![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 1, 626-637, January 6, 2006
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia
Received for publication, August 31, 2005 , and in revised form, October 18, 2005.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-integrins (25). Although Gab1 can bind the c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase directly (6), association of Gab1 and Gab2 with receptor signaling complexes is often mediated by the adaptor protein Grb2 (3). The latter binds the tyrosine-phosphorylated receptor or a receptor-associated protein via its SH2 region and the Gab protein via its C-terminal SH3 domain. An important signaling function of Gab proteins is to bind and activate the protein-tyrosine phosphatase Shp2, resulting in enhanced and/or more sustained Ras/Erk signaling (3). Shp2 can positively regulate Ras activation by dephosphorylating Ras GTPase-activating protein recruitment sites on the EGFR (7) or Gab1 (8) or by indirectly activating Src family tyrosine kinases via dephosphorylation of Csk-binding sites on paxillin (9) or PAG/Cbp (10). A second key pathway downstream of Gab proteins is activation of PI3K because Gab13 exhibit three YXXM motifs that mediate recruitment of the p85 subunit of this enzyme. In addition, Gab1 and Gab2 both bind Crk adaptors, and Gab1 couples to phospholipase C
(2, 3).
Although Gab3-deficient mice lack an obvious phenotype, suggesting functional redundancy with the other family members (11), Gab1 and Gab2 perform unique functions in normal and pathological states. Gab1 gene knockouts display embryonic lethality, probably due to the key role played by Gab1 in Met signaling (12, 13). In contrast, mice lacking Gab2, which has a more tissue-specific expression pattern, exhibit impaired mast cell-mediated allergic responses and osteoclast differentiation due to a requirement for Gab2 downstream of Fc
receptor I and RANK, respectively (5, 14). Furthermore, Gab2 is strongly implicated in oncogenic signaling. Gab2 S159A, which is uncoupled from negative feedback phosphorylation by Akt, displays potent transforming properties in fibroblasts, identifying Gab2 as a proto-oncogene product (15). Also, Gab2 is essential for the transformation of fibroblasts by the v-Sea tyrosine kinase oncoprotein (16) and of myeloid cells by Bcr-Abl (17) or Shp2 E76K, a mutated hyperactive version of Shp2 found in certain leukemias (18). Finally, Gab2 is overexpressed in breast cancer cell lines and primary breast cancer specimens (19).
It is now well established that signaling by specific receptor tyrosine kinases plays key roles in both mammary gland development and tumorigenesis. For example, in the normal mammary gland, the ErbB receptor signaling network functions in ductal outgrowth, alveolar morphogenesis, and lactation (20), whereas in breast cancer, overexpression of either EGFR/ErbB1 or ErbB2 is associated with a more aggressive disease phenotype (21). Consequently, given the oncogenic potential of Gab2 and its common overexpression in breast cancers, an important unresolved question is the functional consequences of elevated Gab2 expression in normal mammary epithelial cells. To address this, we have exploited the characteristics of the spontaneously immortalized human mammary epithelial cell line MCF-10A. Upon three-dimensional culture in reconstituted basement membrane (Matrigel), these cells form acinar structures that retain important characteristics of glandular epithelium in vivo, such as apicobasal polarization, suppression of proliferation, and acinar cavitation through apoptosis of cells located within the inner cell mass (22). This three-dimensional culture system provides a powerful model for characterizing the biological activities of proteins implicated in breast cancer development and progression. Effects observed upon overexpression and/or constitutive activation of particular oncoproteins include lack of proliferative suppression (cyclin D1), luminal filling, development of multiacinar structures (ErbB2), and disruption of cell-cell adhesion in acini (colony-stimulating factor receptor) (2325). In this study, we demonstrate that, depending on its expression level in MCF-10A cells, Gab2 is capable of conferring increased acinar size, resistance to proliferative suppression within acinar structures, independence of the morphogenetic program from exogenous EGF, and defective luminal clearance, thus supporting a role for Gab2 in breast cancer development.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Retroviral VectorsA cDNA insert encoding human Gab2 with a C-terminal HA tag was excised from pcDNA3.1/Gab2-HA 9 by XbaI/HindIII digestion, blunted, and subcloned into the HpaI site of the retroviral vector pMIG (also known as pMSCV-IRES-GFP (28)) to yield the construct pMIG/Gab2. The QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) was used to generate pMIG/Gab2 expression vectors encoding Gab2 mutants lacking the binding sites for Grb2 (
Grb2), p85 (
p85), and Shp2 (
Shp2). In brief, the
Grb2 mutant was generated by deleting the 351PPPRPPKP358 sequence, representing a typical Grb2-binding site, and by performing two alanine substitutions to mutate the atypical Grb2-binding site from 510PPPVNR515 to PAPVNA (29). The other mutants were generated by performing phenylalanine substitutions at Tyr614 and Tyr643 (
Shp2) and Tyr452, Tyr476, and Tyr584 (
p85).10 The coding sequences of all Gab2 mutants were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Cell Culture and Retroviral Infection of MCF-10A CellsMonolayer cultures of MCF-10A cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/nutrient mixture F-12 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 5% (v/v) horse serum (Invitrogen), 20 ng/ml human recombinant EGF (R&D Systems), 0.5 µg/ml hydrocortisone (Sigma), 100 ng/ml cholera toxin (Sigma), 10 µg/ml bovine insulin (Sigma), 50 units/ml penicillin G (Invitrogen), and 50 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate (Invitrogen). For growth factor stimulation experiments, cells were starved overnight in 0.2% (v/v) horse serum prior to treatment with 10 ng/ml EGF. For cell cycle analysis of cells grown in monolayer culture, MCF-10A cells were starved for 34 h in 0.2% (v/v) horse serum and then stimulated with 10 ng/ml EGF. Relative cell numbers were estimated using a non-radioactive cell proliferation assay (Promega) after up to 5 days of EGF treatment, and doubling times were calculated from lines of best fit during exponential growth.
For the establishment of three-dimensional cultures, cells grown in monolayer culture were detached by trypsin/EDTA treatment and seeded in precoated glass chamber slides as described previously (30). Briefly, cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline and then resuspended in assay medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/nutrient mixture F-12 supplemented with 2% (v/v) horse serum, cholera toxin, hydrocortisone, penicillin G, and streptomycin sulfate as described above) at 2.5 x 104 cells/ml. 8- or 4-well glass chamber slides were coated with 40 or 80 µl of Matrigel/well, respectively, and left to solidify in the incubator for 1 h. The cells were then mixed with an equal volume of assay medium containing 4% (v/v) Matrigel, which was supplemented with 10 ng/ml EGF and 10 µg/ml insulin or with either EGF or insulin alone. The cell suspension was then added to the 4- or 8-well chamber slides to yield 5 x 103 or 1 x 104 cells/well, respectively. This time point was taken as Day 0, and the medium was replaced every 4 days. For preparation of cell lysates from the three-dimensional culture, the appropriate medium was replaced at Day 3, and cells were recovered and lysed at Day 4 as described below. Where indicated, U0126 (Promega Corp.) was added to cultures at the specified dose on Day 1, and the medium was replaced on Day 3.
MCF-10A cells expressing the ecotropic retroviral receptor (MCF-10A/EcoR cells; a kind gift of Drs. Danielle Lynch and Joan Brugge) were grown and infected with retroviruses as described (30). In brief, the ecotropic packing cell line Phoenix-Eco was transfected with 10 µg of plasmid DNA using PolyFect (Qiagen Inc.). Retroviral supernatants were collected 48 h post-transfection, passed through a 0.22-µm filter, supplemented with Polybrene at a final concentration of 8 µg/ml, and diluted with fresh MCF-10A growth medium. This solution was then used to overlay a subconfluent culture of MCF-10A/EcoR cells, which were plated out at a density of 5 x 106 cells/10-cm dish on the day before infection. GFP-positive cells were then sorted to homogeneity by flow cytometry.
AntibodiesAntibodies against phospho-Thr308 Akt, phospho-Ser473 Akt, total Akt, and phosphorylated and total p42/44 Erk and Stat5 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Rat anti-HA monoclonal antibody 3F10 was obtained from Roche Diagnostics. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-phosphotyrosine antibody PY20 and antibodies against
-catenin (clone 14) and E-cadherin (clone 36) were obtained from BD Transduction Laboratories. Antibodies against the EGFR (528 or 1005) and Rb (C-15) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. The anti-Gab2 (B-D39), anti-phospho-Rb (S780), anti-activated caspase-3, anti-
-actin (clone AC-15), and anti-Ki67 antibodies were purchased from Diaclone, Calbiochem, R&D systems, Sigma, and DakoCytomation, respectively.
Analysis of Three-dimensional Matrigel Cultures by Bright-field and Confocal MicroscopyAcini were photographed, and their diameters were assessed using Leica Q500 MC QWin software (Version V01.02). For confocal microscopy, the acini were fixed and stained using the indicated antibodies as described (30). Following incubation with the primary antibodies, the acini were stained using the appropriate Cy3-labeled secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.) and TOPRO-3 or 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole as a DNA counterstain.
Recovery of Acini from Three-dimensional Matrigel CulturesAfter removal of the supernatant, the cultures were incubated in an appropriate volume of cell recovery solution (BD Biosciences) for 75 min at 4 °C to dissolve the Matrigel. Thereafter, acini were collected by centrifugation at 805 x g for 10 min at 4 °C and washed once with cold phosphate-buffered saline.
Cell Lysis and ImmunoprecipitationRecovered acini or cells grown in monolayer culture were washed once with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed with radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 0.5% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate) for 10 min on ice. Thereafter, the suspension was centrifuged at 17,530 x g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was transferred into a fresh tube and stored at -80 °C.
For the immunoprecipitation of Gab2 signaling complexes, a subconfluent 10-cm dish of MCF-10A cells expressing the indicated Gab2 proteins was lysed with 1 ml of lysis buffer (1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 20 mM NaF, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin) for 15 min. Subsequently, immunoprecipitations were performed by adding 1 µg of anti-HA monoclonal antibody to 900 µl of post-nuclear supernatant containing 50 µl of recombinant protein G-Sepharose 4B slurry (Zymed Laboratories Inc.) as described previously (31). Following overnight incubation, the immunoprecipitates were washed four times with lysis buffer and then resuspended in SDS-PAGE sample buffer.
Western Blot AnalysisThis was performed as described previously (32).
Flow CytometryCells grown in monolayer culture or recovered acini were trypsinized at 37 °C for 12 min. Subsequently, the trypsin was inactivated by adding harvest medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 2% horse serum), and cells were collected by centrifugation at 805 x g for 5 min at 4 °C. Thereafter, cells were resuspended in harvest medium containing 62.5 µg/ml ethidium bromide and 0.25% (v/v) Triton X-100 and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 3 h. 2 h before fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, RNase (Sigma) was added to a final concentration of 500 µg/ml. All fluorescence-activated cell sorting data were acquired with a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) with CellQuest professional software. Analysis was performed with ModFit software.
DensitometryThis was performed using IPLab Gel software (Signal Analytics Inc.).
Statistical AnalysisThis utilized a two-sided Student's t test, and differences were considered to be statistically significant at p < 0.05. For statistical evaluation of more than two groups, analysis of variance was used. A Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch multiple comparison test was employed to compare every possible pair of means and to distinguish significantly different groups using SPSS software.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In our original study, we determined that normal or immortalized human mammary epithelial cells express very low levels of endogenous Gab2, whereas a subset of breast cancer cell lines exhibits Gab2 expression that is at least an order of magnitude higher (19). However, MCF-10A cells were not included in this analysis. Therefore, Western blotting was used to confirm that Gab2 expression in these cells was also low (Fig. 1A and data not shown). The cells were then infected with a bicistronic retrovirus encoding Gab2 and GFP from the same transcript and sorted according to their green fluorescence. This allowed the isolation of three pools expressing relatively low, medium, and high levels of Gab2 (Fig. 1A). These pools expressed levels of Gab2 that were 3-, 6-, and 18-fold higher, respectively, than those in the breast cancer cell line with the highest Gab2 expression, MDA-MB-468 (19). Therefore, the low expressing pool represented an appropriate model to study the biological consequences of Gab2 overexpression and was used for all of our analyses, unless indicated otherwise.
Effects of Gab2 Overexpression on EGF-induced Signaling and Cell Cycle Progression in Monolayer CultureEGF is an important mitogen for MCF-10A cells in culture (33). Therefore, we first examined the effects of Gab2 overexpression on EGF-induced signaling events. Western blotting of cell lysates revealed reduced tyrosine phosphorylation of protein bands at
180 and 110 kDa and increased phosphorylation of a band at 95 kDa in MCF-10A/Gab2 cells compared with controls (Fig. 1B). Immunoprecipitation/Western blot analysis identified the 180-kDa band as the EGFR (data not shown) and the 95-kDa band as Gab2 (see Fig. 4A), whereas the 110-kDa band remained uncharacterized. Because the total levels of the EGFR were unchanged (data not shown), reduced tyrosine phosphorylation of this receptor upon Gab2 overexpression is likely to reflect competition between phosphorylation sites on Gab2 and the EGFR C terminus. Furthermore, the activity of several downstream signaling pathways was enhanced in MCF-10A/Gab2 cells relative to controls. Phosphorylation of the PI3K effector Akt at the regulatory sites Thr308 and Ser473 was increased at both early and late time points (Fig. 1, B and C), whereas MCF-10A/Gab2 cells also exhibited more sustained Erk activation as indicated by increased levels of phospho-Erk at 15 and 45 min post-stimulation (Fig. 1, B and D). Finally, MCF-10A/Gab2 cells displayed a higher basal level of Stat5 tyrosine phosphorylation. (In three independent experiments, there was a mean increase of 2.3-fold (p < 0.05).) This increased phosphorylation was maintained over 45 min of EGF stimulation.
To further characterize the functional consequences of Gab2 overexpression, we investigated growth factor regulation of the cell cycle. EGF treatment of cells arrested in G1 phase by serum starvation led to a semisynchronous entry into S phase that was both more pronounced and more rapid for Gab2-overexpressing cells, so the percentage of cells in S phase peaked
3 h earlier than for vector controls (Fig. 2). EGF stimulation led to sustained proliferation of both control and Gab2-overexpressing cells, with respective doubling times of 35.5 and 27.0 h at 0.1 ng/ml EGF and 15.5 and 14.2 h at 10 ng/ml EGF. Therefore, the increased activation of mitogenic signaling pathways in MCF-10A/Gab2 cells results in an enhanced rate of EGF-induced G1 phase progression and a consequent increase in the overall rate of proliferation.
|
|
25% (Fig. 3, A and B). We also investigated acinar growth and morphogenesis in medium containing EGF alone. At Day 6 of culture, there was an increase in acinar diameter relative to controls of
50%, indicating that, during the early stages of acinar development, Gab2 can partially substitute for the growth-promoting effect of insulin. Although the size of Gab2-overexpressing acini was near-maximal at Day 6, whereas the control acini continued to increase in size until Day 12, a significant increase in diameter for the former was still evident at Day 21. For cells grown in full growth medium or only in the presence of EGF, Gab2 overexpression did not impair luminal clearance in late stage cultures (Fig. 3C). However, staining at late time points for the proliferative marker Ki67 revealed a greater proportion of positive cells in Gab2-overexpressing acini (Fig. 3D), indicating that Gab2 overrides the proliferative suppression that normally occurs in the morphogenic program. Western blot analysis of lysates derived from Day 4 acini grown in full growth medium or only in the presence of EGF revealed that Gab2 overexpression resulted in increased levels of phospho-Ser780 Rb (both growth conditions) and total Rb (EGF alone) (mean 24% increase, p = 0.03), indicating enhanced signaling to the cell cycle machinery (Fig. 3E). Consistent with these data, flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle phase distribution revealed that Gab2 overexpression resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of cells in S phase (Fig. 3F). This approach also revealed that Gab2 overexpression did not alter cell size (data not shown). Therefore, the observed increases in acinar size reflect enhanced proliferation within the Gab2-overexpressing structures, particularly during the early stages of acinar development.
|
Grb2). Also, to determine the roles of two key Gab2 effectors, we generated Tyr-to-Phe mutants at the two Shp2-binding sites (
Shp2) or three p85 recruitment sites (
p85). The different mutants were expressed in MCF-10A cells by retroviral infection, and the GFP-positive fractions were subjected to flow cytometric sorting to isolate pools with expression comparable to that in MCF-10A/Gab2 cells.
First, we characterized the magnitude and kinetics of EGF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the different Gab2 proteins, with a particular focus on
Grb2. Western blotting of Gab2 immunoprecipitates confirmed loss of Grb2 binding for this mutant (Fig. 4C). Interestingly, at 2.5 min of EGF stimulation, all of the mutants exhibited a similar degree of tyrosine phosphorylation that was slightly reduced compared with the wild-type protein (Fig. 4A, upper panels). However, at 15 min, phosphorylation of
Grb2 was markedly reduced compared with phosphorylation of both
p85 and
Shp2, indicating more transient phosphorylation in the absence of Grb2 association (Fig. 4A, lower panels). Furthermore, association of the
Grb2 mutant with the receptor was reduced compared with wild-type Gab2 and the other mutants at 2.5, 15 and 30 min (Fig. 4B and data not shown), confirming that Grb2 acts to bridge the EGFR and Gab2 and suggesting that receptor association is required for sustained tyrosine phosphorylation of Gab2. Introduction of the
Grb2 mutations also abrogated ligand-induced Shc binding to Gab2 (Fig. 4C), indicating that Gab2-bound Grb2 normally acts to bind tyrosine-phosphorylated Shc via the Grb2 SH2 domain.
In terms of recruitment of other proteins, Shp2 binding to Gab2 peaked at 2.5 min and then gradually declined (Fig. 4C and data not shown). However, Shp2 recruitment was markedly reduced for the
Grb2 mutant and almost undetectable for the
Shp2 mutant. Interestingly,
Shp2 also exhibited reduced ligand-induced binding of Grb2. Binding of p85 was undetectable at 2.5 min, reached a maximum at 15 min, and then declined from 15 to 30 min (Fig. 4D and data not shown). Recruitment was reduced for
Grb2 and undetectable for
p85. Thus, in line with its transient tyrosine phosphorylation,
Grb2 is impaired in its binding of two key Gab2 effectors.
The effect of the different mutants on acinar growth was then determined. For cells grown in three-dimensional culture in the presence of both EGF and insulin, acini derived from cells expressing the
p85 mutant were consistently of an intermediate acinar diameter compared with those derived from control or Gab2-expressing cells (Figs. 5A and 6D). However, no effect on acinar size was observed for the
Grb2 and
Shp2 mutants. Similar trends were observed in the presence of only EGF; but under these conditions, the effect of the
p85 mutant was less marked (Fig. 5A).
To characterize the effects of Gab2 and the different mutants on cell signaling in three-dimensional culture, acini were recovered from the Matrigel, lysed, and subjected to Western blot analysis (Fig. 5B). Robust tyrosine phosphorylation of Gab2 was observed for cells grown with EGF and insulin or with EGF alone. Under both conditions, tyrosine phosphorylation of the
p85 and
Shp2 mutants was reduced, whereas that of the
Grb2 mutant was undetectable. This pattern was similar to that observed for cells maintained in monolayer culture and stimulated with EGF for 15 min (Fig. 4A). The levels of phospho-Erk in the vector controls were markedly reduced for cells grown with EGF compared with those maintained in the presence of EGF and insulin. However, under either culture condition, expression of either wild-type Gab2 or the
p85 mutant resulted in an enhancement of Erk activation, which was not observed for either the
Grb2 or
Shp2 mutant. For cells grown in EGF and insulin, the increases for wild-type Gab2 and the
p85 mutant were 77 and 50% (p < 0.01), respectively, whereas for cells grown with EGF only, the increases were 117 and 126% (p < 0.01), respectively. Cells maintained in the presence of EGF and insulin exhibited a modest, but statistically significant increase in Akt activation upon Gab2 overexpression (23%, p = 0.01). A smaller, but non-significant enhancement of Akt phosphorylation was also detected for the
p85 mutant, whereas no effect was observed for the
Grb2 and
Shp2 mutants. Similar trends were evident for cells grown with EGF only, although the increase in Akt activation upon Gab2 overexpression was smaller and did not reach statistical significance. Because the
p85 mutant was not as effective as wild-type Gab2 in enhancing acinar size under both growth conditions (Fig. 5A), but induced similar levels of Erk activation (Fig. 5B), this indicates that activation of PI3K by Gab2/p85 binding contributes to the effect of Gab2 on cell proliferation in three-dimensional culture.
|
|
p85 mutant did not affect acinar diameter (Fig. 6, C and D), which may indicate that Akt activation is growth-limiting for these cells. Also, because acini expressing the
p85 mutant and treated with U0126 were still larger than controls, Gab2 must promote growth by one or more mechanisms independent of p85 binding and Erk activation.
Gab2 Overexpression Results in Independence of the Acinar Morphogenetic Program from Exogenous EGFThe ability of Gab2 to partially substitute for insulin in the early stages of acinar development (Fig. 3) led us to perform a more stringent test of the effect of Gab2 on growth factor sensitivity and to determine its ability to compensate for the absence of EGF. The previous work of Brugge and co-workers (34) has determined that only expression of certain oncogene combinations (e.g. activated Akt and cyclin D1) will drive formation of acinar structures under these conditions. Consistent with these data, vector control cells grown in the presence of only insulin formed small clusters of cells that lacked structural organization. However,
50% of the MCF-10A/Gab2 cells formed much larger structures that developed hollow lumina due to apoptosis of centrally located cells (Fig. 7, AC). At Day 4, weak tyrosine phosphorylation of Gab2 could be detected in these acini, along with enhanced Erk activation and an increased proportion of cells in S phase relative to controls (Fig. 7D and data not shown). Determination of the signaling requirements for Gab2-stimulated acinar growth under these conditions revealed a contribution from p85 binding and a dependence on recruitment of Grb2 and Shp2 (Fig. 7E). Acinar morphogenesis was not observed upon expression of any of the mutants (data not shown). Unfortunately, we could not obtain reproducible data for activation of downstream pathways by these mutants because only very small amounts of protein could be isolated from the cultures.
To eliminate the possibility that Gab2-stimulated acinar growth under these conditions was in response to a low concentration of residual EGF present in the culture medium or to autocrine EGFR ligands, we tested the effect of gefitinib, a selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Addition of 0.5 µM gefitinib to three-dimensional cultures markedly reduced EGF-induced EGFR and Gab2 tyrosine phosphorylation, without affecting Gab2 protein levels (data not shown). However, for cells maintained in medium containing insulin alone, this concentration of gefitinib did not prevent Gab2-mediated growth enhancement (Fig. 7F), and the spheroids still underwent normal morphogenesis (data not shown). These data confirm that the effects of Gab2 in insulin-only cultures are independent of EGFR kinase activity.
Further Elevation of Gab2 Expression Results in a More Advanced PhenotypeAs described above, we originally generated three pools of MCF-10A cells designated as low, moderate, and high expressors of Gab2 (Fig. 1A). To evaluate the oncogenic potential of Gab2 in more detail, we characterized the "high expressing" pool. This level of Gab2 expression led to a more marked amplification of intracellular signaling, as indicated by the enhanced Erk activation in unstimulated cells as well as in cells treated with EGF for 1 and 5 min (Fig. 8A). This is in contrast to the "low expressing" pool, in which effects of Gab2 on Erk were observed only at 15 min and later (Fig. 1B). Upon monolayer culture, the high expressing cells exhibited an enhancement of the EGF-induced proliferation rate similar to the low expressing cells (data not shown). However, when grown in Matrigel,
30% of the high expressing cells formed large disorganized structures with defective luminal clearance and a lack of proliferative suppression. These effects were related to the degree of Gab2 overexpression, as indicated by GFP intensity (Fig. 8B). These findings lend further support to the hypothesis that deregulated Gab2 signaling contributes to mammary tumorigenesis.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
receptor I-mediated mast cell responses (14). However, the overexpression of Gab2 in a subset of breast cancer cell lines and primary breast cancers (19) raises the important question of its effects on mammary epithelial cells. Therefore, we have addressed this issue using three-dimensional culture of MCF-10A cells, which provides the opportunity to investigate a variety of biological endpoints. Furthermore, we have utilized this model system to characterize a series of Gab2 mutants and thus provide novel insights into the role of particular protein-protein interactions and effector pathways in Gab2 signaling. Overexpression of Gab2 at a magnitude similar to that observed in breast cancer cells confers three effects on MCF-10A cells in Matrigel culture. First, Gab2 enhances acinar diameter by increasing cell proliferation during the early stages of morphogenesis (Figs. 3 and 7). For cells growing in both EGF and insulin, Gab2/p85 binding (leading to stimulation of PI3K) and enhanced Erk activation both contribute to this effect (Figs. 5 and 6). These findings are consistent with the increased proliferation in MCF-10A acini expressing activated Akt (34) and the requirement for Erk in alveolar morphogenesis (37). Second, Gab2 overcomes the proliferative suppression that normally occurs in late stage cultures (Fig. 3). Interestingly, this does not occur upon expression of activated Akt alone (34), indicating that other pathways downstream of Gab2 must contribute to this effect. Finally, Gab2 overexpression results in independence of the morphogenetic program from exogenous EGF, so, in the presence of insulin only, the resulting structures are smaller than those observed upon culture with EGF, but still display a normal architecture and hollow lumen (Fig. 7). Certain aspects of the phenotype resulting from Gab2 overexpression resemble the effects of introducing the human papilloma virus-16 E7 oncoprotein into MCF-10A cells; this also results in larger acini with a normal lumen that escape proliferative suppression (23). However, E7 expression is insufficient to promote EGF-independent proliferation and morphogenesis (34).
|
p85 mutant of Gab2 cannot promote acinar morphogenesis in insulin-only cultures, one of these must be PI3K/Akt. This is consistent with the observation that coexpression of activated Akt with E7 overrides the dependence of the MCF-10A morphogenetic program on EGF (34). However, activated Akt alone cannot promote EGF independence (34), indicating that other pathways must contribute. This is supported by the requirement for Shp2 binding by Gab2 (Fig. 7E). Potential candidates are Stat5 (discussed below) and NF-
B, which has recently been demonstrated to function downstream of Gab2 (5). Also, it should be noted that high expression of Gab2 may promote c-Src activation via either Shp2 activation (10) or direct association (38) and that, in the Matrigel culture system, Gab2 may amplify integrin-derived signals (4). Therefore, the observed effect of Gab2 on MCF-10A cells growing in the presence of only insulin is likely to reflect its role in these pathways as well as its coupling to the activated insulin receptor and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor.
|
The MCF-10A system also provided a novel and powerful model system to characterize the biological activity of a series of Gab2 binding site mutants. Because receptor co-immunoprecipitation was markedly reduced for the
Grb2 mutant (Fig. 4B), Grb2 is required for Gab2 recruitment to the EGFR, as it is for Gab2 binding to c-Met (41). However, because introduction of the
Grb2 mutation also resulted in loss of EGF-induced Shc binding (Fig. 4C) and because the EGFR binds directly to both Shc and Grb2 (42), Gab2 may be coupled to the EGFR by either Grb2 alone or a Grb2·Shc complex. Both modes have been reported for recruitment of Gab proteins to particular receptors (3). Interestingly, the
Grb2 mutant is initially tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to EGF (Fig. 4A), but this effect is transient, presumably indicating that stable association with the EGFR is required to maintain tyrosine phosphorylation in the presence of protein-tyrosine phosphatase activity. Indeed, in three-dimensional cultures, tyrosine phosphorylation of the
Grb2 mutant was undetectable (Fig. 5B). Consistent with this finding, the
Grb2 mutant was unable to promote acinar growth under any of the growth conditions examined (Figs. 5 and 7). Interestingly, Grb2 binding to Gab2 was also required for acinar growth and morphogenesis in the presence of insulin (Fig. 7E). Because Grb2 is not thought to bind the insulin receptor and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor directly, one possibility to explain this observation is the assembly of an insulin receptor substrate-1·Grb2·Gab2 complex. A precedent for this is the formation of a fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate-2·Grb2·Gab1 complex in fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling (43).
The two other Gab2 binding partners that we investigated were the protein-tyrosine phosphatase Shp2 and the p85 subunit of PI3K. Recruitment of Shp2 by Gab proteins is critical for Erk activation in response to a variety of stimuli (3), and expression of Shp2 binding-defective Gab2 proteins in hepatocytes (38) and breast cancer cells (44) inhibits EGF-induced activation of this pathway. As expected from the role of Shp2 as a positive regulator of Ras, the
Shp2 mutant of Gab2 was unable to promote Erk activation in three-dimensional culture (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, Grb2 binding was reduced for the
Shp2 mutant (Fig. 4C), an observation consistent with a previous report describing a requirement for Shp2 for optimal Grb2 binding by Gab1 (45). This may indicate that a kinase that phosphorylates Grb2 SH2 domain-binding sites on Gab2 is positively regulated by Shp2 or that Grb2 binds via its SH2 domain to Gab2-bound, tyrosine-phosphorylated Shp2 (46). Either mode would provide an additional mechanism whereby Gab2 regulates Ras/Erk signaling.
However, Gab2/Shp2 binding is also important for cytokine-induced immediate-early gene activation independent of its effect on Erk (47), indicating at least one additional signaling function. Of interest in this regard, introduction of the
Shp2 mutation also reduced the ability of Gab2 to enhance Akt activation (Fig. 5B). Work by Neel and co-workers (45) has revealed a complex interplay between Shp2 and activation of PI3K in fibroblasts, with Shp2 negatively regulating PI3K signaling in response to EGF, but playing a positive role upon cellular stimulation with platelet-derived growth factor or insulin-like growth factor-1. For MCF-10A epithelial cells under our culture conditions, positive effects of Shp2 on PI3K activation must predominate. Possible mechanisms include Shp2-mediated activation of a kinase that phosphorylates the p85-binding sites on Gab2 and an indirect effect via Ras, which, in its GTP-bound form, binds and activates the PI3K p110 catalytic subunit (48). Operation of both mechanisms would explain why the
Shp2 mutations appear to have a more deleterious effect on Akt activation than loss of the p85-binding sites (Fig. 5B). The inability of the
Shp2 mutant of Gab2 to enhance activation of either Erk or Akt is consistent with its lack of effect on proliferation (Figs. 5 and 7).
For cells maintained in the presence of both EGF and insulin, deletion of the p85-binding sites on Gab2 impaired the ability of this docking protein to promote Akt activation and to increase acinar size (Figs. 5A and 6D). Because loss of p85 binding did not affect Erk activation (Fig. 5B), these data indicate that activation of PI3K via Gab2/p85 binding contributes to promotion of acinar growth. However, the size of acini expressing the
p85 mutant of Gab2 was not altered when Erk activity was reduced to control values by MEK inhibition (Fig. 6, C and D). The residual effect of the
p85 mutant on acinar size could be due to enhancement of PI3K activation by a mechanism independent of Gab2/p85 binding, e.g. via Ras, because a small increase in Akt activation was detectable in cells expressing the
p85 mutant (Fig. 5B). Alternatively, Gab2 may promote activation of one or more downstream pathways in addition to Erk and Akt. One possibility is the Stat5 pathway, which positively regulates cyclin D1 expression and thus may stimulate cell cycle progression (49). A potential link between Shp2 and Stat5 is provided by c-Src, which is activated by Shp2 (10) and can tyrosine-phosphorylate Stat5b, leading to its nuclear translocation (49). Also, Shp2 complexes with Stat5 and migrates with it into the nucleus (49). In support of this hypothesis, elevated Stat5 tyrosine phosphorylation is observed in cells expressing the leukemogenic Shp2 mutant E76K (18), and we observed increased basal Stat5 phosphorylation in Gab2-overexpressing MCF-10A cells (Fig. 1B). To summarize, enhanced activation of Erk (due to Shp2 binding) and PI3K/Akt (due to both Shp2 and p85 binding) contributes to enhancement of acinar growth by Gab2, but we cannot rule out a contribution from at least one other pathway.
The ability of Gab2 to stimulate cell cycle progression, to override proliferative suppression, and to induce growth factor independence is consistent with a role for this protein in mammary tumorigenesis. Because activating Shp2 mutations have been detected in certain leukemias and solid tumor types (50), Gab2 overexpression may represent an alternative mechanism to amplify this signaling pathway. Although inhibition of luminal clearance in MCF-10A acini occurred only upon further elevation of Gab2 expression, this may indicate that the levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated Gab2 must be increased above a particular threshold for oncogenic transformation to occur. This is consistent with the biological activity of the Gab2 S159A mutant, which is transforming in fibroblasts and exhibits enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation due to loss of negative feedback regulation (15). Notably, several receptor and non-receptor tyrosine kinases that couple to Gab2 exhibit enhanced expression and/or activity in breast cancer, including ErbB2 and c-Src (21, 51). Therefore, the cooperation between such kinases and Gab2 in malignant transformation of breast epithelial cells will be an important area for future study.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Both authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
2 Recipient of an Endeavor Australian postgraduate research fellowship. ![]()
3 Cancer Institute NSW Fellow. ![]()
4 Recipient of an Australian postgraduate award. ![]()
5 Cancer Institute NSW Scholar and recipient of an Australian postgraduate award. ![]()
6 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Cancer Research Program, Garvan Inst. of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St., Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia. Tel.: 61-2-9295-8333; Fax: 61-2-9295-8321; E-mail: r.daly{at}garvan.org.au.
7 The abbreviations used are: Gab, Grb2-associated binder; DOS, daughter of Sevenless; SH, Src homology; RANK, receptor activator of NF-
B; Grb2, growth factor receptor-bound 2; Erk, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; EGF, epidermal growth factor; HA, hemagglutinin; GFP, green fluorescent protein; Stat, signal transducer and activator of transcription; Rb, retinoblastoma protein; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase. ![]()
8 Primer sequences and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis conditions are available on request. ![]()
9 D. K. Lynch and R. J. Daly, unpublished data. ![]()
10 Primer details are available upon request. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|