JBC Connect with Cosmo for Collagen Detection

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M602607200 on March 30, 2006

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 22, 15423-15433, June 2, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/22/15423    most recent
M602607200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yan, H.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, H.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yan, H.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, H.-Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase PCP-2 Inhibits beta-Catenin Signaling and Increases E-cadherin-dependent Cell Adhesion*

He-Xin Yan{ddagger}, Wen Yang{ddagger}, Rui Zhang{ddagger}, Lei Chen{ddagger}, Liang Tang{ddagger}, Bo Zhai{ddagger}, Shu-Qin Liu{ddagger}, Hui-Fang Cao{ddagger}, Xiao-Bo Man{ddagger}, Hong-Ping Wu{ddagger}, Meng-Chao Wu{ddagger}, and Hong-Yang Wang{ddagger}§1

From the {ddagger}International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Institute, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438 and the §National Laboratory for Oncogene and Related Genes, Cancer Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200032, China

Received for publication, March 20, 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
beta-Catenin is a key molecule involved in both cell adhesion and Wnt signaling pathway. However, the exact relationship between these two roles has not been clearly elucidated. Tyrosine phosphorylation of beta-catenin was shown to decrease its binding to E-cadherin, leading to decreased cell adhesion and increased beta-catenin signaling. We have previously shown that receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase PCP-2 localizes to the adherens junctions and directly binds and dephosphorylates beta-catenin, suggesting that PCP-2 might regulate the balance between signaling and adhesive beta-catenin. Here we demonstrate that PCP-2 can inhibit both the wild-type and constitutively active forms of beta-catenin in activating target genes such as c-myc. The phosphatase activity of PCP-2 is required for this effect since loss of catalytic activity attenuates its inhibitory effect on beta-catenin activation. Expression of PCP-2 in SW480 colon cancer cells can lead to stabilization of cytosolic pools of beta-catenin perhaps, by virtue of their physical interaction. PCP-2 expression also leads to increased membrane-bound E-cadherin and greater stabilization of adherens junctions by dephosphorylation of beta-catenin, which could further sequester cytosolic beta-catenin and thus inhibit beta-catenin mediated nuclear signaling. Furthermore, SW480 cells stably expressing PCP-2 have a reduced ability to proliferate and migrate. Thus, PCP-2 may play an important role in the maintenance of epithelial integrity, and a loss of its regulatory function may be an alternative mechanism for activating beta-catenin signaling.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Reversible and dynamic tyrosine phosphorylation is controlled by the opposing actions of protein-tyrosine kinases and protein-tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs)2 (1). PTPs are a large family that is broadly classified into receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) and cytosolic PTPs (2). A subfamily of RPTPs containing an MAM (Meprin/A5/PTP mu) domain in the ectodomain followed by an Ig-like domain and fibronectin type III repeats is defined as the MAM-subfamily PTPs (MAM-PTPs), which include PCP-2, PTPµ, PTP{kappa}, and PTP{rho} (3, 4). These RPTPs also contain a single membrane-spanning region with two cytoplasmic PTP domains. The intracellular juxtamembrane domain of these RPTPs contains a region that is homologous to the conserved intracellular domain of the cadherins (5).

Cadherins are a family of calcium-dependent adhesion molecules that play an essential role in the formation of the cell-cell contacts termed adherens junctions. Cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion is important for development and maintenance of epithelial tissue integrity, and its disturbance contributes to the invasive and metastatic phenotype of epithelial tumors. Through their intracellular domains, cadherins associate with molecules of the Armadillo superfamily including beta-catenin, which links them to the actin cytoskeleton via the {alpha}-catenin bridge (6, 7). In addition to its adhesive functions, beta-catenin has also been found to serve as a key component in Wnt signaling (8, 9). When released from E-cadherin, uncomplexed beta-catenin is rapidly degraded by cytosolic proteasomes. Failure to properly degrade beta-catenin, primarily attributable to an impairment in its ubiquitination, results in its posttranslational stabilization and passage into the nucleus, where it interacts with transcription factors of T cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (Tcf/Lef) family to activate target genes involved in cell growth control and apoptosis such as c-myc and cyclin D1 (10, 11). Aberrant activation of beta-catenin signaling has been implicated in cancer formation in numerous basic and clinical studies (12).

There is increasing evidence to suggest that phosphorylation of tyrosyl residues in some components of the cadherin/catenin complex leads to loss of adhesive function and breakdown of adherens junction. Roura et al. (13) reported that phosphorylation of tyrosine residue 654 on beta-catenin diminishes its association with E-cadherin. Furthermore, they observed that phosphorylation of Tyr-654 also stimulated the association of beta-catenin to the basal transcription factor TATA-binding protein. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that phosphorylation-dependent release of beta-catenin from the cadherin complex not only regulates the integrity and function of the adhesion complex but may also be an alternative mechanism for activating beta-catenin signaling (14). We and others have previously shown that several RPTPs were functionally associated with E-cadherin/beta-catenin complex and play a regulatory role in the control of the integrity of cell junctions, presumably by keeping them in a dephosphorylated state (1518). In this study, we investigated the regulatory effect of PCP-2 on nuclear signaling activity of beta-catenin. We demonstrate that PCP-2 repressed not only wild-type but also active mutant beta-catenin-induced transcriptional activity. PCP-2 expression in human colon carcinoma cell line SW480, in which the beta-catenin signaling pathway is up-regulated, led to stabilization of cytosolic pools of beta-catenin, perhaps by their physical interaction and by enhancing adherens junction stability, thus decreasing the transcriptional activity of beta-catenin by sequestering the protein at the plasma membrane. This effect was attributed to the inhibition of cell proliferation and migration when PCP-2 was transfected into SW480 cells. These results delineate a novel role for PCP-2 in regulation of the canonical beta-catenin signaling pathway.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Culture and Transfections—HEK293, SW480 colon carcinoma cells, A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells, and SW850 pancreatic carcinoma cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Stable SW480 clones were generated by transfection using JetPEI (Polyplus) of pcDNA3.0 or PCP-2 constructs and screened by Western blotting. Positive clones expressing similar levels of PCP-2 were cultured in the presence of 300 µg/ml G418 for maintenance of transgene expression.

Plasmids—Different recombinants for wild-type or mutant forms of PCP-2 were constructed using pcDNA3/Myc(–) (Invitrogen). All beta-catenin constructs tagged with Myc were produced by PCR amplification with the use of human wild-type beta-catenin in a pRK5RS vector as a template. The fidelity of the constructs was verified by DNA sequencing. The resulting PCR products were subcloned into the pcDNA3/Myc(–) vector. N-terminal-deleted beta-catenin (beta-{Delta}N) lacks the first 140 amino acids, C-terminal-deleted beta-catenin (beta-{Delta}C) lacks the last 147 amino acids, and armadillo-domain-deleted beta-catenin (beta-{Delta}Arm) contains both the N-terminal 140 amino acids and the C-terminal 147 amino acids but lacks the 141–633 amino acids. Point mutant Y654E was obtained using the QuikChangeTM site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).

Antibodies—Monoclonal antibodies specific for E-cadherin and beta-catenin were purchased from BD Transduction Laboratories and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA), respectively. Polyclonal antibodies reactive with PCP-2 were used as described (18). The monoclonal antibodies against Myc tag (9B11) and phosphotyrosine (P-Tyr-102) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology. The monoclonal antibodies specific for c-Myc was purchased from Neomarker (Fremint, CA).

beta-Catenin/Tcf Luciferase Reporter Assay—Two different Tcf-luciferase reporter constructs were used in this study: an intact wild-type Tcf-luciferase construct (pGL-OT) and a mutant Tcf-luciferase reporter construct (pGL-OF) (both gifts of B. Vogelstein) (10). The cyclin D1 reporter plasmid was kindly provided by Dr. O. Tetsu (11). A Dual Luciferase reporter assay was carried out according to the manufacturer's suggestions (Promega). pRL-TK (Promega) was cotransfected with each reporter construct to normalize for transfection. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Immunofluorescence—Cells were cultured on glass coverslips, fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100. The coverslips were incubated with E-cadherin or beta-catenin monoclonal antibodies at 4 °C overnight. The secondary antibody was fluorescein isothiocyanate- or Cy3-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Sigma). After being washed in Tris-buffered saline, coverslips were mounted with 90% glycerol in Tris-buffered saline and analyzed with a conventional fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX70).

Immunoprecipitation, Immunoblotting, and Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)—Cell extracts were prepared using Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 1mM EGTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM beta-glycerol phosphate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin). The supernatant was collected and incubated with antibodies at 4 °C for 3 h and then with protein A for an additional 3 h. The beads were washed three times with lysis buffer and resuspended in SDS sample buffer. For immunoblot analysis, samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schüll). The membrane was first probed with a specific antibody and then detected using the ECL system with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Amersham Biosciences). For ChIP assay, chromatin was isolated from formaldehyde-treated SW480 cells, fragmented to a mean size <600 bp, and subjected to ChIP using chromatin immunoprecipitation assay kits (Upstate%20Biotechnology">Upstate Biotechnology, Hamburg, Germany) together with 10 µgof beta-catenin-specific antibody following Upstate%20Biotechnology">Upstate Biotechnology's protocol. A specific primer pair for the c-myc promoter region was used for investigating the binding of beta-catenin to DNA. For analyzing chromatin input, one-fiftieth of the precipitated chromatin was taken as a template, and for all other reactions, one-tenth of the precipitated chromatin was taken as a template.

Cell Fractionation—To obtain Triton X-100-soluble and -insoluble fractions, cells were incubated with Triton buffer (1% Triton X-100, 0.3 M sucrose, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) for 15 min on a rocking platform. After centrifugation, the supernatant (Triton X-100-soluble fraction) was collected. The cell pellet was resuspended in SDS lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 2.5 mM EDTA, 1% SDS, and 1 mM dithiothreitol) and subjected to standard SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis.

Aggregation Assay and Wound Healing—Cell-cell adhesion was evaluated in an aggregation assay, as described previously (19). In brief, cultures were rinsed with 10 mM HCMF buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 137 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 0.3 mM Na2HPO4·7H2O, 5.5 mM glucose) containing 2 mM CaCl2 and trypsinized into single cells by incubation with 0.04% trypsin in HCMF buffer supplemented with 2 mM CaCl2. They were then incubated under gyratory shaking at 80 rpm for 30 min in HCMF containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 1.25 mM Ca2+ and photographed. For in vitro wound assays, monolayers of cells were wounded by scraping with a plastic pipette tip, rinsed several times with medium to remove dislodged cells, and cultured in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium for 24 h in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. Cells that had migrated into the wound area were photographed with a light microscope equipped with phase-contrast optics (Olympus IX70).

Cell Surface Biotinylation—Cells were rinsed once in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and twice in ice-cold PBS, pH 7.5, and then incubated with 1.0 mg/ml sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin (biotin disulfide N-hydroxysuccinimide ester, Pierce) and dissolved in PBS for 30 min on a rocking platform on ice. Biotinylation was stopped by washing twice in PBS containing 100 mM glycine and twice in PBS for altogether 35 min. Cells were solubilized in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitors: 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin), pH 7.4. The unlysed cells were removed by centrifugation at 15,700 x g at 4 °C. A 50-µl volume of streptavidin-agarose beads was then added to the supernatant to isolate cell-membrane protein. Membrane-associated E-cadherin or beta-catenin was detected in the pool of surface proteins by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.

Generation of Recombinant Adenovirus Expressing PCP-2—The PCP-2 coding sequence insert was cloned into the adenoviral shuttle vector (Stratagene). Then it was linearized with PmeI and cotransformed with E1-deleted adenoviral backbone AdEasy-1 into the competent bacterial strain BJ5183, which allows efficient recombination to occur. After screening, recombinants for adenoviruses Ad-PCP-2 and Ad-Blank, which contain no insert sequence as a control, were generated.


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1.
PCP-2 prevented transactivation by beta-catenin. A, HEK293 cells were cotransfected with wild-type beta-catenin and the increasing amounts of plasmids expressing PCP-2 together with the Tcf reporter construct pGL-OT or pGL-OF, which harbors mutated Tcf-binding sites. Luciferase activity was determined 24 h after transfection. pRL-TK was used as a control for transfection efficiency. The total amount of plasmids was held constant for each transfection by the addition of empty pcDNA3 vector. Western blot analysis for beta-catenin and PCP-2 in cell lysates from the experiment was shown. B, constructs for PCP-2 were cotransfected into HEK293 cells with reporter constructs. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were treated with LiCl (20 mM) for an additional 12 h and subjected to luciferase assay and Western blot analysis for the LiCl-induced beta-catenin expression. C, HEK293 cells were cotransfected with wild-type beta-catenin and PCP-2 together with a cyclin D1 reporter gene and, 24 h later, were subjected to luciferase assay and immunoblotting. D, down-regulation of PCP-2 by siRNA. A431 cells were transfected with PCP-2 siRNA or irrelevant control siRNA, and 36 h later, were subjected to real-time PCR analysis. The mRNA copy numbers were normalized to the corresponding copy number of beta-actin. E, down-regulation of PCP-2 led to beta-catenin transactivation. A431 cells were cotransfected with siRNA and reporter plasmids. Twenty-four hours later, cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml EGF for an additional 8 h and subjected to luciferase assay. Shown is the fold induction of luciferase activity after EGF treatment. Similar results were obtained in two additional independent experiments.

 
Growth Curves and Colony Formation Assay—Growth Curves, stable SW480 cell lines (5 x 104) were plated per well of 6-well plates. At each time point, the cells were trypsinized and counted. Each data point was performed in triplicate. The measurement of viable cell mass was also performed with a Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojin Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) to count living cells by WST-8. For colony formation after transfection with drug selection, an equivalent number of SW480 cells (106) were transfected with 2 µg of vector or PCP-2 constructs conferring neomycin drug resistance. After transfection, cells were replated and selected in G418-containing medium for 3 weeks, and the resultant colonies were fixed and stained with crystal violet. Transfections were done in triplicate for each combination of plasmids.

RNA Interference—Three double-stranded siRNA oligonucleotides against PCP-2 (sense strand, 5'-CCACAAAGAAGAAAGACAAGGUCAA-3', 5'-GGGACAUCAAGAUUAUGCUGGUGAA-3', 5'-GAUCCGCAUUGAUCCUCAGAGUAAU-3') were provided by Invitrogen. Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) was used as the transfection reagent according to the manufacturer's directions with 150 nmol of siRNA per well in a six-well dish. A scrambled siRNA was used as the control. siRNA transfected cells were incubated for 36–48 h in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum.


Figure 2
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2.
PCP-2 reduced transactivation capacity of non-ubiquitinatable mutant forms of beta-catenin. A, schematic presentation of the Myc-tagged point mutant beta-catenin S37A and the different truncation forms of beta-catenin (left); lysates from transfected HEK293 cells were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-PCP-2 or anti-Myc antibodies. WB, Western blot. B, HEK293 cells were cotransfected with wild-type PCP-2 and the wild-type and mutant forms of beta-catenin, together with the reporter plasmids. Luciferase activity was determined 24 h after transfection. pRL-TK was used as a control for transfection efficiency.

 
In Vivo Tumorigenicity Assay—SW480 transfectants were released from tissue culture dishes and washed in serum-free medium. Tumor cells were diluted with PBS and injected into the mid-dorsum of BALB/c nude mice (4–6 weeks old) in a total of volume 0.1 ml (5 x 106). Animals were inspected weekly for tumor development. Growing tumors were measured using vernier calipers, and tumor volume was calculated by the formula length x width2 x 0.52, which approximates the volume of an elliptical solid. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t test (two-tailed). The criterion for statistical significance was taken as p < 0.05. All procedures regarding animals were conducted according to institutionally approved protocols.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PCP-2 Inhibited beta-Catenin-mediated Transcriptional Activity—We have previously demonstrated functional interaction between beta-catenin and PCP-2. To study its effect on beta-catenin-mediated transactivation, PCP-2 was cotransfected with wild-type beta-catenin into HEK293 cells together with Tcf reporter plasmid pGL-OT. As shown in Fig. 1A, PCP-2 very strongly suppressed beta-catenin-mediated luciferase activity driven from the pGL-OT reporter in a dose-dependent manner. We also used LiCl, an inhibitor of GSK3beta activity and widely used to mimic Wnt signaling, to increase endogenous beta-catenin levels and detect its transactivation potential after transfection with PCP-2. Treatment of the cells with LiCl resulted in an evident increase in beta-catenin levels. Although beta-catenin activity was elevated in empty vector-transfected cells, this effect was significantly reduced in cells transfected with PCP-2 (Fig. 1B). As functional beta-catenin/Tcf-binding sites have been identified in the promoter of cyclin D1, we then tested the effect of PCP-2 on the cyclin D1 reporter transcription. Fig. 1C shows that cyclin D1 reporter was strongly transcribed in response to wild-type beta-catenin. However, exogenous expression of PCP-2 imposed a substantial inhibition of the cyclin D1 promoter activity. To address the inhibitory effect of PCP-2 on beta-catenin transcriptional activity under normal signaling conditions, we knocked down endogenous PCP-2 level using RNA interference strategy and then examined changes of beta-catenin reporter gene activity after EGF stimulation in A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells, which overexpress EGFR. As shown in Fig. 1, D and E, PCP-2 down-regulation by siRNA led to an increased transcriptional activity of beta-catenin upon EGF treatment as compared with cells transfected with control siRNA. The specificity of PCP-2-mediated effects on Tcf reporters was confirmed by using pGL-OF, which harbors mutated Tcf-binding sites and was not influenced by PCP-2. Taken together, these results suggest that PCP-2 can exert specifically inhibitory effect on beta-catenin-dependent transcriptional activity.

PCP-2 Down-regulated the Active Mutant Form of beta-Catenin-induced Signaling—Mutations in the ubiquitin-targeting sequence of beta-catenin occur in a number of different cancers (20). Among these mutations, S37A and N-terminal truncation are common stabilizing ones that render beta-catenin resistant to ubiquitination-dependent degradation. To test whether PCP-2 could modulate the transcriptional activities of the degradation-resistant mutants of beta-catenin, we cotransfected Myc-tagged wild-type and S37A, {Delta}N, {Delta}C, or {Delta}Arm mutant beta-catenin constructs (Fig. 2A) together with empty vector or PCP-2 and the Tcf reporter plasmids pGL-OT into HEK293 cells and monitored beta-catenin signaling by assaying the reporter activity. As shown in Fig. 2B, transfection of S37A and {Delta}N mutant forms of beta-catenin significantly increased the Tcf reporter activity in HEK293 cells, whereas {Delta}C and {Delta}Arm did not, probably due to the loss of Tcf-binding sites and transactivation domain of beta-catenin. Cotransfection of PCP-2 significantly reduced both S37A and {Delta}N mutant forms of beta-catenin-induced Tcf reporter activation, indicating that the inhibitory effect of PCP-2 on beta-catenin is independent of its degradation sensitivity.


Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3.
PCP-2 phosphatase activity contributed to its inhibitory effect onbeta-catenin (beta-cat) signaling. A, tyrosine phosphorylation of beta-catenin increased Tcf-mediated transcription to a higher extent. HEK293 cells were cotransfected with wild-type beta-catenin or Y654E and Y654F mutant plasmids together with Tcf reporter constructs. Twenty-four hours later, Renilla-corrected beta-catenin-dependent luciferase activity was determined. B, HEK293 cells were cotransfected with wild-type beta-catenin or Y654E mutant and reporter constructs together with or without PCP-2. Shown is the fold repression of luciferase activity in the presence of PCP-2. Similar results were obtained in two additional independent experiments. C, HEK293 cells were cotransfected with reporter constructs, WT- or mu-PCP-2, and beta-catenin. Renilla-corrected luciferase activity was measured 24 h after transfection. D, constructs for Myc-tagged wild-type PCP-2 or its phosphatase mutant form were cotransfected into HEK293 cells with wild-type beta-catenin or Y654E mutant. Either wild-type or mutant PCP-2 proteins could be similarly detected in either wild-type or mutant beta-catenin immunoprecipitates (IP). WB, Western blot.

 
The Phosphatase Activity Was Involved in PCP-2-mediated Repression of beta-Catenin Signaling—We previously showed that PCP-2 bound beta-catenin and conferred its dephosphorylation (18). To examine whether the tyrosine phosphorylation of beta-catenin was attributed to its transcriptional activity, we transiently transfected wild-type beta-catenin or its point mutants Y654E and Y654F, which mimic the phosphorylated or dephosphorylated states of Tyr-654 respectively, together with pGL-OT reporter plasmids and determined beta-catenin-sensitive reporter activity 24 h after transfection. As shown in Fig. 3A, expression of Y654E beta-catenin mutant raised the activity of this reporter gene to a higher extent than the WT and Y654F forms of beta-catenin did. Interestingly, as compared with the wild-type beta-catenin, PCP-2-mediated fold repression of beta-catenin-dependent transcriptional activity was evidently decreased in the presence of the Y654E mutant, which was resistant to dephosphorylation by PCP-2 (Fig. 3B). These data suggest that tyrosine phosphorylation of beta-catenin lead to a greater stimulation of beta-catenin-Tcf-mediated transcription, and PCP-2-mediated dephosphorylation was necessary for its role in negatively regulating beta-catenin signaling. To further confirm these results, a catalytically inactive mutant of PCP-2 (PCP-2/CS) was generated in which critical cysteine residues in both PTP domains were mutated to serine. As shown in Fig. 3C, introduction of the Cys to Ser mutation in both PTP domains evidently interfered with its inhibitory effect on beta-catenin activity. To examine whether such mutations affect PCP-2 association with beta-catenin, Myc-tagged wild-type or mutant PCP-2 were transiently cotransfected into HEK293 cells with wild-type beta-catenin or its point mutant Y654E. Twenty-four hours later, cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with antibody specific for beta-catenin. After SDS-PAGE of immunoprecipitates, immunoblots were probed for PCP-2 and beta-catenin. As shown in Fig. 3D, either wild-type or mutant PCP-2 was efficiently coimmunoprecipitated with beta-catenin or its mutant, indicating that their association was independent of PCP-2 catalytic activity or beta-catenin tyrosine phosphorylation status.


Figure 4
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4.
PCP-2 repressed beta-catenin activity in SW480 cells. A, SW480 cells were stably transfected with cDNAs encoding for wild-type PCP-2 or a catalytic-inactive mutant PCP-2/CS. Proteins of the appropriate constructs as well as endogenous E-cadherin and beta-catenin were detected in the transfected cell clones in Western blot analysis. Vector-transfected cells served as controls. PC3, empty pcDNA3. B, ectopically expressed PCP-2 was analyzed using immunofluorescence. IF, immunofluorescence. Bar, 10 µm. C, individual cell lines were transiently transfected with reporter genes together with pRL-TK plasmid to control for transfection efficiency. Negligible activity was observed when the Tcf-binding sites were mutated. D, analysis was done using real-time PCR specific for the mRNAs of c-myc. The mRNA copy numbers were normalized to the corresponding copy number of beta-actin. E, expression of c-Myc from control and PCP-2 construct-expressing cell lines were analyzed by Western blotting (WB) with c-Myc- or beta-actin-specific antibodies (leftpanel). The protein levels were normalized to the corresponding expression levels of beta-actin (right panel). F, ChIP done with chromatin from SW480-derived cell pool using beta-catenin-specific antibody or preimmune rabbit IgG as a negative control for precipitation. Analysis was done using a specific primer for the promoter region of c-myc containing T-cell factor-4-binding elements. As controls, one-fiftieth of the starting chromatin (Input) and water (negative) was used.

 
PCP-2 Repressed beta-Catenin Activity in Colon Cancer Cell Line—To examine the effects of PCP-2 on beta-catenin signaling in detail, we isolated stable clones of SW480 cells expressing Myc-tagged WT-PCP-2 or PCP-2/CS (mu-PCP-2) and characterized them by immunoblotting (Fig. 4A) and by immunofluorescence (Fig. 4B). SW480 cells were chosen for study because they harbor a truncated APC that renders beta-catenin resistant to degradation and contains relatively low E-cadherin levels; thus, most of the beta-catenin is not retained in the membrane by this molecule (21). Two independent clones for each construct with similar protein expression levels were used for further analysis. Drug-resistant clones of empty vector-transfected cells were pooled to rule out clone-specific effects. As shown in Fig. 4C, exogenous expression of WT-PCP-2 led to a substantial drop in Tcf reporter activities. The inhibitory effect of PCP-2 was partially compromised by inactivation of its catalytic activity, as expected from the above observation that the phosphatase activity was involved in PCP-2-mediated repression of beta-catenin signaling (Fig. 3). To directly address whether there was physiological relevance to our finding of decreased beta-catenin transactivation, we then evaluated the amounts of c-myc, which was a crucial target for beta-catenin/Tcf4-mediated Wnt signaling activities. In Fig. 4, D and E, we showed that exogenous expression of PCP-2 or PCP-2/CS caused a significant reduction in the amounts of c-myc mRNA and protein levels, suggesting that the decreased transcriptional activity is accompanied by specific decreases in gene transcription and that the decrease in c-Myc protein levels occurs at the mRNA level. A ChIP assay was further performed to determine whether PCP-2 signaling caused a direct effect on reducing binding of the beta-catenin-Tcf transcription factor to the endogenous c-myc promoter region. Fig. 4F revealed that beta-catenin was indeed recruited less to the promoter regions of c-myc gene in the PCP-2-expressing cell pool than in the empty vector control cell pool. These data demonstrate that PCP-2 induced dissociation of beta-catenin-Tcf with c-myc promoter and suggest a new function for this RPTP in beta-catenin-dependent gene regulation.


Figure 5
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5.
Effect of PCP-2 on beta-catenin stability. A and B, PCP-2 or beta-catenin was immunoprecipitated from SW480 cells stably transfected with Myc-tagged WT- or mu-PCP-2. The immunoprecipitates (IP) were then analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-beta-catenin, anti-E-cadherin, or anti-Myc tag antibodies. PC3, empty pcDNA3. WB, Western blot. C, cells were chased with cycloheximide (CHX) (50 µg/ml) to inhibit de novo protein synthesis. At the indicated times after the addition of cycloheximide, the levels of the beta-catenin, E-cadherin, and beta-actin proteins were analyzed at the indicated time points by cell lysis followed by Western blot analysis using the appropriate antibodies.

 
PCP-2 Directly Associated with beta-Catenin and Enhanced Its Stability—To explore the molecular mechanism by which PCP-2 down-regulate beta-catenin signaling activity, we first tested whether PCP-2 could associate with E-cadherin/beta-catenin complex in SW480 cells. PCP-2 or beta-catenin was immunoprecipitated from SW480 cells stably transfected with Myc-tagged WT- or mu-PCP-2. The immunoprecipitates were then analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-beta-catenin, anti-E-cadherin, or anti-Myc tag antibodies. As shown in Fig. 5, A and B, both PCP-2 and E-cadherin were found in beta-catenin immunoprecipitates, but only beta-catenin could be found in PCP-2 immunoprecipitates, indicating that PCP-2 directly associated with beta-catenin but not E-cadherin. Note that mu-PCP-2 was able to coimmunoprecipitate with beta-catenin to the same extent as WT-PCP-2. We then examined whether the expression of PCP-2 could influence the stability of beta-catenin. The cells were treated with cycloheximide to block new protein synthesis; protein extracts were prepared at 0, 3, 6, and 9 h after the block. Western blotting (Fig. 5C) showed that beta-catenin was rapidly degraded in empty vector-transfected cells, whereas its levels remained stable in WT- and mu-PCP-2 cells. These data suggest that PCP-2 expression could lead to stabilization of cytosolic pools of beta-catenin perhaps by virtue of their physical interaction.

Expression of PCP-2 Led to Decreased Free Cytoplasmic beta-Catenin and Increased Membrane-associated E-cadherin—To determine whether the reduction in beta-catenin/Tcf signaling was due to beta-catenin sequestration by PCP-2 from the free competent signaling pool, beta-catenin from SW480-derived cells was affinity-precipitated with a GST-E-cadherin cytoplasmic fusion protein, and the levels of free, uncomplexed beta-catenin were analyzed by immunoblotting (Fig. 6A). As demonstrated previously, this strategy allows, in contrast to immunoprecipitation, specifically and selectively, the precipitation of the free, non-E-cadherin-bound pool of beta-catenin (22). As shown in Fig. 6, the free, uncomplexed pool of beta-catenin was significantly reduced in WT-PCP-2 cells as compared with control and mu-PCP-2 cells, whereas the total expression levels of beta-catenin were unaffected. The data demonstrate that only WT-PCP-2 could stabilize or increase the E-cadherin-bound pool of beta-catenin. To further characterize this effect, we evaluated the membrane-bound E-cadherin and beta-catenin levels with a biotinylation method using sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin. Because this modified biotin is membrane-impermeable, it only binds to surface-associated proteins, which can then be separated from the intracellular pool by conjugation with streptavidin beads and visualized by Western blotting. Using this method, we observed increased surface expression of E-cadherin and membrane-bound beta-catenin in WT-PCP-2 cells (Fig. 6B). These data, in conjunction with the results from the glutathione S-transferase pull-down studies, support the hypothesis that the functional association of PCP-2 with beta-catenin is correlated with enhanced membrane localization of E-cadherin/beta-catenin complex. It is noteworthy that membrane-bound beta-catenin was also slightly increased in mu-PCP-2 cells. Because PCP-2 is a transmembrane protein, the increased recruitment of beta-catenin at the cell-cell contacts in mu-PCP-2 cells was most possibly due to PCP-2 binding. Cell fractionation by Triton X-100 was further used to examine the attachment of the E-cadherin/catenins complex to the cytoskeleton. In Fig. 6C, we demonstrate that significantly increased amounts of E-cadherin and {alpha}- and beta-catenin were localized in the Triton X-100-insoluble fraction in WT-PCP-2-expressing cells as compared with control cells, indicating that PCP-2 enforced the linkage of E-cadherin/catenins complex to cytoskeleton.

Consistently, forced expression of WT-PCP-2 but not mu-PCP-2 induced a striking rescue of normal epithelial morphology. The loose organization of the parent cells gave way to compacted epithelial colonies (Fig. 6D, panels a–c) with increased staining of E-cadherin and beta-catenin at cell-cell junctions as observed by immunofluorescence analysis (Fig. 6D, panels d–i). Furthermore, aggregation assays show that WT-PCP-2-expressing cells formed large, tight cell clusters, whereas the other cell clones formed small aggregates that were poorly associated (Fig. 6E, panels a–c). Removal of calcium ions by the addition of EDTA/EGTA to WT-PCP-2-transfected cells decreased cell aggregation, which is comparable with the control or mu-PCP-2 cells (data not shown). These results demonstrate clearly that the increased membrane-associated E-cadherin in WT-PCP-2 cells was responsible for the observed cellular aggregation. The changes in cell adhesion led us to investigate the effect of PCP-2 expression on cell migration with use of a classical wound-healing assay. As expected, expression of WT-PCP-2 markedly reduced the number of migratory cells apparent 24 h after initiation of the assay (Fig. 6E, panels d–g), suggesting that the tighter cell-cell adhesion of WT-PCP-2-expressing cells inhibits SW480 cell migration.


Figure 6
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6.
PCP-2 expression resulted in decreased free pool of beta-catenin and increased adherens junction stability. A, affinity precipitations were performed with 5 µg of a GST-E-cadherin cytoplasmic protein. Precipitates and total cell lysate were separated by SDS-PAGE, and the levels of free, uncomplexed beta-catenin as well as total levels of beta-catenin were analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. B, for cell surface expression (left panel), cells were biotinylated, and the labeled cell surface proteins wereprecipitated with streptavidin beads, separated by SDS-PAGE, and visualized by immunoblot analysis using anti-E-cadherin or beta-catenin antibodies. Whole cell lysates were also separated and visualized as above. PC3, empty pcDNA3. C, the association of the E-cadherin/catenin complex with the cytoskeleton was examined using Triton X-100 fractionated samples. Increased expression levels of E-cadherin and {alpha}- and beta-catenin was detected in the insoluble fraction only in cells expressing wild-type PCP-2. beta-Actin was stained to prove equal loading of the blots. Representative assays out of three are shown. D, phase microscopy (panels a–c) and indirect immunofluorescence staining of E-cadherin (Cy3, panels d–f) and beta-catenin (fluorescein isothiocyanate, panels g–i) in stable cell lines. E, estimation of cell aggregation capacities in SW480 cells expressing various constructs (panels a–c). The effect of PCP-2 expression on cell migration was measured (panels d–f). Confluent monolayers of cells in serum-free medium were wounded. Cell migration into the wound was photographed and counted (panel g) at 24 h. Data are means ± S.E. of triplicates from an experiment that was repeated a total of three times with similar results. *, p < 0.05 for the indicated comparisons (Student's t test). (Original magnification, x100).

 


Figure 7
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7.
PCP-2 mediated dephosphorylation of beta-catenin. A, cells were serum-starved overnight, treated with 50 ng/ml EGF for 30 min, and lysed. Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated (IP) using anti-beta-catenin monoclonal antibody, separated by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted using anti-beta-catenin, anti-E-cadherin, or anti-tyrosine phosphorylation antibodies. PC3, empty pcDNA3; WB, Western blot. B, cells were pretreated as in A and stimulated with the indicated concentration of EGF for 5 min. Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-EGFR followed by anti-phosphotyrosine blots. C, cells were starved overnight and stimulated with EGF for the time indicated. The activated form of Erk1 and Erk2 were detected with antibodies specific for phosphorylated (P) Erk (upper panels); the same blot was also probed with antibodies to total Erk protein to ensure that the same amount of protein was present in each lane (lower panels).

 
PCP-2-mediated Dephosphorylation of beta-Catenin Contributed to Enhanced Cell Adhesion—Because the presence of phosphorylated tyrosine residues on beta-catenin is correlated with the loss of E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion, we then determined whether the level of phosphorylated beta-catenin could be influenced by PCP-2 expression. As shown in Fig. 7A, the tyrosine phosphorylation of beta-catenin was markedly attenuated in WT-PCP-2 cells without any overall change in the beta-catenin steady-state level after exposure to EGF, suggesting that expression of WT-PCP-2 shifts the balance of the tyrosine phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of beta-catenin in favor of the latter. The amount of E-cadherin coimmunoprecipitated with beta-catenin dramatically increased as the proportion of tyrosine-phosphorylated beta-catenin declined, suggesting that abrogation of beta-catenin tyrosine phosphorylation markedly enhanced beta-catenin-E-cadherin association (Fig. 7A).

Although beta-catenin itself appeared as the major site of PCP-2 action, it was possible that the restriction to beta-catenin phosphorylation might be secondary to impaired beta-catenin-associated activation of receptor protein-tyrosine kinase. This possibility was examined by analysis of EGFR phosphorylation and subsequent Erk activation upon EGF treatment. As shown in Fig. 7B, the response of EGFR to EGF stimulation was independent of PCP-2 expression, and Erk activation also behaved similarly. Therefore, EGFR regulation might not be the key mechanism underlying the effects of PCP-2 on beta-catenin. Taken together, our data suggest that PCP-2 represents a specific negative regulator of beta-catenin tyrosine phosphorylation, which induces E-cadherin/beta-catenin association and prevents an increase in free beta-catenin, thereby inhibiting its signaling activity.

PCP-2 Inhibited Cell Growth and Transformation in SW480 Cells—On the basis of the above observation, we then determined whether down-regulation of thebeta-catenin signaling pathway by PCP-2 affected cell growth and transformation in SW480 cells. As compared with empty vector or the PCP-2 mutant, introduction of WT-PCP-2 significantly inhibited cell growth and colony formation (Fig. 8, A and C). Interestingly, mu-PCP-2 cells showed an intermediate suppression between control and WT-PCP-2 cells. We also constructed Ad-Blank and Ad-PCP-2 adenovirus vectors under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter. Cells were infected with the adenoviruses, and the cell growth rate was measured using CCK-8 cell proliferation assay. Ninety percent of cells were infected at multiplicity of infection of 30, as judged by immunofluorescence analysis of PCP-2 expression (not shown). As shown in Fig. 8B, the growth rate of SW850 pancreatic carcinoma cells, in which beta-catenin/Tcf-mediated transcription was inactivated, was not affected by Ad-PCP-2, whereas SW480 growth was significantly retarded (Fig. 8A and not shown). These data suggest that the effects of PCP-2 on growth were mediated, even in part, through regulation of beta-catenin activity. Suppression of cell transformation following the exogenous PCP-2 expression in SW480 cells was confirmed in tumor xenografts (Fig. 8D). The tumor growth rate for vector control cells injected into nude mice is shown, whereas WT-PCP-2 cells did not grow tumors. Thus, stable expression of WT-PCP-2 in SW480 cells is sufficient to eradicate the tumorigenic growth of SW480 colon cancer cells, implicating a role for PCP-2 in counteracting beta-catenin-mediated neoplastic transformation even in the presence of oncogenic mutations in APC.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we have identified PCP-2 as a novel PTP of adherens junction. Our results are along the lines of the general view that activation of PTPs stabilizes the cadherin-catenin complex and results in increased cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion but go further in showing that PCP-2 also has the potential to suppress beta-catenin-dependent signaling activity. There are at least two different mechanisms for negatively regulating beta-catenin signaling: the APC/GSK3beta/axin-dependent destruction pathway and a cadherin-dependent sequestration pathway (21, 23, 24). Our observation that PCP-2-induced inhibition of beta-catenin signaling was irrespective of its proteasome sensitivity indicates that the forenamed destruction pathway might, seemingly, not be responsible for this effect. In general, activation of tyrosine kinases results in a loss of cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion and an increase in the level of cytoplasmic beta-catenin. For example, activation of EGFR or c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase resulted in beta-catenin tyrosine phosphorylation, accumulation, and increased beta-catenin-mediated gene transcription (25, 26). Conversely, pharmacological depletion of ErbB2 resulted in increased binding of beta-catenin to cadherin and a consequent decrease in beta-catenin-mediated gene transcription (27). Because PCP-2 could directly associate with beta-catenin and confer its dephosphorylation, we therefore speculate that PCP-2 might repress beta-catenin signaling either by directly sequestering cytosolic beta-catenin or by indirectly stabilizing E-cadherin/beta-catenin complex to plasma membrane. We indeed found that loss of catalytic activity of PCP-2 reduced its inhibitory effect on beta-catenin-mediated transactivation, suggesting that the inhibitory effect on beta-catenin signaling activity was not only due to direct association with PCP-2. After induction of wild-type PCP-2 expression in SW480 cells, membrane-associated E-cadherin/beta-catenin complex was increased, and the free, uncomplexed beta-catenin was decreased. Furthermore, the levels of phosphotyrosine content of beta-catenin were evidently decreased in the presence of wild-type PCP-2 upon EGF stimulation, confirming that beta-catenin may act as a substrate of PCP-2. In contrast, using a construct that can bind beta-catenin but was defective in phosphatase activity had little effect on E-cadherin localization. Although the association of mutant PCP-2 and beta-catenin also led to slightly increased levels of membrane-associated beta-catenin and reduced beta-catenin turnover, the inhibition of beta-catenin signaling activity was significantly attenuated in mu-PCP-2-expressing cells. These results suggest that direct binding of beta-catenin by PCP-2 may not only sequester free cytoplasmic beta-catenin in the vicinity of cell membrane but also induce its subsequent dephosphorylation and association with E-cadherin, thereby increasing the stability of adherens junctions, thus making beta-catenin unavailable for signaling to the nucleus.


Figure 8
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8.
PCP-2 inhibited cell growth and transformation in SW480 cells. A, growth curves for stable SW480 transfectants in complete medium containing 10% serum. Each measurement was the mean of cell counts from at least three wells. B, SW850 cells in 96-well plates were infected with Ad-Blank or Ad-PCP-2 adenoviruses at a multiplicity of infection of 30. Cell proliferation was measured using CCK-8 assay at the indicated times. The number of viable cells is proportional to the color intensities. The data shown are the means of five wells for each condition. This experiment has been repeated once, and the result was consistent with data shown here. C, colony formation assay after transfection with control plasmid (pcDNA3), wild-type PCP-2, or its mutant construct. Mock, mock-transfected. D, Xenograft tumor growth rate. 5 x 106 cells were injected subcutaneously into nude BALB/c mice (n = 5/group), and tumor volumes of xenografts were measured. Shown is the mean (±S.D.) tumor volume for SW480-pcDNA3 cells and SW480-WT-PCP-2 cells.

 
We also found that enforced expression of PCP-2 in colon carcinoma cell line SW480 significantly suppressed cell proliferation and migration. Growth inhibition of PCP-2 correlated with a reduction in beta-catenin signaling, as assessed with beta-catenin/Tcf-responsive reporter assay and evidenced by consequent inhibition of beta-catenin target gene, c-myc. Association of tyrosine-dephosphorylated beta-catenin with E-cadherin was enhanced, and this occurred concurrently with dramatically reduced cell motility, which seems to be primarily a consequence of changes in cell adhesion. Because PCP-2 was able to mediate cellular homophilic binding in a calcium-independent manner,3 it is tempting to assume a dual function for this molecule in contributing directly to the adhesion of cells by its extracellular domains and indirectly via regulation of the tyrosine phosphorylation balance at cell adherens junctions by their intracellular domains. However, aggregation assays revealed that cells expressing WT-PCP-2 were unable to form the tightly compacted cellular aggregates following treatment with calcium depletion. We therefore postulate that PCP-2-induced E-cadherin membrane localization is mainly responsible for the enforced cell integrity, and PCP-2 appears to cooperate with E-cadherin to facilitate this process.

Although beta-catenin itself appears as the major site of PCP-2 action, the mechanism whereby PCP-2 confers E-cadherin/beta-catenin stabilization also could result from its modulation on activities of beta-catenin-associated tyrosine kinases. For example, PTP-LAR (leukocyte common antigen-related) and CD45 have been shown capable of attenuating ligand-dependent tyrosine kinase receptor activation or cytokine receptor signaling (2830). However, the current results, which show that PCP-2 did not inhibit ligand-dependent activation of EGF receptor, imply that dephosphorylation of beta-catenin by PCP-2 occurred downstream of EGFR activation.

Given the ability of PCP-2 to suppress both proliferation and migration, carcinomas that lose PCP-2 expression or function may acquire a more aggressive behavior. In support of this hypothesis, a mutational analysis of the tyrosine phosphatase gene superfamily in human colon cancers identified frequent somatic mutations in PTP{rho}, another member of the MAM-PTPs family. Importantly, most commonly altered PTP{rho} genes were found to reduce phosphatase activity, and expression of wild-type, but not a mutant, PTP{rho} in human cancer cells inhibited cell growth, which is strikingly consistent with our results. In addition, PCP-2 (also known as PTP{pi}) was recently shown to be down-regulated in melanoma, which has long been recognized as the highly metastatic malignant tumor (31). It is of note that melanoma also contains highly tyrosine-phosphorylated beta-catenin and, importantly, frequent stabilizing mutations in beta-catenin or inactivation of APC (27, 32). Thus, it will be interesting to determine the therapeutic value of reintroduction of PCP-2 into these melanoma cells.

Recently, Aerne and Ish-Horowicz (33) reported that reduction of PCP-2 activity resulted in severe disruption of the segmental pattern of the zebrafish embryo and interfered with convergent extension during gastrulation. In light of our results, it is therefore possible that reduced PCP-2 activity may impinge both on the formation and establishment of specific cell layers during morphogenesis of convergent extension movements and on beta-catenin-directed transcriptional regulation of the segmentation. However, the mechanistic insight into this possibility warrants further study.

In summary, the results presented in this study suggest that PCP-2-mediated sequestration of beta-catenin and abrogation of its tyrosine phosphorylation, even in cells expressing aberrantly stable beta-catenin, may counteract the tumor-promoting activity of nuclear-localized beta-catenin while simultaneously enhancing the tumor suppressive activity of plasma membrane beta-catenin-E-cadherin complexes.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by grants from the High-Tech Research and Development Program of China (Grant 2001AA221021); China Key Basic Research Program Grant 2002BA711A02-3; and National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 30370740. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

1 Address correspondence to: Hong-Yang Wang, M.D. International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Institute, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, 200438 Shanghai, China. Tel: 86 21 2507 0856; Fax: 86 21 6556 6851; E-mail: hywangk{at}vip.sina.com.

2 The abbreviations used are: PTP, protein-tyrosine phosphatases; RPTP, receptor-like PTP; MAM-PTP, MAM-subfamily PTP; APC, adenomatous polyposis coli; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, EGF receptor; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; siRNA, small interfering RNA; Tcf, TCF, T cell factor; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; WT, wild type; mu, mutant. Back

3 P. Zhang, H.-X. Yan, and H.-Y. Wang, unpublished data. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Axel Ullrich, Dr. Bert Vogelstein, and Dr. Osamu Tetsu for kindly providing antibodies or cDNAs. We also thank Dr. Peng Zhang for DNA constructs preparation.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Majeti, R., and Weiss, A. (2001) Chem. Rev. 101, 2441–2448[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Andersen, J. N., Mortensen, O. H., Peters, G. H., Drake, P. G., Iversen, L. F., Olsen, O. H., Jansen, P. G., Andersen, H. S., Tonks, N. K., and Moller, N. P. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 7117–7136[Free Full Text]
  3. Wang, H., Lian, Z., Lerch, M. M., Chen, Z., Xie, W., and Ullrich, A. (1996) Oncogene 12, 2555–2562[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Besco, J., Popesco, M. C., Davuluri, R. V., Frostholm, A., and Rotter, A. (2004) BMC Genomics 5, 14[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Zondag, G. C., and Moolenaar, W. H. (1997) Biochimie (Paris) 79, 477–483
  6. Hirohashi, S. (1998) Am. J. Pathol. 153, 333–339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Huber, O., Bierkamp, C., and Kemler, R. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 685–691[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Peifer, M. (1997) Science 275, 1752–1753[Free Full Text]
  9. Moon, R. T., Bowerman, B., Boutros, M., and Perrimon, N. (2002) Science 296, 1644–1646[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. He, T. C., Sparks, A. B., Rago, C., Hermeking, H., Zawel, L., da Costa, L. T., Morin, P. J., Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. (1998) Science 281, 1509–1512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Tetsu, O., and McCormick, F. (1999) Nature 398, 422–426[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Giles, R. H., van Es, J. H., and Clevers, H. (2003) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1653, 1–24[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Roura, S., Miravet, S., Piedra, J., Garcia, d. H., and Dunach, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 36734–36740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Nelson, W. J., and Nusse, R. (2004) Science 303, 1483–1487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Brady-Kalnay, S. M., Mourton, T., Nixon, J. P., Pietz, G. E., Kinch, M., Chen, H., Brackenbury, R., Rimm, D. L., Del Vecchio, R. L., and Tonks, N. K. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 141, 287–296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Brady-Kalnay, S. M., Rimm, D. L., and Tonks, N. K. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 977–986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Fuchs, M., Muller, T., Lerch, M. M., and Ullrich, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16712–16719[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Yan, H. X., He, Y. Q., Dong, H., Zhang, P., Zeng, J. Z., Cao, H. F., Wu, M. C., and Wang, H. Y. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 15854–15860[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Nam, J. S., Ino, Y., Sakamoto, M., and Hirohashi, S. (2002) Clin. Cancer Res. 8, 2430–2436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Polakis, P. (1999) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 15–21[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Gottardi, C. J., Wong, E., and Gumbiner, B. M. (2001) J. Cell Biol. 153, 1049–1060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Muller, T., Choidas, A., Reichmann, E., and Ullrich, A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 10173–10183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Stockinger, A., Eger, A., Wolf, J., Beug, H., and Foisner, R. (2001) J. Cell Biol. 154, 1185–1196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Sadot, E., Simcha, I., Shtutman, M., Ben Ze'ev, A., and Geiger, B. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 15339–15344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Danilkovitch-Miagkova, A., Miagkov, A., Skeel, A., Nakaigawa, N., Zbar, B., and Leonard, E. J. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 5857–5868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Lu, Z., Ghosh, S., Wang, Z., and Hunter, T. (2003) Cancer Cell 4, 499–515[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Bonvini, P., An, W. G., Rosolen, A., Nguyen, P., Trepel, J., Garcia, d. H., Dunach, M., and Neckers, L. M. (2001) Cancer Res. 61, 1671–1677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kulas, D. T., Goldstein, B. J., and Mooney, R. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 748–754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kulas, D. T., Freund, G. G., and Mooney, R. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 755–760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Irie-Sasaki, J., Sasaki, T., Matsumoto, W., Opavsky, A., Cheng, M., Welstead, G., Griffiths, E., Krawczyk, C., Richardson, C. D., Aitken, K., Iscove, N., Koretzky, G., Johnson, P., Liu, P., Rothstein, D. M., and Penninger, J. M. (2001) Nature 409, 349–354[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. McArdle, L., Rafferty, M., Maelandsmo, G. M., Bergin, O., Farr, C. J., Dervan, P. A., O'Loughlin, S., Herlyn, M., and Easty, D. J. (2001) J. Investig. Der