|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 20, 14465-14473, May 19, 2006
Cytoplasmic Function of Mutant Promyelocytic Leukemia (PML) and PML-Retinoic Acid Receptor-
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(RAR
) fusion protein. Two missense mutations in the remaining PML alleles have been identified, which give rise to a truncated cytoplasmic PML protein (Mut PML). APL patients carrying these mutations display resistance to retinoic acid (RA) and very poor prognosis. Here we show that Mut PML associates with the cytoplasmic regions we refer to as PML-cytoplasmic bodies (PML-CBs). Mut PML interacts with PML-RAR
in PML-CB and potentiates PML-RAR
-mediated inhibition of RA-dependent transcription. Remarkably, Mut PML stabilizes PML-RAR
and inhibits differentiation induced by pharmacological doses of RA. A mutant form of PML-RAR
that accumulates in the cytoplasm inhibits RA-dependent transcription and differentiation, thus suggesting that cytoplasmic localization of PML-RAR
may contribute to transformation. Finally, we show that the bcr3 PML-RAR
form is predominantly cytoplasmic and accumulates in PML-CBs. Taken together, these findings reveal novel insights into the molecular mechanisms contributing to APL. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(1). Two major isoforms are generated, depending on the location of the PML breakpoint, named bcr1 (long) and bcr3 (short) (2, 3). PML-RAR
is able to act as a dominant-negative retinoic acid receptor, thus inhibiting the response to RA and blocking RA-induced differentiation (4). This function is mainly exerted through changes at the chromatin level through the recruitment of histone deacetylases and methyltransferases (5-7). However, it is presently unclear whether other mechanisms are involved. Treatment with pharmacological doses of all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) causes the degradation of the fusion protein and the maturation of the leukemic cells, thus resulting in clinical remission in patients (8). However, 20-30% of patients are insensitive to such treatment and suffer relapse (8). Treatment regimens of such patients include the use of arsenic trioxide, which has a high efficacy (9, 10). On the other hand, PML-RAR
inhibits PML tumor-suppressive functions thus lending the leukemic cells a growth and survival advantage (1). Because the effects of PML-RAR
on PML are dose-dependent (1), the product of the remaining PML allele may oppose PML-RAR
-mediated leukemogenesis. Indeed, progressive reduction of the PML gene dosage in a murine APL model results in increased incidence and decreased latency of the disease (11). PML is a member of the Ring-B-box-coiled coil (alternatively named tripartite motif, TRIM) family and exists as multiple splicing variants (12). PML nuclear splice variants localize to a subnuclear structure known as the PML-nuclear body (PML-NB), which has been implicated in transcriptional regulation and is disrupted in APL (1). Nuclear PML is essential for the proper formation and stability of these subnuclear structures (1). Several nuclear proteins localize to the PML-NB, such as p53, the p53 acetyltransferase cAMP-response element-binding protein-binding protein (CBP), the cell death regulator Daxx, and Sp100 (1). By contrast, cytoplasmic isoforms are less characterized. One specific cytoplasmic isoform has been associated with transforming growth factor-
signaling (13). Remarkably, a recent study conducted on a cohort of 17 RA-resistant APL cases identified two Pml mismatch mutations in the remaining allele, which are associated with very aggressive disease (14). Both mutations (1272delAG and IVS3-1G-A) generate a premature stop codon upstream of the nuclear localization signal. Thus, the resulting truncated proteins accumulate in the cytoplasm (14). Furthermore, another study identified a murine plasmacytoma cell line harboring a PML mutation (mut ex3), which also leads to a premature stop codon at the end of exon three, cytoplasmic localization and dominant-negative properties (15). PML-RAR
itself undergoes alternative splicing to produce truncated proteins that are predicted to localize in the cytoplasm (16, 17). Localization of PML-RAR
in the cytoplasm has been reported to cause an endoplasmic reticulum stress response and the ubiquitination of N-Cor (18). Moreover, the proteolytic cleavage of PML-RAR
by elastase results in cytoplasmic accumulation of the PML portion of the fusion protein and is probably required for disease progression (19). Thus, accumulating evidence suggests that both PML and PML-RAR
might have a functional role in the cytoplasm.
Although APL-associated PML mutations have been shown to cause PML relocation to the cytoplasm (14), the evidence that PML delocalization has an impact on the sensitivity to maturation signals such as RA was lacking. Here we show that mutant PML potentiates PML-RAR
-mediated block of differentiation and inhibition of retinoic acid-dependent transcription. Moreover, PML mutants form cytoplasmic bodies (PML-CB), where selective PML-NB components accumulate. PML-RAR
itself accumulates in PML-CB and colocalizes with Mut PML. Finally, we found that a PML-RAR
mutant that accumulates in the cytoplasm retains the ability to inhibit RA-dependent transcription and differentiation.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cloning and Plasmids GenerationPML mutants (14) as well as PML-RAR
bcr3 were generated by using PCR-based strategies, tagged at the amino terminus with HA or Myc epitope, and then subcloned in into pcDNA3.0 (Invitrogen) and pBABE PURO (20). PML-RAR
bcr1 (17) was cut from PINCO-PML-RAR
(a kind gift of Dr. Saverio Minucci) and subcloned into pSG5, pcDNA3.0, and pBABE PURO. When not specified, the PML-RAR
form used in this study is brc1. QuikChange® site-directed mutagenesis kit was used according to the manufacturer's instructions to delete PML or both PML and RAR nuclear localization signals (nls) of PML-RAR
to generate pcDNA-PML-RAR
-
NLS1 and -
NLS2, respectively (
1PR and
2PR). PML-RAR
2 mutant that lacks the capability to bind RXR
has been described elsewhere (21) and was generated using standard PCR-based strategy. Finally, RXR
cDNA was amplified using RNA prepared from human primary fibroblasts (BJ) and subcloned into pcDNA 3.0.
Subcellular FractionationFor each cell type, subcellular fractionation was performed as described previously (22). Cells were harvested, washed twice in ice-cold PBS, and homogenized using a loose-fitting Dounce homogenizer in ice-cold hypotonic buffer (10 mM Hepes, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA in the presence of a complete protease/inhibitor mixture). Alternatively, hematopoietic NB4 cells were homogenized using a tight-fitting Dounce homogenizer in ice-cold hypotonic buffer with added 0.25 M sucrose. After that, the homogenate was centrifuged at 1000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C to obtain pellet (P1) and supernatant (S1) consisting of nuclei and whole cytoplasmic extracts, respectively. Pellet P1 was lysed in ice-cold hypertonic buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Hepes, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA supplemented with a complete protease/inhibitor mixture), whereas S1 was further centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 1 h at 4 °C to obtain pellet (P100) and supernatant (S100) which represent, respectively, the insoluble (membranes enriched) and soluble cytosolic fractions. Aliquots of each fraction as well as whole cellular lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with relevant antibodies.
ImmunoprecipitationCells were lysed in immunoprecipitation (IP) buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM Na2VO3, 2.5 mM NaF, and 0.5% Triton X-100 in the presence of a complete protease/inhibitor mixture). 500 µg of lysates was subjected to immunoprecipitation using Sepharose beads coated with relevant antibodies for 3 h at 4 °C. Immunocomplexes were washed five times with 500 µl of IP buffer, resuspended in SDS sample buffer, and then subjected to Western blot analysis.
Western BlotsWestern blot analysis was performed as described previously (23). In particular, the effect of Mut PML on PML-RAR
protein levels was assayed upon treatments with ATRA or arsenic trioxide (As2O3) in COS1 cells. Briefly, 2.5 x 105 cells were seeded in a 6-well plate for 12 h before transfection. Transfections were carried out using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The following expression vectors were transfected: 1600 ng of pcDNA-HAPML-RAR
together with 400 to 200 ng of pcDNA-mycMut PML or empty vector. Eight hours later cells were washed twice with PBS and cultured in the presence or absence of 0.1 µM ATRA (Sigma) or 1 µM arsenic trioxide (Sigma). Finally, cells were harvested 12 and 24 h after treatments, and PML-RAR
protein levels were analyzed by Western blot.
AntibodiesAntibodies employed in this study are as follows: rabbit anti-human PML (Chemicon), mouse anti-human PML PG-M3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-HA (Sigma), anti-Myc tag (Cell Signaling), anti-EEA1 (BD Biosciences), anti-FLAG (Sigma), anti-RAR
(C20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-RXR
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-DAXX human (Upstate%20Biotechnology">Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.), anti-Sp100 (a kind gift of Thomas Hofmann) (24), anti-CBP (A22; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-CD11b fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated (Caltag Laboratories). Fluorescein isothiocyanate- and phycoerythrin-conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Molecular Probes (Invitrogen), and hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase-linked secondary antibodies were purchased from Amersham Biosciences.
ImmunofluorescenceImmunofluorescence and confocal microscopy was performed as previously described (25).
Electron Microscopy and Immunogold CytochemistryAdherent cells were processed and embedded in epoxy resin. Duplicate pellets were fixed with 4% formaldehyde (freshly made up from paraformaldehyde) or a mixture of 4% formaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde in PBS, pH 7.4, for 1 h at room temperature and rinsed in PBS. A subset of these pellets was post-fixed in a mixture of osmium tetroxide (0.05%) and potassium ferrocyanide (0.05%). All were embedded in LR-White resin (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK) and labeled with immunogold (British Biocell International, Cardiff, UK) (26). Ultra-thin sections were examined unstained or after staining with lead citrate and/or uranyl acetate. Control incubations involved the replacement of primary antibody with an equivalent concentration of the appropriate immunoglobulin.
NucleofectionU937 cells were transfected using the Amaxa Nucleofector system (Amaxa GmbH) according to the manufacturer's instructions (protocol V-01).
Transcriptional AssaysCells (COS1) were seeded 24 h prior transfection in 12-well plates and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma), penicillin/streptomycin, and GlutaMAX (Invitrogen). Transfection was carried out by using a calcium phosphate transfection kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For RA-dependent transcription, the following expression vectors were used (100 ng unless otherwise stated): pCH110, 300 ng of pRep4-RARE-Luc and pcDNA-PML-RAR
alone or in combination with 100 ng of pcDNA-HAMut PML. Fresh medium containing 10-7 M ligand (ATRA) was added 24 h post-transfection, and cells were incubated for 12 h. Finally, cells were harvested, and 5µl of extracts were assayed by using dual light system kit (Applied Biosystem) for luciferase activity according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transcriptional activity of PML-RAR
NLS-1 and -2 mutants was assayed as above. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and transfected with 1 µg each of pcDNA-PML-RAR
, pcDNA-PR
NLS-1, and -2. Effects of PML-RARµ
2 on dihydroxyvitamin D3-dependent transcription were investigated in transiently transduced COS1 cells. Briefly, cells were transfected with 300 ng of vitamin D3 luciferase reporter (consisting of four DR3-type vitamin D3-responsive elements inserted upstream of the tk-luciferase) (kind gift of Professor Carsten Carlberg), 600 ng of PML-RAR
(bcr-1), PML-RAR
2, or pcDNA3.0 vectors along with 100 ng of pCH110. Cells were cultured for 12 h in presence or absence of 10-6 M of dihydroxyvitamin D3 (Calbiochem) and subsequently assayed for luciferase and
-galactosidase activities.
