Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M609756200 on January 16, 2007

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 12, 8658-8666, March 23, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/12/8658    most recent
M609756200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paz, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Pick, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paz, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Pick, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Multicopper Ferroxidase Involved in Iron Binding to Transferrins in Dunaliella salina Plasma Membranes*

Yakov Paz, Adriana Katz, and Uri Pick1

From the Department of Biological Chemistry, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel

Received for publication, October 17, 2006 , and in revised form, January 9, 2007.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The halotolerant alga Dunaliella salina is unique among plants in that it utilizes a transferrin (TTf) to mediate iron acquisition (Fisher, M., Zamir, A., and Pick, U. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 17553–17558). Two new proteins that are induced by iron deprivation were identified in plasma membranes of D. salina as follows: a multicopper ferroxidase termed D-Fox and an internally duplicated glycoprotein (p130B). D-Fox and p130B are accessible to glycolytic, proteolytic, and biotin surface tagging treatments, suggesting that they are surface-exposed glycoproteins. Induction of D-Fox was also manifested by ferroxidase activity in plasma membrane preparations. These results are puzzling because ferroxidases in yeast and in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii function in redox-mediated iron uptake, a mechanism that is not known to operate in D. salina. Two lines of evidence suggest that D-Fox and p130B interact with D. salina triplicated transferrin (TTf). First, chemical cross-linking combined with mass spectroscopy analysis showed that D-Fox and p130B associate with TTf and with another plasma membrane transferrin. Second, detergent-solubilized D-Fox and p130B comigrated on blue native gels with plasma membrane transferrins. 59Fe autoradiography indicated that this complex binds Fe3+ ions. Also, the induction of D-Fox and p130B is kinetically correlated with enhanced iron binding and uptake activities. These results suggest that D-Fox and p130B associate with plasma membrane transferrins forming a complex that enhances iron binding and iron uptake. We propose that the function of D-Fox in D. salina has been modified during evolution from redox-mediated to transferrin-mediated iron uptake, following a gene transfer event of transferrins from an ancestral animal cell.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Iron is an essential element for all photosynthetic organisms because it is a cofactor of multiple components in photosynthetic electron transport. Iron deficiency is a common limitation for plant and algae proliferation because of its low availability in aerobic aqueous solutions. On the other hand, an excess of iron is highly toxic because it can elicit the formation of reactive oxygen species causing oxidative damage. Therefore, all photosynthetic organisms had to develop efficient regulatory mechanisms to control the uptake and storage of iron in order to maintain optimal iron metabolism.

Two major strategies of high affinity iron uptake have been demonstrated in plants and in algae as follows: siderophore-mediated Fe3+ uptake and a redox-mediated mechanism. The siderophore-mediated Fe3+ uptake was first described in bacteria and is characteristic to several algae (1, 2) and to grasses (strategy II plants). Redox-mediated iron acquisition, initiated by reduction of ferric to ferrous ions by a plasma membrane ferrireductase, is characteristic to strategy I plants, yeast, and algae (36). The mechanism of redox-mediated iron uptake in plants differs from that in yeast and in the alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in that plants transport the reduced ferrous ions directly via a divalent metal transporter, whereas in yeast and in C. reinhardtii ferrous ions are reoxidized to ferric ions. Reoxidation is mediated by a membranal multicopper ferroxidase, Fet3 or Fox1, belonging to the multicopper oxidase (MCO)2 superfamily (7, 8). Ferric ions are next transported through a coupled ferric-specific transporter. The MCO Fox1 and the iron permease Ftr1 are believed to form a complex at the plasma membrane as demonstrated in yeast (9, 10). Both siderophore and redox-mediated iron uptake are up-regulated under iron deprivation, thus compensating for the decreased iron availability by a more efficient high affinity iron uptake.

The halotolerant alga Dunaliella salina is well adapted to iron deprivation, as manifested by its proliferation and by maintenance of photosynthetic activity under iron deprivation (11). We found that D. salina has an unusual mechanism of iron uptake, mediated by binding and internalization of Fe3+ to a surface transferrin-like protein, TTf (12, 13). TTf serves as a housekeeping mechanism for iron uptake, but its expression level and activity are enhanced under iron deprivation or at high salinity, which limits iron availability. The origin of transferrins in Dunaliella is not clear, because no other transferrins have been described so far in other plants or in related organisms. More recently we identified another transferrin, DTf, that is induced under iron deprivation in D. salina plasma membrane. The function of DTf has not been elucidated yet (14).

Because TTf is an iron-binding protein that is loosely associated with the outer plasma membrane surface (15), it may be expected that iron uptake in D. salina requires additional plasma membrane proteins. In an attempt to identify such proteins, we compared the protein composition of plasma membranes derived from iron-deficient and from iron-sufficient D. salina cells. The comparison revealed two major induced proteins of about 130 kDa in the plasma membrane of iron-deficient cells. Based on their cDNA-deduced sequence, one of the proteins was identified as a member of the MCO family, and hence termed Dunaliella ferroxidase (D-Fox), whereas the other protein (p130B) showed no sequence homology to any known protein. Unexpectedly, we found that D-Fox is not involved in redox-mediated iron uptake, like MCO in yeast or in C. reinhardtii, but it is associated with transferrins in D. salina plasma membranes and functions in enhancing iron binding. Thus, enhancement of iron binding appears to be a critical parameter for iron acquisition in D. salina.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Algal Strain and Growth ConditionsD. salina was obtained from Dr. W. H. Thomas, La Jolla, CA. All culture glassware was washed in acid and thoroughly rinsed with Milli-Q water. Cells were cultured in iron-sufficient or in iron-deficient media as described previously (12, 13). Standard growth medium contained 1 M NaCl, with or without 1.5 µM FeCl3, 6 µM EDTA, unless otherwise indicated.

Plasma Membrane Preparation—Plasma membranes were prepared by differential centrifugation as described earlier (14). In brief, cells were washed in glycerol medium and osmotically lysed; chloroplasts were then removed by sedimentation at 650 x g for 10 min, and plasma membranes were sedimented at 12,000 x g for 60 min, washed, and stored in liquid nitrogen.

Cloning of D-Fox and p130B—Total RNA was prepared from 5 x 107 cells harvested 20 h after transfer to iron-deficient medium with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Synthesis of cDNA using 1 µg of RNA was carried out with the superscript reverse transcriptase (Clontech). The cDNA was used as template in PCR performed with degenerate primers designed from peptide sequences obtained from MS analysis (D-Fox 5'-sense, GTNCCNGARRGAYGCNGC; D-Fox 5'-antisense, GTNGCNGTRTTNCCNCC; p130B 5'-sense, AYACNGAYGARCARTTYTGG; and p130B 5'-antisense, TCYTGCATRTTNGTNCCCC). The 600-bp PCR product was subcloned into pTZ57R vector using the InsT/AcloneTM cloning kit (Fermentas UAB, Vilnius, Lithuania). Specific primers (D-Fox 5'-sense, CTGTATCCATGCATCCCC; D-Fox 5'-antisense, GTAGGTCTTGATCGCCTGC; p130B 5'-sense, CTCAGCACTAACAATTGGGGG; and p130B 5'-antisense, CAAGCTTGCCAGTGTCTGCC) were used in 3'- and 5'-RACE reactions to clone the full-length cDNA using the SmartTM RACE cDNA amplification kit (Clontech).

Polyclonal Antibodies—Polyclonal antibodies were prepared in rabbits against synthetic peptides derived from the amino acid sequences of D-Fox and p130B (C-TFTEEVERPQEDAY and PADGNKEELYRNEDL-C, respectively). The peptides, containing an extra terminal cysteine, were coupled to a carrier protein, maleimide-activated keyhole limpet hemocyanin, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pierce), and were injected into rabbits. On Western blot analysis with protein extracts from intact cells or plasma membrane, both antibodies reacted with a single band of about 130 kDa.

Trypsin Digestion—Iron-deficient cells (2 x 107 cells/ml) were suspended in iso-osmotic suspension buffer (100 mM NaCl, 1.4 M glycerol, 10 mM Tris-HEPES, pH 7.2, 10 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2) and were then incubated with 3 mg/ml trypsin (L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone-treated) for 30 min at room temperature. The digestion was terminated by addition of 12 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor. An aliquot of 2 x 106 cells was analyzed on SDS-PAGE.

Deglycosylation with PNGase F—Plasma membrane preparations from iron-deficient D. salina cells were denatured in glycoprotein denaturing buffer (0.5% SDS, 1% beta-mercaptoethanol) at 100 °C. Next, the deglycosylation reaction was carried out in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, supplemented with 1% Nonidet P-40. After addition of 1 unit of N-glycosidase PNGase F, the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. The digestion was arrested by addition of loading sample buffer. Samples containing 20 µg of protein were resolved on 7.5% SDS-PAGE, stained with Coomassie Blue, or analyzed by immunoblotting.

Biotin Labeling of Surface Proteins—The biotinylation procedure was performed essentially according to Ref. 14. In brief, cell samples were washed and incubated with 0.5 mg/ml NHS-LC-biotin (Pierce). Cells were lysed, and plasma membranes were prepared as described above. After protein separation by SDS-PAGE and electroblotting, biotinylated proteins were identified with streptavidin.

Chemical Cross-linking—Plasma membrane preparations from iron-deficient D. salina cells were suspended in 1.4 M glycerol, 20 mM Na-HEPES, 10 mM KCl, and 2 mM MgCl2. Disuccinimide tartrate (DST) in Me2SO was added to a final concentration of 5 mM followed by incubation for 30 min at room temperature. The reaction was terminated with 50 mM unbuffered Tris and incubated for another 10 min on ice.

Protein Analysis by Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis—Separation and analysis of proteins on 7.5% SDS-PAGE was performed as described previously (16). Analysis of plasma membrane proteins by two-dimensional isoelectric focusing (IEF)/SDS-PAGE was as follows. Plasma membrane protein samples (350 µg of protein) were incubated in standard IEF buffer containing 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 0.5% Triton X-100, 5% glycerol, 0.5% IPG buffer (GE Healthcare), and 20 mM DTT for 1 h at room temperature, loaded onto an 18-cm IPG dry strip, pH 3.0–5.6 (GE Healthcare), by active rehydration (for 12 h), and subjected to IEF for 65,000 V-h using IPG-phor instrument (GE Healthcare). Focused gel strips were equilibrated in SDS equilibration buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.8, 30% glycerol, 2% SDS, 6 M urea), first in 1% DTT (w/v) and next in 4% iodoacetamide. Strips were washed briefly with running buffer and loaded onto 7.5% SDS-PAGE. Gels were stained with Coomassie Blue or electroblotted to polyvinylidene difluoride paper for reaction with antibodies. Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry analysis of excised protein spots was performed by the MS service unit at The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.


Figure 1
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1.
Iron deficiency-induced proteins in D. salina plasma membrane. Plasma membrane preparations were derived from D. salina cells cultured for 48 h in the presence (+Fe) or absence (–Fe) of iron. A, one-dimensional SDS-PAGE. Aliquots containing 25 µg of proteins were separated on 7.5% SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Blue. Arrows indicate the major iron deficiency-induced proteins. B, resolution of p130A and p130B by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Plasma membrane proteins from iron-deficient cells containing 350 µg of protein were solubilized in IEF buffer and loaded on a nonlinear (pH 3.5–5.0) IPG strip. Second-dimensional separation was on 7% SDS-PAGE and followed by staining with Coomassie Blue. A section of the two-dimensional gel containing only the highest molecular weight and most acidic proteins is shown. Arrows indicate the major iron deficiency-induced proteins as follows: TTf, DTf, D-Fox, and p130B.

 
Two-dimensional BN/SDS-PAGE—Membrane samples (75 µg of protein) were solubilized in 30 µl of buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM Bis-tris, pH 7.0, 0.5 M {epsilon}-aminocaproic acid, 2 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, and plant protease inhibitor mixture. After 20 min at 4 °C, unsolubilized material was precipitated, and the solubilized proteins were mixed with BN sample buffer (final: 0.1 M 5-aminocaproic acid, 0.5% Coomassie Blue G-250). The samples were resolved on 4.5–13% gradient BN gel at 4 °C for 4 h. For resolution on a second dimension, lanes were cut out and equilibrated in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 6 M urea, 2% SDS, and 30% glycerol, supplemented consecutively with 1% DTT or with 2% iodoacetamide and resolved on 7.5% SDS-PAGE. Gels were stained with Coomassie Blue and analyzed by immunoblotting as described above.

Ferroxidase Activity—Ferroxidase activity was determined by following the oxidation of ferrous ions using ferrozine as a specific chelator of ferrous ions (17). Cells were washed once and suspended in a buffer containing 1 M NaCl, 50 mM Na-HEPES, pH 7.0, 10 mM KCl, and 2 mM MgCl2. Ferrous sulfate was dissolved in 100 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, under N2 gas (to avoid ferrous spontaneous oxidation), prior to use. The reaction was initiated by adding ferrous sulfate to a final concentration of 50 µM at a cell density of 107 cells/ml. Incubation was under continuous shaking in the dark to avoid generation of O2 in the oxidation assay. Reactions were terminated by addition of ferrozine to a final concentration of 600 µM, followed by sedimentation, and the rate of ferrous oxidation was calculated from the decreased absorbance at 562 nm ({epsilon}562 of 27,900 mol liter–1 cm–1).

Iron Binding and Uptake—Iron binding and uptake assays were performed as described previously (13). Cells (5 x 107 cells/ml) were suspended in growth medium buffer without iron, containing 50 mM Na-HEPES, pH 8.0, and 5 mM NaHCO3. The binding/uptake assays were initiated by addition of 59Fe citrate and incubated for 30 min in the dark at 4 °C (iron binding) or for 1 h in the light under continuous shaking at 24 °C (iron uptake). Incubations were terminated by a 5-fold dilution into ice-cold stop solutions, containing 1 M NaCl, 50 mM Na-MES, pH 5.3, without (iron binding) or with (iron uptake) 5 mM Na-EDTA. The cells were washed twice in the same solutions and counted in a beta-counter.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Identification and Cloning of Iron Deficiency-induced Proteins—A comparison of plasma membranes polypeptide composition was carried out between iron-deficient and iron-sufficient D. salina cells. As shown in Fig. 1A, three major proteins accumulate under iron deprivation as follows: two transferrin-like proteins, TTf and DTf (idi-100), which were previously cloned and characterized (13, 15), and a broad protein band of about 130 kDa, which was absent from plasma membranes derived from iron-sufficient cells. Separation of plasma membrane proteins from iron-deficient cells on two-dimensional IEF/SDS-polyacrylamide gels, resolved the 130-kDa band into two distinct proteins of similar apparent molecular weight that were termed p130A and p130B (Fig. 1B). Treatment of plasma membranes from iron-deficient cells with a peptidyl N-glycosidase, also resolved the 130-kDa bands into two distinct components on one-dimensional SDS-polyacrylamide gels (see Fig. 4C). Both protein bands from the two different gels were excised, cleaved with trypsin, and analyzed by nanoelectrospray MS/MS. A partial sequence of about 30 peptides was obtained. A search in protein data bases revealed that 14 of these sequences show homology to MCO. Based on these sequences, forward and reverse degenerate nucleotide primers were designed and utilized in different combinations for PCR amplification on cDNA from iron-deficient cells. A PCR product of 600 bp was initially cloned, and the sequencing was completed by 3'-RACE and 5'-RACE PCR extensions. A DNA product of 4275 bp was obtained, containing an open reading frame of 3225 bp, encoding a deduced polypeptide of 1075 amino acids, flanked by 45 bp at the 5'-UTR and by 1003 bp at the 3'-UTR. A polyadenylation signal (TGTAA), located 14 bp upstream from the poly(A) tail, was identified. All 14 amino acid sequences obtained by the MS analysis, covering about 12% of the total protein, were identified within the deduced amino acid sequence (data no shown). The highest sequence similarity (40% identity and 57% similarity) was obtained by FOX1, an iron-deficiency induced protein from the green alga C. reinhardtii (Fig. 2; compare with Fig. 3 in Ref. 8). The protein was therefore termed D-Fox (Dunaliella ferroxidase; GenBankTM accession number AY987035 [GenBank] ).


Figure 2
View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2.
Alignment of D-Fox to Fox1. Alignment of the amino acid sequence of D-Fox with C. reinhardtii Fox1 (GenBankTM accession AF450137) was made by ClustalW (EBI). Identical and conserved amino acid residues are shaded in black and gray, respectively. Putative copper-binding motifs type I, type II, and type III are boxed in thin or boldface frames or dot-underlined, respectively.

 
Sequence Analysis of D-Fox—By comparing amino acid sequences of D-Fox to Fox1, we found 20% higher abundance of acidic residues, a characteristic feature of proteins in halophiles, which was also found previously in extracellular proteins of Dunaliella (18). Analysis of the deduced amino acid sequence of D-Fox revealed that it consists of three internal homologous repeats with 28–31% sequence identity (amino acids 61–350, 400–715, and 764-end), a typical feature in the MCO family, probably resulting from a gene duplication event. Moreover, we identified several putative copper-binding sites, which are conserved in the MCO protein family and in particularly in C. reinhardtii Fox1. The copper-binding sites included three type I motifs, between amino acids 331–351, 694–714, 1049–1070, and one type II copper-binding motif, between amino acids 336 and 347. In addition, several His-X-His copper-binding motifs were found, as reported also in C. reinhardtii Fox1 (Fig. 2). Interestingly, type I copper-binding motifs were perfectly aligned in all three domains within the internal triplication. A hydropathy plot of D-Fox revealed a large hydrophilic protein with only one clear hydrophobic stretch at the N-terminal end. Sequence analysis predicted a signal peptide in the N-terminal hydrophobic stretch, which is most likely cleaved between amino acids 25 and 26. Three potential N-glycosylation sites were identified at amino acid residues 382, 814, and 934.


Figure 3
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3.
Nucleotides, deduced amino acid sequence, and hydropathy plot of the D. salina p130B. A, amino acid sequence. Sequences matching proteolytic fragments determined by MS spectrometry are underlined. B, hydropathy analysis. Analysis was performed with DNAStrider Program. Positive values represent amino acid segments of hydrophobic nature.

 
Cloning and Sequence Analysis of p130B—To identify p130B, degenerate nucleotide primers were designed corresponding to the amino acid sequences of peptides that did not correspond to D-Fox, and we utilized them in different combinations for PCR amplification on cDNA from iron-deficient cells. This resulted in cloning of a second DNA product of 3948 bp, containing an open reading frame of 3163 bp, encoding a deduced polypeptide of 1054 amino acids, flanked by 93 bp at the 5'-UTR and by 692 bp at the 3'-UTR (Fig. 3A). All 17 amino acid sequences obtained from the MS analysis, covering about 10% of the total protein, were identified within the deduced amino acid sequences as shown in Fig. 3A. The sequence of p130B (GenBankTM accession number AY987036 [GenBank] ) showed no significant homology to any known protein in the data bases. It should be noted that the sequence of p130B revealed an internal duplication with 38% sequence identity and 59% similarity. Hydropathy plot demonstrated two putative membrane-spanning helices, one at the N-terminal end and another at the C-terminal end of the protein (Fig. 3B). The N-terminal helix was predicted to be a leader peptide helix, which is most likely cleaved between residues 23 and 24 (computed by the CBS prediction server). Motifs for C-terminal protein prenylation (19) or post-translational glycosylphosphatidylinositol lipid-anchoring predictions (20) were not detected. However, sequence analysis prediction revealed three putative N-glycosylation sites in amino acid residues 86, 361, and 495 (NetNGlyc).

D-Fox and p130B Are Surface-exposed Glycoproteins—If D-Fox is involved in iron acquisition, it is expected to be localized at the extracellular surface of the plasma membrane. Two approaches were selected to test the orientation of D-Fox and p130B as follows: exposure to proteolysis and biotin surface tagging. As demonstrated in Fig. 4A, exposure of intact cells to trypsin treatment resulted in digestion of TTf, p130B, D-Fox, and DTf, as shown by the disappearance of the corresponding protein bands and by Western analysis. Labeling intact cells with a membrane-impermeable biotin tag, followed by detection with streptavidin, revealed a selective labeling of four major components corresponding to TTf, p130B, D-Fox, and DTf (Fig. 4B). These results suggest that p130B and D-Fox, similar to TTf and DTf (14), are also exposed to the extracellular side of the plasma membrane of D. salina. Treatment of plasma membrane preparations from iron-deficient cells with PNGase F increased the electrophoretic mobility of D-Fox and of p130B and resolved them into two distinct bands on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4C). These results indicate that D-Fox and p130B are N-glycosylated proteins, consistent with their putative N-glycosylation sites. We also found that both proteins, as well as TTf, are stained with the glycoprotein stain DIG-Glycan detection kit (Roche Applied Science), (not shown). Together, these results clearly indicate that D-Fox and p130B are N-glycosylated proteins located at the outer surface of the plasma membrane.

D-Fox Is a Plasma Membrane Ferroxidase—To test if D-Fox functions as a ferroxidase, we measured ferroxidase activity in intact cells and in plasma membrane preparations derived from iron-deficient cells. The colorimetric assay is based on the oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+, measured with the Fe2+-specific chelator ferrozine. As shown in Table 1, the measured ferroxidase activity in iron-deficient cells, as well as in the corresponding plasma membrane, was greatly enhanced, in correlation with the accumulation of D-Fox. Kinetic characterization of ferroxidase activity in plasma membrane preparations yielded an optimal pH of 7.0 and a slight stimulation by salt, with optimal activity between 0.5 and 1.0 M NaCl (data not shown). A notable factor in the regulation of multicopper ferroxidase biosynthesis in yeast and in C. reinhardtii is the availability of copper, a cofactor in all MCO members. Depletion of copper from the growth medium of iron-deficient cells partially inhibited the accumulation of D-Fox protein and suppressed ferroxidase activity (Table 1). Tetrathiomolybdate (TTM) is a characteristic inhibitor of MCO proteins (21). Incubation with 250 µM TTM strongly inhibited ferroxidase activity of both cells and plasma membranes from iron-deficient cells, but it only slightly affected the activity of control or high salt cells (<15%, not shown). These results indicate that D-Fox is a multicopper ferroxidase and that it may be involved in iron uptake in iron-deficient D. salina cells.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1
Iron deprivation induces ferroxidase activity in D. salina intact cells and in plasma membrane preparations

Intact D. salina cells or plasma membrane preparations derived either from iron-sufficient, iron-deficient, or cells deprived of both iron and copper were tested for ferroxidase activity using the ferrozine assay. One sample of iron-deficient cells was incubated for 1 h with 250 µM of the ferroxidase inhibitor TTM.

 


Figure 4
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4.
Enzymatic digestion and biotin tagging of surface proteins in iron-deficient D. salina cells. A, trypsin treatment. Samples of 2 x 107 iron-deficient D. salina cells were incubated with or without 3 mg/ml trypsin. Digestion was terminated by addition of 12 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor. Aliquots of 4 x 106 cells were washed twice and separated by SDS-PAGE. Left, Coomassie staining. Right, Western blot detected with anti-TTf, anti-D-Fox, anti-p130B, and anti-DTf. B, biotinylation of surface-exposed proteins. Biotinylated and nonbiotinylated iron-deficient D. salina cells (T.C) were fractionated, and plasma membrane (PM) fractions were prepared. Left, Coomassie Blue staining using 20 µg of protein per lane. Right, Western blot analysis using streptavidin, 0.5 µg of protein per lane. C, resolution of D-Fox and p130B on SDS-PAGE following deglycosylation with PNGase F. Plasma membrane preparations from iron-deficient D. salina cell were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with PNGase F. Samples containing 20 µg of protein were resolved on 7.5% SDS-PAGE. Left, Coomassie Blue staining. Right, Western blot analysis using anti-p130B and anti-D-Fox.

 


Figure 5
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5.
Induction of DTf, D-Fox, and p130B is correlated with enhanced iron binding and uptake. D. salina cells were cultured in iron-deficient medium for 36 h and then either supplemented with 10 µM iron citrate or left in the iron-deficient medium. Samples were taken at the indicated time points for SDS-PAGE, Western analysis (2 x 106 cells/sample), or for activity measurements (5 x 107 cells/sample). A, Western analysis. Proteins were extracted, separated on 7% SDS-PAGE, blotted, and reacted with anti-TTf, anti-p130B, anti-D-Fox, or anti-DTf antibodies. B, iron binding and iron uptake activity measurements.

 
Induction of D-Fox, p130B, and DTf Are Correlated with Elevated Iron Binding and Uptake—We next tested by immunoanalysis whether the inductions of D-Fox, p130B, DTf, and TTf are kinetically correlated. Accordingly, we monitored the changes in expression levels of these proteins by an immunoanalysis during the progress of adaptation to iron deficiency and following iron re-supplementation. As shown in Fig. 5A, similar time dependences of induction and degradation of D-Fox, p130B, and DTf were observed. All three proteins were induced between 12 and 24 h from the onset of iron deprivation and disappeared within 12 h after re-supplementation of iron. However, the level of TTf, the housekeeping transferrin in D. salina (13), deviated from the other three proteins, being induced faster upon iron deprivation and suppressed slower upon iron re-supplementation.

To test if the induction of these proteins is correlated with changes in iron binding or iron uptake activities, we monitored in parallel the expression level of the proteins and the specific iron binding and iron uptake under the same conditions. As shown in Fig. 5B, there is a large increase in iron binding and a smaller increase in iron uptake, starting 24 h following iron deprivation, which are correlated with the induction of D-Fox, p130B, and DTf but not with the faster elevation in level of TTf. Similarly, re-supplementation of iron after 36 h suppressed iron binding and uptake within 12 h in correlation with disappearance of D-Fox, p130B, and DTf but not TTf. Induction of ferroxidase activity followed the same time dependence (not shown). These results suggest that the large increase in iron-binding capacity in iron-deprived cells is not induced by TTf but may be associated with the induction of DTf, D-Fox, and/or p130B. RNA transcript analysis revealed that the transcript levels of the new plasma membrane proteins, D-Fox and p130B, increased in parallel, preceding the accumulation of the corresponding proteins (data not shown). These results suggest that the induction of D-Fox, p130B, and DTf may be coregulated.

D-Fox and p130B Associate with Plasma Membrane Transferrins—The following two approaches were attempted to test if D-Fox, p130B, DTf, and TTf interact with each other in D. salina plasma membranes: resolution of protein complexes on native gels and chemical cross-linking. Plasma membrane proteins were dissolved in 1% Triton X-100 and resolved on BN gels, a procedure that has been successfully applied to identify and to isolate protein complexes from mitochondrial and chloroplast membranes (22). The BN resolution, combined with Western immunoanalysis, revealed that each protein migrates in several positions on BN gels, corresponding to monomers (TTf and DTf), homo-oligomers (p130B), or hetero-oligomers. A major complex of about 380 kDa was resolved in iron-deficient cells that was absent in control membranes. This complex positively cross-reacted with antibodies against TTf, p130B, D-Fox, and or DTf (Fig. 6). Preincubation of plasma membranes with 59Fe3+ followed by resolution on BN gels and autoradiography revealed in iron-deprived plasma membranes four iron-binding protein bands, corresponding to the following: band 1, TTf, DTf, D-Fox, and p130B; band 2, DTf and D-Fox; band 3, TTf; and band 4, DTf (Fig. 6D). For comparison, only one weak iron-binding component, corresponding to TTf, was observed in membranes from iron-sufficient cells (not shown). It should be noted that the apparent molecular weight of the largest iron-binding complex (~380 kDa) is too small for a tetrameric complex of TTf, DTf, D-Fox, and p130B (~520 kDa). Hence, this band may represent a mixture of two complexes of similar molecular weight (for example TTf/DTf/D-Fox and or TTf/DTf/p130B).

In the second approach, we selected several chemical bi-functional cross-linkers, spaced by different lengths and directed against different amino acid functional groups. Both plasma membranes and intact cells were incubated with different cross-linkers and tested by Western immunoanalysis. Two cross-linkers yielded cross-linked products as follows: DST and EGS, directed against {epsilon}-amino groups of lysine. Several high molecular weight products were identified by antibodies against DTf and D-Fox in plasma membranes from iron-deficient cells (Fig. 7). The cross-reacted products were sent for MS analysis and were found to contain several peptides of DTf, D-Fox, p130B, and TTf (not shown). Taken together, these results suggest that D-Fox and p130B interact with the transferrins TTf and DTf in D. salina plasma membranes and that these interactions are associated with enhanced iron binding.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Multicopper ferroxidases are crucial components in Redox-mediated iron uptake in yeast and in the algae C. reinhardtii. These proteins are induced under iron deprivation in coordination with a membrane-associated ferrireductase and with a specific Fe3+ transporter, which together mediate high affinity iron uptake (9, 10, 2325).


Figure 6
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 6.
Comigration and iron binding of plasma membrane iron-induced proteins on BN gel. A, one-dimensional BN gels. Plasma membrane preparations isolated from iron-deficient (–Fe) or iron-sufficient (+Fe) D. salina cells were solubilized in 1% Triton X-100 and loaded on BN gels. B, two-dimensional BN-PAGE. C, Western analysis. Immunoanalysis with anti-TTf, anti-D-Fox, anti-p130B, and anti-DTf. D, iron binding activity. Plasma membranes from iron-deficient cells were preincubated for 30 min at 4 °C with 59Fe, solubilized, and loaded on BN gels and either subjected to autoradiography (top) or separated on a 7% SDS-PAGE as in B (bottom). Proteins were detected by Coomassie Blue (CB) staining and identified by immunoblot analysis.

 


Figure 7
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 7.
Cross-linking between D-Fox and p130B with transferrins in D. salina plasma membranes. Plasma membrane preparations from iron-deficient D. salina cells were subjected to chemical cross-linking with EGS or DST. Samples containing 20 µg of protein per lane were separated on 7.5% SDS-PAGE. Western blot analysis was performed with anti-D-Fox antibodies and/or with anti-DTf antibodies. High molecular weight cross-linked products are indicated by arrows.

 
D. salina D-Fox resembles in many respects Fox-1 from C. reinhardtii. Both proteins are induced in the plasma membrane under iron deprivation and have ferroxidase activity that is dependent on copper availability and is sensitive to TTM (8, 26). Moreover, the high sequence similarity between Fox-1 and D-Fox suggests that these proteins probably had a common evolutionary origin, implying a similar physiological function.

Unexpectedly, we could find no evidence for redox-mediated iron uptake is D. salina; iron-deficient D. salina cells have no detectable ferrireductase activity, neither in intact cells nor in plasma membranes, indicating that no plasma membrane ferrireductase is induced in this alga under iron deprivation (data not shown). This finding contradicts a previous report of induction of a weak ferrireductase activity in iron-deprived Dunaliella bardawill (27). However, upon testing iron uptake in D. bardawill, we found that this species acquires iron primarily via transferrins and that redox-driven iron uptake and iron reductase activities are hardly detectable and by far lower than in C. reinhardtii.3 Also, we found that ferrozine, a chelator of Fe2+, does not inhibit iron uptake in Dunaliella,4 suggesting that ferrous ions are not intermediates in iron uptake in D. salina.

These results suggest that D-Fox in D. salina is not involved in redox-mediated iron uptake. In previous studies we have demonstrated that TTf is an Fe3+-binding protein and concluded that all Fe3+ uptake in D. salina is mediated by internalization of Fe3+ bound to TTf (13, 15). Also in iron-deficient D. salina cells, we found that the iron binding shows characteristic features of transferrins. For example, elimination of bicarbonate, a co-ligand for Fe3+ binding to transferrins, completely inhibited iron uptake and binding.4 Moreover, we have previously shown that dissociation of TTf from the plasma membranes of iron-deficient cells completely eliminated iron binding indicating that TTf is the major contributor to iron binding activity (14, 15). The 59Fe3+ binding analysis on BN-PAGE shows that the iron-binding components are TTf and DTf monomers as well as protein complexes that contain both TTf and DTf. Our previous unsuccessful attempts to show iron binding to DTf (14) may be due to the weaker binding affinity of this protein compared with TTf. D-Fox and p130B are unlikely to bind Fe3+ because their predicted sequences have no typical iron-binding motifs and because on BN-PAGE neither monomeric D-Fox nor oligomeric p130B shows 59Fe binding activity. Taken together, these results suggest that TTf and/or DTf are the iron-binding proteins in D. salina plasma membranes. It is likely that the major iron-binding element in the native membrane is a complex of TTf and DTf with D-Fox and/or p130B, which partially dissociated during resolution on the BN-PAGE.

The kinetic analysis of protein induction and of iron binding and uptake shows that the induction of TTf precedes the maximal iron binding/uptake activities, reached 24 h after the onset of iron deprivation. If indeed TTf is the major iron-binding protein in iron-deficient cells, how is it possible that the large increase in iron binding activity is not correlated with a parallel increase in level of TTf? A possible explanation may be that in iron-sufficient cells TTf does not exhibit its maximal iron binding activity. According to its predicted amino acid sequence, TTf possesses three potential iron-binding sites (12). Yet, we found that isolated TTf binds substoichiometric amounts of Fe3+ of less than 1 iron/TTf (15, 29). It is therefore possible that the interactions of TTf with DTf, D-Fox, and/or p130B in iron-deficient cells induce a conformational change in TTf that opens up all three iron-binding sites thus increasing its iron-binding capacity. This interpretation is consistent with our recent finding that the affinity for Fe3+ and for bicarbonate is significantly increased in iron-deficient D. salina cells, indicating modification of the iron-binding sites.4 We therefore propose that the function of DTf, D-Fox, and p130B is to create a high affinity and stable iron-binding complex with TTf in D. salina plasma membranes that manifests its maximal iron-binding capacity.

How did Dunaliella evolve an MCO ferroxidase that is not linked to redox-mediated iron uptake? A possible course of events may be that Dunaliella switched during evolution from redox-mediated to transferrin-mediated iron acquisition, as a consequence of a gene transfer event of a transferrin-like gene from an ancestral animal cell. The low sequence similarities between Dunaliella TTf and DTf to mammalian transferrins suggest that such an event occurred early in the evolution of this alga. It may be expected that acquisition of an efficient iron uptake mechanism, perfectly suited for iron uptake in hypersaline solutions, the natural living environment of Dunaliella, would predominate and lead to disappearance of less efficient iron uptake mechanisms. This is consistent with the absence (this work) or very low (27) ferrireductase activity observed in various species of Dunaliella. If such a switch in iron uptake indeed occurred, why was D-Fox preserved whereas the ferrireductase gene disappeared during evolution? A possible reason may be that association of D-Fox with transferrins at the plasma membrane of Dunaliella, enabled it to utilize ferrous ions, which might have been more abundant than today in the primordial living environment of Dunaliella. We found that under reducing conditions, iron-deficient D. salina cells can take up ferrous ions, presumably via D-Fox Fe2+ oxidation coupled to TTf-mediated Fe3+ uptake,4 consistent with this possibility. In fact, Dunaliella may be exposed to anaerobic conditions under certain natural conditions, such as sulfate limitation (28), which could give D-Fox a direct functional significance for iron acquisition. Accordingly, we propose that D-Fox changed its physiological role during the evolution of Dunaliella from redox-mediated to transferrin-mediated iron uptake by association with transferrins at the plasma membrane surface.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by grants from The Israel Science Foundation and by The Charles and Louise Gartner fund (to U. P.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AY987035 [GenBank] and AF450137 [GenBank] . Back

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 972-8-9342732; Fax: 972-8-9344118; E-mail: uri.pick{at}weizmann.ac.il.

2 The abbreviations used are: MCO, multicopper oxidase; D-Fox, D. salina ferroxidase; Fox1, C. reinhardtii ferroxidase; TTf, D. salina triplicated transferrin; DTf, D. salina transferrin; PNGase, peptide N-glycosidase; BN, blue native gels; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; IEF, isoelectric focusing; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid; DTT, dithiothreitol; TTM, tetrathiomolybdate; DST, disuccinimidyl tartrate; EGS, succinimidylsuccinate; Bis-tris, 2-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol; UTR, untranslated region; MS, mass spectrometry. Back

3 U. Pick, unpublished observations. Back

4 Y. Paz and U. Pick, unpublished results. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Meira Weiss for help and advice in cloning D-Fox and p130B genes.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Benderliev, K. M., and Ivanova, N. I. (1994) Planta 193, 163–166
  2. Boye, M., and van den Berg, C. M. G. (2000) Mar. Chem. 70, 277–287[CrossRef]
  3. Allnutt, F. C. T., and Bonner, W. D. (1987) Plant Physiol. 85, 751–756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Dancis, A., Roman, D. G., Anderson, G. J., Hinnebusch, A. G., and Klausner, R. D. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 3869–3873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lesuisse, E., Casteras-Simon, M., and Labbe, P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13578–13583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Robinson, N. J., Procter, C. M., Connolly, E. L., and Guerinot, M. L. (1999) Nature 397, 694–697[CrossRef]
  7. Herbik, A., Haebel, S., and Buckhout, T. J. (2002) Plant Soil 241, 1–9
  8. La Fontaine, S., Quinn, J. M., Nakamoto, S. S., Page, M. D., Gohre, V., Mosely, J. L., Kropat, J., and Merchant, S. (2002) Eukaryot. Cell 1, 736–757[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Stearman, R., Yuan, D. S., Yamaguchi-Iwai, Y., Klausner, R. D., and Dancis, A. (1996) Science 271, 1552–1557[Abstract]
  10. Askwith, C., and Kaplan, J. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 135–138[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Varsano, T., Kaftan, D., and Pick, U. (2003) J. Plant Nutr. 26, 2197–2210
  12. Fisher, M., Gokhman, I., Pick, U., and Zamir, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1565–1570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Fisher, M., Zamir, A., and Pick, U. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 17553–17558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Schwarz, M., Sal-Man, N., Zamir, A., and Pick, U. (2003) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1649, 190–200[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Schwarz, M., Zamir, A., and Pick, U. (2003) J. Plant Nutr. 26, 2081–2091
  16. Fisher, M., Pick, U., and Zamir, A. (1994) Plant Physiol. 106, 1359–1365[Abstract]
  17. Gibbs, C. R. (1976) Anal. Chem. 48, 1197–1201
  18. Premkumar, L., Greenblatt, H. M., Bageshwar, U. K., Savchenko, T., Gokhman, I., Sussman, J. L., and Zamir, A. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 7493–7498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Maurer-Stroh, S., and Eisenhaber, F. (2005) Genome Biol. 6, R55[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Eisenhaber, B., Wildpaner, M., Schultz, C. J., Borner, G. H. H., Dupree, P., and Eisenhaber, F. (2003) Plant Physiol. 133, 1691–1701[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Chidambaram, M. V., Barnes, G., and Frieden, E. (1984) J. Inorg. Biochem, 22, 231–239[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Schagger, H., and von Jagow, G. (1991) Anal. Biochem. 199, 223–231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Urbanowski, J. L., and Piper, R. C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 38061–38070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wang, T. P., Quintanar, L., Severance, S., Solomon, E. I., and Kosman, D. J. (2003) J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 8, 611–620[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Di Patti, M. C. B., Miele, R., Schinina, M. E., and Barra, D. (2005) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 333, 432–437[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Herbik, A., Bolling, C., and Buckhout, T. J. (2002) Plant Physiol. 130, 2039–2048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Keshtacher-Liebson, E., Hadar, Y., and Chen, Y. (1999) Plant Soil 215, 175–182
  28. Melis, A., Zhang, L., Forestier, M., Ghirardi, M. L., and Siebert, M. (2000) Plant Physiol 122, 127–136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Schwarz, M. (2002) Iron Deficiency-induced Proteins in the Halotolerant Alga Dunaliella salina, Ph.D. thesis, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. E. Allen, J. LaRoche, U. Maheswari, M. Lommer, N. Schauer, P. J. Lopez, G. Finazzi, A. R. Fernie, and C. Bowler
Whole-cell response of the pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum to iron starvation
PNAS, July 29, 2008; 105(30): 10438 - 10443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
M. D. Allen, J. A. del Campo, J. Kropat, and S. S. Merchant
FEA1, FEA2, and FRE1, Encoding Two Homologous Secreted Proteins and a Candidate Ferrireductase, Are Expressed Coordinately with FOX1 and FTR1 in Iron-Deficient Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Eukaryot. Cell, October 1, 2007; 6(10): 1841 - 1852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
Y. Paz, E. Shimoni, M. Weiss, and U. Pick
Effects of Iron Deficiency on Iron Binding and Internalization into Acidic Vacuoles in Dunaliella salina
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2007; 144(3): 1407 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/12/8658    most recent
M609756200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paz, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Pick, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paz, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Pick, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement