JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.R600028200 on November 29, 2006

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 4, 2125-2129, January 26, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/4/2125    most recent
R600028200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spiegel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Milstien, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spiegel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Milstien, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Minireview

Functions of the Multifaceted Family of Sphingosine Kinases and Some Close Relatives*

Sarah Spiegel{ddagger}1 and Sheldon Milstien§2

From the {ddagger}Department of Biochemistry, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia 23298 and §National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 INTRODUCTION
S1P in Immunity and...
 How Is S1P Transported?
 SphK1 Versus SphK2: Castor...
 Ceramide Kinase and Ceramide...
 AGK: the Profligate Sibling
 REFERENCES
 
Sphingosine kinases (SphK)3 are prototypical members of a highly conserved family of signaling enzymes. They are present in organisms as diverse as mammals, flies, worms, yeast, and plants and catalyze the phosphorylation of sphingosine to form the bioactive sphingolipid metabolite sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P). Two distinct mammalian isoforms have been identified, SphK1 and SphK2. Other close relatives, ceramide kinase (CerK) and the more promiscuous acylglycerol kinase (AGK), are now emerging as lipid-signaling kinases with important functions. This brief review will focus on the biochemical properties of this novel family of lipid kinases with emphasis on recent studies that have begun to uncover the biological functions of their phosphorylated products.


   S1P in Immunity and Cancer
TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 S1P in Immunity and...
How Is S1P Transported?
 SphK1 Versus SphK2: Castor...
 Ceramide Kinase and Ceramide...
 AGK: the Profligate Sibling
 REFERENCES
 
As a specific ligand for a family of five G protein-coupled receptors, termed S1P1–5, S1P regulates diverse physiological processes important for cancer as well as lymphocyte trafficking, immunity, and allergy. S1P also has receptor-independent intracellular functions in mammalian cells important for calcium homeostasis, cell growth, and suppression of apoptosis (reviewed in Ref. 1), consistent with the observations that lower organisms, including plants and yeast, although they express sphingosine kinases and produce and respond to S1P, do not express S1P receptors.

Interest in the functions of S1P in the immune system has increased recently due to the discovery that the potent immunosuppressive drug FTY720, a sphingosine analogue, has great clinical potential for the prevention of renal graft rejection (2) and treatment of multiple sclerosis where it is currently in phase II clinical trials (3). A large body of evidence suggests that FTY720 is a pro-drug that is phosphorylated by SphK2 to a mimetic of S1P, FTY720-P, which prevents egress of T-cells from secondary lymphoid organs and back into circulation by functionally antagonizing S1P1 (4, 5). Fascinatingly, Kruppel-like factor 2, a transcription factor known to influence T-cell survival, regulates thymocyte and T-cell trafficking by binding and transactivating the promoter for S1P1 to enhance its expression (6). In addition, it has also been demonstrated that agonists can act through S1P1 on endothelial cells to enhance adherens junction and endothelial barrier function to prevent lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes (7).

S1P may also be important for arrival of mast cells (8) and eosinophils (9) to sites of inflammation. In an animal asthma model, FTY720 inhibited the infiltration of both Th2 cells and eosinophils into bronchial tissue, reduced the levels of Th2-related cytokines, and almost completely blocked airway hyper-responsiveness (10), all characteristic features of clinical asthma. Interestingly, it was recently found that unphosphorylated FTY720 blocked stimulated secretion of all eicosanoids from mast cells and macrophages by directly inhibiting cytosolic PLA2, the rate-limiting step in eicosanoid formation, independently of S1P receptor functions (11). These findings have important implications for the potential therapeutic mechanism of action of this potent immunosuppressive drug in inflammatory and allergic responses.

Many reports have shown that S1P is an important player in the regulation of cancer cell survival and tumor progression. Growth factors, hormones important for progression of cancer, and cytokines stimulate SphK1 and production of S1P (1). SphK1 is a critical regulator of the balance between the pro-growth and anti-apoptotic S1P and its pro-apoptotic precursors ceramide and sphingosine. Numerous previous studies have shown that overexpression of SphK1 promotes tumorigenesis (12). In accordance, down-regulating its expression in cancer cells reduces growth, increases apoptosis, and enhances chemosensitivity (13). Recently it was suggested that SphK1 regulates autophagy, a normal physiologic self-digestion mechanism for the turnover of cellular proteins and excess or damaged organelles, to protect cancer cells from apoptosis during nutrient starvation (14). Moreover, SphK1 is up-regulated in a variety of solid tumors, including breast, colon, lung, ovary, stomach, uterus, kidney, and rectum (15), and several lipid and non-lipid SphK inhibitors have anti-tumor activity in xenograft models (16). An elegant study recently demonstrated that intravenous administration of a monoclonal antibody that neutralizes S1P drastically reduced tumor progression and associated angiogenesis in several animal models of human cancer (17). These results suggest that S1P not only has effects on tumor cells themselves but also is permissive or required for the actions of angiogenic factors and provide proof of concept that targeting of this important sphingolipid signaling molecule is a novel strategy for the development of new types of cancer treatments.

Transactivation of growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases by G protein-coupled receptor ligands, such as S1P, is important for amplification of signaling and regulation of cell growth. A reciprocal mechanism of receptor cross-talk has been shown to regulate movement of cells whereby activation of receptor tyrosine kinases stimulates and translocates SphK1 to the plasma membrane, resulting in spatially restricted formation of S1P that in turn activates S1P1 (or other S1P receptors present on the cell surface) and downstream signaling events critical for directed cell movement (Fig. 1) (18). Thus, S1P might be the central controller of several amplification loops, in line with the emerging view of the intricacy and nonlinearity of signaling via S1P receptors and receptor tyrosine kinases and the importance of membrane compartmentalization of a signaling complex (signalplex). This web has become even more entangled by the recent demonstration that estrogen acting on its own receptors stimulates SphK1 and the release of S1P, which in turn activates S1P3 leading to EGFR transactivation in a matrix metalloprotease-dependent manner (19).


Figure 1
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1.
Localization and signaling functions of SphK1, SphK2, CerK, AGK, and their phosphorylated products. Stimuli, such as EGF, activate and translocate SphK1 to the plasma membrane. S1P thus formed is exported by ABC transporters to stimulate S1P receptors and downstream signaling. The functions of SphK2 at the plasma membrane and/or nucleus remain to be uncovered. In the mitochondria, AGK produces LPA and PA, which can function as a ligand for LPA receptors or intracellularly to activate mTOR, respectively. In the Golgi, activation of CerK and formation of C1P lead to translocation and activation of cPLA2, liberation of arachidonic acid, and formation of eicosanoids. For more details, see text. For simplicity, not all of the known cross-talk among S1P receptors, LPA receptors, and growth factor receptors or their functions are indicated. Moreover, it should be noted that this drawing is not meantto indicate that these pathways are all simultaneously active as shown. DAG, diacylglycerol; pFTY, FTY720-phosphate; GF, growth factor; MAG, monoacylglycerol.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 2.
Schematic representation of the multifaceted family of sphingosine kinases. Sphingosine kinases are conserved across a diverse range of eukaryotic organisms. The five conserved domains of all SphKs, C1–C5, are indicated by the colored boxes. C1–C3 are conserved in all diacylglycerol kinases. The pleckstrin homology domain in CerK is indicated by the purple oval. Confirmed and putative calcium/calmodulin binding sites are indicated by black and orange asterisks, respectively. The nuclear localization sequence in SphK2 is indicated by v. DAG, diacylglycerol; MAG, monoacylglycerol.

 

   How Is S1P Transported?
TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 S1P in Immunity and...
 How Is S1P Transported?
SphK1 Versus SphK2: Castor...
 Ceramide Kinase and Ceramide...
 AGK: the Profligate Sibling
 REFERENCES
 
It is still a mystery how S1P produced inside cells by two SphKs can reach its receptors on the cell surface. Although it has been suggested that extracellular production of S1P by exported SphK1 may contribute to the establishment of the vascular S1P gradient (20), data from many studies indicate that intracellularly produced S1P itself is secreted. Studies originally related to multidrug resistance in cancer cells identified several ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, including ABCB1 (previously called MDR-1 and P-glycoprotein) and ABCC1 (previously called MRP1) that, in addition to export of amphiphilic drugs, catalyze the movement of lipids from the inner to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane. It is well documented that many ABC transporters are up-regulated in solid and hematological cancers, and in some cases, their expression correlates with negative responses to treatment and poor disease outcome. The ability of S1P to act in an autocrine or paracrine manner to regulate angiogenesis and vascular maturation suggests that increased secretion of S1P by cancer cells, perhaps by ABC transporters, due to up-regulation of SphK1 or the transporters, could contribute to tumorigenesis. Curiously, both ABCB1 and ABCC1 are required for FTY720 to induce lymphocyte homing (21). Recent work suggests that ABCC1 is also responsible for transport of S1P, as its down-regulation as well as a specific inhibitor decreased secretion of S1P from human and rodent mast cells (22). Activation and translocation of both isoforms of SphK to the plasma membrane after Fc{epsilon}RI cross-linking and therefore to their substrate sphingosine (23) and the subsequent synthesis of S1P at the plasma membrane in close proximity to ABCC1 could account for the abundant and stimulated secretion of S1P by antigen in mast cells (Fig. 1). These findings have important implications for intracellular and extracellular functions of S1P in mast cell-mediated immune responses. It will be important to determine whether S1P release from other cells, particularly cancer cells, is also mediated by ABC transporters.


   SphK1 Versus SphK2: Castor and Pollux
TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 S1P in Immunity and...
 How Is S1P Transported?
 SphK1 Versus SphK2: Castor...
Ceramide Kinase and Ceramide...
 AGK: the Profligate Sibling
 REFERENCES
 
The ubiquitously expressed SphK2 also has the same five evolutionarily conserved domains found in all SphKs (Fig. 2) but diverges in its central region and has a longer amino terminus. SphK1 and SphK2 have different kinetic properties and also have different developmental and tissue expression patterns, suggesting that they have distinct physiological functions. Little is known of the functions of SphK2, although its overexpression suppresses cell growth and enhances apoptosis (24). These effects of SphK2 might be related to its localization to the nucleus (25) or endoplasmic reticulum (26) or to its putative BH3 domain (24). However, the role of endogenous SphK2 is still controversial as down-regulating its expression suppressed growth and enhanced apoptosis of glioma cells (27) yet protected HEK 293 cells from serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis (25).

Importantly, expression of SphK2 increased production of ceramide, whereas SphK1 decreased it (26). In accordance, down-regulating SphK2 reduced conversion of sphingosine to ceramide in the recycling pathway, and conversely, down-regulating SphK1 increased it (13, 26). How do SphK1 and SphK2 exert opposite effects on ceramide levels? Sphingosine is not produced by de novo biosynthesis; rather, it is derived from cleavage of ceramide by ceramidases and can then be re-utilized for ceramide and complex sphingolipid synthesis or phosphorylated by SphKs to form S1P. Thus, SphK2 might play a role in a sphingosine salvage pathway of mammalian cells, acting in concert with S1P phosphatase to convert S1P back to sphingosine and then to ceramide. In contrast, S1P formed by SphK1 may inhibit ceramide biosynthesis as a cellular sensing mechanism to regulate levels of ceramide (26).

The two SphK isoenzymes might also have some overlapping and/or complementary functions. For example, both SphK1 and SphK2 were required for EGF-induced migration of MDA-MB-453 breast cancer cells but not for motility of HEK 293 cells (28). Furthermore, although the single knock-out mice have no phenotype, the SphK1/SphK2 double knock-out is lethal with severely disturbed neurogenesis, including neural tube defects and aberrant angiogenesis, accompanied by a dramatic increase in apoptosis and a decrease in mitosis in the developing nervous system (29).

Much progress has been made in the last several years in understanding how external stimuli regulate SphK1 activity. Although activation of protein kinase C by phorbol ester and VEGF induced phosphorylation of SphK1 and translocation to the plasma membrane, protein kinase C does not phosphorylate SphK1 directly. Rather, activated ERK2 phosphorylates SphK1 on serine 225, which both increases its activity and is necessary for its translocation from the cytosol to the plasma membrane and also for its oncogenic function (30). Recently, it was suggested that this phosphorylation may induce a conformational change or electrostatic switch of SphK1 that allows it to specifically interact with phosphatidylserine in the plasma membrane (31). It has also been suggested that release of calcium and association of Ca2+/CaM with hSphK1 through its CaM binding site is also involved in translocation of SphK1 to the plasma membrane (32). Whether SphK2 is also regulated similarly is still unknown.


   Ceramide Kinase and Ceramide 1-Phosphate: Little Brother Grows Up
TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 S1P in Immunity and...
 How Is S1P Transported?
 SphK1 Versus SphK2: Castor...
 Ceramide Kinase and Ceramide...
AGK: the Profligate Sibling
 REFERENCES
 
Based on sequence homology to SphK1 and SphK2, a related lipid kinase was cloned that catalyzed the phosphorylation of ceramide to form ceramide 1-phosphate (C1P) (33). Ceramides with acyl chains of 8 or 16 carbons were the best substrates, whereas short-chain ceramides were poor substrates. CerK contains several regions conserved in SphKs (Fig. 1), an N-terminal pleckstrin homology domain that binds phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate and a calcium/CaM binding motif (33). Recent studies demonstrated that the pleckstrin homology domain of CerK regulates its membrane targeting and activity and that calmodulin is involved in calcium-dependent activation (34, 35). Expression of a CerK homolog (CerKL) has been detected in several human tissues, and a truncated form of CerKL in the nucleus has been associated with retinitis pigmentosa (36). Surprisingly, however, CerKL has no detectable ceramide phosphorylating activity, and its biological function is thus not clear.

Down-regulation of CerK expression led to the discovery of a novel role for its product C1P as a proximal mediator of arachidonic acid release (37), a critical event in the production of all eicosanoids. Interleukin-1beta activated CerK in A549 human lung cancer cells leading to increased C1P and concomitant increased arachidonic acid release, and down-regulation of CerK suppressed arachidonic acid release (37). Moreover, treatment with exogenous C1P induced translocation of cPLA2 from the cytosol to the Golgi apparatus, a known site of translocation in response to agonists. Indeed, CerK is also localized to the Golgi (34), and in vitro binding assays showed that C1P interacts directly with cPLA2 (38) to not only increase its membrane affinity but also to allosterically activate it (Fig. 1) (39). Notably, the binding site for C1P is within the C2 domain of cPLA2{alpha}, in a region distinct from the pleckstrin homology domain.

There is also evidence that SphK1 and S1P mediate the effects of cytokines on induction of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), the rate-limiting step in prostaglandin production (40). Hence, activation of SphK1 and production of S1P can prime cells for prostaglandin synthesis by inducing COX-2. Then, activation of CerK and formation of C1P can trigger the eicosanoid cascade. This mechanism would ensure coordinated activation/translocation of cPLA2 and induction of COX-2, the enzymes that generate and metabolize arachidonic acid, respectively, leading to formation of prostaglandins, suggesting that these two phosphorylated sphingolipid metabolites and the kinases responsible for their formation, SphK1 and CerK, may act in concert to regulate inflammatory responses. A recent study suggests that CerK and C1P also regulate phagocytosis (41) as CerK-transfected cells displayed a significant increase in phagocytic index in association with increased activity and translocation to lipid rafts and increased membrane liquid crystalline order after activation with opsonized erythrocytes leading to promotion of phagosome formation (41).

Exogenous C1P was originally shown to have mitogenic properties, and more recently, it has been described as a potent inhibitor of apoptosis and inducer of cell survival (42). Interestingly, CerK was identified as the accelerated cell death 5 (ACD5) gene product in Arabidopsis thaliana (43). Plants harboring an ACD5 mutation undergo programmed cell death accompanied by increased accumulation of ceramide prior to death. It is also worth mentioning in this regard that down-regulation of CerK reduced proliferation of A549 cells, progression into S phase, and enhanced apoptosis induced by serum starvation.4 Thus, CerK may determine the balance between pro-apoptotic ceramide and anti-apoptotic C1P to regulate mammalian cell fate.


   AGK: the Profligate Sibling
TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 S1P in Immunity and...
 How Is S1P Transported?
 SphK1 Versus SphK2: Castor...
 Ceramide Kinase and Ceramide...
 AGK: the Profligate Sibling
REFERENCES
 
While searching for additional isoforms of SphK, a related gene was identified that when expressed encoded an AGK that phosphorylated monoacylglycerols and diacylglycerols to form LPA and PA, respectively (44). Both of these phospholipids regulate pivotal processes related to pathogenesis of cancer, and LPA has long been implicated as an autocrine and paracrine growth stimulatory factor for many cancers (45). AGK, also known as MULK (multisubstrate lipid kinase), might be more promiscuous in vitro (46) than in vivo (44). It is still not clear why AGK is localized to the mitochondria or what the functions of LPA and PA are there. In addition to actions of LPA through its conventional G protein signaling pathways, activation of LPA receptors can indirectly regulate cell functions by transactivating the EGF tyrosine kinase receptor (47). AGK, which is highly expressed in prostate cancers, could play a role in prostate cancer progression as its overexpression in prostate cancer cells increased formation and secretion of LPA, resulting in transactivation of EGFR and activation of ERK1/2 leading to increased cell growth (44). Conversely, its down-regulation blocked EGF-induced ERK1/2 activation and cell proliferation and also decreased EGFR-mediated cell motility, which plays an important role in androgen-refractory prostate cancer. Because AGK can also phosphorylate 2-arachidonoyl glycerol, an endogenous cannabinoid and pro-apoptotic lipid, converting it to LPA may regulate the dynamic levels of these counterregulatory lipids that have been shown to play opposing roles in growth and survival.

Of note, an LPA-specific phosphatase localized to the mitochondria has been implicated in the progression of prostate cancer (48). A recent study suggests that expression of AGK in esophageal cancer tissue was significantly lower than in corresponding normal esophageal mucosa and correlated with poor prognosis (49). Interestingly, LPA fatty acyl transferase, endophilin B1, is required for the maintenance of mitochondrial morphology and is translocated to the mitochondria during the synchronous remodeling of the mitochondrial network that occurs during apoptosis (50).

AGK could play an important role in cellular responses induced by EGF as it regulates production and secretion of LPA, which in turn stimulates the release of mature EGF and thus activates the EGF receptor, amplifying mitogenic and survival signals (Fig. 1). Remarkably, expression of AGK is stimulated by EGF and even by LPA itself (44), thereby providing a positive feed-forward stimulus that could further enhance EGFR-dependent and -independent processes important for cancer progression. Therefore, targeting AGK, which is upstream of EGFR, might offer additional therapeutic benefits in treatment of many types of cancers in which EGF and LPA play a synergistic role.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This minireview will be reprinted in the 2007 Minireview Compendium, which will be available in January, 2008. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Research Grants GM43880, CA61774, and AI50094 (to S. S.). Back

2 Supported by the National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program. Back

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 804-828-9330; Fax: 804-828-8999; E-mail: sspiegel{at}vcu.edu.

3 The abbreviations used are: SphK, sphingosine kinase; S1P, sphingosine 1-phosphate; C1P, ceramide 1-phosphate; CerK, ceramide kinase; AGK, acylglycerol kinase; PLA2, phospholipase A2; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; PA, phosphatidic acid. Back

4 P. Mitra and S. Spiegel, unpublished observations. Back



   REFERENCES
TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 S1P in Immunity and...
 How Is S1P Transported?
 SphK1 Versus SphK2: Castor...
 Ceramide Kinase and Ceramide...
 AGK: the Profligate Sibling
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Spiegel, S., and Milstien, S. (2003) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 397–407[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Tedesco-Silva, H., Mourad, G., Kahan, B. D., Boira, J. G., Weimar, W., Mulgaonkar, S., Nashan, B., Madsen, S., Charpentier, B., Pellet, P., and Vanrenterghem, Y. (2005) Transplantation 79, 1553–1560[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Kappos, L., Antel, J., Comi, G., Montalban, X., O'Connor, P., Polman, C. H., Haas, T., Korn, A. A., Karlsson, G., and Radue, E. W. (2006) N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 1124–1140[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cyster, J. G. (2005) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 23, 127–159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Rosen, H., and Goetzl, E. J. (2005) Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5, 560–570[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Carlson, C. M., Endrizzi, B. T., Wu, J., Ding, X., Weinreich, M. A., Walsh, E. R., Wani, M. A., Lingrel, J. B., Hogquist, K. A., and Jameson, S. C. (2006) Nature 442, 299–302[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Sanna, M. G., Wang, S. K., Gonzalez-Cabrera, P. J., Don, A., Marsolais, D., Matheu, M. P., Wei, S. H., Parker, I., Jo, E., Cheng, W. C., Cahalan, M. D., Wong, C. H., and Rosen, H. (2006) Nat. Chem. Biol. 2, 434–441[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Jolly, P. S., Bektas, M., Olivera, A., Gonzalez-Espinosa, C., Proia, R. L., Rivera, J., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (2004) J. Exp. Med. 199, 959–970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Roviezzo, F., Del Galdo, F., Abbate, G., Bucci, M., D'Agostino, B., Antunes, E., De Dominicis, G., Parente, L., Rossi, F., Cirino, G., and De Palma, R. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 11170–11175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Idzko, M., Hammad, H., van Nimwegen, M., Kool, M., Muller, T., Soullie, T., Willart, M. A., Hijdra, D., Hoogsteden, H. C., and Lambrecht, B. N. (2006) J. Clin. Invest. 116, 2935–2944[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Payne, S. G., Oskeritzian, C. A., Griffiths, R., Subramanian, P., Barbour, S. E., Chalfant, C. E., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (2006) Blood, in press
  12. Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (2006) Cancer Cell 9, 148–150[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Taha, T. A., Kitatani, K., El-Alwani, M., Bielawski, J., Hannun, Y. A., and Obeid, L. M. (2006) FASEB J. 20, 482–484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Lavieu, G., Scarlatti, F., Sala, G., Carpentier, S., Levade, T., Ghidoni, R., Botti, J., and Codogno, P. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 8518–8527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. French, K. J., Schrecengost, R. S., Lee, B. D., Zhuang, Y., Smith, S. N., Eberly, J. L., Yun, J. K., and Smith, C. D. (2003) Cancer Res. 63, 5962–5969[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. French, K. J., Upson, J. J., Keller, S. N., Zhuang, Y., Yun, J. K., and Smith, C. D. (2006) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 318, 596–603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Visentin, B., Vekich, J. A., Sibbald, B. J., Cavalli, A. L., Moreno, K. M., Matteo, R. G., Garland, W. A., Lu, Y., Yu, S., Hall, H. S., Kundra, V., Mills, G. B., and Sabbadini, R. A. (2006) Cancer Cell 9, 225–238[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Hobson, J. P., Rosenfeldt, H. M., Barak, L. S., Olivera, A., Poulton, S., Caron, M. G., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (2001) Science 291, 1800–1803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Sukocheva, O., Wadham, C., Holmes, A., Albanese, N., Verrier, E., Feng, F., Bernal, A., Derian, C. K., Ullrich, A., Vadas, M. A., and Xia, P. (2006) J. Cell Biol. 173, 301–310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Venkataraman, K., Thangada, S., Michaud, J., Oo, M. L., Ai, Y., Lee, Y. M., Wu, M., Parikh, N. S., Khan, F., Proia, R. L., and Hla, T. (2006) Biochem. J. 397, 461–471[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Honig, S. M., Fu, S., Mao, X., Yopp, A., Gunn, M. D., Randolph, G. J., and Bromberg, J. S. (2003) J. Clin. Invest. 111, 627–637[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Mitra, P., Oskeritzian, C. A., Payne, S. G., Beaven, M. A., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 44, 16394–16399
  23. Olivera, A., Urtz, N., Mizugishi, K., Yamashita, Y., Gilfillan, A. M., Furumoto, Y., Gu, H., Proia, R. L., Baumruker, T., and Rivera, J. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 2515–2525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Liu, H., Toman, R. E., Goparaju, S., Maceyka, M., Nava, V. E., Sankala, H., Payne, S. G., Bektas, M., Ishii, I., Chun, J., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 40330–40336[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Okada, T., Ding, G., Sonoda, H., Kajimoto, T., Haga, Y., Khosrowbeygi, A., Gao, S., Miwa, N., Jahangeer, S., and Nakamura, S. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 36318–36325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Maceyka, M., Sankala, H., Hait, N. C., Le Stunff, H., Liu, H., Toman, R., Collier, C., Zhang, M., Satin, L., Merrill, A. H., Jr., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 37118–37129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Van Brocklyn, J. R., Jackson, C. A., Pearl, D. K., Kotur, M. S., Snyder, P. J., and Prior, T. W. (2005) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 64, 695–705[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Hait, N. C., Sarkar, S., Le Stunff, H., Mikami, A., Maceyka, M., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 29462–29469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Mizugishi, K., Yamashita, T., Olivera, A., Miller, G. F., Spiegel, S., and Proia, R. L. (2005) Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 11113–11121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Pitson, S. M., Xia, P., Leclercq, T. M., Moretti, P. A., Zebol, J. R., Lynn, H. E., Wattenberg, B. W., and Vadas, M. A. (2005) J. Exp. Med. 201, 49–54[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Stahelin, R. V., Hwang, J. H., Kim, J. H., Park, Z. Y., Johnson, K. R., Obeid, L. M., and Cho, W. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 43030–43038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sutherland, C. M., Moretti, P. A., Hewitt, N. M., Bagley, C. J., Vadas, M. A., and Pitson, S. M. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 11693–11701[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sugiura, M., Kono, K., Liu, H., Shimizugawa, T., Minekura, H., Spiegel, S., and Kohama, T. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 23294–23300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Rovina, P., Jaritz, M., Hofinger, S., Graf, C., Devay, P., Billich, A., Baumruker, T., and Bornancin, F. (2006) Biochem. J. 400, 255–265[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Mitsutake, S., and Igarashi, Y. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 40436–40441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Tuson, M., Marfany, G., and Gonzalez-Duarte, R. (2004) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74, 128–138[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Pettus, B. J., Bielawska, A., Spiegel, S., Roddy, P., Hannun, Y. A., and Chalfant, C. E. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 38206–38213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Pettus, B. J., Bielawska, A., Subramanian, P., Wijesinghe, D. S., Maceyka, M., Leslie, C. C., Evans, J. H., Freiberg, J., Roddy, P., Hannun, Y. A., and Chalfant, C. E. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 11320–11326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Subramanian, P., Stahelin, R. V., Szulc, Z., Bielawska, A., Cho, W., and Chalfant, C. E. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 17601–17607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Pettus, B. J., Kitatani, K., Chalfant, C. E., Taha, T. A., Kawamori, T., Bielawski, J., Obeid, L., and Hannun, Y. A. (2005) Mol. Pharmacol. 68, 330–335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Hinkovska-Galcheva, V., Boxer, L. A., Kindzelskii, A., Hiraoka, M., Abe, A., Goparju, S., Spiegel, S., Petty, H. R., and Shayman, J. A. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 26612–26621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Gomez-Munoz, A. (2006) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1758, 2049–2056[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Liang, H., Yao, N., Song, J. T., Luo, S., Lu, H., and Greenberg, J. T. (2003) Genes Dev. 17, 2636–2641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Bektas, M., Payne, S. G., Liu, H., Goparaju, S., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (2005) J. Cell Biol. 169, 801–811[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Mills, G. B., and Moolenaar, W. H. (2003) Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 582–591[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Waggoner, D. W., Johnson, L. B., Mann, P. C., Morris, V., Guastella, J., and Bajjalieh, S. M. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 38228–38235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Prenzel, N., Zwick, E., Daub, H., Leserer, M., Abraham, R., Wallasch, C., and Ullrich, A. (1999) Nature 402, 884–888[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Tanaka, M., Kishi, Y., Takanezawa, Y., Kakehi, Y., Aoki, J., and Arai, H. (2004) FEBS Lett. 571, 197–204[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Ando, T., Ishiguro, H., Kuwabara, Y., Kimura, M., Mitsui, A., Kurehara, H., Sugito, N., Tomoda, K., Mori, R., Takashima, N., Ogawa, R., and Fujii, Y. (2006) Oncol. Rep. 15, 1551–1555[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Karbowski, M., Jeong, S. Y., and Youle, R. J. (2004) J. Cell Biol. 166, 1027–1039[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 FASEB J.Home page
D. R. Gude, S. E. Alvarez, S. W. Paugh, P. Mitra, J. Yu, R. Griffiths, S. E. Barbour, S. Milstien, and S. Spiegel
Apoptosis induces expression of sphingosine kinase 1 to release sphingosine-1-phosphate as a "come-and-get-me" signal
FASEB J, August 1, 2008; 22(8): 2629 - 2638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Bu, B. Kapanadze, T. Hsu, and M. Trojanowska
Opposite Effects of Dihydrosphingosine 1-Phosphate and Sphingosine 1-Phosphate on Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}/Smad Signaling Are Mediated through the PTEN/PPM1A-dependent Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2008; 283(28): 19593 - 19602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Lipid Res.Home page
D. A. Lebman and S. Spiegel
Thematic Review Series: Sphingolipids. Cross-talk at the crossroads of sphingosine-1-phosphate, growth factors, and cytokine signaling
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1388 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. R. Hammes and E. R. Levin
Extranuclear Steroid Receptors: Nature and Actions
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2007; 28(7): 726 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
H. M. Sankala, N. C. Hait, S. W. Paugh, D. Shida, S. Lepine, L. W. Elmore, P. Dent, S. Milstien, and S. Spiegel
Involvement of Sphingosine Kinase 2 in p53-Independent Induction of p21 by the Chemotherapeutic Drug Doxorubicin
Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 67(21): 10466 - 10474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Zhao, S. K. Kalari, P. V. Usatyuk, I. Gorshkova, D. He, T. Watkins, D. N. Brindley, C. Sun, R. Bittman, J. G. N. Garcia, et al.
Intracellular Generation of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate in Human Lung Endothelial Cells: ROLE OF LIPID PHOSPHATE PHOSPHATASE-1 AND SPHINGOSINE KINASE 1
J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2007; 282(19): 14165 - 14177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/4/2125    most recent
R600028200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spiegel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Milstien, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spiegel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Milstien, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.