Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M702111200 on May 14, 2007

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 27, 19331-19341, July 6, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/27/19331    most recent
M702111200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christiansen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Braüner-Osborne, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christiansen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Braüner-Osborne, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Cloning and Characterization of a Functional Human {gamma}-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Transporter, Human GAT-2*

Bolette Christiansen{ddagger}, Anne-Kristine Meinild§, Anders A. Jensen{ddagger}, and Hans Braüner-Osborne{ddagger}1

From the {ddagger}Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences and §Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Received for publication, March 12, 2007 , and in revised form, May 10, 2007.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Plasma membrane {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transporters act to terminate GABA neurotransmission in the mammalian brain. Intriguingly four distinct GABA transporters have been cloned from rat and mouse, whereas only three functional homologs of these transporters have been cloned from human. The aim of this study therefore was to search for this fourth missing human transporter. Using a bioinformatics approach, we successfully identified and cloned the full-length cDNA of a so far uncharacterized human GABA transporter (GAT). The predicted protein displays high sequence similarity to rat GAT-2 and mouse GAT3, and in accordance with the nomenclature for rat GABA transporters, we therefore refer to the transporter as human GAT-2. We used electrophysiological and cell-based methods to demonstrate that this protein is a functional transporter of GABA. The transport was saturable and dependent on both Na+ and Cl. Pharmacologically the transporter is distinct from the other human GABA transporters and similar to rat GAT-2 and mouse GAT3 with high sensitivity toward GABA and β-alanine. Furthermore the GABA transport inhibitor (S)-SNAP-5114 displayed some inhibitory activity at the transporter. Expression analysis by reverse transcription-PCR showed that GAT-2 mRNA is present in human brain, kidney, lung, and testis. The finding of the human GAT-2 demonstrates for the first time that the four plasma membrane GABA transporters identified in several mammalian species are all conserved in human. Furthermore the availability of human GAT-2 enables the use of all human clones of the GABA transporters in drug development programs and functional characterization of novel inhibitors of GABA transport.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
{gamma}-Aminobutyric acid (GABA)2 is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system (1, 2). In the GABAergic synapse, GABA is released from presynaptic nerve terminals, and it exerts its physiological effects through ionotropic GABAA and GABAC receptors and metabotropic GABAB receptors (3, 4). The GABAergic neurotransmission is terminated by rapid uptake of the neurotransmitter from the synaptic cleft into neurons and glial cells by specific high affinity GABA transporters (57). To date, four different plasma membrane GABA transporter subtypes have been identified in the central nervous system of several mammalian species (817). Unless otherwise specified, we will use the nomenclature introduced by Guastella et al. (8) and Borden et al. (11) for rat and human GABA transporters and refer to the transporters as GABA transporter (GAT)-1, betaine/GABA transporter-1 (BGT-1), GAT-2, and GAT-3. A different nomenclature, originally suggested by Liu et al. (13), names the corresponding homologous transporters in mouse GAT1–GAT4 (without hyphen), respectively.

The GABA transporters belong to the family of Na+/Cl-dependent transporters (SLC6 gene family) that also includes transporters for the neurotransmitters dopamine, serotonin, norepinephrine, and glycine (7, 18). The transport process of these transporters is electrogenic because Na+ (and Cl) is translocated across the membrane together with the respective substrates (7, 19). As an example, the co-transport of one GABA, two Na+, and one Cl has been reported for human (h) GAT-1 (20). The topologies of these membrane-bound proteins are composed of 12 transmembrane domains connected by interchanging extracellular and intracellular loops and intracellular amino and carboxyl termini (8, 9, 21). Recently the crystal structure of a bacterial homolog of the transporters has been resolved, and the structure has brought significant insight into the structure and function of the Na+/Cl-dependent transporters (22).

Neurotransmitter transporters are drug targets for several neurological and psychiatric disorders (19, 23). Diseases such as epilepsy, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, drug addiction, and various pain states are related to the GABA system (2426), and pharmacological inhibition of GABA transport constitutes an attractive approach to increase overall GABA neurotransmission (27, 28). So far, this concept has been exploited for the treatment of epilepsy where the GAT-1-selective inhibitor tiagabine is administered clinically as adjunctive therapy for partial seizures (29, 30). Furthermore inhibition of GABA transport in general and tiagabine in particular has been suggested for the treatment of clinical conditions such as ischemia, anxiety, sleep disorders in the elderly, and neuropathic pain (3134).

GAT-1 and GAT-3 are abundantly expressed throughout the rat, mouse, and human central nervous system and absent from the periphery (1113, 28, 3539), and thus these two subtypes have attracted considerable attention as potential drug targets (30, 35, 40). Mouse, rat, and human BGT-1 is expressed in both the brain and periphery (10, 14, 16, 17) and believed to be involved in osmoregulation (18) but has recently also been suggested to play a role in the control of epilepsy (4143). Rat (r) GAT-2 and mouse (m) GAT3 is similarly found in the brain as well as in the periphery where it is abundantly expressed in kidney and liver (11, 13, 36, 39, 44).

In contrast to the four identified plasma membrane GABA transporter subtypes in mouse and rat, only three have been characterized in human. These include hGAT-1, hBGT-1, and hGAT-3, whereas the human ortholog of mGAT3 and rGAT-2 has remained enigmatic and typically is referred to as "not cloned" in the literature (35, 45). However, in 2001, the cDNA supposedly encoding for the hGAT-2 was reported to have been cloned, although functional uptake of [3H]GABA in mammalian cells transiently transfected with this cDNA could not be demonstrated (46). Bioinformatics analysis of this putative hGAT-2 sequence revealed that it was likely to be an incomplete cDNA sequence with several truncations. In the present study, we cloned the full-length hGAT-2 and characterized the pharmacology of the transporter in several functional assays.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials—GlutaMAX-I Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, dialyzed fetal bovine serum, penicillin, streptomycin, Hanks' balanced salt solution, and bovine serum albumin were purchased from Invitrogen. All buffer reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. [2,3-3H]GABA (specific radioactivity, 27.6 Ci/mmol) and D-[2,3-3H]Asp (specific radioactivity, 40.0 Ci/mmol) were purchased from GE Healthcare.

β-Alanine, taurine, L-2,4-diamino-n-butyric acid (L-DABA), quinidine, NNC-711, and (S)-SNAP-5114 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. GABA was obtained from Fluka Chemie AG, Buchs SG, (Dübendorf, Switzerland), betaine was from B.A.S. Synteselaboratorium, nipecotic acid was from Aldrich, and DL-2,3-diaminopropionic acid (DAPA) was from TCI Europe nv (Zwijndrecht, Belgium). The following compounds were synthesized in house: 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo(4,5-c)pyridin-3-ol (THPO) (47), guvacine (48), and N-[4,4-bis(3-methyl-2-thienyl)-3-butenyl]-3-hydroxy-4-(methylamino)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]isoxazol-3-ol (EF1502) (49).

Cloning of hGAT-2—The I.M.A.G.E. cDNA clone 4612245 was purchased, and subsequent sequencing revealed the presence of the full-length nucleotide sequence encoding for the open reading frame of hGAT-2. The cDNA of hGAT-2 was amplified by PCR using the forward primer 5'-gggatggatagcagggtctc-3' and the reverse primer 5'-ctagcagtgagactctagctc-3' and subcloned into the mammalian pcDNA5 vector according to the protocol of the manufacturer (pcDNA5/FRT/V5-His TOPO® TA Expression kit, Invitrogen). The sequence of the cDNA and the absence of mutations were confirmed by automated DNA sequencing.

Bioinformatics Analysis of the Protein Sequence of hGAT-2—An alignment of hGAT-2 with the previously reported sequences of hGAT-2 (46), mGAT3 (13), and rGAT-2 (11) was performed using the ClustalW alignment program available at the home page maintained by The European Bioinformatics Institute. Transmembrane segments in the hGAT-2 protein were identified by the hidden Markov model for prediction of transmembrane helices (50). The algorithm is publicly accessible at the Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark through internet services. Furthermore a hydrophobicity analysis using the TMpred program was performed. This algorithm is based on the statistical analysis of TMbase, a data base of naturally occurring transmembrane proteins (51) and is available at the home page maintained by Swiss EMBnet. The overall sequence identity of the predicted amino acid sequence of hGAT-2 to other related GABA transporters was examined by searching the protein data base at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using the BLASTp algorithm.

Expression Analysis—The expression pattern of hGAT-2 mRNA was examined by reverse transcription-PCR using human multiple tissue cDNA (MTCTM) panels according to the protocol of the manufacturer (Clontech). The cDNA was amplified by PCR using the forward primer 5'-atggatagcagggtctcaggcacaaccagtaatgg-3' and the reverse primer 5'-attctcagaggtaccattcagggagccgttgg-3'. The primers are complementary to exons 1 and 4, respectively, and PCR with the two primers resulted in a specific band of 533 nucleotides.

PCR was performed using Taq polymerase as described by the manufacturer (Promega, Madison, WI) and a PTC-100 thermal cycler (MJ Research, Waltham, MA). The reactions were heated to 95 °C for 2 min and then cycled 35 times at 95 °C for 1 min, 65 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min. All reactions were carried out in parallel and were run on a 1% agarose gel containing SYBR SafeTM (Invitrogen). Amplification of a 983-base pair fragment from human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was used as a control.

Expression of hGAT-2 in Xenopus laevis Oocytes—The hGAT-2 and the mGAT3 cDNAs were subcloned by PCR into an expression vector (pEXP-SML) containing 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions of the Xenopus β-globin gene and a poly(A) signal for optimal expression in oocytes using the GATEWAY® technology (Invitrogen). The cDNA was linearized downstream of the poly(A) signal and in vitro transcribed with the T7 RNA polymerase using the T7-Message Machine® kit from Ambion (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX). 50 ng of cRNA was injected into defolliculated stage 5-6 X. laevis oocytes, prepared as described in Meinild et al. (52). The oocytes were incubated in Kulori medium (90 mM NaCl, 1 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) at 19 °C for 3–5 days before experiments were performed.

Electrophysiology—The two-electrode voltage clamp method was used to control the membrane potential and monitor the whole cell current in oocytes expressing hGAT-2. The recordings were performed at room temperature with a Dagan Clampator (Dagan Corp., Minneapolis, MN) interfaced to a personal computer using a DigiData 1320 analog/digital converter and pCLAMP 9 (Axon Instruments at Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). For continuous current measurements, the membrane potential was held at –50 mV, and the currents were low pass-filtered at 1 Hz and sampled at 10 Hz. To obtain steady-state current/voltage relationships the membrane potential was held at –50 mV and jumped to test potentials ranging from +50 to –150 mV in 20-mV increments for 200 ms. Currents were low pass-filtered at 500 Hz and sampled at 2 kHz. In general, the experimental chamber was continuously perfused by a NaCl solution (100 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4). In Na+ substitution experiments, Na+ was equimolarly replaced with choline ions, and in experiments with low concentrations of Cl (6 mM), NaMES was used instead of NaCl. In experiments with low Cl concentrations, the reference electrode was connected to the experimental chamber via an agar bridge (3% agar in 3 M KCl).

Cell Culture and Transfections—tsA201 cells (a transformed human embryonic kidney 293 cell line) (53) were cultured in GlutaMAX-I Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% dialyzed fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. The constructs encoding the hGAT-2 and the human excitatory amino acid transporter hEAAT3 were transiently transfected into cells using PolyFect according to the protocol of the manufacturer (Qiagen, West Sussex, UK), and the functional assays were performed 36–48 h later.

[3H]GABA and D-[3H]Asp Uptake Assays—tsA201 cells transfected with hGAT-2-pcDNA5 or hEAAT3-pcDNA3 were split into poly-D-lysine-coated white 96-well plates (BD Biosciences). The next day, the medium was removed, and cells were washed with 100 µl of assay buffer (Hanks' balanced salt solution supplemented with 20 mM HEPES, 1 mM CaCl2, and 1 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4). Then 75 µl of assay buffer supplemented with [3H]GABA or D-[3H]Asp and various concentrations of the test compounds was added to each well, and the plate was incubated at 37 °C for 3 min. Then the cells were washed with 3 x 100 µl of ice-cold assay buffer, and 150 µl of MicroscintTM20 scintillation fluid (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) was added to each well. The plate was shaken for at least 1 h and counted in a Packard TopCount microplate scintillation counter.

In the saturation experiments, a [3H]GABA concentration up to 100 nM was used, and to measure transport at higher concentrations the radioligands were diluted with the corresponding "cold" ligand (GABA). Nonspecific transport was determined in the presence of 3 mM GABA. In the competition transport experiments, either 30 nM [3H]GABA (in the experiments with hGAT-2) or 30 nMD-[3H]Asp (in the experiments with hEAAT3) was used as tracer concentration. The [3H]GABA competition curves were constructed based on measurements obtained typically for eight different concentrations of the test compounds. The following maximal concentrations of the test compounds were applied: GABA, 3 mM; DAPA, 1 mM; β-alanine, 3 mM; (S)-SNAP-5114, 500 µM; EF1502, 250 µM; nipecotic acid, 10 mM; L-DABA, 3 mM; quinidine, 1 mM; guvacine, 10 mM; NNC-711, 1.6 mM; THPO, 10 mM; taurine, 10 mM; and betaine, 10 mM.

The FLIPR® Membrane Potential (FMP) Assay—The test compounds were characterized functionally in the FMP assay (Molecular Devices, Crawley, UK) essentially as described previously (54). Briefly tsA201 cells transfected with hGAT-2-pcDNA5 were split into poly-D-lysine-coated black clear bottom 96-well plates (BD Biosciences). The next day, the culture medium was removed, and the cells were washed with 100 µl of assay buffer (same buffer as used in the [3H]GABA uptake assay). In the substrate experiments, 100 µl of assay buffer supplemented with FMP assay dye was added to each well, and the plate was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The plate was assayed at 37 °C in a NOVOstarTM plate reader (BMG Labtechnologies, Offenburg, Germany) measuring emission at 560 nm caused by excitation at 530 nm before and up to 1 min after addition of 25 µl of substrate solution (the substrate was dissolved in assay buffer). Inhibition experiments were performed similarly except that a mixture of 50 µl of FMP assay dye solution (2x final concentration in assay buffer) and 50 µlof inhibitor solution (2x final concentration in assay buffer) was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, and the plate was assayed by addition of 25 µl of GABA solution (assay concentration of GABA, 50 µM). The experiments were performed in triplicate at least three times for each test compound. The concentration-response curves for the substrates and the concentration-inhibition curves for the inhibitors were constructed based on the maximal responses obtained for the various concentrations of the respective compounds. For generation of concentration-response curves the following maximal concentrations of the test compounds were applied: GABA, 3 mM; β-alanine, 3 mM; L-DABA, 1 mM; nipecotic acid, 10 mM; guvacine, 3 mM; taurine, 10 mM; betaine, 3 mM; and THPO, 3 mM.

Data Analysis—All data were analyzed using Prism 4.0b (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). For experiments with X. laevis oocytes, the transporter-specific substrate-induced current (Isubstrate) was obtained from the difference between the currents in NaCl ± substrate. For steady-state kinetic analysis, the Isubstrate was measured at various membrane potentials and external substrate concentrations, and at each voltage the Isubstrate versus concentration of substrate relations were fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation I = (Imax x [S])/([S] + K0.5) where [S] is the substrate concentration, Imax is the maximal current for saturating [S], and the half-maximal concentration, K0.5, is the substrate concentration giving rise to 50% of Imax. The K0.5 for GABA and β-alanine was obtained at 100 mM external Na+, varying the GABA or β-alanine concentrations, and Na+ activation was obtained at a saturating GABA concentration (100 µM) and varying external Na+ concentrations.

The saturation curves from the [3H]GABA uptake assay were fitted by nonlinear regression using the equation Y = Bmax x X/(Kd + X) where X is the concentration of the ligand, Y is the specific binding, Bmax is the maximal binding, and the equilibrium dissociation constant, Kd, is the concentration of ligand required to reach half-maximal binding. The inhibition curves from the [3H]GABA and D-[3H]Asp uptake assays were fitted by nonlinear regression using the equation Y = Bottom + (Top – Bottom)/(1 + 10 ((log KmX) x Hill slope)), where X is the logarithm of the concentration, Y is the response, Top is the Y value at the top plateau, Bottom is the Y value at the bottom plateau, log Km is the X value when the response is halfway between Bottom and Top, and the Hill slope describes the steepness of the curve.


Figure 1
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1.
Deduced amino acid sequence of the hGAT-2. Shown are the hGAT-2 cloned and characterized in this study (GenBank accession number NP_057699 [GenBank] ) and the previously reported amino acid sequence of hGAT-2 (GenBank accession number U76343 [GenBank] ) (46). The sequences of mGAT3 (GenBank accession number NP_653095 [GenBank] ) and rGAT-2 (GenBank accession number NP_598307 [GenBank] ) are shown for comparison. The alignment file was generated by use of the ClustalW alignment tool provided by the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. A star (*) indicates that the residues in the given column are identical in all sequences in the alignment; a colon (:) indicates a conserved substitution; a period (.) indicates a semiconserved substitution.

 
The concentration-response curves from the FMP assay were fitted using the same equation as described above for the inhibition curves in the uptake assay. The Ki value of THPO was determined based on the following equation: Ki = IC50/(1 + [S]/Km) where IC50 is the concentration of compound that produces 50% of the maximum inhibitory response, [S] is the concentration of substrate (GABA) used for the inhibition experiment, and Km is the concentration of substrate required to reach half-maximal activation. Determination of Km for GABA was always performed on the same day as the inhibition experiment.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cloning of the hGAT-2—Initially we performed a multiple alignment of the amino acid sequence of the previously cloned non-functional hGAT-2 (GenBankTM accession number U76343 [GenBank] (46)) with the mouse and rat orthologs. This comparison revealed that the previously reported hGAT-2 cDNA clone contained four truncations and a fairly different carboxyl-terminal sequence compared with the mouse and rat sequences. Due to these differences we next performed a tBLASTn search of the human genome and expressed sequence tag data bases at the NCBI website using the mGAT3 amino acid sequence as query. Results from both of these data bases suggested that the truncations and deviating carboxyl-terminal sequence of the previously reported hGAT-2 cDNA clone was erroneous and that a full-length human ortholog does exist. Further searches of GenBank at NCBI revealed a full-length cDNA clone identified by the Mammalian Gene Collection Program Team (accession number BC022392 [GenBank] (55)) that could be obtained from the I.M.A.G.E. Consortium (56). We then used PCR to amplify a nucleotide sequence from the I.M.A.G.E. clone that is identical to GenBank accession number BC022392. The cDNA has a predicted amino acid sequence containing an open reading frame of 602 amino acids, which is in good agreement with the lengths of the rat and mouse orthologs (11, 13). Alignment analysis demonstrates that the sequence is different from the trun-cated hGAT-2 of 569 amino acids previously reported by Gong et al. (46) and that the amino acid sequence of the full-length hGAT-2, reported here, displays high similarity to mGAT3 and rGAT-2 including the carboxyl-terminal sequence (Fig. 1).

Analysis of Sequence—A search in the gene data base maintained by NCBI demonstrated that the gene for hGAT-2 (SLC6A13) is localized to human chromosome 12p13.3. The presence of 14 exons in the gene was found by comparison between the amino acid sequence of hGAT-2 and the genomic DNA (Fig. 2A). These findings are similar to what has recently been reported in a description of the complete repertoire of the SLC6 family (57).

The topology of the predicted protein was analyzed using two different analysis tools for prediction of transmembrane helices. Analysis by the hidden Markov model predicted the presence of 12 transmembrane {alpha}-helices (Fig. 2B). Hydrophobicity analysis using the TMpred program identified two possible models for transmembrane topology with 11 and 12 transmembrane {alpha}-helices, respectively, depending on the predicted orientation of the membrane spanning segments (Fig. 2C). A similar result was obtained when the TMpred program was run using the amino acid sequences of both mGAT3 and rGAT-2 (data not shown). Collectively the two algorithms demonstrate that hGAT-2 contains 12 putative transmembrane {alpha}-helices, which is expected for a member of the Na+/Cl-dependent neurotransmitter transporter superfamily (7).

The similarity of the predicted amino acid sequence of hGAT-2 to other GABA transporters was examined. Alignment analysis demonstrated that GAT-2 displays 51–74% overall amino acid identity to the other human GABA transporters and 91% identity to the mouse and rat orthologs mGAT3 and rGAT-2 (Fig. 2D).

Expression Pattern of hGAT-2 mRNA in Human Tissues—To examine the expression pattern of the transporter in human tissues we performed reverse transcription-PCR of commercially available human tissue panels. These MTC panels consist of first strand cDNA generated using poly(A)+ RNA derived from normal adult human tissues. The cDNA in the applied MTC panels has been normalized using the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. The reverse transcription-PCR experiment revealed a high mRNA level of hGAT-2 in kidney and low levels in brain and lung. Furthermore we were able to detect a very low level of mRNA of the transporter in testis, whereas it was absent from the other tested peripheral tissues (Fig. 3).

Pharmacological Characterization of hGAT-2 Expressed in X. laevis Oocytes—To determine whether the cloned hGAT-2 cDNA encodes for a functional GABA transporter, we expressed the hGAT-2 construct in X. laevis oocytes. For the characterization of hGAT-2 in this and subsequent assays, we used a number of different compounds (depicted in Fig. 4). Addition of GABA (500 µM) induced an inwardly directed current in voltage-clamped oocytes injected with hGAT-2 cRNA. β-Alanine (500 µM) similarly induced an inward current, whereas betaine (500 µM) did not. The magnitudes of the GABA- and β-alanine-induced currents were not the same when measured in the same oocyte: Iβ-Ala > IGABA (Fig. 5A). In the presence of either GABA or β-alanine there was an almost linear relationship between current and voltage, and the substrate-induced current did not saturate with hyperpolarizing membrane potentials (Fig. 5B).


Figure 2
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2.
Bioinformatics analysis of hGAT-2. A, schematic organization of the human SLC6A13 gene. Exons are shown by boxes, and introns are shown by horizontal lines. The structure of the gene and the chromosomal location was found in the gene data base (Entrez Gene) maintained by NCBI (GeneID 6540). B, prediction of transmembrane {alpha}-helices of hGAT-2 by the hidden Markov model. C, prediction of transmembrane-spanning domains of hGAT-2 based on analysis of hydrophobicity. D, amino acid sequence identity between hGAT-2 and related GABA transporters.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3.
Expression pattern of hGAT-2 and the housekeeping control gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH) in various human tissues as determined by agarose gel electrophoresis with SYBR Safe staining. PCR products were amplified from multiple tissue cDNA panels that contain normalized adult human cDNA preparations. The bands shown correspond to the predicted size of 533 nucleotides for hGAT-2 (upper panel) and 983 nucleotides for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (lower panel).

 


Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4.
Chemical structures of the compounds characterized pharmacologically at the hGAT-2.

 
The kinetics of substrate transport through hGAT-2 was determined by measuring the steady-state substrate-induced currents at different substrate concentrations and constant Na+ and Cl concentrations. The substrate-induced currents reached saturation levels with increasing concentrations of substrate, and the currents could be fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation. The K0.5 was 3.7 ± 0.7 µM for GABA (n = 4) and 20.2 ± 0.3 µM (n = 5) for β-alanine at a membrane potential of –90 mV (Fig. 5, C and D). The K0.5 values were not significantly different at membrane potentials ranging from –150 to –30 mV (Fig. 5E). This K0.5 for GABA was similar to the K0.5 for GABA in oocytes injected with the mouse ortholog transporter mGAT3 (data not shown and Ref. 58).

It was also investigated whether the GABA-induced currents in hGAT-2-expressing oocytes could be inhibited by a GABA transporter inhibitor. We used oocytes clamped at –50 mV, and the results show that inward current induced by 50 µM GABA was partly inhibited by addition of 100 µM (S)-SNAP-5114 to the superfusing solution, whereas addition of 500 µM (S)-SNAP-5114 blocked the GABA-induced current to 8.5 ± 9.0% of the initial inward current (n = 4) (Fig. 5F).

In the studies of hGAT-2 expressed in oocytes the substrate transport through the transporter was found to be highly dependent on the external ions. Replacement of 100 mM Cl with NaMES in the perfusing solution caused a reduction in the GABA transport, whereas removal of Na+ abolished the GABA-induced current as demonstrated by the replacement of Na+ with choline ions (Fig. 5G). When measured in the same oocyte, a reduction in Cl from 106 to 6 mM resulted in a reduction in IGABA from 100 to 54.4 ± 3.9% (n = 6). When Na+ was removed from the external solution, IGABA decreased to 0.4 ± 4.5% (n = 5).

To further investigate the Na+ dependence of the substrate transport we measured the GABA-induced current at different Na+ concentrations and a constant GABA concentration of 100 µM. The GABA-induced current plotted as a function of the external Na+ concentration was fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation to obtain values for the half-maximal Na+ concentration. For Na+ the K0.5 was highly voltage-dependent with a value of 25.6 ± 4.1 mM at –150 mV and 93.3 ± 11.1 mM at –90 mV. It was not possible to fit the data at membrane holding potentials more positive than –90 mV (data not shown). In mGAT3 the K0.5 was also highly voltage-dependent (data not shown) but 3–4-fold lower than for hGAT-2 (data not shown and Ref. 58).


Figure 5
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5.
Functional characterization of hGAT-2 expressed in X. laevis oocytes. A, substrate-induced currents. The current trace was detected upon addition of the following putative substrates to the NaCl buffer: GABA (500 µM), β-alanine (500 µM), and betaine (500 µM). In this oocyte GABA induced an inward current of 40 nA, β-alanine induced an inward current of 50 nA, whereas betaine did not induce any current. B, voltage dependence of substrate-induced currents. The substrate-induced currents (Isubstrate) were examined at test voltages (Vt) from +50 mV to –150 mV with 20-mV increments. The magnitude of the GABA-induced currents varied from –50 to –125 nA in different oocytes. C, the GABA-induced current (–I) plotted as a function of the external GABA concentration at a membrane potential of –90 mV and constant extracellular Na+ (100 mM) and Cl (106 mM). The K0.5 for GABA was determined to be 3.7 ± 0.7 µM (n = 4). D, the β-alanine-induced current (–I) plotted as a function of the extracellular β-alanine concentration at the same conditions as in C. The K0.5 for β-alanine was determined to be 20.2 ± 0.3 µM (n = 5). E, voltage dependence of the K0.5 for GABA (squares) and β-alanine (triangles). The K0.5 was plotted as a function of the membrane holding potential. F, current trace showing the inhibiting effect of (S)-SNAP-5114 on the GABA-induced current. Addition of 50 µM GABA induced an inward current. This current was partly blocked by addition of 100 µM (S)-SNAP-5114 and fully blocked by addition of 500 µM (S)-SNAP-5114. G, current trace showing the ion dependence of the substrate-induced current. The oocyte was perfused with external buffers of different ion composition (NaCl, NaMES, and choline chloride (CholCl)) and in the absence or presence of 100 µM GABA. The addition of 100 µM GABA is indicated by arrows. In this oocyte IGABA {approx}–35 nA in NaCl, IGABA {approx}–26 nA in NaMES, and IGABA = 0 nA in choline chloride.

 
Pharmacological Characterization of hGAT-2 in the [3H]GABA Uptake Assay—Next we characterized the pharmacology of hGAT-2 transiently expressed in tsA201 cells ina[3H]GABA uptake assay. Initial experiments demonstrated a time-dependent uptake of GABA in cells transiently expressing hGAT-2. The uptake was linear up to ~10 min, and thus it was decided to use an uptake period of 3 min for pharmacological analysis as this gave rise to an uptake of less than 10% of the total amount of [3H]GABA in the assay buffer (data not shown).

In the saturation experiments with hGAT-2-expressing tsA201 cells, a dose-dependent increase in [3H]GABA uptake reaching saturation levels at higher concentrations was observed. The saturable transport of GABA was characterized by a Km value of 8.24 ± 0.38 µM (n = 4) (Fig. 6A).

The pharmacological properties of 13 standard GABA transporter ligands (Fig. 4) were characterized at the hGAT-2 in the [3H]GABA uptake assay using a tracer concentration of 30 nM [3H]GABA. In this assay, all test compounds displayed dose-dependent inhibition curves with the exception of betaine, which only displayed minor inhibitory activity at concentrations up to 10 mM. GABA, DAPA, and β-alanine displayed the most potent competition of GABA transport at hGAT-2 (IC50 values in the range of 10–100 µM). The compounds (S)-SNAP-5114, EF1502, nipecotic acid, L-DABA, and quinidine were moderate in the competition of [3H]GABA transport (IC50 values of 100–800 µM), whereas guvacine, NNC-711, THPO, taurine, and betaine displayed only low or very low competition of the transporter activity (IC50 ≥ 1000 µM) (Table 1 and Fig. 6B). As a control for non-specific inhibition of [3H]GABA uptake, the test compounds were also characterized at hEAAT3-expressing tsA201 cells. None of the compounds inhibited the uptake of D-[3H]Asp at hEAAT3 in the concentrations used for hGAT-2 (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1
IC50 values for inhibition of [3H]GABA uptake in tsA201 cells transiently transfected with hGAT-2

The test compounds were examined for their ability to inhibit uptake of 30 nM [3H]GABA as described under "Experimental Procedures." All experiments were performed in triplicate in at least three independent experiments. The corresponding IC50 values for mGAT3 and rGAT-2 reported in other studies are given for comparison. ND, not determined.

 


Figure 6
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 6.
Pharmacological characterization of hGAT-2 in the [3H]GABA uptake assay using tsA201 cells transiently transfected with hGAT-2. A, saturation curve for GABA transport where specific uptake of increasing concentrations of GABA was measured. The maximum concentration of [3H]GABA used was 100 nM, and the uptake assay was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data are given as pmol/well and are means ± S.D. of triplicate determinations of a single representative experiment. The KD for GABA was determined to be 8.24 ± 0.38 µM (n = 4). B, representative concentration-inhibition curves of GABA ({blacksquare}), DAPA ({circ}), (S)-SNAP-5114 ({diamondsuit}), guvacine Figure 6, THPO ({square}), and taurine (•). Competition for transport of 30 nM [3H]GABA by the indicated standard ligands was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Results are given as cpm and are means ± S.D. of triplicate determinations of single representative experiments. At least two additional experiments performed on different days gave similar results.

 
Pharmacological Characterization of hGAT-2 in the FMP Assay—We characterized the functional properties of the 13 test compounds in the fluorescence-based high throughput membrane potential assay. The basis of this assay is the distribution of an assay dye across the cell membrane that is dependent on the membrane potential of the cells. One particular advantage of using this test system is the ability to distinguish between substrates and inhibitors of electrogenic transporters (54).

In the FMP assay exposure of hGAT-2-transfected tsA201 cells to known GABA transporter substrates gave rise to solid concentration-dependent increases in fluorescence intensity (Fig. 7). The increase in the fluorescence intensity in this assay reflects cell depolarization, which again is a reflection of the co-transport of Na+ and Cl ions through the transporter elicited by the transport of the substrate. GABA, β-alanine, L-DABA, nipecotic acid, guvacine, taurine, and betaine were identified as substrates for the hGAT-2, whereas THPO was found to be a weak inhibitor (Table 2). The remaining test compounds gave rise to nonspecific responses at the hGAT-2 in the FMP assay because they exhibited similar responses in cells transfected with the glutamate transporter hEAAT3 (data not shown). Hence these compounds were not tested further in the FMP assay. The Hill slopes for betaine and THPO could not be estimated; however, for the rest of the tested substrates the average Hill slopes were between 1.2 and 1.7.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2
Pharmacological characteristics of test compounds at tsA201 cells transiently transfected with hGAT-2 in the FMP assay

 


Figure 7
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 7.
Pharmacological characterization of hGAT-2 in the FMP assay using tsA201 cells transiently transfected with hGAT-2. Shown are representative concentration-response curves of GABA ({blacksquare}), β-alanine ({circ}), L-DABA ({diamondsuit}), nipecotic acid Figure 7, guvacine ({square}), taurine (•), and betaine (*). The FMP assay was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The responses are given as {Delta} fluorescence units ({Delta}FU) and are means of triplicate determinations of single representative experiments. Error bars have been omitted for clarity. At least two additional experiments performed on different days gave similar results.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Since the cloning of the rat, mouse, and human GABA transporters in the early 1990s, the possible existence of hGAT-2 remained enigmatic until a non-functional clone was reported in 2001 (46). Our analysis of this sequence revealed that it contains several truncations and a deviating carboxyl terminus compared with the rat and mouse orthologs; this was puzzling considering the close sequence relationship shared by the orthologs of the other three GABA transporter subtypes. This observation led us to use bioinformatics tools to identify the full-length open reading frame of hGAT-2 containing a carboxyl terminus similar to the rat and mouse orthologs. Here we thus report the cDNA cloning of the human GABA transporter hGAT-2, which is functional and displays pharmacological characteristics very similar to its rat and mouse orthologs rGAT-2 and mGAT3. The protein is closely related to other cloned human plasma membrane GABA transporters and displays high amino acid sequence similarity to mGAT3 and rGAT-2. Examination of mRNA levels of hGAT-2 by reverse transcription-PCR in tissues from adult individuals revealed expression in kidney, brain, lung, and testis. This corresponds to previous reports using either Northern blots (46) or analysis of expressed sequence tags (57), which also demonstrate expression of hGAT-2 in kidney and brain. Furthermore expression in liver (46) and in eye and the gastrointestinal system has been reported (57). The rGAT-2 has been detected in brain and retina, and in peripheral tissues it has been found in kidney, liver, heart, spleen, pancreas, and adrenal gland (11, 36, 39). The expression of mGAT3 has been found to be more restricted with low abundance in adult mouse brain and higher levels of expression in kidney and liver. Interestingly expression at a high level has been found in neonatal mouse brain (13), and the expression of mGAT3 in various embryonic peripheral tissues has also been reported (44). Based on the expression pattern, several suggestions regarding a physiologically relevant function of GAT-2 have been made. These include maturation of the central nervous system (13, 44), regulation of GABA levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (36, 37, 39), and a role for GAT-2 in tight junctions in the kidney (44).

Using the Xenopus oocyte expression system we demonstrated that hGAT-2 is a functional transporter. Putative substrates (GABA and β-alanine) induced inwardly directed currents under voltage-clamped conditions, reflecting the co-transport of ions and substrates. Betaine, however, is not a substrate for hGAT-2, as would be expected for this transporter (in contrast to the BGT-1). Not surprisingly, the kinetics of the hGAT-2 are comparable to those of the ortholog mGAT3 (58), whereas they differ from those of hGAT-1 (20). Examination of ion dependence revealed that the transport of substrate is absolutely dependent on Na+, whereas transport is not completely eliminated upon removal of Cl. This is in agreement with observations made for both mGAT3 and rGAT-2 and also hGAT-1 where it has been reported that the transporters are strictly dependent on the presence of Na+, whereas the absence of Cl only reduces GABA transport by ~50% (11, 20, 58).

We examined the pharmacological characteristics of hGAT-2 transiently expressed in tsA201 cells using a number of both synthesized and commercially available compounds (Fig. 4). These compounds have been tested previously as substrates or inhibitors of GABA transport and found to possess different selectivity profiles for neuronal and glial transport and for the four cloned GABA transporters. The compounds include the classical GABA transporter substrates L-DABA and β-alanine, which originally were thought to be markers for neuronal and glial transport, respectively, as well as nipecotic acid and guvacine, which were reported to be substrates at both neuronal and glial GABA transporters (for a review, see Ref. 27). Also included in this study is DAPA, which has been reported to be selective for the mouse orthologs of GAT-2 and GAT-3 (13, 59); quinidine and betaine, which display selectivity for especially the mouse ortholog of BGT-1 (10, 13, 14, 28); (S)-SNAP-5114, which is a relatively selective inhibitor of hGAT-3 (12, 60); EF1502, which preferentially inhibits the mouse orthologs of GAT-1 and BGT-1 (41); NNC-711, which selectively inhibits rGAT-1 and hGAT-1 (61); THPO, which is a weak inhibitor of all the cloned mouse GABA transporters (62); and taurine, which is a selective substrate of the closely related taurine transporter in rat, TAUT (63, 64).

Applying the [3H]GABA uptake assay and the FMP assay we demonstrated that hGAT-2, similarly to hGAT-1 and hGAT-3, displays high affinity transport of GABA. Furthermore we found the approximately same orders of potencies for the tested substrates in the two assays: GABA ≥ β-alanine > L-DABA = nipecotic acid ≥ guvacine > taurine = betaine. In agreement with the oocyte data (Fig. 5A) and previous reports (see Refs. 27, 62, and 65 and references therein) the results demonstrate that the applied FMP assay can be used to distinguish between substrates and non-substrates at GABA transporters. However, due to nonspecific effects the pharmacological properties of the compounds DAPA, (S)-SNAP-5114, quinidine, NNC-771, and EF1502 unfortunately could not be studied in the FMP assay. Considering the bulky substituents of the four latter compounds, it is reasonable to assume that they are inhibitors of hGAT-2 just as they have been demonstrated to be at other GABA transporter subtypes as described above. Intriguingly several of the substrates (e.g. β-alanine, guvacine, and L-DABA) displayed maximal responses greater than the maximal response of GABA (Table 2 and Fig. 7). This observation cannot be interpreted as an increased substrate transport rate for these compounds compared with GABA because other events could change the ion flux ratios during the interaction of the compounds with the transporter (54). However, the increased response level is an indication of increased currents, which is in agreement with the observed current trace for β-alanine in the Xenopus oocyte expression system (Fig. 5A).

Comparing the pharmacological characteristics found in this study (Tables 1 and 2) with reports for hGAT-1, hBGT-1, and hGAT-3, most of the results obtained in this study are in good agreement with previously reported properties of the compounds. Betaine, quinidine, taurine, NNC-711, and THPO all display low activities at hGAT-2. Nipecotic acid and guvacine display weak to moderate activities as substrates in the FMP assay and as competitors of [3H]GABA transport at hGAT-2. In comparison these two compounds have been reported to display strong competition of [3H]GABA transport at hGAT-1 and moderate and weak competition at hGAT-3 and hBGT-1, respectively (12). The hGAT-2 and hGAT-3 both display high affinity transport of β-alanine, whereas (S)-SNAP-5114 is a selective inhibitor of hGAT-3-mediated transport (12) and displays a substantially lower inhibitory activity at hGAT-2. Our study therefore demonstrates that hGAT-2, in agreement with the overall amino acid identity (Fig. 2D), is different from the other cloned GABA transporters and that the pharmacology of the transporter is more similar to hGAT-3 and hBGT-1 than to hGAT-1.

As can be seen from Table 1, the overall rank order of IC50 values for the 13 standard compounds at hGAT-2 and its rat and mouse orthologs rGAT-2 and mGAT3 is similar. This is hardly surprising considering the high amino acid sequence similarity between the three transporters. (S)-SNAP-5114 appears to display a lower inhibitory activity at hGAT-2 compared with mGAT3 and rGAT-2. However, it should be noted that data in Table 1 are derived from several different studies, and caution should therefore be taken when drawing comparisons because differences between transporters from different species also could arise from different assay conditions, assay systems, or expression levels. This is also indicated by the variation of the inhibition constants measured for some of the compounds at either rGAT-2 or mGAT3 (Table 1).

The therapeutic potential of targeting the hGAT-2 remains to be clarified. It has been suggested previously to be unlikely that GAT-2 is involved in regulation of GABA inside and outside intracerebral synapses (35). However, it may be noted that BGT-1, which similarly to GAT-2 is expressed in non-neural tissues, only recently has been suggested to have a functional role in the central nervous system (41). This finding was based on the discovery of the novel GABA transport inhibitor EF1502, which acts on both GAT-1 and BGT-1 (49). So far, (S)-SNAP-5114 is the only available pharmacological tool for determination of the functional role of especially GAT-3 but potentially also GAT-2 in the central nervous system (28). However, the recently obtained knowledge about the determinants of substrate binding to a homolog of the GABA transporters (22) is likely to enable a more rational approach to the design of new selective compounds for each of the GABA transporters. Such compounds will hopefully reveal more about the function of GAT-2 both in the central nervous system and in the periphery. Furthermore the identification of this human ortholog of rGAT-2 and mGAT3 enables the use of the human GABA transporters in future studies of GABA transport inhibitors. Although GAT-2 is similar among the species mentioned in this study, there appears to be some variations in transporter pharmacology, and thus the availability of hGAT-2 is highly relevant for future drug development programs.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Carlsberg Foundation, and the Danish Medical Research Council. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. Tel.: 45-3533-6518; Fax: 45-3533-6040; E-mail: hbo{at}molpharm.net.

2 The abbreviations used are: GABA, {gamma}-aminobutyric acid; BGT-1, betaine/GABA transporter-1; L-DABA, L-2,4-diamino-n-butyric acid; DAPA, DL-2,3-diaminopropionic acid; EF1502, N-[4,4-bis(3-methyl-2-thienyl)-3-butenyl]-3-hydroxy-4-(methylamino)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]isoxazol-3-ol; FMP, FLIPR membrane potential; GAT, GABA transporter; MTC, multiple tissue cDNA; NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; SLC6A13, solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter, GABA), member 13; THPO, 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo(4,5-c)pyridin-3-ol; m, mouse; h, human; r, rat; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Susan Amara for the hEAAT3 cDNA and Dr. Nathan Nelson for the mGAT3 cDNA. Bente Frølund, Rasmus P. Clausen, and Christian A. Olsen are acknowledged for providing THPO and guvacine, EF1502, and DAPA, respectively.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Krnjevic, K., and Schwartz, S. (1967) Exp. Brain Res. 3, 320–336[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Bowery, N. G., and Smart, T. G. (2006) Br. J. Pharmacol. 147, Suppl. 1, S109–S119[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Rudolph, U., and Möhler, H. (2006) Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 6, 18–23[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Bettler, B., Kaupmann, K., Mosbacher, J., and Gassmann, M. (2004) Physiol. Rev. 84, 835–867[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Radian, R., Ottersen, O. P., Storm-Mathisen, J., Castel, M., and Kanner, B. I. (1990) J. Neurosci. 10, 1319–1330[Abstract]
  6. Iversen, L. L., and Kelly, J. S. (1975) Biochem. Pharmacol. 24, 933–938[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Nelson, N. (1998) J. Neurochem. 71, 1785–1803[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Guastella, J., Nelson, N., Nelson, H., Czyzyk, L., Keynan, S., Miedel, M. C., Davidson, N., Lester, H. A., and Kanner, B. I. (1990) Science 249, 1303–1306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Nelson, H., Mandiyan, S., and Nelson, N. (1990) FEBS Lett. 269, 181–184[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. López-Corcuera, B., Liu, Q. R., Mandiyan, S., Nelson, H., and Nelson, N. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17491–17493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Borden, L. A., Smith, K. E., Hartig, P. R., Branchek, T. A., and Weinshank, R. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 21098–21104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Borden, L. A., Dhar, T. G., Smith, K. E., Branchek, T. A., Gluchowski, C., and Weinshank, R. L. (1994) Receptors Channels 2, 207–213[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Liu, Q. R., López-Corcuera, B., Mandiyan, S., Nelson, H., and Nelson, N. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 2106–2112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Borden, L. A., Smith, K. E., Gustafson, E. L., Branchek, T. A., and Weinshank, R. L. (1995) J. Neurochem. 64, 977–984[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Yamauchi, A., Uchida, S., Kwon, H. M., Preston, A. S., Robey, R. B., Garcia-Perez, A., Burg, M. B., and Handler, J. S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 649–652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Rasola, A., Galietta, L. J., Barone, V., Romeo, G., and Bagnasco, S. (1995) FEBS Lett. 373, 229–233[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Burnham, C. E., Buerk, B., Schmidt, C., and Bucuvalas, J. C. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1284, 4–8[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Chen, N. H., Reith, M. E., and Quick, M. W. (2004) Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 447, 519–531[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Gether, U., Andersen, P. H., Larsson, O. M., and Schousboe, A. (2006) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 27, 375–383[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Loo, D. D., Eskandari, S., Boorer, K. J., Sarkar, H. K., and Wright, E. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 37414–37422[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kanner, B. I. (1994) J. Exp. Biol. 196, 237–249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Yamashita, A., Singh, S. K., Kawate, T., Jin, Y., and Gouaux, E. (2005) Nature 437, 215–223[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Iversen, L. (2006) Br. J. Pharmacol. 147, Suppl. 1, S82–S88[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Treiman, D. M. (2001) Epilepsia 42, Suppl. 3, 8–12[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Wong, C. G., Bottiglieri, T., and Snead, O. C., III (2003) Ann. Neurol. 54, Suppl. 6, S3–S12
  26. Jasmin, L., Wu, M. V., and Ohara, P. T. (2004) Curr. Drug Targets CNS Neurol. Disord. 3, 487–505[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Krogsgaard-Larsen, P., Falch, E., Larsson, O. M., and Schousboe, A. (1987) Epilepsy Res. 1, 77–93[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Borden, L. A. (1996) Neurochem. Int. 29, 335–356[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Schachter, S. C. (1999) Epilepsia 40, Suppl. 5, S17–S22
  30. Böhme, I., and Lüddens, H. (2001) Curr. Med. Chem. 8, 1257–1274[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Allen, N. J., Káradóttir, R., and Attwell, D. (2004) Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 449, 132–142[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Crane, D. (2003) Depress. Anxiety 18, 51–52[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Mathias, S., Wetter, T. C., Steiger, A., and Lancel, M. (2001) Neurobiol. Aging 22, 247–253[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Backonja, M. M. (2002) Neurology 59, Suppl. 2, S14–S17[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Dalby, N. O. (2003) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 479, 127–137[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Ikegaki, N., Saito, N., Hashima, M., and Tanaka, C. (1994) Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 26, 47–54[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Conti, F., Minelli, A., and Melone, M. (2004) Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 45, 196–212[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Jursky, F., Tamura, S., Tamura, A., Mandiyan, S., Nelson, H., and Nelson, N. (1994) J. Exp. Biol. 196, 283–295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Durkin, M. M., Smith, K. E., Borden, L. A., Weinshank, R. L., Branchek, T. A., and Gustafson, E. L. (1995) Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 33, 7–21[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Dalby, N. O., Thomsen, C., Fink-Jensen, A., Lundbeck, J., Søkilde, B., Man, C. M., Sørensen, P. O., and Meldrum, B. (1997) Epilepsy Res. 28, 51–61[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Clausen, R. P., Frølund, B., Larsson, O. M., Schousboe, A., Krogsgaard-Larsen, P., and White, H. S. (2006) Neurochem. Int. 48, 637–642[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Schousboe, A., Larsson, O. M., Sarup, A., and White, H. S. (2004) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 500, 281–287[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. White, H. S., Watson, W. P., Hansen, S. L., Slough, S., Perregaard, J., Sarup, A., Bolvig, T., Petersen, G., Larsson, O. M., Clausen, R. P., Frølund, B., Falch, E., Krogsgaard-Larsen, P., and Schousboe, A. (2005) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 312, 866–874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Jursky, F., and Nelson, N. (1999) J. Neurosci. Res. 55, 394–399[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Sarup, A., Larsson, O. M., and Schousboe, A. (2003) Curr. Drug Targets CNS Neurol. Disord. 2, 269–277[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Gong, Y., Zhang, M., Cui, L., and Minuk, G. Y. (2001) Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 79, 977–984[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Sauerberg, P., Larsen, J. J., Falch, E., and Krogsgaard-Larsen, P. (1986) J. Med. Chem. 29, 1004–1009[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. McElvain, S. M., and Stork, G. (1946) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 68, 1049–1053[CrossRef]
  49. Clausen, R. P., Moltzen, E. K., Perregaard, J., Lenz, S. M., Sanchez, C., Falch, E., Frølund, B., Bolvig, T., Sarup, A., Larsson, O. M., Schousboe, A., and Krogsgaard-Larsen, P. (2005) Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13, 895–908[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Sonnhammer, E. L., von Heijne, G., and Krogh, A. (1998) Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 6, 175–182[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Hofmann, K., and Stoffel, W. (1993) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 47, 166
  52. Meinild, A., Klaerke, D. A., Loo, D. D., Wright, E. M., and Zeuthen, T. (1998) J. Physiol. 508, 15–21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Chahine, M., Bennett, P. B., George, A. L., Jr., and Horn, R. (1994) Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 427, 136–142[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Jensen, A. A., and Bräuner-Osborne, H. (2004) Biochem. Pharmacol. 67, 2115–2127[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Strausberg, R. L., Feingold, E. A., Grouse, L. H., Derge, J. G., Klausner, R. D., Collins, F. S., Wagner, L., Shenmen, C. M., Schuler, G. D., Altschul, S. F., Zeeberg, B., Buetow, K. H., Schaefer, C. F., Bhat, N. K., Hopkins, R. F., Jordan, H., Moore, T., Max, S. I., Wang, J., Hsieh, F., Diatchenko, L., Marusina, K., Farmer, A. A., Rubin, G. M., Hong, L., Stapleton, M., Soares, M. B., Bonaldo, M. F., Casavant, T. L., Scheetz, T. E., Brownstein, M. J., Usdin, T. B., Toshiyuki, S., Carninci, P., Prange, C., Raha, S. S., Loquellano, N. A., Peters, G. J., Abramson, R. D., Mullahy, S. J., Bosak, S. A., McEwan, P. J., McKernan, K. J., Malek, J. A., Gunaratne, P. H., Richards, S., Worley, K. C., Hale, S., Garcia, A. M., Gay, L. J., Hulyk, S. W., Villalon, D. K., Muzny, D. M., Sodergren, E. J., Lu, X., Gibbs, R. A., Fahey, J., Helton, E., Ketteman, M., Madan, A., Rodrigues, S., Sanchez, A., Whiting, M., Madan, A., Young, A. C., Shevchenko, Y., Bouffard, G. G., Blakesley, R. W., Touchman, J. W., Green, E. D., Dickson, M. C., Rodriguez, A. C., Grimwood, J., Schmutz, J., Myers, R. M., Butterfield, Y. S., Krzywinski, M. I., Skalska, U., Smailus, D. E., Schnerch, A., Schein, J. E., Jones, S. J., and Marra, M. A. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 16899–16903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Lennon, G., Auffray, C., Polymeropoulos, M., and Soares, M. B. (1996) Genomics 33, 151–152[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Höglund, P. J., Adzic, D., Scicluna, S. J., Lindblom, J., and Fredriksson, R. (2005) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 336, 175–189[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Sacher, A., Nelson, N., Ogi, J. T., Wright, E. M., Loo, D. D., and Eskandari, S. (2002) J. Membr. Biol. 190, 57–73[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Kragler, A., Höfner, G., and Wanner, K. T. (2005) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 519, 43–47[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  60. Dhar, T. G., Borden, L. A., Tyagarajan, S., Smith, K. E., Branchek, T. A., Weinshank, R. L., and Gluchowski, C. (1994) J. Med. Chem. 37, 2334–2342[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  61. Borden, L. A., Murali Dhar, T. G., Smith, K. E., Weinshank, R. L., Branchek, T. A., and Gluchowski, C. (1994) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 269, 219–224[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Bolvig, T., Larsson, O. M., Pickering, D. S., Nelson, N., Falch, E., Krogsgaard-Larsen, P., and Schousboe, A. (1999) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 375, 367–374[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Borden, L. A., Smith, K. E., Vaysse, P. J., Gustafson, E. L., Weinshank, R. L., and Branchek, T. A. (1995) Receptors Channels 3, 129–146[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Smith, K. E., Borden, L. A., Wang, C. H., Hartig, P. R., Branchek, T. A., and Weinshank, R. L. (1992) Mol. Pharmacol. 42, 563–569[Abstract]
  65. Schousboe, A., Sarup, A., Larsson, O. M., and White, H. S. (2004) Biochem. Pharmacol. 68, 1557–1563[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  66. Thomsen, C., Sørensen, P. O., and Egebjerg, J. (1997) Br. J. Pharmacol. 120, 983–985[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
S. Z. Young and A. Bordey
GABA's Control of Stem and Cancer Cell Proliferation in Adult Neural and Peripheral Niches
Physiology, June 1, 2009; 24(3): 171 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/27/19331    most recent
M702111200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christiansen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Braüner-Osborne, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christiansen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Braüner-Osborne, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement