JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M601064200 on August 15, 2006

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 41, 30347-30355, October 13, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/41/30347    most recent
M601064200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barker, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nixon, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barker, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nixon, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Deg Proteases Protect Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 during Heat and Light Stresses but Are Not Essential for Removal of Damaged D1 Protein during the Photosystem Two Repair Cycle*

Myles Barker{ddagger}1, Remco de Vries{ddagger}, Jon Nield§2, Josef Komenda3, and Peter J. Nixon{ddagger}4

From the Divisions of {ddagger}Biology and §Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom and the Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences, Opatovickymlyn, 37981 Trebon, Czech Republic

Received for publication, February 3, 2006 , and in revised form, July 24, 2006.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Members of the DegP/HtrA (or Deg) family of proteases are found widely in nature and play an important role in the proteolysis of misfolded and damaged proteins. As yet, their physiological role in oxygenic photosynthetic organisms is unclear, although it has been widely speculated that they participate in the degradation of the photodamaged D1 subunit in the photosystem two complex (PSII) repair cycle, which is needed to maintain PSII activity in both cyanobacteria and chloroplasts. We have examined the role of the three Deg proteases found in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 through analysis of double and triple insertion mutants. We have discovered that these proteases show overlap in function and are involved in a number of key physiological responses ranging from protection against light and heat stresses to phototaxis. In previous work, we concluded that the Deg proteases played either a direct or an indirect role in PSII repair in a glucose-tolerant version of Synechocystis 6803 (Silva, P., Choi, Y. J., Hassan, H. A., and Nixon, P. J. (2002) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 357, 1461–1467). In this work, we have now been able to demonstrate unambiguously, using a triple deg mutant created in the wild type strain of Synechocystis 6803, that the Deg proteases are not obligatory for PSII repair and D1 degradation. We therefore conclude that although the Deg proteases are needed for photoprotection of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, they do not play an essential role in D1 turnover and PSII repair in vivo.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
An inevitable consequence of the light reactions of oxygenic photosynthesis is the formation of highly reactive molecules, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS)5 and amino acid free radicals, which can cause irreversible damage to a variety of cellular components including nucleic acids, lipids, pigments, and proteins (1, 2). The photosystem two complex (PSII), which functions as the light-driven water:plastoquinone oxidoreductase in oxygenic photosynthetic electron transport, is particularly prone to light-induced damage (3). Of the more than 25 protein subunits found in PSII, the D1 reaction center subunit appears to be the major target for photodamage (4–6). To maintain activity, a damaged PSII complex is repaired through the specific replacement of the damaged subunit (usually D1) by a newly synthesized subunit (3). Despite the importance of the PSII repair cycle for maintaining optimal photosynthetic rates in vivo, the molecular details of this repair process remain unclear.

Recently, attention has focused on the identity of the proteases that are involved in removing damaged D1 from the PSII complex. In the case of chloroplasts, in vitro experiments suggest that D1 degradation occurs in a two-step process involving the participation of two classes of protease (7). First, a member of the DegP/HtrA family of proteases (or Deg proteases), originally designated DegP2 but now renamed Deg2 (8), is thought to cleave damaged D1 between trans-membrane helices four and five on the stromal side of the membrane to generate N-terminal and C-terminal fragments of ~23 and 10 kDa, respectively. Subsequently, the 23-kDa fragment, and possibly the 10-kDa fragment, is removed from the membrane by one or more members of the FtsH protease family (9).

Selective D1 degradation also occurs in cyanobacteria such as Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (10). Analysis of the genome sequence of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 has identified three members of the Deg proteases and four members of the FtsH family of proteases (11). Mutagenesis experiments have so far demonstrated a role for one of the FtsH proteases (slr0228) in PSII repair at an early stage in D1 degradation (12). However, it remains unclear to what extent the Deg proteases are important for D1 degradation in vivo. This is a crucial question to address since recent biochemical experiments have suggested that a homologue of Deg2 in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 extracts could be involved in cleaving D1 during PSII repair (8, 13).

The DegP/HtrA family of proteases was initially characterized in Escherichia coli and is composed of DegP (also known as HtrA), DegQ (or HhoA), and DegS (or HhoB) (reviewed in Ref. 14). They are serine-type proteases and are found in the periplasm (DegQ), attached to the periplasmic surface of the cytoplasmic membrane (DegP), or embedded in the cytoplasmic membrane facing the periplasm (DegS). DegS is involved in activating the {sigma}E-dependent transcription of stress genes and is the only member absolutely required for cell viability (14, 15). E. coli DegP has a dual function: acting as a molecular chaper-one at low temperatures and acting as a protease at higher temperatures (16). The major role for DegP is thought to be the degradation of misfolded proteins (17) and denatured proteins formed, for example, during heat shock (18) and oxidative stress (19). Genetic and biochemical experiments indicate that DegP and DegQ, but not DegS, have overlapping functions (18, 20). Likewise, Deg homologues in other bacteria also show overlap in function (21, 22).

In the case of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, the three Deg homologues identified in the genome data base (CyanoBase, Kazusa Research Institute, Japan) are annotated HtrA (CyanoBase designation slr1204), HhoA (sll1679), and HhoB (sll1427). However, these gene products cannot be assumed to play an equivalent role to the E. coli homologues of the same name (23). Structural predictions indicate that all three members possess the serine protease domain and one of the C-terminal PDZ domains typical of this class of protease (23). The deg transcript levels increase upon light but not heat stress (24). This has reinforced the speculation that the primary role of the Deg proteases in cyanobacteria is related to photoprotection and PSII repair rather than heat stress (8).

Although the location of the Deg proteases in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 has not yet been established definitively, proteomics data suggest that HhoA is in the periplasm (25) and HtrA is in the outer membrane (26). At first sight, such a location would appear to exclude a role in PSII repair since functional PSII is found in the thylakoid membrane. However, PSII subcomplexes containing D1 have been found in the cytoplasmic membrane (27, 28), so it remains feasible that proteases found in the extracytoplasmic compartment might play a role in D1 degradation (29).

To address the physiological importance of the Deg proteases, we previously constructed a triple mutant in which each of the Deg proteases was insertionally inactivated in the widely used glucose-tolerant strain of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (30). We found that growth of the triple mutant was more sensitive than the wild type to high irradiances of visible light and that the PSII repair cycle was impaired (31). However, our data did not allow us to differentiate between a direct involvement of the Deg proteases in D1 degradation or an indirect role in optimizing PSII repair within the cell (31). To exclude possible effects of the glucose-tolerant genetic background, we have analyzed in this report the PSII repair cycle in a deg triple mutant made in the original PCC 6803 strain of Synechocystis. Our results now unambiguously demonstrate that the Deg proteases are not essential for selective D1 degradation during PSII repair in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. In addition, we have examined the phenotype of deg triple and double mutants and provide evidence that the Deg proteases show overlap in function with regard to heat stress, light stress, and phototaxis.


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cyanobacterial Strains and Growth Conditions—The glucose-tolerant and wild type PCC 6803 strains of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, hereafter referred to as WT-G and WT, respectively, were utilized in this study (30). Unless stated otherwise, all strains were grown at a light intensity of 10 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 white fluorescent light and at 29 (± 0.5) °C in BG-11 mineral medium containing 5 mM TES-KOH, pH 8.2 (30). Where indicated, the medium was supplemented with 5 mM glucose and the antibiotics chloramphenicol (10 µg ml–1), erythromycin (10 µgml–1), and kanamycin (25 µgml–1).

Construction of Mutants—Interposon disruption of the Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 deg genes encoding DegP/HtrA (slr1204), DegQ/HhoA (sll1679), and DegS/HhoB (sll1427) was performed using plasmids constructed previously (31). The three double deg mutants termed htrA–hhoA– (slr1204–sll1679–), htrA–hhoB– (slr1204–sll1427–), and hhoA–hhoB– (sll1679–sll1427–) were generated in the WT strain, and all three genes were inactivated in both WT and WT-G strains to produce htrA–hhoA–hhoB– triple mutants (hereafter designated {Delta}Deg and {Delta}Deg-G strains, respectively). The genotypes of the mutant strains were verified by PCR using the following internal gene-specific primers: slr1204F, 5'-CTTAAGGATGGTCGTTCCTTTCC-3', and slr1204R, 5'-TCCACAGGAATGTTCATACCCGT-3'; sll1427F, 5'-GTCTTCAGGCCAAAACCATTCCT-3', and sll1427R, 5'-CCGTTTGAATAGGAATGGCAAATC-3'; sll1679F, 5'-ACAGTGGTAACCCGTCGCACT-3', and sll1679R, 5'-GCAGCGAGGGTATTTTGAATTGC-3'. To generate a sigF mutant ({Delta}SigF) of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (WT background), the sigF gene (slr1564) was inactivated by insertion of an aphI kanamycin antibiotic resistance cassette at the StuI site, 604 bp downstream of the sigF start codon. Transcription of the resistance cassette was in reverse orientation to that of sigF.

Protein Assays and Immunoblotting—Crude Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 thylakoid membranes were prepared by glass bead breakage of cells as described in Ref. 32. Chlorophyll a content was assessed by extraction into methanol and measurement of the absorbance at 666 nm (33). Protein concentrations were determined using a DC protein kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories).

Thylakoid membrane proteins were separated on 12% denaturing SDS-PAGE gels according to Ref. 32 unless otherwise stated. Gels were loaded on either chlorophyll a or total protein content where indicated in the legends for Figs. 2C, 5B, 6, and 7B. Gels were then either stained with Coomassie Blue or electroblotted onto nitrocellulose (0.2-µm pore size, Bio-Rad Laboratories). Nitrocellulose membranes were incubated with specific antibodies before being probed with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Amersham Biosciences). Proteins were visualized using a chemiluminescent kit (SuperSignal West Pico, Pierce). Primary antibodies used in this study were: (i) a C-terminal D1-specific anti-peptide antiserum (34); (ii) an anti-peptide antibody specific for E. coli FtsH, which is potentially cross-reactive with all Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 FtsH homologues, kindly provided by Professor T. Ogura (University of Kumamoto, Japan); and (iii) a PsaD-specific antiserum donated by Professor J.-D. Rochaix (University of Geneva, Switzerland). The general oxidation state of membrane proteins was analyzed by the immunochemical detection of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine-derivatized carbonyl groups (OxyBlotTM, Chemicon International). Derivatization was performed on 15 µg of total membrane proteins for each sample.

Electron Microscopy—Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 cells were grown in liquid BG11 medium at 29 °C with a white light intensity of 20 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 to an OD730 of 0.4–0.5. Undiluted cell samples were negatively stained via the droplet method (35), with 2% uranyl acetate, and imaged on Kodak SO-163 film at room temperature using a Phillips CM100 electron microscope. Micrographs were taken at 100 kV, x15,500 magnification, and a typical defocus of 2 µm. Micrographs displaying no discernible astigmatism or drift were scanned with a Nikon LS9000 Super Coolscan densitometer with an initial step size of 6.35 µm.

Growth Assays—Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 cells were grown in liquid or on solid BG-11 medium and subjected to: low light growth, 29 °C with 10 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 white light; high light, 29 °C with 120 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 white light; low temperature, 18 °C with 10 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 white light; high temperature, 37 °C with 10 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 white light; hydrogen peroxide, 29 °C with 10 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 white light and 10–250 µM hydrogen peroxide; cumene hydroperoxide, 29 °C with 10 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 white light and 50–250 µM cumene hydroperoxide; high salt, 29 °C with 10 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 white light and 0.5 M NaCl. Solid medium growth assays were performed by streaking liquid grown cells diluted to an OD730 of 0.1 onto BG-11 plates with incubation for the time indicated in the legend for Fig. 2. For the rescue of photosensitivity, cells were inoculated onto BG-11 solid medium containing 5 mM glucose with or without 10 µM 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) or 10 µM atrazine and subjected to high light stress for the time indicated in the legend for Fig. 2. These concentrations of DCMU and atrazine were sufficient to block PSII activity as assessed by inhibition of growth on BG-11 agar plates and by inhibition of QA-to-QB electron transfer in cells in chlorophyll flash fluorescence experiments. For phototaxis experiments, BG-11 agar plates (1.5% agar) were spot inoculated with 5 µl of cells at an OD730 of 0.1. Plates were then exposed to a unidirectional fluorescent white light at 15 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 and incubated at 29 °C for the time indicated in the legend for Fig. 4 (41).

Photosystem II Activity Measurements and Photoinhibition Experiments—The activity of PSII was assessed by measuring the light-saturated rate of oxygen evolution from whole cells using 1 mM 2,6-dichloro-p-benzoquinone and 2 mM potassium ferricyanide as artificial electron acceptors (10). For photoinhibition experiments, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 cells were grown without glucose and bubbled with air at 29 °C with 10 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 white light to an OD730 of ~0.5–0.8. Cells were harvested and resuspended in BG-11 medium to a concentration of 10 µg of chlorophyll a ml–1 and subjected to a white light intensity of 100 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 for 1 h and then 1,200 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 for up to 8 h either at normal growth temperature (29 °C) or at low temperature (23 °C), with or without spectinomycin (200 µgml–1), a protein synthesis inhibitor.

Pulse-Chase Radiolabeling Experiments—Cells of WT and {Delta}Deg were radiolabeled using a mixture of [35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine (ICN) as described in Ref. 36. Pulse-chase experiments were performed as described in Ref. 32.


Figure 1
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1.
Construction and segregation of the Synechocystis PCC 6803 deg mutants. A, schematic depicting the sites of deletion and/or insertion of antibiotic resistance cassettes into the Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 genes slr1204, sll1679, and sll1427. Each disrupted open reading frame (ORF) is labeled with the fragment size, restriction site used for deletion/insertion, and type of antibiotic resistance cassette. Large arrows signify direction of transcription within the antibiotic resistance cassettes conferring resistance to kanamycin (KmR), chloramphenicol (CmR), and erythromycin (EmR). Small annotated arrows indicate the location of primers used for mutant segregation analysis. B, PCR analysis of the slr1204, sll1679, and sll1427 loci of WT Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, the deg triple mutant ({Delta}Deg), and the double mutants htrA–hhoA–, hhoA–hhoB–, and htrA–hhoB– using the primers indicated in A. DNA molecular weight marker band sizes are indicated in kb. M, DNA molecular weight marker; Mut, mutant.

 

   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Construction of Triple and Double deg Mutants and Their Growth Characteristics in High Light—A triple mutant ({Delta}Deg), in which all three members of the Deg protease family were disrupted, was generated in WT Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 by the stepwise inactivation of each gene (Fig. 1A) (see "Experimental Procedures"). All the genes were interrupted in a way to prevent expression of an intact serine protease domain. PCR analyses confirmed that {Delta}Deg had fully segregated (Fig. 1B). In addition, three double mutants were constructed, htrA–hhoA–, htrA–hhoB–, and hhoA–hhoB–, to test the physiological importance of each member of the family in isolation (Fig. 1, A and B). In agreement with earlier work on a triple mutant constructed in the glucose-tolerant strain of Synechocystis 6803, growth of {Delta}Deg on solid agar was inhibited at high but not low light intensities (Fig. 2A) (31). Importantly, each of the double mutants was able to grow at the high light intensity, suggesting overlap in function among the three members with respect to providing resistance to light stress (Fig. 2A). That a dramatic growth defect was only observed in {Delta}Deg argues against the possibility that the light-sensitive phenotype was due to polar effects on the expression of genes downstream of htrA, hhoA, and hhoB. If this had been the case, the phenotype would also have been observed in single and double mutants. Northern blotting has suggested that htrA and hhoB are monocistronically transcribed (24) and that hhoA might possibly be co-transcribed with a downstream open reading frame (sll1680), which shows similarity to a peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase (MsrB). In a control experiment, a mutant was constructed in which sll1680 was inactivated in an htrA–hhoB– genetic background. The phenotype of the resulting mutant was similar to the htrA–hhoB– mutant with respect to light and heat stress, thus excluding the possibility that polar effects on the expression of sll1680 had caused the light-sensitive phenotype of the {Delta}Deg mutant (data not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2.
Effect of high light on the Synechocystis PCC 6803 deg mutants. A, WT, {Delta}Deg, htrA–hhoA–, hhoA–hhoB–, and htrA–hhoB– double mutants were restreaked onto BG-11 agar plates and incubated for a period of 7 days under low and high light conditions (10 and 120 µmol of photons m–2 s–1, respectively, see "Experimental Procedures"). Arrows indicate strains tested. B, cells of the WT-G strain and equivalent deg triple mutant ({Delta}Deg-G) were streaked onto BG-11 agar containing 5 mM glucose with (+DCMU) or without (–DCMU) 10 µM DCMU. Plates were incubated as described in A. C, cells of WT and {Delta}Deg were subjected to high light treatment (100 µmol of photons m–2 s–1, 29 °C) for 1 h (see "Experimental Procedures"). Thylakoid aliquots (7.5 µg of total protein, DC assay) prepared from cells were analyzed by immunoblotting using an OxyBlotTM kit and a D1-specific antiserum (see "Experimental Procedures"). OxyBlotTM molecular weight marker band sizes are indicated in kDa. * marks the appearance of carbonylated proteins of the range 45–50 kDa seen in {Delta}Deg but not WT. M, OxyBlotTM protein standard.

 
To test whether the growth inhibition observed at high light was related to the effects of photosynthetic electron transport, the growth of a newly constructed triple mutant ({Delta}Deg-G), made in the glucose-tolerant WT background (WT-G), was assessed. Unlike WT, the WT-G strain is able to grow photoheterotrophically on glucose in the absence of linear photosynthetic electron transport. In the presence of 5 mM glucose, growth of {Delta}Deg-G on solid agar was again inhibited at high light intensities (Fig. 2B). However, the addition of either 10 µM DCMU or 10 µM atrazine, which are both potent inhibitors of PSII activity and thus linear photosynthetic electron flow, was now able to rescue {Delta}Deg-G under these experimental conditions (Fig. 2B, atrazine data not shown).

These data suggested that the {Delta}Deg strains might be more susceptible to oxidative damage induced by ROS produced by photosynthetic electron transport (2). To test this, total membranes were isolated from cells of WT and {Delta}Deg that had been exposed to 1 h of white light of intensity 100 µmol of photons m–2 s–1, and the degree of protein carbonylation was assessed immunochemically following derivatization of the proteins with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine. This assay is widely used to measure the degree of ROS-mediated damage to proteins (37, 38). As Fig. 2C shows, after 1 h of illumination, WT and {Delta}Deg exhibited similar PSII D1 protein levels. However, the {Delta}Deg samples showed an increased level of protein carbonylation, particularly of proteins or protein aggregates in the size range 29–60 kDa. Overall, these data suggest a role for the Deg proteases in preventing the accumulation of oxidized proteins in membranes.

Growth Characteristics of the deg Mutants at High and Low Temperatures—A classic phenotype associated with mutation of degP/htrA in E. coli is sensitivity of growth to elevated temperatures (14). To test the involvement of the Deg proteases in resistance to heat stress, growth on BG-11 agar plates was monitored at low light intensities (10 µmol of photons m–2 s–1) either at the normal growth temperature of 29 °C or at 37 °C (Fig. 3). All strains grew at 29 °C, but only {Delta}Deg was unable to grow at the higher temperature. All mutants were able to grow as well as WT at 18 °C and a light intensity of 10 µmol of photons m–2 s–1 (data not shown).


Figure 3
View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3.
Effect of elevated temperature on the growth of the Synechocystis PCC 6803 deg mutants. Cells of WT, {Delta}Deg, and the htrA–hhoA–, hhoA–hhoB–, and htrA–hhoB– double mutants were restreaked onto BG-11 agar plates and grown for 7 days under low light conditions (10 µmol of photons m–2 s–1) either at the normal growth temperature (29 °C) or at high temperature (37 °C).

 


Figure 4
View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4.
Motility of the Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 deg mutants and visualization of their pili. A, WT Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, {Delta}Deg, and the htrA–hhoA–, hhoA–hhoB–, and htrA–hhoB– double mutants were spotted onto BG-11 agar and illuminated by a unidirectional light source (direction indicated by the arrow) (15 µmol of photons m–2 s–1, 29 °C) for a period of 10 days (see "Experimental Procedures"). Lower panels, electron micrographs showing the pili at the surface of WT (B), {Delta}Deg (C), and {Delta}SigF (D) cells. Black scale bar represents 500 nm.

 
Effect of Oxidizing Agents and Salt Stress—Growth of the E. coli degP/htrA mutant has been shown to be sensitive to cumene hydroperoxide, an oxidizing agent that partitions into the membrane, but not to hydrogen peroxide, which can enter the cytosol (19). To investigate whether this was also true for Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, we exposed liquid cultures of WT and {Delta}Deg to various concentrations of either hydrogen peroxide (over a range of 10–250 µM) or cumene hydroperoxide (from 50 to 250 µM). We found that for both compounds, the growth rates of the WT and {Delta}Deg strains were equally sensitive (data not shown). Under our growth conditions, hydrogen peroxide and cumene peroxide prevented cell growth in the range of 75–100 and 50–75 µM, respectively.

In Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, salt stress induces the expression of htrA and hhoB, suggesting that both may be critical for salt stress acclimation (24, 39). To test this hypothesis we exposed cells of WT, {Delta}Deg, and the three double mutants to 0.5 M NaCl in liquid culture. All the mutants were able to grow as well as WT (data not shown). The doubling times were ~67 h in the presence of 0.5 M NaCl when compared with 44 h in its absence.

The Deg Proteases Are Needed for Phototaxis—It is well known that Synechocystis exhibits positive phototactic movement (40). This locomotion requires cell appendages termed type IV pili (TFP), which are also responsible for natural transformation competency (41, 42). Interestingly, we observed that the Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 {Delta}Deg mutant had severely reduced motility during routine cultivation. To confirm this, we spotted cells of WT and each WT-based deg mutant onto BG-11 agar under permissive growth conditions and illuminated by a unidirectional light source. As Fig. 4A shows, the WT and all three double mutants moved toward the light to a similar extent, unlike the triple mutant, which only moved slightly. It is also worthy of note that the colony front of the hhoA–hhoB– strain was smoother than WT and the other two double mutants, suggesting altered surface properties in this mutant. To further probe the reduced motility phenotype of {Delta}Deg, we performed electron microscopy studies to determine the presence or absence of TFP. We analyzed cells of WT, {Delta}Deg, and the non-motile sigF mutant ({Delta}SigF), which has been shown to lack TFP (43). As expected, the WT cells (Fig. 4B) presented both thick and thin pili (41), whereas the sigF mutant (Fig. 4D) lacked the thick pili but retained shorter thin pili (43). Interestingly, the {Delta}Deg mutant (Fig. 4C) appeared to be hyperpiliated with thick pili when compared with both WT and the sigF mutant. We also found that the transformation efficiency of {Delta}Deg was severely reduced (data not shown). This phenotype is reminiscent of that observed in pilT1 and taxAY1 mutants (44, 45). The product of pilT1 is thought to be involved in pilus retraction (45), and TaxAY1 is thought to be a histidine kinase-CheY type response regulator hybrid involved in relaying light signals to the TFP apparatus (44).

D1 Degradation and PSII Repair Do Not Require the Deg Proteases—The major objective of this work was to assess the potential importance of the Deg proteases in PSII repair. A classical method to detect the PSII repair cycle in vivo is to monitor the rate of light-saturated oxygen evolution, which is a measure of the number of active PSII centers, as a function of time of exposure to high light irradiances, either in the presence or in the absence of an inhibitor of protein synthesis that blocks the repair cycle. For these experiments, cells were grown at 29 °C to reduce any possible negative effects on cell function caused by heat stress. In the presence of spectinomycin, both WT and {Delta}Deg showed similar time-dependent decays in PSII activity, which is a measure of the rate of light-induced damage to PSII. In the absence of spectinomycin, PSII activity remained high in the two strains (Fig. 5A). These data provide clear evidence to support the presence of robust PSII repair in the triple mutant. In addition, immunoblotting experiments indicated that the rate of degradation of D1 in the mutant (assessed in the samples treated with spectinomycin) was at least the same, if not greater, than that observed in the WT (Fig. 5B). In the absence of spectinomycin, D1 levels were maintained during the illumination period (Fig. 5B). Levels of immunodetectable FtsH were also similar in WT and {Delta}Deg (Fig. 5B).

To assess D1 turnover more directly, pulse-chase experiments were performed using [35S]methionine/cysteine. In the experiment shown in Fig. 6, radiolabeled D1 was turned over at an even greater rate in the mutant than the WT. Under these experimental conditions, there was no evidence for the accumulation of D1 aggregates, D1 cross-linked products, or D1 breakdown fragments, which are detected when PSII repair is perturbed in vivo (46).

The Deg Proteases Are Not Required for D1 Degradation When the PSII Repair Cycle Is Impaired at Low Temperature—To test whether the Deg proteases had a role in D1 degradation under more extreme conditions, cells were exposed to higher light irradiances at a cooler temperature. Under these conditions, PSII repair is compromised so that there is loss of PSII activity even in the absence of an inhibitor of protein synthesis (Fig. 7A). Overexposed immunoblots revealed the presence of an approximate 60-kDa D1 aggregate band (indicated by D1a), probably consisting of a D1/D2 heterodimer (47), in addition to the faster migrating D1 band at ~30 kDa (Fig. 7B). Immunoblots of spectinomycin-treated samples (Fig. 7B) indicated similar degradation rates of D1 in both strains but a slightly faster degradation rate of the D1 aggregate band in the triple mutant. Light-induced loss of D1 aggregates was also seen in samples from cells not treated with spectinomycin (Fig. 7B). The reason for the decrease in the steady-state level of D1 aggregates during illumination is unclear but might be due to an increase in the degradation rate in response to increased levels of oxidative damage to the aggregates. Overall, our data clearly show that the Deg proteases are not essential for the removal of D1 and D1 aggregates at low temperature.


Figure 5
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5.
The effect of high light on PSII activity and D1 degradation in {Delta}Deg. A, cells of WT ({square}/{blacksquare}) and {Delta}Deg ({triangleup}/{blacktriangleup}) were subjected to high light treatment (1,200 µmol of photons m–2 s–1, 29 °C) for a period of 7 h with or without spectinomycin (closed and open symbols, respectively) (see "Experimental Procedures"). Oxygen evolution measurements were taken from cells at the time points indicated, and the average of four readings was plotted. Error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean at each time point. B, thylakoid aliquots (1 µg of chlorophyll a) prepared from WT and {Delta}Deg cells with (+spec) or without (–spec) spectinomycin were taken at the time points indicated and were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting (see "Experimental Procedures") using FtsH-specific (FtsH) and D1-specific (D1) antisera.

 


Figure 6
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 6.
The effect of high light on D1 turnover in {Delta}Deg. Cells of WT and {Delta}Deg were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine and subjected to high light treatment (500 µmol of photons m–2 s–1, 29 °C) for a chase period of 6 h with non-radioactive amino acids (see "Experimental Procedures"). Left panel, a Coomassie Blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel of thylakoid membranes (1 µg of chlorophyll a) isolated from cells at the time points indicated. Locations of the D1, D2, and CP47 PSII core subunits are indicated. Right panel, an autoradiogram of the gel in the left panel.

 


Figure 7
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 7.
The effect of high light and reduced temperature on PSII activity and D1 degradation in WT and {Delta}Deg. Cells of WT ({square}/{blacksquare}) and {Delta}Deg ({triangleup}/{blacktriangleup}) were exposed to high light (1,200µmol of photons m–2 s–1) and low temperature (23 °C) with or without spectinomycin (closed or open symbols, respectively) for a period of 8 h (see "Experimental Procedures"). A, cell samples were taken at the time points indicated, and oxygen evolution measurements were made of each aliquot (see "Experimental Procedures"). The average of four readings was plotted, and error bars represent the standard deviation for each time point. B, thylakoid aliquots (1 µg of chlorophyll a) prepared from cells with (+spec) or without (–spec) spectinomycin from the experiment in A were analyzed by immunoblotting (see "Experimental Procedures"). Right panel, thylakoid membranes from both WT and {Delta}Deg including a serial dilution of time point 0 h (1.0–0.25 µg of chlorophyll a). Strips labeled D1, D1a (D1 aggregates), and PsaD show immunoblots utilizing D1 and PsaD-specific antisera. Left panel, immunoblots of WT thylakoid membranes indicating the position and intensity of D1 and D1 aggregate bands (indicated by D1a). Both under- (U) and overexposed (O) blots are presented. Relevant molecular weight marker band sizes are indicated in kDa.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Based on a recent model for D1 degradation in chloroplasts, there has been speculation that proteolysis of photodamaged D1 protein in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 requires the direct participation of one or more members of the Deg family of proteases (8). The results contained herein show unambiguously that these proteases are not essential for the selective replacement of damaged D1 during PSII repair in vivo. Deg-mediated degradation of D1, if present, must therefore be a redundant process or make only a minor contribution to total D1 degradation under the experimental conditions examined here. However, it still remains feasible that Deg proteases might play a more significant physiological role in D1 degradation under conditions not tested here or in longer term acclimation processes such as those involved in reducing levels of PSII at high light (48).

In our original studies on a deg triple mutant constructed in the glucose-tolerant strain of Synechocystis 6803, we did observe some impairment in PSII repair (31). However, as we emphasized at the time, our results did not allow us to differentiate between a direct role for the Deg proteases in D1 degradation and an indirect role in optimizing the PSII repair cycle (31). Given the unambiguous data presented here for {Delta}Deg, we are now able to exclude an essential role for the Deg proteases in D1 degradation. With hindsight, it seems likely that the effects on PSII repair observed in our initial work were indirect and might have stemmed from the differences in the genetic background of the two strains examined (glucose-tolerant versus PCC 6803) or from differences in experimental growth conditions. In our original study, the cells were grown photoautotrophically at 30–33 °C, rather than at the 29 (±0.5) °C used here, which might have resulted in the cells being heat-stressed (Fig. 3) (31). Indeed, cells in the earlier study showed reduced levels of PSII detected in activity measurements (40% of WT levels) and lower levels of D1 detected immunochemically (31), indicative of suboptimal growth conditions. In contrast, the {Delta}Deg mutant showed WT levels of PSII under the experimental growth conditions used here (Fig. 5).

We have previously shown that D1 degradation is impaired at an early stage in ftsH (slr0228) insertion mutants and that FtsH co-purifies with PSII (12). These observations, together with the results in this report, support a model for D1 degradation in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 in which FtsH complexes are able to remove damaged D1 without the participation of the Deg proteases. Based on the analysis of the var2 FtsH mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana, we have recently proposed that this Deg-independent FtsH-mediated pathway of D1 degradation also occurs in chloroplasts (49). Although Deg2 has been assigned a role in D1 degradation, this conclusion was based on the results of in vitro assays (7). As yet, there is still no evidence, such as from the analysis of a deg2 null mutant, to support such a role in planta.

Our results clearly demonstrate that the Deg protease family is not required for cell viability in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. This contrasts with the situation in E. coli where DegS is required because of its role in activating the extracytoplasmic stress-response pathway through degradation of the anti-{sigma} factor RseA (14, 15). For Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, there is no obvious homologue to RseA, so this activation pathway would appear to be absent. The nature of the envelope stress-response pathway(s) in Synechocystis 6803 and whether they are related to the two-component pathways found in E. coli (50, 51) is, at the moment, unclear.

Importantly, we show that there is overlap in function between the members of the Deg proteases with regard to providing resistance to light and heat stress and enabling cells to perform positive phototaxis. The sensitivity of growth of {Delta}Deg to light and heat stress probably reflects an inability to remove photodamaged and thermally denatured proteins, respectively, from the cell. It is important to note that we cultivated Synechocystis in the light, so the overall degree of damage to protein is in principle dependent on both the temperature and the prevailing light intensity. Interestingly, the PSII inhibitors, DCMU and atrazine, protected the {Delta}Deg-G triple mutant from the effects of increased light stress. Such a phenotype suggests that the Deg proteases are required to remove proteins that have been damaged by ROS generated during linear photosynthetic electron flow. Given that two of the three members have been detected in the periplasm (HhoA) (25) and outer membrane (HtrA) (26), we suggest that ROS generated by the photosynthetic electron transport chain might damage cytoplasmic membrane proteins and also diffuse across the cytoplasmic membrane, causing damage to proteins in the extracytoplasmic compartment. This possibility is supported by the detection of carbonylated membrane proteins in the triple mutant that are absent in the WT (Fig. 2C). A role for the Deg proteases in countering the damaging effects of photosynthetic electron transport is in accordance with the observations that deg transcripts increase upon a dark-to-light transition (24) and that they accumulate to high levels upon the development of the photosynthetic apparatus (52).

The reduced phototaxis of the deg triple mutant might also be related to oxidative damage to TFP. However, our data (Fig. 4C) indicate TFP hyperpiliation of cells similar to that observed in pilT1 and taxAY1 mutants (44, 45). This suggests that removal of Deg proteases disturbs one or more of the following processes: (i) pilus subunit degradation; (ii) the mechanism of pilus retraction; (iii) the sensory pathway(s) involved in stimulating positive phototaxis. Taken together, our data indicate that the Deg proteases are involved in maintaining the extracytoplasmic properties of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 cells.

Surprisingly, we were unable to demonstrate the involvement of the Deg proteases in providing resistance to either salt or cold stress. DNA microarray and Northern blotting experiments have indicated that the transcripts for htrA accumulate rapidly following exposure to high salt and cold temperatures (24, 39). Consequently, other proteases might be able to substitute for the loss of the Deg proteases under these and possibly other stress conditions.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

1 A recipient of a BBSRC ear-marked PhD studentship. Back

2 Currently holds a Royal Society University Research Fellowship. Back

3 Supported by Institutional Research Concept AV0Z50200510. Back

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London, S. Kensington campus, Wolfson Biochemistry Bldg., London SW7 2AZ, UK. Tel.: 44-20-7594-5269; Fax: 44-20-7594-5267; E-mail: p.nixon{at}imperial.ac.uk.

5 The abbreviations used are: ROS, reactive oxygen species; PSII, photosystem two complex; WT, wild type; DCMU, 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea; TFP, type IV pili; TES, 2-{[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]-amino}ethanesulfonic acid. Back


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are grateful to J.-D. Rochaix and T. Ogura for sending us various antisera.



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Asada, K. (1999) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 601–639[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Niyogi, K. K. (1999) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 333–359[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Aro, E. M., Virgin, I., and Andersson, B. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1143, 113–134[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Ohad, I., Kyle, D. J., and Arntzen, C. J. (1984) J. Cell Biol. 99, 481–485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kyle, D. J., Ohad, I., and Arntzen, C. J. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 4070–4074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Adir, N., Zer, H., Shochat, S., and Ohad, I. (2003) Photosynth. Res. 76, 343–370[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Haussuhl, K., Andersson, B., and Adamska, I. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 713–722[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Huesgen, P. F., Schuhmann, H., and Adamska, I. (2005) Physiol. Plant. 123, 413–420[CrossRef]
  9. Lindahl, M., Spetea, C., Hundal, T., Oppenheim, A. B., Adam, Z., and Andersson, B. (2000) Plant Cell 12, 419–431[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Nixon, P. J., Komenda, J., Barber, J., Deak, Z., Vass, I., and Diner, B. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 14919–14927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Sokolenko, A., Pojidaeva, E., Zinchenko, V., Panichkin, V., Glaser, V. M., Herrmann, R. G., and Shestakov, S. V. (2002) Curr. Genet. 41, 291–310[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Silva, P., Thompson, E., Bailey, S., Kruse, O., Mullineaux, C. W., Robinson, C., Mann, N. H., and Nixon, P. J. (2003) Plant Cell 15, 2152–2164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kanervo, E., Spetea, C., Nishiyama, Y., Murata, N., Andersson, B., and Aro, E. M. (2003) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1607, 131–140[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Clausen, T., Southan, C., and Ehrmann, M. (2002) Mol. Cell 10, 443–455[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Alba, B. M., Zhong, H. J., Pelayo, J. C., and Gross, C. A. (2001) Mol. Microbiol. 40, 1323–1333[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Spiess, C., Beil, A., and Ehrmann, M. (1999) Cell 97, 339–347[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Strauch, K. L., and Beckwith, J. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 1576–1580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kolmar, H., Waller, P. R., and Sauer, R. T. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 5925–5929[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Skorko-Glonek, J., Zurawa, D., Kuczwara, E., Wozniak, M., Wypych, Z., and Lipinska, B. (1999) Mol. Gen. Genet. 262, 342–350[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Waller, P. R., and Sauer, R. T. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 1146–1153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Boucher, J. C., Martinez-Salazar, J., Schurr, M. J., Mudd, M. H., Yu, H., and Deretic, V. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 511–523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Noone, D., Howell, A., Collery, R., and Devine, K. M. (2001) J. Bacteriol. 183, 654–663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kieselbach, T., and Funk, C. (2003) Physiol. Plant. 119, 337–346[CrossRef]
  24. Jansen, T., Kidron, H., Taipaleenmaki, H., Salminen, T., and Maenpaa, P. (2005) Photosynth. Res. 84, 57–63[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Fulda, S., Huang, F., Nilsson, F., Hagemann, M., and Norling, B. (2000) Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 5900–5907[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Huang, F., Hedman, E., Funk, C., Kieselbach, T., Schroder, W. P., and Norling, B. (2004) Mol. Cell Proteomics 3, 586–595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Zak, E., Norling, B., Maitra, R., Huang, F., Andersson, B., and Pakrasi, H. B. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 13443–13448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Keren, N., Liberton, M., and Pakrasi, H. B. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 6548–6553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Smith, D., and Howe, C. J. (1993) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 110, 341–347
  30. Williams, J. G. K. (1988) Methods Enzymol. 167, 766–778
  31. Silva, P., Choi, Y. J., Hassan, H. A., and Nixon, P. J. (2002) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 357, 1461–1467[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Komenda, J., Barker, M., Kuvikova, S., de Vries, R., Mullineaux, C. W., Tichy, M., and Nixon, P. J. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 1145–1151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Komenda, J., and Barber, J. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 9625–9631[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Nixon, P. J., Metz, J. G., Roegner, M., and Diner, B. A. (1990) in Current Research in Photosynthesis (Baltscheffsky, M., ed) Vol I, pp. 471–474, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
  35. Harris, J. R. (1999) Methods Mol. Biol. 117, 13–30[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Tichy, M., Lupinkova, L., Sicora, C., Vass, I., Kuvikova, S., Prasil, O., and Komenda, J. (2003) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1605, 55–66[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Komenda, J., Lupinkova, L., and Kopecky, J. (2002) Eur. J. Biochem. 269, 610–619[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Finn, P. F., and Dice, J. F. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 25864–25870[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Kanesaki, Y., Suzuki, I., Allakhverdiev, S. I., Mikami, K., and Murata, N. (2002) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 290, 339–348[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Choi, J. S., Chung, Y. H., Moon, Y. J., Kim, C., Watanabe, M., Song, P. S., Joe, C. O., Bogorad, L., and Park, Y. M. (1999) Photochem. Photobiol. 70, 95–102[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Bhaya, D., Bianco, N. R., Bryant, D., and Grossman, A. (2000) Mol. Microbiol. 37, 941–951[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Yoshihara, S., Geng, X., Okamoto, S., Yura, K., Murata, T., Go, M., Ohmori, M., and Ikeuchi, M. (2001) Plant Cell Physiol. 42, 63–73[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Bhaya, D., Watanabe, N., Ogawa, T., and Grossman, A. R. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3188–3193[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Bhaya, D., Takahashi, A., and Grossman, A. R. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 7540–7545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Okamoto, S., and Ohmori, M. (2002) Plant Cell Physiol. 43, 1127–1136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Lupinkova, L., and Komenda, J. (2004) Photochem. Photobiol. 79, 152–162[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Yamamoto, Y. (2001) Plant Cell Physiol. 42, 121–128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Yokoyama, E., Murakami, A., Sakurai, H., and Fujita, Y. (1991) Plant Cell Physiol. 32, 827–834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Nixon, P. J., Barker, M., Boehm, M., de Vries, R., and Komenda, J. (2005) J. Exp. Bot. 56, 357–363[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Danese, P. N., Snyder, W. B., Cosma, C. L., Davis, L. J. B., and Silhavy, T. J. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 387–398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Raffa, R. G., and Raivio, T. L. (2002) Mol. Microbiol. 45, 1599–1611[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Funk, C., Haussuhl, K., and Adamska, I. (2001) in Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Photosynthesis (Larkum, T., and Critchley, C., eds) CSIRO Publishing, Brisbane, Australia, www.publish.csiro.au/paper/SA0403246.htm

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Bacteriol.Home page
P. F. Huesgen, P. Scholz, and I. Adamska
The Serine Protease HhoA from Synechocystis sp. Strain PCC 6803: Substrate Specificity and Formation of a Hexameric Complex Are Regulated by the PDZ Domain
J. Bacteriol., September 15, 2007; 189(18): 6611 - 6618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Plant CellHome page
J. Komenda, M. Tichy, O. Prasil, J. Knoppova, S. Kuvikova, R. de Vries, and P. J. Nixon
The Exposed N-Terminal Tail of the D1 Subunit Is Required for Rapid D1 Degradation during Photosystem II Repair in Synechocystis sp PCC 6803
PLANT CELL, September 1, 2007; 19(9): 2839 - 2854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Plant CellHome page
X. Sun, L. Peng, J. Guo, W. Chi, J. Ma, C. Lu, and L. Zhang
Formation of DEG5 and DEG8 Complexes and Their Involvement in the Degradation of Photodamaged Photosystem II Reaction Center D1 Protein in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, April 1, 2007; 19(4): 1347 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]