Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M601097200 on April 4, 2006

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 23, 15837-15844, June 9, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/23/15837    most recent
M601097200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miyoshi, H.
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miyoshi, H.
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, A. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Perilipin Promotes Hormone-sensitive Lipase-mediated Adipocyte Lipolysis via Phosphorylation-dependent and -independent Mechanisms*

Hideaki Miyoshi{ddagger}§1, Sandra C. Souza{ddagger}1, Hui-Hong Zhang{ddagger}, Katherine J. Strissel{ddagger}, Marcelo A. Christoffolete, Julia Kovsan||, Assaf Rudich||, Fredric B. Kraemer**, Antonio C. Bianco, Martin S. Obin{ddagger}2, and Andrew S. Greenberg{ddagger}3

From the {ddagger}Jean Mayer United States Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, §Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, ||Ben-Gurion University, 84105 Beer-Sheva, Israel, and **Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University, Palo Alto, California 94305

Received for publication, February 6, 2006 , and in revised form, March 28, 2006.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) is the predominant lipase effector of catecholamine-stimulated lipolysis in adipocytes. HSL-dependent lipolysis in response to catecholamines is mediated by protein kinase A (PKA)-dependent phosphorylation of perilipin A (Peri A), an essential lipid droplet (LD)-associated protein. It is believed that perilipin phosphorylation is essential for the translocation of HSL from the cytosol to the LD, a key event in stimulated lipolysis. Using adipocytes retrovirally engineered from murine embryonic fibroblasts of perilipin null mice (Peri–/– MEF), we demonstrate by cell fractionation and confocal microscopy that up to 50% of cellular HSL is LD-associated in the basal state and that PKA-stimulated HSL translocation is fully supported by adenoviral expression of a mutant perilipin lacking all six PKA sites (Peri A{Delta}1–6). PKA-stimulated HSL translocation was confirmed in differentiated brown adipocytes from perilipin null mice expressing an adipose-specific Peri A{Delta}1–6 transgene. Thus, PKA-induced HSL translocation was independent of perilipin phosphorylation. However, Peri A{Delta}1–6 failed to enhance PKA-stimulated lipolysis in either MEF adipocytes or differentiated brown adipocytes. Thus, the lipolytic action(s) of HSL at the LD surface requires PKA-dependent perilipin phosphorylation. In Peri–/– MEF adipocytes, PKA activation significantly enhanced the amount of HSL that could be cross-linked to and co-immunoprecipitated with ectopic Peri A. Notably, this enhanced cross-linking was blunted in Peri–/– MEF adipocytes expressing Peri A{Delta}1–6. This suggests that PKA-dependent perilipin phosphorylation facilitates (either direct or indirect) perilipin interaction with LD-associated HSL. These results redefine and expand our understanding of how perilipin regulates HSL-mediated lipolysis in adipocytes.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The enzymatic hydrolysis of stored neutral lipid in adipocytes is an exquisitely regulated process that maintains whole body energy homeostasis in response to physiological demands. In both white and brown adipose tissue (BAT)4 basal (constitutive) rates of adipocyte lipolysis are rapidly and dramatically up-regulated by lipolytic hormones such as catecholamines (1, 2). In white adipose tissue, catecholamine-induced lipolysis provides fatty acids as fuel to peripheral tissues during times of energy need, such as fasting and exercise (35). In BAT of human newborns and rodents, catecholamine-stimulated lipolysis provides fatty acids for heat production (via beta-oxidation and mitochondrial uncoupling) in response to hypothermia (i.e. adaptive thermogenesis) (2, 6). Fatty acids that are released during adipocyte lipolysis also function as modulators of glucose and insulin action and insulin production (7, 8). Moreover, the dysregulated release of fatty acids from adipocytes that occurs in obesity is implicated in the etiology of obesity-related complications, including type 2 diabetes (810). Thus, in addition to its role in whole body energy homeostasis, the regulation of adipocyte lipolysis is vital to metabolic health.

Catecholamines stimulate lipolysis by binding to beta-adrenergic receptors on adipocytes, resulting in up-regulation of adenyl cyclase and activation of PKA (11). PKA activity is thought to increase lipolysis simultaneously by phosphorylating two key substrates, 1) the LD-associated protein, Peri A (12), and 2) HSL, the major lipase in adipocytes with significant hydrolytic action against triacylglyceride (TAG) and diacylglyceride (1315). HSL phosphorylation by PKA increases HSL catalytic activity, although this increase (2–3-fold) cannot account for the up to a 100-fold increase in adipocyte lipolysis observed after PKA stimulation by catecholamines (1517). More importantly, PKA-dependent phosphorylation of HSL also promotes HSL translocation from the cytosol to the LD, and the resulting interaction between catalytically active HSL and neutral lipid stores at the LD surface is thought to account for the preponderance of catecholamine-stimulated (versus basal) lipolysis (16, 18). However, the molecular mechanisms by which HSL accumulates at the LD remain unelucidated.

Recent studies suggest that HSL translocation requires PKA-dependent phosphorylation of Peri A (19). Peri A (the predominant perilipin isoform in adipocytes) is the most prevalent PKA substrate in adipocytes and is a key regulator of both basal and PKA-stimulated lipolysis. In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate that reduced levels or absence of perilipin A results in increased basal lipolysis while substantially attenuating catecholamine (PKA)-stimulated lipolysis (2023). The ability of perilipin to function as both a repressor of basal lipolysis and an enhancer of PKA-stimulated lipolysis has been incorporated into a "barrier"/translocation model of perilipin function wherein the following occur. 1) In the absence of PKA-dependent phosphorylation, perilipin functions as a barrier between stored neutral lipid and lipases such as HSL, thereby maintaining a low rate of basal lipolysis (2224). The mechanism underlying perilipin's barrier function is undetermined, as perilipin does not form an actual continuous physical barrier around LDs (25). 2) PKA-dependent perilipin phosphorylation at six serine residues (consensus PKA sites) is required for stimulated lipolysis (14, 22, 26), presumably reflecting perilipin conformational changes that expose stored neutral lipid and facilitate HSL translocation to the LD (19, 22, 27). This combination of abrogated barrier function and facilitation of HSL translocation is proposed as the mechanism by which PKA-dependent perilipin phosphorylation mediates catecholamine-stimulated lipolysis in adipocytes (19, 22, 23, 27). This model is called into question, however, by the observation that significant levels (up to ~50%) of HSL are associated with adipocyte LDs under basal conditions (25, 28, 29) and by the fact that bulk translocation of HSL is not a consistent feature of hormone-stimulated lipolysis (30, 31).

The present study provides the first empirical dissection of the coincident effects of blocking perilipin phosphorylation on both HSL translocation and lipolysis. Employing adenoviral and transgenic expression of a perilipin construct deficient in all six PKA sites (Peri A{Delta}1–6), we demonstrate that PKA-dependent phosphorylation of perilipin is not required for HSL translocation to the LD but is essential for the lipolytic action(s) of LD-associated HSL in adipocytes. Cross-linking and immunoprecipitation studies suggest that PKA-dependent phosphorylation of perilipin promotes close-range interaction with LD-associated HSL. These observations redefine the mechanism by which perilipin regulates HSL-mediated lipolysis in response to beta-adrenergic stimuli.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Antibodies—A polyclonal anti-perilipin antibody (22, 23) and a polyclonal anti-HSL antibody (32) were generated as previously described. A polyclonal antibody (catalog #9621) recognizing phosphorylated serine/threonine residues of consensus PKA sites was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA). Rabbit anti-NAD(P)H steroid dehydrogenase-like protein (Nsdhl) (33) was generously provided by Dr. Masato Ohashi, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan). A mouse monoclonal antibody specific for adiponectin was from Affinity BioReagentsTM (Golden, CO). A rabbit polyclonal antibody against clathrin was from BD Biosciences. Horseradish-linked anti-rabbit IgG was purchased from Amersham Biosciences. Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG was purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR).

Perilipin Knock-out (Peri KO) Mice and Peri KO Mice Expressing the Peri A{Delta}1–6 Transgene in BAT (Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 Mice)—We generated mice with a targeted disruption of the perilipin gene by replacing exon 3 (nucleotides 3515 and 3887) with a neomycin cassette, thereby disrupting coding of all known perilipin mRNAs. The Peri KO mice were viable and exhibited predicted reductions in adipocyte size and adipose mass as previously described (20, 21). Peri KO mice were backcrossed for 10 generations to C57BL/6 mice (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN). We subsequently generated mice expressing a Peri A{Delta}1–6 transgene in adipose tissue. We first generated a mouse Peri A{Delta}1–6 cDNA, FLAG-tagged at the carboxyl terminus using PCR (23). This cDNA was then ligated into a SmaI site of pBluescript SK vector containing the aP2 enhancer/promoter region, the SV40 small tumor antigen splice site, and polyadenylation signal sequence (a gift of Dr. B. M. Spiegelman) (34). A fragment containing the entire aP2-Peri A-FLAG transgene was microinjected into fertilized eggs of C57BL/6 mice. The general procedure for microinjection of the transgene is described elsewhere (35). Transgenic mice expressing the Peri A{Delta}1–6 transgene almost exclusively in BAT were obtained. These mice were fully viable and exhibited no overt adipose phenotype (data not shown). These transgenic mice were mated with backcrossed Peri KO mice to generate Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 mice used in these studies.

Generation and Differentiation of Stable Lines of MEF Adipocytes—Stable lines of MEF adipocytes were generated from 12.5–14.5 day embryos of Peri+/+ and Peri–/– mice as described (36). Retrovirus expressing mouse peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} in a pMSCV vector (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) were generously provided by Dr. Evan Rosen and transfected into phoenix cells using the manufacturer's instructions. Viral supernatants were added to MEF cells for 4 h, selected with puromycin, expanded, and frozen for later use. Selected MEF cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum. At confluence cells were exposed to a pro-differentiation regimen of dexamethasone (1 µM), insulin (5 µg/ml), isobutylmethylxanthine (IBMX, 0.5 mM), and rosiglitazone (5 µM). After 2 days, cells were maintained in medium containing insulin for 4 days, then in medium without insulin for an additional 3–4 days before use.

Recombinant Adenoviruses—Serine to alanine mutations were made in all six Peri A PKA sites (Ser-81, Ser-222, Ser-276, Ser-433, Ser-492, and Ser-517) using Muta-Gene Phagemid in vitro mutagenesis version 2 (Bio-Rad). Adenoviruses expressing this construct (Ad Peri A{Delta}1–6), wild type perilipin (Ad Peri A), or Aequoria Victoria green fluorescent protein (Ad GFP, a control for nonspecific adenoviral effects) were generated using the AdEasyTM adenoviral vector system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) (23). Wild type perilipin and Peri A{Delta}1–6 were FLAG-tagged at the COOH terminus. Adenoviruses were amplified in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, purified, and concentrated to 0.6 x 1012 plaqueforming units/ml by CsCl ultracentrifugation.

Isolation and in Vitro Differentiation of Brown Preadipocytes—Brown fat precursor cells were isolated from the interscapular brown adipose tissue of 5–6-week-old C57BL/6 and Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 mice as previously described (37). Cells were cultured in maintenance medium (DMEM medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum supplemented with 10 mM HEPES, 100 nM sodium selenite, 3 nM insulin, 15 µM ascorbic acid, 50 mg/liter tetracycline, 50 mg/liter streptomycin, 50 mg/liter, ampicillin, and 1 mg/liter Fungizone (Invitrogen)). Precursors were seeded at 15,000–20,000 cells/cm2 in 12-well plates or in 35-mm coverslip-bottom dishes for lipolysis and immunostaining studies, respectively. After they attained confluence (day 0), cells were cultured for 2 days in differentiation medium (DMEM containing 0.5 mM IBMX, 0.5 mM dexamethasone, and 125 mM indomethacin (38)), after which they were maintained in maintenance medium for an additional 3 days before assays.

Recombinant Adenovirus Expressing Small Hairpin RNA (shRNA) for Murine HSL—HSL shRNA design was based on accession number NM010719 (sequence GCAAGAGTATGTC ACGCTA) (Welgen, Inc., Worcester, MA). A "scrambled" version of this HSL shRNA (CGCGCTTTGTAGGATTCA) was also generated as a control for nonspecific effects of shRNA on lipolysis. Both HSL shRNA and the scrambled shRNA were cloned into the pQuiet vector to generate recombinant adenoviruses.

Adenovirus-mediated Expression of Perilipins or shRNAs in MEF/ Adipocytes—Recombinant adenovirus was transduced in Peri–/– MEFs with Lipofectamine PlusTM reagent (Invitrogen) on days 2 (shRNA) or 3 (perilipins) after induction of differentiation. To assure comparable levels of adenovirally induced protein expression, each adenovirus was pre- and post-titered using Western blots and densitometry of cell lysates (22).

Lipolysis Assays—Before lipolysis assays, differentiated brown adipocytes were incubated overnight in insulin/serum-free medium with 2% fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (DMEM/BSA). MEF adipocytes were incubated for ≥4 h in the same medium. For lipolysis assays, adipocytes were incubated for either 40 min (brown adipocytes) or 2 h (MEF adipocytes) in DMEM/BSA containing 200 nM phenyl isopropyl adenosine (PIA) (basal condition) or in PIA and 10 µM norepinephrine (NE) (brown adipocytes) or PIA and 20 µM forskolin (MEF adipocytes). The medium was then collected, and established procedures were used to quantify glycerol and fatty acids as indices of HSL-mediated and total lipolysis, respectively (22, 39).

Insulin-dependent Glucose Uptake—Insulin-dependent glucose uptake was measured in MEF adipocytes using insulin and the 2-[3H]deoxyglucose uptake assay as previously described (40).

Immunofluorescence Microscopy—After serum depletion, cells were treated for 15 min with either 200 nM PIA to repress adenyl cyclase activity (basal condition) or with 20 µM forskolin plus 0.5 mM IBMX (stimulated condition) followed by fixation and incubation with antibodies recognizing either perilipin or HSL. Differentiated brown adipocytes were treated for 15 min with either 200 nM PIA or 10 µM NE. Images were acquired with a Leica TCS SP2 confocal microscope equipped with an acoustico-optical beam splitter.

Subcellular Fractionation—Differentiated MEF–/– adipocytes were incubated in differentiation medium containing palmitic and oleic acid (240 µM each) for 48 h. After overnight serum depletion, adipocytes were treated for 13 min with 200 nM PIA (basal state) or 20 µM forskolin plus 0.5 mM IBMX (stimulated state), washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and then maintained for 10 min in hypotonic buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)) containing 2 mM EDTA, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 100 µM sodium orthovanadate, protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma), and either PIA or forskolin plus IBMX. Cells were homogenized on ice, and homogenates were centrifuged (12,000 rpm) at 4 °C for 20 min to separate fat cake (FC, upper layer containing lipid droplets) or supernatant (SP, lower layer) and a membrane pellet. The FC layer was isolated with a tube cutter and placed in a fresh tube. The SP was subjected to multiple rounds of centrifugation and removal of the residual FC until almost no FC fraction was visible. Then the lower portion of the SP fraction was harvested by needle aspiration and removed to a fresh tube. The pooled FC fractions were washed with 1 ml of fresh lysis buffer, collected (as above) after centrifugation, and resuspended in fresh lysis buffer. Half of this FC suspension was used for TAG measurement. The remaining half was incubated with SDS lysis buffer (10% final) at 37 °C for 30 min with vortexing and then centrifuged for 10 min, after which the final FC fraction was harvested. One-thirtieth (by volume) of each fraction was loaded on SDS-PAGE gels and then Western-blotted for perilipin and HSL. The FC isolation procedure resulted in minor differences in the total FC fraction recovered. Therefore, FC sample volumes were adjusted based on TG content to ensure that equivalent amounts of FC were loaded from basal and PKA-stimulated samples.

Perilipin-HSL Cross-linking and Co-immunoprecipitation—Differentiated MEF–/– adipocytes expressing GFP, FLAG-tagged Peri A, or FLAG-tagged Peri A{Delta}1–6 were incubated as described (above) for cell fractionation studies with the exception that Hepes (pH 7.4) replaced Tris in the hypotonic buffer. Cells were then harvested and hand-homogenized on ice. 3,3'-Dithiobis sulfosuccinimidyl propionate (DTSSP), a cross-linker with a 12-Å spacer arm length (Pierce) was added to the homogenates and incubated with rotation at room temperature for 30 min as per the manufacturer's instructions. The cross-linking reaction was terminated by the addition of Tris-HCl (50 mM final). After the addition of Triton X-100 (2% final) and NaCl (75 mM final), samples were drawn through a 23-gauge needle and then centrifuged (12,000 rpm) at 4 °C for 20 min. The supernatant and FC were purified as for the subcellular fractionation studies (see above). Western blotting confirmed that >95% of perilipin was removed from the LD and present in the SP fraction. The SP fraction was immunoprecipitated using the FLAG® Tagged Protein Immunoprecipitation kit (Sigma) at 4 °C for 24 h with rotation. Immunoprecipitates were eluted from pelleted anti-FLAG-agarose beads by boiling in SDS-PAGE sample buffer containing the reducing agent 2-mercaptoethanol. The reducing conditions are sufficient to break the 3,3'-dithiobis sulfosuccinimidyl propionate-induced protein cross-links. Eluted samples were electrophoresed and immunoblotted for the LD-associated proteins perilipin, HSL, and Nsdhl. To assess potential nonspecific cross-linking of perilipin with membrane or cytosolic proteins, immunoblots were also probed with antibodies to clathrin and adiponectin.

Statistical Analysis—Results are expressed as the mean ± S.E. Differences between treatments were analyzed by analysis of variance using Bonferroni protections for multiple comparisons (STAT view Version 5.0 for Macintosh, SAS Institute). Percentage data for HSL cellular distribution (Table 1) were transformed as arcsin Formula before analysis of variance (41).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Effect of Peri A and Peri A phosphorylation on HSL distribution in MEF adipocytes

HSL Western blots (as in Fig. 4A) were quantified by scanning laser densitometry.

 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Characterization of Peri/MEF Adipocytes—Our experimental strategy was to develop a stable line of perilipin null adipocytes in which to examine the effects of ectopically expressed wild type or PKA site-deficient perilipin on HSL translocation and HSL-mediated lipolysis. We generated a stable line of adipocytes from MEFs of wild type and Peri–/– mice using retroviral expression of mouse peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} in both lines to drive adipogenesis (see "Experimental Procedures"). To confirm that the absence of Peri A in Peri–/– MEFs did not significantly alter adipogenesis, we compared the differentiation time course and hallmark adipocyte phenotypes in Peri+/+ and Peri–/– adipocytes. We confirmed that the time course of adipogenesis was identical in Peri+/+ and Peri–/– MEF adipocytes, with both lines differentiating into mature adipocytes by 9 days of culture (Fig. 1A). At this time, both Peri+/+ and Peri–/– MEF adipocytes exhibited robust expression of characteristic adipocyte proteins, including adiponectin and HSL (Fig. 1A, left panel) as well as Glut 4, adipocyte triglyceride lipase and adiponutrin (data not shown). Expression levels of hallmark adipocyte proteins in Peri–/– MEF adipopcytes were comparable with levels observed for Peri+/+ MEF adipocytes (Fig. 1A, right panel). Peri–/– MEFs also exhibited physiological characteristics of mature adipocytes, including TAG accumulation in LDs (Fig. 1B) and ≥4-fold increase in glucose uptake in response to insulin (Fig. 1C). In addition, forskolin stimulated activation of PKA up-regulated lipolysis ~12-fold in Peri–/– MEF adipocytes ectopically expressing Peri A (see below). The magnitude of forskolin-stimulated lipolysis was comparable with that obtained with Peri+/+ MEF adipocytes (11.5-fold) and with 3T3-L1 adipocytes (8–15-fold) (data not shown). In summary, we were able to successfully generate a stable line of Peri–/– MEF adipocytes that exhibit typical molecular and physiological characteristics of adipocytes.


Figure 1
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1.
Characterization of stable lines of MEF adipocytes derived from perilipin null (–/–) and wild type (+/+) mice. A, expression profile of hallmark adipocyte proteins during the time course of MEF differentiation. Total cell lysates were collected at the indicated days after induction of differentiation, and equivalent protein loads were analyzed by Western blotting for perilipin, HSL, and adiponectin (AD). Retrovirally expressed peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} (PPAR{gamma}) is also shown. Protein lysates of Peri–/– and Peri+/+ adipocytes were subjected to all procedures (including exposure to film) at the same time and in the same apparati. B, Oil Red O staining demonstrating neutral lipid (TAG) accumulation in Peri–/– MEF adipocytes. Peri–/– MEF adipocytes accumulate 20% less neutral lipid than MEF+/+ adipocytes. C, insulin-dependent glucose uptake in differentiated MEF adipocytes. Results are expressed as the mean ± S.E. of three separate experiments performed in triplicate. 2DG, 2-[3H]deoxyglucose.

 
Lipolytic Actions of Peri A and Peri A{Delta}1–6 in Peri/ MEF Adipocytes—We next utilized adenoviral gene delivery to assess the effects of Peri A and Peri A{Delta}1–6 on lipolysis in differentiated Peri–/– MEF adipocytes. As a control for the potential confounding effects of adenoviral infection, a third group of MEF–/– adipocytes was infected with an adenovirus expressing GFP. In the Peri A{Delta}1–6 protein, serine residues composing the six consensus PKA sites are mutated to alanine (Fig. 2A). Based on prior studies in lipid-loaded fibroblasts ectopically expressing HSL, we predicted that both Peri A and Peri A{Delta}1–6 would block basal lipolysis, but only Peri A would support PKA-stimulated lipolysis (23). Western blot analysis demonstrated that Peri A and Peri A{Delta}1–6 were expressed at comparable levels (Fig. 2B, compare lanes 3 and 5). However, only Peri A was hyperphosphorylated in response to the PKA activator forskolin (Fig. 2B, compare lanes 4 and 6). Perilipin hyperphosphorylation is manifest on Western blots as the formation of a slower migrating upper band. The presence of two perilipin bands gives the appearance of increased protein levels as compared with non-phosphorylated perilipin (Fig. 2B, lanes 3, 5, and 6).

In lipolysis assays, both Peri A and Peri A{Delta}1–6 reduced basal lipolysis (measured as glycerol release) as compared with MEFs expressing GFP (p < 0.001; Fig. 2C). The inhibitory effects of Peri A and Peri A{Delta}1–6 on basal lipolysis were essentially identical (p = 0.42). This result is consistent with prior demonstration in non-adipocyte cell lines that the perilipin's ability to block basal lipolysis does not require phosphorylation of PKA sites (23). Forskolin treatment increased lipolysis ~1.6-fold (versus basal) in Peri–/– adipocytes transduced with GFP adenovirus, suggesting that a perilipin-independent mechanism mediates a modest level of PKA-dependent lipolysis in MEF adipocytes (20, 21) (Fig. 2C). In contrast, ectopic expression of Peri A in Peri–/– adipocytes increased forskolin-stimulated lipolysis ~12-fold as compared with basal lipolysis, confirming the predominant role of perilipin in PKA-stimulated lipolysis. In contrast, forskolin-stimulated lipolysis in Peri–/– adipocytes expressing Peri A{Delta}1–6 attained only the level observed for Peri–/– MEF adipocytes expressing GFP (p = 0.52; Fig. 2C). Thus, the perilipin-dependent enhancement of PKA-stimulated lipolysis that was observed with wild type Peri A was absent. This result confirms that one or more perilipin PKA sites is required for perilipin-dependent enhancement of lipolysis in response to PKA.


Figure 2
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2.
Mutation of PKA phosphorylation sites abrogates the ability of Peri A to promote PKA-stimulated lipolysis in Peri–/– MEF adipocytes. A, schematic diagram of Peri A and Peri A{Delta}1–6, a PKA phosphorylation mutant. Consensus PKA phosphorylation sites are indicated by arrows and numbered 1–6 according to convention. B, adenoviral (Ad) expression of Peri A and Peri A{Delta}1–6 in Peri–/– MEF adipocytes. C, lipolysis assays. Peri–/– MEF cells were transduced with adenovirus expressing GFP (negative control), Peri A, or Peri A{Delta}1–6. After differentiation to adipocytes, cells were depleted of serum and treated for 2 h with/without forskolin. The medium was collected, and glycerol content was determined. Results are expressed as the mean ± S.E. of 12 separate experiments performed in duplicate or triplicate. *, p < 0.01 versus Ad GFP.

 
HSL shRNA Abrogates the Preponderance of Perilipin-dependent, PKA-stimulated Lipolysis in MEF Adipocytes—In previous studies using lipid-loaded fibroblast cell lines (23), we observed that up to one-third of total perilipin-mediated PKA-stimulated lipolysis (glycerol release) could be accounted for by unidentified lipase(s) other than HSL. Here, we employed a shRNA strategy to determine the relative contribution of HSL and non-HSL lipases to PKA-stimulated glycerol release in MEF adipocytes. Expression of HSL-directed shRNA in MEF–/– adipocytes transduced with Peri A adenovirus reduced HSL protein levels by >90% compared with the expression of scrambled shRNA (Fig. 3A, compare lanes 3 and 4 with lanes 5 and 6). This reduction in HSL protein expression was associated with comparable (92%) attenuation of forskolin-stimulated glycerol release to levels almost identical to those measured in MEF–/– adipocytes expressing GFP (p = 0.67; Fig. 3B). Thus, glycerol release from MEF–/– adipocytes provides a robust assay for investigating the role of perilipin phosphorylation in PKA-stimulated HSL translocation and HSL-mediated lipolysis.

HSL shRNA blocked 77% of PKA-stimulated fatty acid release (from 2.82 ± 0.55 µEq/mg of protein to 1.20 ± 0.12 µEq/mg of protein). The residual (23%) fatty acid release relative to Peri–/– adipocytes expressing GFP (0.73 ± 0.13 µEq/mg protein; p = 0.01) implicates an additional lipase(s) in PKA-stimulated fatty acid release in our MEF adipocytes.

Elucidating the Role of Perilipin and Perilipin Phosphorylation in PKA-stimulated HSL Translocation and Lipolytic Action—It has been proposed that PKA-dependent phosphorylation of perilipin promotes lipolysis in large part by facilitating HSL translocation from the cytosol to the LD (16, 18). This currently accepted model predicts that in the absence of perilipin hyperphosphorylation (basal state or in the presence of Peri A{Delta}1–6) HSL would be prevented from translocating from the cytosol to the LD, resulting in low rates of lipolysis. To directly test this model, we investigated the subcellular localization of HSL in response to PKA activation in MEF–/– adipocytes expressing our adenoviral constructs. These investigations used cell fractionation and Western blotting in conjunction with confocal microscopy of immunofluorescent stained cells. Cell fractionation studies of Peri–/– adipocytes expressing GFP revealed that in the basal state (absence of forskolin) most (~95%) of the HSL is located in the supernatant, although some HSL appears to be associated with the "fat cake" (Fig. 4 A, top row, compare lanes 1 and 2; Table 1). The addition of forskolin did not increase HSL association with the FC fraction (Fig. 4A, top row, compare lanes 3 and 4 with lanes 1 and 2; Table 1). Confocal studies confirm that in the absence of either wild type or mutant perilipin, most HSL immunofluorescence is localized to the non-LD compartment in both basal and stimulated states (Fig. 4B, top row, compare panels 1 and 2 with panels 3 and 4).


Figure 3
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3.
HSL shRNA abrogates almost all PKA-dependent glycerol release in MEF adipocytes. Peri–/– MEFs were transduced with adenovirus (Ad) expressing either GFP (control) or Peri A in conjunction with either HSL shRNA or scrambled shRNA. After differentiation to adipocytes, cells were treated for 2 h with/without forskolin. The medium was collected, and released glycerol was measured. A, Western blot of endogenous HSL and adenovirally expressed Peri A in Peri–/– MEF adipocytes. B, lipolysis assays demonstrating almost complete abrogation of perilipin-enhanced PKA-stimulated glycerol release in Peri–/– MEF adipocytes expressing HSL shRNA. Results are expressed as the mean ± S.E. of six experiments performed in duplicate or triplicate. *, p < 0.01 versus Ad GFP.

 


Figure 4
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4.
Mutation of PKA phosphorylation sites in Peri A does not abrogate HSL translocation to LDs. Peri–/– MEFs were transduced with adenovirus and differentiated to adipocytes (as in Fig. 2). After serum depletion, MEF adipocytes were treated for 15 min with/without forskolin plus IBMX followed by either cell fractionation to obtain FC and SP fractions followed by Western blotting for HSL and perilipin (A) or immunostaining with anti-HSL antibody (green) and analysis by immunofluorescence (lanes 1 and 3) and differential interference contrast microscopy (lanes 2 and 4) (B). Note that in the presence of either Peri A or Peri A{Delta}1–6, PKA activation by forskolin leads to a relative increase in HSL in the FC fraction (Western blot) or associated with LDs (bright, LD-localized green in confocal images), coincident with reduced levels of HSL associated with the SP fraction (Western blot) and non-LD cell compartments (confocal images). Shown are representative data from 2–5 cell fractionation and 7 confocal experiments.

 
In Peri–/– MEF adipocytes expressing Peri A, approximately half of cellular HSL was associated with the FC fraction in the absence of forskolin (p < 0.001 versus GFP; Fig. 4A, middle row, compare lanes 1 and 2; Table 1). However, consistent with the ability of Peri A to block basal lipolysis, this perilipin-dependent increase in FC-associated HSL was coincident with reduced lipolysis as compared with MEF–/– adipocytes expressing GFP (Fig. 2C). The addition of forskolin to MEF–/– adipocytes expressing Peri A resulted in a 25–30% relative increase in the proportion of HSL in the FC fraction (p < 0.05; Fig. 4B, middle row, compare panels 3 and 4 with panels 1 and 2; Table 1). This PKA-dependent increase in the relative proportion of FC-associated HSL is confirmed in confocal images by the appearance of less diffuse, bright rings of green fluorescence around LDs (Fig. 4B, middle row, compare panels 3 and 4 with panels 1 and 2). The PKA-dependent increase in LD-associated HSL in Peri–/– MEF adipocytes expressing Peri A is coincident with enhanced lipolysis (Fig. 2C).

We next examined HSL cellular localization in MEF–/– adipocytes expressing Peri A{Delta}1–6. Comparable with wild type Peri A, Peri A{Delta}1–6 supported the basal state association of ~50% of cellular HSL with the FC fraction, a significant increase over levels observed with GFP (p < 0.001) (Fig. 4A, compare the bottom row, lanes 1 and 2 with the top row, lanes 1 and 2; Table 1). This perilipin-dependent increase in HSL in the FC fraction was associated with reduced basal lipolysis (Fig. 2C). Most surprisingly, Peri A{Delta}1–6 supported a 43% relative increase in HSL association with the FC fraction in response to forskolin (p < 0.01) (Fig. 4A, bottom row, compare lanes 3 and 4; Table 1). Importantly, this PKA-induced increase in FC-associated HSL was as great as the increase observed in MEF–/– cells expressing Peri A (Table 1; p = 0.67). This unexpected PKA-dependent increase in FC-associated HSL in Peri A{Delta}1–6 adipocytes was confirmed by the appearance in confocal images of bright rings of HSL immunofluorescence around LDs (Fig. 4B, bottom row, compare panels 3 and 4 with panels 1 and 2). Thus, mutation of perilipin PKA sites had no observable effect on the ability of HSL to translocate to the LD in response to PKA activation, yet mutation of perilipin PKA sites fully blocked the enhancement of PKA-stimulated lipolysis (Fig. 2C).


Figure 5
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5.
PKA-stimulated glycerol release is blunted in differentiated brown adipocytes from Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 mice. A, Western blotting for protein markers of brown adipocyte differentiation in wild type and Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 mice. Brown pre-adipocytes from wild type and Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 mice were differentiated to adipocytes. Cell extracts (20 µg) were immunoblotted with antibodies recognizing Peri A, the FLAG epitope ligated to Peri A{Delta}1–6, phosphorylated serine and threonine residues of PKA substrates (~P-PKA substrate), HSL, or uncoupling protein-1 (UCP1). Shown is one of two replicate blots. B, lipolysis assay. Cells were treated with PIA (basal) or with NE (10 µM) for 40 min after which media were collected and assayed for glycerol. Results represent the mean ± S.E. of sextuplicate measurements. ***, p < 0.001 versus basal; *, p = 0.02 versus basal.

 
Together, results from lipolysis and translocation studies indicate that perilipin, but not PKA-dependent perilipin phosphorylation, is required for HSL translocation to and association with the LD. However, PKA-dependent perilipin phosphorylation is required for the lipolytic action of LD-associated HSL (and perhaps other lipases).

Distinct Roles of Perilipin and Perilipin Phosphorylation in HSL Translocation and HSL-mediated Lipolysis Are Confirmed in Differentiated Brown Adipocytes from Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 Transgenic Mice—As part of the studies to elucidate the in vivo role of perilipin phosphorylation in PKA-stimulated lipolysis, we generated perilipin knock-out mice that express a FLAG-tagged Peri A{Delta}1–6 transgene in brown adipocytes (Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 mice). We used in vitro differentiated brown adipocytes from these transgenic (and wild type) mice to verify and extend our observation that PKA-dependent perilipin phosphorylation is not required for PKA-induced HSL translocation but is required for HSL lipolytic action at the LD surface. Differentiated brown adipocytes from wild type and Peri AKO{Delta}A1–6 mice expressed protein markers of mature brown adipocytes, including perilipin, HSL and uncoupling protein-1 (UCP1) (Fig. 5A). Perilipin levels were ~2-fold greater in differentiated brown adipocytes from Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 mice than from wild type mice. We previously reported that overexpression of perilipin up to 4-fold versus wild type levels of expression has no detectable effect on differentiation, viability, or lipolysis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (42). Differentiated brown adipocytes acquired the characteristic rounded adipocyte morphology with intracellular TAG stored in LDs (Fig. 5B). Moreover, in response to physiologically relevant PKA stimulation by NE, PKA site-specific phosphoserine content of wild type Peri A increased, whereas no PKA site-specific phosphoserine content was detected in Peri A{Delta}1–6 (Fig. 5A). This result confirms that Peri A{Delta}1–6 is not phosphorylated by PKA in response to catecholamines in differentiated brown adipocytes derived from Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 mice. Consistent with the abrogation of PKA-dependent phosphorylation, lipolysis assays revealed a ~90% block of NE-stimulated glycerol release in Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 adipocytes as compared with wild type adipocytes (p < 0.001; Fig. 5B). Specifically, whereas NE treatment stimulated lipolysis 3.2-fold in wild type adipocytes, NE stimulated lipolysis only 1.3-fold in Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 adipocytes (Fig. 5B). However, this 30% increase in glycerol release was statistically significant relative to basal state release (p = 0.02; Fig. 5B).


Figure 6
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6.
Differentiated brown adipocytes from Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 mice exhibit catecholamine-induced HSL translocation. Differential interference contrast (DIC) and immunofluorescence (IF) images of differentiated brown adipocytes from wild type and Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 mice treated with PIA (basal) or with NE (10 µM) for 15 min followed by immunostaining for perilipin (PERI, red) and HSL (green). Co-localization of HSL and perilipin is indicated by the yellow/orange color in the PERI/HSL overlay. Data shown are representative of two individual experiments. The scale bar represents 8.3 µm.

 
We next assessed perilipin and HSL localization in wild type and Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 brown adipocytes employing confocal, differential interference contrast (DIC) and immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy (Fig. 6). Perilipin immunofluorescence (red; second column) demonstrates that Peri A{Delta}1–6 localizes exclusively to LDs similar to wild type Peri A in brown adipocytes. HSL immunofluorescence (Fig. 6, third column) reveals that in the basal state, HSL localizes to both the cytoplasm and LDs in wild type and Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 adipocytes, as indicated by diffuse green fluorescence surrounding LDs. Colocalization of perilipin and HSL is manifest as an orange color in the Peri A/HSL overlay images (Fig. 6, fourth column). This HSL association with the LD in the basal state is consistent with our observations in the MEF studies of Fig. 4.

In response to NE treatment, HSL immunofluorescence (green) becomes less diffuse, and bright distinct rings of green immunofluorescence are observed in both wild type and Peri AKO{Delta}1–6 adipocytes, an indication of increased LD-associated HSL (Fig. 6, third column). The proportional increase in LD-associated HSL produces a yellow color in the HSL/Peri A overlay images (Fig. 6, fourth column). Thus, in differentiated brown adipocytes as in MEF adipocytes, the PKA-stimulated increase in LD-associated HSL does not require PKA-dependent perilipin phosphorylation. However, in both differentiated brown adipocytes (Fig. 5B) and MEF adipocytes (Figs. 2 and 3), PKA-stimulated lipolysis requires phosphorylation of one or more perilipin PKA sites.


Figure 7
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7.
Cross-linking of HSL and perilipin is enhanced after PKA activation and is blunted in Peri–/– MEF adipocytes expressing Peri A{Delta}1–6. Peri–/– MEF adipocytes adenovirally expressing GFP, FLAG-tagged Peri A, or FLAG-tagged Peri A{Delta}1–6 were treated for 15 min with/without the PKA activator forskolin. Lipid droplets were released from cells by homogenization, and LD-associated proteins were solubilized with detergent (see "Experimental Methods"). Detergent lysates were treated with cross-linker (3,3'-dithiobis sulfosuccinimidyl propionate) followed by perilipin immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-FLAG agarose beads. After the breaking of protein cross-links by 2-mercaptoethanol, immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blotting (IB) for the presence of perilipin and co-immunoprecipitated HSL (A). One of four similar experiments is shown. B, Western blot of perilipin immunoprecipitates (20% input, lanes 1–6) and the pre-immunoprecipitation lysate from MEF adipocytes expressing Peri A (5% input, lane 7) for the LD-associated protein Nsdhl. One of two similar experiments is shown.

 
Perilipin Phosphorylation Promotes Close Interaction of LD-associated HSL with Perilipin—The requirement of perilipin for quantitative HSL association with the LD (Fig. 4) suggested that HSL might bind to perilipin (either directly or indirectly) and that perilipin phosphorylation might promote HSL lipolytic action at the LD by altering this interaction. To examine this possibility, we performed cross-linking and perilipin immunoprecipitation studies in Peri–/– MEF adipocytes expressing the (FLAG-tagged) Peri A or Peri A{Delta}1–6 constructs used for the lipolysis and translocation studies above. Cross-linking was used because solubilization of LD proteins for immunoprecipitation requires detergents or chaotropic agents, which disrupt protein-protein interactions (see "Experimental Procedures"). Chemical cross-linking stabilizes these interactions. After immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG antibody, immunoprecipitates were Western-blotted for perilipin and for co-immunoprecipitated HSL.

Both Peri A and Peri A{Delta}1–6 were successfully immunoprecipitated from MEF adipocytes (Fig. 7A, upper panel). Immunoprecipitation was quantitative, removing 60–80% of perilipin from adipocyte lysates, based on densitometric comparison of pre-and post-immunoprecipitation lysates (data not shown). In the basal state low levels of HSL were co-immunoprecipitated with either Peri A or Peri A{Delta}1–6 (Fig. 7A, lanes 3 and 5). When normalized to perilipin levels (assessed by densitometry), basal state levels of co-immunoprecipitated HSL were comparable between wild type perilipin and Peri A{Delta}1–6 (data not shown). These observations suggest that a small amount of LD-associated HSL is closely associated with perilipin in the basal state. Forskolin treatment of Peri–/– MEF adipocytes expressing wild type perilipin resulted in a dramatic (6–8-fold) increase in co-immunoprecipitated HSL as compared with the basal state (Fig. 7A, compare lanes 3 and 4). These results suggest that PKA-dependent perilipin phosphorylation alters the spatial relationship between Peri A- and LD-associated HSL in such a manner as to facilitate HSL-Peri A cross-linking over that observed in the absence of perilipin phosphorylation. This cross-linking is quantitative, as ~30–35% of total HSL was co-immunoprecipitated with Peri A from lysates of forskolin-treated cells expressing Peri A, based on densitometry and adjusted for nonspecific HSL loss in the presence of GFP (~7%) (data not shown). The figure of 30–35% is comparable with half of the LD-associated HSL in forskolin-stimulated MEF adipocytes (Table 1).

The importance of Peri A phosphorylation to enhanced HSL-Peri A cross-linking is underscored by our observation that forskolin treatment of Peri–/– MEF adipocytes that express Peri A{Delta}1–6 resulted in only a modest (2-fold) increase in co-immunoprecipitated HSL, presumably reflecting direct effects of PKA on HSL (27) (Fig. 7A, compare lanes 5 and 6). Thus, abrogation of PKA-dependent Peri A phosphorylation substantially (≥3-fold) reduced the amount of HSL that was cross-linked to Peri A under the experimental conditions reported here. Consistent with this result, only ~8% of HSL was specifically co-immunoprecipitated with Peri A{Delta}1–6 from lysates of forskolin-treated cells (data not shown).

Importantly, Western blots of perilipin immunoprecipitates were negative for the LD-associated protein, Nsdhl (33), demonstrating that co-immunoprecipitation of HSL and perilipin in these experiments does not reflect promiscuous cross-linking of perilipin with all LD-associated proteins (Fig. 7B). In addition, Western blots of immunoprecipitates were negative for clathrin and adiponectin (i.e. proteins that are not LD-associated), although these proteins were readily detected in MEF supernatants from which perilipin was immunoprecipitated (data not shown). It is, therefore, unlikely that HSL co-immunoprecipitation with perilipin in these experiments reflects cross-linking of cytosolic HSL to perilipin. Finally, neither HSL nor perilipin was immunoprecipitated from Peri–/– MEF adipocytes expressing GFP (Fig. 7A, lanes 1 and 2), arguing against nonspecific binding of HSL to the agarose beads used for immunoprecipitation.

These results in conjunction with data from lipolysis assays (Figs. 2 and 3) suggest that 1) PKA-dependent perilipin phosphorylation promotes close range interaction of LD-associated HSL with perilipin, and 2) this interaction contributes to PKA-stimulated lipolysis.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
It was previously held that PKA-dependent perilipin phosphorylation was required to induce HSL translocation from the cytosol to the LD, an event critical to hormone-stimulated lipolysis in adipocytes (19, 27). We evaluated the requirement for perilipin phosphorylation in HSL translocation using two types of differentiated adipocytes; 1) adipocytes developed from MEFs of perilipin knock-out mice (these adipocytes were transduced with adenovirus to express either wild type perilipin (Peri A) or PKA site-deficient perilipin (Peri A{Delta}1–6)) and 2) adipocytes differentiated from BAT preadipocytes of perilipin knock-out mice expressing the Peri A{Delta}1–6 transgene in BAT. These two adipocyte model systems allowed us to dissect and distinguish effects of perilipin and perilipin phosphorylation on HSL association with the LD and with HSL-mediated lipolysis, respectively.

Our studies demonstrate that perilipin promotes HSL-mediated adipocyte lipolysis via discrete phosphorylation-independent and phosphorylation-dependent mechanisms. A phosphorylation-independent mechanism(s) mediates HSL association with the LD in the basal state as well as HSL translocation from the cytosol to the LD in response to PKA activation (Figs. 4 and 6). These observations confirm prior reports that Peri A is required for HSL association with the LD (19). In response to PKA, the amount of LD-associated HSL increases relative to the basal state, reflecting the translocation of phosphorylated HSL from the cytosol to the LD and its perilipin-dependent arrest at the LD. Importantly, we demonstrate for the first time that this PKA-and perilipin-dependent increase in LD-associated HSL does not require PKA-dependent Peri A phosphorylation. It remains unclear how perilipin promotes HSL arrest at the LD either in the basal state or after HSL translocation from the cytosol. The mechanism may be indirect. For example, Peri A may facilitate the formation of LDs of a certain size, curvature, or protein composition, and HSL may preferentially associate with such LDs, as recently suggested (25). Irrespective of the mechanism involved, our data do not support the proposed role of Peri A phosphorylation in PKA-induced HSL translocation (17, 19). This discrepancy is likely to reflect the fact that studies suggesting a requirement of perilipin phosphorylation for HSL translocation were conducted in a non-adipocyte cell line (Chinese hamster ovary cells), which does not express endogenous perilipin or HSL and is not specialized for TAG storage or hydrolysis (19).

With respect to the phosphorylation-dependent mechanism by which perilipin promotes lipolysis, the present study reveals that the lipolytic action(s) of LD-associated HSL requires a novel event(s) mediated by PKA-dependent perilipin phosphorylation (Figs. 2C and 5B). The precise nature of this event(s) remains to be elucidated. However, it is likely to involve conformational changes in perilipin that bring LD-associated HSL into proximity with stored neutral lipid. The effected LD-associated HSL presumably includes the pool of HSL that is prepositioned at the LD in the basal state (Fig. 4A and Table 1) (25, 28, 29). Our cross-linking studies (Fig. 7) suggest that PKA-dependent phosphorylation of perilipin alters the spatial relationship between perilipin and LD-associated HSL in such a way as to facilitate close-range interaction between the two (or between HSL and a perilipin-associated moiety). This interaction may facilitate access of LD-associated HSL to stored neutral lipid, thereby initiating lipolysis. While the present study was in review, Brasaemle and co-workers (43) reported that chronic PKA-dependent phosphorylation of Peri A induced LD remodeling (i.e. fragmentation and dispersion) independently of lipase action and suggested that this remodeling promoted lipolysis. These observations support the concept that PKA-dependent phosphorylation induces dramatic conformational changes in perilipin. However it is currently undetermined if PKA-induced LD remodeling is mechanistically related to the altered HSL-Peri A interaction suggested by the present study.

In summary, the present study supports an emerging view of perilipin as the critical component of a scaffold that stabilizes LD structure and composition for optimal lipid storage and regulated lipolysis (25, 29). The scaffold is dynamic. In the basal state it arrests HSL (and perhaps other lipases) at the LD, but precludes lipolysis, ostensibly by sequestering HSL from neutral lipid stores. In response to hormonal activation of PKA, the scaffold brings LD-associated HSL into sufficiently close proximity to lipid substrate to affect PKA-stimulated lipolysis. This function of the scaffold requires PKA-dependent perilipin phosphorylation. These and other functions of the lipolytic scaffold are likely to require the interplay of perilipin with lipid substrate(s) and/or other LD-associated proteins that remain to be identified.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant IH DK-50647 and United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service Co-Operative Agreement 58 1950-4-401 (to A. S. G.), National Institutes of Health Grant AG024635, GRASP (Center for Gastroenterology Research on Absorptive and Secretory Processes) Center P30 DK-34928 and the American Diabetes Association (to M. S. O.), Tufts Center for Neuroscience Research, P30 NS047243, the Research Service of the Department of the Veterans Affairs (to F. B. K.), and United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation Grant 2003088 (to A. S. G. and A.R.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

1 These authors contributed equally to this work. Back

2 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 617-556-3279; Fax: 617-556-3224; E-mail: martin.obin{at}tufts.edu. 3 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 617-556-3279; Fax: 617-556-3224; E-mail: andrew.greenberg{at}tufts.edu.

4 The abbreviations used are: BAT, brown adipose tissue; FC, fat cake; FLAG, a peptide comprised of DYKDDDDK; GFP, green fluorescent protein; HSL, hormone-sensitive lipase; IBMX, isobutylmethylxanthine; LD, lipid droplet; MEF, murine embryonic fibroblast; NE, norepinephrine; Nsdhl, NAD(P)H steroid dehydrogenase-like protein; Peri A, perilipin A; Peri A{Delta}1–6, perilipin A containing Ser -> Ala mutations of all six PKA phosphorylation sites; Peri KO, perilipin knockout; PIA, phenyl isopropyl adenosine; PKA, protein kinase A; shRNA, small hairpin RNA; SP, cell supernatant remaining after removal of fat cake; TAG, triacylglyceride; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; Ad, adenovirus. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
H. M. thanks Professor Takao Koike for continued support and mentorship. We thank three anonymous reviewers for thoughtful comments.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Tansey, J. T., Sztalryd, C., Hlavin, E. M., Kimmel, A. R., and Londos, C. (2004) IUBMB Life 56, 379–385[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Robidoux, J., Martin, T. L., and Collins, S. (2004) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 44, 297–323[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Coppack, S. W., Jensen, M. D., and Miles, J. M. (1994) J. Lipid Res. 35, 177–193[Abstract]
  4. Arner, P. (1995) Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 19, Suppl. 4, 18–21
  5. Dodt, C., Lonnroth, P., Wellhoner, J. P., Fehm, H. L., and Elam, M. (2003) Acta Physiol. Scand. 177, 351–357[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Sell, H., Deshaies, Y., and Richard, D. (2004) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 36, 2098–2104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Frayn, K. N. (2003) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31, 1115–1119[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Arner, P. (2005) Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 19, 471–482[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Shulman, G. (2000) J. Clin. Investig. 196, 171–176
  10. Wyne, K. L. (2003) Am. J. Med. 115, Suppl. 8A, 29–36[CrossRef]
  11. Belfrage, P., Fredrikson, G., Olsson, H., and Stralfors, P. (1982) Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 102, 213–223
  12. Greenberg, A. S., Egan, J. J., Wek, S. A., Garty, N. B., Blanchette-Mackie, E. J., and Londos, C. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11341–11346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Fredrikson, G., Stralfors, P., Nilsson, N. O., and Belfrage, P. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 356, 6311–6320
  14. Holm, C. (2003) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31, 1120–1124[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Yeaman, S. J. (2004) Biochem. J. 379, 11–22[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Egan, J., Greenberg, A., Chang, M.-K., Wek, S., Moos, M. C., Jr., and Londos, C. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 8537–8541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Londos, C., Sztalryd, C., Tansey, J. T., and Kimmel, A. R. (2005) Biochimie (Paris) 87, 45–49
  18. Brasaemle, D., Levin, D., Adler-Wailes, D., and Londos, C. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1483, 251–262[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Sztalryd, C., Xu, G., Dorward, H., Tansey, J., Contreras, J., Kimmel, A., and Londos, C. (2003) J. Cell Biol. 161, 1093–1103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Tansey, J., Sztalryd, C., Gruia-Gray, j., Roush, D., Zeo, J., Gavrilova, O., Reitman, M., Deng, C.-X., Ki, C., Kimmel, A., and Londos, C. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 6494–6499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Martinez-Botas, J., Andreson, J., Tessler, D., Lapillojnne, A., Hung-Junn Chang, B., Quast, M., Gorenstein, D., Chen, K.-H., and Chan, L. (2000) Nat. Genet. 26, 474–479[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Souza, S., Muliro, K., Liscum, L., Lien, P., Yamamoto, Y., Schaffer, J., Dallal, G., Wang, X., Kraemer, F., Obin, M., and Greenberg, A. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 8267–8272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Zhang, H., Souza, S., Muliro, K., Kraemer, F., Obin, M., and Greenberg, A. S. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 51535–51542[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Brasaemle, D., Rubin, B., Harten, I., Gruia-Gray, J., Kimmel, A., and Londos, C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 38486–38493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Moore, H. P., Silver, R. B., Mottillo, E. P., Bernlohr, D. A., and Granneman, J. G. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 43109–43120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Tansey, J., Huml, A., vogt, R., Davis, K., Jones, J., Fraser, K., Brasaemle, D., Kimmel, A., and Londos, C. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 8401–8406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Su, C. L., Sztalryd, C., Contreras, J. A., Holm, C., Kimmel, A. R., and Londos, C. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 43615–43619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Morimoto, C., Kameda, K., Tsujita, T., and Okuda, H. (2001) J. Lipid Res. 42, 120–127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Brasaemle, D. L., Dolios, G., Shapiro, L., and Wang, R. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 46835–46842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Clifford, G., Londos, C., Kraemer, F., Vernon, R., and Yeaman, S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 5011–5015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Clifford, G., Kraemer, F., Yeaman, S., and Vernon, R. (2001) Metabolism 50, 1264–1269[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Wang, J., Shen, W. J., Patel, S., Harada, K., and Kraemer, F. B. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 1953–1959[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Ohashi, M., Mizushima, N., Kabeya, Y., and Yoshimori, T. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 36819–36829[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Ross, S. R., Graves, R. A., Greenstein, A., Platt, K. A., Shyu, H.-L., Mellovitz, B., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 9590–9594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Brinster, R. L., Chen, H. Y., Trumbauer, M., Senear, A. W., Warren, R., and Palmiter, R. D. (1981) Cell 27, 223–231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Rosen, E., Hsu, C.-H., Wang, X., Sakai, S., Freeman, M., Gonzalez, F., and Spiegelman, B. (2002) Genes Dev. 16, 22–26[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Martinez-deMena, R., Hernandez, A., and Obregon, M. J. (2002) Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 282, 1119–1127
  38. Klein, J., Fasshauer, M., Ito, M., Lowell, B. B., Benito, M., and Kahn, C. R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34795–34802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Souza, S. C., Yamamoto, M., Franciosa, M., Lien, P., and Greenberg, A. (1998) Diabetes 47, 691–695[Abstract]
  40. Gross, D. N., Farmer, S. R., and Pilch, P. F. (2004) Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 7151–7162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1969) Biometry, pp. 607–610, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA
  42. Souza, S., Moitoso de Vargas, L., Yamamato, M., Line, P., Franciosa, M., Moss, L., and Greenberg, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24665–24669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Marcinkiewicz, A., Gauthier, D., Garcia, A., and Brasaemle, D. L. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 11901–11909[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. Bezaire, A. Mairal, C. Ribet, C. Lefort, A. Girousse, J. Jocken, J. Laurencikiene, R. Anesia, A.-M. Rodriguez, M. Ryden, et al.
Contribution of Adipose Triglyceride Lipase and Hormone-sensitive Lipase to Lipolysis in hMADS Adipocytes
J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2009; 284(27): 18282 - 18291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Chakrabarti and K. V. Kandror
FoxO1 Controls Insulin-dependent Adipose Triglyceride Lipase (ATGL) Expression and Lipolysis in Adipocytes
J. Biol. Chem., May 15, 2009; 284(20): 13296 - 13300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Q. G. Zhou, M. Zhou, F. F. Hou, and X. Peng
Asymmetrical dimethylarginine triggers lipolysis and inflammatory response via induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress in cultured adipocytes
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2009; 296(4): E869 - E878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
R. Zechner, P. C. Kienesberger, G. Haemmerle, R. Zimmermann, and A. Lass
Adipose triglyceride lipase and the lipolytic catabolism of cellular fat stores
J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 3 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. J. Smith, M. A. Sanders, B. E. Juhlmann, A. V. Hertzel, and D. A. Bernlohr
Mapping of the Hormone-sensitive Lipase Binding Site on the Adipocyte Fatty Acid-binding Protein (AFABP): IDENTIFICATION OF THE CHARGE QUARTET ON THE AFABP/aP2 HELIX-TURN-HELIX DOMAIN
J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2008; 283(48): 33536 - 33543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. Prentki and S. R. M. Madiraju
Glycerolipid Metabolism and Signaling in Health and Disease
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2008; 29(6): 647 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. E. Smith, K. L. Tucker, N. Yiannakouris, B. Garcia-Bailo, J. Mattei, C.-Q. Lai, L. D. Parnell, and J. M. Ordovas
Perilipin Polymorphism Interacts with Dietary Carbohydrates to Modulate Anthropometric Traits in Hispanics of Caribbean Origin
J. Nutr., October 1, 2008; 138(10): 1852 - 1858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
N. Anderson and J. Borlak
Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets in Steatosis and Steatohepatitis
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2008; 60(3): 311 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M.-S. Gauthier, H. Miyoshi, S. C. Souza, J. M. Cacicedo, A. K. Saha, A. S. Greenberg, and N. B. Ruderman
AMP-activated Protein Kinase Is Activated as a Consequence of Lipolysis in the Adipocyte: POTENTIAL MECHANISM AND PHYSIOLOGICAL RELEVANCE
J. Biol. Chem., June 13, 2008; 283(24): 16514 - 16524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
R. Manzano-Roman, C. Almazan, V. Naranjo, E. F. Bloui, K. M. Kocan, and J. de la Fuente
Expression of perilipin in human promyelocytic cells in response to Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection results in modified lipid metabolism
J. Med. Microbiol., February 1, 2008; 57(2): 159 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
L. L. Listenberger, A. G. Ostermeyer-Fay, E. B. Goldberg, W. J. Brown, and D. A. Brown
Adipocyte differentiation-related protein reduces the lipid droplet association of adipose triglyceride lipase and slows triacylglycerol turnover
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 2751 - 2761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
D. L. Brasaemle
Thematic review series: Adipocyte Biology. The perilipin family of structural lipid droplet proteins: stabilization of lipid droplets and control of lipolysis
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 2547 - 2559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Kovsan, R. Ben-Romano, S. C. Souza, A. S. Greenberg, and A. Rudich
Regulation of Adipocyte Lipolysis by Degradation of the Perilipin Protein: NELFINAVIR ENHANCES LYSOSOME-MEDIATED PERILIPIN PROTEOLYSIS
J. Biol. Chem., July 27, 2007; 282(30): 21704 - 21711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Wang and R. J. St. Leger
The Metarhizium anisopliae Perilipin Homolog MPL1 Regulates Lipid Metabolism, Appressorial Turgor Pressure, and Virulence
J. Biol. Chem., July 20, 2007; 282(29): 21110 - 21115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
K. Jaworski, E. Sarkadi-Nagy, R. E. Duncan, M. Ahmadian, and H. S. Sul
Regulation of Triglyceride Metabolism. * IV. Hormonal regulation of lipolysis in adipose tissue
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): G1 - G4.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. C. Souza, M. A. Christoffolete, M. O. Ribeiro, H. Miyoshi, K. J. Strissel, Z. S. Stancheva, N. H. Rogers, T. M. D'Eon, J. W. Perfield II, H. Imachi, et al.
Perilipin regulates the thermogenic actions of norepinephrine in brown adipose tissue
J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 1273 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
J. Laurencikiene, V. van Harmelen, E. Arvidsson Nordstrom, A. Dicker, L. Blomqvist, E. Naslund, D. Langin, P. Arner, and M. Ryden
NF-{kappa}B is important for TNF-{alpha}-induced lipolysis in human adipocytes
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 1069 - 1077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. G. Granneman, H.-P. H. Moore, R. L. Granneman, A. S. Greenberg, M. S. Obin, and Z. Zhu
Analysis of Lipolytic Protein Trafficking and Interactions in Adipocytes
J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2007; 282(8): 5726 - 5735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Miyoshi, J. W. Perfield II, S. C. Souza, W.-J. Shen, H.-H. Zhang, Z. S. Stancheva, F. B. Kraemer, M. S. Obin, and A. S. Greenberg
Control of Adipose Triglyceride Lipase Action by Serine 517 of Perilipin A Globally Regulates Protein Kinase A-stimulated Lipolysis in Adipocytes
J. Biol. Chem., January 12, 2007; 282(2): 996 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/23/15837    most recent
M601097200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miyoshi, H.
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miyoshi, H.
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, A. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement