HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 44, 33363-33372, November 3, 2006

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 281/44/33363    most recent M607259200v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Morrison, A. R. Articles by Bortell, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Morrison, A. R. Articles by Bortell, R. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

ART2, a T Cell Surface Mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase, Generates Extracellular Poly(ADP-ribose)^*

Alan R. Morrison¹, Joel Moss, Linda A. Stevens, James E. Evans^¶, Caitlin Farrell, Eric Merithew^¶, David G. Lambright^¶, Dale L. Greiner, John P. Mordes, Aldo A. Rossini, and Rita Bortell²

From the Departments of Medicine and ^¶Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605 and the Pulmonary-Critical Care Medicine Branch, NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1590

Received for publication, July 31, 2006

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
NAD functions in multiple aspects of cellular metabolism and signaling through enzymes that covalently transfer ADP-ribose from NAD to acceptor proteins, thereby altering their function. NAD is a substrate for two enzyme families, mono-ADP-ribosyltransferases (mARTs) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs), that covalently transfer an ADP-ribose monomer or polymer, respectively, to acceptor proteins. ART2, a mART, is a phenotypic marker of immunoregulatory cells found on the surface of T lymphocytes, including intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs). We have shown that the auto-ADP-ribosylation of the ART2.2 allelic protein is multimeric. Our backbone structural alignment of ART2 (two alleles of the rat art2 gene have been reported, for simplicity, the ART2.2 protein investigated in this study will be referred to as ART2) and PARP suggested that multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylation of ART2 may represent an ADP-ribose polymer, rather than multiple sites of mono-ADP-ribosylation. To investigate this, we used highly purified recombinant ART2 and demonstrated that ART2 catalyzes the formation of an ADP-ribose polymer by sequencing gel and by HPLC and MS/MS mass spectrometry identification of PR-AMP, a breakdown product specific to poly(ADP-ribose). Furthermore, we identified the site of ADP-ribose polymer attachment on ART2 as Arg-185, an arginine in a crucial loop of its catalytic core. We found that endogenous ART2 on IELs undergoes multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylation more efficiently than ART2 on peripheral T cells, suggesting that these distinct lymphocyte populations differ in their ART2 surface topology. Furthermore, ART2.2 IELs are more resistant to NAD-induced cell death than ART2.1 IELs that do not have multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylation activity. The data suggest that capability of polymerizing ADP-ribose may not be unique to PARPs and that poly(ADP-ribosylation), an established nuclear activity, may occur extracellularly and modulate cell function.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs)³ are intracellular, usually nuclear proteins that respond to DNA damage by synthesizing large ADP-ribose polymers that, in some instances, serve to initiate DNA repair signals (1). PARPs are also involved in caspase-independent cell death and chromatin remodeling, facilitating transcription of stress-response proteins (2, 3). In infectious diseases like diphtheria, cholera, and pertussis, prokaryotic mono-ADP-ribosyltransferases (mARTs) act as toxins. They typically catalyze post-translational modification of specific proteins, often GTP-binding proteins, with one or more mono-ADP-ribose moieties. These modifications disrupt cellular metabolism by altering target protein function, resulting in disease (4).

Mammalian mARTs are cytoplasmic and extracellular enzymes first isolated from muscle and lymphoid tissues (5). ART2 in the mouse functions as an mART; ART2 in the rat functions as an NAD glycohydrolase (generating free ADP-ribose and nicotinamide). Rat art2 encodes two allelic proteins, ART2.1 and ART2.2, that differ by 10 amino acids; whereas both proteins have NAD glycohydrolase activity, only ART2.2 has auto-ADP-ribosyltransferase activity (6-8). ART2 is anchored to the surface of T cells, including intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs), by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol linkage, and it is also present in serum (9). Addition of NAD to T cells reportedly inhibits proliferation (10) and induces apoptotic cell death (termed NAD-induced cell death, NICD) through a mechanism that involves ADP-ribosylation of cell-surface proteins associated with the cytolytic P2X7 purinoceptor (11). In the BB rat model of human type 1 diabetes, transfusion of ART2⁺ T cells protects against autoreactive cells targeted to pancreatic beta cells (12), whereas a deficiency in a novel immunoregulatory population of ART2⁺ IELs is associated with the development of autoimmune diabetes (13). It is thought that the purinergic products of ART2 may interact with or modify immune cell membrane proteins (10-12, 14, 15), generating signals that down-regulate autoreactivity and prevent diabetes.

Mono-ADP-ribosylation involves nucleophilic attack on NAD by acceptor substrates such as the amino acids arginine, asparagine, or glutamate (16-18). Many mARTs exhibit NAD glycohydrolase activity, consistent with water serving as a nucleophile. Polymers of ADP-ribose appear to be formed by a similar stereospecific, S_N2-like, nucleophilic reaction in which a hydroxyl group from ribose is the nucleophile (19, 20). The best understood structural determinant of nucleophile specificity is the ADP-ribosylating turn-turn (ARTT) motif in the catalytic core (21). The sequence of the ARTT motif appears to control whether arginine or asparagine can act as a nucleophile in mART toxins. In PARPs, the ARTT motif region appears to define an acceptor site for ADP-ribose polymer elongation, suggesting that a hydroxyl group from ribose serves as the nucleophile (22, 23). In the case of ART2, the ARTT motif permits water to act as a nucleophile, resulting in NAD glycohydrolase activity (7, 24).

In previous studies of mARTs, including the prokaryotic mART toxins, multimeric ADP-ribosylation has been synonymous with mono-ADP-ribosylation at multiple sites (25), and there are no reported exceptions. We have recently demonstrated that the auto-ADP-ribosylation of recombinant ART2 in vitro is multimeric, yet all automodification of ART2 was lost when a single arginine in the ARTT motif was mutated (24). In the present study, we observed multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylation of ART2 on IELs and on lymph node T cells following cell membrane disruption. We hypothesized that this multimeric ADP-ribosylation of ART2 represents extracellular poly(ADP-ribose) formation, and our results document for the first time the existence of extracellular PARP-like activity.

	EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Materials—Chemicals were purchased from Sigma. PCR primers were from the University of Massachusetts Medical School Center for AIDS Research. The pMAL-c2x vector was from New England Biolabs. PCR, ligation, and PCR purification (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) followed the manufacturer's protocols. Radiolabeled ([adenylate-³²P]NAD, 1000 Ci/mmol, and [carbonyl-¹⁴C]NAD, 30-62 mCi/mmol) -NAD were obtained from Amersham Biosciences.

Animals—WF rats have the art2b locus (expressing the ART2.2 allelic protein) and were obtained from Harlan Sprague-Dawley (Indianapolis, IN); WF.art2a congenic rats were developed at the University of Massachusetts. They express at least one copy of the "a" rather than the "b" allotype of the ART2 T cell alloantigen on chromosome 1 (26). For simplicity, we refer to them as WF.ART2.1 rats; wild type WF rats are designated WF.ART2.2. All animals (8-12 weeks of age) were housed in a viral antibody-free facility and maintained in accordance with recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, 1996) and the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Massachusetts Medical School.

T Cell and IEL Isolation—Cervical and mesenteric lymph nodes were removed from rats killed in an atmosphere of 100% CO₂. Single cell suspensions were prepared and T cells were purified by nylon wool column as described (13). IELs were prepared from rat small intestine by Percoll density gradient centrifugation as described (27). In some studies, IELs were incubated in serum-free medium (AIMV, plus 20 µM 2-mercaptoethanol) (Invitrogen).

Structural Comparisons—Structures from the Protein Data Bank included: 1A26 [PDB] , 1GXY, 1GXZ, 1TOX, and 1XTC. Backbone structural alignments were generated with program O and figures with Pymol.

Recombinant ART2—The pMAL-c2x vector was modified to express a His₆ tag at the N terminus of maltose-binding protein by ligating the PCR product from the PMAL-c2x vector: forward primer, 5'-GTCAGCCGCCATATGCATCATCATCATCATCATAAAATCGAAGAAGGTAAACTGG-3'; reverse primer, 5'-GGCGTGCCGCTCAGCACGCCAACGAAC-3'. Recombinant ART2 was subcloned from the pCR2.1 vector (8) into the His₆-modified pMAL-c2x for expression. PCR primers were: forward primer, 5'-GTCAGCCGCGGATCCATGCTAGACACGGCTCCC-3'; and reverse primer, 5'-GGCGTGCCGTCGACTCACTTATTAGCTGTATAAGCAATTGTAGTTG-3'. Sequencing was performed by the University of Massachusetts Medical School Center for AIDS Research.

The BL21(DE3) strain was transformed and selected for ampicillin (100 µg/ml) resistance. Expression was induced by 1 mM isopropyl -D-thiogalactopyranoside for 60 min at 37 °C. Cells were lysed by sonication, and inclusion bodies were pelleted by centrifugation at 32,000 x g, for 40 min at 4 °C. ART2 inclusion bodies were resolubilized in 6 M guanidine buffer (25 mM Tris·Cl, 1 mM reduced glutathione) and applied to nickelcharged iminodiacetic acid-agarose. A linear gradient was applied from the guanidine buffer to an activation buffer (50 mM Tris·Cl, 500 mM NaCl, pH 7.5). HIS₆MBPART2 fusion protein was eluted in an imidazole gradient (0-400 mM). The sample was then dialyzed against 25 mM Tris·Cl (pH 7.5). Anion exchange purification used a Q-Sepharose column (Amersham Biosciences), fractions with a NaCl gradient of 0-250 mM. NAD glycohydrolase activity was pooled, and the fusion partner was removed by digestion with factor Xa (New England Biolabs). The sample was washed through amylose resin (New England Biolabs) to remove residual HIS₆MBP and undigested HIS₆MBPART2 fusion proteins. Protein was quantified using Protein Dye Reagent Concentrate (Bio-Rad).

Electrophoresis—Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie Blue, autoradiography, or Western blot with the rabbit polyclonal antibody 1126 or 1742 (8) and ECL chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences). Autoradiography used Kodak X-Omat AR2 film. Poly(ADP-ribose) was resolved by electrophoresis using a modified sequencing gel format (28).

Enzyme Assays—NADase activity was assayed in a volume of 0.3 ml containing 50 mM K₃PO₄ (pH 7.5), 100 µM NAD, and [carbonyl-¹⁴C]NAD (55,000 cpm) for 5 min at 30 °C (29). Assays of NAD concentration dependence were carried out in a volume of 0.15 ml containing 1.25 µg of ART2, 100 mM K₃PO₄ (pH 7.5), and radiolabeled NAD at a ratio of 1.5 µCi of ³²P-labeled NAD/0.1 mM NAD; assays were run for 6 min at 30 °C with 0.1-10 mM NAD. Time course assays were carried out in a volume of 0.8 ml containing 6.5 µg of purified ART2 protein, 100 mM K₃PO₄ (pH 7.5), 20 mM NAD, and 1 mCi of ³²P-labeled NAD at 30 °C. Polymer assays were carried out in a volume of 6 ml containing either 4 nmol of ADP-ribose-agmatine, 4 nmol of poly(ADPR) (Biomol, Plymouth Meeting, PA), 4 nmol of cholera toxin (List Biological Laboratories, Campbell, CA), 4 nmol of ART2, or 0.33 nmol of PARP (Biomol). The reaction buffer included 100 mM K₃PO₄ (pH 7.5), 10 mM NAD, and 100 µCi of ³²P-labeled NAD (20 µCi in PARP sample); incubations were for 240 min at 30 °C. Proteins were precipitated with 25% trichloroacetic acid and washed with ethanol:acetone before MS studies.

Dihydroxylboronyl Chromatography—Dihydroxylboronyl Bio-Rex affinity resin was used for isolation of ADP-ribose as described (30).

Hydroxylamine Cleavage—ADP-ribosyl protein bonds were hydrolyzed using 2 M hydroxylamine at pH 7.0 at 37 °C for 40 min as described (24).

Endopeptidase Digestion—Auto-ADP-ribosylation reactions were carried out in a 10-ml volume containing 200 µg of ART2, 100 mM K₃PO₄ (pH 7.5), and 20 mM NAD for 60 min at 30 °C. Proteins were digested with chymotrypsin, trypsin, or Glu-C. Digests containing 100 µg of ART2 protein, 50 mM NH₄HCO₃ buffer (pH 7.8), 5 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.1% (w/v) RapiGest SF detergent (Waters, Milford, MA) were incubated for 60 min at 60 °C. After 30 min incubation at room temperature with 15 mM iodoacetamide, 2 µg of endopeptidase (1:50 protease:protein) were added, and the mixture (volume 50 µl) was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h.

HPLC—HPLC was carried out using a Waters 600 pump with a dual absorbance model 2487 detector and model 600 controller. Product identification anion exchange chromatography was run on a SynChropak Q column (Eichrom, 250 x 4.6 mm inner diameter) with a 50-mm guard column. Samples were digested with snake venom phosphodiesterase I (Worthington, Freehold, NJ) for 30 min at 37 °C as described (30) and injected into the HPLC, which was subjected to a linear NaCl gradient at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min (average pressure 300 p.s.i.). Eluates were monitored by absorption at 260 nm.

Mass Spectrometry—HPLC samples for ESI-MS were analyzed at a concentration of 100 µg/ml in 50% methanol and infused at 5 µl/min into the ESI ion source using a ThermoFinnigan LCQ quadruple ion trap mass spectrometer in negative ion mode. Full spectra were acquired from m/z 150-1500, and the major ions were subjected to collisional activation decomposition (CAD) analysis.

MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry) was carried out on a Waters MALDI-L/R mass spectrometer. Sinnapinic acid or -cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid was used as matrix. Peptides were identified using theoretical digests of ART2. Quadruple time-of-flight (Q-TOF) nanoscale HPLC-MS (MS/MS) analysis was carried out on a Waters model Q-TOF API-US mass spectrometer. Peptides were separated on a PorousR2 (Applied Biosciences, Salt Lake City, UT), 10 cm x 75-µm internal diameter, C18 reverse phase HPLC column and directly introduced into the nanoelectrospray ion source. Peptide sequence determination was carried out by CAD analysis in the Q-TOF.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Conservation of Structural Elements and Catalytic Regions of ART2 and PARP—ART2.2 has auto-ADP-ribosyltransferase activity, and we have previously demonstrated that, in the presence of millimolar concentrations of NAD, the automodifications of recombinant ART2 protein are multimeric (24). Because all auto-ADP-ribosylations are lost upon mutation of a single arginine, we hypothesized that this multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylation of ART2 could represent poly(ADP-ribose) formation rather than mono-ADP-ribosylation at multiple sites. To investigate this we first compared the structures of PARP and ART2. Primary sequence analysis revealed three regions of similarity in the catalytic cores of mARTs and a typical PARP (PARP1, PDB 1A26 [PDB] ) (31). Backbone structural alignment of PARP and ART2 (ART2.2, PDB 1GXZ) also demonstrated three regions of structural similarity (Fig. 1, A and B). Region I contains three largely non-polar -strands forming a small -sheet. The first two -strands bind the adenosine portion of the donor NAD (18). The third -strand contains an arginine or histidine typically followed by a glycine and appears to be crucial for binding the nicotinamide mononucleotide of the donor NAD (18, 32). Region II is a motif (Y/SXS-X₁₀-Y/F) that, by its U-shape, appears to form a critical hydrophobic pocket, holding the nicotinamide mononucleotide in a rigid conformation. Region III contains the ARTT motif within a loop, which appears to define an ADP-ribose acceptor site, as well as a short -strand sequence.

Both ART2 and PARP contain catalytic glutamates (Glu-190 and Glu-988, respectively, Fig. 1) that are critical for NAD catalysis and are highly conserved (7, 32). PARP lysine 903 (Lys-903), which is important for the polymerization activity (23), is part of the -helix of its Region II. The amide group of Lys-903 extends toward the catalytic glutamate, suggesting a functional role in PARP activity. Instead of lysine, ART2 contains a valine (Val-155) in the Region II helix that is directed away from the catalytic glutamate; however, a glutamine (Gln-188) in the ARTT motif of ART2 does project an amide group toward the same region as the amide of Lys-903 of PARP (Fig. 1A). A methionine (Met-890) provides a hydrophobic cushion for the acceptor adenine in the PARP model. In ART2, the hydrophobic side chain of a phenylalanine (Phe-184) in the ARTT motif loop occupies a space comparable with that occupied by Met-890 of PARP.

Multimeric Auto-ADP-ribosylation of Recombinant ART2— To determine whether ART2 could polymerize ADP-ribose from NAD, we generated recombinant ART2 with high specific activity (2.3 µmol/min/mg) (7, 8, 24, 32). Purified ART2 appeared as a band at 28 kDa by SDS-PAGE and had auto-ADP-ribosyltransferase activity demonstrable by Western blot and autoradiography (data not shown). In a 6-min reaction, the extent of ART2 modification increased as the NAD concentration was increased from 0 to 10 mM, reaching a maximum at 7.5-10 mM NAD (Fig. 2A). The assay used concentrations of NAD comparable with intracellular concentrations (0.4-4 mM) (33, 34). The variable extent of auto-ADP-ribosylation over time (Fig. 2B) resulted in heterogeneous protein band shifts on SDS-PAGE that were comparable with band shifts reported in studies of PARP (30).

View larger version (57K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 1. ART2 may have PARP-like activity. A, ribbon diagrams of PARP (PDB 1A26) and ART2 (PDB 1GXZ) depict three conserved regions of secondary structure. NAD (from the diphtheria toxin structure, PDB 1XTC) is aligned to the catalytic cleft and signified by the label DONOR NAD. ADP (from carba-NAD of the PARP structure, PDB 1A26) is positioned in the putative acceptor site of polymer elongation for both ART2 and PARP and labeled ACCEPTOR ADP. -Strands, -helices, and the Region III loop are depicted as arrows, coils, and a line, respectively. B, primary sequence alignments and a secondary structural schematic derived from a backbone alignment of ART2 and PARP. Key conserved amino acids of the PARP and mART families are in bold. The ARTT motif of Region III is illustrated.

Previous studies have shown that, under high-salt and alkaline conditions, NAD can be a highly reactive molecule that reacts non-enzymatically with ADP-ribose polymers and covalently attaches ADP-ribose (35). To exclude the unlikely possibility of non-enzymatic ADP-ribosylation in our system, mono-ADP-ribosylated agmatine, ADP-ribose polymer, and auto-ADP-ribosylated cholera toxin, which is known to be mono-ADP-ribosylated at multiple sites (25), were analyzed using the same conditions (Fig. 2C). There was no evidence of non-enzymatic formation of poly(ADP-ribose).

Digestion of ART2 Polymers with Phosphodiesterase Produces PR-AMP—Additional evidence for the enzymatic generation of poly-ADP-ribose polymers by ART2 was obtained in snake venom phosphodiesterase (SVP) analyses. Digestion of PARP-generated ADP-ribose polymers with SVP generates two major products, 2'-O--D-ribosyladenosine 5',5''-bisphosphate (PR-AMP) and AMP (1, 36). In contrast, digestion of non-enzymatically generated polymers does not generate PR-AMP (35). The observation of PR-AMP provides strong evidence that a polymer had been digested. Accordingly, we treated ART2- and PARP-generated polymers with SVP and assayed for PR-AMP. HPLC analyses of the polymers produced by both PARP and ART2 contained SVP-specific peaks with the same retention times as AMP and ADP standards (Fig. 3A). The SVP-specific peaks with retention times of the ADP standard were thought to represent PR-AMP (1, 36) and were analysed further.

To confirm that the SVP-specific products with retention times of the ADP standard were PR-AMP, HPLC eluates were collected and analyzed by negative ion electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MSⁿ). ADP-ribose was also analyzed by ESI-MSⁿ as an isomer control. In the PARP and ART2 samples, a single major ion species was found at m/z 558, which corresponds to the [M - H]^- of PR-AMP (Fig. 3B, left panels). The m/z 558 ion was then subjected to CAD MSⁿ to fragment the putative PR-AMP, confirming its identity structurally. The MS² product ion MS of the m/z 558 from both PARP and ART2 revealed a major product, m/z 460 (Fig. 3B, middle panels), corresponding to the neutral loss of phosphoric acid (M_r 98). This reflected cleavage of a primary phosphate, resulting in ribosyl-AMP. MS³ product ion MS of the m/z 460 produced a major product, m/z 325 (Fig. 3B, right panels), corresponding to the neutral loss of adenine and resulting in ribosyl-(5' phosphoribose).

In contrast, MS² product ion MS on the m/z 558 from ADP-ribose revealed a major product m/z 346 (Fig. 3B, top middle panel), corresponding to cleavage of the pyrophosphate bond, resulting in AMP. MS³ product ion MS of the m/z 346 ion revealed major product 211, corresponding to 5'-phosphoribose (Fig. 3B, top right panel). The product ion spectra from the ART2 and PARP samples differ from the product ion spectra of ADP-ribose (Fig. 3, B and C). In addition, they matched each other and produced product ions that were consistent with the structure of PR-AMP, confirming that ART2 can polymerize ADP-ribose.

The Site of ADP-ribose Polymerization on ART2 Is Arg-185— To clarify the mechanism by which ART2 polymerizes ADP-ribose, we next searched for the site of polymerization. To identify ADP-ribosylated sites, including polymer site(s), 200 µg of ART2 were incubated with 20 mM NAD for 60 min. Unmodified and modified ART2 samples were then digested with chymotrypsin, Glu-C, or trypsin endopeptidases at a protease:protein ratio of 1:50. Digests were analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS and liquid chromatography-ESI MS. The combination of MALDI-TOF MS and liquid chromatography-ESI MS identified that peptides covered 86% of ART2 and accounted for 10 of 11 arginines; only one overlapping peptide region appeared to be ADP-ribosylated (Table 1 and data not shown). The modified ART2 sample generated MALDI-TOF MS ions that were consistent with peptides to which had been added one, two, or three ADP-ribose moieties, respectively (Table 1).

View larger version (89K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 2. Multimeric band shifts and ADP-ribose polymers are generated upon auto-ADP-ribosylation of ART2. A, ART2 was incubated with 32P-labeled NAD, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by Western blot (upper panel) and autoradiography (lower panel) as described under "Experimental Procedures." The 31-kDa molecular mass marker is indicated. B, ART2 was incubated with NAD, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by Western blot (upper panel) and autoradiography (lower panel). Molecular mass markers are as indicated. C, ADP-ribose-agmatine (ADPR-Ag), poly(ADPR), cholera toxin (CT), ART2, and PARP were incubated with 32P-labeled NAD; ADP-ribose moieties were isolated by boronate affinity chromatography, and resolved on a modified sequencing gel as described under "Experimental Procedures." ADP-ribose (ADPR), bromphenol blue (BB), and xylene cyanol (XC), serve as markers for 1-, 8-, and 20-mers of ADP-ribose, respectively. Shown are data representative of at least three independent trials.

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 3. PR-AMP generated by SVP provides evidence of enzymatic polymer formation. A, PARP or ART2 was incubated with NAD, and polymers were isolated and incubated with or without SVP as described under "Experimental Procedures." Products were resolved by anion exchange HPLC. Standards (NAD, AMP, ADPR, and ADP) eluted as indicated. B, putative PR-AMP from PARP or from ART2 was purified by HPLC and analyzed by ESI-MSn using ADP-ribose as an isomer control. Spectra shown in the left-hand panels are for m/z 558 of ADP-ribose (top) and putative PR-AMP from PARP (middle) and ART2 (bottom). The SVP-specific peaks (m/z 558) and ADP-ribose (m/z 558) were subjected to CAD MSn for structural analysis of MS2 (middle panels) and MS3 (right panels). The data are representative of at least three independent experiments. C, structural interpretation of CAD MSn analysis of m/z 558 of ADP-ribose (top), PR-AMP from PARP (middle), and PR-AMP from ART2 (bottom). The respective fragmentation sites of each are indicated by the labeled brackets.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2 LC-ESI MS/MS product ion table of the [M + H]2 ion of m/z 2582 The singly modified peptide, m/z 2582, identified in Table I was subjected to an ion trap as the [M + 2H]2 ion and ESI CAD MS2, using Q-TOF MS, was performed to determine its sequence. The spectra were calculated to have a dynamic range of 5000; the lowest percent base intensity used was 0.2%, 10-fold above baseline. The average m/z was 0.02. The table summarizes peptides that were identified as having one ADP-ribose covalently attached.

Multimeric Auto-ADP-ribosylation of ART2 Is Greater on IELs than on T Cells—To next determine whether similar multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylations could occur on endogenous, cell-surface ART2, we isolated lymph node T cells and IELs from WF rats and incubated the cells with 5 mM NAD for 60 min. Cell lysates were separated by gel electrophoresis and analyzed by Western blot for ART2 automodifications. As shown previously (8), ART2 derived from lymph node T cells incubated with NAD revealed one higher molecular weight (M_r) band shift, presumably corresponding to the addition of a single ADP-ribose moiety on ART2 (Fig. 5A). In contrast, ART2 derived from IELs incubated with NAD showed several higher M_r band shifts (Fig. 5B). These multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylations were similar to those shown above (Fig. 2) with recombinant ART2, consistent with auto-poly-ADP-ribosylation of endogenous cell bound ART2.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 4. Mass spectrometry confirms an ADP-ribose trimer. ART2 was incubated with NAD, and ADP-ribose moieties were isolated and subjected to negative ion ESI-MSn as described under "Experimental Procedures." The full mass spectrum revealed a major product ion at m/z 819, corresponding to the [M - 2H]2- of an ADP-ribose trimer. The CAD MS2 spectra and structural interpretation of m/z 819 are shown. Major product ions included m/z 540 and 1099, which correspond to [M - H]- of a dehydrated monomer of ADP-ribose and a dimer of ADP-ribose, respectively. The labeled bar on the structural diagram indicates the corresponding cleavage site. Shown are data representative of at least three independent experiments.

View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 5. Time course of auto-ADP-riboyslation of T cell and IEL ART2. WF rat T cells (5 x 106 cells/assay) (A) or IELs (106 cells/assay) (B) were incubated at 30 °C with 5 mM NAD in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline for the indicated times. Proteins were trichloroacetic acid precipitated, separated by 12% SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose. Blots were incubated with 1742 anti-ART2 antiserum and quantified by chemiluminescence. Data represent at least two experiments.

Release of Cell-bound ART2 or Disruption of T Cell Membranes Increases Multimeric Auto-ADP-ribosylation—The reduced ability of ART2 to generate multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylation when expressed on lymph node T cells suggests that the local membrane milieu may restrict the ability of ART2 to catalyze multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylation. To investigate this possibility, we treated T cells and IELs with methyl--cyclodextrin, an agent known to disrupt cholesterol-containing lipid rafts. Whereas ART2 from T cells incubated with 5 mM NAD showed little automodification, ART2 from T cells pre-treated with methyl--cyclodextrin showed multiple higher M_r bands corresponding to multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylation (Fig. 7A). Similar results were obtained when ART2 was released from the T cell membrane by treatment with PI-PLC, an enzyme that cleaves glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins and releases ART2 from the cell surface. In contrast, ART2 from IELs pre-treated with methyl--cyclodextrin or PI-PLC showed no change in its ability to catalyze multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylation (Fig. 7B).

View larger version (101K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 6. Time course of auto-[32P]ADP-ribosylation of T cell ART2. WF rat T cells (2.5 x 106 cells/assay) were incubated with [32P]NAD, 10 µCi/assay, 5 µM NAD, and 1 mM ADP-ribose for 15 min. Cells were centrifuged, washed with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline, and then incubated with 5 mM unlabeled NAD at 30 °C for the indicated times. Trichloroacetic acid-precipitated proteins were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and incubated with 1126 anti-ART2 antiserum; signals were detected by chemiluminescence (A) or PhosphorImager (B). Data are representative of at least two experiments.

ART2.2-expressing IELs Are Resistant to NICD—We have previously reported that ART2.2- and ART2.1-expressing lymph node T cells showed no difference in viability in response to incubation with NAD (10). However, the above data (Fig. 5) suggest that T cell-bound ART2.2 is resistant to multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylation, whereas IEL ART2.2 is not. Therefore, to investigate potential biological functions for multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylation, we next examined the propensity of IELs to undergo NICD. For these studies, IELs were isolated from WF.ART2.2 rats, as well as from WF.ART2.1 rats that lack the critical Arg-185 necessary for auto-poly(ADP-ribosylation) activity. Cell viability was measured by trypan blue exclusion at the time of isolation and was not different between WF.ART2.2 and WF.ART2.1 rats (95.2 ± 0.5 and 95.0 ± 2.4%, respectively). The IELs were then placed in culture (1 x 10⁶ cells/ml) in the absence or presence of 1 mM NAD, a concentration that favors IEL, but not T cell, ART2.2 auto-poly(ADP-ribosylation) (Fig. 8). After 18 h of incubation, there was little difference in viability between untreated ART2.2 and ART2.1 IELs (Table 3). However, in the presence of NAD, cell viability was greatly decreased in ART2.1-expressing IELs, whereas viability was unchanged in ART2.2-expressing IELS. These data suggest that IELs that have multimeric auto-ADP-ribosylation activity are more resistant to NICD.

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 7. Auto-ADP-ribosylation of T cell and IEL ART2 after incubation with methyl--cyclodextrin or PI-PLC. A, T cells (2.5 x 106 cells/assay) were washed with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (1), the supernatant from T cells was incubated with PI-PLC, 0.05 units in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline for 1 h at 37 °C (2), or T cells incubated with methyl--cyclodextrin (10 mM) in Tris-EDTA (pH 7.4) for 1 h at 37°C, then solubilized with 1% -octylglucoside (3), were incubated with or without 5 mM NAD in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline for 1 h at 30°C. Trichloroacetic acid-precipitated proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. The blot was incubated with 1742 anti-ART2 antibody and immunoreactivity detected by chemiluminescence. B, IELs (107 cells/assay) were incubated, treated, and analyzed as in A. Data are representative of at least two experiments.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

In contrast, we observed that ART2 on the IEL cell surface is not restricted in its ability to form an ADP-ribose polymer. Collectively, these data indicate that intestinal and peripheral T lymphocyte populations differ in their surface topology, which in turn affects the ability of ART2 to auto-ADP-ribosylate. Thus, T cells and IELs may respond differently to inflammation, where local concentrations of NAD may be high.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 8. Auto-ADP-ribosylation of T cell-associated and soluble ART2. A, WF rat T cells (5 x 106 cells/assay) were incubated with 0 to 10 mM NAD in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline for 2 h at 30°C before precipitation with trichloroacetic acid. Pellets were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. The blot was incubated with 1742 anti-ART2 antibody and immunoreactivity was detected by chemiluminescence. B, WF rat T cells were incubated with or without NAD as in A. Cells were washed with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline and incubated for 1 h at 37°C with 0.05 units PI-PLC in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline. Samples were centrifuged, supernatants collected, and proteins precipitated with trichloroacetic acid. The proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. The blot was incubated with 1742 anti-ART2 antibody as above. C, T cells were incubated with 0 to 10 mM NAD, PI-PLC treated as in B, and solubilized proteins were incubated with 1 mM NADfor 1 h at 30 °C. Proteins were precipitated by trichloroacetic acid and separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed as above. Data are representative of at least two experiments.

To gain insight into the biochemical nature of the ART2 multimeric modification, we performed extensive studies using recombinant protein. Our analyses of recombinant ART2 identified the primary site of ADP-ribose polymerization as Arg-185, consistent with our previous report demonstrating that mutation of this same arginine residue to a lysine abolishes the multimeric band shifting associated with modified ART2 (24). Yet, when comparing structures, one major difference between ART2 and PARP is the ARTT loop of Region III (Fig. 1A), which is pulled outward in PARP, creating space for the ADP-ribose to enter the nucleophile acceptor site. In contrast, the predicted ART2 crystal structure has a more constricted ARTT loop due to a salt bridge among Glu-160, Arg-185, and Asp-187 that appears to block access to the acceptor site by steric hindrance. However, Arg-185 is also the initial site of ADP-ribose polymer formation (Table 2). We interpret the salt bridge between Arg-185, Glu-160, and Asp-187 as a novel "drawbridge" that opens the acceptor site for polymerase activity upon binding NAD.

Crystallographic models suggest that ADP-ribosylation and subsequent ADP-ribose polymerization on Arg-185 may take place by movement of Arg-185 toward the acceptor site. By adjusting side chain torsion angles to energetically favorable rotamer conformations, Arg-185 can be modeled into the acceptor site with stereochemistry appropriate for intramolecular nucleophilic attack (Fig. 9). Chain extension is more difficult to evaluate because the initial modification with ADP-ribose would require a conformational change that opens the N-terminal loop of Region III. However, given the number of degrees of freedom resulting from free rotation about multiple single bonds, it appears that the initial ADP-ribosyl arginine could fold back into the acceptor site to facilitate intramolecular polymerization. We recognize that the probability of the terminal ADP-ribosyl moiety occupying the acceptor site would be a function of chain flexibility and length. Further analysis of the kinetic mechanism, structural intermediates, and statistical distribution of reaction products will be required to determine the extent of intramolecular transfer as well as any potential for intermolecular transfer.

Our data further reveal that the ADP-ribose polymers made by ART2 and PARP differ in size and branching structure. PARPs generate ADP-ribose polymers that are typically >100 residues in length, and the ratio of PR-AMP to AMP is an indicator of the average chain length between branch points (30). Consistent with previous reports (30), the ratio of PR-AMP to AMP in our PARP-generated sample as determined by HPLC was 20:1, indicative of 1 branch point for every 20 ADP-ribose residues resulting in long, linear poly(ADP-ribose) chains. In contrast, ART2 generated ADP-ribose polymers that were 2-12 residues in length, and the ratio of PR-AMP to AMP was 2:1. This ratio suggests an average of one branch point for every 2-3 ADP-ribose residues, producing a short, highly branched structure. It is interesting to speculate on the biological implications of such a branching pattern. For example, the large number of possible size/branching patterns with ART2 polymers makes it plausible to infer that these purinergic products could interact with a variety of receptors, including purinoceptors or Toll-like receptors (11, 15).

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 9. Structural modeling suggests how ADP-ribosylation of Arg-185 may occur. A, a lateral view of the NAD-binding cleft using the ribbon diagram ART2 (PDB 1GXZ). The "acceptor" site for polymer elongation is blocked by a salt bridge among Arg-185, Glu-160, and Asp-187. B, NAD (PDB 1TOX) bound to the catalytic cleft may induce a conformational shift that breaks the salt bridge and allows the nucleophilic Arg-185 to enter and attack NAD. C, after ADP-ribosylation of Arg-185, the bridge remains open for polymer elongation or branching to occur. In this illustration, ADP-ribosylated Arg-185 could return a nucleophilic hydroxyl group to the acceptor site for attack of NAD and intramolecular polymer elongation. NAD bound to the "donor" site is colored orange; NAD bound to the acceptor site is colored red. Modeling was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures."

	FOOTNOTES

 
^* This work was supported in part by University of Massachusetts Center Grant DK32520 and National Institutes of Health Research Grants DK49106 (to D. L. G. and J. P. M.), DK36024 (to D. L. G.), and DK25306 (to A. A. R. and J. P. M.), Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Grant 1-2002-394 (to R. B.), and the Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, NHLBI. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

¹ Recipient of an American Diabetes Association Physician-Scientist Training Award.

² To whom correspondence should be addressed: Diabetes Division, Suite 218, 373 Plantation St., Worcester, MA 01605. Tel.: 508-856-3788; Fax: 508-856-4093; E-mail: rita.bortell{at}umassmed.edu.

³ The abbreviations used are: PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; mART, mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase; ARTT, ADP-ribosylating turn-turn; MS, mass spectrometry; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; ESI-MS, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry; CAD, collisional activation decomposition; MALDI-TOF MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; Q-TOF, quadruple-time-of-flight; SVP, snake venom phosphodiesterase; PR-AMP, 2'-O--D-ribosyladenosine 5',5''-bisphosphate; IEL, intraepithelial lymphocyte; NICD, NAD-induced cell death; PI-PLC, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We thank Dr. Martha Vaughan for useful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript, and Clinton Becker and Prerna Chopra for production of recombinant protein.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1. Sugimura, T., and Miwa, M. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 138, 5-12[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Yu, S. W., Wang, H., Poitras, M. F., Coombs, C., Bowers, W. J., Federoff, H. J., Poirier, G. G., Dawson, T. M., and Dawson, V. L. (2002) Science 297, 259-263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Tulin, A., and Spradling, A. (2003) Science 299, 560-562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Okazaki, I. J., Kim, H. J., and Moss, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22052-22057[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Zolkiewska, A., Nightingale, M. S., and Moss, J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 11352-11356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Koch-Nolte, F., Petersen, D., Balasubramanian, S., Haag, F., Kahlke, D., Willer, T., Kastelein, R., Bazan, F., and Thiele, H.-G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7686-7693[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Hara, N., Tsuchiya, M., and Shimoyama, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29552-29555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Rigby, M. R., Bortell, R., Stevens, L. A., Moss, J., Kanaitsuka, T., Shigeta, H., Mordes, J. P., Greiner, D. L., and Rossini, A. A. (1996) J. Immunol. 156, 4259-4265[Abstract]
9. Waite, D. J., Handler, E. S., Mordes, J. P., Rossini, A. A., and Greiner, D. L. (1993) Cell. Immunol. 152, 82-95[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Bortell, R., Moss, J., McKenna, R. C., Rigby, M. R., Niedzwiecki, D., Stevens, L. A., Patton, W. A., Mordes, J. P., Greiner, D. L., and Rossini, A. A. (2001) J. Immunol. 167, 2049-2059[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Seman, M., Adriouch, S., Scheuplein, F., Krebs, C., Freese, D., Glowacki, G., Deterre, P., Haag, F., and Koch-Nolte, F. (2003) Immunity 19, 571-582[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Rigby, M. R., Bortell, R., Greiner, D. L., Czech, M. P., Klarlund, J. K., Mordes, J. P., and Rossini, A. A. (1996) Diabetes 45, 1419-1426[Abstract]
13. Todd, D. J., Forsberg, E. M., Greiner, D. L., Mordes, J. P., Rossini, A. A., and Bortell, R. (2004) J. Immunol. 172, 5356-5362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Takada, T., Iida, K., and Moss, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 9420-9423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Lee, J., Chuang, T. H., Redecke, V., She, L. P., Pitha, P. M., Carson, D. A., Raz, E., and Cottam, H. B. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 6646-6651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Oppenheimer, N. J. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253, 4907-4910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Zhang, R. G., Scott, D. L., Westbrook, M. L., Nance, S., Spangler, B. D., Shipley, G. G., and Westbrook, E. M. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 251, 563-573[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Bell, C. E., and Eisenberg, D. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 1137-1149[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Miwa, M., Saito, H., Sakura, H., Saikawa, N., Watanabe, F., Matsushima, T., and Sugimura, T. (1977) Nucleic Acids Res. 4, 3997-4005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Miwa, M., Ishihara, M., Takishima, S., Takasuka, N., Maeda, M., Yamaizumi, Z., Sugimura, T., Yokoyama, S., and Miyazawa, T. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 2916-2921[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Han, S., Arvai, A. S., Clancy, S. B., and Tainer, J. A. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 305, 95-107[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Jung, S., Miranda, E. A., Demurcia, J. M., Niedergang, C., Delarue, M., Schulz, G. E., and Demurcia, G. M. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 244, 114-116[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Ruf, A., Rolli, V., de Murcia, G., and Schulz, G. E. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 278, 57-65[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Stevens, L. A., Bourgeois, C., Bortell, R., and Moss, J. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 19591-19596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Moss, J., Stanley, S. J., Watkins, P. A., and Vaughan, M. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 7835-7837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Mordes, J. P., Leif, J., Novak, S., DeScipio, C., Greiner, D. L., and Blankenhorn, E. P. (2002) Diabetes 51, 3254-3262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Todd, D., Singh, A. J., Greiner, D. L., Mordes, J. P., Rossini, A. A., and Bortell, R. (1999) J. Immunol. Methods 224, 111-127[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Alvarez-Gonzalez, R., and Jacobson, M. K. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 3218-3224[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Moss, J., Manganiello, V. C., and Vaughan, M. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73, 4424-4427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Shah, G. M., Poirier, D., Duchaine, C., Brochu, G., Desnoyers, S., Lagueux, J., Verreault, A., Hoflack, J. C., Kirkland, J. B., and Poirier, G. G. (1995) Anal. Biochem. 227, 1-13[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Okazaki, I. J., and Moss, J. (1999) Annu. Rev. Nutr. 19, 485-509[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Mueller-Dieckmann, C., Ritter, H., Haag, F., Koch-Nolte, F., and Schulz, G. E. (2002) J. Mol. Biol. 322, 687-696[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Williams, G. T., Lau, K. M., Coote, J. M., and Johnstone, A. P. (1985) Exp. Cell Res. 160, 419-426[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Anderson,R.M.,Latorre-Esteves,M.,Neves,A.R.,Lavu,S.,Medvedik,O.,Taylor, C., Howitz, K. T., Santos, H., and Sinclair, D. A. (2003) Science 302, 2124-2126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Ikejima, M., and Gill, D. M. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 5039-5045[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Inagaki, F., Miyazawa, T., Miwa, M., Saito, H., and Sugimura, T. (1978) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 85, 415-420[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Chen, J., Chen, Y. G., Reifsnyder, P. C., Schott, W. H., Lee, C. H., Osborne, M., Scheuplein, F., Haag, F., Koch-Nolte, F., Serreze, D. V., and Leiter, E. H. (2006) J. Immunol. 176, 4590-4599[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 281/44/33363    most recent M607259200v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted