![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 1, 99-106, January 6, 2006
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is a Repressor of Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase Gene Transcription*





From the
Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom, the ¶Department of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, the
Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, and the ||Molecular Oncology Group, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec H3A 1A1, Canada
Received for publication, August 23, 2005 , and in revised form, October 31, 2005.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is a downstream effector of the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1
in the regulation of genes important for mitochondrial oxidative capacity. PGC-1
is also a potent activator of the transcriptional program required for hepatic gluconeogenesis, and in particular of the key gluconeogenic enzyme phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK). We report here that the regulatory sequences of the PEPCK gene harbor a functional ERR
binding site. However, in contrast to the co-stimulating effects of ERR
and PGC-1
on mitochondrial gene expression, ERR
acts as a transcriptional repressor of the PEPCK gene. Suppression of ERR
expression by small interfering RNA leads to reduced binding of ERR
to the endogenous PEPCK gene, and an increase in promoter occupancy by PGC-1
, suggesting that part of the ERR
function at this gene is to antagonize the action of PGC-1
. In agreement with the in vitro studies, animals that lack ERR
show increased expression of gluconeogenic genes, including PEPCK and glycerol kinase, but decreased expression of mitochondrial genes, such as ATP synthase subunit
and cytochrome c-1. Our findings suggest that ERR
has opposing effects on genes important for mitochondrial oxidative capacity and gluconeogenesis. The different functions of ERR
in the regulation of these pathways suggest that enhancing ERR
activity could have beneficial effects on glucose metabolism in diabetic subjects by two distinct mechanisms: increasing mitochondrial oxidative capacity in peripheral tissues and liver, and suppressing hepatic glucose production. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is a nuclear receptor with high sequence similarity to the estrogen receptors, and the founding member of a small family of orphan receptors that also includes ERR
and ERR
(3, 4). Despite their similarity to estrogen receptors, ERRs are not activated by estrogens or other known natural agonists (reviewed in Refs. 5 and 6). Structural studies of ERR
and ERR
indicate that these receptors can achieve a transcriptionally active conformation in the absence of a ligand, and suggest that ERR activity may not be subject to regulation by small lipophilic molecules (7, 8). As an alternative mechanism of regulation, ERR
activity is controlled by the availability of specific coactivators that act as protein ligands (911). Notably, the transactivation function of ERR
is weak in many cells where other nuclear receptors are active, and is greatly enhanced by expression of the transcriptional coactivators PGC-1
or PGC-1
(911). PGC-1
not only activates the transcriptional function of ERR
but also induces the expression of this receptor (9). Consistent with the ability of PGC-1
to induce ERR
activity and expression, PGC-1
and ERR
show similar spatial and temporal expression patterns in vivo. They are co-expressed at high levels in tissues with high energy demands, and are co-induced in a tissue-specific manner in response to signals like fasting, exposure to cold, and physical exercise (9, 12, 13).
Several recent studies support a role for ERR
in the regulation of mitochondrial oxidative capacity. Binding sites for ERR
(ERR
response elements) are present in genes with roles in fatty acid oxidation (PPARA and ACADM), mitochondrial biogenesis (NRF2 and NRF1), the citric acid cycle (IDH3A), the respiratory chain (CYCS and ATP5B), and mitochondrial dynamics and function (MFN2) (1318). At these targets, ERR
co-operates with PGC-1
to induce gene expression (1618). Consistent with the ERR
functions observed in cell culture systems, ERR
null mice show defects in lipid metabolism and decreased expression of genes coding for fatty acid oxidation enzymes and oxidative phosphorylation components (18, 19).
The transcriptional coactivator PGC-1
coordinates, in a signal- and tissue-specific manner, the induction of genes important for multiple adaptive metabolic responses (reviewed in Ref. 20). PGC-1
functions in adaptive thermogenesis in brown adipose tissue (2123), and fiber-type specification in skeletal muscle (24), two processes that involve the regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and function. PGC-1
also regulates gluconeogenesis in liver (2527). The induction of hepatic gluconeogenesis during periods of fasting is an essential adaptive response that requires the enhanced transcription of genes encoding rate-determining gluconeogenic enzymes, such as phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and glucose-6-phosphatase (2831). Transcription of the PEPCK gene is tightly regulated by hormones, including glucagon, insulin, and glucocorticoids, via complex mechanisms that involve several transcription factors, such as HNF-4
, COUP-TFI, forkhead factors, the glucocorticoid receptor, C/EBPs, cAMP-response element-binding protein, and AP-1 (3235). PGC-1
, whose hepatic expression is increased upon fasting, contributes to the induction of the gluconeogenic genes PEPCK and glucose-6-phosphatase, via its interactions with HNF-4
, glucocorticoid receptor, and the forkhead factor FOXO1 (26, 3638). Importantly, increased expression of PGC-1
in the liver of fed animals is sufficient to inappropriately induce gluconeogenic enzymes and elevate blood glucose levels, a finding that underscores the possible involvement of this coactivator in the elevation of hepatic glucose production in the diabetic state (26).
Whereas a positive role of ERR
in PGC-1
-induced expression of mitochondrial genes has been established, the role of ERR
in the regulation of genes involved in hepatic glucose metabolism, including PGC-1
-stimulated gluconeogenesis, is not clear. ERR
is induced in the liver in response to fasting, but has been proposed to either be a repressor of general PGC-1
transcriptional activity (12) or to have no effect on gluconeogenic enzymes (17). Notably, the PEPCK gene promoter contains a sequence that resembles an ERRE and that overlaps with a site (glucocorticoid accessory factor 3 (gAF3)) critical for the activation of PEPCK transcription by PGC-1
(45). In this study, we address in vitro and in vivo the role of ERR
in the regulation of PEPCK gene expression. Our findings demonstrate that ERR
inhibits PEPCK gene expression, at least in part by restricting the interaction of PGC-1
with the PEPCK promoter. Furthermore, the repressive effect of ERR
is specific for gluconeogenic genes, whereas genes involved in mitochondrial respiratory function are activated by hepatic ERR
. The potential benefits of an ERR
role in reducing hepatic glucose production while increasing oxidative capacity are discussed.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
null mice in the C57BL/6 background has been described elsewhere (19). Mice were housed at 21 °C on a 12-h light-dark cycle and fed ad libitum with a standard diet containing 5% fat (Harland Tekland LM-485, Indianapolis, IN). For gene expression analysis, adult (810 weeks) ERR
null females and wild type littermates were fasted for 24 h and then fed for 5 h with standard diet. After the refeeding period, mice were euthanized, and tissues were removed and stored for subsequent analysis. All procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines for animal care and use of The Scripps Research Institute.
Plasmids and Adenoviral ConstructsLuciferase reporter constructs for wild type and mutant (AF3m
and AF3m
) PEPCK promoter, and expression plasmids for ERR
-VP16 and PGC-1
have been described previously (9, 39). pSG5/mERR
for the expression of full-length mouse ERR
was a gift of J.-M. Vanacker (40). Adenoviral vectors expressing GFP, ERR
, PGC-1
, ERR
-VP16, and small interfering RNA (siRNA) for human ERR
have been described (9, 16). The adenoviral vector expressing siRNA for rat ERR
was generated by CRE-lox-mediated recombination in CRE8 cells (41), and targets the sequence 5'-GAGCATCCCAGGCTTCTCC-3' of mouse and rat ERR
.
Cell Culture, Transfections, Luciferase Assays, and Adenovirus InfectionsH4IIE rat hepatoma cells were maintained as described (42). HepG2 and COS-7 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum. H4IIE cells were transfected with calcium phosphate-precipitated DNA (42). COS-7 and HepG2 cells were transfected using the FuGENE 6 reagent (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Luciferase reporter activities were determined
18 h after transfections using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega). For adenovirus infection, cells were infected first with the siERR
adenovirus or a control virus in 10-cm dishes and at a multiplicity of infection of 100, and then (3 days later) with GFP or PGC-1
expressing viruses and a second dose of the siERR
or control viruses (multiplicity of infection 50 each). Cells were harvested 24 or 48 h after the second infection.
Protein Extractions and Western BlotProtein lysates were prepared using either the NE-PER reagent (Pierce) (Fig. 1) or by lysis in Nonidet P-40 buffer (Figs. 2 and 4) as previously described (9), and subjected to Western analysis using antibodies against PGC-1
(9) and ERR
(43).
Electromobility Shift AssayElectromobility shift assays were performed as described previously (32). Nuclear extracts from COS-7 cells (about 1.5 µg/sample) transfected with an ERR
expression vector or H4IIE cells (about 8 µg/sample) were incubated with labeled probe and separated on an 8% polyacrylamide gel, in 0.5x TBE buffer at 25 mA (
180 V). Labeled probe and unlabeled oligonucleotides used for competition studies were as follows (5' to 3', the ERR
recognition site is shown bold, mutations are underlined): TCCCGGCCAGCCCTGTCCTTGACCCCCACCTGACAATTAAGG (PEPCK AF3 probe); GCGATTTGTCAAGGTCACACAGCGC (TR
); GCGATTTGTCAAGTGCACACAGCGC (TR
M4); GATCGGCCAGCCCACGAGTTGACCCCCACCTGACAATTAAGG (AF3m
); GATCGGCCAGCCCTGTCCTTAACACCCACCTGACAATTAAGG (AF3m
). Antibodies against ERR
(14) or COUP-TFI (44) were included in the incubation, as indicated in the figure legend.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation AssayChromatin immunoprecipitations were performed with antibodies against the glucocorticoid receptor (Santa Cruz, sc-1004), PGC-1
(Santa Cruz, sc-13067), or ERR
(14) as described (45).
RNA Isolation, Reverse Transcription, and Quantitative PCRTotal RNA was isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). RNA (400 ng) was reverse transcribed to cDNA using the SuperScript II RNase H-Reverse Transcriptase system (Invitrogen) and specific transcripts were quantitated by real-time PCR using the Chromo4 (MJ Research), gene-specific primers, and the SYBR GREEN system (Applied Biosystems). Sequences of the primers for human CYCS, ATP5B, isocitrate dehydrogenase subunit
, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase have been published (16). Other primers used in this study are as follows (gene, forward primer/reverse primer, 5' to 3'): human ERR
, TTCTCATCGCTGTCGCTGTCT/CAGCCGCCGCACTAGTTG; mouse and rat Err
, ATCTGCTGGTGGTTGAACCTG/AGAAGCCTGGGATGCTCTTG; human PEPCK, GAAAAAACCTGGGGCACAT/TTGCTTCAAGGCAAGGATCTCT; mouse Pepck, ATCTTTGGTGGCCGTAGACCT/GCCAGTGGGCCAGGTATTT; rat Pepck, GAGTGCCCATCGAAGGCAT/CCAGTGCGCCAGGTACTTG; mouse and rat glucose-6-phosphatase, TCCTCTTTCCCATCTGGTTC/TATACACCTGCTGCGCCCAT; mouse and rat PGC-1
, GGTACCCAAGGCAGCCACT/GTGTCCTCGGCTGAGCACT, mouse glycerol kinase, TGAAGTCAATTGGTTGGGTTACA/ATGCAGCCAGTGGCTTATGAA; mouse Atp5b, GCAAGGCAGGGACAGCAGA/CCCAAGGTCTCAGGACCAACA; mouse cytochrome c-1, ATTTCAACCCTTACTTTCCCG/CCACTTATGCCGCTTCATGGC; mouse cyclophilin, CAAGACTGAATGGCTGGATG/ATGGGGTAGGGACGCTCTCC. Relative mRNA levels for the specific genes were determined using the comparative threshold cycle method (Applied Biosystems, User Bulletin 2, 1997) and have been normalized to either glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA levels (for HepG2 cells) or cyclophilin mRNA levels (for mouse liver RNA). The two reference genes (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and cyclophilin) were not affected by PGC-1
and/or ERR
expression.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Binds to the Regulatory Sequences of the PEPCK GeneThe sequence of the gAF3 binding site in the PEPCK gene promoter shows a high degree of identity with known response elements for ERR
