|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 28, 20763-20773, July 13, 2007
Dual Subcellular Localization in the Endoplasmic Reticulum and Peroxisomes and a Vital Role in Protecting against Oxidative Stress of Fatty Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Are Achieved by Alternative Splicing*![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 1
From the
Received for publication, December 27, 2006 , and in revised form, April 23, 2007.
Fatty aldehyde dehydrogenase (FALDH, ALDH3A2) is thought to be involved in the degradation of phytanic acid, a saturated branched chain fatty acid derived from chlorophyll. However, the identity, subcellular distribution, and physiological roles of FALDH are unclear because several variants produced by alternative splicing are present in varying amounts at different subcellular locations. Subcellular fractionation experiments do not provide a clear-cut conclusion because of the incomplete separation of organelles. We established human cell lines heterologously expressing mouse FALDH from each cDNA without tagging under the control of an inducible promoter and detected the variant FALDH proteins using a mouse FALDH-specific antibody. One variant, FALDH-V, was exclusively detected in peroxisomal membranes. Human FALDH-V with an amino-terminal Myc sequence also localized to peroxisomes. The most dominant form, FALDH-N, and other variants examined, however, were distributed in the endoplasmic reticulum. A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-based analysis of metabolites in FALDH-expressing cells incubated with phytol or phytanic acid showed that FALDH-V, not FALDH-N, is the key aldehyde dehydrogenase in the degradation pathway and that it protects peroxisomes from oxidative stress. In contrast, both FALDHs had a protective effect against oxidative stress induced by a model aldehyde for lipid peroxidation, dodecanal. These results suggest that FALDH variants are produced by alternative splicing and share an important role in protecting against oxidative stress in an organelle-specific manner.
Plants produce a variety of secondary metabolites, and some of these are potentially toxic to animals (1). Herbivora have developed behavioral and physiological strategies to avoid specific plants and to detoxify any toxins ingested. Detoxification can occur in the mouth and the gut rumen with or without the help of microbes (2). The absorbed toxins must be detoxified in the intestine and liver, but studies on these mechanisms are limited because to date most animal experiments have been carried out using laboratory diets. Recently we found that a nuclear receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR ),2 is involved in the detoxification by using plant seeds as a diet for mice (3).
PPAR
ALDHs comprise a superfamily of NAD(P)+-dependent enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of a wide variety of endogenous and exogenous aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes (10). The ALDH3 subfamily enzymes efficiently oxidize middle and long chain aldehydes (10), and one member of this subfamily, FALDH encoded by ALDH3A2, has a distinct role from the dehydrogenase encoded by ALDH3A1 (11, 12). FALDH is essential for the complete breakdown of phytanic acid, a branched fatty acid derived from the chlorophyll molecule (13), and loss of its activity has been proved to be the cause of Sjögren-Larsson syndrome (14). It has been suggested that FALDH protects cells against oxidative stress associated with lipid peroxidation and plays an important role in insulin action (15). Because of these potential roles in protection against oxidative stress and PPAR
Phytanic acid, a metabolite of phytol, has a methyl group at the carbon 3 position and must first undergo
In this study, we analyzed the subcellular distribution and function of the major and various variant forms of mouse FALDH using a mouse FALDH-specific antibody after overexpressing each cDNA in human HEK293 cells under the control of an inducible promoter, thus avoiding problems originating from the extremely similar structures and incomplete separation by subcellular fractionation of various forms of FALDH with large differences in expression levels. Our data suggest that only one specific variant of FALDH is expressed exclusively in peroxisomes and plays an essential role in the efficient degradation of branched chain fatty acids in the peroxisomal
Animals and TreatmentsAll procedures involving animals were approved by the Meiji Pharmaceutical University Committee for Ethics of Experimentation and Animal Care. Male C57/BL6J and PPAR -null mice (around 6 weeks old) were maintained under a 12-h light-dark cycle with free access to food and water. After being fed a diet containing the PPAR agonist Wy14,643 ([4-chloro-6-(2,3-xylidino)-2-pyrimidinylthio]acetic acid) (Tokyo-Kasei, Tokyo, Japan) at 0.05% (w/w) or a normal laboratory diet, the mice were killed by cervical dislocation, and portions of the intestine and liver were removed for homogenization. Subcellular Fractionation of Mouse Liver HomogenateSubcellular fractionation was performed as described previously (24) with some modifications. A homogenate was prepared by one stroke with a Teflon-glass homogenizer at 1000 rpm in 3 volumes of ice-cold homogenization buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, and 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4). A postnuclear supernatant fraction was prepared by centrifugation of the homogenate for 5 min at 1200 x g (3). Homogenization buffer was added to the supernatant at up to 10 volumes of the original tissue and recentrifuged for 5 min at 6600 x g. The pellet was suspended in 2 volumes of ice-cold homogenization buffer (mitochondrial fraction). The supernatant was recentrifuged for 20 min at 12,500 x g to obtain the supernatant (microsomal and cytosolic fraction). The pellet was suspended in 2 volumes of ice-cold homogenization buffer (lysosomal fraction). For isolation of the peroxisome-enriched fraction, 1 ml of the lysosomal fraction was layered onto 7.5 ml of Nycodenz (Sigma-Aldrich) solution (30% Nycodenz in 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.3) and centrifuged for 1 h at 131,000 x g. The pellet obtained was suspended in 200 µl of Nycodenz solution and used as the peroxisome-enriched fraction. To disassemble peroxisomes, the peroxisome-enriched fraction was diluted with 4 volumes of 12.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, pH 9.0 or with Triton X-100 to a final concentration of 0.1% as described previously (25) and centrifuged for 1 h at 131,000 x g.
Preparation of an Antibody against Mouse FALDH and Western Blot AnalysisA rabbit polyclonal antibody against mouse FALDH was prepared using the peptide corresponding to Cys425-Arg439 as the antigen. This sequence is unique to mouse FALDH and common to all FADLH variants (22). The antibody used for immunofluorescence microscopy was purified by affinity purification using a peptide-coupled Sepharose 4B column (EAH-Sepharose 4B, GE Healthcare). The specificity of the antibody was confirmed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method using the synthesized peptide and then by Western blotting (3). Protein concentration was determined using the Protein Assay Rapid Kit wako (Wako, Tokyo, Japan), and the same amounts of protein samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The separated proteins were blotted to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon, Millipore), and FALDH was detected by the antibody followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (MP Biochemicals) with SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce). The antibody against the ER membrane protein Isolation of RNA and RT-PCR AnalysisTotal RNA from mouse tissue was prepared by the acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method as described previously (26, 27). Total RNA from the cultured cells was obtained using Quick-Gene (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) and QuickGene RNA cultured cell kit S (Fujifilm). Reverse transcription was performed using an ExScript RT reagent kit (Takara Bio, Kyoto, Japan). Real time PCR was performed with a LightCycler 1.5 instrument (Roche Diagnostics) and SYBR ExScript RT-PCR kit (Takara Bio) as directed by the manufacturer. The primers for real time PCR were as follows: 5'-CGGCTACCACATCCAAGGAA and 5'-GCTGGAATTACCGCGGCT for 18 S rRNA, 5'-TGACCTTGATTTATTTTGCATACC and 5'-CGAGCAAGACGTTCAGTCCT for human hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase, 5'-GTCAGCTGGGCCAAGTTCTTC and 5'-TCATTACAGCTGATCCTTGACAATC for FALDH-N, 5'-GTCAGCTGGGCCAAGTTCTTC and 5'-GAAGCCAACAGGGCTTTTCC for FALDH-V, 5'-CAGCTGTGATTGTCAAGTTTGT and 5'-TCCGTATCACCAGGACGACTTC for FALDH-V2, 5'-CTCTGCCCTTTGGAGGTGTG and 5'-AGGGTCAGAAGGACTGGTTTGTC for FALDH-V3 (22), 5'-TGCACTTCACGCTCAACTCT and 5'-GATAAGCTCCCATCCCACTG for human FALDH-N, and 5'-ATTGTAGCCGCTGTGCTT and 5'-TGAACTACCAGAAAAATCAACAGG for human FALDH-V (23). Isolation of Splice Variants and DNA SequencingThe PCR primers used for the isolation of splice variants of mouse FALDH were the exon 8 primer 5'-CTCTGCCTTTGGAGGTGTG and exon 9' primer 5'-GAAGCCAACAGGGCTTTTCC. Purified RT-PCR products were ligated into pGEM-T Easy (Promega). The cycle sequencing was performed with T7 and SP6 primers in both directions, and the sequences were analyzed using the LIC-4200L-2G sequencer (LI-COR). To annotate each sequence, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Blast (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) was used. To confirm that the variants obtained are not splicing intermediates, RT-PCR was performed using primers annealing to 5'-untranslated region (5'-AAGTGGCAGTGAGCTGTGGCATC) and to each variant-specific region (5'-TCCGTATCACCAGGACGACTTC or 5'-AGGGTCAGAAGGACTGGTTTGTC). cDNA Cloning and Construction of Tetracycline-inducible T-REx On Expression PlasmidsA full-length cDNA clone of the major mouse FALDH was obtained from a fetal mouse cDNA library using the vector pCMV6-XL3 (Origen) by colony hybridization with a 32P-labeled cDNA probe obtained by PCR using the mouse FALDH primers (5'-GCTCCTTGGCCATTCATTTTCCTC and 5'-CATCATGTTGCCTAGGCTGGCTTC). cDNA clones of other variants were constructed by swapping the cDNA fragments obtained by PCR of cDNA synthesized from mouse liver total RNA using primers (5'-CATCAGCGCCCCTGCTTGTTAAA and 5'-TGCTCTCAATTGCGGAGATTTGG for FALDH-V and 5'-CTCTGCCTTTGGAGGTGTG and 5'-GAAGCCAACAGGGCTTTTCC for FALDH-V2 and -V3) with restriction sites for KpnI (for V, V2, and V3) and HpaI (for V), BstXI (blunted after PCR) (for V2), or PstI (blunted after PCR) (for V3) into KpnI and HpaI restriction sites of the FALDH full-length plasmid. To construct expression plasmids under tetracycline control (T-REx system, Invitrogen), the FALDH cDNA inserts in pCMV6-XL3 were excised with NotI and SmaI and cloned into the NotI and blunted ApaI sites of pcDNA5/FRT/TO (Invitrogen). A full-length cDNA clone for human ALDH3A2 isoform 1 (human FALDH-V) (GenBankTM accession number NM_001031806) was obtained by RT-PCR of cDNA synthesized from total RNA isolated from human HEK293 cells using primers 5'-CGGACCGTGCAGTTCTCTG and 5'-AGACAGGGCTGGGTTTTGAA followed by cloning into pGEM-T Easy (Promega). After verification by sequencing, the cDNA insert was cloned into pCMV-tag3A (Stratagene) to construct an expression plasmid for amino-terminally Myc-tagged human FALDH-V. A human FALDH-N (GenBank accession number NM_00382) expression vector was constructed by swapping the RT-PCR fragment obtained by using primers 5'-TTCTCACCATTCAGCCACTG and 5'-CAACCCCGCAGTTTGTATTT after digestion with HindIII in the cDNA fragment and ApaI in the vector region of the FALDH-V expression plasmid above. Generation of Tetracycline-inducible Flp-In T-REx HEK293 CellsHuman HEK293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of air, 5% CO2. To cause Flp-In T-REx HEK293 cells to express FALDH-N, -V, -V2, or -V3 under the control of tetracycline, the cells were transfected with a mixture of DNA of one of the pcDNA5/FRT/TO plasmids and pOG44 (Invitrogen) using Lipofectamine reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 48 h of transfection, the medium was supplemented with hygromycin B (50 µg/ml) to initiate selection for stably transfected cells. The selected cells were cloned and cultured in medium supplemented with hygromycin B (50 µg/ml) and blasticidin (5 µg/ml). For expression of FALDH, tetracycline (1 µg/ml) was added 24 h before the treatment of the cells with phytol, dodecanal, or phytanic acid. Immunofluorescence LocalizationStably or transiently transfected HEK293 cells cultured on polylysine-coated cover-slips were washed with PBS and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 4 °C. After being washed with PBS, cells were permeabilized with ice-cold methanol for 10 min at 4 °C or with a mixture of acetone and methanol (1:1) for 10 min at 4 °C. The cells preincubated with 5% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 30 min at room temperature to block nonspecific binding were then incubated with the antibodies for 30 min at room temperature. To detect the Myc-tagged proteins, an anti-c-Myc mouse monoclonal antibody (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) was used. After a rinse with wash buffer (0.4% Triton X-100 in PBS), the cells were incubated with secondary goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgGs conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (MP Biochemicals) or with Alexa Fluor 594-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen). After being washed with wash buffer and rinsed with PBS, the cells were fixed in Mowiol (Sigma-Aldrich), and the specimens were subjected to confocal fluorescence microscopy with a Fluoview FV500 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). DsRed containing peroxisome-targeting signal-1 (DsRed-SKL) (28, 29) was used to locate peroxisomes in HEK293 cells. GC-MS AnalysisGC-MS was performed according to a published method (30) with modifications on an Agilent GC6890 gas chromatographer coupled to a JMS-AM150 mass spectrometer (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan). A 30-m HP-5 column (0.32-mm inner diameter with 0.25-µm filter, Agilent) was used with helium as the carrier gas. Samples (2 µl) were injected in the splitless mode. The gas chromatographer oven temperature was programmed as follows: 2 min at 70 °C followed by a rise to 120 °C at 5 °C/min, a rise to 260 °C at 7 °C/min, a pause at 260 °C for 3.5 min, a rise to 300 °C at 15 °C/min, and then 10 min at 300 °C. The identities of pristanic acid and stearic acid were determined by comparing their retention times and mass spectra with those of the tert-butyldimethylsilyl derivatives of purchased materials (stearic acid from Wako and pristanic acid from Sigma-Aldrich) as standards. The single ion monitoring mode was used for the detection of the (M - 57)+ ions for both pristanic acid and stearic acid. The amount of pristanic acid and stearic acid was quantified by integration of the respective peaks.
Pristanic Acid AssayThe cells were cultured with 750 µM phytol with or without tetracycline for 24 h. Pristanic acid was extracted from the cells according to a procedure described previously (30) with a slight modification. After being washed with PBS, the cells were homogenized with a Multi-beads shocker (Yasui Kikai, Osaka, Japan) in PBS. Then 0.1 volumes of 12 M HCl was added and mixed by vortexing. Six volumes of ether was added, and the mixture was stored at 4 °C for 48 h after mixing. The organic layer was collected, and the solvents were evaporated to 2 ml at 40 °C and dried with MgSO4. The solution was transferred to reaction vials, and the solvent was evaporated completely. The extracted compounds were converted to their corresponding tert-butyldimethylsilyl derivatives using 10 µl of N-methyl-N-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (Pierce) and 10 µl of pyridine at 80 °C for 1 h. After the derivatization, the solution was directly used as a sample for GC-MS. Cell Viability AssayThe viability of the HEK293 cells was determined using the Cell Counting Kit-F (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan). The assay is based on the activity of living cells to hydrolyze calcein-AM to produce fluorescent calcein (31). The excitation and emission wavelengths of calcein are 485 and 535 nm, respectively, and the intensity of fluorescence is directly proportional to the number of living cells in culture. The fluorescence was quantified with a Typhoon 9410 variable mode imager (GE Healthcare). ER Stress Response AssayER stress was quantified by measuring the amount of variant XBP1 mRNA as described previously (32). Briefly total RNA was extracted from the test cells with Quick-Gene 810 (Fujifilm). The mRNA of the XBP1 variant was quantified by real time PCR using specific primers (5'-GCTGAGTCCGCAGCAGGT and 5'-TTGTCCAGAATGCCCAACAG). For an internal standard, the amount of human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA was measured using the primers 5'-AGCCACATCGCTCAGACAC and 5'-GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC. Statistical AnalysisData are means ± S.D. Significance was examined by the unpaired t test.
FALDH Was Induced in the Liver of Normal Mice Fed Sesame but Was Far Less Abundant in PPAR -null MiceOur preliminary analysis to detect the PPAR -dependently induced mRNAs in the liver of normal mice fed with sesame showed that FALDH, in addition to several P450s, was induced severalfold.3 To confirm this, we prepared a mouse FALDH-specific anti-body (see Fig. 4A) and analyzed the changes in the amount of FALDH in the liver of wild-type or PPAR -null mice fed a normal laboratory diet or sesame seeds by Western blotting. As shown in Fig. 1, sesame induced FALDH expression by severalfold in the liver of wild-type mice. In the liver of PPAR -null mice, the basal expression levels of FALDH were low, about a fifth to a tenth of that in the corresponding tissue of wild-type mice, and a small but significant induction by sesame was observed. These results indicated that the induction of FALDH expression by sesame is dependent on the expression of PPAR , which is consistent with a recent publication (16). The sesame seeds may contain a natural ligand for PPAR (3). Identification of this ligand and elucidation of the mechanism for PPAR -independent induction of FALDH expression by sesame are important issues needing to be solved. However, we are first interested in the physiological significance of the induction of FALDH expression and started the characterization of FALDH at the protein level.
Mouse FALDH mRNA Has Several Variants Generated by Alternative SplicingFALDH is known to have variant forms produced by alternative splicing of the primary transcript (22), but the relationship between the mRNA variants and the subcellular localization of the translation products is still at issue. To detect possible new FALDH isoforms, total RNA was isolated from the liver of mice fed a diet containing the PPAR
Expression of All Four FALDH mRNA Sequences Is Induced by a PPAR AgonistTo examine the possibility of variant-specific transcriptional regulation, the expression levels of four normal and three variant forms of FALDH mRNA were quantitated by real time RT-PCR with the specific primer pairs shown in Fig. 3. The expression of all the mRNAs was largely induced in mouse liver upon administration of a PPAR agonist. Gloerich et al. (16) recently found that the conversion of phytol to phytanic acid is regulated via PPAR using null mice. The present observations support their conclusion. The induction ratios were unequal among the sequences, from 8- to 17-fold the basal level, but it is unlikely that the alternative splicing is coupled with alternative promoter usage in transcription. The changes in the induction ratios may be caused by the differences in the efficiency of alternative splicing and the stability of the mRNA isoforms. Although a precise comparison is not possible by the RT-PCR method, basal levels of each mRNA were largely different; FALDH-N mRNA was most abundant, and the remaining few percent was mostly dominated by variant FALDH-V. The levels of FALDH-V2 and -V3 were quite low in mouse liver. The relative ratio of FALDH-V, -V2, or -V3 mRNA to FALDH-N mRNA was estimated by real time PCR as 1.7, 0.7, or 0.03% under normal conditions and 2.3, 0.7, or 0.2% after feeding a diet containing Wy14,643, respectively.
FALDH-N and -V Isoforms Are Distributed Differently in the CellTo characterize the FALDH isoforms at the protein level, rabbit polyclonal antibodies against mouse FALDH were raised using a synthetic peptide as an antigen corresponding to the sequence from residue 425 to 439 in exon 9. This sequence was chosen to detect all four FALDH isoforms of mice but not those of humans. The antibodies specifically recognized mouse FALDH and the PPAR -dependent induction of FALDH expression in mouse liver was confirmed as shown in Fig. 4A. The antibodies recognized both FALDH-N and -V expressed in HEK293 human cells under the control of a tetracycline-inducible system. The calculated molecular mass of the V form is larger than that of the N form by 2.6 kDa, and the difference was confirmed by Western blotting as shown in Fig. 4B. Next the subcellular distribution of the four isoforms in human HEK293 cells was examined using mouse-specific antibodies against FALDH in established cell lines with tetracycline-inducible expression of FALDH-N, -V, -V2, or -V3. Masaki et al. (21) reported that FALDH-N expressed from cloned cDNA is located on the endoplasmic reticulum, and our observations support their conclusion as shown in Fig. 5A. The carboxyl-terminal sequence KDQL of FALDH-N may actually function as an ER retention signal. Whereas the carboxyl-terminal sequences of FALDH-V2 and -V3 were not similar to the possible retention signal, they were located on apparently the same membranous structure as FALDH-N. FALDH-N, -V2, and -V3 isoforms are likely to be present in the ER, although they have distinct carboxyl-terminal sequences. These results may suggest that an unidentified sequence is important for these three isoforms to remain on the ER. Efficiency to remain on the ER membrane may differ among the isoforms, but this possibility was not examined in the present study. On the other hand, the localization pattern of FALDH-V was significantly different from that of any other isoform. It was localized to small dotted structures in the cytoplasm (Fig. 5A). We directly examined the possibility of its peroxisomal localization by comparing the patterns of FADH-V and a SKL-tagged dye, DsRed-SKL as a peroxisome marker (28). FALDH-V, but not FALDH-N, co-localized with DsRed-SKL as shown in Fig. 5B. Thus FALDH-V was apparently exclusively present in peroxisomes in HEK293 cells.
In humans, splice variant forms of FALDH mRNA are also known (23). However, the carboxyl-terminal amino acid sequence deduced from a variant mRNA corresponding to mouse FALDH-V is SKQR, and this may not function as a peroxisome-targeting signal. To examine whether or not human FALDH-V is also distributed in peroxisomes, we cloned human FALDH-N and FALDH-V expressed with Myc tag to specifically identify the products. As shown in Fig. 5C, only human FALDH-V was localized to peroxisomes as evidenced by co-localization with DsRed-SKL. Thus we confirmed that one splice variant form of human FALDH is present in peroxisomes. These results from mouse and human FALDH-V suggest the possibility that sequences other than the carboxyl-terminal sequences may be involved in targeting these proteins to peroxisomes.
To further confirm the isoform-specific localization of FALDH, subcellular fractionation of the postnuclear fraction of mouse liver was performed using Nycodenz for the separation of peroxisomes followed by Western blotting using calnexin and PMP22 as marker proteins for the ER and peroxisome, respectively (Fig. 6). Although the separation of peroxisomes from ER was not complete as judged by the distribution of calnexin and PMP22, V and N forms of FALDH were distributed differently in the fractions. The distribution of the N form was very similar to that of calnexin, and the distribution of the V form was similar to that of PMP22. It was noteworthy that none of the V forms was detected in the mitochondrial, microsomal, and cytosolic fractions of mouse liver, supporting the previous conclusion that FALDH-V was exclusively localized to peroxisomes. FALDH-V could not be released from peroxisomes by pyrophosphate treatment (25) and was co-distributed with an integral membrane protein, PMP22, demonstrating that FALDH-V is a peroxisomal membrane protein.
Overexpression of FALDH-V Increases the Conversion of Phytol to Pristanic AcidTo determine which FALDH plays a major role in the conversion of phytol to pristanic acid, the amounts of pristanic acid converted from phytol in the cells overexpressing FALDH-N or -V were compared because we assumed that FALDH-V was the enzyme responsible for the final conversion step in peroxisomes. Fatty acids were extracted from cells incubated with phytol in parallel and were analyzed by GC-MS as shown in Fig. 7. Although it had been a concern that the differences between the cell types might be small because HEK293 cells most likely expressed endogenous FALDH, and pristanic acid was an intermediate in the degradation pathway, overexpression of FALDH-V but not FALDH-N largely increased the amount of pristanic acid. A similar increase of pristanic acid in FALDH-V-overexpressing cells was observed when the cells were incubated with phytanic acid instead of phytol (not shown). These results suggest that FALDH in the peroxisome but not in the ER plays a dominant role in the oxidization of pristanal to pristanic acid.
Overexpression of FALDH-V Protects the Cells from the Damage Caused by Phytanic AcidTo examine the physiological role of FALDH, responses of the cells to the stress caused by phytanic acid were compared between the cells overexpressing FALDH in the ER and those overexpressing FALDH in the peroxisome by measuring cell viability (Fig. 8A) and the extent of ER stress (Fig. 9). Incubation of the HEK293 cells with phytanic acid led to cell death, and this was almost completely blocked by overexpression of FALDH-V (Fig. 8A). However, the effect of overexpression of FALDH-N was inappreciable, whereas even the uninduced FALDH-V cells showed significant resistance against phytanic acid (Fig. 8A). A similar result was obtained in the experiment to monitor the reduction of the phytanic acid-induced ER stress (Fig. 9). The stress was lowest in the FALDH-V cells with or without induction, and it was appreciably reduced by overexpression of FALDH-N, although the protective effect was detected as a minimal increase in cell viability (Fig. 8A). To understand the tetracycline-independent phenomena, expression of each mRNA in the HEK293 cells was measured with or without the inducer treatment by a real time RT-PCR method (Fig. 8B). Both cells expressed a similar amount of FALDH when induced by tetracycline as shown in Fig. 4B, and induction of the mRNA in both cells was confirmed. However, almost a tenth of the amount of mRNA in the induced cells was detected in the uninduced cells, indicating that transcriptional regulation of the system by tetracycline was somewhat leaky in our cases. These results suggest that even a small amount of FALDH-V is much more effective than FALDH-N in protecting cells from the stress caused by treatment with phytanic acid.
Both FALDH-N and -V Overexpressions Are Protective against Lipid PeroxidationFinally the role of FALDH in protecting cells from lipid peroxidation in general was examined by treating the same series of cells as above with a middle chain aldehyde, dodecanal, to simulate a toxic effect of lipid peroxidation products and measuring the changes in cell viability (Fig. 10). Overexpression of either type of FALDH partially protected the cells from the death induced by lipid peroxidation. A similar protective effect of the two FALDH isoforms against oxidative stress caused by dodecanal was noteworthy when compared with previous results showing a predominant effect of FALDH-V against the stress caused by phytanic acid. Both FALDHs are likely to play an important role in protecting the intracellular membrane from lipid peroxidation by localizing to distinct regions of the cell.
The identity and subcellular localization of the key aldehyde dehydrogenase in the phytanic acid degradation pathway are controversial (12, 18, 20, 21) because several variants produced by alternative splicing are present in varying amounts and different subcellular locations. In the present study, using cells inducibly overexpressing each variant of FALDH and a specific antibody, it was shown that one variant of FALDH, FALDH-V, but not the others exclusively localizes in peroxisomes. The GC-MS analysis of the metabolites in the FALDH-expressing cells incubated with phytol or phytanic acid showed that FALDH-V is the key aldehyde dehydrogenase in the degradation pathway. It also has a protective role against oxidative stress induced by lipid peroxidation. The heterologously expressed variant mouse FALDH from each cDNA without tagging could be detected distinctly in a specific region of the cells (Fig. 5). This approach avoided the problems of incomplete separation of organelles during subcellular fractionation and possible mislocalization of the chimeric proteins due to the attached tag sequences. Because the differences in expression levels among the various FALDHs are quite large, our strategy dominated previous strategies. Mouse FALDH-V has a possible peroxisomal matrix-targeting signal-1 (SKH instead of SKL) at the carboxyl terminus as suggested by Lin et al. (22). We confirmed its peroxisomal membrane localization morphologically (Fig. 5B) and biochemically (Fig. 6). Furthermore human FALDH-V, which has an SKQR sequence at the carboxyl terminus, was also proved to localize in peroxisomes (Fig. 5C). Honsho and Fujiki (33) reported that not the carboxyl-terminal sequence but a short, positively charged intervening loop sequence and flanking hydrophobic segments are required for peroxisomal membrane localization of human peroxisomal membrane protein PMP34. These suggest that sequences other than the carboxyl-terminal sequence of FALDH-V is important for peroxisomal targeting.
Peroxisomal localization of FALDH-V is important when we consider the ultimate cause of Sjögren-Larsson syndrome. Kelson et al. (12) could detect aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in the ER fraction of human cells but not in peroxisomes, whereas Jansen et al. (20) identified aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in rat liver peroxisomes and claimed it to be one or more additional aldehyde dehydrogenases. However, our result endorses the view that the peroxisomal aldehyde dehydrogenase converting pristanal to pristanic acid is FALDH-V (Fig. 7). The evidence for the existence of another peroxisomal aldehyde dehydrogenase is the 10-15% residual activity of pristanal dehydrogenase in mutant fibroblasts from patients (20). Although the types of mutations were not described in their study, most of them may be missense mutations (34), and such mutated enzymes, in general, are not null but have some residual activities in vivo. The reported remaining activities of aldehyde dehydrogenase determined using FALDH mutant cells could be those of FALDH itself. Our present data strongly suggest that the aldehyde dehydrogenase in peroxisomes is FALDH-V, and it converts pristanal to pristanic acid. Thus we propose from our present data together with published data (18, 20, 35) that all the steps of degradation of phytanic acid to pristanic acid are carried out in peroxisomes as summarized in Fig. 11. To confirm this, it will be necessary to quantitatively correlate the expression levels and activities of each FALDH isoform using cells totally free of endogenous human FALDH. To this end, we are now trying to knock down endogenous FALDH in HEK293 cells.
FALDH has a wide substrate specificity (12) and plays an important role that is not restricted to the pathway of phytol degradation as evidenced by several studies (36-38) including the present study showing protection against the cytotoxicity of a middle chain aldehyde (15), such as dodecanal (Fig. 10). In the case of dodecanal, the expressions of FALDH-N in the ER and FALDH-V in peroxisomes are equally effective at protecting cells (Fig. 10). This result suggests that a model lipid peroxidation product, dodecanal, exerts its toxicity at both the ER and peroxisomes as summarized in Fig. 12, and an additive effect of overexpression of both FALDH-N and FALDH-V can be expected. Distinct expression of two FALDH isoforms in either the ER or peroxisomes is achieved in vivo by alternative splicing, and this mechanism is evolutionally conserved at least in mice and humans, suggesting its essential role in oxidative stress protection. The ratio of the expression levels of two mRNAs for these isoforms did not significantly change under various conditions (Fig. 3), and the major step to regulate the expression of these mRNAs would be at the transcriptional level. Recent studies demonstrated that expression of FALDH is regulated by PPAR and its ligand (16) as we also confirmed in the present study (Figs. 3 and 4), although the precise molecular mechanism has not been elucidated (39, 40). Furthermore phytol and/or its metabolites were shown to activate PPAR probably by acting as ligands (41-43). These observations indicate the autocatalytic nature of this detoxifying system for xenobiotics; a potentially toxic molecule binds to the nuclear receptor PPAR to activate transcription of the gene(s) for its own detoxifying enzyme(s). PPAR is a sensor of not only fatty acids but also some xenobiotic toxic molecules and plays a vital role in the detoxifying system.
In addition to xenobiotics, oxidation of potentially toxic endobiotics, such as very long chain fatty acids, branched chain fatty acids, and bile acid intermediates, takes place in peroxisomes via the production of a large amount of H2O2, up to 35% of the total in the liver. Oxidation-driven detoxification is effective, but it is accompanied by the production of reactive oxygen species. PPAR is well known to largely activate transcription of the genes for oxidation enzymes, but the expression of the enzymes needed to decompose reactive oxygen species such as catalase is not largely activated. These disproportional increases of oxidases and of reactive oxygen species-decomposing enzymes should cause oxidative stress in peroxisomes, leading to lipid peroxidation and protein adduction (44). In this context, a large induction of FALDH-V by PPAR on peroxisomal membranes is reasonable (see Fig. 12). The proposed vital role of FALDH-V in protecting peroxisomes from oxidative stress can be examined by overexpressing the oxidases in FALDH-V knocked down cells. Demozay et al. (15) found a reduction of FALDH expression in both insulin-resistant and diabetic rodent models and suggested its importance in insulin action by protecting against oxidative stress associated with lipid peroxidation leading to deregulation of insulin action. A malignant effect of increased oxidative stress in accumulated fat is also emphasized to be an important pathogenic mechanism of obesity-associated inflammation, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome (45). For this reason, the physiological role and the control of expression of FALDH at the whole body level should be studied further, and the possibility that compounds targeting FALDH are candidates for new drugs to treat obesity-associated diseases (15) needs to be examined.
We started the study on FALDH because its expression was induced in the intestine and liver of mice fed sesame seeds (3). The present results suggesting a protective role of FALDH against oxidative stress induced by lipid peroxidation partly explain the toxicity of sesame only in PPAR
* This work was supported in part by Meiyaku Open Research Project and grants-in-aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Noshio 2-522-1, Kiyose, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan. Tel./Fax: 81-42-495-8474; E-mail: motojima{at}my-pharm.ac.jp.
2 The abbreviations used are: PPAR
3 B. Ashibe and K. Motojima, unpublished data.
We thank Drs. K. Ishii, T. Togawa, H. Ogasawara, and T. Suzuki and the Motojima laboratory members for helpful discussions. We thank Dr. M. Noji for assistance with the GC-MS analysis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||