JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M704706200 on July 19, 2007

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 37, 27250-27258, September 14, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/37/27250    most recent
M704706200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frauenschuh, A.
Right arrow Articles by Proudfoot, A. E. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frauenschuh, A.
Right arrow Articles by Proudfoot, A. E. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Highly Selective Chemokine-binding Protein from the Tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus*

Achim Frauenschuh{ddagger}1, Christine A. Power{ddagger}2, Maud Déruaz{ddagger}, Beatriz R. Ferreira§, João S. Silva§, Mauro M. Teixeira, João M. Dias{ddagger}, Thierry Martin{ddagger}, Timothy N. C. Wells{ddagger}, and Amanda E. I. Proudfoot{ddagger}3

From the {ddagger}Merck Serono Geneva Research Centre, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland, §Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, USP, São Paulo, SP14049-900, Brazil, and Departamento de Bioquimica e Imunologia, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, B1270-901, Brazil

Received for publication, June 7, 2007 , and in revised form, July 10, 2007.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ticks are blood-feeding parasites that secrete a number of immuno-modulatory factors to evade the host immune response. Saliva isolated from different species of ticks has recently been shown to contain chemokine neutralizing activity. To characterize this activity, we constructed a cDNA library from the salivary glands of the common brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus. Pools of cDNA clones from the library were transfected into HEK293 cells, and the conditioned media from the transfected cells were tested for chemokine binding activity by chemical cross-linking to radiolabeled CCL3 followed by SDS-PAGE. By de-convolution of a single positive pool of 270 clones, we identified a full-length cDNA encoding a protein of 114 amino acids, which after signal peptide cleavage was predicted to yield a mature protein of 94 amino acids that we called Evasin-1. Recombinant Evasin-1 was produced in HEK293 cells and in insect cells. Using surface plasmon resonance we were able to show that Evasin-1 was exquisitely selective for 3 CC chemokines, CCL3 and CCL4 and the closely related chemokine CCL18, with KD values of 0.16, 0.81, and 3.21 nM, respectively. The affinities for CCL3 and CCL4 were confirmed in competition receptor binding assays. Analysis by size exclusion chromatography demonstrated that Evasin-1 was monomeric and formed a 1:1 complex with CCL3. Thus, unlike the other chemokine-binding proteins identified to date from viruses and from the parasitic worm Schistosoma mansoni, Evasin-1 is highly specific for a subgroup of CC chemokines, which may reflect a specific role for these chemokines in host defense against parasites.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ticks are blood-feeding external parasites that can infest a wide variety of mammals, including humans. The hard tick species, or Ixodidae, are characterized by the fact that they feed for extended periods of time on their hosts, ranging from a few days to 2–3 weeks depending on the stage in the life cycle and on the species. The normal mammalian response to parasites that penetrate the skin is to unleash an immunological response aimed at destroying or neutralizing the foreign agent. The tick has to block these responses to survive and feed successfully. To do this ticks have developed an armory of anti-inflammatory, anti-coagulant, and anti-pain molecules that they inject into their hosts, allowing them to remain essentially undetected while they feed (13). Many tick-borne pathogens such as the lyme disease-causing bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi and viruses (Rocky Mountain spotted fever, Colorado fever, tick-borne encephalitis virus) are also thought to exploit these activities to facilitate their own transmission and replication (47).

Chemokines are small chemoattractant cytokines that are key mediators of the inflammatory response against parasites. They alert the immune system to the assault and play an important role in recruiting specific leukocyte populations to the site of infection to destroy the invader. Many pathogenic microorganisms including viruses and protozoa have developed immune evasion strategies based on the interference of cytokine- and chemokine-mediated inflammatory signals. Over the last few years a number of distinct chemokine-binding proteins (CKBPs)4 have been isolated from members of the herpes and pox family of viruses, which have been shown to inhibit chemokine activity both in vitro and in vivo and play an important role in immune evasion (for reviews, see Refs. 8 and 9). For example, deletion of the gene encoding the broad spectrum chemokine-binding protein, M-T1, from myxoma virus resulted in an extensive leukocyte infiltration in the dermis of the infected rabbits that could be substantially inhibited when animals were infected by the wild type virus, demonstrating that the virus had evolved a mechanism that prevented the recruitment of leukocytes to the site of infection in the form of a chemokine-binding protein (10). It would, therefore, seem likely that parasites such as ticks have evolved similar immune evasion mechanisms to ensure their survival.

Hajnicka et al. (11, 12) demonstrated the presence of anti-CXCL8 (interleukin-8) activity in salivary gland extracts from several ixodid tick species and have recently shown that tick saliva contains a variety of inhibitory activities directed against pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-2 and the chemokines CCL2/MCP-1, CCL3/MIP-1{alpha}, CCL5/RANTES, and CCL11/eotaxin (13). We have, therefore, used an expression cloning approach to identify chemokine-binding proteins secreted in tick saliva. A cDNA library was prepared from salivary glands, resected from the ixodid tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus (common brown dog tick), during feeding. A chemokine cross-linking assay was used to detect chemokine binding activity in conditioned medium harvested from HEK293 cells which had been transfected with the tick salivary gland cDNA library. Using this method we identified a family of chemokine-binding proteins that we have termed Evasins. In this paper we describe the cloning and characterization of Evasin-1, a CC chemokine-binding protein highly specific for CCL3, CCL4, and CCL18 (Pulmonary and activation-regulated chemokine (PARC)).


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Reagents and Recombinant Chemokines—Unless otherwise stated all reagents and chemicals were purchased from Sigma. Enzymes were obtained from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). 125I-Radiolabeled chemokines and chromatographic materials were obtained from GE Healthcare. Chemokines were purified as described previously (14). The cDNA encoding the ectromelia virus chemokine-binding protein (GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank accession number AJ277111) was kindly provided by Dr. A. Alcami (University of Cambridge). The cowpox virus CKBP p35 protein was a gift from Dr. D. B. Wigley (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, MA).

Preparation of Tick SalivaR. sanguineus ticks were laboratory-reared as previously described (15). All ticks used for infestations were 1–3-month-old adults. To obtain engorged ticks for saliva collection, 20 dogs were infested with 70 pairs of adult R. sanguineus ticks contained in plastic feeding chambers fixed to their backs. The saliva-collection procedure was performed using engorged female ticks (after 3–5 days of feeding) by inoculation of 10–15 µl of a 0.2% (v/v) solution of dopamine in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, using a 12.7 x 0.33-mm gauge needle (BD Biosciences). Saliva was harvested using a micropipette and placed on ice. Pooled saliva samples were centrifuged through a 0.22-µm pore filter (Costar-Corning, Inc., Cambridge, MA) and stored at -20 °C until further use. Each saliva pool consisted of material harvested from more than 200 female ticks. The saliva protein concentration, determined using a bicinchoninic acid solution (Sigma), ranged from 1000 to 2000 µg/ml.

Chemical Cross-linking Assay—Lyophilized, iodinated chemokines were resuspended at 0.23 nM in 50 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.5, containing 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.1% bovine serum albumin and incubated with 10 µl of conditioned media from transfected HEK293 cells or with 10 µl of tick saliva in the presence or absence of 25 mM bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate (BS3) in a final volume of 50 µl for 2 h at room temperature with shaking. The cross-linking reaction was quenched by the addition of 5 µl of 10x SDS-PAGE sample buffer. The samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and scanned using a Personal FX phosphorimaging system (Bio-Rad) at a resolution of 100 µm.

Construction of a Tick Salivary Gland cDNA Library—Tick salivary glands were dissected, rinsed with ice-cold PBS, and stored in RNAlaterTM solution (50 mg of tissue/ml) (Ambion, Inc., Canada) at -70 °C until use. Total RNA was extracted from ~50 mg of salivary glands using TRIzolTM (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's directions. A tick salivary gland cDNA library was constructed using a SMART® cDNA library construction kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) according to the manufacturer's directions. An aliquot of the resultant {lambda}TriplEx2 phage cDNA library containing 2 x 106 plaque-forming units was converted into a plasmid cDNA library in pTriplEx2 in BM25.8 cells according to the manufacturer's protocol. The pTriplEx2 cDNA library was stored at -80 °C in LB medium containing 50% glycerol. For subcloning of the cDNA library into the mammalian cell expression vector, pEXP-Lib (Clontech), plasmid DNA was prepared from a 5-ml overnight bacterial culture inoculated with 5 µl of the glycerol stock (containing 1 x 108 colony-forming units) using the Wizard® Plus SV Minipreps DNA purification system (Promega, Madison, WI). The resultant plasmid DNA was digested with SfiI, fractionated on a 1.1% agarose gel and cDNA inserts were excised and purified using the QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Basel, Switzerland) according to manufacturer's instructions. The cDNA inserts were ligated into SfiI-digested and dephosphorylated, pEXP-Lib vector (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using the Quick LigationTM Kit (New England Biolabs). Ligation reactions were transformed by heat shock into UltraMAX DH5alpha-FT competent cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The pEXP-Lib cDNA library transformation mix was titered and plated at ~100 colonies per 10 cm diameter LB-agar plate containing 50 µg/ml ampicillin. A total of 120 plates were prepared and grown for ~18 h at 37 °C, to yield large colonies (~2 mm diameter). Bacterial colonies were harvested in 5 ml LB medium by scraping the plates with a sterile, triangular plastic loop. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Plasmid DNA was prepared from each pool using a BioRobot 8000 (Qiagen) and stored at–20 °C in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.

Transfection of HEK293 Cells—HEK293 cells were maintained in a 5% CO2, humidified incubator in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium-F-12 Nut medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen), and 1% 100x penicillin-streptomycin solution (Invitrogen). The day before transfection a confluent culture of HEK293 cells was harvested by trypsinization and seeded at ~2 x 104 cells/well in a 96-well plate that had been precoated with 10 µg/ml poly-D-lysine hydrobromide. The next day cells were transfected with 100 ng of plasmid DNA using the Geneporter2 transfection kit (Gene Therapy Systems) using the manufacturer's protocol for low concentration DNA and adherent cells and incubated at 37 °C for 3–4 days. The conditioned medium was then harvested, cell debris was removed by centrifugation, and the supernatants stored frozen at -80 °C until further use.

Expression Cloning—Approximately 80–130 ng of plasmid DNA from each library pool or the positive control plasmid was transfected into HEK293 cells as described above. For the positive controls we used the pEXP-lib vector containing the p35 or vCCI cDNA-coding sequence. Cell culture supernatants (200 µl) were harvested 3 days after transfection and stored frozen. Before use culture supernatants were thawed and concentrated four times using a speed vacuum system. The concentrated culture supernatant (conditioned medium) was tested in a cross-linking assay using 125I-labeled CCL3 as described above. Plasmid DNA from pools that gave a positive signal in the cross-linking assay were retransformed into Escherichia coli, and the transformation mixes plated on 10-cm-diameter LB-amp plates to yield ~100 colonies per plate. Plasmid DNA was then prepared from 100 individual colonies and re-transfected into HEK293 cells. The conditioned medium from each transfection was harvested after 3 days and retested in the cross-linking assay using 125I-labeled CCL3 as described above. Plasmid DNA derived from individual colonies which gave a positive signal in the cross-linking assay was sequenced on an Applied Biosystems 3700 DNA sequencer using a T7 and pEXP-Lib-3' reverse primer (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). The plasmid, which contained the cDNA sequence encoding the CCL3-binding protein (pEXP-Lib-Evasin-1), was subsequently used as a PCR template to generate a six-histidine (His)-tagged version of the cDNA, which was subcloned into the baculovirus vector, pDEST8 (Invitrogen), and into the mammalian cell expression vector pEAK12d (Edge Biosystems) using the GatewayTM cloning system (Invitrogen).

Purification of Evasin-1 from Insect and Mammalian Cells—Evasin-1 with a C-terminal His tag was expressed in Trichoplusia ni (TN)5 insect cells using the baculovirus transduction system or was transiently expressed in HEK293 cells. Conditioned medium from transfected TN5 cells was harvested 72 h post-infection. Conditioned medium from HEK293 cells was harvested 6 days after transfection. The conditioned medium was diluted 8-fold for TN5 expression or 2-fold for expression in HEK293 cells in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, containing 0.3 M NaCl and 10% (v/v) glycerol, respectively, before purification by nickel-affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA-agarose, Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and gels were stained with Coomassie Blue. The pooled peak fractions containing Evasin-1 were dialyzed against PBS and further purified by Sephadex 200 (GE Healthcare) size exclusion chromatography. Fractions of 0.5 ml were collected and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Two additional gels were run with the same samples and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-His antibodies (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions and by cross-linking to 125I-labeled CCL3. Evasin-1-containing fractions were pooled, and aliquots were stored at -80 °C until further use or dialyzed against NH4HCO3 and lyophilized.

Physicochemical Characterization—N-terminal sequence analysis of Evasin-1 was performed using an Applied Biosystems 475A protein sequenator with on-line phenylthiohydantoin derivative detection. MALDI-TOF spectra were obtained on a Voyager DE-PRO Biospectrometry Work station (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The instrument was calibrated over the mass range of interest using a standard set of reference proteins provided by the manufacturer. Sinapinic acid was used as the matrix. Size exclusion chromatography was performed by injecting 200 µl of a 1 mg/ml solution onto an analytical Sephadex 75 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) previously equilibrated in PBS and eluted at 0.5 ml/min. Elution profiles were monitored by UV absorption at 280 nm. The void volume (V0) was determined with blue dextran, and the column was calibrated with the following standards purchased from GE Healthcare: albumin (67 kDa), ovalbumin (43 kDa), chymotrypsinogen (20.4 kDa), and ribonuclease A (13.7 kDa).

Deglycosylation—Evasin-1 produced in TN5 insect cells was subjected to enzymatic deglycosylation with endoglycosidase Hf and peptide-N-glycosidase F (New England Biolabs). A solution of 1 mg/ml Evasin-1 in 50 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 5.5, was incubated with 25,000 units of endoglycosidase Hf at room temperature for 10 h. A second digestion with peptide-N-glycosidase F (PNGase F) was carried out by incubating 1 mg/ml Evasin-1 in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, containing 10% Nonidet P-40 with 12,500 units of PNGase F at room temperature. The extent of digestion was followed by SDS-PAGE.

Surface Plasmon Resonance—Real-time biomolecular interaction analyses were performed using a Biacore 3000 surface plasmon resonance (SPR) system. Recombinant Evasin-1-His was resuspended at 50 µg/ml in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.5, and directly immobilized on the flow cell of a CM4 chip (Biacore) by a standard amine coupling chemistry according to the manufacturer's instructions using the Biacore 3000 Wizard software. Approximately 750 response units of Evasin-1-His were coupled to the cell using this method. A blank cell was prepared using the chemical coupling as a control in the absence of protein. Experiments were performed at 25 °C with a flow rate of 30 µl/min using HBS-P running buffer (0.01 M HEPES, pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl, and 0.005% surfactant P20) (Biacore). For all binding experiments chemokines were resuspended at 0.1 µg/ml in running buffer and filtered through a 0.22-µm filter. The injection time was 2 min followed by a dissociation time of 2.5 min after injection. The chip was regenerated using 50 mM glycine buffer, pH 2.0, for 30 s. For each experiment chemokines were injected in triplicate in random order.

For the kinetic experiments, serial 2-fold dilutions of CCL3 (ranging from 25 to 1.5 ng/ml), CCL4 (ranging from 50 to 3 ng/ml), CCL18 (ranging from 0.5 µg/ml to 50 ng/ml) were prepared in running buffer, filtered through a 0.22-µm filter, and injected over the experimental blank flow cells. The injection time was 3 min followed by a dissociation time of 15 min. The chip was regenerated using 50 mM glycine buffer, pH 2 for 30 s. Each chemokine dilution was injected in triplicate in random order.

For the analysis the sensograms from the blank cell in addition to the sensograms obtained with the running buffer alone were subtracted from the binding to remove the nonspecific background. For the kinetic analyses the association (ka) and the dissociation (kd) values were determined simultaneously by globally fitting sensograms for an entire range of chemokine concentrations according to the 1:1 Langmuir fitting model. The apparent equilibrium dissociation constants (KD) were determined from the mean kinetics values with the equation KD = kd/ka.

Saturation Binding—A saturation binding experiment was used to determine the affinity constant of 125I-labeled CCL3 binding to Evasin-1 using an scintillation proximity assay (SPA). His-tagged Evasin-1 (40 pM) was incubated with increasing concentrations of 125I-labeled CCL3 with or without a 500-fold excess of unlabeled CCL3 in 75 µl of PBS, pH 7.2 containing 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.2% bovine serum albumin. Copper chelate-coated polyvinyl toluene-SPA beads containing scintillant (Amersham Biosciences RPNQ0095) (350 µg) were added in 25 µl of PBS and incubated for 72 h at room temperature with shaking. Competition of heparin for the binding of Evasin-1 to CCL3 was determined by the inclusion of heparin ranging from 1 x 10-3 to 1 x 103 µg/ml in the assay. The amount of bound 125I-labeled CCL3 was determined by measurement of the radioactivity using a beta counter. Nonspecific binding, determined in the presence of a 500-fold excess of unlabeled CCL3, was subtracted and represented between 2 and 4.1% of the total counts bound per minute. The ability of Evasin-1 to bind to a chemokine receptor was investigated using iodinated Evasin-1 (custom product from GE Healthcare, specific activity 222 Ci/mmol) and CCR1 expressed in CHO membranes. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software. Measurements were performed in duplicate.

Equilibrium Competition Receptor Binding—The ability of Evasin-1 to inhibit binding of radiolabeled CCL3 and CCL4 (GE Healthcare) to their cognate receptors was determined using a SPA. Membranes expressing recombinant CCR1 and CCR5 were prepared as described (16). Serial dilutions of Evasin-1 were prepared in binding buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.2 containing 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.15 M NaCl, and 0.5% bovine serum albumin) to cover the concentration ranges shown in Fig. 5. Wheat germ agglutinin SPA beads (Amersham Biosciences) were suspended in binding buffer at 10 mg/ml, and the final concentration in the assay was 0.25 mg/well. CHO cell membranes expressing CCR1 or CCR5 were diluted in binding buffer to 80 µg/ml. Equal volumes of membrane and bead stocks were mixed before performing the assay to reduce background. The final membrane concentration in the assay was 2 µg/ml, and that of 125I-labeled CCL3 and CCL4 was 0.1 nM. The plates were incubated at room temperature with shaking for 4 h. Measurements were performed in triplicate.

Stoichiometry of the Evasin-1-CCL3 Complex—The apparent molecular mass of Evasin-1 in the presence of CCL3 or CXCL8 was analyzed by size exclusion chromatography as described above with a 1 mg/ml solution of Evasin-1 in PBS or a mixture of Evasin-1 and CCL3 or CXCL8, both at 0.5 mg/ml, in PBS. The fractions were analyzed on SDS-PAGE gels stained with Coomassie Blue.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Identification of a CCL3-binding Protein in Tick Saliva—The existence of a chemokine-binding protein in tick saliva was demonstrated by the detection of a radiolabeled band migrating between 25 and 35 kDa after autoradiography of an SDS-PAGE gel following incubation of tick saliva with 125I-labeled CCL3 in the presence of the chemical cross-linker, BS3 (Fig. 1A). This cross-linking assay was subsequently used to screen conditioned media from HEK293 cells transiently transfected with a tick salivary gland cDNA library for the presence of the CCL3-binding protein.


Figure 1
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1.
Identification of Evasin-1 in tick saliva and conditioned medium from transfected HEK293 cells by cross-linking to iodinated CCL3. Samples were incubated with 125I-labeled CCL3 in the presence or absence of the chemical cross-linker BS3 and analyzed by autoradiography of SDS-PAGE gels as described in the "Experimental Procedures." a, cross-linking to tick saliva in the absence of BS3 (lane 1) and in the presence of BS3 (lane 2). b, cross-linking to supernatants from HEK293 cells transfected with pools of cDNA from the salivary gland library. c, analysis of fractions eluting from size exclusion chromatography on a Sephadex 200 of the Ni-NTA eluate by SDS-PAGE stained with Coomassie Blue. Lane 1, molecular weight markers; lanes 2–12, fractions 25–35 corresponding to the elution volume 12–28 ml. d, Western blot analysis after transfer of bands from the SDS-PAGE gel to a nitrocellulose membrane using a mouse anti-His antibody, a rabbit anti-mouse antibody, and detection by chemiluminescence of fractions shown in lanes 7–11 in c. e, cross-linking analysis with 125I-labeled CCL3 in the presence of BS3 of fractions shown in lanes 7–11 in c.

 
Construction and Screening of a Tick Salivary Gland cDNA Expression Library—Total RNA was extracted from salivary glands derived from ~50 female R. sanguineus adult ticks that had engorged on dogs for 5 days. Total RNA was used to prepare a directionally cloned cDNA library in the phage vector, {lambda}TriplEx2. The resultant library contained ~0.575 x 106 independent clones with an average insert size of between 0.3 and 1.5 kilobases. An aliquot of the phage library was then converted into a pTriplEx2 plasmid library. cDNA inserts were excised together from the pTriplEx2 cDNA library using SfiI and ligated into the mammalian cell expression vector, pEXP-lib. Plasmid DNA was prepared from 93 pools of clones, each containing ~85–100 independent cDNAs. Pools were screened by transfecting HEK293/EBNA cells followed by testing of the conditioned media for cross-linking activity to 125I-labeled CCL3. Plasmid DNA from one of the pools which gave a positive signal in the cross-linking assay was retransformed into E. coli, and plasmid DNA isolated from 96 individual colonies was tested by transfection and cross-linking as described above. This process was repeated until a single cDNA (clone 59) giving rise to a positive signal in the cross-linking assay was identified (Fig. 1b, lane 3).


Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2.
Nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of Evasin-1. The putative signal peptide sequence is underlined. Potential N-linked glycosylation sites are circled. The predicted polyadenylation site is in italics.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3.
Biochemical analyses of recombinant Evasin-1. a, Coomassie Blue-stained SDS-PAGE analysis of purified recombinant Evasin-1. Lane 1, molecular weight markers; lane 2, Evasin-1 produced in HEK293 cells; lane 3, Evasin-1 produced in TN5 insect cells; lane 4, Evasin-1 produced in TN5 insect cells and deglycosylated as described in the "Experimental Procedures." b, isoelectric focusing gel analysis of purified recombinant Evasin-1. Lanes 1 and 4, pH markers; lane 2, Evasin-1 produced in HEK293 cells; lane 3, Evasin-1 produced in TN5 insect cells. c, cross-linking of 125I-labeled CCL3. Lanes 1 and 2, recombinant Evasin-1 from HEK293 cells; lanes 3 and 4, Evasin-1 from TN5 cells; lanes 5 and 6, R. sanguineus saliva in the presence (lanes 2, 4, and 6) or in the absence of BS3 (lanes 1, 3, and 5).

 
The cDNA insert sequence in clone 59 appeared to be a full-length DNA with an open reading frame of 339 bp encoding a protein of 114 amino acids with a predicted signal peptide of 20 amino acids, which when cleaved gives rise to a mature protein of 94 amino acids, which we called Evasin-1 (Fig. 2). The cDNA contains a single AATTAA polyadenylation site which spans the stop codon. Data base searches indicated that the Evasin-1 cDNA sequence showed no significant homology to any other protein, nucleic acid sequence, or conserved domain by NCBI blast of public databases including available tick genome databases.

The predicted mass of Evasin-1 is 10,466 Da, and the predicted isoelectric point is 4.29. The mature protein contains eight cysteine residues, suggesting the presence of four disulfide bonds. There are also three predicted N-linked glycosylation sites in the mature protein sequence. Given that the 125I-labeled chemokine migrates at 8 kDa, it appears that the binding protein produced by the tick is heavily glycosylated, as it migrates with a mass ranging from ~17–27 kDa, which is considerably larger than the predicted mass.

Protein Purification and Characterization of Evasin-1—The cDNA sequence encoding the predicted open reading frame of Evasin-1 was subcloned with a C-terminal His tag for expression of the recombinant protein in insect (TN5) and mammalian (HEK293/EBNA) cells. Evasin-1 was well secreted in both expression systems. Elution from the Ni-NTA column was accompanied by high Mr-contaminating proteins which were easily removed by size exclusion chromatography as shown for the HEK protein in Fig. 1c. This chromatographic step clearly demonstrated the extent of glycosylation resulting in a mass distribution during size exclusion chromatography, but the identity of the different forms was confirmed by Western blot with an anti-His antibody (Fig. 1d), and activity of all the glycosylated forms was demonstrated by the cross-linking assay (Fig. 1e).

The recombinant protein expressed in mammalian and insect cell systems showed considerable differences in migration behavior on SDS-PAGE. Recombinant Evasin-1 from HEK293 cells migrated as a broad band between 20 and 30 kDa, whereas Evasin-1 produced in insect cells migrated as a broad band between 15 and 25 kDa (Fig. 3a). Because the His tag at the C terminus was present in both proteins, allowing capture on the Ni-NTA resin, and the N-terminal sequencing showed that the signal sequence was removed in both expression systems according to the in silico prediction (results not shown), the differences in mass were attributed to post-translational modifications, most likely, glycosylation. Treatment of Evasin-1 with a glycosidase (peptide-N-glycosidase F) or Evasin-1 produced by transfected cells cultured in the presence of tunicamycin resulted in a band migrating at 12 kDa, confirming that the mass differences could be solely due to differential glycosylation (Fig. 3a). The apparent molecular mass determined by size exclusion chromatography of insect cell expressed Evasin-1 was 22 kDa, and that of the mammalian expressed Evasin-1 was 31 kDa (data not shown), in accordance with their differential migration pattern on SDS-PAGE. Analysis by isoelectric focusing showed that the major difference in glycosylation appears to be in sialyation. The protein expressed in mammalian cells showed a typical ladder pattern on isoelectric focusing characteristic of sialylated proteins, whereas the insect-derived protein showed only three major species (Fig. 3b) with iso-electric points between 5.3 and 6.0. MALDI-TOF-mass spectroscopy confirmed different glycosylation patterns for both proteins. The mammalian form displayed a wider and smoother distribution of the mass range, with a bell-shaped spectrum peaking at a mass of around 16 kDa, whereas the insect form resulted in a series of sharp spectra with the center of the mass distribution around 13 kDa (data not shown). When tested in the cross-linking assay to 125I-labeled CCL3, the extent of glycosylation of the HEK-derived protein appeared to be closer to that of the natural tick protein in saliva (Fig. 3c).


Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4.
Determination of the selectivity of Evasin-1 by surface plasmon resonance. The chemokine binding profiles of Evasin-1 immobilized onto a CM4 chip were analyzed as described in the "Experimental Procedures." Sensograms corresponding to CCL3 (black lines), CCL4 (dotted lines), and CCL18 (dashed lines) demonstrate strong binding of these chemokines to Evasin-1. The sensograms corresponding to CCL1, CCL2, CCL5 (E66A), CCL7, CCL11, CCL13, CCL15, CCL17, CCL22, CCL26, CXCL1, CXCL4, CXCL7, CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL12, CXCL13, XCL1, and CX3CL1 (gray lines) showed no binding of these chemokines to Evasin-1.

 
Selectivity and Binding Affinity of Evasin-1—To determine the chemokine selectivity of Evasin-1 we immobilized the recombinant protein on Biacore chips and analyzed the binding profiles of a selection of 23 chemokines using SPR. As shown in Fig. 4, we only observed binding to three chemokines, CCL3, CCL4, and CCL18. Although a binding protein to CCL5 was observed in our initial analyses of tick saliva5 and has also been reported elsewhere in another tick species (13), we did not observe high affinity binding of CCL5 to purified Evasin-1 by SPR, suggesting that a different protein is probably responsible for this activity in tick saliva. No binding was observed with 9 other CC chemokines or 9 CXC chemokines as well as XCL1 and CX3CL1, demonstrating an exquisite selectivity that has not been described for any other chemokine-binding protein to date.

The affinities for these three chemokines was determined by SPR, giving KD values of 0.16 ± 0.08 nM for CCL3, 0.81 ± 0.3 nM for CCL4, and 3.21 ± 1.95 nM for CCL18 (Table 1). The affinity for CCL3 was also determined using a saturation binding experiment using the His tag on Evasin-1 to coat copper chelate SPA beads, resulting in a KD of 0.36 ± 0.04 nM, confirming the value obtained using SPR (Fig. 5a). Heparin was unable to compete for the binding of CCL3 to Evasin-1. The IC50 values for the inhibition of CCL3 binding to its receptors (see below) demonstrated even greater potency, so we used an SPA assay with CHO membranes expressing one of the receptors, CCR1, to determine whether Evasin-1 could interact with the receptor. As shown in Fig. 5b, whereas 125I-labeled CCL3 demonstrated saturable binding to CCR1, no binding of 125I-labeled Evasin-1 was observed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1
 
Inhibition of Receptor Binding—We confirmed the affinity of Evasin-1 for CCL3 and CCL4 by equilibrium competition receptor binding to determine the ability of Evasin-1 to inhibit the binding of iodinated CCL3 and CCL4 to their cognate receptors, CCR1 and CCR5, using a scintillation proximity assay. Recombinant Evasin-1 produced in TN5 insect cells was able to inhibit CCL3 and CCL4 binding to their respective receptors (Figs. 6, a–d). Evasin-1 showed remarkable potency in inhibiting CCL3 binding to both CCR1 (Fig. 6a) and CCR5 (Fig. 6b), with IC50 values of 0.05 and 0.015 nM, respectively, and it inhibited CCL4 binding to CCR5 with an IC50 of 3.1 nM. The same potency was observed for recombinant Evasin-1 produced in HEK293 cells, and both proteins showed equivalent activity in this assay after lyophilization (data not shown). Enzymatically deglycosylated Evasin-1 or Evasin-1 expressed in insect cells in the presence of tunicamycin had IC50 values almost identical to that of the glycosylated recombinant protein (Fig. 6d), indicating that glycosylation is not required for the inhibitory activity.


Figure 5
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5.
Saturation binding. a, saturation binding of 125I-labeled CCL3 to Evasin-1 coated onto Copper chelate-coated polyvinyl toluene-SPA beads through the His tag. The Kd measured was 0.36 ± 0.04 nM. One representative experiment of three is shown. b, saturation binding of 125I-labeled CCL3 and 125I-labeled Evasin-1 to SPA beads coated with CHO membranes expressing CCR1. •, 125I-labeled CCL3; {diamondsuit}, 125I-labeled Evasin-1.

 


Figure 6
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 6.
Inhibition of CCL3 and CCL4 binding to their cognate receptors by Evasin-1. Equilibrium competition receptor binding assays were carried out as described in the "Experimental Procedures" with 1 nM 125I-labeled CCL3 or CCL4 and CHO cell membranes expressing CCR1 and CCR5 in the presence of increasing concentrations of Evasin-1 produced in TN5 cells (a–c). a, inhibition of CCL3 binding to CCR1 with an IC50 of 4.97 x 10-11 M. b, inhibition of CCL3 binding to CCR5 with an IC50 of 1.46 x 10-11 M. c, inhibition of CCL4 binding to CCR5 with an IC50 of 3.1 x 10-9 M. d, inhibition of CCL3 binding to CCR5 by Evasin-1. {blacksquare}, glycosylated protein produced in HEK293 cells, IC50 2 x 10-11 M; {diamondsuit}, glycosylated protein produced in TN5 cells, IC50 1.2 x 10-11 M; •, TN5 produced protein, enzymatically deglycosylated, IC50 4.7 x 10-11 M.

 
Stoichiometry of the Evasin-1-Chemokine Complex—To estimate the stoichiometry of Evasin-1 binding to CCL3, equimolar mixtures of Evasin-1 and three chemokines, CCL3, CXCL8, and E66A-RANTES, an obligate dimeric form of CCL5 (17), were applied to a Sephadex 75 10/300 GL column. Confirmation of the selectivity profile described above was demonstrated by the observation of two discrete peaks eluting on size exclusion chromatography for the mixtures of Evasin-1 produced in HEK293 cells with CXCL8 and E66A-RANTES, whereas a single peak was observed for the Evasin-1/CCL3 mixture which eluted with an elution volume corresponding to a mass of 38 kDa (Fig. 7). The analysis of the protein peaks by SDS-PAGE confirmed the formation of a 1:1 complex of Evasin-1 with CCL3, which appears to form a compact structure with an apparent molecular mass only slightly larger than the mass of 34 kDa for the binding protein alone.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We describe the cloning of a highly selective chemokine-binding protein from a cDNA library constructed from tick salivary glands which we have called Evasin-1. Evasin-1 belongs to a totally novel class of chemokine-binding proteins distinct from the known viral chemokine-binding proteins and EB2 from S. mansoni (18). Public data base searches indicated that tick cDNA sequence coding for Evasin-1 did not show significant homology to any known sequence. The highest identity against any tick sequence was 30% over 95 amino acids for a Boophilus microplus EST (EST768980).

Evasin-1 is a small protein, barely larger than its monomeric chemokine ligands, with a predicted mass of 10.4 kDa, although due to glycosylation it has an apparent mass of 15–30 kDa depending on the system in which the recombinant protein is expressed. Removal of glycosylation results in a protein with an apparent molecular mass close to the predicted mass. Recombinant Evasin-1 is differentially glycosylated when produced in mammalian and insect cell expression systems. The extent of glycosylation of Evasin-1 produced in mammalian cells seems to be closer to that of the natural protein found in tick saliva than the protein produced in insect cells when visualized on SDS-PAGE. Although glycosylation does not appear to play a role in activity, it may be involved in preventing immunogenicity. Hard ticks feed on their hosts for protracted periods of time; therefore, glycosylation of proteins secreted in their saliva may be an important way to disguise their proteins from immune recognition by the host. Specific glycosylation and immunogenicity are important considerations in potential therapeutic applications of Evasin-1.

Evasin-1 forms a 1:1 complex with CCL3, distinct from the chemokine-binding protein M3, expressed by myxoma virus, which forms a dimeric complex that binds two chemokine molecules, as established by x-ray crystallographic studies (19). Another feature that distinguishes Evasin-1 from other chemokine-binding proteins is its surprising selectivity profile. Most viral chemokine-binding proteins isolated to date are reported to have broad chemokine binding selectivity. For example, the myxoma virus product M-T7 is the prototype of the type I CKBP family and, as well as binding interferon-{gamma}, also interacts with members of the CXC, CC, and C chemokine families with moderate (submicromolar) affinity (20). Members of the type II CKBP family bind exclusively to CC chemokines with nanomolar affinity (21, 22). The sole member of the type III CKBP family, M3 from murine {gamma}-herpesvirus-68, binds to members of the CX3C, CXC, CC, and C chemokine families with high (nanomolar) affinity (23). A fourth type of CKBP was identified in alphaherpesviruses, which display a broad, yet high affinity binding profile to chemokines of all classes (24). The recently discovered S. mansoni chemokine-binding protein also has broad selectivity, binding to CXCL8, CCL3, and CX3CL1 as well as to CCL2 and CCL5 (18). The binding affinities of Evasin-1 for various members of the chemokine family were determined by SPR. Evasin-1 belongs to a new class of chemokine-binding proteins in that it shows high affinity binding to a very limited set of three highly homologous CC chemokines: CCL3, CCL4, and CCL18. The affinities of Evasin-1 for CCL3 and CCL4 were confirmed by competition in receptor binding assays, where it showed surprising potency for CCL3, with an IC50 value in the picomolar range. We, therefore, investigated whether this potency could be partially due to the binding of Evasin-1 to a CCL3 receptor, but at least for CCR1, no binding could be demonstrated. It has been reported that the binding of chemokines to glycosaminoglycans can aid in sequestration of the chemokine to its receptor (26), but heparin had no inhibitory effect on the binding of Evasin-1 to CCL3. Because the receptor for CCL18 remains unidentified to date, the potency of inhibition of CCL18 receptor binding was not possible.


Figure 7
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 7.
Stoichiometry of the Evasin-1-chemokine complex determined by size exclusion chromatography. Evasin-1 produced in TN5 cells was mixed with an equimolar amount of CCL3, CXCL8, or CCL5 (E66A) in PBS at a final total protein concentration of 1 mg/ml, and the mixture was applied to a Sephadex 75 10/300 GL column. a, elution profile of the mixture of Evasin-1 with CCL5 (E66A) (green), CXCL8 (red), or CCL3 (black). mAU, milliabsorbance units. b, SDS-PAGE analysis stained with Coomassie Blue of the fractions eluting from size exclusion chromatography corresponding to Evasin-1 mixed with CCL5 (E66A). c, SDS-PAGE analysis stained with Coomassie Blue of the consecutive fractions eluting from size exclusion chromatography corresponding to Evasin-1 mixed with CCL3.

 
CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, and CCL18 show high overall sequence identity with each other (>70%), yet CCL5 only shows low, micromolar affinity binding to Evasin-1.6 Resolution of the three-dimensional structure of the Evasin-1-CCL3 complex has identified two hydrophobic interaction sites, and the residues involved are conserved between CCL3 and CCL5. Thus, the features of Evasin-1, which confer such exquisite binding specificity to these chemokines, remain to be elucidated.

The binding of Evasin-1 to CCL18 is interesting. Sequence analysis of the CCL18 gene indicates that it was probably generated by fusion of two MIP-1{alpha}-like genes, with deletion and selective usage of exons (27). The absence of a murine CCL18 ortholog indicates that the generation of the CCL18 gene is likely to have occurred after the diversification of rodents and primates after the tetrapod split. CCL18 has been shown to be one of the most highly up-regulated chemokines in the skin of atopic dermatitis patients, and its expression is associated with an allergy/atopy skin phenotype (25, 2830). The presence of a chemokine-binding protein in tick saliva, which shows selectivity for CCL18, therefore highlights an important role for this chemokine in the immune response in the skin of primates. Targeting CCL18-mediated immune cell recruitment may, therefore, be of therapeutic use in atopic dermatitis. The human receptor for CCL18 is still unknown, which paves the way for the potential use of Evasin-1 as a biotherapeutic for treatment of this disease. However, the lack of a rodent counterpart for human CCL18 would necessitate the use of primate animal models for target validation.

In conclusion, we have cloned a highly specific CC chemokine-binding protein from tick salivary glands, the first chemokine-binding protein to be identified in an external parasitic organism. Evasin-1 is specific for CCL3, CCL4, and CCL18 and shows no sequence homology to any other known protein in public or patent databases. Using biochemical methods we identified the presence of binding proteins for CCL5 and CXCL8 in tick saliva and have subsequently used the expression cloning method described here to identify other distinct, highly selective CXC and CC chemokine-binding proteins from the tick salivary gland cDNA library,5 thus confirming results from other investigators that tick saliva contains diverse chemokine-binding proteins. These novel proteins will be useful tools in helping us to understand the role of specific chemokines in inflammatory disease and may have potential use as biotherapeutics in the future.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

1 Current address: Novartis Pharma AG, Lichtstrasse 35, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland. Back

2 To whom correspondence may be addressed: Merck Serono Geneva Research Centre, 9, Chemin des Mines, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland. Tel.: 41-22-414-98 00; Fax: 41-22-414-99 91; E-mail: christine.power{at}merckserono.net. 3 To whom correspondence may be addressed: Merck Serono Geneva Research Centre, 9, Chemin des Mines, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland. Tel.: 41-22-414-98 00; Fax: 41-22-414-99 91; E-mail: amanda.proudfoot{at}merckserono.net.

4 The abbreviations used are: CKBP, chemokine-binding protein; PBS, phosphate-buffered protein; RANTES, regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted; BS3, bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate; Ni-NTA, nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight; SPA, scintillation proximity assay; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; HEK, human embryonic kidney; SPR, surface plasmon resonance. Back

5 M. Déruaz, A. Frauenschuh, A. L. Alessandri, J. M. Dias, F. M. Coelho, R. C. Russo, B. M. Ferreira, G. J. Graham, J. P. Shaw, T. N. C. Wells, M. M. Teixeria, C. A. Power, and A. E. Proudfoot, manuscript in preparation. Back

6 J. M. Dias, C. Losberger, A. Frauenschuh, C. A. Power, A. E. I. Proudfoot, and J. P. Shaw, manuscript in preparation. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Ribeiro, J. M. (1995) Infect. Agents Dis. 4, 143-152[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Ribeiro, J. M., Makoul, G. T., Levine, J., Robinson, D. R., and Spielman, A. (1985) J. Exp. Med. 161, 332-344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Brossard, M., and Wikel, S. K. (2004) Parasitology 129, (suppl.) S161-S176
  4. Nuttall, P. A. (1998) Parasitology 116, (suppl.) S65-S72
  5. Gillespie, R. D., Mbow, M. L., and Titus, R. G. (2000) Parasite Immunol. (Oxf.) 22, 319-331[CrossRef]
  6. Schoeler, G. B., and Wikel, S. K. (2001) Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 95, 755-771[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Jones, L. D., Hodgson, E., and Nuttall, P. A. (1989) J. Gen. Virol. 70, 1895-1898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Alcami, A. (2003) Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 36-50[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Lalani, A. S., and McFadden, G. (1999) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 10, 219-233[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Graham, K. A., Lalani, A. S., Macen, J. L., Ness, T. L., Barry, M., Liu, L. Y., Lucas, A., Clark-Lewis, I., Moyer, R. W., and McFadden, G. (1997) Virology 229, 12-24[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Hajnicka, V., Kocakova, P., Slavikova, M., Slovak, M., Gasperik, J., Fuchsberger, N., and Nuttall, P. A. (2001) Parasite Immunol. (Oxf.) 23, 483-489[CrossRef]
  12. Kocakova, P., Slavikova, M., Hajnicka, V., Slovak, M., Gasperik, J., Vancova, I., Fuchsberger, N., and Nuttall, P. A. (2003) Folia Parasitol. (Praha) 50, 79-84[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Hajnicka, V., Vancova, I., Kocakova, P., Slovak, M., Gasperik, J., Slavikova, M., Hails, R. S., Labuda, M., and Nuttall, P. A. (2005) Parasitology 130, 333-342[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Proudfoot, A. E., and Borlat, F. (2000) Methods Mol. Biol. 138, 75-87[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Ferreira, B. R., Machado, R. Z., and Bechara, G. H. (1996) Vet. Parasitol. 62, 161-174[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Alouani, S. (2000) Methods Mol. Biol. 138, 135-141[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Czaplewski, L. G., McKeating, J., Craven, C. J., Higgins, L. D., Appay, V., Brown, A., Dudgeon, T., Howard, L. A., Meyers, T., Owen, J., Palan, S. R., Tan, P., Wilson, G., Woods, N. R., Heyworth, C. M., Lord, B. I., Brotherton, D., Christison, R., Craig, S., Cribbes, S., Edwards, R. M., Evans, S. J., Gilbert, R., Morgan, P., and Hunter, M. G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 16077-16084[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Smith, P., Fallon, R. E., Mangan, N. E., Walsh, C. M., Saraiva, M., Sayers, J. R., McKenzie, A. N., Alcami, A., and Fallon, P. G. (2005) J. Exp. Med. 202, 1319-1325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Alexander, J. M., Nelson, C. A., van, B. V., Lau, E. K., Studts, J. M., Brett, T. J., Speck, S. H., Handel, T. M., Virgin, H. W., and Fremont, D. H. (2002) Cell 111, 343-356[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Lalani, A. S., Graham, K., Mossman, K., Rajarathnam, K., Clark, L. I., Kelvin, D., and McFadden, G. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 4356-4363[Abstract]
  21. Smith, C. A., Smith, T. D., Smolak, P. J., Friend, D., Hagen, H., Gerhart, M., Park, L., Pickup, D. J., Torrance, D., Mohler, K., Schooley, K., and Goodwin, R. G. (1997) Virology 236, 316-327[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Burns, J. M., Dairaghi, D. J., Deitz, M., Tsang, M., and Schall, T. J. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 2785-2789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. van Berkel, V., Barrett, J., Tiffany, H. L., Fremont, D. H., Murphy, P. M., McFadden, G., Speck, S. H., and Virgin, H. W., IV (2000) J. Virol. 74, 6741-6747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Bryant, N. A., Davis-Poynter, N., Vanderplasschen, A., and Alcami, A. (2003) EMBO J. 22, 833-846[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Goebeler, M., Trautmann, A., Voss, A., Brocker, E. V., Toksoy, A., and Gillitzer, R. (2001) Am. J. Pathol. 158, 431-440[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Ali, S., Palmer, A. C. V., Banerjee, B., Fritchley, S. J., and Kirby, J. A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 11721-11727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Tasaki, Y., Fukuda, S., Iio, M., Miura, R., Imai, T., Sugano, S., Yoshie, O., Hughes, A. L., and Nomiyama, H. (1999) Genomics 55, 353-357[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Pivarcsi, A., and Homey, B. (2005) Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 5, 284-290[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Nomura, I., Gao, B., Boguniewicz, M., Darst, M. A., Travers, J. B., and Leung, D. Y. (2003) J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 112, 1195-1202[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Gunther, C., Bello-Fernandez, C., Kopp, T., Kund, J., Carballido-Perrig, N., Hinteregger, S., Fassl, S., Schwarzler, C., Lametschwandtner, G., Stingl, G., Biedermann, T., and Carballido, J. M. (2005) J. Immunol. 174, 1723-1728[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
M. Deruaz, A. Frauenschuh, A. L. Alessandri, J. M. Dias, F. M. Coelho, R. C. Russo, B. R. Ferreira, G. J. Graham, J. P. Shaw, T. N.C. Wells, et al.
Ticks produce highly selective chemokine binding proteins with antiinflammatory activity
J. Exp. Med., September 1, 2008; 205(9): 2019 - 2031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/37/27250    most recent
M704706200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frauenschuh, A.
Right arrow Articles by Proudfoot, A. E. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frauenschuh, A.
Right arrow Articles by Proudfoot, A. E. I.