Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M513196200 on January 3, 2006

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 9, 5869-5876, March 3, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/9/5869    most recent
M513196200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, S.-i.
Right arrow Articles by Omata, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, S.-i.
Right arrow Articles by Omata, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Latent Nitrate Transport Activity of a Novel Sulfate Permease-like Protein of the Cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus*

Shin-ichi Maeda{ddagger}1, Chieko Sugita§, Mamoru Sugita§, and Tatsuo Omata{ddagger}

From the {ddagger}Laboratory of Molecular Plant Physiology, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, and the §Center for Gene Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan

Received for publication, December 12, 2005 , and in revised form, January 3, 2006.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The Synechococcus elongatus mutant lacking the nrtABCD gene cluster (NA3) is defective in active nitrate transport and requires high nitrate concentrations (>30 mM) for sustained growth. Prolonged incubation of NA3 in medium containing 2 mM nitrate led to isolation of a pseudorevertant (NA3R) capable of transport of millimolar concentrations of nitrate, from which three mutants with improved affinity for nitrate were obtained. We identified three genes responsible for the latent transport activity for nitrate: ltnA, which encodes a response regulator with no effector domain; ltnB, which encodes a hybrid histidine kinase with two receiver domains; and ltnT, which encodes a sulfate permease-like protein with a putative cyclic nucleoside monophosphate (cNMP)-binding domain. Missense mutations of the high affinity derivatives of NA3R were found in ltnT, verifying that LtnT acts as the transporter. Overexpression of truncated LtnT lacking the cNMP-binding domain (but not full-length LtnT) conferred nitrate transport activity on NA3, suggesting that the cNMP-binding domain inhibits transport under normal conditions. A nonsense mutation in ltnB that resulted in elimination of the receiver domains of the encoded protein was responsible for expression of nitrate transport activity in NA3R. Expression of LtnB derivatives lacking the receiver domains also conferred low affinity nitrate transport activity on NA3. The phosphoryl group of the histidine kinase domain of LtnB was transferred to Asp52 of LtnA in vitro. Overexpression of LtnA (but not LtnA(D52E)) led to manifestation of the latent nitrate transport activity in NA3, indicating involvement of phosphorylated LtnA in activation of the novel transporter.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Nitrate is a major source of nitrogen for plants, algae, fungi, and many species of bacteria (1, 2). It is transported into the cells by an active nitrate transport system (NRT)2 and reduced to nitrite by nitrate reductase. Nitrite is further reduced to ammonium by nitrite reductase, and the resulting ammonium is fixed as the amide group of Gln by glutamine synthetase. Three distinct types of nitrate transport systems have been identified among the large variety of organisms that assimilate nitrate, viz. NRT1, NRT2, and ATP-binding cassette (ABC)-type NRT. NRT1 and NRT2 possess 12 membrane-spanning regions and belong to the major facilitator superfamily of secondary active transport systems (3). ABC-type NRT is a primary active transport system consisting of a substrate-binding protein and a membrane transporter complex (4). Although NRT2 is widespread and found in plants, algae, fungi, the marine strains of cyanobacteria, and some species of heterotrophic bacteria, NRT1 has been found only in vascular plants. ABC-type NRT is present only in prokaryotic organisms, including the freshwater strains of cyanobacteria and some heterotrophic bacteria.

The cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus has an ABC-type NRT encoded by four genes: nrtA encodes the substrate-binding protein; nrtB encodes the integral membrane component of the transporter; and nrtC and nrtD encode the ABC proteins (5-7). The genes encoding NRT, nitrate reductase (narB) (8, 9), and nitrite reductase (nirA) (10, 11) form an operon, nirA-nrtABCD-narB (nirA operon) (11). The NA3 mutant, which was constructed by deleting the nrtABCD genes from the nirA operon, lacks NRT activity and requires high concentrations of nitrate (>30 mM) for sustained growth (12). In this study, we isolated and characterized a pseudorevertant of NA3 (NA3R) that is capable of uptake of low concentrations of nitrate. Genetic analysis of NA3R and its derivatives revealed that a novel sulfate permease-like protein of unknown substrate specificity shows low affinity nitrate transport activity. We also shown that a two-component regulatory system involving a hybrid histidine kinase and a response regulator with no effector domain is required for activation of the transporter. Possible roles of the phosphotransfer reaction via the two-component system in the regulation of the activity of the novel nitrate transport system are discussed.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Strains and Growth Conditions—A derivative of S. elongatus that was cured of the resident small plasmid pUH24 (R2-SPc (13); hereafter designated as the wild-type strain) and the mutant strains derived from it were grown photoautotrophically at 30 °C under continuous illumination provided by fluorescent lamps (70 microeinsteins m-2 s-1). The basal medium used was a nitrogen-free medium obtained by modification of the BG11 medium (14) as described previously (15). Ammonium-containing medium and nitrite-containing medium were prepared by the addition of 3.75 mM (NH4)2SO4 and 5 mM NaNO2, respectively to the basal medium. Nitrate-containing medium was prepared by the addition of KNO3 at the indicated concentrations to the basal medium. Solid medium was prepared by adding 1.5% Bacto agar (Difco) to the liquid medium. All media were buffered with 20 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 8.2). When appropriate, kanamycin and/or chloramphenicol was added to the media at 25 and 10 µg/ml, respectively. The Synechococcus strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Cyanobacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

 
Isolation of a Pseudorevertant of NA3 and Its Derivatives—Cells of the NA3 mutant of S. elongatus strain PCC 7942 (lacking the nitrate/nitrite transporter genes nrtABCD) were inoculated into liquid medium containing 2 mM nitrate and cultivated with occasional dilution with fresh nitrate (2 mM)-containing medium. After 4 months of cultivation, the color of the culture turned yellow green, indicating growth of cells. Streaking of the culture onto a plate containing 5 mM nitrate allowed isolation of a colony of a pseudorevertant (designated NA3R) that grew well on 5 mM nitrate, but failed to grow on 0.5 mM nitrate. For selection of NA3R derivatives with high affinities for nitrate, NA3R cells were incubated under low nitrate conditions that did not support growth of the pseudorevertant. Thus, after incubation for 3 months on solid medium containing 0.3 mM nitrate, one colony arose and was isolated as a high affinity derivative of the pseudorevertant (designated HAR1). Two independent NA3R derivatives capable of growth on solid medium containing 0.3 mM nitrate were isolated from liquid cultures containing 1mM and 0.3 mM nitrate and designated HAR2 and HAR3, respectively.

Loss-of-Function Analysis of the Genes Required by NA3R for Nitrate Transport—A transcriptional fusion of the nitrogen-responsive promoter of nirA (nucleotides -275 to -15 with respect to the nirA translation start site) and the coding sequences of luxA and luxB (PnirA::luxAB) (16) was integrated into the cmpB-cmpC region of the Synechococcus genome as described previously (16) to construct a reporter strain (NA3Rlux) from NA3R. For random tagging mutagenesis of NA3Rlux, genomic DNA isolated from wild-type Synechococcus cells was partially digested with Sau3AI, and the resulting DNA fragments of 0.3-1.0 kilobase pairs in size were inserted into the BamHI site of the pHSG298 vector (TaKaRa). NA3Rlux cells were transformed with the DNA library and allowed to grow on solid medium containing 60 mM nitrate and kanamycin. After cultivation for 10 days on agar plates, colonies emitting strong bioluminescence were selected and shown to be defective in growth on 5 mM nitrate. For retrieval of the genomic DNA regions that were modified by integration of the pHSG298 derivatives, genomic DNA isolated from the selected mutants was digested with EcoRI or SalI and fractionated by electrophoresis on a 0.7% agarose gel. DNA fragments of 3-10 kilobase pairs in size were eluted from the gel and self-ligated, and the resulting plasmids were used for transformation of Escherichia coli JM109. Kanamycin-resistant E. coli transformants were isolated and shown to contain pHSG298 derivatives carrying Synechococcus genomic DNA fragments. Nucleotide sequences of the DNA regions were compared with the complete genome sequence of S. elongatus strain PCC 6301 (GenBankTM accession number NC_006576 [GenBank] ; available at cyano.genome.jp/), the gene sequences of which are 99.7% identical to those of S. elongatus strain PCC 7942, to identify the lesions in the NA3Rlux derivatives unable to grow on 5 mM nitrate.

Construction of the Insertion Mutants—Site-directed insertion mutants were constructed as described previously by Williams and Szalay (17). DNA fragments that contained complete or partial sequences of the target open reading frames (ORFs) of Synechococcus were amplified by PCR and cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega Corp.). A kanamycin-resistant (18) or chloramphenicol-resistant (19) marker was subsequently inserted at a suitable restriction site in each of the ORFs in the same orientation as the ORFs. The resulting plasmids were used to transform Synechococcus to kanamycin or chloramphenicol resistance through homologous recombination. The transformants were allowed to grow on solid medium supplemented with kanamycin or chloramphenicol. After serial streak purifications to promote segregation of alleles and to isolate homozygous mutants, genomic DNA from selected clones was analyzed by PCR to confirm the presence and position of the kanamycin- or chloramphenicol-resistant marker.

Expression of Plasmid-encoded Proteins in Synechococcus—A shuttle expression vector (pSE1) (12) was used for expression of cloned genes in Synechococcus. The coding regions of ltnA, ltnB, and ltnT were amplified from the Synechococcus chromosomal DNA by PCR. Sense primers carried mismatches with the genomic sequence that created an NcoI or a BspHI recognition site at the translation start site without changing the encoded amino acid sequence. Antisense primers carried a BamHI or an XbaI recognition sequence immediately downstream of the termination codon. The ltnA sequence with a T-to-A base substitution at the nucleotide 156 was generated by overlap extension PCR (20). For expression of LtnB derivatives lacking the N-terminal signal input domain, an internal ATG codon located at position 1222 of the ORF was used as the initiation codon. For expression of LtnB derivatives lacking one or two of its receiver domains, antisense primers were designed to introduce stop codons at nucleotides 2563 and 2206, respectively. For expression of an LtnT derivative lacking the C-terminal cyclic nucleoside monophosphate (cNMP)-binding domain, an antisense primer was designed to introduce a stop codon at position 1756 of the coding region. The PCR products were digested with a combination of NcoI and BamHI, NcoI and XbaI, BspHI and BamHI, or BspHI and XbaI and cloned between the NcoI and BamHI sites or the NcoI and XbaI sites of pSE1. The resulting plasmids were introduced into the NA3 cells after verification of the nucleotide sequence.

Preparation of Recombinant Proteins in E. coli—The expression vectors pQE30 and pQE31 (Qiagen Inc.) were used for overexpression of LtnA, LtnB, and their derivatives as His-tagged proteins. The coding sequences of the ltnA and ltnA(T156A) genes were prepared essentially as described above, except that the sense primer used for PCR carried mismatches with the genomic sequence to create a BamHI recognition site nine nucleotides upstream of the translation start site and that the antisense primer carried a BamHI recognition sequence immediately downstream of the termination codon. The PCR products were digested with BamHI and cloned into the BamHI site of pQE30. The truncated ltnB genes were excised from the pSE1 derivatives used for expression of the genes in Synechococcus (see above) by digestion with BalI and XbaI and cloned between the SmaI and NheI site of pQE31. After verification of the nucleotide sequences, the resulting plasmids were transformed into E. coli M15 (pREP4) (Qiagen Inc.), and the His-tagged proteins were purified on nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin.

Phosphotransfer Experiment—Purified proteins were incubated in 15 µl of buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 mM EDTA, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 10% glycerol supplemented with 0.05 mM [{gamma}-32P]ATP (200 TBq/mmol), 50 mM KCl, and 5 mM MgCl2 according to the protocol of Aiba et al. (21). After incubation for 20 min at 30 °C, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 4 µl of SDS buffer containing 250 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 4% SDS, 8% 2-mercaptoethanol, 60% glycerol, and 0.02% bromphenol blue. The samples were subjected to 10-20% gradient SDS-PAGE, and the 32P-labeled signals were detected using a bio-imaging analyzer (Fuji Photo Film).

Measurement of Nitrate Uptake—Cells grown in medium containing 60 mM nitrate were washed with the basal medium supplemented with 5mM NaHCO3 and 20 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 8.2) and suspended in the same medium at a chlorophyll concentration of 5 or 10 µg/ml. The reactions were started by the addition of KNO3 at various concentrations to cell suspensions kept at 30 °C in the light (70 microeinsteins m-2 s-1). Aliquots were withdrawn from the cell suspension at 10-min intervals. After immediate centrifugation to sediment the cells, the nitrate concentrations of the supernatants were determined using a flow injection analyzer (NOX-1000, Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.). The rate of nitrate uptake was calculated from the linear decrease in the nitrate concentration of the medium with time.

Other Methods—Chromosomal DNA was extracted from Synechococcus cells and purified as described by Williams (22). Manipulations and analyses of DNA were performed according to standard protocols. Chlorophyll and protein concentrations were determined according to Mackinney (23) and Lowry et al. (24), respectively. The in vivo bioluminescence from the Synechococcus transformants carrying a PnirA::luxAB transcriptional fusion was measured with a luminometer (ARGUS-50, Hamamatsu Photonics) as described previously (16).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Nitrate Uptake Capacity of the Mutant StrainsFig. 1 compares the growth curves of the wild-type strain, the NRT-deficient mutant NA3, and the pseudorevertant of NA3 (designated NA3R). The wild-type strain grew equally well in ammonium- or nitrate-containing medium with a generation time of 6.4 h (Fig. 1A). The NA3 mutant grew as fast as the wild-type strain in ammonium-containing medium with a generation time of 6.8 h, but hardly grew in medium containing 2 mM nitrate; the generation time was 90 h, and the culture showed a yellow color due to reduced pigmentation (Fig. 1B) as described previously (12). Growth of NA3 was improved with increasing concentrations of nitrate, but even at a nitrate concentration of 60 mM, growth was slower than in ammonium-containing medium, with a generation time of 10 h. NA3R cells grew with a generation time of 11 h in medium containing 2 mM nitrate. At ≥6 mM nitrate, growth of NA3R was as fast as in ammonium-containing medium, with a generation time of 7.0-7.3 h (Fig. 1C). The results indicate that NA3R has a higher capacity for utilization of low concentrations of nitrate compared with NA3.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1.
Growth curves of the wild-type strain (A), the NA3 mutant (B), and the NA3R mutant (C). Cells grown in the presence of ammonium were collected by centrifugation, washed with nitrogen-free medium by resuspension and centrifugation, separated into five portions, and inoculated into medium containing 5 mM ammonium ({blacksquare}), 2 mM nitrate ({square}), 6 mM nitrate ({diamond}), 20 mM nitrate ({circ}), or 60 mM nitrate ({triangleup}) for periodic measurement of optical density at 730 nm. Data from one of two experiments with essentially the same results are shown. WT, wild-type.

 
Fig. 2 compares the dependence of nitrate uptake rate on nitrate concentration in the medium. Wild-type cells took up nitrate at a rate of 40 µmol/mg of chlorophyll/h in an external nitrate concentration range of 0.1-6 mM, but NA3 cells were unable to take up nitrate in this concentration range as described previously (12). NA3R did not exhibit nitrate uptake at external concentrations of 0.1 mM or lower, but the nitrate uptake rate increased as the external nitrate concentration was raised, reaching a rate of 38 µmol/mg of chlorophyll/h at 6 mM nitrate. The results indicate that a low affinity nitrate transport system is present in NA3R.


Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2.
Dependence of the nitrate uptake rate on the nitrate concentration of the medium. Cells grown in nitrate (60 mM)-containing medium were used for the assay. bullet, wild-type strain (WT); {blacksquare}, NA3; {blacktriangleup}, NA3R; {circ}, HAR1;{triangleup}, HAR2; {square}, HAR3. Chl, chlorophyll.

 
NA3R was virtually unable to grow on solid medium containing 0.3 mM nitrate, but prolonged incubation of the cells at the low nitrate concentration led to isolation of three independent NA3R derivatives that could grow on 0.3 mM nitrate (designated HAR1, HAR2, and HAR3). The maximum nitrate uptake rates of the HAR mutants were lower than that of the parental NA3R strain, but the mutants showed much higher rates of nitrate uptake compared with NA3R at external nitrate concentrations of 1 mM or lower (Fig. 2), indicating that the affinity of the nitrate transport system for nitrate had been improved in the HAR mutants.

Genes Required for the Low Affinity Nitrate Transport Activity of NA3R—For genetic identification of the genes involved in the low affinity nitrate transport of the NA3R strain, we first introduced a PnirA::luxAB fusion into the genome of NA3R to construct a reporter strain (NA3Rlux) and then mutagenized this strain by random tagging. The PnirA promoter is responsive to nitrogen and is most active in nitrate-limited cells (16). When NA3Rlux was grown on 60 mM nitrate, the cells were nitrate-replete, and the luciferase expression level was 0.01 of that observed in the PnirA::luxAB strain constructed from NA3 (data not shown). After random tagging mutagenesis of NA3Rlux, we selected strongly luminescent clones in the presence of 60 mM nitrate to isolate mutants with impaired nitrate assimilation. Of the nine mutants thus isolated, three mutants that showed very strong bioluminescence grew normally on ammonium-containing agar plates, but grew very slowly with significant loss of pigmentation on plates containing 5 mM nitrite or 60 mM nitrate, indicating that they were defective in assimilation of nitrite. These mutants carried the pHSG298 vector inserted at different positions in the nirA gene for nitrite reductase. The other six mutants were similar to NA3 in that they grew normally on ammonium- or nitrite-containing plates, at an appreciable rate on plates containing 60 mM nitrate, and only poorly on plates containing 5 mM nitrate, indicating that they had lost the low affinity nitrate transport activity. In five of the six mutants, pHSG298 was found to replace a 4.5-kilobase pair genomic region carrying the six ORFs from syc2273_c to syc2278_d (Fig. 3A). The other nitrate transport mutant was shown to have pHSG298 inserted between syc1141_c and syc1148_c, replacing the six ORFs from syc1142_c to syc1147_c (Fig. 3B). To identify the genes required for the low affinity nitrate transport activity, we insertion-inactivated each of the 12 ORFs in NA3Rlux. Interruption of syc2277_d, syc2278_d, and syc1147_c (but none of the other ORFs) abolished the ability to grow on plates containing 5 mM nitrate and caused high level expression of the PnirA::luxAB fusion when grown on plates containing 60 mM nitrate (data not shown), indicating that the three genes are essential to the low affinity nitrate transport activity. syc2277_d encodes a response regulator of 121 amino acids that has no effector domain and that belongs to the CheY subfamily of response regulators. syc2278_d encodes a hybrid histidine kinase of 977 amino acids that has a predicted signal peptide at the N terminus, a membrane-spanning region, a histidine kinase domain, and two receiver domains (Fig. 4A). syc1147_c encodes a novel sulfate permease-like protein of 727 amino acids that consists of two domains: an N-terminal "sulfate permease (SulP)" domain of 554 amino acids (NCBI accession number COG0659) and a C-terminal cNMP-binding domain of 115 amino acids (NCBI accession number cd00038) (Fig. 4B). The three ORFs required for low affinity nitrate transport, viz. syc2277_d, syc2278_d, and syc1147_c, were named genes ltnA, ltnB, and ltnT, respectively, where "ltn" stands for latent transport activity for nitrate (LTN).

Mutation Responsible for Activation of LTN in NA3R—Comparison of the nucleotide sequences of the ltnA, ltnB, and ltnT genes of NA3 and NA3R revealed a mutation in ltnB, but not in ltnA or ltnT. The ltnB mutation of NA3R was a base substitution from C to T at position 2362, yielding an early termination codon (Fig. 4A). The truncated ltnB gene encodes a histidine kinase lacking the C-terminal 190 amino acids comprising the two receiver domains. These results suggest that altered signal transmission via LtnB is responsible for activation of LTN.

Structure-Function Relationship of LtnT—Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that the HAR mutants, having higher affinity for nitrate compared with the parental NA3R strain, have missense mutations in ltnT (Fig. 4B); HAR1 has a base substitution from T to A at position 256 of ltnT, yielding an amino acid substitution from Tyr to Asn at position 86 of the sulfate permease-like protein. HAR2 has a C-to-A base substitution at position 736, yielding a Leu-to-Ile amino acid substitution at position 246 of the encoded protein. In addition to the mutation found in HAR2, HAR3 carries a second base substitution from C to G at position 733, resulting in an additional amino acid substitution from Pro to Ala at position 245. The amino acid replacements critical for improving the affinity of the LTN system are found at relatively hydrophilic positions in the membrane-spanning regions of the SulP domain. These results confirm that LtnT acts as the permease of the LTN system. When introduced into NA3 cells using the shuttle expression vector pSE1 (12), ltnT did not support growth of the cells on plates containing 5mM nitrate (Fig. 5, row e), indicating that expression of the gene is not sufficient for expression of nitrate transport activity. Expression of ltnT(C736A), which has the same nucleotide substitution as HAR2, did not confer nitrate transport activity on NA3 either (Fig. 5, row g). Surprisingly, expression of the truncated forms of ltnT and ltnT(C736A) lacking the 3'-terminal part that encodes the cNMP-binding domain supported growth of the cells on 5 mM nitrate (Fig. 5, rows f and h). This finding indicates that the cNMP-binding domain inhibits the nitrate transport activity of the permease domain in NA3. Expression of the truncated form of ltnT(C736A) (but not ltnT) supported growth of the cells on 0.5 mM nitrate (Fig. 5, rows f and h), confirming that the C736A nucleotide substitution in LtnT is responsible for the improved affinity of nitrate uptake by HAR2.

Structure-Function Relationships of LtnA and LtnB—To investigate the roles of ltnA and ltnB in expression of LTN, the ltnA and ltnB ORFs and their derivatives were fused to the Ptrc promoter and introduced into the NA3 mutant using the pSE1 shuttle expression vector. The ability of the transformants to grow on nitrate was examined (Fig. 5).

Although neither of the genes encoding full-length LtnB nor the LtnB derivative lacking the C-terminal receiver domain (LtnB-(1-854)) conferred on NA3 the ability to grow on agar plates containing 5 mM nitrate (Fig. 5, rows i and j), introduction of the truncated ltnB gene encoding the LtnB derivative lacking the two receiver domains (LtnB-(1-735)) supported cell growth on 5 mM nitrate (row k). These results confirm that expression of the LtnB protein without a receiver domain results in expression of LTN. When isopropyl beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added, the Synechococcus transformants lost all pigmentation and died, showing that overexpression of LtnB, LtnB-(1-735), and LtnB-(1-854) is lethal. Because the LtnB derivatives lacking the signal input domain (amino acids 1-407) did not kill the cell even when overexpressed (Fig. 5, rows l and m), we deduced that overexpression of the signal input domain of LtnB is toxic to the cell. Although the plasmid encoding LtnB-(408-735) supported nitrate utilization in the absence and presence of IPTG, the plasmid encoding LtnB-(408-977) failed to do so even in the presence of IPTG (Fig. 5, rows l and m). These results confirm the inhibitory effect of the receiver domains of LtnB on expression of LTN.


Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3.
Physical maps of the ltnAB (A) and ltnT (B) genomic regions of S. elongatus. Pentagons show the locations and directions of ORFs. Bars over the maps show the regions found to be replaced with the pHSG298 vector in the NA3Rlux derivatives that had lost the low affinity nitrate transport activity. The white box and triangles show the locations of drug maker insertions at the indicated restriction endonuclease sites for construction of insertion mutants. The ORF identifications proposed in the PCC 6301 strain (with "syc" designations; GenBankTM accession number NC_006576 [GenBank] ) and the PCC 7942 strain (with "syn-pcc7942" designations; accession number NC_007604 [GenBank] ) of S. elongatus are indicated for each ORF. kbp, kilobase pair.

 


Figure 4
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4.
Structural characteristics of LtnB and LtnT. A and B, hydrophobicity plots and domain organization of the LtnB and LtnT proteins, respectively. Hydrophobicity was calculated by the methods of Kyte and Doolittle (33) using a window of 13 amino acid residues. The histidine kinase domain, receiver domain (REC), SulP domain, and cNMP-binding domain are indicated. The nonsense mutation of ltnB in NA3R is indicated in A. The sites of missense mutations of ltnT in the high affinity derivatives of NA3R are indicated in B. C, alignment of the partial amino acid sequences of the putative cNMP-binding domains of LtnT and its homologs with the corresponding regions of known cAMP-binding proteins: domains A (RI{alpha}A) and B (RI{alpha}B) of bovine RI{alpha} (30); the catabolite repression protein (CRP)of E. coli (31); and Sycrp1, the catabolite repression protein homolog of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (32). Regions of the phosphate-binding cassette (boxed) are compared. Residues involved in hydrogen bonding for binding of cAMP are shown in boldface and indicated by arrowheads. D, phylogenetic tree of SulP family proteins of cyanobacteria and the SulP-like domains of LtnT-like proteins in bacteria. The ClustalX program was used to align the protein sequences, and the tree was generated by the TreeView program. LtnT homologs and BicA proteins are shaded. ORFs with "Slr" and "Sll" designations are from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, and those with "Alr" and "All" designations are from Anabaena sp. PCC 7120. Other ORF identifications contain the abbreviation of the species name, viz. Syc for S. elongatus PCC 6301, Cwat for C. watsonii WH 8501, 7002 for Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002, PMM for Prochlorococcus marinus MED4, PMT for Prochlorococcus marinus MIT 9313, Pro for Prochlorococcus marinus SS120, SYNW for Synechococcus sp. WH 8102, bll for B. japonicum, Brad for Bradyrhizobium sp. BTAi1, DVU for D. vulgaris, lpl for L. pneumophila, Mmc for Magnetococcus sp. MC-1, and Magn for M. magnetotacticum.

 


Figure 5
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5.
Growth test showing the effects of expression of the Ltn proteins and their derivatives on expression of nitrate transport activity in NA3. Synechococcus cells (n = 105) were spotted on solid medium containing ammonium (7.5 mM) or nitrate (0.5 or 5 mM) as nitrogen sources and incubated under illumination for 4 days. Where indicated, IPTG (1 mM) was added to overexpress the proteins from the plasmid-borne genes. WT, wild-type; H, autophosphorylated histidine residue in the histidine kinase domain; D, phosphoacceptor aspartate residue in the receiver domain; E, glutamate residue replaced with the phosphoacceptor aspartate residue.

 
The NA3 derivative carrying a Ptrc::ltnA fusion did not grow on plates containing 5 mM nitrate in the absence of IPTG. However, in the presence of IPTG, the cells grew on nitrate (Fig. 5, row n), indicating that overexpression of the response regulator protein can activate LTN in the wild-type ltnB background. IPTG-induced overexpression of a modified ltnA gene that encodes an LtnA derivative with its putative phosphorylation site (Asp52) replaced with Glu did not support cell growth on 5 mM nitrate (Fig. 5, row o). These results indicate that phosphorylation of LtnA is essential for expression of the low affinity nitrate transport activity.

Phosphotransfer Reaction from LtnB to LtnA—To examine whether phosphotransfer occurs from LtnB to LtnA, LtnA and LtnA(D52E) were expressed in E. coli as His-tagged proteins and purified to near homogeneity (Fig. 6A, lanes 1 and 2). The soluble derivatives of LtnB lacking the N-terminal 407 amino acid residues, viz. LtnB-(408-977) and LtnB-(408-735), were also expressed in E. coli as His-tagged proteins and purified to near homogeneity (Fig. 6A, lanes 3 and 4). When incubated for 20 min at 30 °C with 0.05 mM [{gamma}-32P]ATP, LtnB-(408-977) and LtnB-(408-735) were radiolabeled (Fig. 6B, lanes 2 and 7, respectively), whereas LtnA was not (lane 1), demonstrating the capacity of the LtnB derivatives for autophosphorylation. When LtnA was incubated with LtnB-(408-977) or LtnB-(408-735), the radiolabel in the LtnB derivatives was decreased with concomitant labeling of LtnA (Fig. 6B, lanes 3-5 and 8-10, respectively), indicating that the phosphoryl group was transferred to LtnA. When LtnA(D52E) was subjected to the same analysis, there was no transfer of the phosphoryl group to the LtnA derivative (Fig. 6B, lanes 6 and 11, respectively), indicating that Asp52 is the phosphoacceptor site of LtnA.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The NA3 mutant of S. elongatus lacks the four genes (nrtABCD) encoding the ABC-type nitrate/nitrite transporter and is unable to assimilate low concentrations of nitrate (12). A pseudorevertant (NA3R) capable of sustained growth in medium containing 5 mM nitrate was obtained from NA3 and shown to have low affinity nitrate transport activity (Fig. 2). Of the three genes required for nitrate transport by NA3R (Fig. 3), ltnA and ltnB encode a CheY-type response regulator and a hybrid histidine kinase consisting of a signal input domain, a histidine kinase domain, and two receiver domains, respectively (Fig. 4A). NA3R was found to have a nonsense mutation in ltnB resulting in elimination of the receiver domains from the encoded protein, suggesting that altered signal transfer in a His-Asp phosphorelay system had caused manifestation of LTN. Expression of various truncated forms of ltnB in NA3 confirmed that the LtnB derivatives with no receiver domains support nitrate transport (Fig. 5). Because LtnA (but not LtnA(D52E)) receives the phosphoryl group from His-tagged LtnB-(408-735)(Fig. 6), we deduced that the phosphoryl group is transferred from the histidine kinase domain of LtnB (amino acids 408-735) to Asp52 of LtnA. Overexpression of LtnA (but not LtnA(D52E)) leads to expression of nitrate transport activity in NA3 (Fig. 5), indicating that phosphorylation of LtnA is essential for manifestation of LTN. Although His-tagged LtnB-(408-977), which retains the two receiver domains, can transfer the phosphoryl group to LtnA in vitro (Fig. 6), wild-type LtnB or its derivatives with one or two receiver domains cannot support nitrate transport when expressed in NA3 (Fig. 5), showing that the receiver domains interferes with phosphorylation of LtnA in vivo. This suggests that the receiver domains compete with LtnA for the phosphoryl group by continuously shuttling the phosphoryl group to a phosphoreceptor in the cell. Alternatively, a phosphatase may dephosphorylate the receiver domains to allow continued transfer of the phosphoryl group to the receiver domains.


Figure 6
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6.
In vitro phosphoryl transfer experiment using LtnA, LtnB, and their derivatives. A, SDS-PAGE of the purified proteins. Purified His-tagged proteins (3 µg) were separated on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Lane 1, LtnA; lane 2, LtnA(D52E); lane 3, LtnB-(408-977); lane 4, LtnB-(408-735). Molecular mass markers are indicated in kilodaltons. B, labeling experiments with the LtnA and LtnB proteins. Purified proteins were added to the reaction mixtures to give the indicated concentrations and incubated with 50 µM [{gamma}-32P]ATP for 20 min. The proteins were subsequently fractionated on a 10-20% gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and 32P-labeled signals were detected using a bio-imaging analyzer.

 
The other gene essential to nitrate transport by NA3R (ltnT) encodes a protein belonging to the SulP family of the major facilitator superfamily. LtnT is unique among the SulP family proteins in having a C-terminal extension (Fig. 4B), which negatively regulates the activity of the permease domain (Fig. 5). Because no mutation was found in the ltnT gene of NA3R, we deduced that phosphorylation of LtnA had alleviated the inhibitory effect of the C-terminal domain of LtnT on permease activity. Although it is similar to cNMP-binding proteins, the C-terminal domain of LtnT lacks one of the two amino acid residues involved in binding cNMP (Fig. 4C) (25), making it questionable whether cNMP has a role in the regulation of LTN. No interaction was detected between LtnA and the C-terminal domain of LtnT by yeast two-hybrid analysis of the proteins3. The molecular mechanism responsible for the regulation of LtnT activity thus remains unknown. Response regulators of the CheY family, which consist of only the receiver domain, have been shown to be involved in the regulation of chemotaxis of bacteria (26) and phototaxis of cyanobacteria (27). LtnA seems to be the first example of a CheY family protein involved in the regulation of a transport process. Much more work is required to elucidate the mechanism responsible for this unique form of regulation.

Fig. 7 summarizes the roles of LtnA, LtnB, and LtnT elucidated in this study. The histidine kinase domain of LtnB is autophosphorylated, and the phosphoryl group is normally transferred to the receiver domains, leaving LtnA in the unphosphorylated state. Under these conditions, the C-terminal domain of LtnT inhibits the permease activity of the protein. Because of the nonsense mutation in ltnB, NA3R expresses the truncated LtnB protein lacking the receiver domains, allowing phosphotransfer from the histidine kinase domain of LtnB to LtnA. The phosphorylated LtnA protein somehow alleviates the inhibitory effect of the LtnT C-terminal domain on permease activity. It is unknown whether LtnA interacts directly with LtnT or whether other signal-transducing proteins are involved in the regulation. Additionally, the circumstances under which the phosphoryl group of the wild-type LtnB protein is transferred to LtnA remain to be determined. Eighteen cyanobacterial genomes have been sequenced to date, but apart from those of S. elongatus strains PCC 6301 and 7942, only the genome of Crocosphaera watsonii WH 8501 carries a gene encoding an LtnT-like protein. ltnT-like genes are found in the genomes of the bacteria Bradyrhizobium japonicum, Bradyrhizobium sp. BTAi1, Desulfo-vibrio vulgaris, Legionella pneumophila, Magnetococcus sp. MC-1, and Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum, but not in other genomes. The LtnT-like protein is thus limited to a few species of bacteria and cyanobacteria. The SulP domains of LtnT and its homologs are 27-31% identical to one another and are more closely related to one another than to the other cyanobacterial SulP family proteins (Fig. 4D). This suggests that the ltnT gene was acquired by cyanobacteria by horizontal gene transfer.


Figure 7
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7.
Model explaining the roles of Ltn proteins in the regulation of LTN. A, NA3; B, NA3R. The autophosphorylated histidine residue in the histidine kinase domain is denoted by H, and the phosphoacceptor aspartate residue in the receiver domain is denoted by D. Arrows indicate the presumed flows of phosphoryl (P) groups. Further details are given under "Discussion."

 
In the NA3R strain, LtnT supports growth of the cells at 5 mM nitrate, but not at 0.5 mM nitrate (Fig. 5). The low affinity of LtnT for nitrate suggests that the substrate for LtnT may not be nitrate. LtnT clearly does not transport sulfate because overexpression of LtnT-(1-585) (the SulP domain of LtnT) or LtnB-(408-735) (the histidine kinase domain of LtnB) in an S. elongatus cysA deletion mutant that lacks the ABC-type sulfate transporter and that is unable to grow on low concentrations of sulfate (28) did not confer on the mutant the ability to grow on 30 mM sulfate3. SulP family proteins involved in active transport of bicarbonate (BicA) were recently identified in the cyanobacteria Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7002, Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803, and Synechococcus sp. WH 8102 (29), but these proteins are only 18-21% identical to the SulP domain of LtnT and are distantly related to LtnT (Fig. 4D), suggesting that LtnT is unlikely to function as a bicarbonate transporter. An ltnT single mutant of S. elongatus grew normally under standard laboratory conditions,3 giving no clue to the real substrate of the permease. Studies are in progress to identify the substrate of LtnT.

It is important to note that S. elongatus has made use of a normally unused permease for the purpose of nitrate transport by redirecting the phosphorylation signal of LtnB toward LtnA. This indicates that genetic modification of a regulatory network can play a role in adaptation of an organism to unfavorable conditions. Furthermore, secondary mutations in ltnT enabled the cells to grow on lower concentrations of nitrate compared with NA3R (Figs. 2 and Fig. 4B). Spontaneous mutations and selection thus allowed S. elongatus to develop a better permease from the normally unused LtnT permease. Bacterial and cyanobacterial genomes contain large numbers of genes with no known functions, which presumably include many unused genes. Although the physiological significance of the presence of these genes is unclear, we infer from the present results that they enhance the potential abilities of the cells to survive various adverse conditions.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research in Priority Areas 13206027 and in part by Grant-in-aid for Specially Promoted Research 13CE2005 and the 21st Century Center of Excellence Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of Molecular Plant Physiology, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusaku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan. Tel.: 81-52-789-4104; Fax: 81-52-789-4107; E-mail: maeda{at}agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp.

2 The abbreviations used are: NRT, nitrate transport system; ABC, ATP-binding cassette; ORFs, open reading frames; cNMP, cyclic nucleoside monophosphate; SulP, sulfate permease; LTN, latent transport activity for nitrate; IPTG, isopropyl beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside. Back

3 S.-i. Maeda, unpublished data. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Guerrero, M. G., Vega, J. M., and Losada, M. (1981) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 32, 169-204
  2. Guerrero, M. G., and Lara, C. (1987) in The Cyanobacteria (Fay, P., and Van Baalen, C., eds) pp. 163-186, Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam
  3. Forde, B. G. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1465, 219-235[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Omata, T. (1995) Plant Cell Physiol. 36, 207-213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Omata, T., Ohmori, M., Arai, N., and Ogawa, T. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 6612-6616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Omata, T. (1991) Plant Cell Physiol. 32, 151-157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Omata, T., Andriesse, X., and Hirano, A. (1993) Mol. Gen. Genet. 236, 193-202[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Kuhlemeier, C. J., Logtenberg, T., Stoorvogel, W., van Heugten, H. A., Borrias, W. E., and van Arkel, G. A. (1984) J. Bacteriol. 159, 36-41[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Andriesse, X., Bakker, H., and Weisbeek, P. (1990) in Inorganic Nitrogen in Plants and Microorganisms (Ullrich, W. R., Rigano, C., Fuggi, A., and Aparicio, P. J., eds) pp. 303-307, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
  10. Luque, I., Flores, E., and Herrero, A. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 21, 1201-1205[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Suzuki, I., Sugiyama, T., and Omata, T. (1993) Plant Cell Physiol. 34, 1311-1320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Maeda, S.-i., and Omata, T. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3036-3041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kuhlemeier, C. J., Thomas, A. A., van der Ende, A., van Leen, R. W., Biorrias, W. E., van den Hondel, C. A., and van Arkel, G. A. (1983) Plasmid 10, 156-163[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Stanier, R. Y., Kunisawa, R., Mandel, M., and Cohen-Bazire, G. (1971) Bacteriol. Rev. 35, 171-205[Free Full Text]
  15. Suzuki, I., Sugiyama, T., and Omata, T. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 2688-2694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Maeda, S.-i., Kawaguchi, Y., Ohe, T., and Omata, T. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 4080-4088[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Williams, J. G., and Szalay, A. A. (1983) Gene (Amst.) 24, 37-51[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Vieira, J., and Messing, J. (1982) Gene (Amst.) 19, 259-268[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Dzelzkalns, V. A., Owens, G. C., and Bogorad, L. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 8917-8925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ho, S. N., Hunt, H. D., Horton, R. M., Pullen, J. K., and Pease, L. R. (1989) Gene (Amst.) 77, 51-59[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Aiba, H., Mizuno, T., and Mizushima, S. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 8563-8567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Williams, J. G. (1988) Methods Enzymol. 167, 766-778[CrossRef]
  23. Mackinney, G. (1941) J. Biol. Chem. 140, 315-322[Free Full Text]
  24. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275[Free Full Text]
  25. Berman, H. M., Ten Eyck, L. F., Goodsell, D. S., Haste, N. M., Kornev, A., and Taylor, S. S. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 45-50[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Silverman, M., and Simon, M. (1977) J. Bacteriol. 130, 1317-1325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Yoshihara, S., Suzuki, F., Fujita, H., Geng, X., and Ikeuchi, M. (2000) Plant Cell Physiol. 41, 1299-1304[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Green, L. S., Laudenbach, D. E., and Grossman, A. R. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 1949-1953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Price, G. D., Woodger, F. J., Badger, M. R., Howitt, S. M., and Tucker, L. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 18228-18233[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Killary, A. M., and Fournier, R. E. (1984) Cell 38, 523-534[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Aiba, H., Fujimoto, S., and Ozaki, N. (1982) Nucleic Acids Res. 10, 1345-1361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Yoshimura, H., Hisabori, T., Yanagisawa, S., and Ohmori, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 6241-6245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kyte, J., and Doolittle, R. F. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105-132[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-i. Maeda, C. Sugita, M. Sugita, and T. Omata
A New Class of Signal Transducer in His-Asp Phosphorelay Systems
J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2006; 281(49): 37868 - 37876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/9/5869    most recent
M513196200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, S.-i.
Right arrow Articles by Omata, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, S.-i.
Right arrow Articles by Omata, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement