![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 52, 42707-42714, December 30, 2005
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-induced Expression of Phospholipid Scramblase 1 through STAT1 Requires the Sequential Activation of Protein Kinase C
and JNK*

1
1


2
From the
Department of Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of Cell Differentiation and Apoptosis, Chinese Ministry of Education, Rui-Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine (formerly Shanghai Second Medical University), Shanghai 200025, China,
Institute of Health Science, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine/Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200025, China, ¶the Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, and the ||Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La, Jolla, California 92037
Received for publication, June 7, 2005 , and in revised form, October 18, 2005.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PKC
)-specific inhibitor rottlerin and the dominant negative mutant of PKC
significantly antagonized IFN-induced PLSCR1 expression. The influence of PKC
on IFN-mediated induction of PLSCR1 was dependent upon the phosphorylation of STAT1 at Ser-727. Furthermore, PKC
-mediated activation of STAT1 required the activation of JNK, as the inhibition of JNK activity by its specific inhibitor or transfection of its dominant negative mutant suppressed both serine phosphorylation of STAT1 and PLSCR1 expression but not the activation of PKC
. In conclusion, our results suggest that the induction of PLSCR1 transcription through STAT1 depends upon sequential activation of PKC
and JNK. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PKC
), although this could not be confirmed in our recent experiments with recombinant PKC
and apoptosis induction by Fas ligation in Jurkat cells (7). When it fails to be palmitoylated, PLSCR1 can be imported into the nucleus where it binds to genomic DNA, suggesting a potential role for this protein in gene transcription (8, 9).
These biochemical studies strongly indicate that PLSCR1 exerts wide biological effects. Whereas the role of PLSCR1 in remodeling plasma membrane phospholipids and in cell surface exposure of phosphatidylserine, which was originally identified (10, 11), remains a topic of great controversy, there is increasing evidence to suggest a direct role of this protein in regulating cell proliferation and terminal differentiation. As an example, proliferation and terminal differentiation of myeloid precursor cells in response to selective growth factors are impaired in PLSCR1/ mice (12). Furthermore, the suppression of PLSCR1 expression by small interfering RNA and antisense RNA inhibits the all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and/or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)-induced leukemic cell differentiation (7, 13).
However, the mechanisms of regulation of PLSCR1 expression remain largely unknown thus far. Recently, we reported that PKC
mediates ATRA and PMA-induced PLSCR1 expression (7). PLSCR1 has also been shown to be among the most potently activated of the interferon (IFNs)-stimulated genes, suggesting that it possibly participates in cellular response to this important cytokine (14, 15). As recently reported, gene deletion of PLSCR1 or suppression of PLSCR1 expression by small interfering RNA in wild type cells was found to markedly attenuate the antiviral activity of IFNs, which appeared to be related to diminished expression of a subset of IFN-stimulated genes with known antiviral activities in cells failing to up-regulate PLSCR1 (16). However, the mechanism by which IFN induces PLSCR1 expression also remains unresolved. Because IFNs was also shown to activate PKC
(17), in the present study we investigated whether and how activated PKC
contributes to the transcriptional activation of PLSCR1 by IFN.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2a was purchased from Roche Applied Science. PMA and all specific inhibitors, including Gö6976, SB203580, U0126, and SP600125, were from Calbiochem, except for rottlerin (from Biomol, Plymouth, PA). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies for p38, ERK, c-Jun, JNK, and their phosphoylated forms as well as phospho-PKC
(Ser-643), phospho-STAT1 (Ser-727 and Tyr-701), and horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA), except for anti-phospho STAT1 (Ser-727) used in the experiments shown in Fig. 7 (Upstate%20Biotechnology">Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Waltham, MA). Rabbit polyclonal anti-PKC
antibody and mouse monoclonal anti-STAT1 antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA), but anti-STAT1 antibody to detect transfection of mutant STAT1-S727A was purchased from BD Biosciences. Mouse monoclonal anti-
-actin antibody (Ab-5) was from NeoMarkers (Fremont, CA). Human monocytic leukemic cell line U937 (from Cell Bank of Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Shanghai, China) was cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT). The human fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080 (also called 2fTGH) and its STAT1/ cell line U3A (18) (kindly provided by Dr. George Stark, The Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH) were each cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. All cells were maintained in 5% CO2-95% air at 37 °C. During experiments, cell viability was kept at least 90% by trypan blue exclusion assay.
|
carrying the dominant negative (DN) fragment of PKC
and its empty vector pcDNA3 were generous gifts from Dr. Jae-Won Soh (Inha University, Incheon, Korea) (19). pcDNA3-DN-JNK1 was kindly provided by Dr. Young-Mi Ham (Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea) (20). pRc/CMV-STAT1 and pRc/CMV-STAT1-S727A were generously provided by Dr. James Darnell (Rockefeller University, New York) (21). These plasmids were transfected into H1080 and U3A cells using Polyfect transfection reagent (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Expression of transfected cDNAs was confirmed by Western blotting.
|
-actin (sense strand, 5'-CATCCTCACCCTGAAGTACCC-3'; antisense strand, 5'-AGCCTGGATAGCAACGTACATG-3'). The -fold change is shown as means ± S.D. in three independent samples with the same treatment.
|
|
(DN-
) using the Polyfect reagent (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's protocol. Twenty-four hours after transfection, triplicate cultures were treated with IFN
2a in the presence or absence of rottlerin (10 µM) or Gö6976 (5 µM) for 18 h. Luciferase activity was measured using a Dual-Luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) following the manufacturer's protocol. The measured luciferase activity was normalized against pRL-SV40 Renilla luciferase activity for each sample, and luciferase activity was expressed as -fold over empty pGL3 vector luciferase activity normalized by pRL-SV40 Renilla activity.
|
Activity AssaysU937 cells were lysed in phosphorylation lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 200 µM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 100 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM Hepes, 1.5 mM magnesium chloride, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitor mixture). Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-PKC
antibody, and immunoprecipitates were washed three times with phosphorylation lysis buffer and two times with kinase buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 20 µg of phosphatidylserine, and 20 µM ATP) and resuspended in 30 µl of kinase buffer containing 5 µg of histone H1 as an exogenous substrate, to which 12 µCi of [
-32P]ATP was added. The reaction was incubated for 1530 min at room temperature and terminated by the addition of 2x SDS sample buffer. Proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and phosphorylated histone H1 was detected by autoradiography (22).
|
-actin antibody to ascertain equal loading of protein. As necessary, the signal intensities of proteins tested were normalized against the indicated internal control using a densitometer (SmartView, version 5.0, software from Furi, Shanghai, China), and the -fold change was expressed compared with untreated cells. Statistical Analysis Student's t test was used to compare the difference between two different groups. A value of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2a highly induced PLSCR1 mRNA and protein in leukemic U937 cells as determined by real-time quantitative RT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively (Fig. 1A). Prior to PLSCR1 expression, IFN
2a treatment rapidly and time-dependently resulted in an increase in PKC
phosphorylation in intact cells. As shown in Fig. 1B, increased phosphorylated PKC
began to appear at 5 min after IFN treatment and then became more significant. To determine the possible involvement of PKC
in IFN induction of PLSCR1, leukemic U937 cells were treated with IFN-
2a in the absence and presence of the PKC
inhibitor, rottlerin. Pretreatment with rottlerin for 1 h effectively inhibited IFN activation of PKC
as evidenced by PKC
phosphorylation (Fig. 1C) and the ability of immunoprecipitated PKC
to phosphorylate histone H1 (Fig. 1D). It was noteworthy that in addition to PKC
several other kinases, including p38, ERK, and Cdc2/Cdk1, could not be detected in such immunoprecipitates (Fig. 1E), indicating the specificity for in vitro kinase assays of PKC
. More intriguingly, pretreatment with rottlerin prevented IFN induction of PLSCR1 mRNA and protein (Fig. 1F, left panel). In contrast, Gö6976, an inhibitor of conventional PKCs, was ineffective to IFN-induced PLSCR1 expression (Fig. 1F, right panel).
|
(DN
), which selectively inhibited action of PKC
(19). For the convenience of transfection, the human fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080 was used. First, a plasmid containing the PLSCR1 promoter linked to luciferase cDNA (HPPP-luc) or the empty vector was transfected into HT1080 cells. As seen in Fig. 2A, IFN treatment resulted in an increase in the promoter activity, which was significantly suppressed by rottlerin but not by Gö6976 (data not shown). In agreement with the effects of rottlerin, transient transfection of DN
inhibited IFN induction of PLSCR1 mRNA/protein (Fig. 2B) and the PLSCR1 promoter-reporter construct (Fig. 2C). All of these findings indicate that IFN activation of PKC
precedes to and contributes to the subsequent induction of PLSCR1. Additionally, rottlerin and DN
also slightly abrogated the basal level of PLSCR protein and its promoter activity, suggesting that basal activity of PKC
possibly contributes to the constitutive expression of PLSCR1.
Because PKC
is known to phosphorylate STAT1 on Ser-727 in response to IFN, STAT1, Ser-727 phosphorylation, and PLSCR1 induction were monitored in HT1080 in comparison with its derivative, the STAT1-null U3A cell line (Fig. 3A) (18). In response to IFN, STAT1 Ser-727 phosphorylation increased at 30 min of treatment (lower, Fig. 3B), which appeared after activation of PKC
(Fig. 1B), whereas the induction of PLSCR1 mRNA and protein was not seen until after 3 and 6 h of treatment, respectively (Fig. 3B). Similar results were obtained in U937 cells (data not shown). Consistent with our previous report (14), however, PLSCR1 was not induced by IFN in the STAT1-deficient U3A cells (Fig. 3A).
We further determined the role of STAT1 Ser-727 phosphorylation in IFN-induced PLSCR1 expression. For this purpose, wild type STAT1 and mutant STAT1-S727A were transfected into U3A cells. Western blots showed the effectiveness of transfection of wild type STAT1 and mutant STAT1-S727A, the former but not the latter being phosphorylated on Ser-727 (Fig. 4). The results showed that ectopic expression of STAT1 but not STAT1-S727A increased PLSCR1 expression in U3A cells (Fig. 4).
In the next phase of analysis, we extended our investigation to the potential relationship between PKC
and STAT1 in the induction of PLSCR1. Toward this end, HT1080 cells were treated with IFN
2a in combination with either rottlerin or DN
transfection (Fig. 5). The results showed that both rottlerin and DN
transfection effectively inhibited IFN
2a-stimulated phosphorylation on STAT1 at Ser-727, suggesting that PKC
contributes, directly or indirectly, to IFN
2a-induced STAT1 phosphorylation.
Previous studies (26, 27) showed that IFN treatment leads to activation of several serine-threonine kinases including mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) besides PKC
, although the mechanism(s) is incompletely understood. Indeed, several members of the MAPK family including ERK1/2, p38 and JNK, as well as the JNK substrate transcription factor c-Jun, were rapidly but transiently phosphorylated upon IFN
2a treatment (Fig. 6). Thus, we sought to determine whether any of these MAPKs contribute to PLSCR1 expression in response to IFN
2a treatment. U937 cells were pretreated for 1 h with MAPK inhibitors U0126 (28), SB203580 (29), and SP600125 (30). The results showed that SP600125, which inhibited phosphorylation of c-Jun by JNK, blocked IFN
2a stimulation of STAT1 Ser-727 phosphorylation and PLSCR1 expression (Fig. 7A), but U0126 and SB203580 failed to do so. These two inhibitors diminished phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38, respectively, after IFN
2a treatment (Fig. 7, B and C). These results indicate that JNK, but not ERK1/2 or p38, contributes to STAT1 Ser-727 phosphorylation and PLSCR1 expression induced by IFN
2a. Consistent with this fact, DN-JNK, a dominant negative mutant JNK, also reduced phosphorylation of STAT1 Ser-727 induced by IFN
2a and blocked IFN-
2a-induced expression of both the PLSCR1 promoter construct and endogenous PLSCR1 in HT1080 cells (Fig. 8).
|
and JNK on STAT1 Ser-727 phosphorylation are independent or in the same signaling pathway. Here we found that inhibition of PKC
by rottlerin reduced IFN
2a-induced activation of JNK in U937 cells, as determined by reduced phosphorylation of c-Jun. However, inhibition of JNK with SP600125 had no effect on the IFN stimulation of PKC
activation (Fig. 9). In agreement with the effects of these inhibitors, transfection of DN
could inhibit the phosphorylation of JNK and c-Jun, whereas DN-JNK failed to affect the activation of PKC
in HT1080 cells (Fig. 10). These results indicate that PKC
is upstream of and required for JNK activation and that both kinases are involved in IFN signaling to the PLSCR1 gene.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
by phosphorylation mediates ATRA and PMA-induced PLSCR1 expression in leukemic cells (7). In this work, we continued to show that the inhibition of PKC
activation by the chemical inhibitor rottlerin and transfection of the dominant negative mutant of PKC
significantly inhibited IFN
2a-induced expression of PLSCR1 mRNA and protein, whereas such inhibition was not observed for Gö6976, an inhibitor of the conventional PKC. These data, combined with our previous report demonstrating that transfection of the catalytic fragment of PKC
directly up-regulates PLSCR1 expression (7), strongly suggest that PKC
is a common mediator for PLSCR1 expression induced by IFN
2a, ATRA, or PMA. More recently, PLSCR1 expression has been shown to mediate the antiviral activity of IFNs (16). Our previous studies also showed that induced expression of PLSCR1 contributes to ATRA/PMA-induced leukemic cell differentiation (7). Furthermore, IFN
2a and ATRA act synergistically in the induction of cell differentiation and growth inhibition (22). Therefore, it is of interest that IFN
2a and ATRA both up-regulate PLSCR1 expression through PKC
.
It is well known that IFN-
/
binding to the type I IFN receptor initiates a tyrosine phosphorylation cascade involving JAK kinases (JAK1 and TYK2), resulting in the heterodimerization of tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT1 and 2. These phosphorylated STAT proteins are transported to the nucleus and, in a complex with IRF9, bind to IFN-stimulated response elements and activate the transcription of many different genes (3133). However, an additional phosphorylation event on STAT1 Ser-727 is required for a full IFN-stimulated transcriptional response (34). Previously, IFN-
2a was reported to activate expression of the human PLSCR1 gene at the transcriptional level through a single IFN-stimulated response element located in the first exon (14). Accordingly, IFN-
2a failed to induce PLSCR1 in STAT1-negative U3A cells. Here we showed that complementation with wild type STAT1, but not STAT1 mutant S727A, almost completely restored IFN-
2a-induced PLSCR1 expression. These findings support an essential role for Ser-727 of STAT1 in IFN-
2a-induced PLSCR1 expression. Prior studies demonstrating that PKC
can phosphorylate STAT1 on Ser-727 indicated that a role for PKC
in PLSCR1 expression is likely (35). It has been proposed that PKC
is activated during engagement of the Type I IFN receptor and that such an activation of PKC
appears critical for phosphorylation of STAT1 on Ser-727 (17). DeVries et al. (36) also showed that PKC
activates STAT1 through phosphorylation of STAT1 on Ser-727 in etoposide-induced apoptosis. We have shown here that the PKC
inhibitor rottlerin or a dominant negative mutant of PKC
significantly antagonized IFN
2a-induced STAT1 phosphorylation on Ser-727. Therefore, our findings demonstrate a role for PKC
in the Ser-727 phosphorylation of STAT1 required for IFN induction of PLSCR1.
|
activation leads to Ser-727 phosphorylation of STAT1 is still unresolved. IFN
treatment results in phosphorylation of many different signaling proteins, including insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (37, 38), Crk (39), and MAPKs (40, 41). A recent report demonstrated that genotoxic agents such as arabino-furanosylcytosine-induced JNK activation is attenuated by treatment with rottlerin, expression of a kinase-inactive PKC
mutant, and down-regulation of PKC
by small interfering RNA, proposing that PKC
is required, in part, for induction of JNK (42). We have demonstrated here that a JNK inhibitor, but not inhibitors of ERK1/2 and p38, blocked both STAT1 serine727 phosphorylation and PLSCR1 expression following IFN treatment. More importantly, transfection of a dominant negative mutant of JNK also reduced IFN-initiated Ser-727 phosphorylation of STAT1 and PLSCR1 expression. Our results indicated that JNK contributes to both STAT1 Ser-727 phosphorylation and an IFN transcriptional response as monitored by expression of PLSCR1. However, inhibition of JNK did not suppress IFN
2a-induced phosphorylation and activation of PKC
. Therefore, JNK activation is downstream of PKC
, whereas both of these kinases are required for maximal STAT1 Ser-727 phosphorylation. In summary, PKC
inhibition suppressed IFN-initiated JNK activation, STAT1 Ser-727 phosphorylation, and expression of PLSCR1. Transcriptional induction of PLSCR1 through STAT1 that is induced by IFN
2a is dependent upon sequential activation of both PKC
and JNK kinase. | FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 These authors were equal contributors to this work. ![]()
2 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathophysiology, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 280, Chong-Qing South Rd., Shanghai 200025, China. Tel. and Fax: 86-21-64154900; E-mail: chengq{at}shsmu.edu.cn or gqchen{at}sibs.ac.cn.
3 The abbreviations used are: PLSCR1, phospholipid scramblase 1; ATRA, all-trans-retinoic acid; DN, dominant negative; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PKC
, protein kinase C
; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; STAT1, signal transducer and activator of transcription-1; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; IFN, interferon; RT, reverse transcription. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Kaur, A. Sassano, B. Dolniak, S. Joshi, B. Majchrzak-Kita, D. P. Baker, N. Hay, E. N. Fish, and L. C. Platanias Role of the Akt pathway in mRNA translation of interferon-stimulated genes PNAS, March 25, 2008; 105(12): 4808 - 4813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Panaretakis, L. Hjortsberg, K. P. Tamm, A.-C. Bjorklund, B. Joseph, and D. Grander Interferon {alpha} Induces Nucleus-independent Apoptosis by Activating Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase 1/2 and c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase Downstream of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2008; 19(1): 41 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kaur, L. Lal, A. Sassano, B. Majchrzak-Kita, M. Srikanth, D. P. Baker, E. Petroulakis, N. Hay, N. Sonenberg, E. N. Fish, et al. Regulatory Effects of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin-activated Pathways in Type I and II Interferon Signaling J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2007; 282(3): 1757 - 1768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Bogoyevitch and B. Kobe Uses for JNK: the Many and Varied Substrates of the c-Jun N-Terminal Kinases Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 2006; 70(4): 1061 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Thomas, C. L. Galligan, R. D. Newman, E. N. Fish, and S. N. Vogel Contribution of Interferon-beta to the Murine Macrophage Response to the Toll-like Receptor 4 Agonist, Lipopolysaccharide J. Biol. Chem., October 13, 2006; 281(41): 31119 - 31130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||