JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M510242200 on October 14, 2005

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 51, 41997-42003, December 23, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/51/41997    most recent
M510242200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.-R.
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.-R.
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, N. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

State-dependent Chemical Reactivity of an Engineered Cysteine Reveals Conformational Changes in the Outer Vestibule of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator*

Zhi-Ren Zhang, Binlin Song, and Nael A. McCarty1

From the School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0230

Received for publication, September 19, 2005 , and in revised form, October 12, 2005.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) chloride channels are gated by binding and hydrolysis of ATP at the nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs). We used covalent modification of CFTR channels bearing a cysteine engineered at position 334 to investigate changes in pore conformation that might accompany channel gating. In single R334C-CFTR channels studied in excised patches, modification by [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl] methanethiosulfonate (MTSET+), which increases conductance, occurred only during channel closed states. This suggests that the rate of reaction of the cysteine was greater in closed channels than in open channels. R334C-CFTR channels in outside-out macropatches activated by ATP alone were modified with first order kinetics upon rapid exposure to MTSET+. Modification was much slower when channels were locked open by the addition of nonhydrolyzable nucleotide or when the R334C mutation was coupled to a second mutation, K1250A, which greatly decreases channel closing rate. In contrast, modification was faster in R334C/K464A-CFTR channels, which exhibit prolonged interburst closed states. These data indicate that the reactivity of the engineered cysteine in R334C-CFTR is state-dependent, providing evidence of changes in pore conformation coupled to ATP binding and hydrolysis at the NBDs. The data also show that maneuvers that lock open R334C-CFTR do so by locking channels into the prominent s2 subconductance state, suggesting that the most stable conducting state of the pore reflects the fully occupied, prehydrolytic state of the NBDs.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)2 is a chloride channel with a predicted domain architecture including two membrane-spanning domains, each with six transmembrane domains, two nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs), and a regulatory domain (1). CFTR channel gating is controlled by binding and hydrolysis of ATP plus PKA-dependent phosphorylation at the regulatory domain; binding of ATP leads to dimerization of the two NBDs, which is linked to channel opening, whereas hydrolysis of ATP causes disassociation of the dimers and subsequent channel closure (2). Hence, these events in the NBDs induce conformational changes in the pore domain, which leads to opening and closing of the channel pore by an unknown mechanism.

Several lines of evidence suggest that the CFTR pore experiences more than two conformations (i.e. the closed and open states), including evidence that changes in anion selectivity and susceptibility to blockade are associated with the ATP-dependent gating cycle (314) (for a review, see Refs. 15 and 16). We recently showed that single wild type CFTR (WT-CFTR) channels exhibit two subconductance states as well as the full-conductance state (17); the stability and frequency of these substates are enhanced in some channels bearing mutations in the putative pore-lining regions. Using covalent labeling of channels bearing an engineered cysteine, we demonstrated that the subconductance and full conductance states represent different conducting states of a single chloride permeation pathway, which may reflect different conformations of the pore-lining helices (17). In that study, real time modification of single R334C-CFTR channels was observed during patch clamp experiments by the sulfhydryl-modifying agent, MTSET+, diffusing to the tip of the electrode; the resulting deposition of positive charge increased the open channel conductance. Strikingly, we never observed MTSET+-induced modification during an open burst. Therefore, we hypothesized that the accessibility or reactivity of the engineered cysteine in R334C-CFTR for modification by MTSET+ may be favored by the closed state. To test this hypothesis, we performed a series of experiments to measure the rate coefficients for modification by MTSET+ and MTSES under a variety of conditions that alter the channel open probability (Po) of R334C-CFTR. Here we report for the first time in the CFTR pore that the rate coefficient for modification of an engineered cysteine by thiol-modifying reagents is significantly lower when channels are open compared with when channels are allowed to close. The results provide direct evidence that conformational changes in the outer vestibule of CFTR are linked to the ATP-dependent gating cycle.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Preparation of Oocytes and cRNA—For mutant R334C, site-directed mutagenesis used a nested PCR strategy in which the mutation was designed into antiparallel oligomers (18). The rest of the mutants used in this study were prepared with the QuikChange protocol (Stratagene; La Jolla, CA) using oligonucleotide-mediated mutagenesis. All mutant constructs were verified by sequencing across the entire open reading frame before use. For macropatch recordings, cRNAs were prepared from a high expression construct, which was kindly provided by Dr. D. Gadsby (Rockefeller University). Oocytes were injected in a range of 5–100 ng of CFTR cRNAs. Oocytes were incubated at 18 °C in modified Liebovitz's L-15 medium with the addition of HEPES (pH 7.5), gentamicin, and penicillin/streptomycin. Recordings were made 24–72 h after the injection of cRNAs.

