JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M413180200 on December 28, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 9, 8381-8386, March 4, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/9/8381    most recent
M413180200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Pereda, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Liddington, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Pereda, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Liddington, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Structural Basis for Phosphatidylinositol Phosphate Kinase Type I{gamma} Binding to Talin at Focal Adhesions*

Jose M. de Pereda{ddagger}§, Kate L. Wegener§||, Eugenio Santelli{ddagger}, Neil Bate**, Mark H. Ginsberg{ddagger}{ddagger}, David R. Critchley**, Iain D. Campbell||, and Robert C. Liddington{ddagger}§§

From the {ddagger}Program on Cell Adhesion, The Burnham Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, the ||Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom, the **Department of Biochemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom, and the {ddagger}{ddagger}Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093

Received for publication, November 22, 2004


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The cytoskeletal protein talin binds to a short C-terminal sequence in phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase type I{gamma} (PIPKI{gamma}), activating the enzyme and promoting the local production of phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate, which regulates focal adhesion dynamics as well as clathrin-mediated endocytosis in neuronal cells. Here we show by crystallographic, NMR, and calorimetric analysis that the phosphotyrosine binding (PTB)-like domain of talin engages the PIPKI{gamma} C terminus in a mode very similar to that of integrin binding. However, PIPKI{gamma} binds in the canonical PTB-peptide mode with an SPLH motif replacing the classic NPXY motif. The tighter packing of the SPLH motif against the hydrophobic core of talin may explain the stronger binding of PIPKI{gamma}. Two tyrosine residues flanking the SPLH motif (Tyr-644 and Tyr-649) have been implicated in the regulation of talin binding. We show that phosphorylation at Tyr-644, a Src phosphorylation site in vivo, has little effect on the binding mode or strength, which is consistent with modeling studies in which the phosphotyrosine makes surface-exposed salt bridges, and we suggest that its strong activating effect arises from the release of autoinhibitory restraints in the full-length PIPKI{gamma}. Modeling studies suggest that phosphorylation of Tyr-649 will likewise have little effect on talin binding, whereas phosphorylation of the SPLH serine is predicted to be strongly disruptive. Our data are consistent with the proposal that Src activity promotes a switch from integrin binding to PIPKI{gamma} binding that regulates focal adhesion turnover.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The integrin family of cell adhesion molecules provide a mechanical link between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton and form the nuclei of structural and signaling complexes that regulate cell migration, proliferation, and survival, typically in concert with receptors for soluble ligands (1, 2). Integrins are initially activated by intracellular ("inside-out") signals; following ligation to the extracellular matrix, "outside-in" signals lead to reorganization of the cytoskeleton and activation of intracellular signal transduction pathways. Until recently, rather little was known about the membrane-proximal events involved in integrin activation and signaling. Recent studies have demonstrated a critical role for the cytoskeletal protein talin, which binds to the integrin {beta} subunit cytoplasmic tail, disrupting {alpha}{beta} tail association and promoting a conformational change in the extracellular domains that leads to enhanced affinity for extracellular matrix proteins and the subsequent clustering of integrins on the cell surface (3-5). For outside-in signaling, a critical role has been revealed for Src, which binds constitutively to the C terminus of the integrin {beta}-tail and is activated by intermolecular phosphorylation upon integrin clustering (6).

The interplay between inside-out and outside-in signaling is less well understood. Recent evidence points to a prominent role for the enzyme phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase type I{gamma} (PIPKI{gamma}),1 which forms complexes with both Src and talin at focal adhesions (7-9). PIPKI{gamma} synthesizes the lipid phosphati-dylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate, a key activator of proteins involved in focal adhesion assembly, including talin. For example, phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate binding to talin relieves an autoinhibitory head-tail association that allows the talin FERM domain to bind and activate integrin (10). In an example of positive feedback, the binding of talin to PIPKI{gamma} also activates the kinase. However, the binding sites on talin for integrin and PIPKI{gamma} overlap, which may limit this feedback loop (11). It has recently been shown that Src activates PIPKI{gamma} by phosphorylating its C-terminal tail, enhancing its binding to talin (9). By contrast, Src phosphorylation of the integrin tail reduces its affinity for talin, and it has been proposed that Src triggers a switch between talin binding to integrin and PIPKI{gamma} that may also control focal adhesion assembly (9).

We showed previously by crystallographic and NMR analysis that the F3 subdomain of talin engages integrin in a variant of a canonical PTB-peptide interaction (3). The integrin sequence differs from typical PTB-NPXY interactions in that one or two extra residues are inserted between the NPXY "reverse turn" and the upstream {beta}-strand, and a critical tryptophan residue located four residues upstream of the NPXY motif inserts into a deep pocket on the talin surface. The talin F3 subdomain also engages a C-terminal extension of PIPKI{gamma} that is unique to this isoform and involves a WVSPLHY motif (7, 8). Based on comparison of the sequences of F3-binding motifs, we proposed that PIPKI{gamma} would engage the talin F3 domain in a similar fashion to that of integrin (12), and recent evidence has lent support to this hypothesis (9, 11). Here we show by direct crystallographic studies, solution-based NMR spectroscopy, and calorimetry that the binding of PIPKI{gamma} to talin does indeed conform to a canonical PTB-peptide interaction. However, this interaction involves a novel reverse-turn SPLH motif that is immune to the Src regulation observed for the integrin NPXY motif, enabling the activity of Src to provide a switch between integrin and talin binding that may regulate focal adhesion turnover.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Protein Purification and Crystallization—The cDNA sequence corresponding to residues 638-651 of murine PIPKI{gamma} fused to residues 209-410 of mouse talin was amplified by PCR and cloned into the pET15b bacterial expression vector using NdeI and BamHI restriction sites. The absence of errors in the sequence was corroborated by DNA sequencing. The plasmid was transformed into an Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) strain for protein expression. Cells were grown in "terrific broth" medium at 37 °C, and protein expression was carried out at 37 °C for 3 h in the presence of 0.2 mM isopropyl-1-thio-{beta}-D-galactopyranoside. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, and pellets were frozen at -80 °C. Upon thawing, cell lysis was completed by sonication, and cell debris was removed by centrifugation. The chimeric protein was purified using a nickel chelating affinity column (Amersham Biosciences). The His tag was subsequently cleaved with thrombin and removed by extensive dialysis against 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7), 150 mM NaCl, and 2 mM dithiothreitol. Protein was concentrated in an ultrafiltration cell (Amicon), flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 °C.

Crystallography—Crystals were grown at 4 °C with sitting drop vapor diffusion by mixing equal volumes of protein at 13 mg/ml with a solution containing 0.1 M sodium/potassium phosphate (pH 6.2) and 35% (v/v) 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol and equilibrating against a reservoir of the same solution. Crystals were directly flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen for data collection, with the mother liquor acting as cryoprotectant. Data were collected at 100 K at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory beamline 1.5 using a Quantum-4R charge-coupled device detector. Data were indexed with DENZO and reduced with SCALEPACK (13) (Table I). The structure was solved by molecular replacement using the algorithm PHASER (14), which found six copies of the molecule in the asymmetric unit arranged in three pairs of two molecules related by 2-fold non-crystallographic rotation axes nearly parallel to the crystallographic symmetry axes. This quasi-symmetric arrangement of molecules gave rise to an intensity distribution that (erroneously) suggested the presence of merohedral twinning. Refinement was performed by simulated annealing and energy minimization in CNS (15) with model building in TURBOFRODO (16). Given the unusual non-crystallographic symmetry (NCS), the Rfree set was chosen to obey P622 symmetry in order to minimize the risk of bias. Electron density corresponding to the PIPKI{gamma} sequence was evident in the first maps, and a model was built for all six copies. The six amino acid differences between chicken and mouse sequences (all in the F2 domain) were also incorporated. Initially, strong (weight of 300 kcal/mol · Å2 for positional NCS and {sigma}B of 5 for B-factors) 6-fold NCS restraints were applied to three separate groups as follows: (i) residues 642-648 of PIPKI{gamma}; (ii) residues 649-651 of PIPKI{gamma} and 209-309 of talin; and (iii) residues 310-369 and 379-400 of talin. The weight for positional NCS restraints was gradually relaxed to reach 5 kcal/mol · Å2 in the last cycle of refinement. The final model (Rwork = 25.3; Rfree = 28.6) consists of residues 642-651 of PIPKI{gamma} and 209-400 of talin. The positional root mean square deviation between C{alpha} atoms in different molecules ranged from 0.2 to 0.8 Å. Residues 209-400 of chain A superpose with the corresponding residues in the talin/integrin {beta}3 (Protein Data Bank code 1MIZ [PDB] ) with root mean square deviation (C{alpha}) of 1 Å. All stereochemical parameters are excellent as analyzed with PROCHECK (17). The crystal structure and structure factors have been deposited with the Protein Data Bank (accession code 1Y19 [PDB] ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
Crystallographic data

 
Protein Expression and Purification for NMR—For NMR experiments, the F3 domain (residues 309-405) of C336S mutant mouse talin were subcloned into a pGEX-6P-2 vector (Amersham Biosciences) between the BamHI and EcoRI restriction sites. The C336S substitution in talin F3 has no effect on integrin {beta}-tail binding (18). Protein was expressed in E. coli strain BL-21. 15N-Labeled protein was expressed in M9 minimal media. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline containing lysozyme (1 mg/ml), MgSO4 (10 mM), and DNase I from Sigma (20 µg/ml). Cells were lysed by freeze/thaw cycles before adding Triton X-100 (Roche Applied Science) to a final concentration of 0.1% (v/v) and centrifuging. The supernatant was loaded onto glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Biosciences) and purified according to the product manual. Glutathione S-transferase fusion protease 3Cpro was added to cleave the fusion protein overnight at 4 °C (19), and the talin F3 domain was purified away from the glutathione S-transferase and protease by using glutathione-Sepharose 4B. The identity and purity of the final protein was confirmed by electrospray mass spectrometry and SDS-PAGE. The PIPKI{gamma} peptides PTDERSWVYSPLHYSAR and PTDERSWVYSPLHYSAR (phosphotyrosine is in boldfaced type) and the {beta}-integrin peptide RAKWDTANNPLYKE were purchased from Alta Bioscience (Birmingham, UK) and further purified by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography.

Isothermal Titration Calorimetry—Experiments were conducted using a VP-ITC microcalorimeter (MicroCal Inc., Northampton, MA). The cell contained 1.4 ml of ~30 µM talin F3 domain, and the syringe held a solution of the peptide at a concentration 18 times that of the protein. Accurate concentrations were determined from the absorbance at 280 nm using the extinction coefficients 16,500 M-1 cm-1 for talin F3 and 8250 M-1 cm-1 for the PIPKI{gamma} peptides. All solutions were in 10 mM phosphate buffer, 2.7 mM KCl, and 137 mM NaCl at pH 7.4. Solutions were degassed at 15 °C for 20 min prior to the experiment. Experiments were conducted at 25 °C and consisted of a preliminary 2-µl injection followed by 20-24 injections of 5 µl with intervals of 210 s. Samples were injected at a rate of 0.5 µl/min. Stirring of the cell solution was carried out at 310 rpm. The heat of dilution values were calculated by injecting peptide solutions into the buffer alone. The average heat of dilution was then subtracted from the main experiment. Data analysis was carried out with MicroCal Origin software using a single binding site model.

NMR Spectroscopy—All NMR experiments were carried out at 25 °C on spectrometers built in-house at the Oxford Centre for Molecular Sciences. Spectrometers were equipped with Oxford Instruments superconducting magnets (500, 600, and 750 MHz 1H operating frequencies) and GE/Omega computers. The talin F3 domain was assigned using a sample of 0.9 mM U-15N-labeled F3 in 95% H2O, 5% D2O and one of 1.5 mM U-15N-labeled F3 in 99.9% D2O. All samples were buffered with 50 mM phosphate, pH 6.1, and contained 100 mM NaCl. Three-dimensional gradient-enhanced 1H-15N total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY)-heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) (70-ms mixing time) and 1H-15N nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY)-HSQC (125 ms mixing time) spectra were acquired on the water sample (20). Two-dimensional spectra that were acquired on the D2O sample were a 1H-1H-TOCSY with a 70-ms mixing time (21), 1H-1H double quantum-filtered correlated spectroscopy (DQF-COSY) (22), and a 1H-1H NOESY with a 100-ms mixing time (23). Data processing was achieved using the FELIX 2.3 software package (Biosym Technologies Inc.), and spectra were assigned using the program SPARKY (www.cgl.ucsf.edu/home/sparky). Spectra were referenced to an external DSS sample at 0 ppm (1H), with indirect referencing in the 15N dimension using a 15N-1H frequency ratio of 0.101329118 (24).

For the peptide binding studies two samples were used per titration, each containing 100 µM U-15N-labeled F3, with the second sample also containing the maximal concentration of the peptide under study. Intermediate peptide concentrations were then obtained by adding the appropriate volume of the peptide/protein stock solution to the sample of talin F3 alone. Two-dimensional gradient-enhanced 1H-15N HSQC spectra (25) with water flip-back (26) were acquired at each titration point. The concentrations of the PIPKI{gamma} peptides, which bound in slow exchange, were 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, and 1000 µM. For the segment of the {beta}-integrin tail that was in fast exchange, the concentrations were 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 3, 4.5, 6.5, 9, and 14 mM, and in this case saturation was not achieved.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Deletion analysis defined a minimal binding motif on the PIPKI{gamma} tail to the heptapeptide, WVYSPLH, which binds to the F3 subdomain of talin (7, 11). For crystallographic studies we engineered a chimeric molecule that takes advantage of a fortuitous intermolecular contact as described previously for the talin-integrin complex (3). The chimera comprises residues 638-651 (DERSWVYSPLHYSA) of PIPKI{gamma} fused to residues 209-410 of murine talin (the F2 and F3 FERM subdomains). The chimeric protein yielded crystals that diffract to a 2.6-Å resolution, and the structure was solved by molecular replacement. The asymmetric unit contains six molecules arranged as three dimers in which the PIPKI{gamma} arms are exchanged pair-wise. The talin-PIPKI{gamma} interaction is essentially identical in the six crystallographically independent copies.

Talin F3 contains two antiparallel {beta}-sheets that form a {beta}-sandwich with a single helix at the C terminus packing at the edge of the sandwich (Fig. 1). PIPKI{gamma} residues 642-644 (WVY) augment the {beta}5-{beta}6-{beta}7 sheet by creating an additional strand at the {beta}5 end of the sheet, where it packs against the {alpha}-helix. The main chain conformation and location of the tripeptide closely overlap with those of integrin (Fig. 1B). As for integrin, the tryptophan (Trp-642) is buried in a deep pocket created by residues from three strands of the {beta}5-{beta}6-{beta}7 sheet, namely Tyr-377 ({beta}7), Asp-369 ({beta}6), and Arg-358 ({beta}5), consistent with a critical role for the tryptophan in binding (7). The side chain of Val-643 packs against Trp-359 in the hydrophobic core of the {beta}-sandwich. The aromatic ring of Tyr-644 packs against Arg-358 on the outer edge of the complex, with its hydroxyl group making an H-bond to the Arg-358 guanidinium group (Fig. 1C). PIPKI{gamma} residues 645-648 (SPLH) form a reverse turn analogous to the classic NPXY turn in which Ser-645 plays the same role as the asparagine, forming an N-cap to the turn by making a H-bond to the main chain N of Leu-647, whereas its C=O group makes a 310 helix H-bond to His-648. The side chain of Leu-647 makes a leucine zipper-like contact by inserting its side chain into a pocket created by three aliphatic residues at the end of the C-terminal helix; in the talin-integrin complex no such contact is possible because of a 60° tilt of the NPLY motif. The His side chain sits in the pocket occupied by the NPLY tyrosine in the talin-integrin complex, lying flat against the protein surface and forming an H-bond between its side chain N{epsilon}2 and Thr-354 C=O. The tyrosine downstream of the SPLH motif, Tyr-649, lies flat against the outside of the reverse turn.



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Crystal structure of the talin FERM F3-PIPKI{gamma} interaction. A, surface representation of talin FERM F3 domain colored by electrostatic potential (red for -6 kT/e and blue for 6 kT/e) with the PIPKI{gamma} ligand, residues 641-649, shown as sticks. Trp-642 (W642) in the PIPKI{gamma} sequence (which is critical for binding) binds into a deep pocket on the surface of F3. The SPLH sequence adopts the same reverse-turn conformation as the classic NPXY motif. Thus, serine plays a similar role as that of asparagine, forming an N-cap to the reverse turn; the proline promotes the reverse turn, the leucine packs against the hydrophobic surface of F3, and the histidine takes the place of the tyrosine or phenylalanine found in the integrins, packing against a flat somewhat acidic surface. B, comparison of PIPKI{gamma} (yellow) and integrin {beta}3 (light green) sequences bound to talin FERM F3 (ribbon representation in blue). The {beta}3 structure was superposed by aligning the conserved C{alpha} atoms of the talin FERM F3 domain of the talin-PIPKI{gamma} and talin-{beta}3 complexes. PIPKI{gamma} and {beta}3 residues are labeled in red and green respectively. C, detailed stereo view of the talin-PIPKI{gamma} interaction. Talin residues involved in the interaction are shown in gray, and the PIPKI{gamma} ligand is shown in yellow. Intramolecular and intermolecular H-bonds are shown as dotted lines. Surface electrostatic potential was calculated with the program APBS (30). Molecular representation figures were generated with the programs MOLSCRIPT (31, 32), RASTER3D (32), and PyMol (http://www.pymol.org). Single letter amino acid abbreviations are used with position numbers.

 
We assigned the backbone resonances of the isolated F3 domain in solution by NMR (see "Experimental Procedures") and studied the chemical shift perturbations upon binding the PIPKI{gamma} peptide PTDERSWVYSPLHYSAR, as well as the {beta}3 integrin binding peptide RAKWDTANNPLYKE (Fig. 2). The NMR perturbation data are consistent with the crystallographic data, showing that the chimeric crystal structure is a reliable model for the complex in solution. The residues perturbed by PIPKI{gamma} binding are the same as those perturbed by {beta}-integrin peptide binding. The NMR data indicate that the PIPKI{gamma} peptide binds tighter than integrin peptide, as evidenced by generally larger shift perturbations and a slow (separate signals) exchange regime for the PIPKI{gamma} peptide as compared with the fast exchange regime observed for the integrin peptide (Fig. 2D).



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Interaction of the talin F3 domain with PIPKI{gamma} and {beta}-integrin peptides. A-C, chemical shift perturbation maps of the interaction of U-15N-labeled talin F3 with the {beta}3-integrin tail peptide RAKWDTANNPLYKE (A), the PIPKPI{gamma} peptide PTDERSWVYSPLHYSAR (B), and the same PIPKPI{gamma} peptide phosphorylated at Tyr-644 (C). {Delta}{delta}(HN,N) refers to the combined HN and N chemical shift changes, according to the equation {Delta}{delta}(HN,N) = (({Delta}{delta}HNWHN)2 + ({Delta}{delta}NWN)2)0.5, where WHN and WN are weighting factors for the HN and N shifts respectively (WHN = 1, WN = 0.154) (33) and {Delta}{delta} = {delta}bound - {delta}free. Full chemical shift data are given in the supplementary data available in the on-line version of this article. Secondary structure elements are indicated. D, NMR titration of 100 µM U-15N-labeled talin F3 with increasing concentrations of {beta}3-integrin peptide. Overlays of the same region of successive 1H-15N HSQC spectra are shown (some titration points omitted for clarity). Black, magenta, blue, cyan, green, yellow, orange, and red peaks correspond to concentrations of 0, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 3.0, 6.5, 9, and 14 mM peptide. E, the location of the combined 1H and 15N chemical shift changes due to the unphosphorylated PIPKPI{gamma} peptide mapped onto the crystal structure of the talin-PIPKI{gamma} chimera. Small-to-large changes are indicated by the blue-to-red spectral gradation. The PIPKI{gamma} peptide is shown in magenta.

 
The NMR data provide further insights into the conformational changes induced by ligand binding. The major perturbations are to the {beta}5-{beta}6-{beta}7 sheet and the C-terminal helix (Fig. 2E). As expected, strand {beta}5, which forms the main chain {beta}-sheet contacts, is the region most affected by binding. Surprisingly, the whole of the {beta}6-{beta}7 loop is strongly perturbed; at its tip, this loop contacts the Tyr/His of the NPLY/SPLH motif. In previously determined crystal structures of talin lacking a ligand with a reverse turn motif, the {beta}6-{beta}7 loop adopts a conformation in which a tyrosine from this loop (Tyr-373) packs against the body of the domain. In the talin-integrin complex, the loop changes its conformation such that the Phe-370 phenyl ring packs more deeply into its hydrophobic pocket and the Tyr-373 C{alpha} shifts7Åasits phenol ring flips by 180° to become exposed on the protein surface. This switch appears to be driven by the packing of the NPXY tyrosine into its pocket. In the talin-PIPKI{gamma} crystal structure, the histidine projects less far into its pocket, and both conformations are observed in different copies of the asymmetric unit. The biological significance of this conformational switch remains to be defined; although Tyr-373 is not part of a known kinase recognition motif, it is predicted with high confidence to be a phosphorylation site according to the NetPhos method (www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhos/).

We next studied the NMR chemical shift perturbations of a phosphorylated PIPKI{gamma} peptide, PTDERSWVYSPLHYSAR (phosphotyrosine is boldfaced), corresponding to the site identified as a site of Src kinase modification (Tyr-644). The NMR perturbations are very similar to those for the non-phosphorylated peptide, indicating that the binding mode and strength are very similar (Fig. 2, B and C). In general, the shifts are a little higher for the phosphorylated peptide, suggesting either somewhat stronger binding or a direct effect of the phosphate group on the amide resonances. We measured the binding of these two peptides to talin F3 in solution using isothermal titration calorimetry. We found that the dissociation constant for the phosphorylated peptide (pH 7.4) was lower than that for the unphosphorylated peptide (Kd = 170 ± 5 nM versus 271 ± 0.6 nM) (see the supplementary data in the on-line version of this article), but the difference is less than that observed in previous studies using fluorescein-labeled peptide (9). Some of the observed differences may result from the use here of isolated F3 rather than the intact FERM domain used by Ling et al. (9). Modeling (not shown) of the phosphotyrosine onto the crystal structure shows that rotation of the tyrosine about its C{alpha}-C{beta} bond generates favorable ionic contacts between the phosphate group and the side chain of both Arg-358 and Lys-357 without disrupting the main chain contacts with the {beta}5 strand. Modeling of the second tyrosine (Tyr-649) in its phosphorylated form also shows that a favorable contact with the Lys-357 side chain can be made.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our structural model of the talin-PIPKI{gamma} interaction reveals a novel variant of the PTB-peptide interaction in which an SPLH motif replaces the classical NPXY motif. We show directly that the binding sites for integrin and PIPKI{gamma} on talin are essentially identical and, thus, mutually exclusive. The stronger binding of PIPKI{gamma} may be explained by the tighter packing of the SPLH motif against the hydrophobic core of the F3 domain than that observed for integrin, where a two-residue insertion between the {beta}-strand and reverse turn creates a bulge filled by a water molecule. A 60° tilt of the integrin NPLY motif allows the tyrosine to fit into its pocket, but this prevents the leucine from packing against the hydrophobic core of F3. The binding mode for PIPKI{gamma} demonstrates that the talin F3 domain can indeed bind peptides in the "canonical" mode, and increases the likelihood that the protein layilin (27), which has two talin binding sequences (WVENEIY and FVTNDIY), will bind talin in the same fashion.

Previous studies have indicated that phosphorylation of the tyrosine preceding the SPLH motif by Src enhances binding to talin (9). Using fluorescein-labeled peptides, Ling et al. (9) showed by fluorescence anisotropy that phosphorylation at either or both of the tyrosines in the WVYSPLHY motif increased binding to the talin FERM domain by ~ 10-fold. Our NMR and calorimetric data, generated with unmodified peptide and the F3 domain, also indicate a positive, although more modest (~2-fold), effect on binding to talin. Our structural model is consistent with these results, because the use of the SPLH motif places the two flanking tyrosine side chains (Tyr-644 and Tyr-649) in surface-exposed locations appropriately placed to make favorable ionic interactions with exposed basic residues. Surface-exposed salt bridges generally have a much smaller energetic consequence than buried charge-charge interactions (such as those found in classic PTB-phosphopeptide interactions), because exposed groups must compete with water of solvation (28). By contrast, it has been shown that phosphorylation of the NPXY motif on integrin leads to loss of talin binding (9, 29); this finding is consistent with our model of the talin-integrin complex, because the tyrosine side chain fits into a hydrophobic and acidic pocket on the protein surface. Thus, our data support the proposal by Ling et al. (9) that Src phosphorylation of integrin and PIPKI{gamma} promotes a switch from integrin binding to PIPKI{gamma} binding by talin. That is, by substituting an SPLH motif for an NPXY motif, PIPKI{gamma} avoids modification by the Src kinase that would inhibit talin binding. The observation that talin binding to PIPKI{gamma} activates the latter suggests that the talin binding motif is involved in autoinhibitory interactions in unactivated PIPKI{gamma}, which could plausibly be relieved by phosphorylation and provide an alternative rationale for the strong activating effect of Src. Recent data have indicated that the SPLH serine is a target of MEK phosphorylation, which abolishes the PIPKI{gamma}-talin interaction.2 Because this serine is buried in our complex and forms an H-bond that stabilizes the SPLH reverse turn, phosphorylation at this site is strongly predicted to disrupt binding.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The atomic coordinates and structure factors (code 1Y19) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).

* This work was supported by the Cell Migration Consortium of the National Institutes of Health, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, and the Wellcome Trust. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental data on talin F3 and PIPKI{gamma} in the form of Figure S1 (isothermal calorimetry profiles) and Table S1 (chemical shift data). Back

§ These authors contributed equally to this work. Back

Present address: Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, University of Salamanca-CSIC, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, E-37007 Salamanca, Spain. Back

§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Burnham Institute, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037. Tel.: 858-646-3136; Fax: 858-646-3195; E-mail: rlidding{at}burnham.org.

1 The abbreviations used are: PIPKI{gamma}, phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase type I{gamma}; NCS, non-crystallographic symmetry; PTB, phosphotyrosine binding. Back

2 P. De Camilli, personal communication. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Andrei Bobkov and Miya Fujimoto of the Cell Migration Consortium Protein Facility for providing protein for preliminary NMR studies. We also thank the Department of Energy and the beamline staff at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory for synchrotron access and support for data collection.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hynes, R. O. (2002) Cell 110, 673-687[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. DeMali, K. A., Wennerberg, K., and Burridge, K. (2003) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 572-582[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Garcia-Alvarez, B., de Pereda, J. M., Calderwood, D. A., Ulmer, T. S., Critchley, D., Campbell, I. D., Ginsberg, M. H., and Liddington, R. C. (2003) Mol. Cell 11, 49-58[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Tadokoro, S., Shattil, S. J., Eto, K., Tai, V., Liddington, R. C., de Pereda, J. M., Ginsberg, M. H., and Calderwood, D. A. (2003) Science 302, 103-106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Vinogradova, O., Velyvis, A., Velyviene, A., Hu, B., Haas, T., Plow, E. F., and Qin, J. (2002) Cell 110, 587-597[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Arias-Salgado, E. G., Lizano, S., Sarkar, S., Brugge, J. S., Ginsberg, M. H., and Shattil, S. J. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 13298-13302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Di Paolo, G., Pellegrini, L., Letinic, K., Cestra, G., Zoncu, R., Voronov, S., Chang, S., Guo, J., Wenk, M. R., and De Camilli, P. (2002) Nature 420, 85-89[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Ling, K., Doughman, R. L., Firestone, A. J., Bunce, M. W., and Anderson, R. A. (2002) Nature 420, 89-93[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Ling, K., Doughman, R. L., Iyer, V. V., Firestone, A. J., Bairstow, S. F., Mosher, D. F., Schaller, M. D., and Anderson, R. A. (2003) J. Cell Biol. 163, 1339-1349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Martel, V., Racaud-Sultan, C., Dupe, S., Marie, C., Paulhe, F., Galmiche, A., Block, M. R., and Albiges-Rizo, C. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 21217-21227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Barsukov, I. L., Prescot, A., Bate, N., Patel, B., Floyd, D. N., Bhanji, N., Bagshaw, C. R., Letinic, K., Di Paolo, G., De Camilli, P., Roberts, G. C., and Critchley, D. R. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 31202-31209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Liddington, R. C., Bankston, L. A., and de Pereda, J. M. (2003) Curr. Biol. 13, R94-R95[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Otwinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326
  14. Storoni, L. C., McCoy, A. J., and Read, R. J. (2004) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 432-438[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Brunger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J. S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T., and Warren, G. L. (1998) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905-921[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Roussel, A., and Cambillau, C. (1991) Silicon Graphics Geometry Partners Directory, p. 86, Silicon Graphics, Mountain View, CA
  17. Collaborative Computational Project Number 4 (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 760-763[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Ulmer, T. S., Calderwood, D. A., Ginsberg, M. H., and Campbell, I. D. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 8307-8312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Cordingley, M. G., Callahan, P. L., Sardana, V. V., Garsky, V. M., and Colonno, R. J. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 9062-9065[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Marion, D., Driscoll, P. C., Kay, L. E., Wingfield, P. T., Bax, A., Gronenborn, A. M., and Clore, G. M. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 6150-6156[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Davis, D. G., and Bax, A. (1985) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 2820-2821[CrossRef]
  22. Rance, M., Sorensen, O. W., Bodenhausen, G., Wagner, G., Ernst, R. R., and Wuthrich, K. (1983) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 117, 479-485[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Kumar, A., Ernst, R. R., and Wuthrich, K. (1980) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 95, 1-6[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Wishart, D. S., Bigam, C. G., Yao, J., Abildgaard, F., Dyson, H. J., Oldfield, E., Markley, J. L., and Sykes, B. D. (1995) J. Biomol. NMR 6, 135-140[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Kay, L. E., Kiefer, R., and Saarinen, T. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10663-10665[CrossRef]
  26. Grzesiek, S., and Bax, A. (1993) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 12593-12594[CrossRef]
  27. Borowsky, M. L., and Hynes, R. O. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 429-442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Xu, D., Tsai, C. J., and Nussinov, R. (1997) Protein Eng. 10, 999-1012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Tapley, P., Horwitz, A., Buck, C., Duggan, K., and Rohrschneider, L. (1989) Oncogene 4, 325-333[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Baker, N. A., Sept, D., Joseph, S., Holst, M. J., and McCammon, J. A. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 10037-10041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kraulis, P. J. (1991) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946-950[CrossRef]
  32. Merritt, E. A., and Murphy, M. E. P. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 869-873[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Ayed, A., Mulder, F. A., Yi, G. S., Lu, Y., Kay, L. E., and Arrowsmith, C. H. (2001) Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 756-760[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. L. Oxley, N. J. Anthis, E. D. Lowe, I. Vakonakis, I. D. Campbell, and L. Wegener
An Integrin Phosphorylation Switch: THE EFFECT OF {beta}3 INTEGRIN TAIL PHOSPHORYLATION ON DOK1 AND TALIN BINDING
J. Biol. Chem., February 29, 2008; 283(9): 5420 - 5426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Wang, L. Lian, J. A. Golden, E. E. Morrisey, and C. S. Abrams
PIP5KI{gamma} is required for cardiovascular and neuronal development
PNAS, July 10, 2007; 104(28): 11748 - 11753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Patel, A. R. Gingras, A. A. Bobkov, L. M. Fujimoto, M. Zhang, R. C. Liddington, D. Mazzeo, J. Emsley, G. C. K. Roberts, I. L. Barsukov, et al.
The Activity of the Vinculin Binding Sites in Talin Is Influenced by the Stability of the Helical Bundles That Make Up The Talin Rod
J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7458 - 7467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
S. Y. Lee, S. Voronov, K. Letinic, A. C. Nairn, G. Di Paolo, and P. De Camilli
Regulation of the interaction between PIPKI{gamma} and talin by proline-directed protein kinases
J. Cell Biol., February 28, 2005; 168(5): 789 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/9/8381    most recent
M413180200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Pereda, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Liddington, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Pereda, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Liddington, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.