|
Differentiation AnalysisNB4 and U937 cells were infected as described previously (23) using empty and Mut PML or PML-RAR
2 retroviral constructs, respectively. Infection was carried out using spinoculation. Cells were selected with puromycin and used either as clones or mixed populations. Differentiation was induced as reported (27) culturing cells with 10-7 or 10-6 M ATRA. After 4 days, differentiation was assayed by flow cytometry analysis of differentiation surface marker CD11b (Caltag Laboratories). In addition, differentiation was evaluated by morphological analysis of U937 cells following hematoxylin-eosin staining.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
FunctionPML-RAR
acts as a strong inhibitor of the RA receptor complex, thus causing a block of RA-dependent transcription and differentiation (4). We reasoned that Mut PML could affect PML-RAR
-mediated inhibition of RA-dependent processes in leukemic cells. As both Mut PML and PML-RAR
contain the Ring-B-box-coiled coil motif, they can potentially interact and form heterodimers. To test this, we coexpressed Mut PML and PML-RAR
and found that they partially colocalized in cytoplasmic bodies (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, we were able to coimmunoprecipitate PML-RAR
and Mut PML in transfected 293T cells and fibroblasts (Fig. 2B). Remarkably, we found that expression of Mut PML potentiated the inhibition of ATRA-dependent transcription exerted by PML-RAR
(Fig. 2C). To uncover the potential mechanisms underlying the Mut PML-mediated effect on PML-RAR
, we analyzed the effect of Mut PML expression on PML-RAR
down-regulation upon ATRA treatment. Expression of Mut PML resulted in impaired PML-RAR
down-modulation in the presence of different concentrations of ATRA (0.1 and 1 µM; Fig. 2D and not shown). Instead, Mut PML did not affect arsenic trioxide (As2O3)-mediated down-regulation of PML-RAR
(Fig. 2D). However, As2O3 caused reduction of Mut PML protein levels as well, thus explaining the lack of protection (Fig. 2D). To determine whether Mut PML could affect differentiation in the context of APL cells, we transduced the APL cell line NB4 with Mut PML and analyzed the sensitivity to ATRA (Fig. 3A). Mut PML and PML-RAR
partially colocalized in cytoplasmic bodies in these cells (Fig. 3B). Vector- and Mut PML-transduced cells were cultured in the presence of ATRA and analyzed for the expression of the differentiation marker CD11b. Remarkably, in Mut PML-transduced NB4 cells differentiation induced by pharmacological concentrations of ATRA was reduced (Fig. 3C). This indicates that Mut PML is able to potentiate PML-RAR
activity in the context of APL.
|
Inhibits the Response to RAPrevious reports have shown that overexpressed PML-RAR
localizes to the cytoplasm (18, 28-30). We confirmed that in a fraction of transfected fibroblasts (
40%) PML-RAR
accumulates in cytoplasmic structures reminiscent of PML-CB (Fig. 4D and not shown). We then analyzed the distribution of overexpressed full-length PML-RAR
by subcellular fractionation and found that it accumulated in both nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions (Fig. 4A). Moreover, endogenous PML-RAR
accumulated in the cytosolic fraction of an APL cell line, NB4 (Fig. 4B).
To analyze the consequences of cytoplasmic localization of PML-RAR
, we constructed bcr1 PML-RAR
mutants lacking PML nls only (
1 PR) or both PML and RAR
nls (
2 PR) (Fig. 4C).
1 and
2 PR mutants were expressed in both COS1 and U937 cells (Fig. 4D). Immunofluorescence analyses demonstrated that although wild type PML-RAR
was found either in the nucleus only (60% cells; Fig. 4D, upper panel) or in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm (40% cells; Fig. 4D, lower panel),
2 PR was instead exclusively cytoplasmic (Fig. 4D). Interestingly,
1 PR predominantly accumulated in the cytoplasm, thus suggesting that PML nls governs the nuclear localization of PML-RAR
(Fig. 4D). We then studied the transcriptional properties of the PR mutants in COS1 cells. Surprisingly, we found that both
2 and
1 PR are fully capable of inhibiting ATRA-dependent transcription (Fig. 4E and not shown). Furthermore, we observed that
2 PR is not down-regulated upon RA treatment, thus suggesting that cytoplasmic localization of PML-RAR
results in its impaired degradation (Fig. 4F).
Based on these findings, we conjectured that cytoplasmic PML-RAR
could induce the delocalization of essential transcriptional regulators to the cytoplasm. Previous reports have shown that PML-RAR
induces the delocalization of the RA receptor component RXR
to aberrant nuclear and cytoplasmic foci (29). Remarkably, we also found that
2 PR causes the relocation of both endogenous and exogenous RXR
to PML-CB (Fig. 5A and data not shown). To determine whether delocalization of RXR
is required for transcriptional inhibition, we constructed a
2PR mutated at residues essential for RXR
binding (
2 M883R/T886R) (21).
2 M883R/T886R was less potent in repressing ATRA-dependent transcription, indicating that RXR
recruitment is required at least in part for transcriptional repression (Fig. 5B). We next tested whether vitamin D3 (VD3)-dependent transcription, which relies on RXR
and is repressed by WT PML-RAR
, was inhibited by
2 PR (Fig. 5C). Indeed, endogenous VD3 receptor activity is repressed by cytoplasmic PR to an extent similar to WT PR (Fig. 5C).
|
Inhibits Differentiation of Hematopoietic Cells To determine whether
2 PR-mediated impairment of RA-dependent transcription has functional consequences on the maturation of hematopoietic cells, we transduced U937 cells with
2 PR retroviruses and analyzed the sensitivity of the resulting clones to ATRA-induced differentiation (Fig. 6A). Strikingly, the morphology of ATRA-treated
2 PR-expressing cells was almost indistinguishable from control cells, and many mitotic figures were readily detectable in ATRA-treated
2 PR cells (Fig. 6B). Accordingly, the expression of the maturation marker CD11b upon ATRA treatment was inhibited in
2 PR-transduced U937 clones (Fig. 6C).
bcr3 PML-RAR
Largely Localizes to the Cytoplasm and Colocalizes with RXR
We next analyzed the localization pattern of the bcr3 PML-RAR
form (Fig. 7A), which lacks the PML nls (2, 3), and found, remarkably, that it was predominantly cytoplasmic (Fig. 7, A and B). Moreover, as for
2 PR, bcr3 PML-RAR
colocalized with both overexpressed and endogenous RXR
(Fig. 7, A and B). Finally, we analyzed the subcellular distribution of PML-RAR
in primary APL cells carrying the bcr3 breakpoint and found that a substantial amount of PML-RAR
accumulates in the cytoplasm (Fig. 7C). Furthermore, RXR
predominantly partitioned to the cytoplasmic fractions, thus indicating that cytoplasmic PML-RAR
also induces RXR
delocalization in primary APL cells (Fig. 7C).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-mediated leukemogenesis is believed to occur mainly through chromatin remodeling, which leads to dramatic changes in the transcriptome of hematopoietic cells. However, limited information is available about the mechanisms that could promote transformation without a direct effect on chromatin. Our work indicates that cytosolic localization of PML and PML-RAR
can affect transcription and promote a differentiation block in hematopoietic cells. Cytosolic PML Mutants Accumulate in Doughnut-shaped Cytoplasmic BodiesWe have demonstrated that Mut PML forms novel cytoplasmic structures, which we named PML-CB, and closely resembles the PML-NB in EM analyses. This suggests that essential components of the two structures could be shared. Alternatively, PML could be the core and essential component required for the assembly of the doughnut-shaped body. The fact that Mut PML associates with the insoluble part of the cytoplasm originally prompted us to investigate whether it could colocalize with cytoplasmic organelles. However, we were unable to demonstrate any colocalization with known organelles. In particular, Mut PML does not associate with endosomes, as it is known for a cytoplasmic PML isoform (13). It is therefore possible that the association with endosomes may be lost in APL cells expressing truncated PML mutants. While analyzing the distribution of various PML-NB components, we found that CBP relocates to PML-CB in Mut PML-expressing cells, whereas Daxx and Sp100 do not. It is reasonable to hypothesize that CBP redistribution could have functional consequences on the activation of selected transcription factors.
|
|
We found that Mut PML colocalizes and interacts with PML-RAR
in both adherent cells and leukemic blasts. Surprisingly, Mut PML potentiates PML-RAR
-mediated repression of RA-dependent transcription, thus suggesting that cytoplasmic localization of PML-RAR
may result in transcriptional inhibition in the absence of direct effects on chromatin. Remarkably, expression of Mut PML in APL cells counteracts differentiation induced by pharmacological doses of RA. Furthermore, we demonstrated that Mut PML hampers PML-RAR
degradation induced by RA, thus providing a mechanistic explanation for the observed resistance to RA. It is possible that Mut PML can interfere with the proteasome-mediated degradation of PML-RAR
, which is as yet poorly characterized. Another possibility is that Mut PML modulates PML-RAR
SUMOylation, which has been shown to be essential for PML-RAR
-transforming capacity (21).
|
Inhibits Transcription and DifferentiationConsistent with previous reports (18, 28-30), we found that overexpressed PML-RAR
can locate to the cytoplasm. In addition, we demonstrated that endogenous PML-RAR
accumulates in the cytoplasmic fraction of APL cells, thus suggesting it can bear cytoplasmic functions. To test this, we analyzed whether a PML-RAR
mutant (
2 PR) that localizes to the cytoplasm retains the ability of inhibiting RA-dependent transcription. Indeed,
2 PR is almost as potent as WT PML-RAR
in repressing RA-triggered transcription.
2 PR is not down-regulated upon RA, thus again supporting the hypothesis that cytoplasmic localization of PML-RAR
inhibits its RA-dependent degradation. Interestingly,
2 PR colocalizes with RXR
in PML-CB. It is of note that the cytoplasmic redistribution of RXR
has been reported to cause an impairment in its transcriptional function (31). We have found that mutations abolishing RXR
binding substantially reduce
2 PR repressing activity, thus suggesting that RXR
relocation is one of the potential mechanisms involved. As the rescue is not complete, it is conceivable that other mechanisms may contribute to the observed phenomena.
2 PR appears to be a potent inhibitor of differentiation as it represses differentiation in U937 cells at pharmacological doses of RA. Interestingly, we found that although
2 PR causes a 50% reduction of CD11b+ cells compared with ATRA treatment, the morphology of RA-treated
2 PR-infected cells is nearly undistinguishable from untreated cells. Moreover, proliferation is not substantially blocked in
2 PR-expressing cells, which continue to proliferate even at high concentrations of ATRA (1 µM).3 This aspect warrants further investigation in the near future. Finally, we found that the bcr3 form of PML-RAR
, which has been associated with poor prognosis in a number of studies (2, 3), localizes to the cytoplasm at a greater extent than the bcr1 form and causes the redistribution of RXR
to PML-CB. In cells from an APL patient carrying the bcr3 break point, a large fraction of PML-RAR
is found in the cytosol, where also RXR
accumulates. Overall, our findings suggest that PML-RAR
cytoplasmic pool may affect transcription and differentiation in the absence of direct effects on chromatin-dependent phenomena (Fig. 7D).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Fig. 1. ![]()
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-116-2525568; Fax: 44-116-2525616; E-mail: ps90{at}le.ac.uk.
2 The abbreviations used are: APL, acute promyelocytic leukemia; PML, promyelocytic leukemia; RAR, retinoic acid receptor; CB, cytoplasmic body; ATRA, all-trans-retinoic acid; nls, nuclear localization signal; WT, wild type; DAPI, 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; CBP, cAMP-response element-binding protein-binding protein; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; HA, hemagglutinin; Mut, mutant; PML-NB, PML-nuclear body; VD3, vitamin D3; PR, PML-RAR
. ![]()
3 C. Bellodi and P. Salomoni, unpublished observations. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Jul-Larsen, A. Grudic, R. Bjerkvig, and S. O. Boe Cell-cycle regulation and dynamics of cytoplasmic compartments containing the promyelocytic leukemia protein and nucleoporins J. Cell Sci., April 15, 2009; 122(8): 1201 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Ye, B. Zerlanko, R. Zhang, N. Somaiah, M. Lipinski, P. Salomoni, and P. D. Adams Definition of pRB- and p53-Dependent and -Independent Steps in HIRA/ASF1a-Mediated Formation of Senescence-Associated Heterochromatin Foci Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2007; 27(7): 2452 - 2465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |