![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 28, 20207-20212, July 13, 2007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Departments of Internal Medicine and Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Received for publication, December 11, 2006 , and in revised form, April 27, 2007.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-,
-, and
ENaC. However, little is known about the mechanism by which Nedd4-2 regulates ENaC surface expression. Here we found that Nedd4-2 catalyzes ubiquitination of
-,
-, and
ENaC; Nedd4-2 overexpression increased ubiquitination, whereas Nedd4-2 silencing decreased ubiquitination. Although Nedd4-2 increased both mono/oligoubiquitinated and multiubiquitinated forms of ENaC, monoubiquitination was sufficient for Nedd4-2 to reduce ENaC surface expression and reduce ENaC current. Ubiquitination was disrupted by Liddle syndrome-associated mutations in ENaC or mutation of the catalytic HECT domain in Nedd4-2. Several findings suggest that the interaction between Nedd4-2 and ENaC is localized to the cell surface. First, Nedd4-2 bound to a population of ENaC at the cell surface. Second, Nedd4-2 catalyzed ubiquitination of cell surface ENaC. Third, Nedd4-2 selectively reduced ENaC expression at the cell surface but did not alter the quantity of immature ENaC in the biosynthetic pathway. Finally, Nedd4-2 induced degradation of the cell surface pool of ENaC. Together, the data suggest a model in which Nedd4-2 binds to and ubiquitinates ENaC at the cell surface, which targets surface ENaC for degradation, and thus, reduces epithelial Na+ transport. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-,
-, and
ENaC) (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Mutations in
- and
ENaC cause Liddle syndrome, an inherited form of hypertension (3). Moreover, most of the known genetic causes of hypertension are caused by defects in ENaC regulation. Defective ENaC regulation may also contribute to lung disease in cystic fibrosis (4). Thus, understanding the mechanisms that regulate ENaC may provide new insights into the pathogenesis of hypertension, cystic fibrosis, and other diseases of Na+ homeostasis.
ENaC is regulated in large part by mechanisms that control its expression at the apical membrane of epithelia. Several findings have implicated an important role for Nedd4-2, an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase. First, Nedd4-2 and ENaC interact through the binding of PY motifs (PPPXYXXL) located in the C termini of
-,
-, and
ENaC to multiple WW domains in Nedd4-2 (5). Importantly, ENaC mutations that disrupt this interaction cause Liddle syndrome by increasing ENaC surface expression (68). Second, Nedd4-2 overexpression decreases ENaC current by reducing its expression at the cell surface (8, 9). Third, silencing of endogenous Nedd4-2 by RNA interference increases ENaC current (10). Finally, aldosterone and vasopressin regulate ENaC in part by inducing phosphorylation of Nedd4-2 (via serum- and glucocorticoid-induced kinase and cAMP-dependent protein kinase, respectively), which decreases Nedd4-2 binding to ENaC (9, 11, 12).
However, critical questions remain about the mechanism by which Nedd4-2 regulates ENaC. First, it is not known whether Nedd4-2 regulates ENaC directly, by catalyzing ubiquitination of one or more ENaC subunits, or indirectly, by catalyzing ubiquitination of an accessory protein. Staub et al. (13) reported that
- and
ENaC are substrates for ubiquitination and that mutation of lysines at the N termini of these subunits increased ENaC surface expression. More recent work suggests that
ENaC might also be a substrate for ubiquitination (14, 15). However, it is not known whether Nedd4-2 or other ubiquitin ligases catalyze ENaC ubiquitination. Second, the cellular location at which Nedd4-2 binds to and regulates ENaC has not been identified. Nedd4-2 could interact with ENaC in the biosynthetic pathway and block its trafficking to the cell surface. Alternatively, Nedd4-2 could interact with ENaC at the cell surface and increase its endocytosis and/or degradation. In this work, our goal was to test the hypothesis that Nedd4-2 binds to ENaC and catalyzes its ubiquitination at the cell surface, which targets this pool of channels for degradation.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-,
-, and
ENaC (16, 17), Nedd4-2 (11), and Nedd4-2C821A (18) in pMT3 were cloned as described previously.
-FLAG,
-FLAG, and
-FLAG were generated by the insertion of a FLAG epitope (DYKDDDDK) at the C terminus. PY motif mutations were generated in
ENaC (Y644A),
ENaC (R566X and Y620A), and
ENaC (Y627A) as described previously (6). Nedd4-2WW14 was generated by mutating two residues in each of the four WW domains (WW1, V210W and H212G; WW2, V367W and H369G; WW3, I440W and H442G; WW4, I492W and H494G). These mutations abolish Nedd4-2 binding to ENaC, similar to previous work with Nedd4 (19). HA2-tagged ubiquitin (in pMT123) was provided by Dirk Bohmann (University of Rochester), and lysine-less ubiquitin cDNA (Ub-0K) was provided by Joan Conaway (Stowers Institute for Medical Research).
Ubiquitination AssayTo detect ENaC ubiquitination, HEK 293T cells were transfected with or without cDNAs encoding ubiquitin-HA and
-,
-, and
ENaC (one subunit contained FLAG epitope) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). In some studies, cells were cotransfected with Nedd4-2 (wild type or C821A) or green fluorescent protein (GFP, control) cDNA, or with siRNA against Nedd4-2 (10) or GFP (control). The cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10 µM amiloride. To inhibit proteasomal degradation, 10 µM N-acetyl-Leu-Leu-norleucinal (ALLN) was added to some cells 2 h before lysis. 24 h after transfection, cells were solubilized in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma)), and 800 µg of protein was immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody (1:300, Sigma) and immobilized protein A (Pierce). After extensive washing, immunoprecipitated (ubiquitinated) proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, detected by immunoblot with anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody-peroxidase conjugate (1:5000, Sigma), and quantitated by densitometry.
Cell Surface Biotinylation and Protein InteractionsHEK 293T cells were transfected with
-,
-, and
ENaC (1 µg each) and Nedd4-2-HA (0.04 µg). 24 h later, the cells were washed with PBS-CM (PBS with 1 mM MgCl2 and CaCl2), cell surface proteins were labeled with 0.5 mg/ml sulfo-NHS-biotin (Pierce) in PBS-CM for 30 min on ice, and then cells were quenched with 100 mM glycine in PBS-CM for 10 min on ice. After washing three times with PBS-CM, cells were lysed in Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer (0.4% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Nonidet P-40, 63 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), and protease inhibitor mixture). Biotinylated (cell surface) and interacting proteins were isolated by incubating cell lysate with immobilized NeutrAvidin beads (Pierce) for 12 h at 4 °C. Following separation by SDS-PAGE, biotinylated
ENaC and coprecipitated Nedd4-2 were detected by immunoblot. In some experiments, unbiotinylated ENaC subunits were immunoprecipitated from either the NeutrAvidin supernatant or the total cellular lysate.
Cell Surface UbiquitinationHEK 293T cells transfected with or without
ENaC,
-FLAG, and
ENaC, Nedd4-2, and ubiquitin-HA were biotinylated at 4 °C (to prevent protein trafficking) as above or not biotinylated as control. Following solubilization in 1% Triton X-100 lysis buffer,
ENaC was immunoprecipitated (anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel) from 800 µg of cell lysate.
ENaC was eluted from the gel by incubating with SDS-PAGE sample buffer (100 mM dithiothreitol, 20% glycerol, 100 mM Tris-Cl, pH 6.8, and 4% SDS) at 95 °C for 5 min. The supernatant was diluted with 11 volumes of lysis buffer, and biotinylated
ENaC was isolated by incubation with immobilized NeutrAvidin beads and separated by SDS-PAGE. Ubiquitinated
ENaC at the cell surface was detected by immunoblot (anti-HA antibody, 1:2000).
|
ENaC,
-FLAG, and
ENaC (wild type or
Y644A,
Y620A,
Y627A) with Nedd4-2 or GFP. 24 h after transfection, cells were biotinylated on ice for 30 min and then incubated at 37 °C for 0, 40, 80, or 120 min. Cell surface
ENaC was isolated by incubation with immobilized NeutrAvidin beads, detected by immunoblot with anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody-peroxidase conjugate, and quantitated by densitometry.
Short-Circuit CurrentFischer rat thyroid cells on permeable filter supports were cotransfected with
-,
-, and
ENaC (0.17 µg each) with or without Nedd4-2 (0.4 µg) and Ub-0K (0.5 µg) using TFX50 (Promega), as described previously (11); total cDNA was held constant with GFP cDNA. Short-circuit Na+ current was measured using modified Ussing chambers (Warner Instrument Corp.). The apical and basolateral surfaces were bathed in 135 mM NaCl, 1.2 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 2.4 mM K2HPO4, 0.6 mM KH2PO4, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) at 37 °C. Amiloride-sensitive short-circuit current was determined as the current difference with and without amiloride (10 µM) in the apical bathing solution.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-,
-, and
ENaC (one of the subunits contained a FLAG epitope at its C terminus) with or without ubiquitin containing an HA epitope (Ub-HA). To observe ubiquitinated ENaC subunits, the cells were treated with ALLN to prevent proteasomal degradation. Total
-,
-, and
ENaC were detected by immunoprecipitation followed by immunoblot (Fig. 1, bottom). Ubiquitinated ENaC subunits were isolated by immunoprecipitation of ubiquitin (anti-HA) and detected by immunoblot (anti-FLAG). We detected ubiquitinated
-,
-, and
ENaC in cells cotransfected with Ub-HA but not in cells transfected separately with either ENaC or Ub-HA (Fig. 1, top). Interestingly, we detected at least two different ubiquitinated forms of each subunit. Faster migrating bands likely represent ENaC subunits with one or a few ubiquitins attached (monoubiquitinated or oligoubiquitinated), whereas slower migrating bands are multiubiquitinated (polyubiquitinated or poly-monoubiquitinated) ENaC.
|
|
-,
-, and
ENaC (Fig. 2, AC, compare lanes 1 and 2). Moreover, Nedd4-2 increased both the faster and the slower migrating forms. As controls for specificity, we did not detect ubiquitinated proteins in cells lacking ENaC (Fig. 2, A and C, lanes 5 and 7, and Fig. 2B, lane 7) or in cells expressing ENaC without Ub-HA and Nedd4-2 (lane 6).
As a second strategy, we silenced expression of endogenous Nedd4-2 with Nedd4-2 siRNA. We characterized this siRNA in previous work; it selectively decreased Nedd4-2 protein levels (but not the related E3 ligase Nedd4), and it increased ENaC current in epithelia (10). Here we found that Nedd4-2 siRNA decreased ubiquitination of
ENaC (Fig. 3, A and B).
Nedd4-2 HECT Domain and ENaC PY Motifs Are Required for ENaC UbiquitinationThe C terminus of Nedd4-2 contains a HECT domain. Through the binding of ubiquitin to Cys-821, this domain catalyzes ubiquitination of target proteins. Previous work indicates that the HECT domain is required for Nedd4-2 to inhibit ENaC (5, 20). Mutation of Cys-821 to Ala abolished Nedd4-2-mediated ubiquitination of
- and
ENaC, as well as the slower migrating form of
ENaC (Fig. 2, AC, compare lanes 2 and 3, quantified in Fig. 2, DF). Interestingly, the mutant Nedd4-2 increased the faster migrating mono- or oligoubiquitinated form of
ENaC (when compared with the group without Nedd4-2), although much less than wild-type Nedd4-2 (Fig. 2, C and F). Thus, the catalytic activity of the HECT domain is required for Nedd4-2 to induce ubiquitination of
ENaC,
ENaC, and the slower migrating form of
ENaC but not mono/oligoubiquitinated
ENaC.
Nedd4-2 binds to ENaC via PY motifs located in the cytoplasmic C terminus of each ENaC subunit. Mutation of these motifs prevents Nedd4-2 from inhibiting ENaC (5). To test whether binding is required for ubiquitination, we disrupted the PY motifs. Deletion of this motif in
ENaC by a Liddle syndrome mutation (R566X, indicated in Fig. 2 by
L) reduced Nedd4-2-induced ubiquitination of
- and
ENaC (Fig. 2, A and C, compare lanes 2 and 4, quantitated in Fig. 2, D and F). Mutation of the PY motif (Y620A, indicated in Fig. 2 by
Y-A) produced a minimal decrease in the faster migrating form of ubiquitinated
ENaC (which did not reach statistical significance) but not the slower migrating form (Fig. 2B, lane 4, and Fig. 2E). However, simultaneous mutation of the PY motifs in
-,
-, and
ENaC abolished ubiquitination of
ENaC (Fig. 2, B and E). Taken together, these data suggest that Nedd4-2 binds to the PY motifs of ENaC subunits and then catalyzes ubiquitination via the HECT domain.
|
ENaC (Fig. 4A, bottom panel). Nedd4-2 was also present in this cell surface fraction in cells expressing ENaC but not in cells lacking ENaC (Fig. 4A, top panel). These results indicate that Nedd4-2 binds to ENaC at the cell surface. Moreover, they show that Nedd4-2 is not itself a substrate for biotinylation, consistent with its intracellular location.
To test whether Nedd4-2 ubiquitinates ENaC at the cell surface, we subjected cells to cell surface biotinylation followed by sequential precipitation with anti-FLAG beads (to isolate ENaC) and then NeutrAvidin beads (to isolate cell surface ENaC). We then analyzed the ubiquitination state of cell surface ENaC by immunoblot for Ub-HA. Fig. 4B shows that
ENaC was highly ubiquitinated in the presence but not in the absence of Nedd4-2. Together, the data suggest that Nedd4-2 binds to and ubiquitinates ENaC at the cell surface.
Nedd4-2 Selectively Decreases Steady-state Levels of ENaC at the Cell SurfaceIf Nedd4-2 regulates ENaC at the cell surface, we predict that it should decrease steady-state levels of ENaC at the cell surface but have little effect on intracellular ENaC (which primarily reflects immature ENaC in the biosynthetic pathway). To test this prediction, we biotinylated cell surface proteins in cells transfected with ENaC (
ENaC,
-FLAG,
ENaC) and Nedd4-2 (00.5 µg). We separated biotinylated (surface) proteins from non-biotinylated (intracellular) proteins by binding to NeutrAvidin beads and then detected
ENaC in each fraction by immunoblotting; Fig. 5A shows representative immunoblots, and Fig. 5B shows quantitation of the Nedd4-2 dose-response relationship. Nedd4-2 did not alter levels of intracellular
ENaC (Fig. 5, A and B, top panels). In contrast, Nedd4-2 produced a dose-dependent decrease in
ENaC at the cell surface (Fig. 5, A and B, bottom panels). Thus, Nedd4-2 selectively regulates ENaC at the cell surface.
|
ENaC (
Y620A). In the absence of Nedd4-2, this mutation increased ENaC surface expression (Fig. 5A, bottom panel), consistent with previous work (6, 8). Moreover, it reduced the effect of Nedd4-2 on ENaC surface expression (Fig. 5, A and B, bottom panels). In contrast, this mutation had little effect on levels of intracellular ENaC (Fig. 5, A and B, top panels). As a second strategy, we mutated the four Nedd4-2 WW domains (WW domains 24 mediate binding to ENaC). The mutant Nedd4-2 failed to decrease ENaC surface expression (Fig. 5C). The ubiquitin ligase activity of Nedd4-2 was also required; mutation of the HECT domain (C821A) prevented Nedd4-2 from decreasing ENaC surface expression (Fig. 5D).
|
ENaC (Fig. 6, A and B); the half-life of degradation was approximately 1 h. Nedd4-2 dramatically increased the rate of degradation of cell surface ENaC, shortening the half-life to <20 min (Fig. 6, A and B). Mutation of the PY motifs in
-,
-, and
ENaC abolished the effect of Nedd4-2 (Fig. 6, A and C). Thus, once ENaC reaches the cell surface, Nedd4-2 induces its degradation. This negative regulation is disrupted in Liddle syndrome.
ENaC Monoubiquitination Is Sufficient for Nedd4-2-induced DegradationThe data in Fig. 2 suggest that Nedd4-2 catalyzes both monoubiquitination and polyubiquitination of
-,
-, and
ENaC. To assess the relative functional importance of these two species, we used a mutant ubiquitin; mutation of each lysine (Ub-0K) prevents the formation of polyubiquitin chains (21, 22). Expression of Ub-0K increased levels of
ENaC at the cell surface (Fig. 7A, compare lanes 1 and 5). This suggests that ENaC surface expression is in part controlled by polyubiquitination. However, Ub-0K did not prevent Nedd4-2 from decreasing ENaC surface expression; the Nedd4-2 dose-response relationship was identical in the presence or absence of Ub-0K (when each group was normalized to surface expression in the absence of Nedd4-2) (Fig. 7, A and B). In Fischer rat thyroid epithelia transfected with
-,
-, and
ENaC, Ub-0K did not prevent Nedd4-2 from decreasing ENaC current (Fig. 7C). Together, the data suggest that monoubiquitination is sufficient for Nedd4-2 to regulate ENaC.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Does Nedd4-2 regulate ENaC surface expression by ubiquitinating one or more ENaC subunit(s)? Nedd4-2 is an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase. Moreover, its catalytic HECT domain is required for ENaC regulation. Thus, it seems likely that Nedd4-2 regulates ENaC by catalyzing ubiquitination of one or more substrates. These substrates could be either ENaC subunit(s) themselves or a trans-acting protein that modulates ENaC surface expression. In support of the first possibility, we found that Nedd4-2 catalyzes ubiquitination of
-,
-, and
ENaC. We cannot exclude the possibility that ubiquitination of a trans-acting protein by Nedd4-2 also contributes to regulation of ENaC surface expression. For example, we previously found that Nedd4-2 ubiquitinates and induces degradation of serum- and glucocorticoid-induced kinase (SGK), a Ser/Thr kinase that stimulates ENaC (18). In this regard, it is also intriguing that a yeast homologue of Nedd4-2 (Rsp5) induces endocytosis of Ste2p by catalyzing ubiquitination of a component of the endocytosis machinery (23).
Does Nedd4-2 catalyze monoubiquitination or polyubiquitination of ENaC? Our data suggest that Nedd4-2 does both. Nedd4-2 increased the quantity of faster migrating ubiquitinated forms of
-,
-, and
ENaC. Based on the relative molecular mass, this form is consistent with subunits containing one or a small number of ubiquitins (mono- or oligoubiquitinated). Nedd4-2 also increased a high molecular mass smear, consistent with polyubiquitin chains. However, because the N terminus of each ENaC subunit contains multiple lysines, attachment of a single ubiquitin to multiple residues (polymonoubiquitination) could also contribute to the higher molecular mass forms. In addition to ENaC ubiquitination induced by overexpression of Nedd4-2, we also observed ubiquitinated
-,
-, and
ENaC in cells not transfected with Nedd4-2. This is consistent with previous work from other laboratories (although there was disagreement about whether
ENaC was a substrate for ubiquitination) (1315). Our data suggest that endogenous Nedd4-2 contributes to this basal level of ubiquitination; silencing of Nedd4-2 reduced ENaC ubiquitination. Importantly, ENaC regulation by Nedd4-2 was intact under conditions that prevented polyubiquitination (Ub-0K). Thus, although Nedd4-2 catalyzes both monoubiquitination and polyubiquitination of ENaC, monoubiquitination is sufficient for Nedd4-2 to induce ENaC degradation (conversely, polyubiquitination is not necessary).
E3 ligases function at a variety of cellular locations. For example, gp78 and CHIP participate in quality control in the biosynthetic pathway, targeting misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum for degradation in the proteasome (24, 25). Other E3 ligases (e.g. Rsp5, Mdm2) target membrane proteins for endocytosis and degradation (23, 26). Previous work localized Nedd4-2 both in the cytoplasm and at the cell surface (27). Moreover, the C2 domain (required for Ca2+-induced localization to the cell surface (27)) is not required for Nedd4-2 or the related E3 ligase Nedd4 to reduce ENaC surface expression (11, 19, 28). These observations raised the possibility that Nedd4-2 and ENaC interact at an intracellular location (27). Our current data suggest an alternative model in which Nedd4-2 binds to ENaC and catalyzes its ubiquitination at the cell surface. First, we found that Nedd4-2 bound to ENaC at the cell surface. Second, Nedd4-2 catalyzed ubiquitination of cell surface ENaC. Third, Nedd4-2 decreased ENaC expression at the cell surface but had no effect on intracellular ENaC, which principally reflects immature channels in the biosynthetic pathway. Finally, following ENaC trafficking to the cell surface, Nedd4-2 induced its degradation. However, we cannot exclude an additional role for Nedd4-2 at a cytoplasmic location, in either the biosynthetic or the endosomal sorting pathways. Moreover, it seems likely that additional E3 ligases might also regulate ENaC in these locations. Consistent with this notion, silencing of Nedd4-2 did not abolish ENaC ubiquitination. Moreover, disruption of polyubiquitination (Ub-0K) increased ENaC surface expression despite is lack of effect on ENaC regulation by Nedd4-2. One caveat is that our studies were carried out in heterologous cell systems; additional work will be required to determine whether the same mechanisms are operative in native epithelia.
We found that Liddle syndrome mutations disrupted Nedd4-2-mediated ubiquitination of ENaC. Because these mutations delete or alter PY motifs that mediate ENaC binding to Nedd4-2, this suggests that binding facilitates ubiquitination. Moreover, it provides a mechanistic link between the disease-causing mutations and the excessive Na+ reabsorption that leads to hypertension in patients with Liddle syndrome. By disrupting ubiquitination, Liddle syndrome mutations increase ENaC surface expression, causing excessive renal Na+ absorption. Nedd4-2 is regulated by the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathway. Moreover, defects in this pathway are responsible for nearly all of the known inherited forms of hypertension. Thus, understanding the mechanisms that mediate ENaC ubiquitination may help unravel the pathogenesis of more common forms of hypertension.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by the National Institutes of Health. To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of Iowa College of Medicine, 371 EMRB, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail: peter-snyder{at}uiowa.edu.
2 The abbreviations used are: siRNA, small interfering RNA; GFP, green fluorescent protein; ALLN, N-acetyl-Leu-Leu-norleucinal; HA, hemagglutinin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; Ub, ubiquitin; Ub-0K, lysine-less ubiquitin cDNA. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Liang, M. B. Butterworth, K. W. Peters, W. H. Walker, and R. A. Frizzell An Obligatory Heterodimer of 14-3-3{beta} and 14-3-3{epsilon} Is Required for Aldosterone Regulation of the Epithelial Sodium Channel J. Biol. Chem., October 10, 2008; 283(41): 27418 - 27425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Boulkroun, D. Ruffieux-Daidie, J.-J. Vitagliano, O. Poirot, R.-P. Charles, D. Lagnaz, D. Firsov, S. Kellenberger, and O. Staub Vasopressin-inducible ubiquitin-specific protease 10 increases ENaC cell surface expression by deubiquitylating and stabilizing sorting nexin 3 Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): F889 - F900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Bhalla and K. R. Hallows Mechanisms of ENaC Regulation and Clinical Implications J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2008; 19(10): 1845 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. He, D. H. Hryciw, M. L. Carroll, S. A. Myers, A. K. Whitbread, S. Kumar, P. Poronnik, and J. D. Hooper The Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase Nedd4-2 Differentially Interacts with and Regulates Members of the Tweety Family of Chloride Ion Channels J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2008; 283(35): 24000 - 24010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Manunta, G. Lavery, C. Lanzani, P. S. Braund, M. Simonini, C. Bodycote, L. Zagato, S. Delli Carpini, C. Tantardini, E. Brioni, et al. Physiological Interaction Between {alpha}-Adducin and WNK1-NEDD4L Pathways on Sodium-Related Blood Pressure Regulation Hypertension, August 1, 2008; 52(2): 366 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Raikwar and C. P. Thomas Nedd4-2 isoforms ubiquitinate individual epithelial sodium channel subunits and reduce surface expression and function of the epithelial sodium channel Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): F1157 - F1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kabra, K. K. Knight, R. Zhou, and P. M. Snyder Nedd4-2 Induces Endocytosis and Degradation of Proteolytically Cleaved Epithelial Na+ Channels J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2008; 283(10): 6033 - 6039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Butterworth, R. S. Edinger, H. Ovaa, D. Burg, J. P. Johnson, and R. A. Frizzell The Deubiquitinating Enzyme UCH-L3 Regulates the Apical Membrane Recycling of the Epithelial Sodium Channel J. Biol. Chem., December 28, 2007; 282(52): 37885 - 37893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Weixel, R. S. Edinger, L. Kester, C. J. Guerriero, H. Wang, L. Fang, T. R. Kleyman, P. A. Welling, O. A. Weisz, and J. P. Johnson Phosphatidylinositol 4-Phosphate 5-Kinase Reduces Cell Surface Expression of the Epithelial Sodium Channel (ENaC) in Cultured Collecting Duct Cells J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2007; 282(50): 36534 - 36542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Pruliere-Escabasse, C. Planes, E. Escudier, P. Fanen, A. Coste, and C. Clerici Modulation of Epithelial Sodium Channel Trafficking and Function by Sodium 4-Phenylbutyrate in Human Nasal Epithelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., November 23, 2007; 282(47): 34048 - 34057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I.-H. Lee, A. Dinudom, A. Sanchez-Perez, S. Kumar, and D. I. Cook Akt Mediates the Effect of Insulin on Epithelial Sodium Channels by Inhibiting Nedd4-2 J. Biol. Chem., October 12, 2007; 282(41): 29866 - 29873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||