Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M602249200 on April 4, 2006

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 23, 15923-15928, June 9, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/23/15923    most recent
M602249200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brailoiu, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dun, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brailoiu, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dun, N. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Messenger-specific Role for Nicotinic Acid Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate in Neuronal Differentiation*

Eugen Brailoiu{ddagger}, Dev Churamani§, Vinita Pandey§, G. Cristina Brailoiu{ddagger}, Florin Tuluc{ddagger}, Sandip Patel§1, and Nae J. Dun{ddagger}

From the {ddagger}Department of Pharmacology, Temple University Medical School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the §Department of Physiology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom

Received for publication, March 9, 2006 , and in revised form, March 24, 2006.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cells possess several Ca2+-mobilizing messengers, which couple stimulation at the cell surface by a multitude of extracellular cues to the regulation of intracellular Ca2+-sensitive targets. Recent studies suggest that agonists differentially select from this molecular palette to generate their characteristic Ca2+ signals but it is still unclear whether different messengers mediate different functions or whether they act in a redundant fashion. In this study, we compared the effects of nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP), a novel Ca2+-mobilizing messenger, with that of the prototypical messenger inositol trisphosphate on cytosolic Ca2+ levels and differentiation status of PC12 cells. We demonstrate that liposomal delivery of NAADP mediated release of Ca2+ from acidic Ca2+ stores and that this stimulus was sufficient to drive differentiation of the cells to a neuronal-like phenotype. In sharp contrast, cell fate was unaffected by more transient Ca2+ signals generated by inositol trisphosphate-evoked release of endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ stores. Our data establish for the first time (i) the presence of novel NAADP-sensitive Ca2+ stores in PC12 cells, (ii) a role for NAADP in differentiation, and (iii) that Ca2+-dependent function can be messenger-specific. Thus, differential recruitment of intracellular Ca2+-mobilizing messengers and their target Ca2+ stores may represent a robust means of maintaining stimulus fidelity in the control of Ca2+-dependent cell function.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Changes in cytosolic Ca2+ drive numerous cellular events (1) perhaps the most striking example being the activation of the quiescent egg at fertilization resulting ultimately in the generation of highly differentiated cell types. Given the remarkable multifunctional role of Ca2+, stringent mechanisms must exist within the cell to prevent inappropriate activation of Ca2+-sensitive targets. Precise organization of Ca2+ signals both temporally and spatially are likely such mechanisms (1). Ca2+ signals are often in the form of oscillations, the frequency of which has profound effects on Ca2+-dependent output (2–5). Restriction of Ca2+ signals to particular subcellular locations also will ensure the activation of Ca2+ sensors only in that location (6, 7). A full understanding of how these complex Ca2+ signals are generated is then vital to understand how Ca2+ controls cell function.

Cytosolic Ca2+ signals are often generated by agonist-evoked increases in intracellular messengers and the subsequent activation of intracellular Ca2+ channels (1). Inositol trisphosphate is the most ubiquitous of these messengers and is generated in response to a wide range of stimuli that include hormones, growth factors, and neurotransmitters (8). Accumulating evidence indicates that intracellular Ca2+ stores can also be mobilized by NAADP2 (9–14). Ca2+ release via this NADP metabolite is particularly intriguing because in many cells, NAADP appears to target novel acidic Ca2+ stores (15–19) that are readily distinguishable from the endoplasmic reticulum that houses receptor/calcium channels for both inositol trisphosphate and ryanodine (20). Despite this physical segregation, activation of NAADP-sensitive Ca2+ channels is often coupled to activation of endoplasmic reticulum-based Ca2+ channels as evidenced by the sensitivity of NAADP-induced Ca2+ release in intact cells to inhibitors of inositol trisphosphate and/or ryanodine receptors (19, 21–24). NAADP may therefore provide a "trigger" release of Ca2+, which is subsequently propagated by the process of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (21), although direct activation of ryanodine receptors (25–28) and calcium influx by NAADP (29) have been proposed as alternative mechanisms (see Refs. 13 and 30 for discussion).

It has been known for some time that different agonists evoke unique Ca2+ signals or "signatures" (31). The mechanistic basis of this heterogeneity however is not clear. One possibility is that different stimuli may recruit distinct combinations of intracellular messengers. Results of recent studies directly support this hypothesis. In pancreatic acinar cells and smooth muscle cells, desensitization of NAADP receptors or depletion of acidic Ca2+ stores attenuates Ca2+ signals in response to cholecystokinin (17, 21) and endothelin-1 (18), respectively. Importantly, these inhibitory effects are agonist-specific; in acinar cells for example neither acetylcholinenor bombesin-evoked Ca2+ signals are affected by similar treatments (32, 33). Accordingly, only cholecystokinin stimulates increases in NAADP levels (34). Although specific combinations of intracellular messengers can indeed mimic the effect of extracellular stimuli on cytosolic Ca2+ levels (35), functional correlates of messenger-evoked Ca2+ signals are lacking.

Cell differentiation is a process that occurs not only during embryonic development but also in the adult during regeneration of many tissues. Indeed, the potential of stem cells to develop into different cell types has been the focus of much attention recently (36). Differentiation results because of specific changes in gene expression. Because several transcription factors including CREB (37) and NF-AT (37) are Ca2+-sensitive, Ca2+ is likely to be involved in the differentiation process. Indeed, buffering of cytosolic Ca2+ with Ca2+ chelators has been shown to prevent differentiation of several cell types including neurons (2), keratinocytes (38), myocytes (39), trophoblasts (40), and NB4 cells (41). Moreover, imposing Ca2+ transients appears sufficient to drive neurotransmitter specification in embryonic Xenopus spinal neurons (2). Many studies have demonstrated changes in the Ca2+ signaling protein complement upon differentiation (for example see Ref. 42), but whether these changes drive differentiation or are a consequence of altering cell fate is difficult to discern. In particular there is a surprising paucity of information concerning the role of intracellular Ca2+-mobilizing messengers in differentiation. Although ryanodine receptor-mediated Ca2+ signals have been implicated in the differentiation of skeletal myoblasts (43, 44), cardiac myocytes (39, 45), spermatogenic cells (46), and HL-60 cells (47), the latter via CD-38-mediated production of cADPR, an endogenous modulator of ryanodine receptors (48), direct evidence for inositol trisphosphate receptor involvement is scant. In keratinocytes, phospholipase C-{gamma}1 is necessary for differentiation in response to physiologically relevant elevations in extracellular Ca2+ levels (49). What effect NAADP-mediated Ca2+ signals have on differentiation is not known.

In the present study, using liposomes we have examined the direct effects of NAADP and inositol trisphosphate on modulating differentiation of PC12 cells, a rat pheochromocytoma cell line and a long standing model for neuronal differentiation (50). We show that although both messengers evoke changes in cytosolic Ca2+, these signals are kinetically and mechanistically distinct and that NAADP-but not inositol trisphosphate-mediated Ca2+ increases are sufficient to cause differentiation.


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Culture—PC12 cells were routinely maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated horse serum, 5% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml of penicillin, and 100 µg/ml of streptomycin (all from Invitrogen) in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The medium was changed every 72 h.

Liposome Preparation—Liposomes were prepared using egg phosphatidylcholine (Sigma) and 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-ethylphosphocholine (Avanti Polar Lipids) at a 9:1 molar ratio (3 mg of lipid/ml of aqueous phase) as described previously (51, 52). The aqueous phase was either buffer (140 mM KCl, pH 6.9) alone or buffer containing Lucifer yellow (10 mM), NAADP (1–100 µM), or IP3 (1–100 µM). Unincorporated constituents were removed by dialysis (Sigma dialysis sacs, molecular weight cut off of 12,400) against Hanks' balanced salt solution (for experiments using adherent cells) or RPMI 1640 medium (for culture experiments; 1:600 v/v, 150 min, solution changed every 30 min).

Liposome Delivery—Both cells that had been attached to poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips and loosely adherent cells in culture were treated with liposomes (1:15 v/v dilution). For attached cells, the cells were superfused with Hanks' balanced salt solution supplemented with liposomes at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. For cells in culture, the cells were first serum-starved for 12 h, and then cell suspensions were incubated with liposomes in serum-free medium for 2 h with gentle agitation.

Measurement of Lucifer Yellow Fluorescence—Adherent cells were superfused for 2 min with Lucifer yellow-containing liposomes. Unincorporated liposomes were removed by manual rinsing of the coverslips with Hanks' balanced salt solution, and the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Confocal fluorescence images (emission wavelength >520 nm) were captured following excitation at 425 nm.

Measurement of NAADP Levels—NAADP levels were determined based on the method described previously (53). Suspensions of PC12 cells (5–10 x 106) that had been treated with liposomes were washed by brief centrifugation, and cell pellets were resuspended in two volumes of ice-cold 10% w/v trichloroacetic acid. After a 5-min incubation, the samples were centrifuged at 12,100 x g for 1 min, and the supernatants were recovered and neutralized by back extraction with water-saturated ether (5 x 1 ml) followed by addition of 100 mM HEPES (pH 7.2). The samples and known concentrations of NAADP were incubated with sea urchin egg homogenates (0.25% v/v) prepared as described previously (54) in binding buffer consisting of 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), 250 mM potassium gluconate, 250 mM N-methyl D-glucamine, and 1 mM MgCl2. Following a 1–2-h incubation, enzymatically prepared [32P]NAADP (55) was added (0.5 nM) to saturate unoccupied NAADP receptors, and the incubations were filtered through glass fiber filters using a cell harvester to separate bound and free ligand. The radioactivity of the filters was determined by Cerenkov counting. The sensitivity of this assay is markedly enhanced by the addition of unlabeled NAADP before the radiolabel (53). This was necessary to detect NAADP levels in unstimulated cells.

Measurement of Cytosolic Ca2+ Concentration—Cytosolic Ca2+ concentration measurements were performed as described previously (19). Attached cells were incubated with 4 µM Fura-2 AM (Molecular Probes) in Hanks' balanced salt solution at room temperature for 45 min in the dark, washed three times with dye-free buffer, and then incubated for a further 45 min to allow for complete de-esterification of the dye. The coverslips were subsequently mounted in a custom-designed bath on the stage of a S300 Axiovert Nikon inverted microscope equipped with a C & L Instruments fluorometer system. Cells were routinely superfused with Hanks' balanced salt solution at a flow rate of 2.5 ml/min except during liposome addition (see above). Fura-2 fluorescence (emission = 510 nm) following alternate excitation at 340 nm and 380 nm was acquired at a frequency of 20 Hz.

Organelle Localization—For the localization of acidic compartments and the endoplasmic reticulum in the same cells, cells were incubated with a combination of Lysotracker Green (1 µM) and ER-Tracker Blue-White DPX (100 nM) for 15 min. Confocal fluorescence images of the dyes were captured following excitation at 488 nm (emission = 505–530 nm) and 364 nm (emission >385 nm), respectively, using a 63x objective. Acidic compartments were also localized using Lysotracker Red (1 µM, excitation = 543 nm, emission >620 nm) following a 1-h pretreatment with vehicle Me2SO (0.1% v/v), glycyl-L-phenylalanine-beta-naphthylamide (GPN) (200 µM), or bafilomycin-A1 (1 µM). In these experiments, the magnification was increased to 100x and z stack images were captured. All dyes were from Molecular Probes.

Differentiation—Cells suspensions were treated with liposomes (as described above) or nerve growth factor (100 ng/ml, 2 h) and then plated on to poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips in complete medium and cultured for 7 days. In some experiments, cells were incubated with BAPTA-AM (10 µM, 45 min) followed by three washes to remove the Ca2+ chelator, prior to liposome addition. Cells were fixed in freshly prepared 0.2% picric acid, 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. The coverslips were then blocked with 10% normal horse serum for 2 h and incubated sequentially with mouse monoclonal anti-tyrosine hydroxylase antibody (1:750; Chemicon International, Temecula, CA) for 4 h, biotinylated anti-mouse IgG (1:50, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 1 h, and fluorescein Avidin D (Vector Laboratories) for 3 h. All dilutions were done in phosphate-buffered saline, and coverslips were rinsed several times between incubations. The coverslips were mounted in Citifluor (Ted Pella, Redding, CA) sealed, and confocal fluorescence images were captured using excitation and emission wavelengths of 488 and 520 nm, respectively. Cells were considered differentiated if neurite length exceeded that of the cell body.


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1.
Liposomal delivery of cell-impermeable molecules into PC12 cells. A, schematic of the experimental protocol. PC12 cells were incubated with liposomes prepared in the presence of Lucifer yellow or NAADP and then processed for confocal microscopy (top right) or NAADP determination (bottom), respectively. For the latter, acid extracts of the cells were incubated with sea urchin egg homogenates that contain highly specific binding sites for NAADP (larger circles). NAADP in the extracts (black circles) binds to the target protein and inhibits subsequent binding of radiolabeled NAADP (white circles). The extent of inhibition is quantified by measurement of bound radioactivity after rapid filtration and comparison with known concentrations of authentic NAADP. B, liposomal delivery of Lucifer yellow. Confocal images of green fluorescence from PC12 cells superfused for 2 min with liposomes prepared in the presence of 10 mM Lucifer yellow (left), control liposomes (middle), or 10 mM Lucifer yellow added directly to extracellular solution (right). Scale bar, 7 µm. C and D, Liposomal delivery of NAADP. C, results from a typical experiment using PC12 cells that have been incubated with liposomes prepared in the presence of 100 µM NAADP. Inhibition of [32P]NAADP binding by the indicated concentration of NAADP is represented by small diamonds. The effect of three different dilutions of extract prepared from cells treated with control liposomes containing buffer only (C, open squares) and NAADP-containing liposomes (NAADP, open circles) is shown. D, calculated concentration of NAADP in the extracts from untreated cells (–) and cells treated with the different liposomes.

 

   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
We have previously used liposomes to effect intracellular delivery of NAADP and other cell impermeant molecules into neuronal preparations (19, 52). To demonstrate the effectiveness of the methodology in PC12 cells, we characterized delivery of the fluorescent marker Lucifer yellow (Fig. 1, A and B). Confocal imaging of cells that been attached to coverslips and superfused with Lucifer yellow-containing liposomes for 2 min revealed a uniform distribution of the dye throughout the cell (Fig. 1B, left). Little fluorescence was detected upon perfusion of cells with control liposomes prepared in the presence of buffer only (Fig. 1B, middle). These data clearly demonstrate that cytosolic delivery of liposomal constituents is achieved rapidly as reported (56). Extracellular application of the dye resulted in much weaker punctate fluorescence confined to the cell periphery (Fig. 1B, right) most likely reflecting endocytosis.

To further quantify liposomal delivery, cell suspensions were incubated with liposomes encapsulating NAADP (100 µM), acid extracts were prepared, and NAADP content was measured using a radioreceptor assay (Fig. 1A). As shown in Fig. 1C, the concentration of NAADP in extracts from cells treated with NAADP-containing liposomes was markedly higher than in extracts from cells treated with control liposomes containing buffer alone. These data demonstrate that cellular levels of NAADP can be readily elevated in populations of PC12 cells in a non-invasive manner.

Having established experimental conditions for the successful delivery of molecules into PC12 cells, we first characterized the effect of NAADP (100 µM) and inositol trisphosphate (100 µM) on cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (Fig. 2). Both messengers evoked robust cytosolic Ca2+ increases in attached cells loaded with the fluorescent Ca2+ indicator Fura-2 (Fig. 2A). Intriguingly, although the amplitude of Ca2+ signals in response to NAADP and inositol trisphosphate were similar, the kinetics of the evoked changes were quite different (Fig. 2A). Specifically, Ca2+ increases in response to NAADP were slower to peak and more sustained than those mediated by inositol trisphosphate. We quantified the time taken for the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration to peak and then return to 50% of its peak value following stimulation with each messenger. Intriguingly the latter "recovery index" for NAADP was nearly an order of magnitude greater than that for inositol trisphosphate (Fig. 2B). Clearly then, NAADP and inositol trisphosphate mediate kinetically different Ca2+ increases.


Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2.
Messenger-evoked cytosolic Ca2+ increases. A, typical response from Fura-2-loaded PC12 cells superfused with liposomes containing either NAADP (100 µM) or inositol trisphosphate (IP3; 100 µM). B, pooled data from 4–6 experiments quantifying the Ca2+ signals with respect to the peak Ca2+ concentration observed (left), the time taken to peak (middle), and recovery index (right) defined as the time for the Ca2+ concentration to return to 50% of its peak.

 
We next examined the pharmacology of messenger-evoked Ca2+ signals. In these experiments, cells were transiently superfused with liposomes containing 100 µM NAADP (Fig. 3A) or 100 µM inositol trisphosphate (Fig. 3B). Under these conditions, the Ca2+ signals in response to the messengers receded upon washout of the liposomes most likely reflecting rapid metabolism upon termination of delivery. Importantly, control liposomes did not evoke any changes in cytosolic Ca2+ levels (Fig. 3, A and B).

Prior incubation with thapsigargin, a sarcoendoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase inhibitor, which depletes endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ stores, reduced but did not abolish NAADP-evoked Ca2+ increases (Fig. 3A). Peak Ca2+ responses in response to NAADP after thapsigargin treatment were ~50% of control responses (Fig. 3C). To probe the possible involvement of lysosomes in NAADP-mediated Ca2+ changes (15, 17, 18), we compared the effects of NAADP following osmotic lysis of these organelles with GPN, a cathepsin C substrate. GPN pretreatment abolished the effects of NAADP (Fig. 3, A and C). Essentially identical results were obtained with the V-type ATPase inhibitor bafilomycin A1 which prevents organelle acidification (Fig. 3, A and C). In contrast to the effects of NAADP, inositol trisphosphate-evoked Ca2+ mobilization was completely blocked by thapsigargin and unaffected by pretreatment with GPN and bafilomycin A1 (Fig. 3, B and D). Results with the latter confirm the specificity of the inhibitors employed. Stimulation of cells with a lower concentration of either NAADP or inositol trisphosphate (1 µM) failed to significantly affect cytosolic calcium concentration (Fig. 3, C and D).

We compared the distribution of acidic compartments and the endoplasmic reticulum in live PC12 cells. As shown in Fig. 4A, the acidic compartments tended to form perinuclear clusters, whereas the endoplasmic reticulum was more diffuse. Individual acidic vesicles could be resolved at higher magnification (Fig. 4B). When cells were pretreated with GPN or bafilomycin-A1, vesicular staining was abolished (Fig. 4B). Thus, these vesicles are strong candidates for NAADP-sensitive Ca2+ stores.


Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3.
Pharmacology of messenger-evoked cytosolic Ca2+ increases. Cells were pretreated with vehicle (left), the SERCA inhibitor thapsigargin (TG, 1 µM, 1 h), the lysosome disrupter GPN (200 µM, 1 h), or the V-type ATPase inhibitor bafilomycin-A1 (BAF, 1 µM, 1 h). The effect of control liposomes (C) and liposomes containing NAADP (A) or inositol trisphosphate (B) on cytosolic Ca2+ levels is shown. C and D, pooled data from eight experiments.

 
Collectively the data in Figs. 2, 3, 4 suggest that NAADP-sensitive Ca2+ channels are expressed in PC12 cells and that they likely reside on acidic Ca2+ stores. These stores are readily distinguishable from those targeted by inositol trisphosphate thus confirming the original studies using sea urchin eggs (15). The partial sensitivity of NAADP responses to thapsigargin may well be indicative of channel "chatter" (10) between NAADP receptors and endoplasmic reticulum-based Ca2+ channels.

PC12 cells are a long standing model for neuronal differentiation that adopt a more neuronal-like phenotype in response to a variety of cues including neurotrophins such as nerve growth factor. To explore the role of intracellular Ca2+ stores in differentiation, we examined the effects of NAADP and inositol trisphosphate on the morphology of PC12 cells. In these experiments, cell suspensions were incubated for 2 h in the presence of control liposomes or liposomes containing either NAADP or inositol trisphosphate, and then cells were cultured (in the absence of liposomes) for 7 days. The effects of NAADP on cell morphology were dramatic. Remarkably, as shown in Fig. 5, NAADP differentiated a significant proportion of cells in the absence of trophic support. The observed phenotype was highly reminiscent of that following nerve growth factor treatment (Fig. 5A). In stark contrast, liposomes containing inositol trisphosphate had little affect on cell morphology (Fig. 5) despite the demonstrated ability of this messenger to evoke Ca2+ changes (Fig. 3, B and D). As expected, control liposomes did not induce differentiation (Fig. 5). A lower concentration of either NAADP or inositol trisphosphate (1 µM) were also without effect (Fig. 5B).


Figure 4
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4.
Localization of acidic compartments and the endoplasmic reticulum in PC12 cells. A, confocal images of Lysotracker Green (left) and ER-Tracker Blue-White DPX (middle) fluorescence. A merged image is shown on the right. B, higher resolution image of a single PC12 cell labeled with Lysotracker Red in the absence (left) or presence of the indicated lysosome inhibitor. Concentrations were the same as in Fig. 3. Scale bar, 5 µm.

 


Figure 5
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5.
NAADP but not inositol trisphosphate evokes differentiation. A, confocal images of tyrosine hydroxylase immunofluorescence after 7-day culture following 2-h treatment with control liposomes (top left), liposomes containing the indicated messenger or nerve growth factor (NGF, 100 ng/ml, bottom right). B, pooled data (from eight experiments) showing the proportion of cells that had differentiated in response to the various treatments. Cells were treated with BAPTA and washed prior to stimulation as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data are normalized to the response to nerve growth factor, which induced differentiation of 37 ± 3% of the cells.

 
To determine whether the effects of NAADP on cell morphology were Ca2+-dependent, we examined the effect of NAADP-containing liposomes in cells that had been loaded with the Ca2+ chelator BAPTA. Our loading conditions were optimized such that BAPTA completely prevented Ca2+-signals in response to both NAADP and inositol trisphosphate (data not shown). In BAPTA-treated cultures, NAADP did not affect cell fate (Fig. 5B). Importantly, this treatment did not compromise cell viability. Trypan blue staining indicated that 93 ± 2% of the cells were viable. Thus the Ca2+-dependent outcome in this particular scenario appears exquisitely sensitive to the Ca2+-mobilizing messenger.

Although NAADP evokes changes in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration in many cells, little is known concerning its role in neurons and less still concerning downstream functional consequences. Here we have shown for the first time that mobilization of acidic lysosomal-like Ca2+ stores by NAADP is sufficient to mediate differentiation of a neuronal cell model. Combined with the ability of NAADP to modulate neurotransmission (52, 57, 58) and potentiate neurite outgrowth (19), NAADP may well play important signaling roles in the nervous system (59). Indeed, receptors for NAADP are widespread in the mammalian brain (55), and brain homogenates readily metabolize NAADP in a Ca2+-dependent fashion (60). The functional effects of NAADP-mediated Ca2+ signals on differentiation reported here are unprecedented and clearly highly specific because Ca2+ increases by inositol trisphosphate were unable to modify cell fate. The lack of effect of inositol trisphosphate on differentiation is consistent with a previous report using PC12 cells (61). We propose that only sustained Ca2+ signals such as those evoked by NAADP are capable of initiating differentiation, whereas more transient ones mediated by inositol trisphosphate are not. Indeed, Ca2+-dependent gene transcription, which more than likely programs cellular change, is particularly well tuned to both temporal (3–5) and spatial (62–64) subtleties in the Ca2+ signal. It is tempting to speculate that recruitment of endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ stores by NAADP (as evidenced by the partial sensitivity of NAADP-mediated Ca2+ responses to thapsigargin; Fig. 3A) serves to prolong the resultant Ca2+ signal thereby determining functional outcome. Indeed our preliminary data show that cADPR can also induce differentiation of PC12 cells (data not shown) raising the possibility that NAADP and ryanodine receptors are functionally coupled. Blocking both inositol trisphosphate and ryanodine receptors prevents long term oscillations induced by NAADP in sea urchin eggs (65) and potentiation of neurite length by NAADP in cortical neurons (19).

To conclude, we provide a clear example of different Ca2+ mobilizing messengers mediating quite different cellular responses likely through the generation of temporally distinct Ca2+ signals. Ca2+-dependent function may thus be tailored by selective recruitment of intracellular Ca2+-mobilizing messengers.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (to N. J. D.) and the Wellcome Trust, UK (to S. P.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Old Squash Courts, Dept. of Physiology, University College London, Gower St., London WC1E 6BT, UK. Tel.: 44-207-679-6540; Fax: 44-207-813-0530; E-mail: patel.s{at}ucl.ac.uk.

2 The abbreviations used are: NAADP, nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate; BAPTA-AM, 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid tetrakis(acetoxymethyl ester); GPN, glycyl-L-phenylalanine-beta-naphthylamide. Back


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Rachel Ashworth, Grant Churchill, Antony Galione, Chi Li, and Anthony Morgan for helpful discussion, Clare Faux and Andrew Stoker for provision of cells, Steve Bolsover for assistance with image analysis, and Catalin M. Filipeanu for his contributions to the early stages of this project.



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Berridge, M. J., Lipp, P., and Bootman, M. D. (2000) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1, 11–21[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Gu, X., and Spitzer, N. C. (1995) Nature 375, 784–787[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Dolmetsch, R. E., Lewis, R. S., Goodnow, C. C., and Healy, J. I. (1997) Nature 386, 855–858[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Dolmetsch, R. E., Xu, K., and Lewis, R. S. (1998) Nature 392, 933–936[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Li, W.-H., Llopis, J., Whitney, M., Zlokarnik, G., and Tsien, R. Y. (1998) Nature 392, 936–941[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Nelson, M. T., Cheng, H., Rubart, M., Santana, L. F., Bonev, A. D., Knot, H. J., and Lederer, W. J. (1995) Science 270, 633–637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Tinel, H., Cancela, J. M., Mogami, H., Gerasimenko, J. V., Gerasimenko, O., Tepikin, A., and Petersen, O. H. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 4999–5008[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Berridge, M. J. (1993) Nature 361, 315–325[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Lee, H. C. (1997) Physiol. Rev. 77, 1133–1164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Patel, S., Churchill, G. C., and Galione, A. (2001) Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 482–489[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Genazzani, A. A., and Billington, R. A. (2002) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 23, 165–167[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Cancela, J. M., Charpentier, G., and Petersen, O. H. (2003) Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 446, 322–327[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Galione, A., and Petersen, O. H. (2005) Mol. Interv. 5, 73–79[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Lee, H. C. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 33693–33696[Free Full Text]
  15. Churchill, G. C., Okada, Y., Thomas, J. M., Genazzani, A. A., Patel, S., and Galione, A. (2002) Cell 111, 703–708[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Mitchell, K. J., Lai, F. A., and Rutter, G. A. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 11057–11064[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Yamasaki, M., Masgrau, R., Morgan, A. J., Churchill, G. C., Patel, S., Ashcroft, S. J. H., and Galione, A. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 7234–7240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kinnear, N. P., Boittin, F. X., Thomas, J. M., Galione, A., and Evans, A. M. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 54319–54326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Brailoiu, E., Hoard, J. L., Filipeanu, C. M., Brailoiu, G. C., Dun, S. L., Patel, S., and Dun, N. J. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 5646–5650[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Berridge, M. J. (2002) Cell Calcium 32, 235–249[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Cancela, J. M., Churchill, G. C., and Galione, A. (1999) Nature 398, 74–76[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Churchill, G. C., and Galione, A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 38687–38692[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Santella, L., Kyozuka, K., Genazzani, A. A., De Riso, L., and Carafoli, E. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8301–8306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Boittin, F. X., Galione, A., and Evans, A. M. (2003) Circ. Res. 91, 1168–1175
  25. Mojzisova, A., Krizanova, O., Zacikova, L., Kominkova, V., and Ondrias, K. (2001) Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 441, 674–677[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Hohenegger, M., Suko, J., Gscheidlinger, R., Drobny, H., and Zidar, A. (2002) Biochem. J. 367, 423–431[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Gerasimenko, J. V., Maruyama, Y., Yano, K., Dolman, N., Tepikin, A. V., Petersen, O. H., and Gerasimenko, O. V. (2003) J. Cell Biol. 163, 271–282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Dammermann, W., and Guse, A. H. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 21394–21399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Moccia, F., Lim. D., Nusco, G. A., Ercolano, E., and Santella, L. (2003) FASEB J. 13, 1907–1909
  30. Patel, S. (2004) Biol. Cell 96, 19–28[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Petersen, C. C., Toescu, E. C., and Petersen, O. H. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 527–533[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Cancela, J. M., Gerasimenko, O. V., Gerasimenko, J. V., Tepikin, A. V., and Petersen, O. H. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 2549–2557[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Burdakov, D., and Galione, A. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, 993–996[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Yamasaki, M., Thomas, J. T., Churchill, G. C., Garnham, C., Lewis, A. L., Cancela, J. M., Patel, S., and Galione, A. (2005) Curr. Biol. 15, 874–878[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Cancela, J. M., Van Coppenolle, F., Galione, A., Tepikin, A. V., and Petersen, O. H. (2002) EMBO J. 21, 909–919[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Eckfeldt, C. E., Mendenhall, E. M., and Verfaillie, C. M. (2005) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 726–737[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Shaywitz, A. J., and Greenberg, M. E. (1999) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 821–861[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Li, L., Tucker, R. W., Hennings, H., and Yuspa, S. H. (1995) J. Cell. Physiol. 163, 105–114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Ferrari, M. B., Rohrbough, J., and Spitzer, N. C. (1996) Dev. Biol. 178, 484–497[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Wang, J., Rout, U. K., Bagchi, I. C., and Armant, D. R. (1998) Development 125, 4293–4302[Abstract]
  41. Berry, D. M., and Meckling-Gill, K. A. (1999) Endocrinology 140, 4779–4788[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Reber, B. F., and Reuter, H. (1991) J. Physiol. 435, 145–162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Seigneurin-Venin, S., Parrish, E., Marty, I., Rieger, F., Romey, G., Villaz, M., and Garcia, L. (1996) Exp. Cell Res. 223, 301–307[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Pisaniello, A., Serra, C., Rossi, D., Vivarelli, E., Sorrentino, V., Molinaro, M., and Bouche, M. (2003) J. Cell Sci. 116, 1589–1597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Ferrari, M. B., and Spitzer, N. C. (1999) Dev. Biol. 213, 269–282[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Chiarella, P., Puglisi, R., Sorrentino, V., Boitani, C., and Stefanini, M. (2004) J. Cell Sci. 117, 4127–4134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Munshi, C. B., Graeff, R., and Lee, H. C. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 49453–49458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Lee, H. C. (2001) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 41, 317–345[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Xie, Z., and Bikle, D. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20421–20424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Greene, L. A., and Tischler, A. S. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73, 2424–2428[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Brailoiu, E., and Miyamoto, M. D. (2000) Neuroscience 95, 927–931[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Brailoiu, E., Patel, S., and Dun, N. J. (2003) Biochem. J. 373, 313–318[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Churamani, D., Carrey, E. A., Dickinson, G. D., and Patel, S. (2004) Biochem. J. 380, 449–454[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Dickinson, G. D., and Patel, S. (2003) Biochem. J. 375, 805–812[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Patel, S., Churchill, G. C., Sharp, T., and Galione, A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 36495–36497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Papadimitriou, E., and Antimisiaris, S. G. (2000) J. Drug Target 8, 335–351[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Chameau, P., Van de Vrede, Y., Fossier, P., and Baux, G. (2001) Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 443, 289–296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Brailoiu, E., Miyamoto, M. D., and Dun, N. J. (2001) Mol. Pharmacol. 60, 718–724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Cancela, J. M., and Petersen, O. H. (1999) Trends Neurosci. 22, 488–495[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  60. Berridge, G., Cramer, R., Galione, A., and Patel, S. (2002) Biochem. J. 365, 295–301[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  61. Das, K. P., Freudenrich, T. M., and Mundy, W. R. (2004) Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 26, 397–406[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Bading, H., Ginty, D. D., and Greenberg, M. E. (1993) Science 260, 181–186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Hardingham, G. E., Chawla, S., Johnson, C. M., and Bading, H. (1997) Nature 385, 260–265[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Hardingham, G. E., Arnold, F. J., and Bading, H. (2001) Nat. Neurosci. 4, 565–566[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Churchill, G. C., and Galione, A. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 1–6[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eukaryot CellHome page
J. D. Gross
Acidic Ca2+ Stores, Excitability, and Cell Patterning in Dictyostelium discoideum
Eukaryot. Cell, May 1, 2009; 8(5): 696 - 702.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
R. Ji, C. M. Lee, L. W. Gonzales, Y. Yang, M. O. Aksoy, P. Wang, E. Brailoiu, N. Dun, M. T. Hurford, and S. G. Kelsen
Human type II pneumocyte chemotactic responses to CXCR3 activation are mediated by splice variant A
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): L1187 - L1196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
G. C. Brailoiu, S. L. Dun, E. Brailoiu, S. Inan, J. Yang, J. K. Chang, and N. J. Dun
Nesfatin-1: Distribution and Interaction with a G Protein-Coupled Receptor in the Rat Brain
Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 5088 - 5094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
X. Jiang, F. Yang, E. Brailoiu, H. Jakubowski, N. J. Dun, A. I. Schafer, X. Yang, W. Durante, and H. Wang
Differential Regulation of Homocysteine Transport in Vascular Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cells
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 27(9): 1976 - 1983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Steen, T. Kirchberger, and A. H. Guse
NAADP Mobilizes Calcium from the Endoplasmic Reticular Ca2+ Store in T-lymphocytes
J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2007; 282(26): 18864 - 18871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Macgregor, M. Yamasaki, S. Rakovic, L. Sanders, R. Parkesh, G. C. Churchill, A. Galione, and D. A. Terrar
NAADP Controls Cross-talk between Distinct Ca2+ Stores in the Heart
J. Biol. Chem., May 18, 2007; 282(20): 15302 - 15311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J EndocrinolHome page
E. Brailoiu, S. L Dun, G C. Brailoiu, K. Mizuo, L. A Sklar, T. I Oprea, E. R Prossnitz, and N. J Dun
Distribution and characterization of estrogen receptor G protein-coupled receptor 30 in the rat central nervous system
J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 193(2): 311 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/23/15923    most recent
M602249200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brailoiu, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dun, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brailoiu, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dun, N. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement