![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 36, 26268-26279, September 8, 2006
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





1
2
From the
Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 and the
Department of Biochemistry and Kaplan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York 10016
Received for publication, March 29, 2006 , and in revised form, July 7, 2006.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
mutant. These results provide molecular information concerning the role of Rdh54 in homologous recombination and DNA repair, and they also demonstrate the functional significance of Rdh54·Rad51 complex formation. The Rdh54 expression and purification procedures described here should facilitate the functional dissection of this DNA recombination/repair factor. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The genetic requirement of HR was initially defined in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Studies in this model eukaryote have identified the RAD52 epistasis group of genes as being needed for mitotic and meiotic recombination and DSB repair by HR (8). The structure and function of the RAD52 group genes are remarkably conserved among eukaryotes, from yeast to humans (1).
Two RAD52 group genes, RAD54 and RDH54, encode proteins that belong to the Swi2/Snf2 protein family. As deduced from genetic studies conducted by several research groups, RAD54 serves a more prominent role than RDH54 in mitotic DSB repair, intrachromosomal recombination, and sister chromatid-based recombination, whereas RDH54 is more relevant than RAD54 in interhomologue recombination in both mitotic and meiotic cells (1, 9-11). Consistent with their Swi2/Snf2 likeness, both Rad54 and Rdh54 proteins possess a DNA-dependent ATPase activity (12, 13). Employing biochemical means and scanning force microscopy, evidence has been presented that Rad54 and Rdh54 use the free energy from ATP hydrolysis to translocate on dsDNA, generating unconstrained negative and positive supercoils in the DNA (13-15). Importantly, the DNA translocase and supercoiling functions appear to be a generally conserved property of Swi2/Snf2 protein family members (16-18).
Yeast two-hybrid studies (19, 20) and biochemical analyses (12, 13) have shown an interaction of Rad54 and Rdh54 with the Rad51 protein, which is structurally related to the Escherichia coli RecA protein (21). Like RecA, Rad51 possesses an ATP-dependent recombinase activity that can pair and exchange DNA strands between homologous DNA molecules (22). Interestingly, Rdh54 was found to interact with Dmc1, the meiosis-specific RecA/Rad51-like recombinase enzyme (23, 24), in the yeast two-hybrid system (25). Rdh54 was named Tid1 by the authors of this latter study, to reflect its ability for two-hybrid interaction with Dmc1 (25). The meiotic prominence of Rdh54 (1, 9, 10) could very well be because of its physical and functional interactions with not only Rad51 but with Dmc1 as well.
To understand the molecular function and mechanistic role of the RDH54 gene in HR and DSB repair reactions, it is necessary to purify its encoded protein and characterize the protein on its own and in conjunction with the Rad51 and Dmc1 recombinases. To facilitate the detailed dissection of Rdh54 biochemical properties and its functional interactions with Rad51, we have devised an E. coli protein expression system and a purification protocol that together provide milligram quantities of highly purified Rdh54 and mutant variants of this HR factor. Here we report our biochemical studies that show DNA strand opening by Rdh54 with a dependence on ATP hydrolysis. By expressing, purifying, and characterizing several N-terminally truncated forms of Rdh54, we have been able to ascertain the functional significance of the Rdh54·Rad51 complex. Furthermore, we show that at the expense of ATP hydrolysis, Rdh54 efficiently removes Rad51 from duplex DNA. The ability of Rdh54 to remove Rad51 from DNA is less dependent on the N-terminal Rad51 binding domain than is its D-loop promoting activity. Interestingly, the rdh54 K352R mutation that ablates ATPase activity engenders a DNA repair defect even more severe than that seen in the rdh54
mutant. The biochemical and genetic studies described herein contribute help clarify the role that Rdh54 fulfills in HR, and the protein expression/purification and biochemical systems devised here should facilitate the ongoing functional dissection of Rdh54.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
34 mutant; 5'-CTATAGGGAGAGCCACCATGGAAAACACTAGATATTTTACTATC-3' for the
102 mutant; 5'-CTATAGGGAGAGCCACCATGGCCAGTAGCGATAAGTTATGC-3' for the
133 mutant. The reverse primers are: 5'-GATCCGCTCGAGTTATCATTGTTCTCTGAGAC-3' for full-length Rdh54 and the
34,
102, and
133 variants; 5'-GATCCGCTCGAGTTATCATTTTAAGGTAGCGTAGC-3' for the Rdh54-(1-133) polypeptide. For generating the rdh54 K352R expression plasmid, the Rdh54 expression plasmid was subject to in vitro mutagenesis using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene) to alter lysine 352 to arginine (K352R). The primers used for the mutagenesis procedure are: 5'-CCTTTTGGCTGATGATATGGGTTTAGGTCGGACACTAATGAGTATAACTTTGATTTGGACATTAATTAG-3' and 5'-CTAATTAATGTCCAAATCAAAGTTATACTCATTAGTGTCCGACCTAAACCCATATCATCAGCCAAAAGG-3'. All the protein expression constructs were sequenced to verify that no unwanted mutation had been introduced during the subcloning steps. Yeast StrainsAll the yeast strains used in the genetic experiments were derived from W303 and have the genotype leu2-3, 112 his3-11,15 ade2-1 ura3-1 trp1-1 can1-100 RAD5.
Homologous Recombination AssaysRecombination rates were determined according to the median method of Lea and Coulson (26) as described previously (27). Fresh zygotes of each indicated genotype were streaked onto solid YPD medium and nine colonies were used for each fluctuation test for rate determinations. Three zygotes were used for each diploid genotype.
DNA SubstratesAll the oligonucleotides were obtained from Oligos Etc., Inc. To prepare the DNA substrate for the DNA mobility shift assay, the 80-mer oligonucleotide 1, 5'-TTATATCCTTTACTTTGAATTCTATGTTTAACCTTTTACTTATTTTGTATTAGCCGGATCCTTATTTCAATTATGTTCAT-3' was 5' end-labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase (Promega) and [
-32P]ATP (Amersham Biosciences). Following the removal of the free nucleotide with a spin 30 column (Bio-Rad), the radiolabeled oligonucleotide was annealed to its exact complement by heating the reaction mixture at 85 °C for 3 min and slow cooling to 23 °C. The resulting duplex was purified from a 10% polyacrylamide gel by overnight diffusion at 4 °C into TE (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM EDTA). For the D-loop assay, the 90-mer oligonucleotide D1 (14), being complementary to pBluescript SK DNA from positions 1932 to 2022, was 5' end-labeled and then purified using the MERmaid Spin Kit (Bio101). For the DNA topology modification and DNA strand opening reactions,
X174 replicative form I DNA (Invitrogen) was relaxed by treatment with calf thymus topoisomerase I (Invitrogen), as described previously (28).
The 600-bp biotinylated dsDNA used in the experiments in Figs. 5 and 11 was prepared by PCR amplification of pBluescript SK DNA using the 5'-biotinylated primer 1 (5'-AAATCAATCTAAAGTATATATGAG-3') and non-biotinylated primer 2 (5'-TGAGTACTCACCAGTCACAG-3'). The amplified DNA was deproteinized by phenol-chloroform extraction, ethanol-precipitated, and dissolved in TE. To immobilize the biotinylated dsDNA on streptavidin magnetic beads (Roche Applied Science), 30 µg of the DNA was mixed with 400 µl of beads in 800 µl of buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA) for 4 h at 25 °C. The beads were washed twice with 800 µl of buffer A containing 1 M NaCl and stored in 400 µl of buffer A at 4 °C. The beads contained 50 ng of the biotinylated DNA per µl of suspended volume. The linear pBluescript SK dsDNA, used as the Rad51 trap in Figs. 5 and 11, was prepared by digestion of replicative form I DNA with the restriction enzyme EcoRV.
Expression and Purification of Full-length Rdh54 and N-terminally Truncated VariantsE. coli Rosetta cells (Novagen) harboring plasmids that express either the full-length or N-terminally truncated variants of Rdh54 were grown at 30 °C to A600 between 0.6 and 0.8. The culture was shifted to 16 °C and induced with 0.1 mM IPTG(isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside) for 16 h. Cells from 60 liters of culture were harvested by centrifugation and stored at -80 °C. All the subsequent steps were carried out at 4 °C. For protein purification, cells (150 g) were resuspended in 300 ml of buffer B (20 mM KH2PO4 pH 7.4, 150 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.01% Igepal (a nonionic detergent purchased from Sigma), 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and the following protease inhibitors: aprotinin, chymostatin, leupeptin, and pepstatin A at 3 µg/ml each, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and lysed in the French Press. The crude lysate was clarified by ultracentrifugation (60 min at 100,000 x g), and the supernatant was applied onto a Q-Sepharose column (2.5 x 24 cm; 40 ml total). The Q column flow was applied onto a SP-Sepharose column (2.5 x 24 cm; 40 ml total). Following a wash with 80 ml of buffer B, the SP-Sepharose column was developed with a 400-ml gradient of 0-325 mM KCl in buffer B. Rdh54 peak fractions were identified by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining, pooled, and incubated with 2 ml Ni2+-NTA-agarose (Qiagen) for 2 h at 4°C. The matrix was poured into a column with an internal diameter of 1.0 cm and then washed with 24 ml of buffer B containing 500 mM KCl, 12 ml each of buffer B containing 10 and 20 mM imidazole, and then with 10 ml of buffer B containing 200 mM imidazole. The 200 mM imidazole eluate was further fractionated in a 0.5-ml Mono S column (Amersham Biosciences), using a 15-ml gradient of 0-325 mM KCl in buffer B. Rdh54-containing fractions were pooled and concentrated to 5 mg/ml in a Centricon-30 microconcentrator (Amicon). The overall yield of highly purified Rdh54 was
2 mg. The concentrated Rdh54 protein was divided into small aliquots and stored at -80 °C. The truncated Rdh54 variants (
34,
102, and
133) were purified using the same procedure as full-length Rdh54. The Rdh54-(1-133) fragment was purified using the combination of Ni2+-NTA-agarose and Mono S column steps. The concentration of the Rdh54 and rdh54 protein preparations was determined by densitometric scanning of SDS-polyacrylamide gels that contained multiple loadings of proteins against known amounts of bovine serum albumin run in the same gels.
Other Protein ReagentsRad51 and rad51 K191R was purified to near homogeneity from a yeast strain tailored to overexpress this protein, as described previously (29, 30). E. coli topoisomerase I was purified to near homogeneity from the E. coli strain JM 101 containing plasmid pJW312-sal with the topA gene under the control of the Lac promoter, as described (31).
Pulldown AssayFor affinity pulldown through the His6 tag on Rdh54 or the truncated variants, Rad51 (4 µg) was incubated with His6-Rdh54, His6-Rdh54
34, His6-Rdh54
102, His6-Rdh54
133, or the His6-Rdh54-(1-133) fragment (4.8 µg each) in 30 µl buffer C (20 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4, 75 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.01% Igepal, 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) for 30 min on ice. These were incubated with 8 µl of Ni2+-NTA agarose beads for 30 min on ice with gentle mixing every 30 s. The beads were pelleted by centrifugation, and the supernatant was removed. After washing twice with 30 µl of buffer C containing 10 mM imidazole, the beads were treated with 20 µl of 2% SDS to elute bound proteins. The supernatant (8 µl), wash (12 µl), and SDS eluate (8 µl) were subjected to SDS-PAGE to determine their protein contents.
ATPase AssayThe indicated amounts of Rdh54 and truncated variants were incubated at 37 °C in 10 µl of buffer D (35 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 3 mM MgCl2, and 50 mM KCl) containing 100 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, 25 Ci/mol of [
-32P]ATP at the final concentration of 1 mM, and pBluescript II SK DNA (23 µM base pairs). To examine the effect of Rad51 on Rdh54-mediated ATP hydrolysis, the indicated amount of Rad51 was mixed with pBluescript II SK DNA in buffer D at 37 °C for 3 min prior to the addition of Rdh54 or its truncated variants. Aliquots (2 µl) of the reactions were removed at the indicated times and mixed with an equal volume of 500 mM EDTA to halt the reaction. The level of ATP hydrolysis was determined by thin layer chromatography in polyethyleneimine cellulose sheets (J. T. Baker) with phosphorimaging analysis in a Personal FX phosphorimager using the Quantity One software (Bio-Rad), as described previously (12).
DNA Mobility Shift AssayThe 32P-labeled 80-mer dsDNA (30 nM) was incubated for 5 min at 37 °C with the indicated amounts of Rdh54 and truncated variants in 10 µl of buffer D with or without 2 mM ATP and an ATP-regenerating system consisting of 20 mM creatine phosphate and 30 µg/ml creatine kinase. The reaction mixtures were run in 10% polyacrylamide gels in TAE buffer (40 mM Tris acetate, pH 7.4, 0.5 mM EDTA). The gels were dried onto a sheet of DEAE paper to prevent the loss of the radiolabeled DNA and then subjected to phosphorimaging analysis.
DNA Topology Modification ReactionThe indicated amounts of Rdh54 and truncated variants were incubated for 5 min at 23 °C with topologically relaxed
X174 DNA (10µM base pairs) in 9.5µl of buffer D with 2 mM ATP and an ATP-regenerating system, followed by the addition of 100 ng of E. coli topoisomerase I. Reaction mixtures (10 µl, final volume) were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C, deproteinized with SDS (0.5%) and proteinase K (0.5 mg/ml) for 3 min at 37 °C, and then analyzed in 0.9% agarose gels run in TAE buffer. The DNA species were stained with ethidium bromide. To examine the effect of Rad51 on the DNA supercoiling reaction, Rdh54 (or one of the rdh54 truncation mutants) was incubated with the indicated amounts of Rad51 in buffer D for 10 min at 23 °C prior to the addition of the DNA substrate and incubation with topoisomerase.
P1 Assay to Monitor DNA Strand SeparationThe indicated amounts of Rdh54 and truncated variants were incubated for 2 min at 23 °C with topologically relaxed
X174 DNA (18.5 µM base pairs) in 10 µl buffer D with 2 mM ATP and an ATP-regenerating system, followed by the addition of 0.4 unit of P1 nuclease (Sigma). The reaction mixtures (10 µl, final volume) were incubated for 10 min at 30 °C and then deproteinized with SDS (0.5%) and proteinase K (0.5 mg/ml) for 3 min at 37 °C. The DNA species were resolved in 0.9% agarose gels containing 10 µM ethidium bromide in TAE buffer. To examine the effect of Rad51 on the DNA strand opening reaction, Rdh54 (or one of the rdh54 truncation mutants) was incubated with the indicated amounts of Rad51 in buffer D for 10 min at 23 °C prior to the addition of the DNA substrate and incubation with P1 nuclease.
D-loop AssayThe 32P-labeled 90-mer oligonucleotide substrate (2.4 µM nucleotides) was incubated for 5 min at 37 °C with Rad51 (0.8 µM) in 10.5 µl buffer E (35 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 2 mM ATP, and an ATP-regenerating system). The indicated amounts of Rdh54 and truncated variants were then added in 1 µl, followed by a 1-min incubation at 23 °C. The D-loop reaction was initiated by adding pBluescript replicative form I DNA (35 µM base pairs) in 1 µl. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 5 min at 37 °C, deproteinized, and processed for electrophoresis in 0.9% agarose gels in TAE buffer, as above. The gels were dried onto a sheet of DEAE paper to prevent the loss of DNA and the radiolabeled D-loop was visualized and quantified in the phosphorimager.
Assay to Monitor Rad51 Removal from DNATo assemble Rad51-dsDNA nucleoprotein filament, Rad51 (3.7 µM) was incubated for 5 min at 37 °C with magnetic beads containing biotinylated dsDNA (15 µM base pairs) in 18 µl of buffer E. After the incorporation of the indicated amounts of Rdh54 or truncated variants in 1 µl and a 3-min incubation at 37°, the reactions were completed by adding linear pBluescript SK dsDNA (75 µM base pairs) in 1 µl. Following a 10-min incubation at 37 °C, the beads were captured with the Magnetic Particle Separator (Roche Applied Science), and the supernatants were set aside. Bound proteins were eluted from the beads with 10 µl of 2% SDS. The various supernatants and SDS eluates (8 µl each) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining to determine their content of proteins and also by agarose gel electrophoresis in TAE buffer followed by ethidium bromide staining to reveal the pBluescript dsDNA trap.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
mutant, the rdh54K352R mutant is recombination deficient (Fig. 1). We next examined haploid and diploid rdh54K352R strains for their sensitivity to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), which induces DNA damage that is repaired by HR. As shown in Fig. 2A, rdh54K352R strains are sensitive to MMS, in fact even more so than the rdh54
strains. The rdh54K352R mutation appears to engender a greater increase in MMS sensitivity in the haploid state than in the homozygous diploid state (Fig. 2A). We have asked whether the rdh54K352R mutation might exert semi-dominance by determining MMS sensitivity in heterozygous diploids, but found no increase in sensitivity of the heterozygote compared with the homozygous wild-type strain (Fig. 2B).
|
|
diploids are partially impaired for sporulation and show a reduction in spore viability (9), we examined the diploid rdh54K352R mutant for sporulation efficiency and spore viability. As summarized in Table 1, the rdh54K352R diploid has the same reduced level of sporulation as the homozygous rdh54
diploid. The rdh54 K352R mutation has no dominant effect on sporulation levels in heterozygous diploids (Table 1).
|
Expression of Rdh54 in E. coli and Its PurificationAn inframe ATG start codon exists 102 nucleotides upstream of the annotated start codon (according to the data base YGD) in the RDH54 gene. We shall refer to the protein coded by the reading frame that utilizes the upstream ATG as Rdh54 and the shorter protein (as annotated by YGD) rdh54
34, so as to reflect the omission of 34 amino acid residues in the latter. The yeast Rdh54 overexpression system and a multi-step purification protocol that we previously devised yields between 100 and 200 µg of purified Rdh54 protein from 1 kg of yeast paste, being equivalent to 300 liters of yeast culture. Because of the extremely low expression level and the susceptibility of Rdh54 to proteolysis during purification, the purity of the final product is quite variable. These constraints have imposed a great limitation on our ability to conduct biochemical studies on Rdh54. We therefore explored the feasibility of Rdh54 protein production in E. coli. For this purpose, thioredoxin and His6 tags were added to the N terminus of the Rdh54 protein to enhance its solubility and to facilitate its purification of by using nickel-NTA agarose, respectively. The T7 promoter used for Rdh54 expression is IPTG inducible, and extracts made from cells grown in medium containing IPTG harbored a protein species of 125 kDa not found in extracts of either un-induced cells (Fig. 3A) or cells harboring the empty protein expression vector grown under inducing conditions (data not shown). The size of the novel protein species is in excellent agreement with the theoretical value of 125 kDa for the tagged Rdh54 protein. That this protein species corresponds to the Rdh54 protein was verified by immunoblot analysis using either anti-histidine antibodies (Fig. 3A) or affinity-purified anti-Rdh54 antibodies (13). The Rdh54 protein thus expressed is soluble, and a procedure (Fig. 3B) entailing affinity chromatography on nickel-NTA agarose and several chromatographic fractionation steps was devised to purify it to near homogeneity (Fig. 3C). Routinely, we could obtain an overall yield of
2 mg of Rdh54 protein from 150 g of E. coli cell paste harvested from 60 liters of culture. Rdh54 protein thus purified from E. coli shows a dsDNA-dependent ATPase activity (kcat = 1,500 min-1) similar in potency to that (kcat = = 2,200 min-1) of Rdh54 purified from yeast cells, and is also active in DNA supercoiling and in functional interactions with the Rad51 recombinase (see below). Expression of the thioredoxin- and His6-tagged Rdh54 protein in the haploid rdh54 K352R mutant using the ADH1 promoter in a low copy CEN vector complemented the MMS sensitivity of the cells, indicating that the tagged Rdh54 protein is biologically efficacious (data not shown).
|
|
|
|
As shown in Fig. 5B, there was a Rdh54 concentration-dependent transfer of Rad51 protein from the magnetic bead-bound DNA to the non-biotinylated dsDNA trap, indicative of dissociation of the Rad51-dsDNA nucleoprotein filament by Rdh54. The Rdh54-mediated removal of Rad51 from dsDNA requires ATP hydrolysis by the former, as no such transfer occurred when we substituted Rdh54 with the rdh54 K352R mutant variant that is proficient in Rad51 interaction but defective in ATP hydrolysis (13).
Construction, Expression, and Purification of N-terminally Truncated rdh54 MutantsIn Rdh54, the core of the catalytic domain harboring the seven conserved Swi2/Snf2 motifs that are concerned with DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis (36-39) is located a good distance away from the N-terminal portion (Fig. 6A). It seems likely that the N-terminal portion of Rdh54 confers the ability to interact with other HR factors. For testing the role of this N-terminal domain in complex formation and functional interactions with Rad51, we constructed truncation mutants of Rdh54, deleting 34, 102, or 133 amino acid residues from the N terminus. The rdh54
102 and rdh54
133 truncation mutants can be expressed in E. coli, are soluble, and can be purified to near homogeneity (Fig. 6B) using the same chromatographic procedure (Fig. 3B) that we have developed for the full-length protein. The overall yield of the two N-terminally truncated rdh54 mutants is similar to that of the full-length protein. The rdh54
34 mutant protein can also be expressed in E. coli and is soluble, but it proves to be more susceptible to intracellular proteolysis. The major proteolytic product of rdh54
34 has a size of 70 kDa. This proteolytic product copurified with rdh54
34 and represented between 10 and 30% of the final purified preparation. The overall yield of rdh54
34 protein is similar to that of full-length Rdh54.
|
34 protein bound about the same amount of Rad51 as full-length Rdh54, whereas the rdh54
102 truncation mutant had a much weaker affinity for Rad51, and the rdh54
133 protein was completely defective in this regard. Neither full-length Rdh54 (Fig. 6D) nor any of the truncation rdh54 mutants (data not shown) bound E. coli RecA protein. The above results indicated that the N-terminal 133 residues of Rdh54 are necessary for Rad51 binding. We wished to ascertain whether this N-terminal region of Rdh54 is sufficient for Rad51 interaction. To accomplish this goal, we expressed and purified to near homogeneity the Rdh54 fragment that encompasses the N-terminal 133 residues as a His6-tagged polypeptide (Fig. 6E, panel I). Importantly, the Rdh54-(1-133) fragment exhibited the same high affinity for Rad51 as full-length Rdh54 but, as expected, did not bind the E. coli RecA protein (Fig. 6E, panel II).
Biochemical Attributes of Rdh54 and N-terminally Truncated VariantsWe examined the purified rdh54
34,
102, and
133 proteins for the biochemical attributes of Rdh54, i.e. DNA binding, DNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis, DNA supercoiling, and DNA strand opening. As shown in Figs. 7 and 8, the three N-terminally truncated proteins are just as proficient as full-length Rdh54 in all these aspects, indicating that the truncations have no undesirable effect on the basic biochemical functions of Rdh54. We also tested the rdh54 K352R protein for DNA binding and found that it is just as proficient as the full-length and truncated forms in this regard (data not shown).
Rdh54·Rad51 Complex Formation Is Critical for Functional InteractionsFull-length Rdh54 purified from E. coli can greatly enhance the ability of Rad51 to make D-loop (Fig. 9), just as what we previously documented for Rdh54 purified from yeast (13). Even though the rdh54
34 protein retains the ability to bind Rad51 (Fig. 6C), it is, reproducibly, less effective than full-length Rdh54 in the D-loop reaction (Fig. 9). Importantly, the rdh54
102 mutant, which is significantly impaired for Rad51 interaction (Fig. 6C), is much less capable of promoting the D-loop reaction, while the rdh54
133 mutant, which is devoid of Rad51 binding ability (Fig. 6C), is completely defective in this regard (Fig. 9). These results support the premise that Rdh54·Rad51 complex formation is a prerequisite for functional cooperation of these two HR factors in the D-loop reaction.
|
34 is stimulated to a lesser degree by Rad51 (Fig. 10A), and that the ATPase activity of rdh54
102 (data not shown) or rdh54
133 (Fig. 10A) is refractory to Rad51. Reproducibly, Rad51 stimulates the DNA supercoiling activity of full-length Rdh54 slightly (Fig. 10B) but exerts no perceptible effect on the reaction mediated by the rdh54 truncation mutants, i.e.
34,
102, and
133 (data not shown). We consistently saw a 2-fold enhancement of the DNA strand opening activity of full-length Rdh54 by Rad51 (Fig. 10C), but the reaction mediated by the rdh54 truncation mutants is not influenced by Rad51 (data not shown).
|
34,
102, and
133 are capable of removing Rad51 from DNA. To do this, increasing amounts of the truncated rdh54 mutants were incubated with Rad51 filaments assembled on magnetic bead-bound DNA in the presence of a non-biotinylated dsDNA used as Rad51 trap (see Fig. 5A for schematic). The analysis revealed Rad51 dissociation from the bead-bound DNA by rdh54
34 and rdh54
102 with an efficiency very similar to that seen with full-length Rdh54 (Fig. 11). In contrast, the rdh54
133 is partially impaired for this activity, seen as a reduced efficiency of Rad51 removal at lower rdh54 protein concentrations (Fig. 11). Thus, Rad51 removal by Rdh54 occurs in the absence of the N-terminal Rad51 interaction domain in the latter, albeit with reduced efficiency.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Rad54 dislodges Rad51 from dsDNA in a reaction that requires ATP hydrolysis by Rad54 (33). This activity of Rad54 is thought to mediate the removal of Rad51 from the nascent D-loop structure so as to expose the primer end in the D-loop for the initiation of repair DNA synthesis (33), which is a critical step in the HR reaction (1, 8). Alternatively, or in addition, Rad54 may release Rad51 from bulk chromatin and from heteroduplex DNA joints made during HR reactions so as to maximize the free pool of Rad51 to be utilized for HR and DNA repair reactions. In this study, we have presented data to show an ability of Rdh54 to dissociate Rad51 from dsDNA with a strict dependence on the ATPase activity of Rdh54. It seems possible that this Rdh54 activity likewise promotes the intracellular recycling of Rad51 and helps initiate DNA synthesis during interhomologoue recombination and DNA repair reactions. Our results demonstrate that the Rdh54-mediated removal of Rad51 from DNA is only partially reliant on the Rad51 binding domain in Rdh54. Even though Rad51 removal in the in vitro setting is not absolutely contingent upon Rdh54 possessing the ability to bind Rad51, within cells, complex formation with Rad51 may well be necessary for efficient targeting of Rdh54 to chromosome locales where Rad51 is bound. As noted earlier, complex formation of Rad54 with Rad51 appears to be indispensable for functional synergy between them (14, 33, 38, 39, 41-44). It will be important to test whether variants of Rad54 that lack the ability to interact with Rad51 (38, 39) are capable of clearing Rad51 from dsDNA.
Our biochemical studies (13) (this work) have shown an indispensable role of the Rdh54 ATPase activity in DNA supercoiling, DNA strand opening, removal of Rad51 from DNA, and the D-loop reaction. Accordingly, genetic studies involving the rdh54 K352R allele as presented here have revealed a biological requirement of the Rdh54 ATPase function in recombination and DNA repair in mitotic and meiotic cells. Interestingly, in both the haploid and diploid states, the rdh54 K352 mutation causes a degree of MMS sensitivity significantly higher than that engendered by deleting RDH54. This finding argues that a non-productive complex of rdh54 K352R mutant protein and its partner protein(s) is deleterious to the repair of DNA damage induced by MMS.
Several members of the Swi2/Snf2 protein family, including Rad54 (45), possess a chromatin remodeling activity (46). In the case of Rad54, chromatin remodeling is stimulated by a specific interaction with Rad51 (42, 43, 47). With the Rdh54 expression and purification systems that we have devised, it will be possible to address whether Rdh54 also has a chromatin remodeling activity and if this activity is enhanced by Rad51.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520. Tel.: 203-785-4553; Fax: 203-785-6404 or 785-6037; E-mail: Patrick.Sung{at}yale.edu. 2 To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Kaplan Cancer Center, NY University, School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016. Tel.: 212-263-5778; Fax: 212-263-8166; E-mail: hannah.klein{at}med.nyu.edu.
3 The abbreviations used are: HR, homologous recombination; IPTG, isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside; NTA, nitrilotriacetic acid; ds, double-stranded. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|