JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M508931200 on November 29, 2005

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 5, 2515-2525, February 3, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/5/2515    most recent
M508931200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olivera, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rivera, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olivera, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rivera, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

IgE-dependent Activation of Sphingosine Kinases 1 and 2 and Secretion of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Requires Fyn Kinase and Contributes to Mast Cell Responses*Formula

Ana Olivera{ddagger}1, Nicole Urtz§2, Kiyomi Mizugishi, Yumi Yamashita{ddagger}, Alasdair M. Gilfillan||, Yasuko Furumoto{ddagger}, Haihua Gu**3, Richard L. Proia, Thomas Baumruker§2, and Juan Rivera{ddagger}4

From the {ddagger}Molecular Inflammation Section, Molecular Immunology and Inflammation Branch, NIAMS, Genetics of Development and Disease Branch, NIDDK, and ||Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, §Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research/Vienna, 59 Brunner Strasse, Vienna A-1235, Austria, and the **Cancer Biology Program, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215

Received for publication, August 12, 2005 , and in revised form, November 23, 2005.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Engagement of the high affinity receptor for IgE (Fc{epsilon}RI) on mast cells results in the production and secretion of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), a lipid metabolite present in the lungs of allergen-challenged asthmatics. Herein we report that two isoforms of sphingosine kinase (SphK1 and SphK2) are expressed and activated upon Fc{epsilon}RI engagement of bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMC). Fyn kinase is required for Fc{epsilon}RI coupling to SphK1 and -2 and for subsequent S1P production. Normal activation of SphK1 and -2 was restored by expression of wild type Fyn but only partly with a kinase-defective Fyn, indicating that induction of SphK1 and SphK2 depended on both catalytic and noncatalytic properties of Fyn. Downstream of Fyn, the requirements for SphK1 activation differed from that of SphK2. Whereas SphK1 was considerably dependent on the adapter Grb2-associated binder 2 and phosphatidylinositol 3-OH kinase, SphK2 showed minimal dependence on these molecules. Fyn-deficient BMMC were defective in chemotaxis and, as previously reported, in degranulation. These functional responses were partly reconstituted by the addition of exogenous S1P to Fc{epsilon}RI-stimulated cells. Taken together with our previous study, which demonstrated delayed SphK activation in Lyn-deficient BMMC, we propose a cooperative role between Fyn and Lyn kinases in the activation of SphKs, which contributes to mast cell responses.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Receptor stimulation of a variety of cell types induces the early activation of sphingosine kinase (SphK),5 a unique lipid kinase that generates the potent and versatile lipid mediator sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) (1, 2). S1P was demonstrated to function intracellularly, regulating cell survival, cell proliferation, and calcium fluxes (1, 3). However, many of the effects of S1P can be attributed to its role as a ligand for a family of five G-protein-coupled receptors, named the endothelial differentiation gene or S1P receptors (S1P1–5) (4, 5). This receptor family, and predominantly the S1P1 subtype, is known to regulate diverse biological functions, including cytoskeletal changes, chemotaxis, vascular development, regulation of endothelial cell function, and lymphocyte recirculation (1, 4). Two distinct mammalian SphKs (SphK1 and SphK2) have been identified, and both kinases efficiently convert sphingosine to S1P (6, 7). SphK1 is activated in response to multiple stimuli, whereas SphK2 activation was only recently demonstrated in response to epidermal growth factor (2, 8, 9).

In mast cells, the high affinity receptor for IgE (Fc{epsilon}RI)-mediated activation of SphK1 has been associated with calcium mobilization and degranulation (1012). However, the intracellular role of S1P in modulating mast cell calcium responses remains uncertain, in part, due to the failure to identify the intracellular S1P receptors and the organelle(s) from which the calcium is mobilized. Interestingly, mast cells are one of the few cell types that can secrete substantial quantities of S1P upon stimulation, suggesting an important role for this metabolite in their function (13). Studies on the mast cell tumor analog, RBL-2H3, showed that cell migration to an IgE/antigen (Ag) stimulus required transactivation of S1P1 receptors by endogenously generated S1P. Additionally, these studies demonstrated that S1P contributes to mast cell degranulation through a second receptor, S1P2 (12).

Our more recent studies demonstrated that the Src protein-tyrosine kinase (Src PTK) Lyn is required for the early phase of SphK1 activation in mast cells (14). This is mediated through the interaction of SphK1 with Lyn, thus promoting SphK1 recruitment to Fc{epsilon}RI. Nonetheless, because SphK1 activity is delayed but not ablated by Lyn deficiency, we investigated what additional signals might be required for SphK activation. Herein, we demonstrate that both isoforms, SphK1 and SphK2, which are expressed in murine and human mast cells (HuMC), are activated upon Fc{epsilon}RI triggering. Fyn, a second Src PTK crucial for Fc{epsilon}RI-mediated mast cell activation (15), interacted with SphK1 and SphK2 and was required for their activation and for production and secretion of S1P induced by IgE/Ag. Consistent with the previously demonstrated role of S1P in mast cell chemotaxis and degranulation (12), Fyn-deficient BMMC failed to migrate toward an Ag gradient and showed defective degranulation. However, both of these responses were partially restored by the addition of exogenous S1P upon IgE/Ag stimulation.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Antibodies and Reagents—Mouse monoclonal or rabbit polyclonal antibodies specific to the following proteins were used in this study: phospho-Akt (Cell Signaling Technologies), Akt (Pharmingen/BD Biosciences), anti-Myc (Upstate%20Biotechnology">Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY), anti-FLAG (clone M2; Sigma), extracellular signal-regulated kinase, Src, Lyn, and Fyn (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), and anti-V5 (Invitrogen). Antibodies to SphK2 were made by immunizing rabbits (Strategic Biosolutions) with affinity-purified glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins (glutathione S-transferase-SphK2 (Nt) and glutathione S-transferase-SphK2 (Ct)); IRDyeTM 800- or Cy5.5-conjugated anti-rabbit and anti-mouse were from Rockland. S1P and sphingosine were from Biomol. Human myeloma IgE (Calbiochem) was biotinylated as described (16). PP2 and LY294002 were from Calbiochem; human or mouse recombinant interleukin-3 (IL-3) and stem cell factor (SCF), and human recombinant interleukin 6 (IL-6) were from PeproTech. The Ag dinitrophenyl-human serum albumin and Streptavidin were from Sigma. RPMI, StemPro-34 culture media, and fetal bovine serum were from Invitrogen, and L-glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin were from Biofluids. The TNT T7 quick-coupled transcription/translation system was obtained from Promega. Lipofectamine Plus was from Invitrogen. Disposable chemotaxis chambers were from NeuroProbe, Inc.; the Cyquant proliferation kit was from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR); TLC plates were from EMD Chemicals, Inc.; and [{gamma}-32P]ATP and [35S]methionine were purchased from MP Biomedicals and Amersham Biosciences, respectively.

Bone Marrow Isolation and BMMC CultureFyn–/– (SV129 x C57/BL6 (N4)), Gab2–/– (SV129 x C57/BL6 (N4) (17)), and wild type (WT) mice (SV129 x C57/BL6 (N4)) were maintained and used in accordance with National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines. SphK1–/– and the WT littermates were previously reported (18) and maintained as above. Bone marrow was isolated from 5–6-week-old wild-type or gene-disrupted mice, and BMMC were cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 20 ng/ml IL-3 and 20 ng/ml SCF as previously described (19). Cells were generally grown for a minimum of 4 weeks and used when greater than 95% of the population expressed Fc{epsilon}RI.

HuMC Isolation and Culture—HuMCs were developed from CD34+ cells in StemPro-34 culture medium containing L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), IL-6 (100 ng/ml), and stem cell factor (100 ng/ml), as described (20). IL-3 (30 ng/ml) was included for the first week of culture. Experiments were conducted on these cells 8–10 weeks after the initiation of culture, at which point the population was greater than 99% mast cells.

Transfection of Cells—HEK-293 cells were transfected with V5 or c-Myc-tagged mouse SphK1 or FLAG-tagged mouse SphK2 using Lipofectamine Plus as previously described (7). HEK-293 transfectants were harvested and lysed by freeze-thawing in Buffer A (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 100 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 40 mM beta-glycerophosphate, 15 mM NaF, 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, aprotinin and pepstatin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.5 mM 4-deoxypyridoxine). The cytosolic fraction obtained by centrifugation at 100,000 x g for 60 min at 4 °C was used for the measurement of SphK activity or measurements of S1P and sphingosine levels in BMMC. For co-immunoprecipitation experiments, HEK-293 cells were co-transfected with V5-SphK1 or FLAG-SphK2 and murine Lyn, Fyn, or a catalytically inactive mutant (K296N) of Fyn. Forty-eight h after transfection, cells were lysed in Buffer B (borate-buffered saline containing 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin, 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 50 mM NaF, and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate), and the lysates were used for immunoprecipitation of the Src kinases.

Ag Stimulation, Immunoblots, and Immunoprecipitations—HuMCs were sensitized overnight in Stem Pro-34 growth medium without IL-6 or SCF, containing biotinylated human IgE (100 ng/ml) and then triggered by the addition of streptavidin at a final concentration 100 ng/ml as described (16). BMMC were washed and incubated in SCF-free medium for 20–24 h and then sensitized with 1 µg/ml anti-dinitrophenyl mouse IgE in IL-3-free medium containing 2% fetal bovine serum for an additional 3 h. BMMC were washed twice and resuspended in Tyrode's solution/bovine serum albumin buffer (37 °C, 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4), 135 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl, 5.6 mM glucose, and 0.05% bovine serum albumin). Cells were then stimulated with 100 ng/ml Ag unless otherwise indicated. In some experiments, cells were incubated with LY294002, an inhibitor of PI3K, for 20 min at 37 °C prior to Ag stimulation. Preparation of BMMC lysates, immunoprecipitations, and immunoblotting procedures were as previously described (15), except that the secondary antibodies used for protein detection were labeled with dyes sensitive to the infrared range and detected by an Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences). For immunoblots of cell membrane proteins, cells were resuspended in Buffer A and lysed by freeze-thawing. Cell debris and nuclei were removed by centrifugation at 800 x g for 10 min, and the clarified lysates were centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 1 h. Pellets, containing cellular membranes, were washed twice with PBS and solubilized in SDS-PAGE sample buffer.

For co-immunoprecipitations of Fyn and SphK2 from BMMC, cells (6 x 107/sample) were stimulated with Ag and subsequently lysed at 4 °C in Buffer B. In some experiments, BMMC lysates were mixed with lysates of HEK-293 cells transfected with murine FLAG-Sphk2 and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C with gentle agitation prior to immunoprecipitation. Cell lysates were incubated for 3.5 h with rabbit anti-Fyn prebound to protein A-Sepharose. The immunoprecipitated material was washed twice with Buffer B and twice with Buffer A without beta-mercaptoethanol or KCl and assayed for the presence of SphK2 activity in Buffer A containing 200 mM KCl as described below. Alternatively, the immunoprecipitated material was resolved by SDS-PAGE and Fyn, and SphK2 was detected by Western blotting. Immunoprecipitations of proteins generated by in vitro transcription/translation were performed as described (14). Briefly, purified human recombinant Fyn, Lyn, or Src proteins and in vitro transcribed/translated human [35S]methionine-labeled SphK1 or SphK2, were allowed to form complexes for 1 h at room temperature and then isolated with the corresponding antibodies prebound to protein G-Sepharose for 2 h at 4 °C. Immunoprecipitated proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE (4–20% Tris-glycine gels), and [35S]SphK1 or -2 was detected by autoradiography.

Expression of Fyn Kinase in Fyn-deficient BMMC and Sphingosine Kinase Activity—Fyn-deficient BMMC were reconstituted with wild type or a catalytically inactive mutant (K296N) of murine Fyn using a lentiviral expression vector for transduction.6 Briefly, cells were transduced with virus and incubated for 72 h prior to use. Transient expression (as determined by green fluorescent protein expression) was ~70–80%. To determine SphK activity, IgE-sensitized BMMC were activated with 100 ng/ml Ag for the indicated time. Reactions were stopped by the addition of 3 ml of cold phosphate-buffered saline containing 100 µM sodium orthovanadate. Cells were pelleted, resuspended in Buffer A, and lysed by freeze-thawing. The resulting cell lysate was centrifuged at 21,000 x g for 30 min, and 20 µg of the soluble fraction (which also contains cellular membranes) was used to measure SphK activities. SphK activity was measured by incubating cell samples with 50 µM sphingosine and [{gamma}-32P]ATP (0.5 µCi, 1 mM), containing MgCl2 (10 mM) in a final volume of 200 µl of buffer for 20 min at 37 °C (21). To preferentially measure SphK1 activity, sphingosine was prepared in mixed micelles with Triton X-100 (final concentration 0.25%), whereas for assaying SphK2 activity, sphingosine was prepared in bovine serum albumin complexes (final concentration 0.2 mg/ml), and KCl in Buffer A was used at a final concentration of 200 mM (6). 32P-Labeled lipids were extracted and resolved by TLC, and the bands corresponding to [32P]S1P were quantified using an Amersham Biosciences Storm PhosphorImager (21).

Mass Measurement of S1P and Sphingosine—Following Ag stimulation of BMMC, cells (3 x 107 cells/sample) were centrifuged at 4 °C, and supernatants were recovered. The recovered supernatant (1 ml) was further cleared of cells by an additional centrifugation, and S1P in the supernatants was forced into the aqueous phase by the addition of 1 ml of chloroform/methanol (1:1) plus 100 µlof3 N NaOH. Cells were resuspended in 1 ml of 25 mM HCl/methanol, and lipids were extracted with 1 ml of chloroform, 1 ml of 1 M NaCl plus 100 µlof3 N NaOH. Aliquots from the organic phase were used to measure sphingosine levels as described below. The aqueous phase containing S1P was incubated with alkaline phosphatase to dephosphorylate S1P to sphingosine (22). After lipid extraction, mass levels of sphingosine derived from S1P were determined by a previously described enzymatic method (23). In brief, lipids were dried under N2 stream, resuspended, and sonicated in Buffer A containing 0.25% Triton X-100 to form lipid micelles. To these micellar preparations, 5 µl of HEK293 lysates overexpressing c-Myc-tagged SphK1 and [{gamma}-32P]ATP (0.5 µCi, 1 mM) containing MgCl2 (10 mM) were added, and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After lipid extraction, the formed [32P]S1P was resolved by TLC and quantified using a PhosphorImager, and the values were converted into pmol of sphingosine using a standard curve generated with known concentrations of sphingosine (23). Total phospholipids in cellular lipid extracts were quantified by a colorimetric reaction with malachite green as described (22).

Mast Cell Degranulation and Chemotaxis—Sensitized cells were challenged with 25 ng/ml Ag for 10 min, and degranulation was determined by measuring the enzymatic activity of the granule marker, beta-hexosaminidase, as previously described (19).

Chemotaxis was measured using a ChemoTx disposable chemotaxis system in a 96-well microplate format. Plates were not coated with fibronectin to avoid possible augmentation of chemotactic responses through integrin receptors. Chemoattractants were added to the lower wells, and 1.2 x 105 cells were added on top of the membrane above each well. After3hat37°C, cells on the upper membrane surface were wiped off, and the plates with membranes were centrifuged. Cells that migrated were lysed with CyQuant kit lysis buffer and stained with a green fluorescent dye (CyQuant GR dye), whose fluorescence increases when bound to nucleic acids. A linear standard curve with serial dilutions of the cells for each culture of BMMC (ranging from 100 to 5000 cells) was included to equate fluorescence intensity with cell number. Fluorescence was measured using a FluoroStar fluorescent plate reader.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
SphK1 and -2 Are Activated upon Fc{epsilon}RI Triggering of BMMC and HuMC—Aggregation of the Fc{epsilon}RI in murine BMMC, human BMMC, and RBL-2H3 has been reported to cause the activation of SphK1 (1012). Another mammalian sphingosine kinase, SphK2, shows more abundant transcript expression in mast cells (12). Using conditions that differentiate between SphK1 and SphK2 activities (Fig. 1A), we found that SphK2 was a prominent SphK activity in wild type (WT) BMMC (Fig. 1B). To further verify that SphK2 activity can be measured independently of SphK1, we assayed both SphK1 and SphK2 activities in BMMC from SphK1-null mice. As shown in Fig. 1B, SphK1-deficient BMMC had similar levels of SphK2 activity when compared with WT cells. Some residual activity of SphK1 was observed, but this probably resulted from overlapping SphK2 activity, given the noted overlap of SphK1 activity in the SphK2 assay (see Fig. 1A). Human BMMC were reported to express exclusively SphK1 (11). Using two different antibodies, one raised to the NH2 terminus (amino acids 1–136; anti-SphK2 (Nt)) and the other to the COOH terminus (amino acids 291–618; anti-SphK2 (Ct)) of the murine protein, we detected SphK2 protein in peripheral blood-derived HuMC at levels comparable with BMMC (Fig. 1C, lane 3 versus lane 4, respectively). Anti-SphK2 (Ct) recognized the murine protein but showed poor reactivity to the protein in lysates from various human cell types when compared with anti-SphK2 (Nt) (Fig. 1C, upper panels, lanes 3 versus lanes 4, and data not shown). Nonetheless, a weak reactivity was consistently detected at the apparent molecular mass of 70 kDa.


Figure 1
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1.
SphK1 and -2 are present in BMMC and HuMC. A, to determine the selectivity of the SphK assays, cell lysates from HEK293 cells overexpressing either c-Myc-SphK1 (filled bars) or FLAG-SphK2 (open bars), were subjected in parallel to SphK1 and SphK2 assays as described under "Experimental Procedures." The results are expressed as a percentage of the maximal activity. B, SphK1 and -2 activities in BMMC from WT or SphK1–/– mice were measured as explained under "Experimental Procedures." Data are the mean ± S.E. from three independent experiments done in duplicate. Statistical significance (*, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001; paired t test) when compared with SphK1 activity in WT cells. C, Western blot of SphK2 in lysates from BMMC and HuMC. Whole cell lysates (WCL) from equal numbers of HuMC or BMMC were separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted with two different antibodies (Nt and Ct; see "Experimental Procedures") against SphK2. Duplicate samples were run in the same gel and probed with serum from preimmunized rabbits (right panels). The same blots were reprobed with anti-actin to show protein loading. Lane 1, SPHK1-overexpressing cells; lane 2, SPHK2-overexpressing cells; lane 3, HuMC; lane 4, BMMC. Lanes 1 and 2 are shown at lower intensities than lanes 3 and 4.

 
Ag stimulation of IgE-sensitized BMMC and HuMC resulted in rapid activation (with similar kinetics) of both SphK1 and SphK2 (Fig. 2, A–C). The activity of both enzymes in HuMC varied, with SphK2 activity ranging from 8 to 25 pmol/mg/min and SphK1 ranging from 6 to 24 pmol/mg/min (data not shown). As we previously reported for SphK1 (14), a biphasic induction of both SphK1 and SphK2 activity was found in BMMC, with the first peaking at 30 s to 3 min and the second more sustained phase occurring between 15 and 30 min.


Figure 2
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2.
Both SphK1 and -2 are activated by Fc{epsilon}RI cross-linking in BMMC and HuMC. A and B, dependence on Fyn. IgE-sensitized BMMC from WT or Fyn–/– mice were stimulated for the indicated times with 100 ng/ml Ag. In some cultures, WT BMMC were incubated with 15 µM PP2 for 30 min prior to Ag stimulation. SphK1 (A) and SphK2 (B) activities were measured from the soluble fraction containing membrane fragments. Data represent the average ± S.E. of at least five independent experiments. C, biotinylated IgE-sensitized HuMC were stimulated with 100 ng/ml streptavidin for the indicated times. SphK1 and SphK2 activities were measured as in A and B. Data are the average ± S.E. of three independent experiments done in duplicates. Statistical significance (paired t test) when compared with unstimulated conditions was as follows: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01. D, whole cell lysates (WCL) from WT and two different cultures of Fyn-deficient BMMC were immunoblotted with an anti-SphK2 antibody (Ct) and anti-extracellular signal-regulated kinase to show protein loading (left panel). SphK2 was immunoprecipitated (IP) from nonstimulated or Ag-stimulated IgE-sensitized WT or Fyn-deficient BMMC for the indicated times. -Fold increase in SphK2 in the immunoprecipitates was calculated using the Odyssey infrared detection system and is normalized to WT at zero time and for protein in the starting whole cell lysates (Lyn). E–G, changes in cellular S1P (E), S1P released to the extracellular medium (F), and cellular sphingosine (G) are Fyn-dependent. IgE-sensitized BMMC were activated with Ag for the indicated times and lipids extracted from the cells or from the extracellular medium. Lipid levels, measured as described under "Experimental Procedures," are expressed as pmol/nmol of total phospholipids extracted in each sample. Data are the average ± S.E. of at least three independent experiments. Two-way analysis of variance tests indicated statistical significance (p < 0.01) between the kinetics in Fyn-deficient or PP2-treated cells versus those in WT BMMC in A, B, E, F, and G.

 
The Src Kinase Fyn Is Crucial for IgE-dependent Activation of SphKs and S1P Formation—Our previous study showed that Lyn-deficient BMMC were delayed in activating SphK1 and failed to efficiently translocate SphK1 to Ag-stimulated Fc{epsilon}RI. This suggested that Lyn played an important regulatory role but also that other molecular events are involved in activation of SphKs. Pretreatment of IgE-sensitized BMMC with the Src PTK-selective inhibitor, PP2, prevented activation of both SphK1 and 2 by Ag (Fig. 2, A and B). In fact, pretreatment of Lyn-deficient BMMC with PP2 also ablated the delayed activation of SphK1 and SphK2 seen in these cells (data not shown). This suggested that a second Src PTK was involved in SphK activation. Thus, we explored whether another receptor-proximal Src PTK, Fyn (15), was necessary for activation of SphK1 and SphK2. BMMC from Fyn-deficient mice showed a severe defect in SphK1 activation and demonstrated complete ablation of SphK2 activation (Fig. 2, A and B). It is noteworthy that the basal activity of SphK1 was unchanged in Fyn-deficient BMMC (WT, 4.76 ± 0.59, n = 9; Fyn–/–, 4.95 ± 1.19, n = 9), but the basal SphK2 activity was significantly diminished (WT, 8.19 ± 1.19, n = 9; Fyn–/–, 3.80 ± 0.86, n = 8, p = 0.0085). This decline in activity was not due to reduced expression of SphK2, as demonstrated in Fig. 2D. Concurrent with IgE-dependent activation of SphKs, WT BMMC showed increased intracellular expression of the SphK product, S1P (Fig. 2E), with a rapid (1–3 min) and a more prolonged phase (20–90 min poststimulation). In agreement with a previous report (24), the intracellular levels of S1P progressively decreased between 30 and 120 min, whereas the amount of S1P secreted to the extracellular medium increased (Fig. 2F). Coinciding with early increases in S1P, there was a concomitant decrease in the levels of sphingosine, the substrate of SphKs (Fig. 2G). In contrast, Fyn-deficient BMMC failed to substantially increase the intracellular levels of S1P or secrete S1P following Fc{epsilon}RI stimulation (Fig. 2, E and F). Likewise, the levels of sphingosine remained unchanged after activation (Fig. 2G). Sphingosine levels were generally lower in Fyn-deficient BMMC as compared with WT. However, the reduced amount of sphingosine was not the cause for the defective SphK activation, since preincubation of Fyn-deficient BMMC with 100 nM to 1 µM sphingosine (which is rapidly incorporated into cellular membranes) did not modify the response to Ag in these cells (data not shown). This was not unexpected, since the basal amount of sphingosine per nmol of total phospholipid (6–12 pmol/nmol phospholipids) in either WT or Fyn-deficient BMMC was much higher than that reported for other cell types (about 0.2 pmol/nmol phospholipids for HL-60, U937, Jurkat T cells, or Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts) (22, 23), suggesting that sphingosine was not limiting in Fyn-deficient BMMC.


Figure 3
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3.
Fyn kinase restores SphK activation in Fyn-null BMMC. A, Western blot showing the levels of Fyn kinase in WT or Fyn-deficient BMMC transduced with a LacZ vector (WTLacZ, Fyn–/–LacZ), Fyn-deficient BMMC transduced with WT Fyn protein (Fyn–/–WT Fyn), or Fyn-deficient BMMC transduced with kinase-inactive mutant Fyn protein (Fyn–/–KN Fyn). Lyn was used as loading control. B and C, reconstitution of Fc{epsilon}RI-induced activation of SphK1 (B) and SphK2 (C) in Fyn-deficient BMMC transduced with WT Fyn. Experiments were performed as in Fig. 2. Data is the average ± S.E. of three experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; statistical significance when compared with the unstimulated cells in each category using a paired t test. IB, immunoblot.

 
To exclude the possibility of impaired SphK induction as a consequence of a developmental defect in Fyn-deficient BMMC, we transduced these cells with a virus encoding wild type or catalytically inactive Fyn kinase. Expression of wild type or mutant Fyn was achieved at levels close to those in WT BMMC (Fig. 3A). Cells transduced with wild type Fyn showed a fully restored activation of both SphK1 and SphK2 upon Fc{epsilon}RI triggering, whereas the catalytically inactive mutant seemingly (statistical significance was not achieved) partially restored their activation (Fig. 3, B and C). That the noncatalytic function of Fyn might contribute to SphK activation was also supported by transduction with a virus encoding lacZ, which did not cause SphK induction. Collectively, the findings demonstrate that Fyn induction of SphK activities can be restored.

The Requirement of Fyn for Induction of SphK Activity Is Shared by c-KIT but Not by the IL-3 Receptor—We were interested in determining whether the requirement for Fyn kinase in the activation of SphK1 and SphK2 was exclusive to Fc{epsilon}RI. We focused on c-KIT and IL-3 receptors because of previous reports linking these receptors to Fyn kinase (25, 26). c-KIT belongs to the same family of tyrosine kinase receptors as the platelet-derived growth factor receptor, which is known to stimulate SphK in other cell types (27, 28). Similarly, some cytokine receptors have been implicated in the activation of SphKs (29, 30). As shown in Fig. 4, SCF and IL-3 induced the activation of both SphK1 and SphK2. Fyn kinase was absolutely required for c-KIT-dependent activation of SphK1 and SphK2 (Fig. 4, A and B). In contrast, Fyn kinase was dispensable for IL-3 receptor-induced activation of SphK2, although it was more important for the activation of SphK1 (Fig. 4, C and D). Whereas the basal activity of SphK2 was lower in Fyn-deficient BMMC, the extent of activation by IL-3 was similar to that of WT BMMC. Our findings demonstrate that c-KIT utilizes Fyn kinase for SphK activation, whereas IL-3 receptors use pathways that are considerably or minimally Fyn-dependent for SphK1 activation and SphK2 activation, respectively. Importantly, the results also demonstrate that SphK2 activation is not solely restricted to Fc{epsilon}RI engagement.


Figure 4
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4.
Fyn kinase activity is necessary for SCF-induced activation of SphKs but not for IL-3-induced activation of SphK2. BMMC from WT or Fyn–/– mice were washed and incubated in SCF-free medium for 24 h and then in SCF- and IL-3-free medium containing 2% fetal bovine serum for an additional 4 h. Cells were stimulated in Tyrode's solution/bovine serum albumin buffer with 200 ng/ml SCF (A and B) or 200 ng/ml IL-3 (C and D) for the indicated times, and SphK1 (A and C) and SphK2 (B and D) activities were measured. Data represent the average ± S.E. of four independent experiments. Statistical significance (paired t test) when compared with unstimulated conditions was as follows: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.

 


Figure 5
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5.
Fyn interacts with SphK1 and SphK2. A, Fyn (upper and middle panels), Lyn, or Src (lower panel) were immunoprecipitated from an in vitro mixture of purified, human recombinant Fyn, in vitro transcribed/translated 35S-labeled human SphK1 (upper panel) or in vitro transcribed/translated 35S-labeled human SphK2 (middle and lower panels) as indicated. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and subjected to autoradiography to detect co-precipitated [35S]SphKs. Immunoprecipitation (IP) of Fyn was demonstrated by Western blot from an aliquot of the immunoprecipitates. B, HEK293 cells were cotransfected with V5-SphK1 (upper panel) or FLAG-SphK2 (lower panel) and Lyn, Fyn, catalytically inactive Fyn mutant (KN-Fyn), or the vector containing lacZ, as indicated. Fyn or Lyn was immunoprecipitated where indicated, and the presence of SphK1 (upper panel) or SphK2 (lower panel) was demonstrated by Western blotting using anti-V5 and anti-SphK2 (Ct), respectively. Equal amounts of SphK1 or SphK2 in the starting material were demonstrated by Western blot. Note that the amounts shown are a small fraction of the total material used for immunoprecipitation, and the exposure of the starting material is not comparable with the immunoprecipitation blots. C, Fyn was immunoprecipitated from nonstimulated or Ag-stimulated (2 min) WT and Fyn-deficient BMMC. SphK2 activity was measured in the immunoprecipitates. Data represent the average ± S.E. of the relative quantitation of SphK2 activity coimmunoprecipitated with Fyn in four independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; statistical significance with respect to unstimulated WT BMMC using a paired t test. D, Fyn was immunoprecipitated from nonstimulated or Ag-stimulated (2 min) WT BMMC lysates mixed with lysates from HEK293 cells overexpressing FLAG-SphK2. The presence of SphK2 in the immunoprecipitates was demonstrated by Western blot. Equal amount of SphK2 in the starting material was demonstrated by Western blot. The specificity of the interaction is shown by the lack of SphK2 when LAT was immunoprecipitated.

 
Fyn Kinase Interacts with Both SphK1 and SphK2—Using an antibody array, we previously found the interaction of SphK1 with Lyn kinase as well as with Fyn kinase (14). The interaction was specific, because antibodies to other Src kinase family members, such as c-Src and c-Yes, were found on this array but did not demonstrate SphK1 interaction (14). We further confirmed the interaction of SphK1 with Fyn by co-immunoprecipitation analysis using purified human recombinant Fyn and [35S]methionine-labeled SphK1, transcribed/translated in an in vitro TNT T7 reticulocyte system (Fig. 5A, upper panel). Immunoprecipitation of Fyn (lanes 1–3) resulted in co-immunoprecipitation of [35S]methionine-labeled SphK1 only when both Fyn and SphK1 were present. Similar experiments were performed for Fyn-SphK2 interaction. As shown in Fig. 5A (middle panel), Fyn immunoprecipitation also caused the co-immunoprecipitation of [35S]methionine-labeled SphK2. These results indicate that Fyn is able to interact with SphKs, and relative quantitation of these in vitro conditions suggested that ~1–2% of the total input of SphK protein was interacting with Fyn. Furthermore, using highly purified SphK1 and Fyn, we were able to show that this interaction, at least in the case of SphK1, is direct (data not shown). We also tested whether Lyn could associate with SphK2, given that our previous studies had focused on SphK1. As shown in Fig. 5A (lower panel), an antibody to Lyn (lanes 1–3) co-immunoprecipitated [35S]methionine-labeled SphK2 only when both purified human recombinant Lyn and [35S]methionine-labeled SphK2, which was in vitro transcribed/translated, were present. In contrast, an antibody to Src failed to co-immunoprecipitate SphK2 from a mixture of purified human recombinant Src and [35S]methionine-labeled SphK2 (lanes 5–7), demonstrating the specificity of this interaction. These in vitro results were confirmed in HEK-293 cells co-transfected with V5-SphK1 or FLAG SphK2 and the Src kinases, Fyn and Lyn. Fig. 5B shows that antibodies to Lyn co-immunoprecipitated SphK1 (about 0.19% of the total) and SphK2 (0.15% of the total) only when Lyn was also overexpressed (upper and lower panels, respectively). Similarly, Fyn antibodies immunoprecipitated SphK1 (about 0.08% of the total) and SphK2 (0.06% of the total) only when Fyn was also overexpressed (Fig. 5B, upper and lower panels, respectively). The reduced interaction in vivo (~0.1%) relative to the in vitro experiments (~1.0%) may simply reflect the amount of Src PTKs present in these assays or specific compartmentalization in vivo that is not reflected in vitro. Catalytically inactive Fyn (KN-Fyn) also interacted with both SphK1 (Fig. 5B, upper panel) and SphK2 (Fig. 5B, lower panel) to almost the same extent as WT Fyn (0.12% of the total SphK1 and 0.05% of the total SphK2), demonstrating that Fyn activity was not required for its interaction with SphKs.


Figure 6
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6.
Effect of Fyn and Lyn on SphK activity and translocation. A, interaction with Fyn results in enhancement of SphK1 activity but not SphK2 in vitro. SphK1 assay (upper panel) or SphK2 assay (lower panel) using different concentrations of purified SphK 1 or in vitro transcribed/translated human SphK2, respectively, with or without purified Fyn or p60 c-Src kinases as indicated. Shown in the upper panel is the generated product [32P]S1P resolved by TLC at three different exposures (20, 90, and 120 min). In the lower panel, a single exposure is shown, since no differences were observed. B, translocation of SphK2 to cellular membranes after activation in WT, Fyn-deficient (left panels), and Lyn-deficient (right panels) BMMC. The proportion of SphK2 present in membranes (m) as compared with cytosol (c) is also shown in WT, Fyn-deficient, and Lyn-deficient BMMC. Bar graphs represent the -fold increase in band intensity calculated by using the Odyssey infrared detection system, and data are normalized to WT at zero time and for protein loading as determined from anti-Lyn or anti-LAT immunoblots. Values represent the average ± S.E. of three independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; statistical significance with respect to unstimulated WT BMMC using a paired t test. C, translocation of SphK2 is restored in Fyn-deficient BMMC transduced with WT Fyn. The Western blot shows membrane SphK2 in WT or Fyn-deficient BMMC transduced with a LacZ vector (WTLacZ, Fyn–/–LacZ), Fyn-deficient BMMC transduced with WT Fyn protein (Fyn–/–WT Fyn), or Fyn-deficient BMMC transduced with kinase-inactive mutant Fyn protein (Fyn–/–KN Fyn) after challenge with Ag for the indicated times. Lyn was used as loading control. The bar graph shows the average ± S.E. of the -fold increase in band intensity in four independent experiments calculated as in B. Statistical significance (**, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001) with respect to unstimulated cells using a paired t test.

 
To verify that the interaction between SphK and Fyn was not an artifact of the in vitro system or the overexpression of these proteins in cells, we tested the association of endogenous SphK2 (Fig. 5C), which was the weaker interacting SphK, with Fyn in BMMC from WT and Fyn-deficient mice. This was done by measuring Fyn-associated SphK activity, because the available antibodies to murine SphK1 and SphK2 (including our own) failed to detect small quantities of these enzymes. SphK2 activity was detected in Fyn immune complexes after activation of BMMC, whereas no activity was observed when complexes were derived from Fyn-deficient BMMC. Although the amount of SphK2 activity co-immunoprecipitated with Fyn was a small fraction of the total activity (0.044% at 2 min after activation), the results were highly reproducible, showed an Fc{epsilon}RI-induced increase in Fyn-associated activity, and mirrored the amount of total SphK2 found associated with Fyn (0.05–0.06%). To determine whether the increased SphK2 activity in the precipitates was due to increased SphK2 protein associated with Fyn or whether it reflected increased enzymatic activity of SphK2, we preincubated lysates from nonactivated or Ag-activated BMMC with lysates from HEK293 cells overexpressing FLAG-SphK2. Antibodies against Fyn, but not LAT, co-precipitated SphK2 (about 0.084% of the total SphK2). After Fc{epsilon}RI stimulation, the amount of SphK2 associated with Fyn increased by 1.8-fold when normalized to the amount of Fyn immunoprecipitated (Fig. 5D). Densitometric quantitation revealed this increased interaction to be consistent in all experiments. This finding suggests that the increased Fyn-associated SphK2 activity, observed after Fc{epsilon}RI stimulation, may result from increased association of Fyn and SphK2. However, because conditions of SphK2 overexpression were used, further experimentation is necessary to validate this viewpoint.


Figure 7
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7.
Deletion of Gab2 or inhibition of PI3K activity prevents the activation of SphK1 by IgE/Ag (A and C) and reduces the extent of SphK2 activation (B and C). IgE-sensitized BMMC from WT or Gab2–/– mice were incubated with a 200 µM concentration of the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 or vehicle for 20 min and stimulated with 100 ng/ml Ag. Data represent the average ± S.E. of three independent experiments done in duplicate. In A and B, two-way analysis of variance tests indicated significant differences (p < 0.001 in A and p < 0.05 in B) between the kinetics in Gab2-deficient or LY294002-treated cells versus those in WT BMMC. C, increase in SphK1 and -2 activities after 3- or 20-min activation in WT treated with LY294002, Gab2-deficient, and Gab2-deficient treated with LY294002, as compared with the increase found in WT (100%). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; NS, nonsignificant; statistical significance with respect to the increase in WT using a paired t test. D, Western blots detecting phospho-(Ser473)-Akt or total Akt in whole cell lysates from Ag-stimulated BMMC treated or not treated with 200 µM LY294002.

 
Fyn Kinase Increases SphK1 and Not SphK2 Activity in Vitro but, Along with Lyn Kinase, Contributes to the Membrane Translocation of SphK2—To assess the functional consequence of SphK interaction with Src PTKS, we explored the effects of Fyn on SphK1 and SphK2 activities in vitro. As shown in Fig. 6A, the presence of Fyn induced an increase in SphK1 activity (about 8-fold) comparable with that induced by Lyn (about 10-fold) (14), whereas c-Src, which does not interact with SphK1, only slightly affected SphK1 activity (1.5-fold) (data not shown). In contrast, SphK2 activity was unaffected by Fyn, Lyn, or Src (Fig. 6A and data not shown).

SphK1 was shown to translocate to membranes when activated by various stimuli; however, the translocation of SphK2 had not been studied. We sought to determine whether engagement of the Fc{epsilon}RI results in the movement of SphK2 to cell membranes and whether Fyn or Lyn deficiencies affected such movement. We found that SphK2 is translocated rapidly to membrane fractions (8–19% of total SphK2) after activation (Fig. 6B), although the translocation was not quantitatively as pronounced as the previously reported translocation of SphK1 (11, 12). The amount of enzyme present in the membrane fraction decreased after 3 min (not shown), and by 20 min, the amount of SphK2 detected in membranes was comparable with that found in resting conditions (ranging from 5 to 13% of the total SphK2) (Fig. 6B). Consistent with the effects of Fyn and Lyn on SphK activation, no significant translocation of SphK2 was observed in either Fyn- or Lyn-deficient cells (Fig. 6B). Interestingly, the amount of SphK2 in the membrane of resting Fyn-deficient BMMC was reduced relative to wild type cells. Reconstitution of the expression of wild type Fyn kinase in Fyn-deficient BMMC resulted in significant restoration of SphK2 translocation to the membrane after Fc{epsilon}RI stimulation (Fig. 6C). However, the catalytically inactive mutant (KN-Fyn), which is able to associate with SphK1 and SphK2 (Fig. 5B), was unable to cause significant translocation of SphK2, suggesting a role for the catalytic activity of Fyn in the translocation of SphK2.

Role of the Gab2-PI3K Signaling Axis in SphK1 and SphK2 Activity—Our experiments demonstrated that Fyn activity was required for activation of SphKs. Since tyrosine phosphorylation of SphK1 (14) or SphK2 (data not shown) was not observed, demonstrating that these kinases are not direct targets of Fyn kinase activity, we investigated the Fyn-dependent signals involved in SphK activation. We previously found that Fyn-deficient BMMC were defective in PI3K activity (15). Phosphatidylinositols and other acidic phospholipids are known to activate SphK in vitro (31), and PI3K was implicated in the activation of SphK in other cell types (32, 33). Thus, we analyzed the IgE-dependent activation of SphK1 and SphK2 in BMMC in the presence or absence of the PI3K-specific inhibitor, LY294002. Treatment of BMMC with LY294002 inhibited both SphK1 and SphK2 activities (Fig. 7, A–C). However, in contrast to the dramatic inhibition of SphK1 activity (Fig. 7A), LY294002 decreased the extent, but not the onset, of SphK2 activation (Fig. 7B) under conditions where it effectively inhibited Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 7D). This contrasted with the effective abrogation of SphK2 activation observed in Fyn-deficient BMMC (Fig. 2). Therefore, we explored the role of the adapter Gab2, since it is known to regulate PI3K and it binds multiple proteins (17, 34), which could potentially regulate SphK2 activity. BMMC from Gab2-deficient mice showed a pattern of activation of SphK1 and SphK2 almost identical to that observed in LY294002-treated cells (Fig. 7, A–C). Furthermore, treatment of Gab2-deficient BMMC with LY294002 showed no further influence on SphK1 and SphK2 activation (Fig. 7C). This demonstrated a predominant role for the Gab2-associated PI3K pool that is activated by Fyn in the stimulation of SphK1. The results also demonstrated that Fyn-dependent activation of SphK2 requires signals in addition to those generated by activation of the adapter Gab2 and PI3K.


Figure 8
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8.
S1P partially restores the defective Fc{epsilon}RI-dependent chemotactic and degranulation response of Fyn-deficient BMMC. A and B, defective cell migration of Fyn-deficient cells toward Ag and SCF. A, migration assays of BMMC from WT or Fyn–/– mice were performed with the indicated chemoattractants (10 ng/ml Ag, 30 ng/ml SCF, or 10 nM S1P) as described under "Experimental Procedures." B, BMMC (as above) were preincubated with 250 ng/ml pertussis toxin for2hor with 5 µM DMS for 20 min before placing them on the chemotaxis chamber. A migration index of 1 corresponds to the percentage of BMMC (treated or not with pertussis toxin or DMS) that migrated in the absence of a chemoattractant. The number of cells that traversed the membrane was determined by fluorescence measurement using the CyQuant dye. Data represent the average ± S.E. of at least five independent experiments done in triplicate. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; statistical significance with respect to basal migration using a paired t test. The crosses indicate statistical significance in the migration of Fyn-deficient as compared with WT BMMC. C, inhibition of beta-hexosaminidase release by the SphK inhibitor DMS (10 µM). IgE-sensitized WT or Fyn-deficient BMMC were incubated with 10 µM DMS for 20 min before stimulation with 25 ng/ml Ag for 10 min. beta-Hexosaminidase was measured as described under "Experimental Procedures" and is reported as a percentage of total cellular content. D, S1P partially restores defective degranulation in Fyn-deficient cells. IgE-sensitized WT or Fyn-deficient BMMC were stimulated with 25 ng/ml Ag in the presence or absence of 20 µM S1P for 15 min. Data represent the average ± S.D. of duplicate measurements (n = 3).

 
Functional Impairment of IgE-dependent Responses in Fyn-deficient BMMC Is Partially Restored by Exogenous S1P—Our previous studies demonstrated the transactivation of S1P receptor family members (S1P1 and S1P2) in Ag-stimulated mast cells (12). SphK-dependent transactivation of these receptors is important for mast cell chemotaxis (S1P1) and degranulation (S1P2) (12). Thus, we analyzed the chemotactic response of Fyn-deficient BMMC relative to that of WT cells. These assays were done in the absence of integrin engagement (such as fibronectin coating of surfaces) to avoid activation of chemotaxis-enhancing signals that might bypass or dampen the effects of Fyn deficiency (35). As shown in Fig. 8A, IgE-sensitized WT BMMC had a greater than 4-fold increase in the chemotactic response to Ag and SCF. The addition of S1P as a chemoattractant to the lower chamber induced the chemotaxis of BMMC at concentrations as low as 4–10 nM (data not shown and Fig. 8A). The extent of migration (about 2-fold), however, was consistently lower than that obtained using Ag as a chemoattractant (Fig. 8A) and was less effective than the response in RBL-2H3 cells (12). In contrast, Fyn-deficient BMMC were defective in chemotaxis toward Ag and SCF, whereas their response to S1P was similar to that of WT BMMC (Fig. 8A). However, when S1P and Ag were used in combination, the chemotactic response of Fyn-deficient BMMC was significantly enhanced, approximating that of Fc{epsilon}RI-stimulated WT BMMC. Furthermore, as we previously found in RBL-2H3 cells (12), treatment with pertussis toxin, which inhibits G{alpha}i-dependent G-protein-coupled receptor responses, or dimethylsphingosine (DMS), which inhibits SphK activation, reduced by 50% Ag-induced chemotaxis in WT BMMC without affecting the response of Fyn-deficient BMMC (Fig. 8B). This demonstrates that the SphK-S1P-S1P1 chemotactic pathway is inhibited in the absence of Fyn, but exogenous S1P can partly restore the motility defect in combination with signals generated by the addition of IgE/Ag.

Because Fyn is also required for IgE/Ag-mediated degranulation (15) and S1P2 receptors were demonstrated to contribute to this response (12), we investigated the effects of inhibiting SphK activity on this response. Inhibition of SphK activation by DMS resulted in decreased Ag-dependent degranulation (40–50% inhibition) of IgE-sensitized WT BMMC (Fig. 8C), as previously observed (11, 12). However, the poor degranulation of Fyn-deficient BMMC was not further affected, suggesting the possibility that the lack of Fyn-dependent SphK activation leading to S1P generation might contribute to the defective response in these cells. To bypass the lack of SphK activation in Fyn-deficient BMMC, we added exogenous S1P to IgE/Ag-stimulated cells. Whereas the addition of S1P minimally affected degranulation in maximally activated WT BMMC, it increased degranulation of Fyn-deficient BMMC from less than 5% to more than 32%, achieving approximately one-half of the response observed in WT BMMC (Fig. 8D). Thus, the defective degranulation of Fyn-deficient BMMC can be partly attributed to the lack of SphK activation and S1P2 receptor transactivation. Consistent with our findings is the previous observation that S1P2-deficient BMMC showed a decreased (50% inhibited) IgE-dependent degranulation (12).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Two distinct isoforms of sphingosine kinase (SphK1 and SphK2) catalyze the conversion of sphingosine to S1P in mammalian cells. SphK1 activity is regulated by a variety of stimuli and is involved in diverse cellular functions via the formation of S1P and its intracellular or receptor-mediated effects. Engagement of Fc{epsilon}RI was shown to stimulate SphK1 activity, and the ablation of SphK1 expression by antisense oligonucleotides had an effect on several mast cell responses (11, 12). Unlike for SphK1, little was known about SphK2. We now find that in BMMC (and to a lesser extent in HuMC), SphK2 is a prominent activity regulated not only by Fc{epsilon}RI but also by c-KIT and IL-3 receptors. The reasons why SphK2 induction in mast cells was not observed in previous studies are not clear but could include differences in the mast cell type or most likely differences in experimental settings, which could influence the location or inducibility of SphK2 activity.

Our findings demonstrate that Fyn kinase is required for the activation of both SphK1 and SphK2 by Fc{epsilon}RI. Lyn kinase is also important, as demonstrated in our past (14) and present studies, but it has a lesser role. Lyn is required for early activation of SphKs, but it is not necessary for the late activity of these enzymes. Lyn does not appear to function downstream of Fyn in SphK activation but has a complementary relationship with Fyn in regulating SphK activity (14). However, the participation of Fyn and Lyn in activation of SphKs cannot be generalized to all receptors. IL-3 activation of SphK1 required Lyn and was considerably dependent on Fyn, whereas SphK2 activation by this cytokine was mostly independent of both Src kinases (Fig. 4 and supplemental Fig. 1). Thus, the proposed hierarchy of Fyn and Lyn in activation of both SphKs, following Fc{epsilon}RI stimulation, should not be extrapolated to other receptors.

Similar to SphK1 (11, 12), SphK2 was found in the cytosolic fraction of BMMC (85–95%), but a small pool of SphK2 was translocated to cellular membranes and to lipid rafts (data not shown) after Fc{epsilon}RI stimulation. Neither SphK1 nor SphK2 have membrane localization signals, but SphK2 contains several predicted transmembrane sequences (36), and thus its direct association with membranes is possible. We demonstrate that in mast cells, the presence of both membrane-localized PTKs, Fyn and Lyn, is necessary for the early translocation of SphK2. Our preliminary experiments suggest that translocation of SphK2 by Fc{epsilon}RI appears to be independent of extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation, calcium mobilization, and protein kinase C activation (data not shown), signals known to mediate SphK1 translocation (3739). Of these, a direct role for extracellular signal-regulated kinase is most unlikely, since this pathway is not impaired in either Fyn or Lyn-deficient BMMC (15, 40). We also demonstrated that both Fyn and Lyn interact with SphK1 and SphK2. Whether the small but measurable interaction of the SphKs with Fyn is important in the overall translocation of these enzymes remains a topic of future exploration.

The direct interaction of SphK1 with Fyn or Lyn in vitro enhanced its activity. In contrast, the interaction of SphK2 with these PTKs did not affect its activity. Fyn did not appear to phosphorylate SphK1 or SphK2, but its activity was crucial for their translocation, activation, and subsequent S1P production. Thus, we explored the effects of known Fyn-dependent signals on the activation of SphK by IgE/Ag. Fyn induces the phosphorylation of the scaffolding adaptor protein Gab2 (15), which then complexes with PI3K, resulting in PI3K activation (17). BMMC lacking Gab2 had a considerable defect in the IgE/Ag-induced activation of SphK1 but only a partial reduction in SphK2 activation. Similarly, experiments using the PI3K-specific inhibitor LY294002 showed that SphK1 was more dependent on PI3K than SphK2. This dissociation in the regulatory pathways governing these isoforms provides several novel insights: 1) it indicates that the two SphK activities detected in our assays reflect two distinctly regulated SphKs, thus suggesting the possibility of distinct cellular functions, and 2) it also implies that Fyn-dependent but Gab2-PI3K-independent signals are generated that are required for SphK2 activation. This defines a previously unrecognized point where Fyn-dependent signals bifurcate. Based on the essential role for Fyn in SphK1 and -2 activation and the noted differences in downstream signals, we propose a model (Fig. 9) in which membrane-localized Lyn, and possibly Fyn, form complexes with SphKs after Fc{epsilon}RI engagement. This localizes SphKs to the membrane and to lipid rafts, where their substrate, sphingosine, is enriched. Activated Fyn would provide both Gab2/PI3K-dependent and -independent signals that are key to full activation of SphK1 and SphK2, respectively. Lyn would probably contribute to increasing the kinetics of activation through its role in binding both sphingosine and SphKs (14). This complementary role for Lyn is further supported by the large fraction (>50%) of Lyn localized in the sphingolipid-rich lipid rafts of BMMC.


Figure 9
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 9.
Model for the mechanism of activation of SphK1 and SphK2 by IgE/Ag in BMMC and the involvement of S1P in mast cell responses. After Fc{epsilon}RI engagement, association of Lyn and Fyn with SphKs results in the translocation of these kinases to the membrane and the stabilization or facilitation of SphK activity. Fyn-dependent phosphorylation of Gab2 and PI3K activation provides signals in the proximity of SphK complexes that result in the full activation of SphK1. Other Fyn-dependent but Gab2-independent signals are needed for the induction of SphK2 activity. The activation of SphKs results in the rapid generation of S1P efficiently coupled to the transactivation of S1P receptors (12) by an unknown mechanism. Activation of S1P1 and S1P2 contributes to degranulation responses and chemotaxis to Ag, respectively. PTX, pertussis toxin.

 
Besides Fc{epsilon}RI, c-KIT, and IL-3, many other receptors expressed in mast cells (9, 36, 41, 42) are known to activate SphKs. Thus, S1P could be generated in the diverse microenvironment in which mast cells reside. Viewed collectively with the inherent signaling versatility of S1P as an intracellular and extracellular messenger, S1P could serve as an important regulator of mast cell responses. We now find that the lack of Fc{epsilon}RI-mediated activation of SphK in Fyn-deficient BMMC correlates with the defective degranulation and reduced chemotactic response of these cells. As demonstrated herein, these defects were partially corrected when S1P was supplied exogenously in conjunction with Fc{epsilon}RI stimulation. This provides evidence of a contributory role for SphKs in these responses and demonstrates the presence of functional S1P receptors on Fyn-deficient BMMC. Together with our previous study (14), the findings provide the first example of cooperation between Fyn and Lyn in the activation of intracellular signals. Of particular note, our findings demonstrate the receptor-inducible nature of SphK2 activity and the distinct regulatory requirements for SphK2 versus the better characterized SphK1. The fact that both are activated in mast cells stresses the importance of the generation of S1P by mast cells and may reflect on the ability of these cells to produce large amounts of S1P relative to other cell types. The findings herein and elsewhere (reviewed in Ref. 13) support the view of an important role for SphK activation in mast cell physiology.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported in part by NIAMS, National Institutes of Health (NIH) (to A. O. and J. R.) and NIDDK, NIH (to K. M. and R. L. P.) and by United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation Grant 2000016 (to J. R.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

Formula The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Fig. 1. Back

2 Supported by the Novartis Research Institute Vienna. Back

3 Supported by NIH Grant AI51612. Back

1 To whom correspondence may be addressed: NIAMS, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 10, Rm. 9N228, Bethesda, MD 20892-1820. Tel.: 301-496-7592; Fax: 301-480-1580; E-mail: oliveraa{at}mail.nih.gov. 4To whom correspondence may be addressed: NIAMS, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 10, Rm. 9N228, Bethesda, MD 20892-1820. Tel.: 301-496-7592; Fax: 301-480-1580; E-mail: juan_rivera{at}nih.gov.

5 The abbreviations used are: SphK, sphingosine kinase; S1P, sphingosine 1-phosphate; Fc{epsilon}RI, high affinity receptor for IgE; Ag, antigen; PTK, protein-tyrosine kinase; HuMC, human mast cell(s); BMMC, bone marrow-derived mast cells; IL, interleukin; SCF, stem cell factor; WT, wild type; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; DMS, dimethylsphingosine. Back

6 Y. Furumoto and J. Rivera, manuscript in preparation. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Spiegel, S., and Milstien, S. (2003) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4, 397–407[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Olivera, A., and Spiegel, S. (2001) Prostaglandins 64, 123–134[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Olivera, A., Rosenfeldt, H. M., Bektas, M., Wang, F., Ishii, I., Chun, J., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 46452–46460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Sanchez, T., and Hla, T. (2004) J. Cell. Biochem. 92, 913–922[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Spiegel, S. (2000) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 905, 54–60[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Liu, H., Sugiura, M., Nava, V. E., Edsall, L. C., Kono, K., Poulton, S., Milstien, S., Kohama, T., and Spiegel, S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 19513–19520[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kohama, T., Olivera, A., Edsall, L., Nagiec, M. M., Dickson, R., and Spiegel, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23722–23728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Saba, J. D., and Hla, T. (2004) Circ. Res. 94, 724–734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hait, N. C., Sarkar, S., Le Stunff, H., Mikami, A., Maceyka, M., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 29462–29469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Choi, O. H., Kim, J.-H., and Kinet, J.-P. (1996) Nature 380, 634–636[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Melendez, A. J., and Khaw, A. K. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 17255–17262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Jolly, P. S., Bektas, M., Olivera, A., Gonzalez-Espinosa, C., Proia, R. L., Rivera, J., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (2004) J. Exp. Med. 199, 959–970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Olivera, A., and Rivera, J. (2005) J. Immunol. 174, 1153–1158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Urtz, N., Olivera, A., Bofill-Cardona, E., Csonga, R., Billich, A., Mechtcheriakova, D., Bornancin, F., Woisetschlager, M., Rivera, J., and Baumruker, T. (2004) Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 8765–8777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Parravicini, V., Gadina, M., Kovarova, M., Odom, S., Gonzalez-Espinosa, C., Furumoto, Y., Saitoh, S., Samelson, L. E., O'Shea, J. J., and Rivera, J. (2002) Nat. Immunol. 3, 741–748[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Ali, K., Bilancio, A., Thomas, M., Pearce, W., Gilfillan, A. M., Tkaczyk, C., Kuehn, N., Gray, A., Giddings, J., Peskett, E., Fox, R., Bruce, I., Walker, C., Sawyer, C., Okkenhaug, K., Finan, P., and Vanhaesebroeck, B. (2004) Nature 431, 1007–1011[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Gu, H., Saito, K., Klaman, L. D., Shen, J., Fleming, T., Wang, Y., Pratt, J. C., Lin, G., Lim, B., Kinet, J. P., and Neel, B. G. (2001) Nature 412, 186–190[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Allende, M. L., Sasaki, T., Kawai, H., Olivera, A., Mi, Y., van Echten-Deckert, G., Hajdu, R., Rosenbach, M., Keohane, C. A., Mandala, S., Spiegel, S., and Proia, R. L. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 52487–52492