Electrophysiology—The electrophysiological recording methods used were similar to those described previously (17). For single channel recording, CFTR channels were studied in excised, inside-out patches at room temperature (22–23 °C). All single channel recordings for R334C- and R34C/K1250A-CFTR used asymmetrical [Cl] in order to increase the single channel amplitude at VM = –100 mV, where the pipettes were filled with a low [Cl]-containing solution (see below). Oocytes were prepared for study by shrinking in hypertonic solution (200 mM monopotassium aspartate, 20 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM EGTA, and 10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.2) followed by manual removal of the vitelline membrane. Pipettes were pulled in four stages from borosilicate glass (Sutter Instrument Co.; Novato, CA) and had resistances averaging ~10 megaohms when filled with low [Cl] pipette solution containing 30 mM NMDG-Cl, 270 mM NMDG-aspartate, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM TES (pH 7.4). The sulfhydryl-modifying reagents MTSET+ or MTSES (200 µM) were backfilled into the pipettes before seal formation and allowed to diffuse to the tip during and after seal formation; solution lacking MTS reagent was used to fill the very tip of the pipette. Typical seal resistances were 200 gigaohms or greater. R334C-, R334C/K464A-, and R334C/K1250A-CFTR channels were activated by excision into intracellular solution containing 300 mM NMDG-Cl, 1.1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM Tris-EGTA, 1 mM MgATP, 10 mM TES (pH 7.4), 50 units/ml PKA. In experiments designed to increase Po of R334C-CFTR channels, 2.75 mM AMP-PNP was added to intracellular solution containing 1 mM MgATP and 100 units/ml PKA. CFTR currents were measured with an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments; Union City, CA) and were recorded at 10 kHz to DAT tape. For subsequent analysis, records were filtered at a corner frequency of 100 Hz and acquired using a Digidata 1322A interface (Axon) and computer at 2.5 ms/point with pClamp 8.0.

For outside-out macropatch recordings, electrode tips were filled with a modified intracellular solution (150 mM NMDG-Cl, 1.1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM Tris-EGTA, 10 mM TES, pH 7.4) and then backfilled with the same solution containing either 1 mM MgATP plus 100 units/ml PKA or 1 mM MgATP, 100 units/ml PKA, and 2.75 mM AMP-PNP. Through time, nucleotides and PKA diffused to the intracellular face of the outside-out patch; CFTR channels were fully activated in ~50–75 min. The normal extracellular solution (150 mM NMDG-Cl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM TES, pH 7.4) served as bath solution, to which we added MTSET+ or MTSES to reach final concentrations of 10–100 µM, respectively. The pipette potential was held at 0 mV and then stepped to either +80 or –80 mV during exposure to MTSET+. In the case of modification by MTSES, the pipette potential was held at 0 mV and then stepped to +80 mV during perfusion of MTSES. A fast perfusion system (model SF-77B; Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT) controlled by pClamp software was employed for all outside-out macropatch experiments; the time constant for solution exchange using this system is <25 ms as judged by activation of endogenous calcium-activated chloride channels (17). Outside-out macropatch recordings were performed with an Axopatch 200B amplifier operated by pClamp 8.0 software, filtered at 200 Hz, and analyzed using Clampfit 9.0.

Analysis of Single Channel and Macropatch Experiments—For single channel recordings, transition analysis used a 50% cut-off between the open and closed current levels. Burst duration analysis was completed on records from patches containing 1–4 active CFTR channels; we used a minimum interburst duration cut-off of 100 ms to discriminate between interburst gating and fast intraburst closings (19). The mean open burst duration was estimated as previously described (19, 20). The dwell time histograms of mean burst duration were constructed with Igor software (Wavemetrics; Lake Oswego, OR) and then fit to an exponential function. The bin widths for R334C-CFTR recordings in the absence of AMP-PNP were 100 ms, and for R334C-CFTR in the presence of additional AMP-PNP or for a dual mutant R334C/K1250A, bin widths were 500 and 1000 ms, respectively.

For outside-out macropatch experiments, we used pClamp 9.0 to fit the time course of covalent modification of CFTR currents using an exponential function to obtain the time constant, {tau}, which was converted to a rate coefficient with units of M–1 s–1 by dividing by [MTSET+] or [MTSES]. In all experiments, we compared the quality of the fit of the data by a single exponential function and the fit by the sum of two exponentials by assessing the values of the correlation coefficient and S.D., as well as by visual inspection of the goodness of fit to the data trace itself. For those experiments where the data were described best by a single exponential function (Figs. 2A, 5B, and 7A), fitting the data with the sum of two exponentials led to 1) a smaller correlation coefficient, 2) a larger S.D. value, and 3) poor superimposition of the fit line on top of the data trace.

Source of Reagents—Unless otherwise noted, all reagents were obtained from Sigma. MTSET+ and MTSES were purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals Inc. MTSET+ and MTSES were first suspended in deionized water at a concentration of 100 mM, frozen in aliquots at –20 °C, and thawed and diluted into recording solution immediately before use. L-15 medium was from Invitrogen. PKA was from Promega (Madison, WI).

Statistics—Unless otherwise noted, values given are mean ± S.E. for n observations. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test for unpaired or paired measurements by Sigma Stat 2.03 (Jandel Scientific; San Rafael, CA), with p < 0.05 considered indicative of significance.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
R334C Channels Are Modified by MTSET+ Only in the Closed State—We have shown previously that the MTSET+-induced covalent modification of a cysteine engineered at CFTR position 334 (in transmembrane domain 6) increased single channel conductance without altering gating properties (17, 18). In contrast, WT-CFTR does not respond to either MTSET+ or MTSES when these reagents are applied to the outside surface of the membrane (data not shown; see Ref. 18). Excised, inside-out patch clamp recordings in which the pipette was backfilled with MTSET+ allowed us to watch the process of modification in real time as the MTSET+ diffused to the electrode tip and deposited positive charge at the engineered cysteine (Fig. 1A). Despite hours of recording of R334C-CFTR channels, the process of modification was observed to occur only during the closed interval (i.e. sometime between the last opening with lower conductance and the first opening with higher conductance). This observation led us to hypothesize that modification of R334C-CFTR might be favored by the closed state. To test this hypothesis, we coupled the R334C mutation with a mutation at the Walker lysine of NBD2, K1250A, which prolongs the open burst duration of CFTR channels (2123). Fig. 1B shows a recording of a single R334C/K1250A-CFTR channel, where the electrode was backfilled with 200 µM MTSET+. Modification was delayed until the channel transitioned to a brief closed state. Upon reopening, channel amplitude was increased, reflecting covalent modification by MTSET+. Hence, even when Po was increased by the K1250A mutation, modification at R334C did not take place in the open state. These observations strongly suggest that modification of R334C-CFTR by MTSET+ is favored by the closed state.

As shown in Fig. 1A and reported previously (17), R334C-CFTR channels exhibit stable subconductance behavior, including transitions to s1, s2, and f conductance states. In contrast, all of the open bursts of R334C/K1250A-CFTR before modification lacked transitions between conductance states and were "locked" in the s2 state (Fig. 1B). Following MTSET+-induced modification, R334C/K1250A-CFTR channels opened to, and remained locked in, the s2 state. Amplitudes for the s2 state in R334C/K1250A-CFTR were not significantly different from the amplitudes of the s2 state of R334C-CFTR before and after modification (p = 0.85) (17). These data suggest that interruption of the ATP-dependent gating cycle leads to stabilization of the pore conformation, resulting in fewer transitions between the three open conductance levels characteristic of R334C-CFTR; this provides further support for the notion that transitions between open conductance levels in CFTR channels are linked to NBD-mediated gating events.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1.
Real time modification of R334C-CFTR and R334C/K1250A-CFTR channels by MTSET+. A, a representative trace for R334C-CFTR in the excised, inside-out patch configuration during real time modification by MTSET+ backfilled in the pipette. Over the course of 10–15 min, the channel was modified by MTSET+ diffusing into the tip of the patch pipette, as reflected by the increase in the single channel amplitude. Modification occurred between the end of the last unmodified opening with lower amplitude and the beginning of the first modified opening with higher amplitude (i.e. while the channel was closed). Current levels for unmodified R334C-CFTR are indicated by the four dashed lines (in order from top to bottom) c, s1, s2, and f, representing the closed, subconductance 1, subconductance 2, and full conductance states. B, representative trace for R334C/K1250A-CFTR under identical conditions. Current levels are indicated by dashed lines; c, o-pre, and o-post represent closed, unmodified open, and modified open, respectively.

 
Macroscopic Kinetics of Modification Were Altered in the Presence of AMP-PNP—If modification of R334C-CFTR is favored by the closed state, we would expect to observe a slowing of the macroscopic time course of modification under conditions that increase Po. To test this hypothesis, we studied outside-out macropatches pulled from oocytes expressing R334C-CFTR (17). Following steady state activation by ATP and PKA in the pipette, the outside surface of the membrane was rapidly exposed to a solution containing 10 µM MTSET+. Under standard conditions, where the pipette solution contained ATP, rapid exposure to MTSET+ caused an increase in macroscopic current (Fig. 2A); the time course of modification in all four experiments of this type was best described by a first-order exponential, with time constant {tau} = 5.93 ± 1.37 s (TABLE ONE). We converted the time constant to a modification rate coefficient as described under "Experimental Procedures," giving a value of 18,922 ± 3,218 M–1 s–1. To increase the Po of R334C-CFTR channels, we included a poorly hydrolyzable ATP analogue, AMP-PNP, at 2.75 mM in addition to ATP in the pipette (24, 25). Fig. 2B shows that the increase in macroscopic current upon exposure of R334C-CFTR channels to MTSET+ in the presence of cytosolic ATP + AMP-PNP exhibited a somewhat different time course compared with experiments with ATP alone. Although we expected a much slower modification process, the kinetics of modification in the presence of AMP-PNP were fit best with the sum of two exponential functions, with time constants {tau}1 = 4.35 ± 0.9 s (fractional amplitude: 69 ± 4%) and {tau}2 = 157 ± 14.9 s (fractional amplitude 31 ± 4%; TABLE ONE). The modification rate coefficients were 20,636 ± 4,984 M–1 s–1, and 684 ± 93 M–1 s–1, respectively. Hence, modification of R334C-CFTR in the presence of mixtures of ATP and AMP-PNP occurred in two phases. The value of the time constant describing the faster phase of modification in the presence of AMP-PNP ({tau}1) was not statistically different from the single time constant ({tau}) in the presence of ATP alone (p = 0.362), nor were the modification rate coefficients different (p = 0.286). WT-CFTR channels in the presence of mixtures of ATP and AMP-PNP alternate between openings of normal duration, when ATP is bound at both NBDs, and prolonged openings, when AMP-PNP is bound at NBD2 (26, 27). The slower phase of macroscopic modification in the presence of AMP-PNP may reflect the process of modification of those channels that are locked into a long open burst. The faster phase of modification in the presence of AMP-PNP may reflect the modification process of channels exhibiting open bursts of normal duration.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE ONE
Kinetics of modification of R334C under a variety of conditions

Values shown are mean ± S.E.

 



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2.
Modification of R334C-CFTR is slowed in the presence of AMP-PNP. A, a representative recording of macroscopic current of R334C-CFTR. The pipette potential was held at 0 mV and then stepped to +80 mV. The arrow indicates the rapid application of 10 µM MTSET+ to the outside surface of the patch. The dashed line indicates a fit of the data to a first-order exponential function with {tau} = 5.3 s in this record. B, a representative recording of macroscopic current from R334C-CFTR in the presence of ATP + AMP-PNP. The kinetics of modification under this experimental condition were described best by the sum of two exponential functions, with values of {tau}1 = 5.6 s and {tau}2 = 104 s in this record.

 
To understand better the results from macropatch experiments, we performed detached inside-out single channel recordings in R334C-CFTR, in the presence of ATP + AMP-PNP, using the real time modification approach. In Fig. 3, three traces shown are from the same patch containing at least three active channels; traces A, B, and C are from near the beginning, near the middle, and near the end of the experiment, respectively. One can clearly see that there are two populations of open bursts that differ in duration; the vast majority of openings are brief, such as those seen in the absence of AMP-PNP, whereas other prolonged openings arise from channels that are locked open (arrow in trace A). During real time modification by MTSET+, channel openings increased in amplitude but with different time courses. All modified openings in the middle trace were brief ones, whereas the prolonged openings remained unmodified, and all openings in the third trace were already modified. On average, the first modified prolonged opening appeared 147.6 ± 43.2 s later than the first modified brief opening; in five of six patches, all brief openings were modified before the first prolonged one was modified. Furthermore, the prolonged unmodified openings and prolonged modified openings induced by AMP-PNP were "locked" in the s2 state, as was found for R334C/K1250A-CFTR with ATP alone, and the s2 state amplitudes were virtually identical to those for the s2 state of R334C-CFTR in the presence of ATP alone (p > 0.5).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3.
Real time modification of R334C-CFTR in the presence of ATP + AMP-PNP. Three traces from one single channel patch recording in excised, inside-out mode, with real time modification by diffusion of MTSET+ to the patch tip. This individual patch contained at least three R334C-CFTR channels, recorded in the presence of ATP plus AMP-PNP. Experimental conditions were otherwise identical to those in Fig. 1. A, the first trace, from early in the experiment, shows two channels locked open (the upward arrow indicates an example of a locked open burst) and at least one undergoing normal gating (arrowhead). Neither is modified. B, in the second trace, from near the middle of the experiment, only the channel that was not locked open has undergone modification. C, in the third trace, later in the record, both channels have been modified, but only one is locked open. The arrowheads indicate the s2-to-f transition in unlocked channels, for an unmodified channel in the upper trace and for modified channels in the middle and lower traces. The lower dashed line in the bottom trace shows that channels locked open by AMP-PNP were locked into the s2 open state (compare with the unlocked opening at the left). The upper dashed lines represent the closed current level.

 
The data in Figs. 2 and 3 suggested that in the presence of mixtures of ATP and AMP-PNP, one population of channels exhibits prolonged burst durations, making them less reactive toward MTSET+, whereas the other population gates to the closed state more normally, making them more likely to react with MTSET+. We analyzed the mean burst duration of unmodified R334C-CFTR channels either in the presence of ATP alone (Fig. 4A) or in the presence of ATP + AMP-PNP (Fig. 4C). Burst duration dwell time histograms (Fig. 4, B and D) were constructed from multiple patches, as described (19, 20), in order to increase the number of events. The mean burst duration histogram for R334C-CFTR channels in the presence of ATP alone was fit best with a first-order exponential function with {tau}B = 0.46 ± 0.1 s (Fig. 4B). In contrast, the histogram for R334C-CFTR channels in the presence of ATP + AMP-PNP was fit best with the sum of two exponential functions having {tau}B1 = 0.52 ± 0.16 s (p > 0.1 compared with {tau}B obtained with ATP alone) and {tau}B2 = 10.3 ± 1.3 s (Fig. 4D). The fractional amplitudes contributing to the fits corresponding to {tau}B1 and {tau}B2 were 71 and 29%, respectively, which are very similar to the fractional amplitudes for {tau}1 and {tau}2 obtained from the kinetic analysis of modification of R334C-CFTR macroscopic current by MTSET+ in the presence of ATP + AMP-PNP (69 ± 4 and 31 ± 4%, respectively). These data suggest that the faster phase of macroscopic modification arises from modification of R334C-CFTR channels with burst duration of ~0.5 s, and the slower phase of macroscopic modification of R334C-CFTR channels reflects the modification of those channels with burst duration of ~10 s. Hence, these results suggest that the modification rate coefficient slows under conditions that increase Po, which is consistent with the notion that MTSET+-induced modification in R334C-CFTR is favored by the closed state.

