studies focusing on the TMDs will facilitate our understanding about the structure-function relationships of the {gamma}-secretase complex, especially the mechanism of its activation and the role of Pen-2.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 10.
Schematic representation of TMD4 of PS. A, alignment of amino acid sequences of TMD4 of PS1 and its homologues. Letters refer to the single amino acid code. Amino acids identical among multiple organisms are shown in black. Asterisks denote the locations of amino acid substitutions linked to FAD. Amino acid residues that locate on the same interface within the consensus sequence based on the helical wheel prediction (in B) are underlined. B, {alpha}-helical wheel alignment consisting of 18 amino acids of TMD4 of human PS1 starting at the N-terminal asparagine as the 1st residue. The locations of amino acids after the 18th residue (valine) are shown in brackets. Black circles indicate the locations of the consensus amino acid residues. Asterisks and underlines are as defined in A.

 

   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by grants-in-aid from the Program for Promotion of Fundamental Studies in Health Sciences of the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO) and the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports for the 21st Century Center of Excellence Program, Japan. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{boxs} The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains Figs. S1 and S2. Back

1 To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: taisuke{at}mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp. 2 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 81-3-5841-4877; Fax: 81-3-5841-4708; E-mail: iwatsubo{at}mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

3 The abbreviations used are: TMD, transmembrane domain; A{beta}, amyloid{beta} peptide; APP, {beta}-amyloid precursor protein; CCP, CD4-CD4-PS1 chimera; CHAPSO, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-2-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonate; CPC, CD4-PS1-CD4 chimera; CPP, CD4-PS1-PS1 chimera; DKO, Psen1/Psen2 double knockout fibroblasts; Nct, nicastrin; NICD, Notch intracellular domain; NTF, amino-terminal fragment; mt, mutant; PCC, PS1-CD4-CD4 chimera; PCP, PS1-CD4-PS1 chimera; PPC, PS1-PS1-CD4 chimera; PS, presenilin; WT, wild-type; FAD, familial Alzheimer disease; HMW, high molecular weight. Back

4 M. Cruts, personal communication. Back


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. H. Komano for pMX-Pen-2, C. Haass for CD4 cDNA, B. De Strooper for DKO cells, T. Hamakubo and T. Kodama for anti-SCAP antibodies, R. Kopan for N{Delta}E cDNA and critical reading of the manuscript, M. X. Ilagan for helpful comments, S. Kim and S. S. Sisodia for sharing unpublished information, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. for A{beta} enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and our lab members for helpful discussions and technical assistance.



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Tomita, T., and Iwatsubo, T. (2004) Drug News Perspect. 17, 321–325[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Iwatsubo, T., Odaka, A., Suzuki, N., Mizusawa, H., Nukina, N., and Ihara, Y. (1994) Neuron 13, 45–53[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Huppert, S. S., Le, A., Schroeter, E. H., Mumm, J. S., Saxena, M. T., Milner, L. A., and Kopan, R. (2000) Nature 405, 966–970[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Kopan, R., and Ilagan, M. X. (2004) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 499–504[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Takasugi, N., Tomita, T., Hayashi, I., Tsuruoka, M., Niimura, M., Takahashi, Y., Thinakaran, G., and Iwatsubo, T. (2003) Nature 422, 438–441[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Edbauer, D., Winkler, E., Regula, J. T., Pesold, B., Steiner, H., and Haass, C. (2003) Nat. Cell. Biol. 5, 486–488[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Kimberly, W. T., LaVoie, M. J., Ostaszewski, B. L., Ye, W., Wolfe, M. S., and Selkoe, D. J. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 6382–6387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kim, S. H., Ikeuchi, T., Yu, C., and Sisodia, S. S. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 33992–34002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Thinakaran, G., Borchelt, D. R., Lee, M. K., Slunt, H. H., Spitzer, L., Kim, G., Ratovitsky, T., Davenport, F., Nordstedt, C., Seeger, M., Hardy, J., Levey, A. I., Gandy, S. E., Jenkins, N. A., Copeland, N. G., Price, D. L., and Sisodia, S. S. (1996) Neuron 17, 181–190[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Wolfe, M. S., Xia, W., Ostaszewski, B. L., Diehl, T. S., Kimberly, W. T., and Selkoe, D. J. (1999) Nature 398, 513–517[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Ratovitski, T., Slunt, H. H., Thinakaran, G., Price, D. L., Sisodia, S. S., and Borchelt, D. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24536–24541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Seeger, M., Nordstedt, C., Petanceska, S., Kovacs, D. M., Gouras, G. K., Hahne, S., Fraser, P., Levesque, L., Czernik, A. J., George-Hyslop, P. S., Sisodia, S. S., Thinakaran, G., Tanzi, R. E., Greengard, P., and Gandy, S. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 5090–5094[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Li, Y. M., Xu, M., Lai, M. T., Huang, Q., Castro, J. L., DiMuzio-Mower, J., Harrison, T., Lellis, C., Nadin, A., Neduvelil, J. G., Register, R. B., Sardana, M. K., Shearman, M. S., Smith, A. L., Shi, X. P., Yin, K. C., Shafer, J. A., and Gardell, S. J. (2000) Nature 405, 689–694[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Esler, W. P., Kimberly, W. T., Ostaszewski, B. L., Diehl, T. S., Moore, C. L., Tsai, J. Y., Rahmati, T., Xia, W., Selkoe, D. J., and Wolfe, M. S. (2000) Nat. Cell. Biol. 2, 428–434[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Tomita, T., Takikawa, R., Koyama, A., Morohashi, Y., Takasugi, N., Saido, T.C., Maruyama, K., and Iwatsubo, T. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 10627–10634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Tomita, T., Watabiki, T., Takikawa, R., Morohashi, Y., Takasugi, N., Kopan, R., De Strooper, B., and Iwatsubo, T. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 33273–33281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Takasugi, N., Takahashi, Y., Morohashi, Y., Tomita, T., and Iwatsubo, T. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 50198–50205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kaether, C., Capell, A., Edbauer, D., Winkler, E., Novak, B., Steiner, H., and Haass, C. (2004) EMBO J. 23, 4738–4748[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Yu, G., Nishimura, M., Arawaka, S., Levitan, D., Zhang, L., Tandon, A., Song, Y. Q., Rogaeva, E., Chen, F., Kawarai, T., Supala, A., Levesque, L., Yu, H., Yang, D. S., Holmes, E., Milman, P., Liang, Y., Zhang, D. M., Xu, D. H., Sato, C., Rogaev, E., Smith, M., Janus, C., Zhang, Y., Aebersold, R., Farrer, L. S., Sorbi, S., Bruni, A., Fraser, P., and St. George-Hyslop, P. (2000) Nature 407, 48–54[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Goutte, C., Tsunozaki, M., Hale, V. A., and Priess, J. R. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 775–779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Francis, R., McGrath, G., Zhang, J., Ruddy, D. A., Sym, M., Apfeld, J., Nicoll, M., Maxwell, M., Hai, B., Ellis, M. C., Parks, A. L., Xu, W., Li, J., Gurney, M., Myers, R. L., Himes, C. S., Hiebsch, R., Ruble, C., Nye, J. S., and Curtis, D. (2002) Dev. Cell 3, 85–97[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. LaVoie, M. J., Fraering, P. C., Ostaszewski, B. L., Ye, W., Kimberly, W. T., Wolfe, M. S., and Selkoe, D. J. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 37213–37222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Shirotani, K., Edbauer, D., Kostka, M., Steiner, H., and Haass, C. (2004) J. Neurochem. 89, 1520–1527[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Morais, V. A., Crystal, A. S., Pijak, D. S., Carlin, D., Costa, J., Lee, V. M., and Doms, R. W. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 43284–43291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Farmery, M. R., Tjernberg, L. O., Pursglove, S. E., Bergman, A., Winblad, B., and Naslund, J. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 24277–24284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Niimura, M., Isoo, N., Takasugi, N., Tsuruoka, M., Ui-Tei, K., Saigo, K., Morohashi, Y., Tomita, T., and Iwatsubo, T. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 12967–12975[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Li, T., Ma, G., Cai, H., Price, D. L., and Wong, P. C. (2003) J. Neurosci. 23, 3272–3277[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Ma, G., Li, T., Price, D. L., and Wong, P. C. (2005) J. Neurosci. 25, 192–198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Serneels, L., Dejaegere, T., Craessaerts, K., Horre, K., Jorissen, E., Tousseyn, T., Hebert, S., Coolen, M., Martens, G., Zwijsen, A., Annaert, W., Hartmann, D., and De Strooper, B. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 1719–1724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Crystal, A. S., Morais, V. A., Pierson, T. C., Pijak, D. S., Carlin, D., Lee, V. M., and Doms, R. W. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 20117–20123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Bergman, A., Hansson, E. M., Pursglove, S. E., Farmery, M. R., Lannfelt, L., Lendahl, U., Lundkvist, J., and Naslund, J. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 16744–16753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Prokop, S., Shirotani, K., Edbauer, D., Haass, C., and Steiner, H. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 23255–23261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kim, S. H., and Sisodia, S. S. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 1992–2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Hasegawa, H., Sanjo, N., Chen, F., Gu, Y. J., Shier, C., Petit, A., Kawarai, T., Katayama, T., Schmidt, S. D., Mathews, P. M., Schmitt-Ulms, G., Fraser, P. E., and St. George-Hyslop, P. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 46455–46463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Prokop, S., Haass, C., and Steiner, H. (2005) J. Neurochem. 94, 57–62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Fraering, P. C., LaVoie, M. J., Ye, W., Ostaszewski, B. L., Kimberly, W. T., Selkoe, D. J., and Wolfe, M. S. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 323–333[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Karlstrom, H., Bergman, A., Lendahl, U., Naslund, J., and Lundkvist, J. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 6763–6766[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Schroeter, E. H., Ilagan, M. X., Brunkan, A. L., Hecimovic, S., Li, Y. M., Xu, M., Lewis, H. D., Saxena, M. T., De Strooper, B., Coonrod, A., Tomita, T., Iwatsubo, T., Moore, C. L., Goate, A., Wolfe, M. S., Shearman, M., and Kopan, R. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 13075–13080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Tomita, T., Maruyama, K., Saido, T. C., Kume, H., Shinozaki, K., Tokuhiro, S., Capell, A., Walter, J., Grunberg, J., Haass, C., Iwatsubo, T., and Obata, K. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2025–2030[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Shiraishi, H., Sai, X., Wang, H. Q., Maeda, Y., Kurono, Y., Nishimura, M., Yanagisawa, K., and Komano, H. (2004) J. Neurochem. 90, 1402–1413[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Kopan, R., Schroeter, E. H., Weintraub, H., and Nye, J. S. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 1683–1688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Iwata, H., Tomita, T., Maruyama, K., and Iwatsubo, T. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 21678–21685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Chiu, J., March, P. E., Lee, R., and Tillett, D. (2004) Nucleic Acids Res. 32, e174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Morita, S., Kojima, T., and Kitamura, T. (2000) Gene Ther. 7, 1063–1066[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Kitamura, T., Koshino, Y., Shibata, F., Oki, T., Nakajima, H., Nosaka, T., and Kumagai, H. (2003) Exp. Hematol. 31, 1007–1014[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Hayashi, I., Urano, Y., Fukuda, R., Isoo, N., Kodama, T., Hamakubo, T., Tomita, T., and Iwatsubo, T. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 38040–38046[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Morohashi, Y., Hatano, N., Ohya, S., Takikawa, R., Watabiki, T., Takasugi, N., Imaizumi, Y., Tomita, T., and Iwatsubo, T. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 14965–14975[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Urano, Y., Yamaguchi, M., Fukuda, R., Masuda, K., Takahashi, K., Uchiyama, Y., Iwanari, H., Jiang, S. Y., Naito, M., Kodama, T., and Hamakubo, T. (2003) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 308, 191–196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Tomita, T., Tokuhiro, S., Hashimoto, T., Aiba, K., Saido, T. C., Maruyama, K., and Iwatsubo, T. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21153–21160[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Takahashi, Y., Hayashi, I., Tominari, Y., Rikimaru, K., Morohashi, Y., Kan, T., Natsugari, H., Fukuyama, T., Tomita, T., and Iwatsubo, T. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 18664–18670[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Saura, C. A., Tomita, T., Davenport, F., Harris, C. L., Iwatsubo, T., and Thinakaran, G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 13818–13823[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Saura, C. A., Tomita, T., Soriano, S., Takahashi, M., Leem, J. Y., Honda, T., Koo, E. H., Iwatsubo, T., and Thinakaran, G. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17136–17142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Lee, S. F., Shah, S., Yu, C., Wigley, W. C., Li, H., Lim, M., Pedersen, K., Han, W., Thomas, P., Lundkvist, J., Hao, Y. H., and Yu, G. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 4144–4152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Capell, A., Kaether, C., Edbauer, D., Shirotani, K., Merkl, S., Steiner, H., and Haass, C. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 52519–52523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Hashimoto, T., Wakabayashi, T., Watanabe, A., Kowa, H., Hosoda, R., Nakamura, A., Kanazawa, I., Arai, T., Takio, K., Mann, D. M., and Iwatsubo, T. (2002) EMBO J. 21, 1524–1534[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Li, X., and Greenwald, I. (1996) Neuron 17, 1015–1021[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Doan, A., Thinakaran, G., Borchelt, D. R., Slunt, H. H., Ratovitsky, T., Podlisny, M., Selkoe, D. J., Seeger, M., Gandy, S. E., Price, D. L., and Sisodia, S. S. (1996) Neuron 17, 1023–1030[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Lehmann, S., Chiesa, R., and Harris, D. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 12047–12051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Nakai, T., Yamasaki, A., Sakaguchi, M., Kosaka, K., Mihara, K., Amaya, Y., and Miura, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 23647–23658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Oh, Y. S., and Turner, R. J. (2005) Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol 289, C576–C581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Henricson, A., Kall, L., and Sonnhammer, E. L. (2005) FEBS J. 272, 2727–2733[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Murphy, M. P., Uljon, S. N., Fraser, P. E., Fauq, A., Lookingbill, H. A., Findlay, K. A., Smith, T. E., Lewis, P. A., McLendon, D. C., Wang, R., and Golde, T. E. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 26277–26284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Annaert, W. G., Esselens, C., Baert, V., Boeve, C., Snellings, G., Cupers, P., Craessaerts, K., and De Strooper, B. (2001) Neuron 32, 579–589[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Leem, J. Y., Saura, C. A., Pietrzik, C., Christianson, J., Wanamaker, C., King, L. T., Veselits, M. L., Tomita, T., Gasparini, L., Iwatsubo, T., Xu, H., Green, W. N., Koo, E. H., and Thinakaran, G. (2002) Neurobiol. Dis. 11, 64–82[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Leem, J. Y., Vijayan, S., Han, P., Cai, D., Machura, M., Lopes, K. O., Veselits, M. L., Xu, H., and Thinakaran, G. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 19236–19240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Steiner, H., Winkler, E., Edbauer, D., Prokop, S., Basset, G., Yamasaki, A., Kostka, M., and Haass, C. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 39062–39065[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Luo, W. J., Wang, H., Li, H., Kim, B. S., Shah, S., Lee, H. J., Thinakaran, G., Kim, T. W., Yu, G., and Xu, H. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 7850–7854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Bergman, A., Laudon, H., Winblad, B., Lundkvist, J., and Naslund, J. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 45564–45572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Steiner, H., Romig, H., Pesold, B., Philipp, U., Baader, M., Citron, M., Loetscher, H., Jacobsen, H., and Haass, C. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 14600–14605[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  70. Brunkan, A. L., Martinez, M., Wang, J., Walker, E. S., and Goate, A. M. (2005) J. Neurochem. 92, 1158–1169[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  71. Brunkan, A. L., Martinez, M., Wang, J., Walker, E. S., Beher, D., Shearman, M. S., and Goate, A. M. (2005) J. Neurochem. 94, 1315–1328[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  72. Moehlmann, T., Winkler, E., Xia, X., Edbauer, D., Murrell, J., Capell, A., Kaether, C., Zheng, H., Ghetti, B., Haass, C., and Steiner, H. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 8025–8030[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Hardy, J., and Crook, R. (2001) Neurosci. Lett. 306, 203–205[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  74. Kim, S. H., Yin, Y. I., Li, Y. M., and Sisodia, S. S. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 48615–48619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Capell, A., Beher, D., Prokop, S., Steiner, H., Kaether, C., Shearman, M. S., and Haass, C. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 6471–6478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Vetrivel, K. S., Cheng, H., Lin, W., Sakurai, T., Li, T., Nukina, N., Wong, P. C., Xu, H., and Thinakaran, G. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 44945–44954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Urano, Y., Hayashi, I., Isoo, N., Reid, P. C., Shibasaki, Y., Noguchi, N., Tomita, T., Iwatsubo, T., Hamakubo, T., and Kodama, T. (2005) J. Lipid Res. 46, 904–912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  78. Wang, J., Brunkan, A. L., Hecimovic, S., Walker, E., and Goate, A. (2004) Neurobiol. Dis. 15, 654–666[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  79. Steiner, H., Kostka, M., Romig, H., Basset, G., Pesold, B., Hardy, J., Capell, A., Meyn, L., Grim, M.L., Baumeister, R., Fechteler, K., and Haass, C. (2000) Nat. Cell. Biol. 2, 848–851[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  80. Levitan, D., Doyle, T. G., Brousseau, D., Lee, M. K., Thinakaran, G., Slunt, H. H., Sisodia, S. S., and Greenwald, I. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 14940–14944[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  81. Kim, S-H., and Sisodia, S. S. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 41953–41966[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Futai, S. Yagishita, and S. Ishiura
Nicastrin Is Dispensable for {gamma}-Secretase Protease Activity in the Presence of Specific Presenilin Mutations
J. Biol. Chem., May 8, 2009; 284(19): 13013 - 13022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Steiner, E. Winkler, and C. Haass
Chemical Cross-linking Provides a Model of the {gamma}-Secretase Complex Subunit Architecture and Evidence for Close Proximity of the C-terminal Fragment of Presenilin with APH-1
J. Biol. Chem., December 12, 2008; 283(50): 34677 - 34686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Sato, S. Takagi, T. Tomita, and T. Iwatsubo
The C-Terminal PAL Motif and Transmembrane Domain 9 of Presenilin 1 Are Involved in the Formation of the Catalytic Pore of the {gamma}-Secretase
J. Neurosci., June 11, 2008; 28(24): 6264 - 6271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cell Sci.Home page
D. Spasic and W. Annaert
Building {gamma}-secretase - the bits and pieces
J. Cell Sci., February 15, 2008; 121(4): 413 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Isoo, C. Sato, H. Miyashita, M. Shinohara, N. Takasugi, Y. Morohashi, S. Tsuji, T. Tomita, and T. Iwatsubo
Abeta42 Overproduction Associated with Structural Changes in the Catalytic Pore of {gamma}-Secretase: COMMON EFFECTS OF PEN-2 N-TERMINAL ELONGATION AND FENOFIBRATE
J. Biol. Chem., April 27, 2007; 282(17): 12388 - 12396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Sato, Y. Morohashi, T. Tomita, and T. Iwatsubo
Structure of the Catalytic Pore of {gamma}-Secretase Probed by the Accessibility of Substituted Cysteines.
J. Neurosci., November 15, 2006; 26(46): 12081 - 12088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Morohashi, T. Kan, Y. Tominari, H. Fuwa, Y. Okamura, N. Watanabe, C. Sato, H. Natsugari, T. Fukuyama, T. Iwatsubo, et al.
C-terminal Fragment of Presenilin Is the Molecular Target of a Dipeptidic {gamma}-Secretase-specific Inhibitor DAPT (N-[N-(3,5-Difluorophenacetyl)-L-alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-Butyl Ester)
J. Biol. Chem., May 26, 2006; 281(21): 14670 - 14676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-H. Kim and S. S. Sisodia
Evidence That the "NF" Motif in Transmembrane Domain 4 of Presenilin 1 Is Critical for Binding with PEN-2
J. Biol. Chem., December 23, 2005; 280(51): 41953 - 41966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/51/41967    most recent
M509066200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, N.
Right arrow Articles by Iwatsubo, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, N.
Right arrow Articles by Iwatsubo, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement