|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 32, 23672-23678, August 10, 2007
High Circulating Leptin Receptors with Normal Leptin Sensitivity in Liver-specific Insulin Receptor Knock-out (LIRKO) Mice* 1![]() 12![]() ![]() ![]() 3
From the
Received for publication, May 16, 2007 , and in revised form, June 1, 2007.
Liver-specific insulin receptor knock-out (LIRKO) mice display hyperinsulinemia, abnormal glucose metabolism, and progressive liver dysfunction. In addition, circulating leptin levels appear to be increased more than 10-fold. However, food intake, body weight, and adipose mass are not significantly altered in LIRKO mice compared with wild-type littermates. Using a ligand immunofunctional assay, we found that the apparent increase in circulating leptin in LIRKO mice is because of an 80-fold increased serum level of soluble leptin receptor. Gene expression analysis by microarray and real time PCR reveals the liver as the source of soluble leptin receptor in LIRKO mice, with an increase in expression of the short (Ob-Ra), long (Ob-Rb), and soluble (Ob-Re) forms of the leptin receptor. Direct control of leptin receptor expression by insulin could also be demonstrated in isolated hepatocytes from normal mice. Despite the markedly increased levels of leptin receptor in their circulation, LIRKO mice exhibit normal or even enhanced leptin sensitivity, as assessed by their physiological and molecular responses to exogenous leptin administration and their lower base-line hypothalamic levels of SOCS3 mRNA. Thus, insulin signaling in the liver plays an important role in control of leptin receptor expression and shedding. In the LIRKO mouse, this is lost, leading to markedly increased leptin receptors into the circulation. These high levels of circulating leptin receptor bind leptin and likely alter its clearance, but do not inhibit leptin action and may actually potentiate leptin action. In this manner, insulin signaling in liver plays an important role in leptin homeostasis and fine modulation of leptin action.
Leptin is a major sensor of body fat stores. Normally, as fat mass increases, circulating leptin levels rise and act at the hypothalamus to decrease appetite and increase energy expenditure thus limiting further weight gain (1). Although some rare forms of obesity are caused by leptin or leptin receptor mutations (2, 3), in most humans and rodents with obesity there is leptin resistance, and thus leptin is unable to normally suppress overeating or enhance energy expenditure (4). In obese states, leptin resistance is accompanied by hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance.
Cross-talk exists between leptin and insulin-regulated pathways at multiple levels. In the brain, both insulin and leptin act to inhibit appetite (1). In pancreatic islets, leptin has a direct inhibitory effect on insulin secretion (5). Additionally, various mechanisms of cross-talk between leptin and insulin signaling in the liver have been described recently (6). At the cellular level, Cohen et al. (7) found that leptin attenuated insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor substrate (IRS)4-1 in human hepatoma cells. On the other hand, in rodent hepatoma cells, our laboratory found that insulin-induced association of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase with IRS-1 was increased after leptin preincubation, whereas association of the p85
We have previously developed a mouse model of hepatic insulin resistance using the Cre-Lox system to inactivate the insulin receptor gene specifically in liver (LIRKO) (9). These mice develop secondary hyperinsulinemia from a combination of increased Leptin production, mainly from the adipose tissue, leptin bioavailability, and leptin sensitivity of its target cells represent the main regulators of the actions of leptin under physiological conditions, the last two being mediated by leptin receptors. Leptin receptors (Ob-R) occur in several forms as a result of alternative splicing (11). The long form of the receptor (Ob-Rb) serves in leptin signaling, and its functional inhibition by molecules such as SOCS3 represents a major source of leptin resistance during obesity (12, 13). In addition, there are at least four forms of leptin receptor with transmembrane and short intracellular domains (Ob-Ra, Ob-Rc, Ob-Rd, and Ob-Rf). All isoforms share the ligand-binding domain, but only the long form has the full cytoplasmic domain containing all signal transduction motifs (14). Both the long and the short forms of receptor can also be shed into the circulation by the action of surface proteases (15). Furthermore, alternative splicing creates a secretory (soluble) form of receptor (Ob-Re, also known as sOb-R), which lacks a transmembrane domain, and is directly released into the circulation, whereas by binding leptin, it controls the amount of free leptin and the rate of leptin clearance (16). In this study using the LIRKO mouse, we demonstrate an important role of insulin signaling in liver in control of hepatic expression of the various isoforms of the leptin receptor gene, leading to increasing secretion and shedding of leptin receptors. This produces high apparent circulating levels of leptin, but it does not inhibit leptin action and may actually sensitize to these effects. Thus, the liver may modulate leptin homeostasis and function in insulin-resistant states.
Mice—LIRKO mice were generated using the Cre/loxP system for site-specific excisional DNA recombination (17) by crossing mice carrying a floxed insulin receptor [IRlox/lox] and albumin-Cre transgenic mice heterozygous for the floxed allele IRlox/+ as described previously (9). The MIRKO (17) and FIRKO (18) mice were generated in a similar fashion using tissue-specific Cre-transgenics. Other animals described in this study were obtained from The Jackson Laboratories. All protocols for animal care and use were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the Joslin Diabetes Center and were in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines. The body composition of 16-week-old LIRKO and control [IRlox/lox] mice was measured by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorbiometry (DEXA) using a Lunar PIXImus densitometer (GE Healthcare). Leptin Treatment—Recombinant mouse leptin was obtained from Dr. A. F. Parlow, Scientific Director, National Hormone and Peptide Program, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center. For the prolonged leptin treatment experiment, 2-month-old male LIRKO and their lox littermates mice (n = 4-6/group) were treated with leptin (4 µg/g body weight) or PBS intraperitoneally at 0700 and 1900 daily for 4 days, and sacrificed 14 h after their last leptin injection at 0900 in a randomly fed state. A similar cohort of mice (n = 4/group) was used likewise for the short term experiments, with the difference that mice were sacrificed 30 min after their first injection.
Biochemical Measurements—Serum insulin was measured by ELISA (Crystal Chem Inc.). Total serum leptin was measured by ELISA (R & D Systems). sOb-R levels were determined by a ligand immunofunctional assay, as described previously (19). Briefly, the wells of a microtiter plate were coated with the anti-sOb-R IgG and blocked against nonspecific binding with 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS. Twenty microliters of murine rsOb-R (R & D Systems) standards ranging between 10 pM and 1000 nM or serum samples were added to the wells and incubated with an excess of biotinylated leptin in assay buffer (1% goat Gene Expression Analysis—Tissues were immediately collected from animals, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 °C. Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy columns (Qiagen), and cDNA was synthesized using the SuperscriptTM Choice System (Invitrogen) or the Advantage RT for PCR kit (BD Biosciences) and (dT)18 for priming. Biotinylated cRNA was prepared using the Bioarray High Yield RNA transcript labeling kit (Enzo Biochem). Murine 74Av2 chips (Affymetrix) were hybridized in triplicate with RNA pooled from 3 to 4 animals in the Affymetrix Core Lab at the Joslin Diabetes Center. The Affymetrix microarray analysis was facilitated by the Affymetrix 5.0 software, and the filters of significance applied have been described elsewhere (21). Ob-Ra, Ob-Rb, or Ob-Re cDNA was amplified in duplicate in a 40-µl real time PCR (SYBRGreen, PE Biosystems), in an ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system (PE Biosystems). The primer sets were specific for each receptor isoform, and sense and antisense primers were aligned to different exons to avoid genomic DNA amplification. Primer3 software facilitated primer design. The following primer sets were used and presented from 5' to 3': Ob-Ra and Ob-Rb (common) sense, aatgacgcagggctgtatgt; Ob-Ra antisense (specific), atggactgttgggaagttgg; Ob-Rb antisense (specific), tcaggctccagaagaagagg; Ob-Re sense, tgaagatgatggaatgaagtgg; Ob-Re antisense, agttggcatccttattttgaggt; leptin sense, caagcagtgcctatccaga; leptin antisense, aagcccaggaatgaagtcca; SOCS3 sense, gggagcccctttgtagactt; SOCS3 antisense, ctggtactcgcttttggagc; TATA-binding protein (TBP) sense, acccttcaccaatgactcctatg; TBP antisense, tgactgcagcaaatcgcttgg. Amplification of NPY, POMC, and AgRP has been described previously (22). Results are expressed as arbitrary mRNA units normalized by TBP expression.
Isolation and Treatment of Primary Hepatocytes—Hepatocytes from livers of male C57BL/6 mice were prepared by collagenase perfusion as described previously for rat hepatocytes (23). Viability of cells, assessed by trypan blue exclusion, was >90%. Hepatocytes were cultured on collagen-coated 6-well Petri dishes (Costar) in 1 ml of Williams medium E supplemented with 10% bovine calf serum at a density of 125,000 cells/cm2, as described previously (24). After an initial period of 4 h, medium and unattached cells were removed, and the cells transferred to serum-free Williams medium E and incubated for 20 h with or without hormones (0.1 µM insulin, 160 ng/ml leptin). Thereafter, cells were harvested, and total RNA was prepared as described above. Each experimental condition was run three times. Statistical Analysis—Statistical analysis of the data was performed with SigmaPlot 2000 for Windows Version 6.00 (SPSS) and StatView (Abacus Concepts) using a two-tailed unpaired t test and analysis of variance factorial with Bonferroni/Dunn correction for multiple comparisons. A probability value p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results are expressed as mean ± S.E. unless otherwise indicated.
LIRKO Mice Are Characterized by Hyperleptinemia in the Absence of Obesity—As noted previously, LIRKO mice are of normal body weight (30.2 ± 0.9 versus 33.2 ± 2.3 g) and have similar levels of total body fat as assessed by DEXA (7.1 ± 0.5 versus 8.4 ± 1.9 g) and food intake (3.64 ± 0.6 versus 3.86 ± 0.6 g/day) as their 16-week-old male controls (Fig. 1). Despite this, total serum leptin levels as determined by ELISA were more than 10-fold elevated in LIRKO mice compared with controls (1.6 ± 0.2 versus 0.15 ± 0.03 nM, respectively; p < 0.001) (Fig. 2A), and this was true in both males and females and at ages 1 to 4 months (data not shown). The presence of high circulating leptin levels with normal weight in LIRKO mice suggested the possibility of some factor(s) that might modify the action of leptin, and one consideration in this regard would be increased levels of circulating leptin receptor. Indeed, measurement of circulating sOb-R by ligand immunofunctional assay revealed a >80-fold increase in the serum of LIRKO mice as compared with controls (8.3 ± 0.9 versus 0.1 ± 0.01 nM; p < 0.001) (Fig. 2B). As a result, calculated free serum leptin index, normalized by body fat, was 6-fold lower in LIRKO mice than in controls (3.0 ± 0.3 versus 18.8 ± 4.2, respectively; p < 0.01) (Fig. 2C). Indeed, even after acute IP leptin injection, although levels of total circulating leptin markedly increased in both LIRKO and control mice (187 ± 37 versus 373 ± 175 nM; respectively) (Fig. 2D) and sOb-R levels remained unaffected by leptin treatment (6.7 ± 1.0 nM versus 0.04 ± 0 nM) (Fig. 2E), the high level of circulating receptor resulted in markedly lower free leptin levels in LIRKO mice than in control mice (30.4 ± 8.5 versus 12,297 ± 6,213 respectively, p < 0.05) (Fig. 2F), confirming the vast excess of sOb-R in this mouse model of hepatic insulin resistance (Fig. 2, B and E).
LIRKO Mice Have Increased Liver Production of Leptin Receptors—The source of the increased circulating sOb-R in LIRKO mice was the liver. Thus, on Affymetrix microarray analysis, Ob-Ra mRNA expression was >400-fold higher in the LIRKO liver than in controls (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3A). The up-regulation of leptin receptor in liver of LIRKO mice was confirmed by real time RT-PCR using isoform-specific primers for Ob-Ra, Ob-Rb, and Ob-Re. Indeed, there was a marked up-regulation of all three leptin receptor isoforms in the liver of LIRKO mice (Ob-Ra 467.6 ± 31.9-fold, p < 0.001; Ob-Rb 31.5 ± 6.3-fold, p < 0.01; Ob-Re 69.1 ± 11.9-fold, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3B). The increase in leptin receptor expression appeared to be a unique feature of the liver of the LIRKO mouse, because there was no alteration in leptin receptor expression in epididymal fat, skeletal muscle, and kidney of LIRKO mice (data not shown) or in epididymal fat of fat-specific insulin receptor knock-out (FIRKO) mice (18) (Fig. 3C) or skeletal muscle of muscle-specific insulin receptor knock-out mice (MIRKO) (25) (Fig. 3D), as assessed by real time PCR (LIRKO and FIRKO) or Affymetrix microarray analysis (MIRKO).
Insulin Treatment Down-regulates Ob-Ra Expression in Isolated Hepatocytes—The increased Ob-Ra expression in the liver of the LIRKO mice could be due to a direct effect of tissue-specific loss of insulin signaling or secondary to other changes in the liver previously described in these mice (9). To gain some insight to the mechanism, we treated normal isolated mouse hepatocytes with insulin and leptin, as a positive control (26). We found that 20 h of insulin treatment resulted in
Leptin Sensitivity Is Not Compromised in LIRKO Mice—Although there is some debate, it has been suggested that high levels of circulating leptin receptor or high levels of circulating leptin might lead to leptin resistance. To determine whether the LIRKO mice were leptin-resistant, we injected 2-month old male LIRKO and control mice twice a day intraperitoneally with 4 µg/g body weight of recombinant mouse leptin for 4 days. Following leptin treatment, body weight of both LIRKO and control mice decreased significantly over the 4 days, with the fall being slightly, but not significantly, greater on day 1 in the LIRKO mice versus the controls (Fig. 5A). Assessment of food intake revealed that LIRKO mice actually had a more dramatic and rapid response to exogenous leptin than controls. Thus, in LIRKO mice there was a 50% reduction in food intake on day 1 of treatment that persisted throughout the 4 days of leptin injections, whereas leptin-treated control mice decreased food intake slowly over 4 days to eventually approach the same reduction on day 4 that the LIRKO mice achieved on day 1 (Fig. 5B). Moreover, serum insulin levels, which were initially 18-fold increased (p < 0.001) in the LIRKO mice, were decreased by 75% with leptin treatment (p < 0.01), although there was no effect in control mice (Fig. 5C). Likewise, the
Hypothalamic Leptin Sensitivity in LIRKO Mice—SOCS3 mRNA expression in the hypothalamus has been regarded as another potential indicator and mechanism of central leptin resistance (27). Interestingly, SOCS3 levels were 50% lower in LIRKO mice than in controls (p < 0.05) (Fig. 6). We also measured mRNA expression of several neuropeptides known to be targets of leptin in the hypothalamus both in the basal state and after 4 days of leptin (or PBS) treatment. This study revealed that both genotypes had similar neuropeptide levels at base line and both responded with appropriate down-regulation of the orexigenic peptides NPY (Fig. 7A) and AgRP (Fig. 7B) and appropriate up-regulation of the anorexigenic peptide precursor POMC (Fig. 7C). Taken together, these data indicate an increase, rather than a decrease, in leptin sensitivity in the LIRKO mice and are compatible with the suppression of food intake in response to exogenous leptin administration presented in Fig. 5B.
Leptin resistance is a common component of obesity in humans and rodents (28), but the role of circulating leptin receptor as a regulator of leptin action has just started to emerge. The current study of a mouse model with high levels of soluble leptin receptor resulting from genetic ablation of insulin signaling in the liver (9) has allowed us to demonstrate that even in the presence of markedly elevated levels of circulating leptin receptor both from shed and secreted isoforms, sensitivity to both endogenous and exogenous leptin appears to be completely normal. This conclusion is based on reduction of food intake and significant weight loss in LIRKO mice treated with leptin, to a degree similar to that observed in similarly treated wild-type mice (this study and see Ref. 10). In addition, several physiological targets of leptin action (29), such as ob gene expression, insulin, and other appetite-regulating neuropeptides in the hypothalamus also respond appropriately to exogenous leptin administration in LIRKO mice. Moreover, hypothalamic SOCS3 expression, a well accepted marker of central leptin resistance (13, 27), is also lower in LIRKO mice. Thus, high levels of circulating leptin receptors (and the associated hyperleptinemia) do not cause leptin resistance; rather it appears that free circulating leptin may be the better determinant of leptin sensitivity. Such a statement is further corroborated by in vitro experiments showing that increased sOb-R does not directly interfere with leptin signaling at the cellular level but can regulate the availability of free leptin and its clearance (16, 30). Thus, when cells bearing Ob-Rb are incubated with leptin in the presence of high levels of sOb-R, leptin signaling can be inhibited, but this can be easily reversed by increasing the concentration of free leptin, despite the high levels of sOb-R in the media. Interestingly, and in further support of increased leptin sensitivity associated with high sOb-R levels, overexpression of sOb-R in ob/ob mice actually enhances, rather than suppresses, the effects of leptin treatment (31). In analogy to the LIRKO mice, humans that carry a mutant allele of the leptin receptor gene, which results in enhanced shedding of the extracellular leptin binding domain of the receptor, exhibit very high levels of total leptin but normal levels of free leptin and are not obese (32, 33). Typically, in lean subjects the majority of circulating leptin is in its bound form, whereas during obesity serum levels of soluble leptin receptor decrease resulting in more free leptin available to signal in its target cells; conversely, weight loss has been associated with an increase in circulating leptin receptors in both humans and rodents (34-37).
This study of the LIRKO mouse also revealed important aspects of the role of liver in leptin physiology. First, our study demonstrates that the liver may be a site of significant sOb-R production, at least in some pathological states. Indeed, serum leptin levels are higher in patients with liver cirrhosis, as are the levels of leptin receptor mRNA expression in liver, although the levels of circulating sOb-R in these studies have not been directly assessed (38). Second, in liver, leptin receptor expression is clearly under the control of insulin, as evidenced by its markedly elevated levels in the LIRKO mouse, as well as by the significant insulin-mediated down-regulation of Ob-Ra in isolated hepatocytes as presented here (Fig. 4). In fact, in states of low insulin levels, as in men subjected to a 72-h fast (39), in women with anorexia nervosa (40, 41), and in children with type 1 diabetes (42), serum levels of sOb-R are increased.
Our finding of leptin receptor mRNA up-regulation in the liver as a result of the lack of insulin signaling in this organ has been recently recapitulated in mice lacking IRS signaling in liver (43). Although the transcriptional regulators of leptin receptor expression and of specific splice products are largely unknown, a preliminary sequence analysis of the 5'-untranslated region of the leptin receptor gene using the consensus insulin-response elements (IRE) core sequence (44-46) T(G/A)TTT(T/G)(G/T) revealed multiple putative IREs, including one located within the first 2 kb. In addition to leptin receptor, hepatic expression of many genes that regulate metabolism or growth is under the control of insulin signaling (45, 47). In the LIRKO mouse in particular, the inability of insulin to signal through functional IREs in the promoter of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- In aggregate, the current and previous studies clearly indicate that in states of increased sOB-R levels associated with increased free leptin, there is improved, rather than decreased, leptin sensitivity. Moreover, the study of the LIRKO mouse revealed the importance of the liver in the regulation of leptin bioavailability.
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK31036 and DK33201, the Joslin Diabetes and Endrocrinology Research Center, the Iacocca Foundation (to C. R. K.), and National Institutes of Health Grant NIDDK RO1-58785 (to C. S. M.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Both authors contributed equally to this work.
2 Supported by the Harvard Clinical Nutrition Research Center Pilot and Feasibility Project P30-DK040561. 3 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Joslin Diabetes Center, One Joslin Place, Boston, MA 02215. Tel.: 617-732-2635; Fax: 617-732-2593; E-mail: c.ronald.kahn{at}joslin.harvard.edu.
4 The abbreviations used are: IRS, insulin receptor substrate; LIRKO, liver insulin receptor knockout; Ob-R, leptin receptor; POMC, proopiomelanocortin; AgRP, agouti-related protein; NPY, neuropeptide Y; SOCS-3, suppressor of cytokine signaling-3; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; RT, reverse transcription; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; IRE, insulin-response element; TBP, TATA-binding protein.
We appreciate the excellent technical assistance of Laureen Mazzola and John Bullen.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||