![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 49, 37603-37615, December 8, 2006
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 Stimulates Hepatic Lipogenesis in a Mouse Model of Obesity, Insulin Resistance, Dyslipidemia, and Hepatic Steatosis*
1
1





2
From the
Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, New York 10032 and
ISIS Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California 92672
Received for publication, May 17, 2006 , and in revised form, September 6, 2006.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2) mRNA and protein were specifically increased in apoB/BATless mice, as were hepatic mRNA levels of two targets of PPAR
, CD36 and aP2. Treatment of apoB/BATless mice for 4 weeks with intraperitoneal injections of a PPAR
antisense oligonucleotide resulted in dramatic reductions of both PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 mRNA, PPAR
2 protein, and mRNA levels of fatty-acid synthase and acetyl-CoA carboxylase. These changes were associated with decreased hepatic de novo lipogenesis and hepatic triglyceride concentrations. We conclude that hepatic steatosis in apoB/BATless mice is associated with elevated rates of hepatic lipogenesis that are linked directly to increased hepatic expression of PPAR
2. The mechanism whereby hepatic Ppar
2 gene expression is increased and how PPAR
2 stimulates lipogenesis is under investigation. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Associated with a rising prevalence of obesity and insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis is increasing in the United States (7). In addition to having hyperlipidemia, apoB/BATless mice are obese, insulin-resistant, and have fatty livers, providing a model for studying the molecular basis for the association between insulin resistance, VLDL secretion, and hepatic steatosis. Increased hepatic TG could result from increased TG synthesis driven by increased delivery of albumin-bound fatty acids (FA) derived from lipolysis in peripheral adipose tissue, increased hepatic uptake of triglyceride fatty acid in remnant lipoproteins, or increased de novo lipogenesis. Decreased FA oxidation in the liver could lead to accumulation of TG, even when TG synthesis and VLDL secretion are normal. In the present studies, we examined in detail the basis for the hepatic steatosis in the apoB/BATless mouse. Of note, we found increased de novo lipogenesis that was independent of both SREBP-1c (sterol-response element-binding protein 1c) (8) and carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein (ChREBP) (9) regulation. By contrast, we confirmed prior studies demonstrating increased hepatic peroxisomal proliferator-activating receptor
(PPAR
) gene expression and activity in mouse models of insulin resistance (10-12), and we also demonstrated a significant, independent role for hepatic PPAR
in the regulation of de novo hepatic lipogenesis.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All mice were maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle (light cycle, 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.). Mice were weaned onto the Western type diet (number 88137; Teklad Premier Laboratory Diets, Madison, WI) containing, by calories, 42% fat (polyunsaturated/saturated = 0.07), 29% sucrose, and 0.15% (w/w) cholesterol.
Plasma BiochemistriesBlood samples were obtained from the retro-orbital plexus. Total plasma TG and cholesterol concentrations were measured by colorimetric methods using commercial kits (Wako Chemicals, Richmond, VA). FA levels were measured colorimetrically using a commercial kit (number 994-75409) from Wako Chemicals (Richmond, VA). Glucose levels were measured using an enzymatic kit (number 315-100; Sigma).
Determination of FA TurnoverTo determine the rate of FA flux, [3H]palmitic acid (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) was injected intravenously and its disappearance from plasma measured over time. The turnover of FA in plasma is known to be rapid; in fact, by 2 min after the injection of the tracer, plasma counts had decreased to 3-11% of the total injected volume. We bled the mice at 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 min after [3H]palmitic acid injection to determine radioactivity remaining in plasma. The fractional clearance rate for palmitate was determined using a two-pool model to account for recycling of FA from the extravascular space.
Determination of Liver TG LevelsLivers from the mice were collected for the measurement of hepatic TG content. Total liver lipids were extracted by a modification of the Folch method (13), and TG concentration was determined by a commercial colorimetric method (Wako Chemicals, Richmond, VA). [14C]Triolein was added to each sample before lipid extraction to allow correction for recovery during the lipid extraction; final TG concentrations were adjusted accordingly. Total liver protein was extracted using T-PERTM tissue protein extraction reagent (number 78510; Pierce). A protease inhibitor mixture (number 1873580;, Roche Diagnostics) was added into the liver protein extraction reagent. Liver TG levels were expressed as milligrams of TG/g of liver protein.
Measurement of Hepatic de Novo LipogenesisThe rate of hepatic de novo lipogenesis was determined by measuring the amount of newly synthesized FA present in the liver 1 h after intraperitoneal injection of 2 mCi of 3H2O (14). 3H-Labeled fatty acids were isolated by saponification of liver samples in KOH. After extraction of nonsaponifiable lipids, and acidification with H2SO4, the 3H-labeled fatty acids were extracted and separated by thin layer chromatography. The plate was stained with iodine; the FA "spot" was scraped off the plate, and the isolated FA was added to scintillation fluid (Ecoscint H number LS-275; National Diagnostics, Atlanta, GA) and counted in a liquid scintillation counter (LS6500 Beckman Coulter, Fullerton. CA). The specific activity of body water was determined and used to calculate de novo lipogenesis as micromoles of 3H2O incorporated into FA/h/g liver protein.
Northern Blot Hybridization with cDNA ProbesTotal cellular RNA (TRNA) was isolated from livers using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) following the protocol provided by the company, and Northern blot hybridization was carried out with 20 µg of RNA as described (1). The cDNA probes were prepared by reverse transcription-PCR from liver TRNA of male C57BL/6J mice. PCR primers used for each probe are shown in Table 1. A mouse
-actin riboprobe (Ambion Co., Austin, TX) was used in each experiment to normalize for loading of RNA samples. For quantification, autoradiograms were scanned with a densitometer.
|
Quantitative Real Time PCRLiver TRNA samples were used for cDNA synthesis with oligo(dT) primers using a commercial kit (number 11904-018) from Invitrogen. The resulting cDNA samples were then quantified for each test gene using target gene-specific primers. Quantitative real time PCR (QPCR) was done using either TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) or a SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) according to the protocols provided by the manufacturers. Detection of specific products was performed in triplicate using the Mx4000 Multiplex Quantitative PCR system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Using the standard curve method, the relative quantitation of specific PCR products for each primer set was generated. For normalization,
-actin was amplified from each sample. The primers used for real time PCR are shown in Table 1. Mouse cyclophilin and GAPDH probes were synthesized by using antisense internal control templates (catalog numbers 7675 and 7431; Ambion).
ImmunoblotsEqual amounts of liver protein extracts were subjected to 8% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and immunoblotted using standard methods. A rabbit polyclonal antibody against mouse SREBP-1, which recognizes both mature and precursor forms, was a generous gift from Dr. Jay D. Horton (University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas). To measure the level of hepatic nuclear mature form of SREBP-1, hepatic nuclear protein was prepared immediately after exsanguinations as described previously for hamster liver (16). Hepatic FAS content was estimated using anti-FAS monoclonal antibody that reacts against the mouse protein (Pharmingen). Hepatic stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD) was estimated with a rabbit anti-mouse SCD polyclonal antibody that recognizes both mouse and human SCD (a generous gift from Dr. Alan Tall, Columbia University). Hepatic PPAR
protein level was measured with a mouse monoclonal antibody against the carboxyl terminus of human PPAR
, which is identical to the corresponding mouse sequence (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). For normalization,
-actin was measured with a monoclonal anti-
-actin antibody (Sigma). Lamin B antibody was a gift from Dr. Howard Worman.
Gel Mobility Shift AssayGel mobility shift assays were performed by using consensus double-stranded oligonucleotides with the following sense strand sequences: CYP7A1 oligonucleotides that contain the mouse LXR-response element (LXRE) (5'-AGCTTGCTCTGGTCACCCAAGTTCAAGTTAC-3') (17) and the mouse sterol regulatory element (SRE) in the Fas promoter (5'-CGCGCGCGGGCATCACCCCACCGACGG-3') (18). The probes were labeled with [
-32P]ATP and T4 polykinase. Gel mobility shift assays were performed using gel shift core system (Promega, Madison, WI). Hepatic nuclear proteins were prepared with a nuclear extraction kit (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA). Mouse SREBP2 protein, used as a positive control, was a generous gift from Dr. Timothy Osborne (University of California, Irvine). The mouse LXR
and retinoid X receptor-
proteins, used as positive controls, were generous gifts from Dr. Joyce Repa (University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas).
PPAR
Antisense Oligonucleotide ExperimentAn antisense nucleotide (ASO) complementary to murine PPAR
(GenBankTM accession number U09138.1
[GenBank]
), ISIS 141941, 5'-AGTGGTCTTCCATCACGGAG-3', was injected intraperitoneally twice a week into apoB/BATless mice at the dosage of 100 mg/kg/week for 4 weeks. To demonstrate the specificity of inhibition, an in-house universal control, ISIS 141923:,5'-CCTTCCCTGAAGGTTCCTCC-3', was injected simultaneously into a parallel group of apoB/BATless mice. The body weight and plasma lipid profile were measured before and after ASO treatment. At the end of the experiment, de novo lipogenesis, liver TG content, and mRNA levels of PPAR
1, PPAR
2, CD36, aP2, FAS, ACC, SREBP-1c, ChREBP, and LPK were determined as described above.
Kupffer Cell Depletion by Liposome-encapsulated Clodronate Liposome-encapsulated clodronate, which is known to deplete Kupffer cells, was administered intravenously on 2 consecutive days (300 µl), and livers were harvested 48 h later (19). PBS encapsulated in multilamellar liposomes was used as the control. Sixteen mg of cholesterol (C3045; Sigma) and 172 mg of phosphatidylcholine (P3556; Sigma) were dissolved in chloroform in a round bottom flask. The chloroform was evaporated at 37 °C in a rotary evaporator under vacuum until a thin lipid film formed. Dicholoromethylene diphosphonate, 2 g (clodronate, D4434; Sigma), dissolved in 10 ml of PBS or 10 ml of PBS (to prepare empty liposomes) were added to the lipid film and shaken at 250 rpm for 30 min. The solution was sonicated for 3 min at room temperature in a water bath sonicator (50 watts). The liposomes were centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 1 h and resuspended in 8 ml of PBS. Kupffer cell depletion was assessed by liver F4/80 staining and by using QPCR to quantify F4/80 and Nramp1 mRNA. The primers were as follows: mouse F4/80, forward 5'-CTTTGGCTATGGGCTTCCAGTC-3' and reverse 5'-GCAAGGAGGACAGAGTTTATCGTG-3' (20); mouse Nramp 1, forward 5'-ATCCTGCCCACTGTGTTGGT-3' and reverse 5'-GCGAAGGGCAGCAGTAGACT-3' (21). Results were normalized by mRNA levels of
-actin.
StatisticsAll data are presented as means ± S.D. Differences in the mean values between two groups were assessed by two-tailed Student's t test. Differences in mean values among more than two groups were determined by analysis of variance. p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
15 g heavier than male apoB mice (57.0 ± 8.7 versus 41.4 ± 4.0 g). Also consistent with our previously published results (3), fasting blood analyses of 15 male apoB/BATless and 13 male apoB mice revealed hyperinsulinemia (6.7 ± 2.9 versus 1.6 ± 0.3 ng/ml), hypertriglyceridemia (206.6 ± 60.9 versus 127.0 ± 23.5 mg/dl), and hypercholesterolemia (389.6 ± 97.4 versus 332.2 ± 68.4 mg/dl) in the apoB/BATless mice. As observed previously, plasma glucose concentrations were not different in male apoB/BATless compared with male apoB mice (data not shown). A key finding in our first paper was that the hypertriglyceridemia was because of significantly elevated rates of hepatic secretion of VLDL triglyceride, apoB100, and apoB48 into plasma in male apoB/BATless mice compared with apoB mice; those results were confirmed in the present studies (data not shown). Of relevance to the present studies, apoB/BATless mice had greater hepatic TG compared with age-matched apoB mice (Fig. 1A), despite greater rates of secretion of both TG and apoB at the age of 22-26 weeks. Hepatic TG stores are derived from three sources as follows: 1) uptake of plasma albumin-bound FA; 2) uptake of VLDL or chylomicron remnant triglyceride fatty acid; or 3) de novo lipogenesis. Our previous published results demonstrated that fasting plasma FA levels were not increased in apoB/BATless mice (3). Because steady state levels might not provide a true estimate of FA flux, we determined the fractional clearance rate of plasma FA with [3H]palmitate. There was no difference in the fractional clearance rate of plasma FA in apoB/BATless compared with apoB mice (1.70 ± 0.4 versus 1.97 ± 0.8 pools per min, respectively; p = 0.2). When the fractional clearance rates were multiplied by the FA pool sizes, which were larger in the more obese apoB/BATless mice, there was a nonsignificant trend toward a higher total FA flux in the apoB/BATless compared with the apoB mice (2.32 ± 0.6 versus 1.63 ± 0.9 mEq/min; p = 0.10).
Next, we examined de novo hepatic lipogenesis in apoB/BATless and apoB mice. Fig. 1B depicts results of studies to measure hepatic lipogenesis using 3H2O. Incorporation of 3H2O into FA was increased
2-fold in apoB/BATless mice. Therefore, the doubling of hepatic TG mass (Fig. 1A) was associated with marked increases in de novo hepatic lipogenesis.
|
|
|
, an important transcriptional activator of the Srebp-1c gene (25) (apoB/BATless, 110 ± 10%, n = 4, versus apoB, 100 ± 46%, n = 4) (Fig. 2C, right). In addition to SREBP-1c, another major target of LXR
is hepatic ABCA1 (26); mRNA levels of ABCA1 were not different between apoB/BATless and apoB mice (apoB/BATless, 71 ± 21%, n = 6, versus apoB,100 ± 47%, n = 6;, p = 0.19). To rule out the possibility that increased levels of a second member of the SREBP family was involved, we determined mRNA levels of SREBP-2. There was no difference in mRNA levels of SREBP-2 in apoB/BATless versus apoB mice (data not shown). Consistent with the mRNA levels, protein levels of FAS in the liver were also increased 2-3-fold in apoB/BATless mice (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, hepatic SCD protein levels were significantly higher in apoB/BATless than in apoB mice (Fig. 3B). Because SREBP is regulated significantly by post-transcriptional cleavage of the full-length protein to an amino-terminal segment that is transcriptionally active, we determined levels of both the full-length precursor and the truncated mature forms of this protein in apoB/BATless mice. Levels of the precursor and mature forms of SREBP-1 protein in whole hepatic lysates were not different between apoB/BATless and apoB mice (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, the levels of the mature form of hepatic SPEBP-1 protein in nuclear extracts were not different in apoB/BATless versus apoB mice (Fig. 3D).
Because both SREBP-1c and LXR play such prominent roles in hepatic lipogenesis, and because they are ligand-activated, we carried out gel mobility shift assays to support the mRNA and protein data. Male apoB/BATless and apoB mice of similar ages were used for hepatic nuclear extract preparation. These studies revealed that there were no differences in binding activities of hepatic nuclear extracts from apoB/BATless versus apoB mice to either an SRE oligonucleotide found in the promoter of Fas (18) (Fig. 4A) or to an LXRE found in the promoter of Cyp7A1 (17) (Fig. 4B). Together with the mRNA results for both genes, and protein data for SREBP-1c, these results rule out a significant role for SREBP1-c and LXR in the increased lipogenesis observed in apoB/BATless mice.
ChREBP is a recently described transcription factor that can stimulate both glycolysis and lipogenesis (9). Neither the mRNA levels of ChREBP nor those of its specific hepatic target gene, LPK (9), were different between apoB/BATless and apoB mice (Fig. 5).
It had been reported that PPAR
2 is increased in livers of BATless mice fed a high fat diet (28). Quantitative real time-PCR revealed that there were no significant differences in PPAR
1 mRNA levels between apoB/BATless and apoB mice (Fig. 6A, left side). By contrast, hepatic mRNA levels of PPAR
2 were increased by 2-3-fold in apoB/BATless (apoB/BATless,: 257 ± 110%, n = 7, versus apoB, 100 ± 38%, n = 7; p < 0.05) (Fig. 6A, right side). Northern blots showed the same patterns of hepatic Ppar
1 and Ppar
2 gene expression (data not shown). Immunoblotting showed that hepatic protein levels of PPAR
2 were also increased in apoB/BATless compared with apoB mice (apoB/BATless, 167.4 ± 41.8%, n = 8, versus apoB, 100 ± 21.7%, n = 7; p < 0.01) (Fig. 6B). In most experiments, PPAR
1 was not clearly separated from a nonspecific band (Fig. 6B), and densitometry was not performed. However, there was no apparent difference in PPAR
1 protein levels in apoB/BATless versus apoB. To determine whether increased PPAR
2 mRNA and protein in the liver were physiologically active, we measured hepatic mRNA levels of two downstream targets, aP2 and CD36. Hepatic mRNA levels of aP2 were increased 2-fold in apoB/BATless, whereas mRNA levels of CD36 were increased 3-fold in apoB/BATless versus apoB mice (Fig. 6C). Adipsin mRNA, another PPAR
target, was also increased in the apoB/BATless mice (data not shown).
|
and its targets genes, liposome-encapsulated clodronate was administered intravenously over 2 days to deplete hepatic Kupffer cells (19). After clodronate treatment, F4/80 immunostaining demonstrated that Kupffer cells had been ablated (Fig. 7A). QPCR also showed that hepatic mRNA levels of two macrophage-specific markers F4/80 (20) and Nramp1 (21) were dramatically decreased (Fig. 7B, left and right sides, respectively). In contrast, there were no changes in hepatic mRNA levels of either PPAR
1 or PPAR
2 or their targets, aP2 and CD36 (Fig. 7C), after clodronate treatment. Importantly, ablation of hepatic Kupffer cells did not affect hepatic mRNA levels of FAS and ACC (Fig. 7C).
To directly demonstrate the role of PPAR
overexpression in the increased de novo lipogenesis present in livers of apoB/BATless mice, either PPAR
ASO or control oligonucleotide was injected intraperitoneally, twice a week for 4 weeks, to inhibit hepatic PPAR
activity in apoB/BATless mice. All the mice (7-8/group) tolerated the treatment well. Body weights at the start of the experiment were 46.7 ± 7.7 and 48.6 ± 6.7 g in the PPAR
and control ASO groups, respectively. After 4 weeks of treatment, mice receiving PPAR
ASO had a weight of 47.8 ± 6.7 g, whereas those receiving control ASO had a weight of 54.2 ± 6.3 g. There was a non-significant trend (p = 0.08) for a greater weight gain in the control ASO group.
Hepatic mRNA levels of PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 were dramatically decreased (80-90%) in PPAR
ASO-treated mice (Fig. 8A). Consistent with those changes, hepatic levels of PPAR
protein and mRNA levels of CD36 and aP2 were significantly decreased in PPAR
ASO-treated mice (data not shown). Importantly, hepatic mRNA levels of FAS and ACC were also dramatically reduced in PPAR
ASO-treated mice (Fig. 8B). However, hepatic mRNA levels of SREBP-1c (Fig. 8C), CHREBP (Fig. 8D, left), and LPK (Fig. 8D, right) were not affected by ASO treatment. To determine whether the reductions in ACC and FAS mRNA were physiologically important, we measured lipogenesis in male apoB/BATless mice after inhibition of PPAR
with ASO. Incorporation of 3H2O into FA was significantly decreased in PPAR
ASO versus control oligonucleotide-treated apoB/BATless mice (Fig. 8E), and this was associated with a significant 50% reduction in liver TG content in PPAR
ASO-treated mice (PPAR
ASO, 202.4 ± 99.1, versus control ASO, 332.7 ± 91.4 mg/g liver protein; p = 0.04) (Fig. 8F). Of interest, plasma TG levels were not affected by 4 weeks of ASO treatment (212 mg/dl at the start of the PPAR
2 ASO treatment and 205 mg/dl at the end of treatment).
A similar experiment was performed with PPAR
ASO and control ASO in apoB mice (n = 2 per group) on Western diets. mRNA levels for PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 were reduced more than 90%, whereas FAS and ACC mRNA levels fell about 90%. Consistent with the findings in apoB/BATless mice, liver TG was 89.8 ± 12.5 mg/g liver protein in PPAR
ASO-treated mice compared with 296.3 ± 77.8 mg/g liver protein in control ASO-treated mice.
Increased FA availability (from any source) for incorporation into VLDL TG could also be a consequence of decreased FA oxidation in the liver. To rule out this possibility, PPAR
, CPT-1, and AOX mRNA levels were measured. None of these were increased in apoB/BATless mice, suggesting that FA oxidation was not different between the two groups of mice (Fig. 9).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increased TG synthesis could lead to hepatic steatosis even if VLDL assembly and secretion were increased. Hepatic TG synthesis and VLDL TG secretion are regulated by the delivery of plasma albumin-bound FA (40-42). In apoB/BATless mice, despite the presence of insulin resistance, we did not find increased fasting plasma FA levels, even after extended fasting (3). In this study, plasma FA turnover, determined using [3H]palmitic acid, tended to be higher in apoB/BATless mice compared with apoB mice, but this was not statistically significant. Taken together, these results argue against a major role for increased delivery of plasma albumin-bound FA to the liver in the hepatic steatosis observed in the apoB/BATless mouse.
|
|
, a key transcription factor regulating several genes important for
-oxidation of fatty acids by the liver. We found that mRNA levels for PPAR
, and two of its target genes, Cpt-1 and Aox, were not different in apoB/BATless mice compared with apoB mice. These results suggest that there was no significant difference in hepatic fatty acid
-oxidation between apoB/BATless and apoB mice. Although we have not directly determined the role of hepatic remnant lipoprotein uptake in apoB/BATless mice, our previously published study indicated that post-heparin plasma lipoprotein and hepatic lipase in the apoB/BATless mice were the same as in apoB mice (3). Those data suggested that lipolytic clearance of VLDL TG was efficient in apoB/BATless mice. Our finding that VLDL secretion was increased 2-3-fold indicated that the hypertriglyceridemia in the apoB/BATless mice was not because of reduced clearance of VLDL TG. Overall, it is unlikely that there was a greater return of TG-enriched remnants to the liver in apoB/BATless mice.
The remaining pathway, de novo lipogenesis, was clearly increased in the apoB/BATless mice compared with apoB mice, as evidenced by a 2-fold increase in the incorporation of 3H2O into fatty acids and increased expression of three key genes regulating FA and TG synthesis: Fas, Acc, and Scd1. Furthermore, protein levels of FAS and SCD were increased in livers of apoB/BATless mice. Lipogenesis is a modest but significant source of TG for VLDL secretion in rodents (33, 43) and in humans with obesity and insulin resistance (44, 45). Studies from the laboratory of Goldstein and Brown have characterized in detail the role of the basic/helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper transcription factor, SREBP-1c, in the regulation of hepatic lipogenesis (8). More recently, their laboratory has extended this work to clarify the link between insulin and SREBP-1c regulation of lipogenesis (46, 47). Importantly, hepatic Srebp-1c gene expression is increased in several rodent models of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, even when insulin signaling through the insulin receptor substrate pathway is reduced (48). In the present study, however, apoB/BATless mice did not have increased levels of hepatic SREBP-1c mRNA, despite the presence of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. Furthermore, levels of LXR
mRNA, a nuclear receptor that can stimulate Srebp-1c gene expression in the presence of increased insulin (47, 49) and can also directly stimulate transcription of Fas (50), were not increased in the livers of apoB/BATless versus apoB mice. SREBP-1c transcriptional activity is also regulated at the post-translational level by enzymatic cleavage of the precursor transmembrane form, allowing the amino-terminal peptide to translocate into the nucleus (8). Our demonstration that both the precursor and mature forms of SREBP-1 protein were not different in apoB/BATless versus apoB mice is further evidence that the SREBP-1c pathway did not play a role in the increased lipogenesis present in apoB/BATless mice. Finally, gel mobility shift assays using hepatic nuclei isolated from apoB/BATless and apoB mice confirmed the absence of increased transcriptional activity for either an SRE from the Fas promoter or an LXRE from the Cyp7A1 promoter in apoB/BATless mice. Altogether, these different experimental approaches rule out a role for SREBP-1c in the stimulated lipogenesis in apoB/BATless mice.
The lack of evidence linking increased SREBP-1c transcriptional activity to increased lipogenesis in the apoB/BATless mouse was surprising and led us to look for another stimulus for lipogenesis. One such a candidate was the newly identified transcription factor ChREBP, which binds to specific carbohydrate-responsive elements of several lipogenic genes and is regulated by glucose and cyclic AMP (9). In transfected hepatocytes, ChREBP stimulates the transcription of reporter constructs containing carbohydrate-responsive elements of the Acc and Fas genes (51). Additionally, mice lacking ChREBP have reduced lipogenesis without changes in SREBP activity (52). In apoB/BATless mice, fasting plasma glucose levels were not elevated compared with apoB mice (3), although the former mice are glucose-intolerant and insulin-resistant. In any event, hepatic mRNA levels of ChREBP, and its specific hepatic target gene LPK (53), were not different in apoB/BATless versus apoB mice. Thus, the ChREBP pathway for lipogenesis, like the SREBP-1c pathway, does not seem to account for increased lipogenesis in apoB/BATless mice versus apoB mice.
In the absence of evidence for either SREBP-1c or ChREBP playing important roles in the elevated lipogenesis in apoB/BATless mice, we turned our attention to PPAR
. This nuclear receptor, which is a key regulator of adipogenesis, is present in two isoforms, PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 (54). PPAR
1 is expressed in many tissues, whereas significant PPAR
2 expression is thought to be limited almost exclusively to adipose tissue. In adipose tissue, Ppar
2 gene expression is regulated by insulin and nutrients. Importantly, increased expression of either or both isoforms has been observed in livers of obese, insulin-resistant rodents (55, 56). In fact, specific induction of hepatic Ppar
2 gene expression was demonstrated in the BATless mouse on a high fat diet (28). We have confirmed that finding in the present studies, and we have also demonstrated induction of several Ppar
gene targets in livers of these mice. Studies with clodronate confirmed that the increase in Ppar
2 gene expression and activity was in hepatocytes and not Kupffer cells. Most importantly, using PPAR
antisense, we have directly linked reductions in hepatic Ppar
gene expression and protein to reductions in hepatic FAS and ACC mRNA levels, hepatic TG content, and hepatic lipogenesis. The effects of PPAR
antisense on hepatic FAS and ACC mRNA levels occurred in the absence of any changes in the expression of SREBP-1c, CHREBP, or LPK. PPAR
ASO treatment had similar effects on lipogenic gene expression and hepatic TG content in apoB mice.
|
in regulating hepatic lipogenesis. Adenovirus-induced overexpression of PPAR
1 in livers of PPAR
knock-out mice was sufficient to induce adipose tissue-specific gene expression and hepatic steatosis (57). However, it was not clear if overexpression of PPAR
1 in that study would have caused increased lipogenesis without concomitant absence of PPAR
. Stable expression of PPAR
2 in a cultured cell line of hepatocytes resulted in similar changes in hepatic lipid metabolism and gene expression (58). Unlike our findings in apoB/BATless mice, the latter study reported significantly increased hepatic expression of SREBP-1c as well (58). Importantly, specific targeted hepatic deletion of PPAR
resulted in reduced hepatic lipogenesis in both a lipodystrophic model of insulin resistance and steatosis (11) and in ob/ob mice (10). The mRNA levels of the hepatic lipogenic genes, Fas, Acc, and Scd1, were reduced in both models of hepatic PPAR
deletion without obvious changes in Srebp-1c gene expression, which was increased in both of those mouse models. Inhibition of PPAR
expression by adenovirus-delivered RNA interference reduced lipogenic gene expression and hepatic TG content in mice that had reduced levels of cyclic AMP-responsive transcription factor (CREB) (12). Hepatic Srebp-1c gene expression was not altered in the latter study. In a recent report, adenoviral overexpression of PPAR
2 was associated with steatosis in C57BL/6 mice; short hairpin RNA suppression of hepatic PPAR
decreased hepatic TG levels in db/db mice (59). Thus, taking all of the published data together, it appears that hepatic PPAR
can play a critical role in the regulation of hepatic lipid synthesis. However, in all of those studies, either SREBP-1c was elevated concomitantly or some other key hepatic regulatory gene (PPAR
and CREB) was altered. In our model, loss of brown adipose tissue leads to the complex phenotype of obesity, insulin resistance, and altered hepatic lipid metabolism that is regulated by aberrant expression of PPAR
2.
Why is PPAR
2 increased in the livers of apoB/BATless mice, and how might PPAR
2 stimulate lipogenesis? It is possible that the modest increase in FA flux to the liver that we demonstrated, together with hyperinsulinemia, would induce specific expression of PPAR
2 (60). Insulin signaling can regulate hepatic Ppar
gene expression; increased insulin action in livers with targeted deletion of PTEN (a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase phosphatase) is associated with increased Ppar
(the authors did not differentiate between PPAR
1 or PPAR
2) gene expression (61), whereas hepatic Ppar
gene expression is decreased in mice lacking hepatic insulin receptors.4 If insulin can directly elevate hepatic PPAR
2 levels in the apoB/BATless mouse, it would indicate that insulin signaling to PPAR
2 was normal despite the presence of significant insulin resistance through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway in apoB/BATless livers.4 Compartmentalization of hepatic insulin resistance has been observed to be related to intact insulin-mediated stimulation of Srebp-1c gene expression in the otherwise insulin-resistant liver of the ob/ob mouse (48). A recent study indicated that LXR is able to induce Ppar
gene expression in adipocytes (62); it is not known if LXR can activate PPAR
in the liver. However, we did not find any evidence of increased LXR transcriptional activity in the livers of apoB/BATless mice. CREB appears to inhibit Ppar
gene expression by stimulating expression of the transcriptional repressor called Hairy Enhancer of Split gene (Hes-1) (12), but neither CREB mRNA nor HES-1 mRNA levels were reduced in apoB/BATless mice (data not shown). Thus we cannot, at this time, determine why Ppar
2 gene expression is uniquely and aberrantly increased in the apoB/BATless mouse. Even less clear is the manner in which increased Ppar
2 gene expression would induce lipogenesis; although adipocyte PPAR
expression is critical for full adipogenesis, there are no known PPAR-response elements in the lipogenic genes we have studied. Of note, however, is the recent report that a PPAR
agonist increased hepatic expression of the genes for FAS and ACC and that a putative PPAR-response element was present in the Acc promoter (27). Whatever the basis for our findings, further delineation is clearly required, particularly because we have demonstrated that reductions in PPAR
expression in apoB/BATless mice were associated with improvement in hepatic steatosis.
|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Both authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
2 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Medicine, PH 10-305, Columbia University, 630 West 168th St., New York, NY 10032. Tel.: 212-305-9562; Fax: 212-305-3213; E-mail: hng1{at}columbia.edu.
3 The abbreviations used are: apoB, apolipoprotein B; PPAR
2, peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor 2; TG, triglyceride; VLDL, very low density lipoprotein; FA, fatty acid; FAS, fatty-acid synthase; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; PPAR
2, peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor 2; BATless, mice lacking brown adipose tissue; SCD, stearoyl-CoA desaturase; QPCR, quantitative real time PCR; ChREBP, carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein; SREBP, sterol-response element-binding protein; RPA, ribonuclease protection assays; TRNA, total cellular RNA; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; LXR, liver X receptor; LXRE, LXR element; ASO, antisense nucleotide; CREB, cAMP-response element-binding protein; LPK, liver pyruvate kinase; AOX, acyl-CoA oxidase. ![]()
4 Y.-L. Zhang, A. Hernandez-Ono, D. Conlon, and H. N. Ginsberg, unpublished data. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|