Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M513192200 on February 15, 2006

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 16, 10778-10785, April 21, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/16/10778    most recent
M513192200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feng, J.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, S.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feng, J.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, S.-J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Gene ncgl2918 Encodes a Novel Maleylpyruvate Isomerase That Needs Mycothiol as Cofactor and Links Mycothiol Biosynthesis and Gentisate Assimilation in Corynebacterium glutamicum*

Jie Feng{ddagger}1, Yongsheng Che{ddagger}1, Johanna Milse§, Ya-Jie Yin{ddagger}, Lei Liu{ddagger}, Christian Rückert§, Xi-Hui Shen{ddagger}, Su-Wei Qi{ddagger}, Jörn Kalinowski§, and Shuang-Jiang Liu{ddagger}2

From the {ddagger}State Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources at Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, People's Republic of China, the §Institut für Genomforschung, Universität Bielefeld, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany, and the Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, People's Republic of China

Received for publication, December 12, 2005 , and in revised form, January 23, 2006.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Data mining of the Corynebacterium glutamicum genome identified 4 genes analogous to the mshA, mshB, mshC, and mshD genes that are involved in biosynthesis of mycothiol in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium smegmatis. Individual deletion of these genes was carried out in this study. Mutants mshC– and mshD– lost the ability to produce mycothiol, but mutant mshB– produced mycothiol as the wild type did. The phenotypes of mutants mshC– and mshD– were the same as the wild type when grown in LB or BHIS media, but mutants mshC– and mshD– were not able to grow in mineral medium with gentisate or 3-hydroxybenzoate as carbon sources. C. glutamicum assimilated gentisate and 3-hydroxybenzoate via a glutathione-independent gentisate pathway. In this study it was found that the maleylpyruvate isomerase, which catalyzes the conversion of maleylpyruvate into fumarylpyruvate in the glutathione-independent gentisate pathway, needed mycothiol as a cofactor. This mycothiol-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase gene (ncgl2918) was cloned, actively expressed, and purified from Escherichia coli. The purified mycothiol-dependent isomerase is a monomer of 34 kDa. The apparent Km and Vmax values for maleylpyruvate were determined to be 148.4 ± 11.9 µM and 1520 ± 57.4 µmol/min/mg, respectively (mycothiol concentration, 2.5 µM). Previous studies had shown that mycothiol played roles in detoxification of oxidative chemicals and antibiotics in streptomycetes and mycobacteria. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that mycothiol is essential for growth of C. glutamicum with gentisate or 3-hydroxybenzoate as carbon sources and the first characterization of a mycothiol-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mycothiol (1), also known as MSH and chemically 1D-myo-inosityl-2-(N-acetyl-L-cysteinyl)amido-2-deoxy-{alpha}-D-glucopyranoiside, is the major low-molecular mass thiol in mycobacteria and streptomycetes (2). Some investigations showed that mycothiol is associated with protection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium smegmatis against antibiotics such as rifampin (3, 4) and also helped these pathogens to detoxify reactive oxygen species produced by host cells (5). Thus, mycothiol is a potential target for medical treatment and has raised interest from both academia and industry. In addition, mycothiol also has the ability to protect cells against a range of toxic compounds. For example, in Amycolatopsis methanolica and Rhodococcus erythropolis, mycothiol detoxifies formaldehyde by acting as a cofactor for a formaldehyde dehydrogenase (6) and detoxifies alkylating agents such as monobromobimane by converting them to S-conjugates of mycothiol (7, 8). To date, the understanding of the physiological function of mycothiol is limited to detoxification and the protection of living cells (9), whereas essential metabolic roles for cell growth have not been reported.

A survey on the distribution of low-molecular mass thiols in microorganisms showed that Corynebacterium diphtheriae produced mycothiol (2). However, the occurrence of mycothiol in other Corynebacterium species has not been reported, and the physiological function of mycothiol in corynebacteria is still not well defined. The genus Corynebacterium covers both medical and industrial important species. For example, Corynebacterium glutamicum is commercially used for production of amino acids and vitamins (10), and C. diphtheriae is a pathogen for human beings. Recently, the genomes of C. glutamicum (11, 12), Corynebacterium efficiens, C. diphtheriae (13), and Corynebacterium jeikeium (14) have been sequenced. This greatly stimulated the study of the physiology of corynebacteria. Consequently, C. glutamicum has been newly characterized for its robust ability to metabolize aromatic compounds (15–17), and a novel glutathione-independent gentisate pathway has been described (18).

The biosynthesis of mycothiol was characterized in M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis, and the genes mshB, mshC, and mshD were found encoding for the enzymes that sequentially catalyze the formation of mycothiol from 1D-myo-inosityl-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-{alpha}-D-glucopyranoside (GlcNAc-Ins). A fourth gene, mshA, is involved in the production of GlcAc-Ins, but the substrate of MshA has not been identified (9). Orthologs of these msh genes could be found in the genome data of the Corynebacterium species, but their functions in biosynthesis of mycothiol have not been proven experimentally.

During our studies on biosynthesis of mycothiol and assimilation of aromatic compounds with C. glutamicum, we found that mycothiol-negative mutants lost the ability to grow on several aromatic compounds. This surprising discovery raised the question of how mycothiol is involved in aromatic compound assimilation/degradation. In this report, our results indicate that mycothiol functions as an essential growth factor for C. glutamicum when gentisate and 3-hydroxybenzoate are provided as carbon sources. We further linked the biosynthesis of mycothiol to gentisate assimilation by identification of a mycothiol-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase in C. glutamicum.


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions—Bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Escherichia coli strains were grown aerobically on a rotary shaker (150 rpm) at 37 °C in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or on LB plate with 1.5% (w/v) agar. C. glutamicum, Streptomyces clavuligerus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptomyces coelicolor were routinely grown in LB media on a rotary shaker (150 rpm) at 30 °C. To determine the growth with aromatic compounds, C. glutamicum strains were grown in mineral salts medium, pH 8.4, supplemented with 0.05 g liter–1 of yeast extract (15), on a rotary shaker (150 rpm) at 30 °C. Aromatic compounds were added at final concentrations of 2 mM. Cellular growth was monitored by measuring the turbidity at 600 nm. For generation of mutants and maintenance of C. glutamicum, BHIS (brain/heart broth with 0.5 M sorbitol) medium was used. When needed, antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: kanamycin, 50 µg ml–1 for E. coli and 25 µg ml–1 for C. glutamicum.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study

 
Construction of Plasmids for Site-specific Gene Deletion—Plasmids pK18mobsacB{Delta}ncgl1055, pK18mobsacB{Delta}ncgl1457, and pK18mobsacB-{Delta}ncgl2487 were constructed using the gene-SOEing method described by Horton (19). The primers used are listed in Table 1. The primary products were amplified using fusion DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs). The resulting products were purified using the PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and then used as templates for the second round of PCR. The final products were digested with restriction enzymes corresponding to the cleavage sites introduced via PCR and ligated into appropriately digested pK18mobsacB. The ligation mixture was used to transform E. coli DH5{alpha}MCR, the transformants were selected on LB plates containing 50 µg ml–1 kanamycin and 40 µg ml–1 X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside).

To generate mutants in mycothiol biosynthesis from C. glutamicum, site-specific gene deletion was performed using the above generated pK18mobsacB derivatives that are not replicable in C. glutamicum and allow for marker-free deletion of the target genes (20). The resulting plasmids pK18mobsacB{Delta}ncgl1055, pK18mobsacB{Delta}ncgl1457, and pK18mobsacB{Delta}ncgl2487 were transformed into C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 by electroporation (21). Integration of the introduced plasmids into the chromosome by single crossover was tested by selection on BHIS plates containing 25 µgml–1 kanamycin. For the deletion of the target gene, the kanamycin-resistant (KmR) cells were grown overnight in liquid BHIS and spread on BHIS plates containing 10% sucrose. Cells growing on this plate were tested for kanamycin sensitivity (KmS) by parallel picking on BHIS plates containing either kanamycin or sucrose. Sucrose-resistant and kanamycin-sensitive cells were then tested for deletion by PCR, using the corresponding DF1 and DR2 primer pair (Table 1).

Extraction and Determination of Mycothiol in Wild Type and Mutants of C. glutamicum—The detection of mycothiol from C. glutamicum cells was carried out according to the procedures as described by Newton et al. (2) and was modified. One milliliter of 50% warm (60 °C) acetonitrile containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and 2 mM bromobimane (Sigma) was added to a tube that contained 200 mg of frozen cells, sonificated at 60 °C for 20 s, and maintained in a 60 °C water bath for 15 min in dark. After acidification with 5 µl of 5 N methanesulfonic acid, the cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min. Supernatants were diluted 3-fold in aqueous 10 mM methanesulfonic acid prior to HPLC3 analysis. The bimane derivatives of various thiols were separated and detected with HPLC that was equipped with a C18 column (ZORBAX, 250 x 4.6 mm) and was operated at the following conditions. The column was first eluted with 10% methanol (in water) for 5 min, and then the methanol content was increased to 100% in 10 min. The bimane derivative of mycothiol was eluated at 11.79 min in this system.

Heterologous Expression of the Maleylpyruvate Isomerase Gene in E. coli and Purification of Recombinant Protein—The expression plasmid pET28a-ncgl2918 was described previously (18). The plasmid was electroporated into E. coli BL21(DE3). Synthesis of recombinant protein in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells was initiated by addition of 0.5 mM isopropyl 1-thio-beta-D-galactopyranoside when the culture reached A600 of 0.6–0.8 and continued cultivation for an additional 8 h at 25°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and were disrupted by sonification at 4 °C (160 W, 3 s sonifying versus 5 s break, 50 cycles) in Tris-HCl buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). Cellular lysate was centrifuged and the supernatant was used for protein purification. Recombinant protein was purified with the His-Bind protein purification kit (Novagen, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's instructions. To remove any residue proteins, imidazole, and salts in the collected fractions, fractions were pooled and were further separated by SuperdexTM 200 gel chromatography with Tris-HCl buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). All steps of chromatography were controlled by the fast protein liquid chromatography system (Äkta FPLC, Amersham Biosciences). The purified protein was concentrated by ultrafiltration through Millipore Ultra-15 (10 kDa) and stored at –70 °C.

Determination of Molecular Mass of the Purified Proteins—The native molecular mass of the maleylpyruvate isomerase was estimated by gel filtration chromatography on a prepacked Superdex 200 column (Amersham Biosciences). The column was equilibrated and eluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) containing 100 mM NaCl at a flow rate of 0.4 ml min–1. Molecular mass was calculated according to their elution volume and calibrated with the molecular mass standard kit (MW-GF-1000, Sigma). The subunit molecular mass was determined with SDS-PAGE, which was conducted with a 5% stacking gel and 12% resolving gel and run in a Mini-PROTEIN II Electrophoresis Cell (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Apparent molecular mass was estimated according to the relative mobility to protein standards with molecular mass ranging from 14 to 97 kDa.

Enzymatic Preparation of Maleylpyruvate and Determination of Maleylpyruvate Isomerase Activity—Maleylpyruvate was prepared from gentisate by gentisate 1,2-dioxygenase digestion (18) in a system containing (total volume 3 ml): 0.1 mM gentisate, 5 µl of recombinant 1,2-dioxygenase from E. coli, 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0. After incubation at room temperature for 3 min (complete conversion of gentisate to maleylpyruvate), this mixture was used as the crude maleylpyruvate preparation without any further purification. For determination of maleylpyruvate isomerase activity, 10 µl of boiled cellular lysate of C. glutamicum and 5–10 µl of maleylpyruvate isomerase preparations were added to the above crude maleylpyruvate preparation. The maleylpyruvate isomerase activity was qualitatively monitored by scanning the spectral absorption changes at 250–400 nm with a UV visible spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter DU800) at a wavelength interval of 1 nm, and was quantitatively determined by measuring the decrease of absorbance at 330 nm due to maleylpyruvate disappearance. Rates of isomerization of maleylpyruvate to fumarylpyruvate were calculated with a value of 2,400 cm–1 M–1 for the extinction changes at 330 nm (22). To test if coenzyme A and cysteine support maleylpyruvate isomerase activity, coenzyme A and cysteine (each 0.01 mM) were included in the assay broth. Protein concentration was determined according to the method of Bradford (23), with bovine serum albumin as the standard.

Preparation and Treatment of Various Bacterial Cellular Lysates—To evaluateifthefollowingbacteriacontainedthefactorthatsupportedmaleylpyruvate isomerase from C. glutamicum, cells of about 0.15 g from each of S. clavuligerus, B. megaterium, B. subtilis, S. coelicolor, and mutants of mshB, mshC, and mshD of C. glutamicum were disrupted by sonification at 4 °C (160 watts, 3 s sonifying versus 5 s break, 50 cycles) in Tris-HCl buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). Cellular debris was separated by centrifugation and the resulting supernatants were boiled for 5 min to eliminate any enzyme activities. The boiled supernatants (10 µl) were added to the maleylpyruvate isomerase activity assay mixtures, as described above.

Isolation of Mycothiol from C. glutamicum—Isolation and purification of mycothiol from C. glutamicum was carried out by integration of Sephadex LH20 chromatography and the methods of Newton et al. (24) with a thiol-affinity chromatography and Steenkamp et al. (25) with HPLC. Frozen cells (37 g) of C. glutamicum were thawed in 74 ml of 0.75 M perchloric acid. Acid-insoluble cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant was adjusted to pH 4.5 with 4 M KOH and then stored at 0 °C for 30 min. Precipitated potassium perchlorate was removed by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant (81 ml) was mixed with 27 ml of buffer A (0.4 M Tris-HCl, 2 M NaCl, 4 mM EDTA, pH 7.5). The mixture was applied onto a thiopropyl-SepharoseTM 6B column (Amersham Biosciences). The column was washed using 80 ml of buffer B (0.1 M Tris-HCl, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5). The column was then eluted with 60 ml of buffer C (0.1 M Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 30 mM dithiothreitol, pH 7.5). Regeneration of this thiolpropyl-Sepharose 6B column was performed with 1.5 mM 2,2'-dipyridyl disulfide, according to instructions from the Thiolpropyl-Sepharose 6B supplier (Amersham Biosciences, catalog number 17-0420-01). The active eluant (2 ml) was applied onto a Sephadex LH20 column (Amersham Biosciences) and fractionated using 50% methanol in water, pH 4.5. The active fractions were concentrated with a rotary evaporator (Ratavapor, BÜCH RE121, Switzerland), lyophilized, and finally dissolved in water. Further purification of mycothiol was carried out with HPLC using isocratic elution (2% acetonitrile, 0.45% propionic acid) on a C18 column (ZORBAX, 250 x 4.6 mm).

