JBC Oz Biosciences

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M604770200 on August 9, 2006

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 42, 31638-31646, October 20, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/42/31638    most recent
M604770200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paschke, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paschke, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Significance of Ectodomain Cysteine Boxes 2 and 3 for the Activation Mechanism of the Thyroid-stimulating Hormone Receptor*Formula

Sandra Mueller{ddagger}1, Gunnar Kleinau§1, Holger Jaeschke{ddagger}, Susanne Neumann, Gerd Krause§, and Ralf Paschke{ddagger}2

From the {ddagger}III Medical Department, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Strasse 27, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany, §Leibniz-Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Robert-Roessle-Strasse 10, D-13125 Berlin, Germany, and NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Endocrinology Branch, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Received for publication, May 18, 2006 , and in revised form, July 14, 2006.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Recently, we identified constitutively activating mutations at positions Asp-403, Glu-404, and Asn-406 in the third extracellular cysteine box (C-b3) of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor. We hypothesized that this region could act as a molecular interface between the extracellular and serpentine domain. In this study we present a model for properties of potential interaction partners for this region. Moreover, we show that Pro-400 and Pro-407 adjacent to this epitope are also important for stabilizing the partially active, basal conformation of the wild-type (WT) thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor. Furthermore, the mutation K291A in the second extracellular cysteine box (C-b2) was identified as a new constitutively activating mutation that releases the basal conformation of the WT receptor like the known tryptic cleavage in its close vicinity. Taken together, we provide an activation scenario at the C-b2/C-b3 unit. Three anchor fragments (anchors I-III) most likely constrain the basal conformation. The three anchor fragments are tightly packed. A disulfide bridge holds the C-b2/C-b3 portions in close positions. Independent of the type of conformational interference such as side chain modifications, tryptic cleavage, or hormone stimulation that act on the constrained C-b2/C-b3 WT conformation, it will always release one of the anchor fragments. Subsequently, this results in a conformational displacement of the C-b2/C-b3 portions relative to each other, inducing receptor activation.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The human anterior pituitary releases the structurally related glycoprotein hormones (GPHs),3 thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and chorionic gonadotropin. These large hormones (~30 kDa) interact with the N-terminal extracellular domain (ECD) of their specific receptors (1, 2), TSHR, follicle-stimulating hormone receptor, and luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor, which are members of the seven-transmembrane-spanning receptor family (3-7).

The large N-terminal extracellular domain is a common structural characteristic of all GPH receptors. The N-terminal ECD of the TSHR (Met-1-Asp-410) can be subdivided into (all numbers are hTSHR specific): (i) the extreme N-terminal tail (including the signal peptide), (ii) the cysteine box 1 (C-b1; Cys-24-Cys-41), (iii) the 11 leucine-rich repeats (LRR; Pro-37-Tyr-279) and (iv) the hinge region (Pro-280-Asp-410), which can be subdivided further into (v) the central cysteine box 2 (C-b2; Pro-280-Cys-301), (vi) the cysteine box 2/3 linker region (C-bl; Asn-302-Ile-389), and (vii) the cysteine box 3 (C-b3; Cys-390-Asp-410) located close to transmembrane helix 1.

In addition to the activation mediated by TSH, the receptor can be activated by constitutively activating mutants (CAMs) (8, 9), by mutants leading to promiscuous hormone interactions (10), tryptic action (11), and deletions in the ECD and serpentine domain (12-14). Several pathogenic gain of function mutants in the ECD of the TSHR characterized by increased constitutive activity (S281N, I, or T) have been identified (15-17). Mutational studies at Ser-281 of the TSHR (18) and corresponding positions of the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (Ser-277) and follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (Ser-273) demonstrated the importance of this serine for the stabilization of the WT receptor activity state of all GPH receptors (19, 20).

The epitopes C-b2, back to back with C-b3 following the LRR domain, were not included in the crystallized x-ray structure of a follicle-stimulating hormone receptor ectodomain fragment (LRR) (2). It is established that the C-b2 and 3 potentially interact via disulfide bonds (21-23) and that mutations disrupting the disulfide bridge lead to constitutive activation (24, 25). In a previous study we identified new residues within C-b3 that are also involved in receptor stabilization and intramolecular signal transduction based on a suggested homologous molecular model for the C-b2/C-b3 unit (26). By site-directed mutagenesis we defined a region (Asp-403 Glu-404 Asn-406) of the TSHR ectodomain that can act as a switch for constitutive activity. Moreover, except Glu-404, which is TSHR specific, Asp-403 and Asn-406 are conserved within the GPH receptors. We suggested that parts of C-b2 and C-b3 are arranged as a tightly packed structural signaling interface between the N-terminal ECD and the serpentine domain that constrains the partially active, basal conformation of WT TSHR.

To gain further insight into receptor activation caused by mutations at positions Asp-403, Glu-404, and Asn-406, we now characterize the three CAMs in C-b3 in detail by side chain variation. The second aim of this study was the characterization of adjacent amino acids (Thr-399Asp-410) to identify further residues involved in the signaling process. Indeed, mutations at Pro-400 and Pro-407 also lead to constitutive activation of the TSHR. Moreover, tryptic clipping within C-b2 at an undefined site in the region of a cluster of positively charged amino acids (Lys-287-Arg-293) close to Ser-281 also leads to receptor activation (27). Considering the tightly packed structural arrangement of C-b2 and C-b3 via disulfide bridges, we assumed that mutation of additional amino acids within C-b2 might also lead to constitutive activation. We show the alanine mutation of Lys-291 in the C-b2 results in a new CAM and that Lys-291 functions as a further conformational anchor in the C-b2/C-b3 unit. Our data suggest a fundamental role of C-b2 and C-b3 in receptor functions, including stabilization of the basal and hormone-activated receptor conformations.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Site-directed Mutagenesis—Mutations were introduced into the human TSHR via site-directed mutagenesis. Human TSHR-pSVL (28) was used as a template. PCR products containing the mutations were digested with BspTI and Eco91I (MBI Fermentas). The obtained fragments were used to replace the corresponding part in the wild-type TSHR-pSVL vector. Mutated TSHR sequences were verified by dideoxy sequencing with dRhodamine Terminator Cycle Sequencing chemistry (ABI Advanced Biotechnologies, Inc., Columbia, MD). Sequencing reactions were analyzed on a Genetic analyzer ABI 3100 (ABI Advanced Biotechnologies).

Cell Culture and Transfection—COS-7 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen) at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. Cells were transiently transfected in 24-well plates (5 x 104 cells/well) with 0.5 µg of DNA/well for cAMP accumulation and in 48-well plates (2.5 x 104 cells/well) with 0.25 µg of DNA/well for TSH binding analysis. COS-7 cells were transfected using GeneJammer ® transfection reagent (Stratagene). Controls included transfection of the wild-type human TSH receptor and transfection of the pSVL vector alone.

Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorter Analysis—Nonpermeabilized cells were detached from the dishes 48 h after transfection using 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM EGTA in phosphate-buffered saline and transferred in Falcon 2054 tubes. Cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% NaN3 before incubation with the primary antibody. The first step of the permeabilized cell assay included cell fixation with 1% paraformaldehyde for 10 min on ice following an incubation with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% NaN3 and 0.2% saponin for 30 min. Saponin was supplemented in all subsequent buffers. Afterward, cells were incubated for 1 h with a 1:200 dilution of a mouse anti-human TSHR monoclonal antibody 2C11 (MAK 1281; Linaris, Wertheim-Bettingen; 10 µg/ml) in the same buffer. Cells were washed twice and incubated at 4 °C for 1 h in the dark with a 1:200 dilution of fluorescein-conjugated F(ab')2 rabbit anti-mouse IgG (Serotec, Oxford, UK). Cells were washed twice and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde before fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis (FACscan; BD Biosciences). Receptor expression was determined by the mean fluorescence intensity. The WT TSHR was set at 100%, and receptor expression of the mutants was calculated according to this. The percentage of signal-positive cells corresponds to transfection efficiency, which was ~70% of viable cells for each mutant in each experiment.

Radioligand Binding Assay—48 h after transfection, competitive binding studies were performed as previously described (29). Obtained data were analyzed assuming a one-site binding model using the fitting module of GraphPad Prism 4.0 for Windows.

cAMP Accumulation Assay—Measurement of cyclic AMP (cAMP) accumulation was performed 48 h after transfection. Cells were preincubated with serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium without antibiotics containing 1 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX; Sigma) for 30 min at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. Subsequently, cells were stimulated in the same medium supplemented with 100 milliunits/ml bTSH (Sigma) for 1 h. After termination of the reaction by aspiration of the medium, cells were washed once with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and then lysed by addition of 0.1 N HCl. After collecting and drying of the supernatants, cAMP content of the cell extracts was determined using the cAMP AlphaScreenTM assay (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Linear Regression Analysis of Basal Activity as a Function of TSHR Expression Determined by 125I-bTSH Binding—COS-7 cells were transiently transfected in 24-well plates (5 x 104 cells/well) with various concentrations of WT and TSHR constructs (50, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 ng DNA/well). For radioligand binding assays, cells were incubated for 4 h at room temperature in the presence of 180,000-200,000 cpm of 125I-bTSH supplemented with 5 milliunits/ml nonlabeled bTSH. The effect of expression level on basal cAMP accumulation was analyzed according to Hjorth et al. (30). The obtained results for TSH binding and basal cAMP accumulation at various DNA concentrations were used to calculate the constitutive activity of the mutants. Linear regression analysis of basal activity as a function of TSHR expression determined by 125I-bTSH binding (slope) was determined by blotting TSH binding (x-axis) versus basal cAMP accumulation (y-axis) using the linear regression function of GraphPad Prism 4.03 for Windows. The slope of the WT TSHR was set at 1, and slopes of the mutants were calculated according to this.

Statistics—Statistical analysis was carried out by t test using GraphPad Prism 4.03 for Windows (***, p < 0.001 extremely significant; **, p < 0.01, very significant; *, p < 0.05, significant; p > 0.05 not significant) (see Tables).

Molecular Modeling—The generation of the homology model for C-b2/C-b3, modeling procedures, and methods used have been previously described by us (26).


Figure 1
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1.
TSHR amino acids within the C-b3 of the ECD. Schematic representation of the TSHR, in circle, highlighting the substituted residues of the alanine scan between the cysteines 398 and 408 (shown in gray) of the ECD. Residue numbers are determined by counting from the methionine start site of the TSHR. Residues Asp-403, Glu-404, and Asn-406 (shown in black) of the CAM epitope were characterized by side chain variation.

 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
To characterize the influence of Asp-403, Glu-404, and Asn-406 in the extracellular C-b3 in the context of receptor activation, we replaced wild-type amino acids with amino acids of various side chain characteristics by site-directed mutagenesis. Data of the functional characterization of all substitutions are summarized in Table 1. For each experiment a transfection efficiency of ~70% of viable cells could be achieved as indicated by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis (data not shown). To identify further residues involved in the signaling process, adjacent amino acids of the CAM region Asp-403 Glu-404 Asp-406 in C-b3 were investigated by alanine substitution (Fig. 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Functional characterization of the CAM positions in C-b3 of the TSHR by side chain variation

For the determination of cell surface expression, constitutive activity calculated by linear regression analysis of constitutive activity as a function of TSHR expression investigated by 125I-bTSH binding as well as cAMP accumulation (see "Experimental Procedures"), mutated TSH receptors were transiently expressed in COS-7 cells. Data are given as mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments, each carried out in duplicate. The WT receptor and empty pSVL vector were used as controls. Statistical analysis was carried out by t test using GraphPad Prism 4.03 for Windows (***, p < 0.001 extremely significant; **, p < 0.01 very significant; *, p < 0.05 significant; p > 0.05 not significant); ND, not determined.

 
Amino Acid Variation of CAM Positions Asp-403, Glu-404, and Asn-406
Asp-403—All substitutions at position Asp-403 showed a cell surface expression of 50-80% compared with the WT TSHR, except D403L with 15%. For D403L a receptor expression of 50% was measured by means of the permeabilized cell assay, suggesting an increased receptor accumulation within the cells (data not shown). D403L, as well as D403E, revealed a strong increase in basal cAMP accumulation (4- to 7-fold) relative to the WT TSHR. D403S and D403N with a cell surface expression of ~80% of the WT exhibited a cAMP signal comparable with the WT TSHR. Basal activity calculated by linear regression analysis of constitutive activity as a function of TSHR expression was analyzed to evaluate the effect of receptor density on basal cAMP accumulation independently from their cell surface expression.


Figure 2
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2.
Effect of receptor expression level on basal cAMP accumulation of TSHR mutants. For determination of constitutive activity, COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with increasing amounts of plasmids encoding TSHR WT and mutants. Constitutive activity of the mutants was determined by linear regression analysis of constitutive activity as a function of TSHR expression investigated by 125I-bTSH binding and represented as slopes by blotting TSH binding (x-axis; counts/min) versus basal cAMP accumulation (y-axis; nM) using the linear regression function of GraphPad Prism 4.03 The empty pSVL vector was used as control. A-C, all constitutively active mutants of positions Asp-403, Glu-404, and Asn-406. D, CAMs P400A and P407D as well as the inactive mutation P407A of C-b3. E, CAM K291A of C-b2. Representative example of three linear regression analyses of constitutive activity of each mutant, each performed in duplicate.

 
D403L showed the highest constitutive activity of all Asp-403 substitutions with 21.3-fold relative to WT TSHR (Table 1 and Fig. 2A). D403E revealed a 4-fold increased constitutive activity compared with the WT, whereas D403N and D403S showed a constitutive activity comparable with the WT TSHR. Except for D403L, mutants at Asp-403 showed TSH-stimulated cAMP production comparable with WT TSHR (Tab. 1).

Glu-404—All substitutions of Glu-404 (Asp, Lys, Asn, and Ser) revealed a cell surface expression of over 55% of the WT TSHR (Table 1). All substitutions at Glu-404 showed an increased basal cAMP signal (1.7- to 4.5-fold relative to WT TSHR), whereas E404N revealed the highest constitutive activity (Table 1 and Fig. 2B). The only mutation that exhibited WT TSHR properties after functional characterization was E404D. All Glu-404 substitutions resulted in TSH-induced cAMP production comparable with the WT TSHR.

Asn-406—N406Q and N406S showed a cell surface expression of 70%, whereas substitutions to asparagine, lysine, and leucine revealed only a cell surface expression of ~30% of the WT TSHR (Table 1). By means of the permeabilized cell assay, a receptor expression of 50% was measured for these mutants (data not shown). Except for N406K, all mutants showed an increased basal cAMP accumulation (3.0- to 6.8-fold relative to the WT). The mutant N406D revealed the highest basal cAMP value (6.8-fold over WT) of all Asn-406 substitutions and also the highest constitutive activity ascertained by linear regression analysis. (Table 1 and Fig. 2C).

Mutations of Residues in Cysteine Box 3
Data of the alanine scan in C-b3 are summarized in Table 2. Most of the alanine substitutions (T399A-D410A) showed a cell surface expression equivalent to the WT TSHR in the range of 65-100%, except for mutants P400A and F405A with 11-16% compared with WT TSHR (Table 2). In contrast to P400A at the N terminus of the region, mutant P407A at the C-terminal end revealed a cell surface expression of 60%. After permeabilization, expression levels of more than 60% were determined for P400A and F405A, suggesting an increased receptor accumulation within the cells.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Functional characterization of alanine substitutions in C-b2 and C-b3

The mutated TSH receptors were cloned into the expression vector pSVL and transiently expressed in COS-7 cells. Characterization of the constructs was performed by determination of cell surface expression, cAMP accumulation, and constitutive activity calculated by linear regression analysis of constitutive activity as a function of TSHR expression investigated by 125I-bTSH binding (see "Experimental Procedures"). Data are given as mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments, each carried out in duplicate. The WT receptor and empty pSVL vector were used as controls. Statistical analysis was carried out by t test using GraphPad Prism 4.03 for Windows (***, p < 0.001 extremely significant; **, p < 0.01 very significant; *, p < 0.05 significant; p > 0.05 not significant); ND, not determined.

 
The basal cAMP response of P400A is significantly increased (5-fold compared with WT), and P400A showed the highest constitutive activity (Table 2 and Fig. 2D). In contrast to the alanine mutation the alterations of Pro-400 to Asp, Lys, and Leu, characterized by an impaired cell surface expression, were not constitutively active (Table 3). Substitutions of Thr-399, Lys-401, and Ser-402 by alanine resulted in basal and TSH-induced cAMP accumulation as well as constitutive activity comparable with the WT TSHR. Mutants P407A, K, and L displayed basal cAMP accumulation comparable with WT TSHR and a strongly decreased cAMP response after treatment with TSH. Interestingly, mutant P407D activated the cAMP cascade constitutively (basal cAMP, 2.4-fold; constitutive activity, 2.5-fold relative to the WT TSHR) (Table 3 and Fig. 2D).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3
Functional characterization of side chain variations at prolines 400 and 407

COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with various mutant TSHRs. The WT receptor and empty pSVL vector were used as controls. Functional characterization was performed by determination of cell surface expression, cAMP accumulation, and constitutive activity calculated by linear regression analysis of constitutive activity as a function of TSHR expression investigated by 125I-bTSH binding (see "Experimental Procedures"). Data are given as mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments, each carried out in duplicate. Statistical analysis was carried out by t test using GraphPad Prism 4.03 for Windows (***, p < 0.001 extremely significant; **, p < 0.01 very significant; *, p < 0.05 significant; p > 0.05 not significant); ND, not determined.

 
E409A and D410A were characterized by a cell surface expression of over 70% compared with WT TSHR and showed no increase of basal cAMP accumulation. (Table 2). E409A revealed a decreased cAMP accumulation after TSH stimulation relative to the WT TSHR.

Alanine Mutations of Residues in Cysteine Box 2
Based on the model of a tightly packed structural arrangement of C-b2 and C-b3 via disulfide bridges (26) and considering activation by tryptic clipping (27), we hypothesized that apart from Ser-281 additional amino acids in C-b2 could also be sensitive for constitutive activation by mutations. Therefore, we tested by single alanine substitution whether further hydrophilic residues of C-b2, Lys-287, Asn-288, Gln-289, Lys-290, Lys-291, and Arg-293, are involved in constraining the WT TSHR conformation. All mutants revealed a cell surface expression >75% of the WT TSHR (Table 2). All alanine mutants showed a basal cAMP accumulation comparable with the WT, except K291A, which is characterized by a 3.3-fold increase of basal cAMP production (Table 2). K291A also revealed increased constitutive activity compared with the WT TSHR as determined by linear regression analysis of constitutive activity as a function of TSHR expression determined by 125I-bTSH binding (Table 2 and Fig. 2E). Alanine substitutions at positions Lys-287, Asn-288, Gln-289, Lys-290, and Arg-293 revealed no changes in basal activity and were comparable with the WT. In contrast to N288A and Q289A and R293A, which were characterized by a slightly decreased or WT-like TSH-induced cAMP response, substitutions of Lys-287, Lys-290, and Lys-291 by alanine resulted in an increased TSH-stimulated cAMP accumulation.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Interactions of the ECD with the transmembrane domain (TMD) in the basal activity state have been repeatedly postulated (31, 32). The interruption of these ECD/transmembrane domain contacts are a crucial step in TSHR activation. Due to the lack of experimental and structural information, such as x-ray crystal structures of the hinge region (ECD) and the serpentine domain, these complex molecular processes are not completely understood yet. Therefore, in this study we aimed to identify and to characterize amino acids at the interface between the N-terminal ectodomain and the serpentine domain that are important for signaling and the regulation of activation of the TSHR to gain further insights into the molecular organization of the TSHR during the process of activation.

Novel CAMs at Cysteine Boxes 2 and 3—The second aim of this study was to characterize adjacent amino acids of the CAM region Asp-403 Glu-404 Asn-406 to define the extension of this region and to identify further residues involved in the signaling process. Indeed, mutations P400A and P407D constitutively activate the TSHR. We suggest that the constitutive activation caused by the P400A mutant is based on a structural shift of adjacent residues that are involved in the stabilization of the basal TSHR conformation. Furthermore, we assume that the constitutive activation observed for mutant P407D is based on repulsion of an H-acceptor moiety (dotted arrow in Fig. 3), which we already characterized as an interaction partner for Asn-406. It is most likely localized in close spatial neighborhood to Pro-407 (Fig. 3).

Furthermore, the exchange to bulkier side chains at Pro-400 and Pro-407 (Asp, Lys, Leu) led to a receptor conformation that is completely or partially inactive for ligand-mediated cAMP signaling (Table 3). The inhibited signaling by mutants at Pro-400 is most likely caused by strongly decreased cell surface expression and implies a disturbed receptor folding. Mutant E409A is characterized by a strongly decreased capability for cAMP-mediated signaling and a cell surface expression of 83% (Table 2). At the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor the mutation of the corresponding Glu-354 to Lys is a loss of function mutant, characterized by complete loss of cAMP-mediated signaling (33). Mutant D410N is also known as a pathogenic loss of function mutant of the TSHR (34) with a binding capability similar to the WT TSHR. Furthermore, E409K and D410K are characterized by a cell surface expression of 63 and 90%, respectively, of the WT TSHR but a complete loss of cAMP-mediated signaling (35). Therefore, we assume that Glu-409 and Asp-410 are necessary to maintain the hormone-induced active conformation of GPH receptors and they are constituents of an intramolecular activator. We therefore named these amino acids "activator component" (red boxed in Fig. 3B). Mutants at Pro-407 with decreased activity but reasonable cell surface expression indicate the ability of Pro-407 to stabilize the hormone-induced active state, very likely via a backbone orientation that is suitable for the activator component comprising Glu-409 and Asp-410.


Figure 3
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3.
Backbone model for the 'C-b2/C-b3 ' microdomain of the TSHR ectodomain describing a mutation-driven mold of side chain properties for potential interacting counterparts. A, homologous molecular model of C-b2/C-b3 as a common unit transferring the signal between N-terminal ecto- and serpentine domains. Key residues maintaining the basal WT conformation (green box) and transducing the activation signal as well (red box) are colored, indicating their major functional phenotype as determined by mutagenesis (green, CAM; red, inactive; blue, proline effect on backbone fold (partial inactive mutants and constitutive activation); white, no effect on signaling; yellow, cysteines). Approximate orientation of essential side chains mutated in this study are shown as cones, and the properties of their potential interacting counterparts determined by mutations are color coded (orange dotted, H-bond acceptors; red dotted, H-bond donators; gray dotted, tight van der Waals interactions). Besides the disulfide bridge (Cys-408/Cys-283 or Cys-284, yellow boxed) as a known conformational constraint, further effects on the backbone conformation were identified for prolines Pro-400 and Pro-407 (shown in blue). The only CAM mutant at P407D can also be explained by repulsion to the assumed H-acceptor counterpart of Asn-406 (arrow), which subsequently is also in close proximity to Pro-407. The amino acids Pro-407, Glu-409, and Asp-410 are essential for the stabilization of the active conformation after hormone interaction. The identification of Lys-291 at C-b2 as a new CAM provides the second conformational constraint at C-b2 for the basal state and refines the known tryptic cleavage site in this region. For completeness, the Pro-280/Ser-281 epitope is also visualized to indicate the conformational constraint at the opposite side of C-b2. B, schematic of a mold of three conformationally anchored fragments (green boxed) and of a component directly participating in the hormone-induced activation process (red boxed), respectively. Regardless of which types of conformational interferences act on the constrained C-b2/C-b3 WT conformation, such as release of one of the anchors by side chain modifications, tryptic cleavage, or hormone stimulation (red open arrows), in all cases a conformational displacement of the sensitive C-b2/C-b3 portions against each other (violet double arrows) follows, thus affecting the activator component. The cysteine bridge plays a pivotal role as a fulcrum, whereas the three highly conserved prolines (blue) assist in this process by their defined backbone conformation.

 
Due to a tightly packed structural arrangement of C-b2 and C-b3 via disulfide bridges, we hypothesized that apart from Ser-281 additional amino acids in C-b2 could also be sensitive for constitutive activation by mutation. In support of this hypothesis, Chen et al. (27) have shown that a cluster of positively charged hydrophilic amino acids in C-b2 forms the site for tryptic clipping, which also results in partial receptor activation. Such an activation mechanism requires flanking anchor points that constrain the basal WT TSHR conformation. Our structural model suggests that the region Lys-287-Lys-291 of C-b2 is located in spatial proximity to the CAM region Asp-403 Glu-404 Asn-406 of C-b3 now known as one anchor point for the basal WT TSHR conformation (Fig. 3). Based on the combination of data obtained by tryptic cleavage and from our own results (Table 2), we also assumed conformational anchor point(s) within the C-b2 region. Indeed, we could confirm this hypothesis by identification of K291A as a CAM in C-b2. Our results of functionally similar mutant phenotypes at C-b2 and 3 support the assumption that portions of C-b2 and C-b3 in the N-terminal ECD are localized in close spatial proximity and play a pivotal role as a common unit in transferring the signal from the LRR to the serpentine domain (Fig. 3).

Amino Acid Variation on CAM Positions Asp-403, Glu-404, and Asn-406—We have recently shown that alanine and lysine mutations of the amino acids Asp-403, Glu-404, Asn-406 at C-b3 near transmembrane helix 1 lead to constitutive activation of the TSHR (26). Here, we studied further side chain variations at these positions. Mutations of Asp-403 to the bulky hydrophobic amino acid leucine, and even to the charge keeping glutamate but extending the side chain length, showed high constitutive activation, whereas substitutions with reduced side chain length such as asparagine and serine do not exhibit constitutive activity. Therefore, we hypothesize a tight spatial environment by van der Waals interactions surrounding Asp-403, which would explain that smaller amino acids are tolerated and maintain the basal WT TSHR conformation at this position (Table 1 and Fig. 3). In contrast, at position Glu-404 substitutions to amino acids of variable characteristics, except to aspartate, are CAMs. Thus for Glu-404 we assume an H-donator as interaction partner (Fig. 3). All substitutions at Asn-406 except the mutant N406K are CAMs, implying that the interaction partner of Asn-406 should provide a negative charge or at least a strong capacity of accepting H-bond(s) (Fig. 3). Together with our previous data (26) the results of this study show that constitutive activation at Asp-403, Glu-404, and Asn-406 seems to be initiated by disruption of a constraining hydrogen bond network or a destabilization of a tightly packed environment surrounding C-b2 and C-b3 that is necessary for the maintenance of the basal state of the WT TSHR (Fig. 3).

Modulation of Signaling Activity by Amino Acids of Cysteine Boxes 2 and 3—Our data provide (a) properties of potential interaction partners for the amino acids Asp-403, Glu-404, Asn-406 recently identified as CAM positions; and (b) evidence that adjacent prolines (Pro-400, Pro-407) are important for stabilizing the basal WT conformation of the TSHR. These two prolines are also molecular key players for the receptor activation process at C-b2 and C-b3 induced by TSH and provide a backbone orientation that is required for an activator component, which very likely comprises Glu-409 and Asp-410.

Based on our molecular model-driven characterization of mutants we can now outline a refined and extended intramolecular signaling region at the junction of the N-terminal ECD with the serpentine domain. The epitope Pro-280 and Ser-281 on the N-terminal side of C-b2, for which a mechanism of receptor activation by constitutively active mutants via disturbance of structural constraints is suggested (18, 19), was named the anchor I fragment (green boxed in Fig. 3B). On the other hand five amino acids Pro-400, Asp-403, Glu-404, Asn-406, Pro-407 at C-b3 can activate the TSHR by mutations, causing release of constraints responsible for stabilization of the basal WT TSHR conformation, which corresponds to a region named anchor II fragment (green boxed, Fig. 3B). Mutants of amino acids Pro-407, Glu-409, and Asp-410 (C-b3) have a strong effect on hormone-induced signaling by partial inactivation of the TSHR for hormone-induced receptor activation, and we hypothesize that Pro-407 stabilizes the hormone-induced active state very likely via a backbone orientation that is suitable for the activator component comprising Glu-409 and Asp-410. Furthermore, we identified the alanine mutant of Lys-291 as a new CAM in C-b2. The shared effect of receptor activation by tryptic cleavage at a cluster between Lys-287 and Arg-293 or single mutations of the positively charged amino acid Lys-291 at C-b2 leads in both cases to a release of the constrained portion at C-b2. Here, we identified the conformational anchor for C-b2 (Lys-291), which we named anchor III fragment (green boxed in Fig. 3B).

The described CAM positions in C-b2/C-b3 give an image of conformationally anchored fragments (Fig. 3, A and B). Moreover, the side chain mutagenesis studies narrow down the characteristics of the potential interaction partners for this region by characterizing their properties. Based on our findings, we suggest the following scenario for a molecular activation mechanism mediated by C-b2 and C-b3. The three anchor fragments and one activator component are tightly packed and flank the disulfide bridge that holds C-b2 and C-b3 tightly together in the center. Obviously, only the epitope Lys-287-Lys-290 and Arg-293 is accessible, because mutations have no effects on signaling, which is consistent with a reported tryptic cleavage region (27) (Fig. 3, A and B). All three anchor fragments stabilize the basal TSHR conformation. It is very likely that the three highly conserved prolines (blue at Fig. 3, A and B) assist in this process by their defined backbone conformation. Anchor fragments II and III are firmly locked by H-bond interactions. Anchor fragment I is held by tight "knob and hole" van der Waals interactions with its environment (18, 25). Because anchor fragment I follows back-to-back after the LRR domain harboring the hormone binding site, it is conceivable that a conformational change of the LRR upon hormone binding could be transferred to anchor fragment I. Such a conformational change could subsequently displace the identified sensitive C-b2/C-b3 portions relative to each other (Fig. 3B, violet double arrows). Regardless of the type of conformational interferences on the tightly constrained C-b2/C-b3 WT conformation, such as side chain modifications, tryptic cleavage, or hormone stimulation (Fig. 3B, red open arrows), they always release one of the anchor fragments. In all cases this would be followed by a conformational displacement of the sensitive C-b2/C-b3 portions against each other, which in turn could result in receptor activation. In this process, the cysteine bridge plays a pivotal role as a fulcrum. Very likely such displacements also influence the framework between the N-terminal ECD and the serpentine domain (31, 32).


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grants KR 1223/1-2 and PA 423 12-2 and by the Intramural Research Program of NIDDK, National Institutes of Health. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

Formula The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Table S1. Back

1 Both authors contributed equally to this work. Back

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49-341-9713200; Fax: 49-341-9713209; E-mail: pasr{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

3 The abbreviations used are: GPH, glycoprotein hormone; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; bTSH, bovine TSH; TSHR, TSH receptor; hTSHR, human TSHR; CAM, constitutively active mutant; C-bl2/3, cysteine box2/3 linker; C-b1, cysteine box 1; C-b2, cysteine box 2; C-b3, cysteine box 3; ECD, extracellular domain; LRR, leucine-rich repeat; WT, wild type. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Bruce Raaka for critical reading of the manuscript.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Szkudlinski, M. W., Fremont, V., Ronin, C., and Weintraub, B. D. (2002) Physiol. Rev. 82, 473-502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Fan, Q. R., and Hendrickson, W. A. (2005) Nature 433, 269-277[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Gudermann, T., Nurnberg, B., and Schultz, G. (1995) J. Mol. Med. 73, 51-63[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Nagayama, Y., and Rapoport, B. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 145-156[Abstract]
  5. Segaloff, D. L., and Ascoli, M. (1993) Endocr. Rev. 14, 324-347[Abstract]
  6. Simoni, M., Gromoll, J., and Nieschlag, E. (1997) Endocr. Rev. 18, 739-773[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Themmen, A. P. N., and Huhtaniemi, I. T. (2000) Endocr. Rev. 21, 551-583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Parma, J., Van Sande, J., Swillens, S., Tonacchera, M., Dumont, J., and Vassart, G. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 725-733[Abstract]
  9. Wonerow, P., Neumann, S., Gudermann, T., and Paschke, R. (2001) J. Mol. Med. 79, 707-721[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Smits, G., Govaerts, C., Nubourgh, I., Pardo, L., Vassart, G., and Costagliola, S. (2002) Mol. Endocrinol. 16, 722-735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Van Sande, J., Massart, C., Costagliola, S., Allgeier, A., Cetani, F., Vassart, G., and Dumont, J. E. (1996) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 119, 161-168[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Vlaeminck-Guillem, V., Ho, S. C., Rodien, P., Vassart, G., and Costagliola, S. (2002) Mol. Endocrinol. 16, 736-746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Zhang, M., Tong, K. P., Fremont, V., Chen, J., Narayan, P., Puett, D., Weintraub, B. D., and Szkudlinski, M. W. (2000) Mol. Endocrinol. 141, 3514-3517
  14. Zhang, M. L., Sugawa, H., Kosugi, S., and Mori, T. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 211, 205-210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Duprez, L., Parma, J., Costagliola, S., Hermans, J., Van Sande, J., Dumont, J. E., and Vassart, G. (1997) FEBS Lett. 409, 469-474[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Kopp, P., Muirhead, S., Jourdain, N., Gu, W. X., Jameson, J. L., and Rodd, C. (1997) J. Clin. Investig. 100, 1634-1639[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Gruters, A., Schoneberg, T., Biebermann, H., Krude, H., Krohn, H. P., Dralle, H., and Gudermann, T. (1998) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83, 1431-1436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Jaeschke, H., Neumann, S., Kleinau, G., Mueller, S., Claus, M., Krause, G., and Paschke, R. (2006) Mol. Endocrinol. 147, 1753-1760
  19. Nakabayashi, K., Kudo, M., Hsueh, A. J., and Maruo, T. (2003) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 202, 139-144[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Nishi, S., Nakabayashi, K., Kobilka, B., and Hsueh, A. J. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 3958-3964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bozon, V., Couture, L., Pajot-Augy, E., Richard, F., Remy, J. J., and Salesse, R. (2002) Protein Expr. Purif. 25, 114-123[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Rapoport, B., Chazenbalk, G. D., Jaume, J. C., and McLachlan, S. M. (1998) Endocr. Rev. 19, 673-716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Zhang, R., Buczko, E., and Dufau, M. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5755-5760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ho, S. C., Van Sande, J., Lefort, A., Vassart, G., and Costagliola, S. (2001) Mol. Endocrinol. 142, 2760-2767
  25. Ho, S. C., Goh, S. S., Su, Q., and Khoo, D. H. (2005) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 245, 158-168[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Kleinau, G., Jaschke, H., Neumann, S., Lattig, J., Paschke, R., and Krause, G. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 51590-51600[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Chen, C. R., Chazenbalk, G. D., McLachlan, S. M., and Rapoport, B. (2003) Mol. Endocrinol. 144, 3821-3827
  28. Libert, F., Lefort, A., Gerard, C., Parmentier, M., Perret, J., Ludgate, M., Dumont, J. E., and Vassart, G. (1989) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 165, 1250-1255[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Wonerow, P., Schoneberg, T., Schultz, G., Gudermann, T., and Paschke, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7900-7905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Hjorth, S. A., Orskov, C., and Schwartz, T. W. (1998) Mol. Endocrinol. 12, 78-86[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Karges, B., Gidenne, S., Aumas, C., Haddad, F., Kelly, P. A., Milgrom, E., and de Roux, N. (2005) Mol. Endocrinol. 19, 2086-2098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Neumann, S., Claus, M., and Paschke, R. (2005) Eur. J. Endocrinol. 152, 625-634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Stavrou, S. S., Zhu, Y. S., Cai, L. Q., Katz, M. D., Herrera, C., Defillo-Ricart, M., and Imperato-McGinley, J. (1998) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83, 2091-2098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. de Roux, N., Misrahi, M., Brauner, R., Houang, M., Carel, J. C., Granier, M., Le Bouc, Y., Ghinea, N., Boumedienne, A., Toublanc, J. E., and Milgrom, E. (1996) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 81, 4229-4235[Abstract]
  35. Claus, M., Jaeschke, H., Kleinau, G., Neumann, S., Krause, G., and Paschke, R. (2005) Mol. Endocrinol. 146, 5197-5203

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Bruysters, M. Verhoef-Post, and A. P. N. Themmen
Asp330 and Tyr331 in the C-terminal Cysteine-rich Region of the Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Are Key Residues in Hormone-induced Receptor Activation
J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2008; 283(38): 25821 - 25828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
G. Kleinau, H. Jaeschke, S. Mueller, B. M. Raaka, S. Neumann, R. Paschke, and G. Krause
Evidence for cooperative signal triggering at the extracellular loops of the TSH receptor
FASEB J, August 1, 2008; 22(8): 2798 - 2808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C.-R. Chen, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
Identification of Key Amino Acid Residues in a Thyrotropin Receptor Monoclonal Antibody Epitope Provides Insight into Its Inverse Agonist and Antagonist Properties
Endocrinology, July 1, 2008; 149(7): 3427 - 3434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
Y. Mizutori, C.-R. Chen, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
The Thyrotropin Receptor Hinge Region Is Not Simply a Scaffold for the Leucine-Rich Domain but Contributes to Ligand Binding and Signal Transduction
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1171 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/42/31638    most recent
M604770200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paschke, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paschke, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.