JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M602696200 on March 24, 2006

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 20, 14066-14075, May 19, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/20/14066    most recent
M602696200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, T. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Mediator Is a Transducer of Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling*

Seokjoong Kim{ddagger}, Xuan Xu{ddagger}, Andreas Hecht§, and Thomas G. Boyer{ddagger}1

From the {ddagger}Department of Molecular Medicine and the Institute of Biotechnology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78245-3207 and the §Institut für Molekulare Medizin und Zellforschung, Universität Freiburg, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany

Received for publication, March 22, 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Signal transduction within the canonical Wnt/beta-catenin pathway drives development and carcinogenesis through programmed or unprogrammed changes in gene transcription. Although the upstream events linked to signal-induced activation of beta-catenin in the cytoplasm have been deciphered in considerable detail, much less is known regarding the mechanism by which beta-catenin stimulates target gene transcription in the nucleus. Here, we show that beta-catenin physically and functionally targets the MED12 subunit in Mediator to activate transcription. The beta-catenin transactivation domain bound directly to isolated MED12 and intact Mediator both in vitro and in vivo, and Mediator was recruited to Wnt-responsive genes in a beta-catenin-dependent manner. Disruption of the beta-catenin/MED12 interaction through dominant-negative interference- or RNA interference-mediated MED12 suppression inhibited beta-catenin transactivation in response to Wnt signaling. This study thus identifies the MED12 interface within Mediator as a new component and a potential therapeutic target in the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Members of the Wnt family of secreted glycoproteins regulate a plethora of mammalian cell fate and behavioral decisions during embryogenesis and stem cell homeostasis (1, 2). These pleiotropic effects derive from distinct signal transduction pathways, each initiated by engagement of Wnt ligands with members of the seven-pass transmembrane receptors of the Frizzled family. The first and best characterized of these pathways, the canonical Wnt pathway, culminates in programmed changes in target gene transcription through the action of a key nuclear effector called beta-catenin (35). In the absence of Wnt signaling, the steady-state level of cytoplasmic beta-catenin is suppressed by a protein complex composed of Axin, the APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) tumor suppressor protein, and glycogen synthase kinase-3beta, the latter of which phosphorylates beta-catenin, marking it for destruction by the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway (610). Binding of Wnt ligand to Frizzled and its coreceptor LRP5/6 leads to inactivation of the Axin complex and stabilization of beta-catenin. Stabilized beta-catenin then translocates into the nucleus, whereupon its interaction with members of the T cell factor (TCF)2/lymphoid enhancer factor (LEF) family of DNA-binding proteins positions beta-catenin to activate transcription from the promoters of Wnt target genes that function in developmental regulation, cell proliferation, and cell/cell as well as cell/matrix interactions (1118). Dysregulation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling leading to unprogrammed transcription of Wnt target genes has been proposed to be a driving force in the development of many cancers, including colorectal cancers (1921).

Although the upstream events linked to signal-induced accumulation of beta-catenin in the cytoplasm have been deciphered in considerable detail, the underlying mechanism(s) by which beta-catenin activates transcription in the nucleus remains comparatively poorly understood. Thus, although beta-catenin has been proposed to overcome nucleosome-mediated promoter repression and/or to promote transcription preinitiation complex assembly through functional interactions with the catalytic subunit (BRG1) of the SNF/SWI chromatin remodeling complex, the histone acetyltransferases p300/CBP, and the TATA box-binding protein (2226), these interactions are unlikely to wholly account for the unique regulatory specificity inherent to beta-catenin-directed transcription. In this regard, recent genetic studies in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster have revealed that mutations in Mediator subunits MED1 (SOP-3, TRAP220), MED6, MED12 (DPY-22/SOP-1, KTO), MED13 (LET-19, SKD), and MED23 (SUR2) variously affect developmental processes regulated by Wnt signaling (2731). However, whether these observations reflect a direct or indirect requirement for Mediator in Wnt signaling has heretofore remained unknown.

Mediator is an evolutionarily conserved multiprotein interface between gene-specific transcription factors and the RNA polymerase II general transcription machinery (3239). In this capacity, Mediator serves to promote the assembly, activation, and regeneration of transcription complexes on core promoters during the initiation and re-initiation phases of transcription (4049). Because of its direct association with both signal-activated transcription factors and the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery, Mediator has been proposed to function as a general conduit and integrator of regulatory signals that converge on the promoters of protein-coding genes (50). Consistent with this idea, several Mediator subunits are functionally required for activated transcription in response to diverse cell signaling pathways. These include MED1 (TRAP220, ARC/DRIP205) for nuclear receptor, MED14 (TRAP170, ARC/DRIP/CRSP150 (cofactor required for Sp1 function)) for interferon-{gamma}, MED23 (TRAP150beta, ARC/DRIP/CRSP130, human SUR2) for Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and MED15 (ARC105, PCQAP) for TGF-beta signaling pathways (5154). Note that, in this study, we utilize the unified nomenclature suggested by Bourbon et al. (55) to identify Mediator subunits. Where first introduced, however, each Mediator subunit will also be identified by its original name to facilitate recognition.

The role of Mediator as an established signal transducer coupled with its genetic links to the Wnt pathway prompted us to examine the requirement for Mediator in beta-catenin-driven transcription. Herein, we identify a direct physical interaction between beta-catenin and the MED12 subunit in Mediator that is functionally required for activated transcription in response to Wnt signaling. Our study thus identifies MED12 as a new component in the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway and further implicates Mediator in a broad range of developmental and pathological processes driven by canonical Wnt signal transduction.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Antibodies—The antibodies used for immunoblotting, affinity purification, and co-immunoprecipitation analyses were as follows. Anti-MED1 (catalog no. sc-8998), anti-MED6 (catalog no. sc-9433), anti-MED12 (catalog no. sc-5372), anti-MED16 (catalog no. sc-5366), anti-MED17 (catalog no. sc-12453), anti-CDK8 (catalog no. sc-13155, sc-1521), anti-HDAC1 (catalog no. sc-8410), and anti-transcription factor IIH p89 (catalog no. sc-293) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-MED23 (catalog no. 551175) and anti-beta-catenin (catalog no. 610154) antibodies were purchased from Pharmingen. Anti-FLAG antibody M2 was purchased from Sigma. To generate rabbit anti-MED30 and anti-MED4 polyclonal antibodies, recombinant FLAG-His6-MED30 or FLAG-His6-MED4 was expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21(DH3), purified under denaturing conditions by nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid fast flow chromatography (Qiagen Inc.), and used to immunize rabbits (Covance, Berkeley, CA). Specific antibodies were purified from rabbit serum by passage over an antigen-cross-linked affinity column and were used directly for immunoblot analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay or were first cross-linked to protein A-Sepharose (GE Healthcare) using dimethyl pimelimidate (Sigma) for immunoprecipitation assays.

Expression and Reporter Plasmids—All expression vectors forbeta-catenin, Xenopus TCF3, and MED23, luciferase/beta-galactosidase reporters have been described (24, 26, 36, 56, 57). pRC/CMV-MED12, a multipurpose mammalian MED12 expression plasmid, was a kind gift from Dr. Leonard P. Freedman and used for in vitro transcription/translation of full-length MED12. pCMV-3xFLAG-MED12, a mammalian MED12 expression vector encoding MED12 N-terminally tagged with three tandem FLAG epitopes, was constructed by transferring the MED12 cDNA from pRC/CMV-MED12 to p3xFLAG-CMV (Sigma) through a multistep subcloning procedure. pRC/CMV-MED12-(1–1058) for in vitro transcription/translation of a MED12 N-terminal fragment was constructed by restriction digestion of pRC/CMV-MED12 with XbaI and subsequent plasmid religation. pET28-MED12-(626–1749) for in vitro transcription/translation of a MED12 internal fragment was constructed by subcloning an EcoRI-XhoI fragment of MED12 into pET28 (Novagen). pGBKT7-MED12-(1749–2231) for in vitro transcription/translation of a MED12 C-terminal fragment was constructed by subcloning a XhoI-NotI fragment of MED12 into pGBKT7 (Clontech). pCS2+MED12-PQL-His6-FLAG and pCS2+MED12-OPA-His6-FLAG for in vitro transcription/translation and mammalian expression of FLAG and His6 epitope-tagged MED12 PQL and opposite paired (OPA) domains, respectively, were constructed by subcloning PCR-amplified fragments encoding the MED12 PQL (amino acids 1651–2086) and OPA (amino acids 2087–2212) domains into pCS2+-His6-FLAG engineered to contain the His6 and FLAG epitope tag sequences in the multicloning site of pCS2+. pCS2+HA-MED15 and pET28-CycC were constructed by PCR-based subcloning of cDNAs encoding MED15 (cDNA clone MGC:20267; American Type Culture Collection) and cyclin C (cDNA clone MGC:19502; Open Biosystems, Huntsville, AL) into pCS2+ and pET28, respectively, and used for in vitro transcription/translation of full-length MED15 and cyclin C.

Cell Culture, Transfections, RNA Interference, and Reporter Assays— 293 and HeLa cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% bovine growth serum (Hyclone). 293Top cells were a generous gift of Dr. Harold E. Varmus and were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% bovine growth serum and 400 ng/ml G418. T-REx HeLa cells (Invitrogen) were cultured in minimum Eagle's medium with 10% bovine growth serum and 5 µg/µl blasticidin (Invitrogen). Parental and Wnt3{alpha}-expressing L cells (American Type Culture Collection) were cultured and used for preparation of Wnt-conditioned medium as described previously (58). For transient reporter assays, cells were seeded into 24- or 12-well cell culture plates 24 h prior to transfection. Cells (30–40% confluent) were transfected with FuGENE 6 (Roche Applied Science) following the manufacturer's instructions. 48 h post-transfection, transfected cells were harvested and assayed for luciferase (Promega Corp.) and beta-galactosidase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) activity as described previously (59). For MED12 RNA interference (RNAi) experiments, cells were transfected with MED12-specific (catalog no. M-009092-00) or control (catalog no. D-001210-01-05) small interfering RNA (siRNA; Dharmacon, Chicago, IL) using TransIT-siQUEST transfection reagent (Mirus Bio Corp., Madison, WI) 48 h prior to transfection of beta-catenin expression and reporter plasmids using FuGENE 6 as described above. Reporter assay was performed 24 h post-transfection. Each transfection was repeated a minimum of three times in duplicate.

Glutathione S-Transferase (GST) Pulldown Assays—Fusion proteins of GST with full-length beta-catenin (referred to as GST-betacat-FL), an N-terminal beta-catenin fragment spanning amino acids 1–284 (referred to as GST-betacat-N), and a C-terminal beta-catenin fragment spanning amino acids 630–781 and therefore including the transactivation domain (referred to as GST-betacat-C) were overexpressed in E. coli strain BL21(DE3), and soluble lysates were prepared in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, and 0.2% Nonidet P-40 by sonication. HeLa/S3 nuclear extracts were prepared as described (60). Recombinant Mediator subunits and fragments were expressed and radiolabeled with [35S]methionine by translation in vitro (TNT SP6/T7 quick coupled transcription/translation system, Promega Corp.).

For GST pulldown assays using HeLa/S3 nuclear extract, 20 µg of each GST-beta-catenin derivative was immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare) and washed extensively. Immobilized beads were subsequently incubated with 1 mg of HeLa/S3 nuclear extract, dialyzed previously against 0.1 M KCl buffer D (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 0.2 mM EDTA, and 20% glycerol). After overnight incubation at 4 °C, beads were washed five times with 0.15 M KCl buffer D containing 0.2% Nonidet P-40. Bound proteins were eluted in Laemmli sample buffer. 10% of each eluate was resolved by SDS-12% PAGE and analyzed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining to ensure that equivalent amounts of GST-beta-catenin fusion proteins were immobilized. The remaining 90% of each eluate was resolved by SDS-10% PAGE and processed for immunoblot analysis using antibodies specific for Mediator subunits. GST pulldown assays using radiolabeled recombinant Mediator subunits were performed similarly except that bovine serum albumin was added to the binding mixture at a final concentration of 1.5 µg/µl as a blocking reagent, and 0.2 M KCl buffer D containing 0.1% Nonidet P-40 was used for washes. Eluates were resolved by SDS-12% PAGE and visualized by PhosphorImager analysis (GE Healthcare).

For Mediator purification, a soluble nuclear extract was prepared from MED6-HA/S3, a HeLa/S3-derived clonal cell line engineered by retrovirus-mediated gene transfer to express a hemagglutinin epitope-tagged Mediator MED6 subunit. Nuclear extract was first fractionated by phosphocellulose chromatography, and a 0.3–0.5 M KCl step fraction was subjected to 12CA5 (anti-hemagglutinin) affinity purification. Peptide eluates were dialyzed against 0.1 M KCl buffer D and used in GST pulldown assays.

Dual GST pulldown/protein cross-linking assays were performed as described previously (61) with minor modifications. Briefly, glutathione-Sepharose-immobilized GST and GST-beta-catenin derivatives were incubated with HeLa/S3 nuclear extract and washed as described above. Subsequently, beads were equilibrated and resuspended in cross-linking buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9) and 100 mM KCl), followed by incubation with variable concentrations of dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate) (DSP; Pierce) to introduce reversible cross-links between directly interacting proteins. After incubation for 10 min at room temperature on a rocking platform, the cross-linking reaction was immediately quenched by the addition of 1 M Tris (pH 7.5) and subsequently terminated by the addition of quenching buffer (30 mM Tris (pH 7.5) and 100 mM KCl) for 15 min at room temperature. Uncross-linked proteins were removed with urea wash buffer (30 mM Tris (pH 7.5) 100 mM KCl, and 6 M urea); cross-links were reversed; and proteins were retained on beads eluted in Laemmli sample buffer at 94 °C. Eluates were resolved by SDS-10% PAGE and analyzed by immunoblot assay for the presence of Mediator subunits.

ChIP Assays and Quantitative Reverse Transcription (RT)-PCR ChIP assays were performed as described previously (62) with minor modifications. Briefly, 293Top cells were grown in 150 mM culture dishes and treated with 1% formaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. Cross-linking reactions were quenched with glycine, and soluble chromatin was obtained by sonication of isolated nuclei in radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 M LiCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, and 0.7 mM sodium deoxycholate). Immunoprecipitation reactions were performed using 3 µg of control or specific antibody as indicated. After overnight incubation at 4 °C, immune complexes were captured on protein A-Sepharose, extensively washed, eluted, and incubated at 65 °C to reverse cross-links. DNA isolated with a QIAquick PCR purification kit was subsequently used in amplification reactions including primers specific for TCF-binding regions within the DKK1 (14) or axin2 (63) gene.

For quantitative RT-PCR, total RNAs were isolated from 293Top cells treated with control or Wnt3{alpha}-conditioned medium using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using ABsoluteTM MAX 1-STEP QRT-PCR SYBR® Green/ROX Mix (ABgene, Rochester, NY) on an ABI PRISM 7900HT Fast real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The gene-specific primers used in this study were as follows: HsAxin2-F, tgtgggcagtaagaaacagc; HsAxin2-R, ggttctcgggaaatgaggta; HsDKK1-F, catcagactgtgcctcagga; HsDKK1-R, ccacagtaacaacgctggaa; HsGAPDH-F, cctgttcgacagtcagccg; and HsGAPDH-R, cgaccaaatccgttgactcc.

Co-immunoprecipitation Assays—Nuclear extracts from HeLa and BG-1 cells treated with 30 mM LiCl for 6 h were prepared as described (60) and dialyzed against 0.2 M KCl buffer D. Nuclear extracts (1 mg each) were first adjusted to 150 mM KCl and 0.1% Nonidet P-40 and subsequently subjected to overnight immunoprecipitation at 4 °C using 15 µl of protein A-Sepharose conjugated to either MED30-specific antibody or rabbit IgG as a negative control. Immune complexes were washed four times for 5 min with 0.15 M KCl buffer D containing 0.1% Nonidet P-40 at 4 °C, eluted in Laemmli sample buffer, and processed by SDS-11% PAGE for immunoblot analysis. For immunoprecipitation of Mediator in HeLa cells transfected with siRNA, nuclear extract was prepared as described above except that 0.1% Nonidet P-40 was used to disrupt cell membranes rather than mechanical lysis methods. Nuclear extracts (80 µg) were first adjusted to 168 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, and 10% glycerol and subjected to immunoprecipitation and subsequent immunoblot analysis as described above.

For co-immunoprecipitation analysis of endogenous beta-catenin and ectopically expressed MED12, 293 cells were transfected with 6 µg of pCMV-3xFLAG-MED12 or pCMV-3x-FLAG empty vector as a negative control using FuGENE 6. 44 h after transfection, cells were treated with 30 mM LiCl for 4 h, and whole cell extracts were subsequently prepared in 0.15 M KCl buffer D containing 0.3% Nonidet P-40 and supplemented with protease inhibitors. Whole cell extracts (800 µg) were adjusted to 0.1% Nonidet P-40 and then subjected to immunoprecipitation with 1.2 µg of anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody M2 and 15 µl of a protein A-Sepharose/protein G-agarose mixture. Immune complexes were washed four times with 0.15 M KCl buffer D containing 0.1% Nonidet P-40 for 5 min at 4 °C, eluted in Laemmli sample buffer, and processed by SDS-8% PAGE for immunoblot analysis.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The beta-Catenin Transactivation Domain Binds Directly to Mediator To investigate a possible physical interaction between beta-catenin and Mediator, we initially examined the abilities of several GST-beta-catenin derivatives to bind Mediator present in HeLa nuclear extract using a GST pulldown assay and immunoblot analysis using antibodies specific for Mediator subunits MED1, MED6 (ARC/DRIP33), MED12 (TRAP230, ARC/DRIP240), MED16 (TRAP95, DRIP92), MED17 (TRAP80, ARC/DRIP/CRSP77), MED23, and CDK8 (human SRB10). Both GST-fused full-length beta-catenin (GST-betacat-FL) and its transactivation domain (GST-betacat-C) bound intact Mediator, as scored by the presence in bound eluates of all Mediator subunits examined (Fig. 1B). By contrast, GST alone as well as fused to the beta-catenin N terminus (GST-betacat-N), which is principally involved in the regulation of beta-catenin stability, failed to interact with Mediator (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, a weak interaction between the beta-catenin N terminus and CDK8 free of Mediator was consistently observed in repeated binding assays (Fig. 1B), although the significance of this interaction is unclear at present.

To determine whether beta-catenin binds intact Mediator directly, we examined the ability of GST-betacat-FL and GST-betacat-C to bind Mediator purified from a HeLa/S3-derived cell line expressing a hemagglutinin epitope-tagged Mediator MED6 subunit. This analysis revealed that both full-length beta-catenin and its isolated transactivation domain bound intact purified Mediator (Fig. 1C), demonstrating that the interaction between beta-catenin and Mediator is indeed direct.

To examine the physical interaction between endogenous beta-catenin and Mediator, we employed co-immunoprecipitation analysis using nuclear extracts from human HeLa cervical carcinoma and BG-1 ovarian carcinoma cells treated with LiCl. LiCl is an inhibitor of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta that normally phosphorylates beta-catenin in the absence of Wnt signaling, thereby marking it for destruction by the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway; thus, analogous to the Wnt ligand, LiCl promotes the nuclear accumulation of stabilized beta-catenin (64). Immunoprecipitation of intact Mediator using MED30-specific antibody resulted in the specific and efficient co-immunoprecipitation of beta-catenin (Fig. 1D), confirming the association of beta-catenin with Mediator in LiCl-stimulated cells. Collectively, these binding studies reveal that beta-catenin interacts with Mediator both in vitro and in vivo.

beta-Catenin Recruits Mediator to Wnt-responsive Genes—To begin to explore a possible functional interaction between beta-catenin and Mediator, we initially asked whether Mediator is recruited to beta-catenin target genes in response to Wnt signaling. To answer this question, we employed ChIP analysis to monitor Wnt-induced occupancy of TCF-binding elements (TBEs) within the axin2 and DKK1 genes by both beta-catenin and Mediator in 293Top cells (14). For this purpose, 293Top cells were treated with control or Wnt3{alpha}-conditioned medium for 1 h prior to ChIP analysis. We first confirmed, by quantitative RT-PCR analysis, that the axin2 and DKK1 genes are targets of Wnt-dependent regulation in 293Top cells; relative to control medium, treatment with Wnt3{alpha}-conditioned medium stimulated axin2 and DKK1 expression by ~5.5- and ~4-fold, respectively (Fig. 2A). As expected, beta-catenin was detected by ChIP in association with axin2 and DKK1 TBEs only in Wnt-treated cells (Fig. 2B), an observation concordant with the established beta-catenin-dependent regulation of these genes (14, 57, 6570). Notably, occupancy of axin2 and DKK1 TBEs by Mediator was also observed only in Wnt-treated cells (Fig. 2B). This observation suggests that Mediator is recruited to beta-catenin target genes in a Wnt-dependent manner.


Figure 1
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1.
beta-Catenin binds to Mediator both in vitro and in vivo. A, a schematic diagram of full-length beta-catenin is shown. The N- and C-terminal (transactivation domain) fragments used in binding reactions are demarcated. aa, amino acids. B and C, immobilized GST-beta-catenin derivatives were incubated with HeLa/S3 nuclear extract or purified Mediator, respectively. Following extensive washing, bound proteins were eluted in Laemmli sample buffer, resolved by SDS-10% PAGE, and analyzed by Western blotting (WB) for the presence of individual Mediator subunits as indicated. Input represents 5% of the total nuclear extract (B) or 30% of the purified Mediator (C) used in binding reactions. In B, 10% of the eluate was resolved by SDS-12% PAGE and visualized by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining to ensure that equivalent amounts of GST-beta-catenin derivatives were used in binding reactions. In C, purified Mediator used in binding reactions was resolved by SDS-4–12% gradient PAGE and visualized by silver staining. Note that, in B and C, the apparent reduction in the MED23 immunoblot signal derived from comigration during SDS-PAGE of MED23 and GST-betacat-FL used in binding reactions. (Both of these proteins exhibit similar molecular masses.) Because the amount of GST-betacat-FL far exceeded that of MED23 in the gel, co-migration of the two proteins rendered the MED23 signal diffuse. HA, hemagglutinin. D, nuclear extracts derived from HeLa and BG-1 cells treated with 30 mM LiCl for 6 h were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) using rabbit anti-MED30 polyclonal antibody conjugated to protein A-Sepharose. Preimmune rabbit IgG conjugated to protein A-Sepharose was used as a negative control. Following extensive washing, immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-11% PAGE and processed by Western blot analysis for the presence of individual Mediator subunits and HDAC1 as a negative control as indicated. Input corresponds to 5% of the total nuclear extract used in immunoprecipitation reactions.

 
To determine more specifically whether beta-catenin recruits Mediator to Wnt-responsive genes, we used ChIP to compare the resident status of both beta-catenin and Mediator on axin2 TBEs in 293Top and 293Top/betacat cell lines. These otherwise isogenic cell lines differ only in the stable integration of a transgene expressing a constitutively stabilized beta-catenin derivative (S37A) in 293Top/betacat cells. Relative to 293Top cells, 293Top/betacat cells support significantly enhanced expression of the axin2 gene, thus confirming that 293Top/betacat cells express biologically active beta-catenin (Fig. 2C). As expected, beta-catenin was detected in association with axin2 TBEs only in 293Top/ betacat cells, consistent with beta-catenin-dependent regulation of this Wnt-responsive gene (Fig. 2D). Notably, occupancy of axin2 TBEs by Mediator was also observed only in the beta-catenin-expressing 293Top/betacat cells (Fig. 2D). Taken together, the results of these ChIP analyses demonstrate that Mediator is recruited to Wnt-responsive gene elements in a beta-catenin-dependent manner.

beta-Catenin Targets the MED12 Subunit in Mediator—To identify the target subunit of beta-catenin within Mediator, we employed a dual GST pulldown/protein cross-linking assay (61, 71). Briefly, glutathione-Sepharose-immobilized GST-betacat-C (transactivation domain) was used to capture Mediator present in HeLa nuclear extract, and the GST-betacat-C·Mediator complex was treated with increasing concentrations of the heterobifunctional cross-linking agent DSP. Following denaturing washes to remove uncross-linked proteins, Laemmli sample buffer was used to reverse DSP-induced cross-links and to elute proteins from the glutathione-Sepharose beads. Subsequently, eluates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and processed by immunoblot analysis for the presence of individual Mediator subunits. Among the Mediator subunits queried in this assay, MED12 and MED23 exhibited substantial preferential cross-linking to GST-betacat-C at 0.005 mM DSP, indicating their close proximity to the beta-catenin transactivation domain and/or one another in the GST-betacat-C·Mediator complex (Fig. 3A). By contrast, MED1, MED6, MED16, MED17, and CDK8 exhibited very little or no appreciable cross-linking at an equivalently low DSP concentration (Fig. 3A). Virtually the same results were observed when the cross-linking assay was repeated using GST-betacat-FL (data not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2.
Mediator is recruited to Wnt-responsive genes in a beta-catenin-dependent manner. A and B, 293Top cells were treated with control conditioned medium from parental L cells (CM) or, alternatively, conditioned medium from a Wnt3{alpha}-expressing L cell clone (WCM) as indicated. A, total RNA recovered from 293Top cells treated for 4 h with control or Wnt3{alpha}-conditioned medium was processed by quantitative RT-PCR analysis for the levels of axin2, DKK1, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNAs. The mRNA levels of axin2 and DKK1 were normalized to those of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and are expressed as the ratio of normalized axin2 and DKK1 mRNA levels in 293Top cells treated with control conditioned medium. B, soluble chromatin prepared from 293Top cells treated for 1 h with control or Wnt3{alpha}-conditioned medium was subjected to immunoprecipitation with rabbit polyclonal antibody specific for estrogen receptor-{alpha} (ER{alpha}) as a negative control, beta-catenin, or the integral Mediator subunit MED4 to mark Mediator. Immunoprecipitated DNA was PCR-amplified using primers that span functionally critical TCF-binding sites within the axin2 (positions +2699 to +2966) and DKK1 (positions –794 to –215) genes. Input corresponds to direct PCR amplification of 0.25% of the soluble chromatin that was used in immunoprecipitation reactions. C, total RNA recovered from 293Top or 293Top/betacat cells as indicated was processed by quantitative RT-PCR analysis for the levels of axin2 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNAs. The mRNA level of axin2 was normalized to that of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and is expressed as the ratio of the normalized axin2 mRNA level in 293Top cells. D, soluble chromatin prepared from 293Top or 293Top/betacat cells as indicated was subjected to immunoprecipitation and PCR amplification with axin2-specific primers as described for B. Input corresponds to direct PCR amplification of 0.25% of the soluble chromatin that was used in immunoprecipitation reactions.

 
On the basis of the results of these cross-linking assays, we next examined the ability of beta-catenin to bind directly to radiolabeled recombinant MED12 and MED23 using a standard GST pulldown assay. We also included MED15 as a negative control in these binding experiments. It was reported previously that inhibition of MED15 function does not alter the expression of Wnt target genes during Xenopus embryonic development, indicating that MED15 is unlikely to represent a relevant transcriptional target of beta-catenin in Mediator (52). These binding experiments revealed that MED12, but not MED23 or MED15, could interact efficiently with the beta-catenin transactivation domain (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, MED23-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells support efficient beta-catenin-directed transcriptional activation, providing definitive evidence that MED23 is neither a physical nor a functional target of beta-catenin.3

To confirm that beta-catenin can interact with MED12 in vivo, we performed co-immunoprecipitation analyses using LiCl-treated 293 cells transfected with or without FLAG epitope-tagged MED12. This analysis revealed that endogenous beta-catenin could be precipitated by FLAG-specific antibody only in the presence, but not in the absence, of FLAG-tagged MED12 (Fig. 3C), indicating that the two proteins interact in vivo. On the basis of these collective findings, we conclude that MED12 is a direct physical target of beta-catenin within Mediator.

To more narrowly define the beta-catenin interaction domain on MED12, we tested the ability of GST-betacat-C to bind to a series of truncated MED12 fragments radiolabeled by translation in vitro. The beta-catenin transactivation domain bound most efficiently to a fragment of MED12 corresponding to amino acids 1651–2086 (Fig. 3D). Interestingly, this region (previously designated the PQL domain due to its high content of Pro, Gln, and Leu residues) has been shown to mediate the interaction of MED12 with transcriptional activators SOX9 and Rta (61, 72).

Disruption of the beta-Catenin/MED12 Interaction Inhibits beta-Catenin Transcriptional Activity—Should beta-catenin target Mediator for a functional interaction through its MED12 interface, the beta-catenin-binding domain on MED12 (PQL domain) might be expected to inhibit the transactivation function of beta-catenin through dominant-negative interference. To test this possibility, we initially examined, in 293 cells, the effect of MED12 PQL domain overexpression on the transcriptional activity of a constitutively stabilized beta-catenin derivative carrying four alanine substitutions in the glycogen synthase kinase-3beta recognition site (26) using a transient reporter assay. This analysis revealed that ectopic expression of the MED12 PQL domain, but not the neighboring MED12 OPA domain, to which beta-catenin does not bind, efficiently inhibited the transcriptional activity of beta-catenin in a dose-dependent manner in both a synthetic (TOPflash) and a natural (axin2) beta-catenin-responsive promoter (Fig. 4, A–C). By contrast, MED12 PQL domain overexpression did not influence the activity of the adenovirus E1A transactivation domain (Fig. 4D), the established target of which in Mediator is MED23 (36, 53). Immunoblot analysis of transfected whole cell extracts revealed that MED12 PQL domain overexpression did not affect the expression level of beta-catenin, indicating that the dominant-negative influence of the MED12 PQL domain on beta-catenin transactivation is direct (Fig. 4, A and B). Furthermore, MED12 PQL domain-mediated dominant-negative inhibition of beta-catenin transcriptional activity was also observed in HeLa cells, indicating that this effect is not cell type-specific (Fig. 4E).


Figure 3
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3.
beta-Catenin targets the MED12 subunit in Mediator. A, HeLa/S3 nuclear proteins cross-linked by DSP treatment to glutathione-Sepharose-immobilized GST or GST-betacat-C were separated from uncross-linked proteins by urea wash, resolved by SDS-10% PAGE, and scored for the presence of the indicated Mediator subunits by Western blot (WB) analysis. The DSP concentrations used in cross-linking reactions are indicated above each lane. Input corresponds to 5% of the total HeLa/S3 nuclear extract subjected to GST pulldown prior to cross-linking. B, recombinant Mediator subunits MED12, MED23, and MED15 (expressed and radiolabeled with [35S]methionine by translation in vitro) were incubated with glutathione-Sepharose-immobilized GST or GST-betacat-C. Specifically bound proteins were resolved by SDS-10% PAGE and visualized by PhosphorImager analysis. INPUT corresponds to 10% of each in vitro translated product used in binding reactions. The amount of each Mediator subunit retained by GST-betacat-C (Bound) was quantified and is expressed as a percentage of the total input. C, 293 cells transfected with pCMV-3xFLAG-MED12 or the backbone pCMV-3xFLAG vector were treated with 30 mM LiCl for 4 h prior to harvest and preparation of whole cell extracts. Transfected whole cell extracts were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody M2, and immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-8% PAGE prior to Western blot analysis using antibody specific for the FLAG epitope (upper panel) or beta-catenin (lower panel). Input corresponds to 1% of the total whole cell extract subjected to immunoprecipitation. D, recombinant MED12 derivatives spanning the indicated amino acid positions were expressed and radiolabeled with [35S]methionine by translation in vitro prior to incubation with glutathione-Sepharose-immobilized GST or GST-betacat-C. Specifically bound proteins were resolved by SDS-10% PAGE and visualized by PhosphorImager analysis. INPUT corresponds to 10% of each in vitro translated product used in binding reactions. The amount of each MED12 derivative retained by GST-betacat-C (Bound) was quantified and is expressed as a percentage of the total input.

 
To determine whether endogenous beta-catenin is similarly susceptible to dominant-negative inhibition by the MED12 PQL domain, we examined the influence of MED12 PQL domain overexpression on TOPflash reporter activity in 293 cells treated with LiCl or Wnt3{alpha}-conditioned medium. As expected, ectopic expression of the MED12 PQL domain inhibited the transcriptional activity of endogenous beta-catenin stabilized by pharmacological or physiological activation of the Wnt pathway (Fig. 5, A and B). Taken together, these findings support the hypothesis that Mediator transduces Wnt signals through a functional interaction between beta-catenin and its MED12 interface.

To more rigorously examine the functional interaction between beta-catenin and MED12, we monitored the influence of RNAi-mediated MED12 suppression on beta-catenin-directed transactivation. In HeLa cells, MED12-specific siRNA reduced the steady-state level of MED12 protein by ~75% and inhibited the transcriptional activity of beta-catenin in the TOPflash reporter by ~60% (Fig. 6). To confirm that this effect is mediated through the beta-catenin transactivation domain, we also monitored the influence of MED12 knockdown on the activity of the isolated beta-catenin transactivation domain tethered to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain. This analysis revealed that RNAi-mediated MED12 depletion (~75%) inhibited Gal4-beta-catenin transactivation domain activity by ~80% (Fig. 6). Collectively, these findings provide further evidence for a functional interaction between beta-catenin and the MED12 interface within Mediator.

MED12 Is a Principal Target of beta-Catenin within a MED12/CDK8/CycC-containing Mediator Submodule—MED12 in association with MED13, CDK8, and CycC (cyclin C; human SRB11) is thought to compose a discrete submodule within metazoan Mediator based on several lines of reasoning. First, MED12, MED13, CDK8, and CycC homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe compose a subcomplex that is both biochemically dissociable from and stable independently of yeast Mediator (73). Second, two functionally distinct forms of yeast and metazoan Mediator complexes with or without MED12, MED13, CDK8, and CycC can be resolved biochemically (33). Thus, should MED12 function to anchor and/or stabilize a MED12/MED13/CDK8/CycC submodule within Mediator, the functional consequence of MED12 depletion on beta-catenin-directed transactivation could conceivably derive from concomitant depletion of one or more additional submodule components. To address this issue, we examined, by immunoblot analysis, the influence of MED12 knockdown in HeLa cells on the steady-state levels of CDK8 and CycC proteins in nuclear extracts as well as the stable incorporation of CDK8 into Mediator. We observed that RNAi-mediated MED12 depletion resulted in reduced steady-state protein levels of CDK8 and CycC and a concordant reduction in CDK8 in immunoprecipitated Mediator (Fig. 7, A and B). These results suggest that MED12 is critical to ensure the integrity of a MED12/CDK8/CycC-containing Mediator submodule and provide further support for a conserved architectural organization between yeast and metazoan Mediator complexes.


Figure 4
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4.
The MED12 PQL domain inhibits the transactivation function of beta-catenin in a dominant-negative manner. 293 cells (A–D) and HeLa cells (E) were transfected with (i) the TOP-flash or FOPflash reporter plasmid harboring four consensus or mutant TCF/LEF-binding sites, respectively, upstream of the minimal c-fos promoter (A, C, and E), pAxin2-Luc harboring the beta-catenin-responsive murine axin2 promoter (B), and pG5E1B-Luc harboring five tandem Gal4 DNA-binding sites upstream of the minimal adenovirus E1B promoter (D); (ii) pCS2+betacat(S33A) expressing a constitutively stabilizedbeta-catenin derivative (A–C and E) and pGal4-E1A expressing a Gal4 DNA-binding domain-E1A activation domain chimera (D); (iii) an internal control plasmid (pCH110) expressing beta-galactosidase; and (iv) the indicated nanogram quantities of pCS2+MED12-PQL-His6-FLAG and pCS2+MED12-OPA-His6-FLAG plasmids expressing the FLAG epitope-tagged MED12 PQL and OPA domains, respectively. In E, HeLa cells were transfected with an additional plasmid, pCS2+ xTCF3 expressing Xenopus TCF3. 48 h post-transfection, transfected whole cell lysates were assayed for luciferase activity. Luciferase activities were normalized against beta-galactosidase values and are expressed relative to the level of luciferase activity obtained in cells transfected without activator, arbitrarily assigned a value of 1. For experiments using the TOPflash and FOPflash reporter systems (A, C, and E), the ratio of TOPflash to FOP-flash reporter activity for each independent transfection in a series was first calculated and used to establish the relative luciferase activity. Error bars represent the mean ± S.D. of at least three independent transfections performed in duplicate. In A and B, a portion of the whole cell lysate used in luciferase assays was resolved by SDS-10% PAGE and processed by Western blot analysis for the expression levels of beta-catenin, the MED12 PQL domain, and the transcription fraction IIEbeta (TFIIEbeta) subunit, the latter of which served as an internal loading control.

 


Figure 5
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5.
The MED12 PQL domain inhibits the transactivation function of endogenous beta-catenin stabilized by Wnt signaling. A and B, 293 cells were transfected with the TOPflash or FOPflash reporter plasmid, an internal control beta-galactosidase expression plasmid (pCH110), and the indicated nanogram quantities of pCS2+MED12-PQL-His6-FLAG expressing the MED12 PQL domain. In A, transfected cells were treated for 24 h prior to harvest with control conditioned medium derived from parental L cells (–) or, alternatively, conditioned medium derived from a Wnt3{alpha}-expressing L cell clone (WNT3{alpha} CM; +) as indicated. Harvested whole cell lysates were assayed for luciferase activity. Luciferase activities were first normalized to beta-galactosidase values and calculated as the ratio of TOPflash to FOPflash reporter activity and are expressed relative to the level of luciferase activity obtained in control medium-treated cells transfected with no PQL domain, arbitrarily assigned a value of 1. Error bars represent the mean ± S.D. of at least three independent transfections performed in duplicate. In B, transfected cells were treated with 30 mM LiCl for 0, 6, or 12 h prior to harvest and assay of whole cell lysates for luciferase activity. Luciferase activities were first normalized tobeta-galactosidase values and calculated as the ratio of TOPflash to FOPflash reporter activity and are expressed relative to the level of luciferase activity obtained in untreated cells transfected with no PQL domain, arbitrarily assigned a value of 1. Error bars represent the mean ± S.D. of at least three independent transfections performed in duplicate.

 


Figure 6
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6.
RNAi-mediated MED12 suppression inhibits beta-catenin transactivation activity. HeLa cells were transfected with control or MED12-specific siRNA as indicated and, 48 h later, with an internal control beta-galactosidase expression plasmid (pCH110) along with a combination of either a TOPflash reporter plasmid with beta-catenin and Xenopus TCF3 (xTCF3) expression plasmids (gray bars) or a Gal4-responsive reporter plasmid (pG5E1B-Luc) with a Gal4-beta-catenin activation domain (GAL4-betacat) expression plasmid (black bars). 24 h later, transfected cells were harvested and processed for nuclear and whole cell extract preparation. Upper panels, whole cell extracts were assayed for luciferase activity. Luciferase activities were first normalized to beta-galactosidase values, and relative luciferase activities were calculated as described in the legend to Fig. 4A. For comparative purposes on the same plot, the relative luciferase activity of beta-catenin or Gal4-beta-catenin in control siRNA-transfected cells was arbitrarily assigned a value of 100%; their corresponding activities in MED12-specific siRNA-transfected cells are expressed relative to this value. Error bars represent the mean ± S.D. of at least three independent transfections performed in duplicate. The actual average relative luciferase activities for beta-catenin and Gal4-beta-catenin in the TOPflash and pG5E1B-Luc reporters were 8- and 500-fold, respectively. Lower panels, nuclear extracts were resolved by SDS-10% PAGE and processed by Western blot (WB) analysis for the expression levels of MED12 and the transcription factor IIH p89 subunit (TFIIHp89), the latter of which served as an internal loading control.

 


Figure 7
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7.
MED12 is a principal target of beta-catenin within a MED12/CDK8/CycC-containing Mediator submodule. A and B, soluble nuclear extracts were prepared from HeLa cells 48 h following transfection with control siRNA (siCNTL) or MED12-specific siRNA (siMED12) as indicated. A, nuclear extracts (60 and 20 µg) were resolved by SDS-11% PAGE and processed by Western blot (WB) analysis for the expression levels of MED12, MED23, CDK8, MED6, and cyclin C as indicated. B, nuclear extracts (80 µg) were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with rabbit anti-MED30 polyclonal antibody conjugated to protein A-Sepharose. Following extensive washing, immunoprecipitates were eluted in Laemmli sample buffer; 30 and 60% of each eluate were resolved by SDS-4–12% PAGE and processed by Western blot analysis for the presence of MED12, MED23, MED30, and CDK8 as indicated. Note that CycC could not be resolved from IgG light chain, thus precluding its detection by Western blot analysis. C, recombinant full-length MED12, CDK8, and cyclin C were expressed and radiolabeled with [35S]methionine by translation in vitro prior to incubation with glutathione-Sepharose-immobilized GST or GST-betacat-C. Specifically bound proteins were resolved by SDS-11% PAGE and visualized by PhosphorImager analysis. INPUT corresponds to 10% of each in vitro translated product used in binding reactions. The amount of each radiolabeled Mediator subunit retained by GST-betacat-C (Bound) was quantified and is expressed as a percentage of the total input.

 
To exclude the possibility that CDK8 and CycC reduction accompanying MED12 knockdown depletes an additional physical target(s) of beta-catenin within Mediator, we examined the ability of beta-catenin to bind directly to radiolabeled recombinant CDK8 and CycC in vitro. These binding experiments revealed that MED12, but not CDK8 or CycC, could interact efficiently with the beta-catenin transactivation domain (Fig. 7C). Thus, neither CDK8 nor CycC is likely to represent a direct physical target of beta-catenin within Mediator. These results suggest that depletion of CDK8 and CycC accompanying MED12 knockdown is unlikely to account for the reduced transcriptional activity of beta-catenin. Thus, although we cannot entirely exclude the possibility that beta-catenin targets an additional subunit within a MED12/CDK8/CycC-containing submodule, our results nonetheless provide compelling evidence that MED12 is a principal physical and functional target of beta-catenin within Mediator.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The physiological and pathological manifestations of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling derive from programmed and unprogrammed changes in target gene transcription through poorly defined mechanisms. Herein, we have identified and characterized a physical interaction between beta-catenin and the MED12 interface in Mediator that, based upon the following criteria, appears to be functionally important for transduction of Wnt signals through beta-catenin to RNA polymerase II. First, the beta-catenin transactivation domain binds specifically and directly to isolated MED12 and intact Mediator in vitro. Second, endogenous beta-catenin binds MED12 and intact Mediator in vivo, and Mediator is recruited to Wnt-responsive genes in a beta-catenin-dependent manner. Third, the beta-catenin-binding domain on MED12 (PQL domain) inhibits the transcriptional activity of beta-catenin activated by Wnt signaling in a dominant-negative manner. Fourth, RNAi-mediated MED12 suppression inhibits the transcriptional activity of beta-catenin. These findings thus identify MED12 as a direct and functionally important transducer of canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling.

Previous studies revealing repressive as well as activating functions for MED12 suggest a complex regulatory role for this Mediator subunit in gene transcription. For example, MED12 and Mediator subunits MED13, CDK8, and CycC mark a transcriptionally repressive form of Mediator (ARC-L) that is biochemically and structurally distinguishable from an activating form of Mediator (CRSP) lacking this submodule and additionally containing MED26 (CRSP70) (74). However, MED12 is also target of the SOX9 and viral Rta activation domains, supporting a role for MED12 in activator-dependent transcription (61, 72). Finally, targeted disruption of Srb8, the presumptive MED12 homolog in S. pombe, leads to both up- and down-regulation of gene expression, indicating a context-dependent role for Srb8 in the both repression and activation of gene transcription (75). With respect to control of Wnt-regulated transcriptional programs, previous genetic studies in C. elegans have implicated MED12 in the suppression of beta-catenin-dependent transcription (27, 31). Our finding herein that MED12 mediates beta-catenin-activated transcription supports a dual role for MED12 in Wnt-regulated transcription.

In this regard, it is perhaps notable that CBP has also been proposed to both positively and negatively regulate Wnt signaling (22, 23, 26, 76). For example, in addition to its documented role as a transcriptional coactivator of beta-catenin in response to Wnt signaling, genetic studies have also implicated CBP in suppression of Wnt signaling through effects on TCF/LEF. In the absence of Wnt signaling, TCF/LEF factors are known to recruit Groucho and C-terminal binding protein core-pressors to inhibit beta-catenin target gene transcription (7780). Because Mediator containing the MED12/MED13/CDK8/CycC submodule has been implicated previously in reversible repression of transcriptionally induced genes (81), it is possible that a dual function for Mediator in Wnt-regulated transcription could reflect its participation in TCF/LEF-mediated default repression in the absence of Wnt signaling as well as its role as a coactivator of beta-catenin in response to Wnt signaling. Further characterization of the functional interaction between beta-catenin and MED12 will be required to clarify the basis for its context-dependent role in both repression and activation of Wnt target gene transcription.

Our identification of MED12 as a direct target of the beta-catenin transactivation domain was based initially on the results of protein cross-linking analyses indicating their close proximity in the GST-beta-catenin·Mediator complex. However, this approach is inherently biased in nature and constrained by a limited inventory of currently available Mediator subunit-specific antibodies. Thus, although MED12 has nonetheless been validated by further physical and functional analyses to be a bona fide direct target of the beta-catenin transactivation domain, we cannot exclude the possibility that an additional target subunit(s) of beta-catenin exists within Mediator. In this regard, we note that RNAi-mediated MED12 suppression reduced the transcriptional activity of beta-catenin in a TOPflash reporter and of Gal4-beta-catenin in a Gal4-responsive reporter by ~60 and ~80%, respectively. This partial reduction in beta-catenin transactivation activity could reflect incomplete MED12 knockdown (>70%) or, alternatively, a beta-catenin requirement for an additional coactivator target(s), possibly p300/CBP, BRG1, or TATA box-binding protein, or even a second target in Mediator. In this regard, other activators have been proposed to target more than one Mediator subunit, although the functional and mechanistic implications of dual targets within Mediator remain to be defined (82, 83).

The functional interaction between beta-catenin and MED12 established herein reveals a novel molecular interface of potential therapeutic value in colorectal cancer. Because many colorectal cancers involve mutagenic activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway, attenuation of beta-catenin transcriptional activity has been proposed as a rational approach to reverse the malignant phenotype (84). Thus far, small molecule inhibitors of TCF/beta-catenin and CBP/beta-catenin interactions have shown promise as inhibitors of beta-catenin-directed transcription and colorectal cancer cell growth (85, 86). We speculate that the beta-catenin/MED12 interface might similarly represent an attractive target for therapeutic intervention by small molecule drugs. Further characterization of the physical and functional interaction between beta-catenin and MED12 should clarify this issue and further reveal the contribution of Mediator to the entire spectrum of developmental and pathological processes driven by Wnt signaling.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by Career Development Award DAMD17-02-1-0584 and IDEA Award DAMD17-03-1-0272 from the United States Army Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program (to T. G. B.) and by United States Public Health Service Grant CA-098301 from NCI, National Institutes of Health (to T. G. B.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, 15355 Lambda Dr., San Antonio, TX 78245-3207. Tel.: 210-567-7258; Fax: 210-567-7247; E-mail: boyer{at}uthscsa.edu.

2 The abbreviations used are: TCF, T cell factor; LEF, lymphoid enhancer factor; CBP, cAMP-responsive element-binding protein-binding protein; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; OPA, opposite paired; RNAi, RNA interference; siRNA, small interfering RNA; GST, glutathione S-transferase; DSP, dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate); RT, reverse transcription; TBEs, TCF-binding elements. Back

3 A. J. Berk and J. L. Stevens, personal communication. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are most appreciative of the kind gifts of various plasmids received from Drs. Leonard P. Freedman, Ethan Lee, and Rolf Kemler and Kazusa DNA Research Institute. We are very grateful to Dr. Harold E. Varmus for providing the 293Top cell line. We thank Drs. Arnold J. Berk and Dr. Jennitte L. Stevens for communicating unpublished data and H. Zhou, A. M. Trauernicht, N. Ding, W. Tan, P. Garza, X. Xu, S. J. Kim, L. N. Ngo, and P. Renee Yew for helpful discussions.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Wodarz, A., and Nusse, R. (1998) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14, 59–88[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Reya, T., and Clevers, H. (2005) Nature 434, 843–850[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Molenaar, M., van de Wetering, M., Oosterwegel, M., Peterson-Maduro, J., Godsave, S., Korinek, V., Roose, J., Destree, O., and Clevers, H. (1996) Cell 86, 391–399[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Behrens, J., von Kries, J. P., Kuhl, M., Bruhn, L., Wedlich, D., Grosschedl, R., and Birchmeier, W. (1996) Nature 382, 638–642[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Aoki, M., Hecht, A., Kruse, U., Kemler, R., and Vogt, P. K. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 139–144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hart, M., Concordet, J. P., Lassot, I., Albert, I., del los Santos, R., Durand, H., Perret, C., Rubinfeld, B., Margottin, F., Benarous, R., and Polakis, P. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, 207–210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Hart, M. J., de los Santos, R., Albert, I. N., Rubinfeld, B., and Polakis, P. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 573–581[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Aberle, H., Bauer, A., Stappert, J., Kispert, A., and Kemler, R. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 3797–3804[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Zeng, L., Fagotto, F., Zhang, T., Hsu, W., Vasicek, T. J., Perry, W. L., III, Lee, J. J., Tilghman, S. M., Gumbiner, B. M., and Costantini, F. (1997) Cell 90, 181–192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Kishida, S., Yamamoto, H., Hino, S., Ikeda, S., Kishida, M., and Kikuchi, A. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 4414–4422[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Shtutman, M., Zhurinsky, J., Simcha, I., Albanese, C., D'Amico, M., Pestell, R., and Ben-Ze'ev, A. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 5522–5527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Marchenko, G. N., Marchenko, N. D., Leng, J., and Strongin, A. Y. (2002) Biochem. J. 363, 253–262[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Blache, P., van de Wetering, M., Duluc, I., Domon, C., Berta, P., Freund, J. N., Clevers, H., and Jay, P. (2004) J. Cell Biol. 166, 37–47[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Chamorro, M. N., Schwartz, D. R., Vonica, A., Brivanlou, A. H., Cho, K. R., and Varmus, H. E. (2005) EMBO J. 24, 73–84[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Crawford, H. C., Fingleton, B. M., Rudolph-Owen, L. A., Goss, K. J., Rubinfeld, B., Polakis, P., and Matrisian, L. M. (1999) Oncogene 18, 2883–2891[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Brabletz, T., Jung, A., Dag, S., Hlubek, F., and Kirchner, T. (1999) Am. J. Pathol. 155, 1033–1038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. He, T. C., Sparks, A. B., Rago, C., Hermeking, H., Zawel, L., da Costa, L. T., Morin, P. J., Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. (1998) Science 281, 1509–1512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Tetsu, O., and McCormick, F. (1999) Nature 398, 422–426[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Korinek, V., Barker, N., Morin, P. J., van Wichen, D., de Weger, R., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., and Clevers, H. (1997) Science 275, 1784–1787[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Morin, P. J., Sparks, A. B., Korinek, V., Barker, N., Clevers, H., Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. (1997) Science 275, 1787–1790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Polakis, P. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 1837–1851[Free Full Text]
  22. Sun, Y., Kolligs, F. T., Hottiger, M. O., Mosavin, R., Fearon, E. R., and Nabel, G. J. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 12613–12618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Takemaru, K. I., and Moon, R. T. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 149, 249–254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hecht, A., Litterst, C. M., Huber, O., and Kemler, R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 18017–18025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Barker, N., Hurlstone, A., Musisi, H., Miles, A., Bienz, M., and Clevers, H. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 4935–4943[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Hecht, A., Vleminckx, K., Stemmler, M. P., van Roy, F., and Kemler, R. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 1839–1850[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Zhang, H., and Emmons, S. W. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 2161–2172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Treisman, J. (2001) Development (Camb.) 128, 603–615[Abstract]
  29. Zhang, H., and Emmons, S. W. (2001) Development (Camb.) 128, 767–777[Abstract]