JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M511019200 on November 29, 2005

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 5, 2939-2944, February 3, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/5/2939    most recent
M511019200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Crystal Structure of the Hypoxia-inducible Form of 6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (PFKFB3)

A POSSIBLE NEW TARGET FOR CANCER THERAPY*

Song-Gun Kim{ddagger}, Nathan P. Manes§, M. Raafat El-Maghrabi§, and Yong-Hwan Lee{ddagger}1

From the {ddagger}Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 and the §Department of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8661

Received for publication, October 11, 2005 , and in revised form, November 21, 2005.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The hypoxia-inducible form of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (PFKFB3) plays a crucial role in the progression of cancerous cells by enabling their glycolytic pathways even under severe hypoxic conditions. To understand its structural architecture and to provide a molecular scaffold for the design of new cancer therapeutics, the crystal structure of the human form was determined. The structure at 2.1 Å resolution shows that the overall folding and functional dimerization are very similar to those of the liver (PFKFB1) and testis (PFKFB4) forms, as expected from sequence homology. However, in this structure, the N-terminal regulatory domain is revealed for the first time among the PFKFB isoforms. With a beta-hairpin structure, the N terminus interacts with the 2-Pase domain to secure binding of fructose-6-phosphate to the active pocket, slowing down the release of fructose-6-phosphate from the phosphoenzyme intermediate product complex. The C-terminal regulatory domain is mostly disordered, leaving the active pocket of the fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase domain wide open. The active pocket of the 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase domain has a more rigid conformation, allowing independent bindings of substrates, fructose-6-phosphate and ATP, with higher affinities than other isoforms. Intriguingly, the structure shows an EDTA molecule bound to the fructose-6-phosphate site of the 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase active pocket despite its unfavorable liganding concentration, suggesting a high affinity. EDTA is not removable from the site with fructose-6-P alone but is with both ATP and fructose-6-P or with fructose-2,6-bisphosphate. This finding suggests that a molecule in which EDTA is covalently linked to ADP is a good starting molecule for the development of new cancer-therapeutic molecules.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mammalian tissues have evolved to carry out various functions under different physiological conditions. Such differentiation has naturally caused the tissue cells to have different optima for their energy metabolism. The bifunctional enzyme, 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (PFKFB,2 2-Kase/2-Pase), plays a key role in such tissue-specific energy metabolism by controlling glucose utilization. Because this enzyme controls the cellular concentration of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate (Fru-2,6-P2), which is the most potent allosteric activator of phosphofructokinase, the rate-limiting enzyme of glycolysis, PFKFB eventually controls the glycolytic rate (1-3). The bifunctional enzyme acutely controls the concentration of Fru-2,6-P2 by modulating the two mutually exclusive catalytic activities of Fru-2,6-P2 synthesis (2-Kase) and hydrolysis (2-Pase) that reside in the two separate domains (4, 5). The two activities are exquisitely regulated by various metabolic products and signal transduction-dependent phosphorylation such that the resulting predominant activity determines the final concentration of Fru-2,6-P2 and, ultimately, the rates of glycolysis (6-9).

To optimize glucose utilization for physiological roles, every mammalian cell is equipped with one of four PFKFB isoforms, the liver, heart, testis, and inducible forms that are encoded by distinct genes (10-14). Although these isoforms share high "2-Kase/2-Pase core" sequence homology (85%), each isoform has different kinetic properties and responds differently to upstream regulatory signals. This is a function of the highly divergent N- and C-terminal regulatory domains and the sequence differences in the second shell residues surrounding the active sites of the catalytic domains (11). Unlike the other tissue-specific isoforms, the inducible form is ubiquitously expressed by hypoxic stress (10, 15) and found to be identical to the forms previously isolated from placenta (16), pancreatic beta-islet (11), or brain (17). The inducible form has an uncharacteristically high and predominant 2-Kase activity with a 2-Kase/2-Pase activity ratio larger than 700 (18, 19). This is contrast to the much lower ratios of the liver, testis, and heart forms of 1.5, 4, and 80, respectively (1, 11). Phosphorylation of the inducible form on Ser-460 by PKA, or AMP-dependent protein kinase, increases the ratio to >3000 (8, 19-22).

Recent studies show that the inducible form is also frequently found in cancer cells (10, 22, 23). Proliferating cancer cells, which have a higher dependence on glucose for their metabolic needs, obtain ATP from glycolysis rather than by oxidative phosphorylation even under aerobic conditions and, thus, show a much higher rate of glycolysis than normal cells (24). In addition, the severe hypoxic stress under which the cancer cells proliferate inside the mass allows no other energy metabolic pathway but glycolysis. Metabolic adaptation to hypoxia is initiated by changes in gene expression patterns triggered by anaerobic activation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), and the gene (pfkfb3) for the inducible bifunctional enzyme is one of the most immediate targets of transcriptional activation by HIF-1 (15, 25-27). The extremely high 2-Kase activity of the inducible PFKFB provides the impetus for vigorous glycolysis in cancer cells. Recent studies suggest that inhibition of glycolysis to deplete the cellular ATP may serve as an alternative strategy to kill cancer cells that have acquired resistance to traditional drugs. Thus, the inducible PFKFB has been considered as the primary target (26, 28).

We have studied the PFKFB enzyme system for several years and have made significant contributions to understanding the structure/function relationships of the enzyme at a molecular level (29-31). To understand molecular differentiation of the entire PFKFB protein system, which has been the long-term goal of our study, and to provide information on the molecular structure of possible therapeutic targets for cancer, we report here the crystal structure of the human tumor/inducible form of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (PFKFB3).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Preparation and Crystallization of PFKFB3—The His-tagged human inducible bifunctional enzyme was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) pLysS and purified using nickel-affinity columns, and the N-terminal His tag was removed by treatment with thrombin using a standard protocol (19). The final purification was performed using Mono Q anion-exchange chromatography; the resulting pure protein was kept, after concentration to 8 mg ml-1 protein, in pH 8.0, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM NaPi, 0.05 mM EDTA, 5 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 0.2 mM ADP, 5% glycerol, and 0.2 mM Fru-6-P. Crystals were prepared by the sitting drop vapor diffusion of the 1:1 mixture of the protein sample with a mother liquor of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 20-25% ethylene glycol, 12% dioxane, 5% glycerol, and 12% polyethylene glycol 4000. Crystals in a size of 0.2 x 0.2 x 0.05 mm were grown in 2-3 weeks.

Data Collection and Processing—The crystal was soaked with cryoprotectant solutions for 0.5-2 h to remove inorganic phosphate and to incorporate the targeted ligands. A typical cryoprotectant solution is pH 7.5, 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer enriched with 35% ethylene glycol and 1.0 mM Fru-2,6-P2. A soaked crystal was flash frozen at 100 K using an Oxford cryo-device and kept at the same temperature during data collections. The diffraction data were collected at The Gulf Coast Consortium Protein Crystallography PX1 beamline in The Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices, Louisiana State University (Baton Rouge, LA). The x-ray source wavelength was 1.3808 Å. The data recorded on a Mar 165-mm CCD detector were integrated, merged, and scaled using HKL2000 (32), and the resulting data statistics are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Statistics of reflection data and structure refinements

Formula, where h is a set of Miller indices, j is a set of observations of reflection h, and <Ih> is the mean intensity. Root mean square deviation (r.m.s.d.) values are deviations from ideal values. Formula. Rfree was calculated using 10% of the complete data set excluded from refinement. The numbers in parentheses represent values from the last shell.

 
As summarized in Table 1, the crystals belong to space group P6522 with similar cell dimensions regardless of the liganding conditions. The reduced data were formatted for the program suites CCP4 (33) and CNS (34), and 10% of the data were marked for free R-factor measurements in subsequent structure refinements.

Structure Determination and Refinement—The structure of PFKFB3 complexed with ADP and EDTA was determined first by molecular replacement using AMoRE (35) implemented in the CCP4 suite (33). A single polyalanine form of the liver structure (Protein Data Bank accession code 1K6M) (31) was used as a search model. An AMoRE rotation and subsequent translation search was performed using a data subset between 15.0 and 4.0 Å. The molecular replacement search as well as the measurement of solvent fraction suggested a single protein molecule in an asymmetric unit. A good molecular replacement solution was found to show an R-factor of 0.52 and a correlation factor of 0.58. Assignment of the side chains was made using program O (36). The initial model went through iterated cycles of manual model rebuilding using O program and refinement at 2.1 Å using CNS (34). When Rcrys/Rfree reached 0.27/0.29 or below, the ligand molecules were built into the model, referring to the |Fo| - |Fc| omit maps. ADP and the 2-Pase-bound Fru-6-P were incorporated first, and EDTA was added after mass spectrometric confirmation of the crystal. As summarized in Table 1, the final model has Rfree/Rcrys of 0.233/0.209 using a total of 4,085 scatterers, including solvent molecules, against all available 44,651 reflections in the resolution range of 30.0-2.1 Å. The structure contains a total of 452 protein residues of the full-length protein of 520 residues.

The subsequent structure of PFKFB3 complexed with ADP and Fru-2,6-P2 was determined by using the structure of the protein·ADP·EDTA complex after striping the ligands and solvents as the initial model and by following the structural refinements procedures similar to that used for the structure of the protein·ADP·EDTA complex. But to guarantee a freedom to structural refinements, the indices of reflections in the free data were kept as those of the protein·ADP·EDTA complex. The final structure has Rfree/Rcrys of 0.262/0.214 using a total of 3,945 scatterers, including solvent molecules, against all available 28,580 reflections in the resolution range of 30.0-2.5 Å. The structure contains a total of 449 protein residues of the full-length protein of 520 residues. The refinement statistics are summarized in Table 1.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Overall Structure—The PFKFB3 protein was crystallized under conditions similar to those for the liver form (31). The structures from the two different liganding conditions were determined by molecular replacement using the liver structure as a start model. The two different liganding conditions used were ADP and fructose-6-phosphate (Fru-6-P) and ADP and Fru-2,6-P2, and the resulting resolutions of the final structures were 2.1 and 2.5 Å, respectively. Among all the structure-assigned residues, 89% are in the most favored regions in a Ramachandran plot, 9.5% in the additional allowed region, and the rest in the generously allowed region. Details of the crystallographic statistics are summarized in Table 1. Most descriptions of the structure below are according to the structure determined to 2.1 Å resolution, unless specifically mentioned. Amino acid sequence numbers are from the inducible PFKFB3. When the sequence is different in other isoforms, the different sequence is given in a small case. For example, S162e means the 162nd residue in the inducible protein is Ser and the equivalent residue in the liver form is Glu.


Figure 1
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1.
Overall folding of PFKFB3 and the N terminus. A, a ribbon diagram of the dimeric PFKFB3 structure is shown with the bound ligands. One protein subunit is light colored for convenient comparison. ADP are bound to the 2-Kase (magenta) active pocket and Fru-6-P to the 2-Pase (blue). The N-terminal regulatory domain is shown in green. B, The 2 Fo - Fc electron density maps are contoured around the N-terminal hairpin structure at 1.1 {sigma} levels. The structure is from the final model. C, a stereo view of the interactions between the N terminus (green) and the 2-Pase domain (gray). The involved hydrogen bonds and salt bridges are shown as broken lines. Unless specifically mentioned, all structural figures were made using MolScript v2.1.2 (45) and rendered using Raster3D v2.7 (46). The electron density maps are drawn using BobScript v1.4b.

 
As predicted from the high sequence homology (85%) between the PFKFB isoforms, the folding of the inducible form is very similar to those of the testis and liver forms (31, 37). As shown in Fig. 1a, a PFKFB-typical head-to-head functional dimerization is also conserved.

However, the inducible form also has structural features uniquely different from the other isoforms. The conformations of the substrate loops in the 2-Kase domain are different from those of other isoforms (31, 37), providing a structural rationale for the higher 2-Kase activity. The structure of the N-terminal regulatory domain is revealed: the N terminus binds to the 2-Pase domain to cause a local conformational change in the active pocket to enhance inhibitory binding of product. Most strikingly, an EDTA molecule was found at the Fru-6-P site of the active pocket of 2-Kase. Detailed descriptions of these structural features of the inducible form will be made in following sections.

Autoregulation of the 2-Pase by the N-terminal Domain—This is the first time the structure of the regulatory N terminus (residues 2-28 of 31 residues) has been revealed among any of the solved PFKFB structures. As shown in Fig. 1, a and b, residues 4-15 form a beta-hairpin structure, and the rest serve as an arm connecting the hairpin to the 2-Kase. The turn of this hairpin makes a contact with its own 2-Pase domain and causes a global rotation of the 2-Pase domain from its relative position in the liver form (data not shown). Although the domain twist is interesting, its functional effect is not clear.

On the other hand, the contacting area of the 2-Pase domain is functionally very sensitive because the residues critical for binding of both product and substrate are located in close proximity (Fig. 1c). The three key residues, Arg-347, Lys-351, and Tyr-362, which interact with the 6-phosphate moiety (6-P) of substrate (Fru-2,6-P2) and product (Fru-6-P) are located in this area (38, 39). Binding of the N terminus to this area is mediated by salt bridges and/or hydrogen bonds between Arg-8 and Glu-342, between the main chain of Val-9 and that of Tyr-354, between Gln-10 and Gln-363 and Arg-355, and between Lys-11 and the main chain of Arg-355. As a result, the beta-strand where Tyr-354, Arg-355, and Tyr-356 are located moves deep inside by more than 1 Å; as a result, a local network of side chain interactions is reorganized when compared with that of the liver form. Tyr-354 makes a hydrogen bond to Glu-343 and Tyr-356 to Arg-347. Consequently, the interaction of Arg-347 with 6-P of the bound Fru-6-P becomes stronger with a distance shortened by 0.7 Å. Similarly, the distances from 6-P to Lys-356 and Tyr-362 are shortened by 0.7 and 0.4 Å, respectively. This may cause a substantial increase in affinities for both substrate and product.

Because of sequence difference from other isoforms, the inducible form has a serine instead of an arginine at the 302nd residue. The corresponding Arg-307 in the liver form and all other isoforms has dual functions by providing a positive charge for the 2-phosphate moiety (2-P) of substrate: facilitating substrate binding and stabilizing the phosphoenzyme intermediate (E-P) during its breakdown (40). Thus, the inducible PFKFB is doubly compromised by the loss of arginine at this position; its affinity for substrate is decreased, and the rate of E-P breakdown is drastically slowed. Yet, binding of the product, Fru-6-P, which is a potent non-competitive inhibitor of the reaction, is not affected. Site-specific mutagenesis of the liver 2-Pase showed similar results, and the current structure supports the observation (40). Thus, the net result of the loss of arginine in the inducible PFKFB is that its 2-Pase reaction spends more time in the E-P·Fru-6-P complex state. This was kinetically observed in a recent study in which the arginine residue was restored (19). In addition, the interaction with the N terminus mentioned above confers an even tighter binding of Fru-6-P, reducing the activity of the inducible form to negligible rates. Consequently, the N terminus exerts a negative regulatory effect on the 2-Pase activity by enhancing the binding of inhibitor, Fru-6-P, or, more precisely, by slowing down the catalytic rate-limiting step, the release of Fru-6-P from the E-P·Fru-6-P complex. Supporting this hypothesis, the alternative mRNA splicing product of the inducible PFKFB, in which the N terminus is naturally deleted, has a 7-fold higher 2-Pase activity (19).

Substrate Binding Loops of the 2-Kase Domain—The 2-Kase domain has binding sites for the two substrates, ATP and Fru-6-P, the binding of which are sensitive to the conformations of the two outer lobes known as the ATP loop (residues 168-179) and the Fru-6-P loop (residues 72-84) that surround the whole active pocket (31, 41). In the testis form, the two loops are structurally coupled to each other through two hydrogen bonds donated by Arg-181. Upon binding of ATP, the last turn of helix {alpha}5 unwinds to allow Lys-172 to interact with {gamma}-phosphate. This conformational change is transmitted to the Fru-6-P loop via Arg-181 such that the Fru-6-P loop has a new conformation. Fru-6-P can bind only to this new conformation (41). Thus, binding of Fru-6-P is dependent on that of ATP in the testis form in an ordered fashion. However, the native liver form with a cysteine instead of an arginine has the two loops decoupled from each other. As a result, their conformations are different from those in the testis form, and the two substrates bind independently from each other (31).


Figure 2
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2.
Differentiation of the substrate loops and the contribution from the 2-Pase domain. A, the structures of the 2-Kase substrate loops are compared. The ATP and Fru-6-P loops are distinguished from each other by the labels and the bound ADP and EDTA. To compare the conformational differences, the liver structure is also superimposed in gray. B, the interaction between Tyr-424 and ADP is shown. The 2-Kase domain is in magenta and the 2-Pase in light blue.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3.
Interactions between the 2-Kase and the bound ligands. A, the presences of EDTA and Fru-2,6-P2 are shown from the omit maps. The Fo - Fc electron density maps are contoured at 2.5 {sigma} levels, and the ligand structures are from the final models. The map of EDTA is shown at the top and that of Fru-2,6-P2 at the bottom. B, the interactions between EDTA and the 2-Kase active site residues are shown. To show its relative position, ADP is also shown. C, the interactions between Fru-2,6-P2 and the 2-Kase active site residues are shown. For comparisons of positions of the bound EDTA and Fru-2,6-P2, the view points were kept similarly.

 
The inducible form also has a cysteine instead of an arginine, and thus the two loops are decoupled like in the liver form, allowing the independent binding of substrate. In addition, as shown in Fig. 2a, sequence differences in the residues of N178d and E181k provide new interactions necessary to form an additional helix turn to the end of the ATP loop. The substitution of Gln-80 with serine and an added Lys-79 change the local conformation of the Fru-6-P loop to a helix turn; as a result, Tyr-81 makes a hydrogen bond to the main body of the following helix through Asp-185.

The sequence differences in these loop regions add helix turns to the two substrate loops, decreasing the conformational flexibilities of these loops compared with the coil structures of the other forms. The restricted conformations of the two loops appear to enhance binding of substrates.

ATP Binding and the 2-Pase—As shown in Fig. 2b, because of the sequence differences of S162e and M165r from the liver form, the solvent-exposed {alpha}5 moves downward and eventually creates a hydrogen bond between Glu-166 and Ala-423, which does not exist in other isoforms. Consequently, the conformation of the unwound last turn of {alpha}5 is kept stable and pulls a beta-hairpin (residues 415-432) from the 2-Pase domain toward {alpha}5. The hairpin has Tyr-424, which is the only residue from the 2-Pase domain directly involved in the 2-Kase reaction by interacting with ATP. With help from the water-mediated hydrogen bond between Lys-52 and Glu-72, which intercalates the phenyl ring of Tyr-424 between Lys-52 and Val-167, the interaction between Tyr-424 and the bound ADP is firmer with the distance shortened by 0.5 Å. This may increase the affinity of the 2-Kase for ATP.

As described above, the different amino acid sequences introduced into the inducible form contribute to the conformations of the two substrate loops and the other structural elements required for substrate bindings. Together, they provide a structural basis for better affinities for substrates and, ultimately, the highest 2-Kase activity among the PFKFB isoforms.

Binding of EDTA to the Fru-6-P Site of 2-Kase—Despite continuous efforts for the last several years, structural characterization of the Fru-6-P site in the 2-Kase active pocket has never been successful. Structural information on this site is very important for understanding of the catalytic mechanism carried out by the 2-Kase of all PFKFB isoforms. As a trial to define the site, the crystals of the inducible form PFKFB were soaked with a cryoprotectant containing 0.2 mM Fru-6-P before data collection. When the|Fo| - |Fc| omit map was generated (Fig. 3a, top), the putative Fru-6-P site was found to be occupied by an EDTA molecule. It was surprising because the Fru-6-P concentration was 3-fold higher than that of EDTA and because EDTA has never been reported to compete with Fru-6-P for the 2-Kase. Moreover, almost all experimental conditions for the 2-Kase activity assay to date have at least 0.05 mM EDTA, the same concentration that we used. These circumstances cultivated suspicion about the functional nature of this site. To clear the ambiguity, the structures from the crystals soaked with different liganding conditions were determined. From those experiments, it has been found that EDTA is not displaceable from the site with Fru-6-P alone but is with both ATP and Fru-6-P or with Fru-2,6-P2. Among those, soaking with 0.5 mM Fru-2,6-P2, a product of the 2-Kase reaction, was least damaging to the crystals, and thus the resulting structure is also introduced in this report. The omit map from the Fru-2,6-P2-soaked crystal is shown in the bottom of Fig. 3a.

As compared in Fig. 3a, the two omit maps are clearly different and suggest two different molecules. Binding of EDTA and Fru-2,6-P2 were subsequently confirmed by mass spectrometric analysis of the soaked crystals (data not shown). When the final structures were compared (Fig. 2, b and c), it was found that Arg-74, Arg-98, and Thr-126 are commonly employed for binding of the two different molecules. As compared in the figures, the two molecules occupy nearly the same place, a pocket right next to the ADP site. Finally, it was concluded that EDTA binds to the Fru-6-P site. Interactions between the protein residues and the two ligands are summarized in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Interactions between the protein and the Fru-6-P site-bound ligands

 
As shown in Fig. 3b and summarized in Table 2, seven of eight oxygen atoms in EDTA are recruited for salt bridges or hydrogen bonds to the protein residues, which are all positively charged except for Thr-126. To accommodate these interactions with protein, EDTA has an extended conformation. As indicated by the interaction distances in Table 2, the interactions between EDTA and protein are very tight, explaining the unexpectedly high affinity of EDTA. As shown in Fig. 3, ADP is located right next to EDTA with an approximate distance of 3 Å, which is shorter than two average covalent bonds. This proximity suggests a molecular scaffold of the potential inhibitors for the 2-Kase activity of the inducible bifunctional enzyme. As mentioned in the Introduction, the inducible PFKFB is one of the major driving force molecules responsible for tumorigenesis. Suppression of vigorous glycolysis, a hallmark of oncogenic cells, has been suggested as an effective alternative to traditional cancer therapies, and genetic disruption of the inducible PFKFB has been observed to induce deaths of cancerous cells (10, 22, 26, 28). Therefore, an efficient inhibitor for the 2-Kase activity of the inducible PFKFB can serve as a new therapeutic molecule for cancer. Based on the current structure, we suggest a scaffold of the inhibitor new synthetic molecules to be a conjugate molecule in which one acyl group of EDTA is covalently linked to beta-phosphate of ADP.

Biological Significance—Among the four PFKFB isoforms, only the structures of the liver and testis forms have been solved (31, 37), and with the results presented here, the inducible form may be added to the list. The previous structural studies have made great contributions toward understanding of the PFKFB protein at the molecular level. Nonetheless, catalytic mechanism of their 2-Kinase reaction is not very well understood, because structural characterization of the Fru-6-P pocket has never been successful. In this report, we provided information on the interactions between the protein and Fru-6-P. To provide long-waited information on the 2-Kinase reaction, a subsequent structure/function study is being made.

Finding of the N terminus is particularly significant because it seems to exert self inhibition on the 2-Pase, which is more distantly located than the 2-Kase. The previous functional studies of the liver enzyme have suggested that the N terminus may interact with the neighboring 2-Kase domain to enhance Fru-6-P binding (42). Based on this observation, it was expected that the N terminus of PFKFB3 might also be located near the 2-Kase domain. However, the sequences for the hairpin structure (residues 4-15) appear to be well conserved among the inducible, liver, and testis forms, suggesting that N-terminal sequences of the liver and testis forms may also form hairpin structures to exert their regulatory effects. This is consistent with early kinetic data on enhanced 2-Pase activity observed with N-terminal phosphorylation (43). However, because the residues connecting the hairpin to the 2-Kinase domains are highly divergent among the isoforms, it is unpredictable where their N termini would bind.

Together with our previous structural studies (31), the current study suggests that a small number of sequence variations in the catalytic domains cause differences in the substrate loop interactions and that the variable N- and C-terminal regulatory domains function as intrinsic inhibitors of the catalytic domains. Combination of these allows the four tissue isoforms of PFKFB to have different kinetic properties and regulatory mechanisms. Putting aside the C-terminal domains, which either are disordered (the inducible form) or cover the 2-Pase active pocket (the liver and testis forms), the varied loop interactions and/or the N terminus produce differing binding affinities and release rates of substrates or products during the catalytic steps. Mechanistically, these functional effects are made by strengthening or weakening the interactions between the key residues and substrates/products. To achieve this, they affect the secondary shell residues, which are located next to the key residues to determine electrochemical environments of the catalytic reactions.

Compared with alterations in the primary components such as constellations of catalytic residues that can easily cause orders of magnitude differences in kinetic properties (44), variations in the secondary components are more suitable for modest kinetic differences in a range of 2- to 20-fold, which is comparable with the differences between the PFKFB isoforms, and thus are employed as a central scheme of the molecular evolution of the four isoforms of PFKFB.

Binding of EDTA to PFKFB3 raises a possibility that EDTA might have induced a non-physiological conformation of PFKFB3. The suspicion could be ruled out by two observations. First, PFKFB3 can be crystallized without EDTA. Second, when the crystal was soaked with ATP and Fru-6-P, Fru-2,6-P2 was synthesized and found in the structure (data not shown), indicating that the conformation in the presence of EDTA is suitable for the physiological function of PFKFB3.

The inducible PFKFB is one of the major metabolic effectors that facilitate cancer progression. Suppression of glycolysis has been frequently suggested as an effective alternative to traditional cancer therapies; accordingly, the inducible PFKFB has been considered as one of the primary targets of such approaches. The discovery of EDTA at the Fru-6-P site provides a molecular paradigm of a new therapeutic molecule that targets the 2-Kase activity of the inducible PFKFB for cancer treatments. A suggested starter molecule resembles EDTA covalently linked to the beta-phosphate of ADP.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The atomic coordinates and structure factors (code 2AXN) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).

* This work was supported by the Louisiana State Governor's Biotechnology Initiative Fund and the LSU Faculty Research Grant program. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biological Sciences, LA State University, 202 Life Sciences Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803. Tel.: 225-578-0522; Fax: 225-578-7258; E-mail: yhlee{at}lsu.edu.

2 The abbreviations used are: PFKFB, 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphophatase;2-Kase,6-phosphofructo-2-kinase;2-Pase,fructose-2,6-bisphophatase;Fru-6-P, fructose-6-phosphate; Fru-2,6-P2, fructose-2,6-bisphophate; E-P, phosphoenzyme intermediate. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. Henry Bellamy and David Neau at the protein crystallography beamline at The Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices, LSU. We also thank Dr. Marcia Newcomer for spiritual encouragement and critical reading of the manuscript.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Pilkis, S. J., Claus, T. H., Kurland, I. J., and Lange, A. J. (1995) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 799-835[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Pilkis, S. J., El-Maghrabi, M. R., Pilkis, J., Claus, T. H., and Cumming, D. A. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 3171-3174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Uyeda, K., Furuya, E., and Sherry, A. D. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 8679-8684[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bazan, J. F., Fletterick, R. J., and Pilkis, S. J. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 9642-9646[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Pilkis, S. J., Regen, D. M., Stewart, H. B., Pilkis, J., Pate, T. M., and El-Maghrabi, M. R. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 949-958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bertrand, L., Alessi, D. R., Deprez, J., Deak, M., Viaene, E., Rider, M. H., and Hue, L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 30927-30933[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hue, L., Beauloye, C., Marsin, A. S., Bertrand, L., Horman, S., and Rider, M. H. (2002) J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 34, 1091-1097[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Marsin, A.-S., Bouzin, C., Bertrand, L., and Hue, L. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 30778-30783[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Pilkis, S. J., Claus, T. H., and El-Maghrabi, M. R. (1988) Adv. Second Messenger Phosphoprotein Res. 22, 175-191[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Chesney, J., Mitchell, R., Benigni, F., Bacher, M., Spiegel, L., Al-Abed, Y., Han, J. H., Metz, C., and Bucala, R. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3047-3052[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. El-Maghrabi, M. R., Noto, F., Wu, N., and Manes, N. (2001) Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 4, 411-418[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Manzano, A., Perez, J. X., Nadal, M., Estivill, X., Lange, A., and Bartrons, R. (1999) Gene 229, 83-89[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Heine-Suner, D., Diaz-Guillen, M. A., Lange, A. J., and Rodriguez de Cordoba, S. (1998) Eur. J. Biochem. 254, 103-110[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Fukasawa, M., Tsuchiya, T., Takayama, E., Shinomiya, N., Uyeda, K., Sakakibara, R., and Seki, S. (2004) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 136, 273-277[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Minchenko, A., Leshchinsky, I., Opentanova, I., Sang, N., Srinivas, V., Armstead, V., and Caro, J. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 6183-6187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Sakakibara, R., Okudaira, T., Fujiwara, K., Kato, M., Hirata, T., Yamanaka, S., Naito, M., and Fukasawa, M. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 257, 177-181[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Goren, N., Manzano, A., Riera, L., Ambrosio, S., Ventura, F., and Bartrons, R. (2000) Mol. Brain Res. 75, 138-142[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Sakakibara, R., Kato, M., Okamura, N., Nakagawa, T., Komada, Y., Shimojo, M., and Fukasawa, M. (1997) J. Biochem. 122, 122-128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Manes, N. P., and El-Maghrabi, M. R. (2005) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 438, 125-136[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Okamura, N., and Sakakibara, R. (1998) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 62, 2039-2042[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Marsin, A.-S., Bertrand, L., Rider, M. H., Deprez, J., Beauloye, C., Vincent, M. F., Van den Berghe, G., Carling, D., and Hue, L. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, 1247-1255[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Atsumi, T., Chesney, J., Metz, C., Leng, L., Donnelly, S., Makita, Z., Mitchell, R., and Bucala, R. (2002) Cancer Res. 62, 5881-5887[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Minchenko, O. H., Ochiai, A., Opentanova, I. L., Ogura, T., Minchenko, D. O., Caro, J., Komisarenko, S. V., and Esumi, H. (2005) Biochimie (Paris) 87, 1005-1010
  24. Warburg, O. (1956) Science 123, 309-314[Free Full Text]
  25. Minchenko, O., Opentanova, I., Minchenko, D., Ogura, T., and Esumi, H. (2004) FEBS Lett. 576, 14-20[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Chesney, J., Telang, S., Yalcin, A., Clem, A., Wallis, N., and Bucala, R. (2005) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 331, 139-146[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Semenza, G. (2002) Biochem. Pharmacol. 64, 993-998[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Hirata, T., Watanabe, M., Miura, S., Ijichi, K., Fukasawa, M., and Sakakibara, R. (2000) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 64, 2047-2052[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Lee, Y.-H., Ogata, C., Pflugrath, J. W., Sarma, R., Banaszak, L., F., and Pilkis, S. J. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 6010-6019[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Lee, Y.-H., Olson, W. T., Ogata, C. M., Levitt, D., Banaszak, L. J., and Lange, A. J. (1997) Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 615-618[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Lee, Y.-H., Li, Y., Uyeda, K., and Hasemann, C. A. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 523-530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Otwinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326
  33. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 760-763[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J. S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T., and Warren, G. L. (1998) Acta. Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905-921[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Navaza, J. (1993) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 49, 588-591[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Jones, T. A., Zou, J. Y., Cowan, S. W., and Kjeldgaard, M. (1991) Acta. Crystallogr. Sect. A 47, 110-119
  37. Hasemann, C. A., Istvan, E. S., Uyeda, K., and Deisenhofer, J. (1996) Structure 4, 1017-1029[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Li, L., Lin, K., Pilkis, J., Correia, J. J., and Pilkis, S. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 21588-21594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Li, L., Lin, K., Correia, J. J., and Pilkis, S. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16669-16675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Lin, K., Li, L., Correia, J. J., and Pilkis, S. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 6556-6562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Yuen, M. H., Wang, X. L., Mizuguchi, H., Uyeda, K., and Hasemann, C. A. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 12333-12342[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Lin, K., Kurland, I. J., Li, L., Lee, Y.-H., Okar, D., Marecek, J. F., and Pilkis, S. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 16953-16960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Stewart, H. B., El-Maghrabi, M. R., and Pilkis, S. J. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 8793-8798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Koshland, D. E. (1998) Nat. Med. 4, 1112-1114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Esnouf, R. (1999) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 55, 938-940[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Merritt, E. A., and Murphy, M.E. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 869-873[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/5/2939    most recent
M511019200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.