Mass Spectrometry—Positive-ion electrospray mass spectrometry analyses were performed on an Agilent 1100 LC/MSD Trap XCT instrument (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). Instrument control, data acquisition, and data processing were done using the Agilent 1100 Chemstation (version 10.02) and Data Analysis (version 5.1) software. The instrument was operated in full-scan mode. Acquisition was performed in the continuum mode, and the acquisition parameters were as follows: tune source: trape drive (39.9), octopole RF amplitude (187.1 vpp), capillary exit (94.8 V), skim 1 (40.0 V), skim 2 (–5.0 V), dry temperature (325 °C), nebulizer (50.00 p.s.i.), nitrogen gas (10.00 liters/min), HV capillary (2680 V), HV end-plate offset (–500 V). The scan (average of three spectra) was between m/z 100–550 with maximal Accu time of 200,000 µs and ICC target of 200,000. Fragmentation was set with SmartFrag Ampl between 30 and 200%, fragmentation width, 10.00 m/z; fragmentation time, 40,000 µs; and fragmentation delay, 0 µs.

Kinetic Measurements—Michaelis-Menten kinetics of the maleylpyruvate isomerization catalyzed with isomerase from C. glutamicum was identified by plotting reaction rates against substrate concentrations (ranging from 66 to 380 µM) at a mycothiol concentration of 2.5 µM. The apparent Km and Vmax values were determined by nonlinear regression analysis of the plots of the initial isomerization rates and substrate concentrations.

Effects of Metal Ions and Chemicals on Maleylpyruvate Isomerase Activity—To test the effects of various metal ions and chemicals on the mycothiol-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Mn2+, Fe3+, Zn2+ (each 1 mM), GSH (0.05 mM), dithiothreitol (0.05 mM), EDTA (1 and 10 mM), and bromobimane (1 mM) were incubated in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, with the enzyme for 15 min at room temperature. The activities of the treated enzymes were assayed as described above. The enzyme without treatment was run in parallel as control.


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1.
Determination of mycothiol production by C. glutamicum wild type and msh mutants. A, wild type; B, mutant mshB–; C, mutant mshC–; D, mutant mshD–.

 

   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis, mycothiol is synthesized through the catalysis by the MshA, MshB, MshC, and MshD proteins (9). Putative genes orthologous to those encoding for MshA, MshB, MshC, and MshD were identified in the genomes of C. glutamicum and other Corynebacterium species (Table 2). To identify the functions of these genes, efforts on generation of mutations within these genes were made. C. glutamicum deletion mutants in mshB, mshC, and mshD were successfully constructed, and the mutation of each gene was subsequently confirmed by PCR. HPLC analysis showed that wild type and the mshB– mutant produced mycothiol, and mshB– produced about 5% of the wild type, but the mutants mshC– and mshD– did not produce detectable levels of Msh (Fig. 1, A–D).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2
BLAST searching results and annotated and identified functions of genes involved in mycothiol biosynthesis of C. glutamicum

 
All the mutants mshB–, mshC–, and mshD– grew as well as the wild type strain of C. glutamicum, and there were no significant phenotypic differences observed, when cultivated in LB and BHIS media. However, we found that the mutants mshC– and mshD– lost the ability to grow on gentisate as the sole carbon source (Fig. 2). To see if their abilities to grow on other aromatic compounds were disturbed, these mutants were tested for growth on various aromatic compounds as carbon sources. The results obtained showed that mutants mshC– and mshD– also lost the ability to grow on 3-hydroxybenzoate, but their ability to assimilate 4-hydroxybenzoate, benzoate, phenol, and resorcinol was not disturbed (Table 3). Previous studies revealed that (i) benzoate was assimilated through the catechol 1,2-dioxygenase pathway (17), (ii) 4-hydroxybenzoate was assimilated through the protocatechulate 3,4-dioxygenase and the beta-ketoadipate pathway (15), (iii) resorcinol was assimilated through the hydroxyquinol 1,2-dioxygenase pathway (16), and (iv) 3-hydroxybenzoate as well as gentisate were assimilated through a glutathione-independent gentisate pathway (18). Thus, we deduced that there might be a link between the glutathione-independent gentisate pathway and mycothiol biosynthesis in C. glutamicum.


Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2.
Growth of C. glutamicum wild type and msh mutants on gentisate as the carbon source. Data are average of three parallel cultures.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3.
Alignment of Ncgl2918 and its orthologs. All conserved amino acid residues are shown shaded. Each sequence is led by the species name from which the sequence was derived, and followed by the GenBankTM accession number of the sequence. The sequence identities of CE2858, SdgF, Nfa2300, SCO1959, SAV6285 to Ncgl2918 are 82, 36, 29.1, 31, and 27%, respectively.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3
Phenotypes of C. glutamicum wild type and msh mutants on various aromatic compounds as sole carbon and energy sources

Cells were grown in minimal medium with each aromatic compound (2 mM) at 30°C, rotatory shaking of 150 rpm for 9 h. Cell density (growth) is indicated by the increase of absorption at 600 nm (A600). Data are averages from three parallel cultures.

 
Genes encoding for the gentisate 1,2-dioxygenase (ncgl2920), maleylpyruvate isomerase (ncgl2918), and fumarylpyruvate hydrolase (ncgl2919) in the glutathione-independent gentisate pathway were functionally identified in C. glutamicum (18). The gene ncgl2918 encoding for the maleylpyruvate isomerase in C. glutamicum was not homologous to the known maleylpyruvate isomerase genes mhbI from Klebsiella pneumoniae (26) and nagL from Ralstonia strain U2 (27), which encode a glutathione-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase. Rather, ncgl2918 is homologous to a group of genes encoding for hypothetical proteins in C. efficiens (CE2858), Streptomyces strain WA46 (sdgF), S. coelicolor (SCO1959), Streptomyces avermitilis (SAV6285), and Nocardia farcinica (nfa2300) (Fig. 3). Ncgl2918 was identified to be a maleylpyruvate isomerase that did not rely on glutathione (18), or coenzyme A, or cysteine as cofactor (this study). However, results from this study showed that when this C. glutamicum isomerase was expressed in E. coli its activity was dependent on some cofactor occurring in boiled cellular lysates of C. glutamicum (Table 4). It was further found that such a cofactor also existed in cellular lysates of S. coelicolor and S. clavuligerus, but not in B. subtilis and B. megaterium that was reported to have a glutathione-independent maleylpyruvate isomerase activity (Table 4) (22). This cofactor disappeared when bromobimane, a thiol-binding agent, was added to the boiled cellular lysate of C. glutamicum (Table 4), indicating that this cofactor probably has a thiol group.


Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4.
Purification and identification of mycothiol with HPLC and positive-ion electrospray mass spectrometric analyses. A, purification of mycothiol with HPLC. B, mass spectrum of mycothiol with pseudo-molecular ions at m/z 487.1 ([M + H]+) and 509.2 ([M + Na]+). C, mass spectrum produced by MS2 analysis on the pseudo-molecular ion at m/z 487.1. D, mass spectrum resulted from MS3 analysis of the fragment ion at m/z 307.1.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 4
Effects of boiled cellular lysates from various bacteria on maleylpyruvate isomerase activity

 
The cofactor that supported maleylpyruvate isomerase activity in C. glutamicum was purified (Fig. 4A) by following the procedures described under "Experimental Procedures." The purified cofactor was subjected to ESI and tandem MS analyses (Fig. 4, B–D). Positive-ion ESI-MS analysis of this compound produced pseudo-molecular ions at m/z 487.1 ([M + H]+) and m/z 509.2 [(M + Na+)]. The prominent fragment ion at m/z 307.1 resulted from the loss of an inositol-like unit (C6H12O6 (m/z 180)). The fragments at m/z 307.1 and m/z 273.1 of the MS/MS spectrum are corresponding to [(M + H) – C6H12O6]+ and [(M + H) – C6H12O6 – H2S]+, respectively. Upon MS3 analysis on m/z 307.1 (Fig. 3C), fragment ions at m/z 289.1 [(M + H) – C6H12O6 – H2O]+, m/z 273.1 [(M + H) – C6H12O6 – H2S]+, and m/z 255.0 [(M + H) – C6H12O6 – H2O – H2S]+ were observed. In addition, the observed signal at m/z 162.0 was rationalized as the [N-acetylcysteine]+ fragment. These spectral evidence indicated that the thiol-containing compound is mycothiol.


Figure 5
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5.
Isomerization of maleylpyruvate to fumarylpyruvate catalyzed by the mycothiol-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase (A) and absorption spectral changes during catalysis (B). The spectral changes were recorded at time intervals of 30 s.

 
Previously, mycothiol was detected in C. diphtheriae (2). Thus, the identification of mycothiol in C. glutamicum might indicate that mycothiol is common in corynebacteria. When the purified mycothiol was added to the maleylpyruvate isomerase from C. glutamicum produced in recombinant E. coli, significant isomerase activity was observed in the enzyme assay (Fig. 5), indicating that the maleylpyruvate isomerase from C. glutamicum is mycothiol-dependent. Very recently, Newton et al. (28) have reported that the mshD– mutant of M. smegmatis produced altered thiols of N-formyl/succinyl-Cys-GlcN-Ins. The fact that the mshD– mutant of C. glutamicum did not produce remarkable amounts of altered thiols (Fig. 1D) indicated that there might be differences in mycothiol biosynthesis between corynebacteria and mycobacteria.

This mycothiol-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase from recombinant E. coli was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and gel filtration chromatography. Results showed a single protein band at 33 kDa in the SDS-PAGE and a molecular mass of 34 kDa in gel filtration chromatography. Thus, this mycothiol-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase of C. glutamicum is a monomeric enzyme. Amino acid sequence analysis revealed a cysteine residue at position 61 (Cys61). Treatment of the enzyme with thiolmodifying agents such as bromobimane, N-ethylmaleimide, p-chloromercuribenzoate, and iodoacetamide did not significantly inhibit the activity of the enzyme (18), indicating that the cysteine residue in this protein is not important for enzyme activity. Furthermore, alignment of several Ncgl2918 orthologs showed that the cysteine residue is not conserved (Fig. 3). In addition, site-directed mutation of this cysteine residue into the alanine residue did not cause a loss in enzymatic activity (data not shown). Divalent metal ions including Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, and Mn2+ (each 1 mM) did not affect the activity of the mycothiol-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase. Fe3+ (1 mM) showed a moderate inhibition with a residual activity of 85%. Zn2+ (1 mM) showed a moderate stimulation of activity to 121%. EDTA at 1 mM slightly increased activity, but when its concentration reached 10 mM, the activity was inhibited completely. The apparent Km and Vmax values for maleylpyruvate were determined to be 148.4 ± 11.9 µM and 1520 ± 57.4 µmol/min/mg, respectively.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
In this study, the biosynthesis of mycothiol in C. glutamicum and two essential genes, mshC (ncgl1457) and mshD (ncgl2487), involved in the biosynthetic pathway have been identified. Although the biosynthesis of mycothiol and the genes involved in the biosynthetic pathway in M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis are well understood (4, 29–32), the occurrence of mycothiol and its biosynthetic pathway had not been identified in corynebacteria. Mycothiol was detected in C. diphtheriae (2), as well as in C. glutamicum cells (this study). By genome data mining, genes orthologous to the Mycobacterium mshA, mshB, mshC, and mshD genes were identified in the genomes of C. glutamicum, C. efficiens, C. jeikeium, and C. diphtheriae, indicating a similar genetic organization for mycothiol biosynthesis as in mycobacteria. Deletion of individual msh genes (except mshA) in C. glutamicum demonstrated that mshC and mshD were essential for mycothiol production, whereas deletion of mshB resulted in a decrease in mycothiol production. Deletion of mshA was not successful up to now, and more efforts on identifying this gene are currently ongoing. Based on the results obtained in this study, it is reasonable to deduce that biosynthesis of mycothiol is common to the Corynebacterium species and that it is produced by a pathway similar to that in Mycobacterium species.

Mycothiol plays important roles in detoxification of thiol-reactive substances such as formaldehyde and some antibiotics (3, 5, 29). C. glutamicum was originally isolated from soil, and its strong ability to assimilate aromatic compounds has been described recently (16). The finding that mshC– and mshD– mutants of C. glutamicum have lost the ability to grow on gentisate and on 3-hydroxybenzoate was surprising, because no links between mycothiol biosynthesis and aromatic compound assimilation had been established. By examination of all enzymatic reactions involved in the pathway for gentisate and 3-hydroxybutyrate assimilation, we have proven that the isomerization of maleylpyruvate into fumarylpyruvate needs mycothiol as cofactor and that this is the key step that couples the mycothiol biosynthesis and the gentisate/3-hydroxybenzoate assimilation processes. In a very comprehensive review on the mycothiol biochemistry, Newton and Fahey wrote that "there may also be mycothiol-dependent processes, but their discovery will likely be more difficult" (9). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that mycothiol biosynthesis was found to be essential for cell growth when aromatic compounds are provided as carbon sources, and that a mycothiol-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase was identified.

Gentisate and substituted gentisates are key intermediates during aerobic degradation of many aromatic compounds, such as 3-hydroxybenzoate (26, 33, 34), 3,5- or 2,5-xylenol (35, 36), salicylate (37–39), 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoate (40), and naphthalene (41–43). In the gentisate pathway, isomerization of maleylpyruvate to fumarylpyruvate is catalyzed by either a GSH-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase (26, 27, 34), a mycothiol-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase (this study), or a maleylpyruvate isomerase as in B. megaterium that does not rely on glutathione or mycothiol (22). The discovery of a mycothiol-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase in C. glutamicum introduces a new category of maleylpyruvate isomerase, and constitutes significant progress on the way to understanding the gentisate pathway of aromatic assimilation/degradation. Considering the many similarities between mycothiol and glutathione metabolism, we believe that the mycothiol-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase is only one representative of enzymes that are analogous to glutathione-dependent glyxoylases, S-transferases, thioltransferases, etc., and that more mycothiol-dependent enzymes will be identified in the near future.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 30230010 and Chinese Academy of Sciences Grant KSCX2-SW-113. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

1 Both authors contributed equally to this work. Back

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhong-Guan-Cun, Haidian, Beijing 100080, P. R. China. Tel.: 86-10-62527118; Fax: 86-10-62652317; E-mail: liusj{at}sun.im.ac.cn.

3 The abbreviation used is: HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography. Back



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Spies, H. S., and Steenkamp, D. J. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 224, 203–213[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Newton, G. L., Arnold, K., Price, M. S., Sherrill, C., Delcardayre, S. B., Aharonowitz, Y., Cohen, G., Davies, J., Fahey, R. C., and Davis, C. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 1990–1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Newton, G. L., Unson, M. D., Anderberg, S. J., Aguilera, J. A., Oh, N. N., del Dcardayre, S. B., Av-Gay, Y., and Fahey, R. C. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 255, 239–244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Rawat, M., Newton, G. L., Ko, M., Martinez, G. J., Fahey, R. C., and Av-Gay, Y. (2002) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46, 3348–3355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Buchmeier, N. A., Newton, G. L., Koledin, T., and Fahey, R. C. (2003) Mol. Microbiol. 47, 1723–1732[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Misset-Smits, M., Ophem, P. W., Sakuda, S., and Duine, J. A. (1997) FEBS Lett. 409, 221–222[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Newton, G. L., Av-Gay, Y., and Fahey, R. C. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 10739–10746[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Rawat, M., Uppal, M., Newton, G. L., Steffek, M., Fahey, R. C., and Av-Gay, Y. (2004) J. Bacteriol. 186, 6050–6058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Newton, G. L., and Fahey, R. C. (2002) Arch. Microbiol. 178, 388–394[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Eggeling, L., and Bott, M. (2005) Handbook of Corynebacterium glutamiucm, 1st Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
  11. Kalinowski, J., Bathe, B., Bartels, D., Bischoff, N., Bott, M., Burkovski, A., Dusch, N., Eggeling, L., Eikmanns, B. J., Gaigalat, L., Goesmann, A., Hartmann, M., Huthmacher, K., Krämer, R., Linke, B., McHardy, A. C., Meyer, F., Möckel, B., Pfefferle, W., Pühler, A., Rey, D. A., Rückert, C., Rupp, O., Sahm, H., Wendisch, V. F., Wiegräbe, I., and Tauch, A. (2003) J. Biotechnol. 104, 5–25[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Ikeda, M., and Nakagawa, S. (2003) App. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 62, 99–109
  13. Cerdeno-Tarraga, A. M., Efstratiou, A., Dover, L. G., Holden, M. T., Pallen, M., Bentley, S. D., Besra, G. S., Churcher, C., James, K. D., De Zoysa, A., Chillingworth, T., Cronin, A., Dowd, L., Feltwell, T., Hamlin, N., Holroyd, S., Jagels, K., Moule, S., Quail, M. A., Rabbinowitsch, E., Rutherford, K. M., Thomson, N. R., Unwin, L., Whitehead, S., Barrell, B. G., and Parkhill, J. (2003) Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 6516–6523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Tauch, A., Kaiser, O., Hain, T., Goesmann, A., Weisshaar, B., Albersmeier, A., Bekel, T., Bischoff, N., Brune, I., Chakraborty, T., Kalinowski, J., Meyer, F., Rupp, O., Schneiker, S., Viehoever, P., and Pühler, A. (2005) J. Bacteriol. 187, 4671–4682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Shen, X. H., and Liu, S. J. (2005) Sci. China Ser. C 48, 241–249[CrossRef]
  16. Shen, X. H., Huang, Y., and Liu, S. J. (2005) Microbes Environm. 20, 160–167[CrossRef]
  17. Shen, X. H., Liu, Z. P., and Liu, S. J. (2005) Biotechnol. Lett. 26, 575–580
  18. Shen, X. H., Jiang, C. Y., Huang, Y., Liu, Z. P., and Liu, S. J. (2005) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 3442–3452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Horton, R. M. (1995) Mol. Biotechnol. 3, 93–99[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Schäfer, A., Tauch, A., Jäger, W., Kalinowski, J., Thierbach, G., and Pühler, A. (1994) Gene (Amst.) 145, 69–73[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Tauch, A., Kirchner, O., Löffler, B., Götker, S., Pühler, A., and Kalinowski, J. (2002) Curr. Microbiol. 45, 362–367[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Hagedorn, S. R., Bradley, G., and Chapman, P. J. (1985) J. Bacteriol. 163, 640–647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Newton, G. L., Bewley, C. A., Dwyer, T. J., Horn, R., Aharonowitz, Y., Cohen, G., Davies, J., Faulkner, D. J., and Fahey, R. C. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 230, 821–825[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Steenkamp, D. J., and Spies, H. S. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 223, 43–50[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Robson, N. D., Parrott, S., and Cooper, R. A. (1996) Microbiology 142, 2115–2120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Zhou, N. Y., Fuenmayor, S. L., and Williams, P. A. (2001) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 183, 700–708
  28. Newton, G. L., Ta, P., and Fahey, R. C. (2005) J. Bacteriol. 187, 7309–7316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Sareen, D., Newton, G. L., Fahey, R. C., and Buchmeier, N. A. (2003) J. Bacteriol. 185, 6736–6740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Sareen, D., Steffek, M., Newton, G. L., and Fahey, R. C. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 6885–6890[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Newton, G. L., Av-Gay, Y., and Fahey, R. C. (2000) J. Bacteriol. 182, 6958–6963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Koledin, T., Newton, G. L., and Fahey, R. C. (2002) Arch. Microbiol. 178, 331–337[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Goetz, F. E., and Harmuth, L. J. (1992) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 97, 45–49[CrossRef]
  34. Jones, D. C. N., and Cooper, R. A. (1990) Arch. Microbiol. 154, 489–495[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Jain, R. K. (1996) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 45, 502–508[CrossRef]
  36. Poh, C. L., and Bayly, R. (1980) J. Bacteriol. 143, 59–69[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Itoh, N., Yoshida, K., and Okada, K. (1996) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 60, 1826–1830[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Ohmoto, T., Sakai, K., Hamada, N., and Ohe, T. (1991) Agric. Biol. Chem. 55, 1733–1737
  39. Rani, M., Prakash, D., Sobti, R. C., and Jain, R. K. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 220, 377–381[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Werwath, J., Arfmann, H. A., Pieper, D. H., Timmis, K. N., and Wittich, R. M. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 4171–4176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Fuenmayor, S. L., Wild, M., Boyes, A. L., and Williams, P. A. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 2522–2530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Grund, E., Denecke, B., and Eichenlaub, R. (1992) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 1874–1877[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Monticello, D. J., Bakker, D., Schell, M., and Finnerty, W. R. (1985) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49, 761–764[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Ordonez, K. Van Belle, G. Roos, S. De Galan, M. Letek, J. A. Gil, L. Wyns, L. M. Mateos, and J. Messens
Arsenate Reductase, Mycothiol, and Mycoredoxin Concert Thiol/Disulfide Exchange
J. Biol. Chem., May 29, 2009; 284(22): 15107 - 15116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
G. L. Newton, N. Buchmeier, and R. C. Fahey
Biosynthesis and Functions of Mycothiol, the Unique Protective Thiol of Actinobacteria
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2008; 72(3): 471 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Bacteriol.Home page
K. P. Bzymek, G. L. Newton, P. Ta, and R. C. Fahey
Mycothiol Import by Mycobacterium smegmatis and Function as a Resource for Metabolic Precursors and Energy Production
J. Bacteriol., October 1, 2007; 189(19): 6796 - 6805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Wang, Y.-J. Yin, F. Wang, M. Li, J. Feng, H.-M. Zhang, J.-P. Zhang, S.-J. Liu, and W.-R. Chang
Crystal Structures and Site-directed Mutagenesis of a Mycothiol-dependent Enzyme Reveal a Novel Folding and Molecular Basis for Mycothiol-mediated Maleylpyruvate Isomerization
J. Biol. Chem., June 1, 2007; 282(22): 16288 - 15294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 MicrobiologyHome page
M. T. Chaudhry, Y. Huang, X.-H. Shen, A. Poetsch, C.-Y. Jiang, and S.-J. Liu
Genome-wide investigation of aromatic acid transporters in Corynebacterium glutamicum
Microbiology, March 1, 2007; 153(3): 857 - 865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
Y. Huang, K.-X. Zhao, X.-H. Shen, M. T. Chaudhry, C.-Y. Jiang, and S.-J. Liu
Genetic Characterization of the Resorcinol Catabolic Pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2006; 72(11): 7238 - 7245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/16/10778    most recent
M513192200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feng, J.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, S.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feng, J.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, S.-J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement