|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 28, 18933-18941, July 14, 2006
Diet-induced Obesity Alters AMP Kinase Activity in Hypothalamus and Skeletal Muscle*From the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Received for publication, December 1, 2005 , and in revised form, May 1, 2006.
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a key regulator of cellular energy balance and of the effects of leptin on food intake and fatty acid oxidation. Obesity is usually associated with resistance to the effects of leptin on food intake and body weight. To determine whether diet-induced obesity (DIO) impairs the AMPK response to leptin in muscle and/or hypothalamus, we fed FVB mice a high fat (55%) diet for 1012 weeks. Leptin acutely decreased food intake by 30% in chow-fed mice. DIO mice tended to eat less, and leptin had no effect on food intake. Leptin decreased respiratory exchange ratio in chow-fed mice indicating increased fatty acid oxidation. Respiratory exchange ratio was low basally in high fat-fed mice, and leptin had no further effect. Leptin (3 mg/kg intraperitoneally) increased 2-AMPK activity 2-fold in muscle in chow-fed mice but not in DIO mice. Leptin decreased acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity 40% in muscle from chow-fed mice. In muscle from DIO mice, acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity was basally low, and leptin had no further effect. In paraventricular, arcuate, and medial hypothalamus of chow-fed mice, leptin inhibited 2-AMPK activity but not in DIO mice. In addition, leptin increased STAT3 phosphorylation 2-fold in arcuate of chow-fed mice, but this effect was attenuated because of elevated basal STAT3 phosphorylation in DIO mice. Thus, DIO in FVB mice alters 2-AMPK in muscle and hypothalamus and STAT3 in hypothalamus and impairs further effects of leptin on these signaling pathways. Defective responses of AMPK to leptin may contribute to resistance to leptin action on food intake and energy expenditure in obese states.
Obesity has reached epidemic proportions worldwide and currently affects one in three Americans (1, 2). Most obese people are resistant to the actions of insulin. Obesity is a major risk factor for developing type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and some forms of cancer (1, 2). Leptin (Ob), a hormone secreted by the adipocyte in proportion to fat stores, plays a major role in regulating energy homeostasis by decreasing food intake and increasing energy expenditure. Although these effects are primarily through actions in the hypothalamus (3), peripheral actions of leptin have also been described (4, 5). Rodents with diet-induced obesity (DIO)3 and most obese humans are resistant to the effects of leptin (6, 7). Leptin resistance is defined as decreased sensitivity to the anorexigenic or weight loss effects of leptin. A hallmark of leptin-resistant states is hyperleptinemia. The mechanism for leptin resistance in obesity is of great interest, and understanding it could lead to new approaches to prevent or treat obesity and the accompanying risk for type 2 diabetes.
Leptin binds to its cell surface receptor, leptin receptor b, which is a member of the class 2 cytokine family that classically signals through the Janus kinase (JAK)/STAT pathway. Leptin activates JAK2 and STAT3, as well as the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (Erk 42/44) and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathways. Intact STAT3 signaling is necessary for the effects of leptin on food intake. Mice that lack either the binding site for STAT3 on the leptin receptor (8) or neuronal STAT3 protein (9) are obese and hyperphagic. Leptin also modulates the activity of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and inhibition of AMPK in discrete hypothalamic regions is also critical for the anorexigenic effects of leptin (10). In addition, activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase may be important for the effects of leptin on food intake through changes in membrane potential in target neurons (11, 12). Several studies have demonstrated that rodents with DIO are biologically and biochemically resistant to leptin. They do not decrease their food intake or body weight in response to peripheral leptin administration (6, 13). In addition, leptin injection peripherally fails to induce phosphorylation of STAT3 in the hypothalamus. One proposed mechanism for leptin resistance in DIO is decreased leptin transport across the blood-brain barrier (14, 15). However, this appears to account for only part of the defect in leptin action. Although intracerebroventricular leptin administration induces STAT3 phosphorylation in DIO, this phosphorylation is dramatically reduced when compared with chow-fed mice (13, 16). Taken together, the studies of peripheral and central leptin administration in rodents on a high fat diet suggest that resistance to leptin signaling at the level of STAT3 is due in part to decreased leptin transport into the brain and in part to defective signaling in the hypothalamus. Both suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS-3) and protein-tyrosine phosphatase-1B (PTP-1B) negatively regulate the leptin signaling pathway (1719). Neuron-specific deletion or whole-body haploinsufficiency of SOCS-3 increases leptin sensitivity and confers resistance to diet-induced obesity (20, 21). PTP-1B/ mice exhibit similar characteristics (18, 19, 22, 23).
Leptin has metabolic functions independent of its role as a satiety factor. For instance, leptin partitions fatty acids away from storage toward oxidation in skeletal muscle (24). However, when mice are fed a high fat diet, there is no effect of leptin on fatty acid oxidation in muscle ex vivo (25), indicating leptin resistance. Similarly, when human skeletal muscle is incubated ex vivo with leptin, fatty acid oxidation is increased in muscle from lean subjects only and not in muscle from obese subjects (26). Until recently, the signaling pathways underlying the effects of leptin on fatty acid oxidation were not known. We demonstrated that leptin increases fatty acid oxidation in skeletal muscle by activating AMPK (5). AMPK is a key regulatory enzyme in cellular energy homeostasis (27, 28). It is a heterotrimeric protein consisting of catalytic Once activated, AMPK switches on energy-producing pathways at the expense of energy-depleting processes. AMPK stimulates fatty acid oxidation through phosphorylation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) thereby decreasing malonyl-CoA levels, which disinhibits carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1 and increases fatty acid entry into mitochondria. In addition, AMPK phosphorylates target proteins involved in a number of metabolic pathways, including lipolysis (adipocytes), lipid metabolism (liver and muscle), glucose transport (muscle and adipocytes), and glycogen metabolism (muscle and liver) (34).
We demonstrated a direct, transient effect of leptin on AMPK activation in oxidative muscle and a more sustained effect that is mediated through the hypothalamus and sympathetic nervous system (5). Both effects involved acute phosphorylation and activation of the catalytic In this study, we sought to determine whether the impaired response of the AMPK pathway to leptin could contribute to the molecular pathogenesis of leptin resistance in mice on a high fat diet. We demonstrate that by 12 weeks of high fat feeding, DIO mice are resistant to the effects of leptin administration on AMPK activity in both muscle and hypothalamus. This may be due, at least in part, to constitutive alterations in the AMPK signaling pathway in the absence of leptin administration. Basal activity of AMPK tends to be increased, and basal ACC activity is decreased in muscle. In paraventricular nucleus (PVN) from DIO mice, AMPK activity is constitutively decreased, and in PVN, arcuate (ARC), and medial hypothalamus, leptin fails to suppress AMPK activity. These data suggest that the AMPK pathway is dysregulated in muscle and hypothalamus in obese states resulting from high fat feeding and that lack of dynamic responsiveness of this pathway may play a role in the pathophysiology of leptin resistance in diet-induced obesity.
Mice and DietsMale FVB mice were obtained from Taconic at approximately 3 weeks of age. After an acclimation period of 1 week, mice were randomly assigned to two groups, chow or high fat (DIO). Chow mice were fed Purina Chow diet 5008 (4.5% calories from fat), whereas DIO mice ate a diet high in fat (55% calories from lard; Harlan Teklad 93075) for 512 weeks. Mice were housed one per cage in a temperature-controlled room and were maintained on a 14/10-h light-dark cycle. Mice had ad libitum access to both food and water. Treatment and Tissue HarvestingMice were handled for 35 days prior to experiments to reduce stress during the experiment. After an overnight fast, mice were injected with saline (control) or leptin intraperitoneally (3 mg/kg; A. F. Parlow, National Hormone & Peptide Program, Torrance, CA). Five hours later, mice were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine and killed by decapitation. Hypothalamic nuclei and peripheral tissues were rapidly dissected and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Each hypothalamic region was dissected from 1-mm-thick sagittal sections of fresh brain. PVN, ARC, ventromedial hypothalamus, and dorsomedial hypothalamus were dissected from the first sections from the midline of the brain (10). All assays were performed on hypothalamic regions from individual mice. Metabolic ParametersBody weights were measured at the same time each week. Random fed mice were bled prior to starting the diets and again a week before sacrifice. Plasma samples were centrifuged, and serum was stored at 20 °C until it was assayed. Plasma glucose was measured using the One-Touch Ultra glucometer. Plasma insulin and leptin levels were determined by their respective enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Crystal Chem Inc., Downers Grove, IL). For the glucose tolerance test (GTT), mice were fasted for 16 h, and 2 mg/g glucose was injected intraperitoneally. Blood glucose was measured at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after injection. For the insulin tolerance test, food was removed at 8 a.m. Four hours later, mice were injected with 1 unit/kg human insulin (Lilly) intraperitoneally. Blood was withdrawn from the tail vein at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 min. Food IntakeAfter 10 weeks of DIO or chow diet, six mice from each group received an intraperitoneal injection of leptin (3 mg/kg body weight) or saline at the start of the dark cycle and again 14 h later. Body weight and food intake were measured 14 and 24 h after the first injection.
Indirect CalorimetryThe metabolic rate of mice was measured by indirect calorimetry in eight opencircuit oxymax chambers that are a component of the Comprehensive Lab Animal Monitoring System (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH). Mice were housed singly and maintained at 24 °C under a 12-h light-dark cycle (dark period 20:008:00). Food and water were available ad libitum. All mice were acclimated to monitoring cages for 24 h prior to beginning the physiological recordings. Mice were injected with saline at 4 p.m. on day 1 and again at 8 a.m. on day 2. Mice were then injected with leptin (3mg/kg) at 4 p.m. on day 2 and at 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. on day 3. To calculate oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), and RER (ratio of VCO2 to VO2), gas concentrations were measured at the inlet and outlet of the sealed chambers.
Western Blot AnalysisTissue lysates were prepared as described previously (10). Phosphorylation of STAT3 in hypothalamic regions was determined with 7.5% SDS-acrylamide gels using an antibody against phosphotyrosine705 (Cell Signaling) of STAT3. Phosphorylation of the
Activity AssaysAMPK activity was measured in soleus muscle or hypothalamic regions by immunoprecipitation of Statistical AnalysesAll data are expressed as means ± S.E. Significance is set at p < 0.05. For GTT, insulin tolerance test, and RER, statistical analyses were performed using repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test. Comparisons of mean plasma insulin, plasma leptin, food intake, AMPK activity, phosphorylated AMPK, ACC activity, and phosphorylated STAT3 in DIO versus chow were made by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-test. Comparisons of total protein levels (AMPK, ACC, and STAT3) between two groups (Chow and DIO) were made using Student's t test.
Male FVB mice were randomized to either chow or DIO so initial body weights were similar in both groups. By 2 weeks on the high fat diet, the DIO mice were heavier than their chow-fed counterparts, and the weights continued to diverge throughout 11 weeks on the high fat diet (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1A). After 1 week on the high fat diet, serum insulin levels were normal, but after 10 weeks the insulin levels were 2-fold higher in DIO mice than in chow-fed mice (Fig. 1B). After 1 week on the diet, plasma leptin levels in the fed state were not different in DIO mice compared with chow-fed mice. Serum leptin levels increased 3-fold in chow-fed mice between 1 and 11 weeks of the study, whereas serum leptin levels in DIO mice increased 7-fold during this same period. After 11 weeks on the diet, leptin levels in the fed state were 3-fold higher in DIO mice compared with chow-fed mice (Fig. 1C). An overnight fast decreased serum leptin levels by 51% in chow-fed mice and 78% in DIO mice. Thus, in the fasted state, serum leptin was not elevated in DIO mice compared with fasted chow-fed mice (Fig. 1C). Overnight fasted DIO mice had elevated blood glucose (chow 101 ± 13 versus DIO 145 ± 5 mg/dl, p < 0.05). Glucose tolerance tests revealed overt diabetes in DIO mice (Fig. 1D), and these mice were unresponsive to exogenous insulin during an insulin tolerance test (Fig. 1E), indicating marked insulin resistance.
One of the primary biological indicators of leptin resistance is the inability of leptin to decrease food intake. After 10 weeks on the diets, mice were injected with leptin intraperitoneally, and 24-h food intake was measured. Two injections of leptin (3 mg/kg, each) over 24 h decreased food intake in the chow-fed mice by more than 30%. Saline-injected DIO mice tended to eat less than saline-injected chow-fed mice, and leptin did not reduce food intake in DIO mice (Fig. 2A). We also measured food intake over 48 h and saw no effect of leptin in DIO mice (not shown). These data suggest that the DIO mice are resistant to the effects of leptin administration on food intake. In addition to its ability to decrease food intake, leptin also increases energy expenditure and fatty acid oxidation. To determine whether DIO mice are resistant to the effects of leptin on fat utilization, mice received three intraperitoneal injections of leptin (3 mg/kg, each) over a 24-h period while in the indirect calorimeter. The RER is a ratio of carbohydrate oxidation to lipid oxidation assuming protein oxidation is negligible (39). An RER of 1.0 indicates high utilization of carbohydrate for energy, and an RER of 0.7 indicates increased fatty acid oxidation (39). Fig. 2, B and C, shows the RER after the third intraperitoneal injection of leptin. Prior to the third injection, RER was lower in the leptin-injected chow group compared with the saline-injected chow-fed mice because of the previous two leptin injections. The third injection of leptin led to a sustained decrease in RER in mice on the chow diet compared with saline-injected chow-fed mice (p < 0.01). Even though RER rose in both chow-fed groups as they ate more starting around 18:00, RER remained lower in the leptin-injected chow-fed mice throughout most of the dark cycle. DIO mice have a lower base-line RER because they utilize fat for energy. Leptin had no effect on RER in DIO mice. Fig. 2C is a quantitation of the RER from 18:00 to 6:00 h after three intraperitoneal leptin injections. Whether the inability of leptin to further decrease RER in DIO mice is because of leptin resistance or because DIO mice are already at the lower biological limit for RER from the high fat content of the diet is unknown. The lowest RER we are aware of is 0.7 and is seen in mice on a ketogenic diet with an extremely low carbohydrate content.4 Lower RER in DIO mice reflects increased fatty acid utilization, and we demonstrated previously that leptin increases fatty acid oxidation through activation of AMPK in muscle (5). Thus, changes in AMPK and ACC activities in muscle in DIO mice might explain, at least in part, their lower base-line RER.
We demonstrated previously that leptin activates AMPK in muscle both directly and through the hypothalamic-sympathetic nervous system (5). Because the physiological contribution of direct leptin action on peripheral tissues to whole-body energy homeostasis is controversial, we focused on the effects of leptin on AMPK that are mediated by the sympathetic nervous system. The effects of leptin on AMPK in the hypothalamus are more pronounced after an overnight fast (10). In fasted chow-fed mice, leptin increased AMPK phosphorylation in soleus muscle
AMPK increases fatty acid oxidation by phosphorylating ACC, which decreases ACC activity. As expected, leptin decreased ACC activity in muscle from chow mice (Fig. 4A). However, in DIO mice, there was a significant decrease in basal ACC activity in muscle comparable to the level of the effects of leptin in chow-fed mice, and leptin had no further effect on ACC activity in muscle from DIO mice. Total ACC protein levels were 17% higher in DIO mice (Fig. 4B), and leptin treatment had no effect on total ACC levels (not shown). We can measure total or phosphorylated ACC, but we cannot measure the dephosphorylated form. The increased total ACC protein levels observed (Fig. 4B) in the setting of decreased ACC activity (Fig. 4A) could be due to an increase of the inactive form of ACC. Although leptin increases AMPK activity in skeletal muscle (5), it inhibits it in the hypothalamus (10, 37). This decrease in AMPK activity in the hypothalamus is required for the anorexigenic actions of leptin (10). In chow-fed mice, leptin decreased AMPK activity in the ARC, paraventricular nucleus, and medial hypothalamus, but leptin failed to attenuate AMPK activity in these hypothalamic regions of DIO mice (Fig. 5). Basal AMPK activity in the PVN of DIO mice was already suppressed to the level of the effect of leptin in chow-fed mice, and there was no further effect of leptin. The lower basal AMPK activity in PVN of DIO mice may be due to effects of hyperinsulinemia and/or hyperglycemia, which also suppress AMPK activity in multiple hypothalamic nuclei (10). There was a tendency, although not significant, for basal AMPK also to be lower in the other hypothalamic regions. In the medial hypothalamus, containing dorsomedial and ventromedial hypothalamus, leptin increased AMPK in DIO. This increase is likely to contribute to resistance to the biologic effects of leptin.
STAT3 phosphorylation and activation are required for the effects of leptin on food intake and energy homeostasis (8), and Munzberg et al. (40) recently demonstrated defects in leptin-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in the arcuate hypothalamus of DIO mice. In our study, STAT3 phosphorylation increased 2-fold in arcuate of chow-fed mice 5 h after intraperitoneal leptin (Fig. 6). Similar to the "leptin-like" effect on basal AMPK activity in PVH and the tendency toward this effect in arcuate and MH of DIO mice, there is a 73% increase in basal STAT3 phosphorylation in arcuate of DIO mice. This appeared to be due to increased activation of STAT3 because there was no difference in total STAT3 protein levels between the groups (Fig. 6). Leptin tended to increase STAT3 phosphorylation
Leptin administration had no effect on AMPK activity in muscle and hypothalamus or STAT3 phosphorylation in ARC from DIO mice. There was a leptin-like effect on the AMPK-ACC signaling pathway in muscle and on AMPK activity and STAT3 phosphorylation in hypothalamus in the basal state in DIO mice on a high fat diet for 12 weeks. To determine whether these effects could result from the elevated leptin levels in these mice, we studied mice that were fed a high fat diet for only 5 weeks. After 5 weeks on the diet, DIO mice were heavier than the chow-fed mice (26.6 ± 0.2 g, chow versus 29.5 ± 0.4 g, DIO, p < 0.01). As seen in Fig. 7A, 5 weeks of high fat feeding increased leptin levels 7-fold, similar to that observed in DIO mice on a high fat diet for 12 weeks. Despite this dramatic increase in serum leptin levels, basal STAT3 phosphorylation in ARC from DIO mice fed a high fat diet for 5 weeks was comparable with that in chow-fed mice. Leptin-stimulated phosphorylation of STAT3 was also similar in chow-fed and DIO mice (data not shown). In addition, basal AMPK activities in the PVN, ARC, and medial hypothalamus (Fig. 7, B and C) from DIO mice fed a high fat diet for 5 weeks were not different from chow-fed mice. In muscle, there was also no difference in basal AMPK activity between the two diet groups after 5 weeks on the diets (5.9 ± 0.3 nmol/mg/min, chow versus 6.8 ± 0.3 nmol/mg/min, DIO).
Defects in the genes encoding leptin or its receptor lead to hyperphagia and severe obesity in animals and humans (3). Treatment of leptin-deficient rodents or humans with exogenous leptin ameliorates the obesity (7, 41, 42). However, the vast majority of obese humans are not leptin-deficient. In fact, obese humans are hyperleptinemic, yet this elevated leptin fails to suppress food intake or cause weight loss, indicating resistance to the major effects of leptin on energy balance. Feeding rodents a high fat diet induces an obese phenotype with many similarities to human obesity, including resistance to the actions of leptin on food intake and body weight. Leptin influences body weight not only by suppressing food intake but also by increasing energy expenditure reflected in metabolic rate and oxygen consumption. One of the major actions of leptin on fuel utilization is to increase fatty acid oxidation and decrease fat storage in muscle via activation of AMPK. However, in both obese humans and rodents, treatment with leptin fails to stimulate fatty acid oxidation in muscle (25, 26). The major objective of the present study was to determine whether this biological leptin resistance present in many forms of obesity is caused by impairment in the actions of leptin to increase AMPK activity in muscle or decrease it in the hypothalamus.
We found that the anorexigenic effect of leptin that was present in chow-fed mice was absent in DIO mice, but DIO mice tended to eat less at base line. In addition, leptin decreased RER in chow-fed mice but had no effect on RER in DIO mice, although base-line RER was decreased in DIO mice, and this could preclude a further reduction by leptin. The lower RER in DIO mice is consistent with increased AMPK activity (Fig. 3) and decreased ACC activity (Fig. 4) in muscle. We investigated whether these defects in leptin action on food intake and RER could be due to dysregulation of AMPK activity. The normal stimulation of AMPK phosphorylation and activity in soleus muscle of chow-fed mice by leptin administration was completely abrogated in DIO mice. However, we saw normal stimulation of AMPK activity by AICAR in muscle of DIO mice indicating that the AMPK pathway is intact. This observation agrees with data from human studies in which AICAR activates AMPK in skeletal muscle from lean and obese humans to the same extent (43). Phosphorylation of ACC, a downstream target of AMPK, inhibits its activity. Basal ACC activity was lower in muscle of the DIO mice than in chow-fed mice, and there was no further response to leptin. The lower ACC activity could reflect hyperleptinemia in DIO mice, although serum leptin levels are not higher in DIO mice than in chow-fed mice in the fasting state (Fig. 1C) in which the studies were performed. Furthermore, elevation of leptin alone is unlikely to cause the alterations in signaling in the basal state because leptin levels were similarly elevated in mice on the high fat diet for 5 weeks, but basal AMPK activity and STAT3 phosphorylation were normal in these mice (Fig. 7). Other signaling pathways also regulate ACC, including insulin, which normally stimulates ACC activity in muscle (44, 45). Reduced ACC activity could reflect insulin resistance in muscle of DIO mice. The amount of total ACC protein was increased in DIO. This may be primarily the inactive (phosphorylated) form because ACC activity is decreased.
The tendency toward higher basal AMPK phosphorylation and activity and the lower ACC activity seen in our DIO mice differs from data reported in obese humans who showed no changes in the basal activity of AMPK or in basal ACC Changes in hypothalamic AMPK activity regulate food intake (10, 37, 38); orexigenic factors (e.g. ghrelin (49)) activate hypothalamic AMPK, whereas leptin and other anorexigenic agents suppress AMPK activity in the hypothalamus. Furthermore, inhibition of AMPK is necessary for the anorexigenic effects of leptin (10). In our study, basal AMPK activity was lower in PVN in the DIO mice, and leptin had no further effect. Similar to the effects on AMPK in muscle, this may result from the chronic 7-fold elevation of leptin in the fed state. However, we do not see the same reduction of basal hypothalamic AMPK activity in DIO mice after 5 weeks of high fat feeding, despite similarly increased fed serum leptin levels. Taken together, these data suggest that hyperleptinemia alone is not responsible for the decreased hypothalamic AMPK activity in the basal state. Hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia could also contribute to lower basal AMPK activity, because they have both been shown to suppress hypothalamic AMPK activity (10, 50). In support of this, we have also found lower AMPK activity in hypothalamic nuclei of db/db mice that are hyperglycemic and hyperinsulinemic.5 The fact that constitutively lower AMPK activity does not effectively suppress food intake in these models indicates that a dynamic change in AMPK activity, rather than an absolute level, may be necessary to alter food intake. Alternatively, AMPK acts in conjunction with other signaling pathways that are also affected by DIO. SOCS-3 is increased in DIO and total body SOCS-3 haploinsufficiency, or neuron-specific absence of SOCS-3 protects mice from DIO and leptin resistance (20, 21). Similarly, deletion of PTP-1B also enhances leptin sensitivity and prevents obesity in mice on a high fat diet (18, 19, 22, 23). Defects in one of these pathways or in a pathway downstream of AMPK may be critical for resistance to the effects of leptin on food intake and body weight.
Signaling through STAT3 in the hypothalamus is required for effects of leptin on energy homeostasis (8). In this study, DIO mice showed increased basal STAT3 phosphorylation in the arcuate and a blunted response to leptin treatment consistent with the AMPK/ACC data in these mice. Therefore, several leptin signaling pathways appear to be affected in the basal state with blunted response to exogenous leptin. Previous reports have shown that DIO mice on the C57/BL6 background have no increase in STAT3 phosphorylation and/or DNA binding activity in hypothalamus in response to peripheral leptin (16, 40). However, in DIO rats, basal STAT3 phosphorylation is higher, similar to our data (51). Moreover, in aged obese rats with a 6-fold elevation of serum leptin levels, basal STAT3 activation is also increased (52). As genetic background can influence susceptibility to DIO (13), strain differences or species differences may influence the effects of obesity on basal STAT3 phosphorylation (13, 51, 52). The nature of the defective leptin signaling in hypothalamus remains unknown. It could be due to defective leptin transport across the blood-brain barrier, which has been suggested as a mechanism for resistance to the effect of leptin on food intake in DIO. However, when leptin is administered centrally, DIO rats and mice still have an impaired response both biologically, i.e. a reduced leptin effect on food intake, and in terms of signaling, i.e. impaired activation of STAT3 (6, 16, 40, 5355). In studies from obese humans, there is a threshold for leptin concentration and action above which the blood-brain transport of leptin is saturated, and diminished sensitivity to effects of leptin on food intake and body weight occurs (56, 57). In conclusion, high fat feeding alters the AMPK signaling pathway in both muscle and hypothalamus and blunts the response to leptin administration. These changes do not appear to be due to hyperleptinemia, per se. These data suggest that responses of the AMPK signaling pathway are dysregulated in longstanding DIO, which may be due to constitutive leptin-like signaling effects. This lack of dynamic responsiveness of AMPK to leptin could provide a molecular mechanism underlying the biological resistance to leptin in DIO. Most likely, other pathways such as SOCS-3 and PTP-1B are also involved. Nevertheless, further altering AMPK activity in DIO could have therapeutic effects because AMPK activators have been shown to cause weight loss in some obese rodent models (58), presumably through peripheral mechanisms. Thus, activating AMPK in muscle and other peripheral tissues could be a viable strategy for treating obesity.
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants P01DK56116 and P30DK57521 (to B. B. K.), an individual National Research Service Award DK069026 (to T. L. M.), and an ADA-EASD fellowship (to T. A.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 These authors contributed equally to this work. 2 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 99 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215. Tel.: 617-667-5422; Fax: 617-667-2927; E-mail: bkahn{at}bidmc.harvard.edu.
3 The abbreviations used are: DIO, diet-induced obesity; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; AICAR, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-
4 E. Maratos-Flier, personal communication.
5 Y. Minokoshi and B. B. Kahn, unpublished data.
We thank Dr. D. Carling for the kind gift of 2 AMPK antibodies, the Animal Physiology Core (Grant P30DK56116 from the National Institutes of Health (to Eleftheria Maratos-Flier)), The Metabolic Physiology Core of the Boston Area Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center (National Institutes of Health Grant P30DK57521), Drs. Jeff Flier and Yasuhiko Minokoshi for critically reading the manuscript, and Anna Lee, Fen Fen Liu, Francis Marino, Dr. Odile Peroni and Monette Punzalan for technical assistance.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||