Kinetics of Macroscopic Modification Were Altered in NBD Mutants—As described above, CFTR channel Po can be altered by mutations at the Walker A lysines that are involved in catalysis of ATP (2123). Mutation K1250A reduces the channel closing rate (Fig. 1B). Mutation K464A in NBD1 leads to a great reduction in the channel opening rate. We studied outside-out macropatches from oocytes expressing R334C/K1250A- or R334C/K464A-CFTR to determine the effects of these gating domain mutations on the kinetics of modification, using experimental procedures similar to those described above. Upon exposure to MTSET+, the macroscopic current for R334C/K1250A-CFTR increased rapidly at first, followed by a slower increase in current, reflecting a complicated modification process (Fig. 5A); the kinetics of modification were described best by the sum of two exponential functions. Hence, the consequences of introducing the K1250A mutation were similar to the consequences of the addition of nonhydrolyzable nucleotide; the time-course of macroscopic modification was biphasic, with a component that is much slower than that seen in the single mutant with ATP alone. In five experiments (TABLE ONE), {tau}1 averaged 12.5 ± 0.94 s (fractional amplitude 74.7 ± 1.3%), which was significantly larger than the value of {tau} for R334C-CFTR in the presence of ATP alone and the value of {tau}1 for R334C-CFTR in the presence of ATP + AMP-PNP (p < 0.001). For those five experiments, {tau}2 averaged 225 ± 29 s (fractional amplitude 25.3 ± 1.3%), which was somewhat larger than the value of {tau}2 for R334C-CFTR in the presence of ATP + AMP-PNP (p = 0.049). The modification rate coefficients for MTSET+ in R334C/K1250A-CFTR were 9,840 ± 626 M–1s–1 and 482 ± 65 M–1 s–1, respectively.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4.
Effects of AMP-PNP on mean burst duration of unmodified R334C-CFTR channels. A, R334C-CFTR channels recorded with ATP and PKA. The patch contained at least three channels. B, a dwell time histogram constructed from mean burst durations in 519 bursts from 12 patches in experiments such as in A; under normal conditions, the mean burst duration histogram was fit best with a first-order exponential function (solid line), having a time constant {tau}B = 0.46 s. C, after R334C-CFTR channels were activated by ATP and PKA, 2.75 mM AMP-PNP was added to the solution. The patch contained at least two active channels. Under these conditions, some openings exhibited "normal" gating behavior (brief openings), and there were also some prolonged bursts reflecting channels locked open. D, a dwell time histogram was constructed from mean burst durations in 1266 bursts from six experiments such as in C; the histogram was fit best with the sum of two exponential functions, with {tau}B1 = 0.52 s and {tau}B2 = 10.3 s. Values in parentheses indicate fractional amplitudes for each component of the second-order fit.

 
The biphasic nature of the macroscopic kinetics of modification in these experiments probably reflects the fact that the K1250A mutation reduces the closing rate in some channels but not all (23). In other words, while R334C/K1250A-CFTR channels are closed, they stay closed approximately as long as R334C-CFTR channels do, which provides an opportunity for rapid modification. When R334C/K1250A-CFTR channels are open, they typically stay open much longer than R334C-CFTR channels do, which reduces the macroscopic modification rate coefficient. These interpretations are supported, at least in part, by the single channel behavior of R334C/K1250A-CFTR. The three traces shown in Fig. 6A are from the same patch. The top, middle, and bottom traces are from near the beginning, middle, and end of the experiment, respectively. One can see that R334C/K1250A-CFTR channel openings lack prominent transitions between conductance states, no matter how long the burst duration. Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 6A, there are two populations of open bursts in all experiments (i.e. apparently shorter open bursts (arrowhead in the top trace) and extremely prolonged open bursts). In a manner similar to the experiments using R334C-CFTR in the presence of ATP + AMP-PNP, the briefer open bursts were always modified earlier than the longer bursts. Since all patches recorded contained multiple channels, it was impossible to estimate the interburst closed duration. However, we were able to estimate mean burst duration of R334C/K1250A-CFTR channels. The mean burst duration dwell time histogram was fit best with the sum of two exponential functions having {tau}B1 = 4.1 s and {tau}B2 = 20.4 s. The fractional amplitudes contributed by {tau}B1 and {tau}B2 were 77 and 23%, respectively, which are very compatible with the fractional amplitudes for {tau}1 (75%) and {tau}2 (25%) for the kinetics of macroscopic modification of R334C/K1250A-CFTR. This suggests that the faster phase of macroscopic modification of R334C/K1250A-CFTR by MTSET+ could be attributed to modification of channels with burst duration of ~4 s, whereas the slower phase of macroscopic modification could arise from modification of those channels with burst duration of ~20 s. This behavior also is characteristic of the K1250A single mutant, which under identical conditions exhibits PO of only ~0.77 (27). Hence, even under these conditions, PO is still <1.0, and not all channels gate the same way. This leads to some fraction of channels being more susceptible to modification than others, resulting in the double exponential fit of the macropatch data. These results are consistent with our hypothesis that modification of R334C is favored by the closed state.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5.
MTSET+-induced modification of R334C/K1250A-CFTR and R334C/K464A-CFTR. Shown are outside-out macropatches from oocytes expressing either R334C/K1250A-CFTR (A and C) or R334C/K464A-CFTR (B). Experimental conditions were identical to those in Fig. 2. The pipette potential was held at 0 mV and then stepped to either +80 mV (A and B) or –80 mV (C). The arrows indicate the rapid application of 10 µM MTSET+. The process of modification of R334C/K1250A-CFTR by MTSET+ at Vm =+80 mV was fit best with the sum of two exponential functions, with {tau}1 = 14.8 s and {tau}2 = 158 s in this experiment. The kinetics of modification of R334C/K1250A-CFTR by MTSET+ at Vm = –80 mV also were described best by the sum of two exponential functions, having values of {tau}1 = 12.9 s and {tau}2 = 126 s in this experiment. In contrast, the kinetics of modification of R334C/K464A-CFTR by MTSET+ were fit best with a first-order exponential function, with {tau} = 1.92 s in this experiment.

 



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6.
Kinetics of modification of single R334C/K1250A-CFTR channels. A, a real time modification experiment, where this patch contained at least three channels. Experimental conditions were identical to those in Fig. 3. Three traces are shown from one single channel patch recording. The dashed lines indicate the closed current level. The first trace shows two prolonged openings from channels locked open and at least one channel not locked open (arrowhead). Neither of the channels have yet been modified. In the second trace, only the channel that was not locked has undergone modification (arrowhead). In the third trace, from near the end of the experiment, both remaining channels have been modified. All openings of R334C/K1250A-CFTR channels exhibited conductance equivalent to the s2 conductance state of R334C-CFTR. B, the mean burst duration histogram constructed from open bursts of unmodified channels from experiments such as in A was fit best with the sum of two exponential functions, with {tau}B1 = 4.1 s and {tau}B2 = 20.4 s (548 bursts from n = 7 patches).

 
We also reasoned that if modification of R334C-CFTR channels is favored by the closed state, the modification rate coefficient should be higher under conditions that reduce Po. To test this hypothesis, we first studied outside-out macropatches of R334C-CFTR channels in the presence of 0.2 mM ATP and measured the kinetics of modification. Surprisingly, the time constant of modification was identical to that observed for R334C-CFTR in the presence of 1 mM ATP (p = 0.72; TABLE ONE). We speculated that 0.2 mM ATP may slightly reduce the Po of R334C-CFTR channels, but not to a degree that could alter significantly the kinetics of modification; indeed, the overall Po of R334C-CFTR channels recorded in the presence of 1 mM ATP is already reduced, compared with WT-CFTR under identical conditions (0.24 ± 0.04 (17) versus 0.34 ± 0.03 (27), respectively). Therefore, we recorded from giant outside-out patches pulled from oocytes expressing R334C/K464A-CFTR, which would reduce Po considerably by prolonging the interburst closed durations (2123) (Fig. 5B). The macroscopic current of R334C/K464A-CFTR was increased rapidly upon application of 10 µM MTSET+. The kinetics of modification were described best by a first-order exponential (TABLE ONE; p = 0.004 compared with {tau} for R334C-CFTR). The modification rate coefficient for MTSET+ in R334C/K464A-CFTR was 41,864 ± 4,229 M–1 s–1, which is roughly 2-fold higher than that in R334C-CFTR under identical conditions (p = 0.007). Hence, the prolonged interburst closed duration led to an increase in modification rate coefficient.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7.
MTSES-induced modification of R334C-CFTR and R334C/K1250A-CFTR. Outside-out macropatches were pulled from oocytes expressing either R334C-CFTR or R334C/K1250A-CFTR. Experimental conditions were similar to those described in the legends to Figs. 2 and 5. A, R334C-CFTR channels were activated by ATP plus PKA. The amplitude of macroscopic current was decreased by 79% upon modification by 50 µM MTSES in this experiment. The dashed line indicates a fit of the data to a first-order exponential function, having {tau} = 4.5 s in this experiment. B, a representative recording of macroscopic current of R334C/K1250A-CFTR under identical conditions. The process of modification in the double mutant was fit best by the sum of two exponential functions (dashed line), with values of {tau}1 = 10.8 s and {tau}2 = 144 s, respectively, in this experiment. The amplitude of macroscopic current was decreased by 85% upon modification by MTSES.

 
Kinetics of Modification by MTSES—Because our previous studies (17, 18) showed that the electrostatic potential in the outer vestibule affects the kinetics of modification at R334C, we asked whether the modification rate coefficient (and its potential state dependence) for a negatively charged thiol-modifying reagent was different from that measured for the positively charged MTSET+. Fig. 7 shows outside-out macropatch recordings from oocytes expressing either R334C-CFTR or R334C/K1250A-CFTR, with rapid exposure to 50 µM MTSES. Macroscopic currents from R334C- and R334C/K1250A-CFTR were decreased upon exposure to MTSES (due to deposition of negative charge) by 75 ± 6 and 77 ± 5%, respectively. The kinetics of modification of R334C-CFTR by MTSES were fit best with a first-order exponential function (TABLE ONE). The macroscopic kinetics of modification of R334C/K1250A-CFTR were fit best with the sum of two exponential functions (TABLE ONE; the fractional amplitudes were 84 ± 2.7% for {tau}1 and 16 ± 2.7% for {tau}2), as was found for MTSET+. The modification rate coefficients for MTSES in both R334C-CFTR and R334C/K1250A-CFTR were >3-fold lower than those measured for MTSET+ in the same mutants (p < 0.001). These results suggest that electrostatic profiles may influence the rate of modification by MTS reagents. More importantly, the kinetics of modification of the engineered cysteine at R334C by MTSES were state-dependent, as described above for modification by MTSET+.

Because one might suggest that the apparent state dependence of modification reflects interference from Cl in or near the mouth of the channel, we next asked whether the direction of Cl movement affected the kinetics of modification by extracellular MTSET+. Fig. 5C shows a representative experiment, where Vm was held at 0 mV and then stepped to –80 mV. Upon rapid exposure to MTSET+, macroscopic inward current was increased, reflecting modification of R334C/K1250A-CFTR channels. The kinetics were fit best with a sum of two exponential functions, providing time constants that were very similar to those measured from experiments at Vm =+80 mV ({tau}1 = 13.4 ± 0.8 s and {tau}2 = 217 ± 52 s; n = 3; p > 0.5). These results indicate that the direction of anion movement does not affect the rate of modification by MTS reagent at R334C.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we made use of covalent modification of engineered cysteine residues to investigate potential changes in the conformation of the outer vestibule of the CFTR channel pore between open and closed states. Single R334C-CFTR channels studied using real time modification only showed a reaction to MTSET+ during a closed state, even when channel Po was increased dramatically by exposure to mixtures of ATP and AMP-PNP or by the addition of the Walker A mutation K1250A. Macropatch currents recorded from oocytes expressing R334C-CFTR increased rapidly upon abrupt exposure to MTSET+ (or decreased rapidly upon abrupt exposure to MTSES). Under conditions that increase channel activity (i.e. R334C-CFTR with ATP + AMP-PNP, or R334C/K1250A-CFTR with ATP alone), the kinetics of modification were slowed. Under conditions that decrease channel activity (R334C/K464A-CFTR), the rate of modification was increased dramatically. These data are consistent with a difference in the reactivity of the engineered cysteine to MTS reagents between the open and closed channel states, which most likely reflects changes in the conformation of the pore, or at least the outer vestibule, driven by gating events at the NBDs. These results provide the first evidence of movement in the CFTR pore domain correlated with channel gating state.

Our data indicate that the rate of covalent modification at R334C differs dramatically between closed and open channels. This result could be explained by physical hindrance of the interaction between the reagent and the cysteine if the side chain were buried in protein or lipid during the open state. However, we previously found that the macroscopic conductance of whole oocytes expressing R334C-CFTR channels was sensitive to bath pH, due to titration of the partial negative charge on the unmodified cysteine (17, 18). This observation suggests that R334C indeed faces the water-soluble pore while the channels are open, because protons can access this residue. Hence, the state-dependent ability of MTS reagents to interact with the engineered cysteine of R334C-CFTR most likely reflects a difference in the reactivity of that cysteine during channel closure rather than physical obstruction that reduces accessibility. The difference in reactivity may reflect the impact of another residue, which shifts the pKa for MTSET+. Hence, we cannot say that R334C changes its position between open and closed states but rather must limit ourselves to saying that the orientation of R334C relative to the other residue or the distance between them changes as a function of channel gating. Nonetheless, these data suggest that changes in the rate coefficients for thiol-modifying reagents at R334C under different experimental conditions reflect conformational changes in the outer vestibule of the CFTR pore, which are associated with ATP-dependent gating.

Our results also provide further evidence that transitions between the three major open conductance states are linked to ATP-dependent gating events at the NBDs. As described previously (17), channels formed by WT-CFTR and many pore domain mutants, including R334C-CFTR, exhibit two subconductance states (s1 and s2) as well as the full conductance state (f). The subconductance states in some mutant channels differ markedly in their stability and probability of occurrence from that seen in WT-CFTR (17).

In R334C-CFTR channels, the most stable conducting state is the s2 state, whereas in WT-CFTR channels, the most stable conducting state is the f state (17). Results from the present study show that when R334C-CFTR channels are locked open by either AMP-PNP or the addition of the K1250A mutation, they are locked into the s2 state. In contrast, previous studies show that WT-CFTR channels locked open by the same maneuvers are locked in the f state (2123). These observations suggest that the most stable conducting state of the pore reflects the fully occupied, prehydrolytic state of the NBDs. Consistent with this notion, we recently reported that WT-CFTR channels locked open by either AMP-PNP or vanadate (and K1250A-CFTR channels with ATP alone) exhibit a reduced frequency of flickery closures compared with WT-CFTR channels in the presence of ATP alone (27). R334C-CFTR channels almost always transition briefly to the f state before closure (see the arrowheads in Fig. 3) (17); the f state may represent an unstable conformation that serves as a transition intermediate between the stable s2 state and the stable c state. Hence, the stability of the open conductance states appears to be determined by the processes of binding and hydrolysis at the NBDs. The mechanism that couples conformational changes at the NBDs to conformational changes in the pore is an interesting subject for future study.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DK-056481 and American Heart Association Established Investigator Grant 0140174N (to N. A. M.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 310 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, GA 30332-0230. Tel.: 404-385-2955; Fax: 404-894-0519; E-mail: Nael.McCarty{at}biology.gatech.edu.

2 The abbreviations used are: CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; PKA, protein kinase A; MTSET+, [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl] methanethiosulfonate; MTSES, 2-sulfonatoethyl methanethiosulfonate; TES, N-tris(hydroxymethyl)-methyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid; NMDG, N-methyl-D-glucamine; AMP-PNP, 5'-adenylyl-{beta},{gamma}-imidodiphosphate; NBD, nucleotide-binding domain; WT-CFTR, wild type CFTR. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank G. Cui, M. Fuller, C. Thompson, and D. Dawson for comments.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Riordan, J. R., Rommens, J. M., Kerem, B., Alon, N., Rozmahel, R., Grzelczak, Z., Zielenski, J., Lok, S., Plavsic, N., Chou, J. L., Drumm, M., Iannuzzi, M. C., and Collins, F. S. (1989) Science 245, 1066–1073
  2. Vergani, P., Lockless, S. W., Nairn, A. C., and Gadsby, D. C. (2005) Nature 433, 876–880
  3. Yue, H., Devidas, S., and Guggino, W. B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 10030–10034
  4. Haws, C., Krouse, M. E., Xia, Y., Gruenert, D. C., and Wine, J. J. (1992) Am. J. Physiol. 263, L692–L707
  5. McCarty, N. A., McDonough, S., Cohen, B. N., Riordan, J. R., Davidson, N., and Lester, H. A. (1993) J. Gen. Physiol. 102, 1–23
  6. McDonough, S., Davidson, N., Lester, H. A., and McCarty, N. A. (1994) Neuron 13, 623–634
  7. Xie, J., Drumm, M. L., Ma, J., and Davis, P. B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 28084–28091
  8. Gunderson, K. L., and Kopito, R. (1995) Cell 82, 231–239
  9. Tao, T., Xie, J., Drumm, M. L., Zhao, J., Davis, P. B., and Ma, J. J. (1996) Biophys J. 70, 743–753
  10. Ishihara, H., and Welsh, M. J. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, C1278–C1289
  11. Lansdell, K. A., Kidd, J. F., Delaney, S. J., Wainwright, B. J., and Sheppard, D. N. (1998) J. Physiol. 512, 751–764
  12. Linsdell, P., and Hanrahan, J. W. (1998) J. Gen. Physiol. 111, 601–614
  13. Ishihara, H., and Welsh, M. J. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, C1278–C1289
  14. Harrington, M. A., and Kopito, R. R. (2002) Biophys. J. 82, 1278–1292
  15. McCarty, N. A. (2000) J. Exp. Biol. 203, 1947–1962
  16. Dawson, D. C., Liu, X., Zhang, Z.-R., and McCarty, N. A. (2003) in The CFTR Chloride Channel (Kirk, K., and Dawson, D. C., eds) pp. 1–34, Landes Biosciences, Georgetown, TX
  17. Zhang, Z.-R., Cui, G., Liu, X., Song, B., Dawson, D. C., and McCarty, N. A. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 458–468
  18. Smith, S. S., Liu, X., Zhang, Z.-R., Sun, F., Kriewall, T. E., McCarty, N. A., and Dawson, D. C. (2001) J. Gen. Physiol. 118, 407–432
  19. Zhang, Z.-R., Zeltwanger, S., and McCarty, N. A. (2000) J. Membr. Biol. 175, 35–52
  20. Wang, F., Zeltwanger, S., Yang, I. C., Nairn, A. C., and Hwang, T.-C. (1998) J. Gen. Physiol. 111, 477–490
  21. Carson, M. B., Travis, M. S. M., and Welsh, M. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1711–1717
  22. Powe, A. C., Jr., Al-Nakkash, L., Li, M., and Hwang, T.-C. (2002) J. Physiol. 539, 333–346
  23. Vergani, P., Nairn, A. C., and Gadsby, D. C. (2003) J. Gen. Physiol. 121, 17–36
  24. Hwang, T.-C., Nagel, G., Nairn, A. C., and Gadsby, D. C. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 4698–4702
  25. Gadsby, D. C., Dousmanis, A. G., and Nairn, A. C. (1998) Acta Physiol. Scand. Suppl. 643, 247–256
  26. Fuller, M. D., Zhang, Z.-R., Cui, G., Kubanek, J., and McCarty, N. A. (2004) Am. J. Physiol. 287, C1328–C1341
  27. Fuller, M. D., Zhang, Z.-R., Cui, G., and McCarty, N. A. (2005) Biophys. J. 89, 1–16

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
H. F. Bao, L. Liu, J. Self, B. J. Duke, R. Ueno, and D. C. Eaton
A synthetic prostone activates apical chloride channels in A6 epithelial cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2008; 295(2): G234 - G251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Fatehi and P. Linsdell
State-dependent Access of Anions to the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Chloride Channel Pore
J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2008; 283(10): 6102 - 6109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. J. Beck, Y. Yang, S. Yaemsiri, and V. Raghuram
Conformational Changes in a Pore-lining Helix Coupled to Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Channel Gating
J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2008; 283(8): 4957 - 4966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/51/41997    most recent
M510242200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.-R.
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.-R.
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, N. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS