![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 19, 14655-14664, May 11, 2007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






1
From the
Oxford Protein Production Facility and
Division of Structural Biology, Henry Wellcome Building for Genomic Medicine, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN and the ¶Bacterial Pathogenesis and Functional Genomics Group, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom
Received for publication, February 5, 2007 , and in revised form, March 19, 2007.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
25% sequence identity. Lrp is a global regulator that controls the expression of a large number of operons in E. coli, including those involved in the synthesis and degradation of amino acids (1), whereas AsnC is a specific regulator of the asnA gene, which codes for asparagine synthetase, responsible for converting aspartate to asparagine in an ATP-dependent reaction, and an autorepressor of its own expression (2). As the name implies, many Lrp-responsive operons are co-regulated by L-leucine that can either antagonize or potentiate the effects of Lrp (3). L-Leucine is one of the most common amino acids in proteins and the reciprocal effect of Lrp on amino acid metabolism suggests that intracellular Lrp abundance mediates transitions between "feast and famine" (3, 4). AsnC, on the other hand, appears to be responsible for controlling asparagine levels via negative feedback regulation of asparagine synthetase expression (2, 5).
Insight into the relationship between the structure of Lrp/AsnC family proteins and their function has come from x-ray crystallography. To date, four x-ray crystal structures from the family have been reported, two from Archaeal sources; Pyrococcus furiosus LrpA (Protein Data Bank code 1I1G
[PDB]
(6) and the close homologue, FL11, from Pyrococcus sp. OT3 (PDB code 1RI7 (7) and two from bacterial sources: E. coli AsnC in complex with asparagine (PDB code 2CG4) and Bacillus subtilis LrpC (PDB code 2CFX) (8). The Lrp/AsnC family fold revealed by analysis of these structures consists of a N-terminal DNA-binding domain containing a helix-turn-helix motif connected to a C-terminal ligand binding domain (9), which has a 




fold topology (6). The basic structural unit of Lrp/AsnC biological assemblies is dimeric, with the C-terminal
-sheet regions of each monomer interacting to generate a tightly bound
-cage structure. The association of the dimers into an octameric array is consistent with a model for DNA-protein interaction involving DNA being wrapped around the perimeter of the disc (7, 8). The ligand-bound structure of AsnC confirms an earlier prediction based on sequence alignments (9) and shows that the asparagine-binding site is formed at the interface between adjacent dimers. This results in eight L-as-paragines bound in the AsnC octameric array (8).
In view of their potential role as both global and specific transcriptional regulators, we have targeted the Lrp/AsnC family proteins as part of a structural proteomics and transcriptomics study of pathogenic Neisseria spp. The genomes of Neisseria meningitidis serogroups A (strain Z2491) and B (strain MC58) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (strain FA 1090) have been sequenced and each shown to contain two Lrp/AsnC family regulators (10). The two regulators exemplified by the gene products of NMB0573 (annotated asnC) and NMB1650 (annotated lrp) in N. meningitidis serotype B are each highly conserved between the two species of pathogen (
99% sequence identity) and are 27% identical to each other. In this report we describe the cloning and expression of the NMB0573 gene, which we have designated as NMB0573. We have identified the amino acid ligands of the protein as methionine and leucine and have determined its structure by x-ray crystallography with and without bound amino acids. The regulatory function(s) of NMB0573 have been investigated by comparing the growth phenotype and transcriptomes of wild-type and knock-out strains of N. meninigitidis. Analysis of microarray data indicates that NMB0573 is predominantly a global activator of gene expression. In light of these results, the annotation of NMB0573 as AsnC, implying that it is a specific regulator of asparagine synthetase, will need to be revised.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
cDNA Generation, Labeling, and Microarray HybridizationTotal RNA was prepared as described in Ref. 12. Reagents and enzymes for the preparation of materials for microarray hybridizations were sourced from the 3DNA Array 900 MPX kit (Genisphere, PA) unless otherwise stated. Three to 5 µg of RNA was reverse transcribed into unlabeled cDNA using Super-Script III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) at 42 °C for 2 h. The cDNA was cleaned using a Clean & Concentrate-5 column (Zymol Research) and poly-T tailed with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. Dye-specific capture sequences were ligated to the poly-T tails, and the tagged cDNAs were cleaned using a Clean & Concentrate-5 column. The pan-Neisseria microarray version 2 (13) containing probes to N. gonorrhoeae and N. meningitidis genes was used for these experiments. Microarray slides were pre-hybridized in 3.5x SSC, 0.1% SDS, and 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin at 65 °C for 20 min, washed with water and isopropyl alcohol, dried with an airbrush, and prescanned to check for array defects. The capture sequence-tagged cDNAs were hybridized onto the microarray slide for 16 h at 60 °C in a SlideBooster with the power setting at 25 and a pulse/pause ratio of 3:7. Following the first hybridization, the slides were washed in 2 x SSC, 0.2% SDS for 10 min at 60 °C, followed by washes at 2x SSC and 0.2x SSC for 10 min, each at room temperature. The slides were dried with an airbrush and hybridized with the Cy3 and Cy5 capture reagents at 55 °C for 4 h in a SlideBooster. The slides were again washed in 2x SSC, 0.2% SDS (10 min at 55 °C) followed by 10 min room temperature washes in 2x SSC and 0.2x SSC and dried with an airbrush. Dried slides were scanned using a ScanArray ExpressHT (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) using autocalibration.
Microarray Data AnalysisImages were analyzed using BlueFuse for Microarrays (BlueGnome). Spot data were extracted from images and manually flagged to remove artifacts before fusion. Fused data were filtered according to pON value (BlueGnome). The pON values associated with an absence of visible spot signals was determined for each slide, and used to eliminate the bias generated by the inclusion of un-hybridized spots in the statistical interpretation of the data. The results were then analyzed using BASE (14). Data were globally normalized to the median fold ratio of the central 60% of the data with an intensity of greater than 200 in both channels. The mean overall fold ratio for the combined normalized data from the biological replicates was determined using the MGH fold change algorithm. Statistical analyses were performed using both the Student's t test and a local implementation of Cyber-T within BASE (using a sliding window size of 75, and a Bayes confidence estimate value of 15), and the confidence intervals were determined within a separate local BASE tool. Summary data of the changes discussed in the article are given in supplementary Table S1. The complete data are available in an interactive GBrowse data base online (www.compbio.ox.ac.uk/data). The complete microarray details and experimental data have been deposited in the ArrayExpress data base (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) with the accession number E-MEXP-925.
Protein ProductionNMB0573 gene sequences were amplified from genomic DNA (N. meningitidis strain MC58) using the following pairs of primers (gene-specific sequences are in capital letters). NMB0573 forward primer 1: 5'-aagttctgtttcagggcccgATGCCCCAACTCACTTTAGACAAAACCG-3' or forward primer 2: 5'-aagttctgtttcagggcccgATGTTAATATGGTCTCCATCTGTGCGG-3' and the common reverse primer 5'-atggtctagaaagcttaCTATTCCTTCAGCAGGTGGTTGAGCG-3' were used. The resulting PCR products were inserted into the vector pOPINF (15) using In-Fusion® enzyme (Clontech). The expression constructs contained a N-terminal His tag and 3C protease cleavage site (16). Soluble expression was evaluated at small scale as described in Refs. 15 and 17 and large scale purification carried out as described in Ref. 18. Selenomethionine-labeled proteins were produced in the B834 (DE3) using SelenoMet media (Molecular Dimensions). Full incorporation of selenomethionine was confirmed by LC-ESI-MS (HPLC Dionex, Camberley, Surrey, UK) and electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (Q-TOF micro, Waters, Manchester, UK).
Thermal Shift AssayTo investigate whether the NMB0573 protein bound to amino acids, a thermal shift assay using Sypro Orange dye (Molecular Probes) was performed (19, 20). Briefly, 20-µl reactions containing 0.2-0.5 mg/ml protein, Sypro Orange dye, and either buffer alone or amino acid solutions (0-30 mM) were heated from 20 to 90 °C in 0.5 °C steps in a real time PCR machine (iCycler iQ Real-Time Detection System, Bio-Rad). Each step was held for 15 s and fluorescent intensity was measured at excitation/emission wavelengths of 490/575 nm. The midpoint temperature of transition between folded and un-folded states (Tm) was obtained from the first derivative of the plot of fluorescence intensities at different temperatures. The
Tm was calculated as the difference between the Tm of the protein in the presence of an amino acid compared with the protein alone. Assays were performed in triplicate.
Crystallization and Data CollectionNMB0573 protein (8.6 mg/ml) was crystallized following removal of the N-terminal His tag. An initial screen of 672 crystallization conditions was carried out using the sitting drop vapor diffusion method in 200-nl drop size (1:1 protein/precipitant ratio) prepared using a Cartesian Technologies pipetting system (21, 22). Crystals of NMB0573 were grown from 95 mM HEPES-Na, pH 7.5, 190 mM calcium chloride polyethylene glycol 400 (26.6%, v/v) and glycerol (5%, v/v). Crystals were optimized using the standard nanoliter optimization procedure as described (22). For soaking experiments, crystals were incubated in reservoir solution with either L-methionine or L-leucine (10 mM) for 5-30 min before mounting. Multiple wavelength anomalous dispersion data for selenomethionine-labeled NMB0573 crystals were collected to 2.0-Å resolution at beamline BM14, the ESRF (Grenoble, France). Following a fluorescence scan, 1060 images of 0.5° oscillation at the peak wavelength were collected. 180° of data were also collected at a remote wavelength. Subsequent data collections from crystals of NMB0573 incubated with amino acids were carried out at the ESRF beamline ID14.1. Crystals were flash frozen and maintained at 100 K under a stream of nitrogen gas during data collections. Indexing and integration of data images of NMB0573 and amino acid complexes were carried out with DENZO and data were merged using SCALE-PACK (23). The images of the complexes showed two diffraction lattices. In the case of the NMB0573-methionine complex, the two lattices were indexed and integrated separately and then merged together. The selenomethionine data were processed with HKL2000. The statistics for x-ray data are given in Table 1.
|
|
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
-strand (
1). The N-terminal domain consists of three
-helices (
1,
2,
3) with a helix turn helix motif between residues 23 and 48 (Fig. 4, c and d). The C-terminal domain comprises a four-stranded anti-parallel
-sheet (
2-5) sandwiched between two
-helices (
4 and
5) plus a C-terminal
-stranded tail (Fig. 4, c and d). Examination of the molecular packing within the crystal lattice clearly shows that NMB0573 is assembled into an octameric disc, similar to those previously reported for PfLrpA (6), E. coli AsnC, and B. subtilis LrpC (8). N-terminal DNA-binding domains are located around the periphery of the ring, with the octamer formed as a tetramer of dimers (Fig. 4, a and b). The interactions that form the dimer are similar to the other Lrp/AsnC family proteins, in that a hydrophobic core is formed by residues in the four-stranded
-sheet (
2-5) of each subunit. The crystals were grown in the presence of calcium chloride (190 mM) and a single calcium atom was observed at the interface between each of the dimers of the protein coordinated by Asp-107. The biological significance of this is not clear from the structure.
Refinement of the structures of the NMB0573 protein obtained from crystals soaked with either L-leucine or L-methionine showed density corresponding to the amino acids, located in a cleft between adjacent dimers in the octameric array such that 8 amino acid molecules were bound in the overall structure. This region is close to the position occupied by calcium in the apo structure (see below). To investigate the effect of amino acid binding on the overall structure of NMB0753, the apo- and amino acid-bound structures were compared. The octamers of the apo- and L-methionine-bound NMB0573 were overlaid with a r.m.s. deviation for the C
-C
of 0.5 Å indicating that the structure of the assembly is largely unchanged following amino acid binding (Fig. 4b). A similar result was obtained for the L-leucine-bound structure (data not shown). Furthermore, overlay of the subunit dimer of the NMB0573 apo structure with that of AsnC from E. coli (8) showed a conservation of overall structure with a r.m.s. deviation for the C
-C
comparison of 1.1 Å. The major differences observed between the dimers of NMB0573 and AsnC were a shift in the position of the
4 helix relative to the
2 strand and the positions of the
2 helices (Fig. 4, c and d).
Amino Acid BindingAlthough all of the eight binding sites in the octamer contained a bound ligand, examination of amino acid binding revealed some differences in the residues involved at each site. In all cases the peptide carbonyl oxygen and amide nitrogen of residues Thr-103 and Gly-104 flipped 180° so that L-methionine, and L-leucine formed H-bonds with the corresponding amide nitrogen and carbonyl oxygen of Gly-104 (Fig. 4, e and f). An additional H-bond was also formed between the amide nitrogen of Ser-139 and the carbonyl oxygen of L-methionine at all sites (Fig. 4e). In the E. coli AsnC structure, the corresponding residues, Gly-103 and Thr-139, were also observed to interact directly with the bound asparagine residue in the structure. The fact that the glycine and serine/threonine residues are conserved in all Lrp/AsnC family sequences confirms the key role of these residues in ligand binding (9). In some of the NMB0573 binding sites, either the carboxyl oxygen of Asp-107, the carbonyl oxygen of Thr-106, or both also contribute to the H-bonding network securing the amino acid in the pocket between the dimer subunits depending upon the exact positioning of the L-methionine residue. It is interesting to note that mutation of the equivalent of Asp-107 in E. coli Lrp (Asp-114) abolishes the response of Lrp to exogenous L-leucine (31) but not high affinity binding (30). Another difference between the binding sites is the presence or absence of a calcium atom, which was observed in 3 of the 8 sites coordinated by Glu-105, presumably displaced from its position in the apo structure by amino acid binding. Comparison of the apo- and amino acid-bound structures of NMB0573 indicates that the residues local to the binding site are largely unchanged. The only exception is the side chain of Arg-83, which points into the binding pocket in the apo structure and rotates to accommodate leucine or methionine binding in the amino acid bound structures (Fig. 5, a and b).
The thermal shift response of NMB0573 was specific for L-methionine and L-leucine with no effect observed for other amino acids, including asparagine, raising the question of what determines amino acid selectivity. Comparison of the structures of NMB0573 and AsnC of E. coli indicates that specificity is due to the polarity and size of the residues in the binding site. In the Neisseria protein a hydrophobic pocket is formed by residues from both chains of adjacent dimers, favoring interaction with amino acids with hydrophobic rather than hydrophilic or polar side groups. For example, the binding pocket formed by the interface of the two dimers chains G-H and chains A-B, is lined by Val-124, Leu-129, and Ala-137 from chain G, Leu-123 from chain B, and Ala-101 from chain A (Fig. 4, e and f). By contrast, in the E. coli AsnC protein Leu-129 is replaced by Gln-128 (Fig. 5), which appears to form a key hydrogen bond with the carboxyl oxygen of the asparagine bound in the structure (8). Another key discriminating position appears to be Ala-101 in NMB0573, which corresponds to Tyr-100 in AsnC, the larger side chain of which, although accommodating the asparagine is likely to clash with more extended amino acids, such as L-methionine (Fig. 5b). Consistent with the above, in E. coli Lrp, which binds to L-leucine, the residues corresponding to Leu-129 and Ala-101 in NMB0573 are also hydrophobic in nature (Fig. 1, Leu-108 and Leu-137).
Growth Characteristics and Expression Profiling of Wild-type and NM0573 Knock-out StrainsStructural analysis of NMB0573 confirms its assignment as a member of the Lrp/AsnC family of transcriptional regulators and shows that the protein binds to L-methionine and L-leucine. To investigate the physiological significance of these results, a NMB0573 knockout mutant of N. meningitidis strain MC58 (capsule negative) was constructed by insertion of a kanamycin gene replacing the entire coding region and selecting the transformants with kanamycin. The growth phenotype of the mutant strain was compared with wild-type N. meningitidis grown in both rich (GC media with supplements), and nutrient restricted defined media (RPMI with ferric nitrate and bicarbonate). The growth curves are shown in Fig. 6. The knock-out mutant showed no reduction in the rate of log-phase growth in rich media and only differed from the parent strain in having a shorter lag phase that suggests that it was initially better adapted to these conditions. By contrast, in nutrient poor conditions mutants displayed slower growth, a longer lag phase, and a slightly lower final growth than the parent strains. Overall, it appears that Neisseria requires the presence of NMB0573 for optimum growth in poorer nutrient conditions.
Functional Classes of Genes That Are Differentially Expressed in Wild-type and NMB0573 Knock-out StrainsTo avoid the effects of measuring the secondary consequences of reduced growth in the poor nutrient conditions, and thus to focus upon the direct and indirect effects of the absence of the regulator, mRNA expression profiling was performed on early growth phase cultures grown on solid rich GC media. The data presented are based upon the results from six independent biological replicates (supplemental Table S1). The predominant change in the NMB0573 knock-out compared with the wild-type strain was a reduction of transcript abundance (74 of 91 genes, 81%) suggesting that this protein, if acting directly, is primarily a transcriptional activator. Normally, these regulators bind to DNA as a complex with their cognate ligands and the absence of the amino acid is associated with a reduction in DNA binding. Hence, the mutant would mimic a situation in which there was a lack of the monitored intracellular amino acid. The main groups of genes with annotated functions showing changes are dominated by the most abundant cell surface proteins, and components of aerobic metabolism/the TCA cycle.
|
Consistent with the relatively similar rates of growth of the NMB0573- and parent strains, transcription of the genes of the division cell wall cluster are predominately unchanged. However, the exceptions to this are that there are 1.5-fold decreases in the expression of both ftsZ (p < 0.01) and murD (p < 0.01) in the mutant, which are notable in that each has additional promoters within the dcw cluster (32, 33) and may represent points of fine control of cell division in response to nutrient conditions.
The surface proteins showing the greatest changes include: porB, porA, pilE, pilO, pilP, opc, opa, outer membrane protein NMB1946, adhesin protein NMB2095, serotype 1 antigen, and mafB genes, as well as subunits of two ABC transporters. The simplest explanation for these changes is that under nutrient limiting conditions the cell re-focuses its protein synthesis away from these abundant proteins, toward proteins required for cellular survival and core functions. This diversion of resources may account for the faster growth of the knockout, compared with the parent, under nutrient-rich conditions. Genes coding proteins responsible for synthesis of cell surface elements peptidoglycan (murD, 1.5-fold, p < 0.01), fatty acids (accC and accD, both 1.6-fold, p
0.01), and polysaccharides and lipopolysaccharides (amiC, 1.7-fold, p = 0.02, n = 3) are also decreased in the absence of NMB0573. Moreover ftsZ, which is responsible for septum formation in cell division, follows the same pattern (1.5-fold, p < 0.01).
Generally, the tRNA and amino acid synthetases are not abundant transcripts and do not report from all replicates (supplemental Table S1), but the most strongly increased gene in the absence of NMB0573 was arginyl-tRNA synthetase (0.4-fold, p < 0.02, n = 2), in addition to increases in leucyl-tRNA synthetase (0.6-fold, p =< 0.02, n = 4), glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (0.6-fold, p < 0.01, n = 5), and tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (0.6-fold, N.S., n = 2). All of these changes are consistent with an adaptive role related to amino acid metabolism and control, and perhaps they represent a response to increase the efficiency of tRNA loading and utilization of a limited amino acid pool.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effect of L-leucine on E. coli Lrp oligomerization has been linked to the modulation of Lrp-dependent gene regulation by L-leucine (35) and its role as a global regulator of gene expression in E. coli. By altering the oligomeric state of the protein, leucine appears to effect the efficiency with which Lrp binds to relatively degenerate sequences in the promoter regions of target genes (36). Therefore, it is conceivable that L-methionine and L-leucine also modulate the activity of the NMB0573 regulator via an effect on its oligomeric state. This raises the question of the physiological role of the NMB0573 regulatory protein in Neisseria.
Expression profiling of wild-type and NMB0753 knock-out strains of N. meningitidis suggests that NMB0573 is a global regulator of gene expression. The growth properties and transcriptional response of the knock-out mutant indicate that NMB0573 plays a role in adaptation to low nutrient conditions. The interactions with leucine and methionine are consistent with a central role in controlling the response to the intracellular availability of the key resources for the initiation and synthesis of proteins. Investigation of the genes that are significantly changed in the absence of NMB0573 on BioCyc (37) showed that 19 of them are controlled in E. coli by the cAMP receptor protein. cAMP receptor protein is a global activator that regulates the response of the cell to carbon and energy shortage. Neisseria do not have a cAMP receptor protein homologue and although the results may be coincidental, they may also suggest that NMB0573 directly or indirectly serves a similar role to cAMP receptor protein in Neisseria. In common with other global regulators we would expect that the NMB0573 acts both directly on target promoters to recruit RNA polymerase and indirectly via intermediary transcription factors.
In conclusion, we propose that NMB0573 broadly represents a neisserial equivalent of the Lrp global regulator, controlling an adaptive response to low intracellular amino acid availability. This indicates that members of this regulator family can function as global regulators outside of the enteric bacteria. We conclude that the annotation of this gene as asnC is incorrect, and that NMB0573 probably controls responses to methionine and leucine. The ligand specificity of the AsnC/Lrp family of regulators is determined by the identifiable differences in size and charge properties of the ligand binding region, and that the determination of their DNA binding is primarily mediated through changes in their oligomeric state, rather than through structural changes in their DNA-binding regions.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the Medical Research Council, UK. The Oxford Protein Production Facility is part of the Structural Proteomics in Europe (SPINE) consortium supported by European Commission Grant QLG2-CT-2002-00988. The microarray facilities were largely funded with support from the EPA Cephalosporin Trust and BASE and microarray analysis was supported by the Dunn School/WIMM Computational Biology Research Group. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. ![]()
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Table S1. ![]()
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-0-1865-287748; Fax: 44-0-1865-287547; E-mail: ray{at}strubi.ox.ac.uk.
2 The abbreviations used are: Lrp, L-leucine-responsive regulatory protein; r.m.s., root mean square. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Kumarevel, N. Nakano, K. Ponnuraj, S. C. B. Gopinath, K. Sakamoto, A. Shinkai, P. K. R. Kumar, and S. Yokoyama Crystal structure of glutamine receptor protein from Sulfolobus tokodaii strain 7 in complex with its effector L-glutamine: implications of effector binding in molecular association and DNA binding Nucleic Acids Res., July 24, 2008; (2008) gkn456v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shrivastava and R. Ramachandran Mechanistic insights from the crystal structures of a feast/famine regulatory protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv Nucleic Acids Res., December 18, 2007; 35(21): 7324 - 7335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xiong, C. E. Bauer, and A. Pancholy Insight into the haem d1 biosynthesis pathway in heliobacteria through bioinformatics analysis Microbiology, October 1, 2007; 153(10): 3548 - 3562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||