HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 40, 30251-30259, October 6, 2006

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data All Versions of this Article: 281/40/30251    most recent M605726200v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Suzuki, H. Articles by Nakayama, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Suzuki, H. Articles by Nakayama, T. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

An Isoflavone Conjugate-hydrolyzing -Glucosidase from the Roots of Soybean (Glycine max) Seedlings

PURIFICATION, GENE CLONING, PHYLOGENETICS, AND CELLULAR LOCALIZATION^*

Hirokazu Suzuki, Seiji Takahashi, Ryoko Watanabe, Yusuke Fukushima, Naoki Fujita, Akio Noguchi, Ryusuke Yokoyama, Kazuhiko Nishitani, Tokuzo Nishino, and Toru Nakayama¹

From the Department of Biomolecular Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Aoba-yama 6-6-11, Sendai 980-8579 and the Department of Developmental Biology and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba-yama 6-3, Sendai 980-8578, Japan

Received for publication, June 15, 2006 , and in revised form, August 2, 2006.

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) and certain other legumes excrete isoflavones from their roots, which participate in plantmicrobe interactions such as symbiosis and as a defense against infections by pathogens. In G. max, the release of free isoflavones from their conjugates, the latent forms, is mediated by an isoflavone conjugate-hydrolyzing -glucosidase. Here we report on the purification and cDNA cloning of this important -glucosidase from the roots of G. max seedlings as well as related phylogenetic and cellular localization studies. The purified enzyme, isoflavone conjugate-hydrolyzing -glucosidase from roots of G. max seedling (GmICHG), is a homodimeric glycoprotein with a subunit molecular mass of 58 kDa and is capable of directly hydrolyzing genistein 7-O-(6 ''-O-malonyl--D-glucoside) to produce free genistein (k_cat, 98 s^-1; K_m, 25 µM at 30 °C, pH 7.0). GmICHG cDNA was isolated based on the amino acid sequence of the purified enzyme. GmICHG cDNA was abundantly expressed in the roots of G. max seedlings but only negligibly in the hypocotyl and cotyledon. An immunocytochemical analysis using anti-GmICHG antibodies, along with green fluorescent protein imaging analyses of Arabidopsis cultured cells transformed by the GmICHG:GFP fusion gene, revealed that the enzyme is exclusively localized in the cell wall and intercellular space of seedling roots, particularly in the cell wall of root hairs. A phylogenetic analysis revealed that GmICHG is a member of glycoside hydrolase family 1 and can be co-clustered with many other leguminous -glucosidases, the majority of which may also be involved in flavonoid-mediated interactions of legumes with microbes.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The roots of legumes excrete large amounts of flavonoids, which play very important roles in the interactions of these plants with microorganisms (1). The major flavonoids secreted from soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) roots, for example, are isoflavones (2), a class of flavonoids with a 3-phenylchromone structure. The isoflavones genistein and daidzein (see Fig. 1) in root exudates serve as chemoattractants (3) for specific symbionts, Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Sinorhizobium fredii, as well as genetic inducers of nodulation (4). Moreover, these flavonoids have been proposed to play important roles in defensive mechanisms against infections by pathogens (5-9).

Isoflavones are synthesized from flavanones (liquiritigenin or naringenin) by aryl migration, which is catalyzed by 2-hydroxy-flavanone synthase (10, 11). In G. max cells, the resulting free isoflavones are then 7-O-glucosylated and 6''-O-malonylated by the combined actions of UDP-glucose:isoflavone 7-O-glucosyltransferase (IF7GT)² and malonyl-CoA:isoflavone 7-O-glucoside 6''-O-malonyltransferase (IF7MaT), respectively (5). These conjugates (i.e. 7-O--D-glucosides and 7-O-(6''-O-malonyl--D-glucosides) of isoflavones) are more water-soluble than the aglycons and accumulate in large amounts in vacuoles (5). These isoflavone conjugates are considered to be latent forms of isoflavonoids and must ultimately be converted to aglycons for interactions with symbiotic or pathogenic microorganisms (5, 7, 12). Moreover, the enzyme(s) involved in this conversion must be spatially separated from those of IF7GT and IF7MaT and the vacuolar conjugate pools (5). The release of aglycons in the chickpea (Cicer arietinum) has been proposed to involve a two-step hydrolysis of the isoflavone conjugates, where the isoflavone 7-O-(6''-O-malonyl--D-glucosides) undergoes ester hydrolysis by a malonylesterase followed by hydrolysis of the -glucosidic linkage by a -glucosidase (5). In G. max, however, the release of isoflavone aglycons from their conjugates appears to be mediated by a single enzyme, an isoflavone conjugate-hydrolyzing -glucosidase (GmICHG) (12) (Fig. 1), which appears to play a critical role in the turnover of conjugates for plant-microbe interactions. However, the cDNA encoding this important -glucosidase has not been identified to date, and hence, the primary structure and phylogenetics of the enzyme remain unclear. In addition, the cellular localization of the enzyme remains to be conclusively established.

In this study, GmICHG was purified 4200-fold from roots of G. max seedlings, and its molecular properties were established. This achievement permitted the identification of the GmICHG cDNA and phylogenetic as well as cellular localization studies of the enzyme. The results obtained in these studies provide important information concerning the biochemical mechanism that controls the release of free isoflavones in the G. max root exudates regarding interactions of the G. max plant with microorganisms.

View larger version (7K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 1. GmICHG-catalyzed hydrolysis of isoflavone conjugates. Names of aglycons are daidzein (R1 = H) and genistein (R1 = OH). Conjugates are isoflavone 7-O-glucosides (R2 = H) and isoflavone 7-O-(6''-O-malonyl--glucosides) (R2 = malonyl).

	EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Enzyme and Protein Assays
GmICHG activity was routinely assayed using Gen7MG as a substrate. The standard reaction mixture (final volume, 100 µl) consisted of 50 µM Gen7MG, 100 mM potassium P_i, pH 7.0, and enzyme (final concentrations). The mixture without enzyme was preincubated at 30 °C for 5 min, and the reaction was started by the addition of the enzyme. After incubation at 30 °C for 20 min, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 200 µl of ice-cold 1.0% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid. The isoflavonoids in the reaction mixture were routinely analyzed by reversed phase HPLC on a J'sphere ODS-M80 column (4.6 x 150 mm; YMC, Kyoto, Japan) at a flow rate of 0.7 ml/min. After injection (100 µl) onto the column, which had been equilibrated with 14% (v/v) CH₃CN containing 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid, the column was isocratically developed for 3 min, followed by a linear gradient of 14-90% (v/v) CH₃CN in 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid in 15 min, and then isocratically developed for 1 min, followed by a linear gradient of 90 to 14% (v/v) CH₃CN in 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid in 1 min. The isoflavonoids were detected by UV absorption at 260 nm using an SPD-10A VP UV-visible detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Kinetic parameters and standard errors were determined by fitting the initial velocity data to the MichaelisMenten equation by means of a nonlinear regression analysis (14). Protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford method (15) using bovine serum albumin as a standard.

Purification of GmICHG from Roots of G. max Seedlings
All operations were performed at 4 °C.

Step 1, Preparation of Crude Extract—Soybean roots (200 g, fresh weight; see above) were suspended in 800 ml of 100 mM potassium P_i, pH 7.0, containing 30 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 5% (w/v) polyvinylpolypyrrolidone and were disrupted for 30 s in a Waring blender, followed by centrifugation. The supernatant was used for further purification.

Step 2, Ammonium Sulfate Fractionation—The protein fraction that precipitated between 0 and 60% saturation of ammonium sulfate was collected by centrifugation. The pellet was dissolved in 100 ml of 100 mM potassium P_i, pH 7.0, containing 30 mM 2-mercaptoethanmol, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Polyethyleneimine was then added to the solution to a final concentration of 0.5% (w/v). After allowing the mixture to stand for 30 min, the precipitate was removed by centrifugation. The supernatant was extensively dialyzed against 10 mM potassium P_i, pH 7.0, containing 7.5 mM 2-mercaptoetanol (termed buffer A).

Step 3, DEAE-Sepharose 4FF—The enzyme solution was applied to a DEAE-Sepharose 4FF column (bed volume, 30 ml; Amersham Biosciences) equilibrated with buffer A at a flow rate of 2 ml/min using an FPLC system (Amersham Biosciences). The column was washed with the same buffer. The flow-through fractions that contained enzyme activity were combined.

Step 4, CM-Sepharose 4FF—The enzyme solution was applied to a CM-Sepharose 4FF column (bed volume, 20 ml; Amersham Biosciences) equilibrated with buffer A at a flow rate of 2.0 ml/min using an FPLC system. The column was washed with the same buffer. The enzyme was eluted with a linear gradient of 0-1 M NaCl in buffer B (20 mM potassium P_i, pH 7.0) in 100 min. The active fractions were combined.

Step 5, Resource PHE—Ammonium sulfate was added to the enzyme solution to 20% saturation. The enzyme solution was applied to a Resource PHE column (bed volume, 6 ml; Amersham Biosciences) equilibrated with buffer B containing 20%-saturated ammonium sulfate at a flow rate of 2 ml/min using an FPLC system. The column was washed with the same buffer. The enzyme was eluted at a flow rate of 2 ml/min with a linear gradient between the equilibration buffer and buffer B containing 50% (v/v) ethylene glycol in 30 min. The active fractions were combined and concentrated by ultrafiltration to 3.5 ml.

Step 6, Gel Filtration—The enzyme solution was applied to a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200pg column (Amersham Bio-sciences) equilibrated with buffer B containing 0.15 M NaCl. The enzyme was eluted at a flow rate of 1 ml/min using an FPLC system. The active fractions were combined and equilibrated with 10 mM potassium P_i, pH 7.0 (buffer C), by repeated concentration and dilution by ultrafiltration.

Step 7, HiTrap Heparin—The enzyme solution (2.5 ml) was applied to a HiTrap heparin column (1 ml; Amersham Bio-sciences) that had been equilibrated with buffer C at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min using an FPLC system. The column was washed with buffer C containing 0.15 M NaCl. The enzyme activity was eluted with buffer C containing 1 M NaCl. The active fractions were combined, concentrated, equilibrated with buffer C, and subjected to rechromatography on a HiTrap heparin column in the same manner as described above.

Sugar Staining
Proteins in the SDS-polyacrylamide gels (16) were transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The glycoprotein blots were visualized using methods reported previously (17), using a kit (G. P. Sensor, Seikagaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan) following the manufacturer's guidelines.

cDNA Cloning of GmICHG
Based on the amino acid sequences determined (see "Results"), degenerate oligonucleotide primers were designed as follows: PepF1, 5'-GGICCIAGYATHTGGGAYAC-3'; PepF2, 5'-TGGGAYACITTYACICAYAA-3'; PepR1, 5'-TCCATRTACCAICCRTAYTG-3'; PepR2, 5'-CCRTAYTGRAARTCDATIGC-3', where I indicates inosine and R, H, and Y indicate degenerate sites (R, A/G; H, A/C/T; and Y, C/T). The total RNA was isolated from the G. max seedling roots using the RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). A reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed using Qiagen One-step RT-PCR kit (Qiagen) with the primers, PepF1 and PepR1, and the total RNA of the G. max seedling roots as a template. An amplified fragment was further subjected to nested PCR using primers PepF2 and PepR2. The amplified fragment, which was 0.6 kbp in length, was cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen) and subjected to sequencing using a dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) with the CEQ 2000 DNA analysis system (Beckman Coulter). Poly(A)⁺ RNA was isolated from G. max seedling roots using a kit (Straight As mRNA Isolation System; Novagen, Madison, WI). A cDNA library of the G. max seedling roots was constructed using a ZAP-cDNA synthesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and Gigapack III gold cloning kit (Stratagene) following the manufacturer's guidelines. The cDNA library, 400,000 plaques, was screened using an amplified DNA fragment as a probe. The DIG DNA labeling and detection kit (Roche Diagnostics) was used to label the amplified fragment and detect cDNA clones, following the manufacturer's guidelines. Because the longest cDNA clone was found to lack a translation initiation codon, the 5'-fragment was obtained using a system for the rapid amplification of 5'-cDNA ends (Invitrogen) with the primers GSP1 (5'-CTTCCACCTTCCTTTG-3'), GSP2 (5'-GGCTGAGGATCCAGCCCC-3'), GSP3 (5'-GCAGCGTCATGAACAGGCG-3'), and total RNA of the G. max seedling roots.

The mature form of GmICHG (residues 26-514 of the precursor; see "Results" and supplemental Fig. 1S) was heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli Origami cells as an N-terminal fusion protein with a thioredoxin molecule using a pET Trx Fusion 32a(+) system (Novagen). The expressed product, 71 kDa in size, was purified to homogeneity as described in the Supplemental Material.

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was prepared from the individual organs of the 15-day-old G. max seedlings using the RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA contamination in total RNA was eliminated by the treatment with DNase I (Takara-bio, Tokyo, Japan) at 37 °C for 30 min. For amplification of a 220-bp partial cDNA of GmICHG, a pair of gene-specific primers was designed as follows: GmICHG-S, 5'-CATAAAGGCTGCGAGAAGGGC-3'; GmICHG-A, 5'-TGTCGTTGCTTGGAGGGACAC-3'. For amplification of a 260-bp partial cDNA of G. max ubiquitin, a pair of gene-specific primers was also designed: GmUBQ-F, 5'-GGGTTTTAAGCTCGTTGT-3'; GmUBQ-R, 5'-GGACACATTGAGTTCAAC-3'. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was carried out using mRNA Selective PCR kit (Takara-bio, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's guidelines.

Immunocytochemical Analyses
Cut roots (5-10 mm in length) of the 7-day-old G. max seedlings were fixed overnight at 4 °C in 20 mM sodium cacodylate, pH 7.4, containing 4% paraformaldehyde. After the fixed samples were washed extensively with 0.05 M potassium P_i, pH 7.5, they were embedded in 5% agar. The root sections (50-µm thickness) were prepared from the agar-embedded material with a Vibratome Series 3000 Plus-Tissue Sectioning System (Technical Products International, Inc.; St. Louis) using a razor blade. Immunocytochemical labeling of GmICHG was carried out using a kit (TSA kit 12 with horseradish peroxidase goat anti-rabbit IgG and AlexaFluor 488 tyramide; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) according to the manufacturer's guidelines. The resulting sections were observed under a laser scanning confocal microscope (Fluoview; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a filter set (BA5101F-BA550RIF).

Stable Transformation of Arabidopsis Cultured Cells and GFP Imaging
To construct the 35S-GmICHG:GFP construct, a full-length GmICHG cDNA fused in-frame with sGFP (S65T) (18), provided from Dr. Niwa (University of Shizuoka, Japan), was sub-cloned into the binary vector pBE2113Not (19). Arabidopsis thaliana T87 cultured cells (20) were transformed by co-cultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101(pMP90) carrying the resulting construct, as described in the Supplemental Material.

For GFP imaging, T87 cells expressing GFP-fused GmICHG were counterstained with a 10 µg/ml solution of propidium iodide (Sigma). The cells were observed under a BX50 microscope equipped with a confocal scanning system (Fluoview; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Green (sGFP) and red (propidium iodide and chlorophyll autofluorescence) emissions were detected with filters BA510IF-BA550RIF and BA585IF, respectively. The images were then pseudo-colored and combined into one image.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Purification of GmICHG from the Roots of G. max Seedlings—Our preliminary studies, as well as previous studies by Hsieh and Graham (12), showed that roots of the G. max seedling contain significantly higher (e.g. 50-fold) ICHG activity than hypocotyls and cotyledons. Thus, we chose the roots of 5-7-day-old seedlings as the starting materials for the enzyme purification. The enzyme activity was highly stable throughout the purification procedures and was recovered in high yields at each purification step. Finally, a 4200-fold purification was achieved with an overall activity yield of 30% (Table 1). SDS-PAGE of the purified enzyme indicated a single major protein band with an estimated molecular mass of 58 kDa (Fig. 2A), which stained positive for the presence of sugar (Fig. 2B), indicating that GmICHG is a glycoprotein. The native molecular mass of the purified GmICHG was estimated to be 100 kDa by gel filtration chromatography on Superdex 200, indicating that the enzyme is dimeric. The N-terminal amino acid sequence (five cycles) of the purified enzyme, determined by automated Edman degradation, was Asp-Ser-Val-Pro-Leu-(termed sequence 1; see supplemental Fig. 1S). To obtain the internal amino acid sequences of the purified protein, it was digested with a lysylendopeptidase from Achromobacter lyticus M497-1 (Wako, Tokyo, Japan), and the resulting peptides were separated by reversed phase HPLC as described previously (21, 22). The amino acid sequences of some of these peptides were determined to be as follows: Glu-Gly-Gly-Arg-Gly-Pro-Ser-Ile-Trp-Asp-Thr-Phe-Thr-His-Asn-(sequence 2) and Ala-Ala-Arg-Arg-Ala-Ile-Asp-Phe-Gln-Tyr-Gly-Trp-Tyr-Met-Glu-(sequence 3).

View larger version (53K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 2. PAGE analyses of native GmICHG. A, GmICHG, purified from seedling roots of G. max (lane 2, arrowhead), and marker proteins (lane 1) were simultaneously electrophoresed under the conditions of Laemmli (16) and stained by silver staining. B, glycoprotein staining (GPS) (17). Proteins in SDS-polyacrylamide gels were transferred to Immobilon-P membranes by electro-blotting. In panel GPS, GmICHG in the membrane was stained as described under "Experimental Procedures," with ovalbumin and bovine serum albumin (BSA) as positive and negative controls, respectively. In panel CBB, another set of the electrophoresed proteins was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue.

Properties of GmICHG—The GmICHG purified from the seedling roots (Fig. 2A) efficiently hydrolyzed both the malonylated and nonmalonylated forms of isoflavone 7-O--D-glucosides, with the malonylated form being the preferred substrate. The k_cat and K_m values at pH 7.0, 30 °C for Gen7MG were 98 ± 3s^-1 and 25 ± 2 µM, respectively, and those for Gen7G were 13 ± 1s^-1 and 32 ± 2 µM, respectively (Table 2); thus, the calculated specificity constant (k_cat/K_m) for Gen7MG was 10 times higher than the value for Gen7G. The 7'-O-(6''-O--D-malonyl--D-glucoside) and the 7'-O--D-glucoside of daidzein also acted as effective substrates, the specificity constants for which were 62 and 23% of the value for Gen7MG, respectively. The enzyme had negligible activity for the following glucosides (relative activity, less than 0.01% of activity for Gen7MG): cyanidin 3-O--D-glucoside, cyanidin 3-O-(6''-O-malonyl--D-glucoside), quercetin 3-O--D-glucoside, quercetin 3-O-(6''-O-malonyl--D-glucoside), p-nitrophenyl -D-glucoside, p-nitrophenyl -D-glucoside, and p-nitrophenyl -D-galactoside. Thus, the enzyme was highly specific for isoflavone conjugates.

View larger version (48K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 3. Accumulation of the GmICHG transcripts in various organs of G. max seedling. Total RNAs prepared from roots, cotyledons, and hypocotyls of G. max seedlings were subjected to semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis for the GmICHG expression levels. Accumulation of the transcript of G. max ubiquitin, GmUBQ, was also analyzed as an internal control of RT-PCR.

Expression Analysis—The expression of GmICHG in G. max seedlings was analyzed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The GmICHG transcript was present in roots but was not detectable in either hypocotyl or cotyledon (Fig. 3). This is in very good agreement with the spatial distribution of enzyme activity in seedling (347 picokatal/mg protein in roots, 29 picokatal/mg protein in hypocotyls, and 16 picokatal/mg protein in cotyledons).

Localization Studies—To determine the cellular localization of GmICHG, we first used an immunocytochemical approach with antibodies (anti-GmICHG IgG) raised against synthetic peptides that are predicted to serve as epitopes of this enzyme (see Supplemental Material and Fig. 1S). Because the cotyledons and hypocotyls of G. max seedlings showed essentially no GmICHG activity and expressed only negligible levels of the GmICHG transcript (see above), we focused our analyses on the roots. A Western blotting analysis of crude extracts of G. max roots using anti-GmICHG IgG gave a single immunoreactive band (Fig. 4A), confirming its specificity for GmICHG.

In probing the cross-sections (Fig. 4B) and longitudinal sections (Fig. 4C) of root tissues of dark-grown G. max seedlings with anti-GmICHG IgG, immunopositive signals were found to be heterogeneously located in the peripheries of the cells, which likely correspond to the cell wall and intercellular space, in the epidermis, endodermis, and stele tissues of the root. It is noteworthy that many (but not all) of the cell corners as well as the middle lamella, which are known to be filled with pectic polysaccharides, showed strong immunopositive signals (Fig. 4,B and C). In addition, GmICHG was abundantly expressed in root hairs (Fig. 4, D and E), in particular in the cell walls and apexes, although the expressed product appeared, in part, to remain in the cytoplasm of root hairs. Similar localization patterns were observed in root sections prepared from light-grown seedlings (data not shown).

To further confirm the localization of GmICHG in the plant cell wall, we introduced the GmICHG: GFP fusion gene into the T87 cultured cells of A. thaliana, and we observed the localization of the GFP signals in the transformed cells by means of confocal laser scanning microscopy. The results showed that the GFP signals arising from GmICHG-sGFP appeared to be mainly localized in the peripheries of the cells (Fig. 5, top panels), whereas the expression of sGFP without the fused GmICHG resulted in the localization of the GFP signals in the cytoplasm (Fig. 5, bottom panels). When the cells were counterstained with propidium iodide, which stains cell walls, the green fluorescence signals were colocalized with red fluorescence signals from the staining agent. Moreover, this pattern was not changed after plasmolysis of the transformed cells by treatment with 1 M mannitol (Fig. 5, middle panels), indicating that the expressed product is localized in the cell walls, and not in cell membranes, of the transformed cells. All of these results led us to conclude that GmICHG is localized in the cell walls and the intercellular space of G. max seedling roots.

View larger version (81K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 4. Immunocytochemical analyses of the localization of GmICHG in the roots of the G. max seedling. A, SDS-PAGE analysis (lane 1) and Western blotting analysis using anti-GmICHG IgG (rabbit) (lane 2) of crude extracts of the G. max seedling roots. B-E, microscopic observations of the G. max seedling root, probed with a primary anti-GmICHG IgG (rabbit) and a secondary anti-rabbit IgG (goat)-peroxidase conjugate. B, confocal laser microscopic observations of a cross-section of a root. C, fluorescent microscopic observations of a longitudinal section of a root. D, confocal laser microscopic observations of root hairs. E, fluorescent microscopic observations of root hairs. Negative controls using preimmune antisera showed only negligible levels of fluorescence signals in the root tissues (not shown).

View larger version (63K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 5. Confocal laser microscopic observations of Arabidopsis T87 cultured cells transformed with the gene encoding an N-terminal fusion of sGFP with GmICHG (GmICHG:GFP). Upper panels, T87 cells expressing GmICHG:GFP. Granule-like red fluorescent signals represent autofluorescence from chloroplasts. Middle panels, T87 cells expressing GmICHG:GFP were subjected to plasmolysis by treatment with 1 M mannitol and then stained with propidium iodide (PI), which is retained in the cell wall and emits a red fluorescence. Lower panels, T87 cells expressing sGFP were subjected to plasmolysis by treatment with 1 M mannitol and then stained with propidium iodide. The GFP is targeted to the cytoplasm. The cells were observed by confocal laser microscopy with filters BA510IF (left columns) and BA585IF (middle columns). The images obtained with each filter were then pseudo-colored and combined into one image (Merged, right columns). Bars, 20 µm.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

The results of immunocytochemical analyses, along with the GFP imaging analysis of Arabidopsis cells expressing GmICHG: GFP, conclusively show that GmICHG is localized in the cell wall and the intercellular space (collectively referred to as the apoplast) of seedling roots. The fact that the enzyme purified from the G. max roots is a glycoprotein is consistent with the known extracellular secretory pathway of proteins via ER-to-Golgi trafficking, although a PSORT analysis of the primary structure of the GmICHG precursor could not unambiguously predict such a sorting pathway. The pI value of the mature form of GmICHG is predicted to be 8.1, providing the possibility that this enzyme, a cationic protein, binds to pectic polysaccharides that are also present in plant cell walls and the intercellular space. It is noteworthy that GmICHG appeared to be heterogeneously distributed in the cell wall. This observation may be related to the possible heterogeneous distribution of materials that anchor this enzyme in the cell wall, or alternatively, it may arise from the restricted localization of secretory machinery for the enzyme precursor in root cells, resulting in the localized accumulation of the secreted enzyme in the cell wall.

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 6. Proposed enzymatic regulation of isoflavone conjugate pools in G. max. Dotted arrows indicate possible routes of translocation of isoflavonoids from the cytoplasm, via the vacuole, to the apoplast. Names of compounds are as follows: 1, flavanones; 2, isoflavone aglycons (R = H, daidzein; R = OH, genistein); 3, isoflavone 7-O-glucosides; and 4, isoflavone 7-O-(6''-O-malonyl--glucosides). IFS, 2-hydroxyflavanone synthase. A dimeric GmICHG molecule is shown in red. 2-Hydroxyflavanone synthase is a microsomal P450 enzyme (10, 11), whereas GmIF7GT and GmIF7MaT are predicted to be cytoplasmic enzymes.3 The isoflavone conjugates, 3 and 4, are considered to accumulate in vacuoles (5). GmICHG has been established to be an apoplastic enzyme (this study).

Sequence comparison studies revealed that GmICHG is related to the GH1 family, which includes -glycosidases that play diverse and important roles in prokaryotes, Archaea, and eukaryotes. In higher plants, it has been proposed that GH1 -glucosidases are involved in chemical defense against herbivores and pathogens (31), lignification (32), cell wall degradation (33), and regulation of the biological activity of phytohormones and other growth regulators by the hydrolysis of their inactive glucoside conjugates (34). A previous phylogenetic analysis of these plant GH1 members shows that enzymes sharing similarity in a specificity or biochemical role may be clustered with each other (35). The present analysis (Fig. 7) shows that GmICHG is closely related to -glucosidases of legumes, such as Medicago, Cicer, Trifolium, and Dalbergia, many (but not all) of which appear to be categorized in a cluster that is separated from other plant -glucosidases. Among these phylogenetically related leguminous -glucosidases, dalcochinin -glucosidase of D. cochinchinensis is the only enzyme that has been characterized biochemically (26), which hydrolyzes the -glucosidic linkage of glucosides of an isoflavonoid (12-dihydromorphigenin), thus being similar to GmICHG in its substrate preference. It appears likely that members of this GmICHG-related cluster preferentially catalyze the degradation of flavonoid conjugates. Moreover, because the roots of legume plants are known to excrete flavonoid aglycons, the majority of the members of this cluster may also be involved in flavonoid-mediated symbiotic or defensive mechanisms, as in the case of GmICHG.

View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 7. Molecular phylogenetic tree of the amino acid sequences of the plant members of glycoside hydrolase family 1. The tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method. Numbers indicate bootstrap values greater than 800. Leguminous -glucosidases are shown in red. Clusters shown in color are those of GmICHG-related leguminous -glucosidases (yellow; this study), disaccharide-specific -glucosidases (light blue (35)), and thioglucosidases (gray (36)), respectively. Enzymes used for alignment are as follows: GmICHG, AB259819; dalcochinin -glucosidase (D. cochinchinensis), AAF04007; -glucosidase (C. arietinum), CAG14979; noncyanogenic -glucosidase (T. repens), CAA40058; -glucosidase (A. thaliana), BAC42451; -primeverosidase (Camellia sinensis), AB088027; furcatin hydrolase (Viburnum furcatum), AB122081; prunasin hydrolase (P. serotina), AAF34650; amygdalin hydrolase (P. serotina), AAA93234; furostanol glycoside 26-O--glucosidase (Costus speciosus), BAA11831; linamarase (Manihot esculenta), AAB22162; cardenolide 16-O-glucohydrolase (Digitalis lanata), CAB38854; thioglucosidase (A. thaliana), CAA55787; myrosinase (Sinapis alba), CAA42534; myrosinase (Raphanus sativus), BAB17226; myrosinase (Brassica napus), CAA42775; -glucosidase (Cucurbita pepo), AAG25897; -glucosidase (Avena sativa), AAD02839; -glucosidase (Secale cereale), AAG00614; -glucosidase (Zea mays), CAA52293; dhurrinase (Sorghum bicolor), AAC49177; -glucosidase (Hordeum vulgare), AAA87339; -glucosidase (Pinus contorta), AAC69619; raucaffricine-O--glucosidase (Rauvolfia serpentina), AAF03675; and strictosidine-O--D-glucosidase (Rauvolfia serpentina), CAC83098. GenBankTM accession numbers ABE79403, ABE83886, ABE85993, ABE85996, ABE86373, ABE86378, and ABE90582 are those of family 1 glycoside hydrolases of Medicago truncatula.

	FOOTNOTES

^* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental "Experimental Procedures," Table 1S, Fig. 1S and Fig. 2S, and supplemental Refs. 1-9.

¹ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 81-22-795-7270; E-mail: nakayama{at}seika.che.tohoku.ac.jp.

² The abbreviations used are: IF7GT, UDP-glucose:isoflavone 7-O-glucosyl-transferase; FPLC, fast protein liquid chromatography; Gen7G, genistein 7-O--D-glucoside; Gen7MG, genistein 7-O- (6''-O-malonyl--D-glucoside); GmICHG, ICHG from roots of G. max seedling; GH, glycoside hydrolase; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; ICHG, isoflavone conjugate-hydrolyzing -glucosidase; IF7MaT, malonyl-CoA:isoflavone 7-O-glucoside 6''-O-malonyltransferase; GFP, green fluorescent protein; RT, reverse transcription; ER, endoplasmic reticulum.

³ A. Noguchi, H. Suzuki, and T. Nakayama, manuscripts in preparation.

⁴ The estimated molar ratio of isoflavonoids extracted from roots of G. max seedlings was as follows: aglycons (genistein plus daidzein), 4%; 7-O--glucosides, 8%; and 7-O-(6''-O-malonyl--D-glucosides), 88%.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We thank Prof. Shin-ichi Ayabe, Nihon University, for fruitful discussions.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1. Buchanan, B., Gruissen, W., and Jones, R. (eds) (2002) Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants, pp. 796-815, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
2. Graham, T. L. (1991) Plant Physiol. 95, 594-603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Phillips, D., Stafford, H., and Ibrahim, R. (1992) Recent Adv. Phytochem. 26, 201-231
4. Hungria, M., and Stacey, G. (1997) Soil Biol. Biochem. 29, 819-830[CrossRef]
5. Barz, W., and Welle, R. (1992) in Phenolic Metabolism in Plants (Stafford, H., and Ibrahim, R., eds) Vol. 26, pp. 139-164, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York
6. Rivera-Vargas, L., Schmitthenner, A., and Graham, T. (1993) Phytochemistry 32, 851-857[CrossRef]
7. Dakora, F., and Phillips, D. (1996) Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 49, 1-20[CrossRef]
8. Graham, T., and Graham, M. (1996) Plant Physiol. 110, 1123-1133[Abstract]
9. Graham, T., and Graham, M. (2000) in Plant Microbe Interactions (Stacey, G., and Keen, N., eds) Vol. 5, pp. 181-220, APS Press, St. Paul, MN
10. Akashi, T., Aoki, T., and Ayabe, S. (1999) Plant Physiol. 121, 821-828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Steele, C. L., Gijzen, M., Qutob, D., and Dixon, R. A. (1999) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 367, 146-150[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Hsieh, M. C., and Graham, T. L. (2001) Phytochemistry 58, 995-1005[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Suzuki, H., Nakayama, T., Yonekura-Sakakibara, K., Fukui, Y., Nakamura, N., Yamaguchi, M.-A., Tanaka, Y., Kusumi, T., and Nishino, T. (2002) Plant Physiol. 130, 2142-2151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Leatherbarrow, R. J. (1990) Trends Biochem. Sci. 15, 455-458[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Clarke, J. T. (1964) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 121, 428-436[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Chiu, W.-I., Niwa, Y., Zeng, W., Hirano, T., Kobayashi, H., and Sheen, J. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 325-330[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Mitsuhara, I., Ugaki, M., Hirochika, H., Ohshima, M., Murakami, T., Gotoh, Y., Katayose, Y., Nakamura, S., Honkura, R., Nishimiya, S., Ueno, K., Mochizuki, A., Tanimoto, H., Tsugawa, H., Otsuki, Y., and Ohashi, Y. (1996) Plant Cell Physiol. 37, 49-59[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Axelos, M., Curie, C., Mazzolini, L., Bardet, C., and Lescure, B. (1992) Plant Physiol. Biochem. 30, 123-128
21. Fujiwara, H., Tanaka, Y., Yonekura-Sakakibara, K., Fukuchi-Mizutani, M., Nakao, M., Fukui, Y., Yamaguchi, M.-A., Ashikari, T., and Kusumi, T. (1998) Plant J. 16, 421-431[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Nakayama, T., Yonekura-Sakakibara, K., Sato, T., Kikuchi, S., Fukui, Y., Fukuchi-Mizutani, M., Ueda, T., Nakao, M., Tanaka, Y., Kusumi, T., and Nishino, T. (2000) Science 290, 1163-1166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Hosel, W., and Barz, W. (1975) Eur. J. Biochem. 57, 607-616[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Oxtoby, E., Dunn, M., Pancoro, A., and Hughes, M. (1991) Plant Mol. Biol. 17, 209-219[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Zhou, J., Hartmann, S., Shepherd, B., and Poulton, J. (2002) Plant Physiol. 129, 1252-1264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Svasti, J., Srisomsap, C., Techasakul, S., and Surarit, R. (1999) Phytochemistry 50, 739-743[CrossRef]
27. Henrissat, B. (1991) Biochem. J. 280, 309-316
28. Henrissat, B., and Bairoch, A. (1996) Biochem. J. 316, 695-696
29. Czjzek, M., Cicek, M., Zamboni, V., Bevan, D. R., Henrissat, B., and Esen, A. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 13555-13560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Verdoucq, L., Moriniere, J., Bevan, D. R., Esen, A., Vasella, A., Henrissat, B., and Czjze, M. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 31796-31803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Conn, E. (1979) in Herbivores, Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites (Rosenthal, G., and Janzen, D., eds), pp. 387-412, Academic Press, New York
32. Dharmawardhana, D. P., Ellis, B. E., and Carlson, J. E. (1995) Plant Physiol. 107, 331-339[Abstract]
33. Leah, R., Kigel, J., Svendsen, I., and Mundy, J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15789-15797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Falk, A., and Rask, L. (1995) Plant Physiol. 108, 1369-1377[Abstract]
35. Ahn, Y., Mizutani, M., Saino, H., and Sakata, K. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 23405-23414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Rask, L., Andreasson, E., Ekbom, B., Eriksson, S., Pontoppidan, B., and Meijer, J. (2000) Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 93-113[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Kondou, M. Nakazawa, M. Kawashima, T. Ichikawa, T. Yoshizumi, K. Suzuki, A. Ishikawa, T. Koshi, R. Matsui, S. Muto, et al. RETARDED GROWTH OF EMBRYO1, a New Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Protein, Expresses in Endosperm to Control Embryo Growth Plant Physiology, August 1, 2008; 147(4): 1924 - 1935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. V. Morant, N. Bjarnholt, M. E. Kragh, C. H. Kjaergaard, K. Jorgensen, S. M. Paquette, M. Piotrowski, A. Imberty, C. E. Olsen, B. L. Moller, et al. The {beta}-Glucosidases Responsible for Bioactivation of Hydroxynitrile Glucosides in Lotus japonicus Plant Physiology, July 1, 2008; 147(3): 1072 - 1091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Naoumkina, M. A. Farag, L. W. Sumner, Y. Tang, C.-J. Liu, and R. A. Dixon Inaugural Article: Different mechanisms for phytoalexin induction by pathogen and wound signals in Medicago truncatula PNAS, November 13, 2007; 104(46): 17909 - 17915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Noguchi, A. Saito, Y. Homma, M. Nakao, N. Sasaki, T. Nishino, S. Takahashi, and T. Nakayama A UDP-Glucose:Isoflavone 7-O-Glucosyltransferase from the Roots of Soybean (Glycine max) Seedlings: PURIFICATION, GENE CLONING, PHYLOGENETICS, AND AN IMPLICATION FOR AN ALTERNATIVE STRATEGY OF ENZYME CATALYSIS J. Biol. Chem., August 10, 2007; 282(32): 23581 - 23590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data All Versions of this Article: 281/40/30251    most recent M605726200v1