![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 45, 32765-32772, November 9, 2007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Viral Oncology, Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, 53 Kawaharacho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
Received for publication, May 30, 2007 , and in revised form, August 15, 2007.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
resided on the endoplasmic reticulum membranes and interacted with HCV RNA polymerase NS5B. RNA interference-mediated knockdown of endogenous ESR
reduced HCV replication. Mechanistic analysis suggested that ESR
promoted NS5B association with the RC and that tamoxifen abrogated NS5B-RC association. Thus, ESR
regulated the presence of NS5B in the RC and stimulated HCV replication. Moreover, the ability of ESR
to regulate NS5B was suggested to serve as a potential novel target for anti-HCV therapeutics. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ESR
. As a primary physiological function, ESR is involved in the transcription for downstream genes in response to stimulation by the ligand, estradiol. In the normal state, ESR is mainly located in the cytoplasm and nucleus. Upon binding of the ligand, ESR dimerizes and translocates into the nucleus, where it binds to the ESR-responsive elements (ERE) in the DNA promoter of downstream genes and drives transcription. In addition to this classical genomic action, a portion of ESR is located on the membrane, such as the plasma membrane, and involved in the nongenomic function of triggering signal transduction pathways, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and protein kinase C (2-4). Although the molecular basis of ESR membrane retention is not fully understood, one mechanism involves a membrane protein, caveolin (CAV); ESR
interacted with CAV, and this interaction facilitated ESR
localization to the membrane (5, 6). It was also reported that ESR
localizes to the lipid rafts on the plasma membrane (7). The lipid rafts are microdomains of the membrane that form platforms enriched in cholesterol and glycosphingolipids. However, the characteristics and relevance of membrane-associated ESR have not been fully disclosed. Here, we report the novel role of ESR
in the regulation of viral replication.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV), a causative agent of chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, constitutes a serious health problem worldwide (8). HCV has a positive strand RNA genome that produces at least 10 functional viral proteins: core, envelope 1, envelope 2, p7, nonstructural protein 2 (NS2), NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B (9, 10). NS5B is an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which plays a central role in viral genome replication (11, 12). HCV genome replication can be evaluated using a HCV subgenomic replicon system, which Lohmann et al. (13) first established. In this system, cells carry an HCV subgenome RNA encoding NS3 to NS5B. Using this system, it has been proposed that HCV genome replication occurs in the replication complex (RC), which contains the viral genome RNA and HCV NS proteins. The RC forms on the surface of the intracellular membranes, including the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane, and is surrounded by a membrane structure (14-17). It also has been reported that HCV genome replication associates with the lipid rafts on these intracellular membranes, such as the ER membrane (14, 18). These lipid rafts accumulate CAV2, and HCV proteins involved in viral genome replication cofractionate with CAV2 (18). However, it is largely unknown how the RC is formed and under what mechanism the HCV proteins participate in the RC.
A chemical biology approach is a useful method to analyze the molecular mechanism of viral life cycles as well as cellular physiological processes (19). We employed forward chemical genetics in which we analyzed HCV replication activity as a phenotypic indicator of a cell-based assay to screen chemical compounds that inhibited HCV replication. Using this system, we previously identified an immunosuppressant, cyclosporin A, as an anti-HCV compound (20). We also reported that cyclophilin B regulated the RNA binding activity of NS5B (21). In the current study, this chemical screening approach linked ESR
to HCV replication. We showed that tamoxifen (TAM) suppressed HCV genome replication. Using TAM as a bioprobe, we found that ESR
interacted with NS5B and regulated the participation of NS5B in the RC.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmid Construction—pCMV-FL-ESR
, encoding the whole open reading frame of ESR
fused with a FLAG tag, was generated by inserting the PCR product using 5'-GTTGAATTCATGACCATGACCCTCCAC-3' and 5'-GTTGATCTCGAGTCAGACTGTGGCAGGGAAAC-3' as primer set and human lymphocyte cDNA library (Clontech) as a template into the EcoRI-XhoI site of pCMV-FLAG vector (21). pCAG-HA-NS5B, encoding the NS5B protein fused with a hemagglutinin tag, was made by subcloning the PCR product with 5'-GTTGCGGCCGCTATGTCAATGTCCTACTCA-3' and 5'-GTTCTCGAGTCACCGGTTGGGGAGCAGGTA-3' as primers and pMH14 as a template into NotI-XhoI digestion of PCAG-HA vector (21). Expression plasmids for HCV NS3, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B (pcDNA-NS3, pcDNA-NS4B, pcDNA-NS5A, and pcDNA-NS5B, respectively) were described in Ref. 21. pGEX-ESR
A/B, C, D, and E/F, expressing the fusion protein of the domain A/B, C, D, and E/F of ESR
with GST, were prepared by the insertion of the PCR product with pCMV-FL-ESR
as a template and appropriate primers into the EcoRI-XhoI site of pGEX-6P1 vector (Clontech). The expression plasmids for the point mutants of ESR
, ESR
(L540Q), ESR
(255M), and ESR
(258M), of which Leu at aa 540, IRK at aa 255-257, and DRR at aa 258-260 were replaced by Gln, TGT, and ANT, respectively, was generated by oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. pCMV-FL-CAV2, encoding FLAG-tagged CAV2, was prepared by inserting the PCR product amplified with 5'-GTTGTCGACTATGGGGCTGGAGAC-3' and 5'-GTTAAGCTTTCAATCCTGGCTC-3' as primers and human liver cDNA library (Clontech) as a template into the SalI-HindIII site of pCMV-FLAG vector (21). The mammalian expression vector for the C domain of ESR
was generated by replacing the EcoRI-XhoI digestion of pCMV-FLAG vector (21) by that of pGEX-ESR
C. pLMH14 was described previously (26). pGL3-EREX3-TATA-Luc, pcDNA3-ER
, pcDNA3-hER
were kindly provided by Dr. Kato (Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, University of Tokyo). JFH1 expression plasmid was provided by Dr. Wakita (National Institute of Infectious Diseases).
Luciferase Assay—A luciferase assay monitoring HCV replication activity was performed as described previously (22, 26). In Fig. 1, A and F, we used LucNeo#2 cells, stably carrying luciferase-containing subgenomic replicon (22). In Figs. 2 (D and E), 4C, and 6A, we transiently transduced luciferase-containing replicon LMH14 RNA together with each expression plasmid into cured MH-14 cells (26). A luciferase assay detecting the transcriptional activity driven from the ERE was performed as described previously (25).
Real Time RT-PCR Analysis—Real time RT-PCR analysis was performed as previously described (20).
Immunoblot Analysis—Immunoblot analysis was performed as previously described (25). The antibodies used in this study are anti-NS5A (kindly provided by Dr. Takamizawa (Osaka University)), anti-NS5B (anti-NS5B#14; a generous gift from Dr. Kohara (Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science)), anti-NS5B (NS5B#6; a kind gift from Dr. Fukuya (Osaka University)), anti-tubulin (Oncogene), anti-FLAG (Sigma), anti-I
B
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), anti-calnexin (StressGen), and anti-caveolin-2 antibodies (BD Biosciences Pharmingen).
Indirect Immunofluorescence Analysis—Indirect immunofluorescence analysis was performed as described previously (25). The antibodies used were anti-NS5A and anti-protein-disulfide isomerase antibodies (StressGen).
siRNA—siRNA duplexes (5'-GUGUGCAAUGACUAUGCUUCA-3' for si-ESR
and 5'-CGCAUCGGGAUAUCACUAUGG-3' for si-ESR
) were synthesized (Proligo). A randomized siRNA, si-control, was purchased from Dharmacon (nonspecific control duplex IX).
Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay—HCV core was quantified in the culture medium of the cells transfected with JFH1 RNA (29) with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay according to the manufacturer's protocol (HCV antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test; Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics).
RT-PCR Analysis—RT-PCR analysis was performed as described (20) by using the following primer sets: 5'-CCTACTACCTGGAGAACG-3' and 5'-GCTGGACACATATAGTCG-3' for the detection of ESR
and 5'-AGCCATGACATTCTATAGC-3' and 5'-CCACTTCGTAACACTTCC-3' for ESR
.
GST Pull-down Assay—The GST pull-down assay was conducted as described previously (25).
Immunoprecipitation Analysis—Immunoprecipitation analysis was performed as described previously (25). The antibodies used in this study were mouse normal IgG as a negative control (Zymed Laboratories), anti-NS5B (anti-NS5B#10; a generous gift from Dr. Kohara at the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science), anti-FLAG, and anti-caveolin-2 antibodies.
|
were fractionated essentially as described previously (25). HCV Replication Complex Assay—Isolation of HCV RC was done as described previously (16, 21).
In Vitro HCV Infection Experiment—In vitro HCV infection was conducted essentially as described (23). Briefly, HCV-infected serum (
2 x 105 copies) was inoculated into HuS-E7/DN24 cells (5 x 104 cells) for 24 h. After washes, cells were cultured in the medium supplemented with 10 µM PD98059 to stimulate HCV translation (27) (scheme in Fig. 6B). To observe HCV amplification, HCV RNA in the cells was quantified, since HCV RNA was hardly detected significantly in the culture medium (23).
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide Assay—The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was performed to examine the cell viability using Cell Proliferation kit II, XTT (Roche Applied Science) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ESR Was Involved in HCV Genome Replication—Next, we investigated which cellular protein TAM targets to suppress HCV replication. It has been reported that TAM targets 1) ESR (31), 2) P-glycoprotein (32, 33), 3) calmodulin (34), 4) protein kinase C (35, 36), etc. Although other compounds targeting P-glycoprotein, calmodulin, and protein kinase C did not affect HCV replication in our screening (data not shown), ESR was suggested to play a role in HCV replication as shown below.
RNAi-mediated specific knockdown of endogenous ESR
and ESR
(Fig. 2A) reduced HCV RNA in replicon-containing cells to
20-40% and 60-70%, respectively (Fig. 2B). Transient transfection with ESR
and ESR
expression plasmids, which activated ERE-driven transcription 4-5-fold (Fig. 2C), showed that ectopically expressed ESR
augmented HCV replication activity in a dose-dependent manner, whereas ESR
did not (Fig. 2D). ESR
-induced augmentation of the replication was reversed upon TAM treatment (Fig. 2D). These results suggested a significant role of ESR, especially ESR
, in HCV genome replication. ESR
(L540Q), carrying a leucine to glutamine point mutation at aa 540 within the LXXLL motif (aa 536-540) of ESR
(37), had much lower transactivation activity driven from ERE (Fig. 2C). However, ESR
(L540Q) stimulated HCV replication activity
5-fold, although the stimulation was less than that by wild-type ESR
(Fig. 2E). Thus, ESR
having lower transactivating capacity could still facilitate HCV replication.
|
Interacted with HCV NS5B—Thus, the chemical biology approach revealed the involvement of ESR in HCV genome replication. Then we investigated the molecular mechanism of ESR-induced HCV replication. A binding assay between ESR
and HCV proteins expressed in the HCV subgenomic replicon showed that the C domain of ESR
coprecipitated with NS5B but not NS3, NS4B, and NS5A (Fig. 3A). Other ESR
domains, A/B, D, and E/F, did not bind to any HCV proteins. A coimmunoprecipitation assay also indicated the presence of ESR
in the immunoprecipitate by anti-NS5B antibody (Fig. 3, B and D), and vice versa (Fig. 3C). Thus, ESR
specifically interacted with NS5B. Deletion analysis indicated that the region of 71-591 and 1-520 but not 521-591 of NS5B coprecipitated with the recombinant C domain of ESR
(Fig. 3E). This binding profile is different from that between cyclophilin B and NS5B, which we previously reported (21).
|
-NS5B Interaction Was Important for the Regulation of HCV Genome Replication—To examine whether the interaction between ESR
and NS5B was essential for the ESR
-mediated regulation of HCV replication or not, we searched for a point mutant of ESR
that could not bind to NS5B by alanine-scanning mutation analysis. ESR
mutants, ESR
(255M) and ESR
(258M), in which IRK at aa 255-257 and DRR at aa 258-260 was replaced by TGT and AQT, respectively, had little affinity with NS5B (Fig. 4A) but still possessed the ERE-mediated transactivation capacity (Fig. 4B). However, both ESR
(255M) and ESR
(258M) caused only weak activations of HCV replication, compared with wild type ESR
(Fig. 4C). The data suggest that the interaction of ESR
with NS5B is critical for ESR
-mediated regulation of HCV genome replication.
|
interaction with NS5B regulates HCV replication. NS5B is mainly located on the cytoplasmic surface of the ER membrane (21, 38). On the other hand, ESR
as a nuclear hormone receptor is normally distributed in the cytoplasm and translocates into the nucleus upon ligand stimulation. In addition, a part of ESR
localizes on the membrane fraction. In our experiment, NS5B was mainly located around the ER, colocalized with the ER marker, protein-disulfide isomerase (data not shown) (21). Ectopically expressed ESR
showed diffuse distribution in the cells (data not shown). We fractionated cell homogenates and observed that a part of the ESR
resided in the microsomal membrane (MM) fraction (Fig. 4D). Moreover, ESR
in the MM fraction was coprecipitated with NS5B (Fig. 4E). It suggests the possibility that the interaction between NS5B and ESR
, at least in part of them, occurs on the ER membrane.
ESR
Promoted the Participation of NS5B in the HCV Replication Complex—It was reported that HCV proteins involved in the replication machinery was associated with the lipid raft on the ER and cofractionated with CAV2. A coimmunoprecipitation assay showed that NS5B associated with CAV2 (Fig. 5A). In the experiment investigating the role of ESR
in NS5B-CAV2 association, the coprecipitation of NS5B with CAV2 was decreased upon the knocking down of ESR
(Fig. 5B). Treatment with TAM abrogated the association of NS5B with CAV2 (Fig. 5C), although the total amount of NS5B in the cells is similar in the presence and absence of TAM for 24 h in this experiment (data not shown). Thus, ESR
was suggested to promote the association between NS5B and CAV2. Since a part of CAV2 resided on the lipid raft on the ER (18), ESR
-mediated binding between NS5B and CAV2 was possible to affect the localization of NS5B to the HCV RC. To see the consequential relevance of ESR
on NS5B function, we analyzed the HCV RC by treatment with digitonin/protease as described previously (16). HCV proteins involved in the RC and surrounded by the membrane structure are resistant to the treatment with digitonin followed by protease, whereas those unrelated to the replication outside the RC are digested by the treatment. By using this technique measuring the sensitivity to protease, HCV RC can be distinguished from the ER that is not related to the replication, although the RC and the nucleus cannot be separated. The experimental condition for fractionation was confirmed with the detection with I
B
and calnexin; a cytosolic protein I
B
was washed out following the treatment with digotinin (Fig. 5D, lanes 1 and 2), and ER protein calnexin, which did not accumulate in the RC, was digested by treatment with digotinin/protease (Fig. 5D, lanes 2-4). An ER lipid raft component, CAV2, was still detected under the digitonin/protease treatment (the RC-containing fraction) (Fig. 5D, lanes 3 and 4). Under this condition, a part of NS5B was detected in the digitonin/protease-resistant fraction, as described previously (16) (Fig. 5D, lanes 3 and 4). However, NS5B in this fraction was decreased upon treatment with TAM (Fig. 5D, lanes 3, 4, 7, and 8). On the other hand, the amount of NS5A was not significantly changed by TAM treatment. Knocking down of ESR
also disrupted the association of NS5B with the RC-containing fraction (Fig. 5E). From the above results, it was suggested that ESR
promoted the participation of NS5B in the RC (also see "Discussion").
ESR
Could Serve as a Molecular Target of Anti-HCV Agents—Finally, we assessed the possibility that the association of ESR
with NS5B could serve as a target of anti-HCV agents. By introducing a decoy peptide against ESR
-NS5B interaction, consisting of the C domain of ESR
into replicon-bearing cells, HCV replication activity was reduced in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6A). To further observe the significance of ESR
in a physiological condition, we performed an in vitro infection experiment using serum from an HCV-infected patient as a nascent virus inoculum and nonneoplastic human hepatocytes as highly infection-permissive cells (Fig. 6B). Treatment with 1 µM TAM did not show a cytotoxic effect on these cells in any time course examined (Fig. 6C). However, treatment with TAM as well as cyclosporin A as a positive control inhibited the multiplication of viral genome RNA in the cells along with the time course (Fig. 6D). Thus, ESR
could serve as a potent molecular target of anti-HCV agents.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
as a host cell factor regulating HCV replication and suggested its regulation mechanism.
Currently, it is proposed that HCV RC that replicates the HCV genome is formed on the intracellular membrane, including the ER membrane (14-17). It was also reported that HCV genome replication was associated with the lipid raft on the intracellular membrane (18). Most HCV proteins are not related to the RC, whereas only a minor portion of HCV proteins take part in the RC to drive the viral replication (16). It has remained widely unknown, however, how HCV proteins are regulated to participate in the RC. It was reported that hVAP-33 binds to NS5A and NS5B, and this protein is related to the amount of NS5B in the lipid raft (40). hVAP-33 was speculated to recruit NS5B to the lipid raft, although its molecular mechanism has not been analyzed. This study suggested the interaction between ESR
and NS5B in the ER fraction, although we did not show the existence of ESR
in the RC, since the RC and the nucleus cannot be separated in the digitonin/protease treatment experiment. ESR
promoted the interaction of NS5B with CAV2. Previous papers reported that ESR
bound to CAV1 and CAV2 (6). From these observations, ESR
is likely to function as a bridging factor that connects NS5B to CAV2, although we cannot fully neglect the possibility that ESR
augments NS5B-CAV2 binding via another function, such as transcriptional activity. Because CAV2 resided on the lipid raft of the intracellular membrane (18), this action of ESR
may recruit NS5B to the lipid raft and the HCV RC. In fact, ESR
promoted the participation of NS5B in the HCV RC. Thus, ESR
is suggested to escort NS5B to the HCV RC, although it is also possible that ESR
augments the number of the RC itself. However, ESR
at least augments the amount of NS5B involved in HCV replication machinery to stimulate the replication. It was reported that the membrane-associated ESR
served as a platform where signalsomes, including receptor tyrosine kinase, nonreceptor tyrosine kinase Src, and G proteins, assembled and activated downstream signaling pathways (44-46). HCV may also take advantage of such platform characteristics of ESR
to form the RC for their efficient replication. Although the mechanisms of the nuclear receptor function of ESR
have been extensively elucidated, the functions of membrane-associated ESR
have not been widely characterized so far. This study suggested a novel physiological relevance of membrane-associated ESR
as a regulator of the viral replication.
Until now, there are no clinical studies that report a direct interaction of TAM treatment with HCV replication in patients infected with HCV. Given our results, examinations on the effect of TAM or other anti-estrogen drugs may be one of the useful approaches to develop a new anti-HCV strategy. On the other hand, we disclosed the mechanism of ESR-mediated regulation of HCV genome replication. Screening for compounds that inhibit this mechanism expectedly led to novel types of anti-HCV agents. Further analyses on ESR are needed to develop anti-HCV therapeutics as well as reveal the regulation mechanism of HCV replication.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Viral Oncology, Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, 53 Kawaharacho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. Tel.: 81-75-751-4000; Fax: 81-75-751-3998; E-mail: kshimoto{at}virus.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
2 The abbreviations used are: ESR, estrogen receptor; HCV, hepatitis C virus; RC, replication complex; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; TAM, tamoxifen; ERE, ESR-responsive element(s); CAV, caveolin; NS, nonstructural protein; MM, microsomal membrane; siRNA, small interfering RNA; si-ESR, small interfering ESR; GST, glutathione S-transferase; aa, amino acid(s); RT, reverse transcription; NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B, nonstructural protein 3, 4A, 4B, 5A, and 5B, respectively. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
, and pcDNA3-hER
; anti-NS5A antibody; anti-NS5B antibody; anti-NS5B antibody; and JFH1 expression plasmid, respectively. | REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||