JBC Advanced Glycation Endproducts

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M411894200 on November 16, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 6, 4894-4905, February 11, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/6/4894    most recent
M411894200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deng, X.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deng, X.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Mirk/dyrk1B Decreases the Nuclear Accumulation of Class II Histone Deacetylases during Skeletal Muscle Differentiation*

Xiaobing Deng, Daina Z. Ewton, Stephen E. Mercer, and Eileen Friedman{ddagger}

From the Department of Pathology, Upstate Medical University, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York 13210

Received for publication, October 20, 2004


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mirk/dyrk1B is a member of the dyrk/minibrain family of serine/threonine kinases that mediate the transition from growth to differentiation in lower eukaryotes and mammals. Depletion of endogenous Mirk from C2C12 myoblasts by RNA interference blocks skeletal muscle differentiation (Deng, X., Ewton, D., Pawlikowski, B., Maimone, M., and Friedman, E. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 41347-41354). We now demonstrate that knockdown of Mirk blocks transcription of the muscle regulatory factor myogenin. Co-expression of Mirk with MEF2C, but not MyoD or Myf5, enhanced activation of the myogenin promoter in a Mirk kinase-dependent manner. Mirk activated MEF2 not through direct phosphorylation of MEF2 but by phosphorylation of its inhibitors, the class II histone deacetylases (HDACs). MEF2 is sequestered by class II HDACs such as HDAC5 and MEF2-interacting transcriptional repressor (MITR). Mirk antagonized the inhibition of MEF2C by MITR, whereas kinase-inactive Mirk was ineffective. Mirk phosphorylates class II HDACs at a conserved site within the nuclear localization region, reducing their nuclear accumulation in a dose-dependent and kinase-dependent manner. Moreover, less mutant MITR phosphomimetic at the Mirk phosphorylation site localized in the nucleus than wild-type MITR. Regulation of class II HDACs occurs by multiple mechanisms. Others have shown that calcium signaling leads to phosphorylation of HDACs at 14-3-3-binding sites, blocking their association with MEF2 within the nucleus. Mirk provides another level of regulation. Mirk is induced within the initial 24 h of myogenic differentiation and enables MEF2 to transcribe the myogenin gene by decreasing the nuclear accumulation of class II HDACs.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The availability of in vitro culture systems that recapitulate the major features of muscle cell differentiation has allowed much progress toward the elucidation of the molecular basis for muscle maturation and regeneration. An improved understanding of these processes might have significant clinical ramifications, such as the development of strategies to ameliorate damage to skeletal or cardiac muscle. A novel gene cloned in our laboratory (1, 2), the kinase Mirk, has the unusual properties of mediating cell survival in vitro (2), regulating myoblast differentiation following the commitment stage of myogenesis (3), and maintaining untransformed cells in G0 arrest (4, 5). In C2C12 myoblasts, and in nontransformed epithelial cells and fibroblasts, Mirk elongates the G0 phase of the cell cycle by stabilizing the CDK1 inhibitor p27 Kip1 by phosphorylating p27 at serine 10 (4) and maintaining p27 in the nucleus where it acts as a CDK2 inhibitor. Mirk also destabilizes the G1 cyclin, cyclin D1, by phosphorylation at threonine 288 (5), adjacent to the GSK3{beta} site of threonine 286. In addition, Mirk is activated through the stress signaling pathway by the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase MKK3 (6) and interacts with p38 MAPK (7).

Mirk (minibrain-related kinase) is a member of the dyrk/minibrain family of arginine-directed serine/threonine protein kinases (8-10) and is identical to dyrk1B (11). Mirk is strongly transcriptionally up-regulated under conditions of mitogen deprivation, such as occurs when myoblasts are transferred from growth to differentiation medium. In particular when IGF-1 is eliminated (2, 3) there is an enrichment of active Mirk kinase in G0, the cell cycle stage in which the initial steps of differentiation occur. Whereas Mirk protein levels are very low in dividing myoblasts, they are increased at least 10-fold when myoblasts commit to terminal differentiation and are maintained at elevated levels in mature muscle cells (3). This unusual cluster of characteristics suggests the following model. Mirk levels increase under conditions favorable for terminal differentiation when myoblasts arrest in G0; Mirk aids in maintaining G0 arrest, and elevated amounts of Mirk protein are further activated by cellular stresses to mediate myoblast differentiation.

In this report we have investigated whether Mirk mediates myoblast differentiation solely by maintaining G0 arrest or whether Mirk has an additional role as a transcriptional activator in muscle differentiation. Mirk is also found in normal hepatocytes, and we have shown (6) that Mirk activates the hepatocyte transcription factor HNF1{alpha} by phosphorylation. In the myoblast system, depletion of Mirk by RNA interference strongly blocked expression of the myogenic regulatory factor myogenin (3), suggesting that Mirk might control myogenin expression. In the current study, we demonstrate that Mirk functions as a transcriptional activator of MEF2C, a known mediator of myogenin expression, by decreasing the nuclear concentration of class II HDACs that function as MEF2C inhibitors. Mirk phosphorylates these HDACs at a conserved serine within their nuclear localization signal.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Small Interfering RNA (RNAi) to Mirk—The RNAi sequence to Mirk, GACCTACAAGCACATCATT, was inserted into the pSilencer plasmid (Ambion) (3). C2C12 cells were transfected with a 10 to 1 ratio (µg/µg) of RNAi plasmid to EGFP selection plasmid in serum-free medium and then isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting for EGFP by using a BD Biosciences FACSVantage SE cell sorter.

Affymetrix Gene Chips—The MOE430A chip (mouse expression) was utilized. The chips contain 22,690 unique probe identifier oligonucleotide sequence sets. Data were analyzed by using the Microarray Suite 4.0 and, for a more stringent program, the Robust Multi-Chip Analysis program (Gene Traffic, Iobion) to identify genes exhibiting at least a 2-fold reduction, comparing the RNA populations treated with RNAi to Mirk to those treated with the vector control. 12,433 probe sets were identified in the RNAi population and 12,718 in the vector control. 193 transcripts were decreased, and 86 transcripts were increased.

Materials—Antibodies to myogenin, MEF2C, MyoD, and {beta}-tubulin were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Antibody to the N terminus of HDAC9 from ABGENT was used to detect MITR. Rabbit polyclonal antibody to a unique sequence at the C terminus of Mirk was raised as described (2). Polyvinylidene difluoride transfer paper Immobilon-P was purchased from Millipore. PLUS reagent and Lipofectamine were from Invitrogen; all radioactive materials were purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences; ECL reagents were from Amersham Biosciences, and tissue culture reagents were from Mediatech (Fisher). Alexa Fluor 594 (highly cross-adsorbed) secondary antibody conjugates were purchased from Molecular Probes. All other reagents were from Sigma.

Cell Culture—C2C12 mouse myoblasts and NIH3T3 cells were obtained from the ATCC and cultured according to their recommendations. C2C12 cells were maintained in growth medium (GM; Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 4 mM L-glutamine, 4.5 g/liter glucose, containing 20% fetal bovine serum) and induced to undergo differentiation by switching to differentiation medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 2% horse serum). NIH3T3 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 4 mM L-glutamine, 4.5g/liter glucose, containing 7% bovine calf serum. Cells were used for experiments only from passages 3 to 10 from our frozen stocks.

Plasmids—Plasmids encoding either wild-type or kinase-inactive YF Mirk had been generated previously (2). The mouse myogenin promoter reporter construct mgnp224-luciferase (-184 to +48 from the start site) and the myogenin expression plasmid in pEMSV were from S. J. Tapscott, Fred Hutchison Cancer Center. Expression plasmids for human MEF2C and MEF2D in pCDNA1 and mouse MyoD in pEMSV, and GST-HDAC5 amino acids 1-283, were the gifts of E. N. Olson, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. The MITR expression plasmid was from D. Sparrow, The National Institute for Medical Research, London, UK. The Myf5 expression plasmid in pEMSV was from B. Winter, Technische Universitat Braunschweig. 3xMEF2-luciferase and gal4-luciferase were the kind gifts of Dr. Zhenguo Wu, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Wild-type HDAC5 (pGEX-HDAC5-1-283) and wild-type MITR were mutated by site-directed mutagenesis (Gene-Editor system, Promega). All mutant constructs were sequenced to confirm the mutated sequence.

Transfection and Luciferase Assay—Cells were transfected in 12-well plates for 6 h with Lipofectamine and PLUS reagent (Invitrogen) according to the supplier's manual. Transfected cells were lysed with Cell Culture Lysis Reagent and assayed for luciferase activity (relative luciferase unit) with luciferase assay reagent (Promega) in a Turner Designs Luminometer. The same lysates were diluted and assayed for {beta}-galactosidase activity to normalize transfection efficiency. Data shown are the means of triplicate measurements.

Cell Fractionation—5 x 105 C2C12 cells were plated in 60-mm dishes overnight and transfected with the indicated constructs. After 24 h, the cells were trypsinized, washed with ice-cold PBS, and resuspended in 150 µl of Buffer A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol) containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40 and protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma P 8340). The cell suspension was kept on ice for 10 min with occasional vortexing and monitored microscopically until >90% of the cells were lysed. The nuclei were pelleted at 800 x g for 10 min. The supernatant containing the cytoplasmic fraction was centrifuged at 16,000 x g for 10 min to remove any unlysed cells. The nuclear pellet was washed with 300 µl of Buffer A without Nonidet P-40 and centrifuged at 800 x g for 10 min. The cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were solubilized in hot Laemmli sample buffer before analysis by SDS-PAGE.

Localization of MITR Constructs—C2C12 myoblasts were plated overnight in Lab-Tek 2-well chamber slides (1 x 105 cells per well) and then transfected with FLAG-MITR (1 µg of plasmid DNA) using Lipofectamine and PLUS reagent in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. After 24 h of expression in GM, cells were washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min, washed with PBS, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton in PBS (PBST) for 5 min, and blocked with 10% normal goat serum in PBST for 30 min. The cells were incubated for 45 min with a 1:1000 dilution of either rabbit antibody to the N terminus of HDAC-9 or murine monoclonal antibody to the FLAG epitope, each diluted in 10% normal goat serum in PBST. After three PBS washes, the cells were incubated for 30 min with a 1:1000 dilution of goat anti-mouse antibody or goat anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 594 (Molecular Probes). Nuclei were detected by incubation for 5 min with a 2 ng/ml solution of 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole hydrochloride in PBST. Slides were mounted with Biomedia Gel/Mount. Monochrome fluorescence images were obtained at x400 using a Diagnostic Instruments SPOT RT camera mounted on a Nikon Eclipse E50i fluorescent microscope. SPOT RT software version 4.09 was used to pseudocolor and merge the images. Final figures were arranged using Adobe Photoshop version 7.0.

Northern Analysis for Myogenin mRNA—Total RNA was prepared by the RNeasy protocol (Qiagen) and analyzed for mRNA composition by microarray analysis. 4 µg of the remaining total RNA from each cell lysate was electrophoresed in a 1.1% agarose-formaldehyde gel, transferred to nylon membranes by downward capillary transfer, and cross-linked by baking in an oven. The membranes were hybridized to a 32P-labeled 1-kb EcoRI fragment of the myogenin cDNA construct. The probes were labeled with 32P by random priming (Promega). The blot was hybridized overnight at 68 °C with at least 107 cpm of the labeled probe, washed twice at room temperature for 15 min with 1x SSC, 0.1% SDS, and then washed for 20 min at 65 °C in 0.2x SSC, 0.1% SDS and autoradiographed.

In Vitro Kinase Assay—GST-Mirk or GST-YF-Mirk preparations were incubated for 5 min at 30 °C with 20 µl of kinase buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol), containing 50 µM cold ATP plus 5 µCi of [{gamma}-32P]ATP and 1 µg of purified recombinant GST-HDAC5 protein as substrate, and then analyzed by PAGE and autoradiography.

Glutathione S-Transferase Fusion Proteins—Mirk and YF-Mirk were subcloned into the pGEX-6P1 vector (Amersham Biosciences), and the HDAC5 constructs were subcloned into the pGEX 4T1 vector (Amersham Biosciences), and both were expressed and purified as described.2

Metabolic Labeling—C2C12 cells were incubated for 6 h in serum-free low phosphate Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (9:1 ratio phosphate-free medium/normal medium) with 150 µCi of [32P]orthophosphate/2 ml of medium.

Immunodetection—Following treatment as indicated and washing two times with PBS, cells were lysed in hot SDS-PAGE sample buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol), boiled for 5 min, and vortexed vigorously. Protein determinations were made using Coomassie protein assay reagent from Pierce. Depending upon the experiment, 30-50 µg of cell lysate were blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes after separation on SDS-PAGE. The blots were blocked in 5% milk in TBST (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated for 1-2 h at room temperature with primary antibody in TBST buffer, 3% milk, and proteins were subsequently detected by enhanced chemiluminescence.

Band Analysis—Immunoblots were scanned using a Lacie Silver-scanner, and densitometry was performed using the IP Lab Gel program (Scanalytics).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Use of Small Interfering RNA to Mirk Substantially Decreased the Levels of Myogenin mRNA and Protein in C2C12 Myoblasts—In our recent study (3), we utilized RNAi to demonstrate that Mirk helps to mediate skeletal muscle cell differentiation. Western blotting analysis showed that knockdown of endogenous Mirk led to depletion of other proteins that mediate the myotube phenotype. In the current study we used microarray analysis to identify the genes down-regulated when Mirk levels were reduced by RNA interference. Two RNA populations were compared by microarray analysis as follows: RNA from differentiating C2C12 myoblasts in which Mirk was induced as a natural result of differentiation, and RNA from myoblasts cultured under the same conditions but with endogenous Mirk depleted by RNAi. Cells expressing RNAi were selected by cell sorting for the co-transfected EGFP marker gene, with cells transfected with vector DNA serving as the control. The sorted C2C12 cells were then plated for 1 day and then switched to differentiation medium for 1 day to induce Mirk (vector control, Vc cells) or to allow the RNAi to deplete endogenous Mirk (si cells). Western blotting confirmed that endogenous Mirk levels were decreased 60-fold by RNA interference (Fig. 1A).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Small interfering RNA (RNAi) to Mirk inhibits induction of myogenin. C2C12 cells were co-transfected with an expression plasmid for Mirk RNAi and EGFP, or vector DNA and EGFP, selected by cell sorting for EGFP, placed in GM for 1 day, and then switched to differentiation medium for 1 day. Vc, vector; si, small interfering RNA to Mirk. A, cell lysates examined by Western blotting for Mirk and myogenin. NS, nonspecific cross-reacting protein to demonstrate equal loading and transfer. B, RNA preparations used for microarray analysis in Tables I and II were examined by Northern blotting for myogenin mRNA. 18 S and 28 S rRNA bands are indicated.

 
The MOE430A Affymetrix chip (mouse expression) was utilized for microarray analysis of the RNA populations from Mirk-depleted and control cells. The chips contain 22,690 unique probe identifier oligonucleotide sequence sets. Data were analyzed using the Microarray Suite 4.0 and, a more stringent program, the Robust Multi-Chip Analysis program (Gene Traffic, Iobion) to identify genes exhibiting at least a 2-fold reduction when the mRNA population from the RNAi-treated cells was compared with the mRNA population from vector control-treated cells. 12,433 probe sets were identified in the RNAi population and 12,718 in the vector control. 193 transcripts were decreased, and 86 transcripts were increased. The genes whose expression was most strongly reduced when Mirk was depleted by RNAi are shown in Table I.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
Genes down-regulated by RNAi to Mirk

 
Most of the genes reduced by knockdown of endogenous Mirk by RNA interference were skeletal muscle differentiation genes. None of the Id family of differentiation inhibitor genes was increased when Mirk was depleted (Table II). One of the genes reduced most in expression was myogenin, whose expression was reduced 7.5-fold. Northern blotting confirmed the microarray analysis. Myogenin mRNA was undetectable by Northern blotting, although similar levels of 18 S and 28 S rRNAs were found in the RNA preparations (Fig. 1B). As an additional control, cyclin D1 mRNA levels were measured in the Northern blots and were identical in control and RNA interference samples (data not shown). Therefore, Mirk controls the transcription of myogenin. Our prior study supports the hypothesis that Mirk mediates expression of myogenin. Myogenin and Mirk are induced at the protein level with similar kinetics during the initial differentiation of primary cultured murine hindlimb muscle satellite cells, C2C12 cells, and L6 rat myoblasts placed in differentiation medium (3). Furthermore, depletion of Mirk by RNAi led to a 13-fold reduction in myogenin protein levels (Fig. 1A), and overexpression of Mirk induced a more rapid appearance of myogenin (3). Thus myogenin down-regulation following loss of Mirk is mediated on the transcriptional level.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE II
Genes up-regulated by RNAi to Mirk

 
RNAi to Mirk Blocks Activation of the Myogenin Promoter— Myogenesis is regulated by the following four transcription factors called muscle regulatory factors: Myf5, MyoD, myogenin, and MRF-4, which function in a sequential program, and a second group of transcription factors termed myocyte enhancer-2 (MEF2A through 2D). Myf5 and MyoD are essential for establishing the myogenic lineage, before Mirk is induced through RhoA action at the onset of differentiation (3). Myogenin is up-regulated later during the process of terminal differentiation. Both an E box (CANNTG) and an MEF2-binding site within the myogenin promoter are essential for myogenin transcription. The transcription factors MyoD, MEF-2, Myf5, and the ubiquitous E box proteins have been implicated in myogenin regulation (13-15) and could serve as potential Mirk substrates. The muscle regulatory factor Myf-5 is co-expressed with MyoD only in dividing myoblasts but is lost within 12 h of the start of differentiation and is not seen in cells expressing myogenin, indicating that MyoD, not Myf-5, mediates myogenin transcription (16).

We first determined whether endogenous Mirk could up-regulate myogenin expression by transfecting a myogenin promoter reporter construct into growing C2C12 myoblasts. The cells were then switched to differentiation medium for 24 h to induce the up-regulation of Mirk (3). The cells were not sorted in this experiment, and the transfection efficiency was at best 30%, so some background was detected due to the residual endogenous Mirk activity. However, a clear difference was observed. The myogenin promoter reporter construct was activated 4-fold in differentiating C2C12 cells that had up-regulated endogenous Mirk expression as part of their differentiation program (Fig. 2). However, when the myogenin reporter construct was co-transfected with an expression plasmid for RNAi to Mirk to knockdown endogenous Mirk levels and cells were then cultured in differentiation medium, little increase in myogenin reporter activity was observed. Therefore, reduction of endogenous Mirk levels blocked the activation of the myogenin promoter.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Depletion of endogenous Mirk by RNA interference blocks activation of the myogenin promoter. C2C12 cells were transfected with the pSilencer expression plasmid encoding RNAi to Mirk or vector control, cultured in growth medium for 1 day, and then switched to differentiation medium for 1 and 2 days. Myogenin reporter-luciferase activity was assayed. Mean of three values ± S.D. is shown if S.D. is >5%. One of duplicate experiments is shown.

 
Mirk Activates a Myogenin Reporter Construct in a Kinase-dependent Manner in Concert with MEF2C but Not MyoD or Myf5—Mirk activates the transcription factor HNF1{alpha} and phosphorylates HNF1{alpha} at a residue within its CBP-binding domain (6). We postulated that Mirk would also phosphorylate, and thus activate, one of the transcription factors that mediate transcription of the myogenin gene. We co-transfected a myogenin promoter reporter construct together with expression plasmids for either Mirk, kinase-inactive YF-Mirk, or the vector, and we then performed parallel experiments with the Mirk constructs in the presence of expression constructs for MEF2C, MEF2D, MyoD, Myf5, or combinations. Mirk activated the myogenin promoter reporter construct about 2-fold, whereas YF-Mirk had no effect (Fig. 3A, vector lanes). When either MEF2C or MEF2D were co-expressed with wild-type Mirk, there was a further 2-fold increase in reporter activity. MEF2D, and to a lesser extent MEF2C, increased myogenin reporter expression when co-expressed with kinase-inactive YF-Mirk, probably because each factor complexed with endogenous transcription factors. However, MEF2C clearly activated the myogenin reporter in a Mirk kinase-dependent manner. In contrast, MyoD increased the activity of the myogenin reporter construct about 10-fold, but expression of Mirk did not alter this activation (Fig. 3B). When MyoD and MEF2C were co-expressed, the stimulatory effect of Mirk was seen again (Fig. 3C). As in the case with MyoD, Myf5 increased the activity of the myogenin reporter in a Mirk-independent manner (Fig. 3D). However, when MEF2C was co-expressed with Myf5, the large activation of the myogenin reporter that was seen was further enhanced by expression of wild-type Mirk but not kinase-inactive Mirk. These data, taken together, demonstrated that Mirk functioned by activating MEF2C.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Mirk activation of the myogenin promoter is increased by co-expressed MEF2C, but Mirk does not phosphorylate MEF2C in vivo. A-D, C2C12 cells in growth medium were co-transfected with the myogenin promoter reporter construct together with an expression plasmid for Mirk, kinase-inactive YF-Mirk, or the pCDNA vector, together with either the pEMSV vector or an expression plasmid for MEF2C (A), an expression plasmid for MyoD (B), expression plasmids for MyoD and MEF2C (C), and expression plasmids for Myf5 and MEF2C (D), as noted. After 24 h, cells were transferred to differentiation medium for an additional 24 h before assay. Myogenin reporter-luciferase activity was assayed. Mean of three values ± S.D. is shown if S.D. is >5%. One of duplicate experiments shown. E, C2C12 cells were co-transfected with expression plasmids for MEF2C and either wild-type or kinase-inactive (YF) Mirk, allowed to express, and then labeled in [32P]orthophosphate-containing medium. MEF2C was immunoprecipitated (IP); the level of phosphorylation in MEF2C was determined by autoradiography, and the relative abundance of the immunoprecipitated MEF2C was determined by Western blotting (WB). One of duplicate experiments is shown.

 
Mirk Does Not Directly Activate MEF2C by Phosphorylation—In an earlier study, we had found that Mirk activated transcription mediated by HNF1{alpha} in a kinase-dependent manner and that Mirk phosphorylated HNF1{alpha} at Ser-247 (6). We scanned MEF2C for residues conserved between human and mouse that were similar to the amino acids around the site phosphorylated by Mirk in HNF1 and other substrates (4, 5).2 No consensus sequences were detected in MEF2C, suggesting that Mirk activated MEF2C in an indirect manner. We tested this hypothesis by expressing MEF2C in C2C12 cells with either wild-type Mirk or kinase-inactive YF-Mirk for 24 h, then culturing cells in medium containing [32P]orthophosphate for 6 h, and immunoprecipitating the labeled MEF2C (Fig. 3E). Western blotting after autoradiography demonstrated that equal amounts of MEF2C were immunoprecipitated, but no difference in 32P labeling of the protein was seen between cells expressing ectopic wild-type Mirk and those expressing kinase-inactive YF-Mirk. Endogenous kinases phosphorylated MEF2C, but the abundant ectopic Mirk did not. In contrast, wild-type Mirk strongly phosphorylated co-expressed HNF1{alpha}, whereas this phosphorylation was greatly diminished when kinase-inactive YF Mirk was co-expressed with HNF1{alpha} (data not shown). Because Mirk activates the transcriptional activity of MEF2C in a kinase-dependent manner (Fig. 3A), Mirk must phosphorylate one of the many factors that associate with MEF2, either to release its inhibition, such as class II histone deacetylases (HDACs), or to potentiate its activation, such as nuclear histone acetyltransferases.

Mirk Opposes Transcriptional Inhibition Caused by HDACs—In myoblasts, HDACs associate with muscle regulatory factors such as myogenin and MyoD, whereas in differentiating myotubes HDACs have lost association with these regulatory factors and either bind preferentially to the retinoblastoma protein or are excluded from the nucleus (for a review see Ref. 17). Deacetylase inhibitors such as sodium butyrate are commonly used to enhance differentiation. However, if added to myoblasts just as they are signaled to differentiate by a switch from growth medium to differentiation medium, deacetylase inhibitors have been observed to do the opposite, to block myogenesis and to block the induction of myogenin (18, 19). It has been proposed that the release of HDACs from association with muscle regulatory factors at the start of differentiation can be blocked by the addition of a deacetylase inhibitor (20). We tested whether elevated levels of Mirk in stable C2C12 transfectants (3) would prevent a deacetylase inhibitor from blocking the release of HDACs from MEF2C in transcriptional complexes at the myogenin promoter and thus enhance the transcription of myogenin. C2C12 cells that had been stably transfected with Mirk and control transfectants were transferred to differentiation medium in the presence of an increasing concentration of the histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate, and the induction of myogenin was measured by Western blotting. Higher levels of myogenin protein were observed in the presence of overexpressed Mirk (Fig. 4A). Thus Mirk diminished the effect of the deacetylase inhibitor and restored some myogenin transcription, with the greatest effect seen at the lower levels of sodium butyrate. The hypothesis that Mirk antagonized the function of endogenous histone deacetylases was next tested directly.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Mirk opposes the action of histone deacetylases by increasing myogenin expression. A, inhibition of induction of myogenin by the class II histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate is limited by increased expression of Mirk. Mirk stable transfectants of C2C12 cells and control transfectants were treated with 0.5 to 5 mM sodium butyrate for 24 and 48 h, and the abundance of myogenin protein at each time point was determined by Western blotting. The mean of four experiments, two at each time point, is shown ± S.D., if S.D.>5%. B, Mirk opposes theinhibition of MEF2 by MITR in a kinase-dependent manner in NIH3T3 cells cultured in growth medium. NIH3T3 cells in 12-well plates were co-transfected using Lipofectamine Plus in serum-free medium with the 3x-MEF2-luciferase reporter plasmid (0.1 µg), an expression plasmid (0.05 µg) for MEF2C (pcDNA3-MEF2C), an expression plasmid for {beta}-galactosidase (0.1 µg), and expression plasmids encoding either MITR (H) alone (0-0.1 µg as noted, 1st 4 bars) or 0.1 µg of MITR and increasing concentrations of wild-type Mirk (M) or kinase-inactive YF-Mirk (YF, 0.01-0.05 µg as noted). The amount of DNA transfected was kept constant by the addition of vector DNA as needed. After 5 h in serum-free medium, serum was added to 7%, and the cells were incubated overnight before assay. Data shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate measurements. The asterisks mark the values statistically different (t test) between the Mirk plus MITR transfectants versus the 0.01 µg of MITR-treated cells. C, Mirk opposes the inhibition of MEF2 by MITR in a kinase-dependent manner in NIH3T3 cells cultured in serum-free medium. Transient transfections were performed in parallel to the experiment in B, but the transfected NIH3T3 cells were maintained in medium containing 0.1% fetal calf serum before analysis. Data shown are the mean ± S.D. of triplicate measurements. The asterisks mark the values statistically different (t test) between the Mirk plus MITR transfectants versus the 0.01 µg of MITR-treated cells. D, C2C12 myoblasts were transfected with the myogenin promoter reporter construct, increasing concentrations of the expression plasmid for MITR, with either wild-type Mirk, kinase-inactive YF-Mirk, or an equal amount of vector DNA. After 24 h, cells were transferred to differentiation medium for an additional 24 h before assay. Myogenin reporter-luciferase activity was assayed. Mean of three values ± S.D. is shown if S.D. is >5%. One of triplicate experiments is shown.

 
Mirk Opposes the Transcriptional Repression of the Myogenin Promoter by MITR—Class II histone deacetylases (HDAC-4, -5, -7, and -9) have been shown to repress the transcriptional activity of the MEF2 transcription factors through an MEF2 binding domain (20). We postulated that Mirk might activate MEF2C by opposing the effect of class II HDACs. The natural C-terminal deleted form of HDAC9, MITR, is known to antagonize MEF2 activation of the 3xMEF2-luciferase reporter construct that contains three binding sites for MEF2 (21). By increasing the amount of MITR that was expressed led to a 3-fold decrease in the activity of co-expressed MEF2 (Fig. 4, B and C, first 4 bars) whether the cells were cultured in growth medium (Fig. 4B) or in serum-free medium (Fig. 4C). However, co-expression of increasing concentrations of wild-type Mirk with the highest concentration of MITR added (0.1 µg) partially reversed this inhibition under both culture conditions (Fig. 4, B and C, 4th to 8th bars). In contrast, co-expression of increasing concentrations of kinase-inactive YF-Mirk did not reverse the inhibition of MEF2 by MITR. Therefore, Mirk activated co-expressed MEF2 by counteracting the inhibition caused by MITR.

We next tested whether MITR would antagonize myogenin reporter activation by Mirk. Increasing concentrations of MITR inhibited the activation of the myogenin reporter (Fig. 4D), as has been reported by many investigators. The highest concentration of MITR expression plasmid tested inhibited the activity of the myogenin reporter 3-fold (Fig. 4D). Wild-type Mirk partially blocked the transcriptional inhibition caused by MITR, whereas no such effect was seen when kinase-inactive Mirk was co-expressed (Fig. 4D). Thus Mirk activated the myogenin promoter reporter by blocking, in a kinase-dependent manner, the transcriptional repression caused by the class II HDAC MITR.

Mirk Phosphorylates HDAC5 at a Site Conserved in Class II HDACs—Activated CaMK regulates MEF2-HDAC interactions by phosphorylating two conserved HDAC sites flanking a nuclear localization sequence near their N termini in response to calcium signaling (22, 23). These sites serve as binding sites for 14-3-3 proteins when phosphorylated by CaMK (23). In HDAC5, one CaMK site is Ser-259. We found a consensus region for Mirk phosphorylation 20 amino acids from the CaMK site at serine 279, which is conserved within all class II HDACs (Fig. 5A). To test whether Mirk phosphorylated this site, we mutated this site in HDAC5 to S279A both in the presence of the S259A mutation or with this site unmutated. Neither HDAC5-S259S/S279A nor HDAC-S259A/S279A was a substrate for Mirk. However, Mirk strongly phosphorylated both wild-type HDAC5 and HDAC5-S259A/S279S (Fig. 5B), demonstrating that Mirk phosphorylates HDAC5 at Ser-279 but not at the CaMK site of Ser-259. Mutation of serine 279 in HDAC5 to the nonphosphorylatable alanine did not prevent nuclear export in the presence of activated CaMK (22) in transient transfection experiments in COS cells. However, serine 279 is within the nuclear localization region, so we next tested whether phosphorylation of a class II HDAC by Mirk would block its import into the nucleus.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Mirk phosphorylates HDAC5 at Ser-279. A, Clustal alignment of the regions of class II HDACs showing the conserved CaMK4 phosphorylation site required for translocation from the nucleus and the nearby conserved Mirk phosphorylation site within the region containing the nuclear localization signal. B, in vitro phosphorylation studies: GST-HDAC5 amino acid (aa) 1-283 constructs were mutated from Ser-259/Ser-279 to Ser-259/Ala-279, Ala-259/Ser-279, and the double mutant Ala-259/Ala-279. In vitro kinase reactions were performed at 30 °C for 5 min with either purified recombinant wild-type Mirk or kinase-inactive YF-Mirk. Reaction mixtures were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography (top panel). The amount of the GST-HDAC5 constructs in each reaction mixture is shown by Ponceau S staining (bottom panel). Data shown are representative of three experiments.

 
Phosphorylation of MITR by Mirk Decreases the Nuclear Abundance of MITR—Phosphorylation of a protein within its nuclear localization site often causes retention of the protein within the cytoplasm. For example, phosphorylation of the CDK inhibitor p21 by activated Akt increases the amount of p21 in the cytoplasm in breast cancers (24, 25). We tested the hypothesis that co-expression of MITR with Mirk would reduce the amount of MITR that reached the nucleus. MITR was transiently expressed in C2C12 myoblasts in growth medium for 24 h, either in the presence of wild-type Mirk, kinase-inactive Mirk, or no exogenous Mirk. Endogenous MITR is expressed at low levels in undifferentiated C2C12 cells (26) and was not detected by Western blotting (Fig. 6A, last 2 lanes). Cells were separated into nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions, which were then analyzed by Western blotting for exogenous MITR. The fractionation was effective as only the nuclear fractions contained MyoD, whereas the cytoplasmic fractions were highly enriched in {beta}-tubulin (Fig. 6A). There is very little endogenous Mirk in growing myoblasts, and when MITR was expressed in the absence of exogenous Mirk, about half of the MITR was found in the nucleus (Fig. 6A, 1st 2 lanes, also note the lack of endogenous Mirk). However, when wild-type MITR was co-expressed with Mirk, there was a dramatic 6-fold decrease in the amount of MITR in the nuclear fraction but no increase in the amount of cytoplasmic MITR. In sharp contrast, when MITR was co-expressed with kinase-inactive Mirk, the amount of MITR in the nucleus doubled. These data suggest the following model: Mirk phosphorylates the class II HDAC MITR within its nuclear localization domain thus decreasing the rate of its translocation into the nucleus. Exogenous kinase-dead YF-Mirk did not block MITR from entering the nucleus. In fact, both MITR and kinase-inactive YF-Mirk were enriched in the nucleus. This unusual pattern was seen in duplicate experiments and may suggest some continued association of YF-Mirk and MITR.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Phosphorylation of MITR by Mirk reduces the nuclear abundance of MITR. A, C2C12 myoblasts were transiently transfected with expression plasmids (1 µg of DNA each) for MITR and either wild-type (WT) Mirk or kinase-inactive YF-Mirk or with MITR alone or Mirk alone, with vector DNA added to make each transfection equivalent. After 24 h of expression in growth medium, the myoblasts were partitioned into nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions and analyzed for the abundance of MITR by Western blotting, using the anti-N-terminal HDAC 9 antibody. Fractionation was monitored by Western blotting (WB) for tubulin as a cytoplasmic (Cyt) marker and MyoD as a nuclear (N) marker. One of duplicate experiments is shown. B, C2C12 myoblasts were transiently transfected with expression plasmids (4 µg of DNA total) with 2 µg of MITR each and either 0, 0.5, 1, or 2 µg of wild-type Mirk with vector DNA added to make each transfection equivalent. After 24 h of expression in growth medium, the myoblasts were partitioned into nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions and analyzed for the abundance of MITR by Western blotting using the anti-N-terminal HDAC 9 antibody. Fractionation was monitored by Western blotting for tubulin as a cytoplasmic marker and MyoD as a nuclear marker. Total lysates were examined for the abundance of ectopic Mirk (lower panels). C, C2C12 cells cultured on chamber slides were transfected with MITR alone as in B for 24 h in growth medium. The myoblasts were fixed, and MITR was detected using either the rabbit anti-HDAC9 N-terminal-directed antibody used in A and B or a murine monoclonal antibody to the FLAG epitope at the N terminus of the MITR construct. Each antibody was detected by immunofluorescence using either anti-rabbit IgG or anti-mouse IgG conjugated to Alexa Fluor 594. Nuclei were detected using 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole hydrochloride (DAPI).

 
We extended this study by next investigating whether the amount of MITR that reached the nucleus was dependent on the ratio between Mirk and MITR. In Fig. 6A, equal amounts of expression plasmids for Mirk and for MITR were transfected. The ratio of MITR to Mirk was now varied from 1:1 to 2:1 to 4:1 (Fig. 6B). In the absence of ecoptic Mirk, the ratio of cytoplasmic to nuclear MITR was 0.5. When the MITR/Mirk ratio was 4:1 (0.5 µg of Mirk/2 µg of MITR), the ratio of MITR in the cytoplasm to the nucleus increased 8-fold. When the Mirk level was increased further (1 µg of Mirk/2 µg of MITR), the ratio of MITR in the cytoplasm to the nucleus increased 20-fold. There was no further increase in the amount of Mirk synthesized even when the input of Mirk was increased to 2 µg (see Fig. 6B, total lysates). However, when Mirk was co-expressed, the MITR in the nucleus exhibited a decreased electrophoretic mobility (Fig. 6B, arrows at right), which was observed in duplicate experiments. Therefore, increasing the ratio of Mirk to MITR caused a dose-dependent decrease in the amount of MITR that reached the nucleus, and this MITR exhibited decreased mobility consistent with post-translational modification such as phosphorylation.

When MITR was expressed in COS cells, C2 myoblasts, and 10T1/2 fibroblasts, MITR localized to discrete nuclear bodies, but in response to CaMK signaling, MITR remained in the nucleus but was evenly distributed, as determined by immunofluorescence studies (26, 27). Ectopic MITR was seen in the cytoplasm of C2 skeletal myotubes after 9 days in differentiation medium (26). In contrast to these experiments, MITR was readily detected biochemically in the cytoplasmic fractions of C2C12 skeletal myoblasts (Fig. 6, A and B). To resolve these apparent differences, we examined the location of ectopic MITR in C2C12 myoblasts by immunofluorescence analysis using the same antibody, anti-HDAC9, which readily detected MITR in the cytoplasm of fractionated cells in multiple experiments. In each case, MITR was only detected in the nucleus by immunofluorescence (Fig. 6C). We repeated this experiment using FLAG epitope-tagged MITR, and we detected the FLAG epitope in immunofluorescence experiments. Again, the majority of FLAG epitope-tagged MITR was found localized in the nucleus. MITR occasionally was detected throughout the entire cell (Fig. 6C), as expected from the fractionation experiments. This cytoplasmic and nuclear localization was observed in 7% of the cells (74 of 1053 cells examined). This low frequency prevented analysis of the effect of Mirk on MITR nuclear localization by immunofluorescence, parallel to the studies shown in Fig. 6, A and B. In our fractionation scheme a known transcription factor, MyoD, was localized only in the nuclei, and a known cytoskeletal protein, {beta}-tubulin, was found almost exclusively in the cytoplasmic fractions in multiple experiments (Fig. 6, A and B). We postulate that cytoplasmic MITR is complexed with other cellular proteins in vivo which block the epitopes recognized by the anti-HDAC9 antibody and, to a lesser extent, the FLAG epitope. In contrast cytoplasmic MITR was readily detected when samples were boiled in SDS-PAGE loading buffer before Western blotting. We have demonstrated previously that Mirk, which dimerizes to a 140-kDa form in vivo (28,) is localized in higher molecular weight complexes in vivo,uptoat least 660 kDa by analysis by fast protein liquid chromatography (7). MKK3, the activator kinase for Mirk, can readily be detected by Western blotting of these complexes but cannot be immunoprecipitated from the same complexes (7). Possibly Mirk associates with MITR or other newly synthesized HDACs in such large complexes, preventing their detection by immunofluorescence techniques.

Decreased Abundance of Phosphomimetic MITR in the Nucleus—The results of the fractionation experiments (Fig. 6) implied that a wild-type MITR construct would accumulate in the nucleus to a greater extent than a MITR construct that was mutated to the phosphomimetic aspartic acid residue at the Mirk phosphorylation site. We tested this model by mutating MITR at Ser-243, the Mirk phosphorylation site homologous to the HDAC5 site of Ser-279 (Fig. 5A). Wild-type MITR, MITR mutated at the Mirk site to the nonphosphorylatable residue alanine (S243A), or a MITR phosphomimetic site mutant (S243D) was transiently transfected into C2C12 cells and maintained for 24 h in growth medium, and then one set of cells was switched into differentiation medium for 24 h. Each set of cells was then separated into nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions that were analyzed by Western blotting. The fractionation was effective as only the nuclear fractions contained MyoD, whereas the cytoplasmic fractions were highly enriched in {beta}-tubulin, and the amounts of either MyoD or tubulin were similar in cells expressing each construct (Fig. 7A).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.
Phosphomimetic MITR is lost from the nucleus. A, C2C12 myoblasts were transiently transfected with expression plasmids (2 µg of DNA each) for either wild-type MITR, MITR mutated to alanine at the Mirk phosphorylation site (S243A), or MITR phosphomimetic at the Mirk phosphorylation site (S243D) and were allowed to express for 24 h in growth medium. The cells were either immediately partitioned into nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions or transferred into differentiation medium (DM) for 24 h before fractionation. Both sets were then analyzed for the abundance of MITR by Western blotting. Fractionation was monitored by Western blotting for tubulin as a cytoplasmic (Cyt) marker and MyoD as a nuclear (N) marker. One of duplicate experiments is shown. B, parallel cultures were prepared at the same time as those transfected above, allowed to express for 24 h in growth medium (GM), and then analyzed by Western blotting for MITR without cell fractionation. C, MITR mutated at the Mirk phosphorylation site to alanine has the same inhibitory action as wild-type or phosphomimetic MITR. NIH3T3 cells were transiently co-transfected with the 3x-MEF2-luciferase reporter plasmid, expression plasmids for either wild-type MITR, MITR mutated to alanine at the Mirk phosphorylation site (S243A), or MITR phosphomimetic at the Mirk phosphorylation site (S243D), an expression plasmid for MEF2C (pcDNA3-MEF2C), and an expression plasmid for {beta}-galactosidase, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.2 µg per well, respectively, in a 12-well plate, using Lipfectamine and PLUS reagent for 4 h in serum-free medium, followed by addition of serum and culture overnight to allow expression. Cells were then switched to low serum medium (0.1% serum) for 24 h and then assayed. All points are the mean ± S.D. of triplicate measurements, each normalized by the co-expressed {beta}-galactosidase.

 
In myoblasts in GM, similar amounts of wild-type MITR and both mutant MITR constructs were seen in the cytoplasmic fractions. However, there was less of the phosphomimetic MITR-S243D construct in the nucleus (Fig. 7A, last lane) even though there was no decrease in the amount of MyoD (compare MyoD levels in nuclei from cells in GM). After myoblasts were switched to differentiation medium, MITR was lost from the cytoplasm both in the wild-type and mutant constructs. The level of nuclear MITR was lowest in the phosphomimetic construct, although the levels of MyoD were similar in each transfectant. These data supported the hypothesis that phosphorylation by Mirk inhibited the nuclear transport of MITR, therefore limiting the amount of MITR that could accumulate in the nucleus.

We had considered the possibility that the phosphomimetic construct might be expressed at a lower level than the wild-type construct. Parallel cultures were transfected with each construct, maintained in growth medium for 24 h, and harvested at the same time as the GM experiment shown in Fig. 7A. However, these cells were not fractionated before lysis. Western blotting demonstrated that the three constructs were expressed at similar levels, and there was no decrease in expression of MITR-S243D, which could explain the decrease in its nuclear abundance in fractionated cells (Fig. 7B). Therefore, studies using the mutant MITR constructs gave results generally similar to the co-expression studies. When MITR was phosphorylated by Mirk, its transport to the nucleus was inhibited so less MITR accumulated in the nucleus, and thus less was available to inhibit MEF2C.

Two hypotheses were considered to account for the lack of accumulation of MITR within the cytoplasm when Mirk was overexpressed (Fig. 6A). In the first hypothesis, Mirk only blocked MITR transport into the nucleus and had no effect on the proteolysis of MITR within the cytoplasm. Alternatively, the phosphorylation of MITR by Mirk could also trigger the rapid turnover of MITR within the cytoplasm. We have shown previously that Mirk can mark proteins for proteolysis. Phosphorylation by Mirk shortens the half-life of cyclin D1 in myoblasts. Mirk phosphorylates cyclin D1 at Thr-288 when cyclin D1 is bound to GSK3{beta} (5). GSK3{beta} itself is well known to destabilize cyclin D1 by phosphorylation at the adjacent site of Thr-286 (29).

MITR that did not reach the nucleus was rapidly turned over within the cytoplasm when cells began to differentiate (Fig. 7A). However, the hypothesis that phosphorylation of MITR at Ser-243 by Mirk would directly trigger the rapid turnover of MITR within the cytoplasm was not supported. There was no increase in the amount of MITR-S243A in the cytoplasm in either growing or differentiating myoblasts, compared with wild-type MITR. Therefore, phosphorylation by Mirk at this site was not essential for proteolysis of MITR.

Mutation of the Mirk Phosphorylation Site in MITR Does Not Alter the Capacity of MITR to Function as a Transcriptional Inhibitor—Three MITR constructs were compared for their ability to inhibit the activity of an MEF2-dependent luciferase reporter (3xMEF2-luc). MEF2C activates this reporter although the class II HDAC, HDAC4, blocks its activity in a dose-dependent manner (21). NIH3T3 cells were transiently co-transfected with the 3xMEF2-luc reporter plasmid together with an expression plasmid for MEF2C and expression plasmids for either wild-type MITR, MITR mutated at the Mirk phosphorylation site to the phosphomimetic (S243D), or MITR mutated at the Mirk phosphorylation site to the nonphosphorylatable alanine (S243A). All three constructs inhibited MEF2C to the same extent, about 6-fold (Fig. 7C, mean ± S.D. of three replicate points). Therefore, phosphorylation of MITR by Mirk did not alter the capacity of MITR to inhibit MEF2C, but instead modulated the amount of MITR which reached the nucleus.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Transcriptional activation can occur when histone acetyltransferases acetylate the core histones of nucleosomes, resulting in chromatin relaxation. Conversely, deacetylation of histones by HDACs results in chromatin condensation and transcriptional repression. Histone deacetylases block transcription as part of transcriptional co-repressor complexes. Class II HDACs are structurally related (HDAC4, -5, -7, and -9 and MITR, the natural C-terminal deleted form of HDAC9) and are restricted in distribution, with the highest expression found in muscle, heart, and brain (reviewed in Ref. 17). Class II HDACs bind to members of the MEF2 family of MADS box transcription factors and repress their activity. HDAC4 is either cytoplasmic or pancellular in proliferating C2.7 myoblasts, whereas HDAC5, HDAC7, and MITR are largely nuclear (30-32). During myogenesis, class II HDACs dissociate from MEF2, relieving its repression. HDAC4 remains distributed through the myotube, whereas HDAC5 and HDAC7 exit the nucleus (22, 30, 32). MITR is initially found in punctate "speckles" in the nucleus, but early in myogenesis transitions to a diffuse nuclear localization, then some MITR exits the nucleus when myotubes are formed (27, 26, 33). CaMK signaling mimics the effect of myogenic signals on HDAC dissociation from MEF2 (22). Dissociation of class II HDACs such as HDAC5 and MITR from MEF2 depends on phosphorylation of two conserved serines (22). Phosphorylation of these residues creates binding sites for the 14-3-3 chaperone protein (31, 34).

The abundance of nuclear HDACs is regulated by nuclear localization and nuclear export signals as well as by phosphorylation of 14-3-3-binding sites. Nuclear/cytoplasmic shuttling of class II HDACs depends on a C-terminal nuclear export sequence and a nuclear localization sequence (NLS) in the N terminus (22). Microinjected HDAC4-GFP was shown previously (35) to be localized to the cytoplasm of undifferentiated C2C12 myoblasts, consistent with our observation that some of the ectopic MITR molecules are found in the cytoplasm (Fig. 6, A and B). Microinjection of full-length HDAC4 resulted in cytoplasmic localization in 30-40% of IMR90-EIA fibroblasts, whereas expression of the C-terminal fragment, which lacks the NLS as well as the MEF2 binding region, resulted in cytoplasmic localization in 90% of the cells (12). Formation of an MEF2-HDAC4 complex efficiently targets this complex to the nucleus, whereas deletion of the MEF2 NLS results in cytoplasmic retention of this complex (30).

In the current study we have found that the kinase Mirk/dyrk1B is essential for the transcription of myogenin and that Mirk induces myogenin transcription through indirect activation of the MEF2 transcription factor. Mirk relieves the inhibition of MEF2 by the class II HDAC MITR in a kinase-dependent manner by phosphorylating the class II HDACs on a conserved serine within the highly conserved nuclear localization sequence. Separation of C2C12 cells into nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions and Western blotting analysis demonstrated that the nuclear entry of the HDAC MITR was inhibited when MITR was co-expressed with Mirk. The higher the ratio of Mirk to MITR expressed, the more MITR was constrained to the cytoplasm. In contrast, when kinase-inactive Mirk was co-expressed, MITR was able to concentrate in the nucleus. Cell fractionation studies with mutant MITR constructs confirmed the interpretation that phosphorylation by Mirk decreased the rate of accumulation of MITR in the nucleus. A phosphomimetic construct of MITR mutated at the Mirk phosphorylation site exhibited less accumulation in the nucleus than wild-type MITR. When C2C12 cells were induced to differentiate, MITR was solely detected in the nucleus, but more wild-type MITR was found there than the phosphomimetic construct. Mirk phosphorylated class II HDACs at a conserved serine within the nuclear localization domain and inhibited accumulation of MITR in the nucleus, presumably by blocking a step in nuclear import. Another example of a serine/threonine kinase that blocks nuclear import is Akt/protein kinase B. Akt is well known for its ability to block the nuclear import of the CDK inhibitor p21 Cip1 by phosphorylating p21 at threonine 145 within its nuclear localization domain in Her-2/neu-transformed NIH3T3 cells (24).

The ability of Mirk to activate myogenin transcription complements the various other functions of Mirk during muscle differentiation. Terminal myoblast differentiation occurs when myoblasts cease cycling and become arrested in G0/G1. Myoblast growth arrest is mediated by increased expression of the CDK inhibitor p27 Kip1 and by decreased expression of the G1 cyclin, cyclin D1. However, cell cycle regulation occurs at both the transcriptional level and the post-translational level in myoblasts. Mirk functions at the post-translational level to maintain p27 protein levels while reducing the abundance of cyclin D1. Mirk phosphorylates p27 at Ser-10, thus stabilizing p27 and blocking its nuclear export and degradation (4). At the same time, Mirk acts together with GSK3{beta} to induce cyclin D1 degradation by phosphorylating cyclin D1 at Thr-288, whereas GSK3{beta} phosphorylates the adjacent site of Thr-286 (5). Supporting the results of these phosphorylation studies was the observation that depletion of endogenous Mirk by RNAi in differentiating myoblasts increased cyclin D1 protein and decreased p27 protein without modulating the mRNA levels of either molecule (4, 5). The current study demonstrates the multifunctional role of Mirk in myoblast differentiation. In addition to the previously established role for Mirk in facilitating cell cycle arrest, Mirk is now shown to facilitate progression of the subsequent differentiation program through transcriptional activation of the muscle regulatory factor myogenin.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by United States Public Health Service Award RO1 CA67405 (to E. F.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Upstate Medical University, Pathology Dept., 2303 Weiskotten Hall, 750 East Adams St., Syracuse, NY 13210. Tel.: 315-464-7138; Fax: 315-464-8419; E-mail: friedmae{at}upstate.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; HDACs, histone deacetylases; CaMK, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase; HNF1{alpha}, hepatocyte nuclear factor {alpha}; RNAi, RNA interference; MITR, MEF2-interacting transcriptional repressor; NLS, nuclear localization sequence; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; GM, growth medium. Back

2 S. Mercer, D. Ewton, S. Lim, T. Mazur, and E. Friedman, submitted for publication. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Frank Middleton, of the State University of New York Upstate Core Microarray facility, for execution and analysis of our microarray studies.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Lee, K.-M., and Friedman, E. (1998) Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 39, 273
  2. Lee, K., Deng, X., and Friedman, E. (2000) Cancer Res. 60, 3631-3637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Deng, X., Ewton, D., Pawlikowski, B., Maimone, M., and Friedman, E. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 41347-41354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Deng, X., Mercer, S., Shah, S., Ewton, D., and Friedman, E. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 22498-22504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Zou, Y., Ewton, D., Deng, D., Mercer, S., and Friedman, E. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 27790-27798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lim, S., Jin, K., and Friedman, E. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 25040-25046[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Lim, S., Zou, Y., and Friedman, E. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 49438-49445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kentrup, H., Becker, W., Heukelbach, J., Wilmes, A., Schurman, A., Huppertz, C., Kainulainen, H., and Joost, H.-G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3488-3495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Becker, W., Weber, Y., Wetzel, K., Eirmbter, K., Tejedor, F., and Joost, H.-G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25893-25902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Himpel, S., Tegge, W., Frank, R., Leder, S., Joost, H., and Becker, W. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 2431-2438[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Leder, S., Weber, Y., Altafaj, X., Estivill, X., Joost, H.-G., and Becker, W. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 254, 474-479[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Paroni, G., Mizzau, M., Henderson, C., Del Sal, G., Schneider, C., and Brancolini, C. (2004) Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 2804-2818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Edmondson, D., Cheng, T., Cserjesi, P., Chakraborty, T., and Olson, E. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 3665-3677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Malik, S., Huang, C., and Schmidt, J. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 230, 88-96[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Friday, B., Mitchell, P., Kegley, K., and Pavlath, G. (2003) Differentiation 71, 217-227[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Kitzmann, M., Carnac, G., Vandromme, M., Primig, M., Lamb, N., and Fernandez, A. (1998) J. Cell. Biol. 142, 1447-1459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. McKinsey, T., Zhang, C., and Olson, E. (2002) Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 14, 763-772[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Johnston, L., Tapscott, S., and Eisen, H. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 5123-5130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Iezzi, S., Cossu, G., Nervi, C., Sartorelli, V., and Puri, P. L. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 7757-7762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. McKinsey, T., Zhang, C., and Olson, E. (2001) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11, 497-504[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Chan, J. K. L., Sun, L., Yang, X.-J., Zhu, G., and Wu, Z. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 23515-23521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. McKinsey, T., Zhang, C., Lu, J.-R., and Olson, E. (2000) Nature 408, 106-111[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Zhang, C. L., McKinsey, T. A., Chang, S., Antos, C., Hill, J., and Olson, E. N. (2002) Cell 110, 479-488[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Zhou, B., Liao, Y., Xia, W., Lee, M.-H., and Hung, M.-C. (2001) Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 245-252[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Xia, W., Chen, J.-S., Zhou, X., Sun, P.-R., Lee, D.-F., Liao, Y., Zhou, B. P., and Hung, M.-C. (2004) Clin. Cancer Res. 10, 3815-3824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Zhang, C. L., McKinsey, T. A., and Olson, E. N. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 7354-7359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. McKinsey, T., Zhang, C. L., and Olson, E. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 6312-6321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Zou, Y., Lim, S., Lee, K., Deng, X., and Friedman, E. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 49573-49581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Diehl, J., Zindy, F., and Sherr, C. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 957-972[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Borghi, S., Molinari, S., Razzini, G., Parise, F., Battini, R., and Ferrari, S. (2001) J. Cell. Sci. 114, 4477-4483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. McKinsey, T. A., Zhang, C. L., and Olson, E. N. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 14400-14405[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Dressel, U., Bailey, P. J., Wang, S.-C. M., Downes, M., Evans, R. M., and Muscat, G. E. O. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 17007-17013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Zhang, C. L., McKinsey, T. A., Lu, J.-R., and Olson, E. N. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 35-39[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Wang, A. H., Kruhlak, M. J., Wu, J., Bertos, N. R., Vezmar, M., Posner, B. I., Bazett-Jones, D. P., and Yang, X.-J. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 6904-6912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Miska, E. A., Langley, E., Wolf, D., Karlsson, C., Pines, J., and Kouzarides, T. (2001) Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 3439-3447[Abstract/Free Full Text]