(14, 16, 46). This putative ERRE is conserved in the mouse, rat, and human PEPCK regulatory sequences (Fig. 1A). To test whether ERR
binds to this site, we used gel mobility shift assays. Incubation of nuclear extracts from COS-7 cells expressing ERR
with a labeled oligonucleotide containing the gAF3 sequence gave rise to a complex that could be supershifted with an anti-ERR
antibody but not with a nonspecific antibody (Fig. 1B). A 50-fold molar excess of an oligonucleotide containing a known ERRE from the TR
promoter (TR
) or the gAF3 sequence (AF3) effectively competed for the formation of the complex. However, oligonucleotides with mutations in the TR
-ERRE (TR
M4) or the gAF3-sequence (AF3m
and AF3m
) failed to compete for the formation of the complex, demonstrating that ERR
binds specifically the gAF3 site (Fig. 1B). Next, we asked if endogenous ERR
in H4IIE rat hepatoma cells recognizes the gAF3 site. Incubation of nuclear extracts of H4IIE cells with the gAF3 probe led to the formation of multiple complexes (Fig. 1C). As shown previously, an antibody against COUP-TFI, which also binds the gAF3 site, resulted in a supershift (39). An antibody specific for ERR
also caused a supershift (Fig. 1C), whereas a control antibody had no effect, demonstrating that endogenous ERR
binds the gAF3 site of the PEPCK promoter. Finally, we tested whether ERR
binds the endogenous PEPCK promoter in its chromatin context, using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. H4IIE cells were treated with no hormone or dexamethasone for 2 h. Cross-linked and sheared chromatin fragments were precipitated with either no antibody as control, an antibody against the glucocorticoid receptor or the anti-ERR
serum. The PEPCK promoter sequences containing the gAF3 site could be amplified from the precipitates with the ERR
-specific antibody but not from the control sample (Fig. 1D). In contrast to the binding of the glucocorticoid receptor, which requires the presence of hormone, ERR
binds to the PEPCK promoter independent of glucocorticoid treatment.
ERR
Inhibits the Induction of PEPCK Gene Expression by PGC-1
ERR
mediates the stimulatory effect of PGC-1
on the expression of several genes involved in mitochondrial function (16, 17). Because PGC-1
also stimulates the expression of PEPCK (25, 26), we tested whether ERR
could mediate the enhancing effect of PGC-1
on the PEPCK gene. We used adenoviral vectors to express ERR
and PGC-1
in HepG2 hepatoma cells. Expression of ERR
alone had no effect on basal PEPCK expression in these cells and PGC-1
-induced PEPCK expression as expected (26), however, coexpression of ERR
with PGC-1
repressed the stimulatory effect of PGC-1
(Fig. 2A). The decreased induction of PEPCK expression could not be accounted for by changes in PGC-1
expression (Fig. 2B). Next, we used a PEPCK luciferase reporter to test if ERR
acts through the promoter sequence present in this construct. Expression of PGC-1
in H4IIE hepatoma cells enhanced the expression of a PEPCK luciferase reporter, as shown previously (26, 45) (Fig. 2C). Increasing the cellular levels of ERR
, by transfecting increasing amounts of an ERR
expression plasmid, repressed the activity of the PEPCK luciferase reporter in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2C). These results indicate that ERR
exerts an inhibitory effect on the expression of PEPCK, and show that the regulatory sequence that drives the expression of the PEPCK luciferase reporter is sufficient to mediate both the induction by PGC-1
and the inhibition by ERR
.
A Constitutively Activating Form of ERR
Induces PEPCK Gene ExpressionThe observed inhibition of PEPCK expression by ERR
could be due to the ability of ERR
to bind the PEPCK promoter in a mode that supports repression of transcription. Alternatively, ERR
could be acting indirectly, e.g. by inducing a repressor of PEPCK expression or of PGC-1
function. We reasoned that, if ERR
acted as a bona fide repressor when bound to the PEPCK promoter, modification of the protein so that it functions as a constitutive activator of transcription should alter the regulatory effect on PEPCK. To test this, we expressed a chimeric protein consisting of the ERR
receptor and the potent activation domain VP16 (ERR
-VP16) (14). The expression of ERR
-VP16 induced endogenous PEPCK gene expression about 6-fold, compared with control GFP (Fig. 3A). These results support the notion that a transcriptional repressor function of wild type ERR
is required for the down-regulation of PEPCK expression. Moreover, ERR
-VP16 activated the PEPCK luciferase reporter gene, suggesting that it acts through the regulatory sequences present in this construct (Fig. 3B). Finally, in this context, we tested the role of the gAF3 site, by introducing two different mutations that prevent ERR
binding to the gAF3 site (Fig. 1B). In contrast to the wild type reporter, ERR
-VP16 did not enhance reporter activity from either one of these mutant reporter constructs. The inability of ERR
-VP16 to act on PEPCK promoter with the mutated AF3 site supports the notion that ERR
regulation of the PEPCK promoter depends on this promoter element.
|
|
Leads to an Enhancement of PEPCK ExpressionTo test the role of endogenous ERR
on the regulation of the PEPCK gene, we used an adenovirus that expresses a siRNA for ERR
and leads to efficient suppression of endogenous ERR
expression (Fig. 4A). Expression of PGC-1
in HepG2 cells led to the induction of endogenous ERR
, as has been shown in other cell types (9, 17, 47), and the siRNA for ERR
effectively suppressed this induction (16) (Fig. 4, A and B). Suppression of ERR
expression in HepG2 cells had no significant effect on basal PEPCK expression, but led to an increased induction of PEPCK mRNA by PGC-1
(Fig. 4C). The increased induction of PEPCK mRNA was not because of changes in PGC-1
protein levels, which were not affected by the siRNA for ERR
(Fig. 4B), suggesting that ERR
antagonizes PGC-1
action on the PEPCK gene promoter. These findings demonstrate that endogenous ERR
functions as a repressor of PEPCK gene expression. Furthermore, they suggest a possible feedback regulation loop, with PGC-1
inducing ERR
, and ERR
antagonizing the action of PGC-1
.
ERR
Antagonizes PGC-1
Recruitment to the PEPCK Gene PromoterTo obtain insight into the possible mechanism(s) by which ERR
inhibits PEPCK expression, we next used chromatin immunoprecipitation assays to determine the occupancy of ERR
and PGC-1
at the endogenous PEPCK regulatory site shown in Fig. 1. As expected from the ability of PGC-1
to induce ERR
expression, we observed that viral introduction of PGC-1
led to an increased binding of not only PGC-1
, as reported previously (45), but also of endogenous ERR
to the PEPCK gene promoter (Fig. 5A). Decreasing the amount of ERR
by siRNA effectively reduced the presence of ERR
at the PEPCK gene promoter, as expected. These results also underscored the specificity of the observed ERR
binding in this assay. Strikingly, the decrease in ERR
expression also led to an increase in the binding of endogenous PGC-1
to the PEPCK gene promoter region (Fig. 5, A and B). These results are consistent with a model where the presence of ERR
antagonizes the recruitment of PGC-1
to the PEPCK gene promoter.
|
Is Required for the Induction of Mitochondrial Gene Expression by PGC-1
in HepatocytesERR
mediates the PGC-1
-induced expression of genes involved in mitochondrial function in SAOS2 and C2C12 cells (16, 17). Next we asked if the repressive effect of ERR
on PEPCK gene expression in hepatocytes reflects a distinct function of ERR
in different cell types (e.g. liver versus muscle) or at different types of genes (e.g. gluconeogenic versus mitochondrial genes). To address this point we determined the effect that suppression of ERR
expression in HepG2 cells had on genes encoding mitochondrial proteins of the citric acid cycle (IDH3A encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase subunit
) or with a role in oxidative phosphorylation (CYCS and ATP5B, encoding cytochrome c, somatic, and the
subunit of ATP synthase). As shown in Fig. 6, the ability of PGC-1
to induce the expression of these 3 genes depends on the expression of endogenous ERR
. Suppression of ERR
levels led to a diminished induction by PGC-1
, despite the fact that PGC-1
was expressed comparably in the presence and absence of ERR
(protein levels for PGC-1
and ERR
shown in Fig. 4). These findings suggest that in the same cell type, ERR
mediates the enhancing effects of PGC-1
on one set of genes, while repressing a distinct set of PGC-1
-regulated genes.
|
Has Distinct Functions on the Two Different Sets of PGC-1
-regulated Genes in VivoTo test the notion that ERR
acts as a downstream effector of PGC-1
on some targets, such as genes that encode mitochondrial proteins, while repressing other targets, such as genes encoding critical enzymes in hepatic gluconeogenesis, we compared the expression of representative genes in the liver of mice lacking ERR
(ERR
knock-out) and their wild type littermates. Consistent with the in vitro experiments, the expression of several genes involved in gluconeogenesis, including PEPCK and glycerol kinase,3 was markedly increased in the liver of fed ERR
knock-out mice (Fig. 7A). The expression of glucose-6-phosphatase, another gluconeogenic gene, was also enhanced in ERR
knock-out animals, although the increase did not reach statistical significance (data not shown). Interestingly, there was no effect of ERR
on the induced levels of these genes in fasted animals, suggesting that the repressive function of ERR
is most apparent when PGC-1
levels are low4 (data not shown). In contrast, genes important for oxidative phosphorylation, including Atp5b and cytochrome c-1, were expressed at reduced levels in the liver of ERR
knock-out, compared with wild type animals, supporting the positive role of ERR
for their expression (Fig. 7B). These results support a view in which ERR
represses gluconeogenic gene expression parallel to enhancing mitochondrial gene expression in liver. Moreover, we noticed that ERR
null animals also express higher levels of hepatic PGC-1
in the fed state (Fig. 7C). These differences in PGC-1
expression, which have not been seen in the in vitro systems (Fig. 4 and data not shown), suggest that the repressive effects of ERR
on gluconeogenic gene expression in vivo may be exerted at multiple levels, and not only by direct binding to the promoters of PGC-1
target genes like PEPCK.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
that suppresses PEPCK gene expression. Our findings suggest that one physiological role of ERR
in liver is to limit the expression of the gluconeogenic program in the fed state, possibly by antagonizing the stimulatory effects of PGC-1
. Several lines of evidence support the repressive function of ERR
on PEPCK expression. First, ERR
binds to the PEPCK gene promoter. Second, overexpression of ERR
represses the induction of PEPCK by PGC-1
, whereas inhibition of ERR
expression results in enhanced PEPCK gene expression. Third, disruption of the ability of ERR
to repress, by combining it with a potent viral transcriptional activation domain, converts ERR
to an activator of PEPCK expression. Finally, animals that lack ERR
show increased PEPCK gene expression in the liver, compared with wild type littermates.
Previous studies have shown that ERR
interacts with an inhibitory domain of PGC-1
and represses the transcriptional activity of PGC-1
in transfection assays (12). ERR
was proposed to affect the subnuclear distribution of PGC-1
, and render PGC-1
less accessible to target promoters in general (12). Our findings in this study are consistent with these earlier observations in that ERR
indeed antagonizes the PGC-1
action at the PEPCK gene promoter. However, in the same cell where ERR
inhibits PGC-1
action at the PEPCK gene, ERR
also mediates the enhancing effects of PGC-1
on genes encoding mitochondrial proteins of the oxidative phosphorylation system, such as CYCS and ATP5B. Thus, ERR
represses in a promoter-specific manner, and is not a general inhibitor of PGC-1
activity.
Consistent with gene-specific repression by ERR
, we find that ERR
binds at the previously characterized gAF3 site of the PEPCK promoter. It is not yet clear how the ERR
binding site at the PEPCK gene promoter is distinct from the similar ERR
binding sites at the promoters of ATP5B and CYCS (Fig. 1A). Notably, the gAF3 site at the PEPCK gene promoter is recognized by other nuclear receptors as well (e.g. RAR/RXR, COUP-TFs), and is important for responsiveness to both glucocorticoids and PGC-1
(39, 45). It is possible that ERR
bound at the gAF3 site fails to cooperate properly with adjacent transcription factors, as well as prevents the binding of another factor, perhaps a nuclear receptor, that promotes the formation of a transcriptionally active and PGC-1
-responsive complex. Alternatively, ERR
bound at the gAF3 sequence may actively recruit co-repressors. Furthermore, the finding that mice lacking ERR
have increased PGC-1
expression suggests that ERR
in vivo affects gluconeogenic gene expression by multiple mechanisms, including ones that limit PGC-1
expression. Further studies will be required to understand fully the underlying molecular mechanisms by which ERR
regulates PEPCK gene expression.
The induction of PEPCK gene expression during fasting is a prerequisite for the activation of hepatic gluconeogenesis and maintenance of circulating glucose levels. Suppression of PEPCK expression in the fed state is equally important for proper glucose homeostasis. Multiple signals repress PEPCK transcription, including insulin and high glucose concentrations, but the mechanisms employed are not well understood. The ability of ERR
to repress PEPCK expression manifests in vivo in the fed state as inappropriately elevated hepatic PEPCK mRNA levels in ERR
null animals. Future studies will need to address if ERR
is part of a pathway that mediates the repressive effects of insulin or high glucose. Notably, despite the elevated expression of several rate-determining gluconeogenic genes, ERR
null mice do not have increased plasma glucose levels at the fed state (data not shown). The apparent lack of effect on glucose homeostasis may be explained by a decreased capacity of ERR
null hepatocytes for mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and supply of ATP, similarly to what has been proposed for PGC-1
null animals that have increased hepatic gluconeogenic gene expression and normal plasma glucose levels in the fed state (22). Moreover, possible decreases in mitochondrial oxidative metabolism in peripheral tissues may result in increased peripheral utilization of glucose and mask increases in hepatic glucose production.
Interestingly, we observed no differences in the induced, fasted levels of PEPCK mRNA in wild type and ERR
knock-out animals, even though ERR
levels are increased by fasting (12) (and data not shown). It is possible that hormonal signals (e.g. cAMP) regulate the transcriptional activity of ERR
, and inactivate its repressor function at the PEPCK gene. The high ERR
levels that accumulate during fasting may serve to poise the system for fast and efficient repression as soon as food and associated repressive signals arrive. Additionally, it is likely that ERR
in the fasted state has other roles in hepatocytes, not addressed here.
Even though ERRs have no natural ligands yet, searches for synthetic ligands have identified inverse agonists, as well as partial agonists, that can modulate ERR signaling pathways (5258). At present, it is not clear how such ligands will modulate ERR
activity in contexts where ERR
represses, such as at the PEPCK gene. Because ERR
regulates its own expression in an autoregulatory loop (17, 47), putative agonist ERR
ligands are likely to increase ERR
expression (54), and thus may enhance the native functions of ERR
, including enhancement of mitochondrial genes and suppression of gluconeogenic gene expression. If so, agonists of ERR
may exert beneficial effects in the treatment of diabetes by two mechanisms: (i) increasing mitochondrial function and oxidative capacity (1618), and (ii) inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis and lowering plasma glucose levels.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037. Tel.: 858-784-7287; Fax: 858-784-9132; E-mail: kralli{at}scripps.edu.
2 The abbreviations used are: ERR, estrogen-related receptor; PEPCK, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; ATP5B, ATP synthase subunit
; CYCS, cytochrome c somatic; PGC-1, peroxisome-proliferator activator receptor
coactivator-1; siRNA, small interfering RNA; GFP, green fluorescent protein; gAF3, glucocorticoid accessory factor 3; ERRE, ERR response element; COUP-TF, chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor; HNF-4, hepatic nuclear factor 4. ![]()
3 A putative ERRE is present in the regulatory sequence of the glycerol kinase gene (Fig. 1A). ![]()
4 PGC-1
protein is detectable in hepatic nuclear extracts from fed animals, albeit at lower levels than in ones from fasted mice (48). Consistent with ERR
repression being most apparent when PGC-1
levels are low, the repressive function of ERR
on PEPCK gene transcription in HepG2 cells can be overcome by expressing PGC-1
at 58-fold higher levels than the ones shown in Fig. 4 (data not shown). ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|